WEBVTT - Fed Decision and Price Pressures

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 2>Glenn Cubboard had the privilege of stunding under Benjamin Friedman,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>who took our economics and our society and pieced it together.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Glenn Hubbard definitive at Columbia Business School, his public service

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to the nation as well. I was watching King Charles

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Third Glen Hubbard yesterday and you could feel the calm

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>come across Republicans and Democrats. You are affiliated with a

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Republican tendency. What does that Congress that we saw yesterday

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and the Republicans, what do they look like after Trump?

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think from the King's remarks, you know, good

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 3>policy runs deep. I think the King was calling for

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 3>a return to openness in markets, in trade, in tolerance.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>I think all those things have been a hallmark of conservatism.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I think there's also a real opportunity to pivot while

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>President Trump is here, of course, to growth, to opportunity

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 3>and to full participation in the economy.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>The anger that's out there says that many people are

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 2>not enjoying growth. How do we pull them into growth?

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, first, we've got to get growth itself up, and

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>that's going to require some things that might be controversial

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 3>right now. More spending on research, more high skilled immigration,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>a better policy toward AI and electricity generation. We need

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>all of those things. To get more people into growth

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 3>requires much more investment in people, better training, better resources,

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and better working with companies to do that.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Lazar has been brilliant enough. Paul in market economics.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Professor, the war in the Middle East, it's obviously a

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 4>wreaking havoc on a lot of economic parts of the

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 4>economy here, most notably in the energy markets. Is it

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 4>to the point where you're concerned about its impact on

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 4>global economic growth? Is a recession something that that could

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 4>result from kind of this instability we're seeing.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, it certainly could, but I don't think it's the

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>likeliest outcome. Remember, the United States in particular is much

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 3>less energy intensive than in previous shocks. I think what's

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>more likely is a slowdown in growth combined with inflation

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 3>being uncomfortably stuck, which is one of the problems the FED.

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Of course we'll have to deal with today.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 4>What do you expect from the FED today? And then

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 4>I guess, just as importantly from the new Federal Reserve

0:02:58.200 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 4>Chairman Kevin warsh.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't expect any change in the funds rate today.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 3>It'll be interesting to see if there's any change in

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the language in the FOMSC statement. I think incoming chairwash

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 3>has been pretty clear he wants to look at all

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 3>of the data. He has a very clear story about

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>AI going forward. The time path there though maybe a challenge.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't expect a lot of rate cuts from the

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>FED in the very near term, even under a worsh

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 3>FED chair.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>So if the growth story may be slowing, I guess

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 4>probably maybe the bigger concern for the marketplace is just

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 4>inflation out there. Again, we're looking at the cost of energy,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 4>whether it's gasoline or diesel fuel or jet fuel. And

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 4>again not as big an issue here as it is

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 4>in other parts of the world, but that's going to

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>be a concern.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but it's more than that. I remember inflation was

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 3>a problem before February twenty eighth. Inflation was well above

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the Fed's target and appeared to be stuck. The energy

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>prices may be more of a one off, But the really,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 3>as many beneficials have commented, is do expectations become unhinged? So, yes,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>inflation is a real problem.

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Is we excidout at Glenn Hubbert? Can I do an audible?

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Let it right, Glenn. I don't think you've gotten nearly

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the credit with Lee Bollinger of the miracle rot at

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the Columbia Business School Rocket, What was it like the

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>first meetings where you had a vision to blow it up?

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 2>And by why? To claim Colombia is the juggernaut that

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 2>you and others developed is unparalleled across this nation. How

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 2>did that happen?

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, it happened with a lot of people. And first,

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to give a lot of credit to be Bolinger. Actually,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 3>his vision for this campus was a big part of it.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>But it's really a story about the business community, about alumni,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 3>about students, about faculty. It's always been a great school

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's come together. I'm very proud of it.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, did you like have lunch with David Geffen

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and say, David, we've got to do this. No?

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 3>No, He's been very generous to the school.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Glenn Aulberd, thank you so much. And all I

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 2>can say, did you hire did you bring Abby Joseph

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Cohen over from Goldacs? Is that your fault? That's my blessing.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 2>That's wonderful, Glenn Albert, thank you so much, and seriously

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>congratulations for those of you across this nation and worldwide

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>what the Bolinger Combine at Columbia University did with their

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>business school. It's called Manhattanville. Yeah, new buildings. It's right

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>in the Hudson River.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Half of Global Wall Street, I think came out of

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 4>the Columbia.

