WEBVTT - Eddington, The Fantastic Four, Sunlight, Top 5 Joaquin Phoenix Performances (2023)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in art?

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Now? No, Look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:11.079
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 3>From Chicago.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 4>This is Film Spotting celebrating our twentieth year. I'm Josh Larson.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And in for Adam this week, I'm Michael Phillips.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 5>I am recording this fair warning is not really necessary.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Look Joe six feet.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 4>That's Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal and the trailer for

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 4>Ariasters Eddington, a film which whisks movie audiences back to

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 4>the magical year of twenty twenty.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I am masked up and ready to go.

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Josh cut our review, plus the top five Woaquin Phoenix performances.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>And more ahead. I'm film Spotting.

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by dead Man's Wire,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 6>the new film from Roque Entertainment. Dead Man's Wire is

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 6>the incredible true story of the nineteen seventy seven kidnapping

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 6>that turned an aspiring entrepreneur into an outlaw folk era.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 6>Directed by legendary filmmaker Gus van Zant, dead Man's Wire

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 6>stars Bill Scarsguard Daker, Montgomery, carry Always and Mahalla with

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 6>Coleman Domingo and al Pacino, now playing in select theaters everywhere.

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 6>January sixteenth.

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to Film Spotting. It's Pedro Pascal's world, Michael, we

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 4>just live in it, okay.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>And the time it took you to say that sentence, Josh.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Pedro Pascal started a film podcast and has already already

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>got five trillion subscribers, So.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 4>He's a busy You know, you think you're joking, but

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I bet that's true. Later in the show, you're going

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 4>to have some thoughts, some feelings too, I hope about

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 4>the new Pascal starring Fantastic four First Steps, plus a

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 4>new Golden Brick nominee from me. It's for a deeply

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>strange movie called Sunlight, and we'll have a new deeply

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 4>flawed Film Spotting poll question. All that, plus from the

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Film Spotting archive, it's our top five Walking Phoenix performances.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Adam and I did that one back in twenty twenty three,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 4>around the time of the previous Phoenix Ariastor collaboration bo

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Is Afraid, But First Astors Eddington, which opened and wide

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 4>released this weekend and has been the recipient of strongly

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 4>and maybe this is appropriate divisive takes since its debut

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>at the Cannes Film Festival earlier this year. Phoenix is

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Joe Cross, a conservative small town sheriff with political ambitions.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Pedro Pascal is Ted Garcia, the town's incumbent mayor. Oh

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 4>and did we mention that it's twenty twenty.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>So what have you been doing in there? It's takeaway drinks.

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>All the town council members.

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 7>That's essential business.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can't just call a central business whatever you want.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a city council meeting.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Wherever city council people congregate.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>It's the mayor's office.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>If I'm inside, then you were open and you have

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a pain customer costs trying up.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 4>He's aggressive, he's dangerous. He needs to be locked up.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Your streets.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>No, they're your streets, sheriff.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 2>They're your streets to keep safe.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 3>And where is your man?

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>To kickstart our Eddington conversation, Michael, I'm going to lean

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 4>on our producer Sam and something he posted recently in

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Discord for film Spotting family members. Just a reminder here,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 4>listeners that access to the discord is one of the

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 4>benefits of being a family member, So if you haven't

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 4>already signed up, we'd love to have you do that

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 4>over at film spottingfamily dot com. Now, Sam's prompt was this,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 4>what's the best COVID movie? And by COVID movie, I

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 4>don't necessarily mean a movie that was made during the pandemic.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean a movie that is explicitly or metaphorically reckoning

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 4>with our shared experience as people who lived through the pandemic.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 4>For example, the first titles I think of our asteroid

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 4>city and white Noise. Well, Michael, Certainly, Eddington, written and

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 4>directed by Ariastor of Hereditary and Midsommar Fame, counts as

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>what Sam calls a COVID movie. Set in the small

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 4>New Mexico town of the title, during the spring of

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty, the film pits Joaquin Phoenix's sheriff Joe Cross,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 4>a skeptic of the virus in general and of masking

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>in particular, against Pedro Pascal's mayor Ted Garcia, who staunchly

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 4>supports mandates requiring masks, limiting customers in grocery stores, and

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 4>establishing six feet of separation in public. Have I triggered

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 4>you enough yet, Michael? The movie expands beyond the standoff

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 4>between these two men. However, to consider how the entire

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 4>community crumbles amidst escalating personal tensions, political posturing, and social

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 4>media fueled conspiracies. Going back to Sam's prompt about COVID movies,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 4>I unsurprisingly leaned toward Asteroid City if I were looking

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 4>to put a film in the time capsule for future generations.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Though that's partly because I think Asteroid City touches on

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 4>current anxieties even beyond the pandemic. Now Listeners on the

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 4>film spotting Family discord throughout other titles for pandemic movies,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 4>such as Steven Soderberg's Kimmy, Sarah Polly's Women Talking, and

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Ryan Johnson's Glass Onion. What say you, Michael about pandemic

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 4>movies in general and Eddington in particular? Is Eddington a

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 4>time capsule film for the pandemic? Or should it be

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 4>left in the dustbin of history largely forgotten?

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of how at least half and maybe

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>more of the can first responders to Eddington feel like

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>to hell with it? I mean, they didn't like it

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in any way, And I think it's actually getting a

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>more interesting response here in release, because I'm reading kind

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of a really sharply divided and also I think a

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people stepping up on Reddit or letterboxed two

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and not just so not just mainstream you know, old

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>lye critics, but people stepping up and really grappling with

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they really like a lot of it

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and really kind of hate a lot of it. And

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that's me. Yeah, in that way, it's not It doesn't

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>really reflect the the psychic temperature of the pandemic, because

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody, any sane person would feel that

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they were had mixed feelings about you know, the last

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>five years, you know, I mean, and it's just nothing

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but fall out of every kind that we're going to

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be studying a generation from now. We barely know what

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it is. But it's hard to it's really hard to

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>get extremely recent history sorted out in your mind about

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what captured you know, you know, twenty twenty, or just

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>even just sort of like a metaphoric sort of pandemic

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of isolation and all the rest of it. I

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do love that somebody brought up Kimmi though, because I

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>love Soderberg's Kimmi. If you want to talk about a

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead, straight ahead meat and potatoes, you know, kind

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of linear mystery thriller, storytelling in a pandemic, shot in

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, set in a pandemic with an agoraphobic, pandemically

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>paranoid for good reason character trying to solve, you know,

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a rear window type mystery in her Laft without leaving it.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And I love that about that, and I think that

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>film is just a grand, efficient story to us. Yeah,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that's one, but yeah, I mean Eddington, I wrote a

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>really squirrely review on that one. I do think I

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was happy to have seen it a second time, frankly

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of help sort it out why. I really

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of the first two thirds and I

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of hate the last forty minutes. Did you feel

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that way?

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it definitely escalates spirals, goes off the rails, becomes unhinged,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 4>whatever description you want to use. Purposely, so though, I

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 4>think that's the intent to get us to that point,

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 4>I am in a similar place as you, and maybe

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 4>we can both help each other find a more firm

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 4>position to take at the end of this conversation. I'm

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>at a similar place as you in terms of liking

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of it, disliking much of it, not thinking

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 4>that something's work thinking that some things are pretty audacious

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>and impressive. I don't have as linear of a response

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 4>where it's a first half second half break. To me,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 4>though I would agree, I do think the second half

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>is weaker, squirrely review. Maybe that's what listeners are going

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>to get, because that's how I feel. I went into

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 4>this somewhat dreading it, even though I am a very

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 4>big fan of Hereditary and had positive, if mixed feelings

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>about his other films. I just didn't want to go

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 4>back to twenty twenty. I wasn't really ready. I didn't

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 4>know what could be said about it this soon. Maybe

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 4>that's why we're struggling, Michael Is. It's not so much

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 4>that Eddington doesn't have anything to say about it, because

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 4>I did think. I do think I landed on something there,

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know how helpful it is to capture

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the brain rot and the chaos, and the honestly the

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 4>dysfunction and hatred that we experienced just a few years

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 4>on from the dark heart of the pandemic. I don't

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 4>know what the ultimate value is of an endeavor like that,

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 4>but I found myself surprisingly appreciating the attempt. It's not

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 4>entirely successful. But I did appreciate the attempt and the

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>one thing. Let me throw this out at you and

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>see if you know there's the one thing, this one

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 4>thing that I kind of landed on it. Maybe this

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 4>is what the movie's trying to do, is just capture

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 4>the fact that in the pandemic, the virus was not

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 4>enough of an enemy for us as human beings. You

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 4>would think, and initially maybe it felt this way that

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 4>could you ask for a more common enemy to unite

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 4>against is a virus?

0:09:58.280 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>But what did we do?

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 4>We just tore each other apart eventually instead, and Eddington,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 4>to my mind, is capturing how that happened in this

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 4>particular town.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 3>I think what Astra is trying.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 4>To do is explore the way distrust, disinformation, and as

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned, just hatred between people flared during the early

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 4>months of the pandemic. And I don't know if he's

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 4>as successful the microcosm in the first half that he

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 4>offers I think is successful. Maybe that's why you like

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 4>the first half better, where we're getting to learn how

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 4>this particular community responded the macrocosm. I think that he

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 4>also wants this movie to be for America as a whole.

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Maybe even beyond the pandemic, just as a nation. I

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 4>don't know if Eddington is assured enough to pull that off,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 4>but as an attempt to capture that brain rap that

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, really did spread from sea to shiny sea

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 4>in this country. I do think the movie. I do

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 4>think the movie manages that in some pretty effective ways.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Do we need it now? I'm not so sure about that.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 4>But did you did that have a hook for you?

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Always?

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Just kind of honestly, I couldn't agree less with you

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fact of whether or not it's too soon.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think film history is full of you know, maybe foolish,

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>hopefully very talented, a lot of them, brilliant film directors

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and screenwriters who take on what is happening right now

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or very recently, and you know, maybe maybe this pandemic

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was simply too wrenching, you know, and a lot of

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>people lost a lot of lives in their immediate family

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 1>or friends or whatever. You know, no argument. Absolutely I

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>found it not too soon. And in fact, the best

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of this film, which is almost the first two thirds,

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really more like not halfway that I feel like

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it was settling for something else, because what happens a

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>little past a halfway point, there is an escalation in

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the plot where a certain key character, you know, kicks

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it up a notch to quote Anchorman, and and you know,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>we have a kind of a different, a different, huge

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>plot redirection, and it's it's it's very effective, I think,

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the things Astor does really well.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is also Joaquin Phoenix I think working at

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>his best in this film. I mean, I don't think

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this is this film is Joaquin Phoenix at his best.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But the best work he does in this film is

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we have we have a characterization of this guy, Joe Cross,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't come out as a wildly political really like

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>almost inhumanly stubborn caricature of a conservative, nothing like that.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Nothing like that. It's a much more of a slow

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>build and just kind of like, h I don't know

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>about the band. I love the I love the tone

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of the first scene where you know, it's just it's

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just a debate and an argument between two reservation police

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>coming off the pueblo and you know, saying to Joe

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're both both in their respective you know, law

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>enforcement cars, and it's where's your mass Joy says, I

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>don't need it? You know, very casual, and that's you know,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like it's not like the lines of being

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>drawn in the sand. And I think that's why why

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the film is as intriguing as it is for as

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>long as it is, because Joe Cross, even if he

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is you know, people disagree all over the place about

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>how sympathetic or unsympathetic he is from from scene to scene,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's generally a pretty foolish mediocrity of a man.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's asters you know, he's he's not

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>running from that, he's leaning into it, and it's up

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to it's up to the actor to make that compelling,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>even if not heroic, you know, but that's a good

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>build to that character and very interesting swerves. And then

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>know what's happening around that, well, you have you have

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>at least four or five and maybe six different subplots

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that all kind of feed what is going on in

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this town. There's this nascent Black Lives Matter movement, very

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>small but very mighty in the eyes of the mostly

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>younger characters who are kind of newly awakened, let's say,

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>by what they have seen on the TV in the

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>recent George Floyd murder, up in Minneapolis, and that's why

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this film is set in when it's sad May twenty twenty,

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and some of those scenes are better written than others,

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>or more germane to the I guess the overall plot.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know, I am never a guy, Josh,

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>who goes to any movie to see them tell me

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to watch movie makers and actors tell me a nice

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>linear story. I appreciate it when it's interesting, I guess.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's about forty ninth on my list of why

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I go to the movies. You know, I just I

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like somebody chaos. I mean this you want to talk

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about a chaotic time. I mean, in a way I

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>wish this film we're a little more kind of out

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of control and chaotic in those early more realistic, uh

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of slyly comic scenes where everybody is kind of

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>getting dinged for either their kind of liberal credulousness maybe

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in some characters eyes, or they're sort of like conspiracy

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>prone mania or their butt headed conservatism. I mean, it's

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>all there, and it was all in the country, and

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I like that Astor took it on, so I for me,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not too early, Josh. It's like keep it coming.

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I like topical stuff that forces people into me calling

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you completely wrong in your opinion that it was too

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>still to make this move.

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, and then let me let me clarify that

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 4>a bit. You can still call me wrong.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So, but you're recording this, I mean, I mean, you

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>can't clarify, you can't correct it.

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's against the rules. Yeah, no, no, it's obviously

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 4>filmmakers can tackle timely subjects. But for me, I mean Eddington,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess, is it too soon for what Eddington is

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 4>trying to do?

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe not to your point, maybe it is more successful

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 4>to your point about the chaos, there is a sequence

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe we'll get into in that climax that I think

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 4>absolutely is the where it goes and what happens is

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 4>horrifyingly hilarious. That does capture the chaos of the moment,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 4>and maybe I can share that in a little later.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 4>But going back to Phoenix and this character of Joe

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Cross the Sheriff, I agree with you there on the

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 4>characterization of him, because depending where you lived, the conflicts

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 4>that you encountered at that time, maybe we're more like that,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 4>almost like aggressively passive aggressive about masks, you know, is

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 4>how you and that's how Joe carries himself, right, is like,

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to make a big deal about it,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 4>but I'm also not going to put the mask on.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 4>But notice this happens in an early scene at a

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 4>grocery store where the employees are keeping an older man

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 4>who's not wearing a mask out, and Joe stops them

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 4>and says, you can't put your hands on him like that,

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 4>and says let him in because the man is claiming

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 4>he can't breathe through the mask. So okay, you know,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 4>everyone maybe is trying to be reasonable in this crazy situation.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 4>But then what happens. Then Joe enters the grocery store

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 4>after the man and doesn't put on a mask on either,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 4>and so we're getting this slow escalation. The mayor is

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 4>in the grocery store shopping, and so they have this confrontation,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 4>which is, you know, it's very familiar there. It's a

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 4>showdown of claims and counterclaims, facts and rumors, pandering and posturing.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 4>And I thought that was very smartly handled and written.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 4>But to your point about you know, Phoenix's performance and

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 4>the characterization of this sheriff notice that he buys the

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 4>older man's groceries as well.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>And there's another moment, and that doesn't I just want

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to interdict, that does not seem like a screenwriter contrivance

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to make him more materially sympathetic. That actually seems it's

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>very casually handled to this guy. Yeah, it seems like, okay,

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that's probably part of his thing. Yeah, okay, yeah, I

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 4>It's it's along the lines of when he tosses the

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 4>bottle of water to the itinerant man, who's who's shuffling

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 4>down the street and seems to be, you know, a

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 4>regular fixture in the town. He you know, it's a

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 4>small part for Emma Stone. I think she only has

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 4>a handful of scenes, probably, But his wife is just stricken,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 4>and he's very tender. The sheriff is very tender about

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 4>trying to reach her and making space for her. She

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 4>creates these bizarre, creepy dolls that she sells online, and

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 4>we learn early on he's buying them online to kind of,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, give her a boost of encouragement. So there

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 4>are these other sides to the sheriff that I think

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 4>are important, especially to your point as things do escalate,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 4>and he, you know, he suffers from a particular form

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 4>of brain rot in a particular political direction. At the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 4>same time, Pascal's mayor you know, the movie pokes at

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 4>him too. He seems to he seems to almost delight

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 4>in the new rules that the pandemic is allowing him

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 4>to show that by following them, how progressive he is,

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 4>you know. So this is this is a little bit

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>of an undercutting of that character as well, which I

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 4>think does make the movie richer. And we could list

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 4>a number of other characters who are involved, but this

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>thing really broadens out. I was wondering, Michael, a movie

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 4>that came to mind, and maybe I'm way off here.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 4>You seem to be in the mood of telling me

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 4>when I'm way off, so let me have it. But

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 4>I thought at this point, I thought at this point

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 4>about Robert Eltman's Nashville in the sense of a movie

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 4>that does come to incorporate a very large ensemble cast,

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 4>also wants to, you know, be a cinematic consideration of

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 4>America at a critical juncture, and do it through this

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 4>broad canvas. Now, stylistically, there I can't think of two filmmakers.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Maybe further apart, right, Astor doesn't have the shaggy, free

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 4>flowing touch that you know Altman does, which made us

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 4>feel like a fly on the wall. Astor is very controlled.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 4>His films are very controlled, so there's that difference. But

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 4>just in the sense of the broad canvas and trying

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 4>to capture Americana, Nashville did come to mind for me. Yet,

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 4>how far off am I?

