WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off April 19th, 2024 (EP. 794)

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Bros. MLB. This is Leading

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Off Live, brought to you.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 2>If I bet three sixty five, it is me, Joey,

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>p Joke, Pisapia. That of course is the Welsh, and

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it's you, the Peanuts and the Cracker Jacks hanging out

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>here on a fun Friday. We're gonna try to get

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 2>to your questions. Welsh on the home run board again.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Somebody is getting hot, my trout stealing bases, Welsh calling

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>home runs.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in the upside down world. What's happening

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>right now? I'm defeating Ai. AI is not able to

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>well it was really just a wheel, but the wheel

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is not able to get me a home run. But

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I had to do it all natural with the Dolice

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Garcia and we'll try to go for two. I just

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>walk back on that board. Put me back on that

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>home run board.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Please, not there yet, Not there. Michael obviously knows what

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>today really is. Hello all, and welcome to the Tortured

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Baseball Hosts Apartment Day. Yes, that's right. The new Taylor

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Swift double album. Oh my god, my god, my god

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>just dropped last night. I know, I know it means

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot in my house.

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I have two daughters. You know, my daughter loves twelve

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. My daughter loves Taylor Swift. I didn't know

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>an album was dropping, and then it did, and then

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw the excitement that no one knew that the

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>second album was dropping. What I do love though, And

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know this about me as Taylor is jumping in

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>apparently I don't know any of this. I've just this

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is from the internet jumping into like the shade department

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because there's a song, isn't there a song that is

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>like at Kim Kardashian and it's got like yeah, okay

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, I kind of like I like the pettiness.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm down for it, especially for like the richest people

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>on the planet to like be petty.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that with other rich people. You're right, You're right.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>It brings Welsh joy. Here's a question from Whips Joey

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 2>p and Knoli Welsh. That's a good nickname for you.

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>In my OBP league, I was offered Adolas Garcia for CJ. Abrams.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>What do you think can I move Oneo Cruz to

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>shortstop and Nolan Gorman to middle infield? What do you

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>think about this deal here Garcia for Abrams.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I would do it. I'm not

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>sure unless I was really really chasing power so on

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>itl Yesterday I put out a pole and we discussed it.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Bagman and I. It was who'd you rather have rest

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of season? Boba Shit or CJ. Abrams. And we had

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple people that were like, oh, you know, recency bias,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what is going on? But guess what. CJ Abrams ran

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>away with that, and obviously there's a recency to it.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You and I have also been like, hey, CJ. Abrams

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>might be a superstar. Well, you couldn't look at the

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>profile right now. Obviously he steals bases, his batting average

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is up, he's barreling the ball more, he's hitting the

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ball harder, he's getting the ball in the air, and

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>these are things that I wasn't so sure he was

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>going to do. So I thought the power is in question.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But he's hitting consistently. So all of this to say,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>even if the profile kind of like simmers down a

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit, I just really think he is immensely valuable

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for all five categories this year. Adolies is the Hey

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I want Big RBIs I want big homer chase, but

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no stolen basis, so I don't want to be

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>like one foot in, one foot out and say, well,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>if you only need homers, I lean c j Abrams here.

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>But if you are a heavy, heavy chase on stolen

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>bases and you're comfortable because you have O'Neil Cruz, sure

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you could do it. But I'm team c j Abrams.

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Cruz has struggled recently too, has not been a good

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>week or the last seven days for him. Statistically speaking,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna last. But still I think

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>that's the biggest problem too. If Cruz was playing really well,

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 2>it's an no brainer for me. But Cruise hasn't played great,

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>so I don't know. I mean, I would probably take

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>this deal and put the faith at Cruise could be

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>good enough that I don't have to worry about that.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 2>The other part of this is, too, is how I

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>feel about Nolan Gorman. And you know, I've never been

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the biggest Nolan Gorman guy, so I think that's a

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>bit of an issue. But let's get after the headlines.

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's start about Logan Webb. A seven shownout innings yesterday,

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a win over the Diamondbacks, who cannot buy a win

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco. What in the world I saw that

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>stat yesterday, I was like, I wish I knew that

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>stat yesterday because I would have been all in on

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that one because they've been terrible there. But good outing

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>for Logan Web, which he definitely needs, so we can

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>all breathe the sigh of relief.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to comment on it real quick sure before

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we move on to it, because my bet of the

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>day yesterday was Diamondbacks money line first five, and it

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was looking pretty good. They got to Web super early

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on Ryan Nelson got smacked in the elbow in like

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the second or third inning and got knocked out of

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the game, and they had Logan Allen come in, who

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>then proceeded to give up a run and then shut

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>everything down. But then you just had Web shut them down.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>If you watch the game. One of the craziest things

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>about this too horrible umpire by the way every call

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>on the outside of the plate was given to Logan Web,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it was a change up, a slider, a fastball,

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the Diamondbacks were just feeding it and eating

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>into it. But that's what's like special about logan Web,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is what I really love about him, by

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the way, is that as a smart pitcher who attacks

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 1>those advantages, and he did that last night. I didn't

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>cash it even though it was a one nothing game.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>A tie would have pushed the bet, So that kind

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of stunk. But the Diamondbacks stink right now and logan

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Web totally back on the come up. And I hope

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling better about logan Web because you were definitely

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not a like the Swift and then you got.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>The crappiet out of him in the spring, and then

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the first couple of starts he got the crappy out

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you getn't smacked it a love of the ballpark.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Something's wrong. So a little concerning again when a picture

