WEBVTT - The 2024 Ig Nobels, Part 1

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 3>My name is Robert Lamb and my name is Joe McCormick.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 2>And it is that time again. Sometimes we don't get

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>around to these till November, but this year we're hitting

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>them fresh off of the shelf. The winners were just

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 2>announced last Thursday evening. I believe it is time wants

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>more to discuss some of the winners for this year's

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Ignobel Prizes. Now, if you're not familiar with these, if

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you haven't been listening to the show that long, or

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>maybe you just need a reminder. The ig Nobels are

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a series of awards given out once a year by

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 2>a scientific humor journal named the Annals of Improbable Research,

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 2>edited for many years now by Mark Abrahams, and their

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>stated purpose is to quote honor achievements that first make

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>people laugh and then make them think. We always have

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>a great time with these. You can learn more about

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>them at Improbable dot com. They have a big one

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>pager there where you can go through all of the

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 2>winners throughout the years. There's a lot of amusing stuff.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 3>In there that's right, and they feature works that are

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>funny for different reasons. Sometimes the papers that get selected

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>for prizes are things that are supposed to be funny,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 3>like they are intentionally satirical. One that often comes to

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>mind is a paper we covered on the raiology of cats,

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 3>meaning the study of how cats flow our cats a

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>liquid or a solid. But more often these are just

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 3>real scientific experiments that are straightforward science in one way

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>or another, published in real scientific journals that happen to

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>have some weirdly funny either methodology, the format of the

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>experiment is funny, or the finding of the experiment is funny.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it varies greatly. It depends on what

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the subject matter is, the methodology, and yet your point,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it is something that was intended to be more

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>overtly satirical. And then also the other thing that's worth

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>driving home here, and this will become very apparent as

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>we get into some of the winners we're discussing and

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 2>from this year, is that sometimes these are fairly recent

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 2>studies that have recently made it through even the mainstream

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>news cycle because they are kind of giggle inducing. But

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>other times they dig deeper and they get stuff that's

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>decades old. So you know, it's not necessary, it's not

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 2>as timely as some awards shows might be. But the

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>results are always interesting, you know, sometimes they really pull

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>out a deep cut. Now, in the past, we've been

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>covering these for many years. In the past, we've tried

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to cover all of the winners, or a vast majority

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>of the winners. I don't think we're doing that this year.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I think we're probably just going to cover some of

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the winners, some of the ones that jump out to

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 2>us the most, that would be the most fun for

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>us to chat about. But again, if you want to

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 2>read the fullest of awards from this year and check

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>out all of the research that got highlighted this year's awards, here,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>you can go to the Journal's web website. Again, that

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 2>is improbable dot com.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Robert, you all right, if I kick things off with

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>this year's Physiology Prize.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 2>Yes, give the people what they want.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Trivia question, how many different holes in your body can

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>you breathe through?

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Take your time think about it.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I had to think, and I was like, I'm pretty

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 3>sure the answer is three. Right, I got mouth, nostril, nostril,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>any other serious ones, And I think that's it now.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Of course, these three orifices do not represent fundamentally different

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>ways of breathing. They're just different doorways to the exact

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 3>same hallway, right. They're all different openings that lead to

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the same exchange machinery. In the lungs, of course, the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 3>cells in our bodies need oxygen for cellular respiration. Oxygen

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>is used to break down the energy containing molecules that

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>we get from food to generate a tendency in triphosphate

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 3>or ATP, which powers our bodies at the cellular level.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>This respiration process in the cells, of course, requires a

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>constant supply of incoming oxygen, and it generates carbon dioxide

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 3>as a primary waste product, which is also exchanged through

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>the lungs purged when we breathe out. So, yes, these

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 3>three holes are the normal three ways you get oxygen

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>into the lungs and carbon dioxide out. But here's a

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>perhaps tougher trivia question. Can any of our body cells

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>get their oxygen from anywhere other than the lungs. The

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>surprising answer to this one is yes. Now, the proportion

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 3>of our cells that can do this is relatively small.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 3>Most of our cells rely on oxygen delivered through the

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 3>blood stream from the lungs to perform cellular respiration. So

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>don't start thinking you don't need your lungs. But it's

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 3>true that some cells in our bodies acquire oxygen by

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 3>passive diffusion from the surrounding air. Unsurprisingly, these tend to

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>be cells on the outsides of our bodies, so the

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 3>very outermost layer of our skin, cells in the top

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 3>quarter of a millimeter or so, or maybe a little

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>bit deeper. Also, the cells on the outside front of

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>our eyeballs, according to what I was reading, gets some

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 3>amount of oxygen from the surrounding air. This would be

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>cells in the tissue known as the cornea. And it's

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 3>especially important here for the cornea not to be completely vascularized,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>not to be supplied with blood vessels, because we have

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to see through the lens of our eyes covering the

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>pupil in order to get the light in onto the retina.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 3>You can imagine it might be a little distracting if

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the lenses of your eyes were full of blood vessels.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 3>To supply all those cells with freshly oxygenated blood.

