WEBVTT - What's Next for LIV Golf?

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my ball.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>In a Friday Egg, Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Friday Egg, Frida Egg brid Egg, Frida Egg bride Egg Lie.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm about ready to run off of the Welcome to

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the Friday Egg Golf Podcast. I'm Garrett Morrison, and today

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>with the Live Team Golf Championship approaching, we're talking about

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>what Live is doing well and what it could be

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>doing better. But first we're going to discuss what we're

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in on and what we're out on this week. Here

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that with me are Andy Johnson and Joseph Lamania.

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you. Joseph, what are you in on?

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Garrett?

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 4>I am in on playing golf tournaments in the countries,

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 4>in the home countries of superstars, and I think this

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 4>sometimes gets framed as national opens, right, which we had

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the Irish Open this past weekend and it was an

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 4>unbelievable scene with Rory McElroy playing to a crowd that

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 4>was extremely friendly to him. One of I mean unbelievable

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.919
<v Speaker 4>scenes watching him walk down the seventy second fairway. Shane

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 4>Lowry similarly had a lot of support out there. But

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 4>I just think in general it's a great way to

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 4>engage fans sell tickets. I think it's something that Live

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 4>does effectively. And I know we're going to talk about

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Live a little bit later, but having a tournament in

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Spain when John Rahm and Sergio Garcia are two of

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 4>your biggest stars, I think this is something for the

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour to heavily consider. The Zozo in Japan is

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 4>not a high profile event, and that could be really

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 4>cool if you had more of the top players showing up.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 4>When Hideki Matsuyama is one of your most marketable global stars, right,

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 4>the Irish Open could be really cool if more players

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 4>were there.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 3>I thought that Zozo was becoming a huge event before

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 3>COVID because you had Tiger go and.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I win it.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it felt like it had a lot of

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>momentum until the pandemic, you know.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think another small example would be getting rid

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 4>of the match play in Austin, where Scotti Scheffler and

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Spief both went to school. Like some of there's

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 4>so much local support for those golfers some of their

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 4>biggest stars. I think there should be more of an

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>effort to be a little bit more flexible with venues

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>and get to the places where your best golfers, your

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 4>most marketable golfers have either grew up or have ties

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 4>to So that was a big takeaway for me from

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 4>watching the Irish Norway Here we Come. That'd be sweet.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 3>It's the star still.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. After this season, Yeah, who knows?

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Who knows how Victor Hovlin is doing? All right, So

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>what I'm in on, first of all, The big thing

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm in on is something I'll touch on quickly and

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss maybe later. Is Bubba Watson being relegated and lived.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>That's hilarious, don't. I don't know what's gonna happen there.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's basically he's like a co owner of

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the range Goats.

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>From what I've gathered. What I've gathered, not a lot

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 3>of people like playing on Bubba's team. That could be

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>part of why they made the late rule switch is

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 3>that Bubba, Bubba and in and of himself, is a

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 3>cancer in his own clubhouse potentially.

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean if he isn't playing, then he

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>would be a non playing GM presumably, or maybe he

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>just end up playing for another team and retaining equity

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the range. I don't know. It could get really messy,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty in on that. The serious thing I'm

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in on is during the Solheim Cup, what I saw

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was really refreshing in terms of the dynamic between the players.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was a great combination of competitive spirit

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and genuine friendship between the two teams, and it was

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>just it warmed my heart. I couldn't help it. This

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit sentimental, but you know, like it

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>seems like Nellie Korda and Charlie Hole are really friends,

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but they went after each other. They had this I mean,

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that great of a match because Charlie Hole

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely wiped the floor with Nelly, but it was a

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>great matchup, a great combination of two big personalities and

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>great players, and they seem to keep it really friendly

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time take the competition very seriously

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and put all of their energy into it, and so

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that was just a wonderful competition. It just seems like

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>that balance of the friendliness and the classiness and the

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>competitiveness isn't always there in the right cup. It seems

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>like the men don't quite get that right all the time.

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever reason, this past week's Soulheim Cup was

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was right on the money with the with the vibes.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>The vibes were great. All right, Andy, what are you

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in on?

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I would just add one thing. I thought the personalities

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 3>were great in the Solheim Cup.

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Megan Kang was like, it was a big week for

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Megan Kang.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 3>I just think that in general, like the personalities really

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 3>came out in the group atmosphere. And I think for

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 3>women's golf, that's a big thing that they could differentiate from.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 3>You know, men's golf is men's golf doesn't have a

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 3>ton of personality. It's kind of like, oh, we like

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 3>this guy because he hits the ball far, or we

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 3>like this guy because he's got a good short game,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, and there's very few players who show personality.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>And I thought that was a big part of the

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 3>women's game this week. I guess I like, since you

0:05:55.320 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 3>guys haven't haven't said anything, I guess I'm in on

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>on golf being held at the greatest golf courses in

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 3>the world.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Robert Trent Jones Golf Club.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Royal County Down was incredible.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course it was.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>It was awful coverage, horrendous like in terms of like

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 3>it was. I think at the shotgun start we talked

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 3>about how we were excited for like a modern broadcast

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>at Royal County Down with bells and whistles. It was

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 3>like a two thousand and five broadcast at Royal County Down.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 3>It was handheld cameras. They couldn't track the ball. It

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 3>was just straight world feed. There was no like drone,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 3>There was nothing, nothing out of this world about it was.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>It was horrible, horrendous coverage. That being said, it still

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>was honestly probably the most captivated I have been for

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 3>a golf tournament non major division in uh forever, outside

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>of like the Ryder Cup and made That was the

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 3>most into a golf tournament I've been. And it's because

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the golf course like really forced, Like what you saw

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>was a golf course forcing its will on players. Players

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>had to play certain ways because of the golf design,

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the elements that were thrust in their way. And you

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 3>know the other thing that worked really well with it

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 3>was the time that it was on, at this time

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>of year. It was done wrapped up before the kickoff

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of football, and golf has made this like they've moved

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>mountains to avoid football, move like, done everything. But the

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>reality is like it doesn't work because golf the best

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>golf season is September and October, arguably like late August,

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>September October. That's when you you have every venue, every

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>venue in the world is a possible destination for the

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>most part outside of the Southern sphere, and you have

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>like these delightful, delightful opportunities to have great golf tournaments

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>and the tour. Because of how US centric it is,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>which Joseph just hit on. Because of how US centric

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>it is, it acts like like we can't avoid football

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in any other way.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 4>But the.