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>has a good track record of being good. I don't

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>want to overreact to spring, but it was hard to

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 2>ignore when you're giving up the most hits in spring

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.559
<v Speaker 2>and your logan Web like that should not be either.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Jack Lighter not the best debut. Seven runs and three

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 2>and two thirds innings, struck out three. There were some

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>good moments I think you take away in this start

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to a very emotional guy in the dugout, perhaps on

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the mound too. This was kind of the knock on

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>his daddy. I remember when he was young, coming up

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 2>in the late eighties with the Yankees, because I'm old

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.559
<v Speaker 2>enough to remember that al Lighter was a very emotional picture.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 2>He had a hard time sometimes corralling his emotions, letting

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 2>his emotions settle in, and allowing him to be in

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>command of the mound. And it wasn't until he got

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>traded from the Yankees to the Blue Jays that it

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 2>started to happen. And then eventually the Marlins really merged.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the best version of alt Lighter into that

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>later stage veteran Mets period. But you know, I know,

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 2>different pitchers, lefty, righty, all that same stuff. But what

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 2>do you make of the Jack Lighter start yesterday. I'm

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>attributing a little bit of it to nerves, and I'm

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>curious to see what the second one is more than

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's definitely I wasn't right in, you know, saying, hey,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a good matchup. I think the logic made sense.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>He was awesome in the this is weird. He was

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>awesome in the first inning. Three pitches strikeout, bam. Two

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>strikes were golden. Oh, I was ready to quote tweets

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and then just smashed in the second inning.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>It was that the analysis again, it was that's.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The advanced analysis of.

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Getting analysis like that anywhere else, folks.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And this funny, uh concasious put like you serve up

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like meatball fastballs to Hobby Baia is like, that's where

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a problem. But then the third inning he kind

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of found himself again, and then the fourth inning things

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>fell apart. There's some bad defense that played into it.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>But the end of the day, he didn't get any

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>really whiffs off of the slider. It was some of

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the fastball which looked good, but he didn't command it.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And his change up. I'd love to see the change

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>up more because he had a pretty good whiff rate

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>on that, but it's a command issue, like he wasn't

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>able to be consistent. I thought there were good signs

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of life. I just thought this was a really good matchup.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He got beat up. I don't I think he'll get

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>another start and got I looked, oh it's Seattle. Seattle

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>should be the next startup, which offense is kind of stuttered.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>There's really good k potential. It's a little dangerous if

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna end up starting it. But it was a

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty I don't know, I was pretty discouraged about like

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the start in general, but I do think there's possibilities

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that this can turn around. But we got to see

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>better command because he fell apart there.

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, agreed. I think we'll see another start and look,

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>even if the next one isn't ideal, you'll still see

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Jack Lider again at some point this season. Like I think,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you bring him up there and then

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you just kind of send them down for the rest

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of the year. There will be other injuries. Let's take

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>a quick break in the action and tell you about

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Rival Fantasy. If you want to up fantasy baseball game,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the only place to do it is Rival Fantasy this

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>MLB season. If you're already missing the thrill of the draft,

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 2>jump into one of the Rival Fantasy's daily or weekly

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Best Ball drafts, select your squad, sit back and watch

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the points. Roll in Looking for DFS games you can't

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>find anywhere else. Try Fantasy Bingo. It's a game where

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you pick a lineup featuring any active players on a

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>given day without a salary cap. See which players complete

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>achievements on your bingo cards to win. With each card

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>costing only one buck each, it's the easiest way to

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>get into the action. And if you've got strong opinions

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>about one player over another, Rival Fantasys challenges are tailor

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 2>made for settling those debates once and for all. Pick

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>which player you think will score more Fantasy points that day,

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>throw down some money and see who comes out on top.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Invite your friends and play MLB DFS on Rival Fantasy.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Sign up at Join Rival dot com Slash Fantasy Pros

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to claim your two hundred dollars deposit. Match again. That's

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Join Rival dot Com Slash Fantasy Pros. We'll see you

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in the arena, and now back to the action. There's

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>sures are news to share. We're gonna get to that

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a little later in the show, but he's gonna be

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>coming back earlier than later. Some other news was really

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me. Tristan McKenzie is pitching through a torn

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>ligament in his elbow. I don't know if that explains

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the six two three era. Instead of going through Tommy John,

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 2>he decided to do rehab. But clearly, I mean he

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>has not been good in the first three starts. So

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>what do you make of this news? Because this is

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>something that I think we're all looking around at each

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>other saying, all right, well, if you're not healthy enough

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>to be pitching here, the results are bad. I mean,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the guardians kind of have to make a decision, don't they.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this was like leaked in a when

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he gets because I think he pitches today when he

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>gets hit up today, immedia Tommy John like he's like,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>he's it's not gonna be good outing, and then they've

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>leaked this story and then by Monday he's gonna be

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>having some type of surgery or something like that. I

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm not a doctor, so I don't know

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the different levels of like why are we comfortable with

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>someone with a tear, like obviously it could be like

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a real minuscule tear and if you but this is

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a problem though. I think when you're dealing with a

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>situation like this, they're going to be like, all right,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got extra maintenance. You've got to maintain this arm.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But obviously that's not natural. If if you're changing what

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you do and you're having to kind of pay attention

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to this and baby this situation, he's not pitching to

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>his highest level. No, I don't know what that serves,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, McKenzie, it's a bad situation. He was a

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>good dynasty option. He's not right now, and I think

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we all clearly know like what we are in line

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for here very shortly.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Garcia obviously yesterday a big day, so homering two

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>for five, that's what you want out of him. So

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>good on the well she another home run for him.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately my stuff got rained out yesterday. So bummer for

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Bell and try and get another one in time. Too

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 2>busy doing football shows for NFL Draft. The Cubs activated

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>James and tie On from the IL and also Patrick Wisdom.