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>No, No, no, that's you're not. No. I'm sorry to

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>jumped on your throat on the other one, but you

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's that's my job.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 3>You're good.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Nashville in fact, was just I think

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just part of the Altman retrospective at the Cisco Film Center,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and I wish i'd seen that seen. I haven't seen

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it on the screen since I was a teenager.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 4>But it's been a long time for me too, so

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 4>I could be off on this.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's yeah it. Astor is a different kind

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of I don't want to call him a satirist because

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the strengths of Eddington is that

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not straight up satire. I mean, don't look up.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd agree the Adam McKay meteor, you know, liberal lament

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>film that was straight up satire with then sort of

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a sledgehammer dose of pathos as the world's about to

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>end at the end, and I didn't like any this

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>is a different register. Yeah, and it's and it's it's

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a it's a little it's a little slippery almost all

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the way through. And I guess why I did think it,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know it, I I sense Astor's need to give

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this picture a satisfying, if outrageously kind of overscaled action climax,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just to kind of bring it to a head. And

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe was always scripted that way. I probably was, but

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to me that the kind of outrageousness does seem to

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>me much more puerile, and I guess adolescent need call it.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I compared it to like Tarantino,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a guy who I just don't think has a serious

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>storytelling bone in his body. Truly. I think he's got

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.239
<v Speaker 1>great skill and he's often a lot of fun, but

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>he you know, to me, it's it's just empty calories, uh,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and you know, so be it, you know,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>asters much more he'll he'll never have the commercial instincts

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the Tarantino does. And this film. The funny thing about

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>where this movie goes, where editing goes, and it's last

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>half hour forty minutes or so. It's it's almost as

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if that part of the film exists, so that a

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four could legitimately include some pretty shocking, you know,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>scenes of firearm you know, I mean, like like major

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>league heavy duty firearms and fireballs as part of the trailer,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like a movie. I mean that trailer

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is very, very crafty, and that it seems to get

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>everything about the film, and it might even get a

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>traditional action audience a little bit interested in seeing it.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Now what they get when they go in the door,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe, but they're going to be waiting to way.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 4>Make it they make it to the fireballs, is I know, Yeah.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's not he's a funny guy astor because

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because if I go back to Midsommar, which I really

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>again sort of loved the first two thirds, and I thought,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>even if it's a lot like The wicker Man and

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot like some other films, you know that that's

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>set up, uh where where you really have a film

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>it's about this very queasy relationship that you know is

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not destined to work out and it's it's in that movie.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And Astor is writer director, very very properly hard on

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>the on the on this on this worm of a

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>male protagonist. And he's a very clear eyed and honest,

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of deadpan black humor perspective on on you know,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on this outrageous, outrageous flaws of your typical American and

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what you get in Midsommer, and you also get

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that into Ednington. And I don't think it kills the movie.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that actually, as I say, because Quaquin Phoenix

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>is there to slowly build the character. And also the writing,

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>as you say, it's not all one note like a

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>movie like Don't Look Up. Just you know, they don't

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>even have one note. Is too many notes for to

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>describe Don't Look Up. And it's treatment of all the

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>attitudes and characters, and that I think what you said

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about Emma Stone, yes, but I'm I think I read

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that those scenes differently even after two viewings than you.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 4>I think his tenderness towards her you're there.

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>It's there. I think the tenderness is there, but it

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is more about a guy who's just struggling to try

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to for all the wrote reasons you know, keep this

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>difficult and clearly kind of corrosive, corroding marriage together in

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>this household where his mother in law. I mean, in

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>another way, this movie is just just another mother in

0:24:58.400 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>law joke.

0:24:58.960 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like a little like bo as Afraid

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was in some ways, but it's yeah, it's a little

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>mother issues. Yeah, and it's a little dumb. It's a

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>little dumb and reductive about women in general. I think

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a little like I just don't get them. It's

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of the attitude of the characters. And it might

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>it might interest be it might be Arister's you know,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>private struggle. Like many male writer directors to just write dimensional, interesting,

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>surprising female characters. And I think, you know, Emma Stone

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>does God knows every single thing she could do to

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>make that woman more dimensional interesting than she is on

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the page.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a thinly written role. I will say Deirdre

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 4>O'Connell as the mother in law gets maybe more scenes

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 4>than Ada Stone. She certainly appears in the epilogue and

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 4>is crucial to that. We won't give that away, but

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 4>I thought she was fantastic, I mean, making more perhaps

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 4>than what the screenplay provided. As this conspiracy theory obsessed

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.479
<v Speaker 4>mother in law, which is a crucial part of what

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 4>people were, you know, going through, is when you couldn't

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 4>have human connection, it just amped up our inclination to

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 4>turn to digital connections, which is why Facebook, Instagram, YouTube

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 4>plays a prominent role in this movie. I think it's

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty sharp about that. I would also say, to counter

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>your claim about, you know, the sheriff's feelings towards his wife,

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 4>one of the first videos we see him watching, I

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 4>think it's the very first scene, is a YouTube video

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 4>about someone talking about infertility and how that's hard for

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 4>couples and handling it, and we learn that this is

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 4>part of their difficulty in their marriage at least, if

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 4>not infertility. I think it's just a willingness that he

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 4>does want kids and she's not in an emotional state

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 4>for it. So so yeah, I do think there's more

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 4>of a genuine impetus to him, the sheriff, wanting to

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 4>work out that marriage. But I agree the role that

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Emmastone plays is underwritten. Do you think we should segue

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Michael to a little spoiler? We've been dancing around that

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 4>last third the climax, and I know I do want

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 4>to mention one bit that really did work well for me,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 4>that chaotic bit, which is also a joke. I found it,

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 4>but I'm not quite sure how So maybe listeners, if

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 4>you haven't seen Eddington yet and don't want to hear

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 4>a few spoiler bits towards the end, you might want

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 4>to jump ahead. If you're going to do that and

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 4>you end up seeing the film and want to let

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 4>us know your thoughts, you can always email us at

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Feedback at filmspawning dot net. As we mentioned, Eddington is

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 4>currently playing in wide release.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 2>You want things simple and neat. There was some allegations made,

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>allegations like what you were in this house? Well, here's

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a quote from you arm yourself.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 7>I don't mean literal arms.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I have motive. Oh we need evidence.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 4>People are going to be looking here now, So Michael,

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 4>let's let's get to, you know, just some general thoughts

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 4>about the ending, the bit in the climax, and this

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 4>is to your point about everyone being skewered all their

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 4>political positions. It's almost like the gunfire which erupts, we

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 4>should say, because at this point the sheriff is being

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 4>pursued by anti fascist assassins who come out of out

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 4>of nowhere, heavily armed, chasing him across town, across the countryside,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to kill him. So he breaks into the gun shop,

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 4>comes out with like a Schwarzenegger style machine gun assembly,

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 4>and just starts laying waste to the whole town.

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 3>In defense.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Supposedly, there is a bit in that chase Michael, I

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 4>don't know what to make of this. Maybe you can

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 4>help me, except that it seemed to capture the insanity

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 4>of this country, going back from its very beginning. But

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 4>across Sheriff Cross is being chased. He runs on top

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 4>of the roof of the town's history museum, crashes through,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 4>lands on a display case that also breaks, shatters all

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 4>over the floor, and the case is holding supposedly the

0:28:55.880 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 4>bones of Geronimo. Now you mentioned the Pueblo commune next door.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 4>There is a thread acknowledging you know that part of

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 4>America clearly originally the original indigenous peoples who lived here.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 4>That's a thread in this movie. And something about that

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 4>bit where Cross is laying among the bones and then

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 4>has to get up with his guns and still run

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 4>out and try to take down his assassins. I don't

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what it says. I don't know what

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 4>it means to say, but it seemed apropos for our

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 4>current moment and as I said, the country's history. That's

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>where I think Eddington is doing something that makes me

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 4>at least glad I gave it a shot.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, totally.

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 4>What did you make of that whole sequence or the

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 4>climax in general.

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So that's that part of the sequence where we

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>never really see any of the assassins in close up.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I might be wrong on it, but I

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. So, I mean they're basically anonymous and

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>gamer type assassins, right, Yeah, it's also kind of yeah,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I never, I never, I never think that's the strength

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in narrative filmmaking. I think that's an immediate weakness because

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes it makes it easier to just sort of,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, get off on the killing, which I you know,

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we've you know, the whole industry is built on that

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to some degree. But uh, I think the way that

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>scene is staged and edited and timed, it it leans

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>into the many, many too many times we've seen exactly

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing played for straight laughs in a

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>much lighter film, And so I think the audience doesn't

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>know if you know what what what it's. It's it's

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat insecure a bit of that sequence. I think,

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to your point, Astor doesn't quite really know

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>how he wants to come off. I think just in

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that bit, uh, you know what I thought of I mean,

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I discus I've just seen the play recently, what I

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thought it was. I mean, this is this is sort

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of just the fact that he's landing on the bones

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of First Nation people who were there before all any

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of these idiot white people came along, just are shooting

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>up their town, a town with the absolute palest whitest

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>name in the history of fictional cities in film, Eddington,

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'd love to get the backstory on

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the probably halpless military figure that it's named after. You know,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a maybe there's a short film in that.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So maybe there's a Tracy Let's play called The Minutes

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that premier here at Steppenwolf, played on Broadway, and it's

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>got a very similar kind of dynamic about these foolish,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>blinkered small town white sort of politicos just kind of

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>going about their business and in a way that gets

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>increasingly sinister, and it all kind of ends with this

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of second layer of history kind of eating them,

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>eating them up on stage. I don't want to lay

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it out to uh too completely, but and it's all

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>about the people that were there first. And yes, it's

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>an effective moment, and it's also a little unexamined or

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>it kind of needs a yes and improv prompt at

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that point, like yes, okay, good and and we don't

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>really get that because it's an action set. I mean,

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean at that point, astor probably realized, Okay, this

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just has to kind of I have this thing carved up.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.959
<v Speaker 1>In the eight beats, they're all increasingly violent and fatal

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and bloody, and you know, we just got to keep

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it going at this point. But I don't love I

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't love the way that movie, inevitably, I suppose,

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>goes where it goes, and in sort of a way

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that again, if you see the trailer, you're really you're

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>really I don't want to pin it on a twenty

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fours marketing, but it's just it's just promising a different

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>movie than you get. And I think this movie really

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>does get at a lot of what we still feel.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is why I don't even look at it

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like recent history, Josh. I think you know how many

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>people died last week of COVID in this country. I

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, hundreds, maybe maybe more than a thousand. Is

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there always another viral threat seemingly these days. Yes, So

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, it just plays like it happens to be

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>specific recent history, May twenty twenty. It also feels like,

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we're not over with this. It's not

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in that regard, It's not well in every regard.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>This movie is not the best Years of our lives right.

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Came out in nineteen forty six, a year after the war,

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and the whole movie is about people coming home from

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the war like that. You know, it's set in you know,

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it's set basically one year back.

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great example to prove your point about it, you know,

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 4>not being too soon. That is absolutely not a too

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 4>soon movie for sure.

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>One other thing I'll say, structurally, this is one of

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the few movies where I would say there's enough set

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the first three fifths that the film actually

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>feels like it could be longer, could be two two

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hour chunks, it could be a four hour picture. I

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>suspect that what he wrote initially was longer. I don't know.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>He's probably talked about, you know, whether or not it

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was ever much longer. The cut was three and a

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.479
<v Speaker 1>half hours instead of whatever it is two and a half.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It's two and a half. But it does feel like

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it's either you know, this is one of the rare

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>ones where it's like, you know, just not necessarily to

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>clean up the mess of it, but to actually let

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the things flesh out. You know, it could

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.959
<v Speaker 1>have been longer, and there's something a little off about

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the length. So what do you think, do you think

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it's or did you feel like enough already?

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 4>A little bit, But it also goes back to me

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 4>for me, to the Altman thing a little bit, where

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, some of his movies you feel like, if

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 4>not longer, you know, would be fantastic series where you

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 4>could spend a little more time with some of these

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 4>characters who just walk through and you become you know,

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 4>you they grab your attention and you want to learn

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 4>more about them. I mean, that's to those films credit, right,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 4>that's finding richness in small moments. But here, you know,

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 4>we meet these kids, these teenagers. Those are interesting stories,

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think the Sheriff's deputies are interesting stories

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 4>we only get little bits of and more about the

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 4>marriage the movie I feel I could use. We've talked about,

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, Ema Stone being underused. So yeah, so before

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 4>we wrap up here, we've worked through a few things.

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you feel stronger in terms of a little less squirrely?

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Let me say, would you say you are overall favorable

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 4>on the film or more favorable I am than maybe

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 4>after you saw it. Okay, I'm gonna go favorable as well.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm willingly saw twice. I am wildly conflicted

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>about some of it. I do not like, you know,

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the impulse to just deliver, you know, the kind of

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>somewhat weightless ultra violence at the end, and then it

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't somehow it doesn't override everything I think the movie

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>does not neat and tidy, but very intriguing ambiguities and

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>tonal switches. No, I'm favorable. I want three stars, but

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>star ratings mean nothing with a film like this. But yes,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say check it out.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 3>About it totally?

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Yeah, well I will give it a conflicted a

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 4>conflicted recommendation from me as well. Eddington is currently playing

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 4>in wide release. If you see it and agree or disagree,

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 4>let us know feedback at film spotting dot net. Listening

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 4>is the number one thing you can do to support

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 4>an independently produced show like ours. Here are a couple

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.359
<v Speaker 4>of other things you can do to help us out.

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Take a minute to give us a rating or a

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 4>review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Feel free to do this.

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 4>If you're a brand new listener, just one show under

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 4>your belt, you have something you want to share, leave

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 4>that review. Hey, if you've been listening for twenty years

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and you've never left a review, maybe now's the time.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Every new review helps us reach new listeners. Another way

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 4>to support us, you can join the film Spotting Family

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 4>at film spottingfamily dot com. We want to thank family

0:36:56.120 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 4>member Jason Monholland from Oklahoma City. If if you want

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 4>to follow Jason on letterbox, you can find him at

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Sooner Moondog. So Michael, we have a little bit of

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 4>a questionnaire we ask new family members to fill out

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 4>if they so desire when they join the family. Jason

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 4>did that for us, so I want to share some

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 4>of his responses here. We ask you know when they

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 4>started listening, if they remember their first show, and he says,

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 4>it's been so long, I can't remember when I started listening. Well,

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 4>thanks for sticking with us for a while, Jason. His

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 4>favorite reviewer segment. Jason says, one that sticks out is

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 4>the methodical way you broke down Killers of the Flower Moon.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 4>I love it when you guys geek out about a

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 4>film or a filmmaker. What review did we get wrong?

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I struggle to recaller review I strongly disagree with, which

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 4>means that either the show has started affecting the way

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 4>I watch movies, or that we share similar viewpoints, in

0:37:56.080 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 4>which case I commend you on your impeccable tastes. It's

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 4>always always encouraging to hear that the indoctrination is taking

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 4>effect among our listeners. All right, Jason on Letterbox, As

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 4>I said, here's his top four films listed there, eight

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 4>and a half, The Empire Strikes Back, Princess Mononoke, and

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 4>Rear Window. Any issues with any of those titles, Michael.

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh, heck no, heck no, I mean I mean, yeah,

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we were just true everything.

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, you know the way, well you get the

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Michael Phillips Seal of approval. Jason a favorite movie he

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 4>revisited recently alien a random film or filmmaker that you love,

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Terry Gilliams, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, and a movie

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 4>he credits with becoming a cinophile, Akira kurosawas seven Samurai.

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 4>One last question that Jason answered for us a book

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 4>about movies or movie making. He said, the easy answer

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 4>is Ebert's Great Movies, But I will mention a book

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I got from the book Fair as a young upcoming

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 4>centophile that stuck with and ignited a curiosity about film

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 4>move monsters, monster makeup, and monster shows to put on

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 4>by Alan Ormsby. Thanks for the recommendation, Jason, I am

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 4>unfamiliar with that one. Thank you again for joining the

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Film Spotting Family. If you would like to join the

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 4>Film Spotting Family, just go to Film Spotting Family dot com.

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 9>This episode is brought to you by Peloton break through

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 9>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 9>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 9>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 9>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:39.240
<v Speaker 9>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 9>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training tread plus

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 9>at one peloton dot com.

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 10>Thisay Summer, Marvel Studios invite you to the cinematic event

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 10>of the year with everything from.

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Action You Awesome, Stink You to romance kis for luck.

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Be careful There.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Pedro Pascal again in the trailer for Fantastic four First Steps,

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 4>which arrives in theaters this weekend. This is the third

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 4>attempt to bring the Fantastics to the screen, at least

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 4>in a version that isn't widely hated by audiences and critics.

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 4>There was two thousand and five's Chris Evans starring Fantastic Four,

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 4>and then it's two thousand and seven sequel Rise of

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 4>the Silver Surfer. Here's Roger Ebert weihine in should be

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 4>ashamed to show itself in the same theaters as good

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 4>superhero movies. And yes, I remember the competition was strong

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 4>around two thousand and five and two thousand and seven.

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 4>Ten years later we got Miles Teller and Michael B.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Jordan's turn. That one fared even worse. Here's a review

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 4>we dug up. Everyone on screen speaks in a flat,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 4>earnest monotone, bordering on openly not giving a rip. It's

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 4>a choice, a boring one, but a choice. Do those

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 4>words sound familiar, Michael.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Folks, I think that's a little detritis that floated off

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a one star review in The Tribune.

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, one star from Michael Phillips.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you did not enjoy that one. Well, another ten

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 4>years have passed and they're back. We have Pascal's Mister Fantastic,

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm, Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm,

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 4>and even Muss Backrex the Thing. But this one the

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 4>first Fantastic Four produced by Marvel Studios. It's directed by

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Matt Shackman. Is in the space age nineteen sixties, when

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the quartet first appeared in comics. So Michael, I saw

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 4>those first two Fantastic Four movies. Also not a fan.

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 4>I skipped the twenty fifteen one and didn't make it

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 4>to this latest iteration. So you are our Fantastic Four correspondent.

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Is the third time the charm.

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It is I mean, I mean it's not great. I

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's any way you can actually make

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>great super hero cinema in within the Marvel Studios realm

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, Uh, this far into the collective cultural fatigue.

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>We maybe we might I'll say might might be feeling

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as a populace. But this one's good and it has

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>some of that conspicuously lighter spirit of let's say, the

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>first ant Man film with Paul Rudd. Uh that that

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that to me felt like a relief when it came,

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:32.720
<v Speaker 1>because it was it wasn't It wasn't about yet another

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>apocalyptic sort of universe crushing scenario. Is more just about

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like regional trouble, you know, with the ant Man fighting

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the forces of darkness. All.

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I like that film, and I like this one too.

