Speaker 1: Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.
Speaker 1: Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,
Speaker 1: your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,
Speaker 1: and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,
Speaker 1: here's your host, Paul. Welcome to another edition of Fantasy
Speaker 1: Football Weekly. I am Paul CHURCHI in my co host
Speaker 1: as it has been for a while. Now, Yeah, Harrison, Well,
Speaker 1: I mean technically yes, yeares Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. Hello, guys, helu.
Speaker 1: Last week we broke down everything you need to know
Speaker 1: about the a f C and NFC East. This week
Speaker 1: it's the North. We turned to the North. Yes, the
Speaker 1: North remembers the North? Room? Is that how that goes? Well?
Speaker 1: They King of the North? What's King of the North?
Speaker 1: Was King of the North. We're gonna be king Kings
Speaker 1: of the North's a f C and NFC North. I
Speaker 1: have no idea what you guys are talking about. Correct.
Speaker 1: We will give you a rundown on how each of
Speaker 1: the offenses are going to work for the eight teams
Speaker 1: that comprise the a f C North in the NFC North,
Speaker 1: and we will answer the question about the riskiest players
Speaker 1: to draft compared to a DP and the most upside
Speaker 1: players compared to a d P. We begin with the
Speaker 1: Baltimore Ravens and what has become one of the most
Speaker 1: fascinating offenses in the NFL. Brian Yeah, and Baltimore added
Speaker 1: to it in the draft. Uh obviously drafting J K. Dobbins.
Speaker 1: Everyone knows that in the second round, Devin Duvern a
Speaker 1: wide receiver in the third, and a couple of guards
Speaker 1: in the third and fourth round to protect Lamar Jackson.
Speaker 1: But I really don't want to talk about the running
Speaker 1: backs are wide receivers when it comes to Baltimore and
Speaker 1: re draft this year. It's just a very dicey scenario
Speaker 1: for both. It's all the two players were talking about
Speaker 1: here is Lamar Jackson. Of course, let's start there, and
Speaker 1: I want to go high level drafting Lamar Jackson in
Speaker 1: the early rounds. Right now, Fantasy Pros has him as
Speaker 1: the nineteenth overall player off the board quarterback one, so
Speaker 1: that's mid second round. UM. Last year, L Jacks clearly
Speaker 1: won a lot of people a lot of money, But
Speaker 1: you got him in the ninth, tenth, eleventh round last year,
Speaker 1: I did. He can win you that your league this
Speaker 1: year with those same numbers, he is the potential to
Speaker 1: do it, but obviously the price tag is exponentially higher.
Speaker 1: And this is a classic case. So I was all
Speaker 1: four l jacks maybe in first overall and redraft a
Speaker 1: few months ago. I've totally wavered because this is a
Speaker 1: classic case of he can certainly win your league for
Speaker 1: you if he puts up those numbers even though you're
Speaker 1: paying the first round price tag, but he can lose
Speaker 1: it for you big time if he doesn't replicate those
Speaker 1: numbers with the first second round price tag. So he
Speaker 1: has obviously the highest risk of any player on the
Speaker 1: Ravens right now, because you'll pay the most for him
Speaker 1: by a long shot, compared to any any other raven
Speaker 1: right well. The rest of them are going at mid
Speaker 1: round or lower for the most part, except except for
Speaker 1: Mark Andrews, and that's where I'm going to now, and
Speaker 1: he has the highest upside even though he has a
Speaker 1: pretty empty price tag himself. Thirty third overall, uh go
Speaker 1: on his tight end three obviously behind Travis Kelsey and
Speaker 1: George Kittle. Speaking of Travis Kelsey and George Kittle, those
Speaker 1: two combined for ten touchdowns on two hundred and forty
Speaker 1: three targets last season. Mark Andrews scored ten touchdowns on
Speaker 1: just ight effing targets last half. Andrews played fifteen games
Speaker 1: last year, only saw eight targets on seven occasions yours numbers.
Speaker 1: In those seven games. He should have seen more. This
Speaker 1: is where I'm getting a lot of usage. It is,
Speaker 1: but when he had when when he had at least
Speaker 1: eight targets, he went eight for one oh eight in
Speaker 1: a touchdown, eight for one, twelve in a touchdown, for
Speaker 1: thirty one in a touchdown, six catches yards, two for
Speaker 1: thirty nine that's the one did then six for fifty
Speaker 1: three and two touchdowns and six for nine three and
Speaker 1: two touchdowns. Good things happen when you're target Mark Andrews.
Speaker 1: Hayden Hurst obviously gone, so that's a huge factor. So
Speaker 1: the usage is going to go up for Andrews. Nick
Speaker 1: Boyle is still there, of course, who cares. So if
Speaker 1: you're going early tight end, I'm gonna reach and take
Speaker 1: Mark Andrews in the second round ahead of Travis Kelsey
Speaker 1: and George Kittle. If I'm gonna intend to take them
Speaker 1: in the first, I will fade Kelsey and Kittle because
Speaker 1: I think Andrews could outscore both of them this years
Speaker 1: with another uptight end. Zinger right there, number one tight
Speaker 1: end and Mark Andrews number two. Alright, so number one. Kidding,
Speaker 1: I'm kidding. I might have said that. I've said in
Speaker 1: the past he could. All right, So let's talk more
Speaker 1: broadly about just how this offense works. Do you see
Speaker 1: it being materially different than it was last year where
Speaker 1: it was a most run heavy offense in the NFL.
Speaker 1: You know they're totally gonna flip the script and just
Speaker 1: go Eric Corey, I'm no, Yeah, I think it's gonna
Speaker 1: pretty much be the same, though. John Harbo did say
Speaker 1: just recently that Lamar Jackson's last thing that he needs
Speaker 1: to get into his game is the distance the deep
Speaker 1: downfield passing. And I think that that something that they've
Speaker 1: been concentrating on because it's these corners going single coverage
Speaker 1: against these wide receivers all the time, and they're throwing
Speaker 1: eight in the box and trying to spy Lamar Jackson
Speaker 1: all the time. There something's got to give there if
Speaker 1: they want to get this offense to the next level.
