WEBVTT - 03/30/21 DPS Hour 1 Andy Katz

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. It's our one on a Tuesday, Dan and

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dane's Dan Patrick's Show. Basketball coming up tonight, recapping

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>basketball from last night. We'll check in with Lewis Reddick

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.119
<v Speaker 1>from the Mothership on what the forty nine ers are doing,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>what the Jets are doing, and why are the Niners

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>being so transparent right now? Pro Days coming up, Mac

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Jones again, Justin Fields the Ohio State. Talked to somebody

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>yesterday who plans on being in attendance at Justin Fields

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Pro Day. He could run a four three forty. I

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that means other than he ran a

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>four three forty. Canny play the position and it feels

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>like Justin Fieldstock is the one that is really fluctuating.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now. We'll talk to Brian Cranston, the great actor

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's a bracket contest smack talker right now. Brian

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Cranston acting like Walter right here. He will join us

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up a little bit later on I Am the Danger.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>John Daily leading the Bracket Celebrity Bracket Challenge. Of course,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when you think college basketball, but John being an Arkansas

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>razorback fan, well he took a hit last night, USC, Gonzaga, Ucla,

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan. Coming up tonight, Houston beats Oregon State, Baylor

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>over Arkansas. If you'd like to get in touch with

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the program, dial us up age seven seven three d

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>P show email address DP at dan Patrick dot com,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle at DPS show. Captain Obvious reared his ugly

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>head this morning. Fritzie had an observation with the tournament Todd,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>would you like to give us a Captain obvious? Give

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the audience you're Captain obvious? Okay? So if USC beats

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Zags and UCLA beats Michigan tonight, the final four,

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I listen to this, Okay, Well, slow down, so I can?

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I can? Okay? Captain? Final four would feature two Texas

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>teams that got to each other, because we already have

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Baylor from Waco, Texas and Houston obviously Houston, Texas, but

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>westward and downtown La Ucla and USC. Two Texas teams

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and two Southern California teams would make up the final four.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>All right? How about that? Thank you? That just doesn't

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>happen every day. Nobody else knows. I don't think anyone

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>had thought of it. I don't think there's any features, yes,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>being prepared for that possible, not yet, yes, point And

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>after the final four, Dan is the final game, they're

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a championship for the winners of the two

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>games Saturday. I'm gonna meet Monday, and the winner will

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>cut down the net and declare themselves twenty twenty one

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>national champions. Thank you to thank you, Captain obvious. All right,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>so well, we'll come up with the play of the day,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day, poll, question, all of that. We'll

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>get to those coming up here shortly. If somebody ask

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you if you watch the college basketball game last night,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a pretty good chance that they're not talking

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>about Baylor or Houston the men's tournament. They're talking about

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut and Baylor the women's tournament. That was a heavyweight

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>battle last night. That was the best game last night,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the Huskies holding on for a two point point win,

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks in large part to a controversial no call in

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the final seconds. And you know, I just saw a

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>tweet by Jay Billis who said that with that non call,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no excuse to miss that call, stunning for Jay Billis.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I agree with him. I don't know if it was stunning,

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that it was a situation where

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't just swallow your whistle. There, Carrington made a

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>move to the hoop. Looked like the Yukon women at

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>least one of the players leaned into her made contact.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the other one may have gotten ball on

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the block shot but leaned into her created contact there.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But the Yukon women lived to see another day and

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going to another final four. It was a lot of

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch it. You know, Gino Rima and Kim Mulki,

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they they've gone back and forth here for a couple

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of decades. Now you got to see the Yukon freshman,

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Page Becker. She had twenty eight points last night. She's

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the faces of the sport. But they're going

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to another final four. Gino Oriema the legacy secured. No

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>matter what you think of him, he's established a dynasty,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>continues to add on pages to that book. And it

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was fun to see them challenged by a great rival

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in Baylor in a big moment. So if you didn't

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>watch the game, maybe check out the rest of the

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>women's tournament. It's been a lot of fun. You know.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that Paige Becker's going against Caitlin Clark Iowa

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in Yukon didn't turn out to be the showdown that

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>we thought. But we get to watch these women play

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for the next couple of years in college basketball, and

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that's great for the sport. But last night the game

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was Baylor against Connecticut. Yeah, Paul, it was interesting. When

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>I saw the schedules getting ready to watch the games,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw that the men's game in the women's game

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>was out at the same time. Like, that's bad planning.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You think you want to separate those for college basketball fans.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>But once Oregon State was down a little bit early, yeah,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of just left it. It wasn't intense. The

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Baylor Yukon game felt intense. It felt like that that

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a title at stake there, and usually there

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is when those two teams meet. But you know, it's fun.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It was fun to watch and it's great for the sport.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to have a controversial call be the

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>reason why you're talking about a sport, because it was

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more than just that. It was a really good game.

