WEBVTT - Mayoral Candidate Eric Adams On The Future Of NYC 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, want to

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>treat today in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Today we

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have Eric Adams, New York City mayor candidate, and he's

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got a day job too, he's Brooklyn Borough President. He

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in studio. Mr Adams, thank you so

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We really appreciate you taking the time. Um,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you still have a general election to go,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>but let's make the assumption that you per that you

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>win that election. What is job one for you? And

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>you're a new administration of public safety? We we have

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be safe. I stated this over and over again.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>The prerequisite to prosperities, public safety and justice. I must

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>allow New Yorkers to know that they're going to be

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>safe on our their subway system when they returned back

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to their offices. Our individuals that go to restaurants are

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be robbed like we saw a few

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>days ago while they sit down and have dinner. This

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>city must be safe for tourism to return and for

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses to grow and thrive. How do we do that

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or how does a city do that? Is it simply

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers more cops, better train cops, better deployment of cops.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>How do we do that? It's a combination. Uh, the

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>bad guys are watching the good people of this city

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>squabble with each other over technical aspects and how we police.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to hit reset with my police officers

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and let them know I have their backs. But I'm

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>also going to send aloud message that if you don't

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>respect the nobility of public protection, you can't serve in

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>my agency. And We're going to reintroduce ourselves to the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>men and women who are protecting us. Yeah, I saw.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I was back in New York, um where I'm from,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>actually went to PS for kindergarten. I was back in

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>New York in July and Um I was hanging out

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on Street and Lex waiting for an uber. I saw

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a group of people riding stolen motorcycles past a few

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>squad cars. Not none of the police moved a finger.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I turned around. Somebody was selling drugs right behind me.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>The police clearly could see it, not doing anything about it.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you motivate a police force that is just

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>seemingly given up, and that's true. You motivate them by

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>letting them know that one of their own will be

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>moving into the position of ensuring that they get to

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>support they need to get there to do their jobs.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, I've witnessed it as well, just a

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>hands off approach to dealing with those quality of life issues,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's not acceptable a city as diverse and as

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>large as New York is in parative that we have

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a set of standards and how do we expect to

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>treat our neighbors. I've watched a group of people on

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a t v s driving up to down the sidewalk

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of by Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, New Prospect in Central Park.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't have a city of disorder. We can do

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it without heavy handedness. But at the same time, we

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>need to create a standard of expectations in our city. Alright,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>some stratums you when you came into the Bloomberg in

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg headquarters here on Election toon Avenue and fifty

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>eight Street. You might have seen that in this block

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>between fifty eight and fifty nine Street on Electionington, every

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>storefront was vacant and pre pandemic. They were thriving with

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some seemingly big box stores as well as some local retailers.

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>How do we bring business back to How do we

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>reopen New York City? How do we bring business back

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to New York City? One thing I have been doing

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for the last two and a half three years, having

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>focused with business leaders and finding out how do we

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do just that? And I was alarmed to discover how

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>too expensive, to bureaucratic, and too difficult it is to

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>do business in the empire state. We were a city

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>where we build empires. But cities are made up of agencies,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and if those agencies are in the way of building empires,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we would never be able to allow it to happen.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a city that is vibrating with ten million dreams. Uh,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>those dreams are about to wake up, and they're going

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to wake up because I'm going to create a city

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>that is open for business, where we're going to you

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>utilize our agencies and our manpower to make sure businesses

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are here. We're going to attract them with incentives. We're

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going to encourage them to developing out of boroughs. We're

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>going to build out the pipeline of talent so that

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we can filled the jobs that are available. Right now,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to do business in this city because

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we have been defined as a business enemy city instead

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of a business friendly city. It is too expensive and

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh for residents as well. I say this

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as a free market capitalist, and I'm sure that almost

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all of our listeners and most of our clients also

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>believe in free markets. On the other hand, if you're

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a family of three or four or five,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>and you're working middle class job in New York, there's

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>no way you can afford an apartment big enough for

