WEBVTT - Terrible Ideas, Taken Seriously.  Peter Boghossian talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>When you're ready to ride Metro, we want you to

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know we're ready for you. Here are just a few

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people at Metro to tell you how we're

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>doing our part to keep riders safe. We're cleaning like

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>nevill before half build greatly. You've found has santizing station,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>no mask, no Metro need one. We have a few

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>extras at Metro. We're doing our part to keep the

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>DC area moving. Find out more at well mata dot

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>com slash doing our part. How do terrible ideas get

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>taken so seriously on college campuses? So I'm Strong and

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Getty extra large because four hours simply usn't enough. This

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is Armstrong and Getty extra Large. So freaking interesting. We've

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>been fans of these people ever since the grievance studies

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>thing hit last January. Yeah, the fake papers that they

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>got into various journals. Peter Bogo and James Lindsay and

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>how and pluck Rose. They made up just ridiculous crap.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean ridiculous, no, as you say, nobody but an

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>academic could believe it, but fall down funny crap and

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>actually got them accepted into various peer review reviewed journals.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And the fancy universities across the country. Peter Bogan wrote

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a piece for The Wall Street Journal recently, idea laundering

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>an academia. Peter as an assistant professor of philosophy right

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in the belly of the Beast Portland State University. He's

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>also the co author of a book, How to Have

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Impossible Conversations that we need to talk about at some

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>point down the road, but probably not today. Peter Bagoan

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>joins us, Peter, this is a real pleasure. We've been

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to talking to you for some time. I

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>love talking to you, guys, I really do, and I

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>sincerely appreciate your support because I can't do what what

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I do without without you. So thanks. Yeah, when the

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>whole grievance studies story hit and we were just so

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>taken with it and it's so exciting for everyone. And

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I've watched a ton of YouTube is with you and

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>James Lindsay and that over the last year. So, but

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>has any progress been made our universities better off than

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they were before you did this or that's a good question. No, no,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>no progress has been made. In fact, um, they've they've

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>doubled down on their nonsense and there you go take

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>scholarship and attempts to successful attempts to self credential. So

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the situation as I see it, has actually gotten worse

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>inside the academy, But outside the academy with the Dave

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Chappelle comedy show or Bill Burr or certain cultural now

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>they want to know a gender Santa claus Um. I

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think outside the academy you're seeing pushback, but withinside the

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>academy that absolutely it's absolutely gotten worse. Well, and I'm

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>sorry to hear that given the number of dollars American

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>families are throwing it educating their young ones. Are you

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>surprised to hear that? I'm not surprised at least. I mean,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the same dynamic of power you seeing government

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else where power and money are at stakes.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Self policing rarely works. But I do love the idea,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>idea that more and more people are feeling um. I

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>hate to use the term empowered because it's trade out

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of grieving studies, but they're they're they're feeling more empowered

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to call bullshit on this stuff and they realize, wait

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute, I'm not a bad person because I think

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this is goofy um this is goofy right. And not

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>only that you're not a bad person because you're a male,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you're also not a rapist because you're a male. You're

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not a bad person because you're white. You your your

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>ancestral line has absolutely nothing to do with your decency

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and dignity as a person. So I think it was

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal that ran your piece about idea

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>laundering where we explained that whole thing, And that's why

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to have you on today because I found

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating because I've wondered all along, where do the

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff comes from? How did this stuff catch on? Can

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you explain idea laundering to us? Yeah, So think about

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it this way. This is how they get away with it.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>This is how they do it, and here's how they

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>do it. To an example, let's say that you let's

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>say the three of us have some kind of moral idea, like,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just give me a moral idea like you know, um,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like yeah, it's wrong to steal or

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking like something contemporary political issues like you know, uh,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, impeach Trump for moral senses. Okay, so we

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have an idea, you know, build a wall. Let's just

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>use that one. We need to build a wall, or

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we build a wall, doesn't matter what it is. Okay,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you have this strong moral urge, you feel something really