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Lebron tweeted out that that was a foul,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, watching it in slow motion different angles,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at the two officials. The officials are

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side and their angle is not a great

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:34.239
<v Speaker 1>angle from behind and to the side, whereas if somebody's

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>underneath the basket, then you can see the contact there.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I did think that there was contact enough to

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>call a foul and send Carrington to the line where

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>she's like a seventy five percent free throw shooter. But

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>it was it was great. It was back and forth,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and it was tense. All right, mclemen, you got a

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>poll question for me today. Wow, we could ask did

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you think it was a foul? But I don't know

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that everyone will watch that. That'd be more of a visual. Yeah,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a pre show debate. There was a little saucy.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if we should bring to a poll.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You can have one of these three NFL quarterbacks, Jimmy Garoppolo,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnold or Mitchell Trubisky. So say they were all

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>available via trade or free agency, who's the guy you

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would want? And I have to take one of the three.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately you have to take away the three. Do you

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>realize if Mitchell Trubisky was taken in the third round,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>our view of him would be completely different, and we

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>might look at him as a success story because he

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>does have a good one loss record. He just never

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>stepped up and provided those big numbers that you expect

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>from your quarterback. These are solid stats, but if he's

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a third round draft pick, then all of a sudden,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a great success story. They traded up to get him,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know the expectation level he could never live

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>up to. But I think he was twenty eight and

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one in his career, in his starts, went to

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs twice, Jimmy G went to the Super Bowl.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>He just seems a little fragile for me. Now, I

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know what this is going to do to his psyche. Now.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I know his body can't stay healthy. But now you

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have them openly talking about, hey, we're gonna take a

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback at number three, and Jimmy G's on board with

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all of this. Yeah, I'm a club I can't get over.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Right before the Super Bowl, you said you were worried

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>if Jimmy G could make the big throw in the

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pressure time, and then unfortunately he overthrew the couple ball

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or miss a couple passes that would have won the

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. So that stigma is with me and Jimmy G. Well,

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you talk to people, you want to

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>know what they're seeing. I'm just a novice, so I've

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>been around this a long time, but I know enough

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask people, you know, if certain situations are about

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a player, mental toughness, all of those things that they

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>see firsthand. And that's what I saw with Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I just wandered in the moment. It felt like they

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>were going away from Jimmy Garoppolo, the passing quarterback to

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo just kind of manage the game if you

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>can a little bit, and uh, you know, we'll take

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it from here. And then you saw that in the

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. It was like Jared Goff. You know, the

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Rams kind of shied away from featuring Jared Goff after

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a while, but I would just wonder. You know, we

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about Kyle Shanahan getting his quarterback. That was the

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>big conversation. You know, Mac Jones at Alabama, He's Kyle

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan's kind of quarterback. Was Jimmy g his kind of

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback because he traded for him? Would you trade for

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that wasn't your quarterback? I don't know. I'm

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>just wondering about that, mclovin. It does feel like the

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>two offensive geniuses, Kyle Shanahan and Sean McVay kind of

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>threw their quarterbacks under the bus. Yes, yes, I mean

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff got thrown under the bus, backed up, backed

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>up again, went forward, backed up again, and then send

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>him to Detroit and Jimmy G. Well, Jimmy G's gonna

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>be a good soldier, right, That's what That's who Jimmy

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>G is. Here's Kyle Shanahan did the Niners? Are the

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Niners required to talk to the media yesterday? Like I

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, why are you doing a press conference? You

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>don't have to answer to anybody. You're gonna take Mac

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Jones or Trey Lynch and take him. Hey. I mean,

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if Jimmy Garoppolo wanted to hold a press conference to

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>tell me how he was feeling, I'd be far more

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>interested in that. But here's John Lynch the Niners GM

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>on speaking with Jimmy Garoppolo before the trade. I'm sure

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy was a little a little pissed off from it,

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>just like I would be too. Um But me knowing Jimmy,

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he'll be fired up and come in and he'll work

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>his butt off. And knowing Jimmy, it the more mad

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy gets usually the better he gets. Um. So it's

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jimmy just gets madder and he stays healthy.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is gonna be a good thing for

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy too, which could be a great problem for the

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers. So that's Kyle Shanahan. Sorry, yeah, so

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's Kyle Shanahan telling you this isn't a situation like

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers in Jordan Love, where you light of fire

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>under Jimmy Jean, he's going to be the MVP like

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the Packers did. Apparently that was part of the game plan.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got a light of fire under him.

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>This is different. Jimmy g's being burned at the stake.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>They lit a fire under Aaron Rodgers like, whoa, that

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>seat got a little warm there. Jimmy Garoppolo is going, whoa,

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>here's John Lynch the Niners GM. We both spoke to Jimmy.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. The message was what we were doing, why

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we were doing, and how he is very much still

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a part of our plans and Jimmy he welcomes competition. Okay,

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>he gets to compete for this year. Oh good, I'm

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>so happy. I was hoping to compete for my job

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. That's what I was really looking forward to.

