1
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,800
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

2
00:00:12,640 --> 00:00:15,319
Speaker 1: Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

3
00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,480
Speaker 1: Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

4
00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:21,160
Speaker 1: and a love of all things tech. This is the

5
00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:26,520
Speaker 1: tech news for Thursday, August twenty one. Should be a

6
00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:29,920
Speaker 1: pretty short and sweet episode. Let's get to it now.

7
00:00:30,520 --> 00:00:33,839
Speaker 1: Last week, I reported the Only Fans, which is a

8
00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:40,080
Speaker 1: content platform that is most famous for hosting adult content

9
00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:45,240
Speaker 1: and sexually explicit content, was promoting a streaming video app

10
00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:50,800
Speaker 1: that would strictly stick too Safe for work content because

11
00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:52,440
Speaker 1: that was the only way the company was going to

12
00:00:52,479 --> 00:00:56,360
Speaker 1: get the app through and accepted into the Google and

13
00:00:56,440 --> 00:01:01,040
Speaker 1: Apple app stores. But following that was a roller coaster

14
00:01:01,240 --> 00:01:05,560
Speaker 1: of a story. First, the company said it was planning

15
00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:10,720
Speaker 1: to change its content policies, and namely Only Fans initially

16
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:15,440
Speaker 1: announced that it would no longer allow for sexually explicit

17
00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:19,400
Speaker 1: content on the site, and it sounded as though nudity

18
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:24,240
Speaker 1: would not be forbidden, but anything expressly sexual would be.

19
00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:30,600
Speaker 1: That precipitated a protest, which included content creators who essentially

20
00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:33,679
Speaker 1: made the site what it is, the argument being this

21
00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:39,039
Speaker 1: site wouldn't exist without that content. Sex workers were among

22
00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:43,920
Speaker 1: those protesting and other supporters they were criticizing the company's decision.

23
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,120
Speaker 1: Well now only Fans has since reversed that decision and

24
00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:51,880
Speaker 1: said this planned change in policy will not happen. After all,

25
00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:54,480
Speaker 1: it was supposed to happen October one, and now it's

26
00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:58,080
Speaker 1: not going to happen. Moreover, the company said the whole

27
00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:02,560
Speaker 1: reason for this proposed change the first place wasn't necessarily

28
00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:08,079
Speaker 1: because the company had shifted towards a more conservative philosophy,

29
00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:12,520
Speaker 1: but rather it comes down to money, or maybe more precisely,

30
00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:17,280
Speaker 1: it comes down to payment processing. So, according to this

31
00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:21,639
Speaker 1: argument at issue, our companies like MasterCard and Visa, these

32
00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:27,200
Speaker 1: are payment processing companies that facilitate financial transactions, you know,

33
00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:30,480
Speaker 1: obviously for thousands of companies, right, not just only Fans,

34
00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:34,200
Speaker 1: but all around the world. Now, without these transaction services,

35
00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:40,720
Speaker 1: it becomes increasingly difficult to handle financial transactions, particularly at scale,

36
00:02:41,240 --> 00:02:46,000
Speaker 1: and so companies depend upon these very large entities to

37
00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:50,440
Speaker 1: make the flow of money possible because obviously without money

38
00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:53,560
Speaker 1: there's nothing, you know, creators want to be paid, the

39
00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:57,640
Speaker 1: site needs to make money. So these processing services hold

40
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:00,680
Speaker 1: a lot of power and hold a lot of power

41
00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:05,639
Speaker 1: over the payment processing services are various conservative groups that

42
00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:10,000
Speaker 1: object to sexually explicit content. This is not the first

43
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:14,120
Speaker 1: time we've seen platforms, you know, either bow or attempt

44
00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:18,320
Speaker 1: to bow to pressure from payment services. Patreon went through

45
00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:22,360
Speaker 1: something very similar. There were also reports that Only Fans

46
00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,959
Speaker 1: was struggling to secure investment money, and that the issue

