WEBVTT - Hell and Gone Murder Line: Interview with Crime Scene Expert

0:00:08.285 --> 0:00:16.565
<v Speaker 1>School of Humans. Over the past few weeks, we've been

0:00:16.565 --> 0:00:20.405
<v Speaker 1>covering two cases in Arkansas, the murder of Gale Vaught,

0:00:20.565 --> 0:00:24.565
<v Speaker 1>whose body was found on March seventeenth, nineteen eighty, and

0:00:24.605 --> 0:00:29.205
<v Speaker 1>the strange death of Dennis Flowers. Police believed that Dennis

0:00:29.285 --> 0:00:32.645
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for the execution style murders of Lee Dixon,

0:00:33.045 --> 0:00:35.685
<v Speaker 1>a pharmacist who had become addicted to cocaine and started

0:00:35.725 --> 0:00:39.325
<v Speaker 1>dealing it with Dennis and Lee's wife, Karen Dixon, who

0:00:39.405 --> 0:00:42.805
<v Speaker 1>was eight months pregnant. A few days after the brutal

0:00:42.845 --> 0:00:47.725
<v Speaker 1>double homicide, Dennis's body was found under extremely mysterious circumstances.

0:00:48.445 --> 0:00:51.005
<v Speaker 1>The cause of death was listed as drowning in less

0:00:51.005 --> 0:00:53.485
<v Speaker 1>than three feet of water, and the manner of death

0:00:53.565 --> 0:00:57.485
<v Speaker 1>was listed as a suicide. One of the many questions

0:00:57.485 --> 0:00:59.885
<v Speaker 1>that I see over and over that has come up

0:00:59.925 --> 0:01:03.645
<v Speaker 1>in these cases and so many others, is were these

0:01:03.765 --> 0:01:07.485
<v Speaker 1>crime scenes as they appeared to be or could they

0:01:07.565 --> 0:01:13.165
<v Speaker 1>have been staged? I'm Catherine Townsend. Over the past five

0:01:13.285 --> 0:01:16.645
<v Speaker 1>years of making my true crime podcast, Helen Gone, I've

0:01:16.725 --> 0:01:19.525
<v Speaker 1>learned there's no such thing as a small town where

0:01:19.605 --> 0:01:23.765
<v Speaker 1>murder never happens. I've received hundreds of messages from people

0:01:23.845 --> 0:01:26.725
<v Speaker 1>all around the country asking for help with an unsolved

0:01:26.765 --> 0:01:30.805
<v Speaker 1>murder that's affected them, their families, and their communities. If

0:01:30.845 --> 0:01:32.845
<v Speaker 1>you have a case you'd like me and my team

0:01:32.885 --> 0:01:35.405
<v Speaker 1>to look into, you can reach out to us at

0:01:35.405 --> 0:01:38.725
<v Speaker 1>our Helen Gone Murder Line at six seven eight seven

0:01:38.805 --> 0:01:42.245
<v Speaker 1>four four, six one four or five. That's six seven

0:01:42.325 --> 0:01:46.765
<v Speaker 1>eight seven four four six one four five. This is

0:01:46.805 --> 0:02:20.685
<v Speaker 1>Helen Gone Murder Line. Now, as an investigator, I think

0:02:20.725 --> 0:02:22.965
<v Speaker 1>one of the most valuable skills that I can have

0:02:23.645 --> 0:02:26.485
<v Speaker 1>is knowing what I don't know, Because no matter how

0:02:26.485 --> 0:02:30.125
<v Speaker 1>many autopsies I've seen, or cases I've covered, or episodes

0:02:30.165 --> 0:02:33.485
<v Speaker 1>of forensic files that I've watched, I'm not a professional

0:02:33.485 --> 0:02:40.125
<v Speaker 1>death investigator. So I decided to find one. I did

0:02:40.125 --> 0:02:42.645
<v Speaker 1>this for another reason too, because I get so many

0:02:42.685 --> 0:02:45.925
<v Speaker 1>emails and messages from people out there who have similar

0:02:45.965 --> 0:02:48.765
<v Speaker 1>issues to the ones that Gail and Dennis's relatives have.

0:02:49.565 --> 0:02:51.845
<v Speaker 1>These are people who have a death that they would

0:02:51.925 --> 0:02:56.725
<v Speaker 1>like reinvestigated. Sometimes it's an unsolved murder. Other times it

0:02:56.805 --> 0:02:59.085
<v Speaker 1>may be a death that was ruled a suicide where

0:02:59.085 --> 0:03:01.925
<v Speaker 1>these family members don't believe that their loved one took

0:03:01.965 --> 0:03:05.325
<v Speaker 1>their own life. I wanted to talk to an expert

0:03:05.325 --> 0:03:07.805
<v Speaker 1>of out the way that they work, and I wanted

0:03:07.805 --> 0:03:10.045
<v Speaker 1>to try and answer one of the biggest questions that

0:03:10.125 --> 0:03:14.285
<v Speaker 1>we have in the Gail Vault case. Was Gale sexually assaulted?

0:03:15.005 --> 0:03:17.845
<v Speaker 1>Or are the condom, condom wrapper, and gun box that

0:03:17.845 --> 0:03:21.045
<v Speaker 1>were found near her body evidence that her crime scene

0:03:21.045 --> 0:03:25.325
<v Speaker 1>could have been staged. This is Arthur Steve Chanceller, a

0:03:25.365 --> 0:03:28.405
<v Speaker 1>death investigator who runs a company called Second Look Training

0:03:28.445 --> 0:03:33.205
<v Speaker 1>in Forensic Consulting. They provide investigative and forensic case consultation

0:03:33.405 --> 0:03:34.005
<v Speaker 1>and training.

0:03:36.125 --> 0:03:38.805
<v Speaker 2>I have been in law enforcements for a little over

0:03:38.845 --> 0:03:42.405
<v Speaker 2>fifty years. Spent a couple of years in the uniform,

0:03:42.525 --> 0:03:46.885
<v Speaker 2>and then I transitioned to a special Agent detective with

0:03:47.045 --> 0:03:55.245
<v Speaker 2>the Army Cromoal Investigation Division, which is similar to NCIS right, Okay,

0:03:55.365 --> 0:03:58.525
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the TV. But yeah, it was very rewarding.

0:03:58.685 --> 0:04:01.445
<v Speaker 2>It was a really good career. So I did DA

0:04:01.925 --> 0:04:04.645
<v Speaker 2>for twenty years. I then retired. I went to work

0:04:05.085 --> 0:04:07.765
<v Speaker 2>in a state to Mississippi or the crime Lab, doing

0:04:07.845 --> 0:04:11.965
<v Speaker 2>homicide crime scenes all over the state. Then I transferred

0:04:12.005 --> 0:04:14.765
<v Speaker 2>to the Bureau of Investigation and I created their cold

0:04:14.805 --> 0:04:18.405
<v Speaker 2>case unit. And then after seven years the retirement, I

0:04:18.445 --> 0:04:21.965
<v Speaker 2>went back to work with the Army CID as a civilian,

0:04:23.085 --> 0:04:26.325
<v Speaker 2>so I spent you know, I spent about the last

0:04:26.365 --> 0:04:30.125
<v Speaker 2>twelve years here at Fort Bragg. I was a supervisory

0:04:30.245 --> 0:04:35.445
<v Speaker 2>especial agent, so I supervised about five different CID offices.

0:04:36.125 --> 0:04:41.125
<v Speaker 2>So I've had a chance to work several hundred felony investigations,

0:04:41.325 --> 0:04:45.445
<v Speaker 2>and over the course of my career, I've probably reviewed

0:04:46.085 --> 0:04:50.205
<v Speaker 2>or helped supervise about ten balloton I'm lucky enough. I

0:04:50.245 --> 0:04:54.285
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of really good experience, have a master's

0:04:54.285 --> 0:04:57.245
<v Speaker 2>degree in criminal justice. I'm a graduate at the FBI

0:04:57.365 --> 0:05:02.805
<v Speaker 2>National Academy. I've written a couple of textbooks on death

0:05:02.845 --> 0:05:09.725
<v Speaker 2>investigations on state scenes and one on investigating sexual crimes.