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you realize who has a no trade clause this

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>year but not next year? Say hello to Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It makes a lot of sense, no trade this year,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not next year. Yes, we love. I had no idea

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>id no trade clause could work like that? Yeah? Yeah. Uh.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Here is Kyle Shanahan about the possibility of trading Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems like you really do want to keep Jimmy Garoppolo,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but if someone blew you away with a trade offer,

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you would have to consider that. I guess, brist Harters,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is that accurate? Yeah, that's accurate with every player on

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>our team, I mean probably including myself. Someone blows up

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>away with a trade for me. I bet you so's

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's all I mean? Definitely. Okay, how do

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you think Jimmy g is you know, absorbing this processing this?

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>If you watch these two Laurel and Hardy there at

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the press conference and just back and forth like what

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>do you hey, you could trade me, um, Okay, that's

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not happening. But Jimmy G. The probably could get traded here.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And when do you lose that leverage with Jimmy G.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you lost that leverage with Jimmy G. Yeah, Paul,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, it's different if you want to

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the Packers situation Jordan Love. Later in the

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>first round, the Niners traded up big time. They went

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>from twelve to three. Like they said, we have to

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>get in this quarterback race. That doesn't feel like confidence.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>This program is brought to you by Built Bar, builtbar

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>dot Com promo CODP ten for ten percent off your

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>order builtbar dot Com Romo CODP ten at checkout a

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>protein bar that is quite tasty. Yes, Seaton coach, we're

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just gonna bring in a second head coach and just

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, no, you know you're still the guy

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we just wanted you to, you know, spice things up

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Have you compete for your job. It's

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>because if we know you, you're gonna coach harder now

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>because we just brought in this other guy who's gonna

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be right breathing down your neck. No, it's no, this

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is guy I know you. I know you love to compete.

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you. Oh you gotta light a fire. When

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you light a fire under him, Okay, it'd be that'd

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be funny. All of a sudden, John Lynch said, yeah,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing in another head coach here. But hey, don't

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you worry. You get to compete for this job right now.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why the Niners felt like they were

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>obligated to talk about this. I mean, I appreciate it,

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>but did you really clear up anything. We want to

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>keep Jimmy G. But we would trade Jimmy G. He's

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>competing for the job this year. When you light a

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>fire under him, you know that brings out the best

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in him. I just want to know if somebody would

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ask Kyle Shanahan, Kyle, tell me what a Kyle Shanahan quarterback?

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>What are the attributes? And did you think Jimmy G

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had those attributes? Because after all, you did trade for

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo and then he doesn't have those attributes. The

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem Jimmy G has wee, there's a few he has.

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have good footwork. Now, most of your analysts

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>who look at the quarterbacks will tell you Chris Simms

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was saying this, It doesn't have good footwork. Cam Newton

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have good footwork. I don't care how athletic you are.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You can run a four three forty. If you don't

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have good footwork in the pocket, you're not going to

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>be successful. Mac Jones has good footwork. He is a

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>precise passer. He's not an athlete. He doesn't do anything

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>athletic outside the pocket. But Tom Brady may be the

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>least athletic, greatest player of all time, but what he

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>does is so subtle. It's footwork in the pocket. When

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there's traffic, bodies flying all around there. How do you

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>keep your composure, your head up, head down field? And

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>your footwork is so important. You know, Jamis Winston getting

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>good footwork is really important for him. Like there's certain

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>things that you boil it down to just a couple

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>really important things. And you can look at how strong

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody's arm is, Like I always think that guy's got

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a strong arm. Is it an accurate arm. There's guys

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>who have strong arms, they don't have accurate arms. Well,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's got a strong arm, okay, But he's fast, okay?

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Is he quick? Does he make good decisions? How's his footwork? Like?

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are the smart things that you want out of

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady are two of

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the least athletic quarterbacks of all time and two of

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the greatest. Why processing information, putting in the work, great

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>footwork in the pocket, you know, throwing guys open, like

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just things that you don't remember when we am. I

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bring it up every year, and I always hear gms

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and scouts and coaches saying we're not gonna fall in

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>love and anybody you know at a pro day or

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>combine and what did they do with Zach Wilson? Oh

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>my god, he made that throw. He went and left,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he threw back right and he threw it fifty. Okay,

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that's one throw. But that doesn't mean Zach Wilson is

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be Patrick Mahomes two point zero. I mean

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he might be, But you're falling in love at a

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>pro day. You're falling in love at you know, with

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>combined drills there, how many times do you run a

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>forty in a game? How many people run forties in

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a game? You know? Your cone drill? Like just these

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>things where how many times you you know benching two

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. How many times have you seen somebody bench

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five in a game? I watched all the games.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You haven't seen it. Here's something funny. Tom Brady his

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>longest career run is twenty two yards. He's only run

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>over twenty yards once in his career. Peyton Manning has

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a thirty three yard run. That's it. He's never run

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>over twenty yards after that. But when I brought up

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes's forty yard dash yesterday, just to look on

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>your guy's faces, because he's not fast. But when you

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>watch him, he's a smart runner, but he's not fast.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Russell Wilson is fast. I think

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>he's quick. But we get caught up. You know what

