WEBVTT - Invisible World of the No. 7

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and my name is Julie Douglas.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, guys, we have to have sponsors,

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and this episode is sponsored in part by the numbers seven.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Big sponsors were really happy to have landed, uh, this

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>particular number as a sponsor because it's, uh, it's pretty magical.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a magical, mystical number that we see in nature,

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we see in culture, it's everywhere. Um. In fact, you

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>could say that the number seven is just one of

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the underpinnings that we use to piece together reality for us. Yeah,

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to think of numbers as completely arbitrary, especially

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as we take in the world around us and apply

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>these different values to things. But in this episode, we're

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>going to stop for a second and think, huh, maybe

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there maybe there is something to off this seven. Uh magic.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's true because when you start to consider the number

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>seven and it's relevance in society and again the way

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that we organized life, you begin to see a pattern.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And so the question becomes it's just just our brain's

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pattern recognition sinery or is seven somehow just branded into

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>our brains, and so we're gonna try to tease that

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit without starting any sort of seven

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories. No. Yeah, we're not going to get into

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>into numerology, and particularly in this sub podcast, or at

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>least I'm not going to advocate it, but we will

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>discuss a number of the things that do occur in

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sevens in nature, in culture, in history, and pop culture.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Um where it's not gonna be a comprehensive list by

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>any stretch of the imagination, but um, I think we're

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna fit a lot of stuff on there. Yeah, okay, well,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>let's let's begin with nature. We've got those seven seas,

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the seven continents, the seven colors in a rainbow, that's right,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Roy g. BIV. Seven colors. Most mammals have next with

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>seven bones in them. If you look at the periodic table,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you find? Number of rows is seven? True?

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>The neutral pH value that lies between acidity and alkalinity

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is seven. And should we bet on seven? Seven? Seven?

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>A good gambling number? It is? Yes, it turns out,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's a nine right to die? Nine, you know,

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit too high, five, a bit too low. But

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>seven just right, So it's kind of like the Goldilocks

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of numbers. Yes, you often here too, that by age seven,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the blueprint for adulthood is in place, that a child

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>personality is set in stone. In fact, there's a whole

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>documentary series based on this idea, and the first episode

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the series is called Seven Up. I don't know

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>if you've seen this before, but it's a it's a

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>series in the UK that follows these children at age

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and then every seven years. Yeah I think, I

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not quite sure what age they go up to,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but um, well into to the middle ages of these kids,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's fascinating to see really how very little these

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>kids have changed that truly by age seven there's something

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that is set with a personality. Not to be confused though,

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Seven Ups, the Roy Schneider follow up to

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the French Connection, different film entirely, or the Drink or

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the Drink. Yes, um. Now, of course, when we start

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>getting into culture, this is where the list really gets

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty expansive. So um, you'll have to stop me once

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I get going on this, but just to go back

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and forth a little bit there, of course, seven Holy

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Virtues and seven Deadly Sins. We talked about both of

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>those in our Seven Deadly Sins, a series that we

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>did on the science behind each one. And of course

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 1>there are seven virtues, and of course if you look

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>back at religious texts, you will see that seven shows

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit. It's a it's quite a fortuitous number.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at of course the Bible, there

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is that God created the earth in seven days, right um.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And then of course that has to do with their

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the way we arrange our week seven days a week, right,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>seven chakras, the yoga, which we also did a podcast

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of podcasts. Actually, in the Islamic tradition

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there are seven heavens and seven earths, and the number

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of fires in Hell, and the numbers of doors to

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>both the heaven and the hell is also seven. Yeah. Yeah.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Various uh maps of hell include seven levels, some a

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>little more, some a little less. Um. Among the Babylonians,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Egyptians and other ancient people's there were thought to be

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>seven planets. The Hebrew verb for swear means literally to

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>come under the influence of seven or beersheba um. Again,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you said there's seven days in creation. Likewise, there are

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>seven divisions of the Lord's prayer. The seventh son of

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a seventh son will often turn out to be what

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>magical or Catholic or your boss? Right right? Is our

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>boss the seventh son of a seventh son. I don't.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm still thinking about the spare words, and now I'm