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 2>Henry Kravis stepped up on this along with mister Geffen

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and others, and they brought in Abby Joseph Cohen and

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>we looked sord of speaking to from time to time.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Glenn Hubbard. There, stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>coming up after this.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Joint Auto with the Bloomberg Business Up,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>We are so gifted, folks. Got a great conversation today,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Sea Micheawe. Glenn Hubbard, the giant of Colombian supply side economics,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 2>will be with He hates when I say that. Probably

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 2>in the car right now, I saying, turn a limo around.

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Michael Ball will be with us. Has been on fire.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Cleveland an ain't dollars a gallon gas in LA.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna go narrow now. Libby Cantrell's like, what's the

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Fed gonna do? What are the Democrats gonna do? You

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>weren't at the steak dinner last night. I was not

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>at the same. Okay, I thought you were shortlisted as well.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it was.

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 4>I didn't review the list.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh did you some notable folks there or something? Yeah,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>well it's the way. They weren't in a ballroom. No,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>they were not. Lebby. I want to go wicked narrow ready,

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>folks three two one. Jacob javetts In nineteen seventy two,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>the world was blowing up in in nineteen seventy three, Watergate, Vietnam,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox were terrible. All of it came together

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 2>and the answer is Jacob Javits and a few others

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>said we need to bring back our power the War

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Powers Act? How will that play out May one and beyond.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so this is going to be the big question

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 6>for particular for Republicans. Republicans, of course, have effectively greenlighted

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 6>this conflict in Iran. Publicly, they've supported and endorsed President

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Trump mostly unequivocally. I think privately there's been more skepticism

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 6>and I think there is more growing ambivalence about this

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 6>conflict in terms of what are the strategic objectives, what

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 6>is the endgame? And there will be a vote in Congress,

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 6>and that is because the War Powers Act, it's a

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 6>sixty day requirement per this law that when the president

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 6>has deployed troops that Congress ultimately needs to vote on it. Now,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 6>there's a thirty day grace period, which most likely the

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 6>president will use that option, if you will, So that

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 6>means that vote will be at the end of May.

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 6>But I think push comes a shove. Congress is actually

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 6>gone to go on the record on this. The other

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 6>one important point here is there's going to be a

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 6>big supplemental request that is different from the one and

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 6>a half trillion dollar budget requests that's for next year.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 6>The two hundred billion dollars supplemental requests. We haven't gotten

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 6>any details of it. We've just sort of had, you know,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 6>there's been kind of trial balloons or what have you.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 6>But that is the other kind of forcing issue, and

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 6>I would say that's probably more important than the War

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 6>Powers Act, which is like more symbolic. But really when

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.559
<v Speaker 6>kind of the rubber meets the road, so to speak,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 6>is going to be in that funding bill, and I

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 6>think some Republicans will probably support it, but I think

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 6>there's gonna be much more pushback and you'll see that

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 6>probably with Secretary Hegseth.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that funding bill that two hundred million dollars is

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 4>that have implications for the wars. Some of that two

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 4>hundred million earmarked for the warner in So therefore, if

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 4>you your vote on that will be kind of your

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>vote on the war.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 6>Yes, And I think that they're I mean, you know,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure the White House will characterize this as just

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 6>trying to restock these depleted ammunitions, and I do think

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 6>that's pretty shocking. Any the American public is sort of

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 6>surprised that we actually don't have this sort of arsenal

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 6>of munitions, and of course we've depleted those through into

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 6>both through Ukraine and through Iran. So I think they'll

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 6>probably characterize this as just trying for preparedness against China

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 6>and what have you. But push comes to schev I

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 6>think this probably will be at least in part, a

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 6>referendum on the Iranian conflict. And I mean two hundred

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 6>million dollars, it's a lot of money. I mean, this

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 6>is not for nothing, even for Washington. I mean these

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 6>one we're kind of a neure to these these numbers.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 6>But it's a.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Lot politics here.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Does the president not really care about politics and the