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Opportunity, the way to avoid football was very abundantly clear,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's also in the part of the world that's

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 3>got some of the best golf courses that you could

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>play tournament golf on. It just seems like it makes

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>too much sense to have a Links season. Everybody talks

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 3>about Link season in July. I think they should have

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 3>a Lenk season in September and October. And you have

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 3>these tournaments that end before football, and people wake up

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was great. You wake up, you're having

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>your coffee, you're watching golf, and it rolls right into

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 3>football and it solves your your big issue with the fall,

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>and then the season makes a lot of sense. It

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 3>goes from January to October. There's a two month off

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>season for everybody, and there you go. It doesn't have

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to be as congested, it's spaced out, it's it's it's

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the way that the season should go.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>They've got to commit to that, though, and train people

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch golf at those times, because the ratings issue

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is a profound one, an issue regular tournament, but even

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>more so when you're when you're televising these tournaments in

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the morning. You know when you're in that you know,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>three to six pm Eastern time zone, uh kind of

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>tournament playing prime prime time, you know, golf time zone.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You know you're you're getting the ratings that you are

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what it's like two to three million on Sundays. But

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're earlier in the morning, I'm agreeing with you.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it could work. But it's just like the

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>ratings for the Open Championship in the US are not

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>very good, and for better or for worse, mostly for worse.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Probably US ratings are really meaningful for the PGA Tour,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's financial well being, and so they've just

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>got to train people to get up and watch golf,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>make coffee golf a thing, like, really commit to it

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and actually say this is a fun thing to do.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get up early and let's watch them golf before football.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like they have a shot in the

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>fall of getting people to watch golf in the morning,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, and.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 4>They don't have much of a shot of getting them

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 4>to watch golf in the afternoon.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Right pro Core pro Core was not a hot ticket,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>did not register on the Doppler this past weekend.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I want to get into what we're out on.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sure, I'll start garts ready to go.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready, and I am out on the LPGA Tours

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and NBC's seeming lack of readiness to channel the enthusiasm

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that fans felt for the Solheim Cup this past week.

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>There was real momentum behind the Solheim Cup. People wanted

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to get on site and watch that tournament. People wanted

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to watch it on TV, and guess what, they couldn't

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>get to the golf course. There were buses going to

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the wrong golf course. There were endless lines where people

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>were leaving. Our own megat Cans covered this very well,

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and this was a big subject earlier in the week,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure that people have already heard about it.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think the incompetence here on the part of

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the LPGA Tour, and I'll put this at the doorstep

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 1>of the Commissioner, Molly mark Us Sammon. This is their

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to make sure that fans who are enthusiastic about

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the product can actually get on site and have a

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>great experience. And there at the first tee when they're

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hitting the first t shots, I mean, it was like,

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, half empty, So just a ridiculous display there.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And then the coverage by NBC predictably at this point,

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been a really bad year for NBC golf. This

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>has been well covered, but it was strikingly poor how

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>NBC was covering the Solheim Cup, missing a lot of shots,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>just not getting a grasp on the narrative of each day,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>especially on Sunday. They were just lost and it was

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard to keep track of. They did not find

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a storyline, they didn't have cameras in the right places,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they weren't following the right groups, and they just didn't

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have an idea of how to lay out the narrative

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>of the day. And those were really really disappointing things

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because to me, it really felt like there was there

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there was potential for this event to kind of blow up,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and in a sense it it sort of did, at

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>least in my little world of the Internet and social media.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like people were excited about it, and there

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of coverage of it and genuine enthusiasm,

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think that was that was tempered by the

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>LPGA Tours and NBC's lack of preparedness.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 3>I thought the first Tea coverage was outstanding. I mean

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 3>it was. It was for like two straight hours, and

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>they just neglected all the matches that went out on

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 3>the because you know, the most consequential shot of every

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>match is the first T shot. I'm being starcastic here.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You really appreciated the thoroughness of the first tea.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Coming, Yeah, I mean, like you talk about, literally the

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 3>least consequential shot in a golf match is the first

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>T shot, and I think, like we need to address

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 3>this with like team competitions. I get there's a lot

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>of fans there. I get the golf and have a

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>stadium feel. Very often. I understand why it's like this spectacle.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>It's like this shiny object, but when it comes to

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 3>showing a golf match, it's literally the least important shot

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>of the day is the first te shot, and I

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>just can't It's like now a pet peeve of mine,

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>because like it's just like running for like the thirsty

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>social impressions it's run. It's like the coverage just being

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>like trying to make golf cool. Like you know, what's

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>actually way cooler than the first tea is when somebody

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 3>hits like an unbelievable chip to save par and have

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a hole and throw the kind of throw the momentum

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 3>of a match on its head. We miss that because

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>we're showing people walking up to the first tea and

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>a crowd cheering, like to me, like this is I

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 3>guess this is what I'm out on. This is what

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm out on. I'm out on Golf's constantly to water

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>down the product and like think that we need stuff

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 3>like a cool first t atmosphere to appeal to people,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>like show the sport what's exciting about the sport is

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>when players hit miraculous shots in match play that that

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 3>somehow square matches, or hit unbelievable shots that you know,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 3>flip a hole when it looks like they're going to

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 3>lose a hole, they hit a great recovery shot and

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>win a hole. Show those shots. That is what's exciting

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 3>about the sport, especially match play, and it gives you

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>this awesome opportunity to show these shots and follow these

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 3>matches that hinge on like these micro moments. That is

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>what's amazing about the sport. It's not watching somebody walk

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to the first tea box and people cheer. That's actually

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 3>extremely dull and it gets repetitive after like you know,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 3>show the matches go out, but like we didn't get

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>to see any of the beginning of the Harley Hule

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Nelly Corda match, like two of the most marketable players.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>We're not getting to watch the match because we're watching,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, Lily Avou walk from from the from the

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 3>tunnel to the first t Like this is insane. Like

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 3>imagine like the NFL, the greatest TV sports product. You

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>know what they show about ten seconds of players walking

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>out of the field. You know what they never miss

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>a play. They never miss a play because that's what matters.

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 3>They don't water down the product. It's not like, hey,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 3>like maybe they water down the product a little in

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift's in the stands. Okay, maybe they they do

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>do that.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like after Travis Kelcey makes makes a play.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>That's like the only time I water the product down.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>But anyways, my point is like, show the matches, lean

0:16:54.800 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 3>into the beauty of the sport. To stop andering, stop

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to think that golf needs something outside the product.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 3>It is an unbelievably captivating, complex sport and by just

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 3>showing the action that's in talking at about it in

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 3>like not worry not worrying about trying to make it cool.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>You're you're gonna make it cool.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine if if Taylor Swift were dating a

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour golfer, how much of her they would they

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>would be showing during the telecasts. I mean it would

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>be insane, it would be it would be remarkable. All right,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Sorry you were going to say something, Joseph, go.

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 4>Ahead, No, I think the first team build out is

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 4>important for the on site experience.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>You got to. You got to. It's a matter of ratios, though, right.

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Right, absolutely, I think the way that they missed the

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 4>opening shots and you couldn't see a lot of the

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 4>whole court of match, like you've lost the plot at

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 4>that point, And the same thing happens with the Ryder Cup.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Exacting as a hardcore go to not see the opening

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 4>few holes of some of the coolest, most high profile matches,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 4>and you're missing. Oftentimes the best players are sent off first,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 4>so the longer they dwell on the first team build out,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 4>you're missing the most high profile match, like the entire

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 4>front nine. So I'm with you on that. What I'm

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 4>out on, I think is a combination of both things

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 4>that Garrett and Andy, you both said, I'm out on

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of what's happened on the LPGA tour this year.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I think you could make the argument that it was

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 4>a successful year. Nelly Korda had an unbelievable year, and

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 4>there's a Salheim Cup that had some enthusiasm for it.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 4>But I think the alternate view, and the one I

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 4>subscribe to a little more is, yeah, you had Nelly Korda,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 4>like a generational, very marketable young American star, have a

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 4>good year, and a Salheim Cup year, did you capitalize

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 4>on it? And it feels to me like they did

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 4>not capitalize on it in any way. The turning off

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 4>of a lot of fans with the shuttle bus situation

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 4>is one incident, but I think it's emblematic of larger

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 4>leadership issues to an extent, and I think you have

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 4>to question after this year if it's moving in the

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 4>right direction, like why is twenty twenty five going to

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 4>be a more successful year for the LPGA Tour than

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four was, Because, at least from my perspective

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 4>as somebody who doesn't watch it every week but does

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 4>engage with the high profile LPGA Tour events, I certainly

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 4>was not greeted with a great viewing experience at any

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 4>point this year, and I think enthusiasm for the LPGA

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Tour is low. I think it's reasonable to question if

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 4>this was a successful year despite some of the windfalls

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 4>that they could have had.