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Where does Wisdom fit in with the Cubs now? Between

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Morell and obviously Michael Bush has been red hot?

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Like, where's spot for Wisdom?

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly where it is. It is keeping that

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>bench warm, get those seats, move around, make sure that

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>any of the bleacher parts are nice and warm for

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all the really, really good players. I don't see where

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>that he'll be a pinch hit, day off type of guy.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see where the fitt is. Michael Bush

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is too good Chris Morel has been solid with sales

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Suzuki out there might be a little bit more flexibility

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and maybe dhing in a short period of time, But

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Wisdom was like just a big power chase, you know,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe a good matchup or something like that, but you

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>won't be keeping that bench nice and warm.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to the wheels of Mike Trout, remember

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 2>bet three sixty five. Use that promo code leading off

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>bet five bucks, get one hundred and fifty in bonus bets.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 2>When you do again, we want you to bet responsibly

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>as well. Twenty one or over, eighteen or over in

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 2>Kentucky gambling problem called one hundred gambler or one hundred

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>bets off in Iowa, terms and conditions apply. Again, use

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that promo code for bet three sixty five. The promo

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 2>code is leading off to bet five bucks, he get

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty in bonus bets. Welsh something fun here.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 2>Mike Trout has five steals now after stealing two more

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>bags yesterday. Is the speedback for Mike Trout. Because this offseason,

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of really good analysts were still off of

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 2>Mike Trout even at the ADP they were getting. There

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>was one guy who was not. Now it's you before

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you start, you know, hyper extending your arm to pat

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 2>yourself on the back. Here, that's scorn. It is still April.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>But more importantly, I think this is something that even

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 2>if you were a supportive of Mike Trout, I don't

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>think anybody saw this starting you know, six, you know,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>eight steals possibly in April when all said and done. Now,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody had that necessarily on their radar.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Well you could, you could have envisioned the possibility because

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of Ron Washington, Like this is what he does. He

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>wants his teams to run, and that is typically something

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>that can be aggressive across the board. The reason maybe

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have happened would be obvious, like you don't

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>want your your only really great star player to be hurt.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>This is what he does. He is supportive of base

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>stealing and when you look like baseball savant. As far

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>as speed ratings go, he's trod has had like tiny,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>tiny tickdowns, but it's been like a ninety five or higher,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Like he still can run. I think there might have

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>just been philosophy differences, there might have been injury base things.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not the case. Washington green Light and we are

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>seeing in full force, and this is the type of

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff we're talking about. The obvious Mike Trout thing, by

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, is like great except when not, you know,

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets hurt. That's the argument anyone's gonna make. But

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this was the first year it felt like the narrative

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>change from He's gonna get hurt to yeah, it's gonna

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>get hurt. And he's also like not really good anymore

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's striking out and he doesn't steal. And this

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>has been a complete turnaround.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is like in the Suspect too, and

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that had a lot to do with it,

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of people like the surrounding parts. You know,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>you take o Tani out of this lineup, it's a

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>much different looking lineup.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But also there's I think again it comes back to

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>like offensive philosophy. Look at the drop right now. It's

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>very early in the season, but twenty percent percentage last

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, which is the highest his career. It's down

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to twenty point two, which is one of the lowest

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that he's had. I dare get into this that you

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>could potentially see this as a selling opportunity, but I

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know why you would have like invested in Trout

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, all right, I'm just waiting for

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>my opportunity to sell. The reasons would be if the

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>injuries start to loom, his hard hit numbers are down.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of wonder from the success standpoint, is

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this similar to like Cody Bellinger in that his hard

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hit numbers are coming down, but he's making sure his barrel.

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's barreling up higher, he's making better contact,

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he's making better decisions while he lowers his strikeout rate.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe some of the top end could fade as

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the season goes on. But if he steals more bases

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and he lowers his k's, we're gonna have vintage Mike Trout.

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And guess what deal of deals? Absolute deal of deals

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>when you were drafting in like late February and early March,

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>when he was going in the fifties and sixties and

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like, h screw it, get rid of him. If

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you at all think that you know we're coming to

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a head here, and you believe a lot of the

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>people that were in the full fades, then sell them,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>sell them, get out, because you can sell for King's

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ransom right now, I wouldn't gone.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Right here the baron drout greater than jay Rod. Maybe no,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>not right now, No, I mean right here. No, Look

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>who's got the better stats in April? Fine, But if

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you if if here's the perfect example, if somebody is

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 2>souring on Jay Rod in your league and you have

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 2>my trout, I make this trade in a heartbeat. I'm

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>taking Julio the rest of the season period and end

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of the story. And I'm not even looking back. And

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a deal you can pull off. And

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a big blockbuster kind of deal. And if you

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 2>have Trout, you mean, you know, you might close your

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 2>eyes a little bit and hit except there because you're

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a little going, Okay, baby's gonna happen. Maybe it's not,

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>but I would trust in Julio. He's such a fantastic player.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>In every April he does the same thing. It's like,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 2>just set your watch. It was like Mark to Chera

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>was like that too. He was like the worst in

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 2>April for like an eight year period. I don't know

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>what it is about these guys in April, certain guys,

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>but that is a trade right now that I'd be