47
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,120
Speaker 1: of sexually explicit material on the site was the reason

48
00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:33,280
Speaker 1: for that challenge. But at any rate, the protests seemed

49
00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:36,120
Speaker 1: to have swayed Only Fans to change course yet again

50
00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:39,680
Speaker 1: and reject the requirement for content creators to follow a

51
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,400
Speaker 1: new policy. Now, the reason I wanted to cover the

52
00:03:42,520 --> 00:03:47,640
Speaker 1: story was not for its salacious nature. It wasn't because

53
00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:52,600
Speaker 1: of controversy or to you know, throw sex into the mix,

54
00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:56,680
Speaker 1: but rather to highlight how politics and influence groups and

55
00:03:56,760 --> 00:04:01,040
Speaker 1: money play a huge role in everything in including in

56
00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:04,960
Speaker 1: the tech sector and on online platforms, and that we

57
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:08,400
Speaker 1: can't really look at any issue without taking the larger

58
00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:13,160
Speaker 1: context into account, or else we miss important details. So

59
00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:19,039
Speaker 1: while your personal stance on the appropriate or inappropriate nature

60
00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:22,560
Speaker 1: of sexually explicit content is valid, like that's part of

61
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:26,160
Speaker 1: your philosophy, and I do not wish to put my

62
00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:31,159
Speaker 1: own thoughts on there I would say that, you know,

63
00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:34,280
Speaker 1: ultimately we're looking at a lot of people using a

64
00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:37,719
Speaker 1: lot of influence to try and push things towards a

65
00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:42,000
Speaker 1: specific agenda, and that's where the conflict comes out of.

66
00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,919
Speaker 1: I don't think it was a lot of people reduced

67
00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:48,280
Speaker 1: to this to essentially say that only FANS was turning

68
00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:51,480
Speaker 1: its back on the people who had made the site

69
00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:54,960
Speaker 1: what it was. I think there's an element of that

70
00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:57,320
Speaker 1: that is true, but I think it is far more

71
00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:03,159
Speaker 1: complicated than that summary. Moving on, Earlier this week, I

72
00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:06,440
Speaker 1: talked about the ongoing semi conductor shortage and how we

73
00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:09,159
Speaker 1: might see that issue affects stuff like, you know, the

74
00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:13,320
Speaker 1: supply of various technologies and products. Well, the Wall Street

75
00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:17,359
Speaker 1: Journal reports that the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, which is

76
00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:22,000
Speaker 1: the largest semi conductor chip manufacturer in the world, is

77
00:05:22,080 --> 00:05:26,000
Speaker 1: going to increase its prices potentially by as much as

78
00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:31,120
Speaker 1: twenty percent. Now, if you're gonna bump up your prices

79
00:05:31,120 --> 00:05:34,200
Speaker 1: by a fifth, that's pretty significant. And most of these

80
00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:36,400
Speaker 1: chips are not going to people like you and me.

81
00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:39,800
Speaker 1: These are being purchased by other companies which are then

82
00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:44,200
Speaker 1: using those chips as components in other products, which can

83
00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:49,240
Speaker 1: include anything from advanced technology to simple gadgets. But if

84
00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:54,080
Speaker 1: the semi conductor companies are raising their prices and these

85
00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:57,159
Speaker 1: other secondary companies are going to have to pay more

86
00:05:57,200 --> 00:06:01,000
Speaker 1: money to buy a basic component, I bet you can

87
00:06:01,040 --> 00:06:06,159
Speaker 1: guess where that bumping cost is gonna go next. Yeah,

88
00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:09,919
Speaker 1: this very likely means that for a fairly wide range

89
00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:14,600
Speaker 1: of products, we're likely to see prices start to go up. Otherwise,

90
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:17,200
Speaker 1: the companies that are selling this stuff will have to

91
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:19,360
Speaker 1: do so at a loss, and that's, you know, not

92
00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:23,239
Speaker 1: great in the business plan. You don't want to sell

93
00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:26,719
Speaker 1: things for less than what you paid to make them.

