WEBVTT - House Has Strong Argument for Impeachment: Prof. Briffault

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Let's get straight to our

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>next guest. Richard Bufo, is professor of litigation at Columbia

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Law School. We have a lot to speak to you about, Professor,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>not least the fact that the House has just introduced

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>an article of impeachment against the president, the second impeachment

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever of a president potentially. But

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that said, what is your base case scenario for how

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>rebuke of President Trump proceeds? Well? At this point, it

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like the House is planning to go ahead with

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>an impeachment proceeding unless, which I guess beginning to see

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>monlikely Vice President pens and the Cabinet moved to remove

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the president under the amendment. So it does seem as

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>though the House is quite serious about beginning impeachment proceedings,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly as early as tomorrow or Wednesday. So Professor, Let's

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>assume that the House does move forward. How do you

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>think the timing will play out in terms of the Senate. Well,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, and I think right now they're

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>making some Uh there's the initial comments. Are they want

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the House wants to take care of the impeachment.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Remember the impeachments the equival of an indictment, you could, well,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment means is the House has called for a

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>trial in the Senate. Um. The actual any um conviction

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>would require action by the Senate, as we saw last year,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and like the impeachment that grew out of the Ukraine

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>phone call um, so the House could could do this

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>rather quickly. What about the Senate, that's a good question,

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sent I think is out of session right now. Uh.

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Leuda McConnell is talking about not bringing them back until

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen UM. The House um majority whip UH Congressman Clyburne

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is talking about even not even sending over the impeachment

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>decision the impeachment resolution to the Senate until some time

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>after the start of the Biden administration. So it's not

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to get him away with the fur The opening days

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and weeks of the new administration, So it's a little

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell when it does seem though it's quite

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>possible that an impeachment could be voted soon, but it's

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell at what point it will move from

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the House to the Senate exactly. This talk of you know,

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred days, even allowing Biden half his hundred days.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 1>What about the idea that it's a sole article of

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>impeachment it is regarding inciting the insurrection at the capital

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on January six, in your professional and legal opinion, was

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that the right charge and it is the president guilty

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of it? Well, I noticed they actually combine that with

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the president's phone call to Rappensburg in the Secretary of

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>State of Georgia pressuring him to find new votes in

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>an effective change the outcome of the election. So it

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is primarily, of course about the uh the attack on

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol, but I think there are other other statements

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in it that he followed prior to subvert and obstruct

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the certification of the electors. I think they weave it

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>together in that sense, is that the president, both by

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>his phone call to the Secretary State of Georgia and

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>by his inciting speech at the Ellipse was trying to

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>block Congress from doing its constitutional duty. I think it's

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a good argument. I mean, I think obviously you need

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out maybe to part the exact language of

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>his speech and everything. But the more of this looks

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like this was a clear cut effort by the part

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of many members of that mob to literally block the

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>certification of the vote. That is an aspect of an attacking,

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>attacking the operation of the government, which fits within the

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>model of physition and insurrection. Professor talked to us about

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the amendment, uh, in what's kind of the calculus behind

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be initiated by the vice president? Yes,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it does. UM. I mean I think that

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>UM the twenty and even really emerged in the nineteen

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>sixties as a way of dealing with presidential disability. Disability

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>short of outright death, president might have a stroke or

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>heart attack for some other reason to be incapable of

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling the duties of his office. And it comes up

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>with the process where the vice president, with the concurrence

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the cabinet, can take over, notifies the Congress. UM

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the president is potentially could challenge it. Uh, And there's

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a process for back and forth for congressional resolution, but

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the first step does require action by the Vice president.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And um, I mean candidly, it really wasn't meant for

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this kind of situation, But of course I'm not sure

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>anything really meant for this kind of situation. Yeah, I mean,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Plosi clearly has several plans at our fingertips. And

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there's also a plan D that's getting talked about. The

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>fourteen Amendment Section three. This may apply to the president

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and or also to those who wanted to, you know,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not recognize the certification. What do you imagine as a

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>path forward with that? Will it get used? So? Fourteen

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen member Section three is a provision that was

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>added after the Civil War as a way basically of

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that members of people who have officers of the Confederacy,

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>who had been in part of the US government, people

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>who had taken an oath of allegiance in the United

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>States before the Civil War and then in effect broke

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that oath and joined up with the Confederacy, as as

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>government leaders are as top generals there would be denied,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be thereafter denied any ability to hold the

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>US government office. Again, that's the that's the background, and

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>again it uses that, but it uses the language of

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>participation in insurrection. And so the idea there would be again,

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>if you could show that somebody participated in somebody who

