WEBVTT - Will There Be A Saudi Iran War?

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Tensions heating up in

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. Is Saudi Arabia going to go to

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>war with Iran? Are we going to get involved and

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>perhaps start a war with Iran? We're going to that.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Plus the Libs are doubling down even further on the

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh allegations that have already been proven to be baseless.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into that. Plus, but some of the Democrat

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>candidates are offering up in terms of socialism, expanding government.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>We got doctor Jalathan Schanzer joining the talk national security

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Israeli elections. Lots of stuff coming up. This

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>no mistake American, You're a great American Again. The buck

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show begins analysts this attack on the ore refinery

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>by any reasonable definition, as an act of war. It

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is attacking the world economy, sustability of the oil markets

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>throughout the world. I am looking for a response that

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>would be unequivocal. If they don't pay a price for

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>bombing a neighbor's oil fields, then all hell is going

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to break out in the Mid East. Welcome to the

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, thank you so much for joining.

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>As you can hear there from Senator Lindsey Graham, there's

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely major concerns over what is going on in the

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Middle East right now. So here's here's what we know.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with what we know. It was a devastating

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sneak attack on Saudi Arabia's most important asset on Saturday.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>There was this fuse, a lot of explosive drones and

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>cruise missiles that slammed into the heart of Saudi oil production.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this was a surgically precise military operation. You

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>had nineteen projectiles launched, seventeen hits on critical oil infrastructure.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:23.559
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the Saudi facility at a Keek is the

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>single biggest crude oil stabilization plant in the world and

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Kuras oil field is the second biggest. So as a

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>result of this one attack, Saudi production dropped about fifty percent.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>That's about five point seven million dollars million barrels of

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>crude oil coming offline all at one time on one day.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>If you had this double digit jump in global oil

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>prices as a result, which got everybody's attention. So who

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for this very clear act of war. Well,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was an immediate claim of responsibility from

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Hoothy Rebels, Hoothies, who have been fighting this vicious

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>civil war right next door to Saudi Arabia in Yemen,

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and they've launched hundreds of these small scale drone attacks

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at Saudi Arabia, which has been in charge of this

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>at the head of this coalition to defeat the Hoothy

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Rebels since twenty fifteen, and they have been pretty brutal

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in their efforts to suppress the Hoothies. But you see,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>none of the Hoothie strikes in the past on the

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Saladies were anywhere near this scale or sophistication. This was

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a tactical proficiency far beyond what had been seen previously

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Hoothy militia and Yemen. And you know, and

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>here we are, we're a few days after sifting through

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>missile and drone parts, and you've got all these different

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>experts and intelligence agencies looking at the satellite imagery to

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure they're certain of the culprit. So this could

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>lead to war, and right now it is believed. In fact,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Saudis have said that they are effectively without doubt

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Iranians were behind this, and then it's just

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a question of what the additional details are. The claim

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>from the Hoothies the hoothis trying to take responsibility. That's

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>really a fig leaf meant to create hesitation among the

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Saudis and among and for US striking back militarily against

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians. But look, this all makes some sense from

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of the Iranians are cornered after Trump pulled

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the Obama administrations a Joint Comprehensive Plan of

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Action that JCPOA right, the Iran nuclear deals, how we

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think of it, that hit The brakes on the Iranian

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>economy are real fast. Yeah, sure, the European Union hasn't

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>reimposed sanctions, but you know, oil exports are down tremendous,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>foreign investments down tremendously. Iranian GDP shrunk almost four percent

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>last year and might and they think it will shrink

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about six percent next year if the current trends continue.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So the Mullas are cornered. Iran's heading for a grueling recession.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But they still haven't blinked, not on their nuclear program,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not on negotiations. In fact, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Kamene

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>has said there will be no negotiation with the United

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>States to change this. Instead, it looks like he's certain

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians are striking at the heart of Saudi oil

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>production production. To go Trump, right, they're trying to send

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a signal to the rest of the world that when cornered,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the Iranian viper still has fangs. So let's assume the

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Iranians were behind this. What is the United States? Dude,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>do we really want to get in the middle of this.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope not. The backdrop for this Saudi strike, this

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>sneak attack, which is clearly in that of war, is

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the regional Sunni Shia proxy war with the Iranians that

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>has been escalating in recent years. Some would say it's

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>been escalating for over a millennium, and it could easily

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>set the entire Middle East of flame. All it takes

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is a miscalculation on one side or the other. I

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>think President Trump. I hope President Trump recognizes these risks.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>His supporters were promised a non interventionist foreign policy the

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election looms. Doing the Saudis fighting for them

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is not putting American interest first. It's not putting America first.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Could the Saudis set off a regional war on their

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>own by striking back an It's certainly possible. Could oil

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>spike over one hundred dollars a barrel? Who knows? These

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are dangerous times, my friend. Thoughts and prayers for President Trump,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for our armed forces. Let's hope we can navigate out

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of this without getting ourselves in even deeper. We've got

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>more coming up, and you've introduced a build along with

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Senator Corey Booker, obviously who's running for the White House.

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You did this today. It would create a pilot program

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to guarantee jobs for anyone who wants one. That's ambitious.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>It would cost a lot of money. What is the

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>number one thing you would do to pay for that? Yeah?

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is an idea that has a long legacy.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It was proposed by Franklin Roosevelt. It was supported by

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Martha Luther Kim Junior. It's going to allow it's a

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>pilot project. The pilot program that is going to allow

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen communities within um this country to create this program.

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately, when these jobs are created and

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>people are pleased in these jobs, it will pay for itself. Ah,

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there we go. This has become the new super big

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>government Democrat go to talking point. It will pay for itself. Wow,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that sounds good. How are you going to pay for

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a plan to guarantee everybody the governed, to guarantee everyone

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a job? Oh, don't worry about it, it'll pay for itself. Huh.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>How will you guarantee healthcare for everyone? Well, how are

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you guarantee medicare for all for everyone? Well, it'll pay

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for itself with the savings will get. I've heard people

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>say this. Democrats have said this, dude, with the savings

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that you'll get on your healthcare and when you cut

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>out the insurance companies, this will pay for itself. No

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>serious person can believe that there is no way this

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>will pay for itself. That's just fantasy land stuff. Bernie

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Sanders today rolled out a two point five trillion dollar

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Housing for All plan. Sanders has said that the plan

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>would guarantee every American quote, regardless of income, a fundamental

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>right to a safe, decent, exces and affordable home, and

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>would be paid for by a wealth tax on the

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>top one tenth of one percent of income earners. He

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>said there's virtually no place in America where a full

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>time minimum wage worker can afford a decent two bedroom apartment.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna stop there. I live in New

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>York City. I've never been able to afford a decent

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>two bedroom apartment here. Okay, I'm like, I feel like

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm big time because recently I I'm like pushing forty,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and I moved into one bedroom territory. It used to

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all be in one room. Everything. Bathroom pretty much was

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen, kitchen was the bed. Bed was the bathroom.

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to New York to stake in the toilet. Hey,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever you gotta do, you gotta get it done. It's

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, it's NYC. It's the big Apple, it's the

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>big show. But minimum wage worker two bedroom apart Who

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>said that one minimum wage worker should be able to

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>afford a two bedroom apartment in a city? What's wrong

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with the studio? I lived in studios all through my twenties.

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Studio apartment four hundred square feet, usually a bed, a dresser,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>a place to shower, and maybe like a hot plate.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.599
<v Speaker 1>So I just like Bernie starts from this place. What

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are you even talking about the average two bedroom apartment

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in New York City is probably about four four forty

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars a month, four grand. I'd say the

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>average apartment in Manhattan is over three thousand dollars a month. Now,

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I know the other boroughs, it's different, it gets you

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>can get better deals there. Manhattan's a big place. It's

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the five boroughs. Guarantee everybody at two bedroom

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>apartment on a minimum wage job. Okay, well, not that many.

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>The point of a minimum wage job is generally not

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a minimum wage job forever. Usually, if you

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>do a good job at your minimum wage job, you

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>can move up, you can get into a more senior role,

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you can get into management. And also a lot of

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>people are in two income households. So now if you

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have two minimum wage jobs in the same household, people

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>can do better, and they can start to save some money,

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and they can start to build their way into the

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>middle class. But just think of the central planning on

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>display here. Yeah, we're gonna mandate that, you know, everybody

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>what should be able to afford a two bedroom apartment

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on a minimum wage salary. I mean, do you want

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to start paying forty dollars for cheeseburgers? At McDonald's, because

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe then it could happen the free market,

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>or rather just the market sets prices. Bernie Sanders can

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you all day about how much the government should

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be setting prices, But the government cannot set prices. All

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it does is push capital into other areas through its

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>intrusions and mandates in the marketplace. But it doesn't work

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the way they want it to work. And I can

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>even talk to you about the minimum wage minimum wage.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>When they raise it, some people benefit from it, some

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't. And I'm talking about minimum wage earners, because

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>there is an actual value to the labor provided by

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's earning minimum wage. And businesses have to balance

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>the balance their costs and balance their their input their output.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>And so you can say, well, we're gonna pay everyone

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars minimum wage. Now, what they just do is

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>they cut back your hours or they cut back jobs.

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Some people might be able to stay around with that

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars minimum wage increase, but other people are going

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to lose their jobs or they're gonna have their hours cut.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a minimum wage increase doesn't benefit people the way

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we're always told it does, but it's an emotional issue.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>People feel like, you should you work, you show up,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you work, you should get paid fairly. Meanwhile, I feel

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like I did free work for years as an intern

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at all these different places, building a resume which really

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is exploitative. I'm just gonna say it. But people say, well,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>do you want that stuff in your resume or not?

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I did all kinds of free work. I was running

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>around making copies his book, making cupies. I did all

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stuff. One more thing before we're gonna get

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.119
<v Speaker 1>a little more into the latest with the Cavanall situation,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>which they haven't given up. Libs haven't given up. They've

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they've lost this battle, but they keep They're just hoping

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to wear us down. You know they're wrong. They don't

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>really care. Saturday, I saw something today that Department of

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Justice might be circulating. I haven't seen this confirmed yet.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It might have been confirmed since I read it. Department

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of Justice is circulating what it thinks might be a

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what an Attorney General Barr and others think might be

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a possible compromise on a gun control measure, after all

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the public outcry, after all these shootings, and President Trump

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is assuring us this is something we should not have

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>to worry about and left wing Democrats want to confiscate

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>your guns and eliminate your god given right to self defense.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>You know that as your president, I will never allow

0:13:52.280 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>them to take away your liberty, your dignity, your social security,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and I will never ever allow them to take away

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>your sacred right to keep and bear arms. I don't

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know about that right now. There's really there's no political

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit for Trump in conceding anything on gun control to

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the other side. But I am hearing that the Trump

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>White House and the Department of Justice are thinking about

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about sending something along. Yeah do you here

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you go? DJ sends gun legislation package to the White

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>House as debate rages over mat Okay, yeah, no, this

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was the options. This was the options. But i've heard

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's gone beyond that. Now they're narrowing down because

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this was from about a week ago. They're narrowing down

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the options to oh, that's right, we should actually do

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this thing. I don't see what the benefit is. I

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't see how this is going to result in anything

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>other than a feeling of the left getting its way

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>on guns, which is not good because you're just encouraging

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>them to do more of this, and then you have,

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, the effort to demonize the NRA continues. The

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>NRA has held our Congress hostage, doing everything possible to

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>obscure the truth, trying to appeal to a small subset

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of extremists. They think they can say, jump and hey,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>appose this bill. Appose appill, don't get that done. Don't

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do that suggest you're either in favor of the Second

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Amendment or you want to take everyone's guns away. It's ridiculous.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It is absolutely ridiculous. And on issue after shoot, they

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>are not only out of touch with where the American

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>people are, they are way out of touch with where

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>gun owners are. This is not something we just have

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to put up with. This is not some cosmic force

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that can't be stocked. In other words, when we listen

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to people instead of corporations or special interests, this is

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>going to change. I promise you, this is going to change.

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got to fight the corruption and we've got to

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>be willing to push back. This is something that the

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of Americans want, and we have got to

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have the courage to take them on. The NRA. We

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>can be and it's time that we take action. Tell

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>them to stop working for the gun industry and start

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>working for the American family. President Trump, please tell them

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>molan la bay and leave us all alone. Okay, don't

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>do this, don't go forward with some just it's just

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a response to left wing pressure. They haven't won the argument.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>There's there's nothing that they can point to that would

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>be helpful for saving lives from the perspective of doing

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>some kind of gun control measure here, all that all

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know you're going to get is additional laws,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>additional harassment. I just look today at the what it

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>takes to getting gone in New York City, because I

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>would like to exercise my Second Amendment right here. It's

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take me six months, six months. I was

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>trained by the federal government with weapons and had a

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>top secret clearance for years. It'll take me six months

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to get a gun. And that's assuming that I get

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>through all this stuff, and then I'll figure out, Wow,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>this guy is really right wing. I don't know if

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we can give him a gun. Sounds scary. You're gonna

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna make concessions the other side on this, we

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have so many gun laws already in place, and it's

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>just if you do the universal background check, you're setting

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up what will become a day facto registry. There's every

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>every transaction will be will be logged and cataloged, and

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>then I'll be able to very easily go through them all,

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>maintain a database of all of it. And then you

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>have a registry, and then the call becomes, all right,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody who has this kind of gun, turn it in.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody who has that kind of gun, turn

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it in. All of a sudden, you know, you're left

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>with double barrel shotguns only Elmer Fud style for legal

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 1>for people that want to own firearms, and for all

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the criminals. Guess what they didn't turn in their stuff?

