WEBVTT - Linda Gibson on Quantitative Solutions

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry rid Holds on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have yet another extra

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 2>special guest, Linda Gibson, CEO of Pigium Quantitative Solutions. She

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 2>has a really fascinating background, very clectic, a combination of

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>math and law. She has run a number of firms

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>and a number of divisions at large firms and traced

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 2>a career arc that's just very unusual compared to the

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>typical person in finance, eventually leading her to a point

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>where she's managing quants running about one hundred billion dollars

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>in assets. Really a fascinating background, and it just goes

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>to show you how broad and flexible the world of

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>finance is. That there are so many different ways you

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>can find yourself in a senior management position in this industry.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>If you had to guess someone would run through this path,

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>you would never assume, well, you're going to come out

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>of law school and eventually you're going to be general counsel.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>How does that lead to running a group of quants?

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>But that was Linda's Korea path. There are a few

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>people in the world who are more knowledgeable about the

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>management of asset managers and what it's like to actually

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>run a global organization and interact with lots of aspects

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of the business of finance, whether that's acquisitions or compliance

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>or dealing with all the legalities of multi jurisdictional regulations.

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>She really has been the person who's lived this and

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>walk the walk. And I found this conversation to be

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>quite fascinating, and I think you will also, with no

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>further ado, my conversation with Linda Gibson, CEO of Pigum

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Quantitative Solutions. So let's get into your background, which is

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>really kind of interesting. You get a BS in mathematics

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and a jd from Boston University. Math and law. Yep,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 2>not the usual combination, not at.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>All, Barry. It is something Math has always come easy

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to me since a child. So I was a math

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>major pretty much because it was an easy a for me.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Math is truth, It's absolutely it is.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I loved the fact that my grades weren't subject to

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the subjectivity of my professors, and that there was always

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a right and wrong answer and the one that's.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Until you get to applied mathematics, where it all goes off.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The rails, which, if you notice, that is where I stopped.

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get an advanced degree in math.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 2>But you do get the JD. And you said you

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 2>weren't a math nerd. You were not looking for a

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>job in finance. What happened?

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I was not. I was waitressing one summer, my final

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>summer after my senior year, and a friend called and said,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I just interviewed with a financial services company. I'm not

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in the job, but you might want to reach out.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And I literally reached out. It was Mass Financial Services.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I reached out, I got the interview, and I got

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the job, and I started the next week. Didn't really

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think about going into financial services. I thought it was

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be, honestly a math teacher. I was thinking

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>about teaching in boarding school.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so you go to MFS MFI and was this

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>between college and law school or after you graduated law school?

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>It was between college and law school. So first job

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>out of college.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>And you discover, hey, this finance stuff is kind of interesting.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 2>What then led you to go to law school instead

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>of business school?

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I worked with a bunch of lawyers, So I worked

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at the third party administrator distribution arm of mutual fund

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>family at Mass Financial. So it's called the Banking Services

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>group when banks couldn't offer and distribute mutual funds. So

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we had clients like Chase and City Bank and JP

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and all of those, And so I worked with

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of lawyers and our company was going through

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>transition at the time, and I thought I always wanted

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I knew I wanted to get an advanced degree. My

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>father is still a practicing lawyer at eighty five, and

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>my grandfather was a lawyer.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>So you come from a long family of attorneys.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I do. But my father advised me not to go

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>into law. He always wanted to be a stockbroker, even

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>though he's in trusts in estates, yes, So he was

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>never really interested in pushing me to go into the law.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And even though he worked for his father's law practice

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>with the name on the door, literally, that was not

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>an option for me.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>That's so amusing because I immediately imagined getting pushed back

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 2>from the family. Hey, everybody here is a lawyer, our

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 2>name is on the door. You're turning your back on

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the family business. No, such, Nope.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>They were at a point where they anti nepitism or

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>nepotism was an issue, and they said, nope, you will

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not be coming to work for this firm, so don't

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>even think about it.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Huh.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>So I was literally sitting on the roof deck one night,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was balancing law business school, which one made

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>more sense for me, and didn't really know that much

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>about either. But I was very logical by nature, and

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I was working with a bunch of lawyers at the time.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And I also loved the fact that, well, it took

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>one more a year to get through school, three years

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.239
<v Speaker 1>versus two. But when you come out you are something,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You're a lawyer, you have something, and so off I

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>went to law school.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were going to say indebted, but it

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 2>really had too It really doesn't matter when you come

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>out of business school. You're an MBA wouldn't come out

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 2>of law school assuming you passed the bar, you're JD

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and your license to practice. How soon after law school

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>did you realize I don't want to practice law?

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Pretty soon?

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I went in year third year law school.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty much the third year of law school.

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I was in a immersive mock trial program where you

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.679
<v Speaker 1>spend the whole year and you work for the DA's

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>office in the prosecutor's office. I thought I wanted to

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be a lawyer. LA law was what it.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Was all about, exactly.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It was so cool, and so I thought, that's what

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to do. I got into it. I wanted

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>every single one of my cases to settle. I did

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not like law, especially trial work, at all. And I

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>was walking on the street and I ran into somebody

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I had worked with at this banking services group of

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.559
<v Speaker 1>MFS which had spun off and become Signature Financial Group,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and the woman said to me, you might want to

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>come back and work for us. Have you thought about it?