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, it's the first film in a while I've

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>seen from Marvel Studios in a quite a while that

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>actually gives you some images to remember rather than just

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a general wash of fan service. I mean,

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>it's actually really sharply production design for once. It's not

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it's not production design that gets completely smothered

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>by every other visual element, you know, the via, the

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>visual compiled, the digital compositing, the green screen stuff, all that.

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It actually is a really tasty look at Manhattan the sixties.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>If in an alternate universe, if the designers of Tomorrow

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Land redid Manhattan so that there's an awful lot of

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 1>skyscrapers that don't really exist on the never did exist

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>on the skyline. But you know, so you know, alongside

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this Chrysler building and the pan Am building, uh, you know,

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you get you get these kind of wonderful wonderful you know,

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>what if, what if? The what if? You know, the

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>jet Age, space Age. It's great, and there's kind of

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a movie that really trusts, maybe maybe to to

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a fault, the hangout factor. The audience might feel like,

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind hanging out with these four Fantastic four

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>as they sort of struggle through through various issues about

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's increasingly serious about like, okay, you know, are we

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>really going to deal with this ethical dilemma of doing

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what the nemesis in this story is asking, which involves

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a new family member, and it's a big issue. I

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to spoil it, but I did sense that

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>people were relaxing into enjoying it more than I've maybe

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>experienced in a lot of marvels lately. Pedro Pascal's good.

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he's kind of It's the first performance I've

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>seen it. It didn't seem surprising in any way it's

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a very steady, methodical performance. He's a very serious character.

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's Vanessa Kirby that really kind of takes off

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in this one. And you know, not great,

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but good, solidly good. And you know, I'm you know,

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Superman, which I also I know I like

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Superman more than you did. You didn't like it at all,

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>but I think we hated the same things about it,

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it had that sort of crushing, punishing,

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of like jokey sadism running through it, and that's

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>James Gunn at his worst. But I did like a

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the other bits of Superman that maybe most

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't go to a movie four like in fact,

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that there's a really interesting argument between

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Lois Lane and Clark Kent at the beginning of the

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>picture that's all about like how do we sell how

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>do we solve our relationship issues? And that scene is

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>not a joke, and it actually is like it's buying in,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, buying into the and and there's there's some

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of that, there's some of that even Superman very up

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and down film and kind of neurotically uneven and fantastic

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>four is much more confident and sort of just a gratifying,

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good picture all the way through. And look, I

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't you know these days. I'll take it.

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Superman, I'll admit part of the reason, but I'm

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 4>still recovering part of the reason I didn't make it

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 4>to Fantastic for But with your recommendation, and you know,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 4>people being relatively high on thunderbolts, I might maybe I'm

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 4>getting nudged, nudged back into the MCU here my Well,

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 4>we'll see what happens. Fantastic four First Steps is currently

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 4>playing in wide release. If you see it and agree

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 4>or disagree with Michael's take, let us know feedback at

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 4>filmspotting dot net.

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 7>What Hi, Okay, No, I gotta get to Colorado.

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 5>I gotta drop myself off the lake and then you're

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 5>gonna have your band back.

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not letting some birthday clown take me to Colorado.

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:25.840
<v Speaker 1>A birthday clown.

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 3>This is my vehicle.

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I need you to stop driving in Oh.

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 4>That's from the trailer for Sunlight from writer, director, and

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:39.479
<v Speaker 4>star Nina Kanti. Kanti plays Jane, and she's not, as

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 4>she states, a birthday clown, but she is dressed in

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 4>a full body monkey costume, which yeah, she wears for

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 4>most of the movies runtime. Michael, you know, I'm fascinated

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 4>with manimals. We did up Top five manimals together years ago,

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 4>one of you know, clearly the best top fives in

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 4>the show's history. I don't know if I'd actually go

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 4>a manimal direction here with Sunlight. It's not why I

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 4>am nominating it for our Golden Brick Award. Let me

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 4>just put it that way, But I do want to

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 4>throw Sunlight into the ring for a Golden Brick because, boy,

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 4>we talk about, you know, looking for movies to consider

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 4>for this award having original vision and taking bold strokes. Yeah,

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 4>how about a movie by a ventriloquist comedian of sorts

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:32.800
<v Speaker 4>who is writing it, co writing it, directing and starring

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 4>in a monkey costume. Just the fact that this works, Michael,

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 4>that this isn't an abject disaster, I think is worth admiring.

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 4>And it is much better than that. This film really

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 4>worked for me. Uh, and it is all about to

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.359
<v Speaker 4>my mind, Contie's performance in some ways, you can tell

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 4>it's a first film, and you know, maybe gets a

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:56.839
<v Speaker 4>little too easily cheery at the end. But this performance

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 4>she gives as Jane, the woman behind the mask is

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:05.720
<v Speaker 4>it's alarmingly entertaining and works on a number of levels.

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 4>The idea here Jane is basically fleeing an abusive relationship,

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 4>and you sense that past in the physicality of the

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 4>performance and in the way that Monkey she calls herself.

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Monkey is assertive, crude, and irrationally confident in the ways

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 4>that Jane can't otherwise be. She also speaks I think

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 4>what's supposed to be a vaguely British accent, which is

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 4>very funny. But most of the humor comes down to

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 4>that physicality. There are details like, you know, Jane just

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 4>resting her head on the dashboard of this vehicle. She

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 4>falls in with a man who's actually co wrote the film.

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 4>It's the co star here, Shanoah Allen. He's playing a

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 4>radio personality who's on the road and she falls in

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 4>with him and she's in his motor home. And when

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.240
<v Speaker 4>she just lays her head on the dashboard, there's something

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 4>melancholy funny about this mask doing it, and the mask

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 4>in general works. It has dead eyes and whenever she

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 4>looks at the camera, it's almost like a Rorschack test

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 4>for the audience, for the viewer trying to read what

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:14.399
<v Speaker 4>she might be thinking of what we're thinking about her.

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 4>But then comedy too. You know, she keeps her flip

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 4>phone in the monkey suit, so she has to zip

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 4>it down to get her phone out. When she gets hot,

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 4>she dumps some ice in the suit, and then there's

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 4>pathos as well, as we realize how severe the personality

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 4>split between Jane and Monkey has become, how it's escalating

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 4>and becoming something that's actually concerning. So this is it's

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 4>a cringe free ventriloquism movie that made me genuinely laugh

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 4>and I found moving, and that is a rare accomplishment that, yeah,

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 4>I think does make it worthy of a golden bricknut.

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I know two people who would have jolly will agree

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with you, and I really wish I'd seen some time

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. But my brother and his wife,

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>my brother and sister in law, saw this. They live

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The film was filmed in Albuquerque,

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico, and enquirens And so I think I think

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it's that second filmmaker you mentioned came and introduced it

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in this tiny, little, wonderful little art house theater that

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Albuquerque is sustaining quite nicely. And they loved it. They

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.439
<v Speaker 1>thought exactly the same. I mean, they laughed a lot.

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't believe that the premise didn't dry out after

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:35.919
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes, and by the end they were quite quite

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>touched by it. So it's, you know, it's what you're

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:42.359
<v Speaker 1>describing sounds. Remember that film Frank with Michael Fassbender and

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Domin All, which was quite good, quite good, right, And

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's that whole thing about sort of like you know,

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit about sort of like cloaking your identity but

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you know behind some crazy mask of you know, an

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>artificial front, right and yet finding a weird sort of

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 1>freedom minute. And you know, this is a simple idea,

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's a workable one. But I you know, your

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 1>recommendation on top of brother and sister and my sister law,

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to check it out good.

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad it's getting some good word of mouth.

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 3>That was probably Yeah.

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 4>Who I mentioned Shanoah Allen Kanti's creative partner you know

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 4>offscreen as well in other pursuits, but did co write

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Sunlight with her and also co stars in the film.

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:30.880
<v Speaker 4>So Sunlight had a limited theatrical run this month, but

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 4>it is available now on streaming services. Just came out

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 4>this week, so if it sounds intriguing to you, check

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 4>it out. And as far as the Golden Brick goes,

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 4>we have a healthy list of nominees at this point.

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 4>If you want to see other titles on there, go

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 4>to Film spotting dot net slash Bricks. Next week, Adam

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 4>is going to be back and we have a big

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 4>task ahead of us. We are going to indulge in

0:51:56.560 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 4>a Pantheon Project review of nineteen seventy five's One Flew

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Over the Cuckoo's Nest. It is the film's fiftieth anniversary.

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 4>It's been quite some time since I've seen it, so

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 4>we'll dig deep into that one, and we're gonna pair

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 4>it with our top five Jack Nicholson performances. Michael springing

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 4>this a little bit on you. I know I had

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 4>mentioned we were going to talk Joaquin Phoenix performances on

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 4>this show, but just top of your head, do you

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 4>have a go to favorite Nicholson performance or maybe a

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 4>less praised one that I should try to catch up

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 4>with as homework that you don't think folks talk about enough.

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, yeah, thanks for the thanks for the warning on that, Josh.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 4>You usually just go with the favorite, Just go with

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 4>the favorite, take the easy way out.

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Usually I devote a spa month to working these things

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 1>out privately.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.760
<v Speaker 4>But oh, as do I mean, that's our process.

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I really It was seventy four, I think, or seventy

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 1>three when I saw the last detail. Seventy four I

0:52:55.520 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>think Robert Towns script. Yes, that was you know, that

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was especially bracing to see your first as a probably

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>too young I saw a lot of our rated movies

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that year. That's kind of when it all started for me.

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But that was Nicholson. Nobody considered him anything anything predictable

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or familiar at that point. He was an established, you know,

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>presence for sure, but that he's great in the last detail,

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and he just drives the movies excellent, I think, in

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 1>a smaller role that I think I saw. I saw

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the film like it, don't love it, Reds saw it

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>recently again from is That eighty one? I think from

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Warren Baties film about John Reid and you know Dyan Keto,

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and Nicholson plays Eugene O'Neill and he loses almost all

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of what you might call the nicholsonisms in this This

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very the stern and very careful performance, full of charisma.

0:53:57.120 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>He's really a great, a great addition to that on.

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, those two, those two, all right.

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Last detail is homework that I recently did and it

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 4>was quite amazing. I'm comparing it to my experience with

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 4>Gene Hackman and al Pacino and Scarecrow when we did

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 4>our top five Hackman scenes. I caught up with Scarecrow

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 4>for the first time and you know, just felt horrible

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 4>for taking so long. Similarly with the last detail, it

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:27.879
<v Speaker 4>paid off and very likely will a Nicholson scene from

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 4>the last detail show up on my list. So that

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 4>is coming up next week. If you want to see

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:36.759
<v Speaker 4>our schedule of all our future shows, you can check

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 4>that out at filmspotting dot net slash episodes. Michael, you know,

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I've been doing Ebert Interrupt thiss out in Boulder, Colorado

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 4>at the Conference on World Affairs for a number of

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:50.799
<v Speaker 4>years now, and yeah, brought it a version of it,

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Cinema interruptis to Chicago last December, and am doing it

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 4>again just next month at the Gene Sisco Film Center.

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Have you I don't think you I've ever had a

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 4>chance to see Roger do interrupt this at Boulder, to do.

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>All those, Yeah, I'd love to do one a year

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 1>or sometime.

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 4>That would be great. That would be great. I hope

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 4>to do many more. But yeah, one of my great

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 4>regrets is not getting out to Boulder to do that

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 4>when Rodribert was doing it. But yeah, an honor to

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.839
<v Speaker 4>be able to continue the tradition and have a version

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 4>of it here in Chicago. So, as I mentioned, it's

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 4>going to be August eleven through fourteen, and we are

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 4>diving deep into nineteen ninety Two's the Player. It's part

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Film Center's Altman Centennial series Interrupt This is

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 4>four days of communal film criticism. That's how I've been

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 4>describing it to people. We basically will watch The Player

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 4>in its entirety on day one and then come back

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:46.719
<v Speaker 4>started at the beginning, and for subsequent days make our

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:49.320
<v Speaker 4>way through it scene by scene, and folks can yell, stop,

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:52.759
<v Speaker 4>ask a question, make a comment at any time. So

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 4>it's possible to come for all four days. Buy a

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 4>ticket package for that, that would be awesome. Make it

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 4>a journey, make it a team effort, join me on that.

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 4>But if you can only pop in for one day.

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Single day tickets are also available. You can get either

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of those at Cisclfilmcenter dot org. Slash Interruptis.

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask how it went with Phantom Thread?

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh, just as you can imagine a perfect movie for

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Interruptis where you can dive deep in every aspect, the cinematography,

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 4>that wonderful score, and the performances, but also that relationship

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:34.600
<v Speaker 4>between Alma and Reynolds, which you know, four days debating

0:56:34.640 --> 0:56:36.400
<v Speaker 4>that with folks, and I don't think we're any closer

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 4>to understanding the true nature of that relationship.

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, Phantom Thread. Fantom Thread was perfect.

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:44.919
<v Speaker 4>The Player a little different in terms of what we'll

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:49.319
<v Speaker 4>be dissecting, but I know those those Altman zooms. I'm

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:52.279
<v Speaker 4>going to spend some time on all the movie references

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 4>that are in there. I'm going to show some bonus

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 4>material from some of the films, the posters that are

0:56:56.960 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 4>in the background. So I think the Player will be

0:56:59.120 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 4>a different interrupt Us experience than Phantom Thread, but an

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:04.680
<v Speaker 4>equally rewarded one.

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's great to do that in a couple of weeks.

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 4>Again, if anyone wants tickets, go to Ciscofilmcenter dot org.

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Slash interrupt us This week on our sister podcast, The

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Next Picture Show, looking at cinema's present via its past.

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 4>They've got a new pairing and it's more Superman talk.

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 3>So yes, listeners.

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 4>If you were disappointed at my take and Adam's take,

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 4>we were both pretty down on James Gunns Superman and

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Michael's previous relative endorsement of it. If you want more,

0:57:35.280 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 4>perhaps you'll find support from the Next Picture Show. They're

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 4>going to be talking about the new Superman in relation

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 4>to the nineteen seventy eight Richard Donner Superman.

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Now that's a film.

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:49.600
<v Speaker 4>We did our top five Superman moments Michael on last

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 4>week's show and gave the seventy eight Superman a lot

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 4>of love, trying to make up for not loving the

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five. Now it's the Next Picture Show, folks

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 4>turn to I've Into Superman. New episodes drop every Tuesday.

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 4>You can get them wherever you get your podcasts. And

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 4>for more Next Picture Show related content, listen to Keith

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Phipps new podcast, The Laser Age. Keith, of course, one

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Next Picture Show hosts. Yeah, I've listened to

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Keith's first episode, enjoyed it. Quite a bit. This series

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 4>is exploring science fiction films from the second half of

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 4>the twentieth century. Again, you can find that wherever you

0:58:27.920 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 4>get your podcasts.

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 12>Sixty years of Whistler Black Home, two legendary mountains, thousands

0:58:32.880 --> 0:58:36.000
<v Speaker 12>of stories, ski and ride, legendary terrain and experienced world

0:58:36.040 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 12>class snowsport events, concerts at the edge of the mountain,

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:41.439
<v Speaker 12>gravity defining fire and ice shows and more. This winter,

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 12>go beyond plan your trip to Whistler Blackhome.

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait a minute, haven't I seen you before?

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 5>I know your face?

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Get out till I call my servant.

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 11>You know, I'm a Desmond.

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 8>Used to be in silent pictures, used to be big.

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I am big.

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.280
<v Speaker 6>It's the pictures that got no.

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 4>It is time for another deeply flawed film spotting pole

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:08.280
<v Speaker 4>question that was who else? Glorious Swanson with William Holden

0:59:08.400 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 4>and Billy Wilder's Sunset Boulevard. Sunset Boulevard is another film

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 4>that will be getting the Pantheon Project treatment in a

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks. We've been doing a lot of Wilder

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 4>this summer. We just revisited The Apartment a few shows ago,

0:59:24.200 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 4>thinking about these two Wilder films. Michael, I'm gonna. I'm

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:29.640
<v Speaker 4>gonna ask you a very tough question, or maybe it's

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:31.480
<v Speaker 4>very easy for you. You can only pick one. You

0:59:31.520 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 4>can only have one, The Apartment or Sunset Boulevard.

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>What is this July madness? I don't want to do

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of up stupid, stupid.

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:47.480
<v Speaker 4>You only participate in such things during film spotting madness,

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:50.800
<v Speaker 4>and even then it's more bigrudgingly than I do. So

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I guess you.

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess you're just not gonna answer, are you?

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>No? I will, I will? I think. I think Sunset

0:59:56.600 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Boulevard is the greater film. But I I really love

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The Apartment, and I love how The Apartment feels to

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a new generation seeking some sort of bittersweet romantic comedy

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that isn't all just a bunch of fall de all,

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a romantic comedy that really earns, you know,

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>both the laughs and sort of the pathos. People. There's

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a new generation. Every twenty minutes, there's a new twenty

1:00:29.280 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>two or twenty nine year old or fifteen year old

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that discovers The Apartment and they, maybe forever, maybe just

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for that year, it is their new favorite film. And

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I love that. So it's a tie. Josh, Sorry, Oh

1:00:42.760 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a tie.

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I see that's not allowed. You will be getting

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:49.560
<v Speaker 4>a letter from our attorney. But I can't attest to

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 4>your experience because for this conversation we had this rewatch.

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Both my daughters really enjoyed the apartment as well. And

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's recency by but I am going to make

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 4>a pick, and I'm going to go with the apartment. Nevertheless,

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 4>I am excited about revisiting Sunset Boulevard. Maybe I'll change

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 4>my answer, and that is the film that is inspiring

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:16.919
<v Speaker 4>our new poll question. Actresses plain actresses who are going

1:01:17.120 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 4>through it. So that is producer Sam way of limiting

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 4>this poll to performances that share. You know, they have

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 4>some anks to them, so he didn't want to He

1:01:26.000 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 4>didn't want to include comedies or musicals. He didn't want

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 4>to include apparently Dustin Hoffman as Tutsie. So it's actresses,

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 4>plain actresses who are going through it. Michael, I believe

1:01:36.000 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 4>you have the options, the pole options there in front

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 4>of you. Would you mind reading through those for us?