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, what a shock. It's almost like how gun

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>free zones don't stop mass murderers. I worry about Trump

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on this one. He says he's a gun guy, and

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump is great in many ways, but yeah,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>he's really I don't know if he really is. He's

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not a Second Amendment guy. He listens too much to

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are giving him bad advice. On this one.

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I worry he's getting bad advice from people very close

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to him. In the White House. I think that's happening.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll see. Hopefully I'm wrong on this one. Rarely am.

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons why I ran for Congress is

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to fight for the healing and the justice of all

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>survivors one in sixteen women. Of course, we know this

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is not a genderized crime, and sexual assault is a crime,

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but a crime disproportionally perpetuated on to women, and one

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen women their first sexual experience was rape. This

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is a public health crisis and epidemic. I see it

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>also as a social justice issue, and it's deeply concerning

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that someone who starves on the highest court of the

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>land could have this many allegation, allegations that are highly

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>politically motivated and that keep on turning up false. There's

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a reason that we have the process we do. There's

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a reason that we have the system we do in place.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It's actually to achieve justice, believes it's not just so

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can have a system. There are reasons why

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the presumption of innocence while we have the

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>right to face accusers. These are all procedural, but yes,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they're also intended to get us to a place of justice.

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And it is unjust for someone to suffer professional consequences,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>reputational consequences for an endless series of lies, innuendos, smears,

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>falsehoods that we all understand why they're being made, where

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>they're coming from. And the Democrats just they go with

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it anyway. They realize that if they start adjudicating whether

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>something is a fair allegation against somebody like Kavanaugh, then

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 1>they might have to do that again in the future.

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Better to just stick to the script, keep the party first,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>assault going right, attack Cavanaugh. That's all that really matters.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The truth is irrelevant. Well, here's a little extra bit

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of truth that I thought you should all know. Another

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that just was coincidentally left off of the New

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>York Times is Sunday Essay and hasn't been mentioned now

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>until a few days into this fiasco. So you had

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Max Steyer, who I already played for you yesterday. I mean,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy, a guy who he's like a

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>better government or a good government advocator, talks about collectivizing

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the power of government. This guy's a lib. He's a liberal.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's listening for two seconds. And you know

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he also represented Clinton in the nineties. I believe in

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the specifically in the Paula Jones issue, but tied into Whitewater,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to say Watergate, that's a different one. Whitewater,

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Monica Lewinsky. It's tough to keep all the Clinton scandals

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>straight just because it was the whole presidency was really

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>one long scandal. But it turns out that Max Stier's wife,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Florence you Pan, was nominated by Obama to be on

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Resident Obama wanted Florence

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you Pan to be on the DC Court of Appeals,

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>which is known to everybody in legal circles as the

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>pre eminent stepping stone to the Supreme Court. It's the

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>anti chamber, it's it's the holding place right before you

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>might get a Supreme Court slot if you are so

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>called upon and chosen. But Florence Yupan did not get

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that DC Circuit Court spot because the Republican controlled Congress.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'll Senate under Mitch McConnell just let her

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>nomination lapse. They didn't. They didn't, you know, destroy your character.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>They didn't drum up fake allegations, call her a criminal

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>based on nothing, and no, they didn't do any of that.

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>They just decided that Republicans had a majority. The Senate.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Senate rules allow them to decide whether or not they're

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have an up or down vote on this

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>particular nominee for the DC Circuit, and they just didn't

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.479
<v Speaker 1>do it, just like it was the Merrick Garland situation,

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>except Merrick Garland was up for a Supreme Court seat.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>This is for the DC Circuit. Now, someone please explain

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to me why it is that in none of the

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>interviews that these New York Times authors of this Kavanaugh

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>hit book, which is what it is. It's not going

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to be a hit, but it's a hit book. I mean,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's meant to go after Kavanaugh. Someone explained to

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>me why they didn't think that was relevant information. The

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>one witness they can cite that's new claiming an event

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that even the so called victim herself does not recall.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Their one witness has a wife who was blocked by

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Republicans from more or less becoming Supreme Court Junior Justice

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Florence Upan right right before the Supreme Court. You don't

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe there's a little bit of bitterness there

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't go perhaps to motive with this guy. He

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sees an opportunity. Yeah, I was at Yale with Kavanaugh.

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>We got drunk a lot. Who's gonna know. See, one

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the problems with these allegations against Kavanaugh is that

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>not only can they not not only is it very

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to entirely disprove them because they're so old and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so vague and so lacking in any real detail. No

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>one's going to get in any trouble for making these

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>kinds of allegations. All you have to be is a

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>liberal Democrat who believes very strongly in Roe v. Wade,

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and he was very angry about the conservative tilt of

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, and you know all the rest of it.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And Trump, And you say, yeah, I think I'm pretty

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>sure Kavanaugh one night late drunk at a party. I mean,

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I could tell you this. I could get away with

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>saying this about anybody that I went to college with.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Who's a guy. Yeah, I'm pretty sure I saw him

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>at a party one night and he got really drunk,

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and you know he might have I think he groped

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a girls, you know, behind and she was very upset.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But no one really remembers because we're drunk How are

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you going to disprove that I could even swear that

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>under oath, I could even bear false witness. That's right,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason why that's a sin. I could bear

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>false witness and swear with my right hand on a bible,

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm never going to suffer any legal consequences because

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>how could you How could you prove that I'm lying?

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You can never prove that I'm lying. But that's why

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>things like the possible motivation to lie are so important.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why the full context of who this Max Steyer

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>guy is is something that clearly The New York Times

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and one gives. I mean, the New York Times has

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been humiliated this week. To anybody who is not completely

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>delusional and brainwashed, they have been humiliated, and they should

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>feel humiliated for what they have done, but they don't

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>view it that way. They just doubled down. I mean,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they did their best to attack Kavanaugh. They did their

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>best to undermine him, to hurt his you know, to

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>hurt him on the Supreme Court. And I really do

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>believe this, And I give Eric Ericson credit for getting

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>out ahead of this and making some noise about this point,

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's right that this is also a

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>message to Supreme Court Justice Roberts that if you mess

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>with us on the abortion thing, there's nothing the Left

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is unwilling to do, no place they won't go in

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>order to exact revenge and to take consequences out against people.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's right, Max sty Er, mister O, so honest.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Max Styer turns out his wife feels like she was

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>mistreated by the Republican, a Republican controlled Senate on the

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>issue of getting confirmed as a judge. You don't think

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that maybe that factors into his thinking about his little

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>story about Kavanaugh. Also, I just as an aside here,

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the story that Kavanaugh just got drunk and then went

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and put his member in a in a girl's hand.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>No way, no way, just doesn't it doesn't adn't. It

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. I'm gonna tell you guys something.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of drunk maniacs in college, a

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys that got way too way, way too

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>black out drunk, and you know, some of them definitely

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>were too gropy with women sometimes and you know there

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was there was stuff that happened that was not not acceptable.

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I never heard of this walk up to a girl

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>at a party. I'm just gonna you know, I'm just

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna put my put my stuff on. That's why when

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they said it in the talk of the campus and

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely would have been the talk of that you can't

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>do this. This isn't in the realm of oh yeah,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, people do stuff, they get drunk. Please, this

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>isn't Yale, this isn't an animal house. But this is

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the way it is. Now. As long as the lie

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>has a life cycle useful enough to damage Kavanaugh, they'll

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>tell it anyway. Stires lying folks. They can tell us

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>about how honest he is. Oh, just like they can

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>tell us about how honest Andy McCabe is. That's right,

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>he's facing felony lying charges. Or how honest Comy was.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right, he abandoned essential FBI regulations and abused his

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>position for petty personal attacks, or how how Muller was

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>America's greatest law enforcement officer. Muller needs a blanket and

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a sippy cup and some time to relax. But we

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>had to figure that out. We had to figure that

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>out for ourselves, didn't we We didn't want to tell

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>us any of that. We'll be right back. Oh, I

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>believe that that every member of this caucus them beyond

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because this is not a partisan issue. Again, this is

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>an epidemic, and for far too long we have been

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a way too tolerant and complicit and perpetuating rape culture. Um.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that everyone is committed in this

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Caucus to addressing that issue. But we have Diffressman.

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>He says, get real, so that you say what I say,

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the reckoning and gone other days will be

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we will be complicit and lacks a daizel and the

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that this is an epidemic and survivors deserve healing,

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>injustice and everyone deserves due process. Um. I've filed this

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>resolution to initiate an impeachment inquiry um because we need

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to get to the truth. And I think the Congress can.

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We've proven that we can do the work of legislating,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of oversight and initiating investigations. That's what's happening in judiciary

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 1>right now. Nobody believes what Congresswoman Presley is saying here,

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not even Congresswoman Presley. I mean, no one thinks that

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this is really about the things that she's saying. It's

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>about right, we're all in this, we're all we all

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>get that, we're all in on this. I assume this

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is just a lot of a lot of blather, a

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of talking points about Congress's oversight role and all

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this other stuff. She throws in some phrases like rape culture.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Rape culture is not a is not the thing that

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>liberals pretend it is. I don't know. I don't know

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>what rape culture is. I know they think it is.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Where does this Where does this exist? Rape is a

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>heinous crime. There's there's no place in America where anyone

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>thinks that, you know, rape is not a big deal.

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't exist, doesn't exist on campuses, doesn't exist in companies.

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>There are rapists, there are bad people. There's not some culture, though,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>where this is normalized and everyone just walks around saying, yeah,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes that happens. No, it's a felony. People

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>go to prison for decades in some cases, and rightfully so.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So this again no effort to deal with what really

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>happened here, which is that Democrats in collusion. Yeah it's right,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I like that word, in collusion with the New York

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Times thought that they had something that could really hurt Kavanaugh,

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and this week was gonna be bash Cavanaugh week, you know,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>take it to him, show Cavanaugh that he hasn't just

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>because he got confirmed he's on the Supreme Court doesn't

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that he's going to be able to have a

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>day's piece. And the New York Times just belly flopped here.

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was brutal, and thank Heavens that people

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>were able to figure out what happened. And now they're

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>acting like, yeah, I'm meant to dive in that way.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>That was fine, that was great. I don't think so,

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not at all, not at all. Impeaching Kavanaugh. They're going

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to impeach him now after the stories that were told

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about him a few days ago have already completely fallen apart.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Debbie Ramirez has no idea what she's talking about. Hey,

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this. Do you think that it

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is likely? Do you think it's possible that the best

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>friend Leland Kaiser, the best friend of Christine blasi Ford, received,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>as we now know, a lot of pressure and even threats. Right,

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>all things might come out about your life too. They

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>were threatening her. She was basically being blackmailed to back

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>up crazy Christine blasi Ford's story, and she wouldn't do it.

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that same pressure wasn't used against

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Ramirez or anybody around her as well. Do you think

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that there was an unwillingness to tell Ramirez that, you know,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe it wasn't. Maybe it wasn't negative pressure. Maybe

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was positive pressure. Maybe it was Hey, you can

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be a hero here. You can be a hero to

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>women for all time going forward. All you have to

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>do is say that this guy just you know, put

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>his put his genitals in your vicinity at a party

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago, and you can save women's rights, you

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>can free women from oppression. You can be a hero

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>if you believe all that crap. It's pretty it can

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be compelling, right if you're actually buying into all that.

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But does anyone think that that wasn't a part of this?

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll notice what I was thinking about this today as

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>these New York Times reporters who are just going on.

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>One of them retweeted a Vox piece today that was like, oh,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>conservatives are making this seem like a much bigger deal

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>than it was. No, it's a really big deal. They

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can try to fight this one out, but they're gonna

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>get crushed because it's a really big deal what happened.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>They left out a key detail, and they left it

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out recklessly. And I would argue, intentionally, I can pretend

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that it was something else now, but we don't have

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy their lies. And I would also just say that, yeah,

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing how it didn't matter that it doesn't matter

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to them that it's fake. It doesn't matter to them

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that this is, that this is not true, because it

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was all for a purpose, and the purpose was to

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>destroy Kavanaugh. The New York Times, it has been amazing

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to see this whole thing play out, and with every

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>additional detail. The great thing about defending Kavanaugh is that

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the facts have always been on your side, and additional

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:46.719
<v Speaker 1>facts are even more on your side. You know, The

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>New York Times still doesn't even accept how big of

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>an error it really committed here, or rather how big

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lie it told. And you know, for those

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>who still cling to the fiction that a reason a

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>person could think that Kavanaugh was credibly accused, Well, then

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>why was pressure put on Leland Kaiser to say things

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>she did not believe to help blasi Ford's baseless case

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>in court? That would be called witness tampering. That's what

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you would call it. Why should we accept that in

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>any way here, pretend like that's just the normal course

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of the way things are, the way things were. I've

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>said it before. People that have been defending Kavanaugh have

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not had to retract, have not had to back down,

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have not had to change their story once. Not you,

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not me. No one who has believed in the innocence

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of this man from the beginning has had a single day,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a single moment where it was, oh, wow, I guess

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe Kavanaugh did do it. It went from humh, let's

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hear about these allegations. That seems very unlikely too. As

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>soon as we found the facts out about blasi Ford. Okay,

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>so there are no facts. This is a hit. I

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was saying, you can go back and look at the

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shows we were. We were doing shows titled I think

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Christine blasi Ford is lying, like the first week of

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the allegations, and then it was Ramirez, and then it

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was sweat Nick, and then it was a woman that

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know one even names her, but claimed

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that she was raped in a boat in Rhode Island.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Told the Senate this and nobody believed it. Not even

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Democrats could believe that because he had never even been

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the States. Disgusting the Democrats that they're they're discussing,

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what you see though they never will debate

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>this issue in public. They just hide. They just tell

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>their little stories. They write this stuff for their own constituencies,

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for their own readership, and then they run away. None

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of them are man enough or woman enough to stand

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 1>up and make this case against somebody who knows they're lying.