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 4>fact that it is a mid term election year because

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 4>tariffs don't pull well, the war in Iran is not

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 4>polling well. I would think a lot of Republicans facing

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 4>a race this year would be kind of nervous.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And I think what we've been saying to our

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 6>clients from the beginning of Trump two point zero is

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 6>president Trump if you compare him to one point zero,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 6>where he was really focused on the approval ratings and

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 6>of you know, Republicans, you know, keeping the House, which

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 6>of course they did not in twenty eighteen. This is different, right.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 6>He has a sense of urgency, has his view of

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 6>unfinished business. I think Iran, tariffs, Venezuela all kind of

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 6>fit within that framework. So does he care about Republicans? Yes,

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 6>does he want to keep the House, of course, I

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 6>mean everyone likes power and Washington. However, I do think

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 6>he has his eye on this sort of bigger, more

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 6>symbolic legacy making issues.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I watch every minute I hit the blue button, the

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Detroit Ryons blue Button Lebby Cantrell. I watched every minute

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>of the King's speech yesterday, not the movie, the actual speech.

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>And in the back when you were in the house,

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>were you one of those young interests?

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 6>I was, yes, I usually wasn't on the house floor,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 6>but were young.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 5>I know they're very young.

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>What do they do?

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 6>Congress, by the way, is run by a bunch of

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 6>twenty year olds, so it seems that way. It's because

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 6>it is now. They're smart twenty year olds. But well,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 6>those those may be pages, you know, and they're they're

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 6>they're bringing documents, they're bringing coffee to the coffee and peach.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, these are, but these.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 6>Are important jobs, Tom.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>People need to get me to the Capitol grill and

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I want a medium where don't bring in needed.

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 6>To be sustained one thing on that that speech, if

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 6>I may please, I thought it was really important and

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 6>interesting that members of Congress applauded when he talked about NATO.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 6>And the reason why I think a lot of a

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of our clients don't appreciate this is Congress has

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 6>the final vote on a withdrawal from NATO. That was

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Secretary then Senator Rubio's kind of last gasp. He actually

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 6>passed the bill Biden passed into Senate and to start

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 6>into a lot about the Congress needs to authorize NATO withdrawal.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 6>And so I think that was important that they all

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 6>clapped when he talked about the importance.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>And you missed it. I mentioned this earlier, folks, and

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 2>I will say it again. And I think Liby Will

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 2>you were in the Bentley on her way over. Yeah,

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of course she was tuned the you know Yankees baseball

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>or Broncos radio on sirious way and then Libya I

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 2>just said, you have to listen to this speech from

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>another time and place, and you could feel the room relaxed,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>all parties, everybody just for a moment relaxed. Don't know

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>what it means, but there it was.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 6>I think it was the most unified Congress has been

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 6>since the beginning of this Congress, right and twenty twenty five.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 6>So it is it's at of ironic that became.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I need you bet May six, May seven, May eight,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 2>as we go past the word powers that let me

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>cantrell definitive at pimcos. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Surveillance coming up after this.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US Live

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>We haven't talked about gold and ages with State s

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Treed Investment Management. Alkharstochi joins US now head of Gold Strategy.

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Just as simple as I can. What are the Chinese doing?

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 7>The Chinese are buying gold as the West was unwinding

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 7>holdings in March. Chinese investors continue to have inflows. The

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 7>PBOC People's Bank of China continued to buy and add

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 7>to their gold reserves, and you saw bar and coin

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 7>demand actually spike up in China.

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Buy it. Do they go down to Singapore? They hang

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>out at the raffles hotel over the Fullerton and yeah,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 2>I'll take that.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 7>So they buy it in the onshore market, and there's

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 7>been an incentive to export gold from the rest of

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.239
<v Speaker 7>the world into mainland China like they're galleons.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>It's like the Spanish from Batavia are there like boats

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 2>carrying gold. There are boats carrying gold.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 7>Some comes by airplane as well, and most of it

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 7>clears in the Shanghai Gold Exchange and that market has

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 7>been at a premium to London for the last several weeks,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 7>and I think that shows that there's very strong local

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 7>demand for gold, even as Western investors were taking some

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 7>profits and liquidating some holdings over the last month or

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 7>so since they're on conflicts started.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 4>Why is the Bank of China buying gold.

