WEBVTT - Snap Shares Plunge and Tesla Layoffs Loom

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Hyde at Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York, and.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Coming up Snap plunges and fat by the most in

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the year after earning's disappointed in the company sites a

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 4>challenging operating environment for the full year. We've got all

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 4>the coverage ahead.

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Plus Tesla staff bracing for layoffs as managers are asked

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 5>binary questions on whether their employees' roles are critical.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 6>Details ahead and.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Uber earnings, well, that's showing robust demand for rides and

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 4>delivery as gross bookings and pass estimates. I'm going to

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>be sitting down with the Uber CEO, Darakos or Shaheb.

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 5>A story are reported this morning with Bloomberg's DNA hole.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 5>Tesla has canceled or postponed performance reviews this week, and

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 5>it's said to managers, look at everyone that works under

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 5>you and tell us who is critical.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 6>And now there's a big worry.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm told from sources internally that big layoffs are coming,

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 5>and when we broke the story, there was a.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 6>Big spike hire in pre market.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 5>You can see we've kind of traded choppy throughout the session,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 5>but broadly that's positive to investors. Write Tesla's talked about

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 5>looking at costs. They've done this before, using performance reviews

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 5>as a way of pulling back in certain areas. We'll

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 5>bring you the full data and details with done a

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 5>hole later in the show. Back to the earning side

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 5>of this story and their mixed fortunes depending on who

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 5>you are. Uber's like slightly hired two ten to one

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 5>percent strong earnings, strong outlook. It's a story about an

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 5>app that is more diverse than its peers. New products

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 5>are helping on the mobility side, and as you know,

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 5>we're going to talk to the CEO, Dara Kostrashahi later

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 5>in the program. Snap is the opposite, down thirty four percent,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 5>biggest drop since October twenty twenty two. Top line growth

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 5>of five percent missed estimates. But on the bottom line,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 5>what was with all those job cuts and cost savings.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 6>If you're still on an adjusted EBIT.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Basis saying you're losing fifty five to ninety five million dollars.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 5>There was growth in core Western markets, but those emerging

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 5>markets that Snap's been so focused on, the growth is

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 5>nowhere to be seen. So let's dive in deeper into

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Snap's earnings with Jasminemberg, Principal analysts and Insider Intelligence, where

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 5>she leads coverage of social media and the creator economy.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Your reaction to this Snap.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 7>Print look, investors are obviously unhappy, They're frustrated, they're losing confidence,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 7>and that makes sense, especially in the context of Metas

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 7>blowout earnings.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 8>Just last week.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 7>But if you take out that context, it really wasn't

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 7>all that terrible of a quarter for Snap by its standards.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 7>It's Q four revenue growth did come in at the

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 7>higher end of its internal guidance, and its revenue growth

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 7>for the full year was just about flat and what

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 7>we were pretty much expecting here at Insider Intelligence. The

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 7>problem for Snap, though, is that context is key, and

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 7>investors are inevitably going to compare it to Meta, and

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 7>what Snap is showing is that it just can't keep

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 7>up pace with the big tech titans.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Meta, Amazon as well showing such ad improvements. Is enough

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 4>being done by Evanspiegel to turn around the ads in

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 4>particular and basically prove themselves.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 7>Look, one of the things that's really working against Snap

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 7>and all of this is its lack of scale in

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.839
<v Speaker 7>comparison to its rivals. Now, of course, Evan Spiegel said

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 7>he is going to continue to try and grow the

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 7>user base, but because of its small size, it is

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 7>currently a less essential player for advertisers, which of course

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 7>impacts ad demand, but it also makes it more challenging

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 7>for it to be able to revamp its systems. It

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 7>has less data and less signal to be able to

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 7>work with in order to do this.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 4>When you basically have daily active users of four hundred

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>and fourteen million, monthly active eight hundred million, do you

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>just have to recategorize what Snap is and just be like,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 4>this is a nice, healthy company that's going to be

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 4>boosting overall. It's its earnings and its revenue, but just

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 4>not at a pace in any way comparison with the

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 4>major players.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 7>Look, we're in this environment where we're seeing the bigger

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 7>players get bigger and the smaller players like Snap continue

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 7>to struggle. Snap is never going to be a Facebook,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 7>it's never going to be an Instagram. But with that

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 7>many users, there are a lot of people who really

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 7>love the platform. I think one of the big problems,

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 7>and we've talked about it here on the show before,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 7>is that its primary use case is still messaging. Now

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 7>we heard again, of course that there is growth and

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 7>more of its public facing social media like features, but

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 7>really most people who are using it on a regular

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 7>basis are doing so to message. One of the things

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 7>that you know is really interesting is that all of

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 7>this is also coming at a time where Snap is

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 7>repositioning itself as this anti social media platform. And that

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 7>makes sense in terms of all of the problems with

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 7>social media, especially considering the testimony in Congress last week.

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 7>But it's not really going to help its business.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 5>But like everyone else, Jasmine Real Quick, they're saying that

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 5>the conflict in the Middle East is impacting their ad business.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of that?