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>is Mahomes of four aide forty? Mac Jones is more athletic,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to look at it that way than

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. Well, obviously you take Patrick Mahomes over him.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But we get caught up on these numbers, and we

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think these numbers mean a lot. They mean a lot

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to us, you know, when you're it's combined porn for us,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But for the scouts it's different. What they want. They

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>want the medicals especially with quarterbacks. They want to see

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how you process your information and do you love do

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you love the game? Where you put in the time,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Like those are the things that are really important with us.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>How fast did you run a forty? Micah Parsons at

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Penn State ran a four three forty? Okay, sat out

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all last year. I don't know if he's great. I

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>just know he ran a four three forty. What do

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you do with at four three speed? Henry Ruggs Junior,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the third maybe the fast, one of the fastest guys

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL? What did you do with that speed

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>last year? Jerry Judy, Like I can go down the

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>list of we get caught up in these things and

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you go, God, that guy is fast. Did you see

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>his vertical this in a basketball game? Yeah, McClelland yeah.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>But Ruggs was still the first receiver picked, even though

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of bigger guys. The teams seem

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to value this. How did it work out? I know?

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if they're gonna do the same thing

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this John Ross remember him? Oh? I know, I know

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>gen Ross? Oh my god, you see how fast he is?

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Can he play? Yeah? MC? I was wondering is are

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the Niners setting up a Jimmy g trade to New England?

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Is this bargaining to get the highest draft pick they

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can Is that going to happen? I know no one

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>knows for sure, but it feels like he'd fit better

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in New England and San Francisco after hearing jad An, Well,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess if you're New England and Bill loves

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo, then you would at least entertain the idea

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of bringing him in, but not at that price. Now,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the key. What can you get Jimmy

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo for? Do you send back the draft pick that

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they sent you in the first place? Is he diminishing value?

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Diminishing returns there? Yeah, I'm the club. That's two pretty

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>solid jaw lines in New England. That'd be a fun

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback competition. Cam Newton and Jimmy Garoppolo hants him off,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think it'd be interesting. New England keeps saying

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they love Cam Newton. To put that to the test,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's what they of course they're gonna say that,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but they got over the top with his belochick. Cam

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Newton love but It's like the Giants owner who says,

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we believe Daniel Jones can lead us to a super Bowl.

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if he says we don't think he could lead

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>us to a super Bowl, then that's interesting. George kittle says,

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I want Jimmy g as my quarterback. So what are

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do? You're gonna demand a trade? No, he's

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>saying all the right things. It doesn't mean anything. What

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>did you hear? Can you imagine Kyle Shanahan and you

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know John Lynch going, Oh did you hear George Kittley?

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>He says he wants Jimmy j You know what, maybe

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we should uh, maybe you should take a wide receiver

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>up there? Yeah, mclub. But didn't Belichick not say nice

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>things about Tom Brady? Ironically, like the one quarterback the

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>best ever? Remember you were gonna eat it did win

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriot of the Week or so he well, but he

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>purposely doesn't say nice things about his own guys. It

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's everybody else whenever your faith. We're facing

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariona. He's a really telling quarterback, and we're gonna

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>have our work cut out for him. Okay, Tom never

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>waited around for Bill to say nice things about him.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's so weird that he's so he has

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>so much praise for cam Well. I think because they

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>got him at a bargain, and I think I think

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to boost his camp. I don't think he had.

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Bill had to boost Tom's confidence. If anything,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he probably tried to diminish it a little bit, just

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to let him know that I'm still the coach here.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll take a break here. Fired up? Well,

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I want to know if the Niner did

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL say, you know, you guys got to talk

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, you know, like, what was the reason why

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you hold a press conte? I appreciate it. I just

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a held a press conference and then you have

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the awkward Jimmy g and lightning of fire and you

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>know it, see Jim Morrison, Yes, mcclub. I think it

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was the trade the reason they had the press conference.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I think after a big trade, you're supposed to

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>have a press conference. Isn't that wild? I wouldn't like

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in March, I don't. I don't want to have a

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>press conference because it's it's kind of awkward, right, now,

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this helps the Niners to hold

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a press conference and talk. It didn't clear up anything

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>with Jimmy g If anything, it made it a little

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>more confusing. All right, will take a break. Andy Katz

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.959
<v Speaker 1>on loan from Turnish Sports will join us. Coming up,

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Riddick from the Mothership, Bryan Cranston, the Great actor

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Take a break. Twenty three after the hour.