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>beginning to think about George Carlin and his seven sware

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>words that you cannot say on TV. There were seven

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>meals for Sister Sarah. If you want to go into uh,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>into movies, um, seven notes in the musical scale. In

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the Apocalypse, the Christian Apocalypse alone, we have seven chronicles

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of Asia, seven candlesticks, seven stars, seven trumpets, seven spirits

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>before the throne of God's seven horns, seven vials, seven plagues,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a seven headed nonster, a lamb was seven eyes because

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Revelation is is essentially one big death

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>metal album cover. UM. In the Spanish myth and fable,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you have the island of seven Cities. So where seven

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>bishops fled the moors in Spain to found these seven

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>cities that supposedly existed, I mean not really, it's smith uh.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Seven gifts of the spirit. In Japanese folklore, there are

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>seven gods of luck uh, seven Hills of Rome, seven

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Joys of Mary, seven sacraments uh. Seven senses is interesting

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>an ancient notion that the soul of man is comprised

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of seven properties under the influence of again those seven

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>planets that we mentioned, and likewise, the dark lord Voldemort

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>divided his soul into seven hore cruxes. You might remember

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that part um. There are seven Abdal, the Sumerian guardian

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>water spirits who were kind of like Merman. Seven Naga

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are often seen behind Buddha or the same with Shisha. Uh.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you see this in very like Hindu and time

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is the serpent like creature? Yeah, especially entire They're crazy

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>cool because it's like a serpent, and then it's kind

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of a serpent coming out of its head and out

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of its head, really beautiful, often golden in appearance. Seven

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>dwarves uh. Seven Samurai, seven brides for seven brothers. There

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>was a seven year itch. There are seven Narnia books

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>House of the Seven Gables. Uh. There were a seven

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>headed demonic giant in Armenian folklore. Um. Oh what else

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>do I have on this list? I think there was? Oh, well,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I had to eventually just stop because it just it

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>just kept kept going and going. Yeah, but that's all

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all I'm gonna get into right now. Well, of course,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and that makes me think about why we put so

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>much importance on the number seven, because it pops up

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>everywhere and you begin to ascribe luck to it, fortitude

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to it, and uh. In fact, I was thinking about

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're in Las Vegas, or really any casino for

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that matter, the winning number, of course is seven, triple seven.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That is what is going to make the coins ring

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>into your po But here's the thing. Before you start

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>brushing your teeth seven times, are stirring your coffee seven

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>times in a ritual way to to invoke the gods

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of luck, just consider that this is cultural and it

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean in every culture that it is a

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>good sign of things to come. Yeah, A lot of

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to how we are this with these

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>natural number crunchers. We're always trying to define meaning in

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the world around and when we've talked about this a

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>lot in the past and about how this can bleed

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>over into various supernatural beliefs and supernatural understandings of the

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>world as we try to use our pattern recognizing minds

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just chew up all the data, and so we have

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the sense data around us, and then we

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we put all this culture over everything. We apply various

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers to everything, and so it follows that we're going

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to end up attaching varying degrees of meaning to different

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>things that occur in different numbers. Well in seven too.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just something that I think shows up UM in

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>different types of media too, because linguistically, it is the

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>only single digit with two syllables, right, so it just

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of falls off the tongue more smoothly. So you

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>have uh snow white, and the seven dwarves snow white,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and the five dwarves snow in the six doors it

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work as well, or the five samurai, the eight samurai,

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really well. The seven summari. There's a pleasure

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in saying it's You get into that a lot too.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>With we're talking about this yesterday, particularly in China, there's

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of influence um. Particularly in China. There's a

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of emphasis on what a number sounds like. So

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like the number four, its like the word for death,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh and therefore is to be avoided. Right, So

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a good measure of magical thinking going on

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>here when we talk about in number, and maybe in

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the English language, seven sounds like the word happened heaven.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>There was even a show about the seventh Heaven, which

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>was I think, just all about numerology. All right, okay,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, we are going to take a quick break,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but when we get back, we're going to see if

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea of the number seven is being this mystical,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>magical number is somehow a lot into our brains. There's

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>some sort of secret there about why we heard it