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 7>I think it's part of a long term, medium term

0:13:54.440 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 7>trend of de dollarization, reserve diversification and really using gold

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 7>old as as a hedge against potential US sanctions policy

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 7>and geopolitical fragmentation, a trend I expect to continue over

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 7>the medium term.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 4>So it's not so much an investment for them, but

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 4>it has maybe geopolitical bearings to it as well.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 7>Sure gold can't be sanctioned if it's held in physical form.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't actually have any credit risk. It's a bearer asset.

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Tom.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 7>If we go back to bearer bonds and from the

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 7>nineteen eighties, you could.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Just go.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>There's three thousand people, look at your next I'm the

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>only one that clip Cooper.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 4>So what's the call here as to the fundamentals of gold?

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 4>How do we think about golden? I know it's a commodity,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 4>but is it expensive? Is it not expensive? Should I?

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Is there value?

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 4>How did gold investors think about that?

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 7>The SMP five hundred was at levels we were a

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 7>year ago in April of twenty twenty five, then I would.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Say gold is relatively rich.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 7>But at seven thousand, as INP five hundred, I think

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 7>gold at forty five hundred still provides you that left tail,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 7>low volatility reserve asset feel From that standpoint, what's been

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 7>a headwind into quarter end of one Q has been

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 7>higher real yields.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 2>This war impact has.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 7>Changed fed pricing. If you look right before the war

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 7>started at the end of February, we were looking at

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 7>fifty eight basis points of cumulative easing for twenty twenty six.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 7>At one point in March, the third week of March.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 7>I think we were looking at the fifty to fifty

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 7>potential of a hike. Now we're at a FED that's

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 7>on hold for longer. I think the key for gold

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 7>here is the FED can be on hold so long

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 7>as they're going to cut, gold will do okay. Remember

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 7>last year in twenty twenty five, FED was on hold

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 7>for nine months, gold returned forty three percent. So it's

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of a push and pull friction what's

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 7>happening right now. Arguably, I think the war enhances the

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 7>case long term for gold because it's adding to debt

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 7>and deficits. The war spending higher yields will add to

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 7>interest costs for governments around the world. And then I

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 7>think on the geopolitical fragmentation point, this can increase the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 7>risk that emerging market central banks will further want to

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 7>diversify reserves with.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>What does the cultural overlay of the Eastern Mediterranean and

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>down to the Middle East of gold given conflict, given war.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 7>It tends to be quite strong In the East. Gold

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 7>is seen as a store of wealth, it's not just

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 7>a risk off asset. So if GDP is rising, if

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 7>wealth is rising, if consumers are and demographic shifts are

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 7>occurring that are positive. That tends to be positive for

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 7>gold demand. It's not just a risk off story out

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 7>in the East.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 2>What's your interpretation, I mean, I know gold' you're remat,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>but what's your interpretation of the distillate markets? Are we

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>getting visible and clear pricing on all the different oil derivatives?

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, that is something that has to be closely

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 7>monitored because as high as oil prices have been, product

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 7>prices have scorched even higher. I think we're in a

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 7>risky regime where twenty twenty six is looking analogous to

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty two. I'm surprised equity markets have been this

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 7>strong so far. And how the evolution of oil prices go,

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 7>we'll have a transmission mechanism to other asset markets, particularly

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 7>gold as well through the Fed and dollar channel.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Real needed this a custos. You thank you so much

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 2>for State Street Investment Management. They're on gold again. Is

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>note is absolutely brilliant, Really terse. Look for that from

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 2>State Street Investment Management as we protect their copyright. Stay

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US live

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Suzanne Maloney absolutely definitive at Workings Institute and Foreign Affairs

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Magazine of piecing together where we are in this war? Suzanne,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>what is your uncertainty this morning? And your uncertainty after

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a presidential tweet at four am that frankly could have

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 2>been out of Mad magazine from my childhood.