0:05:10.285 --> 0:05:12.645
<v Speaker 2>I'm under a contract right now to write another book

0:05:12.685 --> 0:05:14.325
<v Speaker 2>about investigating the suicides.

0:05:15.845 --> 0:05:18.285
<v Speaker 1>I tell Steve that we get a lot of calls

0:05:18.325 --> 0:05:22.765
<v Speaker 1>about suicide cases. The case is like Dennis Flowers, where

0:05:22.765 --> 0:05:25.325
<v Speaker 1>the death has been ruled a suicide, but circumstances at

0:05:25.365 --> 0:05:28.805
<v Speaker 1>the crime scene make people believe that this person did

0:05:28.805 --> 0:05:31.765
<v Speaker 1>not take their own life. And yet in so many

0:05:31.805 --> 0:05:35.485
<v Speaker 1>of these cases, these deaths are very quickly ruled suicides.

0:05:36.165 --> 0:05:39.245
<v Speaker 1>So I ask, what can families or other concerned citizens do.

0:05:40.085 --> 0:05:42.965
<v Speaker 1>We're told to let the police do their job, but

0:05:43.125 --> 0:05:46.925
<v Speaker 1>so often people feel as if they're walking a fine line.

0:05:47.085 --> 0:05:48.965
<v Speaker 1>They want to know how they can help, how they

0:05:49.005 --> 0:05:52.685
<v Speaker 1>cannot impede the police investigation, not annoy the police. But

0:05:52.845 --> 0:05:56.605
<v Speaker 1>at the same time they want to be proactive, especially

0:05:56.605 --> 0:05:59.205
<v Speaker 1>when they feel that in the case of a death investigation,

0:06:00.165 --> 0:06:02.645
<v Speaker 1>they believe that things could be falling through the cracks

0:06:03.205 --> 0:06:05.405
<v Speaker 1>or that law enforcement could just be going through.

0:06:06.325 --> 0:06:10.085
<v Speaker 2>On our company website, which is a www. Second Look

0:06:10.125 --> 0:06:13.525
<v Speaker 2>training dot Com, we actually have kind of a self

0:06:13.565 --> 0:06:20.565
<v Speaker 2>paced PowerPoint presentation that is designed to help folks walk

0:06:21.285 --> 0:06:23.045
<v Speaker 2>in all the path of how to deal, what to

0:06:23.125 --> 0:06:26.325
<v Speaker 2>expect from the police, how to get answers from the police,

0:06:26.965 --> 0:06:29.805
<v Speaker 2>how basically to work with the police and not be confrontational,

0:06:29.845 --> 0:06:31.725
<v Speaker 2>and it's designed just to help families.

0:06:32.645 --> 0:06:35.685
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the presentation on Steve's website and it's

0:06:35.845 --> 0:06:38.725
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. One of the best tips that I saw

0:06:38.885 --> 0:06:41.125
<v Speaker 1>was to make a note of any recent developments in

0:06:41.165 --> 0:06:44.125
<v Speaker 1>the victim's life. For example, did they just leave a

0:06:44.165 --> 0:06:48.285
<v Speaker 1>relationship where they arguing with someone about money. Write these

0:06:48.365 --> 0:06:51.445
<v Speaker 1>down in bullet points, and write down the questions you

0:06:51.485 --> 0:06:53.725
<v Speaker 1>have when you go to the police so that you're organized.

0:06:54.725 --> 0:06:57.445
<v Speaker 1>It reminded me of when you go to the doctor's

0:06:57.525 --> 0:07:01.125
<v Speaker 1>office and the doctor's giving you information. All these expert

0:07:01.125 --> 0:07:04.165
<v Speaker 1>websites tell you to write down your questions. It seems

0:07:04.205 --> 0:07:08.325
<v Speaker 1>like such an easy thing, but for example, I never

0:07:08.405 --> 0:07:10.245
<v Speaker 1>do it, and I always walk out of the doctor's

0:07:10.245 --> 0:07:13.925
<v Speaker 1>office feeling like I've forgotten something. I think that it's

0:07:13.965 --> 0:07:16.245
<v Speaker 1>a good idea when you are talking to the police

0:07:16.805 --> 0:07:20.485
<v Speaker 1>to bring a friend with you and either you or

0:07:20.525 --> 0:07:25.765
<v Speaker 1>the person you're with to document everything. Again, we're looking

0:07:25.885 --> 0:07:29.405
<v Speaker 1>at Gail's pattern of life, and any changes in regular

0:07:29.525 --> 0:07:33.725
<v Speaker 1>routine should be noted. The website said something else that

0:07:33.765 --> 0:07:37.285
<v Speaker 1>I think is super important when you're talking to law enforcement.

0:07:37.805 --> 0:07:41.485
<v Speaker 1>It is super important to stick to facts, not opinions.

0:07:41.925 --> 0:07:43.965
<v Speaker 1>This is something that I try to follow myself when

0:07:44.005 --> 0:07:46.765
<v Speaker 1>I'm reporting on a case. I know it's easy to

0:07:46.765 --> 0:07:49.925
<v Speaker 1>get sidetracked by following a theory just because of the

0:07:49.925 --> 0:07:52.485
<v Speaker 1>way our minds work. Even if we are really objective,

0:07:52.885 --> 0:07:55.765
<v Speaker 1>we want to try to make that evidence fit your theory.

0:07:56.245 --> 0:07:58.485
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I'm an investigator.

0:07:58.605 --> 0:08:02.445
<v Speaker 1>It's all about examining facts, going from the crime scene

0:08:02.805 --> 0:08:04.165
<v Speaker 1>and working our way backwards.

0:08:04.685 --> 0:08:09.805
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, suicigns. Typically what happens, and I'm talking you know,

0:08:09.925 --> 0:08:12.685
<v Speaker 2>ninety five percent of the time, I can almost guarantee

0:08:12.685 --> 0:08:15.125
<v Speaker 2>you what happens, and that is the police will come

0:08:15.165 --> 0:08:18.925
<v Speaker 2>to the scene. If everything looks like they think it

0:08:19.005 --> 0:08:22.245
<v Speaker 2>should look, that case is closed out, probably in one

0:08:22.365 --> 0:08:26.485
<v Speaker 2>or two days. There are multiple cases that I've worked

0:08:26.485 --> 0:08:31.005
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't even do an autopsy. So they come in,

0:08:31.445 --> 0:08:34.685
<v Speaker 2>they do what I describe is the bobblehead to come

0:08:34.725 --> 0:08:38.125
<v Speaker 2>in to kind of nod, look around and what should

0:08:38.205 --> 0:08:41.925
<v Speaker 2>be required as an investigation, and that ends up being

0:08:41.925 --> 0:08:44.405
<v Speaker 2>a three or four page report.

0:08:45.405 --> 0:08:49.125
<v Speaker 1>The sad thing is evidence can be lost, and Steve

0:08:49.205 --> 0:08:51.885
<v Speaker 1>explains that even in a best case scenario, if a

0:08:51.925 --> 0:08:55.525
<v Speaker 1>company like his is able to find evidence, even what

0:08:55.565 --> 0:08:58.405
<v Speaker 1>they believe to be definitive evidence, at the end of

0:08:58.405 --> 0:09:00.645
<v Speaker 1>the day, it's up to the police whether or not

0:09:00.685 --> 0:09:04.525
<v Speaker 1>to pursue it, and often the reality is they don't.

0:09:04.885 --> 0:09:09.365
<v Speaker 2>What a frustrating, however, is we have reviewed a case.

0:09:10.565 --> 0:09:13.285
<v Speaker 2>We concurred with the family that there is no way

0:09:13.325 --> 0:09:18.365
<v Speaker 2>that this was a suicide, and we actually found forensic

0:09:18.405 --> 0:09:23.005
<v Speaker 2>evidence in the form of bloodstain analysis that showed that

0:09:23.285 --> 0:09:27.525
<v Speaker 2>after the victim had been shot and injured. Her hand

0:09:27.605 --> 0:09:31.285
<v Speaker 2>had been moved and replaced, so we were able to

0:09:31.325 --> 0:09:36.405
<v Speaker 2>show that to the police and they've done nothing. It's

0:09:36.405 --> 0:09:40.005
<v Speaker 2>extremely frustrating for the families, you know, if nothing else

0:09:40.085 --> 0:09:43.365
<v Speaker 2>just confirmed that it is a suicide. But sure the thought,

0:09:44.165 --> 0:09:47.805
<v Speaker 2>the thought process to the cops is suicide is not

0:09:47.845 --> 0:09:52.485
<v Speaker 2>a criminal offense, right, so if it looks like it's

0:09:52.525 --> 0:09:55.005
<v Speaker 2>a suicide, basically we're not going to waste any time

0:09:55.045 --> 0:09:55.365
<v Speaker 2>on it.

