WEBVTT - Can A 25 Year Age Gap Work… Even If It Didn’t The First Time Around?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks. It is Thursday, September fourth, and we

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>have to admit we were a little surprised and taken

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>aback by a lot of reader's reaction to our ask

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Amy and TJ Yahoo advice column for this week and

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome to this ask Amy and TJ audition of our

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Amy and TJ podcast and robes. This had to do,

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>at least the person that wrote in, had to do

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>with age gaps in relationships. Who knew that this was

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>something that really struck.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 2>A nerve with the right because people seem to have

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>very strong opinions, and oftentimes I was under the impression

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and maybe this is just a sampling with people who

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>wrote in, but most people tend to be skeptical of

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a major age gap because they're concerned about just all

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the obvious things that would Relationships are hard enough, putting

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a huge age gap between two folks makes it even harder.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>So I would have thought that most people would be

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>discouraging this young woman, Cassie, from trying to start again

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 2>with a man who's twenty five years for senior. But

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 2>I actually read a lot of very different comments than

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I was expecting, you know.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of when you talk about age gaps.

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Age gaps, you called it experience gaps or.

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, right, I think it's I think that's a good

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>way to put it, because people are young at hard

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>and old souls and you can find a lot of commonalities,

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of the issues arise when you have

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 2>an experience gap, and there can be a power gap.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Then that ensues in her dynamic, We're going to read

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the full question at least from our reader, but I

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think most of the concern often times comes when the

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>gap has to do with someone who was not just younger,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but eighteen nineteen twenty dating somebody who was fifty sixty seven.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>You look at that experience gap. I think if you

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about it adults who are I don't know, a

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty year old and a fifty year old or a

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty five year old, that it feels like two adults

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:58.919
<v Speaker 1>still making a decision.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Once you've had a experiences enough that you can go

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 2>into a relationship with that wisdom. I think that's a

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>completely different conversation. And this is interesting the reader who

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 2>wrote in Cassie she did have the experience when she

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>was young, a freshman in college, and then after that

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>attempt at a relationship with a major age gap ended,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>she's now considering restarting it thirteen years later. So now

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>she is almost forty, and so now she is a

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 2>bona fide grown up, and so it is different, and

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 2>so should we just go ahead and read the question

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>to refresh? If you all didn't remember, you didn't get

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>a chance to read the column. Here is what Cassie

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 2>wrote to us Amy and TJ. When I was a

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>freshman in college, I fell in love with a man

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years older than me. The connection was unshakable,

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 2>but I was young and he was newly divorced, co

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 2>parenting eight kids. It didn't work. I love that she

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't need to make an explanation as to why it

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't work. It's been thirteen years. I'm about to turn forty,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>and he stepped back into my life. I think we've

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>both grown a lot and might be ready for a

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>real relationship. He worries that my parents and friends won't approve,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>but I don't want to crowdsource my relationship. If we

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>try again, will it be the same old story or

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>could it be for real this time?

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Cassie, Yeah, it could be for real. I think we

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately gave essentially warnings right heads up about this, it's

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>up about that. The concern was that she was so young,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and what did they have in common at that time?

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And yes, things are different now, but it was essentially

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a go for it with caution, Yes, with an open

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>mind to what your challenges are going to be. But

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we're grown folks. Life is too short.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at this point, I feel like she doesn't have

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot to lose, in the sense that she's had

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the experiences on her own, doing her own thing, and

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>now she's come back and maybe perhaps that connection a

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of connections, It might be real, but it might

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>not be the right time, and so maybe it is now.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And I just felt like it couldn't hurt to try.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And you again, if anybody's been listening to these, you know,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that is the one that usually goes through all of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the reader comments and the theme the first thing I

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>always ask you, did you get more men than women

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this time?

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I definitely, you know what, I actually put a nice

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>mix of men and women, But still I saw a

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of men. I actually some of them were so

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>similar about age gaps, all kind of saying the same thing,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>expressing the same experiences that I actually kind of had

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to just pick among the many men who all said

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>and felt the same thing.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask, then, did you notice any theme that women,

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess were less enthusiastic about age gap relationships and

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>about this question or was it still split?

