WEBVTT - Why We Need a Different Form of Money

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Mark

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Moss Show. Or talk about the decentralized Revolution each and

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>every week. Of course, we look at it through the

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>lens of politics, finance, and technology to give you context

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. And I try to bring to you,

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, some big topics and big subjects to help

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you change the way you think about things, because, as

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I like to say, almost everything you've learned is wrong.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Almost everything they're telling you is wrong. You have to

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>learn how to think through that. I like to bring

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to you some of the latest breaking news headlines so

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know exactly what's going on, and some guests so

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to listen to me talk all the time.

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And I want to talk about some of the latest

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking news headlines that happened this week to keep you

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in the know. And you know, my favorite thing to

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about, as we talked about the decentralized revolution is

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 1>of course the technology that's bringing the decentralized revolution, which

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of course is bitcoin. And bitcoin has been all over

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the news the last two weeks because of course it's

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>back from the dead again. Bitcoin has been dead I

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know four hundred times or six hundred times as

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>long as I've been following it. It always dies, but

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>yet somehow it always seems to come back from the dead.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of where we're at today, and that's

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>part of why it's in the news. The price of

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin kind of woke up from a slumber. Since about November.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's been down in this kind of like fifteen sixteen

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars range, and it just kind of basically sat there.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It was that it was about twenty one thousand, so

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of in November we kind of were sitting at

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand range. Then it dropped down into that kind

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen sixteen thousand all range when the FTX fiasco happened,

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and it just sat there for a couple of months.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>In November December. We saw in December it popped up

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to like seventeen thousand, back down to fifteen sixteen thousand,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but finally it took off the first of the year

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and went up almost fifty percent, and so bitcoin's back

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>from the dead. It's down a little bit right now,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's still up about thirty over thirty, with about thirty

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>five sin since it really started making that move at

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. But as it comes back

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>from the dead again over and over and over, of

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>course it starts making news headlines. And one of the

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>news headlines I saw this week I wanted to talk

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about because it was just I just have to say

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>something about it. And it's a shame because maybe one

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of my most often quoted people is not Warren Buffett,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>but his partner, Charlie Munger. Charlie Munger, A lot of

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't know him. Of course, everybody knows Warren Buffett,

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's been his partner forever. What he does talk

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about all the time drives me crazyas he talks about bitcoin.

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why it drives me crazy is because

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>he's such a smart guy. He's done so much in

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>his career. He he knows so much about things, more

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>than I could ever even imagine. He's you know, he's

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>written so many good things. He has, like I said,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so many quotes I use all the time. But he's

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so wrong on his views on bitcoin for a couple

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. And nobody knows the future, so it's not

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like he's saying it's not going to say and I'm

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>saying it's going to survive and I'm saying he's wrong.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't know the future. He's wrong for a couple

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. One, he's wrong because he's calling for the

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>United States government to ban it. As a matter of fact,

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gone on to praise China, being a communist country

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and how they've dealt with this, and that's wrong. So

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he may be right. Maybe bitcoin doesn't succeed, maybe it

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>all falls apart, Maybe we don't know. Time will tell.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But he's always going to be wrong. Anybody's always going

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to be wrong when they're calling for the government to

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>come out and take away our free right to play

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with technology, to use technology, to do what we want

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 1>technology or anything like. We're in America, We're the land

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Free. And for him to call out openly

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for the government to come in and make it illegal,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong. He's also wrongs he hasn't really put any

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>time into it at all. As a matter of fact,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he said as much, Right, why would I spend any

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>time studying that scam thing? Right, So he has put

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>zero time into it, and so trying to pretend like

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you know what you're talking about, or trying to pretend

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're somebody that should be talking about it when

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you haven't put any time into it is intellectually dishonest.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>A better answer might be, you know what, if he

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to respond to the news is he might say,

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I haven't put any time into studying it,

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really have a comment. That could be

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a better one to say. Of course, that doesn't get

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the news headlines that they want. So as this has

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>been kind of coming backing up, everybody's favorite proponent of bitcoin,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sailor, he had something to say, and he said

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that if Munger were a business leader in South America

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or Africa or Asia, and he spent one hundred hours

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>studying the problem, he'd be more bullish on bitcoin than

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I am. Now, this is Michael Sailor, who's put billions

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of dollars into bitcoin, and he's saying Munger would be