Speaker 1: And Lamar Jackson has come out and said he wants
Speaker 1: to pass like Patrick Mahomes. This is the next evolution
Speaker 1: of Lamar Jackson, and maybe he can do it. He's
Speaker 1: certainly athletic enough to do. I'm sure Patrick Mahomes wants
Speaker 1: to be able to run like Lamar Jackson. You can
Speaker 1: want it, but he does not of the natural passing
Speaker 1: talent that the Holmes has. But he's not that far off,
Speaker 1: and I do think they will. He'll be a better
Speaker 1: pass here in year three than he wasn't year two.
Speaker 1: Year two he was way better than he was in
Speaker 1: year one. So I do believe that we will see
Speaker 1: more of a balanced offense in Baltimore this year. And
Speaker 1: I think his receivers are tremendous upside opportunities. You look
Speaker 1: at where Hollywood Brown fits in now a second year
Speaker 1: after missing you know, played hurt for almost all of
Speaker 1: last year, now comes into his second year, which is
Speaker 1: oftentimes when receivers blow up. I'm fascinated by Brown. He
Speaker 1: cost you so little, and to me, he would be
Speaker 1: the upside guy for Baltimore. Let's go to Pittsburgh where
Speaker 1: Ben Roethlisberger returns, and I think we're assuming we're gonna
Speaker 1: get some normalcy back to an offense that was very
Speaker 1: inconsistent last year. Well, let's talk about that offense. Last year,
Speaker 1: they finished with the fewest passing yards in the league,
Speaker 1: they were bottom ten, and rushing yards they had the
Speaker 1: seventh fewest points scored. But they did have injuries to
Speaker 1: Big Ben, James Conner, Juju was a little bit dinged up,
Speaker 1: and Antonio Brown left the team last year. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was there was a lot going on in that team. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so they were left with Mason Rudolph and yeah, that
Speaker 1: guy Duck Hodges. Uh. They still did finish eight and eight,
Speaker 1: which is a pretty testament to Mike Tomlin's coaching ability,
Speaker 1: and they were really underrated defense that was awesome by
Speaker 1: the second half of last Patrick. It helped they were
Speaker 1: one game shy of Tennessee for that final wild card spot,
Speaker 1: and everybody's talking about Tennessee is, you know, possible contenders.
Speaker 1: Pittsburgh was one game off of their face. Um. But
Speaker 1: everybody's reliving last year, which is why the Steelers only
Speaker 1: have two players going in the top one twenty of
Speaker 1: a DP right now. Both of them are going in
Speaker 1: the fourth round, and that's James Conner who's going at
Speaker 1: forty four and Juju Smith Schuster who's going at forty five,
Speaker 1: running back twenty and wide receiver nineteen, respectively. So there's
Speaker 1: there's a lot of upside on this offense because it's
Speaker 1: only been a few years since they were just a
Speaker 1: high flying passing offense. And that's why my my high
Speaker 1: volume target and the guy that I'm looking for in
Speaker 1: this offense is Ben Roethlisberger. Well over five hundred pass
Speaker 1: attempts in five of his prior six healthy seasons, over
Speaker 1: six hundred past attempts and two of those five multiple
Speaker 1: passing touchdowns in seventy one percent of his games over
Speaker 1: the last three years. He has the number nine offensive
Speaker 1: line according to Pro Football Focus, who had an eighty
Speaker 1: one point sex six sex that. I thought it would
Speaker 1: top that at sixty. But where is where is where's
Speaker 1: Roethlisberger's ADP right now? Because I bet he's going off
Speaker 1: the boarder like quarterback twenty two or quarterback eighteen. But
Speaker 1: he's going in the eleventh round of drafts right now,
Speaker 1: So I think he's a guy that you can wait
Speaker 1: on quarterback. He's the eighteenth quarterback off the board, and
Speaker 1: there's just a lot of good quarterbacks right now. So, Um,
Speaker 1: that's why he's a guy that I can target. I
Speaker 1: can go running back, wide receiver, tight end in my
Speaker 1: first ten rounds and then get Roethlisberger in the eleven.
Speaker 1: That's sort of your upside guy who we're both thinking.
Speaker 1: I'll perform his ADP quite a bit. We'llt's flip it
Speaker 1: over in when Pittsburgh, what's the player that you're most
Speaker 1: nervous about compared to ADP. I think it's James Conner,
Speaker 1: and I think it's gotta be um. He had more
Speaker 1: than fifteen rushing attempts only twice last season. Uh, that's terrible.
Speaker 1: He managed that feat seven times in He's really a
Speaker 1: pass catcher. But they have Benny Snell there, they have
Speaker 1: Jalen Samuel's there. Uh, they got Anthony McFarland, the new
Speaker 1: guy there, all of which could be in play to
Speaker 1: take touches from James Conner. And I know Pittsburgh's traditionally
Speaker 1: been a workhorse running back kind of organization. They just
Speaker 1: don't have it. They don't have him right now. So, Uh,
Speaker 1: James Conner going into a contract here, They're gonna see
Speaker 1: what they got with these other guys to see if
Speaker 1: they need to spend another third round pick on a
Speaker 1: draft in the draft on another running back, But James
Speaker 1: Conner is the guy I'm avoiding at all costs. I
Speaker 1: couldn't agree more. And I think if there was any
Speaker 1: lesson to be learned that from James Conner last year,
Speaker 1: and they know it, they can't make him a high
Speaker 1: volume guy because every time they did give him the
Speaker 1: ball more than a handful of times he got hurt.
Speaker 1: I mean it was it was all but guaranteed. So
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any scenario here he turns back
Speaker 1: into a workhorse because they won't let him out of
Speaker 1: fear that will keep getting hurt, which is what happened
Speaker 1: last season. Two more guys I want to mention on
Speaker 1: that offense, Deante Johnson, Baby, his his trajectory is just
Speaker 1: skyrocket in ADP. Everybody loves him and he's going on
Speaker 1: right He's going off at one three right now, wide
Speaker 1: receiver forty nine, that's gonna be. He's gonna be up
Speaker 1: two or three rounds in a DP by the time
Speaker 1: we get to draft season and August. Rather of him
Speaker 1: than Juju Smith Schuster, I think a lot of people
Speaker 1: are are with you more um and one of your
Speaker 1: favorite guys last year was Vance McDonald church. He had
Speaker 1: a terrible year, but he's free this year two hundred
Speaker 1: seventy nine and adp tight end thirty three, and he
Speaker 1: gets back, he gets Ben back. Eric Ebron is there
Speaker 1: who might sipen a few tight end looks. But but
Speaker 1: Vance McDonald wasn't completely terrible before, so he's a free
Speaker 1: tight end. He's like one of those guys you're grabbing
Speaker 1: a best ball league is your second or third tight ends.