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>strong in your heart. I have this strong moral urge.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the academy. I'm a professor at university. We

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>both know, we both hang out. Maybe we know each

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>other from Twitter, or maybe we know each other. We

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a life for Facebook? What have you? So we we

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>all you need a couple of other people have these

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>strong moral urges. What we do is a result of that.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Is I a could journal, and in that I call

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it the journal of you know, um some some fancy

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>academic name. I take papers into my journal that pushed

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the narrative, whatever moral narrative I want to push. Stealing

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, stealing is right. We want to build a wall.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Everybody should be polyamorous. Note it doesn't matter what it is.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Am I clear? So far? Okay? Cool? We then published

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>in this journal, my journal that I create. I we

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>take those articles and I start teaching them to my students.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So the idea, it's called ideal anders is Brett Wae

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and my friend Brett Weinstein's idea. He was the professor

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>who was hunted at Evergreen. It comes in as an

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>idea and it goes out as knowledge. So when you

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ask these people, well, how do you know that obesity

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is just a narrative? How do you know that there's

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>white fragility and then all whites are racist? How do

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that whatever insane idea they want to put forth,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you know there's no such a thing as

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>biological sex. Well, it's in this journal, but the journal

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>itself is bogus. So the whole journal is it's been fabricated.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Whole clause. You have a bunch of ideologues who get together,

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who have a moral idea, make a journal, publishing the journal,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and it comes out to the other end is knowledge,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And I imagine it's chuck full of highly questionable research,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>generally not even questionable, totally fabricated. The whole thing is fact,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole it's fabricated, whole cloth. It's no relationship to

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>reality whatsoever. That's no scientific method, there's no control groups,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no testing, there's literally nothing. So it's so it's purposeful.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Then they make this stuff up because they're so certain

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of their moral belief that they're they're willing to make

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this up so that they can teach it. Well, I'm

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>teaching straight out of this journal, right, this review journal, right,

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and but your pearents are all whack jobs like you,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's even worse listening to you guys. You're

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>just you really are such nice people, and we're talking

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about some really vile id logs here. So it's far

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>worse than that characterization. So it's not only that. So

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the way that this game works, if you get seven

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>papers in seven years, if you're on a tenor track,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you you you received tenure. When you receive tenure, that's

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a job for life. So you have now fabricated a journal.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>It's totally until the to reality. You're teaching these things

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to students' knowledge. Those students are getting out and going

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to the workplace. They're going to Google, like what they

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>did to the Google engineer James more famous from the

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>now Google memo. They're going to Twitter and the ship

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>shadow banning. They're going to YouTube and institute of trutionalizing

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>them monetization. But even within the academy itself, they institute

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms to restrict speech right biased response teams. A student

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>can anonymously be reported to over two hundred universities have

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>biased response teams, divert offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And these words don't mean what you think they mean.

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So they institutionalize these deranged ideas that they themselves have

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>manufactured in journals which are completely unscientific. These are the

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>ramblings of ideologues, and they point to all of this

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff as knowledge, and anybody who questions it is a

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>racist or a bad person, or a homophobe or bigot. Well,

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'd imagine that each iteration of it, each layer

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of or every semester it's taught, adds to the credibility, right.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things you mentioned in your article

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is building up over time, over decades or whatever, some

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of these whack job ideas. You know, you get more

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and more articles from multi generations that sign onto this

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>crap that is absolutely correct, And that's how they manufacture

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a canon of knowledge. This is a completely pretend canon

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge. Well, and and honestly, what makes it so

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible and makes me so worried about it is that

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>these ideologies, as you mentioned, are utterly repugnant. If you're

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a student of of global politics of history or whatever.