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>looking at making if I could.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>No, we will say, like again, Ramashin is letting him run.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna keep running if he stays healthy. And let's

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>even just like arguing, say, like the Power, even though

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been prolific so far, it even tapers down. Hard

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to not envision that Mike Trout is gonna be a

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty guy this year. So everything that we're building up,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this really just comes down to injuries. Like

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout is proving like, hey, I look it, I

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>lowered this k rate that you all were like really

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>hyper focused on. I'm making it work. Even though I've

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>got more homers than RBI or whatever, like, those are

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all good things. He's gonna come back to a bound

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to Earth, but he could still be a thirty thirty guy.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So you just have to figure out where that is

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for your own teams. But if people are talking about

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>j Rod and people are talking about you know, first

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>round talents, there really might be some cool opportunities.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I see Dan in there, judge your Trout rest of season,

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean judge Judge. Yeah, it's not.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Hard, you know, and the people who are like banging

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on Julio Ron Riguez. Right now, let's just read you

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>a stat line for Julio after the bad April last year,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>somebody called him Byron Buckses in the chat, bro, you

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 2>get one hundred and two runs, scored, one hundred and

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>eighty hits, thirty seven doubles, thirty two homers, one hundred

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and three ribies.

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, and he also stole thirty seven bases. Stop it.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 2>You sound like an idiot when you say stuff like that.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't say stupid things in my chat, like I'm sorry,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>it's dumb. Don't say that in my chat. And the

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>year before and one hundred and thirty two games again

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>with a sour April in his first season, still ended

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>up with twenty eight homers and twenty five steals. Where

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>are those years for Byron Boxton? Come on, this is

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 2>when we get stupid and we start to look. We

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 2>hyper focus, it says, saying this guy's a slow starter,

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>this is who he is, instead of looking at the

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 2>bigger picture of this and the fact that he's Oh wait,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>how old is he now? Well she is twenty three

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 2>years old.

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, stop it. We got full like

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we got Madge, I like, I personally liked mad Joe.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Mad Joe's my favorite. You got like a thin died Joe.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>What about this? Real quick? Wonky said, why is it automatically? Judge?

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know I was gonna say Judge is also injury prone,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>so to me it was an automatic. I don't know

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if I was kind of like automatic for me.

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Injury prone but better team, better ballpark, better pizza, Papa

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>John's like all those things, Like it's just look, Aaron,

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Judge is was a first round pick for a reason.

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Mike My Trout wasn't for a reason. Just because so

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 2>far in April Mike Trout has played like a first

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>round pick. Does not mean that we're going to get

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that version of him for one hundred and fifty five game,

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 2>because every year we don't. We just don't get it.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's what's frustrating. And I'm not saying

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 2>this year we can't get it, but you have to

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>start looking at the probabilities of that. And I know

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Judge has risk too, but I'll take the risk of Judge.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Your philosophy for Trout is by or sell buy that

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>he will continue doing what he's doing right now and

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy ish, play like one hundred and thirty games

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, or you need to get out now if

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you had to.

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not running to get out of Mike Trout business,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>but I am ready to pull off a Julia Rodriguez

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 2>trade for him. I'm running on somebody. If you give

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>me elite level Aaron Joe, you're giving me first round

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 2>talent for Mike Trout. Like there's a reason his ADP

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>was where it was. And I'm not saying he's not

0:18:58.320 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>great and he's one of the best players in baseball

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>because we don't know he is. We just know that

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>even if Ron Washington lets him steal like maybe we'll

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe he'll end up with one hundred and fifty games,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>he'll go thirty thirty and everything will be glorious. That's

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of faith to have. I'll put my faith

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>in the twenty three year old who lier Rodriguez have

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a better five months going forward. I'll just will I'll

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 2>put those stats up against it, and I could be wrong,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>but I will take that risk. I think it's a

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>better investment. Let's talk about rookie LOOKI investments. Paul Skeens

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>is pretty good at pitching another ege strikeouts at three

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 2>to third innings, he touched triple digits thirty four times.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I was watching that game yesterday. Does that bother you?

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Like in this age that we live in where everybody

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>throws one hundred and ten miles an hour now and

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 2>everyone's arm is falling off this? I mean, should that

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 2>concern all of us?

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that's also when Charrington came out, so you know,

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we did the prospects of Stash. We talked about Paul

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Skins and it's so funny too because people are so

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>weird about prospects right now and just like, oh, don't

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>even care about them, or people are hyper caring about them. Well,

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Cherrington came and kind of like poured some cold water

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that they finally told us like, hey, listen, Paul Skeins

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is not built up for a full like sp workload

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. Like he's got to build those innings up.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's why we've gotten these three innings. I've been speculating,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like why is he only going three innings every single game?

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So they want to build him up. Now, turn it

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to your question where it's like you see this guy

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>throwing it's like ninety nine percent of the hardest thrown

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>balls in the minor leagues right now, like he has

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all of them. You see all these bullets in the

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues and it's kind of frustrating. But also I

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>watched almost this entire game. I was kind of bouncing

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>around to a couple and the fastball is ridiculous. But

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like as he got into the third inning, he got

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>up to around sixty four. I think he ended at

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>sixty four pitches and he only got into the fourth inning. Like,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not great, that's not great maintenance. That's kind of

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Blake snell Ish without the walks because he throws a

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>ton of pitches. He's trying to power strikeout. So a

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I hate seeing it down there be I don't care

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what Sherrington said. I still think we're going to see

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>him soon, especially that he's working into the mid sixties

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>and see it is overall worrisome seeing a guy throwing

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that max velo in minors and not having it in

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the back of your head. This guy's going down, like

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like nobody maintains anymore. So I just took it in

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of directions there with Paul Skins, he is incredible.