Speaker 1: Let's go to one. This is a new offense led
Speaker 1: by new head coach Kevin Stefanski, and it's gonna be
Speaker 1: run heavy. Stefanski has the highest run rate of any
Speaker 1: offensive coordinator over the past two years. He's got Nick
Speaker 1: Chubb and Kareem Hunt. That is the league's best one
Speaker 1: two bunch of rate mandated though well, you know clearly
Speaker 1: Mike Zimmer wanted to do that, but you know what,
Speaker 1: it worked, and he's got and if he didn't have
Speaker 1: talented backs, i'd be talking about a real regression in use.
Speaker 1: But you've got Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about how good they are and how sneaky similar they are.
Speaker 1: In usage, even though they're not built alike and the
Speaker 1: running game is different. Chubb is the bigger back, but
Speaker 1: he's shockingly elusive and fast. Chubb was Pro Football focuses
Speaker 1: number two rated back in elusiveness Nick Chubb now Hunt
Speaker 1: for his his his part. If we lower Pro Football
Speaker 1: Focus down to the forty four carries that Hunt had,
Speaker 1: he only attes. Hunt becomes the number two back in
Speaker 1: elusiveness if we're looking at the whole league, if we
Speaker 1: lower the threshold down to just forty two carries. Um.
Speaker 1: So they're both very elusive backs. Obviously, both of them
Speaker 1: can catch. Hunts an elite past catcher, but Chub is
Speaker 1: also very good. And before Hunt showed up, Chubb had
Speaker 1: three or more catches in six of eight games. I mean,
Speaker 1: they weren't afraid to use them that way, and they
Speaker 1: can continue to throw to Chub as well, although Hunt
Speaker 1: obviously is the better catcher, and it really both guys
Speaker 1: can do everything. They can run inside, they can run outside,
Speaker 1: they can catch the ball. They're gonna get a ton
Speaker 1: of use here. In his first year's offensive coordinator. Last year,
Speaker 1: first full year, Kevin Stefanski got Kirk Cousins back on
Speaker 1: track and unlocked his best statistical season of his career.
Speaker 1: He's got a similar challenge with Baker Mayfield this year,
Speaker 1: who obviously regressed in most every way last season. But
Speaker 1: we've seen flashes of greatness from from Baker Mayfield, primarily
Speaker 1: as a rookie, and I think he's got an opportunity
Speaker 1: to the same thing here. Now the running game will click.
Speaker 1: I think the running games almost a certainty to be good,
Speaker 1: and I think that means they'll ask Baker, especially to
Speaker 1: throw less often and in higher percentage plays, rebuild some
Speaker 1: confidence here. Last year Mayfield was like Mayfield's deep ball
Speaker 1: passing was terrible. He had a passer rating of one
Speaker 1: hundred six as a rookie on deep passes. Last year.
Speaker 1: That hundred six turned into seventy three as a passer
Speaker 1: rating on deep passes. Um I think Stefanski is going
Speaker 1: to try fewer calls, more higher percentage plays, and even
Speaker 1: more on on the deeper stuff for higher percentage plays.
Speaker 1: Now he'll stefanciles used the run to set up deep shots,
Speaker 1: and we've mentioned that a couple of times. Now. Cousins
Speaker 1: had the NFL's highest passer rating last year on deep passes.
Speaker 1: The highest on deep passes to fancy, he can unlock
Speaker 1: some of that deep passing stuff. So guys, last year,
Speaker 1: Stephan Diggs was a was top ten in depth of
Speaker 1: target at fifteen yards downfield. When you think a depth
Speaker 1: of target on the Browns, who's that Who's going to
Speaker 1: be the Steph Diggs guy would be O'Dell, That'd be
Speaker 1: Odell Beckham, can't be Jarvis Landry. Jervis Landry is like
Speaker 1: the Adam feeling of that team. Well, he's even shorter.
Speaker 1: If theeland can get downfield, Landry never does. So I
Speaker 1: think O'Dell remains sneaky viable here and is potentially poised
Speaker 1: for a nice bounce back season. Tight end to Austin
Speaker 1: Hooper was a big free agent signing. Of course, tfan
Speaker 1: Ski is just middle of the pack for tight end usage,
Speaker 1: but Hooper is good. And I rolled together Kyle Rudolph
Speaker 1: stats and Irv Smith stats from last year into one guy,
Speaker 1: and the numbers are exactly what Austin Hooper put up
Speaker 1: last year. So I think you can look for another
Speaker 1: good season from Austin Hooper just like we saw last season.
Speaker 1: New offensive line is fantastic news for the Browns. They
Speaker 1: put up. They signed Jack Conklin from the Titans, one
Speaker 1: of the better blocking offensive linemen in free agency, and
Speaker 1: then they drafted Jedderck Wills in the first round. These
Speaker 1: are massive upgrades of this offensive line. I love it.
Speaker 1: So who's the riskiest player to draft from the Browns? Nobody?
Speaker 1: You're all undervalued because of what happened last year. But
Speaker 1: just I'm gonna give you a name, just to give
Speaker 1: you a name. Jarvis Landry. He's going off in round five.
Speaker 1: He has been four or five or six touchdowns in
Speaker 1: every season but one. He just he you know exactly
Speaker 1: what you're going to get from him. What about Nick
Speaker 1: Chubb though, remember we we can't broke it down a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago. Last year, fifteen carries inside the
Speaker 1: five for negative fourteen yards and two touchdowns. He's just
Speaker 1: a good He's just a really good running back. And
Speaker 1: I have no problem. He's really good. Cream Hunt is great,
Speaker 1: is really good, and by ADP, I'd rather spend the
Speaker 1: fifth rounder on Kareem Hunt at RB thirty off the board.
Speaker 1: We did a podcast about it. Who's got the most
Speaker 1: upside for the Browns? It's probably Odell Beckham. Last year's
Speaker 1: ADP was the start of the second round. Now it's
Speaker 1: the fifth round and he's only a couple of spots
Speaker 1: ahead of Jarvis Landry. People don't like Odell Beckham and
Speaker 1: that's favorite in factor in do it here a little bit.
Speaker 1: When we come back, Brian Johnson will detail his favorite team,
Speaker 1: which is who Day Who Day Day Who Day, Cincinnati Bengals.