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And I said absolutely, I'm in what do I need

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to do? And I started working for them part time

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>during my third year of law school, and then worked

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for them ten years after.

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. When did the Harvard Advanced Management Program come along?

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 1>That came along much later. So I spent the first

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>decade of my career as a mutual fund attorney, which

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was really in.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>The house for not for a law firm, but for

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a mutual fund related company.

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Right this was the Signature Financial Group. And that was

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity to learn, frankly, because not only was

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I writing offering documents, I was reading I mean, how

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>many people do you know that have read the forty

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Act and read the various Use its Directives, which is

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the basically the UK equivalent to the forty Act.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I saw a lot of people keep it on the

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>nightstand in case they.

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Case I tired, Yeah, put right out right. So that

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was just a really good foundation for me. I also sat,

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as I said, we were the third party distributor for

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 1>all of these major companies, so I was on twelve

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>different boards, not on them, but I was the officer,

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so I was taking minutes. So I was learning just

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton about the mutual fund industry and working with

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>these big global companies. But then this company, I'm getting

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>off topic of the Advanced Management degree, but this company

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>launched a new investment fund structure called Global Hub and

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Spoke or master Feeder you might have heard of it.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And I was chosen by the CEO to go travel

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>globally with him to not only get big firms the

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>likes of HSBC, Julius Beher those types to adopt this

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>fund structure, but also to get regulatory approval. So I

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was traveling all around the globe. This is I was

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in my twenties at Chris.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>It had a lot of fun on the company dime.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It was very, very fun, weird runt of the bus

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>front of the US. Yeah. Well, we actually had a

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>flat in London, so I was going to Luxembourg, Germany, Switzerland,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the UK trying to get regulatory approval of this mutual

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fund structure. So it was really really a great foundation

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>for me and I did that for about ten years,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is where I moved over to UAM at

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the time, which is the first multi boutique investment business,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and I moved over there into their third party mutual

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fund business as general counsel.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's the real interesting question is why general counsel

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>in house when given your background, you could have gone

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to any of the big firms Scadden elsewhere and made

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a ton of money working as an attorney working for

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 2>these big fun companies.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>It's ironic that you said that you said Scadden.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 2>Because not ironic at all.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>When I was thinking about going to Old Mutual, I

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was offered a job at Scadden that same day for

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of money, and I knew UAM was

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>potentially going to be acquired, and I knew it was

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a riskier business, but I thought I can go work

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for a law firm and then eventually become a general

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>counsel or. I can just skip the law firm step,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>especially working at a firm like Scadden, and go directly

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to the general council job, which I thought was much

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>more interesting to me. So even though Scadden had such

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a big name, I decided to go to UAM.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 2>And it's a really challenging life work balance. At my

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>my friends who all went to big firms like you

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 2>hear stories and all they do is wine. Why don't

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you quit? I can't leave. I'm making so much money,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 2>but you're miserable. I'm just going to do this for

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>another five years. I've heard every ten twenty years it

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>keeps going. So you skip that went in house, never

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>looked back.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Never looked back, and the firm got acquired pretty much

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a year later. I was told to shut down my

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>division or my business unit, which I did, and more interestingly,

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>given my us its background, in the fact that I

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had traveled globally. This was a South African based firm,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so Old Mutual, but it was listed in London, so

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the head office was in London. They were very interested

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in my global experience and my regulatory experience, so they said, hey,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to become general counsel of the holding company.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't you? So I then put all of my

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>forty act work aside, and that's when I really learned

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the art of negotiation. They had forty four affiliates at

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the time. We had to convert them from revenue share

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>to profit sharing. We had to put equity in the

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>hands of the founders and their management teams. We were

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>doing M and A work. We were disposing of firms

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that weren't strategic, we were acquiring firms. So I ended

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>up negotiating with so many CEOs CIOs and founders. That

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>was really eye opening. When people have self interest and

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it affects their wallets, they are very interesting people. So

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I had to.

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Pivot and very phrase interesting people. Yeah, are you New

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 2>York based, London based or Nylon back and forth.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I was Boston based. We were Boston based, but we

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>had our parent company was in London, and then the

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimate insurance company was in South Africa, so I was

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in London quarterly. And then we had affiliates. We had

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>forty four affiliates and they were all over the US,

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but they were also in the UK and Tokyo.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>At the time, so you were really on a plane

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 2>a lot global. I think. I think the flight from

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Vancouver to Tokyo is fast than the flight from New

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>York to South Africa. That's a bear of a flight,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't it?

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It is? But South Africa is really amazing. And it

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was interesting going into Cape Town and looking around. The

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>brand Old Mutual was like Coca Cola here. It was

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>on every building everywhere. It was really interesting. They had

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>offices in Cape Town, and Joe Burke I preferred Cape

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Town of course.

