Speaker 1: You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox
Speaker 1: Sports Radio. It's our one on a Tuesday, Dan and
Speaker 1: the Dane's Dan Patrick's Show. Basketball coming up tonight, recapping
Speaker 1: basketball from last night. We'll check in with Lewis Reddick
Speaker 1: from the Mothership on what the forty nine ers are doing,
Speaker 1: what the Jets are doing, and why are the Niners
Speaker 1: being so transparent right now? Pro Days coming up, Mac
Speaker 1: Jones again, Justin Fields the Ohio State. Talked to somebody
Speaker 1: yesterday who plans on being in attendance at Justin Fields
Speaker 1: Pro Day. He could run a four three forty. I
Speaker 1: don't know what that means other than he ran a
Speaker 1: four three forty. Canny play the position and it feels
Speaker 1: like Justin Fieldstock is the one that is really fluctuating.
Speaker 1: Right now. We'll talk to Brian Cranston, the great actor
Speaker 1: and he's a bracket contest smack talker right now. Brian
Speaker 1: Cranston acting like Walter right here. He will join us
Speaker 1: coming up a little bit later on I Am the Danger.
Speaker 1: John Daily leading the Bracket Celebrity Bracket Challenge. Of course,
Speaker 1: when you think college basketball, but John being an Arkansas
Speaker 1: razorback fan, well he took a hit last night, USC, Gonzaga, Ucla,
Speaker 1: and Michigan. Coming up tonight, Houston beats Oregon State, Baylor
Speaker 1: over Arkansas. If you'd like to get in touch with
Speaker 1: the program, dial us up age seven seven three d
Speaker 1: P show email address DP at dan Patrick dot com,
Speaker 1: Twitter handle at DPS show. Captain Obvious reared his ugly
Speaker 1: head this morning. Fritzie had an observation with the tournament Todd,
Speaker 1: would you like to give us a Captain obvious? Give
Speaker 1: the audience you're Captain obvious? Okay? So if USC beats
Speaker 1: the Zags and UCLA beats Michigan tonight, the final four,
Speaker 1: I listen to this, Okay, Well, slow down, so I can?
Speaker 1: I can? Okay? Captain? Final four would feature two Texas
Speaker 1: teams that got to each other, because we already have
Speaker 1: Baylor from Waco, Texas and Houston obviously Houston, Texas, but
Speaker 1: westward and downtown La Ucla and USC. Two Texas teams
Speaker 1: and two Southern California teams would make up the final four.
Speaker 1: All right? How about that? Thank you? That just doesn't
Speaker 1: happen every day. Nobody else knows. I don't think anyone
Speaker 1: had thought of it. I don't think there's any features, yes,
Speaker 1: being prepared for that possible, not yet, yes, point And
Speaker 1: after the final four, Dan is the final game, they're
Speaker 1: gonna play a championship for the winners of the two
Speaker 1: games Saturday. I'm gonna meet Monday, and the winner will
Speaker 1: cut down the net and declare themselves twenty twenty one
Speaker 1: national champions. Thank you to thank you, Captain obvious. All right,
Speaker 1: so well, we'll come up with the play of the day,
Speaker 1: stat of the day, poll, question, all of that. We'll
Speaker 1: get to those coming up here shortly. If somebody ask
Speaker 1: you if you watch the college basketball game last night,
Speaker 1: there's probably a pretty good chance that they're not talking
Speaker 1: about Baylor or Houston the men's tournament. They're talking about
Speaker 1: Connecticut and Baylor the women's tournament. That was a heavyweight
Speaker 1: battle last night. That was the best game last night,
Speaker 1: the Huskies holding on for a two point point win,
Speaker 1: thanks in large part to a controversial no call in
Speaker 1: the final seconds. And you know, I just saw a
Speaker 1: tweet by Jay Billis who said that with that non call,
Speaker 1: no excuse to miss that call, stunning for Jay Billis.
Speaker 1: I agree with him. I don't know if it was stunning,
Speaker 1: but I do think that it was a situation where
Speaker 1: you can't just swallow your whistle. There, Carrington made a
Speaker 1: move to the hoop. Looked like the Yukon women at
Speaker 1: least one of the players leaned into her made contact.
Speaker 1: I think the other one may have gotten ball on
Speaker 1: the block shot but leaned into her created contact there.
Speaker 1: But the Yukon women lived to see another day and
Speaker 1: going to another final four. It was a lot of
Speaker 1: fun to watch it. You know, Gino Rima and Kim Mulki,
Speaker 1: they they've gone back and forth here for a couple
Speaker 1: of decades. Now you got to see the Yukon freshman,
Speaker 1: Page Becker. She had twenty eight points last night. She's
Speaker 1: one of the faces of the sport. But they're going
Speaker 1: to another final four. Gino Oriema the legacy secured. No
Speaker 1: matter what you think of him, he's established a dynasty,
Speaker 1: continues to add on pages to that book. And it
Speaker 1: was fun to see them challenged by a great rival
Speaker 1: in Baylor in a big moment. So if you didn't
Speaker 1: watch the game, maybe check out the rest of the
Speaker 1: women's tournament. It's been a lot of fun. You know.
Speaker 1: I mentioned that Paige Becker's going against Caitlin Clark Iowa
Speaker 1: in Yukon didn't turn out to be the showdown that
Speaker 1: we thought. But we get to watch these women play
Speaker 1: for the next couple of years in college basketball, and
Speaker 1: that's great for the sport. But last night the game
Speaker 1: was Baylor against Connecticut. Yeah, Paul, it was interesting. When
Speaker 1: I saw the schedules getting ready to watch the games,
Speaker 1: I saw that the men's game in the women's game
Speaker 1: was out at the same time. Like, that's bad planning.
Speaker 1: You think you want to separate those for college basketball fans.
Speaker 1: But once Oregon State was down a little bit early, yeah,
Speaker 1: I kind of just left it. It wasn't intense. The
Speaker 1: Baylor Yukon game felt intense. It felt like that that
Speaker 1: there was a title at stake there, and usually there
Speaker 1: is when those two teams meet. But you know, it's fun.
Speaker 1: It was fun to watch and it's great for the sport.
Speaker 1: You don't want to have a controversial call be the
Speaker 1: reason why you're talking about a sport, because it was
Speaker 1: more than just that. It was a really good game.
Speaker 1: You know, Lebron tweeted out that that was a foul,
Speaker 1: and you know, watching it in slow motion different angles,
Speaker 1: and I'm looking at the two officials. The officials are
Speaker 1: on the side and their angle is not a great
Speaker 1: angle from behind and to the side, whereas if somebody's
Speaker 1: underneath the basket, then you can see the contact there.
