WEBVTT - 5/21, Hour 1: Mike Soroka, Chris Ventura joins, Matt Chapman,

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, Do to To To, to Do, to Do,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to Do, to Do, to tota too. Yeah, of this

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as the Fantasy best Friends Forever here in the Fantasy

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Sample, I am Greg Susman. Alright,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's come on a happy Tuesday. How much's going on?

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Get the Yankee shirt going on? A little glabor Torres

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>on the back of his shirt. Happy Glabor Day yesterday,

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Big Yankee comeback. It was an interesting night in baseball.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Only one hour today abbreviated program. So for this abbreviated

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>hour we are joined. But the Closer Christ, what's up, guys?

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing? It's your boy The Closer Chris

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Ventry here and yeah, big Yankee win last night. We're

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in first place. He's looking good for New York. Right

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>now we are in first We are not New York

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in general not in a great shape. The Giants quarterback,

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, the Mets are jokes. So Baseball New York

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>basically our entire lives, Greg even No, I mean the

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Giants have been there, but like it's pretty much been

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees as the constant and then everybody else this

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a ray everywhere else. That's basically the your sports. Why

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>would have changed now? It wouldn't, Frank, I mean, the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Giants franchise have been you know, yeah they're not bad.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been bad they are now but now they're bad. Yeah,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>very dumb, very dumb people. They they're all about culture.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>The Giants now, Oh yeah, they got a great so

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they got rid of Landing Collins and Odell and they

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>all defended chother yesterday. Check baby, check. That's a nice

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>little culture right there. Checkdown culture. That fantastic videos of

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones during the wall to the running back. I

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>gotta love that. Do you this picture show? You haven't

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>seen it yet. I don't know what you're talking about

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it to you. This picture is not photoshop in anyway.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Which ones he like? I actually did see that. I

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>assume he's the one in the foreground. So basically, there's

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a good face. There's a picture. It's too small for

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>me to show everybody, but like, it's literally just the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>same guy. It's a joke, Unbelievaniel John's any same guy,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>same guy. Le big deal, le big deal all right.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>On the program today, little backpacking where you get your

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>um your best pick, best bet everbody, the best bet ever,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>best bet forever? What it was, best bet forever? It

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was best bet ever? Whatever were your best bet forever.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>A little bit later on the program, Frank, we technically

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>made three of three of them mester at your best

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>bets forever, go three, and out of course we did.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>They were the best best forever. They were as advertised, Greig.

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll try, We'll try and keep it going again today.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's see see what we can do. Le's see if

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we can start up a little streak here. When I

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>looked at it, when I looked at it last night,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I was pumped. I was really more intrigued by the

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Twins and Angels game than I should have been great. Oh,

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, no doubt when there was no one score him.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not the biggest Jaco to Rees fan, but you

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>were last night. I was last night big fan Jacoreesy.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's start there. Let's start with Jacob are Easy.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that okay? Fantastic? Because Jake Odor Easy and Frank's

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota twins going to l A and defeat the Angels

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>three So one under easy five shut out anything, three hits,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>two walks, he struck out six. Felix pain on the

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>other side with five innings, a lout of four hits,

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>one run, walked, one, struck out three. Once again, he

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>was your uh with the term I heard yesterday for him?

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>What his role is that? What his follower? Yeah, right

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>after the open? What do you have after an opener?

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You have a follower? Cole pitched one and then he

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 1>pitched five. All right, so I'll go with pseudo starter. Alright.

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So Painia was your follower as it froll into the purposes,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>he was your starter, Taylor Cole was the opener here ty,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but Sherty takes the lost Hunzle rob last picture of

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>the ninth pitches actually very solid ninth right there, which

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you think godoresis performance right now? Down to two point

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>three eight, franc I mean this has been pretty standard.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Jake Goderizy, he only had eight tweetings strikes yesterday in

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety pitches. But the Los Angeles Angels are a team

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that does not strike out very much at all. They're

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>actually among the league le leaders in terms of strikeout

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>right and swinging strike rate. So they're just really good

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. And now it's been this to four

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>six eight straight starts that Jacob Reezi has allowed three

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>earned runs four of his last five. I believe zero

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>runs allowed, that is correct. Yeah, so he's getting it

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>done right now. Greg, there are some underlying numbers here

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>with Jacob Reezi. You can try and turn him into

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>someone else that you trust more long term. That's probably

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>something that I would look into. He's got a two

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>point three eight e R ray. Looking into the rest

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the number his numbers, it's not like he's doing

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>anything vastly different than he has in years past. He's

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>using his curveball a little bit more this year. The

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>v low on his fastball is up a mile and

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a half last year one point one mile. Is proud

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of this year ninety two point six, but he's got

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a two point three eight ear a, he's got a

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>four point five nine x fit Greggy, I think I

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>would try. I think I would try just float them

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>out there a little bit and see what you can

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>get in return. Venture That's exactly what I was gonna say.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the ultimate sell high picture right now.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>The problem is jakeodre easy and everybody knows that if yeah,

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, nobody's gonna people have been playing or you know,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>watching baseball for a long time. No, yea, So it's

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>very hard to to do that. You would probably you

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>would have to do it for someone who's struggling, like

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it would have to be like a classic sell high,

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>sell high by low situation. Who would you rather have?

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Jake Odoreesi or Mike Minor Because Mike Miner last night

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>my man six innings of two run ball. He struck

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>out eleven at Seattle Mariners last night and that was

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the second double digit strike out game of the season.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>No big deal, what is going on? We got blast

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>in the past here with Mike Miner and Jake Odoreesy,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>two of the most relevant starting pictures in baseball to

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>be honestly lowers his e R rate to two point

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>six four. Now you have two guys here with sub

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>three e R a s. Mike Miner yesterday with nineteen

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes on a hundred and seven pitches going up

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Seattle Mariners. We've talked about how they've come

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>back down to earth. They got off to a blistering

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>hot start their offense, and you know there are all

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, like four games under five hundred, so

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they've they've come crashing back down to earth. Greg But

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the underlying numbers, they're actually pretty similar to to Jake Odorezy.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think I would go with Mike Miners. These

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>guys are close and it's a fair strike, and if

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at the ballpark like you probably lean with

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Odoreesy over Mike Miner, who pitches in Texas, which is

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not frankly just not a good pitching environment. But I

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>first what I'm seeing from him a little bit more

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>than I am. Odoreesi doesn't walk as many guys as

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Odoreeze either, the hard hit rate against him isn't as