Speaker 1: We'll tell you who they are when we come back.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi in, Matt Harrison,
Speaker 1: Brian Johnson with you. We're breaking down the teams in
Speaker 1: the North, the a f C North, the NFC North.
Speaker 1: We're on Cincinnati, Brian, this is your newly adopted favorite team.
Speaker 1: And with Joe Burrow now leading what should be an
Speaker 1: improved passing attack with a j greenback uh Te Higgins,
Speaker 1: this has turned into an awfully interesting offense. By the way,
Speaker 1: is this the best offensive division in football? Baltimore, Cleveland, Cincinnati,
Speaker 1: It's pretty probably, It's pretty interestingly even Pittsburgh is probably
Speaker 1: the worst offense in this division. They're not terrible. NFC
Speaker 1: West might be in that conversation. In the West too,
Speaker 1: it's got some um maybe Chargers Jeeps. Alright, Broncoes on
Speaker 1: the up and up. Anyway, let's you know, so now
Speaker 1: that we've got a new quarterback, we get a new
Speaker 1: talent wide receiver coming returning talents team, it's a brand.
Speaker 1: You just feel like a bit of a new team,
Speaker 1: even though the same coaching staff. How do you feel?
Speaker 1: How does this offense going to look? So it's got
Speaker 1: to be different than it was last year? Yeah, it's Uh,
Speaker 1: it's kind of a star studded, sexy offense with Burrow
Speaker 1: at quarterback and he got Tyler Boyd, A J. Green
Speaker 1: who will talk about a little more very shortly, who's
Speaker 1: supposedly fully healthy, Tee Higgins who was drafted thirty third
Speaker 1: overall you just mentioned, and Joe Mixing of course. So
Speaker 1: this is looking like a fun offense on paper with
Speaker 1: not a great defense to uh on the other side
Speaker 1: of the ball. So for fantasy football purposes, uh, the
Speaker 1: Browns are almost as sexy as the Bills. Bizarre world
Speaker 1: we live in, right, But I'm really worried about Joe
Speaker 1: Mixing here. He's crept into first round territory eleventh overall,
Speaker 1: going as RB eight. Um, I guess we should start
Speaker 1: with the hold out. He could hold out, So there's
Speaker 1: inherent risk right there. He's willing to hold out, he says,
Speaker 1: if he's not signed to an extension, but uh, hold
Speaker 1: out aside, let's assume he's not holding out. Hope he
Speaker 1: doesn't hold out. Um, Joe Mixon was kind of a
Speaker 1: jekyl and hide last year. UH first eight games of
Speaker 1: the season he was the thirty third overall running back,
Speaker 1: but the second half he caught fire. Finished eleven overall
Speaker 1: at the position, and the underlying stats supported that as well.
Speaker 1: He finished fourth and broken tackles with twenty four in
Speaker 1: seventh in yards after contact with six five. But again,
Speaker 1: if you draft Mixing today in the first round, he
Speaker 1: holds out, you got Levan Bell two point oh from
Speaker 1: a couple of years ago, and uh Rodney Anderson waiting
Speaker 1: in the wings. If that happens, and then but then
Speaker 1: then again you might get the bad Joe Mixon that
Speaker 1: we saw or maybe this comes a very pass heavy offense.
Speaker 1: So for as much as I love Mixing, he's clearly
Speaker 1: the highest, uh the riskiest player based on ADP for me,
Speaker 1: and you would think this guy could have been the
Speaker 1: riskies player based on ADP. But I'm going with the
Speaker 1: most upside in A. J. Green. I am banking on
Speaker 1: a bounce back for the thirty two year old turns
Speaker 1: thirty two at the end of July. Still got some
Speaker 1: tread on the tires. He right now is going off
Speaker 1: fifty six overall. That's around wide receiver four. Um. Now,
Speaker 1: we all know he missed all of last season, missed
Speaker 1: seven games in twenty eighteen and six games in ten.
Speaker 1: That means Green has only played nine games in the
Speaker 1: last two years. But if you extrapolate games into a
Speaker 1: sixteen game season, it comes out to eighty one catches
Speaker 1: over twelve hundred yards and ten touchdowns. And A J's
Speaker 1: last full season came in seventeen when he went for
Speaker 1: seventy five nearly eleven hundred yards and eight touchdowns. So A. J.
Speaker 1: Green steps into this suddenly very electrifying offense and it's
Speaker 1: fully healthy, and you're getting him at wide receiver twenty four.
Speaker 1: He still has top ten wide receiver potential if healthy.
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna roll the dice in the what is
Speaker 1: that the mid five fifty six overall because wide receiver
Speaker 1: is so deep. If A J goes belly up, I'll
Speaker 1: have someone on the bench, but the upside is certainly
Speaker 1: still there for Green. You didn't you don't seem to
Speaker 1: have any hesitation about Joe Burrow being good and good
Speaker 1: early some but not any worse than Andy Dalton or
Speaker 1: who else played quarterback for Cincinnati last year. I should know.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that's some Jeff drisk about Jeff Burrow is
Speaker 1: he has pinpoint accuracy, and that's what he was really
Speaker 1: known for last year at l s U as he
Speaker 1: was one of the most accurate pastors, especially downfield. So
Speaker 1: that should translate, I mean that should even translate to
Speaker 1: the NFL. They get a good offensive lineman back, uh
Speaker 1: that that's gonna be a really good offense. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be fun to watch. Plus their defense is still terrible,
Speaker 1: so they're they're gonna be playing four wide receiver sets.
Speaker 1: And the wide receiver you didn't mention is John Ross
Speaker 1: is a former first rounder who had a couple of
Speaker 1: great games last year, was a very good receiver or
Speaker 1: when he got run and now he's been relegated to
Speaker 1: like fifth options. It's a deep team. Let's just hope
Speaker 1: makes it doesn't hold up. Joe Burrow I think is
Speaker 1: almost even money to win Rookie of the Year in
Speaker 1: a stacked, stacked rookie draft. It sounds about right. I
Speaker 1: think too. It would be in the conversation if Stu
Speaker 1: Beard wasn't there, kind of probably blocking him for the
Speaker 1: first six to eight games of the season. Burrow feels
Speaker 1: like the most pro ready quarterback in a long time,
Speaker 1: doesn't luck. Yeah, it feels just like an automatic and
Speaker 1: hopefully this is going to be a resurgence for the Bengals.