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the family. How do you do? How do you deal

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>with that? As mayor? Well, clearly we have decimated the

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>middle class in this city. There are a lot of

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>incentives for low income and high income, but we forgot

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the backbone of our city. And I believe the backbone

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is that teacher and accountant. Uh that backbone. Believe it

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in odd is even the fast food workers. We were

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>successfully getting them to receive a fifteen dollar minimum wage. Uh,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a husband and wife. They are moved into

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>an area where the city is unaffordable. And so we

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>must reinvest in the Mitchell Llama style programs that we had,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in the officer teacher next door programs that we had

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>where we incentivized people to be able to not only

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>rent approaches. And then we should look at our affordable

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>housing program and look at some form of affordable housing

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with ownership in that affordable housing. How do we carry

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it out so people can start owning and building equity

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the city that they love. So we must ensure

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the areas that government can control, such as rent. We

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>must ensure that we have a cross section based on

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>income bands of low income, middle income New Yorker is

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>so that they can stay in the city that they love. Uh.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr Adams talked to us about infrastructure. We've um, you know,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the subways and just general infrastructure in this city challenge.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>We just have the recent um, you know, the remnants

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Hurricane Ida, you know, putting a crimp into

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the subway system for about twenty four hours. How do

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you think about infrastructure in this city? Great question of

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to be honest with ourselves. We

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>screwed up the planet and we didn't do it in

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one day. We did it over years of improper treating

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of the planet. So we're not going to fix this instantly.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>We must have an intervention plan and a prevention plan,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>prevention other long term things. Every new sewer project we

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>should build it with a one hundred year outlook of

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>canna withstand the water levels and the changes in our environment.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We need to look at how do we learn how

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to live with water UH, And there's some amazing programs

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that are taking place globally. I'm getting ready to take

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a trip to the Netherlands so I could look at

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that they're doing. But then we

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>need intervention right now. Mother Nature is not going to

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wait for us to build out our sewer systems, so

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we need to have early warning systems, identified those basement

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>apartments and give people the proper escape routes, investing legalizing

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the units. UH build large retaining pools of

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We could use some of our open spaces to build

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>large retaining pools to deal with water spill off, spill

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>off and to hold the water into we did with

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the emergency situation of something they're doing in Hoboken right

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>now where they're building basketball courts over retaining pools. So

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to think differently and embrace the concept that

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>are coming from the experts who we have been meeting with.

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.239
<v Speaker 1>But there must be a two pronged attack, both intervention

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and prevention. Have you got any um, you know, think

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>differently solutions to the congestion, the traffic, the double parking.

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's always been an issue with New York,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but cities around the world are coming up with other

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>ideas and ways to fight it. I'm a congestion pricing guy.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe in it. I believe the concept is important.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Is similar to what London has done many years ago.

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important that we do so. But I

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>also believe we need to incentivize truck deliveries. A lot

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of our congestion is coming from deliveries. We need to

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>start delivering at night, and I think if we incentivize that,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we can get a lot of the deliveries done. Uh.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And then we need to use alternative methods of transportation. UH.

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>That's everything from the scooters, uh, the you know, the

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>mopas I've visited many countries bike use. When I'm in

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>China or in other parts of the globe, people are

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>using non cars to get around for those who can

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do so. And not only does it encourage a greater

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>level of mobility diversity, but it does it also deals

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>with the congestion because this congestion is not sustainable in

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the city. Too much is lose, is lost doing business

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in the city because you're stuck in traffic somewhere. And

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>then we must create a first rate transportation system. I'm

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna train user, I have a metro card. We create

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a safe, first rate transportation system, people will utilize our

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>subways and buses. Inequality. As this city builds back, reopens,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>how do we ensure it reopens and builds back for everyone.