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 2>But so the obvious question, given this background in law

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and working on mutual funds and eventually becoming general counsel,

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 2>how does this prep you for the role you have

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>today essentially hurting cats and managing a whole bunch of quants.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Again, the learning the negotiation skills really helped a lot

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in dealing with managing investment professionals as well as managing quants.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>As you know, quants have extremely high IQs. I mean

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>our firm pgum quant we have twenty nine PhDs. Our

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>CIO is literally an x rocket scientists to use to

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>work at NASA, and then we have an advisor to

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK as a CIO,

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so these are very very smart people. Managing them you

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely have to adapt your style a bit, so you

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have to learn how to deal with smart people as

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>well as introverts. We have a lot of introverts at

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are firm. They sometimes have trouble talking to clients. Sometimes

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they have trouble talking to me, so I need to

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>adjust my management style. But what I learned really early

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in my career is that it's not about IQ, it's

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>about well, it is about IQ. We need very smart people,

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but EQ is equally important. So what I have to

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>do for them is I have to lead them, direct them,

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>manage them and then sort of push them, but then

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just leave them alone. I want to make sure I've

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>give them the resources that they need, but also give

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>them the direction that they need. And having this legal background,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what was really great about it is when you're a lawyer,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you're at every important meeting. You're in all the board meetings,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>midting everything, You're in the board meetings, you're in the

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>compensation meetings, you're in the internal audit meetings. So you

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>really learned everything about a business, everything that goes right

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything that goes wrong. So that really helped me

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>understand what it was like or what it would be

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>like to manage a company. And then I had this

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>strange seven year stint of heading global distribution, which is

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that was very interesting. I didn't want that job at all.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The CEO of our firm came to me and said,

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't really need a chief operating officer, but what

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I do need is a global head of distribution. Can

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you build a centralized global sales team? And oh, by

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, your compensation is going to be tied to

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>assets raised, which is the first time that ever happened

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in my life.

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, interesting perspective change, eating what you kill.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I had never sold anything either, So again, what

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I had to do there was be comfortable with hiring

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>really smart people. So I analyzed the landscape, figured out

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>where there was demand for our products, made sure we

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>had the right products to sell, made sure that the

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>regulatory and the expense hurdles were too high to go in.

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And then I had to build a lean team of

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>very smart salespeople that could sell our products in these

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>various jurisdictions. But also, when you think you're managing people

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so far away from you, the distance is so vast

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that you have to trust them. We had people in Dubai.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I need to make sure those people are doing what

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they say they're doing and that I can trust them,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and never mind also people in China, Hong Kong, Tokyo.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we had language barriers, so again I had to

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that I hired the best people that I

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>could really trust to do what they needed to do,

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and then again let them go. I also needed to

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>learn fast that when somebody is not right or not

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a good cultural fit, that you need to make a

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>change very very quickly.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not to say the very least. So let's talk

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about your work with Pigium. They are

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 2>one of the world's top twenty asset managers well over

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a trillion dollars. What was it like settling in to

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>such a giant firm coming from more reasonable both size

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>firms in the early part of your career.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I came from a more reasonably sized firm. It

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was a very very easy transition for me because I

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>spent seventeen years at an insurance owned multi boutique at

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the head office in various executive positions, So it was

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a surprisingly easy transition for me.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Close of the insurance background, or because of.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Just the multi boutique background. So I wasn't on the

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>insurance side. So I was at the asset management arm

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Old Mutual insurance enterprise, and I worked at

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the head office. I was after I was general counsel,

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I was chief operating officer and head of affiliate management.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So I oversaw nineteen different investment boutiques that frankly spanned

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the gamut of offerings. We had timber, we had real estate,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we had global fixed income, quant equity, fundamental equity, managed futures,

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>everything you name it had it. And Old Mutual was ODDO,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, London, New York, Boston.

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Boston, Okay. So you're used to working cross timelines and.

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Regions, absolutely, and having worked in that environment for so

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>long made moving over to pGEM and pGEM Quant Solutions

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a pretty easy transition for me. I was really excited

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. I had been watching PGIM, I had been

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>watching their reputation and their brand grow exponentially under David

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Hunt's leadership, and then I had also known a lot

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about pGEM. Quant at the time was called QMA, and

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a firm at Old Mutual two firms Acadian

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and Analytic, who are both quant firms, and I sat

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on both of their boards for years, and as head

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of affiliate management, you're responsible for their p and ls,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so you're in their shorts with respect to their strategy,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>their product development, any liftouts they would do, making sure

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they had appropriate distribution resources and funding, made sure their

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>succession plans were set and were executed seamlessly. So I

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time with quantitative firms and I

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>really really liked it. Coming from a math science background,

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I very much liked the systematic nature of a quant firm,

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>but I also liked it pagem quant. We like to

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>call it the fusion of art and science, so you

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have the fundamental insights plus the systematic And while I

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>am a math science person, I am very very artsy

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and creative. I love a good craft. My daughter got

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>married two weeks ago and I spent my winter learning

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>how to day coupage oyster shells with maps of the

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>cape and gold gilding along the edges. So I spent

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many weekends doing two hundred of

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>these over the winter last year. So that is a

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>little snapshot into my life. But to take it back.

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So I very much like sort of the art and

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>science of quant investing. So it was a natural fit

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for me to come to PGM, but also to come

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to pagemqu and it's been it was remarkably easy to

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>transition to the firm and more interesting to me. When

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I became COO, I expected, frankly, organ rejection because I

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't come from the investment management side of the business,

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and often you think that investment professionals want CEOs who

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are investment professionals. And I was shocked and delighted frankly

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>when I was appointed a Chief operating officer of PGAM.