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. So we're back, we're talking about the number seven,

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what it means to us, and we've mostly just rattled

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>through various um cultural, historical, geographic, a little science, a

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>little what have you there, all the different things that

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we attached seven to and why we think it's a

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool number. But is there more to that? Is

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there something? Is there something going on inside the human

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>mind that's deeper than that. Well, so there's this idea

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes to remembering numbers rattling them back

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>out again, we basically have a seven limit on that,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 1>give or take it to and certainly there are individuals

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>without standing limits to that who can rattle off, you know,

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>pie to the ode of the ridiculous degree um sixty

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand, nine digit if you're chow Lou, who holds

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>again as world record for a citing pie. But for

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the most part we're hitting significantly lower than that um.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you think of anything like your

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>social Security number or your phone number, it is worth

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>noting that you will remember you maybe remembering a digit,

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a number longer than seven, but you're remembering it generally

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like three different numbers. Yeah. I was gonna point out

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a little interesting anecdote here, and uh, this is our

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>video producer and editor Tyler Or was telling me that

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>when he memorized pie in school, that he did it

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in chunks of seven. Interesting. So again it places this

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of anything you you can memorize, but these chunks

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of seven sort of like when we talked about um

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the rooms, the memory recall rooms that we create in

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>our mind. It's that same sort of idea where if

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you can just make this definitive chunk, then you can

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>recall it a lot better. And this is an idea

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that George Miller had. Yes, he wrote this excellent, at

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>times very confusing paper. I find it's not it's not

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily you know, it's not like straight up something you know,

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>something you would find on a Twitter feed and go

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and just you know, consume it over lunch. And he

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>gets a little heady and a little mathematical. I mean,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's awesome, but it's a you can get lost in

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it a bit or I can. Uh. The title of

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the article is the magical number seven plus or minus

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>two colon some limits on our capacity for processing information.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>And in this uh, he starts off by pointing out

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that there is a clear and definite limit to the

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>accuracy with which we can identify absolutely the magnitude of

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you need dimensional stimulus variable. Uh. There's a span of

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>absolute judgment. And part of that is that there is

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a uh, that there is a finite s fan of

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>immediate memory, and that for a lot of different kinds

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of test materials, this span is about seven items in length.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we've already hit this seven items I

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>can remember. I mean I have trouble remembering like three

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>things if I need to pick them up at the

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>grocery store, but ideally I should be able to remember seven. Right,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if you had to really sit there and concentrate. You

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>could do it, and we'll get into why you can

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>concentrate for such a limited amount of time. But before

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we do that, I just wanted to mention that if

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at memory as this kind of house of memory,

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you see that on one side you have, you know,

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>long term memory, which is like a library, which a

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of with a bunch of books of your memories

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can recall whenever you want, right, just slip

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>them off, Michelle, look up what you want, right, Yeah,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>change them and then put them back right. Long term memory,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but a short term memory is more like a white

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>board where you kind of have a cheat sheet to

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>keep up with the conversation or to remember directions, and

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's just kind of there to help you create

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>some sort of association with what the present topic is. Right,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at someone like Mikhail Rabinovich and

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>his uh research into neural pathways, you begin to see

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this idea that seven bears out just in the way

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that we have um our neural pathways paved for us

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and the limits really of our processing when we're working

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>with that white board, that working memory. Yes, he was

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the others on this paper that presented a

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mathematical picture of how neurons fire when we recall a

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>sequence of steps, and one of the examples used here

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>is is that it's like running across a tight rope

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>walker not even a walker, because a walker can take

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>his time and go back and forth between the World

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Trade Center buildings. But but this is the idea that

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that you you do not have that ability, you don't

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have the big poll. What can you do? You just

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of speed up and go with it.