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>They could have had, Yeah, tell me if this is

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>an unfair comparison. It is at an unfair comparison. I

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>know that, But look what's going on with the WNBA

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, And obviously Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese are

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>rare superstars.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad that you acknowledge the Chicago sky Superstars.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, oh god, no, thank.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 3>You, thank you for acknowledging Skytown. We're very proud of

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 3>it in Chicagoans.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Sandy, this has been this has been your your

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>daily word from Chicago. Man. Clearly, clearly those are are

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>are a rare breed of athlete. But the w n

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>b A has done a really great job of channeling

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the organic enthusiasm for these players and for the league.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And it just seems like the LPGA Tour is not

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>similarly situated to deal with the breakout popularity of any

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>given player where whether that's Nelly Korda or to an extent,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Hole.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, Rose a couple of years ago was a disaster.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The rollout was was not great. And you know what,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>like Roseaning has done some remarkable stuff in the past

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years now, I will say that that Rose's

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>personality is low key, that's just who she is. She

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't kind of sparkle in interviews and so maybe that

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>element isn't there. But she won her first event as

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>an LPGA Tour player. She has kept winning and she

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been impressive in majors, but this is still an

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>exciting developing storyline in women's golf. And clearly what Nelly

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Corda did this year, especially in the first half of

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the year, was remarkable and I think probably could have

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>been capitalized on a lot more effectively by the LPGA Tour.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>The LPGA Tour, I believe, needs to have the attitude

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying to lift up and promote our star

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>players and try to get them to resonate in the

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>culture as much as possible. The strategy is different than

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the PGA Tour, which can allow things to

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of just unfold, but the LPGA Tour really needs

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to kind of pounce on these moments, and it just

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like the current leadership is really into that. Right.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>For a while when Mike Wan was commissioner, there was

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a feeling of energy like we're going to make this happen.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But things have calmed down during the reign of the

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>current commissioner, and I think that's a problem.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 4>The difficult part of the comparison is that the WNBA,

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I think this warrants being said, doesn't go head to

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>head with the NBA and with the golf men's professional

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 4>calendar basically spanning year round. In it being an outdoor sport,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 4>it's a little bit difficult. The Kaitlin Clark isn't playing

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 4>at the same time as Lebron James and Steph Curry.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 4>It's really hard for the women's game to earn its

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 4>spot in the certain television window.

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know.

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there's a streaming option. The WNBA has their own

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 4>league pass set up, and I don't know if it's

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the LPGA Tour is going to build out a whole

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 4>league pass, But I think the availability of watching it

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 4>on television has been a huge problem for the LPGA

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Tour this year. It's very difficult to find where it's

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 4>going to be, so a lot of issues. I'll cut

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 4>on some slack on that, but it doesn't feel like

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 4>they capitalized. Andy, What were you about to say?

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 3>I just think in general it's a tough situation. I

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>think like there are a lot of aspects of the

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>LPGA and I think we could this probably can parlay

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 3>us into Live a little bit. But I think when

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 3>you look at the organization, how they view the sport,

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 3>what they allow to happen on the golf course, how

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 3>they go about selecting venues like these are all major

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>issues that hold the LPGA back. I mean, I've been

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the the idea of how you could get

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour playing premier venue after premier venue. It's

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>very difficult because, like there just aren't a lot of

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 3>venues that are capable of hosting the modern male professional

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 3>who hits the ball three hundred and fifty yards. Like

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 3>you start to like it's just like wow, Like as

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 3>great as Royal County Down was this week, there was

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 3>it was not really a driver test, you know, there

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>was from that standpoint, like you could like say, hey,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 3>is it a complete test if it never really challenges

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 3>somebody's driving ability. Now, with the women's game, the number

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>of potential great venues that you could go play is

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 3>got to be close to five hundred. I mean, it

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>fits in just about just about anywhere. And of those

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>five hundred, they might visit three per year. I mean,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 3>there is an unbelievable opportunity. I think, like we've we

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 3>saw this this week at the Irish Open. And sure

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 3>the ratings aren't gonna be good, but guess what you

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 3>have to go to NBC Sports app to watch it like, yeah,

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 3>the ratings aren't going to be good, but with the

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 3>with the LPGA, you have an opportunity, unlike men's professional golf,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 3>to get week in, week out, the best players playing

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 3>some of the best golf courses in the world. And

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that that pairing is part of what is

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 3>going to propel the sport and too, like you need

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 3>to figure out ways to get more people interested in

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>watching the golf and by going to local market's best

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 3>known golf course, that is a way to get more

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 3>people interested in the sport. So if you're going to

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 3>big markets in their best golf course, more people are

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>going to watch the sport because they're gonna be like

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 3>interested golfers that want to just go to the event

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 3>to see the golf course to like, Oh it's being

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 3>held at Medina, I'll go watch that. Oh it's being

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 3>held at Blue Mound in Milwaukee, I'll go. I'll go

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 3>see Blue Mount, I'll go walk around Blue Mount. Like

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 3>this is a way to capture a bigger audience. Also

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 3>administering pace of place so so that your product is better.

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 3>It's just a better watching product. I went to a

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>baseball game for the first time since the since the

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>new rules, Like in person, it's incredible. The innings just

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 3>go so fast, and it's like, why isn't golf looking

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 3>at this stuff? It's it just like kept my attention

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 3>so much more. Even with a four year old, I

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 3>felt myself watching more pitches because they were just coming

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 3>in succession, you know. So anyways, I think just in general,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 3>the LPGA like needs to take a good hard look

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 3>at the mirror and say, like, what what are we?

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 3>How do we differentiate ourselves from other tours? And how

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 3>do we become the best tour we can be because

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 3>right now it seems like they're just kind of very

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 3>content being you know, the second or third biggest golf

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 3>tour in the world.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. And I have

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>low confidence right now that the leadership of the tour

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is kind of on top of this, that they've wrapped

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>their arms around this issue and are ready to push

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the tour forward. And you know, if I were an

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>LPGA tour player, I would be beginning to get a

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit frustrated with it.

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, right, I mean, there's a real opportunity for them,

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 3>this is not There's a real opportunity for them to

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 3>be the most popular version of professional golf.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Men's golf is in chaos right now. Clearly there's an

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and it doesn't seem like they've really moved on it.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 3>But all right, is it easy to get there? Absolutely not.

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 3>But in order to get there there have to be

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 3>some wholesale changes with the way they do their business,

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and that to be seems like the thing that it

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 3>seems like they're almost going the opposite way.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Before getting into lives, we're going to discuss the state

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of live in a moment. Here, let's talk a bit

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>about Goodwalk Coffee. So Goodwalk Coffee is in my Goodwalk

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>mug right now. This is the fried Egg golf blend

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from Goodwalk. This is our own blend. It's a bright

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and vibrant organic coffee roasted to a medium light level.