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 7>It certainly was a headwind for Snap's ad business. I

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 7>do think though, that that's emblematic of some of the large, larger,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 7>long standing fundamental challenges that Snap has. Its direct response

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 7>ad platform, of course, is not as sophisticated. It's still

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 7>making improvements on that, and brand advertisers that are spending

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 7>really heavily, especially in Q four on Snap brands, of

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 7>course are more risk averse. They're more likely to pull

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 7>or pause their spend spending in times of conflict or crises,

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 7>and without that direct response ad advertising platform and AD

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 7>dollars to make up for that, it's probably more noticeable

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 7>in snaps earnings. And then again there's the small size

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 7>when advertisers are thinking about where to you know, cut spending,

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 7>it's the smaller players that are going to go to first,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 7>Jasmine and Berg.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 4>It's always great to have your analysis across the show.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Principal analyst and insider intelligence.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 5>Uber out with the results, reporting gross bookings that beat estimates,

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 5>showing strong global demand for rides and food delivery during

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 5>the holiday period.

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Joining us now Bloomberg's Emily.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Chang and ubercio Dara Kasha Shahi for more on the

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 5>strong numbers.

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 10>M Ed, thank you, Dara, thank you as always for

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 10>joining us. Look, it was a beat across the board,

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 10>but the stock is down this morning, you know. Now

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 10>the times are good. We saw trip growth really accelerated.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 10>Will that keep up?

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>And how well? Our trip growth was super strong? Right?

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We grew trips twenty four percent on a year. On

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>your basis on a base of two point six billion trips,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, as you get larger, it gets tougher

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to have that kind of growth. But if you look

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>at our gross bookings guidance going forward, it's between eighteen

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three percent. So we do expect to continue

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to grow at very very strong rates while at the

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>same time continuing to increase profitability and margins, which is

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the best of both worlds, which is what investors expect

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of us, and frankly it's what we know Uber can

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>deliver well.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 10>Shares just turn positive, so investors are liking what you're saying.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 10>Let's talk about the other half of the business, and

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 10>that is delivery. You had to raise some fees in

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 10>some markets, you added multi store ordering. What more can

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 10>you do in delivery to keep this up?

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's a ton going on in delivery. There's obviously

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the core online food delivery business. Overall, delivery grew seventeen

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>percent on a year on your basis, and it's actually

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>accelerating emily, right, So it's accelerating versus Q two versus

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Q three, and it is about getting the basics right.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 2>The first thing is customers want choice.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We now have almost a million restaurants on our site

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on a global basis, up about ten percent.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But they also want reliability.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So when we measure the number of orders that we

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>get wrong, the number of orders we get wrong are

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>down twenty five percent on a year on your basis,

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>So the business is reliable. You get what you expect

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. And what that's resulting in is our audience

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is growing. Frequency is growing as well, and then as

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>eaters order more and more in a basket, actually basket

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>size is growing. So the growth that we see in

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>eats is.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Very, very broad.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>We're adding to it grocery, which is a segment that

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we're very excited about. You know, the grocery business is

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>actually bigger than the online food business than the food

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>business in terms of total size. Our grocery business is

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>still pretty young. It's about seven billion dollars now run

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>rate growing over forty percent, and we're very excited to

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>introduce the grocery experience to all of our eaters out there.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 10>Caroline just pointed out your stock just hit a new

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 10>record high. I got to talk about the Super Bowl commercials.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 10>I'm obsessed. You've got Ross and Rachel, You've got the Beckhams.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 6>These big stars cost money.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 10>Though, and you had a lot of celebrities last year too,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 10>So is this marketing spend paying off? And are you

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 10>sure because next year I'm expecting Taylor Swift.

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, you see it by the results.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, these big stars they cost a lot, but

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>they deliver a lot, right, And who's better than the

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Beckhams and Jennifer Aniston as well. You know, the amazing

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>thing about these stars is you know, they're not afraid

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of making a little fun of themselves and having a

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor, but they also use their own social

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>platforms to amplify the message out there. So it's not

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>just about the commercial. It's about people talking about the commercials.

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's about the stars using their Instagram accounts to amplify

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the platform, et cetera. That's why it's working out for us,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and we think it's worth investment and then.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 4>More and Dara, many times, these are global celebrities you

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 4>and a global company, even if the super Bowl is

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more US focused. How much you see

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 4>in growth, particularly Latin America Asia standout. Are there any

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 4>areas that you're worried about?