Speaker 1: And I did think that there was contact enough to
Speaker 1: call a foul and send Carrington to the line where
Speaker 1: she's like a seventy five percent free throw shooter. But
Speaker 1: it was it was great. It was back and forth,
Speaker 1: and it was tense. All right, mclemen, you got a
Speaker 1: poll question for me today. Wow, we could ask did
Speaker 1: you think it was a foul? But I don't know
Speaker 1: that everyone will watch that. That'd be more of a visual. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there was a pre show debate. There was a little saucy.
Speaker 1: I was wondering if we should bring to a poll.
Speaker 1: You can have one of these three NFL quarterbacks, Jimmy Garoppolo,
Speaker 1: Sam Darnold or Mitchell Trubisky. So say they were all
Speaker 1: available via trade or free agency, who's the guy you
Speaker 1: would want? And I have to take one of the three.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately you have to take away the three. Do you
Speaker 1: realize if Mitchell Trubisky was taken in the third round,
Speaker 1: our view of him would be completely different, and we
Speaker 1: might look at him as a success story because he
Speaker 1: does have a good one loss record. He just never
Speaker 1: stepped up and provided those big numbers that you expect
Speaker 1: from your quarterback. These are solid stats, but if he's
Speaker 1: a third round draft pick, then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: that's a great success story. They traded up to get him,
Speaker 1: and you know the expectation level he could never live
Speaker 1: up to. But I think he was twenty eight and
Speaker 1: twenty one in his career, in his starts, went to
Speaker 1: the playoffs twice, Jimmy G went to the Super Bowl.
Speaker 1: He just seems a little fragile for me. Now, I
Speaker 1: don't know what this is going to do to his psyche. Now.
Speaker 1: I know his body can't stay healthy. But now you
Speaker 1: have them openly talking about, hey, we're gonna take a
Speaker 1: quarterback at number three, and Jimmy G's on board with
Speaker 1: all of this. Yeah, I'm a club I can't get over.
Speaker 1: Right before the Super Bowl, you said you were worried
Speaker 1: if Jimmy G could make the big throw in the
Speaker 1: pressure time, and then unfortunately he overthrew the couple ball
Speaker 1: or miss a couple passes that would have won the
Speaker 1: Super Bowl. So that stigma is with me and Jimmy G. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, when you talk to people, you want to
Speaker 1: know what they're seeing. I'm just a novice, so I've
Speaker 1: been around this a long time, but I know enough
Speaker 1: to ask people, you know, if certain situations are about
Speaker 1: a player, mental toughness, all of those things that they
Speaker 1: see firsthand. And that's what I saw with Jimmy Garoppolo.
Speaker 1: I just wandered in the moment. It felt like they
Speaker 1: were going away from Jimmy Garoppolo, the passing quarterback to
Speaker 1: Jimmy Garoppolo just kind of manage the game if you
Speaker 1: can a little bit, and uh, you know, we'll take
Speaker 1: it from here. And then you saw that in the
Speaker 1: Super Bowl. It was like Jared Goff. You know, the
Speaker 1: Rams kind of shied away from featuring Jared Goff after
Speaker 1: a while, but I would just wonder. You know, we
Speaker 1: talked about Kyle Shanahan getting his quarterback. That was the
Speaker 1: big conversation. You know, Mac Jones at Alabama, He's Kyle
Speaker 1: Shanahan's kind of quarterback. Was Jimmy g his kind of
Speaker 1: quarterback because he traded for him? Would you trade for
Speaker 1: a quarterback that wasn't your quarterback? I don't know. I'm
Speaker 1: just wondering about that, mclovin. It does feel like the
Speaker 1: two offensive geniuses, Kyle Shanahan and Sean McVay kind of
Speaker 1: threw their quarterbacks under the bus. Yes, yes, I mean
Speaker 1: Jared Goff got thrown under the bus, backed up, backed
Speaker 1: up again, went forward, backed up again, and then send
Speaker 1: him to Detroit and Jimmy G. Well, Jimmy G's gonna
Speaker 1: be a good soldier, right, That's what That's who Jimmy
Speaker 1: G is. Here's Kyle Shanahan did the Niners? Are the
Speaker 1: Niners required to talk to the media yesterday? Like I
Speaker 1: was thinking, why are you doing a press conference? You
Speaker 1: don't have to answer to anybody. You're gonna take Mac
Speaker 1: Jones or Trey Lynch and take him. Hey. I mean,
Speaker 1: if Jimmy Garoppolo wanted to hold a press conference to
Speaker 1: tell me how he was feeling, I'd be far more
Speaker 1: interested in that. But here's John Lynch the Niners GM
Speaker 1: on speaking with Jimmy Garoppolo before the trade. I'm sure
Speaker 1: Jimmy was a little a little pissed off from it,
Speaker 1: just like I would be too. Um But me knowing Jimmy,
Speaker 1: he'll be fired up and come in and he'll work
Speaker 1: his butt off. And knowing Jimmy, it the more mad
Speaker 1: Jimmy gets usually the better he gets. Um. So it's
Speaker 1: you know, Jimmy just gets madder and he stays healthy.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is gonna be a good thing for
Speaker 1: Jimmy too, which could be a great problem for the
Speaker 1: forty nine ers. So that's Kyle Shanahan. Sorry, yeah, so
Speaker 1: that's Kyle Shanahan telling you this isn't a situation like
Speaker 1: Aaron Rodgers in Jordan Love, where you light of fire
Speaker 1: under Jimmy Jean, he's going to be the MVP like
Speaker 1: the Packers did. Apparently that was part of the game plan.
Speaker 1: You know, we got a light of fire under him.
Speaker 1: This is different. Jimmy g's being burned at the stake.
Speaker 1: They lit a fire under Aaron Rodgers like, whoa, that
Speaker 1: seat got a little warm there. Jimmy Garoppolo is going, whoa,
Speaker 1: here's John Lynch the Niners GM. We both spoke to Jimmy.
Speaker 1: You know. The message was what we were doing, why
Speaker 1: we were doing, and how he is very much still
Speaker 1: a part of our plans and Jimmy he welcomes competition. Okay,
Speaker 1: he gets to compete for this year. Oh good, I'm
Speaker 1: so happy. I was hoping to compete for my job
Speaker 1: this year. That's what I was really looking forward to.
Speaker 1: Do you realize who has a no trade clause this
Speaker 1: year but not next year? Say hello to Jimmy Garoppolo.