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Kwant that the investment group embraced it. They loved the

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that I would support them and lean into them

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and really let them do what they do and not

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>micromanage them.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So CIO and CEO are very very different skill sets. CIO,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you're essentially dealing with a probabilistic process trying to make

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 2>assessments about an unknown outcome in the future. CEOs have

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to manage people, they have to manage budgets. It's much

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 2>more blocking and tackling and less probabilistic than the investment side.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that you're now CEO of this group

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>of quants but don't have a background as a CIO,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think that at all would work to

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 2>your disadvantage.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I saw it in real life when being

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>part of a multi boutique and being on the boards

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen investment managers. I saw the difference between the

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>CEOs that had been investment professionals or CIOs and the

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>ones that were heads of distribution or were in operations.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting, though the majority are either in distribution

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or CIOs, they don't tend to be lawyers. So but regardless,

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think that CIOs tend, if I'm going to stereotype,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>they tend to do better managing money.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Than people I know. That's absolutely I don't think that

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 2>that's over generalizing at all. What's kind of interesting is

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought the ease going from Old Mutual to pGEM,

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>given both of their insurance backgrounds, might have been that,

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>but you're suggesting it was less had to do with

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 2>that and more had to do with just running a

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 2>broad assortment of different groups, departments, division strategies, et cetera.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, both pGEM and All Mutual are similar with respect

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to their investment management businesses tend to be pretty separate

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and distinct from their insurance businesses. So they report in

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and they have quarterly business reviews and all of that stuff,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and they dovetail nicely, but they really are run separately.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So you were general counsel and how to manage a

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 2>large group of attorneys, and now you're managing a large

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 2>group of quants. Any similarities or differences that are noteworthy

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>between hurting each herd of cats over there?

0:21:55.200 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>There are similarities in that they both tend to be meticulars,

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>so they're both type A. They're both very very smart,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to get into the weeds and the details.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have to constantly take them up. So at

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>our firm, putting portfolio managers in front of prospects and clients,

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we constantly have to train them, give them presentation training.

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>We need to often bring in CPMs to help translate

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>their knowledge into Layman's terms. It cpmbing being client portfolio managers.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So these are the people that explain what we do

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in Layman's terms.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 2>To prospects client facing.

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and many of our as I said before, many

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of our investment professionals or introverts. They do not want

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>to be in front of clients or prospects. Lawyers can

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>be the same, and you often have to get lawyers

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to think like business people. You do the same thing

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with investment professionals. They don't have to think like business

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>professional as much as lawyers do, but they still need

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to adjust their thinking a little bit. And I often

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>need to change my leadership style. And I learned early on.

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>I took a personality profiling test. I don't know if

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you've ever heard of it. It's called Insights Discovery, and

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they put you into a color bracket and I'm red,

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>which means I tend to like people to be be bright,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be brief, and be gone. That's how I like people

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>to interact with me. But there are a lot of

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>people that want a lot of data. They want a

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of information. You need to spend time with them.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You need to ask them how their kids are. Some

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>are extroverts, they don't care about the topic. They just

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>want to have fun, you know. Others care more about socializing.

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of different ways people like to take

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in information. So when you're managing lawyers and you're managing quants,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>there is something similar there. Managing distribution people is a

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>whole different ball of wax, though that was fascinating when

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I managed distribution group.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Salespeople respond to financial incentives.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>They do. They also can be very needy and they

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>can require a lot of your time. And they also

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be praised a bit, huh, which is interesting

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>although everybody, I think everyone likes praise.

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess. But if you're on a variable com system,

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 2>depending on how successfully you raise assets, it's there in

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 2>black and white on the sales log you've raised X. Hey,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 2>do I really need to tell you this is fantastic?

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 2>You did a great job this quarter.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You do. Actually, what I did learn is you do

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and the more you do it, the better they perform. Now,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think again, that works everywhere. What do they say

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to say something positive X number of times

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the sandwich?

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're gonna say something negative. You've got to put

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>something positive on either side.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Either side of it.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Criticism sandwich I find not amusing. So let's drill down

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit to the various quant strategies that pGEM utilizes.

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Is a different asset classes, different geographies, different strategies. What

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 2>is the full spectrum of offerings pGEM has for their

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Quant group.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Short answer is all of the above. So pagem Quant

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is divided into three platforms. We have our quant Equity platform,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>which manages risk control equity portfolios that were quants, so

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they're model and factor driven. They cover core value, opportunistic equity,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and indexing. Then we have a multi asset platform. The

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>multi asset platform manages things like offerings that give you

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation hedging against inflation, so we use publicly traded real

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>assets and commodities. We do defensive equity strategies. We also

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>do asset allocation and overlays. And then we have a

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>third platform which pGEM Quant acquired right before I joined,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>which was another interest of mine was integrating a new

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>firm into the fold, and this is Pgemwouldwanti. It's our

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>London based liquid alternatives firm. It offers global macro trend following.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It also has inflation hedging products as well as macrotail

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>risk products, so we kind of cover and we go

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>up and down the market spectrum from microcap all the

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>way up to large cap and then we go across geography,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so we'll do US, International, EMX, China, you name it.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We offer most of it in quant form. The one

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thing we don't offer is privates. Our sister company does that.

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the name of the sister Hume.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>We have well Page in private capital. We have pGEM

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>real Estate. We actually have six sisters. We have pGEM

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Fixed Income, Jennison PGE and Portfolio Advisory and pGEM Investments.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Those all wrapped together make up that one point two

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 2>That is PGIM really interesting. So let's talk a little

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 2>bit about multi asset opportunities. Starting with you have a

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>year like last year twenty twenty two. Stocks are down,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>bonds are down, all these asset classes are under pressure.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 2>How does that affect all the various strategies that you

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 2>guys are running.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, Clearly the markets affect our strategies. But that's one

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that we feel strongly that quants excel

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in volatile times, mostly because they have a long term approach.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>They're data driven, they're disciplined, they're diversified. So we have

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>three hundred plus stocks in our portfolios. We look at

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of pieces of data on ten thousand companies every day,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>so we're very, very diversified. But the other thing about

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>being a quant which is nice is it removes the

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>emotional bias from picking socks, so you don't get caught

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>up in what's going on in the market and freaking

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>out in essence and making bad decisions. You have your

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>models to ground you. Sure there's fundamental insights on top,

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and there are people here back to that fusion of

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>art and science, but we have the models as our bedrock.

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>So, given what twenty twenty two is like and obviously

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>very challenging, what's it like when the calendar flips really

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>was last October twenty twenty two, where market's bottomed and

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>took off. How does that change in market regime effects

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 2>how you're going about your business or is it still

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, just whether market's going up and down,

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 2>you're still applying the same strategies.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>We're applying the same strategies. But having said that, and

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>again we offer so many different strategies, but what we

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do have and people have been very very interested in them,

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are sort of that in the inflation hedging strategies that

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we offer the custom mandates. We're all about solving our clients'

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>needs not only today but tomorrow. So how do we

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>work with those clients to figure out what they're trying

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to solve for some downside protection, so we've been recently

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>putting together portfolios that have downside protection. They might limit

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the upside a little bit. We can adjust that depending

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on our client's preference and needs and wants. The macro

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>tail risk products, the inflation hedging products, all of these

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>different things that are helping clients right now move away

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>from the sixty to forty portfolio is just not working

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for clients right now. And sure they want to put

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>money into privates. Privates are big right now, and pGEM

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is leaning into our privates and our alts, meaning pGEM

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at our head office. But at the same time, people

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>need liquid investments, and so what we provide for them

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is liquid solutions to help them navigate through these turbulent times.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Huh really interesting. So the bulk of what you're doing

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 2>is liquid. You don't need a gate to get out.

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 2>These are all stocks, bonds, other assets that are readily

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>tradable any given day.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Yep. All liquid, including publicly traded real assets and commodities.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Clearly liquidity is a little tougher with sort of the

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>microcap and the small all. So what we do what

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>our models do there is they assess the trading costs

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of getting in and out of companies, because we want

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to make sure, of course that you don't pay more

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in trading costs to get out than your alpha, so

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to pay attention to that. We also have

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>people that use us for overlay strategies and they often

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have to get out on a dime, so we need

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that everything is very, very liquid.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting. How bespoke are the portfolios and the

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>solutions that you come up with for clients. Are they

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>really customized for individual institutions or how do you think

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>about that approach?

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>They're extremely customizable across all of our platforms. So even

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example, our quant equity platform, we

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have an ESG solutions offering. We had a very very

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.959
<v Speaker 1>large E andF endowment and foundation come to us and

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>say we need to get we need to solve for

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>our ESG needs, and we want to do that. We

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>want to track a certain index, but we want to

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>take energy out of the portfolio. So what we've been

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>able to do is we've been able to help investors

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>solve for their ESG needs wherever they are in their journey,

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and I get that it's different for different people. But

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what's really unique about our offerings is that we're

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>able to sit there and talk to you and say, Berry,

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>what's important to you? Do you care about water usage?

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you care about women on boards? You care about energy?

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you care about carbon footprint? How much do you

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>want it to impact your returns? Or maybe you don't

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>want it to impact your returns at all? So how

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do we work with you to create a portfolio that

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>does what you wish? So that's been really interesting and

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten a lot of traction there.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Huh, really super intriguing. So you mentioned some people are

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 2>looking for inflation hedging. I would imagine that would have

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>been really useful last year. Are you still getting demand

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 2>for that? Given how far ce is fallen from the peak?

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 2>When was that June twenty twenty two something like that?

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Is there still a demand for inflation hatching?

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>There still is? It may not be as in demand

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as it's been, but if you think about where we are,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the macro environment is so uncertain. People still don't know

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>whether we're going to have a recession. People don't know

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>people are assuming there's going to be a recession in Europe,

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so people just don't know. So I think they're really

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to pardon the use of the word hedge, but

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge their bets and make sure that they have downside protection.

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And people get a bit scared in this type of

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>environment and they want to diversify their portfolio. So we

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>just what we want to do is we want to

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>partner with our clients. And they might have any number

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of needs. They might have, you know, risk parameters, they

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>might have liquidity needs, they might want to track a benchmark,

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they might want to just absolute return, they might want

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>real return. Whatever they need, we will solve for.

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So about half of your clients Bullpark are large institutions.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned endowments and foundations, and given the background of

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>pGEM with insurance, I think about future liabilities. Is there

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of matching? Hey, in twenty thirty five, we

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>have this sort of expected demand on our capital. How

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>important is future liability matching to custom solutions?