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, right now, fortunately, we're seeing growth across the globe

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for US in mobility, Latin America and Asia Pacific have

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>really been standouts. The Latin business is growing, the base

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>business is growing, but now a lat of time, what

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing is more two wheelers. Actually, it's a product

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we call Ubermoto. It's lower costs than much more affordable

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and so if you want a low cost ride in

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Brazil or Mexico, we're seeing more and more users take

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>two wheelers. And in Asia, we're very, very excited about

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Indian market. The Indian market has been one that

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>has always held a lot of promise, but we're seeing

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that promise come to fruition now there it's not just

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>four wheelers, but it's three wheelers. And the growth rates

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in India are substantial and we think

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know that business can continue to grow over

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the next.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Five to ten years.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of growth and excitement ahead in

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>many of the markets out there.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 4>A global conversation with our global TV and radio audience,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 4>we are of course speaking with Uber CEO Dara Kosashahi

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 4>and Dara I hate to be the Debbie downer that

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 4>focuses on the one area of perhaps lackluss and performance,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 4>but freight tell us a little bit about it was

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 4>in line with where the market wanted to see it,

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 4>but it is still a bit of a drag. When'd

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 4>you see the turnaround?

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the freight business is a cyclical business, and what

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing is at least a stabilization of the

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>overall freight industry. There was too much supply out there,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>demand wasn't growing. We're seeing a stabilization and rates. We're

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing spot rates improve as well, so I think that's

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>an early signal that the freight marketplace is going to improve.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>And what's really cool about Uber Freight is that we

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are using our marketplace technology, matching, pricing, etc. And bringing

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it to the freight industry. So we're very confident that

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a turn is coming. We don't know what when, but

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely seeing signal of that turn, and we can

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>bring our technology, prowess and the service levels that other

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>players who are just offline really we believe can't match.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're quite optimistic about freight, but it's a little

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of a waiting game to see that cycle turn,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're hoping to see that cycle turn this year.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 5>Dara, good morning, I think we kind of learned a

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 5>lot about Uber the technology company in the court have

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 5>just gone new products and just more diverse offering on mobility.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 5>But there are lots of questions about, well, what is

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 5>the new product pipeline going forward? You know, how can

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 5>you keep adding functionality to the platform that is new,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 5>opens new addressable markets. Car rental is interesting, right, because

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 5>that's an Industryalen's suffering some pain.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I think it's car rentals is one area

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're pretty excited about. And what we try to

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do with Uber is we don't want to just build

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that others have built, but let's say

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. We really try to reinvent how

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you think about a particular product. So one product that

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty excited about with car rentals is actually what

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we call Uber Valet. And with this product, you know,

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you push a button, you get to pick your car,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but then an Uber.

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Driver will come and drop off.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>That car for you in front of your house or

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever you want that car dropped off. So we want

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring that little Uber delight in whatever experiences that

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we build so that we're heads and shoulders above our competition.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So to speak.

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we do it in partnership with car rental companies,

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's good business for them. But it's the magic

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of Uber that we want to introduce in every single

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>out there, and we think there's plenty of innovation ahead

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for us.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm somebody that takes right share. There are other

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 5>right share platforms available to work every morning. But there

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 5>seems to be some evidence that that corporate ridership is

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 5>coming back. Where do you see that most.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, corporate has actually been a great signal for us

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>early this year, last year if you looked at corporate

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and we have a very significant corporate presence and what

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we call Uber for business and it allows companies instead

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of you know, black cars, et cetera, they can use Uber.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's connected into the corporate expense systems, et cetera. There's

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>an area of safety, which is you know exactly where

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>your employees are.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's been a very very popular offering for us.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And last year, you know, as corporates were more careful

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their spending travel, et cetera, the spending

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>with you for B was muted. We are now seeing,

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in Q four and so far in the first

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>quarter companies are starting to leaning in again. They're starting

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to invest, they're getting their employees out to go out

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to meet customers face to face, and that absolutely is

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>helping our you for B business that's starting to accelerate.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>It's high margin business. Usually with you for B you.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Know, you take a comfort car or black car, so

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's high margin businesses as well. And we're very very

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>happy with the signal that we're seeing, and that signal

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is pretty broad. It's not just the US phenomenon. We're

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing companies around the globe starting to invest again, which

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we think is a great sign.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I want to talk.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 10>About evs because there's you know, reports, consumer demand is following.

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 10>You're seeing big automakers pulling back, your own rental partner

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 10>hurts also putting back, pulling back. How much is this

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 10>hurting your partnership. You're pushed to zero emissions and everything

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 10>you're doing to try to incentivize drivers to switch over.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, Emily, we're continuing to push on the EV space.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>No one said this was going to be easy. And listen,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with every technology, there's this initial excitement and everyone gets

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on board and maybe maybe people overestimate the potential of

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a business or how it is going to be. You know,

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been around a uber for a while and we

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>actually love solving tough problems, so we continue to lean

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in with evs. We now have over one hundred and

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand drivers driving evs all over the world. Over

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the past years, we completed more than three hundred million

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>trips in terms of evs, So we continue to lean in.

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I think a real concern is with charging infrastructure and

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>making sure that that charging infrastructure is available and ready,

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>especially where our drivers need. It may not be in

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the center of the city, but it may be in

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the towns that.

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>They live, et cetera.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So if the charging infrastructure comes comes in, we think

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the partnerships in place. We're putting real money

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred million dollars behind our push to evs, including

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>subsidizing rides so drivers actually make more on an EV trip.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>So we're determined and we think we're going to keep

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>pushing the momentum in this space.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 10>You're shutting down Drizzly, you're laying off one hundred and

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 10>fifty people.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 6>What happened there?

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 10>Did alcohol sales just decline post pandemic?

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 6>Don't you know?

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 10>There's a super Bowl coming.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Up, so it's you know, listen.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a tough decision there, and what we have

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>observed is that the Uber Eats platform.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 2>We talk about the power of the platform, which is, you.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Know, you ride on Uber, you eat on Uber, you

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get growceries on Uber, you order your alcohol on Uber eats.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The power of that platform is really significant. And you know,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>things have changed where companies have to be more disciplined

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in their investments. And when we look at a marketing investment,

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>should we put the next marketing dollar behind Uber eats

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>ie a super Bowl commercial, or should we put that

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>next marketing dollar to introduce the Drizzly brand and to consumers,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it didn't make sense to keep investing in Drizzly, So

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we've taken a lot of what we've learned from Drizzly,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>many of the merchant relationships, et cetera. But essentially that

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>business is shutting down in terms of that organic Drizzly business,

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and we are building on alcohol within Uber eats. We

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's the next best investment going forward for.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 6>Us as a company cost discipline.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Uber CEO Darakrososhahi, I joyed to have you on the show.

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, and of course are thanks to you. Emily

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Chang now coming up. The head of Byte dances China

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 4>operations stepping down.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 6>More news coming out of China.

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, this is a blue meg technology time now

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 4>for talking tech. First up t SMC, the world's biggest

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>chip contract manufacturer and supplier to the likes of Apple

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 4>and Nvidio. Just January, sales rise after strong demand for

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 4>AI chips, and it helped off set the continued weakness

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 4>and consumer electronics products. Now revenue rose almost eight percent

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 4>last month six point nine billion dollars. The growth is

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 4>the later sign that a sector rebound could be on

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the horizon. Meanwhile, the head of Byte Dancer's China operations

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 4>is stepping down, just a week after the CEO, Liang

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Rubo said that the company needs to avoid complacency and

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 4>make up lost ground in the AI race. According to sources,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Byte Dance will not seek to appoint a successor and

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Zang will shift her focus to the video editing app

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 4>cap cut and then Ali Baba reported lower than expected

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 4>sales wellied down by a weaker performance and its core

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 4>domestic e commerce business from the company also approved, though

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 4>an increase of twenty five billion dollars to its share

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 4>re purchase program, and of course this is desperately trying

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 4>to add sort of build up investor confidence when they

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 4>can't do it with the proof of the pudding of

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 4>revenue increases that the market wanted to see. They therefore

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 4>have some of the big executive's buying shares and also

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 4>a being buy back to announce.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 5>I always think about Ali Barber as the nearest thing

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 5>to Amazon in China.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 5>It has a similar story e commerce and cloud. The

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 5>cloud's not growing, and they're doing all they can to

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 5>kind of sweeten things for investors the divvy or whatever, buybacks, whatever,

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 5>and the prospect of spinning off other units. But it

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 5>just comes back to the core business in China's economy.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 4>And isn't it just what you're hearing from byte Edance

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to not have complacency focusing in on particularly AI

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 4>as well. That's exactly where Ali Barba perhaps has been

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 4>falling behind. They've had issues, of course getting in video

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 4>products as well.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 6>And this while they're also.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Trying to fend off deep competition abroad and internally of

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 4>e commerce. I mean, they don't look like they're going

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 4>to sackfice profitability though, that's one key analyst takeaway.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and one of the cool things about ADRs or

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 5>US listed shares is it gives different market exposures to

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 5>that name, which is kind of interesting. Much more to

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 5>talk about quit check in on the markets and earnings

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 5>is kind of the big story. But as that one

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 5>hundred at the index level higher a percentage point, I

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 5>look at Tesla, it's now continuing to push higher. Later

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 5>in the show, Bloomberg's Dan a Hole on set to

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 5>explain the story. Were reported this morning that managers are

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 5>being asked to look at their staff and tell the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 5>company who is critical and who is not. The idea

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 5>layoffs might be coming. Roadblocks moving to the upside eight

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 5>percent astonishing record revenue in the quarter, And what they

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 5>said is that every single day in the quarter gone,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 5>seventy one point five million people logged on to play

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 5>through Roadblocks, which is a pretty astonishing performance for that platform.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 5>It is one of the big video games movers in

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 5>the moment right now. And then the other name is

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of Kindrel that we're looking at. I always find

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Kindrell very interesting. Remember we kind of introduced this name

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 5>to you at the time of its listing at the

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 5>end of last year, we're up two percent, most biggest

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 5>gain in around three months, at one point in the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 5>session when it was up six point two percent.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 6>It's a sales beat.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 5>And there is look at the performance gone and the

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 5>outlook carrow and the street likes what it.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 6>Sees it does.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 4>And we can speak to Kendril CEO. Now Martin schrote

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 4>about how after you've spun offrom My IBM in twenty

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 4>twenty one, the focus has been on getting rid of

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 4>zero margin or low profitability deals, re anchoring the way

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 4>the business is going. And yeah, it means revenue might

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 4>be lower for a bit, but we've still got a loss.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 4>But this seems to be progressed. Talk us through whether

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 4>it's turning around at the pace you want.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, thank you, Thank you for the opportunity to talk

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 11>a little bit about our quarter. Look, we had another

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 11>great quarter which continues now our string of strong execution

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 11>as we execute as you said well, Caro, and this

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 11>plan to remove content that really had no or even

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 11>negative margins in many instances. So while we're engineering the

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 11>decline in revenues, at the same time we are focused

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 11>on growth and in the quarter, again, we saw good

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 11>growth in our kindrel consult business, which was up fourteen

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 11>percent in the quarter and now fourteen percent for the

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 11>year as well. And we continue to see great growth

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 11>in our signings and our revenue that.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 8>We're delivering with our Hyperscaler partners.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 11>So where we're focused on growth, it's going well, and

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 11>where we're focused on engineering the decline, we'll be through

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 11>most of that at the end of this fiscal year,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 11>which for us ends in March.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 8>So it is moving at a very fast pace.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 11>And the reason it moves so fast is because our

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 11>customers really do rely on us for the help they

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 11>need in the secular trends that either represent opportunities or

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 11>represent risks to them, and that's where we sit in

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 11>the heart of their mission critical workloads.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 4>You just announce that you're, of course building that partnership

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 4>with Hyperscale is like Google Cloud, and I'm interested is

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 4>to ultimately where your clients want the most handholding. At

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 4>the moment, you've said in the past there's no recession

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 4>in cybersecurity. Evidently, with macro headwinds as they are, how

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 4>much our company is willing to purchase your expertise when

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 4>it comes to AI.

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 8>For example, Yeah, it's a great question.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 11>And look, remember where we sit in what we do

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 11>for our client We sit at the heart of mission critical.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 11>So much of our consulting is also around mission critical.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 11>And so while our customers are looking for help in

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 11>the newer things like jen AI, and we're certainly getting

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 11>a lot of a lot of activity with our customer

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 11>base to help them architect their data and to help

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 11>them think through resiliency as they move into that AI world.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 11>At the same time, you know, there are some really

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 11>basic security things that our customers need help with, and

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 11>so our consulting business is really driven by the same

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 11>the nature of the same nature of the work that

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 11>we do in mission critical. And obviously AI and JENAI

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 11>represent a really good long term secular trend as they

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 11>start to as they start to try to figure out

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 11>how do they reach their customers. But this work is

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 11>not is not again solely in these new areas. The

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 11>work is still primarily in the mission the mission critical

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 11>nature of what we do for them on a run basis.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Martin, Let's think about that in the text of a

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 5>case study that you outlined on your call partnership with

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 5>an unnamed global automaker, and you basically, I'm paraphrasing you

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 5>basically said, this isn't just about it. We're helping this

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 5>particular company in the manufacturing context. So I just wondered

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 5>if you'd explain how that works in practice.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 8>Sure.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 11>Sure, So when you think about the complexity that every

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 11>auto manufacturer is dealing with across their supply chain and

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 11>how you bring all of that together, you can imagine

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 11>the complexity of the IT infrastructure that has to bring

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 11>that together, including where is the data?

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 8>Is it secure? Can these systems.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 11>Run at the level of resiliency, because once you introduce

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 11>new complexity, obviously that has an impact or could have

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 11>an impact on it their resiliency and these lines can't

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:51.479
<v Speaker 11>shut down. So the coordination of their very complex supply

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 11>chains have to run on highly resilient, highly secure infrastructure.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 11>And as they go look as auto manufacturers and all

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 11>of our customers go look for new innovations to help

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 11>them do what they do, that just makes the whole

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 11>infrastructure even more complex and so they need.

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 5>Kindrel Martin, you spend a lot of time on the

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 5>call talking about cost savings, discipline, the work you've done.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 5>You know, we I reflect back to the conversation we've

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 5>had before that in March of last year, you trimmed

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 5>a small percentage of a really big workforce ninety thousand

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 5>people at that time.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 6>How do you see that playing out this year?

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Caroline and I have been covering, unfortunately layoffs across the

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 5>technology sector on an almost daily basis at the moment.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, look for us, you know, we were born with

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 11>eighty plus thousand employees over two years ago. We did

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 11>peek up a little bit, and when last we spoke,

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 11>it was about ninety and.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 8>We're still in the eighties.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 11>And the reason we're still in the eighties is because

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 11>our focus on delivery and what we call our advanced

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 11>delivery efforts has led to tremendous quality improvements for our customers.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 8>They're seeing it. But at the same time, it.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 11>Allows us to free up people and move them into

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 11>these new areas, so that we are actively reskilling our

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 11>employees and moving them into being cloud experts, for instance,

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 11>moving them into being cybersecurity experts, etc. So when we

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 11>were born a little bit over two years ago, we

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 11>had fewer than a thousand credentialed people across the entire

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 11>employee base fewer than a thousand who were certified and

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 11>credentialed on a Hyperscaler. We now have over thirty five thousand,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 11>and that's what's driving the growth. For instance, whether our

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 11>Hyperscaler partners, that's what's driving the growth with our consult

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 11>business as well. We have the people, the best engineering

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 11>talent who know these customers so well well.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 8>So our customers are.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 11>Delighted that yes, they're getting better quality because we're using

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 11>our AI through our platforms, but they're also getting back

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 11>the same people they trust and have known for years

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 11>to help them in these new areas. It's a really

0:27:58.680 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 11>terrific model for us.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Kindrell CEO Martin Schrotzer. Great to catch up here on

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Technology. Thanks for your time.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Coming up on the show.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 5>Could Tesla be the next company to undergo a way

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 5>of layoffs? We have Bloomberg's Dana Hole here in studio,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 5>an important report that.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 6>We put out this morning. That's next. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Tesla staff are bracing for potential job cuts after managers

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 5>were asked to affirm whether each of their employees that

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 5>worked under them is in a position that is critical.

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 5>I want to bring in Bloomberg's Danna Hole, who reported

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 5>this with me this morning. So what we kind of

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 5>heard from sources is it's performance review week and managers

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 5>are saying or being asked to look at everyone that

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 5>works or reports into them and decide, I guess who

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 5>stays and who goes.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's the fear. I mean, we don't know that

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 12>for sure, but what we've heard, I mean, I think

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 12>you and I have heard from different people, is that

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 12>performance evaluations happened, and then what I heard was that

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 12>they were reopened and there was one new question, is

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 12>this employee's role critical? And that's like basically you need

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 12>to just and then the managers need to justify that job.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 12>So that is definitely worrying. You know, Tesla so far

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 12>has avoided the layoffs out of Rock Silicon Valley. We

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 12>don't know whether this is sort of a culling based

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 12>on performance or whether widespread layoffs or in the offering.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 5>What I would reflect on is that this is kind

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 5>of normal, both in the sense that Tesla's looking for

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 5>cost savings everywhere, but it's kind of played out in

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 5>the past. And I know that I've heard from sources, like,

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 5>for example, when we reported on the Autopilot trims last

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 5>year that headcount was moved elsewhere.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 6>To like batteries for example. What is the aim here

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 6>for me Elon Musk and co.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 12>Do you think, well, I think that Tesla's still aggressively

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 12>hiring in a lot of areas. If you look at

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 12>their website, they have tons of openings for optimists, for Dojo,

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 12>for megapack, for you know, payment systems. I mean, there's

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 12>a lot of job openings at Tesla. So they are

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 12>still aggressively hiring. So this could be an effort to

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 12>just kind of reduce headcount in some places where they

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 12>feel like it's no longer necessary so that they can

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 12>afford to hire elsewhere.

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 4>And Danna, like say a Goldman Sachs, they're trying to

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 4>put forward the idea that you'll constantly be reviewed. If

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 4>you're underperforming, you might well be let go. And I

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 4>guess this is a way of ascertaining whether you are

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 4>or not. And I just wonder how it speaks though,

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 4>to the fact that we are seeing such pressure on

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Tesla from an evy demand perspective, Will it automatically be

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 4>in the manufacturing areas that you think these jobs ultimately

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 4>have to be sacrificed.

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 12>It's hard to say where the cuts, if they happen,

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 12>would be. I mean, but I think that you're right.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 12>Like Tesla regularly, you know, they go through a performance

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 12>review cycle every six months, and you know in Silicon

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 12>Valley it's called stack ranking or ranking yank to be

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 12>coarse about it, and I think that this just really

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 12>keeps everybody on their toes. You always want to be

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 12>a higher performer. There's always concern if you're needing to

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 12>justify staff. I mean, I think that Tesla has grown

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 12>dramatically since twenty twenty during the pandemic.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 6>They now have over one.

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 12>Hundred and forty thousand employees globally, and they will continue

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 12>to hire in the areas of the company that Elon

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 12>Musk really wants to sort of staff up.

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 6>But like any company, you.

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 12>Know, when you're kind of facing a down year in

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 12>terms of growth, you start cutting and salaries as the way.

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 6>To do that, and must talk it's about the rate environment.

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 5>Again, when we played our ownings Bingo, which I thoroughly enjoyed,

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 5>that I always find that astonishing one hundred and forty

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 5>thousand people. If there's a big bright spot it's probably

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 5>the energy business because what they said was it will

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 5>just outpace the car business in terms of growth.

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.959
<v Speaker 6>What else do we know about what's going on with energy?

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So Tesla has this big factory in Laythrop, which

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 12>is here in California. It's sort of a little bit

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 12>outside of the Bay Area and what we call the

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 12>Central Valley, and that is where they are building the Megapax.

