1
00:00:01,560 --> 00:00:03,920
Speaker 1: When you're ready to ride Metro, we want you to

2
00:00:03,960 --> 00:00:06,560
Speaker 1: know we're ready for you. Here are just a few

3
00:00:06,600 --> 00:00:08,399
Speaker 1: of the people at Metro to tell you how we're

4
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:11,320
Speaker 1: doing our part to keep riders safe. We're cleaning like

5
00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:16,040
Speaker 1: nevill before half build greatly. You've found has santizing station,

6
00:00:17,760 --> 00:00:21,079
Speaker 1: no mask, no Metro need one. We have a few

7
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:23,880
Speaker 1: extras at Metro. We're doing our part to keep the

8
00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:26,720
Speaker 1: DC area moving. Find out more at well mata dot

9
00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:32,280
Speaker 1: com slash doing our part. How do terrible ideas get

10
00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:35,559
Speaker 1: taken so seriously on college campuses? So I'm Strong and

11
00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:41,240
Speaker 1: Getty extra large because four hours simply usn't enough. This

12
00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:49,600
Speaker 1: is Armstrong and Getty extra Large. So freaking interesting. We've

13
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:52,720
Speaker 1: been fans of these people ever since the grievance studies

14
00:00:52,760 --> 00:00:56,680
Speaker 1: thing hit last January. Yeah, the fake papers that they

15
00:00:56,720 --> 00:00:59,800
Speaker 1: got into various journals. Peter Bogo and James Lindsay and

16
00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:03,520
Speaker 1: how and pluck Rose. They made up just ridiculous crap.

17
00:01:03,640 --> 00:01:06,920
Speaker 1: I mean ridiculous, no, as you say, nobody but an

18
00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:10,880
Speaker 1: academic could believe it, but fall down funny crap and

19
00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:15,480
Speaker 1: actually got them accepted into various peer review reviewed journals.

20
00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:19,560
Speaker 1: And the fancy universities across the country. Peter Bogan wrote

21
00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:22,240
Speaker 1: a piece for The Wall Street Journal recently, idea laundering

22
00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:25,920
Speaker 1: an academia. Peter as an assistant professor of philosophy right

23
00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:28,920
Speaker 1: in the belly of the Beast Portland State University. He's

24
00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,200
Speaker 1: also the co author of a book, How to Have

25
00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:34,160
Speaker 1: Impossible Conversations that we need to talk about at some

26
00:01:34,200 --> 00:01:37,600
Speaker 1: point down the road, but probably not today. Peter Bagoan

27
00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:40,280
Speaker 1: joins us, Peter, this is a real pleasure. We've been

28
00:01:40,280 --> 00:01:43,039
Speaker 1: looking forward to talking to you for some time. I

29
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:45,480
Speaker 1: love talking to you, guys, I really do, and I

30
00:01:45,560 --> 00:01:49,520
Speaker 1: sincerely appreciate your support because I can't do what what

31
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:52,160
Speaker 1: I do without without you. So thanks. Yeah, when the

32
00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:55,400
Speaker 1: whole grievance studies story hit and we were just so

33
00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:58,480
Speaker 1: taken with it and it's so exciting for everyone. And

34
00:01:58,480 --> 00:02:00,560
Speaker 1: I've watched a ton of YouTube is with you and

35
00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:02,880
Speaker 1: James Lindsay and that over the last year. So, but

36
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:07,240
Speaker 1: has any progress been made our universities better off than

37
00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:11,320
Speaker 1: they were before you did this or that's a good question. No, no,

38
00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:14,560
Speaker 1: no progress has been made. In fact, um, they've they've

39
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:17,399
Speaker 1: doubled down on their nonsense and there you go take

40
00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:22,680
Speaker 1: scholarship and attempts to successful attempts to self credential. So

41
00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:25,080
Speaker 1: the situation as I see it, has actually gotten worse

42
00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,639
Speaker 1: inside the academy, But outside the academy with the Dave

43
00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:32,840
Speaker 1: Chappelle comedy show or Bill Burr or certain cultural now

44
00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:36,360
Speaker 1: they want to know a gender Santa claus Um. I

45
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,640
Speaker 1: think outside the academy you're seeing pushback, but withinside the

46
00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:44,399
Speaker 1: academy that absolutely it's absolutely gotten worse. Well, and I'm

47
00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:47,600
Speaker 1: sorry to hear that given the number of dollars American

48
00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:50,239
Speaker 1: families are throwing it educating their young ones. Are you

49
00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:52,440
Speaker 1: surprised to hear that? I'm not surprised at least. I mean,

50
00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:54,640
Speaker 1: this is the same dynamic of power you seeing government

51
00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:56,760
Speaker 1: and anywhere else where power and money are at stakes.