Speaker 1: It makes a lot of sense, no trade this year,
Speaker 1: not next year. Yes, we love. I had no idea
Speaker 1: id no trade clause could work like that? Yeah? Yeah. Uh.
Speaker 1: Here is Kyle Shanahan about the possibility of trading Jimmy Garoppolo.
Speaker 1: It seems like you really do want to keep Jimmy Garoppolo,
Speaker 1: but if someone blew you away with a trade offer,
Speaker 1: you would have to consider that. I guess, brist Harters,
Speaker 1: is that accurate? Yeah, that's accurate with every player on
Speaker 1: our team, I mean probably including myself. Someone blows up
Speaker 1: away with a trade for me. I bet you so's
Speaker 1: you know, that's all I mean? Definitely. Okay, how do
Speaker 1: you think Jimmy g is you know, absorbing this processing this?
Speaker 1: If you watch these two Laurel and Hardy there at
Speaker 1: the press conference and just back and forth like what
Speaker 1: do you hey, you could trade me, um, Okay, that's
Speaker 1: not happening. But Jimmy G. The probably could get traded here.
Speaker 1: And when do you lose that leverage with Jimmy G.
Speaker 1: Have you lost that leverage with Jimmy G. Yeah, Paul,
Speaker 1: And like you said, it's different if you want to
Speaker 1: look at the Packers situation Jordan Love. Later in the
Speaker 1: first round, the Niners traded up big time. They went
Speaker 1: from twelve to three. Like they said, we have to
Speaker 1: get in this quarterback race. That doesn't feel like confidence.
Speaker 1: This program is brought to you by Built Bar, builtbar
Speaker 1: dot Com promo CODP ten for ten percent off your
Speaker 1: order builtbar dot Com Romo CODP ten at checkout a
Speaker 1: protein bar that is quite tasty. Yes, Seaton coach, we're
Speaker 1: just gonna bring in a second head coach and just
Speaker 1: no, no no, no, no, you know you're still the guy
Speaker 1: we just wanted you to, you know, spice things up
Speaker 1: a little bit. Have you compete for your job. It's
Speaker 1: because if we know you, you're gonna coach harder now
Speaker 1: because we just brought in this other guy who's gonna
Speaker 1: be right breathing down your neck. No, it's no, this
Speaker 1: is guy I know you. I know you love to compete.
Speaker 1: I know you. Oh you gotta light a fire. When
Speaker 1: you light a fire under him, Okay, it'd be that'd
Speaker 1: be funny. All of a sudden, John Lynch said, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're bringing in another head coach here. But hey, don't
Speaker 1: you worry. You get to compete for this job right now.
Speaker 1: I don't know why the Niners felt like they were
Speaker 1: obligated to talk about this. I mean, I appreciate it,
Speaker 1: but did you really clear up anything. We want to
Speaker 1: keep Jimmy G. But we would trade Jimmy G. He's
Speaker 1: competing for the job this year. When you light a
Speaker 1: fire under him, you know that brings out the best
Speaker 1: in him. I just want to know if somebody would
Speaker 1: ask Kyle Shanahan, Kyle, tell me what a Kyle Shanahan quarterback?
Speaker 1: What are the attributes? And did you think Jimmy G
Speaker 1: had those attributes? Because after all, you did trade for
Speaker 1: Jimmy Garoppolo and then he doesn't have those attributes. The
Speaker 1: biggest problem Jimmy G has wee, there's a few he has.
Speaker 1: He doesn't have good footwork. Now, most of your analysts
Speaker 1: who look at the quarterbacks will tell you Chris Simms
Speaker 1: was saying this, It doesn't have good footwork. Cam Newton
Speaker 1: doesn't have good footwork. I don't care how athletic you are.
Speaker 1: You can run a four three forty. If you don't
Speaker 1: have good footwork in the pocket, you're not going to
Speaker 1: be successful. Mac Jones has good footwork. He is a
Speaker 1: precise passer. He's not an athlete. He doesn't do anything
Speaker 1: athletic outside the pocket. But Tom Brady may be the
Speaker 1: least athletic, greatest player of all time, but what he
Speaker 1: does is so subtle. It's footwork in the pocket. When
Speaker 1: there's traffic, bodies flying all around there. How do you
Speaker 1: keep your composure, your head up, head down field? And
Speaker 1: your footwork is so important. You know, Jamis Winston getting
Speaker 1: good footwork is really important for him. Like there's certain
Speaker 1: things that you boil it down to just a couple
Speaker 1: really important things. And you can look at how strong
Speaker 1: somebody's arm is, Like I always think that guy's got
Speaker 1: a strong arm. Is it an accurate arm. There's guys
Speaker 1: who have strong arms, they don't have accurate arms. Well,
Speaker 1: he's got a strong arm, okay, But he's fast, okay?
Speaker 1: Is he quick? Does he make good decisions? How's his footwork? Like?
Speaker 1: Those are the smart things that you want out of
Speaker 1: your quarterback. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are two of
Speaker 1: the least athletic quarterbacks of all time and two of
Speaker 1: the greatest. Why processing information, putting in the work, great
Speaker 1: footwork in the pocket, you know, throwing guys open, like
Speaker 1: just things that you don't remember when we am. I
Speaker 1: bring it up every year, and I always hear gms
Speaker 1: and scouts and coaches saying we're not gonna fall in
Speaker 1: love and anybody you know at a pro day or
Speaker 1: combine and what did they do with Zach Wilson? Oh
Speaker 1: my god, he made that throw. He went and left,
Speaker 1: he threw back right and he threw it fifty. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's one throw. But that doesn't mean Zach Wilson is
Speaker 1: going to be Patrick Mahomes two point zero. I mean
Speaker 1: he might be, But you're falling in love at a
Speaker 1: pro day. You're falling in love at you know, with
Speaker 1: combined drills there, how many times do you run a
Speaker 1: forty in a game? How many people run forties in
Speaker 1: a game? You know? Your cone drill? Like just these
Speaker 1: things where how many times you you know benching two
Speaker 1: twenty five. How many times have you seen somebody bench
Speaker 1: to twenty five in a game? I watched all the games.
Speaker 1: You haven't seen it. Here's something funny. Tom Brady his
Speaker 1: longest career run is twenty two yards. He's only run
Speaker 1: over twenty yards once in his career. Peyton Manning has
Speaker 1: a thirty three yard run. That's it. He's never run
Speaker 1: over twenty yards after that. But when I brought up
Speaker 1: Patrick Mahomes's forty yard dash yesterday, just to look on
Speaker 1: your guy's faces, because he's not fast. But when you
Speaker 1: watch him, he's a smart runner, but he's not fast.