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 12>We also have heard that they are expanding megapac production

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 12>in Shanghai. And these are the big batteries that Tesla

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 12>sells to utility is like PG and E and it

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 12>is a huge growth driver for the energy business. Like

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 12>forget about the solar roof, Megapak is the big driver

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 12>of the growth there.

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Danaha, always a joy, great reporting from you both on

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 4>this key story. We thank you so much. But let's

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 4>for a moment now turn to another one of Musk

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 4>companies x Now. This is after Tucker Carlson has announced

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 4>on the social media platform then he has interviewed Russia's

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 4>leader Vladimir Putin. He also gave a shout out to

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk, who he says is going to allow the

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 4>full interview to be published on x Let's bring in

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Bilimos Kurt Wagner, for one, on this, the context being

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 4>that he is the first US journalist to do a

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 4>significant sit down since war erupted back in twenty twenty two,

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 4>and notably, Putin has fought back against critical journalism in particular,

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 4>and in fact has a key Wall Street Journal reporter

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 4>incarcerated at the moment. Now, give us the context of

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 4>what this makes advertisers feel like.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, obviously there are a lot of advertisers who

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 13>would be very reluctant to see their brand show up

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 13>anywhere near this interview right. But I also think that

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 13>a lot of advertisers who are uncomfortable with that are

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 13>probably no longer on X. I think a lot of

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 13>the people who are still spending money on X have

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 13>pretty thick skin when it comes to what they expect

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 13>or imagine that their marketing is going to appear next

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 13>to right.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 9>And so I'm not sure that we're necessarily going to.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 13>See a new wave of people rushing in the other direction,

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 13>mostly because a lot of those people are already.

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 4>On And this speaks, of course to the ultimate aim

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 4>that we've always been told from Musk about X is

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 4>for freedom of speech. In all its entireties. So tell

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 4>us a little bit about how ultimately the deals with

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 4>the likes of Tucker Carlson are going getting on very

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 4>people who tracked a big crowd to come and ultimately

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 4>have shows on the platform.

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, you know, I was really interested in this about

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 13>a month ago, right after CEES, when X announced that

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 13>they were going to be doing, you know, these new shows.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 13>Don Lemon of course, was another one who they were

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 13>going to bring on, and you know, I spoke to

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 13>four media agencies, you know, after the announcement was made,

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 13>and all of them basically said the same thing that

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 13>these shows aren't really going to move the needle. Now,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 13>if you're a big brand looking to spend money on X,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 13>it might be nice to have sort of a something

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 13>that at least is professionally produced that you can you know,

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 13>run your video ad next to.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 9>But until X gets you know, a.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 13>Much larger collection of these types of shows with much

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 13>more and less controversial hosts. Quite frankly, I'm not sure

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 13>that this is the kind of thing that's going to

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 13>draw advertisers back. And again, I don't think they're running

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 13>the other way because those folks are already gone. But

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 13>I don't think this is necessarily big enough that it's

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 13>going to you know, lure people back who have been

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 13>reluctant to spend money on X.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 5>To begin with, there's a lot happening in the social

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 5>media space in real time, Kurt. You reported that Jack

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 5>Dorsey's Blue Sky, the decentralized social media platform, is now

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 5>opened up to everyone.

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Why is that significant?

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 13>Well, blue Sky, as you both probably know, has emerged

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 13>as sort of one of the main alternatives to X

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 13>ever since Elon Musk took over, and you know, there's

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 13>a bunch of technical reasons that people are excited about it.

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 13>You know, this decentralized element is idealistic, I think, But

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.919
<v Speaker 13>for the most part, this is simply a place where

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 13>people who used to love Twitter but no longer feel

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 13>you know, comfortable using X have been going. And so

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 13>the fact that they're sort of opening this up to everybody,

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 13>you know, perhaps that will kind of expedite the growth

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 13>of Blue Sky. But you know, again, we're looking at threads,

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 13>we're looking at Blue Sky. You might even remember massed

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 13>on These were you know, essentially ex alternatives, and so

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 13>it's just always interesting to keep tabs on what they're doing,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 13>and whether or not they're still growing and capturing people

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 13>who are running away from X.

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 6>Your your book on X is imminent or your book

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 6>on Twitter? I mean.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 5>With you, so much has changed in real time. We

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 5>were teasing Jason Stride other day about how you to

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 5>rewrite the last graph of his book based on what

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 5>happened with Blizzard. But something you just said, blue Sky

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 5>is the alternative to X. Where do you think X

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 5>sits in the landscape right now? Meta, Facebook, Snap, Instagram reels,

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 5>things like that.

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 13>Sure, you know, I still feel like it's a good

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 13>place to go for certain types of news.

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 9>Right I'm a big sports fan.

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 13>I still think that X is probably the best place

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 13>to go when you want to figure out, Hey, what's

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 13>going on with my favorite team, what's going on in

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 13>the NFL playoffs. But there's a bunch of other categories

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 13>of news that I think that X used to sort

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 13>of be the go to place for where it's no

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 13>longer that or it's certainly not as reliable as it

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 13>used to be. And I think there's a bunch of

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 13>reasons for that, the most notable probably being the change

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 13>in verification right and sort of eliminating this ability to

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 13>quickly identify who legitimate journalists are versus folks who might

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 13>you know, not be doing that professionally.