0:09:56.405 --> 0:09:58.885
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's really unfortunate.

0:09:59.925 --> 0:10:03.365
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you I have reopened the suicide, improved

0:10:03.365 --> 0:10:09.885
<v Speaker 2>this a murder. Well, we talked to the family and

0:10:09.925 --> 0:10:14.725
<v Speaker 2>somebody came forward with the new information. The difference is

0:10:15.165 --> 0:10:18.605
<v Speaker 2>just happened in the military. But in the military, the

0:10:18.765 --> 0:10:23.845
<v Speaker 2>Army Cide did a complete crime scene examination, a complete

0:10:24.045 --> 0:10:28.205
<v Speaker 2>laboratory analysis. So when I went in to reopen, I

0:10:28.245 --> 0:10:30.645
<v Speaker 2>actually had a lot of stuff to work with, had

0:10:30.685 --> 0:10:34.765
<v Speaker 2>good scene photographs and stuff like that. The only thing

0:10:34.925 --> 0:10:38.125
<v Speaker 2>is that even if I give you an outstanding report,

0:10:38.445 --> 0:10:41.765
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen? Because I just told you about

0:10:41.765 --> 0:10:44.925
<v Speaker 2>the case we had, but we actually had forensic evidence.

0:10:44.965 --> 0:10:49.245
<v Speaker 2>My partner is a bloodstain expert, so he identified a

0:10:49.285 --> 0:10:53.725
<v Speaker 2>bloodstain that was peer reviewed by another bloodstain expert which

0:10:53.725 --> 0:10:56.765
<v Speaker 2>said the same thing. Yet absolutely this hand was moved,

0:10:57.805 --> 0:11:00.085
<v Speaker 2>and the police just shrugged it off, like dam they

0:11:00.085 --> 0:11:00.485
<v Speaker 2>don't care.

0:11:07.405 --> 0:11:11.045
<v Speaker 1>We start talking about Gail's case. I tell Steve about

0:11:11.045 --> 0:11:13.765
<v Speaker 1>the condom that was lost and about the fact that

0:11:13.805 --> 0:11:16.685
<v Speaker 1>a number of tests weren't done that I believe could

0:11:16.725 --> 0:11:19.565
<v Speaker 1>have more definitively answered the question about time of death

0:11:19.645 --> 0:11:22.845
<v Speaker 1>and possibly whether or not Gail's body had been moved,

0:11:23.405 --> 0:11:26.645
<v Speaker 1>including insect activity, which I did not see on the

0:11:26.645 --> 0:11:30.285
<v Speaker 1>autopsy report. Steve said he also noted that the lack

0:11:30.325 --> 0:11:34.485
<v Speaker 1>of insect activity being documented, and I asked him about

0:11:34.485 --> 0:11:37.285
<v Speaker 1>one of the most crucial elements of this case, Gail's

0:11:37.325 --> 0:11:38.005
<v Speaker 1>time of death.

0:11:39.125 --> 0:11:41.605
<v Speaker 2>This is an example will be called tunnel vision, and

0:11:41.685 --> 0:11:46.805
<v Speaker 2>that is I've identified the suspect. So don't confuse me

0:11:46.845 --> 0:11:48.845
<v Speaker 2>with the facts that leads me to anywhere else.

0:11:50.205 --> 0:11:55.445
<v Speaker 1>Because remember, Gail's boyfriend, Ray was basically never charged, largely

0:11:55.525 --> 0:11:57.925
<v Speaker 1>due to the fact that police believed Gail had been

0:11:57.965 --> 0:12:00.805
<v Speaker 1>killed the night before. But as we said in last

0:12:00.805 --> 0:12:04.325
<v Speaker 1>week's episode, I believe that the evidence points to the

0:12:04.365 --> 0:12:07.685
<v Speaker 1>possibility that Gail's could have been killed later early in

0:12:07.725 --> 0:12:11.485
<v Speaker 1>the morning on March seventeenth. That would explain why parts

0:12:11.525 --> 0:12:14.645
<v Speaker 1>of her body were still warm, and why rigor mortis

0:12:14.685 --> 0:12:17.525
<v Speaker 1>had begun in her face but not progressed down her body.

0:12:18.045 --> 0:12:21.325
<v Speaker 1>We also talk about the rain, and this is why

0:12:21.365 --> 0:12:24.405
<v Speaker 1>I love talking to experts, because Steve found things that

0:12:24.445 --> 0:12:28.365
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see. I mentioned in last week's episode that

0:12:29.045 --> 0:12:31.245
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons I believed why Gail had been

0:12:31.325 --> 0:12:34.445
<v Speaker 1>killed later than the police believed was because of the

0:12:34.485 --> 0:12:38.045
<v Speaker 1>tire tracks. The tire tracks were very detailed, and in

0:12:38.085 --> 0:12:41.125
<v Speaker 1>the police report it was noted that there had been

0:12:41.205 --> 0:12:45.485
<v Speaker 1>rained the night before, torrential rain at around two am.

0:12:45.765 --> 0:12:48.925
<v Speaker 1>But Steve pointed out that in the autopsy report there

0:12:48.965 --> 0:12:52.125
<v Speaker 1>was some conflict about whether the rain had started at

0:12:52.125 --> 0:12:55.125
<v Speaker 1>two am or ended at two am, which could potentially

0:12:55.285 --> 0:12:56.205
<v Speaker 1>be very important.

0:12:56.605 --> 0:13:00.045
<v Speaker 2>There were some conflicting information. Was it a torrential rain

0:13:00.125 --> 0:13:03.245
<v Speaker 2>at two o'clock or did it stop raining at two o'clock,

0:13:03.725 --> 0:13:05.885
<v Speaker 2>So there's real conflict, that's what I mean. So that

0:13:06.165 --> 0:13:07.845
<v Speaker 2>would be some of the stuff that I would have

0:13:07.965 --> 0:13:12.045
<v Speaker 2>to check out because the body was the was wet. Now,

0:13:12.085 --> 0:13:15.045
<v Speaker 2>some of the things that I noticed, first of all,

0:13:16.685 --> 0:13:20.325
<v Speaker 2>the gunshot, probably a small caliber twenty two or twenty five,

0:13:20.445 --> 0:13:24.845
<v Speaker 2>probably not anything heavier, but it never penetrated the skull,

0:13:25.725 --> 0:13:28.725
<v Speaker 2>so it kind of slid along. Okay, which is good. Now,

0:13:28.805 --> 0:13:32.645
<v Speaker 2>it did cost some bruising contusions to the brain and

0:13:32.925 --> 0:13:37.165
<v Speaker 2>some skull fractures, but it didn't end the brain. So

0:13:37.325 --> 0:13:41.885
<v Speaker 2>clearly she was killed by being run over. Okay. Now,

0:13:42.845 --> 0:13:45.845
<v Speaker 2>the thing that I caught that really caught my attention, however,

0:13:46.045 --> 0:13:50.525
<v Speaker 2>is the medical examiner investigator I think is who it is,

0:13:51.085 --> 0:13:53.045
<v Speaker 2>or the assistant one of them is out there, makes

0:13:53.045 --> 0:13:57.365
<v Speaker 2>an observation how she is described lying in the ground

0:13:57.685 --> 0:14:01.245
<v Speaker 2>on her right side, shoulders down. That she said that

0:14:01.325 --> 0:14:04.685
<v Speaker 2>it looks like her right foot had moved back and forth.