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, I think we're in a very unpredictable

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 5>situation right now. The President and the Iranians appear to

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 5>be in a standoff around who can last longer under

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 5>severe economic pressure. The President is determined to maintain the

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 5>blockade on Iran, preventing them from exporting and earning revenues

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 5>from their oil production, which is the primary source of

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 5>support for the regime and for the country as a whole.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 5>The Uans are determined to maintain their choke hold on

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 5>the straight of hormones, which we'll have catastrophic implications over time.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Nowers for oil price, but for the larger global economy.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Susan, your heritage, I'm going to editorialize is realist foreign

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 2>policy of Robert Gates. It's a big new Brazinski and others.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Do we have a theory right now a foreign policy?

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Are we realist? Are we something else? I don't know?

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Are we just making it up by tweet?

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 5>I think the America First ideology has morphed over time

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 5>under President Trump's first and second terms. At this point,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 5>it is highly militaristic. It is very much forced first

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 5>as a means of asserting American interests around the world,

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 5>and it is very disinterested in the traditional reliance on

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 5>allies and partners that has been the key to the

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 5>extension of American influence, as well as the broader prosperity

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 5>and piece that we've had in the post World War

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 5>two era Susanne.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Do we actually know who is running Iran right now?

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 4>And whoever that is, is that a group that can

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 4>really negotiate on behalf of the country.

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 5>I think we have a decent sense of the most

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 5>important figures within the regime. They're largely drawn from the

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Revolutionary Guard, but of course we believe that Mosch Tabahameny,

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 5>the son of the late Supreme Leader who was killed

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 5>on the first day of the war and then elevated

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 5>to his father's position, is still alive and is still

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 5>helping to shape decision making. This is very much a

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 5>system now that is driven by hardliners who have been

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 5>at the forefront of Iran's most damaging and violent policies

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 5>over the course of the past forty seven years. And

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 5>they're not individuals who are particularly prone to compromise or

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 5>to reconciliation with the United States or Israel.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 4>So President Trump portrays the leadership in Iran is in

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 4>flux failing. Maybe is that accurate?

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think? Again?

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 4>It just kind of goes to the question of ken

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the United States negotiate in good faith with whomever is there.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Look, Iran has always had a kind of diversity of

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 5>factions within a system and really bociferous debates about both

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 5>its foreign policy and its domestic policy. That isn't new,

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 5>and it's not surprising that in the aftermath of the

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 5>elimination of the senior echelons of the clergy as well

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 5>as the security of bureaucracy, that we're seeing at least

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 5>some questions about how decisions are being made in different positions.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that that is fundamentally, it makes it

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 5>impossible for us to negotiate with Iran. It has always

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 5>been complicated, It has always required a high degree of

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 5>focus and patients from the international community to achieve any

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 5>clear outcomes with Iran. I think the challenge that we

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 5>face is not the internal politics, but the sense within

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 5>the regime that they have the upper hand and the

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 5>time is on their side.

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Suzanne Maloney with US Folks a definitive on this study

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 2>of the Eastern Mediterranean and Levon. She's a Brookings Institution

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 2>and of course writing for foreign policy as well as

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>foreign Affairs, I should say, which I can't say enough

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 2>about Suzanne. Long ago and far away, you were actually

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>in Tehran. Did you ever take a bus like the

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>four hour bus south from Tehran to Istefan? Did you

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 2>do that as a kid?

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 5>I visited Isbahan several times when I was studying in

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 5>Iran in the late nineteen nineties. I actually flew with

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 5>the flights were very inexpensive at that time and very convenient.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Isfahan is a phenomenally beautiful historic city, but it is

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 5>obviously proximate to some of the most important nuclear lights

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 5>in the system.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 2>What's the number one thing we get wrong in our

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 2>perception of the road from Tehran to Istefan.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 5>I think the fundamental issue that we have is recognizing

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 5>that this is a regime that has staked its existence

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 5>on maintaining some kind of a nuclear infrastructure. They have

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 5>fought for that. They have suffered enormous trillions of dollars

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 5>of damage and sanctions and lost opportunities as a result

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 5>of their determination to maintain that. The President walked away

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 5>from the nuclear deal in twenty eighteen. There were lots

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 5>of critics of that deal, but it is very hard

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 5>to reconstitute any kind of an agreement given all that

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 5>has happened in the in the interim. So this is

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 5>a challenge. The US wants a quick fix, a quick deal,

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 5>a quick end to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 5>The Iranians are going to try to continue to maintain

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 5>their choke hold and assert this leverage even after this

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 5>conflict ends.