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>His change up looks great. You know, he's got that

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>slider that he throws really hard, throws his change up

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.239
<v Speaker 1>really hard, and his fastball is almost unhittable. He went

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>up against Tony Kemp, who's a major leaguer, and like

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there's one at that like Tony Kemp just swung through

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a one oh two. You could almost see the like

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the hell's going on here type of mentality and everybody

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is locked into it. Paul Skins is when we talk

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 1>about those stashes. I don't care what Charrington says. I

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>am stashing Paul Skins because I think when we get

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to that eighty marker sixty four, this last one, he's

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>coming up, so like two more starts beginning.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I would love to see when he gets that call

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 2>up what his trade value is in the open market.

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to see that, not in dynasty and keeper

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>League's obviously not there. When you're redraft leagues may be

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>very interesting.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think like top Well, so you can't

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>trade like SP for SP. So like do you think

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you can get like a tea?

0:21:58.640 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Can it happens?

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Can? Why would you dry? But anybody trade like I

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>guess unless they're trading like a struggling picture like.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Louis Castillo has struggled, Like, I don't think Paul Skins

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 2>for Louis Castillo is a good trade for the you know,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like I'm saying, I don't know. I mean, I think

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>it's it's tough as much as I especially in head

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 2>to head formats, it's a little dangerous because I think

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 2>in the season long we compared it early on, you know,

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.479
<v Speaker 2>back in spring, we said, look look at the Strasbourg year, right,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 2>his debut year. Can he give you seventy five innings

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>eighty innings in that range of great and if he can,

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that's really useful in season long rodo like edy head

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>to head format, that's something you have to consider. The

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>limitations he's gonna be on the injury risky has because

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>how max vlow he is. There's a lot of concerns

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and head to heads and you're probably not gonna have

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>him for the playoffs. So in head to head formats,

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Paul Skins is somebody that I think you really got

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>to think long and hard about what the value is

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.239
<v Speaker 2>long term and look at that peak value he comes out,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be the fanfare, there's gonna be so much

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>attention on him, just like there wasn't Strasbourg. I mean

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 2>that's tasperg start got huge ratings. I remember they put

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>on ESPN. Everybody was watching. It was wild and it

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>was great, and his value was unbelievable at that time.

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's when you always have to look

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and see what can I get for this? Because what

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 2>does August and September look like for Paul Skins in

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four?

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we had the same thing with Uri

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Perez when Uri came up. That's what I've been likening to,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like Jared Jones too, Like when Uri Perez came up,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>he was amazing for some period of time and then

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it was like, ooh, we have to baby My worry

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>would be the pirates have already given us this, like

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we are gonna kind of baby him. That's why, by

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm into stashing schemes because I don't want

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>to pay exorbitant like fab prices or number one waivers.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to be ahead of the game on it

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>because either you can ride out some of the good stats,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or there might be a men's trade value, Like if

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>he were up, who'd you rather have? Rest of the season?

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul skeins with some of the unknowns or Michael King.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Michael King.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So I mean that, and that seems kind of low.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>That seems kind of low, Like you could probably do

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that maybe.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Like right, and I think that would be a great

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 2>trade if you can get Michael King, Michael King. Excuse

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 2>me for Paul Skeins. I made them one person. I

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>made them mi celebrity couple for a second there, Like

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Michael Kaine in field prospect for the Blue Jays, Orelvis

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Martinez two for five is sol a homer. He's heading

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 2>three h five right now with three homers eleven ribies

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 2>over fifteen games. Are you impressed at all by him?

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never been a big O'errolvis, but I guy, but

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you I've had many conversations Jeff Ponts

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to Baseball America, Like he is definitely defended where bad

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>batting average stuff is. He's hitting over three hundred. That's

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>great for Arolvis, but he's had some k problems and

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>bad batting average stuff. Rob Howard's always been there, so

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not his question. He has always kind of defended

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to me a little bit more for an Orelvis Martinez.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So he's definitely a guy to pay attention to if

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this offense is looking to pick stuff up. They got

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, middle infield like David Schneider, Craig Vigio, like

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they could fill that gap. But I just don't know

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>how aggressive they're really going to be with that current lineup.

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But you should pay attention to him. He would probably

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be right on the cusp. I didn't have him in

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>my stashed article. Maybe that was a mistake.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Also, Hessen Kiersta for three with a solo homer another

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 2>homer for carstat I.

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Mean trade rumors. There was a rumor going out there

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>that that the Orioles might be floating him around in

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>trade talks. Yeah, for Mike Trout, that's oh yah, I

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>keep forgetting our Mike Trout to the Orioles thing our Yes, yours,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, yours, George, George.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 2>Or Well, I mean you would come you can come

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>on board now if you think it's a good idea.

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's a great idea. I don't

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's happening. I think it's a fantastic idea. Best

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>destination do you.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Want to you want to put the Orioles into All right,

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 2>we are not just fun. Now we're serious. Mike Trout's

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the deal.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a I think it's the Angels.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the Orioles.

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean unless the Angels continue. Look last year they

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>threw the punch and they're gonna do it again, and

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be brutal if they do.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Three up, three down. Marcus Simeon Homer three for five,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>good for him. Ryan Pepio a good start against the Angels.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 2>One run over six inning, seven strikeouts for the Pepio

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and Jared Durant two more runs and another stolen base

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>there for him. He continues to be a just a

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 2>fill in the categor man Duran, I'm so happy he

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 2>was one of our guys we loved going into the season.

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Adp was unbelievable. I don't know how many times I

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>took him in mocks. I don't know how many times

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I had to write about who's underrated? Oh, Jared Durant's underrated.

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>He has been three down. Canta my eight to six runs,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>five or nobody pitched well yesterday in that game between

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers and the Rangers. Evan Carter over four another

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 2>oo for him. With two strike cats and Corbyck Carroll

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>over four three ks. W TF Welsh, what's going on

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 2>with Corbyck Carroll?

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Wwtf Joe, I come three? I'm frustrated and I've had

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>people being like, come on of you, of all people, like,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of all of the first round picks, I legit. I

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do have the most concern for Corbyn Carroll. And maybe

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just being more dramatic because I'm closer to it,

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, he's kind of been like all or nothing.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He is so hyper progressive into early counts, which I

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely hate. He has not shown the ability to get

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball in the air. He did hit like a

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>one eight or one oh nine single yesterday, which if

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>there was no one on base he probably would have

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>turned into a double. But he's not consistently doing it.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>He's got a one ten max EV and eighty three

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>average EV, so I mean that shows how inconsistent he's been.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he has had a pretty low a

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty low k rate comparatively ten percent this year. He's

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>walking more than he's striking out, but he's just not

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>making quality contact. He's going to steal a ton of bases.

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get on base, but I am worried that

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 1>power is going to take a little bit of backseat.

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think you will stabilize and you know, me,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>being me, I would not buy I would buy low

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like, oh, how about this Mike Trouder Corbyn

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Carroll rest this season.

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's an interesting one because we only have the

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 2>one season of Corbyn Carroll and it is it was

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>a very good season of Corbyan Carroll. I mean, I'm

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>a big fan, you know that. I almost thought Corbyn

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Carroll was a slumproof kind of guy because of the

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 2>style of his game, because he runs, because he's got

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 2>quick hands. You know, I think. I think it's a

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 2>bad couple weeks. It's a bad stretch. I'm not going

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to overreact to it yet.

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That might be an amazing trade, by the way, if

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you had Mike Trout to go and offer that.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm leaning towards the Carrol side the rest

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 2>of season because I just want the younger player. At

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>this point. It's very close.

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Wonky killed me. I love this idea. Wonky says, She's like,

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely want an EMAI apocalyptic where a Welsh recording

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Carroll segment and it made me think we need, you know,

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>my picture of me and Corbyn. We need like a

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the future one where one of us is

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like fading away, like slowly over the season as he struggles,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like I'm fading away, and then when he comes back

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll be like yeah, or we just do wear in

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the world are Welsh recorbing Carroll? And then it's just like,

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly do you think it's a health issue.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I know some people were speculating about that, and some

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>people in the chat we're talking about that everybody.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Frank Ceves, Frank has been hard about

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that all off season, that they're really thinking that this

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was a shoulder thing. I don't. He's still taking the

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>relatively same approach, but he just seems so hyper aggressive,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>so hyper aggressive, and.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 2>It's like me, I'm hyper aggressive.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just it real.

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 2>If you say good things in the chat, but I'm

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 2>excited if you say stupid things in the chat, I'm

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna take it a task on it, Like that's okay,

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I say stupid things.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I take myself to task for it. But I'm just

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's been a while, but we might have to

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>bring it back. I am the King of keeping it real.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Such a good idea. Finish the show with that, please.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I will here's a question for you too well. I

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>wear my crown question in trivia because it made me

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 2>think about it. We were talking about the lighters, al Lighter,

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Jack Lighter, Highlighter, all the lighters when al Lighter was

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 2>traded from the Yankees to the Blue Jays. Who came

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 2>back in that deal from the Blue Jays to the Yankees.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 2>If you know, drop your answers in the chat. Don't

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>google it. I want your authentic answers if you know

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, and if you don't, don't go googling it

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 2>because that's no fun.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I will say. We were talking a little bit about

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the soft Air, and my timeline is messed up on

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Outlighter because like I was like ten years into the

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>future when he was a Marlin, So I really don't know.

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I really have absolutely no the.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Year nineteen ninety where he was traded. That should help.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>It was the beginning of the Yankees, kind of in

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that weird mold where they were tearing out No Uncle Ted.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>It was not David Wells. That's a good one. Tony

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Fernandez also a good one. There. That is incorrect. We're

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>going to get to the injuries and then we'll get

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>back to see who's right if they can get it.

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Tyler O'Neil concussion, hoping to come back.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>In Tuesday's opener at home against the Guardians, Ryan Nelson

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 2>was removed. Unfortunate for him, he had a right elbow contusion.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>He had to come out of that game. Walker Bueller

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 2>surrendered two runs and two and two thirds yesterday in

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the rehab Star from the elbow. Alex Cobb still dealing

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 2>with the shoulder irritation. Ricky Tiedeman went on the IL

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 2>in the minor leagues, but nobody give a reason why,

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>which I think is kind of weird, like don't you

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>have to give a reason?

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Why do you put again in an il?