Speaker 1: Their fan base certainly deserves it. Let's go to Green Bay,
Speaker 1: matt where they had the opposite draft, a draft that
Speaker 1: was universally listen to Paul Charchi and do they really did.
Speaker 1: If we have a need on this roster, we're not
Speaker 1: going to address it, damn it. We're taking the best
Speaker 1: player available no matter what. Uh. Let's talk about this
Speaker 1: Green Bay offense and how do you how do you
Speaker 1: think that works overall this season? So, the really nice
Speaker 1: part about the Packers is there's not a lot of
Speaker 1: different options on the field in the passing game. You
Speaker 1: can narrow it down to two guys in the passing
Speaker 1: game that you will draft at all. Um. If you
Speaker 1: don't get Davante Adams, you can pretty much avoid all
Speaker 1: their wide receivers um and Aaron Rodgers is the other one.
Speaker 1: You don't think mvs just because they've they've jettison Geronimo Allison,
Speaker 1: They've got no you got an obvious answer at Alan
Speaker 1: Lazard is the next highest guy. He's going off the
Speaker 1: board at one seventy six. That's wide receiver sixty eight.
Speaker 1: Then you've got Devin Funcius there. It's like they won't
Speaker 1: I'm serious, you won't be on the team. That's why
Speaker 1: for me, if I don't get Davonte Adams and I
Speaker 1: don't get Aaron Rodgers, I'm just out on the Packers
Speaker 1: passing games. On the other part, well, what do you
Speaker 1: even want? Do you do? You see Aaron Rodgers putting
Speaker 1: up a substantial but you you you had all the
Speaker 1: reasons why not to take Aaron Rodgers And uh he's
Speaker 1: going off the board at quarterback number eight right now,
Speaker 1: uh seventy seven. Overall, By the way, there's only three
Speaker 1: players on the Packers roster that are going in the
Speaker 1: top third teen rounds of fantasy drafts right now, Davante
Speaker 1: Adams and Aaron Jones, and then the top two rounds
Speaker 1: and Aaron Rodgers in the middle of the eight or seventh.
Speaker 1: So but the bad part is the running game is
Speaker 1: the exact opposite of the passing game. All three backs
Speaker 1: should be in the mix for touches, and we've touched
Speaker 1: on a little bit before, and it's not going to
Speaker 1: be easy to decipher who's going to be the hot
Speaker 1: hand in any given week. So I mean, we have
Speaker 1: a J. Dillon, we have Jamal Williams, and we have
Speaker 1: Aaron Jones, and they're going at very different points in
Speaker 1: the draft. I should mention overall a very good offensive line.
Speaker 1: Green bad the number six offensive line according to Pro
Speaker 1: Football Focus last year. Their line did allow pass rush
Speaker 1: pressure more often than twenty one teams in the league.
Speaker 1: So Rogers was under pressure, but he's such a wizard
Speaker 1: of at getting out of that. But they it took
Speaker 1: them the most time in the league. It took two
Speaker 1: point six seconds for them to allow pressure. He's holding
Speaker 1: the ball to it's because Rogers, you know, I think
Speaker 1: he's just it's because Davante Adams was hurt and nobody
Speaker 1: was getting open. You could very well be right about that. Um,
Speaker 1: So here's my my target is A J. Dillon He's
Speaker 1: a two d fifty pound running back with a forte vertical.
Speaker 1: He's literally the heaviest running back in the NFL right now,
Speaker 1: and he has a top five combined vertical of any
Speaker 1: running back ever. Go figure. He's you know for his vertical,
Speaker 1: he's too He's a goal line back who can literally
Speaker 1: jump over the details. So he's the guy I'm totally targeting.
Speaker 1: And obviously I'm avoiding Aaron Jones. We've harped on it
Speaker 1: over and over. He could get schemed out of game
Speaker 1: plans a lot this year. He was very touchdown dependent,
Speaker 1: and the Packers brought in Dylan as Jones is touchdown
Speaker 1: stealing vulture in his free agent year this they're gonna
Speaker 1: let Jones walk after this walking Uh, so'm I'm avoiding
Speaker 1: Aaron Jones and I'm getting out too early rather than
Speaker 1: too late. A J. Dillon is a good back, you
Speaker 1: know the issue. You know, for all the heat that
Speaker 1: Green Bay took for drafting him in the second round,
Speaker 1: it wasn't because A. J. Dillon's not good. It's because
Speaker 1: they had so much need at other positions. You're staring
Speaker 1: at the greatest second round draft for wide receivers and
Speaker 1: years and you don't take one stuff like that. Don't
Speaker 1: draft from need, just don't draft the best player. That
Speaker 1: means they did. That's what they did. Sam. The Portland
Speaker 1: Trailblazers drafted Sam Boobe because they needed a big Last
Speaker 1: thing I want to say on Aaron Rodgers is man.
Speaker 1: Did he post dud games last year? So many games
Speaker 1: that clocked in at like two thirty yards, zero touchdown,
Speaker 1: one touchdown. Those things murder your fantasy team. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: a bummer. And I chuck a lot of that up
Speaker 1: to Davante Adams just not being healthy for most of
Speaker 1: the season. Even when he was there after he came back,
Speaker 1: he wasn't fully there until the very tail end of
Speaker 1: the year. Minnesota's got a new offensive coordinator, Gary Kubiak,
Speaker 1: familiar name. Last year's offensive coordinator Kevin Stefanski has gone
Speaker 1: to Cleveland, but the transition will be seamless because Stefanski
Speaker 1: was largely implementing Gary Kubiak's offense last year, same terminology
Speaker 1: and everything else. So Kubiak is a wizard with fantasy
Speaker 1: running backs. He has unlocked unlocked massive seasons from I'm
Speaker 1: gonna love this list, Gerrell Davis Olandis, Gary Anderson, Clinton Portis,
Speaker 1: Steve Slayton, Arian Foster, Justin for Sett and last year,
Speaker 1: of course, Dalvin Cook. I went through twenty five years
Speaker 1: of Kubiak runners as an offensive coordinator or a head coach.
