WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2024 Week 12 NFL MegaPod Betting Preview

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Betting on sports can be hard, but hiring Morgan and

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Morgan is easy. Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>law firm. They have over one hundred offices nationwide and

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>more than one thousand lawyers. Their fee is free unless

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>they win. For more information, go to four the people

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash best Bets, or dial pound law pound

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>five to two nine from your cell phone. That's f

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>o R thepeople dot com slash best Bets. This is

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a paid advertisement.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Check it out Man.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Thursday Morning, November twenty first, twenty twenty four, and is

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>the Beating the Book podcast Megapod Megapod for week twelve

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>in the National What All League, It's Gill Alexander.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening. I am now back to being

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>only a half game behind Todd. The inevitable is about

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to We all know it, we all feel it. Todd

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>chief among those people feel Todd Wishnev from his mom's

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>cork attic at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, joined us as always, how

0:00:58.880 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you doing, Totty.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't feel it.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>At t wish Nev on Twitter, He's busy. Let me

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>just say this, let me just point this out. Todd

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>is mainly concerned with betting in game college basketball. Right now,

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll try to see if we can get some of

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>his attentions. He is the star of a Showtimes docuseries

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Action one of the stars looking for another documentary to

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be it.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that's what he's acting.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And then Will Hill at not the Will Hill, by

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, Todd is at tea wish New I say

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that Will Hill at not V. Will Hill the host

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Should Have bet More podcasts three times a week,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>available where all your podcasts are distributed. Will also part

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Filica's Bare Best podcast at Fox Sports. You

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>don't Willie, What's going on?

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're we're trying not to get too much out

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 5>of Todd with this podcast because he's been cooking pretty

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 5>much in college basket. It's almost like you guys ever

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 5>watched Breaking Bad when they're trying to get Walter White

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 5>to cook. We just need to like get him in

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 5>his environment, let him do his thing, just kind.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Of let the genius work. Till last night when I

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 4>couldn't pick one single game if my have my life

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 4>depended on it, I was horrible, But we did get

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 4>the winner. This morning with James Madison a U.

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I see, wait a minute, what do you mean we

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>got the winner? We got destroyed in that. What are

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you talking about?

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>We won? What are you talking about?

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Madison's first half under pre flop.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 6>And the game and he won.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I played over end game.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was a Willie pick. You know what I did?

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Todd on air on a Numbers game. I said it

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>was a U pick.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 4>You apologize for that. I will, okay.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 5>I aggregated it from like these first half unders in

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 5>early game.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 6>So I'm gonna I'm gonna pull a f aggregation card.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh our guest, our rotating guest on the show today.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>He has made this an annual uh mitzvah of his

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on the show to come on the Megapod. He joins

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>me on a Numbers game every quarter. He's kind enough

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that. We have done this podcast for over

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a decade. We have done this, but we haven't done

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the megapod for over a decade. He is correct about that.

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>We've only done the megapod for about three years. I

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>think this is the third. It is the great Aaron Shots.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>He is the creator of DVOA, the most granular play

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>by play NFL statistic You can find, which has analyzed

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>every single National Football League play all the way back

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>dating to nineteen hundred and seventy nine. Defense value over adjusted.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron joins us now he works at FTN Sports. How

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you doing, Aaron?

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Know nothing about college basketball? I know nothing nothing about

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>college basketball.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Todd said, do you have any opinions on Drake? And

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you were like, Drake may No, Drake from where is Drake? Indiana?

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 2>My brother from Toronto.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, he's one of our our miss bucher from Toronto, Toronto. Yeah,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Drake had a bar mitzvatad. Did you know

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that Drake hena bar mitsvatad? Were you aware of this?

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>God? Who did?

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>God is never mind? Okay, by the way, Erin, I

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>just want to before we get into the show here,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say I'm always fascinated by these

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>things through ten weeks of the NFL season, because obviously

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there's buys in Baldo. I know we're in week twelve,

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but through ten games, let me be clear, games ten

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>games of the NFL season. Correct me if I'm wrong,

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but I believe I saw this that in your historical

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>through ten games DBA numbers, you famously have the two

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven Patriots one, the nineteen ninety one Washington

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Redskins number two, and the twenty twenty four Lions number three.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Is this correct?

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>It's remarkable? But yeah, despite those couple of games where

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the opponent had more yards than them on an efficiency basis,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>they've just been ridiculous this year. Number two in offense,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 2>number two in defense, and number one one in special teams.

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 2>My numbers love the Lions this year.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>And I always ask you this as a follow up

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to these kinds of questions. Removing Aaron Shots the analytics

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>guy and talking to Aaron Shots the football viewer. Now,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>does it sort of check out for you with the

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>eye test?

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean they're doing everything well. What doesn't check

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>out is you keep waiting for the game we're not

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 2>having Hutchinson really hurts, right, we keep waiting for the

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 2>opponent where it really matters that Hutchinson is not healthy.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know when it's coming.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder, I wonder you're.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Also hurt now, right? Gilly, isn't the middle Anzeloni or

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 4>somebody isn't he Aloney's.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Out for a few weeks.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Also, Yeah, yeah, I just wonder like Will is wearing

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>his Vikings purple today. The Vikings are one game behind them,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>as are in the in the division, as are the

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Eagles in the conference. And I just wonder, like, okay,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>third greatest of all time, and yet they still might

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>not get the number one seed, right, still might not?

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And then then this looing specter of Jared Goff on

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the road in January, is that in the back of

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>your mind still doesn't doesn't.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>The specter, the flip spector is Jared Goff in New

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Orleans in February. Indoors baby, Oh, good point, good point?

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Before we get to our best bets, we

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>always start with by the way I love I love

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>historical DVOA. And if you're looking for.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Point out, by the way I bet I put this morning,

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I actually put my down this morning. I put down

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>on the Eagles plus four hundred to lose the NFC

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Championship game.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 6>That's a fun one.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Where is that it was on DraftKings. Oh, I like

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that with the il the Lions are the best team

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 2>in the conference, but the Eagles are the second best team.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned on the Bear Pod that I've seen these

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 5>in the past, but I haven't seen them once the

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 5>season started, like conference title game exactly as where we

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 5>have to pick both teams. I know it's square at

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Chalky and it's the NFL, anything can happen. I have

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 5>a hard time seeing past an Eagles Lions NFC title

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 5>game obviously.

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean there's like all kinds of possibilities, but

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 2>to me, that seemed like a good a good bet.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>At this point I started, I started putting together super

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Bowl matchups. Again, not exactly, it's just teams to meet

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl. My first two bets are Lions

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>are are are Chalky Lions Chiefs six to one, Lions

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Ravens nine to one. Yeah, no, I'm right there with you, man,

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>right there with you. Before we get into the best bets,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>mister wishnev Our records on the season, sir as. The

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>courts stenographer of the podcast.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Are Gilly and Willy had good weeks last week, Gilly

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>going two and one one. The only mistake was his

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 4>little commanders taking what they call the proverbial deuce in

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the pants in the fourth quarter and blowing the plus four,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 4>and so he went two and one. He goes to

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 4>seventeen fifteen and one with a nice little comeback there,

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 4>and his teaser lost again. Somehow he is now two

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 4>eight and one when Kansas City, well, actually both sides lost,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 4>but that Kansas City Josh Allen nonsense. So Willy had

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 4>an outstanding week. And if you guys remember when I

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 4>told you that when Willy was down, he's probably gonna

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 4>have a nice little comeback run, and he is having

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>that comeback run with a three and ozh not even close.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Had the Eagles on that the Ravens under easy in

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 4>the Denver easy. Unfortunately, he took another teaser loss when

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen rolled to the right on fourth and two.

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Even though Gil Alexander always predicts on our text that

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.599
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen on fourth and two will run the ball, somehow,

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 4>some way, Steve Spagnola doesn't know that maybe Josh Allen

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 4>may tuck the ball and run. And he's still running

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>today for a nine point teaser blessed up. So you guys,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>did you did you catch?

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you catch? The Jim Nance? Right after that play

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>goes the best NFL the greatest NFL play of the season,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and out loud alone in my apartment, I go, really, Jim,

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the best and he then immediately responds on air, he goes,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by that is he qualifies it.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 4>It's so great, all right, now now you do so?

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Willie goes fifth, goes to fifteen seventeen and one, an

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>excellent comeback. He's three six and two on his teezers.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 4>I unfortunately went one and two when the Texans back

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 4>doored me on the on that total. So I am

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 4>now eighteen and fifteen, so things are tightening up. I

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 4>won my teaser again, so I have made a full

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 4>recovery on teasers to six and five. The guests Brent

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Musberger went two and one, and that moves the guest

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 4>to sixteen sixteen and one, and their teasers are also

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 4>six and five. So that's where we are as we

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 4>start the week. Billy and Willy breathing.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>You're you're eighteen and fifteen? What am I?