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd be honored. Josh Betty Davis, all about Eve Jenner, Rowlands,

1:01:47.640 --> 1:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Opening Night, Glorius Wanson, Sunset Boulevard Juliet Binoche, The Clouds

1:01:53.080 --> 1:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of Sils Maria Laura dern Inland Empire Good Choice, Naomi Watts,

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Maul Holland Drive List, Natalie Portman May December, Scarlett Johansson

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Asteroid City. That's a good list or other And I'd

1:02:08.360 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>love to hear if somebody come up with a good

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>There's others in that category, but that's a great list.

1:02:13.120 --> 1:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>It has your approval. Will it get a vote from you?

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Do you have an obvious choice? I'll say while you're thinking.

1:02:19.400 --> 1:02:21.720
<v Speaker 4>For me, I think I'm gonna have to go with

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Genner Rowlands. I know a woman under the Influence is

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 4>the broadly acclaimed consensus choice for her career performance, but man,

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:34.919
<v Speaker 4>is she incredible in Opening Night? So I think that's

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 4>where I would go. How about you, Michael Boy.

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen that for decades, so I'd have to

1:02:45.080 --> 1:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>see it again to kind of see where it falls

1:02:47.040 --> 1:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on the list for any But you know, I guess

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'd had to go, if I had to go

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for nineteen fifty's, it's either all about ev or Sunset Boulevard.

1:02:57.120 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'd probably go Betty Davis actually, uh, and

1:03:02.280 --> 1:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably go for more more modern. I'd probably go

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Nailmi watch because I just you know, I think that

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know that that what she has to do in

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Mulholland Drive is make sense of two very different psychees

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's, uh, it's great work. So yeah, that's very

1:03:17.280 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a fruitful, A fruitful list Sam, Sam, Yeah.

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 4>A fruitful less okay, And and yet you're still trying

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:26.640
<v Speaker 4>to square them out of it. I see, Okay, that's fine.

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 4>I am listeners who can vote, who can just choose,

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:31.920
<v Speaker 4>who could just choose one who could be disciplined. You

1:03:32.040 --> 1:03:33.680
<v Speaker 4>can do that, and you can also leave a comment

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>at film spotting dot net. We're going to share results

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>and some feedback in a couple of weeks.

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:43.480
<v Speaker 8>I am so sorry.

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 12>From what your daddy passed down to you, but I

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 12>wanted a child the greatest gift of my life.

1:03:59.200 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm visiting my.

1:04:01.960 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>That's Joaquin Phoenix and bo Is Afraid from director Ari

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Astor back in twenty twenty three. Adam and I use

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:11.800
<v Speaker 4>the occasion of bo to share our top five Phoenix performances,

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 4>with Phoenix reuniting with Astor again in Eddington. We are

1:04:15.800 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 4>reuniting you, the listener, with this top five But before

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>we get to that, Michael, since you're here, only natural

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 4>to ask if there are any favorite Joaquin Phoenix performances

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 4>you'd like to talk about.

1:04:28.720 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>MM. Yeah, yeah, there's a few. There's Yeah, I guess

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I like the ones for me, the ones that require

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to him a different side than than the more obvious

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of strangulated torment, you know, the one, the stuff

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that wins oscars, you know, vis A v. Joker. Let's say,

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I actually really like this. It's super solid work and

1:04:56.440 --> 1:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>walk the line, and he turned out to be a

1:04:58.400 --> 1:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>very good choice for that Johnny biopic. I think The

1:05:02.480 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Master is really inventive work that daringly starts on such

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>an extreme note of distress with that character Freddie Quell,

1:05:14.440 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that the movie can barely recover from it, but somehow

1:05:17.360 --> 1:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it does. And so it is Phoenix. I really love

1:05:20.280 --> 1:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>his work with Spike Jones on Her, which I am

1:05:24.600 --> 1:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>due for a rewatch, but I haven't seen it since

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it came on, I think all the way through. But

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>another one I'd utterly forgotten, and this is the other

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one i'd mentioned. Another one I'd almost forgot is Lynn

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey's You Were Never Really Here Where that's much more

1:05:39.000 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of a I mean, that's an explosively violent picture, and

1:05:42.920 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I had you know, it's only since twenty seventeenths only

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>been eight years since I've seen it, but I you know,

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't retain much of a clear memory of it,

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>but rereading it, his work is really good in that

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and I just think he is. One of the best

1:05:55.240 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>things about Phoenix is he really seeks out and responds

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to a variety of directors that he may lock horns

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with half the time. I don't know. I suspect he does,

1:06:08.840 --> 1:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's what's keeping him reasonably more than reasonably, that's

1:06:14.240 --> 1:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>what's keeping him vital and worth seeing what he's up

1:06:19.000 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to next. The one thing he can't do, Josh, you

1:06:22.320 --> 1:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>want to hear it. The one thing that I think

1:06:24.400 --> 1:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>will never get from Watkin Phoenix, the one thing he

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have. And no actor has everything or can do

1:06:31.720 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>everything or anything. He doesn't have great verbal facility. I

1:06:35.800 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think he knows how to use his voice beautifully in

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different keys and for different kind of

1:06:42.600 --> 1:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>shades of character. But when you see something like Inherent Weiss,

1:06:46.960 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>which is all about that, that's what I was thinking

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to play. Yeah, he's not a guy who can spin

1:06:52.280 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of crazy gobblybook crisply. You know, he

1:06:56.960 --> 1:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that. It's just it's something. It's just part

1:06:59.720 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of its just the physical equipment you're born with. Part

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of it is the training you either have or have

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have as a screen actor. It's the one thing

1:07:08.160 --> 1:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, it's it's the one thing in almost

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>every kind of film he's done. He's done almost every

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>genre where if he has to do that where he

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>has to really propulsively zip through a scene, and it's

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about just how fast you can handle the

1:07:22.160 --> 1:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>language and sling it, you know, in another character's direction.

1:07:25.760 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He's not the guy. And that's an interesting interesting I

1:07:29.280 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call it a drawback, but because you know, he

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is just like every other really good actor on the planet.

1:07:33.960 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>He cannot do everything equally well. But those are those

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>are some of the ones I think very fondly of.

1:07:39.720 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, now, can I pay you a licensing fee or

1:07:43.080 --> 1:07:48.480
<v Speaker 4>something and use the phrase strangulated torment to describe Phoenix

1:07:48.840 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 4>going forward? Because I think that's just perfect that that

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:55.120
<v Speaker 4>is what he specializes in, especially in something like The Master,

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 4>and it's just so so good at evoking that sort

1:07:58.600 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 4>of experience. Look at your fee structure, Michael, and get

1:08:03.240 --> 1:08:04.440
<v Speaker 4>back to me, because I do want to I do

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:07.120
<v Speaker 4>want to use that phrase at some point. Now, speaking

1:08:07.160 --> 1:08:10.040
<v Speaker 4>of her, which you called out as listeners will hear,

1:08:10.280 --> 1:08:14.360
<v Speaker 4>that was a performance that we excluded from our top

1:08:14.560 --> 1:08:18.640
<v Speaker 4>five list, Michael, And that's where Phoenix played Theodore of

1:08:18.720 --> 1:08:21.080
<v Speaker 4>course and Spike Jones is her. The reason we did

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:24.560
<v Speaker 4>that is because we had devoted a bonus episode to

1:08:24.760 --> 1:08:27.600
<v Speaker 4>that film for its tenth anniversary, which I think was

1:08:27.680 --> 1:08:30.160
<v Speaker 4>right around the time we did this top five list,

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:35.080
<v Speaker 4>So there was a lot of talk about Phoenix's performance

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 4>in her on that bonus episode. We did repost that

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:41.439
<v Speaker 4>her review in our main podcast feed this week, so

1:08:41.520 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>you can find that wherever you get your podcasts. And

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you want to make sure you always

1:08:45.880 --> 1:08:48.320
<v Speaker 4>get our monthly bonus episodes, just join the film Spotting

1:08:48.360 --> 1:08:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Family at film spottingfamily dot com. All right now, from

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:55.960
<v Speaker 4>April twenty twenty three, here are our top five Joaquin

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Phoenix performances.

1:09:02.000 --> 1:09:04.639
<v Speaker 7>We are ready to dive into this top five look

1:09:04.680 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 7>at our favorite performances by someone who is one of

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:11.799
<v Speaker 7>the best actors, if not the best actors working today.

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:16.160
<v Speaker 7>We do have one disclaimer. We're setting aside one film

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:19.599
<v Speaker 7>that would have definitely made both of our lists, one

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.760
<v Speaker 7>performance by Joaquin Phoenix. And that's not because it's been

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:25.840
<v Speaker 7>talked about a lot over the course of the show's history.

1:09:25.840 --> 1:09:28.200
<v Speaker 7>It's actually because we're going to be talking about it

1:09:28.600 --> 1:09:29.080
<v Speaker 7>coming up.

1:09:29.640 --> 1:09:32.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have our next bonus show for film Spotting

1:09:32.960 --> 1:09:36.760
<v Speaker 4>family members focusing on Her, the ten year old. It's

1:09:36.800 --> 1:09:40.320
<v Speaker 4>the tenth anniversary of Spike Jones's Her Believe it or Not,

1:09:40.479 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 4>so that was one reason we wanted to revisit it.

1:09:42.800 --> 1:09:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Also considering Joaquin Phoenix for this top five, and with

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:48.320
<v Speaker 4>bo as Afraid, we thought it'd be another good chance

1:09:48.400 --> 1:09:51.000
<v Speaker 4>to take a look at her. And of course we're

1:09:51.040 --> 1:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>living right now, not only in the Age of Ai

1:09:53.439 --> 1:09:56.519
<v Speaker 4>but Chet GPT, so that plot is going to have

1:09:56.560 --> 1:09:59.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of resonance for us, I think, and we

1:09:59.360 --> 1:10:02.200
<v Speaker 4>will be spent a fair amount of time talking about

1:10:02.280 --> 1:10:05.799
<v Speaker 4>Phoenix's performance in Her, So we are setting that aside,

1:10:05.920 --> 1:10:09.040
<v Speaker 4>putting it in the penalty box for this list. Officially,

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 4>though I think we can say, Adam, it would be

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 4>on both of our last.

1:10:12.320 --> 1:10:15.840
<v Speaker 7>Otherword, yes, one of his best performances as Theodore in

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:19.040
<v Speaker 7>her without a doubt. Let's get into our list, though,

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.439
<v Speaker 7>I can't wait to hear what you've got at number five.

1:10:22.080 --> 1:10:25.400
<v Speaker 4>All right, I am going sort of back to the

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:29.599
<v Speaker 4>beginning with Jimmy Emmett from To Die For Now. Phoenix

1:10:29.720 --> 1:10:31.720
<v Speaker 4>had been in a number of pictures before, so this

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 4>isn't exactly his first or second role even, but it

1:10:35.240 --> 1:10:39.280
<v Speaker 4>was his breakout Gus Vinceyan's nineteen ninety five satire about

1:10:39.360 --> 1:10:42.800
<v Speaker 4>fame and celebrity. Phoenix's Jimmy is one of the high

1:10:42.800 --> 1:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>schoolers who falls under the spell of Nicole Kidman's aspiring

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:51.200
<v Speaker 4>TV reporter. She seduces him, manipulates him into killing her husband.

1:10:52.120 --> 1:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Didn't you just get a divorce and then you get

1:10:56.040 --> 1:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the conte and he get the car.

1:11:00.280 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 9>Quality from me?

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I really think I'm just a kid, But.

1:11:08.720 --> 1:11:13.200
<v Speaker 8>I can never do anything bad to you or I

1:11:13.360 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 8>ever hurt you. A guy that does that to someone

1:11:17.160 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 8>like you doesn't deserve to live.

1:11:21.520 --> 1:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the cheesy.

1:11:22.280 --> 1:11:23.280
<v Speaker 8>Doesn't deserve to live.

1:11:25.479 --> 1:11:30.160
<v Speaker 9>No, I suppose you're right he doesn't.

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:34.960
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting to me about this performance, especially looking through

1:11:35.000 --> 1:11:37.360
<v Speaker 4>the lens of the rest of Phoenix's career, is that

1:11:37.600 --> 1:11:41.599
<v Speaker 4>right from the start, he had no interest in audience sympathy,

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:44.519
<v Speaker 4>did not seem like something that he cared about was

1:11:44.600 --> 1:11:50.240
<v Speaker 4>on his radar at all, Yet he nevertheless gets it somehow.

1:11:50.439 --> 1:11:54.879
<v Speaker 4>In this character, we do have a bit of sympathy

1:11:55.000 --> 1:11:58.559
<v Speaker 4>for Jimmy Emmett, even though he's a messy kid making

1:11:58.680 --> 1:12:03.080
<v Speaker 4>bad decisions. Phoenix brings that out in us while being

1:12:03.160 --> 1:12:05.600
<v Speaker 4>completely committed to those more negative.

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Aspects of the character.

1:12:07.000 --> 1:12:09.120
<v Speaker 4>I did turn to social media to help me make

1:12:09.280 --> 1:12:12.720
<v Speaker 4>some of these other Phoenix performance picks, just to see

1:12:13.200 --> 1:12:15.519
<v Speaker 4>beyond her, you know, and some of the other obvious ones,

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:19.639
<v Speaker 4>what people's favorites were. And I got a few interesting responses.

1:12:19.680 --> 1:12:21.719
<v Speaker 4>When it came to Jimmy Emmett here a few people

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:25.000
<v Speaker 4>who also picked it. Adam Rupert touched on this audience

1:12:25.040 --> 1:12:28.519
<v Speaker 4>sympathy quality on Facebook said that scene where he's shaking

1:12:28.600 --> 1:12:32.280
<v Speaker 4>so bad while being questioned by the police heartbreaking, and

1:12:32.360 --> 1:12:35.800
<v Speaker 4>then over on Twitter, Marissa Jude, she's at Marissa Jude

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:40.000
<v Speaker 4>here said, Phoenix reminded me of Juliet Lewis's performance in

1:12:40.120 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Cape Fear. The exquisite and nuanced expression of vulnerability and

1:12:44.439 --> 1:12:49.240
<v Speaker 4>desire that seems unteachable well said by both. I love

1:12:49.320 --> 1:12:52.840
<v Speaker 4>that comparison to Juliet lewis also one of those just

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:58.439
<v Speaker 4>deeply uncomfortable, unsettling breakout performances from a younger performer, and

1:12:58.560 --> 1:13:00.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it does apply to what Phoenix is doing

1:13:00.720 --> 1:13:02.479
<v Speaker 4>here as Jimmy Emma in to.

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:05.720
<v Speaker 7>Die for an honorable mention for me one that was

1:13:05.760 --> 1:13:09.400
<v Speaker 7>a strong contender for my top five, And you're right,

1:13:09.520 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 7>the performance that surely put him on the map for

1:13:12.920 --> 1:13:14.800
<v Speaker 7>a lot of viewers put him on the map for me.

1:13:15.000 --> 1:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Now.

1:13:15.640 --> 1:13:19.160
<v Speaker 7>I had seen him first as Leaf Phoenix, then in

1:13:19.320 --> 1:13:22.160
<v Speaker 7>Space Camp in the mid eighties, but I wasn't paying

1:13:22.160 --> 1:13:25.719
<v Speaker 7>a whole lot of attention then to him as someone

1:13:25.760 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 7>who I thought would be one of the best actors

1:13:28.240 --> 1:13:31.519
<v Speaker 7>of his generation. But you're correct, and the listener is

1:13:31.600 --> 1:13:35.640
<v Speaker 7>correct that he plays a character who shouldn't be heartbreaking,

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:40.080
<v Speaker 7>but is. He's a killer, and we have to buy

1:13:40.840 --> 1:13:44.439
<v Speaker 7>that he's going to make the leap he does. As

1:13:44.520 --> 1:13:48.960
<v Speaker 7>a character, he's naive, certainly, he's malleable, he's gullible in

1:13:49.080 --> 1:13:52.479
<v Speaker 7>that way, but he doesn't seem overly dangerous. And for

1:13:52.640 --> 1:13:54.760
<v Speaker 7>him then to get to that point where he is

1:13:54.880 --> 1:13:58.519
<v Speaker 7>going to murder Matt Dillon's character. We have to buy that,

1:13:59.160 --> 1:14:03.880
<v Speaker 7>and we by it because Phoenix makes him damaged enough

1:14:04.280 --> 1:14:07.280
<v Speaker 7>that you can go there as quickly as you do

1:14:07.760 --> 1:14:10.160
<v Speaker 7>with him. But then he also plays him as an innocent,

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:14.560
<v Speaker 7>so that he just becomes part of this tragic, manipulative

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:17.400
<v Speaker 7>web of Kidman's character. He's another victim in at all.

1:14:17.720 --> 1:14:20.160
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if damaged is going to come up quite

1:14:20.160 --> 1:14:22.080
<v Speaker 4>a bit on our lists. That word, that's a good one,

1:14:22.120 --> 1:14:23.040
<v Speaker 4>that fits absolutely.

1:14:23.439 --> 1:14:27.720
<v Speaker 7>My number five Walking Phoenix performance is the performance that

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:31.440
<v Speaker 7>earned him the first of his four Academy Award nominations.

1:14:31.680 --> 1:14:32.400
<v Speaker 3>He did not win.