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and then Ken Rosenthal, this is the biggest news

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>reporting that Max Scherzer could return in early May. We

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>just said it yesterday on the show. It was like, well,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Max Suens is going to beat that timeline because he's

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>a nut job. So there you go. Max Schurzer looks

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>like he's beating that timeline. What does that mean for

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 2>folks who have met right now stashed away? That's got

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>to be a huge lift. You can get him back

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 2>in even mid May as opposed at June first. That's huge.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>That's three more starts, four more starts.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That is massive, massive. I mean, and I can be

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>annoying and some people love it, some people hate it.

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But remember talking about you know, I'm on the backfields

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of the in spring training of the Rangers, and I note,

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>even though sometimes it's anecdotal, I was like, you know,

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting. He was throwing full field across

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the field where de Gram was baby thrown and stuff

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. And that showed that timeline being a little

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>bit higher, which is gonna make Max Schuzer maybe a

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid value early on. I'm pretty optimistic about it.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff isn't quite the same with Max Scherzer, and you

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>want that bullpen to be a little bit stronger. Lea

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>clerk has been struggling. Kirby Gates is now the closer.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how deep I going too games, but

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like bottom line, like this is great. You just want

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>solid starters. You hate when you see Andrew Heeney or

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>John Gray starting for the Rangers. You want the max

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>susers because of the offensive support and everything like that so, yeah,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this is solid.

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Nelson, you did it not wrong. Jerry says, I'm

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 2>taking a guess, probably wrong, But Jesse Barfield pops in

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>my head. Jesse Barfield is correct. Jesse Barfield had some power,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 2>had a cannon for an arm. People forget that. Jesse

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Barfield arm were the best right field arms you ever saw.

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>His son was the developmental director for the Diamondbacks and

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just went over to think to the White Sox this

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>past year.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>George Gestanza for al Leider would have been a good

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>trade too. All right, let's gear it up, Welsh, you're ready,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 2>It's Friday. Let's have some fun, a lot more games today,

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's time for the best bets of the day

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 2>with Joey p and the Welsh. Welcome in everybody. We're

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna get our MLB bets. Unfortunately, some bets got rained

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>out upon yesterday. But I'll still be very much on

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Cody Bellinger today as long as things are a little

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>drier for me today. Looking at the run line in

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the Phillies game against lowly White Sox, the Phillies have

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 2>been great. They pitched tremendously minus one and a half

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of plus money plus one twenty against the lowly white

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Sox and no crchetes on the mount. I know he's

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the best guy.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't care.

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 2>At some point in time, they're gonna either get to

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 2>him or get to the bullpen, and I will take

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the Philly side of this game, especially at home. I

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 2>will also take the Twins minus one and a half

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>at plus one forty five against the Tigers as well,

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 2>like the plus money I'm getting, and then I want

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 2>to focus on the Brewers game today. You're getting the

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Brewers on the run line minus one and a half

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 2>at plus one forty against the Cardinals as this one's

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 2>on the road. But Freddy Perolt's pitching and he has

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>been absolutely tremendous. Not to mention the fact that Saint

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Louis Cardinals are a strikeout machine of a team. They

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>have really had some struggles there at the play collectively,

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 2>there's you could just take him on the money line

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 2>at minus one eighteen. Pair that with Freddy Peralta over

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half strikeouts today at plus money plus

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>one fifteen, and you turn that in to a same

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>game parlay for plus two one seven. So that's what

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm in on today. The King of keeping it real.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>As you can see, my crown is on today. And

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of course when you make your wagers, don't forget to

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>do it over at bet three sixty five. He's that

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 2>promo code leading off at five bucks get one hundred

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and fifth the in bonus bets. When you do Welsh,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>what do you have for the people on a fun Friday?

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You and I are kind of in the same trajectory.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got some bets that are gonna probably be coming

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>here in just a little bit, So again, just remind

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys fennispros dot com or Bettingpros dot com slash Welsh.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>If you want to follow me, you can do the

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing with Joey. Brewers are a really interesting one.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But let's start with the same place that you started

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in the White Sox and Phillies game. And I'm going

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>back to a nurfee. I felt a little dicey about

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday and I was like, this could be a

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit risky, and it was and it didn't cash

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 1>because Pepio was awesome, but the other side wasn't. There

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is some risk in this one today, so buyer beware

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>because I'm taking the no run first inning in Chicago

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and Philly. Now Philly is the third highest scoring team

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>through the first inning, So Welsh, what the hell are

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you doing? White Sox are in the middle. This is

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>about Garrett Crochet. He's about thirty five percent K percentage

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. I'm not against the idea of

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, by the way, that he could get

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>got to pretty soon, so I don't hate taking the

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>full in the first inning. You got two lefties that

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to be at least in the first three

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of that lineup. Garrett Crochet has been hyper deceptive. It's

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fastball is amazing, and he's been just a K monster.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm betting on Garrett Crochet. And then on the

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>other side of it, you know, Spencer Turnbull is up

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and ups and downs White Sox in that middle range.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>But they're hitting around two hundred against righties right now

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's got a sub one whip. So I'm banking

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>on these two shutting it down at least in the

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>first inning very early on. Things may change coming up

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at number two. I'm doing an alt K prop and

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going back to Crochet six. This is the six

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to six K prop because Crochet is at six and

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a half, and I'm taking his alt at six and

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm adding Freddy Peralta, who's got a pretty big line today,

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>where that suckers up at seven and a half. I

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>know you took it little concerned about the top end

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of it getting to eight, so I'm bringing it down

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm getting this at minus one twenty and I

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>know this is a safe that if you wanted to

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>play it at seven for Paralta, you can get plus money.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But give me strikeouts over for Crochet and Peralta combined,

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that's near ish, you know, even money at one twenty

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and I really like that one. And then finally the

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>early game here picking on Ajpuck, this one kept coming

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>up and off of books, which is super interesting. I'm

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>taking aj pucks walks two and a half over. It's juiced.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't as juiced early on. It moved up. The

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>reason why he has walked three or more in every

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>game he's played. The Cubs are averaging just under four

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>walks per game, and they got an overall ten percent

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:33.479
<v Speaker 1>walk rate, which is at the higher level. AJ Puck

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of stunk, so I'm betting he's gonna walk

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>another three in this one for my best bets of

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, and I got a few others that'll be

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>up on the app.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Are you having everybody? Those are the best bets of

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the day. Download the Betting Pros app right now, It's free.