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, this seems like a refreshingly mature subject area for

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the ignobells to have focused on here something about our

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>cornea is breathing. Yeah, I like it.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 3>That's not what this prize is about. So this year's

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Physiology prize was awarded to and I apologize if I

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 3>pronounced anybody's name wrong, but two a list of authors

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 3>including Riyo Okabe, Toyo, Toyofumi, f Chin Yoshikawa, Yosuke Yoonoyama,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>yo Hey Yokoyama, Satona Tanaka, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Wendy L. Thompson,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Gokul khanan Aji Kobayashi, Hiroshi Daate, and Takanori takebe four

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 3>discovering that many mammals are capable of breathing through their anus.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, there it is now. This paper was published

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 3>in the Journal MED in May or June of twenty

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. I've seen different citations on that. In the

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>spring of twenty twenty one, whenever that issue was and

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I was reading several supplementary sources to get some background

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and explanation on their findings. And so these sources include

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 3>a commentary piece also published in the Journal MED, sort

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 3>of explaining the background and significance of this main research paper.

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>The commentary piece was by a Yale gastroentrology fellow named

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Caleb Kelly. This was published along with the paper and

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>the same issue, I believe, And then also I was

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 3>reading a New York Times article reporting on the findings

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and including some interviews. This was by Elizabeth Preston from

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>May twenty twenty one. So I think this paper is

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>a bullseye in terms of the Ignobel's goal of making

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 3>people laugh and then making them think, yes, it is

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>about breathing through your butt, but it sent me down

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of interesting trails and it may turn out

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to have quite real medical significance. So the procedure that

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be describing in this paper is being

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 3>called EVA or EVA, which stands for interial ventilation via anus.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Shout out to all the people named EVA or AVA.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>If this becomes a part of the common medical parlance,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>you're just gonna have to deal with.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>It, yea. It might have to bust out full Evelyn

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>or whatever.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So Caleb Kelly in the commentary piece makes an

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>interesting observation about this, which is that, yes, it's funny

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to think about breathing via the anus. But Kelly writes,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 3>quote initial perception of AVA is likely to parallel that

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>of fecal microbiota transplant for recurrency deficial infection, which not

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 3>long ago was deemed untenable for quote practical and esthetic reasons,

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>but now has less stigma as data supporting effectiveness are overwhelming.

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>So this is talking about another medical discovery in recent

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>decades that was once considered much more weird and shocking

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>the use of fecal microbiota transplants literally transplanting poop from

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>one person's digestive system into another and carrying along with

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 3>it all of the microbiota that live on it, transplanting

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 3>that into the digestive system of somebody who has maybe

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 3>an antibiotic resistant infection by the Bacterium seed officile. This

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>was once considered a fairly crazy treatment idea, but now

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 3>it is widely used and is considered generally very effective.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>So could ventilation via the anus one day have a similar.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Arc Yeah, I mean it's possible, because yeah, I remember

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>when the idea of fecal transplants was more of this

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of like fringy. Oh my goodness, imagine imagine if

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 2>this became standard, and now it pretty much has. You know,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not that crazy of an idea, So I don't

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 2>know it's possible. I mean, the thing is if it

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>ultimately works and it helps save lives, that you know,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>that's going to make all the difference.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 3>So the New York Times article and this included some

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>quotes from one of the lead authors of the study,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 3>doctor Takanori Takebe of the Tokyo Medical and Dental University,

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>who apparently got the idea to work on this after

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>experiencing his father fighting lung disease. And of course part

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 3>of the problem is, you know, when a patient's lungs

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>are failing, a hospital will usually try to use a

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 3>mechanical ventilator to help keep the patient alive and keep

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>their tissues oxygenated. But there are cases where this solution

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>either isn't available or isn't appropriate. One example they cite

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 3>is the horrible event that there was a there was

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>a mass shortage of mechanical ventilators during the early COVID

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 3>nineteen pandemic. So of course mechanical ventilators are a finite resource,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>but also there are other complications. This is a point

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>made by Kelly in that commentary piece. Kelly writes, quote,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 3>even if mechanical ventilation is available. In severe disease, gas

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 3>exchange may be impaired to the degree that oxygenation is inadequate.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So in some cases you may be able to actually

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 3>use a mechanical ventilator to pump into the lungs, but

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>you still will not be able to get enough oxygen in.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>And so Kelly says quote, faced with this situation, extra

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>corporeal membrane oxygenation is a technology that can temporarily replace

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the functions of the heart and lungs, providing forward flow

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 3>of blood and gas exchange using an external apparatus. And

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>if you've never seen this, this is like a type

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>of machine that essentially does the job of the heart

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 3>and lungs outside of the body. They hook up an

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>artery in a vein to this machine and it pumps

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>the blood through, oxygenates it, and then returns it to

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>the body. But Kelly goes on to say, quote yet,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 3>extra corporeal membrane oxygenation has inherent risks, requires significant outlay

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>of human labor and financial resources, and therefore availability is limited.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 3>So the question is what if the EVA the ventilation

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 3>through the anus approach could help increase the range of

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>options available when a patient has failing lungs. So the

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Times article gets into the question of how did this

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>idea come about? Doctor Takeba had Apparently he had previously

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>experimented with using stem cells to try to grow new

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 3>auxiliary organs like tiny lungs, but branching out of this,

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 3>he instead got the idea of using body organs that

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>we already have organs other than the lungs to provide

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 3>oxygen to our blood. Now, the inspiration for this, I

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>thought was very interesting. It was a bit of inspiration

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 3>from the animal kingdom. Takeba cited the example of a

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>fish called a loach. So a loach is any fish

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 3>from a family of freshwater fishes also known as the

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 3>kobitidy or cobitidoids. They're often fairly elongated, and some species

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of look a little bit like snakes or eels

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 3>because they're kind of long, but they're fish. Like most fish,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Loaches primarily breathe with their gills, so they use the

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 3>gills these, you know, these sort of thin booklike surfaces,

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 3>to extract dissolved oxygen from the water around them. But

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 3>they have a backup method for getting extra oxygen if

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 3>they need it. Loaches can stick their heads up out

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 3>of the water and take a bite out of the atmosphere.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>So they don't have lungs. They can't normally breathe through

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 3>their mouths like we can. Instead, a loach uses its

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>mouth to take in and swallow a mass of air.

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Swallow the air into its digestive system, and that bubble

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>of air goes down into the digestive tract and then

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 3>the walls of the fishes intestines absorb extra oxygen from

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the air that the fish eat.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, they really are eating air.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I loved this fact and I didn't know about

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 3>this before. So the article sites of biologists talking about

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>these fish. The biologist is Jonathan Mark Wilson, who is

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>on faculty at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Canada, and

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Wilson says like, sometimes a loach will be trapped in

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>some kind of situation where the oxygen in the water

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 3>around it is not sufficient the oxygen that it will

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>normally get from its gills. So one example of this

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 3>would be if it is stuck in a pond or

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>even a puddle with low amounts of oxygen due to overcrowding.

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>There might be a lot of animals or other fish

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 3>in the water, and they're extracting a lot of the oxygen,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>so it can't get enough with its gills. It has

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>this air eating method to get extra oxygen from the environment.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's a fish obviously fairly different biology than mammals

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>like us. But Ta Keba and colleagues wondered could a

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 3>mammals intestines do the same thing get oxygen from air

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>or even pure oxygen gas inserted into the digestive system.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So initial experiments showed that when mice were deprived of oxygen,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>if you stuck an oxygen pump up the anus, it

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>did actually work. But in order for it to work well,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>in order for it to work optimally, the researchers had

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to sort of inflict little abrasions on the mucous membrane

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of the intestinal wall, so when the wall was thinned,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>the oxygen was absorbed better. Obviously, that's not ideal. Having

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to scrape the inside of your colon or your intestines

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 3>to help you absorb anally supplied air is not the best.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So they came up with the second idea. Instead of

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 3>supplying O two in its gas form, what about a

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>liquid enema containing oxygen.

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, you're for science fiction fans out there.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 2>This would of course be the same technology that the

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>deep divers are supposed to be using in James Cameron's

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>The Abyss.

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, yeah.