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>You're seventeen fifteen and one a half game back? And

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Willy is fifteen seventeen and one not two four backs?

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay, did hardly get home? Did that?

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 6>Did we count that?

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Or no?

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 6>The touchdown parlay of the Frank did break the touchdown.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Partly that he gave up. Yeah, we didn't count that. Okay,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 4>what is it?

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>What is the guest chair? What's the record for the

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>guest chair?

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 4>The guest chair is now sixteen, sixteen and one and

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 4>six and five. Onto this one we are, and I'd

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 4>like to ask Aaron about I'd like to ask Aaron

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 4>Shotts about my dummy of the week. And it's going

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 4>to be a guy you might have heard of name

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Jane Campbell. I go on commercials and I say you

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>should eat Applebee's wing endlessly. And you know what, I

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 4>am the best at making speeches in the locker room afterwards.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Now here's my question, Aaron. If Willie Hill gives you

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 4>under twenty nine and under twenty eight and a half

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 4>attempts for Jared goff right, and you look at the

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 4>game log and you see every time they win big,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't throw the ball a lot. So you tell

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 4>will Hill. You say, will that's a great bet. I'm

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 4>going to bet that under twenty eight and a half attempts.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 4>So you do bet the under twenty eight and a

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 4>half temps. Now you're watching a National Football League game,

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 4>and Aaron, you watch a lot of National Football League games.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Have you ever seen a football team at thirty five

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 4>to six throwing on first down. Now I ask you

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>another question. Have you ever seen a team up forty

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 4>two to six in the fourth fink quarter throwing the

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>ball first down the game England? Right, okay, but still

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 4>forty two to six and they're throwing the ball in

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 4>the fourth quarter. Now here's why I make Dan Gamble

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 4>the Dumbo of the week. What if Jared Goff on

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 4>one of those throws gets his head torn off and

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 4>he's out for the season and I was rooting for

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 4>I never root for injuries because I'm a good person,

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 4>But on this case, I rooted for an injury because

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 4>those people are assholes. Why are you throwing the ball

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 4>up forty two to six?

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And you led him answer the question, and you let

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>him answer.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>You can remember the two thousand and seven Patriots.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Wait, I want to tell him before he answers that

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 4>we lost because twenty nine throws instead of twenty eight

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 4>and a half attempts under Now, please answer.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Remember the two thousand and seven Patriots. Yes, this is

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>not the first team that threw the ball with big

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>leads in the fourth quarter. And this is not the

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 2>first team where fans looked at the TV and went,

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>why are you not pulling the quarterback to make sure

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't get injured? It happens more.

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Than you think. Six, Aaron forty two six.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember the two thousand and seven Patriots to

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>go back to.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Look at it right now because you said it, I'm

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 4>going to go look and see if they was throwing them.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>From fans of other teams constantly complaining, why are the

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Patriots passed in the fourth quarter?

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 6>Why is right after the flight they were trying to

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 6>run up the score?

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Was that the year, hold on, let's someone you. Was

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that the year that Joe Gibbs two point zero got

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>crushed by Belichick And in a similar type of score,

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Belichick just kept pouring on points. And as a Washington

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Skins fan, as a Washington Skins van, we were unbelievably

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>offended that Bill Belichick, supposed historian of the game, would

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>do this to a coach of whose jockstrap Bill Belichick

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>could never hold.

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Sorry because I know they played the Cowboys that year,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 2>so they probably played Washington too.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they ran it up. I'm looking at the box score.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 6>It was only fifty two to seven.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>By a way, will I will stand by that I

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>know you that's hard if you if you gave Joe

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Gibbs, Tom Brady, he would have won. Let me

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>do the math. Twenty seven Super but.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Brady threw one touchdown pass their first Super Bowl run.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 5>Brady won the final Super Bowl, like thirteen to three.

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Brady wants Belichick won Super Bowls with the Giants. I

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 5>don't think it's fair to just because we dide guilty

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 5>of it too, Like all he did was half.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 4>All he did was have Drew.

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Brees, and you know he's not a good coach. He's

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 5>turned out to be a good coach. I don't think

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>it's fair.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Gibbs the greatest of all time. I will die

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on this.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 6>What about Barry Lamar Bonds not.

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>As good a coach? Okay, I will give another just

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>because we have another candidate besides Dan Campbell, because it

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is tough to give someone dumb over the week in

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a fifty two to six game. What do we feel

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about the great Matt Eberflus, who sort of lotly gagged

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that last drive for the Bears against the Packers. All

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bears need was a field goal to win. Caleb

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams had a great game at a great final drive

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for it down conversion to a dunze than another one

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to a dunzae. They matriculate the ball down the field.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>They end up with a lengthy forty almost fifty, but

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it was less than fifty yard field goal, about forty

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>seven yard I believe it was. But they had an

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>extra thirty seconds or so to run an additional play.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>They chose not to, and after the game Eberflus was like, yeah,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we were good. I think it's an exact quote. We

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>know what happens. Cairo Santos gets his field goal blocked.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say that he wouldn't have gotten it

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>blocked from twenty seven. Maybe he would have. Do we

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with that? Who's the worst Dumbo of

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the week? Campbell for doing what he did or Eberflus

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for just saying I will settle it.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I would go with Eberflus because this is a problem

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of coaches in the NFL have, is

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>this belief that field goal range is some kind of

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>binary where when you pass a certain yard line, now

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 2>you're in field goal range. That's it. We're done, Like,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>that's not how it works.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It's such a good point too, because remember earlier in

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the year and this is not this is an armchair

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback because I said it at the time the Chiefs

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>won a game. I want to say it was against.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 4>The Chargers against the Bengals.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Was the Bengals where Andy Reid was just like, yeah, Harrison,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>butker fifty one yards, it's fine, we'll win. And he

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>kicked it and he made it and they won and

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody said a word. And I'm like, wow, have we

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten to the point where we're just like nonchalantly kicking

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty one yarders to win a game? And we were

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the season because nobody was missing,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden yesterday it's like the

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>field goal button got turned off and no one was

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>making anything. There was that one sequence where Hopkins missed

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>two chip shots at the same time Joshua Cardi missed

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a chip shot when same chip shots like shorter than

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards twenty.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Four or something.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Card Yeah, yeah, that was amazing, both of them. Incredible.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So you would vote forever flu So I think Todd

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to stand on the Dan camp both of

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the weekend.

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Well here's why I'm going to because I just pulled

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 4>up an NFL reference and I went back to a

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 4>game where the Patriots won fifty six to ten in

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and six. In two thousand and seven, which

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 4>is a similar to scenario. And guess who was in

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 4>the game in the fourth quarter Matt Castle handing off

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to Heath Evans, not Thomas Brady. Sure, late third quarter,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 4>who was still in but not Thomas Brady. It was

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 4>a guy named Matt Castle who was in the game

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 4>in fifty six.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>You know they did so, Brian Hendon Hooker, Yes, they

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 2>did bring that.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Finally, finally after when they got the ball back with

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 4>like five minutes left in the game. I'm saying that

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the starting quarterback you should not.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Be Campbell does not know what the over under on

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Jared goff passes.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 4>I didn't say he was parent I say. I did

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 4>not say he knows. I just said he's an asshole,

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 4>That's all. I didn't say he knows.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd, you asked Aaron the question, he gave you a

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very correct historical answer, and you're just you choose to

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 4>No, all I'm saying is I'm looking at a reference

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 4>and it shows that that Tom Brady was out of

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 4>the game in the fourth quarter. That's all. But I

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 4>allows point that they did one second up. Take his

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 4>point that they did run it up, and I agree

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 4>with him that they ran it up. But there's a

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 4>difference between running it up and what Dan Campbell did

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 4>forty two to six is beyond running it up. That's

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 4>called like insanity.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I am I am old school when it comes

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to this stuff. And I will reference again the greatest

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>coach of all time, the great Joe Jackson Gibbs, and

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I will say, listen, when they won the Super Bowl,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>excuse me. The year they lost the Super Bowl, I

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>believe it was to the La Raiders when they were

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>an absolute offensive juggernaut and they set the record for

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the most points until the ninety nine Vikings beat it

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with the first game of the season. I remember distinctly, right,

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they're beating the Lions, who they ended up beating in

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the NFC Championship, like forty one to nothing or something

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>like that, and they're knocking on the doorstep, and what

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>do they do. They just they kneel on it, right,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's how you did it back in the day.

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>You were you had class, and you allowed.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 4>To even today, when you're up thirty one six. Even

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 4>today the Arizona Cardinals were up thirty one six against

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 4>the Jets the other day. They hand off not because

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 4>they're they're trying not to run it up, just because

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 4>they're trying not to get anyone injured and get to

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 4>the next game.

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I objected, like to Belichick, and I

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>don't listen, Belichick's one of the all time greats. I'm

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously saying he's not. He's not not that, but you

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>know that was he was the first one of the

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>first people to be like, if you want to stop us,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>then you know I want us not to score, then

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>stop us. And so this younger generation got into this

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>whole thing like, yeah, that's what you do. And I'm

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>just too old for that ship. I really am, Like,

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I get it, that's how it is now,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I'm still not.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 5>And my concern with the golf that even though I

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 5>thought it was a good beat because they take the

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 5>foot off the gas and you know they can have

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 5>a big lead that probably can throw a lot, is

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 5>that golf through the five picks the.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 6>Week before, I know one was a hail Mary but

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 6>that they were going to.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 5>Try to get his confidence back and Patti stats and

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 5>just keep throwing to make him feel good.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>So that wasn't the back of my head the whole time.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, by the way, if.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.239
<v Speaker 4>Aaron is just to be fair, because I always liked

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 4>to be fair and argue in a fair minded way

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to the way people argue nowadays. But it's

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 4>the fifty two to nothing game where the Patriots beat

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 4>a certain team named the Washington Gilly Redskins. It was

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 4>thirty eight nothing in the fourth quarter and the Patriots

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 4>actually had Tom Brady in and he did throw a

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 4>couple of passes to get the forty five nothing and

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 4>then they took him out. So Aaron is actually correct

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 4>on one the one game. I didn't correct in the

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 4>other game. But either way, it's still not right. It's

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 4>just not right, all right.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to give an in game story before

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>we go to the best bets?

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, I'd like to give it a little quick

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 4>little Grand would talk about that.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 4>I thought Steve had a great bet on Grand Canyon,

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 4>and I ended up winning it, so I was lucky.

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 4>But the Bears were playing the forty nine ers this

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>past weekend. The score in the first half was very

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 4>low because both teams were taking forty nine ers, were

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 4>playing the Seattle, and the drives were very long drives,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 4>like seven to eight minute drives. In the first half,

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 4>the score was very low. And a lot of times

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 4>in those kind of games where the line is originally

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 4>high and the score is very low in the first half,

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 4>typically you see points in the second half. Well, that's

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of what to start it to happen. When finally

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the Niners took a thirteen to ten lead late in

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 4>the third quarter, around three minutes to go at the

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 4>end of the third quarter. At that point some of

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 4>the books had thirty seven fourteen more points and then

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>you could get thirty six and a half at minus

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 4>one twenty nine. So at that point I said to myself,

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 4>I think more touchdowns are coming in this game. Overtime

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 4>is also maybe a possibility. I just feel like we've

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 4>got points coming in this game, and so I bet.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 4>So the question was thirty seven or thirty six and

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 4>a half in pay extra? I paid extra for the

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 4>thirty six and a half, and I should have won easily.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 4>The Niners went down on another long drive, got a

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 4>touchdown to go up seventeen thirteen. The Seattle went on

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 4>a long drive, came down fourth and one. Now, please

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 4>explain this to me. Gil When it's third and one

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 4>and a half and you run Gino Smith on a

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 4>quarterback keeper and he gets one point thirty five yards

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 4>and now there's six inches to go on fourth down,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 4>you hand off to the guy so he can't get

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 4>it on fourth down. I'll still never understand that they

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 4>just got a yard and a half, almost just get

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 4>another six inches. Anyways, they get stopped. Then somehow they

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 4>stop the Niners, and of course Gino Smith goes on

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the run to infamy, the beautiful run forty yards down

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 4>the sideline, then another thirty yards for the touchdown, and

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 4>I end up winning because it ends twenty to seventeen.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 4>So I guess the point that I want to make

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 4>here is in this kind of game where there's long

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 4>drives and you don't want to play over thirty seven

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 4>there because what's the point. You're just going to get

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 4>a push. If you get the two touchdowns you need,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 4>you might as well pay the extra twenty five cents.

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people don't like paying minus one twenty

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>nine minus one thirty five. They were like, they're scared

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 4>of that extra number. Juice is worth paying for in

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 4>that scenario, and it ended up working out for me.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The juice thing across sports is a great bit of

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>advice for betters because there was the Mac game last

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>night where I said, I jumped in the second quarter

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Toledo minus two and a half extra juice. They were

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>at midfield. You cannot shy away from those moments, like

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>pay the extra juice. There's the reason why there's juice there.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't see you half away?

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like what you have to make a determination.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's say you're paying minus one to fifty. You got

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 4>to win this bet over sixty percent of the time,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 4>but very often it is a sixty percent bet, like

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>in your case with your excellent Collin Toledo.

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Best Bets Week twelve and that ASHNAL Football

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>League aarin. By the way, before you before you give

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>your first best bet, a couple of things. One, you're

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>following Brent Musburger no pressure whatsoever? Ay, do you believe

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Brent should be in the NFL Hall of Fame? Because

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I was going off on that last week in front

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of Brent he was very uncomfortable, and two tell everybody

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what they can get at FTN and where they find it.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Has uh they the he's never won the Broadcaster Award

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>or whatever that they give.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so has it. Maybe he has, Maybe

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe he won't mention it if he. If he had,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he's definitely the last guy to say that he has.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh Okay, I mean if he has.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 5>They have the Ford Frick Award and they put the

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 5>guys in the Hall of Fame. Might get confused with

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 5>the different writer wings in the Hall of Fame because

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 5>I was just at the baseball one, and you know

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 5>they have this whole wing of like writers team.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a Broadcaster Award for football too, though,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 2>like I think Joe Buckle won.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It is Steve Sable in the NFL Hall of Fame,

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Like is that family? Yeah?

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I think as a contributor, Oh, as.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>A contributor, I just whatever the whatever the categorization is.

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Brent needs to be. He's eighty five years old.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 2>FT and Fantasy. We have tons of good stuff. We

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 2>have the stats Hub with all kinds of advanced charting

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>statistics and DVOA for Advanced charting Statistics updated during the season.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 2>We have all of our daily fantasy optimizers. We have

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 2>all of our picks in lots of sports. I only

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 2>do NFL, but we do everything from women's basketball to

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 2>golf and have good records in it. So folks should

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 2>check out Ftnfantasy dot Com.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And I have guys friends of mine that still play fantasy.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>They swear by FDA. They really do.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Jeff Radcliffe does great projections.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>They that's the guy they love. They're like Jeff Radcliffe,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody better. Okay, your first best bet of the week, sir, is.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you left me on the Lions, but I'm going

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>with the Lions. Lions minus seven and a half at Indianapolis. Right,

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Lions are one of the best teams of all time.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 2>By my numbers, Colts are twenty first, and that's slightly

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>juiced by the Joe Flacco games. Right, Like, I feel

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>like the Colts are not six and a half points

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>better than the Jaguars. The Jaguars line last week was fourteen.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe it's an a home and away thing,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 2>but I don't remember last week where that game was.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>But I just don't think seven and a half is

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>high enough. So Lions minus seven and a half at Indianapolis.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The Lions are starting to feel like those teams we

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>grew up on, whether it was a Niners team or

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Giants or the Skins, those NFC, those NFC teams,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>also the Bears in eighty five, that just steamroll teams,

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and they do have that feel a little bit this year.

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm hoping that Vikings.

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And losing the end. Yeah, Toddy, what do you got first?

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Were we talking to discuss the Thursday night game? We

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 4>were just going to go right to the Oh.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I wish I have this podcast?

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, Gilty, Sorry?

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Does anybody there? They're supposed to be in clement weather tonight?

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>In clement weather tonight in Cleveland. I forgot about that

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>mix of rain and snow. I'm not a trends guy,

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like I'm not doing my job unless

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I give him here for this one, because Thursday Night

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>trends abound. Steelers have never won a road Divisional Thursday

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Night football game. They're oh and seven all time, and

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>oh and five under Mike Tomlin. Tomlin is two and

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>eight on the road on Thursday Night football. The Browns

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>six and oh straight up their last six Thursday Nights

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>including two and overs. Is Tomlin I was saying earlier,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this might be a field overprop kind of

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>game where they throw him in the game for a

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of plays.

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like you. I like the over on this

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 2>until the snow. We start talking about the snow. I

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 2>think if they dropped the over under last time, I

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>thought it was thirty six, if they drop it a

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>little bit more than that, I think I like the

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>over despite the snow, because Winston hits there much better

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 2>on offense than Watson was. Right now, Yeah, oh, I think, yeah,

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that the snow, I'd probably shy away.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 6>Then if it is thirty seven, I will make this

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 6>one of my picks.

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thirty seven it is.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I'll go on the reason. I think, just so you know, Willie,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 4>the wind is supposed to be down to under ten

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 4>miles an hour. I think that's why back up. But anyways, good.

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wind is not supposed to be a fact.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 4>I still think the weather is not going to be great.