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of most people were for the

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 2>age gap. Yeah, I mean that was really that really

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 2>took me back. So I'll all jump in with and

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>some of these folks, I don't know if they're men

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>or women. Sneed Maker is one of them. I don't know,

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 2>but this is what sneed Maker said, and this was.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>One of the skeptical reas.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>If you have to seek advice, then that is a

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 2>red flag for me.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 3>What is the concern?

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>If they are both comfortable with the age difference, both

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>understand and accept their roles, and see the same future

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 2>for themselves, why question it?

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I can understand two degree, but I think it's

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>healthy to question any relationship if be the same age.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter where you are. Of course, you should

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>have a little level of skepticism and always seek counsel

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>from people you trust. Maybe you don't write into Yahoo

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com, But I think it's always good to seek

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>some counsel.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anyone who, regardless of age difference, who

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't or who is completely sure, is completely comfortable and

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 2>how they feel and how they view their relationship. Most

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>people want to ask whether it's a therapist, your mom,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>your best friend, your sister. Isn't that what we go

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>in because love can be blind sometimes, and sometimes people

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>who love us can see things more objectively, or people

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>who actually I don't even know us can see things

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 2>more objectively because you're not looking at things through emotion.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>You're actually looking at facts versus feelings. And I do

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 2>think that it's I think it's I applaud Cassie and

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 2>other people who are willing to be vulnerable and say,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>what do you think. I think that's healthy. But sneaed

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>Meeker thinks it's a red flag all right. Jane Jane

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 2>writes in and says this, I'm assuming children are not

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 2>in the picture for you. You would have stepchildren and grandchildren,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 2>so that might work. If you still have lots of

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 2>things in common, then I say go for it. You

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>might have to end up taking care of him health

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>wise sooner than you had hoped for, but that can

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>happen in any relationship.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was such a good point.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>That was very practical, to look at what you're like.

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It had none to do with love and feeling. This

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is practical. This is what your challenges. These are what

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be, and you have to consider that.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And she didn't mention. I think about a forty year

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>old woman. Maybe she never wanted to have kids, maybe

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>she does have kids. Who knows.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel like she would have mentioned that because that

0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>would have been a complicating factor.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a issue.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, by the mere fact that she chose not to

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>even acknowledge it or talk about it, it seems like that

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>isn't a sticking point. I question that as well when

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>we were reading through it. But he does have eight

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>children with another woman, so there will still be lots

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of family. Hopefully he's got a good relationship with them,

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully they can come around to her. She didn't

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>really explain if that was an issue at the time.

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Seems like it might have been the fact that she

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>put it in there initially that he was co parenting

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>eight children after being recently divorced. So they're all grown

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>now and potentially around the same age as her, So

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's one of those things where that could

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>still be a big, full.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful family.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to give birth to children to enjoy

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 2>them and experience them and have them be a big

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>part of your life.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>So I thought that was really good.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 2>And the thing about taking care of someone, Yeah, someone

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>can get in an accident, someone can get sick, someone

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 2>can get cancer.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>You never know. And that's love is not about that.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>It's about knowing when you go into it that it's

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>about taking care of another regardless.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And she knows she's going to have to look sixty.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>He's sixty five now, it would be.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Somewhere around there. Yeah, that would make sense.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean a forty year old woman forty five, fifty

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus. I mean, you keep going. And they were

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>very active fault. When you think about a guy in

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years, he's going to be seventy five

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>or eighty. Fine, you can be, but generally speaking, they're

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>not as acting.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>No, And someone actually several people wrote in and was

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>actually doing the numbers game.

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 3>So just think about it.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>When you're fifty, he's going to be seventy five. How's

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>that going to feel? It might feel fine when you're

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>forty and he's sixty five. What about when you were

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>sixty and he's eighty five. How's that going to feel?

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Just they were just suggesting she really think about it.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure she has, but to really actually put those

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>numbers in front of you and say, am I okay

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 2>with this?

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And it might not matter to her anyway, But why

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>should that factor in? If you feel the way you feel,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly supposed to be. Oh, something's going to happen

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>down the road. We hear, we're now and I don't know.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>The more I we've talked about this, I'm leaning more

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>into that area of go for it. My only hesitation

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was as a parent, thinking about my daughter at eighteen

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>dating somebody that was forty three. Yeah, at the time,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I would never get over that with this guy.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, especially if the guy would be your age like

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>that would be alarming and disturbing. But we have friends

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 2>who were in that situation and it turned out okay.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know how I think about Kathy Lee Gifford

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and Frank Gifford. I actually got to see a little

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 2>bit of their relationship up close, and she talked a

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 2>lot about it. We would all be in the makeup

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>room at the Today Show, and she met him when

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>she was I think in her twenties and he was

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>in his fifties or forties, forties, fifties, and they had

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful love story. From everything I could hear from

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>her and everything I saw with my own two eyes,

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>it was beautiful until the very end, and she was justugh.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean when she lost him, she was devastated. So

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>that was a real love story from my vantage point.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think from the did we or do we? If

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you take out the college part of story, does it

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>change how you view it? Yes, it does for me too.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>She just said, I'm forty and thinking about dating a

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty three, sixty five year old guy. Okay, yeah, I

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>think something about the dynamic early on I was trying

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand and it maybe it doesn't matter, but I

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think about an eighteen year old girl.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's and that is a big difference. So

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 2>here are now a few of the reader's comments who

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>shared their own experiences, which I think is really cool.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that makes it feel even more.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Personal, just the fact that other people are in her

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>boat or have been in her boat and are giving advice.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 2>So Todd wrote in and said, I'm thirty five and

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 2>my girlfriend just turned fifty one. All three of her

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>kids just graduated college. We started seeing each other in

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>November of last year, and I can't tell you just

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>how happy we both are together. Neither of us come

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>from wealth. We both have our differences, including our politics.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 2>It took some time for us to adjust, but it

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>is worth it in my eyes. We are both we

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>both are honest with each other, and we look forward

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to seeing what the future holds. I make her happy

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and she makes me happy.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like an adult. Thank you, Todd. Yes, that's what

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all about. It almost sounds like their situation. It's

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't even have to mention his aide. What difference

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>does it make because take out what he said there.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Everything else is kids out of college, you see each other.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just a relationship.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and even with political differences. We've had readers write

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 2>in about that and how that's tearing their relationship apart.

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>He's like, look, it's we had to adjust, but we're

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>honest with each other and we are focused on making

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 2>each other happy.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Isn't that what it's all about?

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, Todd, thank you for that. But man Todd ain't

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>got nothing on Anita and Pete. Yeah, Jay, who also

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote in one of them, took very very serious, heated

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and even offensive issue with the advice that Robot and

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I gave Cassie. You'll see which one.

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Welcome aback.

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't get that out of my brain. I think

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>it's going to happen at least once a week, but

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe more.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope more, because.

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm taken aback.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You're taking it back?

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Why do I do that?

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>It's funny how your brain gets into patterns and then

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 2>I can't break out of it. Now I'm going to

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>start stressing about it. So welcome back.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. Used to have an issue with backlash and

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>always came out as blacklash. That used to be funny too.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope we can bring that one back.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I hope that one never comes out of my mouth again.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness. All right, welcome back to this edition

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 2>of Amy and TJ. This is our ask Amy and

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>TJ edition, but it's our favorite version of it because

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about what you.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 3>The reader wrote in.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Under the comment section to our reader who asked us

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 2>a question about what she should do, and so this

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of course was Cassie asking if she should give it

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>a try. There's a twenty five year age gap, and

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>this is round two. She's now nearly forty. Should she

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>make it worse? Could it actually work? That's kind of

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the bigger questions she's asking.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I have a quote. Do you have an indication

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of how long they dated the first time?

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it must have been for a while, because some

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>readers actually put in this so it's funny. Everyone notices

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>she said she was a freshman in college when they met. Okay,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>so that means say that means she's nineteen. Then she

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 2>says thirteen years later, she's almost forty. Yep, so they

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>must have been seeing each other for several several years.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>It just didn't work. But it must have gone on

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 2>for quite some time. If you do the math, she

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>had to have been seeing him for at least seven

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>years or so.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I did not initially factor that

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in because all I'm thinking when she said it when

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I was a freshman, I fell in love and that

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was it the connection. But it didn't work. She didn't

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>say how long it went. Right Now, when you think

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>about it that way, this wasn't just an eighteen year

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>old girl. She might have been into her twenties. I

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>mean she had to have been.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh if she's now almost forty and they were apart,

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 2>they were broken up so to speak, for thirteen years,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 2>that tells you up until twenty seven, even me, Yeah,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 2>she was with this guy.