Speaker 1: I don't know if Russell Wilson is fast. I think
Speaker 1: he's quick. But we get caught up. You know what
Speaker 1: is Mahomes of four aide forty? Mac Jones is more athletic,
Speaker 1: if you want to look at it that way than
Speaker 1: Patrick Mahomes. Well, obviously you take Patrick Mahomes over him.
Speaker 1: But we get caught up on these numbers, and we
Speaker 1: think these numbers mean a lot. They mean a lot
Speaker 1: to us, you know, when you're it's combined porn for us,
Speaker 1: But for the scouts it's different. What they want. They
Speaker 1: want the medicals especially with quarterbacks. They want to see
Speaker 1: how you process your information and do you love do
Speaker 1: you love the game? Where you put in the time,
Speaker 1: Like those are the things that are really important with us.
Speaker 1: How fast did you run a forty? Micah Parsons at
Speaker 1: Penn State ran a four three forty? Okay, sat out
Speaker 1: all last year. I don't know if he's great. I
Speaker 1: just know he ran a four three forty. What do
Speaker 1: you do with at four three speed? Henry Ruggs Junior,
Speaker 1: the third maybe the fast, one of the fastest guys
Speaker 1: in the NFL? What did you do with that speed
Speaker 1: last year? Jerry Judy, Like I can go down the
Speaker 1: list of we get caught up in these things and
Speaker 1: you go, God, that guy is fast. Did you see
Speaker 1: his vertical this in a basketball game? Yeah, McClelland yeah.
Speaker 1: But Ruggs was still the first receiver picked, even though
Speaker 1: there are a lot of bigger guys. The teams seem
Speaker 1: to value this. How did it work out? I know?
Speaker 1: But I wonder if they're gonna do the same thing
Speaker 1: this John Ross remember him? Oh? I know, I know
Speaker 1: gen Ross? Oh my god, you see how fast he is?
Speaker 1: Can he play? Yeah? MC? I was wondering is are
Speaker 1: the Niners setting up a Jimmy g trade to New England?
Speaker 1: Is this bargaining to get the highest draft pick they
Speaker 1: can Is that going to happen? I know no one
Speaker 1: knows for sure, but it feels like he'd fit better
Speaker 1: in New England and San Francisco after hearing jad An, Well,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna guess if you're New England and Bill loves
Speaker 1: Jimmy Garoppolo, then you would at least entertain the idea
Speaker 1: of bringing him in, but not at that price. Now,
Speaker 1: I think that's the key. What can you get Jimmy
Speaker 1: Garoppolo for? Do you send back the draft pick that
Speaker 1: they sent you in the first place? Is he diminishing value?
Speaker 1: Diminishing returns there? Yeah, I'm the club. That's two pretty
Speaker 1: solid jaw lines in New England. That'd be a fun
Speaker 1: quarterback competition. Cam Newton and Jimmy Garoppolo hants him off,
Speaker 1: but I think it'd be interesting. New England keeps saying
Speaker 1: they love Cam Newton. To put that to the test,
Speaker 1: but that's what they of course they're gonna say that,
Speaker 1: but they got over the top with his belochick. Cam
Speaker 1: Newton love but It's like the Giants owner who says,
Speaker 1: we believe Daniel Jones can lead us to a super Bowl.
Speaker 1: Imagine if he says we don't think he could lead
Speaker 1: us to a super Bowl, then that's interesting. George kittle says,
Speaker 1: I want Jimmy g as my quarterback. So what are
Speaker 1: you gonna do? You're gonna demand a trade? No, he's
Speaker 1: saying all the right things. It doesn't mean anything. What
Speaker 1: did you hear? Can you imagine Kyle Shanahan and you
Speaker 1: know John Lynch going, Oh did you hear George Kittley?
Speaker 1: He says he wants Jimmy j You know what, maybe
Speaker 1: we should uh, maybe you should take a wide receiver
Speaker 1: up there? Yeah, mclub. But didn't Belichick not say nice
Speaker 1: things about Tom Brady? Ironically, like the one quarterback the
Speaker 1: best ever? Remember you were gonna eat it did win
Speaker 1: Patriot of the Week or so he well, but he
Speaker 1: purposely doesn't say nice things about his own guys. It
Speaker 1: feels like it's everybody else whenever your faith. We're facing
Speaker 1: Marcus Mariona. He's a really telling quarterback, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: have our work cut out for him. Okay, Tom never
Speaker 1: waited around for Bill to say nice things about him.
Speaker 1: That's why it's so weird that he's so he has
Speaker 1: so much praise for cam Well. I think because they
Speaker 1: got him at a bargain, and I think I think
Speaker 1: he's trying to boost his camp. I don't think he had.
Speaker 1: I don't think Bill had to boost Tom's confidence. If anything,
Speaker 1: he probably tried to diminish it a little bit, just
Speaker 1: to let him know that I'm still the coach here.
Speaker 1: All right, we'll take a break here. Fired up? Well,
Speaker 1: I just I want to know if the Niner did
Speaker 1: the NFL say, you know, you guys got to talk
Speaker 1: about this, you know, like, what was the reason why
Speaker 1: you hold a press conte? I appreciate it. I just
Speaker 1: wasn't a held a press conference and then you have
Speaker 1: the awkward Jimmy g and lightning of fire and you
Speaker 1: know it, see Jim Morrison, Yes, mcclub. I think it
Speaker 1: was the trade the reason they had the press conference.
Speaker 1: Like I think after a big trade, you're supposed to
Speaker 1: have a press conference. Isn't that wild? I wouldn't like
Speaker 1: in March, I don't. I don't want to have a
Speaker 1: press conference because it's it's kind of awkward, right, now,
Speaker 1: I don't know if this helps the Niners to hold
Speaker 1: a press conference and talk. It didn't clear up anything
Speaker 1: with Jimmy g If anything, it made it a little
Speaker 1: more confusing. All right, will take a break. Andy Katz
Speaker 1: on loan from Turnish Sports will join us. Coming up,
Speaker 1: Lewis Riddick from the Mothership, Bryan Cranston, the Great actor
Speaker 1: as well. Take a break. Twenty three after the hour.
Speaker 1: This is the Dan Patrick Show. Oh Man hitting golf
Speaker 1: balls over the weekend. And then I was doing a
Speaker 1: little putting. You know, you drive for show, you put
Speaker 1: for dough PAULI And now I'm on the no. No,
Speaker 1: somebody else did, maybe like last week or something. Callaway
Speaker 1: Chromesoft golf ball. Callaway doesn't just make the ball better
Speaker 1: for tour players, it makes the better tour player ball
Speaker 1: for us. I mean that's really important here. I wanted
Speaker 1: to be included the original Chromesoft Callaway's number one selling
Speaker 1: tour ball. Most golfers have the combination of that incredible distance,
Speaker 1: soft field, short game control, and you'll love that with
Speaker 1: Callaway the number one ball on tour, the Chromesoft X.
Speaker 1: You got elite players using that. And I said, well,
Speaker 1: I'm not an elite player, but I want to use
Speaker 1: that golf ball. Callaway's longest tour ball is called the
Speaker 1: chrome Soft x LS. The LS is low spin, providing
Speaker 1: max distance off the tea tour level short game spin.
Speaker 1: Chromesoft isn't just better, it's better for everyone. Find your
Speaker 1: Chromesoft today Callaway golf dot com chrome Soft. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to
Speaker 1: catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern
Speaker 1: six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio and you
Speaker 1: can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or
Speaker 1: stream us live on the Peacock app. What's up everyone,
Speaker 1: It's me three time NFL All Pro Sean Mary and
Speaker 1: I have a new sports podcast called The Lights Out
Speaker 1: Podcast with Sean Mariner. This podcast especial to me is
Speaker 1: I get a chance to talk to some of the
Speaker 1: best we've ever done it on a field or to track.
Speaker 1: So whether it's talking to a Super Bowl champion or
Speaker 1: a NASCAR Cup Series champion, the Lights Out Podcast We'll
Speaker 1: bring it to you the only where I know how to.
Speaker 1: I'm giving you the best insight from the best we've
Speaker 1: ever done it. Listen to lights out with Sean Merman
Speaker 1: or the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 1: Our conversation with Andy Katz brought you by Capital One.
Speaker 1: What's in your wallet? We'll get to Andy in a
Speaker 1: moment here. But Poully just brought up something during one
Speaker 1: of our live lookings on Peacock and we're watching old
Speaker 1: videos of forty yard dash times because of course that's
Speaker 1: what grown men do, and PAULI says that Tom Brady
Speaker 1: is faster than Steven Seagal. Now, if you would have said,
Speaker 1: give us a reference that you wouldn't think he would
Speaker 1: bring up on today's show for the entire three hours,
Speaker 1: it wouldn't be that Tom Brady is faster than Steven Seagal.
Speaker 1: I can't remember when Steven Seagal was running in one
Speaker 1: of his movies. Henced Paul. We were talking about how like,
Speaker 1: if you run, if someone videotaped it, you probably wouldn't
Speaker 1: like what you saw. I'm aware I'm not fast, I mean,
Speaker 1: but also when I run, it's not the prettiest thing.
Speaker 1: I look unathletic. You think you can run faster than
Speaker 1: Steven Seagal, probably, but I know I could run prettier
Speaker 1: if he caught you, he's gonna kick your Yes, But
Speaker 1: if you watch Steven Seagal running in movies, it looks
Speaker 1: like it's the first time he's ever done it, Like
Speaker 1: he had like a new baby dough running for the
Speaker 1: first time. Steven Seagal's arms get all floppy. You're gonna
Speaker 1: have to pull up some video. All right, let me
Speaker 1: get to Andy Katz Turner Sports NCAA dot com college
Speaker 1: basketball analyst. March Madness continues tonight USC Gonzaga UCLA versus Michigan.
Speaker 1: Andy will be with Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith, and Ernie
Speaker 1: Johnson on studio coverage beginning at six eastern. Sorry to
Speaker 1: put you through that, Andy, Good morning, How are you? Uh?
Speaker 1: Good morning? Dan? Yeah, I you know, I run a lot,
Speaker 1: but I'm not the prettiest runner either. I don't think
Speaker 1: I could. Uh, I don't know. Maybe I could beat
Speaker 1: Stephen Sagol. I don't know. I don't even know, like
Speaker 1: how that came up that PAULI could outrun Stephen Seigal. Oh, okay,
Speaker 1: you'll look better than running maybe Paully's early years in
Speaker 1: the late nine All right, give me the surprise tonight,
Speaker 1: is there a surprise tonight, and how does that team
Speaker 1: pull it off? If there is a surprise, I believe
Speaker 1: it will be UCLA. I am picking Michigan and Gonzaga,
Speaker 1: but I want to qualify this as this has been
Speaker 1: my worst bracket ever. Usually I'm pretty good, but this
Speaker 1: has been my worst one ever. Although in my revive
Speaker 1: he practed I'm doing much better. But UCLA definitely can
Speaker 1: beat Michigan, I think more so than USC. Against Gonzaga.
Speaker 1: Ucla has found itself. They'd lost four in a row.
Speaker 1: You know the fact that Johnny Juzang and Heimie Hawkes
Speaker 1: and now Jules Bernard are all playing well at the
Speaker 1: same time that had not happened in basically a month,
Speaker 1: and so offensively they're just playing much better. I mean,
Speaker 1: Cody Riley is sort of by himself inside and that's
Speaker 1: gonna be a problem against Hunter Dickinson. But UCLA now
Speaker 1: can score much better than they could, and that's why
Speaker 1: give him a chance, certainly against Michigan. Explain that to me, though,
Speaker 1: you know, these guys are quarantine in a bubble in
Speaker 1: Indianapolis and USC and UCLA even Oregon State, like they
Speaker 1: emerge from the Pac twelve that we didn't talk about
Speaker 1: the Pac twelve and they'll you know, here they are
Speaker 1: on the doors of maybe going to a Final four. Well,
Speaker 1: a couple of things. First of all, it's not a
Speaker 1: true bubble. It's not the NBA bubble where you could
Speaker 1: actually seal off the Disney compound. So you know, I
Speaker 1: know this sounds very NCA speak in the controlled environment,
Speaker 1: but it really is not a true bubble because there
Speaker 1: were a lot of coaches and teams seeing each other,
Speaker 1: you know, passing back and forth. But you know, I
Speaker 1: do think, and Kenny made this point a week or
Speaker 1: I guess a week ago, where because there were fewer games,
Speaker 1: you know, usually takes sometimes by game nineteen to figure
Speaker 1: your team out, and by game nineteen or twenty for
Speaker 1: some of these teams, they were in the postseason. And
Speaker 1: I do think with the case of UCLA, because they
Speaker 1: had to learn how to play without Chris Smith, without
Speaker 1: Jalen Hill, and these happened during the season, they just
Speaker 1: needed more games. And you could argue the same thing
Speaker 1: with Oregon State. I thought USC was good all year.
Speaker 1: They had a couple of questionable games that they shouldn't
Speaker 1: have lost, but they had the talent from the getting.
Speaker 1: But Oregon State was another team that just got better
Speaker 1: as the season went along because they needed more games.
Speaker 1: These teams did not have that traditional longer nonconference you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of them didn't play in traditional nonconference tournaments,
Speaker 1: and so it just took longer. And then you have Gonzaga.
Speaker 1: They're trying to go wire to wire. Best team is
Speaker 1: Gonzaga basketball power. Yes, people should wash their mouth out
Speaker 1: with soap if they say mid major because it doesn't
Speaker 1: exist in their vernacular. It has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: this program anymore. I don't like the term anyway because
Speaker 1: I feel like it's labeling. But I mean they travel
Speaker 1: Charter everywhere. Mark makes fantastic money. That's comfortable to anyone
Speaker 1: around the country. They can get games now. Years ago,
Speaker 1: people wouldn't come to Spokane, or they wouldn't maybe they
Speaker 1: would come to Spokane and Spokane Arena, not to campus.
Speaker 1: That's not an issue. They can get any game in
Speaker 1: the country. Duke just signed up to play them in Vegas,
Speaker 1: so that's not a problem. Now they can get anybody
Speaker 1: in the country. I mean, they're getting the top, literally
Speaker 1: the top recruits in the country, beating Kentucky and Duke
Speaker 1: and Jalen Suggs on this team. You know, he legitimately
Speaker 1: has a chance to be the number one draft pick
Speaker 1: from Gonzaga. But when did it change for gun Zaga
Speaker 1: or the perception of Gunzaga. I would say I think
Speaker 1: it changed with Adam Morrison because Adam Morrison, if you
Speaker 1: remember that year with JJ Reddick, were you know, want
Speaker 1: back and forth with the scoring lead. Morrison was sort
Speaker 1: of musty TV. They never should have lost that game
Speaker 1: to UCLA, and that was the beginning of UCLA's run
Speaker 1: of final fours under Ben Holland. But then Morrison got
Speaker 1: picked by Michael Jordan. I think it was number three
Speaker 1: in the draft. Maybe he shouldn't have been, but he was.
Speaker 1: And but I think that's where it started a change.
Speaker 1: And then I think it really changed when they played
Speaker 1: for the National Championship in twenty seventeen against North Carolina.
Speaker 1: Game really you know once again that they could have
Speaker 1: and maybe should have won because they had a lead
Speaker 1: late I think around the five minute marks. So but
Speaker 1: that's a title though, Andy, they have to win a title.
Speaker 1: It's this isn't a successful season if they don't win
Speaker 1: a title, right, Yeah, I mean it's probably not fair
Speaker 1: to say that in general, but yes, they are the
Speaker 1: best team. They have the best players on the floor
Speaker 1: no matter who they play against. Um, you know, Baylor's
Speaker 1: very good, but I would still take the pros on Gonzaga.
Speaker 1: And the thing that you know has been great being
Speaker 1: in the studio with these guys is, you know, because
Speaker 1: obviously they have such an amazing NBA background, is watching
Speaker 1: them watch Gonzaga looking at them like an NBA team,
Speaker 1: And the way they share the basketball, the way they're
Speaker 1: just their offensive rhythm. Um, you know, the passing has
Speaker 1: been phenomenal, you know, throughout the course of the season.
Speaker 1: I mean the bounce pass, especially from sugs and Andrew
Speaker 1: them Hard who probably does not get enough credit. The
Speaker 1: transfer from Florida. He has been phenomenal for them too.
Speaker 1: But their ability to share the basketball and be really
Speaker 1: in concert with each other in a year where that
Speaker 1: was very difficult because people didn't have a traditional summer
Speaker 1: or fall, that's even more impressive. We're talking to Andy
Speaker 1: Katz Turners, sports NCAA college basketball analyst. The coverage starts
Speaker 1: tonight with Andy, Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith, and Ernie Johnson.
Speaker 1: That'll be at six Eastern on TBS. The situation with
Speaker 1: Indiana with Mike Woodson is well, your reaction to Mike
Speaker 1: Woodson as Indiana's coach, Well, the figurine in front of
Speaker 1: you of Bob Knight, I think has already expressed himself
Speaker 1: to be very happy with this selection. Look, I think
Speaker 1: he you know, give him a chance. They're obviously going
Speaker 1: down this model. They weren't going to get Brad Stevens
Speaker 1: unless Brad Stevens had been fired, you know, two weeks before. Also,
Speaker 1: the current trend for the most part is those NBA coaches,
Speaker 1: younger NBA coaches don't want to go back to college
Speaker 1: and deal with recruitings. I never thought they were getting Brad.
Speaker 1: They weren't getting Chris Holtman. So the question is, Okay,
Speaker 1: what are they going to get Scott Dolson? The AD
Speaker 1: has Bob Knight ties to that era, and so there
Speaker 1: are candidates in that pool, and they went to that pool.
Speaker 1: And Mike Woodson has had success in the NBA. Now
Speaker 1: he's older than Juwan Howard, he's in his sixties, you know,
Speaker 1: adding Thad Mata as a consultant, whatever that will mean,
Speaker 1: He's not gonna be on the bench. But maybe allowing
Speaker 1: for the transition back to college basketball and helping him
Speaker 1: understand all that will be helpful. But I think his
Speaker 1: staff would be critical. And Juwan Howard did an unbelievable
Speaker 1: job of building his staff at Michigan, especially adding Film Martelli,
Speaker 1: and that has really helped connect with these players and
Speaker 1: this game. And you know, we'll see how it goes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but I wonder were they going to hire thad monas
Speaker 1: their basketball coach he failed the physical. They were probably
Speaker 1: d into conversations with him and wanted to give him
Speaker 1: a job, and therefore they made him sort of the
Speaker 1: overseer of the It just doesn't make any sense, Andy,
Speaker 1: I mean, fad Mona is a great college coach Mona
Speaker 1: part Yeah, No, I agree. I am very perplexed by
Speaker 1: it unless that has and I have not talked to him.
Speaker 1: I never really believe, though, when he left because of
Speaker 1: his health issues, that he really wanted to get back
Speaker 1: into coaching. Sometimes these guys like to be wood. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, it does feel like they're you know, still
Speaker 1: important and wanted. And I think he did that dance
Speaker 1: a little bit on a couple of jobs. But I
Speaker 1: never was convinced that he wanted to be fully back
Speaker 1: in to college basketball, you know, head coaching in that form,
Speaker 1: even as a Martelli like assistant. So to me, I'll
Speaker 1: be very interesting see what this really means. Is he
Speaker 1: really gonna be living in Bloomington. Is he just gonna
Speaker 1: be maybe in Indianapolis and in Florida where he's been
Speaker 1: living and just sort of pop in. Is he just
Speaker 1: on the phone as he zoom? Is he just you know,
Speaker 1: sort of like a hired consultant. And if that's the case,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe that'll work out. But I'm really interesting
Speaker 1: see just how involved he will be. We started the show,
Speaker 1: I was talking about the basketball game last night, and
Speaker 1: that was Connecticut against Baylor, the women's game, and it
Speaker 1: came down to, you know, a no call at the
Speaker 1: end of the game. You know, you hear officials, we
Speaker 1: talk about it. Do you swallow your whistle at the end?
Speaker 1: Do you let him play? Do you allow a little
Speaker 1: more contact there? Where do you stand on that? And
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw the play. To me,
Speaker 1: it looked like there was contact with the body by
Speaker 1: one of the Yukon women against Carrington on that shot. Yeah,
Speaker 1: a couple of things on that Dan. First of all,
Speaker 1: if there's contact, there's contact. I don't care what time
Speaker 1: has left in the game. A foul as a foul.
Speaker 1: You know, I've been covering this now for thirty years,
Speaker 1: and every coach and official will say that. Now. They
Speaker 1: might not like that, but it was clearly a foul,
Speaker 1: you know from what I and should have been called.
Speaker 1: You know, who knows if she makes the free throws
Speaker 1: and all that. But you know, we could also be
Speaker 1: critical that it was not a great play. They look
Speaker 1: kind of lost offensively, and she ran right into traffic
Speaker 1: and so it was not executed well. But you know,
Speaker 1: probably should have been a foul. Two other things I
Speaker 1: just want to add on that Dan little soapbox moment here.
Speaker 1: First off, doctor mulkahey, I don't think she's a medical
Speaker 1: doctor or an epidemiologist. I'm not sure why she randomly
Speaker 1: went off that there should be no COVID testing here
Speaker 1: at this point. I mean, we're at the we're basically
Speaker 1: near the finish line of the two final fours, and
Speaker 1: she's preaching that there should be no COVID testing here
Speaker 1: at the final stop. That made no sense, and so
Speaker 1: I don't know why she even went down that road.
Speaker 1: And then secondly, I don't understand for the life of me,
Speaker 1: because they could have done it differently this year. You're right,
Speaker 1: that was the best game last night. Why was it
Speaker 1: opposite the men or why would the men opposite the women.
Speaker 1: I don't understand why this whole tournament they now they
Speaker 1: won't this weekend they finally got it right where it's
Speaker 1: the second fourth of the women, third fifth of the men.
Speaker 1: How they have the men and women going opposite It
Speaker 1: just makes zero sense to me. And you know, the
Speaker 1: NC DOABLEA should have worked with the television partners on
Speaker 1: both sides and say, look, here's our schedule. Let's not
Speaker 1: have them go against each other. Yeah, I'm with you
Speaker 1: on that. I'm with you on that. Hey, it's great
Speaker 1: to talk to you and play nice tonight on the
Speaker 1: set with those guys. They can they can rough you up.
Speaker 1: I know that. Good to talk to great time. They've
Speaker 1: been wonderful. Thank you, Dan. That's Andy catch Turner Sports
Speaker 1: and he'll be in the studio with those guys tonight.
Speaker 1: This interview brought you by Capital One. What's in your Wallet?
Speaker 1: Our Play of the day, your phone calls coming up next.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be
Speaker 1: sure to catch us live every weekday morning nine until
Speaker 1: noon eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio,
Speaker 1: and you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at
Speaker 1: FSR or stream us live on the Peacock app. Oh
Speaker 1: My God, Lay of the day, God Play. This is
Speaker 1: the play on the day. Check this out, Baby and
Speaker 1: White Junior. He'll back it out to Grimes Crimes three
Speaker 1: on the right winging, Oh the answer for crimes look
Speaker 1: free from the right wing fifty eight fifty five you're
Speaker 1: sticking back up by three courtesy of Westwood One Radio.
Speaker 1: Quentin Grimes has made twenty three field goals in the tournament,
Speaker 1: seventeen three pointers. Play of the day brought you by
Speaker 1: M Drive, the supplement I take every day, powerful ingredients
Speaker 1: back by science. Get me energized, stronger, leaner. Go to
Speaker 1: M drive dan dot com today, free shipping, sixty day
Speaker 1: moneymat guarantee. Don't let h beat you. rEFInd your prime
Speaker 1: with M drive. We have somehow stumbled upon Steven Seagal
Speaker 1: this morning, and of course you're probably thinking that tuning
Speaker 1: into the show, what are they talking about today? Basketball?
Speaker 1: Last night? Maybe the nine and who they're going to take. Nope,
Speaker 1: Steven Seagal and the ability to not look convincing as
Speaker 1: a runner during his Great Movies. Paulie brought this up
Speaker 1: that he runs more esthetically pleasing than Steven Seagal. Right,
Speaker 1: you think Seagal is a trained martial artist and very
Speaker 1: in tune with his body. But it's a very fun
Speaker 1: video to look up on YouTube. It's Steven Sall running
Speaker 1: because his hands seemed like they're going a different direction
Speaker 1: than the rest of his time. Well, in fairness too,
Speaker 1: those who are well versed in martial arts, like was
Speaker 1: Bruce Lee a great runner? Was Jean Claude vandam kickboxer
Speaker 1: a great runner? Chuck Norris? Chuck Norris doesn't look like
Speaker 1: he's a good runner, you know. See. So are you
Speaker 1: saying that becoming an elite martial artist makes you become
Speaker 1: then a bad runner or are you naturally born a
Speaker 1: bad runner? And like, you know what, you should go
Speaker 1: into martial arts? You don't know how to run? I
Speaker 1: think it's that. I think it's the latter one, Yes,
Speaker 1: the ladder of the two. But I don't know if
Speaker 1: anybody ever talked about Bruce Lee run. Yes, mcle. I
Speaker 1: mean it's evolution. Basically, if you can't run, you need
Speaker 1: to learn to stay and defend yourself. Steven Seagal. When
Speaker 1: you google Steven Seagal, his running style comes up. It's
Speaker 1: not the first thing that comes up. It's the fourth
Speaker 1: thing that comes up, just ahead of martial arts. Actually
Speaker 1: is Steven Seagal running? What about his hair? You know
Speaker 1: it might be it was something like Steven Seagal net worth,
Speaker 1: Steven Seagal hair, Steven Seagal running, Steven Seagal martial arts.
Speaker 1: Maybe Steven Seagal movies thrown in there something. He did
Speaker 1: have a window though, where he was pretty good. He
Speaker 1: was entertaining, yes, and all his movies had three names.
Speaker 1: He started out with Above the Law, Hard to Kill,
Speaker 1: Marked for Death, Out for Justice on Deadley Ground, and
Speaker 1: then he went to a two name move with under
Speaker 1: Siege and Executive Decision which terrible decisions, yes, even though
Speaker 1: there was for solid Then you went to fire down below,
Speaker 1: back to three names. But his window had passed. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Paulle Jesse and Los Angeles half past Dead, Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: Jess at a half positivity Tuesday obviously the more important
Speaker 1: pressing matter because wishing the Bruins the best tonight and
Speaker 1: it's been an awesome run. But Paul, he's definitely, he's
Speaker 1: definitely onto something. Seven Sagal runs like he's a chicken
Speaker 1: trying to flap his arms to flap at the same time.
Speaker 1: And did you know that he has a show called
Speaker 1: Lawman where he's a cop in New Orleans. Could you
Speaker 1: imagine getting chased down by a guy like Steven Seagal.
Speaker 1: But also there's there's another guy you guys need to
Speaker 1: look up and it's not esthetically please it's not like,
Speaker 1: not as esthetically pleasing. But Tom Cruise must have a
Speaker 1: running contract in every movie he does, because if you
Speaker 1: look at Tom Cruise running, there's a twenty minute montage
Speaker 1: of every rudy he's done in every movie ever. Thank
Speaker 1: you Jesse. It's a reality show with Steven Seagal trying
Speaker 1: to track down bad guys. Right. It was on for
Speaker 1: about five years. It was called Steven Seagal Colon Lawman,
Speaker 1: and it's really Steven Seagal out with real cops busting people.
Speaker 1: You guys see these people's faces when they realize, hey,
Speaker 1: Steven Sgals put me in the back of my Cruiser.
Speaker 1: But Tom Cruise does like to run like it always
Speaker 1: feels like there's there's but you know, I think he
Speaker 1: looks athletic though, But I think Tom Cruise is a
Speaker 1: good enough actor where he'll act like he's a really
Speaker 1: good runner, like he'll he'll be obsessed about looking like
Speaker 1: he's a really good runner. Yeah. Now, just to be fair,
Speaker 1: when you type in Tom Cruise, what comes up as
Speaker 1: movies net worth, height, smile, age, teeth, wife, and then
Speaker 1: traffic thunder. Nothing about his running, so he must be
Speaker 1: a good runner. Yeah, yeah, yes. Is this a close
Speaker 1: cousin in the debate about whether a guy can play
Speaker 1: basketball on screen, because that's the worst. If an actor
Speaker 1: is in a basketball scene and clearly doesn't know how
Speaker 1: to shoot well baseball as well, throwing the baseball and
Speaker 1: then being at the plate, it always feels like whenever
Speaker 1: we watch him. Kevin Constner was so convincing in Bull
Speaker 1: Durham because he looked like he would have been that
Speaker 1: guy in the minor league and never got to the
Speaker 1: majors and he had a good swing but he played
Speaker 1: I believe college baseball. That was convincing. You know. Charlie
Speaker 1: Sheen looked like he could spring some cheese in Major League.
Speaker 1: But there are times when you watch it, like I
Speaker 1: thought that the Robert Redford's bat looked a little slow. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's just me. He was like sixty two years old.
Speaker 1: Film probably he was well jaritall. Yeah, Yeah, that was
Speaker 1: a different hera. That was the twenties in baseball. You
Speaker 1: could get away with a long guns play. Have a
Speaker 1: John Goodman his paper route. That wasn't good. That was
Speaker 1: not you were not a good Man. Yes, there's a
Speaker 1: thing about the making of the movie Hoosiers. The guys
Speaker 1: who played the players and Hoosiers were actual basketball players,
Speaker 1: but they had to learn to play like they're in
Speaker 1: the fifties. The defense is different, the passing is different,
Speaker 1: the layups are different than the two handed runners. They
Speaker 1: had to learn fifty style. Yeah, I guess the style.
Speaker 1: But Jimmy Chittenwood I don't even think made his high
Speaker 1: school team. I don't think he played varsity bounce them all.
Speaker 1: He was a great golfer. Maris villanis, but you know
Speaker 1: they put him in there as the star. Yes, Seaton.
Speaker 1: I'm a minute into the Tom Cruise running video and
Speaker 1: I've only made it to nineteen eighty three, and that's
Speaker 1: probably seven movies already in it, the easily seven clips
Speaker 1: from different movies. And I'm only a minute in Yeah,
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty three, I'm at so I haven't even hit
Speaker 1: Mission Impossible, which you know is going to be. I
Speaker 1: just don't know if anybody runs with more passion than
Speaker 1: Tom Cruise does. I almost feel like I'm running with him.
Speaker 1: He's got a high motor. If he was at the combine,
Speaker 1: I think they would say high motor, Tom Cruise. Coming
Speaker 1: up next hour, Did the Niners make the right decision?
Speaker 1: Are they making the right decision? We'll talk to Lewis
Speaker 1: Riddick from the Mother's Ship, and the great actor Brian
Speaker 1: Cranston stops by close out the first hour with Draft Kings.
Speaker 1: Grab your peanuts and popcorn. Baseball is back. That's right.
Speaker 1: Teams will be getting back out on the diamond this week.
Speaker 1: Last year's season certainly was different, that doesn't mean it
Speaker 1: act excitement, and this year is poised to be even better. DraftKings,
Speaker 1: the leader in one day fantasy sports, is putting you
Speaker 1: on the field with a free shot at a share
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars in total prices, and if you
Speaker 1: haven't tried it yet. Fantasy baseball is really easy to play.
Speaker 1: You pick ten players, stay under the salary cap, pile
Speaker 1: up points for hits, run, strikeouts. In more. No better
Speaker 1: way to put your baseball knowledge to the test than
Speaker 1: compete for a shot at millions of dollars throughout the week.
Speaker 1: It's simple to download the DraftKings app now, use the
Speaker 1: promo code Patrick and get a free shot at your
Speaker 1: share of millions of dollars up for grabs this week
Speaker 1: with your first deposit promo code Patrick, get a free
Speaker 1: shot at a share of millions of dollars with your
Speaker 1: first deposit only at DraftKings minimum five dollars deposit required.
Speaker 1: Eligibility restriction supply. See DraftKings dot com for details