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 9>And to me, I think that's the company when it

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 9>comes to news.

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 13>But obviously Elon would disagree, And you know, for that reason,

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 13>I feel like Ex's sort of fallen out of the

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 13>position that it had over news, over you know, Instagram,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 13>Facebook and others a few years ago.

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bloombers, Kot Wagner and everything on the social

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 5>media beat, we thank you very much.

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Ral Leo Messi is in seemingly the hot seat after

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 4>taking part in a football match or soccer as we

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 4>call it in Japan, just days after not appearing in

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 4>a match in Hong Kong now Hong Kong. Sports rulemaker

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 4>Kenneth Fox comments accused Messi I'm the US club into

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Miami of disrespecting fans, and that was trending on wabo,

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 4>along with another popular topic partly entitled Messi's mess ed.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 5>It's an astonishing situation, Messi finds himself and let's stick

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 5>with sports and bring in US media and list for

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg intelligent Geita Ang and Nathan to unpack what was

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 5>an interesting deal last night ESPN, Fox and Warner Brothers

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 5>join forces and they're going to launch what is a

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 5>sports focused streaming service.

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of that? GETA? I mean that

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 6>is that's a move.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 3>It definitely is a bold move I think aired by

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 3>these big media companies to kind of really in many ways,

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, control their own future, right, kind of control

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 3>their own destiny as we kind of move to the

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 3>streaming world. Because you know, we always know that they've

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 3>been in charge of content production, but this kind of

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 3>really gives them a hold of content distribution as well

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>as more and more people cut the cord.

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 4>What's so interesting, particularly for Disney, is they say, look,

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 4>we're still going to go along with our own ESPN

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 4>offering an app, whether that's camealization or not. They just

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 4>want to be there as much as they can. Also,

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 4>ahead of Nelson Peltz's own white paper where he wanted

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 4>basically ESPN to be sold off or a partnered with

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 4>a Netflix. Who loses through this? Is it Netflix? Amazon?

0:38:57.880 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 8>Is it?

0:38:58.320 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, the legacy ones aren't involved.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think necessarily in Netflix and Amazon will lose,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 3>So this I think it's really more a defensive move

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 3>by the big media companies to make sure that they're

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 3>actually at the table. We know that big tech has

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 3>been really, really aggressive and it comes to bidding for

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>all of these sports. Right you look at Amazon with

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Thursday Night Football, You look at Netflix with that big

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollar WWE deal. You know Apple kind of

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 3>doing things with MLS MLB. So you know, obviously big

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 3>media knows that there are going to be a lot

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 3>of these sports rights that come up for renewal. And

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>we know that NBA and some of these leagues are

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 3>looking for huge increases, I mean triple the fees in

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 3>some of the cases. So they definitely want to shore

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 3>up their resources and kind of be at the table.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 3>So I very much look at this as a defensive move.

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think necessarily that anybody else loses out, at

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 3>least the big tech companies.

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 5>This is the battle for those that can't remember their passwords.

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 6>Right, it's already hard.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 5>I got a paramount plus for Champions League football, I

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 5>got Peacock for Premier League. I'm watching the FA Cup

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 5>on ESPN. Look, there are too many platforms, Skeeter, it's hard.

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't remember how.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 6>To log in.

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 3>You're absolutely right, ed. I mean that we do need

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 3>a comprehensive bundle, and I mean this is going to

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 3>We're coming full circle here. I think we are going

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 3>to go back to some form of, you know, a bundle.

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:17.919
<v Speaker 3>I think this is the first step in that, having

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of the skinny sports bundle. Of course, you're right,

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>we don't have paramount content, we don't have NBC content,

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 3>we don't have so many of the other regional sports.

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Networks, so we will need all of that.

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 3>But I think this is definitely a good first step.

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 6>Get the guy a one pass, get the guy a

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 6>last pass.

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 5>That's the way.

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Who you remember a pass? Whereas we thank you so much.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 4>US media analyst Bloomberg Intelligence keth Ranganavan, always great to

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.959
<v Speaker 4>get her expertise defensive rather than offensive at the moment.

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 4>We look ahead, of course, to Disney's earnings a little

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 4>bit later this week. But that does it for this

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 4>addition of Bloomberg technology ed.

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 5>By the way, shout out two stage encryption authentication. You know,

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 5>I can log in, say see places Mega Show recapital

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 5>on the podcast we're posting to all the places you'd expect.

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Apple's spot of iHeart and of course on the Bloomberg

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 5>platforms as well, and we really appreciate all the feedback

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 5>that Karen I've been getting about those of you that

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 5>are taken on the show and the podcast. My goodness,

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 5>we're three days in. Are we to what's been an

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 5>incredible week? From New York City with Carrol and San

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 5>Francisco with me? This is Bloomberg Technology