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>On day one of my administration, I will use my

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>executive authority to start closing the pay gap between women

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 1>of color and everyone else, because it's about time we bo.

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>We must recognize the systemic discrimination that infects our economy,

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and we must work actively and deliberately to root it

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>out and set this country on a better path. Elizabeth

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Warren is a shameless demagogue. I do think she is

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>smart enough and well read enough, although not nearly as

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>well read as she presents herself, to know that the

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>pay gap is a myth. There's no such thing. There

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is there is no pay gap as presented by Democrats.

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a different there's a differential in pay between men

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and women, but the moment that you account for things

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>like chosen profession, hours worked overtime, just choices that one

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 1>makes in the workplace. Yes, what pay gap disappears like

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so many other things. You know what I discuss climate

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>change with you, I point out and I've seen now

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>some more in depth analyzes about this. If what they

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>say is true, that the world is going to be underwater,

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>at least the whole sections of it. You know, the

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>entire state of Florida coast to California thirty year mortgages

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, or you know when people bought take out

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year mortgage home prices would have to would

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have to take this in new account, and insurance would

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have to take this in new account. If they really

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>believed in climate change, it would have an effect on

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>beachfront property. Obama just bought a fifteen million dollar mansion

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of Martha's Vineyard on the beach on the water at

0:37:56.160 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>sea level. Do you think he's worried about that? See

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>how people act. Forget about what people say they want

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to do, See what they actually do. Elizabeth Warren here

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is talking about the pay gap. If the pay gap

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>were real, than anybody who was a capitalist people do

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like money. Capitalist like money too. Anyone who was a

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>real capitalist would say, I've got a great idea if

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I can get an almost thirty percent, let's say, a

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent on average savings on every employee I

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>hire by just hiring a woman to do the same

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>job as a man, I would only hire women a

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent advantage in the labor cost in your

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>business over your competitors. You would crush everyone. Just hire women.

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it's because you know hiring women that that

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>would never can be considered discriminated. You can hire only

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 1>women and only minorities, and that would never be considered discrimination.

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>If you brought a lawsuit saying hey, I'm a I'm

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>a white male, like I didn't get hired. You know,

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult that those lawsuits do exist, but it's

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to win those lawsuits. Why don't people only

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hire women because they try to hire the best employee

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>they can, man or woman, and they try to hire

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>people that are going to bring the most value to

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the business because it is in their interest to do so.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren saying she's going to close the pay gap

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with an executive order, that should really put a jolt

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>into people. What does that even mean? How would that work?

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>How would she do that. I'm not even sure she knows,

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's a it's a good applause line. I suppose

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 1>it's something that gets her supporters very, very fired up.

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just missed it? Was was it? Last night?

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren gave a speech here in Manhattan at Unions

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>not Union Square Park, Washington Square Park, which is where

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Occupy Wall Street back in the day used to have

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of its big meetings. I remember covering some

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of the big Occupied Wall Street gatherings, protest movements, whatever

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it, down in Washington Square Park.

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I've also played speed chess there against many an individual

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and done better than they thought I would. I will

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have you know what, it's true, what you're a chess hustler.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I got chess skills that shouldn't surprise anybody.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I got all. I got all kinds of skills nobody

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 1>knows about. They're like, they're always like, damn, you're good

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>at chess. I'm like, that's right, I'm actually not that good.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But I've I've learned enough from plank speed chess that

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you really just have to memorize some quick patterns because

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 1>by making somebody else go very fast. If you know

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>some movement patterns, you can usually win very But the

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>whole point is you have to move really fast, right,

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. If someone thinks about it, it it won't

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>work anyway. So she was there giving a speech, and

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit sad that I missed it because

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have been really interesting to see

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>what Elizabeth Warren supporters, you know, how they react or

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they said there were ten or fifteen thousand

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>people there was their biggest and I just can't imagine

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>all these people in New York City, what do they

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>think Elizabeth Warren's really going to do for them? This

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>city is wildly expensive. It's expensive in large part because

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of well obviously supplying to man, but also there's a

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of regulations around housing. The tax rate here is

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>very high. There's all kinds of government decision making about Look,

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of central planning in New York City.

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of costs are much higher than they should be.

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>So I would have been interested to go just to

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>see what the New York City socialists would really like.

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't know about it, and so I missed it,

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and I only saw it as it was happening, and

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Ah, I don't know if I can

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>go deal with the communes right now. I'm just gonna

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have a nice quiet night. So I decided to do something,

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:56.280
<v Speaker 1>just hang out solo, do my own thing, do some writing.

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>But that then brings me to another former female presidential

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>candidate out there on the stump. She's never gonna give

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>it up, folks. She's never going to admit that she

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was wrong, that she wasn't a good candidate, that she

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to win, and that no one cheated. She

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't good at this. She's back. So I've talked

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with many of the Democratic candidates for president, as you

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>might guess, I've answered their questions about everything from digital

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>outreach to investments in the early States, and I've ended

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>every conversation by saying, to each one, let me tell

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you what I think the biggest obstacle might very well

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be, and that is this. You can

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:54.240
<v Speaker 1>run the best campaign, you can have the best plans,

0:42:54.920 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get the nomination, you can win the popular vote,

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can lose the electoral College and therefore the election.

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>For these four reasons. Number one, voter suppression. Wait, what

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are the other way? Do we cut off the other reasons?

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, I guess we'll just have to. I want

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to number two. I don't like pat suits. I want

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear what the other reasons are? You know what

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this is? This is this serves a couple of purposes.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton's out there saying this stuff because one, she's

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>an egomaniac and really thinks the presidency was her should

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be her. She still thinks to this day, I assure you,

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that she should be the president of the United States,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that she's not is just a testament

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to how terrible Trump is, how unfair the world is,

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of it. But that's that's really,

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you know where that's really where it is, right. She

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thinks that it was hers and it was taken from her.

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>She also, though, is playing into this victim mentality that

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Democrats have around how they they really

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>think that even when they lose elections, they win. Has

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting comment yesterday on the show. I mean,

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>she's not she's not all that pro Trump, but she's

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>she's a she's sharp, and she does good work. Over

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Washing Examiner. When Tiana Lowe joined us, and

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>she said that every Supreme Court justice except for Alito,

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a conservative for the last whatever it

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is twenty years now. The left has some reason, some excuse, Oh,

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't count that person. There's an asterisk. That person's not,

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, not really shouldn't really be on the court.

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>It's Merrick Garland seat. People say this. I've heard legal

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>analysts say this like they're morons. It was never Merrick

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Garland seat. He doesn't own it. It wasn't given to him.

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a process, he didn't get through the process. That's

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, tough. Sorry, libs. Of course we know all

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Kavanaugh asterisk, which is just baseless, clearly politically

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>motivated accusations with no evidence or corroboration. It's supposed to

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>create an asterisk. Well that's yeah, that's not going to

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.720
<v Speaker 1>be weaponized and abused for the rest of our lives.

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.879
<v Speaker 1>You look at you look at the way that they said, oh, well,

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, Bush stole the election. Oh there's another thing.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We always when we win elections, there must be stolen

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Bush stole the election, and Bush with the whole Bush v.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Gore Florida recount. Trump stole the election with, you know,

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because of Russia. I mean, this is these people are babies.

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They lost, and you see at the very top of

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>their babies. Hillary is being child this year. She lost.

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>She's not the president, She's never going to be the president.

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:56.879
<v Speaker 1>It's time to give it up. Time to stop the wives.

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Voter suppression. Democrats like to point to places where they've

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>had record voter turnout and claim voter suppression. We ask

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>cal and they say, oh, well, because voter because they

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ask for ID at the polling place. The Supreme Court

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>has ruled on this already and they have said that

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 1>voter ID is not voter suppression is not prohibited. Is

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>not unfair. I don't know what's a suppression of rights.

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It's over three hundred dollars for me. I looked it

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.839
<v Speaker 1>up today because I'm getting ready to go through over

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars to get to apply for a New

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.439
<v Speaker 1>York City handgun permit. I think it's three twenty five.

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It's over three hundred bucks. Why don't we charge three

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars for people to vote? I have to It

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>cost me three hundred dollars in order to enjoy my

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment rights? Why is that? Okay? If you ask

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 1>him some live that's because of finger pronting and background checks.

0:46:56.400 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>That are okay. Well, I've got a constitutional right to

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a firearm, just like they've got a constitutional right to vote.

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I have to pay over three hundred all but you know,

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I digress. Actually not really, it's kind of related, isn't it. Well,

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a lie, just like Stacy Abrams running around

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>saying that she would have won in Georgia. She would

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>have won that gubernatorial race but for voter or suppression.

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That is a lie. It's just not true to the Democrats.

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Does the mainstream media ever call her out for that?

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Do they ever say, hold on a second, where's your

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence for that? In fact, all the if you look

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers, if you look at what happened, it's

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>quite clear that that's not true. She lost. She lost

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>an election. It happens to Democrats. When was the last

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>time you could think of where conservatives were claiming mainstream

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>conservatism was saying that Supreme Court justice is illegitimate or

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that election didn't really happen. Libs do it all the time.

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hillary does it, doesn't care about it. Doesn't matter to

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 1>her what it does to our faith in our institutions.

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, she's look, let's just say it, she's

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>a deeply unethical and really damaged person. I've been saying

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>she has a hole in her soul for a long time.

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that was going to fill it was

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the presidency. You know, now she's got to fill it

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with rose, yoga and long walks in Chappaqua. I don't

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>know if that's going to do it for her. Well,

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>right back, we also saw what happened in twenty sixteen.

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Experts estimate that anywhere from twenty seven thousand to two

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand Wisconsin citizen voters, predominantly in Milwaukee, were turned

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>away from the polls. That's a lot of potential voters.

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>They showed up, but maybe they didn't have the correct

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>form of identification. Maybe the name on their driver's license

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>included a middle name or an initial that wasn't on

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>their voter registration. But officials made every excuse in the

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>book to prevent certain people from voting in that election.

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they didn't have the right identification. Ah. I

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thought we were done hearing from Hillary Clinton, but we're

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 1>never really going to be done. She can't help herself.

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We have to hear her opinions all the time. We

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:29.879
<v Speaker 1>have to always be hearing from Hillary Clinton about all

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 1>things involving the election that she still pretends she would

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have won. Notice the range there too. Experts estimate what

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was the twenty five thousand and two hundred fifty thousand

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>or something like. That's a big range. That was true,

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. That's a lot, almost like, it's such

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a big range that experts don't know what the heck

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about. They're just guessing. You know, I can

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>guess too well. I estimate that on the day of

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the election, there were at least two or three million

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:00.080
<v Speaker 1>people who were hung over, and people who tend to

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 1>go out and party are more likely to be conservative.

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>If therefore, Trump really should have won the popular vote.

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Prove me wrong, me wrong. I knew John was going

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to hit that one. Yeah, that's true. Prove me wrong.

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Hillary and never going away, Jimmy Carter is

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>still making the rounds. But he's talking about something that

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, Heaven forbid, But here we are.

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with former President Carter on something. Here's what

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he said I hope. You know, if I will just

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty years old, if I was fifty years younger, I

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't believe I could undertake the duties that I experienced

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>when I was president. But one thing, you had to

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>be flexible with your mind. You had to be able

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to go from one subject to another and conservate on

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>each one adequately and then them all together in a

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive way, like I did between begging instad with a

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>piece agreement. You also have to be able to I

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>got new ideas. He's saying that there should be an

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 1>age limit for the presidency, and this is going to

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 1>be a very real discussion. You know. Joe Biden, I

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>still I still cling to my belief that he's not

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be their nominee. But all the major polls,

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:30.720
<v Speaker 1>all the real all the number crunchers are saying, sorry,

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's gonna be the nominee. Joe Biden's gonna be

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the nominee. As if they're all there, they're across the

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>board pretty much. That has been the trend. In fact,

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>one amazing statistic that I saw yesterday was that in California,

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, among likely Democrat voters, Andrew Yang is beating

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris, which was just amazing to me. Yang Gang

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is a phenomenon such that Camelot Mamala Harris, who for

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>months we were all told, ooh, she's you know, she

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>brings all these different elements together at a very appealing

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>candidacy for Democrats and maybe she'll even went over some

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 1>undecided We were told all that, Oh, she's the real deal,

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 1>She's the real candidate. No breakthrough, nothing. Yang's ahead of

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>her in her home state of California. So keep that

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in mind. But Biden, look, he seems too old for

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the job, and it does matter. And I do think

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats recognize the second that they try to pull

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Oh that's not fair. You can't make an issue

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're being agist, you know agist like producer Mark. Yeah,

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that's right, we know he's like, Yeah, what's it like

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>being north of thirty old men? You know? My bones creak?