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>even more bullish if he looked at it from the world,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>from a different world view, from being in a different country,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and you'd put a little bit of time into studying it.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>What Sailor calls quote the plight of the common man

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is better illustrated by the recent events in Lebanon, Argentina,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Venezuela, And what those countries all have

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in common is those currencies have completely collapsed. When you

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>live in a country like Lebanon, Argentina, Sri Lanka, where

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>your currency just disappears and all your life savings disappear

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with it, in the market's all going to turmoil because

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of that, what do you do. You just lose all

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>your money and you're just okay with it. So what

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.559
<v Speaker 1>he's saying is that Charlie Munger has this very US

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>centric viewpoint, and that's what I find all the time

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 1>with bitcoin is a lot of people in the United

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>States sitting at the bar in Manhattan drinking a twenty

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 1>dollar cocktail, are like, why do we need a different

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>form of money? But when you live in Nigeria or

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka, Argentina, or Lebanon or Venezuela, you know why

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we need a different form of money. It's not working

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for you. It's failed. And so if he was a

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>business owner, a business leader in one of those countries

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>watching his money disappear, knowing that any time it could

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>basically just all evaporate, then he would be looking for

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>another solution. Monger has a lot of money he wouldn't

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>want it to disappear. But he's coming from a US

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>centric viewpoint. So one, his viewpoint is wrong. Two, he

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't put the research in. Three, when you're openly calling

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for the land of the Free and a free country

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to make things illegal, I'm sorry, you're just wrong. You're

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just wrong. Now, another big well known investor, Ray Dalio,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, he has lots of things to say about bitcoins.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>He's come around a bitcoin. At first he was he

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't like bitcoin, that he was skeptical of bitcoin, that

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>he was interested in bitcoin, then he liked bitcoin, and

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>now this week he says that still doesn't like bitcoin,

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but thinks inflation beating coin could work. So he says, quote,

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be an effective money. It's not

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be an effective money. What I like about

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys is that they don't maybe even understand what

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that means. So he says, it's not an effective medium

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of exchange. Why not? In order for a collectible to

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>become a store value, to eventually become a medium exchange,

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it must have certain attributes. It must be portable, it

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>must be durable, it must be divisible, it must be recognizable,

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>salable and it must be fungible. So does it fit

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>those Does it fit those attributes? Yes, And as a

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, I would happily argue with him or

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody else that it actually matches all of those attributes

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>better than anything else. Gold emerged as the best form

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of money because it had the best attributes. You can't

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>use bananas because they're they're not durable. You can't use

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>old car that's collectible because it's not it's not divisible,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's not portable. And gold is not portable either.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Gold cannot be sent over to space and bitcoin can.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So for Radali to say this, I mean again, maybe

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>he should do a little bit of researchers or take

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a backseat and just say, hey, look I'm not the

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>expert in this. I don't get it. But when he

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>comes out and says things like this, it just shows

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that he just doesn't know what he's talking about. It's

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not an effective media exchange. Well, it has all the attributes.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, it has better attributes in

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>regards to media exchange than anything else does. You can't

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>send ten cents across the internet, you can't do it.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The dollar doesn't work gold doesn't work. You can't send

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gold over the internet, so it's more portable. Now, it's

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not as recognizable. More people take dollars across the world

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>than they will bitcoin, but it's in the top five

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's only in twelve years. It's on its way,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's something to keep in mind. If you're just

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moas Show, we're

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the latest breaking news headlines that

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>came out this week talking about bitcoin and what what

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>some of these well known people like Charlie Munger and

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Ray dalily I had to say about it. I got

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to cover when I come back, some

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>big stories on what's going on with China, the spy balloon,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>potential war, what's going on with FED, the economy, and more.

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>A lots of cover when I come back. You don't

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>want to miss it, so don't go away. I'll be

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>right back. All right, Welcome back. If you just tune in,

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Moas Show. We're talking about

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Decentralized Revolution, and we're going through some of the

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest news headlines this week, and there is plenty to

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>go around now. The news story that seemed to dominate

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the news headlines this week were can you guess it?

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Putting the comments down below what you think it is?