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not. We don't do as much of that at

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>pGEM quant So we do manage money for the prudential

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>general account, but it tends to be in equities, and

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we do manage some money for them through our pagem

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>would WANTI. But as you know, insurance companies have various

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>constraints and that they need to solve for these things,

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and they have much smaller buckets of risk assets. So

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>should insurance companies invest in equities? We very much want

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of that, and we do manage

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>equities on behalf of our parent company. But lucky for

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>us is we don't We don't have to think about

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>paying claims. We just have to think about managing the

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>money in the best way that we can.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>What about since people are talking about hedging, how do

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you think about risk management? Are you looking at a

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>series of small wins or is there sometimes hey, we're

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 2>going to take a big bet because we have a

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of conviction here.

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So risk management is very much embedded in our process.

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's not an afterthought. It is something that we

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to. And clearly, you have to take risk

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to get gained. So but what our

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>models try to do is take that the risks, the

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>risks that are going to benefit us, and then manage

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the risks that are not. We tend to take a

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of singles and be consistent, but It depends on

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what our clients are looking for. So I say that

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with respect to our equity book, but then we have

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>also we take much you know, larger bets with our

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Pigeono with war platform as well as if you're thinking

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>about maybe a small cap investment versus a large cap investment.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So it really goes up and down the gamut depending

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>on what our clients are looking for, what their risk

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>tolerances are. We try to solve for their risk needs.

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And again quants can do that pretty effectively because of

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>their process.

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 2>So how big a differentiator is pgeum quantitative solutions to pgeum. Again,

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 2>given the insurance background, I don't know of a lot

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>of other large insurers whose financial arms are leaning this

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 2>heavily into the quant side.

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a big differentiator for pgeum one. I

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just pGEM has one of, as you mentioned, one of

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the broadest asset management offerings out there, and I feel

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like quant is a very important component to the offering,

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>especially how if you think about how technology is advancing

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's becoming more and more a part of our lives.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>AI is evolving, and we've been doing that for a

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>long long time, So I think it's just natural to

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have a quant manager as part of your stable of offerings.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I do believe that it's a differentiator for pechim.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Really really intriguing. So there's a couple of quotes of

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 2>yours that I have to ask about because they're kind

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 2>of fascinating. Quote. Softer skills are more valuable than ever.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 2>They are what clients want. So first I have to ask,

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean by softer skills? Tell us about that.

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I often refer to softer skills when I'm talking about

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>women in management. Actually, when you think about the ability

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to connect with people, to really listen to understand what

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>their wants and needs are, that many people don't do that,

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I feel as though softer skills,

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>especially in this tech enabled environment, so in a hybrid environment,

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're streaming and dealing with people by zoom and

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>teams and you're not seeing people in the hallway, these

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>softer skills really really differentiate you. And one of the

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>things that I've been doing as CEO during CODE or

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>what I did during COVID and I've continued to do now,

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>is you lack that ability to run into people in

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen and to connect with them and really build

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a relationship, because I do believe that building relationships is

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>important to building trust. Building trust is essential to building

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>working relationships with your business partners. And so what I

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>started doing was I started doing a video series. If

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you think carpool karaoke. I would drive my dog to

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the dog park in the mornings, and it was about

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 1>a forty minute drive, and I would do a lot

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of reflecting and thinking about strategy, people, whatever I was

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>doing at work, and instead of thinking about it, I

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thought I'm going to do some little video segments too minutes.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Didn't really think about what I was going to say,

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just got on the and talked to the employees of

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>our company. And I did that regularly, so they would

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm up to, what I'm thinking about. They

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>knew a little about me personally, but they also knew

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what I was thinking about, what the management team was

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, and what we were up to. And that's

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>an example of a softer skill that it's that ability

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to connect with people and to think about how you

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>can connect with people in different ways to build their

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>trust and get to know you better.

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the various hybrid work options that, especially what

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 2>took place during the pandemic. Are you guys still operating

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 2>on a hybrid basis and what does that do for you?

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>We are, we're working in a hybrid three days in

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the office, two days work from home, and I believe

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's the best of both worlds because we have

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>those three days to collaborate, to continue to get to

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>know each other, to brains dorm and then we have

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 1>two days that we can do heads down work, meaning

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the work from home days. And I also feel that

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>we get a lot of credit for doing that with

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>our employees, our employment. Our employees are happier in this environment.

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It's what they want, it's what they're getting used to.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was just listening to actually Bloomberg this morning

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>where they were talking about how the trains are getting

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>busier and workplaces are going are changing their hybrid schedules.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'll be interested to see what happens in the

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>next year or so with respect to hybrid, but I

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>think right now it's a pretty good balance.

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Does it help with employee retention and even new hires?

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It does. We've actually had certain people that wanted full

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>work from home, which we don't do so it is

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>something that I believe companies need to do, they need

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to that. I think our offices are

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in Newark, newt so hybrid is pretty appealing and I

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>do think it's a differentiator, or maybe it's not even

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a differentiator. It might just be table stakes.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Right Amongst the big banks, a lot of them have

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 2>been gone back to JP Morgan, Chase, Goldman, Sachs, mongst On.