0:14:04.725 --> 0:14:08.445
<v Speaker 2>So that's important because that tells me that she was

0:14:08.485 --> 0:14:12.685
<v Speaker 2>probably killed right in that spot. Maybe not shots, but

0:14:12.925 --> 0:14:18.085
<v Speaker 2>killed in that spot. Yeah. Now I'm going to kind

0:14:18.125 --> 0:14:20.125
<v Speaker 2>of go off subject just a little bit because one

0:14:20.165 --> 0:14:24.045
<v Speaker 2>of the things that I looked at I've been scratching

0:14:24.045 --> 0:14:28.325
<v Speaker 2>my head, and that is her pants are down, but

0:14:28.365 --> 0:14:31.005
<v Speaker 2>they're not all the way off, so they.

0:14:30.885 --> 0:14:33.165
<v Speaker 3>Were it said that her clothes they found her clothes

0:14:33.165 --> 0:14:35.565
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten feet away or twenty feet away in the bushes.

0:14:35.925 --> 0:14:39.205
<v Speaker 2>Well, but there's conflicting information because there's another report that

0:14:39.365 --> 0:14:42.965
<v Speaker 2>said her pants was around her, around her ankles. So

0:14:43.125 --> 0:14:44.805
<v Speaker 2>you saw there there's a conflict.

0:14:45.885 --> 0:14:46.845
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I didn't notice that.

0:14:48.605 --> 0:14:51.165
<v Speaker 1>We discussed the fact that, according to the police report,

0:14:51.685 --> 0:14:54.125
<v Speaker 1>Gail's clothing was found several feet away from her in

0:14:54.165 --> 0:14:57.725
<v Speaker 1>the woods. Steve says that in the autopsy report there's

0:14:57.805 --> 0:15:01.085
<v Speaker 1>also a reference to her pants being around her ankles.

0:15:01.685 --> 0:15:03.965
<v Speaker 1>In the crime scene photos, Gail is naked from the

0:15:04.005 --> 0:15:07.765
<v Speaker 1>waist down, so this is probably a mistake unless someone

0:15:07.805 --> 0:15:11.645
<v Speaker 1>took her pants off at the crime scene, which seems unbelievable.

0:15:12.125 --> 0:15:15.605
<v Speaker 1>But then again, this is a strange case. Steve and

0:15:15.645 --> 0:15:19.365
<v Speaker 1>I talk again about crime scene staging. Gail doesn't appear

0:15:19.365 --> 0:15:21.445
<v Speaker 1>to have been hit with the car, and she doesn't

0:15:21.445 --> 0:15:25.525
<v Speaker 1>have defensive wounds on her hands. So was she forced

0:15:25.565 --> 0:15:28.205
<v Speaker 1>out of the car at gunpoint or could she have

0:15:28.245 --> 0:15:31.125
<v Speaker 1>been shot somewhere else and then her killer took her

0:15:31.125 --> 0:15:33.805
<v Speaker 1>body out to dump her in the woods. Could they

0:15:33.845 --> 0:15:36.885
<v Speaker 1>at that point have realized that Gail was still alive

0:15:37.005 --> 0:15:39.285
<v Speaker 1>and decided to stage a sexual assault to throw off

0:15:39.285 --> 0:15:40.125
<v Speaker 1>the investigators.

0:15:40.605 --> 0:15:42.805
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that I will tell you

0:15:42.845 --> 0:15:47.325
<v Speaker 2>that I started looking at is one of the most

0:15:47.805 --> 0:15:52.045
<v Speaker 2>popular themes to use when you stage the scene is

0:15:52.405 --> 0:15:57.445
<v Speaker 2>the sexual assault of sexual homicide. Right, So, I mean

0:15:57.485 --> 0:15:59.525
<v Speaker 2>I started looking at that, and I'm thinking, you know,

0:15:59.565 --> 0:16:04.965
<v Speaker 2>I have to me, this is so odd that she's

0:16:05.005 --> 0:16:09.285
<v Speaker 2>clearly but she wasn't dumped out of the car. She

0:16:09.365 --> 0:16:11.805
<v Speaker 2>wasn't thrown down because she doesn't have any of the

0:16:11.885 --> 0:16:15.005
<v Speaker 2>contusions or she doesn't have any of the upraisings that

0:16:15.045 --> 0:16:18.365
<v Speaker 2>I would expect that she had been pushed out right,

0:16:18.605 --> 0:16:21.845
<v Speaker 2>I'm not seeing that. So and the other thing is

0:16:21.845 --> 0:16:24.285
<v Speaker 2>is I always the hair on the back of my

0:16:24.365 --> 0:16:26.725
<v Speaker 2>neck stands up every time I feel like I'm being

0:16:26.765 --> 0:16:30.005
<v Speaker 2>led down a path. Because if this is the guy

0:16:30.045 --> 0:16:32.285
<v Speaker 2>and he's a sexual offender and he's out and he's

0:16:32.325 --> 0:16:34.285
<v Speaker 2>gonna kill this girl, then why does he leave a

0:16:34.325 --> 0:16:35.005
<v Speaker 2>condom behind?

0:16:36.005 --> 0:16:39.845
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I I agree. I have seen people

0:16:39.925 --> 0:16:42.365
<v Speaker 3>do dumb things. But then on the on the flip side,

0:16:42.485 --> 0:16:44.965
<v Speaker 3>or the condom could have been totally unrelated. It could

0:16:44.925 --> 0:16:46.685
<v Speaker 3>have just been out there, maybe some people talking up

0:16:46.685 --> 0:16:47.045
<v Speaker 3>out there.

0:16:47.125 --> 0:16:50.805
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, exactly, And that's the other that's the other possibility.

0:16:51.165 --> 0:16:54.685
<v Speaker 2>But then we have she's undressed, but there's really no

0:16:54.765 --> 0:16:57.365
<v Speaker 2>indication of recent sexual activity.

0:16:57.645 --> 0:16:59.725
<v Speaker 3>No, I think in the in the report, it said

0:16:59.965 --> 0:17:02.325
<v Speaker 3>she had had sex with her boyfriend like two nights earlier,

0:17:02.325 --> 0:17:03.525
<v Speaker 3>and that would have been consistent with that.

0:17:03.605 --> 0:17:06.405
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, exactly, because so that that could be

0:17:06.445 --> 0:17:09.765
<v Speaker 2>present for up to ninety six hours. So I'm sitting

0:17:09.765 --> 0:17:11.125
<v Speaker 2>here and I'm looking at it, and I said, you know,

0:17:11.245 --> 0:17:15.205
<v Speaker 2>I know about sex offenders, and I said, this doesn't

0:17:15.365 --> 0:17:18.885
<v Speaker 2>This doesn't pass the common sense test that some sexual

0:17:18.885 --> 0:17:22.765
<v Speaker 2>offender has this girl and he can do whatever he wants,

0:17:23.245 --> 0:17:26.845
<v Speaker 2>but he doesn't do anything. Now, there are offenders that

0:17:26.965 --> 0:17:29.845
<v Speaker 2>might kill her and then maybe masturbate over her. Now

0:17:30.765 --> 0:17:36.965
<v Speaker 2>that there, Yeah, exactly. And I don't see any elements

0:17:37.005 --> 0:17:41.205
<v Speaker 2>of her being no bondage. I don't see any indication

0:17:41.365 --> 0:17:44.125
<v Speaker 2>that she was anally assaulted, which is something else I

0:17:44.165 --> 0:17:47.765
<v Speaker 2>would expect for those type of offenders who do that. Yeah,

0:17:48.765 --> 0:17:52.925
<v Speaker 2>So I'm sitting here scratching my head that I don't

0:17:52.965 --> 0:17:57.125
<v Speaker 2>know if you're dealing with the true sexual offender are

0:17:57.205 --> 0:17:59.765
<v Speaker 2>someone who's trying to make it look like a sexual offender.

0:18:00.605 --> 0:18:03.485
<v Speaker 1>We're split on whether this could be a staged crime

0:18:03.525 --> 0:18:08.165
<v Speaker 1>scene or just a panic sex offender. Steve asked me

0:18:08.245 --> 0:18:11.165
<v Speaker 1>more about the location where Gaile's body was found, which

0:18:11.205 --> 0:18:15.565
<v Speaker 1>is another extremely odd factor in this case, because why

0:18:15.605 --> 0:18:18.125
<v Speaker 1>would gles kill her not leave her in the woods?

0:18:18.165 --> 0:18:21.045
<v Speaker 1>They were surrounded by these very dense woods and trees.