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Come on, it was the China spy balloon, right. It

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>was all over the news. It was on every news website,

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on every news channel. Spy balloon, spy balloon, spy balloon.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>At Biden's State of the Union address this week, Rep.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie from Florida was like carrying a balloon with her

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in there, just kind of mocking it. It's all over

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the place. A couple of things I want to talk

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>about specifically in this that I don't think I haven't

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>seen anybody else talk about. But what I want to

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about is why why are we all talking about

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the spy balloon? Have you thought about that? Now? You

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>may not realize this, but you think about whatever they

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>want you to think about. You think about whatever the

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>current thing is. So when they don't want you to

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about something, they don't talk about it. So, for example,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter files. I talked about the Twitter files here.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a massive piece of news and

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone should have covered it, but yet nobody did. No

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>news outlets except for Fox covered it at all. Because

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't want you to know about it. They don't

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>want you to talk about it. So why do they

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>decide to completely bury things that should be talked about,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And then something trivial like a balloon and they talk

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about it all the time. Now, even more importantly, why

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are they talking about the balloon all the time right now? Now?

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it because it was such a big threat? Is

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it because China was actually using this to spy on

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>us and this was a threat to our national security

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and we have to crack down on China with this

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a balloon? So we let China spy on us, We

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>let them bribe our professors in college, we let them

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>steal our secrets out of the university, We let them

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>steal all our companies ips over in China. We let

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>them buy up all the farm land, we let them

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>buy the strategic land next to all the military bases.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen to all of that, But the balloon is a

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>big problem. And that's my point. There's way worse things

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that are being done every single day in the open

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that China is doing to damage the United States national

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>security every single day, Massive things that never get one

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>single mention. But you had a balloon harmless balloon. Now

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>sure it's probably spine. Yeah, okay, so it's taking pictures

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's not good. I don't want that to happen.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But they got da lights that do that. What's even

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>worse is the spies here. What about their own police

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're running inside the United States to police their

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>own citizens in our country. There's way worse things that

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>should be talked about. Now. The question that I will

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you back to is, so, why are we talking

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>about the balloon? Why are we not talking about all

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>these other things? Now? Big news this week I saw

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>was that a town in North Dakota council unanimously votes

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>down Chinese company's local project. So City Council, North Dakota

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>voted towards protecting national security and national sovereignty in just

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the latest move against taking a stand against the Chinese

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party the CCP attempting to purchase control of the

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>United States. So Grand Forks, North Dakota got cheers from

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>all the attendees that were chanting USA USA. They to

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>prevent this Chinese company from moving ahead with plans to

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>develop a corn mill on land that they had purchased

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>near Grand Forks. Air Force base. So the Chinese had

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>already bought the land next to the Air Force base,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a strategic military base. They spent two point three millions

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to take ownership of the three hundred acre plot twelve

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>miles from the base, home to a top secret drone technology.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>This isn't just a base, this isn't one of our

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>strategic bases working on top secret drone technology. Now, the

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>CCP was offering, you know, millions of dollars of tax revenue,

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred jobs to the town, all these things, but

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the town said, no, we're going to shut that down. Okay,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>those are stories we should be talking about. Why are

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>they acquiring strategic land next to our top secret drone technology,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Why are they acquiring our best farm land, etc. But

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about that. You didn't hear about this

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>story in Grand Forks, right, This is on small little

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>news outlets. I had to dig this up under So

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>why again are we talking about the balloon? Now? If

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you're asking me, I would say, well, they want us

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to think that China spying on us without really directing

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>our attention to what's really going on. So then I

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>would ask myself, well, why do they want us to

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>get enraged about China spying on us. Well, so they

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>can get public sentiment to not like China. Well why

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>would they want public sentiment to not like China. Well

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe if we want to continue to sanction China and

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially go to war with China, they're going to need

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the public to not like China. So would this be

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a way for them to build sentiment towards potentially going

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to war with China. You know, things are escalating pretty quick. Obviously,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we have the whole Taiwan situation. President he wants to

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>take over Taiwan. You know, Biden and the US have

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>said we will not let you take Taiwan. So we

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>know that we're starting to build up a lot of

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>tension right there. We have the Pentagon has announced now

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're moving military presence into the Philippines, trying to

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of get ready for this armed conflict in the

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan Straight. So there's lots of angling, There's lots of

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>maneuvering that are being done with China between Taiwan, between

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the Taiwan Straight things like that. We also see that

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as things between Russia and the US get more heated

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and more focused, China is also getting more heated and focused.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And so we saw that Beijing, China is investing in

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>more nuclear weapons. They're getting ready as well. It's not

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just the United States moving people over there. China is

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>also now building up its nuclear weapons. So again, what's

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>going on here? If China's investing in nuclear weapons, they're

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>investing in new long range missiles. They're not giving us

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>any type of dialogue. There's no open communication, there's no

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>transparent as to what they're doing. They know that NATO

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>has been expanded in Europe and is looking to expand

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Indo Pacific region. So what's going on here?