52
00:02:56,760 --> 00:03:00,000
Speaker 1: Self policing rarely works. But I do love the idea,

53
00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:04,200
Speaker 1: idea that more and more people are feeling um. I

54
00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:06,400
Speaker 1: hate to use the term empowered because it's trade out

55
00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:09,720
Speaker 1: of grieving studies, but they're they're they're feeling more empowered

56
00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:12,560
Speaker 1: to call bullshit on this stuff and they realize, wait

57
00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:14,760
Speaker 1: a minute, I'm not a bad person because I think

58
00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:18,360
Speaker 1: this is goofy um this is goofy right. And not

59
00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:20,679
Speaker 1: only that you're not a bad person because you're a male,

60
00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:23,240
Speaker 1: you're also not a rapist because you're a male. You're

61
00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:27,880
Speaker 1: not a bad person because you're white. You your your

62
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:31,840
Speaker 1: ancestral line has absolutely nothing to do with your decency

63
00:03:31,880 --> 00:03:34,280
Speaker 1: and dignity as a person. So I think it was

64
00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:36,800
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal that ran your piece about idea

65
00:03:36,880 --> 00:03:38,800
Speaker 1: laundering where we explained that whole thing, And that's why

66
00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:40,440
Speaker 1: we wanted to have you on today because I found

67
00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:44,080
Speaker 1: it's fascinating because I've wondered all along, where do the

68
00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:46,640
Speaker 1: stuff comes from? How did this stuff catch on? Can

69
00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:50,480
Speaker 1: you explain idea laundering to us? Yeah, So think about

70
00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:53,440
Speaker 1: it this way. This is how they get away with it.

71
00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:56,480
Speaker 1: This is how they do it, and here's how they

72
00:03:56,520 --> 00:03:59,360
Speaker 1: do it. To an example, let's say that you let's

73
00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:03,200
Speaker 1: say the three of us have some kind of moral idea, like,

74
00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:07,440
Speaker 1: let's just give me a moral idea like you know, um,

75
00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:12,320
Speaker 1: I don't know, like yeah, it's wrong to steal or

76
00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:17,040
Speaker 1: I was thinking like something contemporary political issues like you know, uh,

77
00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:20,680
Speaker 1: you know, impeach Trump for moral senses. Okay, so we

78
00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:23,080
Speaker 1: have an idea, you know, build a wall. Let's just

79
00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:25,680
Speaker 1: use that one. We need to build a wall, or

80
00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:28,760
Speaker 1: we build a wall, doesn't matter what it is. Okay,

81
00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:34,720
Speaker 1: you have this strong moral urge, you feel something really

82
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:39,880
Speaker 1: strong in your heart. I have this strong moral urge.

83
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:44,520
Speaker 1: I'm in the academy. I'm a professor at university. We

84
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:46,840
Speaker 1: both know, we both hang out. Maybe we know each

85
00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:48,720
Speaker 1: other from Twitter, or maybe we know each other. We

86
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:51,359
Speaker 1: a life for Facebook? What have you? So we we

87
00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:54,599
Speaker 1: all you need a couple of other people have these

88
00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:58,520
Speaker 1: strong moral urges. What we do is a result of that.

89
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:02,320
Speaker 1: Is I a could journal, and in that I call

90
00:05:02,400 --> 00:05:06,440
Speaker 1: it the journal of you know, um some some fancy

91
00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:12,599
Speaker 1: academic name. I take papers into my journal that pushed

92
00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:16,200
Speaker 1: the narrative, whatever moral narrative I want to push. Stealing

93
00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:18,400
Speaker 1: is wrong, stealing is right. We want to build a wall.

94
00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,120
Speaker 1: Everybody should be polyamorous. Note it doesn't matter what it is.

95
00:05:21,839 --> 00:05:27,320
Speaker 1: Am I clear? So far? Okay? Cool? We then published

96
00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:34,039
Speaker 1: in this journal, my journal that I create. I we

97
00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:38,640
Speaker 1: take those articles and I start teaching them to my students.

98
00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:41,800
Speaker 1: So the idea, it's called ideal anders is Brett Wae

99
00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:43,960
Speaker 1: and my friend Brett Weinstein's idea. He was the professor

100
00:05:43,960 --> 00:05:49,200
Speaker 1: who was hunted at Evergreen. It comes in as an

101
00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:52,279
Speaker 1: idea and it goes out as knowledge. So when you

102
00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:55,000
Speaker 1: ask these people, well, how do you know that obesity

103
00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:57,560
Speaker 1: is just a narrative? How do you know that there's

104
00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,560
Speaker 1: white fragility and then all whites are racist? How do

105
00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:04,560
Speaker 1: you know that whatever insane idea they want to put forth,

106
00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:06,000
Speaker 1: how do you know there's no such a thing as

107
00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:09,920
Speaker 1: biological sex. Well, it's in this journal, but the journal

108
00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:14,840
Speaker 1: itself is bogus. So the whole journal is it's been fabricated.