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You understand that inter ethnic, interracial, inter religious strife is

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the source of most of the horrors um, you know,

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>putting aside communism, um of of the last several centuries.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>If you can whip up people to believe that the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>other is evil, which is what these people are doing

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time, I mean, the results are truly horrific. Right,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and again you got your very nice people. It's not

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>only that they're evil. Privilege is their original sin. But

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>unlike original sin from which you can find redemption through

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the savior Jesus Christ, there is no redemption for these people.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>If you were born white and male and cists in

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>hetero I would use a word or on the air

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>beginning with f We can believe you are fucked. There's

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>no redemption. That's it. Yeah, you're you're you're irrevocably stained,

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>indelibly stained by your whiteness, your maleness, your privilege, your heterosexuality,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and your sister genderness. That doesn't sound at all Nazi.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So somebody, So somebody could start decades ago, you know,

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>some something about white privilege and and start a journal

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and by now they're they're a senior member on whatever campus,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're looked at the here's somebody for twenty five

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>years has been doing research into this completely made up.

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been made up the entire time. And they're an expert.

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>They're a quote unquote expert, and the media contact them

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and they teach students, and their students didn't go on

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>at twenty five years. They go on to leadership positions

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and they sway the academy and they they're the ones

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that you hear what they're consulted. They're consulted for jury cases.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you this is a massive problem. And and

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the question becomes for the university system is my friend

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for Oisin said, if you're if you have a dog

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and your dog has rabies, that's not your dog anymore.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>If your dog has cancer, then you get the dog treated.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Does the university system have rabies or does that have cancer? Interesting?

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it at this point, the university system

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>has rabies. It's irredeemable and nothing can be done about it.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Are we're going to get worse? Am I correct that?

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking of um the recent move in the

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>University California system that you must submit a statement of diversity,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is that what it's called to get hired. I imagine

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>hiring practices are highly tilted toward recruiting people who are

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>going to tow the party line. Well yeah, okay, so

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this isn't another conversation. But you're absolutely correct diversity, equity

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and inclusion, and we should probably spell those words out

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>at some point, but you have to hire a diversity

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>statement moreover, and I published a using the Philosopher's magazine

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about this called deluded Departments. Here's how it works. One

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the single greatest insights in all of critical thinking

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>comes from the a man by the name of Dr

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Shermer. Why does smart people believe weird things? Well,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we've answered that question. Here's the answer to it. Because

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>smart people are better at rationalizing bad ideas. In other words,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the smarter you are, the better you are at justifying

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a bad conclusion, and then you convince yourself that it's true. Okay.

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>That same mechanism operates when you have more people involved.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you have ten people involved, they're better at

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>rationalizing a bad idea. What we have now in the

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>university system is we have entire university departments that are

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>pumping out justifications complete nonsense. And those justifications are themselves

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>based upon the literature that these people have fabricated. Well,

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and if it were merely that they were claiming dinosaurs

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>were ancient giant people, I mean that would be idiotic

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and and and you know, uh, not temptable from an

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>intellectual point of view. But the fact that they're pitching

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the most horrific sort of ideologies is Yeah, you talk

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about being fucked trum. I was watching a YouTube video

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with I think you and James Lindsay, or maybe it

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>was just James talking about the whole critical race thing

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and how it's a no win situation and I worry

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about this raising I got a couple of young white boys,

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>um where either you're you're a racist or you're anti

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>racist in the in the new theory of things, either

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you're actively working either you admit your racist and you

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>actively work toward being anti racist, which is defined it's

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>undefined herble and defined by others. They will tell you

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>what it means exactly. You can't ever win and that stuff.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It makes my head want to explode, but it seems

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to actually be happening. Right. It's called a costa trap,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and that is so this is the This is the

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 1>way they view the world. We already know you're a racist,

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>so you should just admit it and work toward it.

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you say no, I'm not a racist, they

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>point to the fact that you said no, I'm not

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a racist as evidence that you're a racist. So there's

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>literally nothing that you can do if you start with

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea that someone is a racist, no matter what

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they say has taken as evidence of their racism. You know,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's no redens. Let me just let me

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just go on some My daughter was adopted from China.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We got her as a waiting child, which means she's disabled,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not using that as a weapon or touting

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that around. That's not evidence that you're not a racist.