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And like I said in my opinion, they're getting this

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>ready for more war. Now, this should be a problem

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for everybody because, first of all, why are we continuing

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to go into these wars? The fact that we have

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this potential nuclear war hanging over our heads already between

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>US and Russia over Ukraine. The fact that we have

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>one guy Biden or a group of people, however, you

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>want to look out at the neo cons that have

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the right to drag us into a potential nuclear war

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that could put my kids lives in danger because of

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>who controls CRIMEA. Do you even know where Crimea is

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on a map, and do you care who controls it?

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia used to control it, now Ukraine controls it. Now

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Russia wants to control it again. What do you care?

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you care enough to put your kids and your

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>grandkids and my grandkids lives in danger? But that's where

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we're app So this looks like more war rhetoric to me.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why we're all hyped up on this balloon.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully you have enough to see through that, But of

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>course I'd love to hear your viewpoints on that. Hit

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>me up on social media. I'd like to hear more

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>from some of you guys. Hit me up on social

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>media at one Mark Moss. You can hit me up

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram or on Twitter, ask me a question, tag

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>me in it, or let me know what you think about.

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the balloon being angled to get us ready

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to build sentiment against China, to get us ready for war.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to hear what you think. If you're just

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>tuning in, you're listening to the Mark mo Show, we're

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>going through some of the biggest breaking news headlines. This

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about the decentralized revolution. I had a

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>lot more to cover when I come back. You don't

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>want to miss it, all right, Welcome back. If you're

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Moa Show.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the decentralized revolution, talking about the way

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the world is changing right before our very eyes. We're

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the latest breaking news headlines this

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>week to show us how this is going down. Of course,

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>we look at it through the lens of politics, finance,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and technology, because those are the three drivers, and we

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the where those three converge. Now, looking at

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the finance piece, we know that about every eighty years

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a financial revolution, the entire financial markets reset,

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're witnessing. We're witnessing the end of

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a sovereign debt bubble. So all the big nations of

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the world have taken on too much debt. They're in

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a massive bubble and they're all crashing right now. And

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're witnessing right now. And we can see,

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>of course, the biggest central bank in the world, the

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>US Federal Reserve, and the head of that, Jerome Powell,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>has been busy trying to talk down markets and all

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>eyes that have been on the Fed, because the Feds

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have been hell bent on bringing the markets down. When

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I say the markets, I'm talking about the asset prices,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the asset prices. So you have to

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>understand there's a big difference between the economy and the

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>asset prices. So you saw in twenty twenty all the

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>businesses were shut down, the whole world was shut down,

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but yet asset prices went to new all time highs.

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So we don't have to look at the asset prices

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and the economy together. And the FED has been hell

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bent on bringing asset prices down because they want you

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to feel broke, because if you feel broke, you don't

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>buy as many things. And if you don't buy as

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>many things, their hope is that then prices or inflation

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>comes back down. So the Fed's been hell bent on

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>raising rates at the fastest rate in history to try

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to slow things down, and they've done a good job

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of bringing the markets down. The markets have come crashing down.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that now we're at this point where

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the markets, the traders, the investors don't really believe the

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>FED anymore. They don't believe the FED is capable of

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>doing what they're going to do. And I say capable

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think at least for me and I would

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think for most people, we believe that the FED and

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Powell means what he says. We believe that he's serious.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>We believe that he he believes it. So when he

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>says that he's going to raise rates and keep them

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>there for a long time, I think he believes it

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and he means that. But he also said that they

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>were going to lower rates and they wouldn't raise them

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for four years, and then they did after two. Now,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>when he said they wouldn't raise them for four years,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he believed and meant that as well. But

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens is things change, conditions change, there's constraints, and

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't deal with this massive inflation, and so they

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>were forced to raise rates. Inflation came on way faster,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>way harder, and ways way more sticky than they thought

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be. Remember, they kept saying its transitory, transitory, transitory,

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>which it wasn't. And so when it was found to

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be sticky and it wouldn't go away, they were forced

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates sooner than the four years they had predicted.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And so now Jerome Pale's committed to it. He's committed