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 2>A lot of these have gone back to five days

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 2>in the office, and there's been some pushback, not so

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 2>much from the young twenty somethings who really need to

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 2>be immersed, but the slightly older generation late twenties, early thirties,

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 2>who really know how to work remote right.

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's important for the younger generation because you

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>want that mentoring. You want to be able to again

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>run into people in the halls, get to know them,

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>get to understand what they do, and I do think

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:52.479
<v Speaker 1>that's important. I think flexibility is also important to many

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Many have either young kids at home, or they have

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>ailing parents, or they have hobbies, or they just have

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>wellness goals. So getting that balance right can be tricky.

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But this is again why I think the three days

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is a good balance. It's a nice way to solve

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>for our employees' needs but also get the work done

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and build a culture. Building a culture. We haven't talked

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>much about that, but one of the first things that

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I did when I took over as CEO was work

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with the employees to reset our values and then not

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>only reset them, but then drive them home and live

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>by them and make changes based on them. And I

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>think that building that culture it's very, very difficult to

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do if you're in a fully worked from home environment.

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 2>You know that makes that makes a lot of sense.

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Last quote of yours. You've talked a lot about leadership

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 2>and diversity, especially when it comes to women in finance.

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit about your thoughts about the

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>best strategies for leading an industry that's spent so many

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>decades as a male dominated bastion.

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Again, it's lean into those softer skills. I think it's

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a trifecta of opportunity right now for women. So you

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have companies and boards that are trying to increase their

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>diversity stats, so they're more open to women in senior

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>leadership positions. The hybrid work environment makes it easier for

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>women that are balancing multiple, multiple different chores and responsibilities,

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the benefit of women having these

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>softer skills that work in this new tech, tech enabled environment.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a great opportunity for women going forward.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the issue really is the pipeline. And one

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'm passionate about, and we're doing

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot with at pGEM quant is we're going out

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and doing community work. We're reaching out into the newer community,

0:42:56.080 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're working with kids as young as elementary school kids,

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>so we're getting them interested in asset management. We're doing

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>things like shark Tank and job fares and things like

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that that are kind of mock job fares, and it's

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>just been really rewarding for us because we have to

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>start at such a young age. So these women and

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>other diverse populations will continue to have an interest in

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>asset management.

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 2>You're playing a long game. You're planning seeds ten fifteen

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 2>years in advance. Because none of this is going to

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:29.959
<v Speaker 2>pay off for a long time.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 1>We need to be patient as we invest for the

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>long term. We need to be patient, but not complacent.

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Not complacent. So let's jump to our favorite questions that

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>we ask all of our guests starting with Hey, what

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 2>kept you entertained during the lockdown? What are you streaming

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:47.720
<v Speaker 2>these days?

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Gosh meaning streaming on television?

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 2>Sure, television, podcast doesn't matter what whatever audio video is

0:43:58.400 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>entertaining you.

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So like documentaries, So what I was looking or watching

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:08.879
<v Speaker 1>this weekend was fantastic Fungi, which I highly recommend. This

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is all about the medicinal and healing properties of mushrooms.

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 1>If one has ailing parents or is having health issues,

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I highly encourage you to tune in. But it is

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>also a beautifully beautifully filmed documentary. I also live on

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cape, so I had to you know, the shark

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 1>population is booming, so I had to watch After the Bite,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>which is all about the shark population on Cape Cod.

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, as far as sort of more mainstream,

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I did like Ted Lasso very much. It was entertaining.

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You always got a good tidbit of knowledge, Like being

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>an authentic leader, you know, lean into your insecurities. I

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 1>never turned that off about picking up some little tidbit

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of information. As far as podcasts, I get most of

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>my new use by email feeds, so I tend to

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>do that more as a hobby so I do. I'm

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>very interested right now in longevity and health. So I

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>listened to something called the Cabral Concept by doctor Stephen Cabral,

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>which talks about all sorts of things. One of the

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>things I was looking into was an infrared sana and

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a cold plunge. So my husband and I just recently

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>purchased both of those things.

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I have a buddy who is crazy into the cold

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 2>plunge and whatever that breathing technique is that you need

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:36.240
<v Speaker 2>to do, and I committed to doing a cold plunge

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 2>next summer, so we'll see how that goes. I'm in

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the ocean every Memorial Day weekend. Wow, that's my cold

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 2>plunge because that's like, you know, sixty degrees, but what

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 2>these guys are talking about is high thirties, low forties,

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 2>really really cool.

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, ours is forty nine degrees and it's cold. It

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>takes about a minute and thirty seconds to numb up.

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>So that's an interesting podcast. Asked for me, I do

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>tune into this other podcast. It's called Your CEO Mentor.

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It's by the author of no book Leadership, and this

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>individual's name's Martin Moore, and I totally skipped your conversation,

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your question about the AMP program, which is an advanced

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>management program. It's an elite executive education program. But he

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was a buddy of mine at the a MP and

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:26.919
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a book on leadership. He was the CEO

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of a company and he wrote a book called No

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Book Leadership, and I of course read it out of

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>courtesy because I don't normally get a lot, frankly out

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of leadership books. It's very intuitive to me. But I

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>got quite a few nuggets of information from this book.