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 4>Suzanne, what do we know about the people of Iran?

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 4>What do they want? How supportive of the are they

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 4>of this government? Because boy, not just the sanctions, as

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, but now the blockade I'm sure is wreaking

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 4>tremendous hardship on the people of Iran. What do we

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 4>know about them?

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, the Iranian people have been the biggest losers in

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 5>all of these conflicts between their regime and the international community.

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 5>They have suffered immensely, and of course we know that

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 5>thousands went to the streets all around the country on

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 5>multiple occasions, but most recently back in January, demanding regime change,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 5>a different government. They do not want the theocratic regime

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 5>that imposes so many constraints on their interaction with the world,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 5>on their own opportunities. They were slaughtered in very large numbers.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 5>We've documented, credible organizations have documented seven thousand deaths. Is

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 5>probably two or three times that number at least were

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 5>killed by the regime in order to maintain its hold

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 5>on power. And I think that gives you a sense

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 5>of how determined they are.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 2>This is the time that we've got I got eight

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 2>ways to go here. Let me start with you know

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 2>how I learned about shuttle diploma. We already Kissinger's diplomacy

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 2>covered a cover and then he reinvented it by getting

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 2>on airplanes. How do you perceive as a diplomac and

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>someone who believes in international relations, the idea that a

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 2>real estate developer from New York and a family member

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>get on a plane to go negotiate like this, or

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 2>the Vice president for that matter. Do we have a

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 2>diplomatic industry now negotiating with they we're on in this war?

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 5>Well, I believe that the team that was sent to

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 5>Islamabad and was prepared to return did in fact include

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 5>a number of technical experts who would be supporting the

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 5>Leeds Steve Woodcoff, Jared Kushner and Vice President Vance in

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 5>the initial outcome. But truthfully, you know, we are operating

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 5>in very unprecedented times in terms of how we have

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 5>tried to manage these negotiations, and I think we see

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 5>the result of that.

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 2>My answer is my deep readier pop is a blockade?

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Is Russell Kroll on a boat in the Napoleonic Wars.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 2>It makes for hell of a good movie. If you

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 2>read Patrick O'Brien, What does Suzan Maloney think about the

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>simple word blockade? When we mentioned the Persian Gulf and

0:25:58.160 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 2>around the South.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 5>It will certainly hurt Around's economy, But I think most

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 5>experts on Iranian politics and on the regime believe that

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 5>they're prepared to pay the price, and that they have

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 5>over the past forty seven years learned to adapt. Their

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 5>entire economy is based on evading US sanctions and mitigating

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 5>the impact of American economic pressure, and they will look

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 5>for workarounds and they will probably succeed longer than we

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 5>would like them to.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Given that backdrop, Suzanne, and given what we know now

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 4>eight weeks into this, what is a reasonable solution here

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 4>and what is a reasonable timeframe?

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 5>I think it's critical to reopen the straight up horomos

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 5>to something resembling pre war traffic. It will take some

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 5>time before we get there, and so the sooner we

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 5>actually agree on some kind of reopening, the closer we

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 5>are to addressing the really big tsunami of economic pain

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 5>that is coming as a result of this closure.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Suzan, let's end with this. Paul had the correct question,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 2>like who are It's like Cassidy. I know, Suzanne Maloney

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>saw Butch Cassidy. You know you're looking out and you're going,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>who are these guys? Your essay the Third Islamic Republic?

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Are we speaking to the leaders of the Third Islamic Republic?

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 5>We are speaking to the leaders of the Third Islamic

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 5>Republic they're still trying to make up their minds. But

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 5>I do think that the only way that we can

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 5>come to an end here is through some kind of

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 5>a diplomatic negotiation. And the more that we invest in

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 5>seriance diplomacy, the closer will be to a solution.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Susan, thank you so much. Just thrilled to have you

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 2>in today. Suzanne Maloney with us and I will get

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.479
<v Speaker 2>it out on the LinkedIn and Twitter folks. Her essay

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Affairs, a third Islamic Republic is just absolutely definitive.

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Award's unintended consequences for Oran, the Middle East and a

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>global order. Suzanne Maloney, thank you so much.

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal