WEBVTT - Bank CEOs, Oil, and Rate Cuts

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven News.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot going on Souper to Washington. We've been

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>totally ripping up this screw. As Tom Keenan would say,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Joe Matthew He is our go to voice for Bloomberg

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Radio and television down in Washington, DC. He joins US,

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 2>as does Mick mulroy, co founder of the Lobo Institute

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>East at the US Department of Defense. Former US Marine

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Infantry officer for sixteen years. We thank him, of course

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>for his service. Joe, let's start with you, McCarthy. What

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>do you make of it? I know you're gonna tell

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 2>me that you guys down in DC were expecting it.

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Simone and I totally were not yet by surprise. So

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>what does it mean.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 3>I won't go that far. Okay, I do, by the way,

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm bouncing back if we can fix that. But I

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>know it's got to be a heck of a day

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>if you call me twice, yes, in one day. But yet, Look,

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>there were questions about what he was going to do

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 3>because he had not announced his plans for re election,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>and so a little bit difficult. Sorry about that. It's

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, not a massive shocker knowing he had not

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 3>announced his plans. Thank you for that, But the timing

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>is what blew me away. Gone by the end of

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the year. That's a lot different than saying you're not

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 3>going to run for reelection, and following yesterday's news, Patrick McHenry,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the Chair of the Financial Services Committee, who was acting Speaker,

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Remember he was slamming the gavel and anger just a

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>couple of months ago, or I guess it was weeks

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>at this point, he just announced that he's leaving the

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>House as well. So you put these two together and

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>it's two major retirement slash resignations for the Republican conference

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>in the House, and it tells us a lot about

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the chaos that we've been seeing.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Nick, does this have any impact on the overall discussions

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 4>that we expect to see happen and negotiations we expect

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 4>to see happen both around Ukraine AID as well as

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 4>AID for Israel.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think it does. Actually, I think a lot

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 5>of the people that are retiring are people that at

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 5>least initially were very supportive of Ukraine AID in the

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 5>role that the United States has played in getting the

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 5>world together to get behind them. So as you see

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 5>these individuals get replaced, the concern will be that they're

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 5>going to be more inclined with I guess the far

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 5>right of the Republican Party that now sees this as

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 5>something that we shouldn't be doing. I obviously would disagree

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 5>with that, but I think these shifts may have an impact.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 5>You're already seeing it, and you're also seeing and I've

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 5>been up there to brief many fence sitters, if you will,

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 5>you're also seeing them say that as we get closer

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 5>to the election that this is going to be even

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>harder to pass this one hundred plus billion dollars in

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 5>support to Ukraine. So the quicker we can do this,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 5>the better, and before a lot of these individuals are replaced,

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>is also a good thing.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mick, we're still waiting comments from President Biden about

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the funding including Ukraine. Give us your updated view of

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 2>how critical additional funding for Ukraine is because it's, quite

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>frankly and unfortunately for them, the events in Israel have

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of taken Ukraine off the front page. Just give

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>us an update from your perspective.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 6>That's a good point.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 5>I haven't talked about Ukraine in over a month, so

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 5>that should say something.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 6>I do think.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, we have to remember this is somewhat of

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 5>a David and Goliath type scenario. We forgot that. But

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 5>if you go back to the beginning of when what's

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Russian invaded. Everybody expected this to be over in weeks

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 5>and keep to fall and everything. Look where we are now,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 5>where it's a counter offensive, counter offensive for the Ukrainians. Yes,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 5>it has stalled. Yes it's very difficult, but it's an

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 5>entirely different situation. And part of that is because of

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 5>the support that's come to them from Europe and from

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 5>the United States, with the United States being the leader

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 5>in that. If we failed to support them this one

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion plus dollars, they're going to be in a

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 5>serious situation. This is largely a war of attrition. Now

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 5>it's in inches, but Ukraine is on the offense and

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 5>it really needs the munitions to be able to take

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 5>on and go into the defenses that Russians have built

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 5>over many many months before this counter offensive start. If

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 5>we pull out now, that is a big problem for

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 5>the Ukrainians. Could this could then start, the type could

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 5>start turning and we could see the Russians start gaining ground.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Boy, all right, here's just a quote today from President

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of Zelenski of Ukraine. Quote. We have a realistic action

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 2>strategy and it is our efforts with your support, that

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>can ensure Ukraine's success on the ground. Zelenski said in

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a speech to G seven leaders, including President Joe Biden,

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 2>during a virtual meeting Wednesday.

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Joe, what's your sense of how much political support

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 4>that can be a drawn up for Ukraine? Because it

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 4>does seem like when you you know, if you look

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 4>across the majorities of these two chambers, you know probably

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 4>if you could just put the resolution on the floor,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 4>they'd get passed. But you know who can be pulled

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 4>on the fence.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>What you just said is correct. If you put Ukraine

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>funding on the floor of the House, we already saw

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>it happen with standalone Israel funding, it would pass, and

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 3>it would pass with bipartisan support. The question is procedure

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 3>in this case and exactly what the Speaker of the

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>House can get away with with a actured conference. Look,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Kevin McCarthy just left for a reason. Mike Johnson has

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 3>to figure out a way around this. Here he says

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 3>that he supports getting this done, he does not want

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 3>to do it, by the way, all in one pop.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>This more than one hundred billion dollar request that President

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Biden made. He wants to have bills on Israel, Ukraine,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan separately on the floor, and he wants Ukraine tied

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>to border funding, border security changes in asylum law, something

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that has eluded lawmakers for decades. The prospect of getting

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>that done in the next couple of weeks is not

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 3>looking really great, which is why it's likely this is

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 3>going to turn into something next year. The White House

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>says they're out of time, they're out of money. But

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 3>until this can be taken care of on the border,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 3>something that Republicans and Democrats can swallow, it's not likely

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>going to happen.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mick, you know, probably a week or so ago,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>we spoke with the Admiral Strevetis, former head of NATO,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and he made a point. He had just returned from

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>a trip to South Korea, and he felt like, what's

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna What probably and is likely to happen in Ukraine

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>is some type of trade land for peace, much like

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>it happened in Korea. Is that a scenario now that

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>it appears that it's become more of a kind of

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>drawn out situation here militarily.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think the Admiral is right. I think that

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 5>is something that will be looked at and probably is

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 5>already being looked at, But ultimately it's going to be

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 5>up the Ukrainian people. President Zelinski said he's going to

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 5>need a referendum when it comes to giving any land away,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 5>but there needs to be something in return, and I

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 5>think that will be of course peace, but also potentially

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 5>NATO membership. If I was in their shoes, I wouldn't

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 5>want to give any territory away unless I had absolute

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 5>assurances security wise that this wasn't going to happen again.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 5>And one way to do that is to get into NATO,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 5>which of course then gives them the Article five protection

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 5>if they're ever attacked again. So I don't know where

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 5>that stands right now, but I know that those discussions

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.679
<v Speaker 5>are ongoing. And as this to your point of your question,

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 5>as this goes into this kind of stalemate, it's going

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 5>to be more and more likely because the stalemate means

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 5>nobody's really gaining a lot, doesn't mean people aren't dying.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 5>So it is it is still incumbent on both sides

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 5>to look at what they can do to end this

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 5>in a way that's at least acceptable to both both countries.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Are the Ukrainians optimistic that at any point that there

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 4>can be a sort of breakthrough, an end to the stalemate.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 4>I know that, you know, throughout the spring, in the summer,

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, there were moments where they said yes in

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 4>the next couple of weeks. But has that kind of

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 4>optimism's gone away?

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 5>So I don't think the optimism has gone away from

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 5>the Ukrainian people. I think they're in it to the end.

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 5>You know, there was just one story that was out

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 5>there about the Ukrainian soldier that called in all of

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 5>the artillier on his own position because it was about

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 5>to be overrun, and of course killed all the Russian

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 5>troops that were about to overrun his positions. But that

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 5>those kind of things really indicate to me is somebody

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 5>spent a lot of time in conflicts. People that do

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 5>that don't generally lose wars. They'll go to the end.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's what really is that kind of

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>power that the Ukrainian people have. They are tenacious and

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 5>they're never going to give up. And Russian people, I

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 5>think realize that they've lost so many They've lost more

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 5>people in this conflict that we lost in Vietnam if

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 5>you think about the time difference in that. So this

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 5>is something that I think really is that factor that

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 5>you can't duplicate, you can't buy. It's ingrained in the

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Ukrainian people to keep fighting. I do think once the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 5>summer hits again, in all the weapons systems that we've provided,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of the advanced ones that we're training

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 5>them on now, like the F sixteen, they will start

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 5>gaining some terrain. So Russia is going to be very

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 5>concerned when all that comes together and there's a and

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 5>they really start pushing in the spring.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Can we shift to the conflict in the Middle East? Now?