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>high as well, the underlying numbers are a little bit better.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>The first pitch strike percentage better as well. So it's close,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but I would lean with Mike Miner and if I could,

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but probably try and dangle both out there and what

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he wants Jay Gunner easier, Mike mins Nobody wants these

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>guys Pitley. I had a Mike Minor and he talked

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>me out of keeping him, so I dropped him. Yeah,

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.679
<v Speaker 1>she said, it's Mike Minor, what are you doing? Probably

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>not true exactly what happened. If. I definitely didn't tell

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you to drop Josh Bell either, so I think he

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>did that. I did not tell you to drop Josh Bell. Yeah,

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody did. I think he just probably

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>told you so that he could try and pick him up. No, No,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he had a bad first week, so I dropped Mike Minor,

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like and that's why you don't do what Breg Susman

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>does and and just lose patients on your players after

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the first week. But you also can't wait too long.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Now Josh Bell is gonna win the n L m

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>v P. Probably it's either him or Stick. He's got

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>hurt sticking looking for players are like in the range

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as what RESI and Mike Minor. Minor in my home

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>league is top twelve starting pitcher right now. Speaking of Texas, Frank,

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you were tweeting about this last night, drink. Chris Martin

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>came in for not to save, but to close this

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>game out there up four runs. He left three of

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>them in the ninth inning and did ultimately close this

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one out. But Jose Clerk has looked very, very good

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in his rollabill as an opener. Uh and in the

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>middle inning Shawn Kelly activated off the aisle last night.

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>This could be the end of Chris Martin the closer. Yeah,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I mean three r and runs last night,

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gives up another home run to Dan Vogelboch, who we

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>spoke about yesterday, who is officially hot once again. He

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>was hot to start the season, got cold. This is

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the player that Dan vogelok is gonna be. But regardless

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Martin, this is three straight appearances now where

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he's allowed to run. He allowed three ear and runs yesterday,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the ear a all the way up to four point

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>six six. Conversely, Jose La Clerk has gone three straight

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>outings without allowing a run venturous. So I think it's

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be somebody, whether it's Sean Kelly or Jose la Clerk.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>They're probably taking this over from Chris Martin, and I

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>would still put my money on it being Jose La

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Clerk sooner rev than later. I agree Martin, you know

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously falling apart and you know it really doesn't have

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the experience. I would take a flyer on Kelly though,

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>you know I would actually, I'm sure he's very long

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the only five on ESPN leagues, so because he's been

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>on the I L you could also stash until he

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>comes back, which is soon, and then you know you

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 1>have a potential closure here that le Clark could be

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, all over the board. Like you said,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>these these closers are becoming guys that pitch in situations

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>where you know they're most needed. So Kelly could end

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>up getting a lot of saves and you're getting him

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for nothing. Really, I think you could put his zero

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one dollar bit or something on him and grab him. Um.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I agree with you on that and the

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>other thing. Mike Minor and ODORREESI back to that for

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a second. They're like the same guy in their career too.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>There are guys that have been around for well, never

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>really put it together. They had a couple of good

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>glimpses here and their career, and all of a sudden

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>they're having this kind of breakout late in their career.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I do trust Minor a little more, but both of them,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>I think, try to sell right now if you can.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're gonna be able to get

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>for them, Like I'm just looking at my home league

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>points lee right now. Like players who are significantly below

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>them who I'd rather have. I mean, they're all big names.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It's Jack Flaherty, we always talk about, Zach Wheeler, Carlos Carrasco,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola. I mean, if anyone's freaking out about those pictures,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>obviously you'd rather have them. Even if David Price, who

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>just came back off the I l of course you

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>loved all right yesterday. So these are just some of

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the names. I'll throw them out there is like, can

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you flip them for that highly doubted but crazier things

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have happened. What we had someone say they traded glass

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Now for Chris Sale right or something like that earlier

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>on in the season. So crazy things happen in leagues.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>So you could also package the deal. Yeah, float float

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys out there well, I will say this,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not impossible to kind of have this career renaissance

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>later on in your career, Like look at Jay Hat.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>When Jay Hab first came up with the Phillies, he

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was you know, took the league by a storm. Everyone

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>was so excited about him. You know, he bounced around

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>certain locations. And then the past couple of years with Toronto,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you talk about a guy like in his mid thirties

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>randomly starting to take off again. That was Jay Hab.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Greg So, I don't think it's impossible that some of

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>these pictures figure things out, but you're right it is

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>probably unlikely. Who do you think it's the next same

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Texas? I think it's Sean Kelly. I agree, Adventure.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Sean Kelly. He pitched. He pitched well

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>before he came off, before he went on the I

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>l for the most part. Although the clerks look good,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I think they light the role that the clerks in

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't think you want to mess with it.

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they give it a Sean Kelly. I agree

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with christ. The only reason I'll bring this up is

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>because Floria willingly called himself out for it in our

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>text change, so I feel like I could call him

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>out now you can come for anything, you know that,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>And you know I don't. I don't care at it.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course he convinced us to pick up Chris Martin

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>over Steve c Check. Yes, I also supported. It doesn't

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>look great supported it. I'm pretty sure I was on

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>team c Check. I picked him up in the man. Yeah,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought he had a little bit more staying power.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's there's a lot of mounts there in

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Texas with the clerk, and now Sean Kelly is back,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and I guess there's a lot in Chicago as well.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But a they're gonna win more games, and Becheck has

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>done a pretty damn good job, so I think if

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he continues to do well, they might just leave him

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in the closed role for the rest of the season.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of like pick your poison, you know. Yeah.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And then with c Check last night, the Cubs had

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a savor opportunity. But the night before he went like

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>what two and a third innings pitched, so he was

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not available last night. And what happens, Brad Brock comes

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>in to close the game out for the Cubbies, and

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>he blows it that just further in trance to Steve Schick.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And the best thing about that for the Cubs, as

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it really turns out when patro stroke if Peter Show

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>comes back, when if Brandon morro goes back, looking after

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>they go into that role has seemingly run away with it.

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>How many times have we heard this before? Greg where oh,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>once this reliever is back from injury, he's no doubt

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the closer role back. And they find someone

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>who's performing so well in the role. And Patriot Strope

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>had a ton of experience as a setup man anyway,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think they're gonna mess with this. By

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, she's like quick for you here. Malex Smith

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>had three strikeouts last night, up to one seventy two

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the average. So all right, so him and Jose Ramirez

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>neck and neck for player of the year. There you go,

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>um to Meckham, Chris is ninth homer here, you don't

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have anymore right dropped him? Oh yeah, he's gone. I

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>got Travis instead. He was three for four. He's starting

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to lose playing time to the team. Just called shed

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>long back up as well. It looks like Ryan Healey

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>might hit the I L So there's a lot of

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>mouse here with TIAD and I think as the season

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>goes along, they want to see what they have. And

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these young players j P crawl for shed

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>long as well, so I don't really have a problem. Plus,

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>tattle Seeker is gonna be back soon too. And if

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you play in deeper leagues, I am stashing him in

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the Great Fantasy Baseball Invitation. I think I picked him

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>up for like three bucks out of a thousand and

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>past week. So if you're playing the deeper league AO

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>only or like a fifteen team mix and you need

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a corner infielder, I think now is the time to

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>statch Kyle Seeger. You're gonna be back within I believe

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the next week. Right. Elvis Andrew is also in the

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>same game. We heard he's on a rehab assignment starting today.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>He went on the last week with a hamstot injury.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You thought that might have been three to four weeks.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It looks like he could be back as soon as

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, if not next week, which means good news.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It was Elvis Andrew's owners out there. Um he's been

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the survivor surprise shortstops. Of the season, certain ridiculous.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Seegar comes back, will it be Beckham moving? I don't think.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't see JP Crawford holding down the shortstop job

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like Beckham. My Place show. They traded for him, right,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so I think that they want to see what they

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have it. They technically traded for Beckham too, did they

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Did they sign him? No, they traded for him. They

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>traded with Baltimore for who. Look, JAP Crawford is younger,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that, and he did have not hitting well though,

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>well you know Tim Beckham did that prospect pedigree too.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sorry, you're right they signed him in January.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. So they traded for JP Crawford and that

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was part of that Jane Sigura trade. So I think,

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if anything, they want to see what they have in him.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It might be a split, but I would imagine it's

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>probably JP Crawford getting more of the point and Beckham.

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Beckham had five abbuys that last night. You're right, three

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for four, big, But like, can he keep doing it consistently?

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>If he does, he could hold down that job. I

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think where to take a break. When we come back,

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the Mets get a much needed victory over Patrick Corbyn. Finally,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that was good. We mentioned one of our bets from

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>yesterday when we get into today's bets, but also the

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>other bet from yesterday, which was Mike Szarroka doing Mikesaroka things.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll mention him and where he falls on the range.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>All your best thing pictures in the MLB when we

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>were serience Fantasy best Friends Forever a fantasy sports right

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you network Daily rododo dot Com. Learn from the game's

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>best DBS players. We don't just give you advice. We

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>play every day, all major sports, all year round. We

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>never stop. Industry leading DPS tools and custom projections, and

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>now the Daily rodo dot Com Optimizer. In minutes, build

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys. Learn

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DBS players. Join Daily rodo dot com.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Is someone in your family playing a dangerous game of

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die a year

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>from drug overdose, A hundred and twenty people a day,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes. Thousand

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>people die every year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and forty people of the day ten an hour, one

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>person every six minutes, somebody you know. Maybe next learn

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>how to help someone you love get away from the drugs,

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>alcohol and bad influences. With the f m l A,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people can take a leave of absence from their job

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and still keep it. Call now and learn how we

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>can help you. Eight six six four eight four nine

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>six two one eight six six four eight four nine

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>six two one. That's eight six six four eight four

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety six one full time fancy Like that's the escapegoat

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. You know they're playing horridly. You know again,

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>you can't get swept by the marlin. So they're getting

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention right now. And what are they

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? Cano No, they're not gonna make a trade Tomati,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So they have to do something. That's the thing is

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're struggling and things are not going to write, okay, well,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do? You gotta start up. So

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>who's the first person to go? The manager week days

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to the four m Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Network

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and on your popular podcast providers. The BFFs live on

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports or in your network Frankie Stamford, the Closer,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ventra hanging out as well. We mentioned yesterday our

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite debts of the day were The Twins and the

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Under That was Mine and the Combo, and then Frankie's

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was Mike Saroca taking on the San Francisco Giants and

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Alsa Rocca did was once again be awesome. Eight hits,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, eight hings, two hits, one run, struck out seven.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The only run he allowed him on a Brandon Crawford

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>solo shot in the sixth. Only one other hit other

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>than that. It was a marvelous performance. But because he

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed one run, his era actually went up slightly, which

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. The ear A now states at one point

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>zero one coming on for the save Shaw on Newcomb

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>after Luke j actually really pitched the day before. I

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know that's true as it is, but it's just

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thing unless really fell off. Mike Sarrocca five and one.

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Frank on the season. Mike Sarrocca is absolutely phenomenal. Man

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out about this last night. I was not

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>being too hard on myself. I legitimately hated myself in

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that moment for not having Mike Sarrocca I can't believe

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it because I was one of the biggest guys even

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>from last year, but I was worried during the spring,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's one of my biggest lessons from

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the spring. Greggy is normally I don't like to have

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>injury optimism for guys who are hurt during spring training.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at a lot of the guys

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>who were hurt, they're perfectly fine right now and they're awesome.

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Lindoor has come back and has been great. Tommy fam

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>has been awesome for the season. He was dealing with

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a shoulder thing. Marcelo Zuna, aside from scaling a wall

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and then falling off and looking ridiculous awesome for fantasy purposes.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bueler not as great consistent. He's coming around, but

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Mike Saroka was dealing with the shoulder injury. And all

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we kept hearing where the Braves have all these possible

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers that could be in their rotation, all these

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>different prospects, and they tried with this guy, and they

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>tried with that guy, and to try with that guy,

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the one guy who they tried out who

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>has stuck around the longest. Well, there's two. Max Freed

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>has been great too, but Mike Saroka man and I

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>knew how good he can be. His combination of command,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he has a four pitch mix that is legitimate. He

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>gets groundball outs, he gets a decent amount of strikeouts.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>He's not ever gonna be a guy who's like Tan

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven case per nine. But he's up over eight so

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>far this year, and he has allowed one earned run

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>or less in all seven of his starts this season.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And he's starting to give you length going deep into

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>games as well. If you look at three of his

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>last four starts, he's gone at least seven innings pitched.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Last night just absolutely masterful his first start of the season,

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>where he didn't allow a single walk. He's just been ridiculous.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>At one point zero one e R the strand right,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the strand rate is high, it's eight seven percent, and

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he has a two oh three bad like he's not

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to maintain some of these things.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I realized that he's got a three six nine exfit.

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think when it's all said and done, we're probably

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at a low three's e r A. And I've

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>had some people asking me, well, should I sell high

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>on Mikesaroka. No, the answer is no. You watched the

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>guy pitch with the fastball. He's got a changeup that's

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like twelve difference. I mean, that's the difference that you're

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for between a fastball and a changeup. And it's

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a really good changeup. And then he has a slider,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg it looks like a curveball. I mean, it's like

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a power curveball. The guy's got the complete package. The

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>only thing that I would worry about him with him

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is that he's probably gonna be on an Endy's limit,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>like similar to a guy like Chris Paddock. But as

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>much hype as Chris Paddock has gotten, Mike Saroka has

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>been just as good, maybe even better. Well in a

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>shorter time frame. Right, it's only even it was one starter,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so more right pitch. But yeah, So Roca has seven

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and seven starts so far, he's got two thirds and

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I have one second. Paddock has pitched one start, iras

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>at one point three. They're both pretty good. I mean,

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you're splitting hairs here. But Paddock got blown up

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>once I think recently, so it's not right to give

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>him a pass. We'll give him a pass. But if

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you these two guys, especially and keep his leagues, you

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have to hold. The thing is obviously there's gonna be

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>some regression for both of them. I mean both of

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>them under a two e R A this one one

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>point one. Oh, that's impossible to sustained. But I would

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>say that both of them will end up with even

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>possibly even a high two e R. Not even low threes,

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe even high too. They're that good, both of them,

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like dominant with the control uh their stuff everything, like

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, both of them possibly even you know, future

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimate aces on major league teams for years to come.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Both of them. Maybe Sirocca more of a deuce because

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have the k upside you said, like a

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>paddock will, I think, but both. I mean, you can't

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ask for any more from both these guys right now.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I got two of them on the same team, which

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is pretty crazy. But it's not gonna it's fun. It's

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be good at the end of the season.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you that. Yeah, I got I got serious, Pomo.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Mike, he was your boy all

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the last year, Frankie, he was your guy. Got hurt, struggled,

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>finally healthy and obviously performing very very well for the

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Braves. They did look up when the last time

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Luke Jackson pitched. It was actually on Saturday. He did

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>not pitch on Sunday, but he threw. He threw and

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>blowing them that save. On Saturday. It was a second

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>day in a row that he pitched, So getting two

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>days off kind of makes sense. Any worry at all

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>here with nucom kind of getting worked in. He's been

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>much better as a reliever since he's come back. Well,

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I will say this also on Saturday. Yeah, I mean

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to give him as much rest because

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he's more so stretched out to be a starting pitcher

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and he could throw a few more innings, throw a

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>few more pitches, so we might see. As you know,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>these things changed when it comes to bullpens, like from

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>one minute to the next, these things can change so quickly.

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So as much as we love Luke Jackson, and we

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>said that he's been pretty good in the opportunities that

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been given. And you know, I saw like there

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was a feature article written about him by I think

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's who is it, David O'Brien, the writer for Atlanta whatever, athletic.

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he were like a feature about Luke Jackson

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and how he's their closer. But I wouldn't be surprised

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>if they kind of makes nukeomb in here, like if

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>there's lefties coming up. Since he's gone to being a

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>reaver reliever, his fastball velocity has gone up over two

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour he was normally sitting. Now he's he's

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up around ninety five. So I mean you're starting to

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>see the velo for Sean nucom and and he's performing

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>quite well as a reliever too. Yeah, I'm intrigued by

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Nukem. I liked him last year. He was

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty good for the most part last year as a starter.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>He kind of tailed off at the end a little bit,

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know every other start he kind of get

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>blown up, wouldn't go deep into games. Well, I didn't

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>expect him going to the bullpen this year, but listen,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>if he's in the bullpen, any starter that goes from

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a starter to the bullpen that was at least halfway

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>decent or above the average as a starter is going

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to be good in the bullpen. It's just easier to

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>go one inning as opposed to five and you know,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>completely dominant, and you could actually go all out in

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that one inning and throw as hard as you can

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and really dominate for that one inning and focus on that.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think Nwcomb could actually take over the closing

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>role at some point here, like I would. I wouldn't

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if Luke Jackson starts to falter a little bit,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, does work. It does bear mentioning that we

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are about eleven days away until Craig Kimberroll is eligibly

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>signed without draft pick compensation, And yeah, he can factor

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>into the mix here for Atlanta as well or some

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>other teams we spoke about s Scheck, I mean he

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>could factor into the Chicago Cubs as well. Since returning

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Gregan on May six, has made seven appearances, has not

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed a run, has not a lot of walk, pitching

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>very very well out of the bullpen for the Atlanta Braves. Frank,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>why don't you turn around for everybody? Because yesterday was

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Glabor Day the New York Yankees, as it has been

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>seemingly every single time that they have faced the Orioles

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this this season, Labor is ten home runs Chris against

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>overall this season. Do you know how many of those

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>will come against the Orioles. I think I heard you

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>guys say this though everybody else. Eight eight out of

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>his ten home runs this season has come against the Orioles,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>and they actually before his second home run the night

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>last night in the eighth inning. Yes, in a montage

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of all the home runs Glabor has hit this year

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Orioles. Next pitch gone off of Michael Gibbons

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>last night? Who blew it? Uh? I watched this game

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and I was texting back and forth with you, Frank.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>The Orioles maybe the worst thing I've ever seen in

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>my life. Like I was saying before the season, I

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're over under for wins was fifty nine. Last

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>year they won forty seven. I said, how is this number? Like?

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>How are people not pounding this under? How are the

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're legitimately they may be the worst team

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I have ever seen in my life. And I'm not kidding,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>like I understand the overall. Yes, I understand you have

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>bad hitters, and I understand you have bad pictures that

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that happens, but their inability in the field, He's like, ridiculous.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I will explain. Did you watch the game in the

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>last night, Christion. But but like I gotta talk about

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>white Smith for a moment. Right was hitting great though

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he is three for five last night. Dwight smiths look great.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>The problem was in left field. Dwight Smith caught a

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>ball that there was the second and third one out right,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Brett Gardner's at third base. That's a kind of speed

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's out there. Dwight Smith catches one in left field.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>What the right play is you throw it to third

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>because it was a deep play ball. You were not

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>getting Gardner coming home. Right, did you see this? Or no?

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, Okay, okay, Dwight Smith catch the ball.