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>How long can you go across that trip wire without

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>falling off? Yeah? And that trip wire is that neural pathway, right,

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And what Rabinovitch discovered is that when a person recites

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a sentence or a list, you can actually see an

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>excited cluster of neurons fire for each word. And then

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these excited clusters create a pathway okay, that that tight

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>rope pathway, and at the same time they tamp down

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>any other competing neurons. Okay, So the competing neurons are

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>really like any other memories or any other thoughts that

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you might be having at the same time. Okay, which

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is really important. When I was saying earlier that you

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>could really do it if you're concentrated, you can recall

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a certain things. That's what we're talking about. This, these

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>excited clusters telling everybody to step off, right. So the

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>longer the sentence or the string of numbers you try

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to recall, the harder it is for those excited cluster

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of neurons to suppress the others from firing. And then

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the weaker the pathway, and then the lousier your your memory.

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So really, what you're seeing here again as a mathematical model,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as you say, a picture of the seven idea at

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>play in your brain. Yeah, this is really interesting and

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it ties right back into what I was talking about,

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>remembering three things to pick up at the grocery versions

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>remembering seven and uh. As they point out in this article,

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>recalling seven items requires about fifteen times the suppression needed

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to recall three. And suppression again, like you say, forcing

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all the other thoughts and competing thoughts out of your

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>head so that you can remember things. Ten more items

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>requires fifty times to strength, and twenty or more items

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>requires uh, hundreds of times to strength. So even in

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the jump from three items to seven items, you see

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this this pretty big jump in the the the amount

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of memory. You're gonna have to throw it at the

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>amount there the cognitive load and the cognitive ramifications of

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to remember things well, and it's interesting to put

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a number on that cognitive load. We've talked about that

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times when we're talking about free will

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or well. One of the studies we looked at actually

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>involved individuals having to remember a number and then they

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>were introduced to the temptation of chocolate cake. And the

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals who had to hold the longer number in their

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in their head, which as I recall, was somewhere in

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the in the neighborhood of seven or eight digits, they

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>had a harder time remembering it if they were introduced

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with this to this cake temptation. What I think it's

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is I wonder if those neurons that are

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>firing those competing ones are like chocolate cake, chocolate cake,

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>chocolate cake, like the literally thing that to the excited

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>cluster that's trying to recall the actual string of numbers. Yeah,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>every time this is probably horrible, But every time I

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>think about this about like our limits on remembering numbers,

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think of the movie Running Man, because there was

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the old Arnold source because there was

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a scene in that where the good guys had to

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>remember some sort of code and then input it, and

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty long code. But they had one

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>character that's supposed to be a math whiz or something

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and it was able to hold all these

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers in his head. But I always found that that

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>part kind of terrifying because I'm like, oh, my goodness,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers so long, how can anybody remember it? Now, if

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>certain certain types of autism will actually allow for people

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to have stronger pathways and recall a greater number of numbers,

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and then just some people in general can can sort

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of break that seven rule. Yeah, And certainly if you

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if you bust out the memory palace on it, then

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then you can really go far with it. Right Again,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>there's that idea of storing seven, you know, having a

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>chunk of seven and storing maybe five chunks of seven

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so that you can really roll out an impressive amount

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of items. UM. Now, I wanted to also mention this

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really cool study about neurons and dendrites UM. And I

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>do want to say that it doesn't mean that you know,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the brain is um. The brain especially loves the number seven.

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But it it does kind of give you pause for thought,

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>because researchers Miliori, Novora and Togola published a two thousand

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and eight study on neuros and the hippocampus that, of course,

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the memory input unit of the brain. The

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>study showed that neurons produced the best information when they're dendrites,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the branches of a neuron that receives stimulation, when those

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>branches numbered seven. So again, here's this idea that this

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of recall fitness has a limit, has a

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>limit within the neuron structure itself, within the pathway that

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>these neurons create, and then within our own ability to

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>recall information. And of course that brings up this crazy

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of well, if we keep ordering the world in sevens,

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, is it the tail wagging the dog? Is

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that because that's the way our brains are constructed? Do

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we end up falling into the trap of seven rather

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>than actually applying it logically? Yeah? Is it more to

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it than just you know, a linguistic lovely sound of seven? Ye,

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say, Oh, it's because our brains have a constraint

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on them. You know, I can't help but think that

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>seven also appeals to us in numbering things because seven,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>being an odd number, you have that you have that

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>room for one of the digits to be a leader,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess you know. You have it in

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>five as well, you have it in nine, but it