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 2>It's fantastic. Also join our group Bettingpros dot com slash

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 2>leading off. Remember from Friday today to next Friday, we're

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna be giving away some free stuff whoever has the

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 2>best return on their investments, So get in on that

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 2>right away and enjoy are best bets of the day

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 2>for MLB. Subscribe to Betting Pros dot com and of

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 2>course subscribe to the YouTube channel of Betting Pros and

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Pros MLB. All right, Welsh, before we get to

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously the home run call for the weekend, don't forget everybody.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 2>When you subscribe to Fantasy Pros MLB, you also get

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 2>a chance to get this Jose Ramirez autograph Jersey. Just

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 2>comment below on a video and subscribe to Fantasy Ros MLB.

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 2>That's it. That's all you gotta do to win this

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>bad boy. We're working on getting out the trophy out there.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 2>That all is working out. Talk to the guy yesterday,

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 2>So that's at an address. Yeah, yeah, your address. Now

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna get your address. Let's check in now, all right,

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 2>so let's get after I after all this today, you know,

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take from my home run call this weekend

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 2>in Cincinnati. You might trout get here. It's in there

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 2>at nine o'clock this morning. By nine in the morning,

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I put this in there and it's staying in there.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Lit Look, it says Mike Trout, haven't changed it. The

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 2>hands are up here. So there you go, Mike Trout

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 2>for the week. Just because I'm a jerk and that's

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 2>who I am. Welsh. Where are you going for your

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 2>home run call for the weekend?

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm making my own pick. I feel like we

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>need to have some type of like like if people

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>want a wheel, they got to do something. We got

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to see some improvement or something across those on that

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like like the video. A whole bunch

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of this video is like more than any of the

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>others and watched for this week. We'll bring back the

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>wheel next week and have some fun. But we are

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to the robots. We're gonna go to me

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and I am gonna make it pretty simple on this one,

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>because this is the player from a BBP standpoint, who

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.959
<v Speaker 1>has the most hits versus a pitcher today. This guy

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>has I believe, seven extra base hits against this matchup.

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Mookie Bets. Mookie Bets at the tippy

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>top of the lineup. I get a few extra at bats,

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe one, maybe two homers are there. Pretty good

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>track record, I believe against Sean and Aya. So give

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>me Mookie Bets for my home run call for Friday

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and maybe I'll carry it over to the weekend and

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get me on that board. Dang it.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 2>So Angelo not a regularly. This is another Angelo. We

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 2>got to we we attract a lot of Angelo's to

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 2>watch for some reason. I can't only assume why, Angela Morales.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 2>What's the swag? We're giving away hats and or T

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 2>shirts for fantasy pros, so you can we're betting pros

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever you prefer. So again, you know, free stuff from

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the channel should be fun. I'd like to get that

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Welshism shirt up there too. I have some other fun

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:19.959
<v Speaker 2>ones up there in the shop.

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>We probably should get some stuff like the Welshisms would

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>be great. I'd love that, you know what, I would love.

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 2>To get shirts.

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want, It just says Joe, and maybe

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a Welsh one. I want a hat, the Welsh hat.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>That's do my autograph. I got a great autograph and

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll just put it as a hat. Let's do that.

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this the crown, Joe, We're.

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Gonna do all of it. Let's let's also join the

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 2>discord if you want to make home run calls.

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot Com slash Chat. It's free to join.

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Remember every Wednesday, were over there, Welsh and myself taking

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 2>your questions, hanging out with you. I make sure you

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 2>sink your leagues if you haven't already for free with

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the Fantasy Pros MLB my playbook, go download the app.

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Today We're going to Fantasypros dot Com, slash my Playbook

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.439
<v Speaker 2>and LB. Now I'm the leader board. I'm still tied

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 2>with everybody at eight. Bo's is still up there at

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 2>nine at number one. So this weekend should be really interesting. Well,

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 2>she should be a lot of fun stuff there. Hopefully

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>would come back and that leaderboard looks a little shaken up,

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully the king of keeping it reels at the top.

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 2>But I want everybody to have a great weekend out there.

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate you guys subscribing to the channel, being part

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of the MLB channel here and all the success and

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 2>we'll see you Monday. So make the time because we

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 2>always make the time for you. Join us live. We

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>love when you join us live here for the program.

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 2>And if you can't, by golly, we appreciate you listening.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, do it for me. Monday is

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 1>my birthday, so do come and watch the show. And yeah,

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>just put number purity got me, um good, got big good,

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>any big good.

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, give me numbies, like, come and watch

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the show and hang out nick me.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 2>There you go. It just wants numbies. That's all he

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 2>wants for his birthday. That'll do it for us. But

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the story of the game goes on for numbees Welsh

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>or Canoli Welsh. I'm angry, Joe. Let's see you next time,

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Kaz enjoy your weekend of baseball.