WEBVTT - Mike Mayo Talks Dimon's Succession Plan, Fraser's Success

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. We're no Mercedes Postrinion time.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Ken. What we're going to do is talk to Mike

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Mayo here with Wells Fargo. Mike Mayo is absolutely legendary

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>in banking. He's one of the few people that Congress

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 2>called upon in the Great Financial Crisis to say what

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in God's name is going on? And it has finally

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>paid off his optimism on large cat banks in Europe

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and of course here in America, I have a charted

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>city group with a ten for one reverse split cratering

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 2>from you down and when and then it just forever

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and finally a legitimate leg up. Let's start with that,

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Mike Mayo. Why is banking finally getting a leg up?

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the times they are a change in and you're

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>sharing historic inflection in terms of the revenues, the earnings,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and especially fifteen years of regulation going from a headwind

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to a tailwind. Now I'm not talking about going back

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and six, two thousand and seven before

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the global financial crisis. I'm talking about preserving the safety

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and soundness of the banks and eliminating a lot of

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>red tape, and that can help banks operate at a

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of higher profit margins to help their stock raise.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it operational excellence or is it the gift of

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the yield curve?

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really more just operational streamlining because regulation

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.559
<v Speaker 1>has gotten so complex. Pull back that complexity and banks

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>can perform better. But yes, you've had fifteen years of

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>financial repression. Zero interest rates were disturbing to banks profitability.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Now you're going back, just back to normal.

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>So talk to us about how you think the regulatory

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>framework may change and what it can do to returns

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>on equities.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, Well, I think the regulatory framework was vastly

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>improved after the global financial crisis. Banks doubled capital, they

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>double their liquidity, They de risked for their consumer customers.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Remember all those subprime loans. They derisk their commercial customers.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>If anything, banks have been marginalized to the benefit of

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the non bank. So a lot of the more risky

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff is going outside the bank industry. So I would say,

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>great job regulators from the year you know, twenty ten

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>through it's called twenty fifteen. But the last decade you

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>had complexity. Pile on top of complexity, the living will,

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the FED stress test. JP Morgan submits eighty thousand pages

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for each and you know, I talked to the ex

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>vice chairman of the fdiic has said he didn't understand

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it when he reviewed it, and nor did a lot

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of the banks. So it's a lot of wasted money.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think you can save a lot of money

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on expenses at the banks, at the regulatory agencies, and

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I think some of that gets passed on to the customers.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And also banks deserve to have a level playing field

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to how much capital they have, So

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>compute those capital ratios the same way you do for

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody else, and the numbers go up by quite a bit.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So this could improve banking returns by two hundred basis

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>points over a few years. That's significant, and that can

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>propel a bank stock rally over a few years.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>So are there certain banks that are better positioned in

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>this type of environment or is this a blanket call

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>on us financials?

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, a rising tide does lift all ships. JP Morgan

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>remains best in class Globile Bank. But my favorite, number one,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>number two, and number three favorite is City Group. I

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was on your show not to you know last year,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's moved, it's starting to move but it's still

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that my dominant number one pick. It's a new era

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for banking, but it's also a new era for city group.

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I've got a chart normalize. We're going to talk about this,

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>folks with Mike Mayo. You're well as Fargo as we

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>go into the next half. For I got a chart normalized.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Back with the day Lehman collapse, I think I maybe

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>talked to you that day. Remember I got a JP

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Morgan moonshot. When you say banks are going to do well,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>are they catching up with JP Morgan or is it

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>all boats rising even for JP Morgan.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd say both. So I think the lesser bank will

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>narrow the gap with JP Morgan for sure. But at

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time, JP Morgan should continue to image what

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>a bank generating over twenty percent returns on fifteen percent

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>capital with some best in class efficiency.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Mike Mayo with this, So I got JP Morgan, you

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>know clearly way ahead. Three hundred and seventeen thousand employees

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>is the working number we've got in the des screen.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's all this, you know the stuff Schinelli

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>basic talks about, all this, OMG, who's going to take

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 2>over for Jamie? Does that Germane to you is like,

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>is that part of your analysis of JP Morgan or

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 2>do you just ignore the people moving around and just

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>look at the financials the execution?

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think good Jamie Diamond. I asked him this

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>question at last earning cast, said Jamie, who's your successor?

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't give much of an answer.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 2>And he's still doing that for ten years.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, then I finally said, so are you going to

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>be around for a few more years? He said yes,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think when you have this many moving parts,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Jamie's not going anywhere in the immediate term. Having said that,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a deep bench at JP Morgan. It could be

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a number of three or four different people. Marion Lake

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly is the name that comes to the four investors knowers.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>She telled a lot of positions. But if Jamie stays

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on for several years, it's you. We'll see what happens.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, Yeah, I'm not. A couple of years ago,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>I downgraded JP Morgan when they were spending all kinds

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of money without telling us why they were spending and

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>everything else, and I upgraded it made it my number

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>one pick. After the failures from a couple of years ago.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But not one investor that I've spoken with, and I've

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>traveled a lot the last month, last two months, not

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>one investor that I've spoken with wants Jamie Diamond to leave.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So people want Jamie Diamond to stay right now, and

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think he should get that message and stay.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And look, he'd been playing for this moment. I caught reregulation,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not deregulation, reregulation, making more common sense regulation. And he's

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna benefit. Japen Morgan's gonna benefit. Why leave now? He's

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for the to go to the ballgame your

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>whole professional career. You're finally getting there. You're not gonna

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>leave before the first home City.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm a former employee there at City, and when I

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>worked there, I felt like there's not a piece of

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>business we couldn't win. What happened to City? And why

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>is it now your number one pick?

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, look what's compared to the time you work there.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>There was a dramatic shift last year that's underappreciated by

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>almost everybody. They went from five decades of this global

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>matrix management structure that nobody understood, and now they have

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>five lines of business. They have payments, banking, markets, wealth

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and consumer. When they have a CEO in charge of each,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>they have return targets for each, they have accountability for

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>each one of those five lines of business. That's what

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're playing for for the next five to ten years.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, they're at that flection point

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the J curve. You invest money and your profits

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>go down. They're turning up on the other side of

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that J curve where those investments start to pay off

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and they start spending less. So you're gonna see twice

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe three times better efficiency improvement at City Group

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and return improvement at City Group than the other banks.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they're passing this magical line where

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they have single digit returns to double digit returns. When

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you go from value destruction to value creation.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>That is the number one biggest driver of bank stock performance.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the number one big bank stock performer so far

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think it'll be the top performer by

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Michael Meyo with us there on City Group and we'll continue.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>He is, of course large cap bank research at Wells Fargo.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Fairly to say, legendary industry. Also very cut and chiseled yep.

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's like, you know, he said to me, Tom,

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>you got to hit the weights again, Jim Tomlin. You

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>know he's like time getting the gym.

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Mike Maya on your City group pick. I'm

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 3>fascinating by this now it's all coming back to me.

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I walked out the out of the door of City

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>after a few years, sold all my stock literally on

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the day I walked out the door.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Very cool.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>In January of two, two thousand. Jane Fraser, she's I

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 3>think she's got a pretty good message for the street.

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>How is she different from other CEOs at city who

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 3>have also promised change and to clean things up in

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the streamline things.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, you're triggering me right now. I think of

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the other CEOs. If he goes back, Tom Kane probably

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>remembers Walter Wriston, right, countries don't go pro My father.

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Knew him personally. They used to talk farms in all

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>he worshiped Walter Wriston and then it ended.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, lending, let's lend. You know, Latin American countries will

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pay us back. They did in nineteen eighty seven you

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>had big charges and then you had John Reid back

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineties, he had the Saudi print, had

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you pump it up with capital, and then you had

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole Sandy Wild era one leader. And then you

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>had long term capital with the problems, and I called

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that Noah's Ark because they brought two of everybody along

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with the beat mergers with travelers. And then you had

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Victim Pandit, which first you had Chuck Prince the lawyer,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and that remember he's gonna keep dancing till the music stops,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and that that ended very stop, and then the music

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>stopped and basic they effectively failed and the government bailed

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>them out. And then you have Victim Pandit, which was

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of there. And then you had this guy Mike Corbett,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who didn't change the strategy at all, and through it all,

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd say city was very arrogant, very arrogant. Jane Fraser

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>gets there and says, you know what, we have a

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of problems. We have a lot of things to fix.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>The first step is to recognize that you have a problem.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's taken a little bit longer than some people

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>would have liked. I understand that, and the expensives are

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot higher than they should have been. But recognizing

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem then last year, everyone said City's going to

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:04.359
<v Speaker 1>mess up up three concurrent initiatives. One is this org simplification.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>They went from the five decades of matrix structure, five

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>lines of business. They eliminated five management layers. They told

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>all the employees you're going to have to manage more

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>people's It was gut wrenching, and they fired some people

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's always tough. And then you have there divesting,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, over a dozen consumer operations and a dozen

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>countries outside the US, and then they have this transformation

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in the back office. They're doing this all at once,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and everybody says city is going to implode. Well, guess what.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year City medics efficiency targets. They beat, their revenue

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>targets they met And so going through those major changes

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and people saying, what's the proof, what's the evidence? Look