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>We also have a Shotgun Start blend that's more of

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a medium dark thing. So Goodwalk is a great company

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're very proud to be to be working with them.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>The founders are golf nuts who also happen to be

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>coffee nuts, and they buy high grade beans from around

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the world at fair market prices, and importantly, these beans

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>happen to be very, very good. This is delicious coffee.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So go to Goodwalkcoffee dot com slash fried Egg and

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>use the code fried egg all one word at checkout

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to save twenty percent on your entire order. Using the

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>same code to start a coffee subscription will save you

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent on your first order and you'll then save

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ten percent on all future shipments. You can pause, skip,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or cancel your subscription at any time on the website.

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So again, Goodwockcoffee dot com slash Frida Egg. All right,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get into Live. We're going to talk about some

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>ways too that Live could be better headed, some fixes

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for Live. But there would be those out there who

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>would argue that Live doesn't need any fixes, that it's

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>doing great, that everything's wonderful, that it's changing golf in

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, in just a couple of years it's

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be the dominant golf league in the world.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. This past week we saw Live Chicago at

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at Bowlingbrook Golf Club.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe a major championship.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>As Bryson Deshambo said, right, well, look, I mean the

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>winning score was what minus eleven or something like that. Clearly,

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly it was administering a an examination of golfing ability,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly acquitted itself better than Valhalla. But in any case,

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you, Joseph. I mean you watch them

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>live this past week. I know, do you do you think?

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the product needs to fix? Needs to

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>be fixed?

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Can I just throw something out there?

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Ok?

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Real quick, go ahead to set the table here. Sure,

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 3>you know we're at this point with the PGA Tour

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and everybody involved, how the how the players seem to

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>be just running in opposite directions of each other, and

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 3>it's become like extra, it's spent. It's at a point

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 3>where it seems like nothing can get done. So like,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>if they want to make changes, there's no way both

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 3>sides of players are going to agree on them. You

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 3>know that, it just seems like they're at this place

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 3>where they're at a stalemate where nothing can happen because

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>everybody's at odds with each other, and the setup of

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>the tour is such that you have to get everybody

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>rowing in the same direction, and that seems to be

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 3>a herculean task right now. I think the unique thing

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 3>about Live is if one person decides that they're going

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>to make months massive changes to the tour. They can

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 3>do it because it's run by one person. It is

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 3>a It is not run by the players.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And Norman or it I don't know.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 3>I think I think.

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It's Andrew Waterman is not quite as visible.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.479
<v Speaker 3>So anyways, I just think when you talk about this

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 3>framing this discussion, if one tour has the ability to

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 3>actually make a wholesale changes and be fixed right now,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's actually Live. I think Live has a

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 3>much greater potential of making changes that improve the product.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the tour, the PGA Tour right now is

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>years away from anything changing. So I would say I

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 3>wanted to just preface this this conversation with of all

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the tours that exist in golf, Live is the one

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 3>that has the most opportunity to evolve, to iterate because

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 3>of the structure it has. The players are contracted, They

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 3>don't really have a say it is. It is run

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 3>by Yasser and Greg Norman. Maybe not Greg for that

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 3>much longer, but who knows.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Well we've been saying that for a couple of years now. Greg,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he's hung on the guy is the guy is tenacious.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Him and Jay could could have a survivor contest, they

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>WI should get him both on survivors who lasts longer.

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Cut from the same very tough cloth. Clearly all right,

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>well with the table, so set, Joseph, I want to

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>get your impressions of Live Chicago this past week, just

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a sense of where we are right now

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with the product.

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 4>So I think there are actually a lot of things

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 4>that Live does well. And straight up, I think the

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 4>model if you're going to build a golf tour from

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 4>scratch or a league from scratch, it would look more

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 4>similar to Live than it would look to the PGA Tour,

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 4>where the members approve of every decision. As Andy's alluding to,

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it has a real problem shaking some of

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 4>the stink of its foundation and it feeling like a

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 4>bunch of players who are past their primes took a

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of money more or less to exit the competitive environment.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't feel particularly competitive. And maybe we'll get to

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 4>some of the stuff that some of the honorable mention

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 4>fixes like, I think everything should be geared towards creating

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 4>as a competitive of an environment as possible. One of

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 4>the things, so my big fix, A lot of contracts

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 4>are expiring or apparently at the end of this year.

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 4>I think it is notable that most of the good

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 4>golf being played right now, in this era of speed youth,

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 4>is being played by players who are ages twenty six

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 4>to thirty three ish. Live is significantly older than that,

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 4>and it's not because they have all these legends like

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 4>Sergio Garcia who are hanging on similar to Adam Scott like,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 4>there are some very talented players who can continue to

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 4>compete into their early forties. But the average age on

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Live is thirty six, which is past the window of

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 4>when you see players playing at their peaks. I just

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 4>was looking at the Tour Championship. The average age is

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 4>thirty one.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, and Live wants to get a young audience too.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>That's their big thing. They want to so younger.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 4>What I would do if I were running Live is

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 4>I would sign a bunch of these twenty two to

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty four year olds who show some upside. They may

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 4>not be the highest profile names, but they maybe they've

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 4>got power, they have some amateur excellence that they've demonstrated.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 4>Give them a couple of years to develop, and by

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 4>the time they're twenty six to twenty seven, they're playing

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 4>in qualifiers to get into majors. You're investing in them,

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 4>getting them into as competitive of shape as possible and

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 4>giving them some time to grow. And you need to

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 4>shed all of these Cameron tringalle type contracts, These thirty

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 4>six year olds, these thirty seven year olds, who we

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 4>know what they are. They provide no value. No one

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 4>cares about watching Cameron Tringgalley play. We know what he is.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Even Carlos Ortiz right.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Thirty three, murdered Charles Howell.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Charles Holl's forty five, right. They have so many of

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 4>these golfers who are past their competitive primes. And again,

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Carlos ORTIZI thrice thirty three, He's not going to turn

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 4>into a world beater next year. If I'm them, I

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 4>shift the narrative. We keep some of the legends, the pills,

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 4>the DJs, obviously Ram who's playing at his peak. Keep

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Patrick west Wood, you know leave West's fifty one.

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Dick Plans was one of the best players on the

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 3>tour this year. If you want to wait a couple

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 3>of them.

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>A banner year for Dick Bland.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 3>How many guys can just go down to the Champions

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Tour and beat up on everybody and then then finish

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 3>fifteenth in live events.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, you get my point. I think you need

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 4>to bring in you can keep some of those legends

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 4>to mentor this new wave, and then I think you

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 4>bring in a bunch of twenty two to twenty five

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 4>year olds with a bunch of promise, and one of

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 4>your benefits is that you lock them up for a

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 4>few years, give them time to develop, and don't put

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 4>pressure on them to compete in year one. That is

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 4>probably the right way to make this whole thing feel

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more competitive.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 3>I want to push back a little here. Golf is

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 3>an extremely fickle game and it's extraordinarily hard to pick

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 3>how what young players are going to pan out. Like

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 3>we're reminded of this all the time. Norman Jong. One

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 3>of their young superstars big splash signings was Matt Will.

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 3>How's that gone? I think they're young guys that they've signed.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 3>They've signed like promising young players, Turk Pettitt, James Piatt,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 3>the NCAA champion, a USAM champion, your Chikara these, Yeah,

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 3>they have not worked out. They haven't worked out. So

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the the smarter path here is that Live

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 3>needs to invest in a robust feeder Tour, and I

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 3>think they've like done a little bit with the Asian Tour, right.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>That's it isn't that their idea for their feeder tour.

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what they want it to be.

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 3>But if your live you could put together like the

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 3>way the corn Ferry Tour works, it is not a

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 3>like a fun place to be if you're on the

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 3>corn Ferry Tour because like, sure I have a chance

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 3>at a PGA Tour card, but I'm not making any

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 3>any money like whatsoever. I think what is the total

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the total prize perse for the corn Faery

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Tour it like very very low. I mean it's like

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 3>effectively like one point two million dollars per tournament, twenty

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 3>five tournaments. So you're talking about a small investment, a

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 3>smaller than Lee Westwood investment, and you could have the

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 3>most lucrative feeder tour in the world. And that's how

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 3>you build it, because it can't be We're going to

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 3>sign ten young players because the reality of pro golf

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>is that eighty percent of them aren't going to be

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 3>very good. Ninety percent of them won't be a superstar.

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Even if you sign the ten best players from next year.

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, like one of them might turn into a superstar.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 4>So that's kind of that's my point though, right you

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 4>want to hit on one or two of the big ones,

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 4>and that's way better than taking your chances on Cameron Tringale.

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 3>So if LIV wants to have the best tour, they

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.479
<v Speaker 3>need to also have the best feeder tour because that's

0:38:55.520 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 3>what's going to ensure you long term sustainable success. It

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 3>is not giving out these contracts to Carlos Ortiz overpaying

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 3>for Graham McDowell. You know, like these are not the

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 3>right answers. The right answers is how do we build

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 3>a sustainable future and that has to be through getting

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the best players in the world at a young age

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 3>to play in your system. And I think like that

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>to me, for you know, with all the you know,

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.760
<v Speaker 3>this sounds crazy. For a meager one hundred million dollars

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 3>a year, Live could have a great, great feeder tour

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 3>where you have the most promising players playing and a

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 3>real opportunity like you could say to college kids like

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 3>right now, it's it's an interesting time with uh with

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the PGA tour you which is like promoting staying in

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.919
<v Speaker 3>school like you are there are massive benefits to staying

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 3>in school. But if you could present a opportunity for

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the best college players to go make a couple million

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year playing on this on their on your

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 3>smaller tour, I think that it would give a lot

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 3>of people a reason to jump over there.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think there's a bigger question here for Live

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>than getting the right players and the right talent, and

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that's whether it's ever going to be on TV in

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful way. The CW deal has been kind of

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a low.

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Key I think that deals up.

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 1>That deal is up this year, Yes, it is up

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 1>right now after the team championship, and the team championship

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>week is usually the week when Live officials convene a

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>few of their their favorite media figures, get them in

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a room and lay out kind of their strategy and

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts about where the league is going next, and

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that would include media rights deals. So maybe something will

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>come out this week about Lib's plan for getting on

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>TV and getting in front of people. But the CW

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.720
<v Speaker 1>thing hasn't worked out. It doesn't seem like either side

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is happy with how it has gone. The ratings, of course,

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have been legendarily abysmal. They've been abysmal at the PGA

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Tour level as well. But you know, like we're talking

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 1>about what three hundred thousand viewers or something like that

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for certain days, maybe maybe less than that, maybe more.

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's like one hundred and fifty lot of final rounds.

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's really low. It's really low even for the CW.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So it just doesn't seem like people are are following

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the league to the CW. Now there are people who

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>would say that we've got a lot of viewers on

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Live Golf Plus app. We don't know who's on

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the CW app. Look at YouTube. Well, we can look

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube. It's you know, the final rounds generally rack

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 1>up views in about one two hundred and fifty thousand

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>by a few days after the tournament, which is not

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>terribly significant, I would say. And then there's the global scene,

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 1>but they don't really have huge media rights deals in

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Australia or other countries. They don't have anything in the

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>UK right now, people in the UK are being asked

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch live on YouTube. They have a deal in

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Spain with movie Star Plus. I believe it's called which

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>is a streaming service that I think is fairly big

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in Spain, but it's a streaming service.

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 3>It would have seen Caffeine collapsing.

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, they have the caffeine thing, Caffeine TV,

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>which was short lived. And then in Australia they have

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>another streaming deal with a major network I believe it

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is in Australia seven, but it's not on TV. It's

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>not on linear TV in Australia. It's purely streaming. And

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>so the linear TV deal that they struck with the

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>CW which is not a traditional media deal, it was

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a revenue share kind of situation. They didn't

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>initially get fayed paid a rights fee for that, which

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of remarkable, but you know, that was kind

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of an accomplishment because now they were on linear TV,

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 1>they were on a network in the US that could

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>be also viewed in other places in the world through

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>DirecTV or whatever. But it hasn't worked out, and I'm

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not sure where they're going next. I can't think of

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the network that they're going to land at. The obvious

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>solution would be kind of a TNT TBS kind of

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>thing with Warner Brothers, because Warner Brothers just lost the

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>NBA and they're desperate for new sports, and so that

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>would seem to be the obvious landing place. But according

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to John rand, who I trust on these subjects, formerly

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sports business journal, now writing for Puck, he

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>says a deal with Warner Brothers is a big long

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shot for Live. I don't know why it's such a

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 1>long shot, because it would seem to be an obvious partnership.

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But again, you know that's those are cable news cable channels.

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Those aren't network channels. Live is not gonna land at

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>NBC obviously, it's not gonna land at CBS. Fox does

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>not seem interested in golf right now, and then it's

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:20.280
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna land at ESPN or ABC because ESPN

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has that relationship with the PGA Tour through ESPN Plus,

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so that they're kind of blocked out of all of

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>these places where their product could be seen. And I

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't think this is anything until there's a major

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>media rights deal that involves some presence on linear TV.

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 1>People will say Phil Nicholson will tell you, oh, we're

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>pursuing the digital strategy that's going to be the big

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 1>wave of the future, but we're not there yet. Maybe

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe in ten years that would be a great strategy

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for Live to focus on digital, focus on YouTube and streaming,

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and find a deal that would get them out that way.

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.399
<v Speaker 1>But right now, linear TV is still where the big

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>bucks are. That's why the NBA and the NFL have

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 1>have still been lining up for those deals and Live

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gotten there, and it doesn't seem like they're going

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to get there in a meaningful way. Not again, something

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.240
<v Speaker 1>may come out this week, but it's a strange situation,

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think that all of this is more or

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>less moot in terms of Lift's popularity until they figure

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that part of it out.

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the TV, the visibility of it is a huge problem.

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 3>And everybody will say, oh, you could just go to YouTube,

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 3>or you could do live golf. Plus you're doing that.

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 3>That's not the way. What works is when you turn

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 3>on like I'm going to go bodered here, I have

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 3>YouTube TV. When you turn on YouTube TV and it

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 3>pops right up here, you know, it suggests it, and

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 3>like Live isn't there. It's not there on my TV.

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I watch golf like it knows I like golf. It

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 3>doesn't pop up. I think it's because like the CW

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 3>is just I don't know how the algorithm works, but

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 3>like it's just not there. And I think, like in general,

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it makes it like it's kind of stuck

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 3>in the middle. I think in a way too, like

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 3>it is. From a product standpoint, it hasn't. They like

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to say they innovate, but they don't really. You know,

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 3>They've like done a couple things, but like if you're

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna go off the wall and try and like appeal

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the youth, like really go for it, And I don't

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 3>think they have. Like I think that's like the tricky

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 3>thing with it is like they've done a few things

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 3>that are different, but for the most part, it's the

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 3>same golf, right, you know. Like I think it's an

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 3>interesting question with with live is is what could you

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:47.720
<v Speaker 3>do with the format to improve from that standpoint outside

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 3>of the players, outside of this visibility, what from the format,

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:55.879
<v Speaker 3>product venue selection could you do. I think like one

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 3>thing that they've done that I'm impressed with that I

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 3>respect the shit out of So they're not afraid to

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 3>dole out pace play penalties.

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I like that sluggers just out there whipping guys.

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, he's not worried about those guys. Kids college funds like.

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>They're already taken care of. Yeah, that's right, he's been

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>freed up. Yeah, I mean, I I don't I don't

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>really know what you could do to to to improve

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the product to a degree that would be more appealing

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for say a network to pick up, because you've just

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got to have in order for the product to

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>be appealing, there has to be a large audience that

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 1>is excited about it, and then people will start to

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>be attracted to that like a moth to a flame, right,

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>And without the visibility, without the you know, establishment of

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a large audience in the first place, that momentum just

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>can't get going. And so it just seems like to me,

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>everything is irre irrelevant until they figure out the media rights,

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>until they figure out how they're delivering this product to

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>people at home. Because you know, the live event seems

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be going well. I was impressed by the live

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>event that Live put on in Portland, and that was

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their second event ever. I'm sure they've improved it and

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems like people are showing up to these tournaments

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and having fun. They report attendance numbers occasionally, when the

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>attendance numbers are from their perspective good. They're not at

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this point anywhere near a popular PGA Tour event in

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of those numbers, but it seems like people are

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>having a good on site experience.

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I had surprise that went to the Bowling Brooke event

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 3>and said it was genuinely good.

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like on site. I think that's been the case

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. They've always been pretty impressive with their

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>live product. But again, I don't think that carries this league.

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about it. Think about the salaries that

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they're paying these guys. You know, Phil Nicholson got a

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>four year, two hundred million dollar deal. He's getting paid

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>an average of fifty million dollars a year. Who gets

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:11.919
<v Speaker 1>paid fifty million dollars a year.

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:13.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure producer Golf.

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure PJ could correct me on this, but I

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's like Patrick Mahomes. I think it's like I

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's like Devin Booker and Steph Curry. That's that's

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the that's what they're getting. And so they've laid out

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this money to these guys and they're just not on

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>not on TV. It doesn't work right now. It's so asymmetrical,

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and obviously we know that the Saudi piff is floating.

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>This is keeping this going for the time being. That's

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why it exists. But at some point it just

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>seems like these this imbalance has to be rectified in

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some reasonable way.

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 4>I'll throw out one in a little different direction as

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 4>somebody who watched a decent amount of Lived this past weekend.

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 4>One thing that has to change, and Live fans will

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 4>probably shake their fists at this. But the shotgun start

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 4>is stupid and one of the I understand some of

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the advantages of it and keeping everyone on the course

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 4>at the same time tightening that window at the end

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 4>of the round is when a lot of the excitement

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 4>happens on players' final holes and it's scattered throughout the course.

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 4>It makes no sense to have those finishing the climax

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 4>of a lot of people's rounds all happening simultaneously. It

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 4>made no sense to me, as if you were watching

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 4>it and you have a couple of golfers fighting this

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 4>relegation zone, this open zone, all while John ram is

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 4>trying to win, and like they're doing it on holes

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 4>two and three, some of them are finishing their rounds

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:46.280
<v Speaker 4>there there's not a big crowd around that eighteenth, around

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 4>their eighteenth green, the second green. I get some of

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the advantages of it, it is stupid, and I also

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 4>think you play certain holes for a reason.

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 3>What if you went to like a structured like star

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on the last day where you had

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 3>like a kind of like a half shotgun, but then

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the last four or five groups went off one.

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And they currently do that with the last two groups. Yeah,

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>sorry if that's wrong, because that's how it was toward

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. But yeah, I mean the shotguns start, wouldn't

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>you say? Josef though that it's sort of integral to

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the concept that they've proposed so far, Like it's absolutely

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the core structure of what their proposal has

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>been for what golf should look like.

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 4>But does it have to be It doesn't seem like

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 4>you would actually compromise on much of what they're doing

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 4>to just change it to where players play the holes

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 4>in order, like Saint Andrew's walking over the bridge on eighteen,

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Like when that's your final hole. There's something special about

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.759
<v Speaker 4>playing the holes in the order that they were designed. Like,

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 4>I know that that's not priority number one, but it

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 4>doesn't make sense to me. To have players finishing on

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 4>the fifth and sixth holes and.

0:51:57.719 --> 0:51:58.320
<v Speaker 3>All that action.

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 4>That could be cool, player going for course record or

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 4>something like that happening in all these disparate locations at

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 4>the same time, and then having a bunch of sleepy

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, their wholes thirteen through fifteen are all sleepy

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 4>at the same time doesn't make sense to me.

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, So we've proposed some fixes here. We've got

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the Team Championship coming up this week. Overall, I want

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to put this out there as kind of a final

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>question for this segment. Do you think Live is in

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a better place now at the end of this season

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>than it was at the end of the last season,

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 1>or do you think it's in a worse position.

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's in a better spot. And I would

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 3>say I think it's in a better spot because of

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour is in a worse spot, and they

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 3>also have John Rahm and they didn't have John rom before.

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 3>And when you start to look at it, you have

0:52:57.080 --> 0:53:01.440
<v Speaker 3>John Rahm who's seemingly playing really good golf again, you

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 3>have Bryson de Shamba who won a US Open, and

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:07.759
<v Speaker 3>you've got a slew the biggest names like I think

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 3>from in terms of star power. They have a significant

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 3>amount of star power. That's important. And I think the

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:20.439
<v Speaker 3>general you know, the PGA Tour doing nothing every day

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 3>that the PGA Tour sits in this limbo, live gets

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 3>in a better position. So I think it is in

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a better position. I do think like the thing to

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 3>think about is like if liv decided to overhaul what

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 3>it's doing, if they wanted to try something new, maybe

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 3>it's not even overhaul. If they want to make significant

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 3>tweaks to what they do, it's actually feasible. The PGA

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Tour could not do that. We have seen this, like

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.359
<v Speaker 3>they're trotting out the same schedule they had last year

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 3>this year, despite fans wanting something different. It is reported

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 3>that it's likely going to be the same next year,

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 3>and that gives like live this weird, like live in

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a way like they've got like two years knowing with

0:54:05.400 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 3>what's going on with the PGA Tour to really make

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:11.319
<v Speaker 3>a dent. And if you think about two years a

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:16.279
<v Speaker 3>long time to continue to pick up fan interest, I

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 3>think there are genuine people that will never go to

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 3>live and I think, like I have a hard time

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:27.200
<v Speaker 3>taking it seriously. I'm just gonna like I just have

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 3>a hard time. I think, like in general, I have

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:33.360
<v Speaker 3>a hard time taking it seriously. And they have you know,

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the Saudi money thing that is like always going to

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 3>turn people off. It turns to be off.