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>had sworn an oath, an oath of office like the

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>president or a member of Congress, or particiating an insurrection,

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be a basis for denying them the right

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.239
<v Speaker 1>to hold uh public office in the United States. Um,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not clearly self executing some it would have to

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>determine that that's what they did, so uh, and of

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>course he would have to determine that what they did

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>constituted insurrection. UM. The President's case, there's a good argument

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>not all of the members of Congress who you know,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>voted to oppose UM the electoral certification would fall into

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that category. I think people are thinking about it mostly

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Senator Hawley, maybe Senator Cruise, particularly people

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>who gave more inflammation, made inflammatory statements, I think, particularly

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Senator Hawley, and maybe from the members of the House. So, Professor,

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if the House is able to deliver the articles of

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>impeachment to the Senate perhaps sometime this week, what is

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>incumbent upon the Senate to do in terms of timeliness

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of acting. They are supposed to take it

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>up right away. I mean, that is the procedure that's

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>been set up. It's supposed to become a first order

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>of business, and they are supposed to take it up

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>right away. So I think the House is I mean,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think in some ways, this this impeachment thing has

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>really three things driving in. One is just the sense

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that something has to be done, that this was maybe

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the most outrageous thing in American president has ever done,

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so something has to be done. Second is to get

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>him out right away. He's still there at this point.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>People accounting the hours, it's ten more days. He's in

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>charge of the unforces, is in charge of the nuclear codes,

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's a I think a concerned that maybe he

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>will do something improper again. And then third is to

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in effect block him from being able to run again. Uh.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the things that the impeachment itself

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't automatically disqualify for future holding office, but it's something

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Senate has the power to do if it

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>should convict, is to disqualify. And at this point, I'm

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>not sure which all three of these things may be

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>at play. The longer they delay any action, the more

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really about the first and the third. Richard Brice brief.

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us with a brief.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Joseph P. Chamberlain, Professor of Legislation at Columbia Law School,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>helping us break down UH the impeachment process, which looks

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like it's about to begin as the House UH introduced

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>its articles Impeachment. Well, of course, it is a great

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to speak to our next guest. Susan DeVore is

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of the Premiere, which is the health

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>services company that's listed on the NASDACK under p I

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>n C, and she joins us from Charlotte, North Carolina. Susan,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining. Scott Stringer, the New York City Controller,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>coming out today and explaining that, you know, the forms

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>online and the process for getting put in line for

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>vaccination is an absolute mess. Talk to us about how

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>better the vaccine can be ruled out. Thank you so

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. While the truth is we've got

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to get from two fifty thousand vaccinations a day to

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>two million a day, and so this is you know,

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the biggest supply chain challenge probably UH in history for healthcare.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>There are several systemic issues. First, we've got a hesitancy problem.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got people who are not willing to take the vaccine.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We've got to do a lot more education. We've got

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>to get people willing to take it. Secondly, our health

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>care systems, the premier hospitals would say staffing is one

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>of the very largest challenges they have. You know, their

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>nurses are taking care of all the COVID patients and

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>now they're also doubling up on providing vaccination, so we

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>need help with staffing. The distribution challenges, you know, are

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about a lot. There are sixty four different state

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and territorial plans, and so the lack of centralization and

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>even the lack of standard processes across states huge issue.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And then there are supply shortages and all kinds of

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>communication gaps. So we're early in the process, but but

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of improvements that need to be made.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So so it's one of the questions is you know,

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are one of the areas of frustration I guess for

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>some people is yes, we we are in the early

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>stage of this process, and there will be bumps in

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the roads, certainly, But when you get uh. You know,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say a ten thousand doses delivered to a vaccination point,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>yet only two or three or four thousand have actually

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>put in people's arms. The question then becomes, what are

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we waiting for if you don't if someone doesn't want

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to take a go to the next person. So I

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>guess there's a question of sticking with the Phase one

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>ABC protocols versus just getting as many shots in as

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>many arms as quickly as possible. How do you think

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>that's going to play out? You know, there's a lot

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of inconsistency state to state. So part of the problem

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is hospitals, premier hospitals don't even know if they're going

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to get it, how much they're going to get, when

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get it. They're worrying about having enough

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for the second dose. And so I think people are

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>being cautious in terms of going too fast down the

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>prioritization list because the worst that they think could happen

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>would be to give them one dose and you don't

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have that second dose. Having said that, I think we

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are being overly cautious as a country, and we ought

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to be using technology to identify all the people out

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>there who want to get a vaccine, uh and are

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.599
<v Speaker 1>willing to get a vaccine. And then we ought to

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>set up more um sites for vaccination National Guard in

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>some places, maybe the retail CBS, Walgreens boxes, so that

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we actually have a way to accelerate this. You know,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with a normal flu it takes three months to get

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>people vaccinated, and this is much more urgent, and we

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>have to change our processes in order to get people vaccinating.

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>How does Premiere work with the various states. It seems

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.359
<v Speaker 1>like because it's a state by state issue, it's obviously

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly different for every state. And you know, a company

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like you or is is it difficult to to manage

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>all that? So Premier has hospitals and hundreds of thousands

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of providers across the country. We work through the inside,

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>We work through the healthcare system them and all of

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the things that they're trying to respond to. At state level,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a big supply chain organization. And one of

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the things folks don't talk a lot about is, you know,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>these these vials are overfilled, so you can get six

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>doses instead of five, while the kit only includes five needles,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>So you've gotta go get needles and surringes, which are

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on shortage. The kids did not include any gloves um

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and most clinicians want to wear gloves when they're vaccinating folks,

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and so we've got a shortage of gloves. So what

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Premier is trying to do is make sure we've got syringes,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure we've got needles, make sure we've got gloves,

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure we're helping health care systems share their best

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>practices and compare notes about how they're dealing with the

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>various state programs and those, you know, states that are

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>doing a better job of accelerating the vaccination are sharing

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>how they're going about that with other other states. So

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Premier is kind of a critical piece right in the

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>middle of all of the activity at the various state levels.

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Susan should there be federal guidance, federal coordination of a

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>vaccination into so how you know, we believe a premiere

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>There should be federal guidance. There should be a standard

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>reporting process, maybe there could even be a universal scheduling process.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the CDC today is reporting the doses, but

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how many of those are first doses

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or second doses. And it's not a problem yet because

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not enough time has passed, but it will be a

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>problem in the future. So we need federal guidelines, We

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>need federal standards of reporting, We need federal you know,

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>technology support. We can use federal and state resources like

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>National Guard and others to accelerate this process. So yeah,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we believe you need a lot more federal guidance and

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>then you need state level execution of the broader vaccination plan. Susan,

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us once again, we

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>would appreciate your perspective. Susan DeVore, chief executive officer of

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>healthcare services company Premier based in Charlotte, North Carolina. Just

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>getting an update on the logistics of getting these vaccines

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>out there, into the marketplace and into patients as quickly,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>UH and asficially and as safely as possible. That's been

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a challenged uh so far, but hopefully things will improve well.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the many fallouts to come from the um

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened at the Capitol last week has been the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>role of social media platforms. What role did they play,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>uh and what roles should they played going forward. We

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>saw many of these social media platforms drop President Trump's account, band,

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's account that's razing some question questions about free

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>speech versus accountability. To dig into that, we welcome Mark Douglas.

0:14:54.720 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a CEO of marketing firm Steelhouse based in Los Angeles. Uh. Mark,

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. So we had Twitter,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we've had Facebook banned the account of President Trump. How

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think those social media platforms and Amazon as

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>related to Parlor? How do you think they came to

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>those decisions? Okay, well, obviously I think, um, what happened

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>last week at the Capitol plus four years of history,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of um, the cumulative effected at um

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>led to that decision. I think that the Twitter and

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook banning his accounts is was somewhat expected. What's unexpected

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think is um Apple and Aws and the actions

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know they've taken that go beyond Trump. And so

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's just a climate right now of of

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>making these kinds of decisions. And I don't I think

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot more to come in terms of

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>where we settle in in terms of what's allowed and

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what's not allowed. Yeah, that was really fascinating. Parlor is

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>funded by, among others, Rebecca Mercer, and it builds itself

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as a platform really for all that protects the First

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights of Americans. But honestly, it did seem like

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some of what happened on Wednesday, if not organized

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on Parlor, was at least chatted about on Parlor. And

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it didn't hurt that people were sort of

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>suggesting things to each other. And then Apple came out

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and said it was going to take it off its

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>app store, and Amazon Web Services said it wouldn't host

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. What is the future for parlor? Who CEO

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>insists that nothing illegal is not dealt with, that they

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>take down illegal things and anything else is completely legal. Yeah,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's two issues there. One is Parlor.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It's although the lot of what people do as right

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>wing discussion is occurring on Parlor. Parler themselves just view

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves as champions of free speech, that's what they say,

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and don't think free speech is a Republican right wing issue.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure there's as much support for, you know,

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of taking apps down and out of the App store.

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of companies, ironically, including Facebook, think

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that Apple has a heavy hand when it comes to

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the app store, and and you know, Facebook and December

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>did full page ads in the Wall Street Journal, in

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>New York Times and other publications essentially railing against Apple's

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>decisions that it relates to to the the app store,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and there are other companies that are suing Apples. So

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>now Parlor, for a different reason, is now in that

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>bucket ironically aligned somewhat with Facebook and that Apple is

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>exerting too much control. And so I think, you know,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the first party issue. The second part is coming

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the app store. I think Parlor will relaunch

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>as a mobile app and um and and I think

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can do so relatively quickly. And so again that's the way,

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they just used the opening in net um

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to put apps out there or to put websites out there,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>rabbit and relying solely on Apple, who who's been somewhat

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly hypocritical on the topic. So Mark, you expect this,

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this discussion again, this whole First Amendment issue, accountability, free

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>speech too. I guess, you know, retrain the lens of Washington,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>d C. Congress regulators on the Internet as it relates

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to kind of these free speech issues. Um, I think

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's a hot topic, but I think actually the

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 1>users of these platforms um are ultimately going to somewhat

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>retrain the lens. So keep in mind only ten percent

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook's users in the United States, but of their

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>revenue is in the United States. So if you have

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of US users of Facebook and Twitter,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>because they're similar type numbers, but Twitter, if you have

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of users for um of Facebook and Twitter,

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially you know, feel that these platforms are being unfairs

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular around free speech. UM it doesn't. It takes

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, but as a percentage of the

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>total number of Facebook users, it doesn't take a lot

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a very big effect on their revenue, which

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to have a huge effect on advertising and

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have a huge effect that they go on Wall Street,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>which you already thing Wall Street somewhat respond to. I

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think some of the drop in Twitter and and UM

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>today is not just about Trump. It's about the savvy

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>investors realizing that you that Twitter cannot afford to lose

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a third or quarter you know up there

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>their US user base, that that that would have a

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>devastating impact on their financials because they're so dependent on

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States for for revenue. So fascinating to see

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens next. And you have to wonder if these

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>companies aren't concerned about legal liability as well, if it

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>can be proven that there was organization for some of

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the events on their platforms. Our thanks to you very

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today. Mark Douglas is CEO of

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>steel House marketing firm with a lot of experience in

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a social media marketing and so on. Interestingly, Paul Bloomberg

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence suggests that Twitter's advertising base will actually grow in

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>spite of its ban on President Donald Trump right now,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have to see if that's the case. Well

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at this time for Bloomberg Opinion, so let's welcome Bloomberg

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Opinion columnist Brooke Sutherland, who is a great opinion out

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about corporate America and how it responded to last Wednesday's events.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really interesting. Only one major business group,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's the National Association of Manufacturers signaled the president

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>out when they were denouncing what happened on Wednesday. Many

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>many big companies from JP Morgan to Goldman Sachs dennounced

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the violence, but only this one group actually mentioned President

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump by name. Brook, You write about this because it's

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>fascinating that it's it's a pretty conservative group that actually

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>ended up doing this what led to the decision? Sure,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think we should say too that

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't just call him out by name. They called

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Vice president and the cabinet to seriously consider

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>removing President Trump from office with the twenty five Amendment.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So this was a pretty incredible statement, um, for many

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>business group, like you said, but especially from the National

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Association of Manufacturers, which has historically, you know, really aligned

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>itself with conservative priorities. They advocated very aggressively for the

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump tax cuts in twenties seventeen, for example. But um,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think for this group in particular, that

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the frustration level with the antics of the Trump administration

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>has been rising for months now. Um. You know, the

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>head of this organization, uh labeled the protests over you know,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the economic protection measures that were taken in the wake

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus m as idiots, saying that, you know,

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>if we try to rush reopening the economy, that's going

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>to be the detriment of everybody. Um. Also, you know,

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 1>came up very strongly against the efforts by some Republicans

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in Congress to uh, you know, argue against the certification

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>of the election results. And I think where this frustration

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>stems from is that, you know, the reason why the

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>National Association of Manufacturers has been aligned with Republicans is

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that they have tended to be the pro business party,

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that they've advocated policies that are good for businesses. And

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that has not necessarily been the case, um this past year.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at the handling of the

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus pandemic, and you know the fact that stimulus became

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>such a political football, the fact that any kind of

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, aggressive progress on stimulus measures was sort of

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>turned into a side show with this election narrative. I mean,

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that is not good for business. That is not what

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers were certainly hoping to see from a Republican party.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And in Manufacturers Brooke, I mean, as you've written about before,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they've actually, i mean they've really stepped up during this pandemic,

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, Ford or General Motors, you know,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>making ventilators, or Boeing you know, making face shields. So

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they've really stepped up and and and and try to

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>be part of the solution here. They really have I mean,

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been incredible. I know, you know, corporate America takes

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flack, and some of it is obviously

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>very well deserved. But in this moment of need, we've

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>seen manufacturers across the spectrum really step up. And that was,

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the crunch time of March and aprilogy

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>reference these companies that you know, I've never made face shield,

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>face masks, ventilators before stepping in and saying, okay, we

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have machinery that we're not using, how can we help.