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>to continuing to crush the markets, and he's content, and

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he's committed to taking rates high and leaving them for

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time. The problem is, even though we believe him,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we understand that there's constraints that will keep him from

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>doing that. And so that's kind of where we're at,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're already starting to see the signs of this

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>being angled. There's a couple of signs to look at.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think one sign is that the government, the US

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>government and the Treasury is at odds with the Federal Reserve,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and so those two have different interests. The Federal Reserve

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to protect the monetary system, that's the dollar and

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the banking system, while the government wants to of course,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not go out of business, not go broken, not default

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>on their debt. The US government wants to continue to

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>buy votes through social spending and not go bankrupt. They

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the dollar, really, and they don't care

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about the monetary system. That's not that's not their viewpoint.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we have the Treasury being head by Janet Yellen,

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and we have the Fed head up by Jerome Powell,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and they have different viewpoints, they have different goals and objectives.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And throughout this interesting inflection point, and we've seen the

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>government is starting to angle to force the Fed's hand.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>A couple things that happen. One, we saw the BLS,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bureau of Labor Statistics, went and change the calculation

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on CPI, which is the way that we measure inflation.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So if the FED is focused on bringing inflation down

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to commit to it until the inflation

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is backed down, well, the BLS the government just went

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and change the calculation, which just brings inflation down easy.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>We don't actually have to bring inflation down, let's just

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>change the way we calculated. And that's exactly what they did,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and that starts to push the Fed's hand. On top

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of that, Janet Yellen has been pivoting the treasury to

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>play with the treasury market without the FED involvement. Now

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this kind of leaves them stuck. And now we're starting

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>to see the FED starting to come around this. And

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so what we saw is that the FED meeting just

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>happened for January and they decided to raise interest rates

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>only twenty five basis points, when they had originally been

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>expecting a fifty point basis hike. So what does that mean.

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>That means they're not pivoting, but they're slowing to a pause.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So as they're raising rates, a pivot would to me

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>mean that they're now lowering rates. A pause means we're

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>just gonna hold and we're gon we're gonna stay. We're wrapped.

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And so they decided to raise rates only twenty five

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>basis points, and they said that there would be quote

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>ongoing increases potentially, but because inflation has eased somewhat, they

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>reserve the right to do more, but we'll see how

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>it goes sort of thing. And so this is like

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a softening. The FED really wants to get this two

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation target, but they're already well on their way.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're a combination of the direction that

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>we're already headed, which is heading down to two percent,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the way that it's been recalculated now,

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it very clearly shows you that they're about

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to obtain their goal. And we can have that pivot

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>if we look at some of the things that the

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Fed said. A couple of things they talk about this

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>thing called the terminal rate, and the terminal rate is

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>how high do we need to raise the rates in

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>order to get the markets or inflation to come down

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>on its own. The problem is because inflation isn't like

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a light switch that can just be turned on and off.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>It takes a while, a long time for that inflation

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to come down. So how do they know that they

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't already achieved the terminal rate? What if they've already

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>achieved the terminal rate, meaning the rates high enough now

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring SPA inflation down. What if they've already achieved

0:24:54.560 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that rate, but they keep hiking anyway, Well, that could

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>be bad. As a matter of fact, that's my base case.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Most likely there will continue to go too far, just

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like they always go too far. Just like they lowered

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>rates too low and they kept them too low for

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>too long. Now they probably raise them too high, and

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>they probably keep them too high for too long, and

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they just go from breaking one thing to breaking the other,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. And this is causing a lot of

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>problems in the markets. It's also causing a lot of

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>problems in the economy, and that's really where we want

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>to look for things. A lot of people looking at

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the stock markets, but the stock markets are what we

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>call lagging indicators. They tell us what's already happened. What

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we want to look at is like the leading indicators,

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So we want to look at the debt markets. Then

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to look at like the Producers Index, how

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>much the manufacturers are paying to produce things, and then

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>eventually we can look at the CPI, and then we

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can look at the stock market. Right. But let's say,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>for example, we're looking at the unemployment data. Right. Unemployment

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is also another lagging indicator because as an employer, the

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>last thing I'm gonna want to do is let go

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of my employees. So my business is going to be

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>bad for a long time. I can't get new debt,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't expand I can't roll my debt over. My

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>customer base is shrinking. I don't have enough money. I'm

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>running out of money. Maybe I haven't paid my electricity

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bill this month. I keep hoping things gonna get better,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and they don't, and then finally I have to lay

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>somebody off. But things have already been bad for a

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>long time for me. And then I lay somebody off.