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So to a lot of the argument being made and

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the concern I certainly had, she did kind of go

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>through and have an adult relationship with him, not just

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a kid in college.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but she's also had thirteen years on her own

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to see what else is out there, what she wants,

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>who she is, and where she wants to be. So

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Anita writes in my late husband was fifteen years older

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>than me and a very different generation. We met late

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>in life too. We had twenty eight years total together

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>when we married, and I retired within a few months.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I knew I had only an unknown period of time.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>We had eleven years married. We really enjoyed those retirement

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>married years evermore, I was very, very lucky to have him.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 3>That makes me like, actually get emotional.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It's beautiful, you know we're hearing. Wow, isn't this something

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to want to single out a couple? But

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe I will coach Belichick. I have no idea what's

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>going on in that relationship. But when something like that

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>comes out, what are people The first thing, the first

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>voices you hear are the loudest ones making fun and

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>making comments on Twitter, trying to get followers and doing

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, trying to just attack, attack, attack, when

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we have to realize there are so many other people

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>out there who have had wonderful experiences that don't look traditional.

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>What is love supposed to look like. It's supposed to

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>look like two people who fell in love in college

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>or right outside of college, that got married at a

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>beautiful ceremony, They had two kids, and they stayed together

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and died in their late eighties surrounded by family. If

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like that, you're a bad person. Nobody's

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>shit looks like that, does it.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>It's extremely rare.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But we hope while we hold on to that. So

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to your point of what this woman is saying, the

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>number of people who would have attacked Belichick, but there's

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a conversation about Belichick that another group of people are

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>having who can relate to You're living, who are living

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and not condemning because they live something that can look different.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 3>It's okay.

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know it's still taboo, right, age guys, absolutely.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 3>But I thought it was really cool.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised at how many people came out, told

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>their stories and were in full support of her going

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>for it for those reasons from actually lived experiences, all right,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>So Pete, Pete came out swinging. When he started out

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>with a little attack on TJ and me, he said,

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>these two don't know what they are talking about, and

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the majority of the comments are lost in the weeds.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I married my wife when I was twenty going on

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty one and she was thirty eight. We had a

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 2>wonderful forty one years, four months and four days together

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>until I lost her in February of twenty fifth. Haven't

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 2>even thought about having a date since that time. So

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>don't tell me about an age difference being a problem

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 2>in a marriage.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>That's his experience, and an emotional one.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like he's still grieving an emotional one.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's okay. And so when I you know, I'm

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>always about words and how we write. It's not usually

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>what we say is how we say it. Yeah, and okay,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he starts out, and it set me off right immediately

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just say what we don't know what they're talking about,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's his opinion. Who knows, he's kind of tongue

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in cheek and saying it. But every he's even making

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the point that I was previously making his experience. Even

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>though he was taking issue with us, he had a

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>different experience that was positive. That doesn't mean that there

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>aren't warning signs or words of caution for people who

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>do find themselves in relationships with age gaps.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, age gaps.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>And look, you could look at our relationship and say

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 2>an interracial relationship. So the argument people make is an

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 2>experience gap, but it's also making relationships which were already

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>hard hard when you have things not in common like that.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 2>So the same thing could be said about you and

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 2>me that we have such different experiences, different cultural experiences,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>different reactions to things based.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>On how we look and how we were.