94
00:06:26,760 --> 00:06:29,680
Speaker 1: And we've definitely seen this already happen in the automotive world,

95
00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:32,480
Speaker 1: although that's a more complicated issue. You've got a limited

96
00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:36,520
Speaker 1: supply of cars and you've got steady demand, and by

97
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:40,919
Speaker 1: the laws of supply and demand, if the supply is

98
00:06:40,960 --> 00:06:43,800
Speaker 1: low and the demand is high, then prices tend to

99
00:06:43,839 --> 00:06:47,599
Speaker 1: go up. Just kind of how it works in in

100
00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:50,919
Speaker 1: that free market sort of approach. However, it would not

101
00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:55,360
Speaker 1: surprise me to see this tent trend kind of affect

102
00:06:55,560 --> 00:06:58,000
Speaker 1: a wider variety of technology in the months to come,

103
00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:01,600
Speaker 1: which is not great new especially as we move towards

104
00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:05,960
Speaker 1: the holiday season, we will have to see. One group

105
00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:09,600
Speaker 1: of policies that has had an enormous impact on business

106
00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:13,440
Speaker 1: in general, but the tech world in particular, is the

107
00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:17,400
Speaker 1: g d p R, or General Data Protection Regulation in

108
00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:22,040
Speaker 1: the European Union. These rules restrict how companies can collect

109
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:26,360
Speaker 1: and use personal information of EU citizens, and it includes

110
00:07:26,480 --> 00:07:29,600
Speaker 1: numerous protections for citizens of the EU in an era

111
00:07:29,680 --> 00:07:32,880
Speaker 1: where data collection is pretty much the name of the game.

112
00:07:33,280 --> 00:07:36,120
Speaker 1: This is why a lot of sites include those little

113
00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:40,480
Speaker 1: pop up notifications about cookies and tracking and whatnot and

114
00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,000
Speaker 1: allow you to opt out of that or to leave

115
00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:47,400
Speaker 1: the site before you know the data collection begins. Well,

116
00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:51,120
Speaker 1: the UK famously said peace out to the EU, and

117
00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:54,480
Speaker 1: now Oliver doubt In, the Culture Secretary for the UK,

118
00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:57,880
Speaker 1: says that the nation is going to take a slightly

119
00:07:57,920 --> 00:08:01,880
Speaker 1: different path from the EU and leave at least parts

120
00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:05,840
Speaker 1: of the g d p R regulations behind. However, this

121
00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:09,000
Speaker 1: is all much easier said than done, because while the

122
00:08:09,080 --> 00:08:12,000
Speaker 1: UK might not be part of the EU anymore, it

123
00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:15,960
Speaker 1: definitely has lots and lots and lots of transactions with

124
00:08:16,040 --> 00:08:20,680
Speaker 1: the EU. Frequently, I mean as as much as a

125
00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,360
Speaker 1: small subsection of Brits might like to think that they

126
00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,600
Speaker 1: are a world unto themselves, something that a lot of

127
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:30,280
Speaker 1: Americans can identify with the fact is there are actually

128
00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:32,719
Speaker 1: a lot more people outside of the UK than there

129
00:08:32,760 --> 00:08:36,800
Speaker 1: are in it. Anyway, whatever new rules take the place

130
00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:39,200
Speaker 1: of g d p R in the UK, we'll have

131
00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:42,800
Speaker 1: to meet EU approval or else the UK might see

132
00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:46,840
Speaker 1: various data channels connecting it to the continent, kind of

133
00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:51,400
Speaker 1: shut down. The UK has named John Edwards, who currently

134
00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:55,880
Speaker 1: is the Privacy Commissioner of New Zealand, as a potential

135
00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:59,320
Speaker 1: candidate to take over the job of Information Commissioner, which

136
00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:02,320
Speaker 1: would start in November of this year, and that he