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 5>And I just think Pittsburgh it's one of these games

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 5>where they run, run, run, kickfield, goals, punt. They just

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 5>come into the game with the approach of, hey, let's

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 5>not turn it over. Let's not screw it up. Winston

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 5>will probably throw us a pick at some point, be

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 5>conserved and win the game. You know, typical stealer. Every

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 5>game is you know, sixteen thirteen, twenty to fourteen, something

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 5>like that. So I will go under. I know there's

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 5>not much margin for air when you're getting as low

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 5>as thirty seven in the NFL, but that's a key number.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 5>At thirty six thirty six and a half, I would pass,

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 5>but I will go under the thirty seven. I don't

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 5>love it either. I don't love the card. This is

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 5>not the last week. I had a good feel and

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 5>there were picks on deck that I liked that got

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 5>through it a great field last week. I don't feel

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 5>the same way this week.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 6>Kind of an ugly week.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 4>But I will make the under.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>One of my picks might end up being one if

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't find three too. I mean, I Jamis Winston

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in the cold and in the rain and the snow

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is not an image that I can sort of imagine

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in my head. There's a guy who's played in warm

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>weather in college largely, I don't know. Just don't throw

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that pick in his own territory deep, you know, for

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>your under Todd, what's your first.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 4>I actually have a pick on tonight's game. I am

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 4>gonna go down to the mistake on the Lake. That's

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 4>what they call it here in Pittsburgh. They call it

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the mistake by the Lake, And I'm gonna take whoa.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna take the Bronnis. What do am I getting?

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Am I getting three and a half?

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes? You are?

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm gonna take the Klee Bronnis plus the three

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 4>and a half. Now, uns are gonna say uns are

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 4>picking against your own store team, wood youans crazy. That's

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 4>a crazy thing to do, are you? Did you eat

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 4>too much done at lunch in East Librity. Well, here's

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 4>why I'm saying that. Here's why I'm saying that. The

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Steelers are are eight and two against the spread and

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 4>the Brownies are three and seven against the spread. The

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Stealers haven't lost a spread game in six weeks. Sooner

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 4>or later they're gonna get you in the NFL. And

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 4>this is a team that doesn't like to win by margin.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 4>We're also a team, like Willie said, it's gonna be

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 4>grinding Pine in the snow. That means a those scoring game,

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 4>those scoring game we got a better chance to cover

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 4>our three and a half. I just think that if

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the Klee Brownies are ever gonna throw the kitchen sinking

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 4>at at a team, they're gonna do it against their rivals,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 4>the Pittsburg Stores. They didn't play that bad in the

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Saints game. They average a lot of yards per play

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 4>it down in New Orleans. I think they can move

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 4>the ball a little bit, keep it close, lose at

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 4>seventeen fourteen, give me the Klee Bronnis, and don't throw

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 4>me out of Pittsburgh.

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I like both of your I like both of your

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>leans on this game and both of your plays. I

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, am going to make the under thirty seven

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>one of my plays.

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's go.

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't like this week enough to find

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>three sides, and I think the weather gets me on

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the under here as well. That's one of those bets

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>where it's like tip of the cap. If you beat

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>y'all can score more than thirty seven points, good, I'm

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on the under thirty seven. Todd, make that I got

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it what you means. Okay, So let's start with Aaron again.

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Then Aaron, your number two would.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Be I'm gonna go over forty one and a half

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 2>In the Giants and Buccaneers. Mike Evans is back for

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the Buccaneers offense, and I do like the idea of

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the kind of new quarterback kind of juices the offense

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit for like a week. And I don't

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 2>think Tommy Cutlets is that much worse than Daniel Jones.

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going with the over forty one and a

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 2>half on the Giants and the Buccaneers, go Mike Evans.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that amazing They that Daniel Jones, the guy they

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>paid that big contract to, ain't much better off any

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at all than Tommy. Tommy Gilly and I have matching Fiji's.

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 6>By the way, for those listening at home, I.

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Want to say mine is bigger.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 4>The way I like Aaron's pick because Tampa Bay is

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 4>is a dumpster fire on defense. So if Tommy DeVito

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 4>is going to be able to call the soprano guys

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 4>and get himself a couple of touchdowns, this is the

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 4>team to do it against, you know. So I kind

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 4>of like that forty one and plus Tampa is going

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 4>to score, So I kind of like that.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Aaron. Do you find that people's recollection of Tommy DeVito

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is a much more positive one than reality. Actually, was he?

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 2>What is people's recollection of Tommy Tavita?

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that he's so.

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Are you asking about NFL fans in general or Giants

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 2>fans in particular, Well, Giants fan, NFL fans in general

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>know what Tommy DeVito was. Giants fans might be a

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 2>little over excited.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, that's by way. I'd like to ask ask

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Aaron to do the fact we are talking about the

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.239
<v Speaker 4>metal Lands. I contend that the metal Lands I have

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 4>no statistical and that's why I'm asking you. I have

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 4>no statistical basis. I contend that the Meadowlands is now

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 4>the hardest place to kick a field goal? Am I correct? Aaron?

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I do not know the answer to that question.

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Do you have totally?

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It feels like you're right.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you have? No?

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't have like a mule of years worth of

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>data together that I could like look right now.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh okay, anyways, I thought you might know. But the

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 4>to me, it really seems like that meadow Lands is

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 4>tough to kick a field goal and the wind is

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 4>swirling around. I mean, where else is it hard to

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 4>kick a field goal? Hines Field is no longer that hard.

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 4>So where else are the tough places to kick a

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 4>field goal?

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. I think of all cold weather stadiums

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>as basically being the same wherever, like.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin visits Cleveland tonight, feels like that. I can distinctly

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>remember seeing field goal attempts in Cleveland look like they're

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>going straight and then taking hard left.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean Buffalo when the weather is horrible. But that's not,

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, not in week one?

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what was the stadium will where I got

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to the uh disagreement with the Lombardi and he said

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he violently disagreed with me about the win.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 5>That was the Buffalo New England win game where it

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 5>was just insane wins and New England didn't even try to.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Throw the ball.

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 5>They just handed off every dime, hand it off every

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 5>down and one and one.

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 1>One and one? Uh, Toddy, what's your number two?

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 4>My number two? And I couldn't agree with you more

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 4>that this is a very difficult card, not that any

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 4>NFL card isn't difficult, But what am I getting in

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 4>the what do I have the line at and the

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Seattle against the Arizona Cardinal game?

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a pick them, dude, that is straight. Pick them,

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is it?

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it at one. I've seen it a minus one,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and I've seen it at pick them in different Wow.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 5>I saw Seattle plus one and a half this morning.

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 5>Now I'm seeing Seattle minus. Wanted some books, some books

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 5>having to pick them that we're going to say.

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Them, So we're gonna say pick them. I'm going to

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 4>take the Seahattle Seahawks, pick them at home. I just

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 4>think that very similar to you know, in the NFL,

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 4>you know when teams covered multiple games in a row,

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:15.959
<v Speaker 4>you're kind of you know that you have to start

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 4>paying the tax on them, and you're buying them high

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 4>versus buying them low. And I feel like Arizona is

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 4>a similar situation where Arizona's just been playing so well lately.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 4>They've played so many good games in a row, and

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Seattle had played so many bad games in a row.

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Metcalf was out and then finally they turned it around

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 4>last week with that big win on the Geno Smith runs.

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I kind of feel that Seattle is starting to turn

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 4>a little bit and Arizona you have to be you know,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 4>they can't be this good. I'm not saying they aren't good.

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure they are good. I'm just saying, are they

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 4>really this good to go into Seattle now and have

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 4>everything go right again like in every other game that

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.959
<v Speaker 4>they play. Give me the Seattle Seahawks. Pick them because

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 4>I feel a little resurgence coming for Seattle.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, Seattle got blown out in that Buffalo game,

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 4>but it really wasn't It could have been totally different.

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 4>They were inside the five yard line a number of

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 4>times in that game, could have scored, and that game

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 4>could have been a completely different game. There were There's

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of games where Seattle has been kind of like,

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, weird to look at. I just feel like

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 4>you're you're buying Arizona too high now and and Seattle

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I could get to buy low unlike Bitcoin. So I'll

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 4>take Seattle. Pick them.

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 5>Wait wait, I'm hearing something Gino Smith tie game back

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 5>to passing.

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Then it's not that comment, will you?

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.720
<v Speaker 4>You can't do my routines if you don't do it properly.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 4>You didn't give us a time, you didn't even score,

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 4>you didn't give us anything. I'll mix it again.

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 5>I'll try to surprise you, like a month from now,

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 5>I'll practice at home and I'll be better.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You didn't give us a pylon involved and you didn't

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>turn purple.

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the ball has to be tipped in the air,

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 4>and then the color guy has.

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>To go aha, loses it. All right, Well, what's your second?

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 6>What do we have for Eagles? Rams?

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>That's what's that?

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Drew three some places and two and a half in

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 2>some places.

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 4>I think the most three. I'm gonna go with three.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I think we have to give the.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, I'll go elsewhere. I'm gonna go back.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 5>You know I can't do Titans. I'll go under forty

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 5>and a half? Is it forty and a half?

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 6>Titans? Texans?