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>If my wife were African Americans, she's not. But if

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you were, that would also not be evidence that you're not.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>There is no evidence that you can provide somebody that

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not a racist. These starting given is that you're

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a racist. How many people think like you on college

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>campuses as opposed to the whack jobs. Who's winning this

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>battle in terms of numbers? Yeah, that is a fantastic question.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The part of the problem is We don't know. So

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't know because people are afraid to voice their

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>actual opinions because if they voice their actual opinions, then

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the mob will come for them. And we have seen

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again. You know, Laura Kitness

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>writes some great stuff about how Title nine has been used.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't really know how many people hate this. I

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>mean people will come up to me and they'll whisper something,

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>or I'll get emails. Think about this, just really think

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. I'll get emails anti Trump emails on p

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>s U s UH University server. Now I should say

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a liberal and I'm an atheist and I don't

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like Trump to say the least, But that is so inappropriate.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It's beyond inappropriate to use university mechanisms to give political opinions.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's the other thing these people have managed. And I

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>know this is going to sound utterly crazy, but it's

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>true and the evidence bears this out. First, they came

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to the conservatives. There's only one person at the entire

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>unipruence a university who I know of who's a conservative.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Now there may be others, but they're probably too terrified

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to speak out. There's one moderate and they've come for him.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You should look Bruce Gilly up. He wrote the paper

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>The Case for Colonialism, and they have been greefing him.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>He this is fascinating. He wanted to have a court.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Now again, this is not a conservative, he's a centrist moderate.

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But for these people Stephen Pinker calls at the left

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>pole if you're on the left, everybody the far left,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody looks like they're on the right. So I, as

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a liberal atheist, look like I'm on the right. They

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>think I'm on the far right. So this guy, Bruce

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>gilly wanted a course in conservative political thought. The university

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>denied it because they said there wasn't enough diversity in

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the course. So so they've come for him. The course

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on irony there at Portland State right now, they're coming

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for the liberals, right, So now they're coming for people

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like me because I am a show whatever they want

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to say. But the but here's the problem with this.

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Part of the problem is they have created this insane

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem where any time you want to voice, any time

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you even ask somebody for evidence, Hey, what's your evidence

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for that, that's construed as racist. Think about that. That's

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a micro asking someone for evidence as a microaggression. This

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is the exact opposite of what we should be doing

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>in the university, because evidence and appealing to logic is

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>white paternalism based traditional right, we're screaming away from the

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment back towards somebody at the top gets to decide

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what's true and what's not exactly, and the idea is

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't disable the master's house with the master's tools. Reason, evidence,

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method. Those are all from white system, heterosexual males.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Therefore they're tainted as evil. You know, that's why Hitler

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>hated communism because Marx was a Jew. Right, this is

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the same thing that's employed, the same

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking that's in place. Wow, it's just it's

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>so true bling. I mean, the idea, the ideology itself

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly troubling. The idea that young people at their

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable, vulnerable are being indoctrinated into this is truly disgusting.

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I'm glad we have a voice

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and a and a reasonably you know, significant one. This

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly disturbing. Yeah, and I really this is the

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>message I really want to get to people, and I

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>hope that I articulate this to do you guys know

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what phrenology is? Yeah? I think so reading the lumps

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on people's heads is that what that is? Yeah? Okay,

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that these lunatics were had journals of phrenology.

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That's ideal laundering, right. They write about phrenology and they

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>know it's true. They say, how do you know it's true?

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>They point to all these articles in the Journal of Chronology,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they start, you know, not only testing people's skulls,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but they start assigning scholarships on the basis of the

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>protrubances in your head, like, oh, this guy is a

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bump at L seven or whatever, you know, put him

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in engineering. Okay. So, if the people in power who

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>are advocating phrenology are liberals, and I call out phrenology

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>as not having enough evidence, that does not make me

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a conservative. That just makes me someone who doesn't think

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there's enough evidence to institutionalize and insane idea. If the

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people in power are conservatives and I call it out,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter their political orientation. They're peddling bad ideas.