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Now that has always remained a problem, by the way,

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with with sponsorships. Yeah, Live, which is a major thing

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that really hasn't come through yet at all for the league.

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it has a problem. It's it's part of

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:58.479
<v Speaker 3>its network problem. Also, Yeah, without a doubt, like that's

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:00.080
<v Speaker 3>why you don't have the blue chips.

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Or feel about it.

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you don't have blue chip networks jumping to get

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 3>behind it because of that. And I think I don't

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.720
<v Speaker 3>know if the PGA Tour continues to drag his feet

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden Live partners with the European Tour,

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we would probably feel a lot differently about

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Live in the future of Live.

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>That would be a big one. Now, what you're saying

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:24.280
<v Speaker 1>just brought to mind something that would be a really

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:28.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting possibility for Live. What if the League just said

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the fifty four holes the shotgun start, all of that

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was Live one point zero, Live two point zero is

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy two holes with a qualifying system, not a shotgun start,

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and we are designed to get OWGR points to force

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the OWGR to give us points. What if they did that,

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that would take down one of the last

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 1>barriers that is preventing some major PGA tour players from

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>coming over, and then there would start to be maybe

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that critical mass that would lead to a TV deal

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and the big sponsorships and all that. They just haven't

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 1>hit that critical mass point with Rom and Phil and

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Dustin Johnson and Cameron Smith, and that maybe has been

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a surprise that the clout of those

0:56:21.960 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>players isn't quite as big as maybe all of us

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be in terms of getting the sponsorships

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and forcing the league's way onto network television and all

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. That it hasn't been enough so far. The

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:40.439
<v Speaker 1>star power has not yet overwhelmed the system to gain

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the league legitimacy. But maybe if it started to get

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>OGBGR points, maybe if they changed their format enough so

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that all of the concerns of the rating system were allayed,

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 1>then maybe you'd start to see way more players come over,

0:56:56.840 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and then it would just be inevitable.

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the other things is what if their feeder tour.

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:07.320
<v Speaker 3>I think like one of the things that it hasn't

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:12.760
<v Speaker 3>done is free agency trades. Those things have never materialized.

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Like the one of the things that people were excited

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 3>about with Team Golf was that like is their player

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 3>movement interest? Is there that not?

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>According to lives in House journalists, trade season is full

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of event and moment for the for the paid live journalists.

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think like, here's the thing is if you

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 3>had team relegation along with player relegation, and you had

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a again a feeder tour that promoted teams and as

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 3>well as made players and options to sign. If you

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 3>had a feeder tour with teams in it, it would

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 3>make it more interesting. It would make the managers more

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 3>engaged because they wouldn't want to get rele gated. Like

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 3>relegation is one of the finest forms of getting people

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to care. And I think like one of the things

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 3>is like a lot of players there, they sign up

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and then they just like, well, I got my check,

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't really care. Public embarrassment is something as a

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 3>guardrail to players getting fat and happy with their contracts.

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I guess one other point on the public embarrassment as

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:31.720
<v Speaker 4>a good motivator slightly different angle, Andy, but I think

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 4>one of the most one of the biggest reasons to

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 4>be bullish on LIV is that I think the twenty

0:58:36.080 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty five PGA Tour season is going to.

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Be a disaster.

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 4>That this year was not exciting and you had Scotti

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Scheffler on a once in a ten twenty year season

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 4>winning at a prolific rate, and the ratings were still bad,

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know that sponsors are overly thrilled with

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 4>where they are, and next year they're running back the

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 4>exact same stale schedule. I think you could see those

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 4>same ratings going down even less enthusiasm for the PGA

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Tour than there was this year, and that's something to

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:12.280
<v Speaker 4>capitalize on if you're a competitor. So that is for me,

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 4>like the one of the top reasons to be optimistic

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 4>about LIVE if you're a LIVE fan, that I think

0:59:17.240 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour is set up for massive failure in

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five.

0:59:21.000 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Ironically, I think if you had a couple of billion

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars laying around right now, the space that these two

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:37.320
<v Speaker 3>organizations have created, it's actually created the perfect opportunity right

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:40.560
<v Speaker 3>now to start another competing golf tour.

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that be Hila premiere Golf League rises from the

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>coffin like in a soap opera.

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 3>I think, like you've gotten to the point where they've

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 3>like created this golf and I don't know if, like,

0:59:55.040 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if anybody's ever going to be able

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 3>to get behind live. I don't. I think that like

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 3>that's a legitimate question, was the start of it and

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the kind of like is there such a bad taste

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 3>in golf fan's mouth that it will never be popularly adopted.

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a real likely answers yes to that.

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:26.120
<v Speaker 3>The PGA Tour has also gotten to the point where

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:30.959
<v Speaker 3>it's so unlikable. I think if I think that right

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>now is would be the perfect time to start, as

1:00:35.320 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 3>as crazy as this sounds, third competing tour thread the

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 3>needle and you could that it could be a winner.

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Takes all proposition. Now, it would probably take a lot

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>of capital, But I do think like right now would

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 3>be the perfect time for a third tour to launch

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:54.840
<v Speaker 3>and potentially win this space.

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We've we've almost run out of people to fund this

1:00:57.960 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of endeavor because you know, John Henry and his

1:01:01.160 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, Boston area private equity guys have

1:01:04.160 --> 1:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>already thrown in their lot with PGA tour enterprises supposedly,

1:01:08.160 --> 1:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>though there seems to have been scant development of that

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of that idea in the past few months.

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like they might be frustrated.

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would. I would as venture to say that

1:01:19.120 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they probably are.

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I would just point out that it seems like anybody

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 3>who has any business acumen that that finds themselves into

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 3>in the PGA tour globe and in the circle, then

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>shortly leaves after extraordinarily frustrated and confused.

1:01:39.400 --> 1:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, like what the hell is this?

1:01:41.360 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's often is a comic. The reaction, it's one

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>could almost we've almost reached a stat level, Joseph, you

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>could correctly, we've almost reached a statistical relevance number here

1:01:55.800 --> 1:01:58.120
<v Speaker 3>where this you could say that this is correlated.

1:01:58.360 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>This is this is not just to random occurrence. There

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>There must be must be some cause for these departures.

1:02:05.760 --> 1:02:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think what you guys are forgetting is that

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 4>on the very beginning of June, Golf Week released a

1:02:11.440 --> 1:02:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Q and A with Joe Ogilvy that said, four months

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>from now, it's going to be a completely different stories,

1:02:17.520 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 4>and that's coming up in a couple of weeks, So

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>that four month deadline, apparently the future of golf is

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 4>going to have been sorted out in that time period.

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:24.880
<v Speaker 4>That's what was pledged.

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, the deal is coming.

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Since June, I up until maybe last week if they

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>did the nine to eleven meet with the Saudi's in

1:02:34.080 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 3>New York City that happened that that was the first

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 3>time they'd talked since June.

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there can't have been much progress. Given the likely

1:02:45.080 --> 1:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>complexity that this deal would would have, it would take

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>far more than kind of that one meeting to work

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>everything out. All right, Well, on that note of confusion

1:02:57.120 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and despair, let's wrap up our segment on the condition

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of live and the competitive landscape of professional golf. I

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>do like the idea of another league suddenly emerging. That

1:03:10.480 --> 1:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>would be an amazing wrinkle in this But I'd like

1:03:14.360 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up with some recommendations. Let's go to a

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>positive place and let me go to Joseph first. Joseph,

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what are you recommending this week? What is something that

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you like and that fills you with joy?

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Easy one for me this week? A Frida Egg listener

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 4>and friend sent me this, I'll always check out what

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>people send me. There's a YouTube channel called the QB

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>School and now that it's NFL season. This is a

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 4>former LSU quarterback Jto Sullivan. He goes through quarterback breakdowns

1:03:44.520 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL. Maybe he does it for other levels

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:49.919
<v Speaker 4>as well, but takes you through. They're like twenty five

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 4>to hour long videos taking you through quarterback play. It's

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 4>really cool, great example of the use of YouTube and

1:03:56.640 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>really shows you what's going on schematically, like takes you

1:03:59.560 --> 1:04:02.160
<v Speaker 4>through the these quarterbacks are doing. So as we get

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:07.280
<v Speaker 4>into NFL season, some content for like pretty hardcore fans

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:09.600
<v Speaker 4>who want to understand what's happening on a deeper level,

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:12.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of within the Frida Egg ethos of understanding golf

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 4>at a deeper level. I can't recommend it enough. I

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:17.480
<v Speaker 4>think I'm gonna watch every video he puts out this year.

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Nice QB School, all right. My recommendation is on the

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>musical end of the spectrum. I'm really liking the album

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Manning Fireworks by MJ. Lenderman. This came out within the

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>past few weeks. I believe a lot of really good

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>indie rock songs on there. If you're approximately my age

1:04:38.600 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying, you know, forty ish years old and

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it kind of grew up. It came of age in

1:04:45.360 --> 1:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands. Listening to in guitar driven indie rock.

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>This music MJ. Lenderman stuff will will hit you right

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the sweet spot. He's a young guys, he's not

1:04:58.320 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>an old dude like me, and so he's to be

1:05:00.480 --> 1:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>deriving some influences from before his time. But very very

1:05:04.960 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>good album Manning Fireworks. I'm not sure exactly where that

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>name comes from. Maybe it's spelled out in the lyrics

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the album, which I haven't really listened to, honestly,

1:05:13.800 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe from watching the UT football game on see Yeah,

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very possible that Manning Manning Fireworks happened this

1:05:20.200 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>past week. We have a running Manning.

1:05:23.360 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I didn't so amazing. It can't be a Manning.

1:05:26.720 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, apparently his dad, Arch Manning's dad, Cooper, is a

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more athletic, right, And you know, when I

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>saw Arch Manning running for that down, just did a

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>double take and I cracked myself up because I remembered

1:05:45.320 --> 1:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>how Peyton Manning used to run, how like sort of

1:05:48.800 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>vertical had and short his steps were and just imagined

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>how he would negotiate that that same play. But in

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>any case, m J. Lannerman Manning Fireworks may or may

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>not have something to do with the Manning family. Andy,

1:06:02.200 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do you have any recommendations for us to close out here?

1:06:05.600 --> 1:06:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I traveled a lot of cities, and you know, I'm

1:06:09.720 --> 1:06:13.800
<v Speaker 3>frequently looking for like restaurants, and I think, like listen,

1:06:13.880 --> 1:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>like Google reviews and Yelp are awful, They're terrible. Something

1:06:18.520 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 3>that I've found that I really like is this company

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:26.360
<v Speaker 3>called Infatuation. Have you guys heard of them before?

1:06:26.480 --> 1:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, they have like a good website, right.

1:06:29.320 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well they do so like they're like legit reviewers.

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:36.440
<v Speaker 3>They are employees of a company. And the way that

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 3>they do food reviews is like they do not tell

1:06:39.720 --> 1:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the restaurant they're coming. They pay their own bill like

1:06:42.720 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of reviewers, like they'll let them know they

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>get comped, like they pay their own bill, and then

1:06:47.920 --> 1:06:50.600
<v Speaker 3>they write these reviews. They have them for like almost

1:06:50.640 --> 1:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>every major city in America. And I just find I

1:06:55.000 --> 1:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>like the the idea of somebody tell like an individual

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 3>telling me like about restaurants. I like that I don't

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:05.720
<v Speaker 3>like what I don't like is like if you go

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>on Google or Yelp, like pretty much everything gets between

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>four and five stars, right like this, this website has

1:07:13.440 --> 1:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>a really nice curation of restaurants it has. They have

1:07:18.120 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>different categories you can click on for like different occasions

1:07:21.680 --> 1:07:25.320
<v Speaker 3>you can like they have recommendations for like sub ten

1:07:25.400 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>dollars meals, They have recommendations for date nights, They have

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>recommendations for big groups like it is uh, and then

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:36.280
<v Speaker 3>they also cover like new restaurant openings really well. I

1:07:36.320 --> 1:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>think this is a great website if you are into food. Uh,

1:07:39.960 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>if you travel and you're going to do areas and

1:07:42.840 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>you're looking for restaurants, this is worth They have a

1:07:45.440 --> 1:07:48.080
<v Speaker 3>map that shows where everything is, so it's like easy

1:07:48.120 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 3>to curate. It's way better. It takes a little bit

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 3>more time than doing like the Google like maps like restaurants.

1:07:55.520 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 3>To hear me, it takes a little more time. But

1:07:57.760 --> 1:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>if you want to plan out like a good inner,

1:08:00.400 --> 1:08:02.640
<v Speaker 3>get a good meal like and want a little bit

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>more inside look like you know, it's funny like I've

1:08:05.560 --> 1:08:08.400
<v Speaker 3>used I've used this in like people like that. No

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>restaurants in areas are like how do you know to

1:08:10.560 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>go there? And I'm like, well, I use this infatuation.

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is a great way to avoid kind of

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:19.400
<v Speaker 3>tourist traps and find like really good local spots in

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>my opinion.

1:08:21.080 --> 1:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Andy and Joseph, thank you for coming on

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the pod today. Thanks Gay. This episode of the Frida

1:08:39.000 --> 1:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Egg Golf Podcast was produced by PJ Clark. Thank you, PJ.

1:08:45.120 --> 1:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>If you like what we're doing on the Frida Egg

1:08:47.080 --> 1:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Golf Podcast, I think you would really like CLUBTFE. Go

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Frida Egg dot com slash membership to see

1:08:53.840 --> 1:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>everything that we're offering at clubtf which includes a lot

1:08:56.920 --> 1:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>of exclusive content. One thing the Club TFE members get

1:09:02.280 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is access to some great golf courses. Sometimes we just

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>come up with some tea times at certain golf courses

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and people get pretty excited about that, and so those

1:09:14.360 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>offerings come to you if you're a Club TFE member,

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a really great benefit of membership

1:09:21.520 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people maybe didn't expect when they

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>initially signed up. So Club TFE, we're doing a lot

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of fun stuff in there that we're very excited about.

1:09:30.880 --> 1:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, and we'll be back again soon

1:09:33.280 --> 1:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with another episode.