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 4>I was so I'm just not doing it.

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm not doing it. You know what, I might actually

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 6>do it for my third pick.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Forty and a half, Yes, sir, I will go under.

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 5>I just don't love the Texans offensive line. I think

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 5>the Tennessee still got some players defensively, They've just been

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 5>so snaked bit in these games. You just, man, you

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 5>touch the stove and you get burned. You don't want

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 5>to keep touching it. So I don't know that I'm

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 5>gonna make the Titans my third pick, But I do

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 5>think their defense can keep this game close. It is

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 5>kind of a semi rivalry game the old Oilers. It's

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 5>a division game. Texans are up, you know, it's a

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 5>short week for them. I think that the Titans can

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 5>keep this game close defensively and just make it like,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, a twenty three sixteen type of game. So again,

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 5>there's not a lot to choose from here. I like

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 5>the Texans defense. These teams are both top five yards

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 5>per play allowed. I will go under forty and a

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 5>half and hope mister Levis does not throw the ball

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 5>to the team wearing the other uniforms.

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I so want you to play the Titans, all right?

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>My number two, My number two is my favorite pick.

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Which is the only thing that I jumped at during

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines on Monday, which is I like the Baltimore

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Ravens in the Harrorball Bowl Monday night. Was it two

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and a half or three? Right now? Three?

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 4>I see those? What do you guys think it's more

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 4>more common? Sing two and a half.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing both equally.

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if I get two and a half on Philly,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I can give you two and a half on Baltimore.

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 6>But if I'm not getting the three. I can't give

0:38:58.600 --> 0:38:59.959
<v Speaker 6>you the three. That's just how this goes.

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>No Philadelphia, clear it is much more three.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 6>So this one's split.

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>One's split. I think.

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's let Aaron make the calls.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I thought.

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting the worst of it, but I'll still do it.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Chargers are quite the hype gene

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that people are making. They their list of vanquished opponents

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is not very strong, and they almost fell apart in

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that Bengals game last week. I think people are a

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:41.240
<v Speaker 1>little mesmerized by Harball. I get it. Their defense is good,

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but the Ravens are just a better football team to me,

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that Pittsburgh game also, coming off

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of that game, is going to be nothing but a

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>good thing for this team heading into this one. It's

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of That was a Sunday night game.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It was not a Monday night game, so it's not

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>really extra rest. But I just my reaction to this,

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>my guess was it was going to be Baltimore minus four.

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>It opened minus two. I betted at minus two and

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'll still play it at three. I think

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are going I think John over Jim here

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Which is a big game for both teams.

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>In the Ravens case, depending on what the Steelers do

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>here tonight could be about getting back into the betting

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite for the division, could be back, you know, getting

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>back to Lamar being the short shot for MVP. We'll see,

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>but I'm on the Ravens as my numbers. I thought

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>about that.

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't think Lamar is a good pick just because

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 5>he already won it twice. He won it last year.

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 5>They've already got four losses. I mean, he's probably gonna

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 5>lose another game or two. Are they're really going to

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 5>give it back to back years to a guy with

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 5>you know, five six losses. I'm not sure, but I

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 5>thought about taking Baltimore. Tucker kept me off at Tucker's

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.439
<v Speaker 5>been awful. He's gone from automatic to just bat Aaron,

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 5>do you do you have any theory, like any precedent

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 5>for somebody.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Being so I do not know what has happened into him,

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 2>like it happens to kickers sometimes, and I don't know

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 2>what it is, and I don't know how to fix it.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 5>It's like having a bad closer in baseball. It's like

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 5>you only can use it with the game.

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 2>No you can hide your closer, you can demote your

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 2>closer to set up right, you can't demote your kicker

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 2>to anything good.

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Point Yeah, well none of that dissuades me. And Lamar

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>has twenty five touchdowns and three picks. Yeah, more, more

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and all the you know, all the running yard of

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>course as well. I have a real time coming up

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with number three this week, I really do. I am

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>tempted to do the kiniella tonight and do two picks

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>on that game, but I don't want to do that.

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stick with just the under What is the

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>line that you are seeing for the do Do Do Do?

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Sorry about this? For the Denver Broncos, what do you sing?

0:41:58.360 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Six?

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 6>Six?

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Who are you gonna take? By the way, in the

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 5>game tonight, what was what was the side you liked?

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna take the Browns? Yeah, I mean I

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like you know, fuck it, I'm taking the Browns plus

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. Sorry, I really I like that

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>better than I like anything on Sunday. I really do.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm literally playing both the side and the total in

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>tonight's game. I'm on the Brownies plus three and a half.

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a low total. I'm betting the under already, so

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be even lower. Their four three

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half points is a lot. I do think

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers are the better football team, but those conditions

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are gonna sort of even the playing field. I think

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a big running game tonight on both

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>sides of the football. But I think the Browns keep

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>it close. I'm not a trends guy, as I said,

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't hate those trends obviously. For this Browns

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>plus three and a half at home on a short

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>week is a better play to me than anything on Sunday.

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>How about that? That's my thirst?

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it better than under one thirty six and a half?

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 4>Drake Miami at the sixteen minute commercial, which I just did?

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 4>Is it better than that? At?

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you just did?

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Traveling, traveling on Drake, we're going the other way.

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it's I'm not sure it's better than that.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it's better than that? Really? Really, what's

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 1>your last.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm just gonna pass. I'm gonna forfeit the third game.

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 5>I don't like anything.

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, what the hell? What do we have for hope?

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Would we get one thirty six and a half? I

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>literally opened my sports is one thirty one already Jesus

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>because a commercial.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 4>At the commercial it was one thirty six and a half,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 4>and then Drake takes the shot, talk all the way

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 4>down to nothing, missus a shot, and then they'd stopped Miami.

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:43.720
<v Speaker 4>So when you get like a minute and fifteen of nothing,

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 4>you get five points less. So you were blathering on

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 4>about Cleveland. I didn't want to interrupt blathering.

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, go ahead. Will I enjoyed it?

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 5>I'm laughing and I'm so I'm so torn here. I'll

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 5>just I'll take the Titans plus the eight it was

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 5>between that, and I'll go back to it again, same handicap.

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 5>I just think their defensive line versus the Texans offensive

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 5>line can give them some issues close game. I haven't

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 5>loved what I've seen from the Texans. They do some

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 5>strange things. They got away with it because Dallas was

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 5>so inept on Monday. But I wasn't impressed with them Monday.

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 5>I haven't been impressed them all year. They're just gonna

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 5>They're just in the right division and they have just

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 5>enough to, you know, to get it done. I think

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Mixing is somebody I thought was kind of washed with Cincy.

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 5>He's played great, But I think Tennessee can stop the

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 5>run here and just keep this game clos So what

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 5>could go wrong? Tennessee Titans plus eight, looking for their

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 5>second cover of the year somehow.

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Less your heart, Less your heart. We were doing a

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on a numbers game yesterday for fewest wins.

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:45.760
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings has fewest wins in the NFL when the season

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is all said and done, and it just was such

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a in case you didn't already know, right, there's like

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ten teams that have a shot at this The bottom

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL is so bad this year, and I

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>think the favorite after we looked at the schedules, I

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>think the short shot is, in fact the Cleveland Browns

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>at plus three fifty. If they lose tonight, that will

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>be cut in half for sure. I think the only

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 1>other team that has a not the only other team,

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think the two bets that I would agree

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>with are either Cleveland or the New York Giants. Who

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>look at that remaining schedule and you're like, I don't

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.320
<v Speaker 1>know if there's a win on there for the Giants.

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>They do play the Cowboys at Dallas next week. That's

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the only one. All the others, including the Jaguars, who

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have a half game lead over the field at two

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and nine. There's too many possible wins left on that schedule,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and I have a feeling they're going to go to CJ.

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Bethard at some point, and Bethard's better than Max Jones.

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 4>I think, so you do that.

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of teams that suck, but I think

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the Browns of the Giants say again, or Trevor.

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Comes back, you're supposed to be back next week for

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville or that.

0:45:58.160 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 5>It's funny, though, some of these teams that are terrible.

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 5>If you're a fan, you're like, oh, man, our team stinks.

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 5>We got two wins, three wins. There's playing those teams,

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 5>but like, hey, at least we're gonna get a good pick.

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Some of these teams that are terrible gonna be picking

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 5>like eight tens. You're not even gonna get a good

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 5>pick because there's so many other bad teams, which just

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 5>adds injury to insult.

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron, do you remember the league being this bottom heavy? Uh?

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's been a long time since it was this

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 2>bottom heavy. This is a particularly bottom heavy year.

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>So bad that I bring that up because Will was

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 1>was betting on the Titans, and I'm just like, man,

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>are they They probably should have won a couple more

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>games along the way, but they didn't, right, So now

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you wonder if they will. What it's like with all

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>these teams that are two and nine, two and eight,

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 1>three and seven or four and seven, Like the best

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 1>they can be is four and thirteen when you go

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>through their skin.

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 6>All right, Raiders, Raiders are another one.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Aaron, your final pick? Do we get?

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Aaron's final pick?

0:46:55.400 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Then all right, go ahead? No time, Billy did it wrong?

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 4>But go ahead?

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Well go ahead, Eric, I'll go with the Ravens, all

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the advanced metrics like the Ravens. I think the Ravens

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 2>have this habit of losing close games because of penalties.

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I think if they lose to the Charges, it'll be close,

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 2>but I think if they win, it will be big.

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not scared of a three point line because

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I think if like Ravens should be favored, and I

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 2>think that if they win, it's not going to be

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 2>by two or three, it's going to be by like fourteen.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to go with the Ravens minus three.

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be like a metaphorical John Harball giving

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Jim a nookie. That's what this is, older brother to younger.

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Todd, you little whiner, you're your last pick.

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 4>You know. It's interesting what Aaron just said, because what

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 4>it reminded me of is the people that had the

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 4>thing on Twitter that said you should play like an

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 4>alt line ladder on the Lions last week, and you

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 4>should like lay this amount for plus three hundred, this

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 4>amount for plus four fifty, this amount for plus five fifty,

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 4>and then of course yeah, yeah, So if you like

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 4>what Aaron's is selling here with Baltimore to win by

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot, you might want to look at one of

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 4>those ault lines, you know, and ladder it up like

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 4>the Lions. You know, you kind of want a fortune

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 4>in the lines game. I don't know if you agree

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 4>with that, Aaron or not, but.

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I think when the Ravens, when they win big

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and when they lose, they lose close.

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 4>So you would you agree with that idea of laddering up.

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 2>I like the idea of an alternate line, like a

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Ravens minus seven or a Ravens minus ten. Yeah, that'd

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>be interesting.

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't do those other way.

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 5>You never get the bang for your buck on those.

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if I don't look at them a lot.

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 5>But even the ones last week, like people were laying

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 5>thirty eight and a half with Detroit and I know

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.479
<v Speaker 5>it got home and it's nice to cash at twenty

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 5>to one, but man, you're laying thirty eight and a

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 5>half of the NFL game and I don't know. Just

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 5>some of those, it doesn't feel like they give you

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 5>the true odds.

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I rarely look at those myself here, by the way,

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>besides Detroit, which is number one with a bullet in

0:48:53.719 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Aaron's DVOA through ten games, Baltimore is number two, Buffalo three,

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the one that I was surprised by, Minnesota four

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City five. Wow. Vikings are tough to evaluate.

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 2>To me, they've been on the decline in the last

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 2>few weeks in the weighted where I lower the effect

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of the earlier games.

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 5>They're only seventh, but they have such a history as

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 5>coming through when it matters, so I'm sure they'll turn

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 5>it around.

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Aaron, where do you have the Steelers.

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 2>The Steelers are much lower in my numbers, like thirteenth

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 2>or fourteenth.

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you know he's got a spot above your You

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>know he's got a spot above your Steelers. Toddy the

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:51.839
<v Speaker 1>three time Super Bowl champion of Washington Redskins.

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh you mean the team with a quarterback who has

0:49:54.520 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 4>no ribs left? You mean that quarter that team. He's

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 4>definitely injured in his in his internal.

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Mid there's no question. Like people are like, hey, he's

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.439
<v Speaker 1>not doing well. He's so clearly not trying to run

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>as much the last couple of weeks. You can tell.

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 4>And he's not throwing the ball. He's not throwing the

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 4>ball the same way with his like I saw that

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Chase Daniel thing on the film, and you can see

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 4>he's not like like pulling into the throw real hard.

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean he's definitely hurt. I think he is.

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, there's no question.

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:32.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I like you guys have said, you know what,

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm just gonna do this. This is great, Okay, I'm

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.280
<v Speaker 4>gonna go. I'm gonna hold my nose and I'm gonna

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 4>go with the Antonio Piercers. Plus six and a half?

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that what I'm getting? Six and half? Am I

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 4>getting six and a half there, it's kind.

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Of six six six. Don't go crazy.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll take Antonio Peers, he of the back door cover.

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 4>He has now done it twice and we've talked about

0:50:56.520 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 4>it ad nauseum. On here mister Antonio Piers who looks

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 4>at the magic eight ball and says, shall I go

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 4>for it on fourth down? The magic eight ball? What

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 4>have you to say?

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 2>And then he goes down and Toni a Pearce's magic

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 2>eight ball just says no on every.

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Side, although he did once Aaron go Ford Kansas City

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 4>on a fourth and goal from the three, which we thought,

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 4>where where did he come up with this? Because he

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 4>always doesn't do that. Anyway, I'm going to take the

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 4>Raiders plus the six. I'm going to hold my nose here.

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 4>This is really this is really the theme of my week,

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.839
<v Speaker 4>which is fade teams that have looked amazing the last

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks and buy low on ship bag teams.

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 4>And you know, that's why I'm doing in Cleveland, and

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 4>that's what I'm going to do here in Las Vegas.

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 4>I just look, Do I want to take the Raiders?

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course not?

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 4>But are the Broncos really this good? I mean, yeah,

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 4>they almost beat the Chiefs. Very impressive win over Atlanta.

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:13.760
<v Speaker 4>I know everyone's getting all bonized about Bonecks and everything.

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh he's so great and everything, But are they really

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:23.360
<v Speaker 4>good enough to go on the road and win by six? Now? Granted,

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 4>the Raiders stink, so of course they could. They did

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 4>beat him thirty four eighteen in the early game, the

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 4>first game they played this year. Actually, the Raiders kind

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.399
<v Speaker 4>of dominated the first quarter and a half of that game,

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 4>and then the Broncos came on in Mile High or

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:37.959
<v Speaker 4>wherever they play those games now and killed him thirty

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.720
<v Speaker 4>four eighteen. But I'm just hoping the Raiders can hang around,

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 4>hang around, be down twelve late and somehow, you know,

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Antonio gets us the magic touchdown at the end, or

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 4>whether they're down nine and he decides to kick the

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:53.319
<v Speaker 4>field goal or whatever. I don't know. Just give me

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 4>some Raiders love here, Raiders plus.

0:52:56.120 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Six Antonio Peers. The radio people know this. But I'm

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>not sure if I mentioned on the megapot this year

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>or not, but Antonio Piers lived in my complex here

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas. He was in the West tower. I

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was in the East tower, So I would I would

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>frequently leave the building at the same time. He did

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 1>in the off season, not during the regular season. He

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:19.239
<v Speaker 1>would leave earlier, and I could never work up the

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>courage to talk to talk to him about his decisions

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's a very intimidating human being. And someone tweeted

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 1>this week which I thought was the greatest tweet of

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the week, where they're like, because I said something negative

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.760
<v Speaker 1>about Antoniopiers and they're like, oh, he'll went to Antonio

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Piers's apartment and made age sure that every item was

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:39.879
<v Speaker 1>out of there before he finally said a critical word.

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not true. I would say a critical word to

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>him on there's radio on the radio, just not to

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>his face. But he's moved out, so I don't know

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what that means. I don't know where he went. You

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>guys should have done something, yeah, getting that head coach

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to money, that's right, Yeah.

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 2>You should have.

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 5>You should have done something where you guys leave the

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:58.320
<v Speaker 5>building at the same time, but you switch jobs for

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 5>a day where Antonio Piers the numbers game and you

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 5>can coach the Raiders.

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think who do you think would have

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:06.839
<v Speaker 1>a rougher time him doing the show?

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, Antonio Pierce was a a intern at

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 4>the Howard Stern Show after being a New York Giant.

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 4>I remember, I remember listening to this and he was

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:21.439
<v Speaker 4>an intern at the Howard Stern Show. I forget whether

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:22.839
<v Speaker 4>it was for a whole week or for a day,

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 4>and it was fantastic.

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that would go better than Max Crosby dealing

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>with me as the head coach of the Raiders.

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 4>For a day, Jilly blowing the whistle, Hey, you get in,

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 4>bring it in.

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's getting mad at the Raiders, which will be like teasing.

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:42.280
<v Speaker 4>I want you guys to play like Joe Gibbs told

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 4>the Skins to play.

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's go jumbo package, all right. Teaser of the week.

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>God help me, I'm so has there ever been a

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>worse performance than my teaser performance this week?

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 6>This year?

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:00.959
<v Speaker 4>God?

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with the defend myself against the back door

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 2>cover teaser, which would be Chiefs minus five at Carolina

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and Texans minus two at home against Tennessee.

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.720
<v Speaker 4>AC minus five and what was the other one?

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Texans minus two?

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you had Texans minus one and a half

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 2>The idea there is these teams are good enough to win,

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 2>but they might take their foot off the gas at

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the end. So I don't want to go eleven points

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 2>with Kansas City, but I could go five.

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of which, I think we should all play the team.

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 4>We should all play the Carolina team total under this week.

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 4>How is Carolina going to get to how many points

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.960
<v Speaker 4>do they need? Sixteen? What do they need this week? Carolina?

0:55:58.920 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 4>I don't see it again.

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Seen seventeen and a half is juice.

0:56:03.040 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 5>It's almost like it's right around as I looked last

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 5>night on another show fifteen and a half, which is

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of a dead number, but you can get like

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 5>a fourteen and a half at a reasonable number, so

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 5>they're kind of making you pay for it. But I mean,

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 5>two touchdowns in a field might be tough. Young has

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 5>looked a little at least a little better, like he's

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.800
<v Speaker 5>had a pulse, but that's still probably not a bad bet.

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I still don't think and we don't do team totals

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 4>obviously on the show. I think Carolina team total under

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 4>is the best bet of the week. I just don't

0:56:29.640 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 4>see them scoring on Spagnola. But anyways, my teaser is

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 4>going to be the La Chargers plus eight and a half,

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going against I'm going against what Aaron has

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 4>told me here, but I just have a feeling that

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:49.720
<v Speaker 4>the Harbaugh Harrba we're gonna somehow, they're gonna hang around.

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna go with the LA Chargers because I

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 4>don't like the Ravens defense. I just can't stand the

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Ravens defense, so I feel like they're always exposed to

0:56:56.719 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 4>backdoor touchdowns. Give me the LA Clippers US eight and

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 4>a half, and I'm gonna take it with the Detroit

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:10.640
<v Speaker 4>endless Wings minus one and a half against Indy, So

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 4>that'll be my teaser the week. I just don't see

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Indy winning the game. Maybe they can cover it, but

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't see them winning the game. So give me

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Lions minus one and a half.

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Willie Oho Lions, Dolphins, Dolphins over the Patriots.

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 6>I think they still have a you know, a habit.

0:57:27.440 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 5>I've taken care of a business against these middling to

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 5>lesser teams like the Patriots. So Dolphins to win, basically,

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:37.320
<v Speaker 5>Lions to win. Hopefully get this one in the bank

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 5>and get on.

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:39.440
<v Speaker 6>Track here with the teasers.

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:42.479
<v Speaker 4>So officially, officially it's Dolphins minus one and a half

0:57:42.520 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Lions minus one and a half.

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Wow, you're not gonna screw me on the lines for

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:49.439
<v Speaker 5>a change. That's that's just this is new Well.

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Because he's right, that's right, the Lions. The Lions thing

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>scares me for some reason. I don't know. Why shouldn't

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 1>put it? Does Downies Niners? What could go wrong?

0:58:02.640 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 6>All right?

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Wait, so you're going Brownies up to nine and a half,

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 4>then you're going with the Niners. You are still Gilly's

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the last person off the Niners boat. If you know Niners,

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 4>he's never getting off that Niners boat. Why Gilly, why

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 4>will you not get off the Niners boat?

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what, You're one hundred percent right that it's irrational.

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>They cannot field a full football team no matter how

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>hard they try. Somebody comes back, somebody gets hurt, and

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it just might be that year, you know. But if

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>something's going to happen, it's going to be this week.

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And if they were to beat the Packers, everybody would

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 1>change their tune instantly. On the nine. I agree with

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you because on Pio right, because on paper, they still

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have more talent if it's all on the field, than

0:58:52.000 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>almost anybody.

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 6>They just have the margin for air.

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they're they're running out of margin air too with

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:00.680
<v Speaker 5>their schedule with Lions and Bills, and this week it's

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 5>probably going to have to get to ten wins because

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 5>their tiebreaker scenario is not great, but they're running out

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 5>of time.

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Purdy's on the injury report now too. It's like anyway,

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that's my teaser, which brings us to our final two

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>questions of each and every megapod. Final two questions, the

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 1>first of which is which of the big favorites is

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the most likely to lose? Outright, here are your candidates.

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The Detroit Lions seven and a half point favorites at

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts, the Chiefs ten and a half point

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>favorites at the Carolina Panthers. Remember this has nothing to

0:59:33.040 --> 0:59:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do with the spread. I'm just giving you the candidate

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Commodores ten point favorites at home against the Cowboys, just

0:59:39.360 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the fifth time since I have been a human being

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Commodores have been double digit favorites against the

0:59:46.720 --> 0:59:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys nineteen eighty nine, nineteen ninety, nineteen ninety one,

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:54.919
<v Speaker 1>two thousand as a Brad Johnson team, And this week,

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:57.960
<v Speaker 1>candidate number two the Dolphins seven and a half point

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.520
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against the Patriots, Texans seven and a

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites at home against the Titans. I'm not

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw in the Broncos because I don't wanna. I

1:00:06.360 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to pollute that group. Those are your choices, Aaron.

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Who's the most likely of those of that group to

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>lose outrights?

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Miami, Miami, Miami, because I don't think their defense is good,

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>And because Drake May seems like the kind of guy

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>right now who has a wide range of possibilities where

1:00:27.240 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>he could throw three picks or he could just make

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a couple of just outstanding, ridiculous plays. So I would say,

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:37.439
<v Speaker 2>of those of those underdogs, the one that's most likely

1:00:37.440 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to win outright is the Patriots.

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>How would you characterize the general consensus New England sports

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>fan view of him at this point? We got the guy,

1:00:47.360 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we got the guy, Okay, Todd.

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with the Broncos. Does Broncos one of

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the choices?

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>No? I took it out on purpose so you couldn't

1:00:57.640 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>use it.

1:00:58.880 --> 1:01:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Okay, So then I I'm gonna then I'm gonna

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:03.440
<v Speaker 4>agree with uh. I'm gonna go with Aaron's call. I

1:01:03.480 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 4>just don't think Capri Pants has it all locked down

1:01:06.880 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 4>enough to the fact to the place where he's for

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.520
<v Speaker 4>sure gonna win games he's supposed to win. So I

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>could totally see him, you know, looking in his card

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>and ruining the game. So I'll go with Miami. Also,

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:22.439
<v Speaker 4>you hate Mike xcuse me? Oh, I don't hate him,

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 4>I have I actually don't hate him. I just don't

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 4>think he's next level coaching, and clearly he shouldn't be

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:30.880
<v Speaker 4>wearing pre pants. But that's the only thing I don't

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 4>like about it. Do you think he was up for

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:34.560
<v Speaker 4>six in the fourth quarter he would throw the ball

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 4>to No, he would run the ball, because that's what

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 4>you're supposed to do in the fourth quarter. You're supposed

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>to take your starter out if you're up forty two

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 4>to six because he could get hurt.

1:01:44.240 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he's done that, Kiffen. I don't know if you've

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 6>ever seen that in college.

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 5>I will go with the Titans over the Texans.

1:01:52.400 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Reasons. Willie Lank through the ball against Furman seventy six

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>to nothing in the fourth quarter with the fourth string quarterback.

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>He's throwing the ball trying to get over eighty And

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:08.840
<v Speaker 4>for me, that is the most egregious action you could

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 4>possibly take on a football field.

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, come on, don't the fourth string quarterback deserve to

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>get to throw a couple passes too?

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:18.959
<v Speaker 4>You know what, Aaron may be in his own side

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 4>of the field, but not.

1:02:20.400 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>From quarterback to point of view, rather than from the

1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>coach's point of view.

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>What was what about the winning seventy six to nothing

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 4>against Furman? It's ridiculous. I took tea.

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:36.360
<v Speaker 6>I don't have I didn't have any reasons though.

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You took the Texans.

1:02:38.600 --> 1:02:40.280
<v Speaker 6>Okay, Texans Texas.

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am going to say, you ready for this,

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ladies and gentlemen, the Detroit Lion.

1:02:48.080 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I just have a feeling. It's like a blink Malcolm

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Gladwell blink thing. I can't really explain it. I just

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's fifty years of watching football. Something in my head

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is telling me something might be question.

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 4>For Hushem Karma. If you're going to be forty two,

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Hashem Karma would definitely say, if you're up forty two

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 4>to six and you're throwing the ball, you deserve to

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:16.680
<v Speaker 4>lose the following week because of obnoxious behavior. You know

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 4>what happened to sportsmanship? What happened to sportsmanship in sports

1:03:21.200 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 4>at thirty five six, you shouldn't even be throwing forget

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:28.360
<v Speaker 4>forty two sick? Is sportsmanship completely dead? What happened to like,

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:30.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, you don't have to embarrass the other guy?

1:03:31.080 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that?

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Is that gone in life? Now? Has that just been totally?

1:03:34.720 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Is that over? Now? What happened to that?

1:03:38.360 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Am I seriously the only one of us who lived

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>through the year two thousand and seven?

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>It was wrong then, Aaron? It wasn't right then, wasn't Aaron? No,

1:03:49.760 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't Ji.

1:03:51.120 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>This is not new, This is not new Belichick.