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But then also you know, on the vaccine distributions front,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't make vaccines without equipment from manufacturers. You can't

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>distribute the vaccines without the logistics companies s FedEx and

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ups and so these companies have been working very, very

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to do whatever they can to try to get

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy back on track, to get steer us through

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this very unprecedented situation. And I don't know if those

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>efforts have been fully appreciated by the federal government, which

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at times just seemed to be sort of floundering in

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>its response effort um And like I said, you know

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that response effort has increasingly become sort of a sideshow

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to some of these more political considerations, and that's not

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>good for business. Some companies have said that they will

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not donate any more to members of Congress who did

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>try to overturn the election. Some have suggested that they

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>won't donate to any political party, Goldman Sex in particular,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that for the first gevil future, there will be

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>no political donations. Are these bold moves on the part

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of our corporate titans? Brook? Uh? You know, I can't

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>speak to the banks specifically, as they don't cover them

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as closely. I mean, I think time will tell how

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>firmly they stick to these initiatives that are coming out now.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously this is a moment where it's easier

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to do something. Um Now, whether you know these that

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>meantest daying power, I think is a question for a

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>different day. It's my understanding this is a pretty light

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>kime of year for political donations anyway. But you know,

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that obviously this is something that people care about,

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that we're living in a moment where

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>people are looking to corporate America to be more of

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a leader. Is that, you know, it's not an option

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>anymore for these companies to stay silent when questions about,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fundamental nature of our democracy are being raised,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and so, you know, I think there has been some

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>question about when we did get into the Biden administration,

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>whether corporate America could sort of fade back into the

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>background and if there wouldn't be quite as much pressure

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on these leaders to come out and make statements in

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the wake of events. And I think what we're seeing

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is evidence that that pressure is not going away, and

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that employees are going to want to work at places

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>where their companies do take a stand um and so,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that's pressure for accountability is going

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to persist. Now, whether that actually translates into you know,

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>where companies put their money, I think we have to

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>wait and see. So, Brooke, you covered the industrial America

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing sector for a long time here. What do you

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think or how how are some of these industrial companies

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and trade organizations how are they viewing the incoming Biden administration. So,

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there was this narrative out there

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Biden administration is going to be bad for

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate American. I don't know if that's really true. I

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>think when you sort of drill deeper down into the

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the election. Now that we do have, you know,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a decision made on those two Georgia Senate seats, I

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think this could actually be a pretty good outcome for manufacturers.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the big question mark is what happens on

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.959
<v Speaker 1>tax policy. And certainly, you know, there's a lot of

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>US manufacturing companies that are heavily geared towards the domestic

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>market and would you know, face repercussions from tax policy changes.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, you know, an infrastructure bill

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a boon to the manufacturing industry. And this

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>is something that companies had hoped to see under a

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration and that did not happen in large part

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>because Congressional Republicans were something of an obstacle to that.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, you know, if you do as

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a unified government on the Democrats, that does pave the

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>way for some sort of infrastructure spending down the road,

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>which I think would be a real benefit to these companies.

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even in the shorter term, talking about

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus stimulus, that does seem to be a priority for

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this administration. That could be particularly helpful for the aerostates

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and defense industry, which of course is still struggling from

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the fallout of the pandemic. And you know, there was

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>some additional stimulus that went to the airlines under the

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>most recent build that was passed. But you know, some

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>questions about getting the aerostas manufacturing industry in a place

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's stabler and stronger to be able to be

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in a position to respond to that demand when it

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>does come back, would certainly be beneficial. Hey, brook thank

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We appreciate chatting with

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you as always about all things coming out of Industrial America.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Brooks Sutherland deals and industrials columns for Bloomberg Opinion. You

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>can read Brooks work and all of the good work

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from our Bloomberg Opinion columns at Bloomberg dot com, Slash

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Opinion or O P I n Go on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>It's eating to see um industrial America. We've seen a

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing data bonnie pretty solid over the last four or

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>five months, so the industrial part of the economy is

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty well, gearing up for what it expects to

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be a stronger back half of Thanks for listening to

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets Podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn. And

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Radio