137
00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:06,160
Speaker 1: would then oversee the drafting of new rules. It will

138
00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,400
Speaker 1: likely be a pretty complicated process to make certain that

139
00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:12,880
Speaker 1: the new rules are compatible enough with g DPR and

140
00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:16,680
Speaker 1: protect British citizens adequately, and to you know, kind of

141
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:19,439
Speaker 1: remove some of the stuff that the UK sees as

142
00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:25,040
Speaker 1: being unnecessary or counterproductive. And I wish them luck in

143
00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:28,600
Speaker 1: those endeavors. I have a few more news stories, but

144
00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:30,760
Speaker 1: before we get to that, let's take a quick break.

145
00:09:38,480 --> 00:09:42,079
Speaker 1: BuzzFeed News published an article that reveals that twenty four

146
00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:45,080
Speaker 1: countries have made use of clear View ai s facial

147
00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:48,440
Speaker 1: recognition technology, and you may have heard me talk about

148
00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:51,560
Speaker 1: clear View AI before. That company has actually run into

149
00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:56,160
Speaker 1: some trouble with various online platforms after using technology to

150
00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:59,439
Speaker 1: scrape those platforms for publicly posted images in order to

151
00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:05,120
Speaker 1: build out an enormous facial recognition database without the consent

152
00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:08,880
Speaker 1: of the people who's you know, images they collected. And

153
00:10:08,960 --> 00:10:12,599
Speaker 1: you might say, well, if someone posts a photo publicly

154
00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:15,600
Speaker 1: on their Facebook profile, like if their profile is public

155
00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:20,040
Speaker 1: and they post it to the public, you know, setting,

156
00:10:20,400 --> 00:10:23,960
Speaker 1: then it's fair game because it's all public, right, But

157
00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:26,720
Speaker 1: what if that photo includes other folks in it? It's

158
00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:29,360
Speaker 1: not like just a selfie. What if a friend of

159
00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:33,120
Speaker 1: yours takes a photo that has you in it, and

160
00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:36,800
Speaker 1: then they post that photo on their public Facebook profile,

161
00:10:37,280 --> 00:10:40,120
Speaker 1: and then clear View AI scoops up that photo and

162
00:10:40,160 --> 00:10:43,320
Speaker 1: now your face is also in that database, even though

163
00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,880
Speaker 1: you never gave consent. You don't publicly post pictures, at

164
00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:51,199
Speaker 1: least in this hypothetical situation, and so you never had

165
00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:54,400
Speaker 1: an option to opt in or opt out of this.

166
00:10:54,559 --> 00:10:57,280
Speaker 1: It just happened because a friend of yours decided that

167
00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:59,840
Speaker 1: that picture just needed to go up on that Facebook profile.

168
00:11:00,760 --> 00:11:03,040
Speaker 1: All of that just stinks, right, I mean this affects

169
00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:07,000
Speaker 1: people who aren't even on Facebook. Right. You've got people

170
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:09,720
Speaker 1: who just know people who are on Facebook, and they

171
00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:11,679
Speaker 1: happen to show up in pictures and they had no

172
00:11:12,040 --> 00:11:15,200
Speaker 1: saying any of this. This is just one of the

173
00:11:15,360 --> 00:11:19,720
Speaker 1: many problems that privacy rights advocates have with clear view AI.

174
00:11:20,600 --> 00:11:25,240
Speaker 1: Another big one is that facial recognition technologies are notoriously

175
00:11:25,520 --> 00:11:29,400
Speaker 1: prone to bias, and that this frequently means the tech

176
00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:34,559
Speaker 1: is just playing bad at recognizing images, specifically of non

177
00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:38,440
Speaker 1: white people, and this can lead to false positives. That

178
00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:42,440
Speaker 1: has actually happened in numerous cases around the world where

179
00:11:42,480 --> 00:11:48,880
Speaker 1: police have acted upon uh incorrect facial recognition hits. So

180
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:54,080
Speaker 1: this disproportionately affects people of color. It is, It is bad.

181
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:58,360
Speaker 1: Buzzfeeds report shows how widely used this tech is within

182
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:01,520
Speaker 1: various institutions around the world, old including agencies that are

183
00:12:01,520 --> 00:12:05,120
Speaker 1: funded by taxpayers. So in other words, we're all paying

184
00:12:05,280 --> 00:12:09,000
Speaker 1: to be spied upon and potentially misidentified. There's been a

185
00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:13,520
Speaker 1: growing movement around the world to restrict facial recognition technology use,

186
00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:18,760
Speaker 1: especially in investigations, and some communities outright ban police use

187
00:12:18,920 --> 00:12:23,960
Speaker 1: of that technology. Honestly, I'm all for banning facial recognition

188
00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:27,959
Speaker 1: tech for those kinds of investigations. And I've said this before.

189
00:12:28,280 --> 00:12:32,040
Speaker 1: Relying on technology to solve a social problem when the

190
00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:35,480
Speaker 1: tech just isn't there yet, that's just a recipe to

191
00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:39,880
Speaker 1: make a bad social problem even worse, or to create

192
00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:44,120
Speaker 1: new social problems that interact with existing ones. Not a

193
00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:49,080
Speaker 1: good thing. Tech is not a solve all approach to

194
00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:52,680
Speaker 1: all of our problems, and relying on tech to be

195
00:12:52,840 --> 00:12:55,640
Speaker 1: that is a recipe for disaster. I see the same

196
00:12:55,679 --> 00:12:58,480
Speaker 1: thing playing out with climate change, where people are saying,

197
00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:01,000
Speaker 1: I'm not worried the as we're gonna come up with

198
00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:04,760
Speaker 1: tech to solve this problem. There's no guarantee will do that.

199
00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:06,880
Speaker 1: There's no guarantee it will be on a timeline that

200
00:13:06,920 --> 00:13:10,720
Speaker 1: will actually make a difference. You cannot use the you

201
00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:14,800
Speaker 1: know tech as some sort of literal deos X makena

202
00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,680
Speaker 1: to come in and rescue us. All right, soap box

203
00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:23,120
Speaker 1: set aside, but sticking with facial recognition tech, The Register

204
00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:26,960
Speaker 1: reports that a South Korean government agency called the Personal

205
00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:31,920
Speaker 1: Information Protection Commission or p i p C, found that

206
00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:37,319
Speaker 1: Facebook created facial recognition templates for two thousand South Koreans

207
00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:41,679
Speaker 1: without first securing proper consent, and that this happened between

208
00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:44,960
Speaker 1: April two thousand eighteen and April two thousand nineteen. The

209
00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:49,800
Speaker 1: government has then find Facebook six point four six billion one. Now,

210
00:13:49,840 --> 00:13:52,920
Speaker 1: that's about five and a half million dollars, and let's

211
00:13:52,960 --> 00:13:55,480
Speaker 1: be honest, that is a lot of money. Five and

212
00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:57,760
Speaker 1: a half million dollars, that's a ton of money. I

213
00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:03,079
Speaker 1: would I would be gob struck to get five and

214
00:14:03,080 --> 00:14:06,760
Speaker 1: a half million dollars, But for Facebook, that probably doesn't

215
00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:11,200
Speaker 1: even amount to a catered dinner at Facebook anyway. The

216
00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:14,840
Speaker 1: organization also told Facebook that it would need to destroy

217
00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:19,280
Speaker 1: the facial recognition info the company had developed for South Koreans,

218
00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:21,720
Speaker 1: and then if it wanted to rebuild it, it it would

219
00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:25,760
Speaker 1: first have to obtain consent from each person before starting

220
00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:29,480
Speaker 1: back into that process. It also issued a warning to

221
00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:32,360
Speaker 1: Google and told the company to make its privacy policies

222
00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:35,920
Speaker 1: and settings more transparent. And Netflix got hit with a

223
00:14:35,920 --> 00:14:40,960
Speaker 1: two million one or are just under a hundred dollars

224
00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:44,680
Speaker 1: in fines for collecting the data of users without first

225
00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:51,400
Speaker 1: gaining their consent. So we're seeing more pushback in this field.