Speaker 1: It's basically impossible to find a talented runner who flopped
Speaker 1: in a healthy season under Gary Kubiak. If you are
Speaker 1: even a middle tier runner, if you are justin for
Speaker 1: set or better, and you're in a Gary Kubiak off fence,
Speaker 1: you're having a good year. Did Kubiak leave the year
Speaker 1: that some of those guys fell off? Matt? I mean,
Speaker 1: Slayton wasn't around a long time, but he was like
Speaker 1: first round pick the following year and he fell just
Speaker 1: like an early round. Yeah, you don't want to be
Speaker 1: there when Kubyak leaves. I can tell you that much,
Speaker 1: because that runner that you that the land is Gary's
Speaker 1: of the world or whatever. He leaves and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, that guy tanks UM. So you still feel
Speaker 1: really good about the running, and you know they're going
Speaker 1: to They're going to continue to run. Zimmer wants it
Speaker 1: and Kubiak can do it. As an um. It'll be
Speaker 1: the second year implementing the zone blocking scheme for the
Speaker 1: Vikings offensive line that should get better in year two,
Speaker 1: but they do have some moving parts here. They put
Speaker 1: his second round picked into presume starting left tackle as
Speaker 1: a Cleveland and that pushes last year's left tackle Riley
Speaker 1: Reef to left guard. They have some question marks at
Speaker 1: right guard, so this is still going to be an
Speaker 1: offensive line that has some transition, but year two in
Speaker 1: the zone blocking scheme should get a little bit better. Um,
Speaker 1: assuming Dalvin Cook is playing you, he'll be the team's
Speaker 1: most important offensive weapon, and even more than anybody in
Speaker 1: the passing game, He'll get plenty of work. As I
Speaker 1: mentioned earlier. But here's your danger point, and this is
Speaker 1: why I've slid Dalvin Cook over the course of my
Speaker 1: preseason here down my rankings. The more and more I
Speaker 1: think about it, you know, between all the injuries he's
Speaker 1: ever had and the fact that last year he got
Speaker 1: to a point in December where he was just worn
Speaker 1: down from use, I really think that they're gonna ratchet
Speaker 1: back the workload on him by ten to try to
Speaker 1: keep Dalvin Cook fresher at the end of the season.
Speaker 1: And that part worries me, and I think Kubias can
Speaker 1: integrate Alexander Madison more often. If you put in a
Speaker 1: team running back league, Yes in Minnesota that it's a
Speaker 1: very good one. There. Passing game is in flux with
Speaker 1: Justin Jefferson taking over Stefon Digs spot. But the two
Speaker 1: players are very different players, and Justin Jefferson isn't gonna
Speaker 1: just become stuff on Digs. Jefferson is primarily gonna run
Speaker 1: from the slot of his college place came from the slot.
Speaker 1: But I believe Jefferson gets immediate time in this offense
Speaker 1: because they don't have anybody else After Adam Feeling, Delan
Speaker 1: becomes the go to receiver for the first time in
Speaker 1: his life. Really is an extent and other than when
Speaker 1: Diggs had missed odd odd ball games here and there
Speaker 1: in the past, Deland's production without Diggs has been uber inconsistent.
Speaker 1: You don't think Thelan was go to and like Pop Warner,
Speaker 1: the first time in his life he's with the number one,
Speaker 1: while first time it's a viking Um. I don't think
Speaker 1: that the loss of Digs ultimately helps deal in here.
Speaker 1: I mean took a lot of heat off of Thelon
Speaker 1: and now Feeland's got gonna get double coverage virtually every play,
Speaker 1: So any Justin Jefferson to basically replaced Diggs, they do.
Speaker 1: And he's good and we're gonna talk about him more
Speaker 1: in a minute. Um Diggs was among the league leaders
Speaker 1: in depth of target, and I think thelan will do
Speaker 1: a little more downfield running than we've seen in the past. Uh.
Speaker 1: Second year tight end Irv Smith gets a bigger role
Speaker 1: this year as well. But that pesky cow Rudolph coming
Speaker 1: off a very good year. So those guys I think
Speaker 1: have middling fantasy value. He's a tight end vulture, which
Speaker 1: one Kyle Rudolph a little bit. So who's the riskiest
Speaker 1: player to out from the Vikings? I think it's Adam Feeling.
Speaker 1: He's going off the board at round three, wide receiver ten.
Speaker 1: He's expensive and hasn't proven that he can be a
Speaker 1: consistent producer without another wide receiver there to help. So
Speaker 1: I think there's some risk there. And who's got the
Speaker 1: most upside. It's Justin Jefferson, the first round rookie going
Speaker 1: off the board in round twelve and wide receiver. Here's
Speaker 1: what he did last year at l s U. Justin
Speaker 1: Jefferson last year in a college season one hundred fifteen receptions,
Speaker 1: one thousand, five hundred yards and eighteen touchdowns. That's absurd,
Speaker 1: absurd levels of production. He attacks the ball. Get this
Speaker 1: on his contested catch rate, So contested catchers, these are
Speaker 1: these are these are plays. This is a ball that's
Speaker 1: thrown where either guy could come down with it, Justin
Speaker 1: Jefferson or the defender. Jefferson a ninety two contested rights nuts.
Speaker 1: That kid's gonna be good. We'll take a break when
Speaker 1: we come back our five two teams. As we examine
Speaker 1: the offenses of the North, the f C North and
Speaker 1: the NFC North. We'll tell you about Chicago and then Detroit,
Speaker 1: not Denver, Chicago, Bultomber sort of north west. It's really
Speaker 1: north like in terms of elevation of the ground. Let's
Speaker 1: go back in moments. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly.
Speaker 1: Paul Charchy and Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison with you.
Speaker 1: If you want to follow us on Twitter, I am
Speaker 1: at Paul Charchy and Brian Johnson is at bt X
Speaker 1: J for sale. I don't mention any corporations out there. J.
Speaker 1: Why would you want to give it on? Did you
Speaker 1: know you cannot make four digit Twitter? Handles anymore. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe there aren't any. Maybe they just said, you know,
Speaker 1: they're not available. It says it needs to be longer
Speaker 1: than Yeah, alright, Brian's got a it's got a gold mine,
Speaker 1: a billion dollar industry, right, probably retire on bt X.
Speaker 1: J X is gonna be tough. X makes it a
Speaker 1: little trick here. You need at least two more to
Speaker 1: make something happen. Matt Harrison is explosive output. Pat got it.