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at the results last year and they're guidance three years

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in a row. They're now guiding if you believe them,

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>revenue is going higher and expenses going lower. So you're

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>at that huge inflection point now. So they're recognized and

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>they have a problem. They don't have that same degree

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of arrogance. They have the ability, they have the capability

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>They're in one hundred countries. So if you're global, multi

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>national corporation, you want to do payments or global investment banking,

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you got it. Their top three and credit cards to

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the franchise, a new strategy and Jane Frasier as the

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimate architect of where city groups should be the next decade.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 2>You are more qualified on this than anybody I know

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 2>on the sales side. You know the great group of

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>sales side analysts that are out there. Jamie Diamond this

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>weekend was a Talk of the Weekend with some tape

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that was, you know, out of JP Morgan and that

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Mike Mayo on Work from Home.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I loved the Jamie Diamond video and the audio that

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>got leaped out to the press, and that's vintage Jamie Diamond.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Is I agree with that.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>He just said he's going to say what he thinks,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and he says, if you don't like it, don't work

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at JP Morgan. We want you to work at JP Morgan,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but if you you need to work in the office

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>so you can mentor people and everything else. And for

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan and Jamie Diamond, that works and that's their strategy.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Correct. When you saw when you were at credit Sweee.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 2>You at mentors as you built your career. You went

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 2>from you know with the day you got candidate credit Sweez.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I spoke to you that day or the

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 2>day after. Whatever. The answer is, you need mentors, Mike

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Mayo and work from home. Talk to the kids right now.

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'd also say it's not one size fits all either. Okay.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's different departments at different.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Banks, different departments, but come on.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Differ different departments, different banks. I will say though Jamie

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Diamond and JP Morgan, it's worked for them. They came

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>back early during the pandemic. Goldman Sachs. That was actually

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>my first meeting at Goldman Sachs. I wasn't going to

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>go in and my wife's a doctor, as you know,

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and she says, no, you're going in to meet with

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>them in person, okay. And and I went to Goldman

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Sachs and I'm telling you, they have this middle area

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>where you have to transfer to the upper floors, and

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it was almost packed. And this was at a time

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>no one was going back to work. So the JP

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Goldman Sachs they had all their not all

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they are so many employees back early and look at

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the most successful. But it's not one size fits all.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So if if City Group decides they're going to allow

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>some people to work remotely, that might be a competitive

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>advantage in hiring certain people. So I saying I get it. Well,

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>just sometimes you can get great people if you make

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some accommodation. So Jamie Diamond is not of that.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, we got Lisa Mateo.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's the way I actually Okay, you might

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 3>talk to us about Bank of America again, former employee,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 3>thank you through Merrill Lynch, I've worked pretty much.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Every work to us.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Are the Bank of America story? Sometimes I g's lost

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit between the Jamie Diamond talk and maybe

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the turnaround at City. What's what's the story at Bank

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 3>of America.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Look, we have three words that sum up the largest banks.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>That is Goliath is winning. Okay, okay, scale is making

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>more difference in banking than ever before in the history.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you tell the European regulators that, I mean,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>because we've they've.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Lost, They've lost, absolutely lost. The five biggest US capital

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>market players Bank America, JP Morgan, Golden Morgan, stan Goldman, Morgan, Stanley,

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>uh and uh Baba Yep. They've gained market sharing capital

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>markets since the global financial crisis, you know, in spades,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think they'll continue to do so. And you're

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like talk about twice or three or JP Morgan four

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>times larger than the European bank peers. And by the way,

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea that US banks should not merge, that's

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Brian moynihan or Jamie Diamond Protection Act. Why

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>do you want to protect them? You should have more

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>large banks PNC. Bill Dempchek talks about wanting to have

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>another trillion dollar bank. He would like to be that,

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.119
<v Speaker 1>but the unintended consequence of regulation. For the last time, thirty.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Seconds, Do you have a regional right now you would

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 2>own around that Mike Mayo theory? Do you have a

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>regional that could be mergeable with the people from Pittsburgh

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>with their beautiful baseball park.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Look, if you want to name it own, it's city group.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's city group. It's city group. I don't want to

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>dilute that call. Let we're weaving all portfolio limits, okay,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's really city group. And then look and

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Bank America. Those are the three goliath They benefit.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>You're not took down.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, look, P and C is a quality

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bank in the national main street Bank. They're the thirty

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>largest cities. They have a ten year runway bill Demcheck

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is an exceptional CEO, and they should have revenues growing

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>far past the expenses. And they'll benefit from the rising

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>tie of lists all ships. But again for me, it's

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>City Group, City Group, City Group as my primary recommendation.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. He's with Wells Fargo.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Folks,