109
00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:18,560
Speaker 1: Whole clause. You have a bunch of ideologues who get together,

110
00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:24,400
Speaker 1: who have a moral idea, make a journal, publishing the journal,

111
00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:26,919
Speaker 1: and it comes out to the other end is knowledge,

112
00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:29,800
Speaker 1: And I imagine it's chuck full of highly questionable research,

113
00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:34,360
Speaker 1: generally not even questionable, totally fabricated. The whole thing is fact,

114
00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:38,120
Speaker 1: the whole it's fabricated, whole cloth. It's no relationship to

115
00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:43,320
Speaker 1: reality whatsoever. That's no scientific method, there's no control groups,

116
00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:47,719
Speaker 1: there's no testing, there's literally nothing. So it's so it's purposeful.

117
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:51,680
Speaker 1: Then they make this stuff up because they're so certain

118
00:06:52,160 --> 00:06:55,720
Speaker 1: of their moral belief that they're they're willing to make

119
00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:57,560
Speaker 1: this up so that they can teach it. Well, I'm

120
00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:02,080
Speaker 1: teaching straight out of this journal, right, this review journal, right,

121
00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:04,160
Speaker 1: and but your pearents are all whack jobs like you,

122
00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:08,880
Speaker 1: And it's it's even worse listening to you guys. You're

123
00:07:08,960 --> 00:07:12,480
Speaker 1: just you really are such nice people, and we're talking

124
00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:15,000
Speaker 1: about some really vile id logs here. So it's far

125
00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:18,840
Speaker 1: worse than that characterization. So it's not only that. So

126
00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:21,520
Speaker 1: the way that this game works, if you get seven

127
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:23,960
Speaker 1: papers in seven years, if you're on a tenor track,

128
00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:27,640
Speaker 1: you you you received tenure. When you receive tenure, that's

129
00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:32,480
Speaker 1: a job for life. So you have now fabricated a journal.

130
00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:36,440
Speaker 1: It's totally until the to reality. You're teaching these things

131
00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:40,560
Speaker 1: to students' knowledge. Those students are getting out and going

132
00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:42,480
Speaker 1: to the workplace. They're going to Google, like what they

133
00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:45,320
Speaker 1: did to the Google engineer James more famous from the

134
00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,000
Speaker 1: now Google memo. They're going to Twitter and the ship

135
00:07:48,160 --> 00:07:51,160
Speaker 1: shadow banning. They're going to YouTube and institute of trutionalizing

136
00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:56,240
Speaker 1: them monetization. But even within the academy itself, they institute

137
00:07:56,320 --> 00:08:01,360
Speaker 1: mechanisms to restrict speech right biased response teams. A student

138
00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:05,440
Speaker 1: can anonymously be reported to over two hundred universities have

139
00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:09,960
Speaker 1: biased response teams, divert offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

140
00:08:10,200 --> 00:08:12,160
Speaker 1: And these words don't mean what you think they mean.

141
00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:16,440
Speaker 1: So they institutionalize these deranged ideas that they themselves have

142
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:21,000
Speaker 1: manufactured in journals which are completely unscientific. These are the

143
00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:25,080
Speaker 1: ramblings of ideologues, and they point to all of this

144
00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:28,280
Speaker 1: stuff as knowledge, and anybody who questions it is a

145
00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:32,560
Speaker 1: racist or a bad person, or a homophobe or bigot. Well,

146
00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:35,840
Speaker 1: and I'd imagine that each iteration of it, each layer

147
00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:40,400
Speaker 1: of or every semester it's taught, adds to the credibility, right.

148
00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:42,040
Speaker 1: And one of the things you mentioned in your article

149
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:44,400
Speaker 1: is building up over time, over decades or whatever, some

150
00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:47,040
Speaker 1: of these whack job ideas. You know, you get more

151
00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:50,040
Speaker 1: and more articles from multi generations that sign onto this

152
00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:54,120
Speaker 1: crap that is absolutely correct, And that's how they manufacture

153
00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:58,800
Speaker 1: a canon of knowledge. This is a completely pretend canon

154
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:02,400
Speaker 1: of knowledge. Well, and and honestly, what makes it so

155
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:05,040
Speaker 1: terrible and makes me so worried about it is that

156
00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:08,839
Speaker 1: these ideologies, as you mentioned, are utterly repugnant. If you're

157
00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:12,960
Speaker 1: a student of of global politics of history or whatever.

158
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:18,840
Speaker 1: You understand that inter ethnic, interracial, inter religious strife is

159
00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:22,760
Speaker 1: the source of most of the horrors um, you know,

160
00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:27,400
Speaker 1: putting aside communism, um of of the last several centuries.

161
00:09:27,640 --> 00:09:30,160
Speaker 1: If you can whip up people to believe that the

162
00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,839
Speaker 1: other is evil, which is what these people are doing

163
00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:36,800
Speaker 1: all the time, I mean, the results are truly horrific. Right,

164
00:09:36,840 --> 00:09:40,760
Speaker 1: and again you got your very nice people. It's not

165
00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:44,960
Speaker 1: only that they're evil. Privilege is their original sin. But

166
00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:48,560
Speaker 1: unlike original sin from which you can find redemption through

167
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:51,840
Speaker 1: the savior Jesus Christ, there is no redemption for these people.

168
00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:54,640
Speaker 1: If you were born white and male and cists in

169
00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:58,079
Speaker 1: hetero I would use a word or on the air

170
00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:03,160
Speaker 1: beginning with f We can believe you are fucked. There's

171
00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:07,760
Speaker 1: no redemption. That's it. Yeah, you're you're you're irrevocably stained,

172
00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:12,880
Speaker 1: indelibly stained by your whiteness, your maleness, your privilege, your heterosexuality,

173
00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:16,160
Speaker 1: and your sister genderness. That doesn't sound at all Nazi.

174
00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:19,560
Speaker 1: So somebody, So somebody could start decades ago, you know,

175
00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:24,040
Speaker 1: some something about white privilege and and start a journal

176
00:10:24,559 --> 00:10:29,000
Speaker 1: and by now they're they're a senior member on whatever campus,

177
00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:31,120
Speaker 1: and they're looked at the here's somebody for twenty five

178
00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:34,360
Speaker 1: years has been doing research into this completely made up.

179
00:10:34,400 --> 00:10:37,720
Speaker 1: It's been made up the entire time. And they're an expert.

180
00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:40,439
Speaker 1: They're a quote unquote expert, and the media contact them

181
00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:42,640
Speaker 1: and they teach students, and their students didn't go on

182
00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:46,280
Speaker 1: at twenty five years. They go on to leadership positions

183
00:10:46,360 --> 00:10:49,400
Speaker 1: and they sway the academy and they they're the ones

184
00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:52,640
Speaker 1: that you hear what they're consulted. They're consulted for jury cases.

185
00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:57,400
Speaker 1: I'm telling you this is a massive problem. And and

186
00:10:57,520 --> 00:11:00,440
Speaker 1: the question becomes for the university system is my friend

187
00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:04,080
Speaker 1: for Oisin said, if you're if you have a dog

188
00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:07,720
Speaker 1: and your dog has rabies, that's not your dog anymore.

189
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:11,560
Speaker 1: If your dog has cancer, then you get the dog treated.

190
00:11:12,320 --> 00:11:17,880
Speaker 1: Does the university system have rabies or does that have cancer? Interesting?

191
00:11:17,960 --> 00:11:20,840
Speaker 1: And I think it at this point, the university system

192
00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:23,880
Speaker 1: has rabies. It's irredeemable and nothing can be done about it.

193
00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:27,680
Speaker 1: Are we're going to get worse? Am I correct that?

194
00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:32,360
Speaker 1: And I'm thinking of um the recent move in the

195
00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:37,439
Speaker 1: University California system that you must submit a statement of diversity,

196
00:11:37,559 --> 00:11:40,640
Speaker 1: is that what it's called to get hired. I imagine

197
00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:45,079
Speaker 1: hiring practices are highly tilted toward recruiting people who are

198
00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:48,360
Speaker 1: going to tow the party line. Well yeah, okay, so

199
00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:52,800
Speaker 1: this isn't another conversation. But you're absolutely correct diversity, equity

200
00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:55,079
Speaker 1: and inclusion, and we should probably spell those words out

201
00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:57,520
Speaker 1: at some point, but you have to hire a diversity

202
00:11:57,559 --> 00:12:01,560
Speaker 1: statement moreover, and I published a using the Philosopher's magazine

203
00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:05,920
Speaker 1: about this called deluded Departments. Here's how it works. One

204
00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:08,640
Speaker 1: of the single greatest insights in all of critical thinking

205
00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:11,240
Speaker 1: comes from the a man by the name of Dr

206
00:12:11,280 --> 00:12:16,240
Speaker 1: Michael Shermer. Why does smart people believe weird things? Well,

207
00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:19,360
Speaker 1: we've answered that question. Here's the answer to it. Because

208
00:12:19,400 --> 00:12:24,160
Speaker 1: smart people are better at rationalizing bad ideas. In other words,

209
00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:27,040
Speaker 1: the smarter you are, the better you are at justifying

210
00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:30,959
Speaker 1: a bad conclusion, and then you convince yourself that it's true. Okay.

211
00:12:31,559 --> 00:12:35,880
Speaker 1: That same mechanism operates when you have more people involved.

