WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Cult of Osiris, Part 1

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>And I am Joe McCormick. And it's Saturday, so we

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>are heading into the vault for an older episode of

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind. This is part one of

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>our series on Osiris and the Cult of Osiris, originally

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 2>published on April second, twenty twenty four.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right, let's geek out on some Egyptomania.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And in this episode, we're going to be diving into

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egyptian mythology once more to discuss an important deity

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>connected to the topic of resurrection, which I think was

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>probably on my mind over the weekend due to first five.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It was the Easter holiday. Also on Weird House Cinema,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>which is of our Friday episode in the Stuffed Blue

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Mind podcast feed, we talked about doctor FIBs rises. Again,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I did not think about this in terms of the

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>holiday at all. I didn't think, oh, this is our

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Easter selection. But then I noticed our social media posts

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>about it on Easter Sunday, and it's like, you know,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about the rise of doctor Fibb's He's rising again.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, wow, we sort of accidentally nailed

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it there.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a movie that has so many resurrections. It has

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Fhibes himself coming out of a sort of a

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>chemically induced slumber where at the end of the first

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>movie he replaces his blood with embalming fluid and then

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 2>goes to sleep in a giant glass contraption under the floor.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 2>At the beginning of this movie he wakes up again.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's one sense of rising, though I guess it's

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>questionable whether he technically died or not there, so he

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>rises at the beginning of the movie. There. The rest

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of the movie is about him trying to live, literally

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>resurrect his wife Victoria played by Carolyn Monroe from the dead.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.279
<v Speaker 2>She sort of spins the whole movie in a glass

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>display case, and he is going to take her to

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a temple in ancient Egypt under which lies the secret

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to resurrection and eternal life. And he departs the end

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of the movie on a barge, singing somewhere over the

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>rainbow to take Carolyn and row down there and bring

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 2>her back to life. And I would mention a third

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 2>resurrection in the film, which is that the character Vulnavia,

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>which is melted like sort of a robot clockwork organism.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>We're not exactly sure. From the first movie, it's Doctor

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Fibes's hinchwoman who helps him commit his quote amazing murders.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 2>She is melted by acid at the end of the

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>first movie, and then just inexplicably comes back in the

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>second movie. Also, they resurrect Terry Thomas, remember he bites

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>it in the first movie, and then he just comes

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 2>back playing a totally separate character in the second movie.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think that motif of coming back in bodily

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>form but playing a different character, maybe maybe may it

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>may have some thematic resonance. That's right.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So what we're gonna be We're gonna be talking about Osiris. Uh.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Osiris came up in Doctor five Rises again,

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe they made passing reference to him. I think I

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>made passing reference to Osiris when we were talking about

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the film. But this is a deity best known for

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>his connections to fertility, to the ancient Egyptian underworld, and

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to rights of mummification.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, I've seen lots of depictions of the

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>god o Cyrus before I was familiar with the imagery

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>associated with him. But something I had never noticed until

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I was reading up in preparation for this episode is

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 2>that while on the top half of his body, he

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>is often depicted, you know, looking kind of like a

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>like a king or a pharaoh, you know, very stately

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>with a beard, with his with his face exposed under

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the crown and all that, if you looked down at

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the lower part of his body, apparently his legs are

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>depicted wrapped together in the in the wrappings of mummification,

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 2>so it's like the bottom half of his body is

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>already mummified. That's right.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I invite listeners who are in a position

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to do so safely to go ahead and look up

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>some images of of of historical depictions of Osiris from

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egypt. Yeah, he's generally depicted as a mummified king,

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, bounds as in the wrappings of mummification. His

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 1>skin as is exposed, you know, in his face and

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>neck and hands, is apparently either black or green. I

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to find more images of green color choices, though

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that may have at one point signified putrification and death,

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but came to symbolize his connection to the cycle of

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>death and life, of resurrection and rebirth, particularly resurrection and

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>rebirth linked to that of plant life. On top of this,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he is generally depicted as wearing a crown and he

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>brandishes a crook and a flail, so strong agricultural vibes already.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>But also with power and authority. You know, it's the

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>crook and the flail and the autaf crown, the crown

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I think of Upper Egypt. This is the imagery of

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a king.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely so. He is very much like an embodimentimum

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of a mummified king. So let's get a little bit

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>into the myth of Osiris. Now standard caveat with mythology,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, as usually as the case, we're not dealing

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 1>with a singular idea from a singular time and place,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but rather a figure and associated narratives that stirred in

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the minds of ancient peoples for thousands of years. We

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>have various accounts of Osiris to go off of, but

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of Osiris is also incomplete, and indeed we

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know with one hundred percent certainty what his name

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>even means. It might well mean the Mighty One, but

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some other ideas out there. There's

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>plenty that experts have had to piece together about Osiris

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that is not explicitly, you know, obvious in the source material. Now,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the books that I that I turned to

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for this episode is the two thousand and two book

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian Mythology by Geraldine Pinch. Pinch also points out that

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't know when, how and where Osiris was first worshiped.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>He might have kicked things off as kind of a

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>deified pre dynastic king. He might have been an old

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>vegetation spirit, a jackal god, or even a mother goddess.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm also assuming based on this that you know,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there might have been some interplay between these concepts, you know,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>various varied possible origins, gods that are combined into new

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>gods and so forth. Now, Pinch summarizes the sort of

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the what you might think of as the canonical rise

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and fall and resurrection of Osiris, pointing out that first

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>of all, he's generally thought to have been born with

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a crown on his head. So taking that concept of

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>born king that is theay referenced in Christian hymns, sometimes

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>referring to Jesus, but taking it to a literal degree.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Ah. So, whereas a lot of kings, say, might be

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>born with a right to the throne that has then

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>recognized in a coronation by placing the crown upon their head,

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 2>that this king is born with the crown already there, like,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't need to be recognized.

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Exactly king at his birth literally because he's look, he's

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>wearing a little crown, and I guess maybe the crown

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>grows with him. I mean, he's a god. He can

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do these things. And fortunately his mother was also a god,

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>so he was the eldest son. It is that of

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the earth god Geb and the sky god as Newt.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So in many respects, he is the place where earth

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and sky converge. He's the very horizon now. Pinch shares

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that some accounts allude to him overcoming his father in

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a vicious dynastic struggle for rule, and one late text

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 1>claims that he died for the first time during this struggle. However,

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>she stresses that no accounts of Osiris's rule and his

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>death survive from before the Greco Roman period concerning this issue.

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So but one way or another he comes to reign

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>over Egypt with his sister consort Isis at his side.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>But of course this rule does not last according to

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the pyramid texts of the Late Old Kingdom, so these

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are for more than four thousand years ago. Osiris was

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>murdered by his brother Seth or set who we've talked

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about on the show before, in part because there is

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>some mystery and disagreement on what the set animal or

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Seth animal is that his iconography is based upon. But anyway,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we have this. Yeah, this brother Seth strikes his brother

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>down and tramples him and or drowns him in the

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Nile River, and Pinch writes that a double death may

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have been deemed necessary to kill a god.

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So, one way or another, either drowned in the

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>water or trampled or both, Osiris is dead.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>That's right, He's overthrown. He's been murdered. And one way

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or another, Osiris's dead body becomes fragmented, either via a

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>deliberate chopping up of his corpse by Seth or possibly

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>due to decomposition. In either event, the dead body of

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Osiris becomes divided. Into in some cases fourteen pieces, though

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's like forty two pieces. A certain number of

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>pieces of the Dead God come into circulation here, and

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this varies from something that happens right away again,

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>like I've killed you and now I'm going to chop

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you up, to something that Seth does later comes and

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>despoils the corpse of Osiris, or something that happens naturally

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>later on. In any case, the pieces are either scattered

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>or become scattered.

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So yeah, that's something I don't know if I

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>ever understood before. Do the pieces come apart as something

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that his enemy does to him? Is it kind of

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 2>a William Wallace situation or is it more kind of

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>a some kind of magical principle at work.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Based on my understanding of the different accounts that

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>are looking at here, it looks like it does vary.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And it also seems to vary whether those pieces stays

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to some degree scattered or are truly brought together. Again,

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess it kind of depends on what sort of

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>concepts are important to the story. That may make more

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sense when I start talking about specifics here in a minute,

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But in any event, it falls to Isis to gather

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the pieces of the fallen Osiris and seek his resurrection

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>via powerful magic, with the aid of Annibus, an underworld

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>deity and thought a god of magic who we've also

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about on the show before. Now Isis herself was

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the mother and throne goddess, so each Egyptian king is

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>her child. It falls to her to find and gather

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the pieces of slain Osiris, to assemble him and hold

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a long vigil over the corpse along with their sister Nephthus,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and they use a spoken magic, Pinch says, to drive

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>away Seth the disturber. So I guess there's this idea

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that even as they are trying to bring him back,

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Seth is trying to disrupt their attempt.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Almost like a scavenger or predatory animal circling. Yeah.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, during this reassembly Osiris is he's described by Pinch

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>as the inert one. So all of the pieces of

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Osiris are either in teared together or assembled into a

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>hole except for his fallas. And remember again that Osiris

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is also a god of fertility, and by this fallus

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or depending on the story, by a flash of divine fire,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case isis becomes pregnant with the Sun by

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the deceased God, and this Sun is going to be Horace,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the Sun destined to overcome Seth. So she raises Horace

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the marshes. She has to raise him in safety

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and secrecy until he is old enough to challenge his

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>father's usurper, which he does. He defeats Seth and he

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes the new ruler.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, I think you're going to get into this in

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a minute, but that part of the myth is important

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>because this will come to have a great significance for

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the succession in the real world of divine kingship as

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 2>a concept in Egypt.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Another interesting part here is that despite Osiris's

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>connection with the concept of resurrection by many definitions or

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in certainly sort of modern interpretations and I guess like

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>dungeons and dragons to interpretations, he is not truly resurrected

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point. He does not become a living flesh again.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>He is not resurrected into this world.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 2>Right and this will be an important point of contention

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>for a question that I think we're going to get

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>into in part two of this series about the concept

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>of resurrection in ancient religions. But yeah, Osiris is not

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>thought to be raised back to the form and the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>place where he originally lived. There is a instead, he

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>goes on living, but it is in a new form

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>in a new world. There is in a sense a

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 2>new Osiris.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So basically, the higher powers and other powers

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of note here decide that okay, Osiris, you were just,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but your death was not just. So therefore he's permitted

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to leave his now mummified body and become the Lord

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the dead in the afterlife, the judge and ruler

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of the kingdom of the dead. And it seems like

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a pretty cool gig to have a Pinch points out that.

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>At all periods. There are a few texts that describe

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Osiris as a terrifying figure who dispatches demon messengers to

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>drag the living into the gloomy realm of the dead.

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So inert but not powerless by any means, and he

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is just. He is an appropriate judge. He said to

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>rule over the dead as when enifer, which either means

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the one whose body did not decay, and we see

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that again his connection to mummification and rites vocation, though

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also according to Pinch, sometimes translated as

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the beneficent one. Uh. This was also apparently the title

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for the high priest of Osiris in you know, religious traditions.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>These are like the basic core myths concerning Osiris to consider,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we always go deeper than that, Like

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>what are we to make of these myths? What do

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>people think they meant? What did they signify? Why did

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they have such you know, cultural significance. And again we

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>have to realize that understandings and interpretations change over time.

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Middle Kingdom rituals seem to associate the body of Osiris

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with barley and the trampling seth. Again, remember the trampling

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>being part of the murder of Osiris. Uh, there seems

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a strong case for associating that trampling with

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the donkeys that would thresh the grain via trampling, thus

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>linking his death and resurrection in this earliest known example

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to the cyclical reaping and sowing of crops.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and again asterisk on the word resurrection there. But

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's an interesting thing how people often do

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>associate religious ideas of resurrection with the cycles of life,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in the cycles of plant life in the seasons. But

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 2>when you were talking about donkeys threshing grain. You know,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I made another kind of association there, which is that

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the grain begins as something that is from the living plant,

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>but then when it is is put through agricultural processing,

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>it is in a way reborn, and it doesn't go

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>on to live again as a plant, but instead it

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 2>goes on to live in a different way. It becomes

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>something else, which is grain and ultimately food.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these different sort of phase changes occur. It has

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>also pointed out that you would have these i the

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>phallic figures of Osiris that would would be planted with crops,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so they would have like a representation of the god

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>planted with the the grains planted with the seeds that

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, that would that would help enable everything to

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>grow into its next form.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>If if phallic, does that mean that's a representation of

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the God with an erection?

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's the literal. Different definition though. I was looking

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at an image of one of these figures in the

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>British Museum's website and and I'm not sure that that's

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>really as pronounced in this image, but but that is

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that is all. That's how it's classified.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, I see it.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's well compared to it's not as it's not

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as as obvious as one might expect.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's certainly not as obvious as you might see.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>And like some other statuary from the ancient world.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I assume the thing is Osiris is wrapped in bandages,

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's like it's he's not naked.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I get you. Now.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There were also New Kingdom period traditions that link o

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Cyrus to water, with all the liquids of his putrefying

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>body being linked to the annual inundation of the Nile,

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily just putrefying liquids, like you know, just

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the various liquids of the body, but also like putrification

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>liquids thrown in there. So I don't want to make

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it sound like it's all gross or anything. And at

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>least one tradition holding that his body parts are buried

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at scattered sites throughout Egypt and the tomb of the

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>left Leg on the Nile island of Baiga. I've also

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>seen this place referred to simply as the tomb of Osyrius. Anyway,

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>different traditions hold that this is the source of the inundation.

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm thinking about the underworld and the cosmos of

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Egyptians, which I think on one hand it's

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>easy to think of that, Okay, these are the worlds

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>beyond our world, but also they're kind of tied to

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to what is seen and what is not seen but

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of implied, and they The one area I want

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to touch on here is the idea of the sun barge,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the manget, the boat of millions of years that travels

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>through the sky with the sun and then down each

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>night over the horizon and then through the underworld to

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>emerge once more on the other side. And of course

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there's there's fighting that takes place. It is like a

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of a it's a perilous journey for the sun

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>through the underworld to come back again when the sun rises.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a whole quest. It's a whole quest line.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is which is at once again very epic

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and otherworldly, but also tied directly to what we observe

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>occurring with the sun. Like the sun goes here and

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>then it goes under seemingly and comes back. What's going

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>on there? And then we have this mythic extrapolation of that.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>But according to Pinch.

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 2>It's singing somewhere over the rainbow.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>According to Pinch, the New Kingdom under and the New

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom Underworld books specify that during the darkest hour of

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the night, the god that is is driving the sun

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>barge ray or raw passes through the underworld chamber where

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the body of Osiris rests, and in this moment may

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>become one soul, and this allows Osyrus and all the

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>dead to live again. So, now that we've established some

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the basics about this underworld fertility god, I wanted

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to get into the cult of Osiris a bit more. Again,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know exactly when, where or how Osiris was

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>first worshiped, or indeed the earliest form or forms that

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>he took in these ancient Egyptian belief systems, but over

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>time he becomes vitally linked with the cycle of life

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and death, with crops, with the inundation, with mummification, and

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the promise of resurrection.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 2>And just a note on terminology. When we talk about

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>things like the cult of Osiris, cult in that sense

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 2>does not have the negative connotations that cult has in

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the modern world. That's just the term you use for

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 2>any any group in the ancient world that is devoted

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to the care and worship of a god.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, one topic that I was really taken with was

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion of the popularity of Osiris, and to a certain extent,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the overall popularity of the ancient Egyptian religion, because, on

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>one hand, I don't remember where I read this, but

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I know I've read commentary that the ancient Egyptian religion

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>was something very much all of the desert of this

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>nile nourished region and something that just did not travel

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>well and was not picked up by other cultures in

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful deeper way. But on the other hand, the

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>trappings of ancient Egypt clearly have fascinated other cultures for

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>an exceedingly long period of time, often in these waves

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of Egyptomania, as it's sometimes termed. So I really wanted

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to get into this latter idea a bit more so.

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I turned to various sections dealing with Osiris in the

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>excellent twenty sixteen book Egyptomania, A History of Fascination, Obsession,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy by Ronald H.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Fritz.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Fritz mentions that the aforementioned pyramid texts from

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>more than four thousand years ago refer to differing ideas

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>about life and death but also they bring up the

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>rising popularity of Osiris within the pantheon, and I was

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this as well. This is I think this

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is something interesting to observe in religion, that it's mostly

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>within these polytheistic traditions that you really get to see

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>or in the and or imagine this idea of the

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>rise and fall of particular gods and goddesses, as well

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as the more like straightforward adoption of foreign originating gods

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>into a given pantheon. You know, we've discussed examples of

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this before, but there's not there's either no room for

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this or not as much room for this in monotheistic traditions.

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess it depends on the specific

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>monotheistic religion, but yes, like growing up a lot of people,

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>this is another one of the many ways that if

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>you grow up in a certain religious context, you might

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>just assume that all religions are similar to your religion.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So like growing up in a Christian context, I think

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people think that all religions have a

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>quote jealous God, like the like the Abrahamic faiths. Do

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 2>you know a God who says you shall worship me

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and me alone? And there's basically one right way to

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 2>have a religion, and it's it's the one you've got,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>whereas with a lot of polytheistic religions it's it's much

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>more free form. You know that you can add gods

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 2>on to the list of gods that you worship, you

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>can remove gods, you can sort of like just shift

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 2>your focus wherever you think it is best. And that

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 2>doesn't compute. Like a lot of Christians look back on

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>the pagan context of the Roman Empire, say, and they

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 2>don't realize that. Like when you would be preaching about

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Jesus to Roman pagans, to a lot of them, they

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>just be hearing about this is well, this is another god.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've got Apollo, and I've got Jupiter and

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>these other gods that I worship, and here somebody's talking

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>about a new one. Oh, except this is weird. They're

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 2>telling me that if I worship this new one, if

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I worship Christ, I can't worship any of the others anymore.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>That would be weird and different.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like downloading apps for your phone, right, Like,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what's this one due? This is a new one? Sounds useful.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll get it too. Whoa, this one says, I can't

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>use any other apps. I've just I've got to use

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this one universal app for everything. Yeah, does it work?

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Is what it sounds like. If it's promises to do everything,

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it probably doesn't do them as well as these specialized

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>apps that I already had.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 2>But to come back to your your original example, Yeah,

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of the rise and fall in the popularity of

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>various gods within these polytheistic pantheons, where you can believe

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>in multiple gods and devote whatever time and care you

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>think is appropriate to each one of them. I guess,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the institution of a monotheistic faith like Christianity

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 2>would be an outlier there where it's like suddenly you

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>pick that, you pick the new God, the Christ, and

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 2>you can't believe in any of the others anymore. That

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>one goes right to the top. But with the others, Yeah,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you do get to see these fluctuations over time.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like some of the Christian examples we've looked at

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>in the past, it's like, oh, your God, actually it

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>can be part of this religion. But I'm sorry they're

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a demon now, Yeah, the demons were rebel angels that

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>our God defeated. So but yeah, we can work them

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in as that. But then again I was thinking about this,

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, well, we've also looked at examples where,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in various Greek myths where something that was

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>once a deity for a particular time in place then

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>later on becomes more of a supporting character or a

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>monster or something to that effect. So it's something that

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>takes place just in general, I guess, and is not

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>particular to monotheistic or polytheistic one way. I kept thinking

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of like if you had like a

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>stock ticker for belief, you know, it's like polytheism, you

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of different stocks that are going up

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and down, but under monotheism, like you're supposed to just

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>have the one stock. Yeah, and you're either all invested

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in that or people are falling out of interest of that.

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's not a perfect way of thinking

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>about it, but it does seem like, certainly with the

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>polytheistic religions of the Greeks and the Romans, there is

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more openness to hey, there's a new god

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this other country has. Let's take a look at. Let's

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>see what worshiping this god is like, what's going to this.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Cult Like, yeah, yeah, there's a lot of just absorption

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 2>of other figures. One example that I was just reading

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 2>about earlier today again, I think we're going to talk

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>about this more in the second episode, is there's a

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Greek figure sometimes referred to as a god. He was

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 2>like a mortal lover of Aphrodite named Adonis, who is

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>very much thought to have been derived from from other deities,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>other ancient Near Eastern deities like Mesopotamian agriculture gods such

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>as Tammuz or DEMUSI. So it's just here, here's a

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>cult figure from one part of the world is absorbed

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>into the number of gods believed in in a different

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 2>part of the world.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to add a quick note since we

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are talking at least briefly here about monotheism and polytheism,

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and in an episode that deals with ancient Egyptian religion,

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're not going to have time to get into

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>discussion of at and Autanism here. But of course that

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>has been like a discussion I think we've touched on

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Where as some experts agree or disagree

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on whether Autanism is truly a monotheistic religion or should

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be thought of as such. So that's a whole different

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>subject for another time.

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 2>The short version is one ancient Egyptian king tried to

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 2>elevate a particular deity from the Egyptian pantheon above all

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 2>others and make that the exclusive focus of state worship.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, you can read more about that if you

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>go look up Auten.

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and basically after that king's death, everyone's like, well,

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the other thing we were telling

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>where maybe not as into the sun disc as we

0:26:53.480 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>were pretending to be anyway, back to o Cyrus here. So,

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Fritz writes that the Old Kingdom, so this is roughly

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred to twenty two hundred BCE, was more rigid,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>was more formal, but that the Middle Kingdom to follow,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>also known as the Period of Reunification from twenty forty

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen eighty two BC, it was more balance, more sympathetic.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>There's greater literacy, there was more of a melding of

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of high mythology and the folklore of the people,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and the rulers of this period promoted the worship of

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Osiris and the cult s emphasis on resurrection, and the afterlife. Now,

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to take this last bit for granted,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>because if you adhere to a religion, or you're closely

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>aligned with one or one or more religions via your culture,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>your upbringing, or just your general interests, then the continuation

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of the soul is not a radical concept. It's like

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to put yourself in a mindset where

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>someone is coming at you with some radically new concept

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of religious continuation of the soul, of some sort of

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>immortality of the soul, someone saying, hey, guess what, you

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>know that part of you that feels special inside your

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>consciousness and heart and all of that. What if that

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be annihilated when you die? And I

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have to stress I say this as someone who was

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>raised in a Protestant church that even now sometimes for

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>me it's more challenging to exercise or entertain a worldview

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in which there is no continuation of the human soul

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>after death. And that's regardless of logic or reason. It's

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>just such a huge part of not only the Christian

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>worldview view but also the mainstream worldview that of course

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what we have is special, and that somehow it continues

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on in one form or another, either directly aligned with

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>some sort of belief system or just you know, in

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of the general pop culture sense of like spirits

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and angels and like there's just something that must live

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on after we die in our physical bodies. And there's

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with that concept, I think, at least just

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>when it's employed in a way that gives us hope

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and peace, though of course it can also be used

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for opposite aims. But to bring us back to this

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>period in which like the cult of Osiris is rising

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's becoming more and more popular, imagine a religious

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>world and a worldview in which the afterlife is largely unavailable.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>It exists, but it's not for the common people. It

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is not for most people. It is for a very

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of people. It is like the equivalent of

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>like extreme opulent wealth in our world, you know, like

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it is the SuperMansion with the apocalypse bunker. You know,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this is only for a very small, very slender portion

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of society. It is not for you. But during the

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Middle Kingdom you have this ongoing democratization of the afterlife

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>where it describes and this was enhanced by the Cult

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of Cyrus. So I want to read a passage from

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Fittzer where he goes through an example of this quote.

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Prior to the Middle Kingdom, Egyptians believed that all people

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>possessed a ka, or a soul or life force, but

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>only rulers possessed a ba, which was the individual uniqueness

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that constitutes a personality. It required the ka and the

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>ba to be kept united or at least in close

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>proximity for immortality in the afterlife. When the people of

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Kingdom came to believe that all humans had

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a ba, they were conceding that everyone could enjoy the

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>after life if the proper burial rituals were followed. Yeah,

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>so suddenly it's available to everyone who at least can

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>undergo the proper rituals. And so you saw certain rituals

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>become more popular and are more present in the archaeological record,

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>such as the use of shabti statues. They begin to

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>appear in more tombs. These would have been like little

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>representations of servants, servants that would work for the deceased

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the afterlife, like this will be buried with you,

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and now you will have a servant to help you

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the afterlife, this sort of general idea we see

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in various other religions as well. Okay, and so Osiris

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>becomes very popular within Egypt. But then eventually the ancient

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Greeks and then the ancient Romans they also get a

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>whiff of Osiris and they're like, oh, we would like

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>some of that as well. He points out that, yeah,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Greeks and Romans were some of the initial egyptomaniacs.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And while the Greeks found on the whole that the

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>religion of the Egyptians was profoundly different from their own,

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they were intrigued by its systems of magic and by it,

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, its deities, just as we are intrigued by

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>these things today. And they did recognize some fundamental similarities.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>He writes that the Greeks frequently attempted to synchronize the

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gods of other cultures with their own, and they certainly

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>did this with the Egyptians. So and actually, for some

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Greek writers, these fundamental similarities were incredibly important.

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Right. So they might say, actually, we're talking about the

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 2>same god when we say this god and they say

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that god. But we just have different names for the

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>same one here.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, and they seem to take it even a step

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, because there's one thing to say, well, you know,

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I have my concept of God and you have yours,

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>but we're really on the same you know, we're really

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on the same wavelength. But it's another to say yours

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>came first. I'm pretty sure mine's just a knockoff of yours,

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, And we kind of see this. According to Fritz,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>so fifth century BC Greek historian Herodotus concluded that knowledge

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of the gods spread from Egyptian origins to the Greeks.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, well, the Egyptians discovered the gods first,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and we just followed. We learned of this from them,

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and anyway, he ends up drawing numerous lines between Greek

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>gods and possible Egyptian word origins, though Fritz points out

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that there are clear exceptions to this line of thinking,

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>such as Poseidon, who was apparently brought to Greece more

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from the direction of Libya. Still, others made these connections.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>To Plutarch made these connections, so there seems to have

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>been at the very least like a recognized heritage in

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>all of this. Now that and certainly the Greeks and

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Romans were particularly taken by not only of Cyrus,

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but also Isis. Here's another bit from Fritz that I

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>want to read.

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Although in the modern stereotype the Egyptian religion is depicted

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as mystical, mysterious, and magical, Greek and Roman visitors did

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>not see it in this way. Plutarch's staunchly defended Egyptian

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>religion as rational and ethical, rather than merely superstitious. Herotogus

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>went so far as to credit the Egyptians with the

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>invention of the common practices of ancient religion, such as altars, statues,

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and temples dedicated to the various gods. The cult of

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Isis became so populated that it spread throughout the lands

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Hellenistic kingdoms and the Roman Empire.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, first of all, ancient Egypt was simply so ancient,

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 2>like there were there were these remnants of great civilizations

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>that had been around for so long. We've mentioned this

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 2>on the show before, but the astounding fact that to

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the Romans, like Plutarch, the you know, the old Kingdom

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of Egypt, the pyramids were older to them than the

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Roman Empire is to us. The distance of history there

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 2>is is crazy to believe. So so there's there. On

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 2>one hand, ancient Egypt was just so evidently ancient as

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 2>a great civilization, you could imagine things, many things you

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 2>had might have come from it. But then also as

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, there's just this clear spread of say the

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 2>cult of isis.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and at the same time, yes, sometimes attributing things

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Egyptians that that they probably didn't invent. Like

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Fritz mentions that that Diodorus credited of Cyrus with the

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>invention of great cultivation and ultimately wine making, though there

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to be evidence of this, you know

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're that wine and great cultivation has an Egyptian

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>origin now, but eventually we do see more of a

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>full on appropriation and recreation of Egyptian concepts. And in

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the strong examples of this, and one that

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>concerns of Cyrus is the god so Rapists. This would

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have been a Greco Egyptian syncretic deity. So it's it's

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like an amalgam of both Cyrus and in Oppus, as

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>well as aspects of various Greek deities, Like I think

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a little Zeus and Hades in there. This would

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have been a being that would have that would have

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>become popular on under the the Ptolemaic rule. But still

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that, for instance, that doesn't really seem

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to impact Isis. Based on what I've read, the worship

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of Isis may have spread even more in Roman culture.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Worship of Isis would travel along trade routes through the

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Mediterranean world, into Spain and even to the British Isles,

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think there I've read articles about archaeological evidence

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of Isis worship, like ancient Isis worship in London. So

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about like later periods of Egypt Domania

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>where you had occultists and so forth bringing in the

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>concept of Isis, but kind of like original Isis worship,

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if you will. But then again to the point, and

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go through all the examples of

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Egypt Domania. I do recommend everyone check out that book,

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>because this is a book that deals not only with

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like ancient Egyptian religion and culture in its origin, but

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>also these various levels of Egypt Domania from like you know,

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>dealing with examples from say the Victorian world and the

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance on up through like trashy b movies give like,

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, brief breakdowns of some really bad mummy movies.

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But they are examples of at least the reverberations of

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>international and multicultural interest in ancient Egypt. And it may

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in many cases it might not be that deep. You know,

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it might be just like, oh, I kind of like

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>how this looks and this sounds weird to me, so

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make a horror movie. But it's still, you know,

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>reverberations are the same energy. But we'll mention one really quickly.

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So during Renaissance Egyptomania, there was there was still a

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of pull toward Osyrus. There's a character that

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:42.439
<v Speaker 1>was an Italian who was originally named Giovanni Nani who

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>lived fourteen thirty two through fifteen oh two, went by

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the name Viterbo, and he made various connections between Etruscan

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>traditions and the Egyptians. But he even went so far

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 1>as to claim that the Boreses were the descendants of Osiris.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what sort of supporting material he made

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for that, but in anyway, Osiris would continue to serve

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as a central figure in various waves of Egyptomania. Moving forward, So,

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Osiris is invoked in various occultist movements, and Osiris is

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely invoked by various ancient astronaut writers. And you also

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>see the use of Osiris in the movements of Afrocentrists

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and also Afrofuturists. It's just I mean, he is a

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>powerful figure mythologically, and of course he's going to We're

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>going to keep coming back to him and finding new

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to sort of think about him and new ways

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to invoke him.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, I think maybe that will do it for

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 2>part one of our series on Osiris, but we've got

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 2>more to talk about next time. That's right.

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>We shall return in a part two and that will

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be on Thursday. In the meantime, certainly write in if

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you have feedback on this episode, other examples of Osiris

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>or isisigyptomania that you want to bring up. Everything is

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fair game, but just reminder stuff Blow your Mind is

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>primarily a science and culture podcast with core episodes on

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Mondays we do listener mail. On

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Wednesdays we do a short form episode, and on Fridays

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we set aside most serious concerns to just talk about

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 2>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Mind dot com.

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:39:47.719 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 3>with rat Rat Rat Rat