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And he's just very entertaining and so I tuned into

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>his podcasts frequently and I get little tidbits like it's

0:46:49.960 --> 0:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>about respect not popularity, it's about excellence not perfection, different

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>things like that. It's just interesting and he's Australian, so

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he's really interesting to listen to.

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned mentors, that's my next question. Who are

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 2>your mentors who helped guide your career.

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I have one mentor. She was the lawyer that hired

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>me for that job out of college. Her name is

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Molly Muggler and she worked with me my entire career,

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>her entire career. She's now retired, so she hired me.

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I then became general counsel, I moved to old mutual,

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I brought her with me. And what was amazing about

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>her is she believed in me before I did. She

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>had such confidence and vision for me and my future,

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and she kept referring to herself as my sticky asset

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that she'd stay with me, but wasn't. What was inspiring

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about her is she's so intelligent, and she's such an

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>accomplished lawyer. But at the same time she was militant

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about balancing her personal life and her professional life. She

0:47:54.680 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>prioritized watercolor, painting and tennis equally with her job as

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:04.919
<v Speaker 1>a general counsel of a big firm. So to this day,

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I am still connected with her, and I'm still constantly

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>inspired by her.

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. Let's talk about books. What are some of

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:14.439
<v Speaker 2>your favorites. What are you reading right now?

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>My nightstand is a bit eclectic right now. So I

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have again another book on longevity called out Living, which

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>has again to do with health and longevity. I have

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the rain Barrel Effect, which is again about what you

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>put into your body and how it affects again your

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>health and longevity. But the real chakra on there is

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's called the Modern Textbook of Astrology. During COVID,

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I started thinking a lot about astrological charts and I

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>found them fascinating and they are tied a lot to

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>math and science, and they're very, very technical. And I

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>had my chart read and I said, you know, i'd

0:48:57.440 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>be interested in learning how to read charts. That doesn't

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>see that hard? He said, oh, trust me, it's hard.

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>He gave me the name of three books. He said,

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 1>start reading and then get back to me. I might

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have to postpone that to retire because it is quite technical.

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very math forward, but it's uh, it's still interesting

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>for fun. Recently, I've read The Lincoln Highway. I really liked.

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I loved. I think it's called beneath a Scarlets guy.

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>What I like to do? Back when I was a lawyer,

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody would say, oh, have you read the most recent,

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, fiction book on law, you know Tom Clancy

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:36.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. And I just don't want to read

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>things that I'm living. So I don't want to read

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>books on investing. I don't want to read books on

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the law. I want to read books that transport me

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to another place in time where I can just learn

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about memoirs of a Geisha. Was you know interesting things

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. Just get out of my own head and

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>think about something different. We do enough as a lawyer.

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Think about how much you have to read when you

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>When I read, I want to for fun or for

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>gaining knowledge of something different.

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Huh? Really interesting. Down to our final two questions, what

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of advice would you give to a recent college

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 2>grad interested in a career in either investment, finance management

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 2>or law.

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>As we've been going through this podcast, I've realized the

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>benefit that my legal profession has had on my management abilities.

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I never quite tied those two things together so much.

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The broad knowledge that you get from being a business

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyer is quite extreme. So depending on what that person's

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>interest in interests are, I would say network, network, Network,

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>It's all about talking to people and understanding what they

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>do and understanding what's out there and really building relationships.

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>That's really what it's about. That's what it's about in business,

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's about in dealing with clients, building relationships.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>It's just what it is about life. But it's very

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to make that decision. Again, I fell into my

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>career and I'm pretty fortunate that I've had a lot

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities come my way. But I'm not somebody who

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>says you need a goal and you need to follow it,

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because I think if you have blinders on for that

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one goal, that you're going to miss all of these

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>other opportunities that can lead you in a direction that

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>might be much more fruitful for you.

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Huh. Interesting. And our final question, what do you know

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 2>about the world of investing today you wish you knew

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years or so ago when you were first

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>getting started.

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, that one's more tricky for me. I feel like

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty informed back then. But if I can

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>flip it on its head a little bit, maybe I'll

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 1>answer it as to what advice would I give to

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>those twenty somethings out there now, And I would say,

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:54.840
<v Speaker 1>understand the benefits of compounding, make sure you invest early,

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're diverse, and make sure you invest in

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>your four to one K plan, because as much as

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels as though you can't afford that extra hundred

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars or ten dollars or one thousand dollars, it's just

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so important to start investing early.

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not to say the very least that decade twenties

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to thirties makes a huge difference over forty years.

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey Tiz for sure.

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Linda, thank you for being so generous with your time.

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 2>We have been speaking with Linda Gibson, CEO of Pigium

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Quantitative Solutions. If you enjoy this conversation, well, be sure

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 2>and check out any of the previous five hundred or

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 2>so we've done over the past nine years. You can

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 2>find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you find your

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 2>favorite podcasts. Sign up for my daily reading list at

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 2>ridults dot com. Follow me on Twitter at rid Holt's

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 2>follow all of the Bloomberg Family of podcasts at podcast

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 2>correct team that helps put these conversations together each week.

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Livesey is my audio engineer. Attika Valbron is my

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 2>project manager. Anna Luke is my producer. Sean Russo is

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 2>my researcher. I'm Barry Riddolts. You've been listening to Master's

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Business on Bloomberg Radio.