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is not a matter of right or left

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or liberal or atheist. Or believer. It's none of that.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>This stuff is pure unadulterated bullshit, and their teaching as

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to kids as knowledge, and it's got to stop. To

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what extent does this sort of thing resemble a religious

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>cult and it's norms and its enforcement mechanisms and the rest,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete religious cult in James Lindsay and Helen

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>clock Rose and I have written about that extensively. You know,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they have the same mechanisms. Blasphemy is big in the

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>religious space. They have the same mechanisms with political correctness.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This case, however, they can actually enforce those mechanisms, enforce

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>blasphemy or political correctness with the university mechanisms, and at

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>some point, let's do let's do this. Let's okay. There

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>are two things going on we haven't talked about, but

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think are very important. One is, if you just

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think about this issue as a free speech issue, you're

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>not understanding the whole thing. These people do not just

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>want to take away your freedom of speech. This is

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>an issue of cognitive liberty. They want you to think

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a very certain way, and if you don't do that,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they will punish you. And when you understand the problem

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, you understand how unbelievably serious it is and

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>why these ideologues have to be stopped. That's some damn

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff. Man. Okay, what what was the second point

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you said? He had to Well, okay, yeah, I have

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to so you know, Okay, it's very complicated. What they've

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>managed to do. Why this is so difficult is if

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I say the word to you social justice mostly of

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>course on for sociive. Who isn't for social justice. It's

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>like the word affirmative action. Of course I'm for affirmative action.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course I'm for positive action. But the words don't

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>mean what people think they mean. So when you say

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>do you want you know, the big push on universities

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>now is to have inclusion, right, And if you just

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the word inclusion, like, well, inclusion, who what

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of every same person should want inclusion? Well, yeah,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>every same person should want inclusion. If someone is a

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>minority or sexual minority or transfer, of course they should

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>be included in the conversation. Of course they should feel welcomed.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what inclusion is. Okay, So inclusion means welcoming,

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, Just the definition of what does what does

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>to include? Someone needs to make them feel welcome. But

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>if somebody says something that could make someone feel unwelcome,

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>then this space isn't inclusive anymore. So what we need

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to do is to restrict speech so that people won't

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>say anything that makes other people feel unwelcome. So when

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you hear the word inclusion, what that should translate that

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in your head is restricted speech. That's what the word

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>inclusion means. And that's another way to rob people of

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>their cognitive liberty. Wow, wow, good stuff. Um, you know,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the best thing we can do is to

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>recommend folks, uh follow you and and James and Helen

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Twitter and read the stuff. You're right, and

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll certainly bring it to people's attention as it comes out.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Keep fighting the good fighting. We'll stay in touch. I

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>love watching the videos, I love reading your stuff. You know, well,

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>thank you. We we appreciate your support. And what I

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>said the beginning of the hours true, We're just we

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. I'm trying to fight a whole university system,

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to take on a system of indoctrination.

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, most people they don't even know what

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a peer of you paper is and when I call

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>out this nonsense, they come for me. So when I

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have the support of you guys, that's a huge deal.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>That that that makes it possible for me to fight

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>keep fighting this fight. So I am incredibly grateful. We'll

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>use us like garden tools, Peter, because we we believe

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that stuff and we're with you. Well, thank you. I

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sincerely appreciate that. It's always great to talk. Thanks a

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>million extra large. When you're ready to ride Metro, we

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>want you to know we're ready for you. Here are

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>just a few of the people at Metro to tell

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you how we're doing our part to keep riders safe.

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We're cleaning like novel before, were half builded greatly. You're

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a found hair sanitizing no mask, no Metro need one.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We have a few extras at Metro. We're doing our

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>part to keep the DC area moving. Find out more

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>at wilmata dot com slash doing our part