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Israel appearing to draw some criticism, increasing criticism, I would

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 4>say from the Biden administration. We saw some restrictions on

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 4>v is first, really settlers involved in violence in the

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 4>West Bank come into play yesterday. How much of a

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 4>divide is how much criticism truly is the Biden administration

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 4>placing on Israel? And you know, is it truly intensifying

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>or are these just little bits and pieces that we see.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 5>So I do think it's intestifying. I think at first

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 5>and still today, the United States is the most significant

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 5>partner to Israel. And I think any country that was

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 5>attacked like they were on October seventh, what have as

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 5>their objective to destroy the entity that did that in

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 5>this case Hamas so militarily degrade them to a point

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 5>where they're not combat effected. But the way they went

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 5>about it, especially in the shaping part of this operation,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 5>the shaping phase where it was significant bombing in areas

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 5>to essentially destroy tunnels, but there are in urban areas

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 5>brought down the multiple buildings at the same time. That's

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 5>why we're seeing this level of civilian casualties at the

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 5>fifteen thy sixteen thousand. Now, I think at first that

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 5>was all said behind the scenes. Now you're seeing more

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 5>and more public statements that they expect Israel to shift

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 5>tactics so they can reduce the amount of civilian casualties

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 5>because this is just not acceptable in their view in

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 5>many military analysis view, but also a need to address

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 5>the humanitarian catastrophe that's happening right now because they can't

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 5>get enough humanitarian aid into gods. So I think you'll

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 5>see the United States, of course stick with our partner

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 5>in Israel, and they're objective, but also really push them

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 5>to do in a manner that doesn't completely alienate them

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 5>from the rest of the world and make our job

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 5>in supporting them more difficult.

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So I mean in terms of that objective which was

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 2>originally stated by Israel, complete annihilation of Hamas, Is that,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>even in practicality possible? I mean, how do you eradicate

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 2>a terrorist organization. It's not like, you know, defeating an

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 2>army of a state. So does that need to be rethought.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 5>Yes, especially if you put it as eliminate Hamas. Right,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 5>So we know at the CIA, I spent twenty years there,

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 5>all my colleagues, all the military, we spent twenty years

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 5>trying to defeat al Qaeda in its offshoots. Right, you

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 5>can't defeat philosophy. In fact, oftentimes if you're heavy handed,

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 5>you create more of the problem what they're trying to do.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 5>And I think when you get into talking to the

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 5>idea of seniors, which I do, they're trying to destroy

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 5>their military capacity. They realize the philosophy itself is not

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 5>something that can be destroyed, but to reduce their weapons stashes.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 5>They're especially precision guided, their soldiers, their leadership, Capture their

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 5>leadership and destroy these tunnels, which gives them a lot

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 5>of military advantages. That's what they're really trying to do.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't think anybody there thinks that they're going to

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 5>destroy the eye biology and that either HAMAS or something

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 5>like AMAS isn't going to continue. They just want to

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 5>reduce the threat to it's manageable. And then the question

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 5>is going to be what comes next, because if the

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 5>international community doesn't come up with some kind of security

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 5>and stabilization force that's acceptable to both, then the IDF

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 5>is going to stay there long term, and that's going

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 5>to be a lot of international pressure to change that.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Nick, thanks so much for joining us. Mick mulroy,

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 2>he is co founder of the Lobo Institute. He's absolutely

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 2>our go to voice on so many of these geopolitical

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>issues given his experience at the US Department of Defense, CIA,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the United States Marine Corps. I mean, the guy's done everything,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>so we really appreciate getting a few minutes of his time.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the team. Ken's our live program Bloomberg

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 7>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 7>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's get back to the discussion of the banks here.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Chris Whalen is at Whaling Global Advisors. He knows a

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 2>thing or two about these banks. Chris, let's just start

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>with the testimony down to Washington, DC. What are in

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the banks really want as it relates to this latest

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 2>round of potential regulation.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 6>I think they want to kill it, delay it, and

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.239
<v Speaker 6>force the FED and the other regulators to do their homework.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, as Jamie Diamond eluded and several others eluded

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 6>Senator Kennedy. There's no prior art this analytical framework that's

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 6>in this rule. They didn't do the work, and this

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 6>breaks the process that we've had with BOSEL going back

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 6>twenty years and more. It says, you know, we're going

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 6>to test it, we're going to argue about it, we're

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 6>going to publish it so we can see all the work,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 6>and then we're going to adopt it. They're not doing that.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 6>And this is part and parcela what you see throughout

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 6>the Biden administration in many areas like housing, where I

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 6>spend most my time, where they come up with these

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 6>crazy ideas that are clearly unworkable, but they're doing it

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 6>for political reasons. You know, for example, they want lenders

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 6>to use two different credit scores now for lending. It's

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 6>arithmetically impossible, and so the FHFA, which regulates Fanny and

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Fanny told them the average to two scores, which is crazy.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 6>But that's what we're dealing with now. So you guys

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 6>at Bloomberg understand what's involved when you start mucking around

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 6>with credit scores in the world of Shakestea income, that's

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 6>not a trivial thing. But the Biden people are going

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 6>for it because they want talking points. You can see

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 6>that Cherick Brown is having a tough time politically. Yeah,

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 6>you spent five minutes talking about the TV ads about

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 6>bossl do you imagine, right?

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 7>Exactly?

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>So all right, we're waiting. That is, we're waiting for

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 2>President Biden. He's going to be scheduled to make some

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>comments shortly on and the apackage to Ukraine when that

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 2>and when he does come, we will bring this to you.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, you were talking, Chris about sort of the

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 4>unworkability of some of these proposals, but you know, haven't

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 4>we seen European regulators do something quite similar. Where are

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 4>the differences here and where is there potent potentially room

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 4>for a compromise between the banks themselves and between regulators.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, the European situations Timona is very different because you

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 6>don't have middle market banking in Europe. The governments take

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 6>all that business. So the big banks basically are banking

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 6>larger corporations, government entities, and then they go offshore and

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 6>they compete with city for example, you know, the markets.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 6>So their approach to things like housing is they don't

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 6>like housing. They don't like the idea of single family homes.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 6>So the Bossil rule from years ago reflects the US

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 6>missed that one and it was unfortunate. Now they're going

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 6>after it even more, things like mortgage servicing rights. I

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 6>don't think the two perspectives are really compatible at the

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 6>end of the day. The Europeans treat business, treat banks

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 6>as second class citizens, and they don't even think about,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, starting new banks and that sort of thing.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 6>In the US, our bond market has been our strength,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 6>the fact that we have private credit markets, and you know,

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 6>our banks still are very important players in that, but

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 6>they're much less involved. You know, I doubt many people

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 6>on the Senate Banking Committee realize that eighty percent of

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 6>all residential mortgages today are underwritten and serviced by non banks.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 2>The you know, that's that Cinneria I wanted to go

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to private credit. It's now a one point five trillion

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>dollar business that kind of sprang up right after the

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Great Financial Crisis. Now, the concerns seemed to be when

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 2>people are getting concerned about the lack of transparency, the

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>lack of regulation from that market. Can you give us

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts there?

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Jamie Diamond and the other witnesses alluded to this,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 6>which is at more than half of the private credit

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 6>market is now conducted by non banks. These are funds,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 6>These are other types of entities ups that are not

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 6>particularly transparent. You know, when a private reap, for example,

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 6>calculates net asset value, there's no rule for how they

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 6>do that, so you know, it's, to say the least,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 6>it's hard to judge what's going on inside these entities

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 6>and the banks financed them. So that's why a couple

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.959
<v Speaker 6>of the witnesses referred specifically to that and said do

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 6>you want more of that? And that's the real question

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 6>before both the Senate and the bank regulators. Do you

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 6>really want to go down this road? Because the capital

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 6>rates are so punitive that no US large bank would

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 6>want to be in residential mortgage at all. Think about that.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 6>No condo loans. You know, that's largely a big bank market.

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 6>The little banks don't do much business there.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 4>But you know too that at the same time stability

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 4>within the broader financial system. This was always one of

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 4>the arguments by hedge funds and private equity firms that

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, well, banks shouldn't be in some of in

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 4>some of this business, we're pulling some of the risk

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>out of, you know, the financial system.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 6>And I agree with that. Operationally, we want non banks

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 6>to take care of mortgages. They're much better at it,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 6>much better orders of magnitude, more efficient, and it's good

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 6>to have the commercial banks as the lenders. They are

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 6>essentially the gatekeepers, right. But you and I both know

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 6>that if a money market funder rolled over, the government

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 6>would intervene. This is why I said was doing two

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 6>trillion dollars of reverse repost a year ago. They essentially

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 6>had to come in and save the money market funds

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 6>from getting zeroed out when t bills were very low. Today,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 6>that problems reversed itself in Yellen's issuing a lot of

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 6>tea bills to facilitate that. Right, But long term, I

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 6>think the non bank sector is going to have to

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 6>live with the interest rates like everybody else, and I

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 6>think the long end of the curve will be higher

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 6>than it is today. That's going to normalize, right, That'll

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 6>be a different world for non banks, particularly because they

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 6>funds in the bond market. Unless you're a read and

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 6>you can sell stock, most other non banks have to

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 6>put out high yield term debt raise capital, and then

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 6>the banks do all the secured financing for them. So

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 6>if you're a fund whatever, it is right right night,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, but it is such an important part of

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 6>the economy. I like the partnership with the banks doing

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 6>the wholesale work. I think it's better for them. Okay,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 6>they don't want to face consumers now, all.