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>How about that producer Mark? They creak? I got got

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like a like a creek like it makes, you know,

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>clicking noises. You'll be there too. One day it was

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like being at the first ever Super Bowl. Wow one

0:52:57.760 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>was that? No, it was like six seven. It was amazing.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:07.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't even wear helmets back then. Even though what

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a television was when you were a kid, you don't

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>even understand. Yeah, you television. If you had one TV

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the whole neighborhood, it was amazing. Everybody watched one

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>black and white box. The thing was like three by

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>five inches of actual screen. The rest of it was

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just casing. Hold all that stuff together. It's like a

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>giant sausage. All right, we'll be right back. There was

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of theatrics being played out by both

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 1>mister Collins and by mister Lewandowski. I think you have

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at mister Lewandowski as an adverse witness. He

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>had no interest in complying with this actual subpoena outside

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of showing up. He intended to obstruct justice once again, frankly,

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 1>by not being willing to give the answers to questions

0:53:56.160 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Democrats. I think if I were mister Nadler

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, I would be slapping mister Lewandowski with an

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>inherent contempt order and calling him in front of the

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives and finding him an inherent contempt order. Huh,

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>bring it, Democrats, bring it. Let's let's see you do it,

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's see where that goes. To live in a country

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>where you can decide that you don't like the way

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>someone's answering your questions, you're going to start finding them.

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You know who is held in contempt of Congress, Attorney

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>General Eric Holder. This is a tool that democrats. They're

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to do it. You know why, because even

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:48.240
<v Speaker 1>they realize where this leads. They put so much pressure

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.759
<v Speaker 1>on our institutions. They put so much downward pressure on

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the most important parts of our so called

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.839
<v Speaker 1>democrat they always loved her as a democracy. They push

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all the outer limits. They have no respect whatsoever for

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:08.959
<v Speaker 1>the actual functionings of these institutions, and the moment something

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>happens that they don't like, they're willing to toss out

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the rule book and just decide, well, we're going to

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do it my way. Meanwhile, krey Lewandowski, he's not backing

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>down at all. He's just saying that this is complete nonsense.

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any reason to be held in content,

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've told the members of Congress I'm happy to

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>come back and answer more questions if they need me to.

0:55:28.320 --> 0:55:30.560
<v Speaker 1>After the five or six hours tarade that I went

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>through yesterday. Yeah, what are they going to hold him

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in contempt? For? The White Houses told them that under

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>executive privilege, he should not answer any questions about his

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>conversations with White House, with White House officials or with

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the President. Okay, well, if they've got a problem with that,

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>figured out what the White House or if they really

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 1>think that he's wrong, all right, fine, all them in contempt.

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 1>See where that gets you. A lot of talk, a

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk from Democrats, and you know what I

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:00.120
<v Speaker 1>will say about the Trump administration really more than think

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:03.799
<v Speaker 1>else President Trump himself, they don't know how to deal

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:06.839
<v Speaker 1>with an opposition. They don't know how to deal with

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>political targets who refuse to bend the knee. The Democrats

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>still haven't figured this out yet. If you don't cave,

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:15.799
<v Speaker 1>if you don't give them what they want, if you

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>don't just decide you're gonna pack up and leave, they

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 1>get very flustered. They don't really understand what to do.

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And Corey Lewandowski yesterday was just turning the tables on

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>them because it was clear they weren't trying. What are

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they trying to do? They want to ask him, They

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>want to ask him to recite things that they are

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>already in record from the Mulla report, as if as

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 1>if he's just supposed to do whatever they say whenever

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:47.319
<v Speaker 1>they say it. They're looking for soundbites to use to

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 1>put on MSNBC and CNN. I'm sorry, I don't think so.

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:59.240
<v Speaker 1>He obviously didn't think so either. I also received hundreds

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of emails, some days with as many as

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a thousand emails, and unlike Hillary Clinton, I don't think

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I ever to leave any of those. Many of them

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>were responded to with either one word answers or voted

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to other staff. It's for additional follow up. But throughout

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it all, and to the best of my recollection, I

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>don't ever recall having any conversations with foreign entities, let

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>alone any who were offering to help him manipulate the

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>outcome of an election. Responding to contempt with contempt is

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty natural human emotion, and I do think that

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately that is what kra Lewandowski was doing here. The

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are contemptuous of him. They're not there to respect

0:57:44.400 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 1>him get answers from him. They are there to grandstand,

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to make him look like a fool, to hurt the

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 1>people not to hurt him, and to hurt the people

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that he worked with, and four to hurt his chances

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to run for the Senate in New Hampshire. They're there

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on a seeking destroy mission. Why should Corey Lewandowski pretend otherwise.

0:58:07.320 --> 0:58:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Why should he be the one who has to act

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like the rules only count for his side? This is

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this is again, this is wartime conservatism. Friends, You see

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>what the other side does. Do you want to do

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to play by their rules keep losing? You

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 1>want to play by their rules and get slapped around?

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Or do you want to say no, I've had enough. Thanks.

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'll let Eric Swalwell and uh you

0:58:33.840 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>know who are all the all the rest I can't

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:40.120
<v Speaker 1>remember now. Going after him, I said, what was Nadler?

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know, Jerry Nadler saying his stuff, doing

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>his usual nonsense. These people are clowns, clowns, and Lewandowski was,

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, telling them exactly what he should have in

0:58:57.280 --> 0:58:59.120
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, which was just you know, you know where

0:58:59.120 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to you know where to suffit? Leave me alone and

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>enough of this right now. If they want to, if

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to hold them in contempt, let's see, let's

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>see how that goes. Let's see where that stops and starts.

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the right I think it was

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the right move. I do think this is problematic when

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you say I have no obligation to be candid, and

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 1>when Corey Lewandowski said that, of course it was. It

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was like man dog bites man. We all are aware

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that the administration does not place a value on being

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>truthful and honest, and so it was nice that he

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 1>would come out and stated so bluntly. But it was

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:38.160
<v Speaker 1>no big surprise. I mean, can can Tim Kane just

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>be honest about what was said? This is a classic

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrat moment. Here you have Tim Kane talking about the

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>need for Corey Lewandowski to be honest, and he's being

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:51.000
<v Speaker 1>dishonest about what Korey Luandowski said. Corey Luandowski said that

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing, there was nothing that requires him to

0:59:55.520 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be truthful with the media. Guess what that's true. That

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is reality. And the media can act like public officials

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>should be run out of town the moment that they

1:00:11.640 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>say anything that is untruthful to the media. But this

1:00:15.120 --> 1:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is as old as politics itself. You know. They can

1:00:19.200 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>try to make it sound like this is some terrible

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>crime against the Republic. But in reality, the media is

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>oppositional to the president, and a lot of people recognize

1:00:27.800 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that this media, in particular, the mainstream media, is dishonest

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>at its core about what its real mission is day

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to day. They don't seek to shed light on the

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>truth in America. They seek to destroy Trump. Why should

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to sit around and pretend otherwise, and why

1:00:48.720 --> 1:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>should the White House? I mean, look, I think one

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest innovations of this White House is to

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>recognize that ninety percent of the press corps is a

1:00:55.520 --> 1:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Libs, a bunch of Democrats. And of that

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent, I'd say ninety percent of the ninety percent,

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>our activists really make almost no effort whatsoever at being

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>objective journalists. And so with that, speaking of contempt, with

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that degree of contempt directed at the White House, why

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not why not respond in kind? Okay, if you guys

1:01:17.200 --> 1:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to try to misrepresent what we're doing, if

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to spread lies about us all the time,

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna call you fake news or, as Trump has said,

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>very fake news. If he wasn't speaking some degree of

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>truth with that, and I think it's generally very truthful.

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But if there wasn't a lot of truth to it,

1:01:37.240 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>then the media wouldn't be nearly as upset, would they.

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Why does it bother them so much when Trump says

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>fake news? Why does it get them so riled up

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>when he talks about how they keep presenting these stories

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and the stories are that are fake are generally always

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>about Trump. They don't make these huge errors in the

1:02:03.400 --> 1:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>other I mean this. The New York Times has been

1:02:05.680 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>making a mockery of itself the last couple of days

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with these these two reporters who just can't get out

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of their own way. And now they were complaining about others.

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>They're complaining about how Fox News, Fox News is the problem. Oh,

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>look at how Fox twisted things. You know, you had

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you had vox dot Com claiming that it was just

1:02:30.680 --> 1:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>an honest mistake that got removed in the editing process. Okay, well,

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if it was just an honest mistake that got removed

1:02:37.720 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the editing process, the fact that the additional accuser

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>has never on the record accused anyone of anything, and

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>her friends claimed that Kavanaugh did nothing, why did the

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>authors also leave that out of a long NPR interview

1:02:51.160 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just never comes up. Huh. Almost like they're trying to

1:02:54.560 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>ram through a narrative to do damage and then they

1:02:57.560 --> 1:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>figure they'll clean it up afterwards. They hate being called

1:03:02.080 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>fake news. I know that At CNN, for example, if

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you ever refer to them as fake news publicly and

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they know about it, even if you're just somebody who's

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>not doesn't do that much media. If you refer to

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the fake news CNN, they unless you're administration official, they'll

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>make exceptions for that, but they will not have you

1:03:19.280 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on air. They are very sensitive about it. They make

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of claims about how that's just that's unacceptable,

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's too much, it's beyond the pale. I like what

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Lewandowski did because it reminds us that we don't have

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to just sit and take it that in the same

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>week that they try to straight up smear operation on Kavanaugh.

1:03:39.400 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>There is another option. There's another alternative, and that alternative

1:03:44.520 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is fight back. We better do it this year, and

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the good news is Trump is definitely going to do it.

1:03:51.240 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But you better be prepared wherever you are across the

1:03:53.160 --> 1:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>country if you want to be involved in this reelection,

1:03:56.920 --> 1:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and one way or another, if you want to share

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts and your values. You better be ready to fight,

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because the other side is coming after all of us

1:04:02.440 --> 1:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff. My name is Griata Timbario. I have

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not come to offer any prepared remarks at this hearing.

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm instead attaching my testimony. It is the IPCC Special

1:04:24.720 --> 1:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Report on Global Warming of one point five degrees celsius,

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the SR one point five, which was released on October eighth,

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen. I am submitting this report as my testimony

1:04:41.440 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want you to listen to me. I

1:04:44.240 --> 1:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>want you to listen to the scientists, and I want

1:04:48.400 --> 1:04:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you to unite behind the science. And then I want

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you to take real action. Thank you. And then I

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>want you to brush your teeth and go to bed early,

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>because you're like thirteen years old and you need sleep,

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and you need life experience, and you need to read

1:05:08.960 --> 1:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of books, and you need to learn things,

1:05:11.880 --> 1:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and you need to grow and you need to understand more.

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>My friends, that young girl is testifying in front of

1:05:18.880 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress today congressional testimony from how producer Mark. You tell her?

1:05:25.960 --> 1:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>How old is she? I think she's thirteen or fourteen,

1:05:28.360 --> 1:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but maybe she's a year to older than that sixteen Wow,

1:05:32.960 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>she looks younger than that sixteen years old. Okay, even still,

1:05:39.680 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I don't care what she has to

1:05:42.240 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say about climate change. I don't care what she has

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to say about much of anything other than what the

1:05:47.040 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>cool sixteen year old kids are listening to these days,

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe what the teenage fashion styles are or something.

1:05:53.480 --> 1:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's not mean. It's not mean to say this.

1:05:56.000 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not I am not putting her down. If I

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>were her and the whole media acting like everything I said,

1:06:03.200 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with some pronouncement from Einstein himself, I would say, Okay,

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of cool. I'll roll this. It's more fun

1:06:09.400 --> 1:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>than being in school. Why would Congress ever testify? What

1:06:16.000 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do we have to learn from me? She's a sixteen

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>year old. She's not a scientist. Even if she was

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a would be scientist, she's sixteen years old. This is

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>yet another data point. They talk about the data and

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the science. Here's a data point. A scientific movement that

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>uses sixteen year olds as its spokespersons is not about science.

1:06:39.160 --> 1:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really not that complicated. It's not that hard, is it.

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You can just think through this all just makes sense.

1:06:47.520 --> 1:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Why not have an actual scientist testify if this was

1:06:50.640 --> 1:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>so compelling, why use a young girl? Oh? We know

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>why because if you criticize her, and I believe she

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>has Asperger syndrome as well. So if you criticize a

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>girl who has a a what I don't even know

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about disability or whatever the preferred nomenclature is for Aspergers,

1:07:12.560 --> 1:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a bad person and you're why you beat I've

1:07:14.840 --> 1:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seen journalists, I've seen blue check Twitter and Facebook journalists

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>do this or on Twitter and Facebook, where if you

1:07:21.920 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>point out, like I do, this is absurd. You know,

1:07:24.400 --> 1:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do I want to hear from a fourteen year old

1:07:26.040 --> 1:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>about whether the FED should lower rates? Come on, fourteen

1:07:29.880 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>year old, finance genius, let's let's hear what you think

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about lowering rates, because you're just what gonna read the

1:07:38.560 --> 1:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>talking points that someone's handed to you. I just wish

1:07:43.160 --> 1:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a greater degree of honesty here, honesty around

1:07:50.600 --> 1:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>how much this climate change movement is really an emotional

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and religious belief. As I keep saying, it as a

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>religious belief for people who think they are too smart

1:08:01.400 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for a religion, for an actual religion, for an actual

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship and philosophy and connection to in spirituality, based in

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in God, or based in you know, whatever deity or

1:08:14.040 --> 1:08:18.479
<v Speaker 1>series of deities on one things exists. No, Now, it's

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the existential crisis of our time.