212
00:12:36,280 --> 00:12:39,440
Speaker 1: So if you have ten people involved, they're better at

213
00:12:39,559 --> 00:12:42,760
Speaker 1: rationalizing a bad idea. What we have now in the

214
00:12:42,840 --> 00:12:47,560
Speaker 1: university system is we have entire university departments that are

215
00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:54,240
Speaker 1: pumping out justifications complete nonsense. And those justifications are themselves

216
00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:59,160
Speaker 1: based upon the literature that these people have fabricated. Well,

217
00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:03,120
Speaker 1: and if it were merely that they were claiming dinosaurs

218
00:13:03,160 --> 00:13:06,719
Speaker 1: were ancient giant people, I mean that would be idiotic

219
00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:10,240
Speaker 1: and and and you know, uh, not temptable from an

220
00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:13,360
Speaker 1: intellectual point of view. But the fact that they're pitching

221
00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:16,640
Speaker 1: the most horrific sort of ideologies is Yeah, you talk

222
00:13:16,679 --> 00:13:20,000
Speaker 1: about being fucked trum. I was watching a YouTube video

223
00:13:20,040 --> 00:13:22,040
Speaker 1: with I think you and James Lindsay, or maybe it

224
00:13:22,080 --> 00:13:24,040
Speaker 1: was just James talking about the whole critical race thing

225
00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:26,400
Speaker 1: and how it's a no win situation and I worry

226
00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:29,120
Speaker 1: about this raising I got a couple of young white boys,

227
00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:33,360
Speaker 1: um where either you're you're a racist or you're anti

228
00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:35,720
Speaker 1: racist in the in the new theory of things, either

229
00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:38,840
Speaker 1: you're actively working either you admit your racist and you

230
00:13:38,920 --> 00:13:42,200
Speaker 1: actively work toward being anti racist, which is defined it's

231
00:13:42,280 --> 00:13:45,240
Speaker 1: undefined herble and defined by others. They will tell you

232
00:13:45,280 --> 00:13:49,199
Speaker 1: what it means exactly. You can't ever win and that stuff.

233
00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:52,080
Speaker 1: It makes my head want to explode, but it seems

234
00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:55,760
Speaker 1: to actually be happening. Right. It's called a costa trap,

235
00:13:56,240 --> 00:13:58,760
Speaker 1: and that is so this is the This is the

236
00:13:58,760 --> 00:14:01,319
Speaker 1: way they view the world. We already know you're a racist,

237
00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:03,679
Speaker 1: so you should just admit it and work toward it.

238
00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:05,760
Speaker 1: And if you say no, I'm not a racist, they

239
00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:07,400
Speaker 1: point to the fact that you said no, I'm not

240
00:14:07,520 --> 00:14:10,600
Speaker 1: a racist as evidence that you're a racist. So there's

241
00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:13,240
Speaker 1: literally nothing that you can do if you start with

242
00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:15,480
Speaker 1: the idea that someone is a racist, no matter what

243
00:14:15,520 --> 00:14:20,280
Speaker 1: they say has taken as evidence of their racism. You know,

244
00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:22,520
Speaker 1: there's there's there's no redens. Let me just let me

245
00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:25,520
Speaker 1: just go on some My daughter was adopted from China.

246
00:14:25,560 --> 00:14:27,800
Speaker 1: We got her as a waiting child, which means she's disabled,

247
00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:30,400
Speaker 1: and I'm not using that as a weapon or touting

248
00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:34,600
Speaker 1: that around. That's not evidence that you're not a racist.

249
00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:38,560
Speaker 1: If my wife were African Americans, she's not. But if

250
00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:41,200
Speaker 1: you were, that would also not be evidence that you're not.

251
00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:44,600
Speaker 1: There is no evidence that you can provide somebody that

252
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:47,600
Speaker 1: you're not a racist. These starting given is that you're

253
00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:52,200
Speaker 1: a racist. How many people think like you on college

254
00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:55,560
Speaker 1: campuses as opposed to the whack jobs. Who's winning this

255
00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:59,280
Speaker 1: battle in terms of numbers? Yeah, that is a fantastic question.

256
00:15:00,120 --> 00:15:03,000
Speaker 1: The part of the problem is We don't know. So

257
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:06,120
Speaker 1: we don't know because people are afraid to voice their

258
00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:09,360
Speaker 1: actual opinions because if they voice their actual opinions, then

259
00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:11,280
Speaker 1: the mob will come for them. And we have seen

260
00:15:11,360 --> 00:15:14,240
Speaker 1: over and over and over again. You know, Laura Kitness

261
00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:17,400
Speaker 1: writes some great stuff about how Title nine has been used.

262
00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:21,080
Speaker 1: We don't really know how many people hate this. I

263
00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:23,320
Speaker 1: mean people will come up to me and they'll whisper something,

264
00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:26,120
Speaker 1: or I'll get emails. Think about this, just really think

265
00:15:26,160 --> 00:15:30,400
Speaker 1: about this. I'll get emails anti Trump emails on p

266
00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:34,120
Speaker 1: s U s UH University server. Now I should say

267
00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:36,560
Speaker 1: I'm a liberal and I'm an atheist and I don't

268
00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:40,040
Speaker 1: like Trump to say the least, But that is so inappropriate.

269
00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:45,400
Speaker 1: It's beyond inappropriate to use university mechanisms to give political opinions.

270
00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:50,440
Speaker 1: Here's the other thing these people have managed. And I

271
00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:53,600
Speaker 1: know this is going to sound utterly crazy, but it's

272
00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:57,440
Speaker 1: true and the evidence bears this out. First, they came

273
00:15:57,440 --> 00:16:00,960
Speaker 1: to the conservatives. There's only one person at the entire

274
00:16:01,040 --> 00:16:03,840
Speaker 1: unipruence a university who I know of who's a conservative.

275
00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:06,000
Speaker 1: Now there may be others, but they're probably too terrified

276
00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:10,760
Speaker 1: to speak out. There's one moderate and they've come for him.

277
00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:13,200
Speaker 1: You should look Bruce Gilly up. He wrote the paper

278
00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:15,880
Speaker 1: The Case for Colonialism, and they have been greefing him.

279
00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:18,760
Speaker 1: He this is fascinating. He wanted to have a court.

280
00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:22,560
Speaker 1: Now again, this is not a conservative, he's a centrist moderate.

281
00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:25,440
Speaker 1: But for these people Stephen Pinker calls at the left

282
00:16:25,480 --> 00:16:28,880
Speaker 1: pole if you're on the left, everybody the far left,

283
00:16:28,920 --> 00:16:31,440
Speaker 1: everybody looks like they're on the right. So I, as

284
00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:33,400
Speaker 1: a liberal atheist, look like I'm on the right. They

285
00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:36,160
Speaker 1: think I'm on the far right. So this guy, Bruce

286
00:16:36,160 --> 00:16:40,200
Speaker 1: gilly wanted a course in conservative political thought. The university

287
00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:43,560
Speaker 1: denied it because they said there wasn't enough diversity in

288
00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:48,320
Speaker 1: the course. So so they've come for him. The course

289
00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:52,360
Speaker 1: on irony there at Portland State right now, they're coming

290
00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:54,800
Speaker 1: for the liberals, right, So now they're coming for people

291
00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:58,720
Speaker 1: like me because I am a show whatever they want

292
00:16:58,760 --> 00:17:01,320
Speaker 1: to say. But the but here's the problem with this.

293
00:17:01,960 --> 00:17:05,280
Speaker 1: Part of the problem is they have created this insane

294
00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:09,440
Speaker 1: ecosystem where any time you want to voice, any time

295
00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:12,360
Speaker 1: you even ask somebody for evidence, Hey, what's your evidence

296
00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:16,040
Speaker 1: for that, that's construed as racist. Think about that. That's

297
00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:19,600
Speaker 1: a micro asking someone for evidence as a microaggression. This

298
00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:22,040
Speaker 1: is the exact opposite of what we should be doing

299
00:17:22,040 --> 00:17:26,119
Speaker 1: in the university, because evidence and appealing to logic is

300
00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:31,080
Speaker 1: white paternalism based traditional right, we're screaming away from the

301
00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:34,359
Speaker 1: Enlightenment back towards somebody at the top gets to decide

302
00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:37,760
Speaker 1: what's true and what's not exactly, and the idea is

303
00:17:37,800 --> 00:17:42,600
Speaker 1: you can't disable the master's house with the master's tools. Reason, evidence,

304
00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:47,000
Speaker 1: the scientific method. Those are all from white system, heterosexual males.

305
00:17:47,160 --> 00:17:49,760
Speaker 1: Therefore they're tainted as evil. You know, that's why Hitler

306
00:17:49,800 --> 00:17:53,080
Speaker 1: hated communism because Marx was a Jew. Right, this is

307
00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:55,040
Speaker 1: the kind of the same thing that's employed, the same

308
00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:58,920
Speaker 1: way of thinking that's in place. Wow, it's just it's

309
00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:03,359
Speaker 1: so true bling. I mean, the idea, the ideology itself

310
00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:06,040
Speaker 1: is incredibly troubling. The idea that young people at their

311
00:18:06,040 --> 00:18:11,679
Speaker 1: most vulnerable, vulnerable are being indoctrinated into this is truly disgusting.

312
00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:15,439
Speaker 1: I don't you know, I'm glad we have a voice

313
00:18:15,480 --> 00:18:18,679
Speaker 1: and a and a reasonably you know, significant one. This

314
00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:22,280
Speaker 1: is incredibly disturbing. Yeah, and I really this is the

315
00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:24,399
Speaker 1: message I really want to get to people, and I

316
00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:27,359
Speaker 1: hope that I articulate this to do you guys know

317
00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:31,000
Speaker 1: what phrenology is? Yeah? I think so reading the lumps

318
00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:33,520
Speaker 1: on people's heads is that what that is? Yeah? Okay,

319
00:18:33,680 --> 00:18:38,080
Speaker 1: So let's say that these lunatics were had journals of phrenology.

320
00:18:38,359 --> 00:18:40,760
Speaker 1: That's ideal laundering, right. They write about phrenology and they

321
00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:42,840
Speaker 1: know it's true. They say, how do you know it's true?

322
00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,120
Speaker 1: They point to all these articles in the Journal of Chronology,

323
00:18:46,359 --> 00:18:50,800
Speaker 1: and then they start, you know, not only testing people's skulls,

324
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:54,040
Speaker 1: but they start assigning scholarships on the basis of the

325
00:18:54,040 --> 00:18:56,280
Speaker 1: protrubances in your head, like, oh, this guy is a

326
00:18:56,320 --> 00:18:58,480
Speaker 1: bump at L seven or whatever, you know, put him

327
00:18:58,480 --> 00:19:03,600
Speaker 1: in engineering. Okay. So, if the people in power who

328
00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:09,480
Speaker 1: are advocating phrenology are liberals, and I call out phrenology

329
00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:12,359
Speaker 1: as not having enough evidence, that does not make me

330
00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:15,720
Speaker 1: a conservative. That just makes me someone who doesn't think

331
00:19:15,760 --> 00:19:20,240
Speaker 1: there's enough evidence to institutionalize and insane idea. If the

332
00:19:20,320 --> 00:19:24,560
Speaker 1: people in power are conservatives and I call it out,

333
00:19:24,560 --> 00:19:28,760
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter their political orientation. They're peddling bad ideas.

334
00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:32,359
Speaker 1: And this is not a matter of right or left

335
00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:35,120
Speaker 1: or liberal or atheist. Or believer. It's none of that.

336
00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:40,320
Speaker 1: This stuff is pure unadulterated bullshit, and their teaching as

337
00:19:40,359 --> 00:19:44,520
Speaker 1: to kids as knowledge, and it's got to stop. To

338
00:19:44,600 --> 00:19:49,280
Speaker 1: what extent does this sort of thing resemble a religious

339
00:19:49,359 --> 00:19:53,320
Speaker 1: cult and it's norms and its enforcement mechanisms and the rest,

340
00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:57,520
Speaker 1: it's a complete religious cult in James Lindsay and Helen

341
00:19:57,560 --> 00:20:00,359
Speaker 1: clock Rose and I have written about that extensively. You know,

342
00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:03,760
Speaker 1: they have the same mechanisms. Blasphemy is big in the

343
00:20:03,800 --> 00:20:07,680
Speaker 1: religious space. They have the same mechanisms with political correctness.

344
00:20:08,440 --> 00:20:12,600
Speaker 1: This case, however, they can actually enforce those mechanisms, enforce

345
00:20:12,960 --> 00:20:16,880
Speaker 1: blasphemy or political correctness with the university mechanisms, and at

346
00:20:16,920 --> 00:20:20,440
Speaker 1: some point, let's do let's do this. Let's okay. There

347
00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:22,639
Speaker 1: are two things going on we haven't talked about, but

348
00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:26,400
Speaker 1: I think are very important. One is, if you just

349
00:20:26,520 --> 00:20:30,120
Speaker 1: think about this issue as a free speech issue, you're

350
00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:33,800
Speaker 1: not understanding the whole thing. These people do not just

351
00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:36,600
Speaker 1: want to take away your freedom of speech. This is

352
00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:40,120
Speaker 1: an issue of cognitive liberty. They want you to think

353
00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:42,480
Speaker 1: a very certain way, and if you don't do that,

354
00:20:42,680 --> 00:20:46,040
Speaker 1: they will punish you. And when you understand the problem

355
00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:50,520
Speaker 1: like that, you understand how unbelievably serious it is and

356
00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:56,280
Speaker 1: why these ideologues have to be stopped. That's some damn

357
00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,200
Speaker 1: interesting stuff. Man. Okay, what what was the second point

358
00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:02,359
Speaker 1: you said? He had to Well, okay, yeah, I have

359
00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:07,240
Speaker 1: to so you know, Okay, it's very complicated. What they've

360
00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:11,120
Speaker 1: managed to do. Why this is so difficult is if

361
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:16,600
Speaker 1: I say the word to you social justice mostly of

362
00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:20,000
Speaker 1: course on for sociive. Who isn't for social justice. It's

363
00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:24,359
Speaker 1: like the word affirmative action. Of course I'm for affirmative action.