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Raised, And so why would you choose to be with

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>someone when you already have extra problems that you wouldn't

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have if you just married someone who was your age,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 2>who looked like you, who came from your same religious background,

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 2>who voted for the same president. And I get that,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes those differences are what make the relationship better

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 2>and sweeter and more interesting, and you learn more and

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 2>maybe you even like I don't want to compare, but

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the point being, sometimes those differences can actually create a

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 2>spark that continues until the very end.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, a lot of people again not making

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a direct comparison, we're not saying that, but people walking

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>down the street with those big age gaps sometimes might

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>get looks the way an interracial couple might have decades ago. Yep,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>because you're looking at it's not common or it's taboo,

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that shouldn't be done for different reasons or whatever reasons

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to think it's wrong. But yeah, so your point,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and right, that is still I don't care who you

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>are anywhere you go. I don't. I'm trying to think

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of some friends we know with age gaps or something. Now,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>there was another couple we knew they're not together anymore,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but still they it worked. But it's always you always

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think about it crosses your mind. Oh when you see

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>an age gap.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>And oh, people go, is he rich? Yeah, right exactly,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I totally get that, all right, an age gap with us,

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 2>that's true, that's true.

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm four and a half years older. Than you.

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>People ask me all the time, you have to have money.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's funny. All right, let's move on to our

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>final reader comment. And this is short but sweet, and

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I actually liked what he had to say. I say, he,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 3>It's j Jay. I guess could be a sheet as well.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 2>My wife of twenty eight years was nineteen when I

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 2>met her, and I was a thirty eight year old divorcee.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 2>Seems I had to learn what not to do in

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a marriage to finally get it right. He's just saying

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>he was divorced much like this guy, and he met

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 2>someone who was nineteen. They've been together for twenty eight

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>years and the marriage has worked really, really well versus.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 3>His other one. Maybe she was more age appropriate. It

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 3>didn't work.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>So he's learned just from having had a you know,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say failed, but a relationship that ended

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>with someone who might have been his age, and he

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 2>took those lessons and it's working. So however, you figure

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 2>out what you need to do better, differently whatever to

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>make a relationship work. The age thing he's saying wasn't

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the issue. It was perhaps even it was him having

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>to correct some behaviors.

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>You think he told his ex wife, thank you for

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>making me a better man. I'm kidding, that's always an

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously you didn't say that. Well, yes, to his point

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight and nineteen, I bet you her parents and

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>folks around her raised some eyebrows and pulled her to

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the side and had some conversations. You just naturally do

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>that by somebody that young, And that's okay. We're not

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>saying anti this or that, but when it comes to

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>somebody seventeen, eighteen, nineteen years old, that's different type of

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an age gap.

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, even my twenty two year old recently told me

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 2>she went on a third date, which is a big

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>deal for her, and I said, what does he do?

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And she told me he was he had a profession

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>upstate and anyway, it just sounded old, and I was like,

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>please tell me how old he is. And he's like,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 2>don't worry, mom, he's twenty three.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 3>But it's funny.

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I even started to go, wait, who is this man?

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 2>How old is he? Why are you seeing him? It's

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 2>just a it's a natural concern of a parent. I

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>have a nineteen year old, and that's okay. Can you

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>imagine Ifnnilie said she was dating a thirty eight year

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 2>old man.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We'd be on the way to Colorado right now, So.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>I understand is a natural reaction, but I love hearing

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>these vantage, like being able to look back and say, hey,

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight years later, we're still going strong. Love is love,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and it might not look the way you think it should,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>but it works for us.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's the only thing we're always hoot and holler about.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I do especially just try to respect and give people

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a little grace for that situations. You might not agree

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with it, but you don't have to attack them for

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>not being like you, looking like you, talking like you,

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking like you. Yeah, it's okay, So we always really

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this was one of the more interesting ones. But I

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>want to say thank you to the readers who have

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>been writing in and being vulnerable. They are sharing details

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about their own stories that have helped in part of

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the conversation robes. And this is a big one because

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it has been a big deal lately Belichick in particular

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>YEP talking about age gaps and to see a calm,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>reason and even loving conversation happening around the same topic

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>but just in a different environment. Now, I love it.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sank you all yes, please. We would encourage you

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>to please check out Yahoo the Life section for our

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Weekly Comments Comments Weekly column, and then please leave your

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 2>comments because we would love to feature them in our

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>next podcast with our Next Question from a Reader, which

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 2>again will be on Yahoo next Monday. In the meantime, though,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>hope you'll have a great day at Amy Roebuck alongside TJ.

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Holmes.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, as always for listening.