WEBVTT - Short Stuff: What is Latinx anyway?

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you know, welcome to short Stuff. I'm Josh and

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there's Chuck and we are the short Stuffers who are

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to you about a new term for

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the Latino community. Latino community. See, here's the reason for

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a new term. Yeah. So I remember when we did

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>our episode on zoot suits, Uh, there was you know,

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we always try to keep up with the latest correct

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>terminology that people want to be called, because people get

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to decide themselves what they want to be called. And

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time there were references to a

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>word chicano. Is that right? Did we do that? Did

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we say that? Well? We did, but we also said

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it in context of that's what they were called at

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the time. And here's the thing. Depending on who you are,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where you are, and when you are, these terms have

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>been uh, sort of interchangeable to some people. Some of

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>these terms have been um in fashion and then out

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of fashion, perhaps maybe offensive or not offensive, or maybe

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>pride wrapped around a term that other people might think

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>might be offensive. Yeah. And what's interesting is some of

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>those terms of transition through all those things over time

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and geography too. And to know all that, Chuck is

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to really remember, be reminded that, Um. You know, when

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you consider entire racial groups, we tend to think of

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>them as like one collective whole that share all the

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>same similarities and and have zero differences. And this, this

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is a very important reminder that no different people consider

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves different things, even within certain racial groups. And then

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>take it eat one step even further and say, oh, well,

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that would suggest that racial groups are actually a social

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and cultural construct, not a biological construct. Then you finally

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>arrived at the right frame of mind to be a

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>human being. That's right. I mean, technically, if you really,

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>um always want to honor a person and do the

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>right thing, you call someone Mexican or Colombian or Honduran

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>or Guatemalan and get very or Spanish and get very

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.119
<v Speaker 1>specific with the country that they come from. But we

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>as humans like to um put a collective name on

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 1>groups of people. That's just what we've always done. Uh.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>In the fifties and a lot of this stuff comes

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>from this house too works article and a historian named

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ortiz, who is a professor at the University of Florida,

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>which we won't hold against him, um, but he points

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>out that in the fifties and and even Before that, Uh,

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Chicano was a term of derision, but then it was

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of adopted and became a term of pride with

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the rise of a few things, the Mexican student movement

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in California, the farm workers movement, and people said, you

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>know what, Chicano was a term of pride, term of

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>self respect, and he likened it to um African American

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and the term black. How the term black or blacks

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very favored for a long time, and then in

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Civil Rights movement they said, no, black is beautiful.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>That's who we are, and that's what we are. Yeah,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, what better way to to um, deflate

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the power out of a word that's used against you

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>than to take it on yourself and use it as

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a as a name of pride. I mean, that's that's

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>podcasters right, right, which has always been a term of

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>scorn for the outside world, but that's right, we're taking

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it on with pride. So yeah, so um a lot.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>When we were growing up, chuck um, Hispanic was always

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the term, I mean, virtually until just a few years ago, Hispanic.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But as time we're on it went from you know,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>those are Hispanic people to those are Hispanic people. And

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of got this idea that the term

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic had fallen out of favor among Hispanic, the Hispanic community.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I knew that, I didn't understand why. And apparently it's

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>because Hispanic has been the longstanding term for the U. S.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Census Bureau UM to describe people who are who um

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>claim an origin or an identity that's associated typically with

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>either Spain or Latin America, Spanish speaking countries, UM or

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the or the Caribbean, something along those lines. Um. And

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>when you really start to dig into it, and you're like,

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, this is the Census bureaus kind of

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>jumble definition. Yes it is, which again reinforces the idea

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that racial groups are not homogeneous groups. They're made of

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different people. It just so happens that

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of different people from a bunch of

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>different backgrounds who claimed this kind of um, this the

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>same uh cultural identity. Yeah, And Professor Ortiz points out

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with Hispanic, he said where he lived, Uh, he was

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>raised in California and Washington Stay. He said Hispanic wasn't

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>a popular term because of that, because he said the

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>elder and his elders in his community would say, you know,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this is the government putting this name on us. But

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>he said in Florida, he said, Hispanic as a term

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was embraced by Floridians. So, like I said earlier at

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, it depends on kind of who you

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>are and where you are, um as to kind of

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what you prefer. And that brings us to a break,

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll reveal the new mystery name that really isn't

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a mystery because everyone already knows it by now. Right

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>after this to Chuck m okay, Chuck, what's the mystery name?

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>This is basically like an episode of the Masks singer

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, do you watch any of those? No,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm just aware of it. Okay, they get really silly.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>They play those during football games. That's the only reason

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I know about them. The adds right, yeah, so and

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>announced the short stuff. But quickly there's a new one

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that um I can't remember what it's called, but it's

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>basically judging whether or not you think a person can sing,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>just by looking at them and how they carry themselves.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>That's good, that's great, that's a that's a good lesson

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to teach. People that you can judge a book by

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>its cover, right, and then they hand them a microphone.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, are they do they sing crappy or not?