0:18:21.765 --> 0:18:23.685
<v Speaker 1>Why did they choose to dump her out in the

0:18:23.685 --> 0:18:27.045
<v Speaker 1>middle of a road. Did they panic and have to

0:18:27.125 --> 0:18:30.365
<v Speaker 1>leave quickly? Or could this have been an indication they

0:18:30.405 --> 0:18:31.685
<v Speaker 1>wanted her body to be found?

0:18:32.565 --> 0:18:35.325
<v Speaker 2>You have to look at us. When was the body

0:18:35.365 --> 0:18:38.765
<v Speaker 2>actually found, because that's when you need to start working

0:18:38.765 --> 0:18:39.445
<v Speaker 2>yourself back.

0:18:39.805 --> 0:18:41.925
<v Speaker 3>Well around just after ten am was when it was

0:18:41.925 --> 0:18:43.725
<v Speaker 3>found and the cops were there by like ten thirty.

0:18:44.085 --> 0:18:46.565
<v Speaker 2>And I guess that's not a very well traveled road.

0:18:47.845 --> 0:18:49.125
<v Speaker 2>No it's not.

0:18:49.245 --> 0:18:51.725
<v Speaker 3>It was a back road off of a off of

0:18:51.765 --> 0:18:54.165
<v Speaker 3>a two lane highway. But no, it's a back dirt road.

0:18:54.685 --> 0:18:56.005
<v Speaker 3>To eat APU kind of know where it was.

0:18:56.205 --> 0:19:00.125
<v Speaker 2>It's like a logging road. Okay. How far away from

0:19:00.205 --> 0:19:00.845
<v Speaker 2>her residence?

0:19:01.805 --> 0:19:04.925
<v Speaker 3>About three miles little less than three miles, so yeah.

0:19:04.965 --> 0:19:07.005
<v Speaker 2>And then the other thing is if this is a

0:19:07.005 --> 0:19:10.885
<v Speaker 2>stranger doing all this, then what I would expect if

0:19:10.925 --> 0:19:14.485
<v Speaker 2>this was a stranger, that after the incident, they would

0:19:14.485 --> 0:19:16.525
<v Speaker 2>have taken her to the next county or something like that,

0:19:16.565 --> 0:19:18.045
<v Speaker 2>and done it not right there?

0:19:18.845 --> 0:19:21.445
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is weird, Yeah, really weird.

0:19:22.045 --> 0:19:27.805
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it has I mean there was interesting, interesting,

0:19:28.165 --> 0:19:29.445
<v Speaker 2>interesting case for sure.

0:19:30.805 --> 0:19:34.605
<v Speaker 1>So what do we know for sure? Gail was almost

0:19:34.645 --> 0:19:37.685
<v Speaker 1>certainly shot before she was run over, because it was

0:19:37.725 --> 0:19:41.565
<v Speaker 1>being run over that killed her. Steve said that, in

0:19:41.605 --> 0:19:45.285
<v Speaker 1>his opinion, Gail's wounds indicate that she was run over

0:19:45.405 --> 0:19:48.445
<v Speaker 1>by a vehicle with a higher undercarriage, one that was

0:19:48.525 --> 0:19:51.245
<v Speaker 1>higher off the ground. Steve said it could have been

0:19:51.245 --> 0:19:55.405
<v Speaker 1>a jeep which Gail drove, or a pickup truck. Remember

0:19:55.485 --> 0:19:57.925
<v Speaker 1>last week we talked to the former sheriff, Herb Marshall.

0:19:58.605 --> 0:20:01.045
<v Speaker 1>He told us that he believed Gail had been run

0:20:01.045 --> 0:20:02.005
<v Speaker 1>over in her own jeep.

0:20:02.405 --> 0:20:04.925
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, she may have gone out there and

0:20:05.565 --> 0:20:08.645
<v Speaker 2>or to you know, maybe regain consciousness, or maybe she

0:20:08.725 --> 0:20:13.005
<v Speaker 2>never lost consciousness, because remember, I mean, it's just like

0:20:13.005 --> 0:20:16.605
<v Speaker 2>like a like a big concussion, okay, is the type

0:20:16.605 --> 0:20:20.605
<v Speaker 2>of injuries Okay, And then they get out there and

0:20:20.605 --> 0:20:22.605
<v Speaker 2>and he figures out, shit, I got to do something

0:20:22.845 --> 0:20:26.685
<v Speaker 2>or else. He's not struggling, right, I am imagining, takes

0:20:26.685 --> 0:20:28.885
<v Speaker 2>her out on the road and just lips your pants

0:20:28.925 --> 0:20:33.325
<v Speaker 2>off and runs over it. Now, the other thing that

0:20:33.405 --> 0:20:36.605
<v Speaker 2>I did see with some of the autopsy photographs that

0:20:36.805 --> 0:20:39.925
<v Speaker 2>are not great, but they're okay. I think you're looking

0:20:39.965 --> 0:20:43.245
<v Speaker 2>at a pickup truck rather than a car. Hmm.

0:20:44.445 --> 0:20:47.205
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. The police think her deep and I don't know

0:20:47.285 --> 0:20:48.165
<v Speaker 3>where they got that from.

0:20:48.205 --> 0:20:50.685
<v Speaker 2>I don't they don't know that well anything that's the

0:20:50.765 --> 0:20:54.885
<v Speaker 2>higher that the body is higher off the ground, because

0:20:55.445 --> 0:20:58.205
<v Speaker 2>what I what I didn't see. And I've seen bodies

0:20:58.205 --> 0:21:01.605
<v Speaker 2>that are hit by cars, you know, the body runs

0:21:01.605 --> 0:21:04.365
<v Speaker 2>into the the undercarriage and there's all kinds of nicks

0:21:04.365 --> 0:21:08.045
<v Speaker 2>and scratches and stuff like that. And I didn't see anything,

0:21:08.085 --> 0:21:14.565
<v Speaker 2>although I did find some pattern injuries. And what I'm

0:21:14.605 --> 0:21:17.725
<v Speaker 2>looking at this at is you know, this is to me,

0:21:18.205 --> 0:21:24.085
<v Speaker 2>these are caused by her laying across or laying on something.

0:21:25.405 --> 0:21:29.765
<v Speaker 2>Well interesting, Yeah, it's on her lower I think left leg.

0:21:29.925 --> 0:21:33.125
<v Speaker 3>Would that have been like something in that road or something?

0:21:33.205 --> 0:21:35.005
<v Speaker 3>Or do you think or do you think someone shot

0:21:35.045 --> 0:21:36.085
<v Speaker 3>her and then took her out there?

0:21:36.685 --> 0:21:40.325
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think she was shot somewhere else, quite honestly,

0:21:41.045 --> 0:21:43.845
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe not. I don't know. I don't have

0:21:43.885 --> 0:21:45.605
<v Speaker 2>her clothing, so I don't know if there's any blood

0:21:45.645 --> 0:21:46.325
<v Speaker 2>own her clothing.

0:21:47.045 --> 0:21:50.005
<v Speaker 1>I remember that there were no pictures of Gail's clothing,

0:21:50.605 --> 0:21:53.645
<v Speaker 1>but the police report indicated that her clothes had been

0:21:53.685 --> 0:21:55.805
<v Speaker 1>thrown in the woods about ten feet from her body.

0:21:56.405 --> 0:21:58.765
<v Speaker 1>Her underwear and jeans were balled up as if they

0:21:58.765 --> 0:22:01.685
<v Speaker 1>had been pulled off together, and there was fecal matter

0:22:01.725 --> 0:22:05.605
<v Speaker 1>in her underwear. This next part is a little bit upsetting,

0:22:05.605 --> 0:22:08.445
<v Speaker 1>but we have to examine the forensic evidence, so I'm

0:22:08.485 --> 0:22:11.685
<v Speaker 1>just going to plow forward. It was noted in the

0:22:11.765 --> 0:22:14.685
<v Speaker 1>report the police thought that, due to the fact that

0:22:14.725 --> 0:22:18.605
<v Speaker 1>there was no feces smeared on Gail's buttocks, they believe

0:22:18.685 --> 0:22:21.205
<v Speaker 1>the feces was expelled when she was run over by

0:22:21.205 --> 0:22:24.125
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle, rather than, for example, when she was shot

0:22:24.125 --> 0:22:26.685
<v Speaker 1>in the head. This is one of the reasons why

0:22:26.765 --> 0:22:29.685
<v Speaker 1>police believe Gail was shot before she was run over.

0:22:30.725 --> 0:22:33.685
<v Speaker 1>But when I talked to Steve, he believes that the

0:22:33.725 --> 0:22:37.205
<v Speaker 1>evidence points to Gail's clothing being stripped off before she

0:22:37.325 --> 0:22:38.485
<v Speaker 1>was run over, not after.

0:22:38.925 --> 0:22:41.125
<v Speaker 3>I would think it would be possible that, you know,

0:22:41.965 --> 0:22:43.685
<v Speaker 3>after you were shot in the head, that would happen.

0:22:44.605 --> 0:22:50.245
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but yeah, I mean it's that you know that

0:22:50.285 --> 0:22:52.805
<v Speaker 2>got a aweso because it is a I awakened and

0:22:52.885 --> 0:22:58.765
<v Speaker 2>experience as you might imagine, Yeah, being run over first

0:22:58.765 --> 0:23:02.325
<v Speaker 2>and then the pants off, I suppose, but you know,

0:23:02.445 --> 0:23:05.485
<v Speaker 2>with her broken pelvis, that may have been a little

0:23:05.685 --> 0:23:06.845
<v Speaker 2>bit more difficult.

0:23:08.005 --> 0:23:10.125
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it seems like it'd be difficult to take off.

0:23:10.325 --> 0:23:12.005
<v Speaker 3>And if they had to and if you do type

0:23:12.085 --> 0:23:15.085
<v Speaker 3>tight jeans or tighter jeans off a girl, right, you're

0:23:15.125 --> 0:23:17.285
<v Speaker 3>going to move things in a certain way, you know. There,

0:23:17.445 --> 0:23:21.005
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, right, Yeah, it's so sad. I mean,

0:23:21.005 --> 0:23:23.245
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing is actually I think about it a

0:23:23.245 --> 0:23:25.205
<v Speaker 3>lot because I can't imagine a worse death. Really, it

0:23:25.285 --> 0:23:25.885
<v Speaker 3>means horrible.

0:23:25.885 --> 0:23:29.485
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, oh no, absolutely, you know, especially if it's

0:23:29.565 --> 0:23:31.765
<v Speaker 2>if it's somebody at one time you had a relationship

0:23:31.805 --> 0:23:35.285
<v Speaker 2>with or whatever, which is which was you know, generally

0:23:35.325 --> 0:23:38.525
<v Speaker 2>what what happens. And one of the things that we

0:23:38.925 --> 0:23:41.205
<v Speaker 2>that we always stay on a stage crime scene, don't

0:23:41.205 --> 0:23:43.685
<v Speaker 2>look out signed on a stage crime scene, look towards

0:23:43.685 --> 0:23:46.525
<v Speaker 2>the victim, because it's going to be somebody that has

0:23:46.565 --> 0:23:50.565
<v Speaker 2>to point at somebody else. Yeah, they want to misdirect

0:23:50.605 --> 0:23:53.685
<v Speaker 2>the police away from them, away from their activities.

0:23:55.045 --> 0:23:57.885
<v Speaker 1>But it's also possible that she was run over by

0:23:57.885 --> 0:24:01.205
<v Speaker 1>a pickup truck and Gail's boyfriend Ray drove a pickup truck,

0:24:02.085 --> 0:24:04.605
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking about what Steve said about police not

0:24:04.725 --> 0:24:07.565
<v Speaker 1>checking out about I've found this to be a theme

0:24:07.725 --> 0:24:10.245
<v Speaker 1>over and over in so many of these cases, which

0:24:10.285 --> 0:24:13.405
<v Speaker 1>you will know if you listen to this podcast. Remember,

0:24:13.485 --> 0:24:16.165
<v Speaker 1>Ray's story was that he borrowed Gale's jeep the night

0:24:16.205 --> 0:24:18.765
<v Speaker 1>before because his own vehicle was dead and not running.

0:24:19.805 --> 0:24:21.805
<v Speaker 1>How do we know for sure that his truck was

0:24:21.845 --> 0:24:25.325
<v Speaker 1>out of action? Ray said that on Friday, after he

0:24:25.405 --> 0:24:27.685
<v Speaker 1>went home after his night out, He said that he

0:24:27.765 --> 0:24:30.805
<v Speaker 1>slept in his truck and then he supposedly called some

0:24:30.845 --> 0:24:33.245
<v Speaker 1>friends to come over to try to help him get

0:24:33.285 --> 0:24:36.405
<v Speaker 1>the truck started and push it. He said that it

0:24:36.445 --> 0:24:40.005
<v Speaker 1>did start briefly but then installed again. But I wonder

0:24:40.285 --> 0:24:43.725
<v Speaker 1>did anyone actually check that. Did they look inside the truck?

0:24:44.165 --> 0:24:47.405
<v Speaker 1>Did they ask Ray how his truck stopped working and

0:24:47.445 --> 0:24:51.365
<v Speaker 1>when that happened? Did it really die months earlier or

0:24:51.445 --> 0:24:54.525
<v Speaker 1>could it have stalled much more recently, for example, after

0:24:54.605 --> 0:24:58.405
<v Speaker 1>running over something heavy. Steve believes, at least based on

0:24:58.485 --> 0:25:01.605
<v Speaker 1>what he's seen so far from the autopsy report, that

0:25:01.725 --> 0:25:04.405
<v Speaker 1>this scene has some of the hallmarks of a stage

0:25:04.445 --> 0:25:05.125
<v Speaker 1>crime scene.

0:25:06.125 --> 0:25:09.045
<v Speaker 2>You know, it could have been you know, teenagers out

0:25:09.045 --> 0:25:12.725
<v Speaker 2>there exercising, and that's one of the rappers there. But again,

0:25:13.205 --> 0:25:15.405
<v Speaker 2>that just it always bothers me when I see that.

0:25:15.525 --> 0:25:18.205
<v Speaker 2>It's like I'm being led down the path, you know.

0:25:18.325 --> 0:25:22.165
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, so it's a little why would someone leave?

0:25:22.365 --> 0:25:22.645
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:25:23.325 --> 0:25:26.005
<v Speaker 3>I mean, on the flip side, I've seen really dumb

0:25:26.085 --> 0:25:28.725
<v Speaker 3>people do really dwmb things, especially when they're panicked. But

0:25:29.645 --> 0:25:30.725
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it's weird.

0:25:30.765 --> 0:25:32.845
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, but he's But here's the thing we

0:25:32.885 --> 0:25:34.845
<v Speaker 2>always look at. We always look at what we call

0:25:34.885 --> 0:25:39.485
<v Speaker 2>it offended the ecotomy. So here's a guy that's apparently

0:25:39.525 --> 0:25:42.445
<v Speaker 2>so clever as he can murder this person and leave

0:25:42.445 --> 0:25:46.005
<v Speaker 2>her out there and leave basically no signs that they

0:25:46.005 --> 0:25:48.365
<v Speaker 2>were there, no evidence. But then he turns around and

0:25:48.485 --> 0:25:52.685
<v Speaker 2>leaves the condom. Yeah, that's the best evidence in the world.

0:25:54.085 --> 0:25:56.765
<v Speaker 1>So it's looking more likely that Gail was shot in

0:25:56.805 --> 0:25:59.805
<v Speaker 1>the head and then her pants and underwear were stripped

0:25:59.845 --> 0:26:04.765
<v Speaker 1>off before she was run over. After that, there are

0:26:04.765 --> 0:26:08.685
<v Speaker 1>two main possibilities. Either her killer took off her pants

0:26:08.725 --> 0:26:11.365
<v Speaker 1>and then dropped the condom and gunbox there to stage

0:26:11.365 --> 0:26:14.245
<v Speaker 1>the crime scene, or that Gale was shot and had raped.