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dan Patrick Show. Oh Man hitting golf

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>balls over the weekend. And then I was doing a

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>little putting. You know, you drive for show, you put

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for dough PAULI And now I'm on the no. No,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody else did, maybe like last week or something. Callaway

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Chromesoft golf ball. Callaway doesn't just make the ball better

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>for tour players, it makes the better tour player ball

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for us. I mean that's really important here. I wanted

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to be included the original Chromesoft Callaway's number one selling

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>tour ball. Most golfers have the combination of that incredible distance,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>soft field, short game control, and you'll love that with

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Callaway the number one ball on tour, the Chromesoft X.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You got elite players using that. And I said, well,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an elite player, but I want to use

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that golf ball. Callaway's longest tour ball is called the

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>chrome Soft x LS. The LS is low spin, providing

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>max distance off the tea tour level short game spin.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Chromesoft isn't just better, it's better for everyone. Find your

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Chromesoft today Callaway golf dot com chrome Soft. Thanks for

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio and you

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>stream us live on the Peacock app. What's up everyone,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>It's me three time NFL All Pro Sean Mary and

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a new sports podcast called The Lights Out

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Sean Mariner. This podcast especial to me is

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I get a chance to talk to some of the

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>best we've ever done it on a field or to track.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>So whether it's talking to a Super Bowl champion or

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a NASCAR Cup Series champion, the Lights Out Podcast We'll

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>bring it to you the only where I know how to.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you the best insight from the best we've

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>ever done it. Listen to lights out with Sean Merman

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Our conversation with Andy Katz brought you by Capital One.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>What's in your wallet? We'll get to Andy in a

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>moment here. But Poully just brought up something during one

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of our live lookings on Peacock and we're watching old

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>videos of forty yard dash times because of course that's

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>what grown men do, and PAULI says that Tom Brady

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is faster than Steven Seagal. Now, if you would have said,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>give us a reference that you wouldn't think he would

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>bring up on today's show for the entire three hours,

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be that Tom Brady is faster than Steven Seagal.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember when Steven Seagal was running in one

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of his movies. Henced Paul. We were talking about how like,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 1>if you run, if someone videotaped it, you probably wouldn't

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>like what you saw. I'm aware I'm not fast, I mean,

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>but also when I run, it's not the prettiest thing.

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I look unathletic. You think you can run faster than

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Steven Seagal, probably, but I know I could run prettier

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>if he caught you, he's gonna kick your Yes, But

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you watch Steven Seagal running in movies, it looks

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's the first time he's ever done it, Like

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>he had like a new baby dough running for the

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>first time. Steven Seagal's arms get all floppy. You're gonna

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have to pull up some video. All right, let me

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>get to Andy Katz Turner Sports NCAA dot com college

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>basketball analyst. March Madness continues tonight USC Gonzaga UCLA versus Michigan.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Andy will be with Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith, and Ernie

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson on studio coverage beginning at six eastern. Sorry to

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>put you through that, Andy, Good morning, How are you? Uh?

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Good morning? Dan? Yeah, I you know, I run a lot,

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not the prettiest runner either. I don't think

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I could. Uh, I don't know. Maybe I could beat

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Sagol. I don't know. I don't even know, like

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>how that came up that PAULI could outrun Stephen Seigal. Oh, okay,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you'll look better than running maybe Paully's early years in

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the late nine All right, give me the surprise tonight,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is there a surprise tonight, and how does that team

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>pull it off? If there is a surprise, I believe

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it will be UCLA. I am picking Michigan and Gonzaga,

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but I want to qualify this as this has been

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>my worst bracket ever. Usually I'm pretty good, but this

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>has been my worst one ever. Although in my revive

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:06.880
<v Speaker 1>he practed I'm doing much better. But UCLA definitely can

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>beat Michigan, I think more so than USC. Against Gonzaga.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Ucla has found itself. They'd lost four in a row.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You know the fact that Johnny Juzang and Heimie Hawkes

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and now Jules Bernard are all playing well at the

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>same time that had not happened in basically a month,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and so offensively they're just playing much better. I mean,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Cody Riley is sort of by himself inside and that's

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a problem against Hunter Dickinson. But UCLA now

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can score much better than they could, and that's why

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>give him a chance, certainly against Michigan. Explain that to me, though,

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, these guys are quarantine in a bubble in

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis and USC and UCLA even Oregon State, like they

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>emerge from the Pac twelve that we didn't talk about

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the Pac twelve and they'll you know, here they are

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on the doors of maybe going to a Final four. Well,

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. First of all, it's not a

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 1>true bubble. It's not the NBA bubble where you could

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>actually seal off the Disney compound. So you know, I

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know this sounds very NCA speak in the controlled environment,

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but it really is not a true bubble because there

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of coaches and teams seeing each other,

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, passing back and forth. But you know, I

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>do think, and Kenny made this point a week or

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess a week ago, where because there were fewer games,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually takes sometimes by game nineteen to figure

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>your team out, and by game nineteen or twenty for

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>some of these teams, they were in the postseason. And

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think with the case of UCLA, because they

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>had to learn how to play without Chris Smith, without

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hill, and these happened during the season, they just

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>needed more games. And you could argue the same thing

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>with Oregon State. I thought USC was good all year.

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They had a couple of questionable games that they shouldn't

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>have lost, but they had the talent from the getting.

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But Oregon State was another team that just got better

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>as the season went along because they needed more games.