1:14:32.680 --> 1:14:35.599
<v Speaker 7>We know he won for a performance that might come

1:14:35.720 --> 1:14:39.400
<v Speaker 7>up later on one of our lists, Josh. This was

1:14:39.439 --> 1:14:44.559
<v Speaker 7>his Best Supporting Actor nominated turn as comedists in Ridley

1:14:44.600 --> 1:14:50.439
<v Speaker 7>Scott's Gladiator, and I googled this just Gladiator Comedists earlier

1:14:50.479 --> 1:14:53.000
<v Speaker 7>today to get a little bit of background on the

1:14:53.080 --> 1:14:55.920
<v Speaker 7>real life person that he was portraying. Not that it matters,

1:14:55.960 --> 1:14:58.600
<v Speaker 7>but I was curious because I hadn't read anything, and

1:14:58.920 --> 1:15:00.960
<v Speaker 7>this is the first thing that popped. Commodist was a

1:15:01.080 --> 1:15:04.640
<v Speaker 7>terrible ruler by virtually any standard. His fictionalized depiction as

1:15:04.680 --> 1:15:07.800
<v Speaker 7>a mad emperor in the film Gladiator actually plays down

1:15:07.920 --> 1:15:11.280
<v Speaker 7>some of his less believable excesses while giving him a

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:14.040
<v Speaker 7>nobler death. So just keep that in mind, Josh, that

1:15:14.160 --> 1:15:20.000
<v Speaker 7>that sniveling, conniving, evil little baby that Joaque in Phoenix

1:15:20.120 --> 1:15:23.160
<v Speaker 7>plays is actually exhibiting some restraint.

1:15:23.320 --> 1:15:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, he's underplaying at apparently right underplaying it.

1:15:26.840 --> 1:15:31.919
<v Speaker 7>We joke. I do genuinely enjoy the theatricality of their performance.

1:15:31.920 --> 1:15:36.360
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a nice counter to the untheatricality of

1:15:36.680 --> 1:15:40.639
<v Speaker 7>Russell Crowe's performance. We get one great moment I always

1:15:40.680 --> 1:15:43.839
<v Speaker 7>see in my head where comedist is watching a battle

1:15:43.880 --> 1:15:47.920
<v Speaker 7>and there's a big blood spurt and he lets out

1:15:48.000 --> 1:15:51.280
<v Speaker 7>this lusty response with his tongue hanging out and he's

1:15:51.320 --> 1:15:54.680
<v Speaker 7>kind of grinning his teeth and growling at the response.

1:15:55.240 --> 1:15:59.760
<v Speaker 7>But in general, that character, the way Phoenix portrays him,

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:04.080
<v Speaker 7>is anksier than Robert Pattinson in The Batman and Adam

1:16:04.200 --> 1:16:07.519
<v Speaker 7>Driver in any of those Star Wars movies combined. He

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:13.120
<v Speaker 7>is so quiet and deliberate, it's as if it's wrenching

1:16:13.280 --> 1:16:16.600
<v Speaker 7>him to even speak. It pains him so much. And

1:16:16.960 --> 1:16:20.799
<v Speaker 7>he's a weak character. He's more than that. He's evil.

1:16:21.640 --> 1:16:27.240
<v Speaker 7>But Phoenix really does give him some dimension. We see

1:16:27.320 --> 1:16:31.599
<v Speaker 7>the emotional havoc. It reeks on him to be weak,

1:16:31.920 --> 1:16:34.960
<v Speaker 7>to not live up to his father's image or to

1:16:35.160 --> 1:16:41.759
<v Speaker 7>his father's expectations, and Phoenix amplifies, I think, his self awareness.

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Even then it was as if you didn't want me

1:16:44.160 --> 1:16:44.599
<v Speaker 8>for your.

1:16:44.520 --> 1:16:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Son, Cominos, you go too far.

1:16:51.280 --> 1:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>The faces off the god waste. Please you can make

1:16:57.720 --> 1:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>you proud.

1:17:00.080 --> 1:17:02.839
<v Speaker 8>Kind what one fullock?

1:17:04.200 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 7>You will just help me, Phoenix with Richard Harris there

1:17:09.960 --> 1:17:15.880
<v Speaker 7>as Marcus Aurelius, one full hug. Josh pressed me to

1:17:16.000 --> 1:17:20.200
<v Speaker 7>your chest and held me tight. That's that's all he's

1:17:20.680 --> 1:17:23.360
<v Speaker 7>longed for. I guarantee you that Russell Crowe's Maximus is

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:27.000
<v Speaker 7>never saying the word hug in a Gladiator, and we

1:17:27.120 --> 1:17:30.280
<v Speaker 7>don't expect any characters to say the word hug in

1:17:30.360 --> 1:17:33.360
<v Speaker 7>a lot of Gladiator type movies. But when he says,

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:37.679
<v Speaker 7>all I've ever wanted was to live up to you, Caesar, father,

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:42.880
<v Speaker 7>you believe him, You really believe the emotional depth of that.

1:17:43.960 --> 1:17:47.200
<v Speaker 4>I have not seen Gladiator since it came out when

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I liked it well enough, But it's interesting, you know

1:17:50.160 --> 1:17:52.840
<v Speaker 4>how careers have gone in terms of the stars and

1:17:52.920 --> 1:17:56.360
<v Speaker 4>so forth. The reason I would rewatch Gladiator now is

1:17:56.520 --> 1:18:00.920
<v Speaker 4>to reconsider that woking Phoenix performance, just how his career

1:18:00.960 --> 1:18:04.200
<v Speaker 4>has ascended, Russell Crows, Russell Crows has tailed off, and

1:18:04.240 --> 1:18:06.080
<v Speaker 4>you wouldn't think that. Yeah, I'm gonna go look at

1:18:06.080 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Gladiator again for the acting necessarily, but that is what

1:18:09.360 --> 1:18:11.080
<v Speaker 4>still intrigues me, and maybe I'll have to do a

1:18:11.160 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 4>revisit for that, all right. Number four for me is

1:18:14.880 --> 1:18:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Merril hess in signs. This is Phoenix in likable mode

1:18:19.320 --> 1:18:22.920
<v Speaker 4>in m Night Shyamalan's Alien Invasion thriller. Likable mode is

1:18:22.960 --> 1:18:27.639
<v Speaker 4>something he can do and does on occasion. Not very often, however,

1:18:27.880 --> 1:18:31.280
<v Speaker 4>but it's kind of fun and rewarding when he pulls

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>it out of his tool kit. I also like here

1:18:34.320 --> 1:18:39.040
<v Speaker 4>how he effortlessly slips into what is essentially an ensemble piece.

1:18:39.080 --> 1:18:41.439
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Mel Gibson is the lead, of course, but

1:18:41.640 --> 1:18:44.439
<v Speaker 4>this is an ensemble drama in a lot of ways,

1:18:44.680 --> 1:18:48.000
<v Speaker 4>and Phoenix comes in to do things you might not expect,

1:18:48.120 --> 1:18:50.960
<v Speaker 4>to lighten the mood, lighten the movie's edges a little bit.

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:55.000
<v Speaker 4>He just has a wonderfully light comic touch, and I

1:18:55.040 --> 1:18:58.880
<v Speaker 4>think it's probably best displayed when he gives the response

1:18:59.080 --> 1:19:04.480
<v Speaker 4>to Mel Gibson and his long soliloquy about miracles or coincidences.

1:19:04.760 --> 1:19:07.720
<v Speaker 4>This is an occasion of Shyamalan, I think, also kind

1:19:07.760 --> 1:19:10.759
<v Speaker 4>of undercutting himself and being aware of his grund eloquent

1:19:11.160 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 4>tendencies with this soliloquy here. But then in comes Phoenix.

1:19:15.640 --> 1:19:18.759
<v Speaker 4>Merrill has given this whole speech some you know, probably

1:19:18.880 --> 1:19:22.639
<v Speaker 4>not so deep thought, and he decides he's a miracle

1:19:22.720 --> 1:19:24.479
<v Speaker 4>man who was at this party.

1:19:24.560 --> 1:19:30.840
<v Speaker 8>Once I'm on my couch with the random McKinney. She's

1:19:30.880 --> 1:19:36.479
<v Speaker 8>just sitting there looking beautiful, staring at me. I go

1:19:36.640 --> 1:19:43.360
<v Speaker 8>to leave him and kiss her. Realize I've got side.

1:19:43.400 --> 1:19:47.679
<v Speaker 8>Turn do you have the gum stuff in the paper?

1:19:47.760 --> 1:19:52.919
<v Speaker 8>Come next to the sofa and turn around. Random McKinney

1:19:53.000 --> 1:19:58.880
<v Speaker 8>throws up all over herself. I knew this a cand

1:19:58.920 --> 1:20:03.000
<v Speaker 8>it happened. It was a miracle. I could have been

1:20:03.080 --> 1:20:06.439
<v Speaker 8>kissing her when she threw up. Now I want to

1:20:06.439 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 8>scar me for life.

1:20:07.920 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 4>Meryl is the sort of part that this movie, you know,

1:20:11.320 --> 1:20:15.880
<v Speaker 4>signs didn't really need Meryl necessarily, but because of Phoenix's

1:20:15.920 --> 1:20:18.719
<v Speaker 4>performance now when I think about it, I can't imagine

1:20:18.760 --> 1:20:20.680
<v Speaker 4>the film without him, you know, just because of the

1:20:21.080 --> 1:20:25.120
<v Speaker 4>contributions he makes and again the different vibes he brings

1:20:25.200 --> 1:20:29.000
<v Speaker 4>to this film. Another fan of this performance is Aaron

1:20:29.040 --> 1:20:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Bergstrom over on Twitter at Aaron Bergstrom. He wrote, Phoenix

1:20:32.240 --> 1:20:35.320
<v Speaker 4>is so often associated with playing weirdos, often dangerous ones.

1:20:35.400 --> 1:20:37.519
<v Speaker 4>So when I look back at his performance as a

1:20:37.600 --> 1:20:40.760
<v Speaker 4>well meaning fella like Meryl, I appreciate how good he

1:20:40.920 --> 1:20:45.640
<v Speaker 4>is at depicting loyalty and bravery. So yeah, maybe a

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:48.000
<v Speaker 4>simpler character than some of the others he plays, but

1:20:48.360 --> 1:20:49.280
<v Speaker 4>he plays it just right.

1:20:49.720 --> 1:20:52.800
<v Speaker 7>He does very good in that scene, very good in

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 7>that film. Interesting that we've got back to back choices

1:20:56.600 --> 1:21:02.280
<v Speaker 7>in which we hear Joaquin Phoenix whispering primarily very very

1:21:02.360 --> 1:21:07.519
<v Speaker 7>quietly different circumstances, and Merrill not exactly an evil character.

1:21:07.760 --> 1:21:11.760
<v Speaker 7>My number four, I've got another weirdo, definitely one of

1:21:12.240 --> 1:21:16.040
<v Speaker 7>Woking Phoenix's weirdos. And you were talking about him in

1:21:16.120 --> 1:21:19.200
<v Speaker 7>terms of whether he plays characters who are likable or unlikable.

1:21:19.280 --> 1:21:22.360
<v Speaker 7>This is one who I don't even know where to

1:21:22.720 --> 1:21:25.559
<v Speaker 7>put him on that scale. And it's not because he's

1:21:25.640 --> 1:21:28.720
<v Speaker 7>got things about him that make him someone that you

1:21:29.760 --> 1:21:33.400
<v Speaker 7>really respond to favorably and even aspire to be like.

1:21:34.160 --> 1:21:36.200
<v Speaker 7>That's not the case at all. But he also isn't

1:21:36.680 --> 1:21:39.720
<v Speaker 7>so bad that you despise him ever, either.

1:21:39.760 --> 1:21:40.280
<v Speaker 3>He's just an.

1:21:40.200 --> 1:21:44.600
<v Speaker 7>Immensely flawed character. And that character is Leonard Creditor in

1:21:44.760 --> 1:21:48.720
<v Speaker 7>James Gray's Two Lovers. So multiple collaborations with James Gray.

1:21:49.200 --> 1:21:53.200
<v Speaker 7>I'm going with his performance as Leonard in Two Lovers.

1:21:53.439 --> 1:21:57.120
<v Speaker 7>What a trip down memory lane. It was Josh reminding

1:21:57.520 --> 1:22:02.120
<v Speaker 7>myself about this film, this performance, and the context around it.

1:22:02.240 --> 1:22:06.760
<v Speaker 7>I had completely forgotten that Two Lovers, the movie and

1:22:06.920 --> 1:22:11.519
<v Speaker 7>this performance were totally overshadowed at the time by the

1:22:11.600 --> 1:22:17.000
<v Speaker 7>Shenanigans surrounding the filming of I'm Still Here, which would

1:22:17.040 --> 1:22:19.960
<v Speaker 7>come out two years later, or actually just a little

1:22:20.040 --> 1:22:22.479
<v Speaker 7>over a year later. In terms of when we reviewed

1:22:22.920 --> 1:22:25.639
<v Speaker 7>this film Two Lovers on the show was February twenty seventh,

1:22:25.720 --> 1:22:30.160
<v Speaker 7>two thousand and nine. That infamous David Letterman appearance was

1:22:30.280 --> 1:22:33.680
<v Speaker 7>February eleventh, two thousand and nine, so this was all

1:22:33.800 --> 1:22:36.519
<v Speaker 7>in the wake of that, and people were really watching

1:22:36.600 --> 1:22:41.400
<v Speaker 7>Two Lovers thinking it was Woquin Phoenix's swan song from acting.

1:22:42.000 --> 1:22:45.479
<v Speaker 7>It was supposedly his final performance as an actor because

1:22:45.520 --> 1:22:49.559
<v Speaker 7>he was retiring to become a rapper, and with all

1:22:49.600 --> 1:22:53.439
<v Speaker 7>of that, he had apparently completely lost his mind.

1:22:55.360 --> 1:22:58.800
<v Speaker 10>So here's my hope that after some time off and

1:22:58.880 --> 1:23:00.519
<v Speaker 10>I think you're taking a little time off tonight.

1:23:04.520 --> 1:23:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I I'm hopeful that you will.

1:23:08.040 --> 1:23:10.840
<v Speaker 10>Reconsider and and come back to acting because you're just

1:23:10.960 --> 1:23:13.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, there's nobody really better than you are.

1:23:14.320 --> 1:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I still like.

1:23:21.120 --> 1:23:24.040
<v Speaker 13>I say never, right, I don't I don't know, I

1:23:24.080 --> 1:23:26.280
<v Speaker 13>don't know what, I don't know if, I don't know

1:23:26.400 --> 1:23:26.920
<v Speaker 13>what will happen.

1:23:27.720 --> 1:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>But you you are You're not gonna act anymore? No, huh?

1:23:33.040 --> 1:23:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Why is that?

1:23:35.160 --> 1:23:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Mmm?

1:23:37.600 --> 1:23:37.960
<v Speaker 8>I don't know.

1:23:40.040 --> 1:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have given up some thought.

1:23:43.000 --> 1:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>This will come up some more.

1:23:46.840 --> 1:23:49.479
<v Speaker 7>But going through my notes, it was amazing because I

1:23:49.600 --> 1:23:51.880
<v Speaker 7>look back on these different films that have been reviewed

1:23:51.920 --> 1:23:56.680
<v Speaker 7>on the show, how many times I'd use synonyms to

1:23:56.840 --> 1:24:00.479
<v Speaker 7>describe his characters and movies. In this case, it was

1:24:00.520 --> 1:24:03.679
<v Speaker 7>talking about a character who was always kind of floating

1:24:04.120 --> 1:24:07.679
<v Speaker 7>through these scenes, disconnected from everything that the movie itself

1:24:07.720 --> 1:24:11.080
<v Speaker 7>has an ethereal quality to it. It's basically a fable.

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:15.599
<v Speaker 7>You could apply similar words and phrases to Bo's Afraid

1:24:15.800 --> 1:24:18.839
<v Speaker 7>or to some of these other performances that we'll probably

1:24:19.080 --> 1:24:22.080
<v Speaker 7>talk about for those who don't remember. Two lovers. It's

1:24:22.640 --> 1:24:25.200
<v Speaker 7>pretty much what the name suggests. It's a movie about

1:24:25.240 --> 1:24:28.840
<v Speaker 7>a love triangle. Leonard is involved with two different women.

1:24:29.160 --> 1:24:32.519
<v Speaker 7>One who really wants to take care of him and

1:24:32.720 --> 1:24:36.040
<v Speaker 7>wants to love him, and he's too neurotic to let

1:24:36.080 --> 1:24:38.080
<v Speaker 7>her do it. That's Vanessa Shaw's character. And then there's

1:24:38.080 --> 1:24:41.400
<v Speaker 7>another woman who he wants to take care of and

1:24:42.120 --> 1:24:44.680
<v Speaker 7>she's the one with the issues in allowing him to

1:24:44.720 --> 1:24:48.400
<v Speaker 7>do that. That's Gwyneth Paltrow's character. But there's a melancholy

1:24:49.040 --> 1:24:54.080
<v Speaker 7>to Leonard that makes him endearing or certainly endearing enough.

1:24:54.280 --> 1:24:59.600
<v Speaker 7>And there's an intimacy that Gray captures with Phoenix and

1:25:00.280 --> 1:25:05.400
<v Speaker 7>these women that is really striking in the way Phoenix

1:25:05.520 --> 1:25:10.000
<v Speaker 7>can often be intimate on screen and also make you

1:25:10.160 --> 1:25:13.040
<v Speaker 7>a little bit uncomfortable at the same time, there's an

1:25:13.120 --> 1:25:18.840
<v Speaker 7>intensity to these intimate scenes that can be both off

1:25:18.920 --> 1:25:22.280
<v Speaker 7>putting and something that also brings you in. And what

1:25:22.400 --> 1:25:26.160
<v Speaker 7>really stands out about Phoenix in this role, but again,

1:25:26.280 --> 1:25:29.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm sure many others we might get to. He's someone

1:25:29.360 --> 1:25:33.760
<v Speaker 7>who's utterly uninterested in vanity. He has no interest in

1:25:33.880 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 7>being cool on screen, and Leonard is not cool, and

1:25:36.960 --> 1:25:40.599
<v Speaker 7>he also has no interest in being conventionally masculine, which

1:25:40.680 --> 1:25:42.360
<v Speaker 7>is also one of the things that I think really

1:25:42.439 --> 1:25:48.160
<v Speaker 7>does define Phoenix as a fascinating performer. He's volatile, but

1:25:48.760 --> 1:25:52.320
<v Speaker 7>the softer and the more vulnerable he is on screen,

1:25:52.680 --> 1:25:55.320
<v Speaker 7>the more interesting he is. And that's certainly the case

1:25:55.360 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 7>here with Leonard in Two Lovers.