226
00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:54,920
Speaker 1: But again, like those amounts I mean, they might probably

227
00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:57,400
Speaker 1: make sense within the context of South Korea, but they

228
00:14:57,400 --> 00:14:59,920
Speaker 1: are so small in the grand scheme of these come

229
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:04,600
Speaker 1: as that while you know, no one ever wants to

230
00:15:04,600 --> 00:15:09,040
Speaker 1: pay a fine, it's barely an inconvenience. The EU is

231
00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:11,160
Speaker 1: looking to chip away at some of the features that

232
00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:16,160
Speaker 1: cryptocurrency enthusiasts happen to like a lot, namely that whole

233
00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:19,560
Speaker 1: bit about privacy, you know, being able to make transactions

234
00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:24,400
Speaker 1: without everyone knowing your business. The EU wants companies like

235
00:15:24,480 --> 00:15:28,480
Speaker 1: coin base and cracking, so essentially companies that handle like

236
00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:31,960
Speaker 1: digital wallets and stuff, to collect information on people who

237
00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:36,000
Speaker 1: are conducting cryptocurrency transactions. And this gets really interesting to

238
00:15:36,040 --> 00:15:41,240
Speaker 1: me because it actually shows how how there's some conflicting

239
00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:45,240
Speaker 1: philosophies at play in the EU when it comes to

240
00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:48,480
Speaker 1: digital information. Because on the one hand, you have some

241
00:15:48,600 --> 00:15:52,160
Speaker 1: fairly extensive data protection laws on the books that are

242
00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:56,400
Speaker 1: meant to help citizens protect their privacy and their security

243
00:15:56,480 --> 00:15:59,160
Speaker 1: and to know who has their data and how they

244
00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:02,920
Speaker 1: are using that. But on the other hand, well, you know,

245
00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:06,520
Speaker 1: they want to keep track of these transactions, and thus

246
00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:10,080
Speaker 1: that means giving up some privacy in order for that

247
00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:13,760
Speaker 1: information to be traceable. Uh. And there's a couple of

248
00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:16,840
Speaker 1: reasons for that. One is that you clearly are thinking

249
00:16:16,840 --> 00:16:21,080
Speaker 1: about taxation, right if you want to tax transactions that

250
00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:24,280
Speaker 1: otherwise are going hidden. Another is that a lot of

251
00:16:24,280 --> 00:16:28,000
Speaker 1: criminals use cryptocurrency in an effort to launder money from

252
00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:32,840
Speaker 1: illicitly gained sources. That's something clearly the authorities would want

253
00:16:32,880 --> 00:16:34,880
Speaker 1: to know about. They'd want to be able to trace that,

254
00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:39,320
Speaker 1: So there are some legit reasons for countries to want

255
00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:42,880
Speaker 1: to do this. This rule would require crypto companies to

256
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:46,520
Speaker 1: make these transactions traceable, and it would bring cryptocurrency kind

257
00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:49,640
Speaker 1: of in line with the rules that guide other banking

258
00:16:49,640 --> 00:16:52,600
Speaker 1: and financial institutions, including the fact that you would not

259
00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:56,400
Speaker 1: be allowed to have an anonymous digital wallet. Like digital

260
00:16:56,400 --> 00:17:01,440
Speaker 1: wallets would have to be tied to specifick individuals and

261
00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:04,280
Speaker 1: that would need to be traceable. And finally, the search

262
00:17:04,320 --> 00:17:09,439
Speaker 1: business is seriously big business, like like wicked big. And

263
00:17:09,560 --> 00:17:12,480
Speaker 1: one way to try and wrap your head around how

264
00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:16,960
Speaker 1: big search is in the sense of like how much

265
00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:20,520
Speaker 1: money it makes is to look at how much Google

266
00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:23,560
Speaker 1: will pay Apple to allow Google Search to be the

267
00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:26,880
Speaker 1: default search engine for Safari and thus the default search

268
00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:31,560
Speaker 1: engine for Mac and iOS devices. Now. Back in Google

269
00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:37,080
Speaker 1: reportedly coughed up ten billion dollars for that privilege, and

270
00:17:37,160 --> 00:17:40,360
Speaker 1: this year, according to an analyst firm called Bernstein, the

271
00:17:40,440 --> 00:17:45,960
Speaker 1: amount might be closer to fifteen billion dollars and it

272
00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:49,240
Speaker 1: would just increase from there, so next year would probably

273
00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:53,359
Speaker 1: be closer to eighteen to twenty billion dollars. That is

274
00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:57,760
Speaker 1: a princely sum. Indeed, now the analysts say this isn't

275
00:17:57,760 --> 00:18:01,119
Speaker 1: set in stone, and Google might ultimately decide that the

276
00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:04,160
Speaker 1: expense it pays is not worth the benefit it gets,

277
00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:08,440
Speaker 1: or you might have a regulatory agency step in and say, hey,

278
00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:14,000
Speaker 1: this doesn't seem like it's a good practice. It seems

279
00:18:14,040 --> 00:18:17,960
Speaker 1: anti competitive, and that would mean that you're falling into

280
00:18:18,040 --> 00:18:21,160
Speaker 1: some you know, trends of monopolies and you start getting

281
00:18:21,160 --> 00:18:24,760
Speaker 1: into illegal territory. But what it really shows you is

282
00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:28,560
Speaker 1: that Google is definitely an ad company, right, Like that

283
00:18:28,720 --> 00:18:33,359
Speaker 1: is Google's business. Search just happens to be the prime

284
00:18:33,400 --> 00:18:37,879
Speaker 1: way that Google gets eyeballs on advertisement and that's what

285
00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:41,399
Speaker 1: generates revenue for the company. So, yeah, Google provides a

286
00:18:41,440 --> 00:18:47,000
Speaker 1: search service, but it's business is in advertising. So I

287
00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:49,679
Speaker 1: guess it's true that you've got to spend money to

288
00:18:49,720 --> 00:18:52,000
Speaker 1: make money, and that applies even when you're looking at

289
00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:56,479
Speaker 1: multibillion dollar corporations. Now, if like me, you're wondering how

290
00:18:56,560 --> 00:19:01,280
Speaker 1: much Google pulls in from its search business, like, what

291
00:19:01,680 --> 00:19:05,800
Speaker 1: is justifying this incredible expense, Well, in the company reported

292
00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:09,600
Speaker 1: revenues of a hundred four billion dollars in the search

293
00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:13,760
Speaker 1: and other category, and that in turn was more than

294
00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:19,000
Speaker 1: all of Google's revenue for that year. So yeah, these

295
00:19:19,040 --> 00:19:21,399
Speaker 1: are the big leagues we're talking about. Still blows my

296
00:19:21,440 --> 00:19:24,919
Speaker 1: mind that it's that big, though. And that's it for

297
00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:27,840
Speaker 1: the news that I have for you guys on Thursday,

298
00:19:27,880 --> 00:19:31,600
Speaker 1: August one. Will be back next week with more tech

299
00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:34,320
Speaker 1: news and episodes. If you have suggestions for topics I

300
00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:36,560
Speaker 1: should cover on tech Stuff, reach out to me on

301
00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:39,840
Speaker 1: Twitter to handle is tech Stuff hs W, and I'll

302
00:19:39,880 --> 00:19:48,680
Speaker 1: talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an

303
00:19:48,680 --> 00:19:52,399
Speaker 1: I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

304
00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:55,879
Speaker 1: visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

305
00:19:55,960 --> 00:20:00,159
Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows. GW