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Except that this would be in the other end of

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the suit. Obviously, that's right.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>So the researchers here experimented with I don't know if

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 3>they name the chemical in the ABYSS, I don't recall,

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 3>but what they're working with here is a type of

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 3>perfluorochemical which exists in liquid form but is able to

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>absorb and carry gases, especially oxygen. Specifically, the chemical that

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>they used in this experiment was called perfluorodecyln or PFD,

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 3>which Kelly explains in his commentary. He says, it's a

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>it's a hydrocarbon where you strip the hydrogen atoms out,

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you swap them with fluorine, which allows this fluid to

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 3>buckle in a bunch of oxygen, carry a lot of

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 3>oxygen along with it, and it is such a remarkable

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 3>oxygen delivery device. Here's here's more. The ABYSS style image

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 3>that experiments in the nineteen sixties showed that you could

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 3>take unconscious anesthetized mice and you could dunk them under

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say underwater. It's not water under.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Submerge them in this fluid for hours and they would

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 3>breathe the liquid and they would survive. Apparently. It has

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 3>also been explored in various experiments as a potential platform

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 3>for artificial blood. We've talked about ideas about artificial blood

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 3>and episodes in the past. It is a long sought

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 3>type of prosthesis or medical device that has always been

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 3>somewhat elusive, and I think it for various reasons. There

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 3>were questions about whether it should continue to be pursued

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 3>as an artificial blood platform, but at least the idea

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 3>was there, and so the idea in this experiment was

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>try this stuff per fluorodecylin jacked full of oxygen, put

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 3>it up the anis into the colon to get extra

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 3>oxygen into the blood. And the experiment found, yes, it

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 3>did work. It worked with both mice and pigs that

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 3>were in a hypoxic state, meaning they were deprived of oxygen.

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>They were supplied with oxygen packed per flora chemicals in

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 3>this solution via the anis, and it signified bagantly improved

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 3>their levels of blood oxygen. There were also behavioral markers,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 3>like the mice that had been inactive due to low

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>oxygen got up and started walking around again. However, there

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>are some important limitations to consider. One is time. So

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Kelly in his commentary piece writes, quote, promising results are

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 3>also reported using a porcine model, meaning a pig model,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 3>in which mean improvement in oxygenation after EVA innima persists

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 3>for eighteen point seven minutes. Thus, in current form, this

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 3>therapy requires repeated cycling of fluid, and the potential of

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 3>EVA is in short term treatment of hypoxia, so that

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 3>means it only lasts a short while, and in order

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 3>to keep getting continued effects and keep oxygenating the body

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and the blood via the anus, you would have to

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 3>keep cycling in new fluid. Another thing to consider is

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 3>that breathing fulfills two extramely important jobs at the same time.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 3>It brings in oxygen that your cells need, and it

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 3>also purges carbon dioxide that your cells have to get

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 3>rid of. And these early results showed more promise with

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 3>providing oxygen than with purging CO two. You have to

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 3>do both, and so Kelly writes, quote, EVA appears to

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 3>be more efficient at oxygen delivery than carbon dioxide removal,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and one can quibble that ventilation is an overstatement. Yet

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the liquid used in EVA has capacity to carry carbon dioxide,

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 3>and the experiments presented test its effectiveness in hypoxia rather

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 3>than hypercarbiam models. So that's the thing. I guess left

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 3>yet to explore whether it could be effective at removing

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 3>carbon dioxide as well. Okay, there are other important complications

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to consider, and Kelly mentions these. I didn't initially think

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 3>of them, but this is a good kind of practice

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 3>for thinking about medical problems. You solve one problem, maybe

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 3>create another. So the surface epithelium of the colon is

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 3>adapted to have low exposure to oxygen. That's just its

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>natural state. There's not usually a lot of oxygen getting

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 3>in there, and it's unclear if there would be any

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 3>negative consequences from exposing it to lots of unexpected oxygen. Also,

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the gut is not just an organ, it is a world.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 3>It's an inhabited world, and the inhabitants of that world

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>have great influence over us over our health. So would

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 3>anything happen to the microbial populations of the distal gut

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 3>if they were suddenly exposed to aerobic conditions instead of

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 3>their natural and aerobic conditions.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. I mean, just spitballing here, but I mean

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 2>you could potentially have a situation where following this kind

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of treatment, you would have to have something like fecal

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>transplant in order to repopulate the gut it. Indeed, if

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>this procedure did theoretically like mess with the microbiome to

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>some degree.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, so that's a good thing to raise. Kelly says.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 3>The authors did investigate this somewhat. They looked at they

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 3>tried to see if there were markers of toxic blooms

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 3>of gut microbiota by looking for a bacterial indotoxin called

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>a lipopolysaccharide in the blood of these animals, and they

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>did not observe any increases at least in these cases.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 3>But Kelly writes, quote, it must be remembered, however, that

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 3>the models of acute hypoxia in the study do not

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>fully reflect the complex multisystem insults experienced by critically ill

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>patients that add infection, inflammation, and hypoperfusion. So it's saying,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, if we ever actually were to move to

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 3>human trials here. Often a person who's in a state

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>where they need supplemental oxiden might have a lot of

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>different things going wrong in their body all at the

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 3>same time that could make them especially vulnerable to maybe

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 3>changes in oxygenation of gut tissues that are not normally oxygenated,

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 3>or changing the microbial environment and possibly causing a flare

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 3>up of some kind of you know, toxic bacteria you

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>don't want.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a great point as well.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so in the end they're sort of saying about

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 3>these these counter considerations like this, you know, this is

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 3>not what the colon was meant to do. The distal

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>gut is not It can apparently breathe a little bit,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>you can get some oxygen in there, that'll help out,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>but that's not what it was you know, designed by

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>evolution to do. And so we don't really know what

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the consequences would be of repurposing it in this way,

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>especially for prolonged periods.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, this should not hold James Cameron back though. If

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>there's a sci fi application here, explore it. I mean,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that is what science fiction is for, that's.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, yes, I fully support all kinds of storytelling

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 3>with sci fi butt breathing astronauts. I don't know how

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>that would it would ultimately cause them to like evolve

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 3>in different directions where they like have different ways of language,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>where they maybe end up speaking through their butts. I

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 3>don't know. But anyway, despite all these counter considerations, this

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 3>is a very fascinating and exciting early result. And you know,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 3>some of the scientists quoted they said, like, obviously, we're

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 3>not at the human trial stage yet, we don't know

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 3>that this would be good for humans. But if it

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 3>did turn out to be a real way of additionally

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 3>supplementing oxygen, this could be a life saving thing in

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 3>many conditions. So we're not at the human trials yet,

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 3>but the fact that it worked in mammals like mice

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and pigs is very promising and it may one day

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 3>become a way of getting extra oxygen to people who

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 3>badly need it.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Excellent. Yeah, I mean again, coming back to your point

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>about fecal transplants, they could very well be a situation

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>where people giggle today, but they giggle less and less

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>as the years go by. When if we realize that

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>this is an actual treatment that can be utilized to

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 2>save lives.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Especially I see quoted in the media. Kelly

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 3>was talking about this point that like, don't let the

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>weirdness of this make you dismiss the idea, he told

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 3>The Times quote it really should be the data rather

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 3>than our visceral reactions to the concept that guide us.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Well said, so we'll see if this ever goes anywhere,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and if it does, maybe one day you will you

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>will benefit from from breathing through the butt.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, that was the Physiology Prize, and I

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>want to talk a little bit about the Biology Prize

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 2>from this year. This one is also a lot of

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>fun and it made me, you know, made me laugh,

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 2>but then also did true to the mission statement, make

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 2>me think a little bit more about about in this

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>case about dairy about the milking of because this particular

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 2>study that they honored this was in the Journal of

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Dairy Science, and this one was from nineteen forty one,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>so this is definitely an older study and we have

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>to sort of keep reminding ourselves of that this is

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 2>not like the cutting edge of research, but it is

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 2>historically interesting in like the research journey that dairy scientists

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 2>have been on.

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe the methods they employ are not the same ones

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 3>that would be used today.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes, one method in particular, which is really spelled

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 2>out in the initial write up on the prize. The

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Biology Prize went to Fortace Elli and William E. Peterson

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>for exploding a paper bag next to a cat that's

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 2>standing on the back of a cow to explore how

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>and when cows spew their milk beautiful the paper was,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of course, was not titled that though the paper was

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>factors involved in the ejection of milk. Now, I think

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>you know everything you need to know really to know

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>why this is funny. And they apparently played it up

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>during the ceremony. They brought out a person in like

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a big inflatable cow costume, and somebody brought out a

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>house cat got to set on top of the cow,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and I think they to somebody, look, I can you

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 2>can see from the image here or that I shared Joe,

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 2>that there is indeed a paper bag in one gentleman's belt.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I imagine that paper bag is about to be inflated

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 2>and then popped behind the cat. This was in fact

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 2>part of the methodology that was explored in this nineteen

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 2>forty one study.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if the cat behaved itself during the ceremony I.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 2>Mean, I would doubt it would. I would be doubtful

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 2>if this cat behaved, and I'm doubtful that any cats

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 2>that they attempted to use during the experiment behaved. But

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, this one's so, this one's obvious why this

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 2>one is funny, And I've I've long found the topic

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and I guess the trope of animals upon animal to

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 2>be rather amusing. This is long entertained us. There's a

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 2>motif of a monkey riding a horse that has a

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 2>very long history in East Asia, where you know, on

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>top of just checking off all the general boxes for

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 2>cute and whimsical, it is also associated with austerity. It

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>has to do with similarities between the sounds of the

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>words for monkey and for high official, so it's based

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in the world of Chinese homonyms. So the general idea

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>is that, you know, it captures a sense of rapid

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 2>advancement in one's work. But again, the basic concept has

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 2>vast cross cultural appeal. There's something strange and fascinating about

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 2>say a goat standing on the back of another animal,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 2>which sometimes they you know, you can observe this happening,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 2>or or monkeys jumping on the backs of any like

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>large or befores that sort of thing. And so when

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw that one of the honored studies this year

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 2>revolved around around frightening a cat sitting atop of a cow,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I was instantly all in. Plus, it's ultimately a study

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 2>regarding animal lactation, which makes it even more perplexing at

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 2>first pass, Like, what could this post we have to

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>do with milking a cow? Why are you scaring a

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>cat on top of the cow?

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I've got to know.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, So a little background. This was again

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a nineteen forty one dairy science paper, so it's kind

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 2>of a kind of a deep cut. Lead author Fortis

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Eli was a professor and chairman of the Department of

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Dairy Science at Ohio State University from nineteen forty seven

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>through sixty three, among other various jobs throughout his career.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So you know, this was a serious dairy science paper

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of the time period. This was not a fluke. There's

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 2>nothing fringe about this. Basically, the stated reason for the

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 2>study is that cows and dairy herds will habitually let

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 2>down or hold up their milk, and that the physiological

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>factors involved were poorly understood at the time. Now I

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>had to look up the terminology here. According to the

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, lactation is

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the continuous secretion and storage of milk in the utter,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>But milk ejection or let is a short term reflex

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>effect that can be inhibited by pain or fear, but

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>can be stimulated by proper care and animal husbandry. Still,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>at least ten percent of secreted milk, they point out,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>will be retained in the utter as residual milk. So

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the study is all about better understanding what's going going

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 2>on here again in nineteen forty one, because as is obvious,

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a humans relationship with the domesticated cow tends to center

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 2>around milk. How do we get the milk out of

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the cow? What are the best conditions to get the

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 2>milk out of the cow? And of course this equation

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>changes throughout the history of our relationship with cattle because

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>as things get more industrialized things, you know, there's a

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>huge effort to streamline things, industrialize things. But then this

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>can bring in various complications that end up hurting your

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>ability to actually get milk out of the animal, you know,

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>for various reasons. So we'll get into here, but One

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>of the big ones, of course, is are you making

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the animal stressed out? Are you making animal afraid? Because

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 2>this inevitably ends up impacting the production and quality of

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 2>their milk. And I know that for any of you

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>four h kids out there, this is like a big

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 2>This is as obvious as it gets. This is an

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 2>overstatement of the obvious. But I think a lot of

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 2>us forget this. You know, we end up having this

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of like video game idea of milking the cow,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, oh, here's cow, here's the milking process,

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>and it just equals milk.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 3>It's basically it's like a soda fountain, you know, it

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 3>just distributes the milk. But no, like a cow is

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 3>an animal, and the and its milk production and yield

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 3>is going to be influenced by things like how it

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 3>feels about its environment.

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So in this nineteen forty one paper they cite

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a nerve stimulant study where a nerve stimulant was administered

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 2>to cattle, to dairy cows to see how this would

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>affect of their milk production. There's another study they side

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>that involves them milking of cats. It has nothing to

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>do with their use of a cat, But it is

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 2>interesting that cats come up a couple of times in

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the article. There's another study that looks at lactating rats

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and another that involves whales and dolphins. And this paper

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and its initial experiments get pretty into the weeds on

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the physiological details of what's going on with a cow's milking.

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 2>But to get into the meat of the study, at

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.239
<v Speaker 2>least as far as the igno bells are concerned, this

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>comes to a section on the effect of fright on

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the ejection of milk.

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>The specific use of the word fright there makes me

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 3>think we're dealing with something a little a little more

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 3>acute than stress.

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so what basically they were like, Well, for the

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>purposes of this study that involves several different things. For instance,

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 2>they denervated the left half of the utters, so remove

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>nerves in order to be able to compare the different

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 2>sides during this experiment. So you know, there's a lot

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 2>going on here that just the vocation of the cat

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't capture. But it did definitely in its early stages

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>involve quote. The following frightening at first consisted in placing

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 2>a cat on the cow's back and exploding paper bags

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>every ten seconds for two minutes later, the cat was

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>dispensed with as unnecessary.

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh maybe that just mean they took it home, took it,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 3>they didn't terminate the cat.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that I did not read that into it

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>at all. I mean one can. I can only imagine

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 2>they realized there were vast difficulties in getting a cat

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to work with them for this study, because I guess

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the idea here is you you scare the cat to

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 2>scare the cow, and or you scare both of them

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, and the cat's fright will compound

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the fright experienced by the cow. But then I guess

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 2>you're having to replace a cat that you've just terrified

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 2>every ten seconds for two minutes. And maybe that means

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you've got to have multiple cats on hand, and cats

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>don't get along. So I just can't imagine how this

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>would work. It feels just very Sussian in its absurdity.

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think the big take home here is that

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>they quickly realized, no, the exploding paper bag is sufficient,

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Like we are scaring the cow regularly with the exploding

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>paper bag. The cat is just an unnecessary complication.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Wait, is there explanation anywhere why the cat was ever

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>included in the first place. Other I mean, I know,

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 3>like it just seems like, oh, that's even more to

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 3>deal with.

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 2>No, they don't really get into it. I think it's

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>just implied that this was perhaps that perhaps they thought

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it was necessary to actually have that fright stimuli, but

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.959
<v Speaker 2>then they quickly realized that this was enough. There's another

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 2>bit where they refer back to it and they say

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 2>sight and sound stimuli. Exploding bags seems to have a

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 2>much more pronounced effect as measured by the rate of

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 2>milk ejection.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm imagining an experiment today where they test what

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 3>happens when you wake people up with a vampire standing

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 3>at the foot of your bed. But it's not good

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 3>enough to just have the vampire. You've also got to

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 3>put a lizard on their arm.

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's that sort of thing. Yeah. So again, this

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>was a fairly involved experiment or series of experiments. They

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 2>also injected some of the cows with adrenaline and other

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 2>substances to test things out. Now, one of the things

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 2>again about a study like this is that it's not current.

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>It stands more as a part of the history of

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 2>research into the topic, rather than some new advancement or

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 2>some glimpse into the future. But it seems to be

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 2>agreed upon that stressed or fearful cows produce the hormone

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>adrenaline and this counteracts the activity of oxytocin. It inhibits

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the milk let down. I mean. And again this probably

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 2>comes back to something that is really long realized in

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>animal husbandry, and that is that you need to take

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 2>care of your farm animals and you don't want your

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 2>dairy cows to be afraid or nervous. You need to

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 2>nurture a proper relationship with them. But again, I you

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 2>know what, you get the feeling that with the industrialization

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>of the farm, a lot of these things then have

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 2>to be relearned or you have to then go back

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 2>and realize, oh, this is why we always did it

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 2>this way, and if we are going to try and

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 2>mechanize this to varying degrees, we need to hold on

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to these lessons from the past. Now, there have been

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 2>plenty more recent studies on callactation. Again, you know, dairy

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 2>remains a huge industry and there are always studies into

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 2>ways how to do it, you know, ways to do

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>it more efficiently, more humanely, and so forth. For instance,

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 2>there was a nineteen ninety nine study by Jay Russian

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 2>who they found that fears certain only plays a role

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>in milk production, and they found that the fear can

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 2>can certainly revolve around humans in the cow's vicinity, and

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it can also you can have a situation where fear

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 2>of individual handlers can impact milk yield. So you know,

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 2>it's like cows often, I guess they can often feel

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 2>hard to read, at least for those of us who

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 2>are not involved in their care. And you can think, well,

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they don't know what's going on, they don't know one

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 2>human from the next, But that doesn't seem to be

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the case, and they can have certain associations with different humans.

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 2>And furthermore, they can they can have various fears and

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 2>anxieties around various containment systems, milking machines and so forth. Yeah,

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I was looking at a write up for the University

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>of Minnesota Extension from twenty twenty three, or at least

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 2>that was like the update date on it by Marcia Indris,

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and this author points out that the comfort of a

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 2>dairy cow is of course very important to milk yield,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 2>to milk quality, and much more. They need proper handling

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and environment in order to deliver to their fullest, and

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the author points out that above all, this is of

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 2>course just the right thing to do. And I really

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 2>appreciate this point that we domesticated cows for this purpose.

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 2>We took something wild and we made it into what

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 2>it is so that it could produce milk for us.

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Not it's young, but another species that just likes that

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 2>milk and grows to depend them on that milk, And

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 2>so we should treat them right, like it's we kind

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>of they didn't really have much of a say in

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 2>this bargain, but this bargain was made, and we kind

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 2>of need to keep our end up. But then the

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 2>author here also stresses that a comfortable cow is a

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 2>cash cow and that I like this one was a

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 2>little more perplexing, but I think it also seems solid

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 2>that today's cows are like high performance athletes, which makes

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>them more sensitive to negative aspects of their environment or management.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I like that. So it's like, hey, we should

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 3>treat cows right because it's the right thing to do,

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 3>but also if you don't care, you better do it,

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:04.479
<v Speaker 3>or they're not going.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 2>To give you the milk.

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 3>You need.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>This also seems to be a certain commentary on the

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 2>way we treat high performance athletes like dairy cattle, like

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 2>like animals that we want a particular product out of which,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 2>so maybe they're getting a little additional commentary in there. Yeah,

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, this means factoring in quality human care, quiet

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and peaceful environments. Proper resting space, head lunch space is

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>apparently very important. You know, it basically breaks down do

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 2>they have room to move their heads around soft stall

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 2>surfaces and again sensitive positive human handling. And again I'm

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 2>sure that those of you out there that grew up

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 2>around cattle and have more experience with cattle and other

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 2>farm animals, you're just nodding your head to this because

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a no brainer. But again, I think it's

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 2>easy to forget these realities. Yeah.

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, a lot of people don't know anything about farms.

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean we go to great pains at

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 2>times to distance ourselves from the realities of the farms,

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 2>both the positive and the negatives, or the perceived negatives

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes the outright negatives. Certainly when you get into

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 2>some practices. Now, this reminded me of something that I

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>had heard about, and I had to look it up because

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of this came from a splendid

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 2>table article or audio piece that I heard on NPR

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 2>back I think in twenty fourteen, so I had to

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 2>look it up again, and basically revolves around water buffalo milking.

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 2>So basically you may have heard this through in various

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>works over the years, but the water buffalos seem to

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 2>be an even more pronounced example of everything we've been

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 2>discussing here, so highly susceptible to fall offs due to

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 2>minor changes in their milking routine, like even apparently the

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 2>presence of strangers they're not used to. I've read elsewhere

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 2>that yeah, that in some traditions of milking water buffalo

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 2>there's like one designated person for the water b in question,

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Like you don't just mix it up, not anybody can

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 2>do it. So it's almost like it needs to be

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>an even more special relationship between the human and the

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 2>animal in this situation. And I was looking at a

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>paper here by Mikou at all. This is water buffalo

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 2>responsiveness during milking Implications for production outputs, reproduction fitness, and

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Animal Welfare from twenty twenty two published in the journal

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Animals and this study backed up a lot of these

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 2>same principles, talking about how well there have been attempts

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to do things like give them oxytocin injections to keep

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 2>them calm, but then this can introduce animal welfare concerns

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>and it can disrupt ovarian cycles. So they ultimately recommend that, Okay,

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 2>you can select for calmer water buffaloes. But at the

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, I mean, it seems like you

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 2>are dealing with a more sensitive species and a species

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>that is a little harder or maybe a lot hard

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 2>to industrialize, and so that is often held back efforts

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 2>or and or proposals to try and establish water buffalo

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 2>milk production more say in the United States. So I

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Again, this is an example of where at

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the top of it, I just found it funny that

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 2>serious researchers would place the cat on a cow back

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and then slowly begin to inflate a brown paper bag

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 2>for science. But it, you know, it forced me to

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, realize, relearn, and you know, and

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 2>learn for the first time some of these realities around

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the relationship between the dairy cow and dairy farmer.

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering, is the cat looking at them while they're

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 3>doing it, while they're like twisting off the end of

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the bag and getting ready, are they making eye contact?

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Like? I can't help but imagine that whoever's idea was

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 2>to use the cat had not really been around cats

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 2>that much and just assumed that this was possible. Because

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 2>if you've been around cats, if you have a cat,

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.919
<v Speaker 2>you know that they don't cooperate with the slightest little thing.

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>And the idea that you're going to get them to

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 2>cooperate in a scientific experiment like this, no, it just

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it was doomed to failure. And in this case, you know, certainly,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 2>if not doomed to failure, they at least quickly realized

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 2>this is a totally unnecessary part of the experiment. We

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 2>can streamline this experiment and remove this wild variable from it.

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Good thinking. These are professionals.

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I kind of want to look out for

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 2>this in future studies, you know, cases where they were like, actually,

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 2>we realized that this was a bad idea. We streamline experience.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 2>We did not need a cat involved. We did not

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>need to have I don't know, some sort of a

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 2>you know Rube Goldberg machine spinning across the room. You

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 2>know you can simplify. It doesn't need to be It

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>doesn't need to be any more complex than it needs

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:53.879
<v Speaker 3>Cut out the middle man.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, we're gonna go ahead and uh close

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 2>out this episode, but we'll be back with another episode

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 2>on third in which we will look at a few

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 2>more of the winners from this year's Ignobel prizes. So

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 2>tune in on Thursday and see which ones we picked out.

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk, we'll talk about it. In the meantime, We'll

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 2>just remind you that Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>primarily a science and culture podcast, with core episodes on

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesdays we do a short form episode,

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and on Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 2>just talk about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hi,

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact stuff to Blow your

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:43:54.200 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.