1:08:20.800 --> 1:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And they I would ask you, if a sixteen year

1:08:23.160 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>old to testify in front of the Congress, why not

1:08:24.920 --> 1:08:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have a toddler. Why not have a five year old

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>just read off whatever is printed for him or her

1:08:31.720 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>by the green the green energy lobby. It makes just

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>as much sense. This is indefensible, and as an American

1:08:39.240 --> 1:08:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I have to say it's it's embarrassing. Our Congress is

1:08:43.520 --> 1:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>increasingly a source of embarrassment. What happened with Korey Lewandowski

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday where you had these these democrats all just lining

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>up one afternother to try to get that that one

1:08:56.560 --> 1:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>viral moment, you know, try to get that one moment

1:08:58.840 --> 1:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>where they were going to at ablish that you know,

1:09:02.280 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they they were really the hashtag resistance fighter. They were

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the one that was trying to hold Trump accountable by

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculing and humiliating his people. And yet what we saw

1:09:17.280 --> 1:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was krey Lundowski saying, no, I don't think I don't

1:09:19.840 --> 1:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>think I'll let you arrest us today be hand, great line,

1:09:24.680 --> 1:09:29.639
<v Speaker 1>really is. It's true though, That's what's going on. That's

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>where we are now. I think this Congress is an embarrassment.

1:09:32.400 --> 1:09:36.599
<v Speaker 1>The people that are constantly trying to come up with

1:09:36.720 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>new ways to discuss how horrible Trump is and then

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and then turn around it and act like this is

1:09:42.080 --> 1:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some assemblage, are that the Congress is some assemblage of

1:09:45.640 --> 1:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>great intellectuals. Because people are in the Congress, we should

1:09:48.920 --> 1:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>listen to them. I'm sorry, I just disagree. I do

1:09:52.640 --> 1:09:56.519
<v Speaker 1>not find them nearly as impressive as they find themselves. Now,

1:09:56.560 --> 1:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>some of them are great, obviously, where it's a big body,

1:09:58.439 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got hundreds of members, hundreds of members in the House,

1:10:03.080 --> 1:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred members in the Senate, and eventually you reach

1:10:07.360 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a point where you understand that a lot of them

1:10:09.960 --> 1:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>are just unimpressive and you move on from there. But

1:10:12.880 --> 1:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a sixteen year old girl testifying about a

1:10:16.080 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>massively complicated scientific issue and telling us, really lecturing the

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>American people through our own elected body, that urgent action

1:10:26.120 --> 1:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>must be taken, this is embarrassing. And anybody who's a

1:10:29.680 --> 1:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>climate change advocate, fanatic, whatever you want to call them,

1:10:34.240 --> 1:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they should be embarrassed by this too, but they're not

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:43.639
<v Speaker 1>seem Some big events happening in the Middle East. Obviously,

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we have the standoff now between Saudi Arabia and Iran,

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps the United States as well, not just on

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines but right in the background, and also a

1:10:54.400 --> 1:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>major election shock in Israel. But first let's get to

1:10:59.200 --> 1:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>our friend, doctor Jonathan Schanzer, who's with us now. He

1:11:02.800 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is from the Foundation for Defensive Democracies and he's going

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what his thoughts are on all this,

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Schans are great to have you back, Thanks duck

1:11:10.840 --> 1:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>than you with you. So let's just start the the

1:11:13.360 --> 1:11:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Iran Saudi situation. How big a deal is this as

1:11:18.520 --> 1:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>you see it? You know, how different is this from

1:11:20.600 --> 1:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the provocations we've seen in the past, and what first?

1:11:23.760 --> 1:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Let let's start with what should the Saudis do? Okay,

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so um, Look, first of all, let's just say that

1:11:31.840 --> 1:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the attack that just took place was a hugely significant

1:11:35.880 --> 1:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one in the sense of the Saudis. Of um. You know,

1:11:38.880 --> 1:11:41.719
<v Speaker 1>they are one of the world's largest producers of oil

1:11:41.880 --> 1:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>sit atop a massive proven reserve, and they have this

1:11:46.400 --> 1:11:51.759
<v Speaker 1>massive facility that is a core component of the global

1:11:51.880 --> 1:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>supply of oil the Iranians know this, and they have

1:11:56.000 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>struck you at it. They've done so with precision, they've

1:11:58.960 --> 1:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>done so with significant weaponry. So this was not just

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>simply an attack on Saudi Arabia. Some would claim this

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was an attack on the US LED system. It was

1:12:09.240 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>certainly an attack on the global supply of oil. And

1:12:12.720 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I must also add that the reassurances that we've heard

1:12:17.160 --> 1:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Saudis that this is all just going to

1:12:19.000 --> 1:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be fixed very quickly, to me, does not strike me

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as true. I think they put a rosy spin on

1:12:25.760 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. If you remember the killing of

1:12:28.200 --> 1:12:32.599
<v Speaker 1>that journalist Jamalsa Shoji, you know they mean for weeks

1:12:32.640 --> 1:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>they were saying it didn't happen as wise, and of

1:12:35.439 --> 1:12:38.479
<v Speaker 1>course we ultimately found out the very ugly truth. I

1:12:38.520 --> 1:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to probably go through a similar exercise

1:12:41.400 --> 1:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>here with the Saudis. Now as to what the Saudis

1:12:44.640 --> 1:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>should do, I mean, certainly I'd like to see the

1:12:47.120 --> 1:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Saudis be able to defend themselves, but we do have

1:12:50.120 --> 1:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>questions about their military capabilities. You know, they've been fighting

1:12:53.680 --> 1:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a war and Yemen and not doing it very well.

1:12:57.439 --> 1:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, instead of attacking Hoofy targets, they can out

1:13:00.520 --> 1:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>school buses full of children. Um, it's not gone well

1:13:04.160 --> 1:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for them. Do you think that's I mean, doctor Jonathan,

1:13:07.080 --> 1:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>do you do you think that that's an accident? I mean,

1:13:08.640 --> 1:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the Saudis are spending the third most on on munitions

1:13:14.240 --> 1:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>each year on defense of any country in the world.

1:13:18.520 --> 1:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So why can't they be more efficient? Or are they

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>haphazard on purpose? Well that's a good question. And you know,

1:13:26.640 --> 1:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I actually visited Saudi Arabia last year and

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was in one of these operation rooms

1:13:32.000 --> 1:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, they really made it look well,

1:13:34.880 --> 1:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>it was a really professional operation. And yes, they're buying

1:13:37.720 --> 1:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>up American sophisticated weaponry hand over fifth. But you know,

1:13:41.800 --> 1:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>when you look at how they have prosecuted their own conflicts,

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it does not look good. And it does question about education,

1:13:48.320 --> 1:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about training, about commitment, and uh, you know, I think

1:13:51.920 --> 1:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the question is, you know, if the Saudis respond, you know,

1:13:54.840 --> 1:13:58.479
<v Speaker 1>with US backing and the Saudis failed to deliver the

1:13:58.600 --> 1:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>message that we want them to deliver, what does that

1:14:01.439 --> 1:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>do to their deterrance, to our deterrance? Does it embolden Iran?

1:14:05.640 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Does it make things worse? Does it turn the tide

1:14:08.600 --> 1:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of public opinion in the favor of the Iranians. These

1:14:12.360 --> 1:14:14.479
<v Speaker 1>are things that I would not personally want to take

1:14:14.479 --> 1:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a chance on. What do you think should happen? So

1:14:18.880 --> 1:14:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the look, there are a lot of different ways to respond.

1:14:21.560 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We've seen from the Trump administration as they've already just

1:14:24.200 --> 1:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>announced new sanctions, and we expect those to be announced

1:14:28.240 --> 1:14:30.639
<v Speaker 1>let's just say within the next couple of days or week.

1:14:31.880 --> 1:14:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I have concerns about that response only because I think

1:14:34.640 --> 1:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a perpetuation of the status quo. The Iranians decided

1:14:38.080 --> 1:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to attack Saudi Arabia and this oil installation because they're

1:14:41.840 --> 1:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>under sanctions and they were trying to gain leverage over

1:14:45.000 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States, showing that they could hurt us at

1:14:47.360 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the pump and that we needed to come to the

1:14:50.120 --> 1:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>table and offer certain concessions. I think if we up

1:14:52.960 --> 1:14:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the Anion sanctions, they likely up the Antion continued attack

1:14:57.240 --> 1:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>against US interests and against oil targets. So then the

1:15:01.920 --> 1:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>question is what do you do beyond that? I think

1:15:04.360 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>there are two things. One is I think it's time

1:15:06.240 --> 1:15:09.519
<v Speaker 1>to engage with our international partners again. There are all

1:15:09.520 --> 1:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>these countries that stopped working with us on Iran policy

1:15:13.320 --> 1:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because we walked away from the Iran nuclear deals saying

1:15:15.880 --> 1:15:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians, we're doing everything we wanted. Well, I think

1:15:19.840 --> 1:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we can now dispense with that. We know now that

1:15:22.040 --> 1:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they are aggressors and that they're not just targeting the

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>US or Saudi Arabia, They're targeting global oil. One would

1:15:28.160 --> 1:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>hope that the French, or the Brits, or even the

1:15:30.000 --> 1:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Russians or the Chinese would say, we don't want that,

1:15:32.920 --> 1:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to spend more on oil. We need

1:15:35.080 --> 1:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a randi heel, so let's all work together.

1:15:38.400 --> 1:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the last part of this, which is a

1:15:41.000 --> 1:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>credible threat from the United States, not necessarily conflict, but

1:15:44.960 --> 1:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly moving assets closer to Iran in the region, letting

1:15:48.200 --> 1:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>them know that there can be a real ramification if

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they continue to escalate. Right now, I am concerned that

1:15:55.840 --> 1:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Iran does not fear us in the least. They look

1:15:59.000 --> 1:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at us with this posture that we're getting ready to

1:16:01.400 --> 1:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>leave the region and that we only rely on sanctions,

1:16:04.680 --> 1:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and that is not a good place to be in

1:16:06.520 --> 1:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with a regime like Iran. What would a strike that

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:18.479
<v Speaker 1>is commensurate with the provocation here look like you could

1:16:18.560 --> 1:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>hit you know, UH, Iranian refining facilities. There's there one

1:16:22.920 --> 1:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or two facilities that I think are probably already being

1:16:27.000 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at. UM. There's also carg Island, which is a

1:16:30.160 --> 1:16:34.919
<v Speaker 1>major shipping point for Iranian petroleum products. You can imagine

1:16:34.960 --> 1:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that a strike along those lines would be commensurate. Uh.

1:16:39.439 --> 1:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>There is the question though, I think a couple of things. One,

1:16:42.040 --> 1:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the President does seem to be concerned about the price

1:16:44.880 --> 1:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of oil and what a conflict might do in terms

1:16:48.320 --> 1:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of just the health of the economy, and so one

1:16:52.040 --> 1:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what that would do globally. There's also the

1:16:55.840 --> 1:16:58.599
<v Speaker 1>question of an Iranian response and whether they attack the

1:16:58.720 --> 1:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>US directly, and whether this draws US into another conflict,

1:17:02.400 --> 1:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>which of course the President is low to do. We

1:17:05.439 --> 1:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>may yet not really have many options left if the

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>irunience continue to escalate, but I think it's important that

1:17:11.920 --> 1:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we have those sorts of targets already in sight. I'm

1:17:15.280 --> 1:17:18.559
<v Speaker 1>sure the Pentagon has already been thinking through these, but

1:17:18.640 --> 1:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting to note that there are voices from

1:17:21.080 --> 1:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon right now urging caution, and this is not

1:17:25.040 --> 1:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly the traditional role of the Pentagon. Usually the Pentagon

1:17:28.439 --> 1:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>says we're here, We're at the ready. You let us

1:17:30.880 --> 1:17:32.519
<v Speaker 1>know when you need us, and you know, we can

1:17:32.560 --> 1:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>do damage to the enemy. Right now, the Pentagon seems

1:17:35.439 --> 1:17:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to be pumping the breaks and that is sort of

1:17:37.560 --> 1:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a new thing for me to watch, and I don't

1:17:40.640 --> 1:17:44.599
<v Speaker 1>really know what it means. How concerning should it be

1:17:45.160 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>that it seems that nineteen projectiles, I mean, they're all

1:17:49.680 --> 1:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>missiles in a sense, but it was a combination of

1:17:52.520 --> 1:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>cruise missiles and drones that nineteen projectiles were fired, seventeen

1:17:57.640 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>hit their targets. Based on the damage assessment I was

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>reading this morning, and that neither the Saudi nor Iran,

1:18:04.360 --> 1:18:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Saudi nor American radar capabilities pick this up. UH. It's

1:18:10.640 --> 1:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's deeply disconcerting. I read a report today suggesting that

1:18:14.840 --> 1:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Saudis were actually pointing their detection UH in the

1:18:21.280 --> 1:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>direction of Iraq, Syria, Yemen, all with this understanding that

1:18:26.680 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Iran would never attack them directly, and so that they

1:18:30.400 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have the means to intercept directly from UH. You know,

1:18:34.280 --> 1:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if attacks are launched by Iran, and that is why

1:18:37.760 --> 1:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we have this kind of blind spot. That is a

1:18:39.840 --> 1:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>heck of a blind spot to have when you're talking

1:18:42.080 --> 1:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about an aggressive country like Iran, you know, a state

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sponsor of terrorism that has been mastering missile technology and

1:18:49.520 --> 1:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>precision guided munition, these PGM kits which they're sending all

1:18:53.479 --> 1:18:55.759
<v Speaker 1>over the place, you know, to his Balah and Hamas

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and other proxies. You'd think that they'd be ready for

1:18:59.479 --> 1:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>all of it. One interesting thing to think about, of course,

1:19:02.600 --> 1:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>is not just that they'd be looking to buy additional

1:19:04.640 --> 1:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>weaponry from the United States, but also potentially to draw

1:19:08.000 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>from the expertise of the Israelis. And there has been

1:19:10.960 --> 1:19:14.559
<v Speaker 1>this really interesting kind of quiet diplomacy that's been taking

1:19:14.560 --> 1:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>place between the Saudis and the Israelis because of their

1:19:17.479 --> 1:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>mutual antipathy for Iran. Maybe this is a moment where

1:19:21.040 --> 1:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they start to work together and the Middle East politics

1:19:24.080 --> 1:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>begin to change. This is potentially one positive spin, but

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>really right now it's a lot of negatives. You're wondering

1:19:30.360 --> 1:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>how professional the Saudis are, whether they can handle this themselves,

1:19:34.400 --> 1:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how the US needs to get involved, should it be involved,

1:19:37.320 --> 1:19:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and whether this puts US from a precipice of another

1:19:39.840 --> 1:19:44.599
<v Speaker 1>conflict that many Americans are very concerned about getting into.

1:19:44.880 --> 1:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>How rattled I mean, I know you have contacts all

1:19:47.680 --> 1:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>across the region. How rattled are the Saudis buy what happened? Well,

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing I mean right now, I think

1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they're circling the wagon. You know. It's a lot of

1:19:57.439 --> 1:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of personal outreach to you know, oil companies to

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out how to get things back online,

1:20:06.560 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reassurances publicly, press statements and things like that.

1:20:11.800 --> 1:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you, we're not We're probably not

1:20:14.320 --> 1:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>going to get an honest answer out of the Saudis

1:20:16.200 --> 1:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit. It's going to be rosy for

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a while. They're going to put the positive spin on it.

1:20:20.520 --> 1:20:23.519
<v Speaker 1>The thing that I'm concerned about is that our financial

1:20:23.520 --> 1:20:27.559
<v Speaker 1>institutions are buying it, you know, talking to oil traders,

1:20:28.240 --> 1:20:30.759
<v Speaker 1>folks are saying, well, look we've got lots of excess

1:20:30.800 --> 1:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>capacity right now and it's going to be fine. Well

1:20:34.120 --> 1:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>what if Iran keeps doing this? And I think Iran

1:20:36.439 --> 1:20:39.559
<v Speaker 1>certainly has the capacity and the will to keep doing this,

1:20:40.000 --> 1:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and if the Saudi facilities are not put back online

1:20:43.200 --> 1:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>quickly and others are taken offline, you have the potential

1:20:46.240 --> 1:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for a real crisis. So that's the kind of thing

1:20:48.360 --> 1:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that I'm watching right now, and I think that goes

1:20:50.800 --> 1:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>very under reported. What do you think the gloves come

1:20:53.160 --> 1:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>off option would be from the American and Saudi point

1:20:56.000 --> 1:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of view, if we just decided we want the Iranians

1:20:59.000 --> 1:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to know that never never again. Are they going to

1:21:02.320 --> 1:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>do something like this? Um? Well, like I said, I

1:21:06.000 --> 1:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think there are some Iranian oil facilities. You start to

1:21:09.200 --> 1:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>take those off offline, and what you're doing is you're

1:21:11.840 --> 1:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you're removing whatever. No, but I mean more along the

1:21:14.080 --> 1:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>lines of is do you think there's a shock and

1:21:15.800 --> 1:21:18.559
<v Speaker 1>awe possibility here too? Or are they are they going

1:21:18.600 --> 1:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to just stay away from that because the possibility of

1:21:21.280 --> 1:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is an escalation, right then then we

1:21:23.200 --> 1:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>are at war. Yeah, that's true, although I think that Look,

1:21:27.120 --> 1:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>there are other things that the US has been thinking

1:21:29.680 --> 1:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>about taking out for quite some time, like Iranian nuclear facilities,

1:21:34.640 --> 1:21:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and you know they've been loath to do it, but

1:21:36.720 --> 1:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is the time now to say, Look, not

1:21:38.840 --> 1:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>only are we going to take out your ability to

1:21:40.400 --> 1:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sell oil, but all these nuclear threats that you continue

1:21:43.600 --> 1:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to to pose and to issue, well they're going to

1:21:46.439 --> 1:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>be taken off the table now too, because we've got

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>these moabs and bunker busters that are going to get

1:21:51.000 --> 1:21:53.479
<v Speaker 1>rid of those nuclear sites that you've got dug in

1:21:53.520 --> 1:21:55.599
<v Speaker 1>in the side of a mountain. Um, so I can

1:21:55.640 --> 1:21:57.559
<v Speaker 1>imagine doing that. And by the way, that's the kind

1:21:57.560 --> 1:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing that the international community, even they're very fearful

1:22:01.000 --> 1:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of a conflict, they're going to cheer because the Iranians,

1:22:04.560 --> 1:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, have had everybody running scared for basically a

1:22:08.000 --> 1:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>decade now over that nuclear program. We're going to come

1:22:10.960 --> 1:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>back in just a moment with doctor Jonathan Schanzer from

1:22:13.040 --> 1:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Foundation for Defensive Democracies and talk about this Israeli election,

1:22:17.520 --> 1:22:20.519
<v Speaker 1>which there are now results in on that in just

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a moment. All right, back on the Bucks Exton Show.

1:22:25.800 --> 1:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Here we have doctor Jonathan Schanzer from the Foundation for

1:22:28.160 --> 1:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Democracies. Jonathan, results came in, Bobe didn't win outright,

1:22:33.080 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that Yahoo is not in the clear. What happens now

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>in Israel? Well, you know, I would say that right

1:22:40.439 --> 1:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>now Boebe looks a little hobbled. I think he had

1:22:44.280 --> 1:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>hoped that he would win out right the second time around.

1:22:46.400 --> 1:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I am sort of joking today that

1:22:49.920 --> 1:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>election day in Israel should be renamed Groundhogs Day. The

1:22:53.439 --> 1:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers are basically the same it was kind of a

1:22:55.280 --> 1:23:00.559
<v Speaker 1>dead heat between Nasanyahos Lecout party and Benny Gantz's Blue

1:23:00.560 --> 1:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and White Party, Against, of course, being the former chief

1:23:03.360 --> 1:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of staff of the Israeli Army, who's pulled together kind

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of a centrist coalition to try to unseat Natagna, who

1:23:10.880 --> 1:23:13.759
<v Speaker 1>is now the longest serving prime minister in Israeli history.

1:23:14.720 --> 1:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, the things that we're watching right

1:23:17.080 --> 1:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>now is this desire on the part of some to

1:23:20.520 --> 1:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>form a unity government between these two parties, and I

1:23:26.520 --> 1:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>think it probably would be the best thing for political

1:23:28.960 --> 1:23:31.559
<v Speaker 1>stability in the country. The problem is is that the

1:23:31.600 --> 1:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Blue and White Party guys say that they refuse to

1:23:33.840 --> 1:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>serve with BB at BB is not likely interested in

1:23:37.400 --> 1:23:40.519
<v Speaker 1>serving with them. So what we're watching for now is

1:23:40.600 --> 1:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>natagnal as a hearing with the Attorney General of Israel

1:23:44.920 --> 1:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in about two weeks for a bunch of charges that

1:23:47.160 --> 1:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are penning against him. If he is wounded by these,

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you might begin to see desfections from within Natagna, who's

1:23:55.439 --> 1:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>own party. There could be an attempt at a coup

1:23:58.520 --> 1:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to unseat him, and for the rest of the members

1:24:01.960 --> 1:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of Lee coud Uh to start working and reaching across

1:24:05.680 --> 1:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Aisle with blue and white, and you would ultimately

1:24:08.400 --> 1:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>see uh that that coalition government. I would say, we

1:24:12.240 --> 1:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>probably have about thirty days to let this thing play out,

1:24:15.040 --> 1:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>which is what the mandate is uh for coalition building

1:24:19.680 --> 1:24:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Uh in Israel? Is there is there any real concern

1:24:23.920 --> 1:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that the that because there's this shift now in Israeli politics,

1:24:27.880 --> 1:24:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that there would be a follow on shift in the

1:24:31.960 --> 1:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>US as your relationship in any meaningful or important way?

1:24:35.320 --> 1:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Or is the expectation here? This is it's interesting to us. Okay,

1:24:39.200 --> 1:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Israel important, Middle East out lily and Middle East is

1:24:41.120 --> 1:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously heating up right now. Ron Saudi things are going

1:24:43.360 --> 1:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a little crazy. Uh, but things will likely be the

1:24:47.360 --> 1:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>same with Israel or what it really matter? Well, look,

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things to point out. First of all,

1:24:52.880 --> 1:24:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the president himself said today that his relationship is with Israel,

1:24:57.760 --> 1:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>America's relationship with with his rail, not with one person.

1:25:01.840 --> 1:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh, you know, the US will respect the

1:25:05.439 --> 1:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>outcome of these elections. The other thing to note here

1:25:09.040 --> 1:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is that blue and white and we could have I mean,

1:25:11.400 --> 1:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they're foreign policies are indistinguishable as far as I'm concerned

1:25:15.120 --> 1:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>from a security perspective. Maybe some domestic things at home,

1:25:19.080 --> 1:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>where where they might differ on the margins, but in

1:25:21.640 --> 1:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of their views on Iran, his Balama, the US

1:25:25.439 --> 1:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Israel relationship, all of these things, the mil to mil relationship,

1:25:29.200 --> 1:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all basically the same. Um. These the guys that

1:25:32.439 --> 1:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>blue and white are are Hawks, but they are less

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>inclined to work with Israel's religious right. Uh. And that

1:25:40.360 --> 1:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is natanya Who's base that religious right. And that's really

1:25:43.320 --> 1:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the big difference here. So I don't seem much changing,

1:25:46.800 --> 1:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>um as a result of a possible change in leadership.

1:25:50.920 --> 1:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that's really different is of course that

1:25:52.960 --> 1:25:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Natanyao and Trump have kind of a bromance going. I mean,

1:25:56.560 --> 1:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>these are two guys that know each other. Um, they've

1:25:59.160 --> 1:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>got a good relationship. Of course, Jared Kushner has known

1:26:02.640 --> 1:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Natanyao for much of his life. So you have this

1:26:06.000 --> 1:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of comfort level among senior administration officials with the

1:26:10.240 --> 1:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>current leadership in Israel. But new relationships can be built,

1:26:15.880 --> 1:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>especially between two allies when the alliance is based on

1:26:19.680 --> 1:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>common values, which this one I think really is. Before

1:26:22.520 --> 1:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you let you get back to all things defensive democracy, Jonathan,

1:26:26.200 --> 1:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask what do you think about these

1:26:27.880 --> 1:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>reports that Ambassador Bolton has some pretty harsh words about

1:26:31.680 --> 1:26:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the presidence foreign policy behind closed door surprises you you

1:26:34.520 --> 1:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think he's spot on? What do you make of it? Well,

1:26:38.200 --> 1:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this about Bolton. Yeah, he's got a lot

1:26:41.080 --> 1:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of harsh words for a lot of people. That's his style.

1:26:44.400 --> 1:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you know the question is whether he's going

1:26:46.920 --> 1:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to do what most people do in Washington, which has

1:26:49.479 --> 1:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>hold your tongue, thank the President for his time, or

1:26:52.479 --> 1:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>whether he's going to lash out. My sense is that,

1:26:55.840 --> 1:27:00.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, if our foreign policy remains relatively constant, you know,

1:27:00.760 --> 1:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Bolton really shouldn't do that. But if you know, if

1:27:04.400 --> 1:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>he if he sees that the President is really shifting

1:27:07.479 --> 1:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>wildly from perhaps whatever the course was that they had

1:27:10.439 --> 1:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>plotted out, I can imagine that he might see that

1:27:12.960 --> 1:27:15.120
<v Speaker 1>as kind of the unraveling of the work that he

1:27:15.240 --> 1:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>did over these many months. And it's still not advisable

1:27:19.080 --> 1:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. You've got to remember the thing is that,

1:27:21.640 --> 1:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, long term relationships are important and reputations are important.

1:27:26.200 --> 1:27:29.599
<v Speaker 1>But like I said, John Bolton has always had these

1:27:29.640 --> 1:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sharp elbows, so wouldn't surprise me anything. Any thoughts on

1:27:34.680 --> 1:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert C. O'Brien as the new Nation Security advisor. We

1:27:37.120 --> 1:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>got about a minute. Yeah. Look, a professional guy, a

1:27:40.960 --> 1:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>capable guy. You know. My question is, and I honestly

1:27:43.960 --> 1:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to this, what is his relationship

1:27:46.240 --> 1:27:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like with the President. I know they've had some victories

1:27:48.720 --> 1:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of reclaiming Americans held against their will. The

1:27:52.080 --> 1:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>question is, will he provide that unvarnished truth, those tough

1:27:56.320 --> 1:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>analyzes to the tough questions that the President may not

1:27:59.720 --> 1:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>want to here but probably should. That's what McMaster did,

1:28:03.280 --> 1:28:05.519
<v Speaker 1>That's what Bolton did. I think that's what any good

1:28:05.600 --> 1:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>national security advisor will do. Jonathan shans Er, everybody, he

1:28:10.120 --> 1:28:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is at the Foundation for Defensive Democracy. So what's the website, Jonathan,

1:28:15.000 --> 1:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>FDD dot org. FDD dot org. Everybody check it out

1:28:17.760 --> 1:28:21.599
<v Speaker 1>your national security analysis. Doctor shans are always a pleasure, sir.

1:28:21.680 --> 1:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for giving us your time today. True thing.

1:28:24.120 --> 1:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks by well. Team. We'll get into some light or

1:28:28.920 --> 1:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>fair here at the moment, we'll get into some roll call.

1:28:30.840 --> 1:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought I thought we'd bring in doctor Shanser though

1:28:32.720 --> 1:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he's he's one of the best in the game on

1:28:34.840 --> 1:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, so I thought you'd want to hear from

1:28:37.080 --> 1:28:39.719
<v Speaker 1>him as well as from me. Back in just a moment.

1:28:45.320 --> 1:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real. It's

1:28:53.920 --> 1:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>time for roll call. So what do we do yesterday?

1:29:08.040 --> 1:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Do we do? Did we do uh Facebook? Or do

1:29:11.880 --> 1:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we do emails? Yesterday? We got a book? We did

1:29:13.840 --> 1:29:15.759
<v Speaker 1>face Okay, so now we got to get into our emails.

1:29:15.960 --> 1:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what Let's see. We got an email world.

1:29:18.160 --> 1:29:23.559
<v Speaker 1>That's always fun. Uh, Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com.

1:29:23.600 --> 1:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>That is the email address. It is very exciting. We

1:29:27.880 --> 1:29:30.439
<v Speaker 1>recommend that you you try it out. You'll love it.

1:29:30.720 --> 1:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>The emails come to us and uh and everyone is happy.

1:29:34.840 --> 1:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So here we go. Valerie, I'm always I'm always worried

1:29:41.200 --> 1:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna start reading off people's full names. So

1:29:44.800 --> 1:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>don't worry. I'll try very hard not to do that.

1:29:48.080 --> 1:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Where did oh whoops? Where did Valerie just go? Okay,

1:29:50.400 --> 1:29:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Valerie disappeared. We'll get back to that. It's oh no,

1:29:52.520 --> 1:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>here it is here. It is she right, Okay, it's

1:29:55.479 --> 1:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>your show. You can take calls if you want. But

1:29:58.960 --> 1:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>she wrote in the subject line callers really question Mark,

1:30:04.360 --> 1:30:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean Valerim is telling you. Sometimes people they write

1:30:06.720 --> 1:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, they go, why are you taking callers? Team

1:30:09.200 --> 1:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Buck wants their voice to be heard as voice is

1:30:11.840 --> 1:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not just as thoughts and emails and messages. And I said,

1:30:14.760 --> 1:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, fine, but I can tell you that producer Mark,

1:30:18.840 --> 1:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>did it seem like folks were all excited about calls

1:30:21.360 --> 1:30:23.799
<v Speaker 1>yesterday because I got some emails. You've got some emails.

1:30:23.920 --> 1:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Didn't seem like there's a lot of love for the calls. Yeah,

1:30:26.120 --> 1:30:28.439
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of anti call emails, a lot

1:30:28.439 --> 1:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of anti call emails. And look, this is a this

1:30:31.160 --> 1:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is not a this is not a buckocracy. This is

1:30:34.640 --> 1:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a buck buck based constitutional republic. So you know,

1:30:39.760 --> 1:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there are rules, and the rules are if the if

1:30:43.400 --> 1:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the audience, if a preponderance of the audience would like

1:30:47.280 --> 1:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it a certain way, we got to make them happy.

1:30:50.160 --> 1:30:55.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, here we go, James, good name, Hey, Buck,

1:30:55.800 --> 1:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>get off my lawn. I'm sorry for nuking. You're taking

1:30:59.520 --> 1:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>calls live night. Oh I guess, James wrote in, all right,

1:31:03.920 --> 1:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>my next email will address the three points you talked about. Peace. James, James,

1:31:07.360 --> 1:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all good, my man, it's all good. You know

1:31:10.400 --> 1:31:12.639
<v Speaker 1>he called in. You had a little spice to the show.

1:31:13.360 --> 1:31:16.559
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. We always appreciate a little spice, although

1:31:16.640 --> 1:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not too much because I'm producer. John has to take

1:31:18.920 --> 1:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the tums. Actually, are you a spicy food guy? Yeah?

1:31:22.280 --> 1:31:26.679
<v Speaker 1>You are. Hey, he's Italian. He's got a mama Mia

1:31:26.720 --> 1:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>with the pamadoro, with the What kind of spices do

1:31:30.320 --> 1:31:35.719
<v Speaker 1>you use in Italy? I don't even know red peppers spicy.

1:31:36.120 --> 1:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it. Italian food is that spicy either,

1:31:37.840 --> 1:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But they can be like spice spicy. At abiata is arabiata?

1:31:41.120 --> 1:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you call it? Right? What do you

1:31:42.720 --> 1:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>call it? Adabiata pasta right? The sauce. No, I don't

1:31:47.120 --> 1:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>know what you're saying. Ah, I'm sorry, John, I know

1:31:51.760 --> 1:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's like the old country here all out

1:31:53.680 --> 1:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a second arabiata. Yeah, atabiata soa. I'm not crazy. It's

1:31:57.960 --> 1:32:02.799
<v Speaker 1>a thing, spicy auta biata us. It's a it's a sample,

1:32:02.880 --> 1:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a recipem make here we go, let's see what it's

1:32:04.880 --> 1:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>got here. It has one a week. U oh now

1:32:09.200 --> 1:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that yeah, Oh my gosh. I want to do a

1:32:13.400 --> 1:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>show called Cooking with Conservatives. I want to do that

1:32:16.680 --> 1:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>show would be amazing. But see, the thing is and

1:32:19.320 --> 1:32:21.439
<v Speaker 1>have to be a very nonchalant, like I'm hanging out

1:32:21.479 --> 1:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with a fellow conservative in a kitchen and we are

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>each drinking our spirit of choice, you know, wine, beer,

1:32:28.479 --> 1:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>liquor whatever it may be. Hopefully, hopefully they'll they'll be

1:32:32.360 --> 1:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like me, and they'll want to just drink something straight

1:32:34.360 --> 1:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's good and they don't want to waste waste

1:32:36.280 --> 1:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the flavor with mixers, you know, like a sorority girl.

1:32:40.640 --> 1:32:43.439
<v Speaker 1>But uh, that's right, I said it. But you know,

1:32:43.640 --> 1:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that we could do this conservative cooking with

1:32:47.280 --> 1:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>conservative I think it'd be a lot of fun. And

1:32:50.400 --> 1:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to see what's I'm trying to see what's

1:32:52.000 --> 1:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in and out. I'll be out the sauce here that

1:32:53.479 --> 1:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just keeps telling me about how delicious it is in

1:32:55.080 --> 1:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this recipe, so I'll figure it out. Uh, you got

1:32:57.960 --> 1:33:00.679
<v Speaker 1>butter olive oil, crushed red pepper flakes. That's the spikes

1:33:00.720 --> 1:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I was looking for. That's what I was saying. You're right,

1:33:04.400 --> 1:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you're right, all right, don't tell a mama producer a

1:33:08.400 --> 1:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>John to give me a beating over the head with

1:33:11.479 --> 1:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the rolling a pin, you know, like the old school.

1:33:15.840 --> 1:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Italian audiences seotyping. I know I was

1:33:18.400 --> 1:33:20.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna say it right now, the Italian the Italian American

1:33:20.640 --> 1:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>segment of the audience like buck thin nice, A little bit,

1:33:22.800 --> 1:33:25.599
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, a little bit of the nice. All right,

1:33:25.680 --> 1:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, here we go, Um where do we where?

1:33:28.160 --> 1:33:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Where we I was doing I was doing roll call

1:33:30.600 --> 1:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I got sidetracked talking about spicy sauces. All right,

1:33:35.720 --> 1:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>here we go more of this? Uh low right. I

1:33:39.960 --> 1:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to your show because of your version of the

1:33:42.040 --> 1:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>day's events. I really like to structure a role call

1:33:44.960 --> 1:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the interaction with your listeners opinions. That way. Taking call

1:33:47.400 --> 1:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>from people in the middle of the show is what

1:33:48.600 --> 1:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody else does. It gets old. I really like everything

1:33:51.280 --> 1:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you're doing to expand your media company. Kudos to producer Mark.

1:33:54.560 --> 1:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Everyone just loves produce. You know, producer Mark comes on board,

1:33:57.360 --> 1:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all this fun stuff happens. Sorry, we love you too.

1:34:00.040 --> 1:34:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Du John, You've been there from the beginning. You're an

1:34:01.560 --> 1:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>early investor. Producer John is like a guy that bought

1:34:04.520 --> 1:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon stock when it was five dollars. You know, I'm

1:34:07.120 --> 1:34:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a very stable genius, exactly exactly. You know. Producer Mark

1:34:11.800 --> 1:34:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is like, ooh, he's like the Mark Zuckerberg of a situation.

1:34:14.400 --> 1:34:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Like he's Oh, I'm i'm young, I'm hip, I'm running things.

1:34:17.680 --> 1:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm helping you create a media empire. Correct. No, I

1:34:20.280 --> 1:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>know that's why we gotta keep you happy. So uh

1:34:23.560 --> 1:34:26.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, well but yeah, Lowell, I think that the people,

1:34:27.200 --> 1:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the people have been heard on this one. Here we go,

1:34:32.240 --> 1:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we have Randolph Randolph Mortimer. I love that movie. If

1:34:39.800 --> 1:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen Trading Places, I do think you will

1:34:42.280 --> 1:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. I think it's worth at I think it

1:34:45.000 --> 1:34:48.479
<v Speaker 1>holds up well. I believe it's Eddie Murphy's and people

1:34:48.479 --> 1:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>always say forty eight hours balderdash, malarkey. Eddie Murphy's second

1:34:55.360 --> 1:35:01.519
<v Speaker 1>best movie, in my opinion, is Trading Places Coming to America.

1:35:01.600 --> 1:35:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I put in the numbers. I don't. I just don't

1:35:03.240 --> 1:35:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like forty eight hours that much. I don't know. It

1:35:04.800 --> 1:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really my thing. Let's see here, Randolph rights. I

1:35:08.840 --> 1:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>recently watched an interview with Peter Hitchens in which he

1:35:12.240 --> 1:35:15.439
<v Speaker 1>said that when he was a revolutionary socialist, they were

1:35:15.560 --> 1:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>very much in favor of large scale immigration, not because

1:35:18.920 --> 1:35:21.479
<v Speaker 1>they particularly liked immigrants, but because they didn't like Britain.

1:35:21.560 --> 1:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought that if they had large numbers of people

1:35:23.200 --> 1:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in Britain from outside of it, it would make the

1:35:25.360 --> 1:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>task of changing Britain easier. Need it be said that

1:35:28.600 --> 1:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Marxists in our own country bear resemblance to their

1:35:31.000 --> 1:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>British comrades. Additionally, I've just begun reading The Gulag Archipelago,

1:35:35.320 --> 1:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which should be a must read. I'm in my mid twenties,

1:35:38.000 --> 1:35:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and not once in high school and nor in college,

1:35:39.640 --> 1:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have I ever had or been encouraged to read the

1:35:42.200 --> 1:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>likes of Souls and Eatsenter, Dostoevsky or even or Well.

1:35:45.840 --> 1:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I did, however, have time to read The Handmaid's Tale.

1:35:47.840 --> 1:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Shield's High Randy from Georgia. Randy, first of all, I'm

1:35:52.479 --> 1:35:57.720
<v Speaker 1>very pleased that you are hopefully you learned about the

1:35:58.320 --> 1:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Archipelago from this show, because I've told people to read it.

1:36:00.800 --> 1:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And also I'm a constant proponent of Orwell and Orwell's

1:36:05.000 --> 1:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>works on the show. I was never assigned it's still

1:36:08.760 --> 1:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and I went to some I went to some schools

1:36:10.760 --> 1:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that were not particularly progressive, at least for their time.

1:36:13.400 --> 1:36:17.479
<v Speaker 1>For grammar school, for high school, college was Commyville, for sure,

1:36:17.520 --> 1:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but college everywhere pretty much is Commyville, except for you

1:36:20.160 --> 1:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>know what. The exception is Hillsdale College. Hillsdale College actually

1:36:26.479 --> 1:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>teaches the American American Founding. It teaches from a perspective

1:36:30.439 --> 1:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of Judeo Christian values, and the more people I meet

1:36:33.479 --> 1:36:37.599
<v Speaker 1>from Hillsdale, the more impressed I tend to be with

1:36:37.680 --> 1:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>what that school is turning out, especially as compared to

1:36:41.120 --> 1:36:45.519
<v Speaker 1>some of its well known Ivy League counterparts out there,

1:36:45.600 --> 1:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>which are just spitting out lots of leftists all the time.

1:36:52.560 --> 1:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So where was I here? Oh? Yes, I was never

1:36:56.880 --> 1:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>assigned Orwell's nineteen eighty four. I was never assigned nineteen

1:37:01.760 --> 1:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty four George Orwell in school, which is just astonishing.

1:37:05.120 --> 1:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just crazy, given the things that I was. I

1:37:08.479 --> 1:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>read a lot of books about somebody living in a

1:37:11.680 --> 1:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>village and the elders wanted to maintain the old ways.

1:37:15.640 --> 1:37:18.519
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, somebody came along with like a

1:37:18.560 --> 1:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>new tractor or some new technology, but the old ways

1:37:22.200 --> 1:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and like the spirits. You know, there's some you know,

1:37:25.920 --> 1:37:30.240
<v Speaker 1>traditional non Judeo Christian religious practices thrown in there. Blah

1:37:30.280 --> 1:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. Yeah, a lot of that stuff, not a

1:37:33.760 --> 1:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the of the Orwell, which the only book

1:37:37.880 --> 1:37:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I was. Actually, that's not even true. I read. I

1:37:40.439 --> 1:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>read Animal Farm on my own. I was never even

1:37:42.720 --> 1:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>assigned Animal Farm in school, which is really nuts. Never

1:37:47.280 --> 1:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>signed Animal Farm, never signed nineteen eighty four, never signed

1:37:49.920 --> 1:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the geolog Archipelago, never assigned crime and Punishment. Never you know,

1:37:53.200 --> 1:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>these are all things that I had to read on

1:37:55.640 --> 1:37:58.760
<v Speaker 1>my own. Actually might go back and read geolog Archipelago again.

1:37:59.160 --> 1:38:07.439
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time. Uh, let's see here. Dixie. Wow? Cool?

1:38:07.680 --> 1:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Dixie wasn't It was the name of my Boston Terrier

1:38:10.000 --> 1:38:13.519
<v Speaker 1>growing up. Hi Buck, Just wondering if you've seen heard

1:38:13.520 --> 1:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the new ad campaign for the Hartford Insurance Company Always

1:38:17.880 --> 1:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Think of You, and it gave me a smile. No, here,

1:38:23.000 --> 1:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what does it say? So the buck starts here with

1:38:27.280 --> 1:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>new branding for the Hartford something or other. Oh that's cool.

1:38:32.040 --> 1:38:34.479
<v Speaker 1>There's like a buck in there. Yeah, that's cute. I

1:38:34.520 --> 1:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. I used to have this T shirt that

1:38:37.200 --> 1:38:39.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it was sold by Urban Outfitters or something,

1:38:39.920 --> 1:38:43.559
<v Speaker 1>but it would said get buck wild and it had

1:38:43.600 --> 1:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>two deer but with human legs kind of so it

1:38:46.840 --> 1:38:51.479
<v Speaker 1>was really a almost like a centaur, but deer top

1:38:51.520 --> 1:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>instead of horse bottom. I guess that that was more

1:38:54.200 --> 1:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>complicated explanation than it need to be. But anyway, and

1:38:56.479 --> 1:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they were dancing, you know, like like getting all dancy

1:39:00.400 --> 1:39:02.280
<v Speaker 1>dance going on. I don't know that T shirt fell

1:39:02.320 --> 1:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I wear that T shirt so much it fell apart.

1:39:03.920 --> 1:39:07.320
<v Speaker 1>But it was a conversation starter. Ladies were like, oh

1:39:07.360 --> 1:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, your name is Buck and your T shirts

1:39:10.479 --> 1:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>as do you want to get Buck wild? That is

1:39:13.040 --> 1:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like so a darbs. And I was like, can I

1:39:16.080 --> 1:39:19.679
<v Speaker 1>have your phone number? And they're like nah, sorry, it's like, ah,

1:39:19.720 --> 1:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>shot down, It's all right, Producer Mark, I say that

1:39:23.760 --> 1:39:27.599
<v Speaker 1>it helped me grow character. Put some hair on your

1:39:27.640 --> 1:39:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you nowhere head. There's so much hair, it's a haircut.

1:39:32.520 --> 1:39:36.639
<v Speaker 1>That's also true. That's also true. Um, we haven't gotten

1:39:36.640 --> 1:39:38.479
<v Speaker 1>to enough enough role call your hold on a second.

1:39:38.560 --> 1:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>When we you know what I'm gonna I'm gonna extend

1:39:41.160 --> 1:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it through, so we'll get into more hole. We'll come

1:39:42.880 --> 1:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>right back. We're gonna do a double. We'll do it well,

1:39:44.360 --> 1:39:47.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll do two, not not, I'll do one, I'll do two.

1:39:47.720 --> 1:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be it back all right, and we're continuing with

1:39:53.120 --> 1:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a roll call. I decided to do a do a

1:39:55.360 --> 1:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>two for a two for today, and I also wanted

1:39:59.120 --> 1:40:01.559
<v Speaker 1>to throw in the mix some of our Facebook messages.

1:40:01.600 --> 1:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot of emails coming to a lot

1:40:02.760 --> 1:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook messages, so I figured, why not, let's let's

1:40:06.360 --> 1:40:10.439
<v Speaker 1>get that at Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. That's

1:40:10.520 --> 1:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>what I h That's how you send us a message.

1:40:13.920 --> 1:40:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That is in fact, if you send a message there

1:40:15.760 --> 1:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it we'll get to us, so you don't have to

1:40:17.040 --> 1:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>send the Is this the roll call? Yes? Yes, If

1:40:21.360 --> 1:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you go to the url I gave you, I assure

1:40:24.200 --> 1:40:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you it is. It is for roll call purposes. And

1:40:26.560 --> 1:40:28.479
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want it read on air, just put

1:40:28.560 --> 1:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not for roll call at the top, please. I feel

1:40:31.280 --> 1:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I always I've had like heart attacks. I've seen it

1:40:33.080 --> 1:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>things a few times though, like this is super sense

1:40:34.840 --> 1:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that I don't tell anybody, but they read it at

1:40:36.720 --> 1:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the bottom and I'm like, no, don't do that. We've

1:40:39.280 --> 1:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>never gotten that on air, but it has been a

1:40:42.080 --> 1:40:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that I've I've seen because I try to scan

1:40:43.920 --> 1:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>them before we get to them. Richard Buck. There was

1:40:50.400 --> 1:40:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a survey of police officers published in twenty thirteen. It

1:40:53.880 --> 1:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>showed that they were overwhelming these skeptical of gun control measures.

1:40:57.680 --> 1:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense they'd be skeptical because they see data

1:41:00.439 --> 1:41:02.639
<v Speaker 1>impact of the laws. Here's a link to the article

1:41:02.640 --> 1:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on police one, I don't know if anything newer exists. Well,

1:41:06.040 --> 1:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Richard. That's very interesting. I mean, look,

1:41:08.120 --> 1:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I never said because I just said I don't know.

1:41:11.400 --> 1:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I just was trying to tell you that I have

1:41:13.240 --> 1:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>met law enforcement officers who aren't particularly pro Second Amendment,

1:41:17.240 --> 1:41:19.479
<v Speaker 1>but I've certainly met a ton of law law enforcement

1:41:19.520 --> 1:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>officers who are all about the Second Amendment. And I

1:41:22.479 --> 1:41:26.519
<v Speaker 1>just never seen any data on this. And according to

1:41:26.560 --> 1:41:31.679
<v Speaker 1>this police one dot com websites, and this is fifteen

1:41:31.680 --> 1:41:34.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand verified law enforcement professionals took part in the survey.

1:41:34.640 --> 1:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It said, quote, do you think a federal band law

1:41:37.240 --> 1:41:40.760
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer and sale of ammunition magazines that hold more than

1:41:40.800 --> 1:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>ten rounds would reduce violent crime? Ninety five point seven

1:41:46.840 --> 1:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of law enforcement officers said no. Another question, what

1:41:53.240 --> 1:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>do you think a federal ban on the manufacturing sale

1:41:55.760 --> 1:41:59.479
<v Speaker 1>on semi automatic firearms turned by some as assault weapons

1:41:59.680 --> 1:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>would due to reducing violent crime? Six percent said moderate,

1:42:06.080 --> 1:42:11.679
<v Speaker 1>seventy one percent said none, twenty percent said a negative

1:42:11.680 --> 1:42:17.280
<v Speaker 1>effect on reducing violent crime one percent of law enforcement officers.

1:42:17.680 --> 1:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>According to this police one dot com site which has

1:42:21.080 --> 1:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this study, I've never heard of police one dot com.

1:42:23.240 --> 1:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is something new for me. But this is

1:42:26.880 --> 1:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>what we got sent on real call. So there we have.

1:42:29.120 --> 1:42:32.639
<v Speaker 1>It looks like overwhelmingly law enforcement according to this are

1:42:32.760 --> 1:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>pro Second Amendment, which makes sense to me. I'm just

1:42:34.680 --> 1:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>telling you, though, there are you know, CNN, We'll find

1:42:37.800 --> 1:42:39.439
<v Speaker 1>all five cops that want to take all your guns

1:42:39.479 --> 1:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>away and put them on TV. I promise you, I

1:42:41.320 --> 1:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>promise you that, Colton Buck, the only excuse you need

1:42:47.800 --> 1:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to come down to Texas is barbecue. Coulton, I agree, man,

1:42:51.120 --> 1:42:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I love, I love. Actually I have not had good

1:42:53.320 --> 1:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>barbecue in a long time. I have not had good

1:42:56.280 --> 1:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>barbecue a long time. All right, Producer Producer John, what

1:43:00.400 --> 1:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is the you can only have one thing at a

1:43:03.439 --> 1:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>great barbered at a great classic Southern barbecue joint? What

1:43:07.320 --> 1:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is your meat of choice? Um? I acceptable answer. I

1:43:12.840 --> 1:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>put it in top three. Producer Mark, what do you

1:43:17.200 --> 1:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you only get one meat choice? Not the five we

1:43:19.240 --> 1:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>usually get there because we go hard in the paint,

1:43:21.160 --> 1:43:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of course. Yeah, what do you get? I guess I

1:43:23.880 --> 1:43:28.679
<v Speaker 1>have to go with ribs? Also acceptable? Also acceptable? Okay,

1:43:28.760 --> 1:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>those are those are two of my top three for me.

1:43:31.080 --> 1:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Number one is brisket. I just I'm a brisket fanatic.

1:43:34.040 --> 1:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the brisket when it's done right, is the

1:43:35.840 --> 1:43:41.800
<v Speaker 1>most delicious. Uh you know meat that there is, so

1:43:42.200 --> 1:43:44.439
<v Speaker 1>number two, what's up? That's my number two? Oh you

1:43:44.439 --> 1:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>go number two? Yeah? Yeah. I just sometimes to talk

1:43:46.680 --> 1:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to people and they're just like, I like the roast chicken.

1:43:49.160 --> 1:43:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you go to a barbecue places for the

1:43:50.800 --> 1:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>roast chicken. What are you some kind of a saying,

1:43:54.400 --> 1:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a communist. It's just it's just ridiculous, Nathan. Right,

1:44:01.880 --> 1:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's about rifles of that distinction. You can call them

1:44:04.320 --> 1:44:08.639
<v Speaker 1>tactical rifles, but given that they feel they fall under

1:44:08.720 --> 1:44:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the ninety four assault weapon ban, they're rifles that are

1:44:11.280 --> 1:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>assault weapons. As dumb as it sounds, the precedence is set. Yeah, Nathan,

1:44:15.040 --> 1:44:16.559
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. I mean, if you know, if

1:44:16.600 --> 1:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody classifies all rifles with a detachable magazine, a four grip,

1:44:23.200 --> 1:44:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and a rail system as an assault rifle in law,

1:44:27.200 --> 1:44:29.880
<v Speaker 1>then when you refer to assault rifles, that's what you

1:44:29.920 --> 1:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are referred to. So you know, we can I understand

1:44:32.400 --> 1:44:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no firearms designation, but we're talking about law and

1:44:35.920 --> 1:44:38.720
<v Speaker 1>legal policy, you know. Yeah, I mean, we can do

1:44:38.800 --> 1:44:41.280
<v Speaker 1>shorthand stuff. Or we can rename things, like with the

1:44:41.320 --> 1:44:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Care Act, we can call it Obamacare. But technically,

1:44:44.760 --> 1:44:46.720
<v Speaker 1>if I want to pull up the bill, I do

1:44:47.160 --> 1:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I do a search for the Affordable Care Act. I

1:44:48.960 --> 1:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't do a search for Obamacare, right, because that's not

1:44:51.439 --> 1:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what it's called technically. I know you're already like, boo

1:44:56.680 --> 1:45:04.479
<v Speaker 1>boo Obamacare. D it's good times, Douglas. Oh wait before, sorry, Douglas.

1:45:04.520 --> 1:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll get you tomorrow, guys, don't forget. Tomorrow, at seven

1:45:07.400 --> 1:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>o'clock at the Women's National republic Republican Club in Midtown, Manhattan,

1:45:12.720 --> 1:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I will be giving a speech on wartime conservatism seven

1:45:16.040 --> 1:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern. Please please come check it out with a

1:45:19.439 --> 1:45:21.639
<v Speaker 1>more team buck that shows up the marrier. I will

1:45:21.680 --> 1:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>stay after the speech. I will drink alcohol, I will

1:45:24.439 --> 1:45:26.679
<v Speaker 1>tell stories. I will hang out. We will take selfies.

1:45:26.720 --> 1:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I want selfies of you. It'll be amazing. Let's go

1:45:29.760 --> 1:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for it. Show up tomorrow, Women's National Republican Club. I

1:45:34.840 --> 1:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>could even tell you the address if I had it

1:45:38.080 --> 1:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pulled up right here, but it's like fifty fifty second

1:45:43.160 --> 1:45:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Street or something and between fifth and sixth I think.

1:45:46.520 --> 1:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>But so it's right in Midtown Manhattan. If you're in

1:45:48.479 --> 1:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>New York City, Team Buck, come on out, come on out,

1:45:51.520 --> 1:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Shield Hie