1:25:58.240 --> 1:25:59.920
<v Speaker 13>If I got to know you that I wouldn't love you,

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:02.960
<v Speaker 13>But I do know you, and I love you a

1:26:02.960 --> 1:26:03.519
<v Speaker 13>little more.

1:26:03.720 --> 1:26:07.559
<v Speaker 2>I understand you, Michelle. I'm up too.

1:26:10.560 --> 1:26:12.880
<v Speaker 6>I'll never walk with from you.

1:26:16.920 --> 1:26:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I left, I never do.

1:26:21.280 --> 1:26:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I take you well.

1:26:24.000 --> 1:26:27.280
<v Speaker 4>You went with the one Waquin Phoenix James Gray collaboration

1:26:27.400 --> 1:26:29.760
<v Speaker 4>I have not seen, but I've liked the other two,

1:26:30.400 --> 1:26:32.800
<v Speaker 4>so I'm going to assume you're right in this pick.

1:26:32.880 --> 1:26:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Adam I especially like him in The Yards. I can

1:26:35.320 --> 1:26:39.240
<v Speaker 4>still picture kind of his devilish face in that one.

1:26:39.439 --> 1:26:42.479
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, these two have been really strong collaborators. My

1:26:42.600 --> 1:26:46.000
<v Speaker 4>number three pick is with another filmmaker he has worked

1:26:46.040 --> 1:26:49.280
<v Speaker 4>with twice now, and that would be Paul Thomas Anderson.

1:26:49.360 --> 1:26:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Here at number three, I have Larry Dox Bortello from

1:26:52.479 --> 1:26:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Inherent Vice. We've touched on a little bit his comedic abilities,

1:26:57.920 --> 1:27:00.120
<v Speaker 4>and I think this is the movie of all of

1:27:00.160 --> 1:27:02.800
<v Speaker 4>his that I've seen that puts them on display the most.

1:27:02.920 --> 1:27:06.960
<v Speaker 4>This adaptation of Thomas Pinchon's comic Gumshoe novel. It's set

1:27:06.960 --> 1:27:10.320
<v Speaker 4>against the druggy beach scene of nineteen seventy California. Doc

1:27:10.360 --> 1:27:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Sportello is this hazy private detective just ekeing out a

1:27:13.720 --> 1:27:16.400
<v Speaker 4>living of sorts in a beach shack just a few

1:27:16.439 --> 1:27:18.840
<v Speaker 4>blocks from the ocean, and as happens in these sort

1:27:18.880 --> 1:27:20.479
<v Speaker 4>of tales, he gets caught up in a rabbit hole

1:27:20.840 --> 1:27:25.240
<v Speaker 4>of an investigation. Phoenix has so much fun with the

1:27:25.520 --> 1:27:29.280
<v Speaker 4>curly qu noir dialogue here and the chance to play

1:27:30.240 --> 1:27:34.599
<v Speaker 4>really this adult fool who's sometimes smarter than he's presenting

1:27:34.680 --> 1:27:38.519
<v Speaker 4>himself and a lot of times not or or let's

1:27:38.520 --> 1:27:41.120
<v Speaker 4>just say not in complete control of his faculties. And

1:27:41.439 --> 1:27:43.960
<v Speaker 4>just watching Phoenix have fun with that is such a blast.

1:27:44.040 --> 1:27:47.800
<v Speaker 4>So many of the laughs come from observing Doc trying

1:27:47.840 --> 1:27:52.720
<v Speaker 4>to focus in the midst of these increasingly ridiculous conversations

1:27:52.800 --> 1:27:56.760
<v Speaker 4>with all sorts of characters, and this includes Josh Brolin's

1:27:56.960 --> 1:28:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Lieutenant Detective Bigfoot Bjornson, Yeah.

1:28:01.479 --> 1:28:07.599
<v Speaker 2>Big and smashed on my door, kwawn.

1:28:08.760 --> 1:28:11.720
<v Speaker 11>After a long and busy day of civil rights violations.

1:28:13.320 --> 1:28:15.880
<v Speaker 11>I found myself in the neighborhood and compelled to drop

1:28:15.960 --> 1:28:19.920
<v Speaker 11>in just to check and see the current state of affairs.

1:28:20.080 --> 1:28:23.880
<v Speaker 11>Mild stomping grounds, seeing as your effort to keep lines

1:28:23.920 --> 1:28:27.280
<v Speaker 11>of communication had been limited.

1:28:27.720 --> 1:28:28.479
<v Speaker 8>To say the least.

1:28:30.479 --> 1:28:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I've been busy.

1:28:33.680 --> 1:28:35.719
<v Speaker 11>I'm trying to figure out which side of the zigzag

1:28:35.800 --> 1:28:36.960
<v Speaker 11>paper is the sticky sign.

1:28:38.040 --> 1:28:40.639
<v Speaker 4>This is not just a comedic performance, though a few

1:28:40.720 --> 1:28:43.120
<v Speaker 4>listeners mentioned when they made this pick some of the

1:28:43.160 --> 1:28:47.040
<v Speaker 4>other qualities that appealed to them about the performance. Andrew

1:28:47.080 --> 1:28:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Bodenbach on Facebook said, He's hilarious and ridiculous, but what

1:28:50.160 --> 1:28:52.240
<v Speaker 4>really hits is how compassionate he is.

1:28:52.439 --> 1:28:53.679
<v Speaker 3>He really cares about people.

1:28:54.160 --> 1:28:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I think you do feel that. And here's from Jeremy S.

1:28:56.960 --> 1:29:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Wade at American Weight on Twitter. You just really want

1:29:00.280 --> 1:29:01.800
<v Speaker 4>that poor son of a bitch to get a win.

1:29:02.400 --> 1:29:04.640
<v Speaker 4>And this kind of speaks, I think, more to the

1:29:05.439 --> 1:29:09.879
<v Speaker 4>you come around to his character's side so often, despite

1:29:09.920 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 4>all evidence to the contrary, that that's where you should be,

1:29:12.479 --> 1:29:14.600
<v Speaker 4>and there's a little bit of that element here in

1:29:14.760 --> 1:29:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Dox Bartello as well. It's also fun to think about

1:29:18.240 --> 1:29:21.840
<v Speaker 4>this being the performance. Going back to the idea of collaborations,

1:29:22.240 --> 1:29:24.320
<v Speaker 4>this being the performance and the character that he and

1:29:24.400 --> 1:29:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Paul Thomas Anderson wanted to explore together after working on

1:29:28.479 --> 1:29:31.800
<v Speaker 4>The Master. So interesting choice. I don't want to get

1:29:31.800 --> 1:29:33.599
<v Speaker 4>ahead of myself, so I'll leave that there.

1:29:34.040 --> 1:29:36.360
<v Speaker 7>And I don't want to get ahead of myself either, Josh,

1:29:36.479 --> 1:29:40.160
<v Speaker 7>so I will also leave Larry Knox Bortello right there

1:29:40.200 --> 1:29:43.080
<v Speaker 7>and go to my number three walking Phoenix performance, a

1:29:43.160 --> 1:29:45.720
<v Speaker 7>performance in a film that no one will apply the

1:29:45.800 --> 1:29:49.479
<v Speaker 7>words fun to or blast to, like you just did

1:29:49.600 --> 1:29:51.000
<v Speaker 7>with Inherent Vice.

1:29:51.360 --> 1:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>But one connection.

1:29:53.360 --> 1:29:56.200
<v Speaker 7>You've got Phoenix in your number three, chasing down a

1:29:56.280 --> 1:29:59.479
<v Speaker 7>missing girl in a complex conspiracy, and so do I.

1:30:00.240 --> 1:30:04.240
<v Speaker 7>But Joe from Lynn Ramsey's twenty seventeen film You Were

1:30:04.280 --> 1:30:07.640
<v Speaker 7>Never Really Here is definitely not the teddy bear, the

1:30:07.720 --> 1:30:11.719
<v Speaker 7>compassionate teddy bear that Doc Sportello is. And Joe suffers

1:30:11.760 --> 1:30:16.280
<v Speaker 7>from something that Doc doesn't, which is severe trauma. So

1:30:16.360 --> 1:30:20.760
<v Speaker 7>you've got a character who is all about repression and

1:30:20.920 --> 1:30:24.920
<v Speaker 7>is all about withholding other than the blunt acts of

1:30:25.040 --> 1:30:28.679
<v Speaker 7>violence that he carries out. He's not demonstrative, he's certainly

1:30:28.760 --> 1:30:32.360
<v Speaker 7>not vocal. He barely speaks. This has to be the

1:30:32.479 --> 1:30:36.800
<v Speaker 7>fewest lines the Phoenix has in any one of his performances.

1:30:37.040 --> 1:30:40.080
<v Speaker 7>He's a big physical presence, like with bo Is Afraid.

1:30:40.120 --> 1:30:43.280
<v Speaker 7>He put on weight for this role, and he certainly

1:30:43.479 --> 1:30:46.840
<v Speaker 7>carries it. It's it's not a weight that manifests itself,

1:30:46.920 --> 1:30:50.800
<v Speaker 7>certainly in muscle or as if he's been hitting the

1:30:50.880 --> 1:30:54.519
<v Speaker 7>gym a lot. He is someone who carries a big

1:30:54.840 --> 1:30:57.760
<v Speaker 7>burden and needs a big frame to do it. And

1:30:57.920 --> 1:31:03.120
<v Speaker 7>yet somehow Phoenix may makes him feel like a ghost,

1:31:03.840 --> 1:31:08.439
<v Speaker 7>like he's incapable of leaving a footprint. He's just moving

1:31:08.640 --> 1:31:14.040
<v Speaker 7>through the world, almost invisible to everyone around him. A

1:31:14.160 --> 1:31:16.080
<v Speaker 7>line that has always stuck with me from that film

1:31:16.840 --> 1:31:18.640
<v Speaker 7>is when a character says, and if I remember the

1:31:18.720 --> 1:31:22.519
<v Speaker 7>context right, they're not using it negatively. I think they

1:31:22.760 --> 1:31:25.839
<v Speaker 7>may need his skills. They say, I hear you're brutal,

1:31:26.600 --> 1:31:30.640
<v Speaker 7>and Phoenix says, I can be. And something about the

1:31:31.120 --> 1:31:35.759
<v Speaker 7>kind of flat delivery of that the succinct screen writing

1:31:35.800 --> 1:31:39.519
<v Speaker 7>there just having him say I can be. It's a

1:31:39.560 --> 1:31:45.320
<v Speaker 7>case where Phoenix in the performance could indicate in that

1:31:45.479 --> 1:31:49.240
<v Speaker 7>line reading or with some kind of physicality or something

1:31:49.280 --> 1:31:52.479
<v Speaker 7>on his face before during after he says it. He

1:31:52.560 --> 1:31:55.720
<v Speaker 7>could indicate that well he's not really a monster. He

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:59.160
<v Speaker 7>doesn't want to be brutal, but sometimes he has to be.

1:32:00.240 --> 1:32:03.479
<v Speaker 7>And again, he's not someone who's interested in being cool

1:32:03.520 --> 1:32:06.639
<v Speaker 7>on screen. He's not someone who's interested, it would seem,

1:32:07.479 --> 1:32:09.160
<v Speaker 7>in indicating those things.

1:32:08.920 --> 1:32:09.599
<v Speaker 3>To the audience.

1:32:09.920 --> 1:32:14.479
<v Speaker 7>He's he's willing to play Joe for exactly who he

1:32:14.680 --> 1:32:18.360
<v Speaker 7>is and his future actions, his choices will determine what

1:32:18.560 --> 1:32:24.200
<v Speaker 7>we ultimately think of him. How many Josh Killer Seeks

1:32:24.280 --> 1:32:27.040
<v Speaker 7>Redemption movies have we seen? I don't know if we've

1:32:27.200 --> 1:32:31.000
<v Speaker 7>done that top five before. We probably have, like Assassins

1:32:31.000 --> 1:32:33.840
<v Speaker 7>with a Heart of Gold or something. It's a well

1:32:34.000 --> 1:32:39.719
<v Speaker 7>worn convention at this point, and Phoenix gives any beat

1:32:40.400 --> 1:32:44.880
<v Speaker 7>that might feel familiar a completely different spin.

1:32:45.280 --> 1:32:52.040
<v Speaker 13>Gets your name, Scott, mister Rogers that I'm to ask

1:32:52.080 --> 1:32:55.960
<v Speaker 13>you some questions. Please be inlest with me, HI security.

1:32:56.240 --> 1:32:59.599
<v Speaker 13>How many are there? Huh so one more than one?

1:33:00.240 --> 1:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Two?

1:33:01.160 --> 1:33:01.519
<v Speaker 8>Two?

1:33:02.960 --> 1:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Where?

1:33:04.200 --> 1:33:04.360
<v Speaker 5>Where?

1:33:06.680 --> 1:33:08.679
<v Speaker 8>Oh god sez the front door?

1:33:08.960 --> 1:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Second guy on the top floor?

1:33:11.640 --> 1:33:18.560
<v Speaker 8>Where's the playgrounds? Thinking that these girls, therefore.

1:33:18.880 --> 1:33:22.680
<v Speaker 7>He makes this character Joe a truly enigmatic one, and

1:33:22.760 --> 1:33:26.920
<v Speaker 7>that he makes some choices sometimes that are confusing or

1:33:27.080 --> 1:33:32.839
<v Speaker 7>bewildering or troubling or upsetting, but you don't ever actually

1:33:33.080 --> 1:33:36.920
<v Speaker 7>question him as a man. And I think that's where

1:33:37.680 --> 1:33:40.120
<v Speaker 7>the term damaged. We'll come back into play here at

1:33:40.200 --> 1:33:42.559
<v Speaker 7>least one more time as a damaged man.

1:33:43.479 --> 1:33:46.280
<v Speaker 4>That's the word that pops up here. I'm just pulling

1:33:46.400 --> 1:33:48.280
<v Speaker 4>up my review and I liked it a little less

1:33:48.320 --> 1:33:51.679
<v Speaker 4>than you, but did appreciate how the filmmaking aligned itself

1:33:51.880 --> 1:33:56.320
<v Speaker 4>with Phoenix's performance and the character's headspace right when Ramsey

1:33:56.479 --> 1:33:59.519
<v Speaker 4>using just a lot of impressionistic imagery, and I think

1:33:59.560 --> 1:34:01.479
<v Speaker 4>of that the haunting sound design as well.

1:34:01.840 --> 1:34:03.559
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I wrote how this is all.

1:34:03.560 --> 1:34:07.519
<v Speaker 4>Geared toward evoking Joe's deranged, damaged point of view.

1:34:07.680 --> 1:34:08.439
<v Speaker 1>So there it is.

1:34:08.960 --> 1:34:12.080
<v Speaker 7>We do have two more a reminder we set her

1:34:12.439 --> 1:34:15.360
<v Speaker 7>and Theodore aside, although we both love those performances. We're

1:34:15.400 --> 1:34:17.640
<v Speaker 7>going to talk about that movie coming up soon in

1:34:17.760 --> 1:34:21.000
<v Speaker 7>some bonus content for film spotting family members.

1:34:21.280 --> 1:34:23.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you have at number two? This might be

1:34:23.800 --> 1:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>where you want to go get some more popcorn and

1:34:26.160 --> 1:34:27.720
<v Speaker 3>something to drink. Maybe look for a.

1:34:27.760 --> 1:34:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Lid, an elusive lid, because it's Arthur Fleck in joker.

1:34:32.960 --> 1:34:35.439
<v Speaker 4>I do think that Phoenix has a talent above all

1:34:35.479 --> 1:34:38.800
<v Speaker 4>for miserableness, and to me, this is one of his

1:34:38.920 --> 1:34:42.639
<v Speaker 4>most fascinating ones. Arthur Fleck the movie itself, we don't

1:34:42.640 --> 1:34:44.320
<v Speaker 4>need to re litigate it. I know I'm one of

1:34:44.360 --> 1:34:47.240
<v Speaker 4>the few people who take it seriously. I'll say I

1:34:47.280 --> 1:34:49.200
<v Speaker 4>still feel okay about that. A couple of years on.

1:34:49.520 --> 1:34:53.640
<v Speaker 4>I think we've only seen more disgruntled individuals lashing out

1:34:53.640 --> 1:34:57.040
<v Speaker 4>at society that hasn't lightened up in recent years. So

1:34:57.120 --> 1:34:59.320
<v Speaker 4>I think this movie resonates in that way. And I

1:34:59.400 --> 1:35:02.680
<v Speaker 4>also think that that is what connects with Phoenix's performance.

1:35:02.960 --> 1:35:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Arthur Fleck is both a symptom and a symbol of

1:35:06.200 --> 1:35:10.479
<v Speaker 4>societal breakdown in Joker, and that is something that Phoenix

1:35:10.600 --> 1:35:15.360
<v Speaker 4>communicates through a performance of operatic physicality.

1:35:16.200 --> 1:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I like the movie.

1:35:17.280 --> 1:35:19.680
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot there, but for me, it's Phoenix who

1:35:19.800 --> 1:35:24.720
<v Speaker 4>is the centrifugal force, and I am mesmerized by his

1:35:25.040 --> 1:35:31.000
<v Speaker 4>carefully choreographed but seemingly chaotic clumsiness in this movie. That's

1:35:31.040 --> 1:35:33.880
<v Speaker 4>also what makes this a somewhat funny performance. I think

1:35:33.920 --> 1:35:37.719
<v Speaker 4>of him running down the streets or hallways, his limbs

1:35:37.880 --> 1:35:40.760
<v Speaker 4>all askew. He's not, but he might as well be

1:35:40.840 --> 1:35:44.160
<v Speaker 4>wearing clown shoes. That's how he runs. I think about

1:35:44.200 --> 1:35:46.879
<v Speaker 4>him slipping and fumbling with the gun on the subway

1:35:46.960 --> 1:35:49.760
<v Speaker 4>in that sequence where he's trying to defend himself from

1:35:49.840 --> 1:35:53.479
<v Speaker 4>his attackers. And then yeah, the dance on those steps.