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Then when they sing crappy, it suddenly turns into the

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Gong show. I'm sure, right, great idea, great idea. All right.

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So that brings us to the mystery word, which is uh.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's a few ways you can pronounce it, depending

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.119
<v Speaker 1>on who you are. Latin X is what I've always said.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>You can also say latin x or latin X. It

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like and I think Webster Marriam Webster says ten x, right,

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so you're either basically saying it as one word or

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>two words. Paul Ortiz says it as two words like

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>latin and then the letter X latin X. That's how. Yeah,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's how what I've always said too. And then somebody

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who pointed out that it was that, no,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you what other people pronounce it like latin x or

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>something like that rather than latino or latina latin X.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I mean the whole point of all this

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is that, um, it's meant to be a gender neutral,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>totally inclusive word for people who identify as Latino, Latina, um, Hispanic, uh, Chicano,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>even um. However you identify that this is this big

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>encompassing word UM. There was a few uh survey that

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was done that said traditionally, or at least now, most

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people like you were saying, prefer to be identified as Guatemalan,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or as Brazilian or as Haitian, um, wherever you're from.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That that that your nation of origin is your you know,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how you identify with. But there is a

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>growing group, especially younger American born English speaking people who

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>identify UM as what the Census Bureau would call Hispanic UM,

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that are adopting this term latin X or latin x

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be to make it more inclusive, which I think

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is cool. Yeah, And as Ortisz puts it, he said,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>he kind of sees it as a bridge building term

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to kind of unite people. Uh. And you know, it's

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>up to the individual what they prefer to be called.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>If you ask me, UM, I definitely see UM. How

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>referring to someone's country of origin can be a nice specificity,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But I also see the value and people coming together

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>as as a whole and saying, you know, we're a

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>big worldwide community and we are latin X, right, and

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's meant to Apparently Latino was also, um, it was

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>very widely used Hispanic Latino. Um. That was like a

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>transition word for sure, from from Hispanic to Latin X

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>or Latin X. Latino definitely made that that kind of

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>bridge those two together. But apparently Latino came to be

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>widely associated specifically with people who, um, whose country of

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>origin is Mexico. Right, And there's plenty of people from

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>other parts of Central and South America, UM who say, well,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not from Mexico, so that one doesn't really apply

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, which is why latin x is um is

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that bridge building term for a lot of people for

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the time being, though it's it's got a lot of

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>ground to cover before it becomes widely used again. According

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to Pew, Right, yeah, I think they did a survey

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>just this year. UM actually just says August very recently

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that is it still actually who knows? I think is

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>now Eternal Damnation year, so it will be going on forever,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so yes the answers, Yeah, yeah, it's been for seven

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>years now. And this survey said that about of Hispanics

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have even heard the term. That surprised me. Um, and

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>only three percent use it. That kind of surprised me too.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's the circles I run in, but I've heard

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it a lot more than that. Well. I think one

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why it seems like there's more people

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>who adopted is because the people who do use it

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to be the most vocal on like social media,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the most present, the most. Um. Yeah, they're younger, Like,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they're out there a lot more than say, like their

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>parents or grandparents or even older siblings. Um. Yeah, they're

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>out there for sure, so it would they have a

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>much larger voice proportions. They have a disproportionately large voice.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>How about that. Um. What I've seen is, uh, some

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>people are like, well, no, I prefer Latino or I

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>prefer Latina. Some people say, well, no, I'm totally down

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>with the gender neutral thing, but latina X that like

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>X is kind of flies in the face of UM,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Spanish as a tongue, So why don't we go with latina?

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And with the accent? Is it? What's the accent called?

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But with an accent over it? You know you've seen

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it before. Um, So latina is gender neutral, but it's

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also much more Spanish sounding where it's from the Spanish tongue.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So maybe go with that. And I think everybody who's

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>already on board latin X has just just be quiet.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We're going with Latin X. Yeah, it's totally cool, for sure,

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely got a cool term. But I remember also

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>when we did Our Kings in europ episode, we were

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>exclusively saying Latin X, I believe, and some people wrote

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in and said, hey, you know, not everybody is down

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with that in the Latino community or Latino community, and

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>it was good to be reminded of that that. Yes,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about entire groups of people, just remember

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't all agree on everything, no matter whether they're white, Black,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Latin X, Hispanic, Asian, doesn't matter. They're all very different

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>people and we're all different when it comes down to it.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>We're all individuals, and uh, maybe that means we can

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>all get along a little better, yes, and at the

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>very least we can defer to them for goodness sake. Yeah,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>when you meet somebody who you would say, oh, this

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>person is of uh Latin next heritage, you could leave

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it to them by saying it's really great to meet

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>someone of yeah, and then let them fill in the

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in the blacks exactly. So there you go go forth

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and think about things a little more and stop pigeonholing everybody. Okay, okay.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Short stuff then is out. Stuff you should know is

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radios. How stuff works for more

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts my heart Radio? Is that the iHeart Radio app,

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.