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Now that person might get thirty days, sixty days, ninety

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 1>days of severance, so they don't even show up on

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment numbers for months after the business already started

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>having a problem. And so when we start looking at

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>some of this economy data, it looks pretty bad. And

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the other reasons why I think the

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>FED is going to continue to come off of this

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>ease off of this and go into this pause reaction.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tuning in and listening to the markmas Show,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about some of

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the latest breaking news headlines this week, and we got more.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a big one. This story I'm super excited

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>for because it's what free markets do. I'm gonna be

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>back with this story and more in a minute. Don't

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>go away, all right, Welcome back. If you just tune in,

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the decentualized revolution and the way the world is changing

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and breaking some of the latest breaking news, some of

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest news headlines this week, and one that is

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>big and it's troublesome and it's worrisome and it bothers me.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>But there's also another side to it that actually I'm

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>happy about and it makes me hopeful and happy So

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what am I talking about. Well, I'm talking about the

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>man Jordan Peterson, who is a very polarizing figure for

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot, meaning that people either love them or hate

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm like a magnet. One side attracts and one side

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>pushes away. And that's sort of what Jordan Peterson is

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in the news about this week. There's two big stories

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that are different, but they involve him, almost like if

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Peterson was the coin, and there's two sides to that.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>The first one is something that's very troublesome, and it's

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>also telling of where we are in the world today,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>and that is that basically, Jordan Peterson has had his

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>medical license been threatened to be stripped away the practice

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of psychology, and Ontario regulates people basically their essential government

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>organization with a managed to protect the public from this conduct,

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, which is good, maybe they probably should. Now

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone anywhere in the world can levy a complaint to

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>these regulatory bodies for any reason, regardless if they've ever

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>had to direct contact with the person or anything doesn't matter,

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and the complaints can be deemed frivolous and dispensed with

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>if they want. But if the college decides to move

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>forward with it. They consider that a very serious move.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, it's so serious it's equivalent

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to a lawsuit. And according to the Ontario College of Psychologists,

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they recommend actually that you get legal counsel if you

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>actually get one of these, So it's as serious as

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit, and the Ontario College of Psychologist recommends that

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you get legal counsel if you have that. Well, the

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Ontario College of Psychologists has levied multitude of lawsuits against

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Peterson since he started rising to a public figure

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about six years ago. Now, he had zero in the

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty years that he was practicing as a psychologist, So

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>when he was actually practicing as a psychologist seeing individual

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>people patients, doing what his license provides for and being

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>regulated by them, he had zero complaints. But now that

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he's not seen people anymore, now that he's just a

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>public figure, now the levies are piling up, which is

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird, right, he hasn't seen any clients and his

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>treckerder has been good now. Jordan Peterson says that it's

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to communicate with as many people as he

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>does and say anything of substance without rubbing at least

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a few of them the wrong way. So he's reaching

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know, tens of millions, potentially hundreds of

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>millions of people on a regular basis. So when you're

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>reaching hundreds of millions of people, and to his point,

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you're saying anything of substance, some people just aren't going

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to like it. There's this meme. It's basically four pictures

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's like a quad, four different pictures, and the

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>first picture is a man and a wife, a man

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and a man and a woman walking with a donkey,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And then it's a man walking with a donkey and

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the woman riding it. And then it's the woman riding

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it I'm sorry, walking with a man riding it, and

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>then both of them riding And basically the gist of

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the meme is that both of them are walking next

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to the donkey and somebody, somebody's gonna go, what idiots,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Why would they be walking when they have the donkey there?

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>They should be riding the donkey. So somebody he has

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.479
<v Speaker 1>a problem with that. I can't believe these idiots, right,

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So then there's a picture of the man walking with

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the donkey and letting the woman ride it, and somebody.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>When you read out of one hundred million people, someone

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go, what an idiot? Why would that man

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be walking when he has a donkey? He could be

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>riding the donkey with the woman, or he should make

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the woman walk. Someone's gonna say that. So then there's

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposite where the man's riding and the woman's walking,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And then someone's gonna say why would that man be

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>riding instead of letting the woman ride? And then finally

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they're both riding the donkey, and someone's like, how cruel

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>these people are putting all this weight on a donkey.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>They should be walking. The point is is that no

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>matter what they do in that situation, somebody is going

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to criticize it. And when you reach one hundreds of

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>millions of people to what he says, if you say

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>anything of substance, you're gonna rub a couple of people

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way. It's just the way it is. And

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so what since when did people become so sensitive? Now?