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Belichick was annoyed because the spygate, remember, and he wanted to.

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>You don't think that was why?

1:04:03.240 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think. I don't know whether it was

1:04:05.640 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 2>spygate or what. I just they just I just remember

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the complaints. I just remember the complaints.

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Before we're okay.

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Can we just ask Karon what his biggest surprise of

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 4>the NFL season has been, opinion? Because I'd love to

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 4>hear that.

1:04:21.920 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I I think it's Washington because maybe because uh,

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I said, one of the rookie quarterbacks is going to

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>be really good. We don't know which one it is.

1:04:34.320 --> 1:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>And it turns out that the answer was it was Daniels.

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're more oppressient calls. Was that you said,

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at least one or two of the second year guys

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be good?

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I said, is like a rookie. I said, Richardson is

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:53.040
<v Speaker 2>like a rookie. He could suck like a rookie. He's

1:04:53.080 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>basically like a rookie. And he did suck. Yeah.

1:04:55.800 --> 1:04:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So who is your biggest surprise On the downside,

1:05:01.360 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>getting a lot of work out of here?

1:05:04.000 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Dallas and the Patriots defense. I thought the Patriots would

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>have a top ten defense. Their defense is horrifyingly bad.

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys thing is fascinating because I feel like a

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people now are like, oh, yeah, totally, I

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>could totally see this coming, could we?

1:05:21.040 --> 1:05:23.439
<v Speaker 2>It was a team that won twelve games the last

1:05:23.440 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 2>three years? What do you mean you see this coming?

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I'm like people are being way too nonchalant

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about this to me, where it's like, oh, yeah, Jerry sucks, well,

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Jerry does suck, but it's like, did you really think

1:05:36.400 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they'd be this bad? And it's just an incredible collapse.

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:45.960
<v Speaker 5>And once every three or four years they have one

1:05:45.960 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 5>of these years where like Romo would get hurt or

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Dak would get hurt and the wheels come off and

1:05:49.080 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 5>then they bounce back next year. Maybe that's why, because

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:52.520
<v Speaker 5>we've seen this before once every few years with that,

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 5>maybe I don't.

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Know, Billy. They were minus thirteen against the Redskins late

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:01.160
<v Speaker 4>last year and now they're plus ten against the Redskins.

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 4>It's an incredible have you ever seen that ever? In

1:06:04.760 --> 1:06:05.360
<v Speaker 4>two years?

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>On guessing lines, I said Washington minus seven. Kelly tells

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>me Washington minus ten, and I just start giggling because

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, it's not in my DNA to guess that

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington will be a double digit favorite over Dallas. That's amazing.

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 5>I consider Dallas as one of my picks, but I

1:06:22.200 --> 1:06:22.880
<v Speaker 5>couldn't do it.

1:06:23.920 --> 1:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, listen, I dare you? Okay? Final question? We live

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in a bizarro world, Aaron, where we are forced to

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>bet a side on every single game that's on the

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL slate for a given a week. But you are

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>allowed one free pass, one game that you want want

1:06:38.120 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>no part of on the line. What game with it?

1:06:41.640 --> 1:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Rams? Eagles?

1:06:43.840 --> 1:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Rams? That's as good a choice as any What that

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was it? You will last week? I said, what the

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hell are the Rams? Are they good?

1:06:49.280 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Are they good?

1:06:50.000 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>What are they?

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 6>I can't figure out the Rams.

1:06:51.960 --> 1:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Hell.

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I know what the Eagles are, but I don't know

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>what the Rams are. And I think that this line

1:06:56.440 --> 1:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>being three points is about perfect, and I think that

1:06:59.120 --> 1:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the over undertow being about fifty is about perfect. And

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't want to have any part of it.

1:07:04.760 --> 1:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Who is the most What the fuck team? Is it

1:07:06.520 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams or is it like the Colts? Like what,

1:07:09.080 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of those two, right?

1:07:12.240 --> 1:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>The team?

1:07:14.600 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but we still think they're good, right, like I'm

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are When they do.

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't like lose to the Raiders, it's like, what the

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>hell is going on?

1:07:22.880 --> 1:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>True? That's for sure? True Todd, same question, What game

1:07:26.640 --> 1:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we want no part of?

1:07:28.840 --> 1:07:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Much like Baller TV, which is the TV network that

1:07:32.840 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 4>we have to pay money to watch East Carolina against Jacksonville. Say,

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:39.760
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea what Baller TV is, and I

1:07:39.800 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>also have no idea what's going on in the Chicago

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 4>locker room. So therefore I will avoid the Chicago Minnesota

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Viking game.

1:07:51.640 --> 1:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Hillson Chiefs Panthers.

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 5>I could see this being one of these Chiefs where

1:07:56.320 --> 1:07:58.480
<v Speaker 5>they chief games where they just kind of sludged through

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:00.840
<v Speaker 5>it and it's somehow a seven point game late in

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 5>typical Chiefs not covering big numbers, or I could see

1:08:03.720 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 5>this being, you know, twenty seven to seven Chiefs get

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:08.400
<v Speaker 5>on track. He's moved the ball here and then motivated

1:08:08.440 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 5>after a loss. So I have no interest either side

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:10.959
<v Speaker 5>of that game.

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I could literally pick ten games this week for this,

1:08:14.800 --> 1:08:17.439
<v Speaker 1>like every Sunday game, because I have no conviction on

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:20.559
<v Speaker 1>it him. I'm gonna say it is the Washington Taco

1:08:20.600 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Holders against the Dallas Cowboys. I don't know. I could

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>see Washington blowing them out, or I could see the

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys actually keeping it close. The problem with the Cowboys

1:08:31.240 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the other night was for as cosmetic as that final

1:08:34.560 --> 1:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>score scened, like Houston in a blowout, Cooper Rush did

1:08:38.640 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>throw to use your acronym, Todd, he threw about four

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>or five inches in that game interceptions that should have happened,

1:08:45.800 --> 1:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was like Houston could have destroyed him that

1:08:48.360 --> 1:08:51.639
<v Speaker 1>way too, but they didn't. They kept dropping. So I'll

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>say Washington in doubt.

1:08:53.800 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Aaron.

1:08:54.240 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Your Twitter handle once again is do I have this

1:08:57.960 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>right a shot? L Yeah?

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Ah Atz NFL.

1:09:04.600 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>A Shots, NFL, FTN Sports is where he does his

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thing once again. The FTN go to Twitter handle is

1:09:11.920 --> 1:09:12.879
<v Speaker 1>FDN Fantasy.

1:09:13.720 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 2>FTN Fantasy is the main ur l and the main

1:09:16.600 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>handle at this point. Yeah, we've sort of merged everything,

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:21.519
<v Speaker 2>even though we do betting and we do dfs and

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 2>we do DVOA, and we've kind of merged it all

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>under the FTN Fantasy banner.

1:09:26.920 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Aaron, always a pleasure man. Thank you so much.

1:09:30.520 --> 1:09:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Great having you on this show. You remember the first

1:09:33.520 --> 1:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>time you came on the megapod. It's one of your

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>more famous lines ever that we still quote to this day,

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>which is after about five minutes. I don't know if

1:09:40.040 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you remember you're saying this. After five minutes, you go,

1:09:43.080 --> 1:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to get used to the rhythm of

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. That's one of the great lines ever. The rhythm.

1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That was a shot at you, Todd, That's what it was.

1:09:55.280 --> 1:09:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, this podcasts definitely mega.

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely definitely mega whatever that whatever mega entails Todd

1:10:04.040 --> 1:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Wishnev from his mom's cork Attic in Pittsburgh, PA. Will

1:10:07.120 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Hill should have bet more podcasts, Aaron, what is your

1:10:11.240 --> 1:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you go live on Twitter. I see that come up.

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Also Monday. Monday and Thursday at eleven am Eastern, me

1:10:18.840 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and Mike Tanier on YouTube and Twitter do our FTN

1:10:24.040 --> 1:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>shots into near NFL podcasts. So yeah, Mondays and Thursdays

1:10:27.920 --> 1:10:29.040
<v Speaker 2>eleven am Eastern.

1:10:29.520 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 6>I got a cute up by listen every week. It's great.

1:10:32.400 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it pops up on my thing and I keep

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning to hit on it. I'm like, what's thereon doing? Okay,

1:10:37.760 --> 1:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game today.

1:10:39.560 --> 1:10:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Break lead sixty one seven. We're five thirty three to play.

1:10:44.120 --> 1:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>As long as we can stay out of the bow zone,

1:10:46.160 --> 1:10:46.920
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna leave this.

1:10:46.880 --> 1:10:51.000
<v Speaker 2>One when Drake is leading. That's called God's plan.

1:10:55.400 --> 1:10:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with all your bets. Week twelve, Ashitt, good

1:10:58.680 --> 1:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bye

1:11:00.280 --> 1:11:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Ba Bang Docta basa the Saban Batang doct