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 1>These teams did not have that traditional longer nonconference you know,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them didn't play in traditional nonconference tournaments,

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and so it just took longer. And then you have Gonzaga.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to go wire to wire. Best team is

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Gonzaga basketball power. Yes, people should wash their mouth out

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>with soap if they say mid major because it doesn't

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>exist in their vernacular. It has nothing to do with

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>this program anymore. I don't like the term anyway because

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's labeling. But I mean they travel

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Charter everywhere. Mark makes fantastic money. That's comfortable to anyone

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>around the country. They can get games now. Years ago,

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't come to Spokane, or they wouldn't maybe they

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would come to Spokane and Spokane Arena, not to campus.

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not an issue. They can get any game in

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the country. Duke just signed up to play them in Vegas,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's not a problem. Now they can get anybody

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the country. I mean, they're getting the top, literally

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the top recruits in the country, beating Kentucky and Duke

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen Suggs on this team. You know, he legitimately

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>has a chance to be the number one draft pick

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from Gonzaga. But when did it change for gun Zaga

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or the perception of Gunzaga. I would say I think

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it changed with Adam Morrison because Adam Morrison, if you

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>remember that year with JJ Reddick, were you know, want

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with the scoring lead. Morrison was sort

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of musty TV. They never should have lost that game

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to UCLA, and that was the beginning of UCLA's run

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of final fours under Ben Holland. But then Morrison got

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>picked by Michael Jordan. I think it was number three

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. Maybe he shouldn't have been, but he was.

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And but I think that's where it started a change.

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And then I think it really changed when they played

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for the National Championship in twenty seventeen against North Carolina.

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Game really you know once again that they could have

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe should have won because they had a lead

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>late I think around the five minute marks. So but

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a title though, Andy, they have to win a title.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It's this isn't a successful season if they don't win

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a title, right, Yeah, I mean it's probably not fair

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to say that in general, but yes, they are the

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>best team. They have the best players on the floor

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>no matter who they play against. Um, you know, Baylor's

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>very good, but I would still take the pros on Gonzaga.

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that you know has been great being

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the studio with these guys is, you know, because

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously they have such an amazing NBA background, is watching

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>them watch Gonzaga looking at them like an NBA team,

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And the way they share the basketball, the way they're

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>just their offensive rhythm. Um, you know, the passing has

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenal, you know, throughout the course of the season.

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the bounce pass, especially from sugs and Andrew

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>them Hard who probably does not get enough credit. The

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>transfer from Florida. He has been phenomenal for them too.

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But their ability to share the basketball and be really

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in concert with each other in a year where that

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was very difficult because people didn't have a traditional summer

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or fall, that's even more impressive. We're talking to Andy

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Katz Turners, sports NCAA college basketball analyst. The coverage starts

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>tonight with Andy, Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith, and Ernie Johnson.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>That'll be at six Eastern on TBS. The situation with

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Indiana with Mike Woodson is well, your reaction to Mike

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Woodson as Indiana's coach, Well, the figurine in front of

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you of Bob Knight, I think has already expressed himself

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to be very happy with this selection. Look, I think

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he you know, give him a chance. They're obviously going

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>down this model. They weren't going to get Brad Stevens

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>unless Brad Stevens had been fired, you know, two weeks before. Also,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the current trend for the most part is those NBA coaches,

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>younger NBA coaches don't want to go back to college

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and deal with recruitings. I never thought they were getting Brad.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>They weren't getting Chris Holtman. So the question is, Okay,

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what are they going to get Scott Dolson? The AD

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>has Bob Knight ties to that era, and so there

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are candidates in that pool, and they went to that pool.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And Mike Woodson has had success in the NBA. Now

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 1>he's older than Juwan Howard, he's in his sixties, you know,

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>adding Thad Mata as a consultant, whatever that will mean,

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be on the bench. But maybe allowing

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for the transition back to college basketball and helping him

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>understand all that will be helpful. But I think his

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>staff would be critical. And Juwan Howard did an unbelievable

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>job of building his staff at Michigan, especially adding Film Martelli,

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and that has really helped connect with these players and

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this game. And you know, we'll see how it goes. Yeah,

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder were they going to hire thad monas

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 1>their basketball coach he failed the physical. They were probably

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>d into conversations with him and wanted to give him

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a job, and therefore they made him sort of the

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>overseer of the It just doesn't make any sense, Andy,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, fad Mona is a great college coach Mona

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>part Yeah, No, I agree. I am very perplexed by

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it unless that has and I have not talked to him.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I never really believe, though, when he left because of

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>his health issues, that he really wanted to get back

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>into coaching. Sometimes these guys like to be wood. Yeah,

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it does feel like they're you know, still

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>important and wanted. And I think he did that dance

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on a couple of jobs. But I

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>never was convinced that he wanted to be fully back

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in to college basketball, you know, head coaching in that form,

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>even as a Martelli like assistant. So to me, I'll

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting see what this really means. Is he

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>really gonna be living in Bloomington. Is he just gonna

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>be maybe in Indianapolis and in Florida where he's been

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>living and just sort of pop in. Is he just

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>on the phone as he zoom? Is he just you know,

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a hired consultant. And if that's the case,

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe that'll work out. But I'm really interesting

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>see just how involved he will be. We started the show,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about the basketball game last night, and

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that was Connecticut against Baylor, the women's game, and it

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>came down to, you know, a no call at the

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>end of the game. You know, you hear officials, we

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Do you swallow your whistle at the end?

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you let him play? Do you allow a little

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>more contact there? Where do you stand on that? And

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw the play. To me,

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>it looked like there was contact with the body by

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the Yukon women against Carrington on that shot. Yeah,

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things on that Dan. First of all,

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's contact, there's contact. I don't care what time

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>has left in the game. A foul as a foul.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been covering this now for thirty years,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and every coach and official will say that. Now. They

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>might not like that, but it was clearly a foul,

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know from what I and should have been called.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, who knows if she makes the free throws

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But you know, we could also be

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>critical that it was not a great play. They look

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost offensively, and she ran right into traffic

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and so it was not executed well. But you know,

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>probably should have been a foul. Two other things I

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just want to add on that Dan little soapbox moment here.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>First off, doctor mulkahey, I don't think she's a medical

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>doctor or an epidemiologist. I'm not sure why she randomly

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>went off that there should be no COVID testing here

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I mean, we're at the we're basically

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>near the finish line of the two final fours, and

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>she's preaching that there should be no COVID testing here

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at the final stop. That made no sense, and so

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why she even went down that road.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, I don't understand for the life of me,

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>because they could have done it differently this year. You're right,

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that was the best game last night. Why was it

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>opposite the men or why would the men opposite the women.

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why this whole tournament they now they

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>won't this weekend they finally got it right where it's

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the second fourth of the women, third fifth of the men.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>How they have the men and women going opposite It

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>just makes zero sense to me. And you know, the

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>NC DOABLEA should have worked with the television partners on

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>both sides and say, look, here's our schedule. Let's not

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>have them go against each other. Yeah, I'm with you

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>on that. I'm with you on that. Hey, it's great

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you and play nice tonight on the

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>set with those guys. They can they can rough you up.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I know that. Good to talk to great time. They've

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>been wonderful. Thank you, Dan. That's Andy catch Turner Sports

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be in the studio with those guys tonight.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>This interview brought you by Capital One. What's in your Wallet?

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Our Play of the day, your phone calls coming up next.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sure to catch us live every weekday morning nine until

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>noon eastern six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio,

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can find us on the iHeartRadio app at

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>FSR or stream us live on the Peacock app. Oh

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>My God, Lay of the day, God Play. This is

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the play on the day. Check this out, Baby and

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>White Junior. He'll back it out to Grimes Crimes three

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on the right winging, Oh the answer for crimes look

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>free from the right wing fifty eight fifty five you're

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>sticking back up by three courtesy of Westwood One Radio.

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Grimes has made twenty three field goals in the tournament,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>seventeen three pointers. Play of the day brought you by

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>M Drive, the supplement I take every day, powerful ingredients

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>back by science. Get me energized, stronger, leaner. Go to

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>M drive dan dot com today, free shipping, sixty day

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>moneymat guarantee. Don't let h beat you. rEFInd your prime

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with M drive. We have somehow stumbled upon Steven Seagal

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning, and of course you're probably thinking that tuning

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 1>into the show, what are they talking about today? Basketball?

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Last night? Maybe the nine and who they're going to take. Nope,

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Steven Seagal and the ability to not look convincing as

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a runner during his Great Movies. Paulie brought this up

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that he runs more esthetically pleasing than Steven Seagal. Right,

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>you think Seagal is a trained martial artist and very

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>in tune with his body. But it's a very fun

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>video to look up on YouTube. It's Steven Sall running

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>because his hands seemed like they're going a different direction

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>than the rest of his time. Well, in fairness too,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>those who are well versed in martial arts, like was

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Lee a great runner? Was Jean Claude vandam kickboxer

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a great runner? Chuck Norris? Chuck Norris doesn't look like

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a good runner, you know. See. So are you

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that becoming an elite martial artist makes you become

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>then a bad runner or are you naturally born a

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>bad runner? And like, you know what, you should go

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>into martial arts? You don't know how to run? I

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's that. I think it's the latter one, Yes,

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the ladder of the two. But I don't know if

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>anybody ever talked about Bruce Lee run. Yes, mcle. I

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>mean it's evolution. Basically, if you can't run, you need

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to learn to stay and defend yourself. Steven Seagal. When

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 1>you google Steven Seagal, his running style comes up. It's

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not the first thing that comes up. It's the fourth

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes up, just ahead of martial arts. Actually

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is Steven Seagal running? What about his hair? You know

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it might be it was something like Steven Seagal net worth,

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Steven Seagal hair, Steven Seagal running, Steven Seagal martial arts.

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Steven Seagal movies thrown in there something. He did

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>have a window though, where he was pretty good. He

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was entertaining, yes, and all his movies had three names.

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He started out with Above the Law, Hard to Kill,

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Marked for Death, Out for Justice on Deadley Ground, and

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>then he went to a two name move with under

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Siege and Executive Decision which terrible decisions, yes, even though

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 1>there was for solid Then you went to fire down below,

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>back to three names. But his window had passed. Thank you.

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Paulle Jesse and Los Angeles half past Dead, Yes, yes,

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Jess at a half positivity Tuesday obviously the more important

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>pressing matter because wishing the Bruins the best tonight and

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it's been an awesome run. But Paul, he's definitely, he's

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely onto something. Seven Sagal runs like he's a chicken

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to flap his arms to flap at the same time.

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And did you know that he has a show called

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Lawman where he's a cop in New Orleans. Could you

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine getting chased down by a guy like Steven Seagal.

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But also there's there's another guy you guys need to

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>look up and it's not esthetically please it's not like,

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>not as esthetically pleasing. But Tom Cruise must have a

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>running contract in every movie he does, because if you

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>look at Tom Cruise running, there's a twenty minute montage

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of every rudy he's done in every movie ever. Thank

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you Jesse. It's a reality show with Steven Seagal trying

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to track down bad guys. Right. It was on for

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about five years. It was called Steven Seagal Colon Lawman,

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's really Steven Seagal out with real cops busting people.

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 1>You guys see these people's faces when they realize, hey,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Steven Sgals put me in the back of my Cruiser.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But Tom Cruise does like to run like it always

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's there's but you know, I think he

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>looks athletic though, But I think Tom Cruise is a

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>good enough actor where he'll act like he's a really

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>good runner, like he'll he'll be obsessed about looking like

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a really good runner. Yeah. Now, just to be fair,

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>when you type in Tom Cruise, what comes up as

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>movies net worth, height, smile, age, teeth, wife, and then

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>traffic thunder. Nothing about his running, so he must be

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a good runner. Yeah, yeah, yes. Is this a close

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>cousin in the debate about whether a guy can play

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>basketball on screen, because that's the worst. If an actor

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is in a basketball scene and clearly doesn't know how

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to shoot well baseball as well, throwing the baseball and

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>then being at the plate, it always feels like whenever

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we watch him. Kevin Constner was so convincing in Bull

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Durham because he looked like he would have been that

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>guy in the minor league and never got to the

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>majors and he had a good swing but he played

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe college baseball. That was convincing. You know. Charlie

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Sheen looked like he could spring some cheese in Major League.

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are times when you watch it, like I

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>thought that the Robert Redford's bat looked a little slow. Yeah,

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just me. He was like sixty two years old.

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Film probably he was well jaritall. Yeah, Yeah, that was

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a different hera. That was the twenties in baseball. You

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>could get away with a long guns play. Have a

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>John Goodman his paper route. That wasn't good. That was

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not you were not a good Man. Yes, there's a

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>thing about the making of the movie Hoosiers. The guys

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>who played the players and Hoosiers were actual basketball players,

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but they had to learn to play like they're in

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the fifties. The defense is different, the passing is different,

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the layups are different than the two handed runners. They

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>had to learn fifty style. Yeah, I guess the style.

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But Jimmy Chittenwood I don't even think made his high

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 1>school team. I don't think he played varsity bounce them all.

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He was a great golfer. Maris villanis, but you know

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they put him in there as the star. Yes, Seaton.

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm a minute into the Tom Cruise running video and

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I've only made it to nineteen eighty three, and that's

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>probably seven movies already in it, the easily seven clips

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>from different movies. And I'm only a minute in Yeah,

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty three, I'm at so I haven't even hit

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Mission Impossible, which you know is going to be. I

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if anybody runs with more passion than

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise does. I almost feel like I'm running with him.

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got a high motor. If he was at the combine,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they would say high motor, Tom Cruise. Coming

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up next hour, Did the Niners make the right decision?

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Are they making the right decision? We'll talk to Lewis

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Riddick from the Mother's Ship, and the great actor Brian

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Cranston stops by close out the first hour with Draft Kings.

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Grab your peanuts and popcorn. Baseball is back. That's right.

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Teams will be getting back out on the diamond this week.

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Last year's season certainly was different, that doesn't mean it

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>act excitement, and this year is poised to be even better. DraftKings,

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the leader in one day fantasy sports, is putting you

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on the field with a free shot at a share

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of millions of dollars in total prices, and if you

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't tried it yet. Fantasy baseball is really easy to play.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>You pick ten players, stay under the salary cap, pile

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>up points for hits, run, strikeouts. In more. No better

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.439
<v Speaker 1>way to put your baseball knowledge to the test than

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>compete for a shot at millions of dollars throughout the week.

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's simple to download the DraftKings app now, use the

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>promo code Patrick and get a free shot at your

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>share of millions of dollars up for grabs this week

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.959
<v Speaker 1>with your first deposit promo code Patrick, get a free

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 1>shot at a share of millions of dollars with your

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>first deposit only at DraftKings minimum five dollars deposit required.

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Eligibility restriction supply. See DraftKings dot com for details