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>We know when? In this modern world that we live in. Now,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you because I traveled a lot to Mexico,

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Central America and other third world countries. They don't care

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>about these stupid social issues like we do here in

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. These are like made up problems. When you've

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>solved every other problem in society, then you have to

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>invent new problems to be worried about. They don't care

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>about that in those countries, I can tell you that.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But for his crimes of rubbing a few people the

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong way, he's been sentenced to a course of mandatory

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>social media communication training with the colleges quote unquote experts. Now,

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>he says, this is not a scientific or a clinical

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>specialty of any standing. There's been no training at this.

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>He's supposed to do it at his own expense for

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>an undisclosed length of time. Just whenever they think that

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>being his training has been good, then they'll let him out.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And when those re educators, those experts have convinced themselves

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's learned his lesson, and we don't even know

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>what that is. Now, if he agrees to this, then

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he has to admit that he's been unprofessional in his

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>conduct and he has said mean things. He retweeted a

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>comment made by the Conservative leader Pierre Polivier about the

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.959
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary severity of COVID lockdowns. He retweeted a comment by

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a political leader in Canada. He criticized the Prime Minister

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of Canada, Justin Trudeau, he criticized other people in politics.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>How dare he do that? So that's where we're at today.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>They want him to either stand up and publicly admit

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that he made a mistake and apologize and subject himself

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to go through re education to keep his license. Now,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what they do in communist countries when there's

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>times of change, right when there's a cultural revolution going on.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They bring the people out and they make them public

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>spectacles and they make them publicly apologize to everybody to

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>basically set a precedent for everybody. And that's what they're

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. They want him to publicly humiliate himself

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and apologize for this. That's the state of the world.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Out On the flip side of the coin with Jordan

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Peterson is that we have the World that Economic Forum

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that's pushing these things, so equality for all and equity

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and all those fancy words, and the World Ecomic Forum,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the an NGEO non government organization of non

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>elected leaders who are somehow kind of controlling, not so

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>much controlling, but certainly influencing the world. Klaus Schwab brags

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about installing all these politicians across all these governments, and

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>he has all these corporation and business leaders there and

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they're using this public private partnership and he's doing all

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>these things to influence politics and policies. And now Jordan

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Peterson announced that he's going to open up another one

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to counterbalance that. So he announced the formation of an

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>international consortium that would serve as a kind of populist

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>alternative to the elitist World Ecomic Forum. So a populist alternative,

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's one for the people instead of the elites.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>He wants to have the people have a voice and

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>to provide a counter valian force against globalist aims and narratives.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>He laid all this out on appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast,

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>telling him if there's an inaugural event it's being planned

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for this year twenty twenty three, sometime in October or

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>November in London. About two thousand businesses, cultural political figures

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>will be invited to take part in the consortium, which

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>puts it almost on the same scale as the WEF,

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>which is about twenty seven hundred leaders. He says they

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have an official name yet, but it's going to

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>be to provide quote, an alternative vision of the future

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and an alternative to that kind of apocalyptic narrative. And

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>what I love about this is this is what free

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>markets do. If you don't like what the WEF is doing,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like what they're trying to achieve and

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 1>what they're teaching, then you have the right to go

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and create a competitor to that, a counterbalance. And that's

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Jordan Peterson is doing now. Who gives him

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the right to do that. Nobody gives him the right.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>He gives himself the right. And if you want the right,

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you can do the same thing too. Nobody stood up

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and asked Cloud Schwab to do this, and nobody's standing

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up and asking Jordan Peterson to do it. You can

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>take part of it, or you can abstain from it.

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But either way, this could have ramifications and you should

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>know about it. I am, for one, happy about it.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Not that I'm saying this is gonna be the best

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>thing in the world, but I'm happy to have a

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>counter balance. If you're just tune in, you're listening to

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Mos show, we're talking about the decentralized revolution

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and as globalization is breaking apart now we have Jordan

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Peterson coming in to push it off the proverbial cliff.

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I got for you today. Thanks so much

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Until next time,