364
00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:28,280
Speaker 1: Of course I'm for positive action. But the words don't

365
00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:31,960
Speaker 1: mean what people think they mean. So when you say

366
00:21:32,119 --> 00:21:34,720
Speaker 1: do you want you know, the big push on universities

367
00:21:34,760 --> 00:21:37,679
Speaker 1: now is to have inclusion, right, And if you just

368
00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:40,800
Speaker 1: look at the word inclusion, like, well, inclusion, who what

369
00:21:40,920 --> 00:21:43,720
Speaker 1: kind of every same person should want inclusion? Well, yeah,

370
00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:46,280
Speaker 1: every same person should want inclusion. If someone is a

371
00:21:46,280 --> 00:21:49,320
Speaker 1: minority or sexual minority or transfer, of course they should

372
00:21:49,359 --> 00:21:52,360
Speaker 1: be included in the conversation. Of course they should feel welcomed.

373
00:21:52,640 --> 00:21:58,040
Speaker 1: But that's not what inclusion is. Okay, So inclusion means welcoming,

374
00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:00,600
Speaker 1: all right, Just the definition of what does what does

375
00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:03,199
Speaker 1: to include? Someone needs to make them feel welcome. But

376
00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:08,119
Speaker 1: if somebody says something that could make someone feel unwelcome,

377
00:22:08,359 --> 00:22:12,120
Speaker 1: then this space isn't inclusive anymore. So what we need

378
00:22:12,160 --> 00:22:15,040
Speaker 1: to do is to restrict speech so that people won't

379
00:22:15,080 --> 00:22:18,520
Speaker 1: say anything that makes other people feel unwelcome. So when

380
00:22:18,520 --> 00:22:22,439
Speaker 1: you hear the word inclusion, what that should translate that

381
00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:26,480
Speaker 1: in your head is restricted speech. That's what the word

382
00:22:26,560 --> 00:22:30,520
Speaker 1: inclusion means. And that's another way to rob people of

383
00:22:30,560 --> 00:22:36,520
Speaker 1: their cognitive liberty. Wow, wow, good stuff. Um, you know,

384
00:22:36,560 --> 00:22:38,600
Speaker 1: I think the best thing we can do is to

385
00:22:38,840 --> 00:22:43,240
Speaker 1: recommend folks, uh follow you and and James and Helen

386
00:22:43,640 --> 00:22:45,560
Speaker 1: on the Twitter and read the stuff. You're right, and

387
00:22:45,600 --> 00:22:48,280
Speaker 1: we'll certainly bring it to people's attention as it comes out.

388
00:22:48,560 --> 00:22:50,239
Speaker 1: Keep fighting the good fighting. We'll stay in touch. I

389
00:22:50,240 --> 00:22:53,240
Speaker 1: love watching the videos, I love reading your stuff. You know, well,

390
00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:55,119
Speaker 1: thank you. We we appreciate your support. And what I

391
00:22:55,119 --> 00:22:57,600
Speaker 1: said the beginning of the hours true, We're just we

392
00:22:57,800 --> 00:23:00,800
Speaker 1: can't do that. I'm trying to fight a whole university system,

393
00:23:00,840 --> 00:23:03,800
Speaker 1: and I'm trying to take on a system of indoctrination.

394
00:23:04,240 --> 00:23:05,840
Speaker 1: And you know, most people they don't even know what

395
00:23:05,880 --> 00:23:08,920
Speaker 1: a peer of you paper is and when I call

396
00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:12,159
Speaker 1: out this nonsense, they come for me. So when I

397
00:23:12,240 --> 00:23:14,800
Speaker 1: have the support of you guys, that's a huge deal.

398
00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:18,200
Speaker 1: That that that makes it possible for me to fight

399
00:23:18,280 --> 00:23:21,040
Speaker 1: keep fighting this fight. So I am incredibly grateful. We'll

400
00:23:21,200 --> 00:23:24,560
Speaker 1: use us like garden tools, Peter, because we we believe

401
00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:27,600
Speaker 1: that stuff and we're with you. Well, thank you. I

402
00:23:27,640 --> 00:23:30,520
Speaker 1: sincerely appreciate that. It's always great to talk. Thanks a

403
00:23:30,560 --> 00:23:37,800
Speaker 1: million extra large. When you're ready to ride Metro, we

404
00:23:37,840 --> 00:23:40,280
Speaker 1: want you to know we're ready for you. Here are

405
00:23:40,359 --> 00:23:42,240
Speaker 1: just a few of the people at Metro to tell

406
00:23:42,280 --> 00:23:44,639
Speaker 1: you how we're doing our part to keep riders safe.

407
00:23:44,880 --> 00:23:48,760
Speaker 1: We're cleaning like novel before, were half builded greatly. You're

408
00:23:48,760 --> 00:23:54,680
Speaker 1: a found hair sanitizing no mask, no Metro need one.

409
00:23:54,840 --> 00:23:57,600
Speaker 1: We have a few extras at Metro. We're doing our

410
00:23:57,640 --> 00:24:00,280
Speaker 1: part to keep the DC area moving. Find out more

411
00:24:00,280 --> 00:24:02,560
Speaker 1: at wilmata dot com slash doing our part