Speaker 1: We turn our attention to I'm not going to talk
Speaker 1: about it. Bears led By led probably not bled By. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there will likely be a change of quarterback. Yeah, Nicholes
Speaker 1: the end, Yeah, Nicholes, all right, Chicago. Nick Foles obviously
Speaker 1: added a quarterback. They brought in Jimmy Graham, the corps
Speaker 1: of Jimmy Graham to play tight end. Then they drafted
Speaker 1: Cole Commit tight end. But by the way, I believe
Speaker 1: I'm not exaggerating. I think right this minute they have
Speaker 1: ten tight ends on roster. It's pretty ridiculous. That's too
Speaker 1: many tight ends for me. The tight end lover of
Speaker 1: all commit can't be right? How is it just met?
Speaker 1: Is it right? Well? Again, not talking about oh, Cole,
Speaker 1: I want to talk, so we expect Nicholes to beat out.
Speaker 1: Thank you sorry, And you know, Nick Foles has never
Speaker 1: really lit up the scoreboard. He did it one time
Speaker 1: against the Raiders with the Eagles way back when that
Speaker 1: was a six touchdown. I think it was like seven
Speaker 1: seven touchdown. That was an amazing game. He's never put
Speaker 1: up massive numbers. And the Bears, although their defense faltered
Speaker 1: big time last year, took a step back from this
Speaker 1: team is gonna play defense, and they're gonna want to
Speaker 1: run the ball, and just in limited turno turners, let's
Speaker 1: get to the running game. And David Montgomery. I'm hearing
Speaker 1: a lot of talk out there in the Twitter world
Speaker 1: about like people going to bat for David Montgomery. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: He looked at all the touches. They didn't draft anyone.
Speaker 1: He finished this RB twenty. I want RB twenty and
Speaker 1: my team I don't want this RB twenty. I like
Speaker 1: here RB twenty. When you play all sixteen games in
Speaker 1: average within fifteen plus touches, if you're finishing in RB twenty,
Speaker 1: you're consistently below average. And he's he hit more than
Speaker 1: half of his games. He was outside of the top
Speaker 1: thirty at his position. The Bears are gonna run, uh
Speaker 1: you know, Montgomery and nine tight ends on the field
Speaker 1: at any given time, so so that might help with
Speaker 1: the blocking whatever. Take that. He's RV twenty, he's played
Speaker 1: every game. He's gonna see two plus touches. Throw it
Speaker 1: out the window. Do not touch David Montgomery. He's not
Speaker 1: a good football player, all right. He's not a good runner, now,
Speaker 1: don't can we agree that? And we've seen it many
Speaker 1: times where rookie runners don't flash much that rookie year,
Speaker 1: but year two they look like a different guy. Don't
Speaker 1: you think there's an opportunity for David Montgomery to be
Speaker 1: a better fit in this offense, to be a better athlete,
Speaker 1: you know whatever. The things that need to come together
Speaker 1: for him to be better. Better off offensive line could
Speaker 1: and should be better as well. I feel like you
Speaker 1: rookies that disappoint their rookie year tend to fall off
Speaker 1: the map entirely in the second third year, more so
Speaker 1: than than pop Off and Montgomery, all the underlying stats,
Speaker 1: all the overlying stats are awful. He can't catch the ball.
Speaker 1: He's probably the worst receiving running back in the NFL.
Speaker 1: Three cones there, of course, but check out these uh
Speaker 1: stats for Cohen. I'm sorry, Montgomery catches a hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty five yards in one touchdown. That's pretty bad numbers
Speaker 1: on thirty five targets. So if you use pro football
Speaker 1: focuses yards per route run, which takes into account the
Speaker 1: number of snaps at a player runs a you know,
Speaker 1: a pass pattern, um, this provides a better indicator of
Speaker 1: production than yards per reception or even yards per target.
Speaker 1: Montgomery averaged zero point seven seven yards per route run.
Speaker 1: That seems really bad. I could make it for points
Speaker 1: seven yards. Here are some numbers from running backs with
Speaker 1: similar final receiving numbers like the five the pitiful numbers.
Speaker 1: Remember zero point seven seven yards per route run for
Speaker 1: David Montgomery. Ronald Jones one point eight two, Rex Burkhead
Speaker 1: one point eight to Shady Corpsey McCoy one point to five,
Speaker 1: Patrick Laird one point to nine, Boston Scott two point
Speaker 1: three four, Mark Ingram one point five, DeAndre Washington two
Speaker 1: point three. Mont comedies doesn't get done, and I don't
Speaker 1: want to have this reliable suck face in my lineup,
Speaker 1: so I'm not draft of him. I don't care if
Speaker 1: it's r I'll give one silver lining for David Montgomery.
Speaker 1: He he he had a bad yards per touch on
Speaker 1: the ground last year, only three point six yards per carry,
Speaker 1: But in his last five games he had four games
Speaker 1: where he was above four point three, So it seemed
Speaker 1: like he started to figure it out a little bit.
Speaker 1: At the tail end of the year. They started feeding
Speaker 1: him the ball a little bit more. He didn't have
Speaker 1: the touchdowns in those last five games, but there was
Speaker 1: there was some signs of life there that he might
Speaker 1: not be completely terrible. I'm out entirely guys going later
Speaker 1: in redraft, Guys like Todd Gurley, Jonathan Taylor, he Mooster,
Speaker 1: DeAndre Swift, Cream Hunt. There's opportunity every day. I'm taking
Speaker 1: those guys over. Yeah, the problem is that that is
Speaker 1: the problem, and he gets the opportunities that it's a
Speaker 1: big problem. Who's got the most upside then from the Bears,
Speaker 1: My boy Alan Robinson. He's really good, by the way,
Speaker 1: Younger than Michael Thomas, still twenty six years old. Allen
Speaker 1: Robinson right now going off the boards, going off the
Speaker 1: board as wide receiver sixteen thirty ninth overall. Finished last
Speaker 1: year at wide receiver ten with at quarterback. It seems
Speaker 1: like a happy trombone if you finished his wide receiver
Speaker 1: number ten. I'm so worried for Allen Robinson. Allen Robinson,
Speaker 1: by the way, Uh, he was happy. That's a duck.
Speaker 1: Oh there it is. We need a little map for
Speaker 1: the buttonsself. Allen Robinson again finished top ten wide receiver UM.
Speaker 1: His success rate versus man coverage was the highest among
Speaker 1: all wide receivers to the NFL last year. That's from
Speaker 1: Matt Harmon and reception perception. Uh, it's just the quarterbacking
Speaker 1: is the concern. But Nick Foles will be an upgrade
Speaker 1: for a rob and uh again top he's getting drafted
Speaker 1: as the sixteenth wide receiver off the board. Finishes the
Speaker 1: top ten wide receiver last year? Why not? Why can't
Speaker 1: you do it again? I just fear his career trajectory
Speaker 1: is gonna He's gonna be a Hall of Fame receiver,
Speaker 1: but he's gonna have quarterbacking like Andre Johnson had his
Speaker 1: entire career, Larry Fitzgerald outside of the two, like Kurt
Speaker 1: Warner of good years. So but Allen Robinson certainly has
Speaker 1: a high upside. Let's go to Detroit, Matt, where you
Speaker 1: know you and I have been a lockstep and almost
Speaker 1: everything so far this show DeAndre Swift. Everybody. So many
Speaker 1: people are down on DeAndre Swift because how how the
Speaker 1: lines have used their backs in the past. I think
Speaker 1: DeAndre Swift is a special running back who will dominate
Speaker 1: the carries on this team. And let's find out. We
Speaker 1: gotta keep this quiet because it's because carry On Johnson
Speaker 1: is just not very good. I was optimistic for him
Speaker 1: last year than David Montgomery. UM better than David mcgomery.
Speaker 1: Maybe they're six super viable players on Detroit's depth chart
Speaker 1: for the offense. Uh. Detroit was one of eight teams
Speaker 1: last year that allowed more than four hundred points on
Speaker 1: defense last year, which meant that their offense was pretty
Speaker 1: much always in catchup mode and outside of drafting Jeff
Speaker 1: Okuda and adding Desmond Truffont at corner, but they did
Speaker 1: lose Darius Slay, they pretty much stood pat with a
Speaker 1: really bad defense. So, uh, there's a lot of good
Speaker 1: things that could happen with Detroit's offense. Number eleven offensive
Speaker 1: line according to Pro Football Focus to top ten offensive
Speaker 1: lineman at their positions with Frank rag Now and Taylor Decker.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot of reasons to be bullish on
Speaker 1: the offense this year. Uh, Kenny Golladay is going off
Speaker 1: the board in the second round. He's a great wide receiver. Um,
Speaker 1: here's my issue, and we're gonna touch on it as
Speaker 1: my player to avoid. Who's carry On Johnson? Who's going
Speaker 1: off at player number seventy six RB nine. Wow, that's
Speaker 1: so high for him for carry On Johnson. He's he's
Speaker 1: going as the twenty nine running back. Though if you
Speaker 1: think about it, Uh, DeAndre Swift going one round later,
Speaker 1: pick eight three, that's absurd. That's gonna flip flop soon.
Speaker 1: Carry On Johnson has missed forty four percent of his
Speaker 1: career games due to injury. He only had ten receptions
Speaker 1: in eight games last season. In eighteen career games, he's
Speaker 1: barely topped one thousand rushing yards, and his yards per
Speaker 1: attempt where a meager three point six last year. And
Speaker 1: you have to take him above DeAndre Swift, who was
Speaker 1: arguably the best running back in last year's draft class.
Speaker 1: That's all. It doesn't make it do, So why don't
Speaker 1: we take the talent? Because talent will win. Even even
Speaker 1: if you think Detroit's coaching staff is a bunch of duds.
Speaker 1: Talent is gonna eventually went out. They might give carry
Speaker 1: On the job to start there. I don't think he
Speaker 1: keeps it for very long, and I think there's the
Speaker 1: look they could start carry On Johnson week one. Then
Speaker 1: in the third quarter they give DeAndre Swift a handoff
Speaker 1: that he houses for sixty yards and you know, blows
Speaker 1: by people like he did all through college and of that,
Speaker 1: let's see it all of a sudden your plans change. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So DeAndre Swift's definitely a guy that you can target
Speaker 1: and you can get late. But my main target on
Speaker 1: this offense is Matthew Stafford, who last year was on
Speaker 1: pace for his best year since his two thousand eleven season. Uh.
Speaker 1: He was on pace for five thousand passing yards, thirty
Speaker 1: eight touchdowns, and only ten interceptions, and his completion percentages
Speaker 1: remained very steady for the last five years, at right
Speaker 1: around sixty give or take a percentage one way or
Speaker 1: the other. He's got a he's got a good group
Speaker 1: of receivers with Golladay, Marvin Jones, Danny Amendola's no slouches,
Speaker 1: a third wide receiver, t J. Hockenson's a good tight
Speaker 1: end coming into a second year, probably take a step
Speaker 1: assume he's a good tight end. Last year was a lost.
Speaker 1: I mean, let's extrapolate week one for t J. Hockenson,
Speaker 1: shall we? But I like the weapons on this team
Speaker 1: and even carry on Johnson filling in as a backup
Speaker 1: running back. I I think it's a good offense that's
Speaker 1: going to be in catchup mode a lot this year.
Speaker 1: And I like the Lions didn't mention Marvin Jones. Who's
Speaker 1: who is? Did? Did you? Sorry? He's going off as
Speaker 1: wide receiver thirty nine right now, pick three. Overall, it
Speaker 1: seems like there's some value there there. Definitely he's going
Speaker 1: into a contract here as well. There you go, eight
Speaker 1: teams from the a f C North and the NFC
Speaker 1: North broken down fantasy style, what we expect? Who are
Speaker 1: the guys are targeting? Who are we avoiding? I hope
Speaker 1: you found this helpful. Next week, let's do the South.
Speaker 1: You didn't want to mix it up, I am speaking
Speaker 1: to They tried in true east, north, south west. That
Speaker 1: never that you always see these divisions in I shouldn't
Speaker 1: be a slave. It's alphabetical. It is alphabeticals, and maybe
Speaker 1: that's it. Maybe maybe it's not just East. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not East coast bias. Maybe that's it. It's just alphabetical.
Speaker 1: We'll look forward to that. If you want to hear
Speaker 1: about the a f C and NFC East, go to
Speaker 1: last week's podcast. We broke on those eight teams similarly,
Speaker 1: and I think even better than this week. I mean,
Speaker 1: last week is just brilliant feedback I got. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was an amazing show. Thanks a lot, no problem. I
Speaker 1: think this is a lukewarm effort. If I'm just being honest, Well,
Speaker 1: we'll do better. We'll do better next week, and we'll
Speaker 1: talk to you then, by bye, everybody. Fantasy Football Weekly
Speaker 1: is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts
Speaker 1: from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.