0:26:15.805 --> 0:26:18.805
<v Speaker 1>Did Gail's killer leave her in that open road because

0:26:18.805 --> 0:26:20.685
<v Speaker 1>they wanted her to get found, which would be more

0:26:20.765 --> 0:26:24.645
<v Speaker 1>characteristic of a stage crime scene. Or was them dumping

0:26:24.645 --> 0:26:26.965
<v Speaker 1>her there a panicked reaction to something that got out

0:26:27.005 --> 0:26:30.245
<v Speaker 1>of control. Did her killer panic for some reason and

0:26:30.285 --> 0:26:33.645
<v Speaker 1>have to take off suddenly. One thing that Steve and

0:26:33.645 --> 0:26:36.845
<v Speaker 1>I both agree on immediately is the fact that Gail's

0:26:36.885 --> 0:26:40.125
<v Speaker 1>killer was almost certainly not a random stranger. It was

0:26:40.125 --> 0:26:44.165
<v Speaker 1>someone local, someone who knew these woods well and believed

0:26:44.245 --> 0:26:46.725
<v Speaker 1>that on that road at that time they would not

0:26:46.805 --> 0:26:47.885
<v Speaker 1>be disturbed.

0:26:48.125 --> 0:26:52.485
<v Speaker 2>Right, and the stranger would put her somewhere's else because

0:26:52.525 --> 0:26:56.285
<v Speaker 2>that gives him a chance to get more distanced than

0:26:56.325 --> 0:26:59.205
<v Speaker 2>the topspineing them. Yeah, so this is that was my

0:26:59.245 --> 0:27:02.885
<v Speaker 2>impression as well, that somebody wanted her found. And the

0:27:02.925 --> 0:27:05.005
<v Speaker 2>other thing is is that this is a dirt road.

0:27:05.605 --> 0:27:08.805
<v Speaker 2>I asked myself, how would a stranger know how to

0:27:08.805 --> 0:27:11.765
<v Speaker 2>get out there or why took the road.

0:27:13.285 --> 0:27:16.245
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned to Steve the interview with laith Lane, the

0:27:16.285 --> 0:27:18.325
<v Speaker 1>man who said that he saw Gail hitchhiking on the

0:27:18.365 --> 0:27:21.005
<v Speaker 1>side of the road on Thursday, and too, as I

0:27:21.045 --> 0:27:23.925
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, for some reason, when he was interviewed on Friday,

0:27:24.085 --> 0:27:27.565
<v Speaker 1>just hours after Gail's body was found, knew exactly what

0:27:27.685 --> 0:27:31.045
<v Speaker 1>Gail had been wearing when she was killed. We look

0:27:31.125 --> 0:27:34.765
<v Speaker 1>back at our location map. Gail's apartment that she shared

0:27:34.805 --> 0:27:37.325
<v Speaker 1>with Ray was about three miles from where her body

0:27:37.405 --> 0:27:40.325
<v Speaker 1>was found. According to her sister, it was a distance

0:27:40.365 --> 0:27:42.725
<v Speaker 1>that was a little bit too far to walk. Also,

0:27:43.045 --> 0:27:46.285
<v Speaker 1>when she was found, she was wearing socks but no shoes,

0:27:46.885 --> 0:27:50.805
<v Speaker 1>so she probably did not walk out there. Someone probably

0:27:50.885 --> 0:27:55.645
<v Speaker 1>drove her to that location. Now, laith Lane may have

0:27:55.765 --> 0:27:59.245
<v Speaker 1>a totally reasonable explanation for how he knew this. We

0:27:59.365 --> 0:28:01.765
<v Speaker 1>know that word travels fast in that neck of the woods.

0:28:02.285 --> 0:28:05.765
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people had cbe radios and police scanners. Also,

0:28:05.965 --> 0:28:09.885
<v Speaker 1>laith Lane's mother lived near that crime scene, so he

0:28:09.925 --> 0:28:12.365
<v Speaker 1>may have actually seen Gail at the crime scene. We

0:28:12.485 --> 0:28:15.245
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. What bothers me is that I don't

0:28:15.325 --> 0:28:18.485
<v Speaker 1>know an answer to a crucial question, actually one of

0:28:18.525 --> 0:28:20.165
<v Speaker 1>the same ones that Steve asked me.

0:28:21.165 --> 0:28:24.485
<v Speaker 2>So everybody that lives around there would know about it,

0:28:24.565 --> 0:28:28.325
<v Speaker 2>but someone who's coming to Memphis probably wouldn't know about it.

0:28:28.845 --> 0:28:31.405
<v Speaker 3>Oh No, I don't think any I don't think it

0:28:31.685 --> 0:28:34.085
<v Speaker 3>was a stranger from like out of town. It might

0:28:34.085 --> 0:28:36.405
<v Speaker 3>have been a stranger to her or something she didn't know. Well,

0:28:36.605 --> 0:28:38.725
<v Speaker 3>that's possible, but I don't. I think I think you're right.

0:28:38.805 --> 0:28:39.845
<v Speaker 3>I think it was someone.

0:28:39.605 --> 0:28:43.245
<v Speaker 2>From Yeah, and that's what I meant by that. It's

0:28:44.245 --> 0:28:47.965
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's probably somebody local rather than someone just

0:28:48.085 --> 0:28:50.365
<v Speaker 2>driving through happened upon her.

0:28:51.365 --> 0:28:55.365
<v Speaker 1>We start talking again about Gail's pattern of life. Where

0:28:55.685 --> 0:28:59.085
<v Speaker 1>was Gail in the twenty four hours before she disappeared. Now,

0:28:59.165 --> 0:29:02.525
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately the record of where she was on Thursday is

0:29:02.565 --> 0:29:05.965
<v Speaker 1>not super well documented in the police reports, but I

0:29:06.005 --> 0:29:08.765
<v Speaker 1>tell them what we know. Gail had her jeep on

0:29:08.805 --> 0:29:11.565
<v Speaker 1>Thursday morning. She was seen at the job site talking

0:29:11.565 --> 0:29:15.965
<v Speaker 1>to people, behaving normally. Then she left the job site

0:29:16.005 --> 0:29:18.485
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night, just after eight pm. She called her

0:29:18.565 --> 0:29:20.845
<v Speaker 1>supervisor and asked if they would be working the next day.

0:29:21.365 --> 0:29:23.725
<v Speaker 1>When she was told no that because the rains had

0:29:23.725 --> 0:29:25.965
<v Speaker 1>been too heavy, that she would not be working on Friday,

0:29:26.645 --> 0:29:29.245
<v Speaker 1>Gail told her supervisor she planned to come in and

0:29:29.245 --> 0:29:33.125
<v Speaker 1>pick up her paycheck the next morning. Friday morning. Again,

0:29:33.485 --> 0:29:35.965
<v Speaker 1>most of the things that happened that day in Gail's

0:29:36.005 --> 0:29:40.925
<v Speaker 1>life seemed to be unfolding completely normally, except for one

0:29:40.965 --> 0:29:43.885
<v Speaker 1>incident that was completely out of the ordinary and stood

0:29:43.925 --> 0:29:47.405
<v Speaker 1>out the fact that Gail supposedly let Ray borrow her

0:29:47.485 --> 0:29:51.365
<v Speaker 1>jeep that night. Steve once again talks about how crucial

0:29:51.405 --> 0:29:53.845
<v Speaker 1>it is to identify a victim's pattern of life and

0:29:53.885 --> 0:29:56.645
<v Speaker 1>to truly get inside the mind of the victim. I

0:29:56.805 --> 0:29:58.405
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people may think that I go

0:29:58.525 --> 0:30:00.685
<v Speaker 1>over and over the same facts a million times on

0:30:00.725 --> 0:30:03.085
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, but that is what I'm trying to do.

0:30:03.605 --> 0:30:06.925
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand Gaile's routine. What was she doing

0:30:07.005 --> 0:30:09.725
<v Speaker 1>during all of the spaces in the police report where

0:30:09.725 --> 0:30:11.405
<v Speaker 1>there are these unexplained gaps of time.

0:30:12.565 --> 0:30:14.765
<v Speaker 2>Well, the big thing I always look for is any

0:30:14.885 --> 0:30:18.285
<v Speaker 2>change of routine is what we call a coincidence, Right,

0:30:18.445 --> 0:30:23.765
<v Speaker 2>any change of routine. Well, usually when we teach law enforcement,

0:30:23.845 --> 0:30:27.045
<v Speaker 2>we say, every time you hear a coincidence, the many

0:30:27.085 --> 0:30:30.205
<v Speaker 2>thing you hear is probably a lie. So in this

0:30:30.245 --> 0:30:34.965
<v Speaker 2>particular case, she never lets anybody use her car, but

0:30:35.085 --> 0:30:37.485
<v Speaker 2>that night she does. That's a change of routine, That's

0:30:37.485 --> 0:30:38.205
<v Speaker 2>a coincidence.

0:30:46.245 --> 0:30:48.845
<v Speaker 1>Once again, Steve and I discussed the fact that Gail,

0:30:48.965 --> 0:30:52.845
<v Speaker 1>according to her friend Sheila, never let anyone borrow her vehicle,

0:30:53.565 --> 0:30:55.685
<v Speaker 1>and then it seems weird to both of us. That

0:30:55.765 --> 0:30:58.285
<v Speaker 1>suddenly Ray was out all night with her jeep and

0:30:58.365 --> 0:31:01.405
<v Speaker 1>told the police later that Gail was fine with that.

0:31:01.405 --> 0:31:03.485
<v Speaker 1>That's a definite red flag. That makes the hairs on

0:31:03.485 --> 0:31:04.605
<v Speaker 1>the back of my next stand up.

0:31:06.325 --> 0:31:08.445
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a there's an awful lot of stuff.

0:31:09.125 --> 0:31:12.885
<v Speaker 2>Quite honestly, it's it's a it's a pretty good case.

0:31:13.125 --> 0:31:17.965
<v Speaker 2>It's I wish the cops had done obviously a little

0:31:18.005 --> 0:31:18.445
<v Speaker 2>bit better.

0:31:19.565 --> 0:31:22.685
<v Speaker 1>Ray has passed away, so if the evidence does ultimately

0:31:22.765 --> 0:31:26.125
<v Speaker 1>end up pointing to him, obviously he can't be prosecuted.

0:31:27.205 --> 0:31:30.405
<v Speaker 1>But Gail has a sister, Teresa, who is still alive

0:31:30.965 --> 0:31:32.965
<v Speaker 1>and who still has to go to sleep at night

0:31:33.085 --> 0:31:35.965
<v Speaker 1>wondering what really happened to her sister all those years

0:31:35.965 --> 0:31:39.645
<v Speaker 1>ago and why. Steve agrees with me that the laith

0:31:39.725 --> 0:31:43.005
<v Speaker 1>Lane lead should have been investigated further, and he asks

0:31:43.045 --> 0:31:45.405
<v Speaker 1>another one of the same questions that I've been lying

0:31:45.445 --> 0:31:48.605
<v Speaker 1>awake at night, tossing and turning and thinking about obsessively.

0:31:49.005 --> 0:31:52.405
<v Speaker 2>Here's the important question. Did the police contact him or

0:31:52.445 --> 0:31:54.165
<v Speaker 2>did he contact the police first?

0:31:54.925 --> 0:31:58.205
<v Speaker 3>Exactly? You know what? I asked that, and nobody can

0:31:58.245 --> 0:31:59.805
<v Speaker 3>tell me the answer to that, because I was like,

0:31:59.885 --> 0:32:02.525
<v Speaker 3>I'm just I just want to know how this guy

0:32:02.685 --> 0:32:05.165
<v Speaker 3>got involved, like with he at the crime scene? Did

0:32:05.165 --> 0:32:07.645
<v Speaker 3>he live? Did he happen to pass by? And then

0:32:07.685 --> 0:32:09.605
<v Speaker 3>maybe you know, because that would explain it. But I

0:32:09.725 --> 0:32:11.965
<v Speaker 3>just need to know an otherwise. It is very strange.

0:32:12.405 --> 0:32:15.925
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I always I'm always suspicious of anybody who

0:32:15.965 --> 0:32:18.965
<v Speaker 2>tries to interject themselves into the into the case.

0:32:19.885 --> 0:32:23.525
<v Speaker 1>Something else bothers me. This idea that once someone is

0:32:23.565 --> 0:32:27.365
<v Speaker 1>elderly above say age sixty five or seventy, that they

0:32:27.365 --> 0:32:28.925
<v Speaker 1>are somehow harmless.

0:32:29.845 --> 0:32:32.205
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. Yeah, I don't care who it is.

0:32:33.165 --> 0:32:34.805
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're gonna at least look at these things. But

0:32:34.885 --> 0:32:37.485
<v Speaker 3>there's something weird. To check it out.

0:32:37.765 --> 0:32:41.685
<v Speaker 2>Well, most most criminals will burn themselves out between forty

0:32:41.685 --> 0:32:44.645
<v Speaker 2>five and fifty. But there's two people that will never

0:32:44.725 --> 0:32:47.525
<v Speaker 2>burn out. That they will offend and up until the

0:32:47.605 --> 0:32:53.245
<v Speaker 2>day they die if they can. Okay, that's a pedophile right,

0:32:54.285 --> 0:32:57.285
<v Speaker 2>and a sexual statist. Now, this is the guy who's

0:32:57.325 --> 0:33:01.245
<v Speaker 2>into the d s M. Often they reach the stage

0:33:01.285 --> 0:33:04.845
<v Speaker 2>that their whole intent is to sexually torture someone all

0:33:04.845 --> 0:33:07.525
<v Speaker 2>the way up to the timely murder them like Bundy

0:33:07.765 --> 0:33:12.845
<v Speaker 2>like BTK. Now, those are all sexual status. So those

0:33:12.885 --> 0:33:17.925
<v Speaker 2>little guys that never burn out. They will offend continuously

0:33:18.045 --> 0:33:18.605
<v Speaker 2>if they can.

0:33:21.165 --> 0:33:24.005
<v Speaker 1>You can find Steve's company, Second Look Training and Forensic

0:33:24.045 --> 0:33:27.965
<v Speaker 1>Consulting online at second Loooktraining dot com. You can also

0:33:28.045 --> 0:33:30.965
<v Speaker 1>reach them at nine to one nine three six zero

0:33:31.325 --> 0:33:35.045
<v Speaker 1>three five one eight. So where does this leave us

0:33:35.125 --> 0:33:38.925
<v Speaker 1>with Gail's case. It's possible that Gail's killer is dead,

0:33:39.805 --> 0:33:42.285
<v Speaker 1>But what if they're not. What if there is a

0:33:42.365 --> 0:33:46.645
<v Speaker 1>killer walking around out there right now, one who now

0:33:46.685 --> 0:33:50.445
<v Speaker 1>maybe has children and grandchildren. I'm thinking about the information

0:33:50.485 --> 0:33:54.085
<v Speaker 1>that Steve gave me. What if that crime scene wasn't staged.

0:33:54.765 --> 0:33:57.725
<v Speaker 1>What if there's a sexual sadist out there, one who

0:33:57.765 --> 0:34:01.125
<v Speaker 1>got away with murder? What else have they been doing

0:34:01.165 --> 0:34:05.965
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen eighty? I'm Catherine Townsend. This is Helen on

0:34:06.085 --> 0:34:11.925
<v Speaker 1>Murder Line. Helen Gone Murder Line is a production of

0:34:11.965 --> 0:34:15.285
<v Speaker 1>School of Humans and iHeart Podcasts. It's written and narrated

0:34:15.325 --> 0:34:19.165
<v Speaker 1>by me Catherine Townsend and produced by Gabby Watts. Music

0:34:19.205 --> 0:34:23.165
<v Speaker 1>contributed by Ben s Lee. Executive producers of Virginia Prescott,

0:34:23.645 --> 0:34:27.445
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Barr, and Elsie Crowley. Special thanks to Amy Tubbs

0:34:27.485 --> 0:34:30.605
<v Speaker 1>for her research assistance. If you have a case, you'd

0:34:30.645 --> 0:34:32.685
<v Speaker 1>like me and my team to look into. You can

0:34:32.725 --> 0:34:34.645
<v Speaker 1>reach out to us at our Helen Gone Murder Line.

0:34:34.645 --> 0:34:37.725
<v Speaker 1>It's six seven eight seven four four six one four five.

0:34:38.085 --> 0:34:42.085
<v Speaker 1>That's six seven eight seven four four six one four five.

0:34:51.165 --> 0:34:53.005
<v Speaker 1>School of Humans