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so true. That is a real problem we have

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the city. Uh, the inequalities that we're witnessing is

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>leading to the lack of prosperity for so many New

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yorkers and it's just on so many levels. We must

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>do so, and it's not going to be done in

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the first four years. What I must do, if I'm

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to become the mayor, is to build the

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>foundation that other mayors can build on. Uh. The inequalities

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is to go to the source. Number one education. We

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>need to deal with children with special needs and learning

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>disability tease. One study showed that over thirty of our

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 1>prison population a place like uh like Texas, we're dyslexic.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't just do dyslexia screening in our city. UM

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.599
<v Speaker 1>learning disabilities. Uh, you see, fifty five percent of the

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>inmates a rich is a dealing with learning disabilities. So

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one way of ending inequalities is to focus on education

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so people can have the opportunities they deserved. Eric Adams,

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We really appreciate

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your time. Eric Adams, New York City Mayoral. Kennedy in

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Borough President joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. I want to bring in Megan Horneman, director

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>of portfolio Strategy Advertence Capital Advisors, about two point six

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management, located in Hunt Valley, Maryland,

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>just outside the Charms City of Baltimore. Megan, thanks so

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. You know, let's turn to

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings here, evaluation and some of the old time fundamental

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff here we've had some really good earnings over the

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>past several quarters, but some economic concerns you know, from

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant and so on, or maybe causing some

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>people to question some of the earnings essments out there

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for ACQUES three and four. How do you think about

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that in potential risk for this market. Yes, I think

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we we've likely seen that peak in the earnings growth rate.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We probably saw that this year, and now there's just

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more uncertainty because people had come into

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter with such heightened expectations for economic growth

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and now a lot of the data has been mixed.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can see that even just by looking

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>at the City Group Economic Surprise Index that's deeply in

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>negative territory. Um. I know, we got some some positive

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>news from the consumer, but it is on the backup

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>some downward revisions to the prior month. And then as

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>as mentioned, the consumer confidence is still relatively weak. So

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see some estimates coming down,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not just from the earnings perspective, but also from the

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>economic growth perspective as well. We have our own economic

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Surprise Index as L and a really cool page that

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you can pull it up with e C s U.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Paul just in case you're on right now is the

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>command and obviously, UM it matches up with Megan with

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the city surprise in Dex we've seen you can you

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>can if you click on the chart on e C

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>S you go, you can blow up the surprise index. Um,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>look look at or zoom into what we've seen happen

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last I don't know, UM, I guess six months.

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It hit a high in April May and has come

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>down now into pretty extreme negative territory. Um does this

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>opera opportunities you think, Megan, I don't think quite yet.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still is some more there's some other

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>things in the market that keep us a little hesitant. Um,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>we have some dry powder, we have cash in portfolios

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're waiting to put to work. We're still optimistic

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>long term, but in the very near term, I think

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there's still some other risks that we have to digest.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's from the political standpoint. Um, there's going to

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of noise just over the next next

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, the Federal Reserve next week evaluation. Still

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>even with the modest you know, weakness we've seen here

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and I say very modest. Keep in mind, the smps

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>only down about two um. This isn't really a pullback

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing here, um. But the valuations still look

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit stretched here. And do you expect to

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>pull back? Do you expect that we've been hearing so

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>many warnings of maybe there's a ten even fiftcent pullback

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to come. I think that there is chance for this

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to continue to get for us to go a bit

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>weaker from here. I can't pinpoint exactly whether it'll be

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen percent, but I think we're well overdue

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for at least a minimum of five percent correction. We

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't even pullback. We haven't even had that this year yet. Megan,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>where are you suggesting your clients allocate their equity portfolios.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it more than the growth, typical growth kind of

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and that has worked so well for a decade

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>or more, or is it some of the more cyclical

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>trades that might be more sensitive to maybe you know,

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, rising in flay, shouldn't reopening economy, that type

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Yeah, we we have a little bit of

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>both in our portfolios, but we definitely have more of

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the value til given our view that we think the

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>cyclical trade has room to go. And also we think

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that interest rates are going to go higher from here.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that everybody knows that. But I think interest

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rates right now just aren't justified where they are looking

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at long term ten thirty year treasure yields, that's just

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>not justifiable. And when you're talking about the FED tapering,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>those types of things will weigh on those expensive, you know,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>growth types of stock, so we have more of a

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>value till here in the US you expect a serious taper.

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna get the first um, you know,

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a solid suggestion about it um in the meeting next week.

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll start to see the actual taper or

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>taping taking place before the end of this year, probably

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the in the November meeting. But I think we're

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>probably going to kind of get us through this debt

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ceiling that we have at the end of this month.

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're gonna get a firm commitment of

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>its starting next week. I think it'll probably be in

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>November or December, and then they'll have that continue to

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>taper through the all of next year and they'll continue

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, interest rates and tapering are not

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>tied together, so the interest rate hikes are still aways off. Megan,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do you get a lot of incoming calls from your

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>clients about crypto and if so, what do you tell them? Uh? No,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been UM pretty vocal and some of our publications

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>about the crypto market UM that we at this time

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not investing in in the cryptocurrency market or any

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of the other crypto type of investments. There's still this

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is such a um the crypto market and all of

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>these other crypto coins and things. But this is a

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>very new UM kind of experiment trying to look at

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at things. Is using this as some sort of a

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>uh form of tender. But I just don't think that

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>at this time that it really warrants us investing in it.

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It's way too violatble for our clients, just doesn't have

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a place in client portfolios. We don't leave it's going

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to take over any kind of the regular you know,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar or anything from a currency perspective and regulation.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the biggest risk that you're going to

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>see in the crypto market. Could really take the wind

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the sales here and then also just spark

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 1>volatility and that's just not something that we that we

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>find profit find a good place for portfolios. Megan, thanks

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Great to get your take

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and I hope we can get you back on the

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>program soon. Megan Hornum and their director of portfolio Strategy

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at Verden's Capital Advisers out of Hunt Valley, Maryland, where

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they have about two point six billion dollars of assets

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>under management. Earlier I said we're gonna bring in Morgan

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Stanley's global chief economist, Seth Carpenter, and we've got him

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>on the line right now. Seth, great to have you

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 1>with us. Um. I guess the overriding question is what

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>does the global economy look like right now after a

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>big spike in the delta variant? Is it rolling over?

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we reopening again? It's your view. Yeah, it's great

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's great to be on with with both of you,

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for having me. You know, in the

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>medium term where we're pretty constructive and then there are

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of asterisks to talk about downside risks, but

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you sort of nailed it with the delta variant being there.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So what have we seen. We've seen a clear deceleration,

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but there was always going to be a bit of

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a deceleration once we got past the surge and growth

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>from reopening and settled into something you know, more medium

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>term and sustainable. So we still feel like we'll see

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the slowdown, but it will be sustained. What's driving that,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at global trade for example, trade and

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>consumer good sort of exploded out and brought us back

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to pre COVID levels. We're seeing now trading capital goods

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in a CAPEX cycle. What could get in the way, though,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is if DELTA is not as contained as we think,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So as you implied and as we think, you know,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we're peaking with delta, it should be subsiding. And if

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, then we should see continued, you know,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>reasonably strong growth from consumers globally, not just in the US.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And the part of global trade that's lower than pre

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID levels is trade and services, especially tourism, and if

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>travel restrictions keep getting lifted, you know, we should see

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that coming back as well. Seth, I'm a logistics geek

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>here and I'm just fascinated by it, by this global

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>supply chain UH challenges out there, and it's affecting all

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>types of companies and industries. We hear that, then they're

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterly conference calls. Um, how does that impact your global

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>economic outlook if we can't get goods to where they

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be in a timely fashion. Uh so, yeah,

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you're right to focus on it.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think the even more sort of nerdy part

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of it is that there are non linear implications here.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not as though there's a producer that has a

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>supplier and if that supplier has trouble, then we have

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a supply chain issue. It's the fact that they are producers,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>many of them, who have suppliers, and those suppliers have

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>suppliers and those suppliers of suppliers as well. And so

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>when a country somewhere has a COVID case flare up

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and there are these very intense restrictions, but in place

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to limit things, you can get a disruption that just

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>spreads out in a very rapid way. So you know,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to monitor those sorts of things as well

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>as we can. We turn to our colleagues, whore the

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>equity analysts who cover specific firms. This general feedback we're

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>getting as things have got past their worst for supply

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>chain's disruptions and they're gradually getting better. You can look

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at some of the p M I type surveys and

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>look at how long the delivery delays are, and does

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>also give you the impression that we got past worse

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>than things are slowly starting to normalize by no means

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>good right now, but hopefully starting to heal. And so

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>again it with that is the baseline view that the

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>supply chains are going to get fixed over time. You've

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>got to feel pretty good as a baseline, But we

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have seen flare ups time and again, and and so

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I think again you don't want to get too complacent

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and just assume that everything's on a steady path back

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to normal. Well, I'm sure that UM J. Powell and

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Christine Leguard would agree with you. Nonetheless, it doesn't really

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>seem like all these asset purchases are doing that much.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Should they be wrapping this stuff up? Is it time

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 1>to taper? Yeah? Well, I mean I think just listening

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to the FED commentary themselves, the answer is yes. And

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so Powell and the rest of the committee has said

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that tapering this year is their baseline view, and so

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I see no reason to disagree with them. You know,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>our view is slightly more probability on December than the November,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas November is clearly from my perspective, market consensus. You know,

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the last um CPI report, the last retail sales report,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the last jobs report have shown us that forecasting and

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>current circumstances is even harder than usual, and so I

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>think that favor is slightly more patient fed to accumulate,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, two more jobs report before tapering instead of

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just the one that they're going to get at the

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>November meeting. But nevertheless, it seems like they're set to

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>start tapering. I think the ECB is a little trickier

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>they're President le Guard said in her press conference. You know,

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the lady isn't tapering and trying to draw a big

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>distinction between the PEP, the emergency QUEI program versus the

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>app ongoing QUI program. You know, our the Morgan Stanley

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>European Economics team expects, uh as the PEP program is

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>tapered down, the APP program gets more flexible and actually

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>picks up a little bit um. You know, is that constructive?

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>You asked you they be wound down. I think the

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>challenge that the ECB has to confront is where inflation

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>expectations are for them and how how low they are.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Their own forecasts have inflation coming back down well below

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>two percent, you know, one and a half percent or

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so in coming years. That for them, I think is

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the key struggle if they ever want to get their

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate back up to their two percent target. And

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that from from the CBS perspective, is the

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 1>real reason to keep going with their QUI program is

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to try to support those inflation expectations. So that's how

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>coordinated are the global central banks these days? As again

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a global issue, like you know, we haven't

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>really seen before. How coordinated are they? Should they be

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>more coordinated? How do you view it? Yeah? So, um,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. So it spent fifteen years doing central banking

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>at the FED, and one thing that always happens is

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of communication. Coordination where they actually take actions together

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>is quite rare. And I think now we're actually in

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a place where there's meaningful divergence that's starting to happen.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think right now that divergence is between e

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>M central banks and d M central banks in general.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And then as we get into next year and beyond,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be divergence between the ECB on the one

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>hand and other developed market central banks. And what I

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>mean here is, you know, inflation, the inflation surges is global.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 1>It's likely to be transitory. But a lot of e

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>m UH central banks are saying, we can't rely on

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>anchored inflation expectations given the performance of inflation in recent decades,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>so they have to be a little bit more active

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to the high inflation. Until we're seeing, for example, Latan

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>central banks shifting to a hawkish stance UH in contrast

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to where the d M central banks are UM and

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that makes sense. They also have

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to react to the market starting to say, wow, the

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed's gonna start to taper, and after that, at some point,

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's gonna start to hike, and they have to

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>worry about depreciation possibly exascerbating inflation. Fast forward to next

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>year when we see the Bank of England the Bank

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of Canada starting to tighten policy, and then we think

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED actually raises rates in the middle of three

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be very different than the ECB with

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>their inflation outlook. I think they're in trouble if they

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>have any communication missteps and inflation expectations go lower, not higher.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you push our European econ economics team

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and you say when when is the ECB gonna hike?

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>They they say, well, I'd say you had five but

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with the risk to never, because you know, I'm an economist.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>We forecast, but how good is the forecast? Exactly? All right,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>set thank you so much for joining us. To really

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time. Seth Carpenter, Global chief economist for Morgan Stanley.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now we are truly global. We not only

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>cover what happens in New York, but we also cover

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens outside of Detroit. Let's go to David Diets

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>right now. Sorry, some in New Jersey, David, and some

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. It is a booming outdoor dining capital

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of New Jersey. Yeah, I don't know how I I

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was thinking of something else anyway. David Deets joins us

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>managing Principal and senior portfolio strategist at Peapack Private Wealth Management.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got about ten billion dollars of assets under management,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so not that far off from New York. David, what

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>did you think about the our interview with the next mayor.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how important is uh is New York to

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Summit New Jersey. Well, it's critical, I think. I mean

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the residents Summit New Jersey have

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>historically commun it it into New York. Now we'll see,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, in this post pandemic world, whether there's a

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more permanent remote working. But uh, the somewhat

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>depends on New York and and our real estate prices

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>go up as New York real estate prices go up.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>So whatever is good for New York is gonna be

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>good for Summer. And David, I just so you know,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I hopped on New Jersey Transit from Summer today and

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>make my way into New York. To everybody, trains are

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>more packed. I will say they're much more crowded than

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>they were even a couple of weeks ago. So it

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>looks like people slowly are coming back to work. So David,

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is your day job is looking at these markets here

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and trying to get a sense of where the next

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve months are. I'm a valuation guy, you know,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little more than a little I'm a lot

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>concerned with valuation here. Yes, I know the ten years,

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, one point three eight percent, But still this

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is a big multiple. How do you think about evaluation? Yeah,

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so evaluation is critical, of course, because we all know

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that the more you pay, the lower is going to

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be your returns. But I guess I would pushed back

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit insofar as UM your key valuation

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>metric perhaps is what you can uh earn in terms

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of alternatives like putting your money in a CD, like

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>buying a ten year treasury. It we've got historic lows

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>on those levels. Indeed, the yield on the SMP five

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred is about comparable with that yield on attain your treasury.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Now ten your treasury payout is going to be locked

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 1>in for the next ten years. Historically, dividends move up

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>two to ten percent each year. So if people put

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a gun to my head and say, Dave, where am

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I going to make more money over the next ten years?

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Was with the dividend payout on stocks going up and

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>presumably asset prices moving up as well, it seems to

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tilt pretty well in favor of fixed income. Of course,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be a straight line. One other

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>thing I point out is, remember, uh, Matt, you know

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>five companies at the very top of the SMP five

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred account for of the overall waiting of that market.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That index, okay, and those are the ones that, for example,

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft trying to get thirty three times earnings if you

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>strip is out. Although it's not a cheap market, is

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly more reasonably priced. Well, some stocks are cheap. Some

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>uh industries or regions have taken a hit. I noticed

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that some of your ideas wells Fargo taken a beating lately,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Exxon as well, I share as large cap China. Is

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the bad news you think is has

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>passed on these Well, you know, we we do like

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy things that you know, have solid valuations but

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit out of favor. So let's look

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>at China for a moment. Here. You know, the China

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Large cap et F is down thirty seven since March.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So if the if the concern is we're at nosbley

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>valuations China maybe the antidote. Of course, that doesn't mean

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>things are going to turn around. But the more I

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>look at it, and I was certainly heartened by the

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that they injected about fourteen billion dollars of reserves

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in the past twenty four hours into the economy. It

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense for the second largest economy if

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it wants to be a true geopolito, well power to

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>kneecap that private sector. It just doesn't really make sense.