1:35:53.680 --> 1:35:56.639
<v Speaker 4>I love so much, the dance and then his comic

1:35:56.800 --> 1:35:59.880
<v Speaker 4>scrambling away when the cops come interrupt him in undercut.

1:36:00.040 --> 1:36:02.640
<v Speaker 4>The whole scene, now, as outward is so much of

1:36:02.680 --> 1:36:05.360
<v Speaker 4>this is Phoenix. This is the thing he does. We've

1:36:05.400 --> 1:36:08.000
<v Speaker 4>touched on a number of times. He internalizes all of

1:36:08.120 --> 1:36:11.640
<v Speaker 4>this as well, so you're getting both. He's using physicality

1:36:11.720 --> 1:36:15.720
<v Speaker 4>to convey and internal brokenness, and we get another man

1:36:15.800 --> 1:36:19.160
<v Speaker 4>whose wires just seem to be crossed, and in this movie,

1:36:19.200 --> 1:36:21.680
<v Speaker 4>he's stuck in a society that doesn't care at all

1:36:21.840 --> 1:36:23.920
<v Speaker 4>to even bother trying to uncross them.

1:36:24.560 --> 1:36:28.120
<v Speaker 5>He just asked the same questions every week, how's your job?

1:36:28.800 --> 1:36:33.439
<v Speaker 5>Are you having any negative thoughts? All I have are

1:36:33.560 --> 1:36:40.200
<v Speaker 5>negative thoughts, But you don't listen anyway. I said, for

1:36:40.439 --> 1:36:44.960
<v Speaker 5>my whole life, I didn't know if I even really existed,

1:36:46.800 --> 1:36:52.719
<v Speaker 5>But I do, and people are starting to notice.

1:36:54.160 --> 1:36:57.280
<v Speaker 4>I heard from Anton varfort Over on Twitter who said

1:36:57.360 --> 1:36:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Joker is good. I think there is a vulnerability or

1:37:00.080 --> 1:37:03.240
<v Speaker 4>maybe even something damaged there. It is to Woking that

1:37:03.400 --> 1:37:06.000
<v Speaker 4>makes him work especially well in those kind of roles.

1:37:06.240 --> 1:37:08.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the movie was amazing, but it wasn't

1:37:08.200 --> 1:37:11.760
<v Speaker 4>just a King of Comedy ripoff. So yep, I'm going

1:37:11.880 --> 1:37:16.360
<v Speaker 4>with Arthur Fleck my number two. I think, you know, technically,

1:37:16.439 --> 1:37:18.680
<v Speaker 4>if we were including her, I'd probably have it up

1:37:18.720 --> 1:37:21.599
<v Speaker 4>this high and Joker would be at three. But for now,

1:37:22.120 --> 1:37:24.360
<v Speaker 4>it's my number two Walking Phoenix performance.

1:37:25.000 --> 1:37:27.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, let's just go ahead and keep this positive. I'm

1:37:27.400 --> 1:37:30.479
<v Speaker 7>not gonna rehash any in my comments about not only

1:37:30.560 --> 1:37:32.160
<v Speaker 7>the film, but actually it turns out.

1:37:32.080 --> 1:37:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I didn't even really like Walking Phoenix performance, and terrible, terrible.

1:37:37.560 --> 1:37:41.680
<v Speaker 7>To me, especially after preparing for this list, is genuinely

1:37:42.240 --> 1:37:45.920
<v Speaker 7>unthinkable because I think he can pull off the impossible,

1:37:46.600 --> 1:37:52.360
<v Speaker 7>and yet Joker was too much for Walking Phoenix. In

1:37:52.439 --> 1:37:56.280
<v Speaker 7>this case, I've got at number two a performance that

1:37:56.400 --> 1:38:01.320
<v Speaker 7>you already mentioned. Some crossover here Paul Thomas Anderson Larry

1:38:01.560 --> 1:38:04.720
<v Speaker 7>Dox Sportello from a Inherent Vice, which contains what is

1:38:04.800 --> 1:38:08.800
<v Speaker 7>still probably my funniest moment in any Paul Thomas Anderson film,

1:38:09.240 --> 1:38:12.639
<v Speaker 7>when early in the movie he's talking to Jenna Malone's

1:38:12.720 --> 1:38:17.479
<v Speaker 7>character at her kitchen table, she's recounting her heroin use

1:38:18.040 --> 1:38:22.520
<v Speaker 7>and getting pregnant. She shows a picture of little Amethyst,

1:38:23.320 --> 1:38:25.240
<v Speaker 7>which Phoenix's doc responds to.

1:38:25.760 --> 1:38:27.640
<v Speaker 8>This way, this is.

1:38:29.479 --> 1:38:32.679
<v Speaker 6>What we had her looking like. Everybody helpfully pointed out

1:38:32.720 --> 1:38:35.559
<v Speaker 6>how the heron was actually coming through my breast milk.

1:38:36.240 --> 1:38:41.320
<v Speaker 7>But m h, now, I don't know that I've seen

1:38:41.400 --> 1:38:44.240
<v Speaker 7>one used myself in the wild. But not surprisingly, if

1:38:44.280 --> 1:38:47.240
<v Speaker 7>you search in Hairent Vice scream or Joaquin Phoenix screaming,

1:38:47.840 --> 1:38:50.360
<v Speaker 7>all the gifts pop up. This is a ready made

1:38:50.560 --> 1:38:54.879
<v Speaker 7>meme moment, but it's really brilliant acting. I mean Malone,

1:38:55.560 --> 1:38:57.920
<v Speaker 7>she doesn't flinch at all what he screams like that.

1:38:58.400 --> 1:39:00.760
<v Speaker 7>She does say I, I don't know if you have

1:39:00.880 --> 1:39:04.080
<v Speaker 7>the stomach for it before she hands him the photo,

1:39:04.320 --> 1:39:07.080
<v Speaker 7>so she knows that the picture is horrifying because she

1:39:07.200 --> 1:39:11.519
<v Speaker 7>was breastfeeding but using heroin at the time, but it's

1:39:11.520 --> 1:39:15.120
<v Speaker 7>still her baby. And you still expect that Doxportello will

1:39:15.160 --> 1:39:20.679
<v Speaker 7>react by repressing whatever his instinctual reaction is. You actually

1:39:20.720 --> 1:39:23.920
<v Speaker 7>think he'll do what he does right after he screams,

1:39:24.439 --> 1:39:27.320
<v Speaker 7>which is he looks again at the photo, even though

1:39:27.360 --> 1:39:29.320
<v Speaker 7>he doesn't want to. He looks again at the photo

1:39:29.400 --> 1:39:32.200
<v Speaker 7>almost like he's he's assessing it, and he says mm hm,

1:39:33.520 --> 1:39:36.760
<v Speaker 7>and he's very clinical about it, but he can't help it.

1:39:36.840 --> 1:39:39.680
<v Speaker 7>He's so horrified. He lets out that scream and then

1:39:39.800 --> 1:39:43.960
<v Speaker 7>it just immediately closes up. And I laugh every time

1:39:44.120 --> 1:39:46.840
<v Speaker 7>I see it, and I do just love this gumshoe

1:39:47.000 --> 1:39:52.080
<v Speaker 7>character who's in, as you said, this labyrinthine pinsion world

1:39:52.160 --> 1:39:56.599
<v Speaker 7>of early seventies LA. In the setup to our review

1:39:56.640 --> 1:39:59.080
<v Speaker 7>of this film, I described it this way. I said,

1:39:59.120 --> 1:40:03.120
<v Speaker 7>take the big Lebouse, he's perpetually stone protagonists. Add the

1:40:03.320 --> 1:40:07.479
<v Speaker 7>anachronistic absurdity and culture clashing of Altmans along Goodbye, Mix

1:40:07.600 --> 1:40:10.800
<v Speaker 7>in the borderline nonsensical plot machinations of the Big Sleep,

1:40:11.280 --> 1:40:14.280
<v Speaker 7>and top it all off with the pervasive corruption of Chinatown.

1:40:15.000 --> 1:40:17.160
<v Speaker 7>That's what you get with this film. And there's some

1:40:17.240 --> 1:40:20.080
<v Speaker 7>pretty strong touchstones there. Not surprising that I love this

1:40:20.240 --> 1:40:24.400
<v Speaker 7>movie as much as I do. And I think one

1:40:24.479 --> 1:40:26.559
<v Speaker 7>of his real gifts we've talked about a few of them,

1:40:27.160 --> 1:40:30.519
<v Speaker 7>is that he's able to embody these characters who do

1:40:30.680 --> 1:40:35.040
<v Speaker 7>kind of straddle these different these different worlds. He so

1:40:35.479 --> 1:40:39.599
<v Speaker 7>naturally exudes being a man out of time, even literal

1:40:39.720 --> 1:40:42.840
<v Speaker 7>time with this character and others in terms of the

1:40:43.439 --> 1:40:46.920
<v Speaker 7>pace of his movements, his manner of speaking. He always

1:40:47.040 --> 1:40:51.839
<v Speaker 7>moves at his own pace and often doesn't verbally respond

1:40:52.479 --> 1:40:55.639
<v Speaker 7>in moments that you think a woking Phoenix character would.

1:40:56.400 --> 1:41:02.240
<v Speaker 7>He's he's processing, he's experiencing it. You experience it in

1:41:02.360 --> 1:41:06.400
<v Speaker 7>real time with Phoenix's character. So I'm with you in

1:41:06.520 --> 1:41:09.439
<v Speaker 7>my appreciation. I have it even higher Dox Portello at

1:41:09.479 --> 1:41:13.639
<v Speaker 7>number two. A lot of processing going on by document

1:41:13.800 --> 1:41:17.960
<v Speaker 7>of processing, indeed, and that brings us to our number one,

1:41:18.080 --> 1:41:21.760
<v Speaker 7>which is not a surprising pick, but we think it's

1:41:21.840 --> 1:41:25.760
<v Speaker 7>the right pick obviously, and it's a joint number one

1:41:25.880 --> 1:41:28.479
<v Speaker 7>pick there. There can only be one here if we're

1:41:28.479 --> 1:41:31.000
<v Speaker 7>talking about Phoenix, and it turns out if we're talking

1:41:31.040 --> 1:41:33.200
<v Speaker 7>about Phoenix and Paul Thomas Anderson.

1:41:33.880 --> 1:41:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean in The Master as Freddi Quell. It's

1:41:37.280 --> 1:41:40.640
<v Speaker 4>a character you immediately know when you first see him

1:41:40.640 --> 1:41:43.040
<v Speaker 4>in that movie you're not going to take your eyes

1:41:43.080 --> 1:41:46.280
<v Speaker 4>off him, partly because you don't want him out of

1:41:46.320 --> 1:41:48.639
<v Speaker 4>your sight for what he will do if he's out

1:41:48.640 --> 1:41:54.000
<v Speaker 4>of your range of vision, so discomfaning, so unnerving. Maybe

1:41:54.160 --> 1:41:59.120
<v Speaker 4>the character that tests the theory the most of Phoenix,

1:41:59.280 --> 1:42:03.960
<v Speaker 4>somehow ill attracting the audience's interest and sympathy. I think

1:42:04.120 --> 1:42:08.759
<v Speaker 4>Freddie Quell pushes that the most, and it's only maybe

1:42:08.880 --> 1:42:13.560
<v Speaker 4>having Philip Seymour Hoffmann's Master as something of an antagonist

1:42:13.840 --> 1:42:16.320
<v Speaker 4>that allows that to happen. I think once we see

1:42:16.920 --> 1:42:19.559
<v Speaker 4>how Freddy is being manipulated a little bit, we maybe

1:42:19.640 --> 1:42:21.320
<v Speaker 4>begin to feel a little more sorry for him. But

1:42:21.479 --> 1:42:27.799
<v Speaker 4>this is a broken, dangerous, scarred man. And I remember

1:42:27.920 --> 1:42:31.959
<v Speaker 4>my first impression of The Master, a movie I've revisited

1:42:32.000 --> 1:42:35.000
<v Speaker 4>a number of times, but coming away from it that

1:42:35.040 --> 1:42:37.880
<v Speaker 4>first screening was Phoenix's face and what he did to it.

1:42:38.800 --> 1:42:43.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how he transformed physically so much. You know,

1:42:43.200 --> 1:42:46.639
<v Speaker 4>we talk about losing weight gaining weight for actors. I wrote,

1:42:47.040 --> 1:42:50.080
<v Speaker 4>his face was withered and warren. Particularly when he scowls,

1:42:50.600 --> 1:42:52.960
<v Speaker 4>it's almost as if his cleft lip has spread so

1:42:53.120 --> 1:42:57.479
<v Speaker 4>that rivulets now also cross his cheeks, his brow, his chin,

1:42:58.200 --> 1:43:01.840
<v Speaker 4>And that also is a physical man inifestation again of

1:43:01.920 --> 1:43:06.280
<v Speaker 4>what's inside. It's like all of this torture is bubbling

1:43:06.400 --> 1:43:09.479
<v Speaker 4>and seeping out, and it's coming out in his face.

1:43:09.520 --> 1:43:11.880
<v Speaker 4>It's also coming out, and how Freddie walks, how Phoenix

1:43:12.000 --> 1:43:14.080
<v Speaker 4>carries himself. I want to get to this when we

1:43:14.160 --> 1:43:18.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about his performance in Her. There's some interesting examples

1:43:18.160 --> 1:43:20.800
<v Speaker 4>of just, you know, his gait as an actor, and

1:43:20.960 --> 1:43:24.479
<v Speaker 4>we see it here more than anywhere else. I think

1:43:25.280 --> 1:43:28.080
<v Speaker 4>it's just this mask of torment that Phoenix wears and

1:43:28.640 --> 1:43:31.639
<v Speaker 4>spreads to the rest of his body, and of course

1:43:31.840 --> 1:43:35.080
<v Speaker 4>it does explode into violent physicality at times. I think

1:43:35.120 --> 1:43:37.080
<v Speaker 4>one of the movies' first indications of this is that

1:43:37.280 --> 1:43:41.519
<v Speaker 4>incredibly odd and uncomfortable scene where Freddie is working as

1:43:41.560 --> 1:43:44.479
<v Speaker 4>a photographer at the department store when he gets back

1:43:44.520 --> 1:43:47.880
<v Speaker 4>from the war, and he just lets his rage seep

1:43:47.960 --> 1:43:51.280
<v Speaker 4>out into this passive, aggressive session with a client.

1:43:51.760 --> 1:43:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm starting to sweat.

1:43:53.880 --> 1:43:57.360
<v Speaker 2>You need to shut up, you need to move the gun.

1:43:58.560 --> 1:44:03.040
<v Speaker 8>You need to shut up, you need to back off,

1:44:03.880 --> 1:44:05.200
<v Speaker 8>sit down. I'm very sorry.

1:44:05.280 --> 1:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to get the landing right. He must understand

1:44:08.600 --> 1:44:09.559
<v Speaker 2>you want to get the radio.

1:44:11.640 --> 1:44:15.880
<v Speaker 4>You can hear the simmering confrontation there. But there's also,

1:44:16.000 --> 1:44:18.680
<v Speaker 4>of course in what Phoenix does again the actions. There's

1:44:18.800 --> 1:44:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the slow shoving of that hot lamp towards the man's face,

1:44:22.680 --> 1:44:26.479
<v Speaker 4>then the choke like tightening of the tie, and of

1:44:26.560 --> 1:44:28.920
<v Speaker 4>course again that scowling look he has at the very

1:44:28.960 --> 1:44:31.200
<v Speaker 4>beginning of the scene, just utter disdain for this guy.

1:44:31.360 --> 1:44:34.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, he hates this man. We could speculate on

1:44:34.320 --> 1:44:36.400
<v Speaker 4>the reasons. I think the movie goes on to give

1:44:36.479 --> 1:44:40.320
<v Speaker 4>us a few of them, but immediately Freddy Quell hates

1:44:40.400 --> 1:44:43.120
<v Speaker 4>this man. It's going to go badly for him. So yeah,

1:44:43.360 --> 1:44:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you, master crowning achievement at this point in

1:44:45.680 --> 1:44:48.800
<v Speaker 4>his career. Just a perfect marriage of the physical and

1:44:48.800 --> 1:44:50.799
<v Speaker 4>the psychological that he's so good.

1:44:50.640 --> 1:44:54.800
<v Speaker 7>At rewatching that scene today. I don't think it's an

1:44:54.840 --> 1:44:59.759
<v Speaker 7>accident that the actor, if you look closely, the actor

1:45:00.000 --> 1:45:06.200
<v Speaker 7>really resembles Philip Seymour Hopkins Lancaster. So it's it's foreshadowing

1:45:06.640 --> 1:45:10.760
<v Speaker 7>the relationship he's going to have with that man as well,

1:45:10.920 --> 1:45:18.680
<v Speaker 7>Lancaster DoD And we do get this seemingly unprovoked response,

1:45:18.920 --> 1:45:22.720
<v Speaker 7>this disdain for this character. But it all starts when

1:45:22.760 --> 1:45:25.720
<v Speaker 7>he asks him about who it's for. He says it's

1:45:25.800 --> 1:45:30.840
<v Speaker 7>for his wife. This is this is the virile American

1:45:30.960 --> 1:45:35.800
<v Speaker 7>male who is the domesticated version of a man that

1:45:35.880 --> 1:45:39.679
<v Speaker 7>Freddy Quell can never be right. And it makes sense

1:45:39.760 --> 1:45:41.840
<v Speaker 7>on some level that then that's going to be his

1:45:42.000 --> 1:45:45.120
<v Speaker 7>instinctive response to him. And this movie is dealing with

1:45:45.160 --> 1:45:46.920
<v Speaker 7>a lot of those subjects and those themes in a

1:45:46.960 --> 1:45:50.880
<v Speaker 7>way that is not spelled out. But I really feel

1:45:50.880 --> 1:45:53.080
<v Speaker 7>that Freddy Quell is carrying the burden of post war

1:45:53.160 --> 1:45:57.360
<v Speaker 7>America on his shoulders, on his pretty slight shoulders here, Yeah,

1:45:57.560 --> 1:46:01.639
<v Speaker 7>very thin and way more frail coming back from the war.

1:46:01.720 --> 1:46:03.559
<v Speaker 7>And the way I described his character at the time

1:46:03.680 --> 1:46:07.720
<v Speaker 7>was he's like an arthritic fist. You know, he's just

1:46:07.960 --> 1:46:08.720
<v Speaker 7>crumpled up.

1:46:09.560 --> 1:46:10.839
<v Speaker 3>You see it in that scene.

1:46:11.160 --> 1:46:13.320
<v Speaker 7>It's as if every part of him is in pain.

1:46:13.400 --> 1:46:15.200
<v Speaker 7>I think he does remark at some point that he's

1:46:15.240 --> 1:46:18.040
<v Speaker 7>got stomach pain. But you watch him in that scene

1:46:18.280 --> 1:46:22.200
<v Speaker 7>when he's getting the camera ready, pretty Quill acts as

1:46:22.240 --> 1:46:27.559
<v Speaker 7>if he's perpetually experiencing heartburn, a terrible taste in his mouth,

1:46:27.600 --> 1:46:33.160
<v Speaker 7>that as if he is always suffering or experiencing some pain,

1:46:33.880 --> 1:46:38.360
<v Speaker 7>And you watch his mannerisms in that scene or throughout

1:46:38.400 --> 1:46:41.600
<v Speaker 7>the movie, is Freddy. I really think a lot of

1:46:42.000 --> 1:46:47.000
<v Speaker 7>lesser actors who tried to embody that character, tried to

1:46:47.560 --> 1:46:51.080
<v Speaker 7>evoke those feelings and the type of phrasing that we're

1:46:51.320 --> 1:46:57.120
<v Speaker 7>summoning here. They would make him overly theatrical. They would

1:46:57.160 --> 1:47:01.680
<v Speaker 7>make him feel like a character, wouldn't feel natural, and

1:47:01.720 --> 1:47:03.880
<v Speaker 7>it wouldn't have the power that it has. The putting

1:47:03.920 --> 1:47:06.960
<v Speaker 7>his hand on his hips, the slouching that he does

1:47:07.040 --> 1:47:09.960
<v Speaker 7>with his shoulders, in the facial reactions, all the things

1:47:10.000 --> 1:47:15.599
<v Speaker 7>were saying, Phoenix makes it feel almost like Freddie Quell

1:47:15.760 --> 1:47:17.479
<v Speaker 7>may have come out of the womb that way to

1:47:17.560 --> 1:47:19.639
<v Speaker 7>go back to bow is afraid. We know that's probably

1:47:19.760 --> 1:47:23.360
<v Speaker 7>not the case. That the war and his experience is

1:47:23.439 --> 1:47:26.799
<v Speaker 7>there had to shape him somewhat into, if not completely,

1:47:26.920 --> 1:47:29.599
<v Speaker 7>into the man that we see now, this broken man

1:47:29.680 --> 1:47:32.639
<v Speaker 7>that we see now. But he makes it feel as

1:47:32.720 --> 1:47:35.920
<v Speaker 7>if this is his life experience, and we don't ever

1:47:36.080 --> 1:47:37.880
<v Speaker 7>we never questioned it. I never questioned it.

1:47:38.040 --> 1:47:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Enough performance you'd pass this guy in the street.

1:47:41.240 --> 1:47:44.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's like a very basic litmus test you

1:47:44.840 --> 1:47:48.000
<v Speaker 4>can give to any sort of reality based performance. At

1:47:48.080 --> 1:47:50.920
<v Speaker 4>least can I imagine myself passing this guy in the street,

1:47:51.360 --> 1:47:54.880
<v Speaker 4>And in Freddy Quayle's case, absolutely, and you would know

1:47:55.040 --> 1:47:59.640
<v Speaker 4>by all of those things you described Phoenix doing that

1:47:59.760 --> 1:48:03.360
<v Speaker 4>can innicates you'd want to step aside, right it's just

1:48:03.560 --> 1:48:03.880
<v Speaker 4>like this.

1:48:04.840 --> 1:48:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Chances ire'll pass this guy, it'll be fine. Chances are

1:48:08.000 --> 1:48:09.560
<v Speaker 3>more likely it won't.

1:48:09.280 --> 1:48:12.519
<v Speaker 7>Be Yeah, even if he's not being assault of himself

1:48:12.600 --> 1:48:13.600
<v Speaker 7>and no, no moment.

1:48:13.520 --> 1:48:15.920
<v Speaker 3>How he's carrying himself, just the energy. Yep.

1:48:17.200 --> 1:48:20.800
<v Speaker 7>Those are our top five walk in Phoenix performances. Any

1:48:20.840 --> 1:48:23.160
<v Speaker 7>honorable mentions, Josh, do you like to throw in?

1:48:23.680 --> 1:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:48:24.200 --> 1:48:26.479
<v Speaker 4>I think we should get to this one because I

1:48:26.720 --> 1:48:28.719
<v Speaker 4>saw this come up a lot on social media. People

1:48:28.720 --> 1:48:31.320
<v Speaker 4>are big fans of the film, Come on, come on.

1:48:31.920 --> 1:48:35.479
<v Speaker 4>And his performance as Johnny this is from writer director

1:48:35.520 --> 1:48:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Mike Mills, and this is another nice guy Phoenix role.

1:48:39.520 --> 1:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:48:39.760 --> 1:48:43.360
<v Speaker 4>He's this single, kind of emotionally reserved uncle of a

1:48:43.479 --> 1:48:46.040
<v Speaker 4>young boy and he ends up caring for the boy

1:48:46.200 --> 1:48:48.519
<v Speaker 4>while his mother and father are going through this difficult patch.

1:48:48.560 --> 1:48:50.759
<v Speaker 4>The boys played by Woody Norman. They have great chemistry

1:48:50.840 --> 1:48:56.040
<v Speaker 4>together and it's a very generous and light turn. I

1:48:56.240 --> 1:48:59.720
<v Speaker 4>think that is as good as the other stuff he's done.

1:48:59.760 --> 1:49:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Maybe just not isn't the epitome to me of what

1:49:03.960 --> 1:49:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Phoenix is like. So it didn't quite make the cut.

1:49:06.640 --> 1:49:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can just take this process slowly and and yeah,

1:49:14.040 --> 1:49:15.000
<v Speaker 2>see how it feels.

1:49:16.400 --> 1:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>M H.

1:49:17.240 --> 1:49:23.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm just really sorry that your children died.

1:49:27.160 --> 1:49:28.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, only I can do that part.

1:49:29.000 --> 1:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I told you that's how me and mom do it.

1:49:32.000 --> 1:49:34.360
<v Speaker 2>If it makes sense for your mom to do that,

1:49:34.920 --> 1:49:36.479
<v Speaker 2>that's cool, But it doesn't make sense to me. That's

1:49:36.479 --> 1:49:41.519
<v Speaker 2>what I was explaining to you, because it's ridiculous. It's sad.

1:49:42.720 --> 1:49:45.599
<v Speaker 4>From April twenty twenty three, those were our top five

1:49:45.720 --> 1:49:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Joaquin Phoenix performances. You can see our picks and more

1:49:49.160 --> 1:49:52.799
<v Speaker 4>top fives at film spotting dot net slash lists.

1:49:53.479 --> 1:49:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Michael. That does it for us listeners.

1:49:56.280 --> 1:49:58.599
<v Speaker 4>If you'd like to connect with us on social media,

1:49:58.680 --> 1:50:01.240
<v Speaker 4>you can find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook,

1:50:01.680 --> 1:50:05.920
<v Speaker 4>and letterbox at film Spotting, I'm at Larson on film

1:50:06.080 --> 1:50:09.280
<v Speaker 4>At all those places, as well as Blue Sky, we

1:50:09.400 --> 1:50:12.640
<v Speaker 4>are independently produced and listener supported. You can support the

1:50:12.680 --> 1:50:16.040
<v Speaker 4>show by joining the film Spotting Family at film spottingfamily

1:50:16.120 --> 1:50:19.160
<v Speaker 4>dot com. You can listen early and ad free. You'll

1:50:19.200 --> 1:50:22.639
<v Speaker 4>also get a weekly newsletter, monthly bonus episodes, and access

1:50:22.680 --> 1:50:25.800
<v Speaker 4>to the entire show archive. For show t shirts and

1:50:25.880 --> 1:50:30.479
<v Speaker 4>other merch go to film spotting dot net slash shop now.

1:50:30.680 --> 1:50:34.800
<v Speaker 4>In that film Spotting archive, you will find reviews of

1:50:34.960 --> 1:50:38.760
<v Speaker 4>all three previous ariastorfilms, so bo Is Afraid on Show

1:50:38.840 --> 1:50:42.559
<v Speaker 4>nine seventeen, Midsomars seven thirty six, and Hereditary on six

1:50:42.800 --> 1:50:46.000
<v Speaker 4>eighty five. I'm going to do a quick ranking here, Michael,

1:50:46.200 --> 1:50:52.040
<v Speaker 4>just because I recently revised my Ariaster ranking on Letterboxed,

1:50:52.120 --> 1:50:54.320
<v Speaker 4>I still have Hereditary up at the top. Maybe it's

1:50:54.360 --> 1:50:58.160
<v Speaker 4>the horror fan in me just love that movie so much.

1:50:59.160 --> 1:51:01.800
<v Speaker 4>I think I have bos Afraid next. I think that's

1:51:01.800 --> 1:51:04.960
<v Speaker 4>where I put it because it and Eddington are close

1:51:05.240 --> 1:51:07.479
<v Speaker 4>in that. Something's worked for me. Some things don't. But

1:51:07.560 --> 1:51:11.200
<v Speaker 4>I love the swings they're taking. Midsomar I am positive on,

1:51:11.520 --> 1:51:14.720
<v Speaker 4>but I thought was the least successful. Do you have

1:51:14.800 --> 1:51:16.920
<v Speaker 4>a clear favorite of his, Michael, or have you seen

1:51:17.000 --> 1:51:17.360
<v Speaker 4>all four?

1:51:18.040 --> 1:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a good I have. It's a good question. I

1:51:20.760 --> 1:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't revisited Hereditary because you know it's for me. That

1:51:25.000 --> 1:51:27.559
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be an easy revisit, although it's very good, I think,

1:51:27.720 --> 1:51:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and unnerving as all hell. But don't I don't. I

1:51:32.920 --> 1:51:35.000
<v Speaker 1>got to think about that in a funny way. The

1:51:35.120 --> 1:51:40.760
<v Speaker 1>movies themselves are so internally uneven and arguably inconsistent, Yet

1:51:40.880 --> 1:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he is consistently worth the provocations. You know, I mean

1:51:46.720 --> 1:51:48.519
<v Speaker 1>I I's a good sign.

1:51:48.680 --> 1:51:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I think I feel the same way. Yep. Yeah.

1:51:51.360 --> 1:51:53.760
<v Speaker 4>And I'm realizing now, Michael, you're basically coming away from

1:51:53.760 --> 1:51:57.080
<v Speaker 4>this recording with a homework assignment that's pretty hefty. So

1:51:57.240 --> 1:52:00.680
<v Speaker 4>I want your ariost ranked list. I want you to

1:52:00.800 --> 1:52:04.160
<v Speaker 4>choose between the apartment in Sunset Boulevard, and then I

1:52:04.240 --> 1:52:06.000
<v Speaker 4>want you to vote in the film spotting poll about

1:52:06.040 --> 1:52:08.080
<v Speaker 4>actresses playing actresses who are going through it?

1:52:08.160 --> 1:52:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you got all that? Do you write all that

1:52:10.479 --> 1:52:10.800
<v Speaker 3>in your.

1:52:10.720 --> 1:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Noble all right, Yeah, I'll do it. It'll be the

1:52:13.000 --> 1:52:15.599
<v Speaker 1>last time I remember darken these doors again.

1:52:15.720 --> 1:52:22.439
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it's next week, all right, on streaming and

1:52:22.760 --> 1:52:24.040
<v Speaker 3>v o D right now.

1:52:24.360 --> 1:52:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Recently released is Happy Gilmore two. This has apparently Betty Safty, Haley,

1:52:29.320 --> 1:52:33.599
<v Speaker 4>Joel Osmond, Margaret Qually, Travis Kelcey and Bad Bunny. Make

1:52:33.680 --> 1:52:36.400
<v Speaker 4>of all that what you will? In wide release The

1:52:36.520 --> 1:52:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Fantastic Four First Steps recommended by Michael Phillips. Also in

1:52:41.720 --> 1:52:45.920
<v Speaker 4>wide release, Oh Hi. This stars Molly Gordon from Shiva, Baby,

1:52:46.000 --> 1:52:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Theater Camp and of course The Bear. She plays a

1:52:49.000 --> 1:52:50.880
<v Speaker 4>woman who goes on a romantic get away with a

1:52:50.960 --> 1:52:55.120
<v Speaker 4>new boyfriend played by Logan Lherman. Next week, Adam is

1:52:55.360 --> 1:52:58.920
<v Speaker 4>back and we will be doing a Pantheon Project review

1:52:59.000 --> 1:53:01.640
<v Speaker 4>of One Flew Over the Huku's Nest in honor of

1:53:01.680 --> 1:53:05.760
<v Speaker 4>its fiftieth anniversary, and we're also tackling our top five

1:53:06.200 --> 1:53:10.479
<v Speaker 4>Jack Nicholson scenes. Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe

1:53:10.520 --> 1:53:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Deso and Sam van Holgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe,

1:53:14.160 --> 1:53:18.000
<v Speaker 4>this show wouldn't go. Our production assistant is Sophie Kempenar.

1:53:18.320 --> 1:53:21.719
<v Speaker 4>Special thanks to everyone at wb easy Chicago. More information

1:53:22.080 --> 1:53:27.000
<v Speaker 4>is available at wbeazy dot org and special special thanks

1:53:27.479 --> 1:53:31.040
<v Speaker 4>to Michael Phillips for helping me wade through my conflicted

1:53:31.080 --> 1:53:35.240
<v Speaker 4>thoughts about Eddington. Michael, any work you've been up to

1:53:35.560 --> 1:53:39.400
<v Speaker 4>coming out, things you're looking forward to that listeners should

1:53:39.600 --> 1:53:40.479
<v Speaker 4>keep an eye out for.

1:53:41.000 --> 1:53:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, every almost every week over a classical WFMT

1:53:45.720 --> 1:53:48.959
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight point seven FM here in Chicago, I introduce

1:53:49.320 --> 1:53:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and host the first segment of the weekly program. Soundtrack

1:53:53.160 --> 1:53:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a great array of film music, mostly film, TV, some

1:53:57.520 --> 1:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>video games, but mostly film. And you know, I'm working

1:54:02.000 --> 1:54:06.439
<v Speaker 1>on just all kinds of fascinating stuff, including I Think

1:54:06.600 --> 1:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what I Hope is going to be a piece that

1:54:09.280 --> 1:54:11.280
<v Speaker 1>allows me to stretch out a bit and actually take

1:54:11.320 --> 1:54:15.920
<v Speaker 1>time to do a proper Kim Novak interview and profile.

1:54:16.040 --> 1:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>She's getting a Lifetime Achievement Award at the Venice International

1:54:19.000 --> 1:54:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Film Festival. I've been lucky enough to get invited back

1:54:22.840 --> 1:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to Venice to be on this sort of off off

1:54:26.200 --> 1:54:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the main slate side panel called the Bi and Ali

1:54:29.880 --> 1:54:33.560
<v Speaker 1>College Cinema. Several critics in the country are going over

1:54:33.640 --> 1:54:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to could reconvene and do that, and I'd like to.

1:54:37.080 --> 1:54:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to, and I'll just talk process right here.

1:54:39.360 --> 1:54:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it doesn't work out. You guys

1:54:40.880 --> 1:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>are all friends. I'm trying to get. I may try

1:54:43.640 --> 1:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to get out to Oregon, where miss Novak lives and

1:54:47.040 --> 1:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>has lived for many decades now, and do a do

1:54:50.160 --> 1:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a minute interview away from the red carpet first and

1:54:53.360 --> 1:54:55.360
<v Speaker 1>then catch up with her. So I'd love to. I'd

1:54:55.400 --> 1:54:57.440
<v Speaker 1>love to do that. She is one hundred percent of Chicago,

1:54:58.080 --> 1:55:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a really great, very bittersweet and anyways Chicago story, and

1:55:03.200 --> 1:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I love it that she's getting the recognition now for

1:55:06.560 --> 1:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the most unusual big stars Hollywood ever produced.

1:55:12.160 --> 1:55:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Sounds like an incredible project, So all the best with

1:55:15.320 --> 1:55:19.640
<v Speaker 4>that and safe travels to Venice. Thanks again for joining

1:55:19.720 --> 1:55:22.360
<v Speaker 4>me here. Thanks Josh, it was fun for film spotting.

1:55:22.560 --> 1:55:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm Josh Larson.

1:55:23.640 --> 1:55:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.

1:55:24.680 --> 1:55:29.200
<v Speaker 2>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. The burn.

1:55:45.520 --> 1:55:48.440
<v Speaker 7>Film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family

1:55:48.560 --> 1:55:51.400
<v Speaker 7>at film spottingfamily dot com and get access to ad

1:55:51.480 --> 1:55:54.880
<v Speaker 7>free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and, for

1:55:54.960 --> 1:55:57.600
<v Speaker 7>the first time, all in one place, the entire film

1:55:57.640 --> 1:56:00.320
<v Speaker 7>spotting archive going back to two thousand and five. That's

1:56:00.320 --> 1:56:02.080
<v Speaker 7>a film spotting Family dot com

1:56:04.240 --> 1:56:05.520
<v Speaker 8>Pannably