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>seems most clear in seven because you have I can

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>easily picture seven dudes. You have the one dude in

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the middle, and he's flanked by three on each side,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but you have one that stands out. Or if it's

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a body of seven voting on something, then you have

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>room for there to be a clear majority pretty easily. Well,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain kind of natural symmetry to it. Yeah,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very symmetrical number. You can just picture it

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there on a movie poster. And esthetically too, it's it's

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>better to have seven objects displayed than yeah, six. Yeah,

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>And and then the numeral is pretty, uh, pretty sexy too.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>You know. It looks kind of like a like a weapon,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>like we're like a hockey stick, you know. Yeah, I

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I feel a little bit weird about saying yeah,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's got a long neck. I mean, like, now I'm

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>getting into some weird territory here. Probably, So I like

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>it because I can seven is an odd number, but

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually if I do another seven to it's even number.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if anybody has this sort of particular

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>numbers obsession. Wait wait, so break this down for us again,

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>your number of obsession. How it works? Well I did.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I like even numbers, and I like getting to even numbers.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I could be sitting there in a

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation counting letters, or in a sentence, or if there's

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a sign nearby, and if it ends in an odd number,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's uh disconcerting to me. Well, I'd say you have

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to keep counting. I'm not a big fan of one

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because one is the loneliest number to um, yeah, I'm

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay. To two is a good number. I guess three,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>three is three is nice because three is like a

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>three is that? You know, you're a nice odd number.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a trinity. Uh. Four, you got the four Horsemen

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Apocalypse, So that's pretty good. I like that, yeah,

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>for in in Chinese death right, Yeah, so that's kind

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of it's got, you know, some sort of death metal

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>vibe to it, which is nice. Uh. Five, you know

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the five Wounds of Christ. So I kind of like that.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's nice and grizzly, exactly what I thought of. Yeah.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Six unholy numbers, so you gotta love that. Um. Seven,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 1>as we've been discussing here, lots of great things going

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for that. Eight you turn it on its side, it's infinity,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>so nice like that. Nine we have the nine Rings

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of Power from Lord of the Rings, the Nine Ring Ray.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's off the jokes store because it can flip

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>upside down and be a six. That's right, and it's

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a it's also a trinity of trinities, so it's got

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that going for it. And ten, I don't know, I

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of lose interest at ten. Well, you know, now

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you've gone into double digits. Yeah. Um, I would really

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from from you guys out there. Do

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a certain sort of number that you really liked?

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You have some number obsession going on? And seven? Do

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>you if you have a particular feeling for it. Do

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you think there's something to this the way that our

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>minds were constructed, in the way that we paint reality

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with it. Yeah, I think about it and think about

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>it the next time you're walking, uh walking through your

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>video store. If you still go to those and you

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>should because they won't be around for long. You should

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>appreciate him while you have them. Check out the titles.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Notice the ones that have seven in the number in

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the title. Those the ones that have six that have three? Like,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>how does it? How does it affect you? Like? What

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>is the like instant cognitive impact of that title? Uh?

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>You know? Likewise look at I think the same thing

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at a bookstore or library while those exist. Indeed, Yeah,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so we'd love to hear from you on that. Well,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>let's let's call over the robot and do it just

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a quick bit of listener mail, because I think he

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>may have something that relates to this. All right, here's

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>one that comes to us from Aaron Erin, writs In

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and says, Hi, Julian Robert, I'm a bit behind at times.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I am commenting on episodes you did a year ago,

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but you'll have to forgive me. I've spent the last

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>year as a Peace Corps volunteer in a rural village

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in West Africa. I recently finished listening to your episodes

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.479
<v Speaker 1>on the seven Deadly Since and was especially intrigued by

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the episode on Gluttony. My fellow volunteers and I live

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly in in small rural villages without access to markets

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or food other than what has grown on the desert

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like village land or brought in from a large town.

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Each week, we eat with our host families out of

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>out of communal bowls, and while we usually get just

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>enough calories consumed, it's not the food that we are

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>used to in the United States, and it's not high

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>nutritional value. I think lots of porridge, white rice in oil.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So when I go into the cities and meet up

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>with my friends, we binge as a recovering health nut.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>My sister calls my diet reindeer food. I never out

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I was capable of that kind of eating. For example,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>I had an entire jar of nutella in one setting,

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>remarkably easy to do um, something I wouldn't even touch

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. My father recently referred to me as

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>as a sumo wrestler during one of my of the

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>many buffets we enjoyed. On implication, I began to call

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>us opportunistic bingers. Here's a nice way of avoiding the

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>word glutton us. Our circumstances that have definitely turned on

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>some evolutionary need may be triggered by being denied what

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we are used to eating. I think this is true

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not only of gluttony, but other sins as well. Lust, wrath, sloth,

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and pride have emerged in our lives far more than

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>ever before because of living in a completely different culture

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>or and living in a completely different lifestyle. This sounds blasphemous,

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and I mean no disrespect to any religion or to

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>me uh and other volunteers. But maybe we feel a

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be more gluttonous, lustful, wrathful, slothful, and prideful

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>if we are going to maintain our sense of identity

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in this new and challenging place. Or maybe we're simply

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>more aware of those tendencies here. Sometimes it feels like

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we haven't changed, We're just using more of the potential

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of our personalities, both for the worse and for the better.

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So back to glightening. While most of us are not dieting,

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>our minds and bodies are rebelling, subconsciously demanding the food

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>we are not providing. Meanwhile, my host family and my

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>village is not very interested in the foods I make,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and they are perfectly satisfied and happy with the food

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>they're used to. It makes me wonder if it was

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>better to have loved than lost the variety and plethora

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of food in the US than to never have loved

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it at all. Does the loss of what we once

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>had make us more sinful in trying to fill the void?

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Two very big hips in a hurrah for opportunistic eaters everywhere.

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the awesome science and stories you keep me

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>entertained and sane during long, hot days in a foreign land.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I make connections between the lives of people here in

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>my village and the science you unveil every day, and

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel more informed and at peace because of it.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You help me understand this crazy world within the world

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>erin Wow. So that's really interesting. I keep thinking about

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to one of the studies that talked about when you

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>lose something like of your weight, that you really your

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>body sort of rewires itself to crave fatty foods, to

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>want to regain that weight because it thinks that there's

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>something wrong, and it makes it incredibly hard to maintain

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that weight. In fact, for someone who is a similar

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>weight but has not lost it, um you have to

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>expand many more calories exercising to maintain than that other

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>person such as your your body trying to make up

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for this loss. Yeah, indeed, Yeah, I thought that was

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a great email. I really enjoyed a particularly by the way,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, Aaron was sort of extrapolating this to the

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>other um sins that that we discussed as well. Yeah. No,

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a very interesting perspective to take. I

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can't help the of course, thinking about how your body

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is sort of gaining the gaming, the gluttony part of it, yea. Um.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot to think about two in terms

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of maintaining identity. Yeah. Yeah, So Aaron, Uh, first of all,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the great work you're doing out there, and

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for writing in and sharing your thoughts with us.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>The rest of you can do the same. Uh. There

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are numerous ways to get in touch with us, uh

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and find out what we're up to. The big one,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, is go to Stuff to Blow your mind

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's the mothership. That's where all of our

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff winds up in some form or another and links

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to everything else we're in. It's the center of the

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>spider's web, and uh, I guess that makes us spiders,

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot. You can also find us on elsewhere

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in the web. On Facebook, we are Stuff to Blow

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. You can find us on Twitter where we

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>are blow the Mind. We have a tumbler account we

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are stuff to Blow your Mind on that as well,

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you head on over to YouTube you will

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>find our account at mind stuff Show. That's right, you'll

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>see puppets of us talking in video about science. Really now,

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be nice. I just got excited. Maybe soon

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we can that's that's on the table. We could do that.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>If you think we should do that, let us know. Yeah,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want to see puppets of us interacting and

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>us doing some freaky voices? Can build those puppets also,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be also, I would also be heppy. Please

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>do drop us a line there and let us know

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about your thoughts on the number seven about puppets and

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>everything else that you can think of. Um, you can

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>do so at blow the Mind at discovery dot com

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Does

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com