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a lot of noises here, but to destroy

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the value of companies like Ali Baba in ten cent, well,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>what do they really get out of that? Yeah, it's

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>been an extraordinarily difficult time for those stocks there, and

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it just kind of highlights, you know, the whole quote

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote China risk uh that people always had in the

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>back of their mind. But boys are coming to roost here. Uh.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>David back closer to home with the U S stocks here,

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do I go reopening cyclical small caps or do I

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>stick with my big cab growthy Amazon, Apples, Google's kind

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of things? Well, certainly you want to beat the first

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of five. But I share the concern we started conversation

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with that our evaluations are an issue. So I valuations

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>are an issue. You've got to be cautious with Microsoft,

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You've gotta be cautious with for example, Amazon, and and

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we like for example financial services. We think that five

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.719
<v Speaker 1>years now, interest rates will be higher as inflation picks up,

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>as the economy picks up, and loan demand goes up,

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the financial services companies are so well

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>poised to benefit from that because the price of their

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>key product, loans will will go up. Historically, they're not

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>trading much above what they've normally traded in the last

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty years in terms of relative to book value. The

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one word, oh did I I think you might have

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>lost David Diets. I thought it was me for a second.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's probably some problems, you know, in the summit,

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe the phone issues out there and someone off the

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>check on that. When we get home. We didn't even

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 1>get to get to bud. Yes, I mean, I mean

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. You know, it's t Bush. He likes Anheuser

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Busch as well, which I wanted to ask about now.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It's shocking if you pull up the chart right bud

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>uh the ticker b U D obviously, and the beer

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 1>um has risen this year up to eighty dollars a share,

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's now back down at fifty seven, and I

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder why that is. I mean, we're people drinking more

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bud at home, and you think when they go out

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to the bars in the reopening trade, they're gonna be

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>ordering um, you know, yava or Vosh diner becks something

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more high brow. Or is the idea

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that the delta variant has stopped people from going out

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and ordering a bud at the ballpark. Here's what I

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think it is. I think it's the hard seltzer thing.

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a fat. It's gone. It's over the white claw

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>every oh and Anheuser Bush makes. It's not You're right,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't just make beer. They make that stuff. What's

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for the whole industry. It's for the whole industry. And

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of that was one of the really

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>near term growth drivers for um, you know, the malt

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>liquor business, if you will, kind of the beer business

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple years of these hard seltzer So

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of like the wine coolers of our day. So,

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was a fat. It reminded me of Zema.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>When I was in high school, there was there was

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a malt liquor beverage called Zema. I remember that it

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was clear and absolutely delicious. Really you didn't drink that,

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>did you? Well? I did when I was fifteen. Um,

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but obviously a else aren't down and that's the same

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with the hard Seltzer. Right, we got David Diet's back.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me David just asked you quickly about Anheuser Busch.

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Why has it been hit so hard coming from eight

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>down to fifty seven? And why do you like it? Sure?

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so we like it because when you talk about beer,

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's got. UM is one of the largest

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer products companies in the world. It's got like ten

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty largest brands. So why is it off

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>from the start of the summer. I think several things.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>One is UM busting beer, which is big on the

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>hard Seltzer and not very disappointing continuing trend in in

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>hart Seltzer, So the whole category were sold off, but

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of course we know, but there's a lot more than

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the hard Seltzer. Second, of course, there is concerned about

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this surging dollar UM and of course so much of

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>their revenues come in from overseas. That's not helpful. And

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of course the big difference between the start of the

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>summer and now is the continuing delta variant issues, and

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so much of their business comes in from the emerging markets.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>There's real questions, says delay in the reoining great, but

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I thank you very longer term for you. You'll do well. Yeah,

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, David. Thanks, I'm glad we got you back

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in for that. David Dietz talking to us there from

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Peapack Private Wealth Management. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Yet on Fall Sweeney

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio