WEBVTT - Texas AG Ken Paxton on DACA Termination (Audio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>In late June, ten states, led by Texas and its

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Ken Paxton, set a September five deadline for

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>President Trump to say he would end the DOCCA deferred

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>deportation program. If Trump did neck by then, Paxton said

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>he'd see the administration in court. Yesterday, of course, the

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>administration did indeed announced plans to phase out DACCA. That's

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the Obama policy that applies to eight hundred thousand people

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>who entered the US illegally as children. With us to

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about the President's decision is Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>General Paxton, thanks so much for joining us. When when

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we booked you yesterday, I thought I was going to

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>ask you about what seemed to be a clean victory

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for you on this issue. But then last night the

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>President uh put out a tweet and he seemed to

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>suggest he might eventually reverse court. He tweeted that if

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Congress doesn't legalize DACA in six months, he will quote

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>revisit this issue. Did you declare victory too soon? I

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. Uh. You know, well, I don't know

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen six months down the road. It

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>should be obviously Congress dealing with this. That's all we've

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ever made the argument on is this. Congress should deal

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with this. This is not something that is in the

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>power of the presidency, and I think the president knows

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that he criticized this during his campaign as unconstitutional, So

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I I find it hard to believe that he would

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>go back and do something that is outside of his

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>area of responsibility or that he's given authority into the

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Constitution to do. General, you were the leader, as Greg mentioned,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>of a group of state attorneys general who gave Trump

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a deadline to end DACA. Do you have any concerns

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for these dreamers who played by the rules? Are country

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>set for them? Absolutely? I think that Congress does need

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this issue and figure out what our

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>policy going forward is. But I do it's always important

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>how the process is done. You know, our founders didn't

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>want a king, and they certainly didn't. That's why we

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>set up That's why they set the constitution up the

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>way they did. And it really doesn't matter how the

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>process is done. And so I'm not opposed to Congress

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>addressing this issue, but I am opposed to the President

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of States changing law and act acting outside of what

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>what his constitutional duties are well, what specifically should be

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>done with them? So you have eight hundred thousand people.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly how many of them are in Texas,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a large number. Right now. These are

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>people who have lives, They have the right to hold

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>down jobs, and they don't have to fear at least

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately being being deported. Uh what what sorts of rights

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>should those people have? Well, so, look, the problem with

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the president President Obama doing this is that it's a

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>house of cards. It's not built on anything done legally,

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's just as easily undone as you

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday. If if they're going to be granted certain

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>status like Obama Wana, which was a green card and

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>an ultimately citizenship um, that needs to be done congressionally

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>through statue because that that that is what controls immigration law.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So my suggestion is, hey, if if Congress wants to

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>address this issue, and I think they should, then deal

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with it the right way and and change law. Have

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the debate. General leaders in the construction industry have been

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>sounding the alarm across the country that there won't be

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>enough American born workers to rebuild as quickly as needed.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And the executive vice president of the Houston Contractors Association

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>said that even before Harvey hit, contractors were grappling with

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a shortage of workers. And these jobs are pouring concrete

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or hot else asphalt. Immigrants really helped to rebuild New

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Do you have any fears that

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there won't be enough construction workers to rebuild Texas? So

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this is another reason that Congress. You know, Congress has

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>six months to deal with this and to address this issue.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>This is another reason that Congress should look at that

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what does American need, What kind of

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>immigration policy do we need, What kind of people do

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>we want coming to this country, what would be most

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to the American people and to the American on

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>me and and as those are legitimate questions to ask,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think they need to be asked and then

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>debated and then answered and voted on. So generalize. You know,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Congress sometimes has trouble getting things done, agreeing on things.

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And and given the president's tweet last night about the

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>possibility that he will revisit this issue, of Congress can't

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>come up with an agreement in six months. If the

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>President decides to reinstate, DOCCA, will you file a lawsuit

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Look, I'm not going to speculate on

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what he's gonna do or how he's gonna do it.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>My guess is that whatever he does, he'll do he'll

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>be very thorough about making sure that it's legitimately and

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>done under his authorities president and not made up laws.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't seen this president do that what what

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Obama did, but and so don't. I don't expect him

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to change course now and violate his constitutional authority. He's

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He's done an amazing job following the law he's been

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in office, and I expect him to continue it. General.

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Just a question then about he signed more than forty

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>executive orders, ranging from stopping immigrants from some Muslim countries

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>from entering the US to stopping transgender people from serving

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in the military. We have about forty five seconds. Why

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't that wrong? If you feel that what President Obama

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>did by executive order is wrong, well, fundamentally two different things.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Obama we ended up suing the administration, UH twenty seven times.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We sued the federal government and Trump we looked at

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>his stuff. The travel band we actually supported, so the

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>difference is that that Obama was making up law, which

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is what Congress is supposed to do. If you look

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at the travel band and other other executive orders, he's

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the president. President Trump was following specific outline statutes passed

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>by Congress, and so he's acting within his authority by

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>statute and by Constitution versus Obama just saying I'm not

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna work with cargners, I'm going to become carners. There's

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. I want to thank our guests. That

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. He was a leader

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in challenging Sident Obama's defer deportation policies. Uh. President Trump

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>inherited those and under threat of legal action from General Paxixton,

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>President Trump yesterday announced that he would phase out the

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>program known as DACA. Thanks very much, Attorney General Ken Paxton.