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Arn't Hicks sits it to the left field. The proper

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>baseball player, he throws the third to the runner can

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>advance or maybe you get it down. Dwight Smith throws

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it into the dugout. I don't think he was trying

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that. He airmails it. He wasn't trying to

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>third the third trying to throw it home. He airmails

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it and it goes essentially all the way into the dugout.

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, obviously cameraminating advance is the third base obviously

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>extremely not even anything in the ninth fitting, but dude

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>does the same thing. He did it twice, same situation.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>He airmails it again. Runners advanced, the runner did score,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but runner advanced. Oh my, what are you doing? And

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>then it gets worse. Did you watch the ninth the

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>ninth ning, Frank I did not. Okay, do you know

0:29:54.680 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens other than Gary Sanchez? H right, that's the

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>eight thing. So the ninth inning, Yankees tied up seven seven.

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a runner on third two acts Luke Void three

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>two cats to him right. Michael Gibbons throws the pitch.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Luke Void pops it straight up like straight up, okay,

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>slams his bat on the ground. Camera Mayban, who's on

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>third base again running comes, I mean comes home, right,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it founds a right to it, right. Hadri Sevorino,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles catcher, throws the mask and it goes like this.

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It was like this, and the ball lands over there.

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Not even I am not exaggerating at all. It is

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>worth going to watch, gentlemen. Is this the real life

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>embodiment of the bad News bear? Legitimately goes like this

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and the ball lands over there. Next pitch is found

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the way next pitch voit walks. Garrison just comes up

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>for your own bombed Yankee. They should have been out

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the inning. It was a foul pop up right

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>behind home plate. His ball easily, no one else, no one.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Those like this waives everybody aloft like he has it

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>lands over there. I have never seen a worst organization

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>than what the Orioles did. Like with the Yankees bad feelings,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we talked about that, but this is embarrassing. Man, and listen,

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Luke Void had a bad pop up drop earlier in

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, but this was a joke. I will find

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it for you, gentlemen during the break. You can't find

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it yourself because there's not an aspect of the Orioles

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that is even like it's not even the farm system either,

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you don't really have much to look forward to either.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Understand they have used Neil d As he was the

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>big piece that they got back in the Manny Machado trade.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But I said this last year. I said this during

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the preseason as well, when we were talking about using

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Neil Diaz. I can't believe at the Orioles couldn't get

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>more for Manny Machado than they did. I kind of

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like they got fleeced because the Dodgers have all

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>these prospects. You're telling me you couldn't get Manny Machado,

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean man Machado Superstar. I understand it was a rental,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>but you couldn't give Verdugo. You couldn't get like Julio

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>your Rya is somebody. He was still coming off injury

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time. So even like they have used Neil Dz,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I like Ryan Mountcastle a lot as well, and I

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be here sooner rather than later. And

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I like Austin Hayes. So you have some young hitters

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that you might be able to build around. And I

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>understand you probably more so want to care about offense

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with a team that plays in Camden Yards, and you

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>want to pitching, but they don't really have much pitching

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to look forward to. Maybe these guys developed well, but like,

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>who was the last great Orioles starting pitcher that they developed?

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Greg That was a long time ago. Oh no, Eric

0:32:54.040 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Bdard was not. He was he started, he started, was

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna trade to the Mariners. Yes, he wasn't even great either,

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but I mean and he was good for the Orioles.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just named the Orioles that but that's like, that's

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm telling Like they couldn't develop him, took the

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Cubs to develop. Well, it was supposed to be, right,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it was supposed to be Dylan Bundy and Kevin Gallasman

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Tilman, like those three guys were supposed to

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>lead them into the future. Just a weird spot, and

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to continue to, you know, sell

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>some pieces off here, Like whatever you can get for

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Johnny VR, you could get for for

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a tree Man Seny Blowser's that was bad. Oh, that

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. Yeah, they don't really have to top prospects either,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just they don't what did they get from?

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Like what did they got? They got used Neil Ds it, Yeah,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm sure they got like a few other

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like lesser prospects and maybe these guys can develop. But

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I used Neil das this year at double A A

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody hitting two it's one five with one homer read

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>doubles seven ribbies with a b P. Yeah, they might

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have tos in double A using neil ds main piece

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of the many Mattado trade. They need to like revamp

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>their whole scouting you know, no work they did in

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the off season. I'm pretty sure they made huge front

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>office changes, right, Greg, didn't they like they changed everybody? Yeah,

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>so they have still organizational problem and they got rid

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of their manager. Obviously, they got rid of their general

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>manager of president baseball operations, who was Dan Duquette. So

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they brought in a new president. But he comes from

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the ownership where Peter Angelo has never really wanted to

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>spend money and now his sons are running it. But

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, like know which son is. Brady Anderson

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of influence there. It's like, ultimately they

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ended up choosing to spend on Chris Davis rather than

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>there has there has been. Yes, they ultimately did Brendon

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Hides there. They're just not enough talent. There's just not

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>enough talent as Oriels team, and Frank you mentioned it.

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>There's just tell you there's hope in a moment, there

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't hope. We and we've seen it time and time again.

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, the Astros were the worst team in baseball

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>by far for years and then they got the number

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one pick. A couple of years in a row or

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>three years in a row, and but now, I mean,

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be like a long standard. It's gonna

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>be one of those five It's gonna be one of

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>those five year rebuilds. But that's the thing though, the

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Astros actually had like they did well scouting their prospects,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that got good prospects. Yes, they had first picks for

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>many years in a row, but they turned this team

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 1>completely around. But it took it took a one like

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>four years, right something like that. They were they were

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>really bad. Oh I remember when they were when they

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>when they were from the n L to the a L,

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is when they were really bad. Basically one they got

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>rid of Berkman. That was like the end of the

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Astros right time they were good. That was like the

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Orioles that they were remembered they were, they used to

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have meals. He used to be one of their Actually,

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it actually started even worse than we remember, Chris. So

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it started when they're the n L. So back in

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and uh two eight they went eighty six

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and seventy five, finishing third division, right, So that was

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the end of the era. That was the end of

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the era. Before that finished fourth like I was, before

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that finished seconds that was the end of the era.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Was two thousand eight, two thousand nine and central, seventy

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>four and eight, two thousand and ten, seventy six and

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty six rock bottom, so we thought, was two thousand

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>eleven still in the end. By the way, fifty six

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and one oh six. A year later, they're even worse.

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Fifty five and one oh seven their first year in

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a O West, even worst, fifty one and one eleven.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>They were laughing. They were the stock of baseball for

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 1>five years. A year later seventy and ninety two starting

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>to turn around there, and then twenty fifteen they turned

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it around. When eighty six and seventy six, that was

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the year I believe they beat the Yankees in the

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>wild Card game. Year stretched, they were horrible. It was

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the Stretchers won two, three or five five years before

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you saw progress. Really sick. That's five year looking at

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe worse. Who knows. They don't have prospects. To take

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a break. We're back after us. The Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is ready to take you out to the ball game.

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Our experts and analysts are following the Boys of Summer

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>through all one sixty two games of the two thousand

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Catch the latest news and notes every day

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to help you win your fantasy leagues and Georgy at

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>best tournaments will always want you back listening and watching

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Network on the v and T s

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio app and the Van T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're Root Root rooting for

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Morie Sale two thousand and fifteen,

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen, European Long Drive Tour Champion, two

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World number one Me personally, I keep my

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of the bucker, leaving the range or you're leaving the boys.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Can go to game based Grooming dot

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Com from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs,

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>game time decisions. You know what's crazy Actually a guy

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>last night from Scarborough who was watching a rapid game,

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but he was talking about like marriage, about how he

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just got divorced. Top times art to find a single

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>park diamond up today in the air divorce. Yeah, so

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it sounds like maybe we should, like

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we have pipe share like we should have like a

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>divorce sort of thing. Excellent boy. Hey, you want to

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>get out of the pipe share ad. We've got that

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>guy that the best. Thanks Dad, week days four pm

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Eastern one pm Pacific, only on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Can't get enough Fantasy football, Rhoto Experts has launched their

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>NFL three Fantasy Football package, which includes the best math

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet.

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Davis Madig and the Rhoto Experts are providing dynasty, season

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft content every day

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year to give you an edge regardless of

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>what type of fantasy football you play. Save Timber sent

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at roto experts dot com with the promo code Evan

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>t s Y. It's the NFL sixty five Fantasy Football

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 1>package only at Rhoto Experts dot Com, Fantasy Best Friends Forever,

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network, over at FanDuel of the Milwaukee

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Bucks to an hal point favorites to night Lights. One's

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>head on the road in Toronto, I believe, Gabes said earlier,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time the Raptors have been home dogs all

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>season long. Bucks reminds one of thy two on the

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>money line over under total sits at two sixteen raptors.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You're at plus one thirty. Can they get it done

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at home again? It took a miraculous effort from Toronto

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time. The second time, Well, we'll find out

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>can they get the job done. We'll put your money

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>where our mouths are. At FanDuel dot com slash grid,

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you receive a free bet up to five hundred bucks.

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>To free bet up to five hundred dollars, we open

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a sports wagering account at FanDuel dot com slash grid.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Call into the show with your wayning wager and walk

0:39:57.920 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>us through your bet. We'd love to hear from you,

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>So go to handle dot com slash grid, open your

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>new account and claiming you're freewager of up your five

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars today. Who do you like in the game?

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Milwaukee. I've like Milwaukee since the beginning to Actually, yeah,

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.959
<v Speaker 1>I like Milwaukee tonight as well. Grey heard Gabe talking

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. He said, Uh, the Milwaukee Bucks are twenty

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one and one coming off a loss this year straight

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>up in their eighteen and four against the spread, So

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that just shows you they have a lot of resiliency,

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Like once they lose a game, they bounced back. And

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>you kind of saw that in the Celtics series where

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they got punched in the mouth early on. They lost

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that first game, won the next four in a row.

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think they kind of needed another wake up

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>call here from Toronto. And I think Milwaukee bounces back.

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember Jesson, we scored twelve points in that game and

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it took double overtime and a herculean effort from Kawhi

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Leonard in order to win that game. So just does

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>anything like what we're used to seeing from him, then

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>they probably win this gentleman sweetly. By the way, my

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>my friends, my friends were looking at during March madness,

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're around there maybe a little after. They

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>were looking at the odds to win the NBA championship, right,

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and they sell the Bucks. At the time, it was

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>plus eight hundred. They're like the Bucks like probably the

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>best team in the East, had the best record in

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. Where did they rank among all the teams

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that like? I believe it was third behind the Warriors

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and the rock I don't know the Rockets probably, so

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I believe they were third. But there were plus eight

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of time, and my buddy was really in the

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>basketball like this. This is a crazy number because they

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the best record in the NBA, and the East is not.

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to go through Golden State in Houston,

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a gat there and if they get to the finals,

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 1>they'll take your shot against Golden State. By the time

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you put the bet in at the Vandal sports book,

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it went down to plus seven fifty. But all my

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>friends basically I didn't do it. I'm an idiot. But

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 1>because the Bucks are not winning it, you could hedge it.

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Now they're not. They make it sure that they to them.

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to make money off it if you

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>hedge anyway, because you have to put down so much

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>for the world. Do remember the Warriors, the Bucks of

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>home court advantage that But so they all put like

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred bucks on it each like they can

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>walk away with nice, nice windings and then walking can

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are two games away from making with

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the finals. Would I think it would be a fun

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>series against Golden State, But I don't think they realistically.

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they need Kevin Durant back to win eight? Geez?

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It would make each No, do you have anything for tonight,

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll go. So there's one thing I like that I knowed.

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 1>We we mentioned this briefly because we were excited about

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>our pats. Uh, there's one thing we both like. There's

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>there's if I have to choose my own, I will

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll go first. So we were talking about this a

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit downstairs. And the one that really stood out

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to me this morning, Uh, I was on the bus.

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I was looking through some of the lines for today

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Tigers going up against the Marlins. This game

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is in America. I really like the total here at

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, and I realized that it's a

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>low number, but like the undergrad, you're looking at two

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>teams that are twenty nine and thirtieth and run scored

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this year in the Tigers and the Marlins, and Caleb

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Spencer Turnbull both have sub three e R rays.

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're in for a pitching clinic tonight. Yeah.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I also take the under there, even though it number

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>at seven and a half. I also I also like

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Spencer turn Bowl and the Tigers in this game. In general,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's completely a toss of it's pick him game is

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>really good. He is really good, but both Fends are

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.879
<v Speaker 1>really bad. So that's kind of my thought. The other game,

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I like, I know this is weird, but Joe n

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>was talking about it this morning. I'll make it rain.

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I like the Padres Matt Strom tonight against the Arizona

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Diamonbacks and Zach Grinky. Griggy left that last last start

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>with something kind of wrong with him, and I wonder

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>if he has a little bit of debilitating effects from that,

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Like he's extra cautious, something like along those lines. So

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I like the Padres money line and listen, Vegas is

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:20.919
<v Speaker 1>onto this too. Over at the at the Fantal Sports Book.

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>They're both sitting at my just went away. So I'm

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>not against that, but it's one of those things where

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you kind of look like that kind of seems weird

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>given that it's grinky and strong because that I like

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Strom and I like the Padres tonight. That's a

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that's me. You got anything that you like adventure? I

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>haven't really looked all right, It's fine, there you go.

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So our picks tonight Marlins and Tigers under mine is

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt strong and the Padres against the Dimebacks. I have

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to give you a second one I'll take the Tigers

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>in that Marlins game as well. There you go. Those

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:55.919
<v Speaker 1>are three tonight. Those are your best that's ever here

0:44:56.160 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on the BFFs parrently three. Now keep it going out here, Grady,

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if we can keep it rocking and rolling.

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to last night, gentlemen, for a moment

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 1>where Carlos Carrasco did not give you the quality start.

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He went five inutings like the last seven, hits, three runs,

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>striking out at four while walking to Fred Anderson actually

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>out pitched them. Lucavino let up a run, as did

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Blake trying, but he ultimately got his eighth save of

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this season. By the way, Frank, tell them the look now,

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, man got five outs last night, fourv the strikeout,

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>his ear a sins at one point six nine. You

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>know what we're talking about. That would be the phenomenal. Hey,

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Jay Cole, all right, well, this is just another weird

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:47.720
<v Speaker 1>infatuation that Gregor has really, really bad major league baseball player.

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna completely ignore what you just said and

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Carlos Carrasco and why I

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think right now is a really good buying opportunity for him.

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Before this start, he had gone to star in a

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>row where he went twelve innings, didn't allow a run.

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Both starts were against the White Sox, and here against

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland A's didn't have his best stuff. I was

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>watching a lot of this start. Five innings, three earned runs,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>four point three zero e r A, which is basically

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in line with what we normally get from him in

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the first half in his career. In the first half,

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Charlos Carrasco four point zero four e r A in

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the second half three point three seven. He's just a

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>guy that gets better as the season goes along. I

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>owned him last year. That was the case last year

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. And if you look at the underlying numbers

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for Carrasco, they're all really damn Anybody in your league

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is freaking out about Carlos Krasco. He's got a four

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>point three zero ear A, three six two FIP, three

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>point to five x fit over eleven case per nine.

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>If the season ended today, that would be a career high.

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>One point five five walks per nine. If the season

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>ended today, that would be a career low. There's lots

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>of like about Carlos Carrasco. If someone's freaking out nap,

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm all over that. Totally, totally agree with that as well.

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>There was no love it soft for a J Cole.

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It happens. I guess Matt Olson Frank fourth homer of

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the year, Matt Chapman Frank eleventh homer of the season.

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chapman had been a little bit cold recently. I

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>actually got a few tweets yesterday about match Chapman. What's

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>going on? Man, Um, he's been cold. I can't necessarily

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:29.879
<v Speaker 1>but aunces back yesterday, multi hit game, two hits, three ribbys. Um,

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is gonna happen. I think he always

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of was overperforming a little bit when he was

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting over three. Remember this was a guy who struggled

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 1>mightily with strikeouts in the minor leagues, and he was

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>more of like a hit for low average but hit

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for power kind of guy, like a two thirty two

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>forty hitter in the minors that would hit like thirty bombs.

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So I was never realistically expecting a three batting average

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from him. I still think he'll be better than two

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty four. But Ventura, I think if you drafted Chapman

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you still have been puzzle be surprised he's giving you

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>tho far. Yeah, you're still very happy. I mean because

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he started so hot and so good, Like you're like, oh,

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he's getting cold now, and you're upset obviously, But this

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is what you uh, this is what you paid for for.

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know you did. You got a kind

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of a discount on him on draft day, and yeah,

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna cool off a little bit because he's not

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit three hundred. He's not that type of guy.

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>He's giving you eleven homer, he's got eleven doubles, twenty

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>seven abuis. He's doing everything you wanted for where you

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>drafted him. So don't panic about, you know, him cooling

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit yesterday to foward a home or

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>through ours. That's what you want to see. As long

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as he could keep the cold streaks to a minimum,

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>he'll be fine. Yeah. And looking at the underlying numbers,

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, three thirty eight babbit for Matt Chapman led

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to a two seventy eight batting average. This year a

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>two sixty five babbit as let's wait, two sixty four

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>batting average and interesting, it's not like he's hitting a

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ton of flyballs. Normally, if you see a guy who's

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hitting a lot of flyballs or hitting a lot of

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>home runs, uh, that means you're probably gonna have a

0:48:57.040 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>low babbit. But is flyball rate last year thirty roe

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>point three percent this year forty point eight percent, so

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not really out of whack. And his hard hit

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 1>rate still really good last year forty three points percent

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this year forty eight but still really be good. So

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I would expect both the babbit and the batting average

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to jump up here. He's lowered his strikeout rate tremendously

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>last year twenty three point seven percent, this year fifteen

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>point nine. So this is part of the natural progression

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that I was talking about before the season when we

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>did the third base preview, that he took huge steps

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.359
<v Speaker 1>forward last year, and it looks like from a plate

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>disciplined perspective, he's taken even more step forward, more of

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a step forward this year. I would expect the batting

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>average to get even better. Yeah, yeah, not to mention,

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 1>he's also twenty seven times so far this year as well, Yeah,

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>eleven point six percent walk create that's also up two

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>percent from last year as well, so just making massive

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>improvements at the plate. For MATCHA, Jose Ramira is still

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>batting under two hundred. As we get towards June one seven,

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the average sits j Ramirez at the movie he has

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:00.959
<v Speaker 1>a two hit games goes up to one crazy seven.

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely go on a crazy test soon. Gotta come at

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this point he's played so much and where it's not

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>impossible because we saw what he did last year to

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>start the season, like those first two months, first three months,

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>he was ridiculous. It was almost I think he was

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>almost a thirty thirty player in the first half. I

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sear Greg it's how ridiculous he was. So we know

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>what he's capable of when it when it comes to

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 1>like going on a hot treat, and he still is

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>giving you twelve stolen basis. So for all the bad

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's done, well stolen bases is great. But I

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think overall, if you were expecting a I drafted him

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a few places and I like, I'll as soon as

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I draft someone like, I'll put in projections to see

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>where like my Rhodo standings are at, and I was

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>probably expecting like a two eight batting average. He's not

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 1>going to get there s something like crazy, miraculous. Even

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.240
<v Speaker 1>if he goes on a run like hell, he'll probably

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>get it up to like two best. But what you

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>were expecting coming into the season, we are not going

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to get from Hoss. But if he does get to

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like two sixty or even a little higher than that,

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that means he had a great second half. From your out,

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that means he's probably gonna hit. So you don't want

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of you don't want to sounding stats

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the season are not gonna look

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>good because if teen rb I s seven team runs

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>scored four home runs on one, I mean he would

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.919
<v Speaker 1>have to do something miraculous. He's capable, capable, But based

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on the way he's struggling with breaking balls again and

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what he showed last year in the second half struggling

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>against breaking balls, I don't really have faith that that's

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen again. Quickly, guys, moving only about five

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago. In the program for the Astros last night,

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>brat Pecott continued to pitch very very well. He allowed

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>just two hits over his five and his of work,

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the annoying part because he didn't throw anyone

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pitches despite not walking anybody, struck out nine batters. Bullpen

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for Houston was particularly excellent. Run uh Roberto being up

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:51.720
<v Speaker 1>his twelveth saved on the other side of the White Socks.

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Nothing really to speak about as Ryan Pressley gone like

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>dings or something like that without a run. He he's

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:06.320
<v Speaker 1>quite good. Zero despicious year also has two saves whenever

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to give Roberto as soon a day off. Look,

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean I drafted him in our safe plus holds league.

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the top relievers to grab in

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that format just because he is lights out as a reliever.

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Brad Peacock Now, since getting blown up on May second

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Twins, Greg He's gone seventeen innings, pitched one

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>earned run in with twenty four strikeouts. So Brad Peacock

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>has been very good since getting blown up. Something Colin

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>mckugh was not able to do so at least one

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of those pictures. Similar. Range has been able to right

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the ship. And we said this all along, like he's

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:40.399
<v Speaker 1>not gonna give you he's not gonna go deep into games.

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna give you a lot of quality starts

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because they kind of limited him to five innings a

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time, but roto he'll take it. Yeah, yeah,

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of course we will. Absolutely Yeah. Tyler White, by the way,

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>finally gets on the board with his first one, first

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>home run. Thanks Buddy, Happy, you came, Happy showed up

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Mets win. I mentioned exactly where I was going,

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and amazingly, the Mets finally get away font on them

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 1>against the Nationals. They have no fifth starter at the moment,

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.319
<v Speaker 1>as when we're five to get the start. The person

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that they announced was going to start the game early

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:18.320
<v Speaker 1>on was Drew Gagnon, who pitched as the follower in

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.759
<v Speaker 1>this one. UH pitch to shutout innings there for the Mets,

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbyn, they finally get to him. Five innings, six hits,

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:26.880
<v Speaker 1>four runs, walk three, struck out seven. Pete Alonso had

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 1>a really long home run in the first inning. Azario

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>also hit his UH hit his fourth home run in

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the first inning of this one. A lot of damage there,

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of course against Patrick Corvin. Here for the Nats, Anthony

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Rendon hit his ninth home run of the year. For

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Rendon batting three forty two with the OBP of four

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:50.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty three. Remember Anthony Bardon a free agent after this season.

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Complete beast. Yeah, we'll see what happened our m v

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:55.560
<v Speaker 1>P Frank, our m v P pick. Look, if you

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't get hurt, he's stilled any three forty two. I

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:03.760
<v Speaker 1>understand he plays in the same UH league as Cody

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Bellinger and Christian Yellot, so his opportunity for the m

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>v P is probably gone. But because of the counting stead,

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he still can't be awesome for fantasy, and I expect

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:16.120
<v Speaker 1>him to do just that. For Patrick Corbin, this was

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth time already this season that he faced the

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:21.359
<v Speaker 1>New York Mets. I would think the more time can

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you face a team, the more it favors the He

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.240
<v Speaker 1>seen so many times and so he's been absolutely dominant.

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 1>His last time out was against the Mets. Eight innings

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 1>pitched with eleven strike aus. So I kind of give

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corban a little bit of a pass. And he's

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:37.959
<v Speaker 1>been so good. Even after this start where he allows

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>four and runs in five innings, he has a three

0:54:39.600 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>point to five yar a venture. I kind of give

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.399
<v Speaker 1>him a pass here. Yeah, absolutely. I mean he's been

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:47.359
<v Speaker 1>as advertised where you drafted him, be a happy way

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you got him. He's been exactly as he was last year,

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he's got the k rate up like it was last year, right,

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe not as high, right, just but still above acape

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>rading um. And yeah, consistent as they come. This was

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't even that bad of a start. He at

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 1>seven ks, so I'm not gonna worry about that. What

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I am worried about is Victor Robles really cool and

0:55:06.400 --> 0:55:11.040
<v Speaker 1>off lately to forty four batting average and just doing

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>really not much of anything lately. I know he's got

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a homes, eight bags, but are you worried about Victor

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>rob At least you got the eight homers and eight bags,

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's contributing it. Yeah, he's in a slump, but

0:55:21.480 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the young players slump. I'm not worried because we're getting

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what you need, which is the home runs and the

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Steelers that combination. That's why he draft Or Robles. Yeah,

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to see more batting average. I spoke about

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit last week that like, the underlying

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:36.399
<v Speaker 1>numbers for Victor Roblests were not great, but you took

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it because you were still getting eight homers, eight stolen bases,

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and thirty runs scored. But the hard hit rate is

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent. League average is like low thirties percent

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>percentage and he's had last year he was at thirty

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>five point four percent. And uh, the strikeout from last

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>year to this year this year six point nine and

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the walker it has gone down to, like walking numbers

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for Victim Robust are just not great right now. So

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>to answer your question, venture, I am a little bit

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about him. Um, he still had this interesting mix

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of that power speed combination, but I mean

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the batting averages coming down in a major way. He's

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting under two thirty in the month of May, and

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. If you can't bat to forty and

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:23.839
<v Speaker 1>two thirty, if you're a guy that doesn't even get

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on base with the walks much, you're gonna get yourself

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of zero point games, you know as

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy for us, and that's not good. He needs

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to bat for hot a much high average in that,

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like two eight plus. The good thing for him is

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't really have anyone to replace him with, so

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he'll get it shot. Playing time is fair. Yeah, And

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking of playing time and getting an opportunity harder key boom,

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:50.399
<v Speaker 1>let's remember the name living for thirty five with four

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:54.720
<v Speaker 1>home coming, we need for Chris venture in frank Stample.

0:56:56.000 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see tomorrow. We hope fix