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, Chris, thanks so much for joining us. Chris Whalen,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 2>chairman of Waling Global Advisors.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape cats are Line program Bloomberg

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 7>You can also in live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Talk to somebody who.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Does this for Living Quincy Crosby, she's achieved the global

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 2>strategist for LPL Financial. She joins us Quincy, what do

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>you make of the last four or five weeks? That

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>was the heck of a November four all these markets.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, it was, And what the beautiful part of it

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 8>is is how perverse the markets can be. Because what

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 8>happened was we were in October and by the time

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 8>we got to the end of the October, nobody believed

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 8>in seasonality. Nobody believed in November or December seasonality. Nobody

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 8>believed that this market could actually enjoy an important rally.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 8>And then on November first, almost like clockwork, we get

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 8>the Treasury announcement, which was positive for the markets in

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 8>terms of funding needs a little bit lower. And then

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 8>the Fed at that afternoon meeting right after the Treasury announcement,

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 8>for the market interpreting it as at dubbish pivot that

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 8>they're finished. Then added to all of this is the

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 8>most important narrative, and that is that the market is

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 8>convinced that the FED is going to cut rates even

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 8>as early as March. This part of that narrative is

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 8>I think completely what the market is focused on. However,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 8>when we see these yields coming down, we always look

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 8>at the pace of a direction, how quick or how slow.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 8>It has been very fast, coming from five percent on

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 8>October nineteenth all the way down to today, it's been

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:45.199
<v Speaker 8>very quick. How about that. It is screaming a difficult economy,

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 8>a difficult backdrop, a perhaps a pride for help from

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 8>the Federal Reserve, which is sticking to its narrative. No,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 8>we're not going to cut rates. The market is saying

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 8>you're wrong, and you know it. And so it's going

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 8>to be interesting to see what the Fed has to

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 8>say next week.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have before we get to next week, a

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 4>big week of economic data, culminating with the jobs report,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 4>and we have very disparate signals coming through. Is the

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 4>data bad enough to warrant some of what we're seeing

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 4>in interest rates WAPs? You know, the Fed cuts next year,

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 4>or our investors getting ahead of themselves.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, they're probably getting ahead of themselves. But again, when

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 8>you look at the treasury market and you see the

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 8>rates coming down that quickly, it typically is underpinned by

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 8>a growth scare. I mean, you don't usually see rates

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 8>coming down that quickly. When rates moved up dramatically to

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 8>five percent. Jennert Yellen said, well, the term premium, it

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 8>is based on the fact that the economy is so strong. Well,

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 8>now that we're going in the other direction, doctor Yellen,

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 8>I wonder what she has to say now about how

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 8>strong the backdrop.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Is hold up though? Direction we saw it wasn't third

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 4>quarter GDP point two percent annualized. Are we truly going

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 4>in the other direction?

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, right now, the same forecaster, the Atlanta Fed GDP

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 8>now that had it almost nailed at five point one

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 8>five point two percent for the third quarter is looking

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 8>at one point three percent right now. Of course, tomorrow

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 8>is going to Friday is going to make an important

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 8>difference in terms of what it has for December. But

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 8>the fact is it's not a recession. It may not

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 8>be stellar, but it's not a recession. But again, this

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 8>persistence of the market saying the Fed is going to

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 8>cutreates it doesn't end. In fact, if anything, it's been intensifying.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, So, Quincy, it's it's December. It's time to

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 2>start looking towards the year ahead. Here, what are you

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 2>telling your clients about twenty twenty four.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, our view is that, first of all, to end

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 8>this year. We like the fact that we're seeing some consolidation.

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 8>Even though it's this meandering between positive negative terity, it's

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 8>moving sideways. That's pretty healthy. It should lead us to

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 8>a rally toward the end of the year. However, we

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 8>don't want it to be completely overbought going into next

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 8>year because that sets the stage for more of a

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 8>market pulling back as the market figures out how is

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 8>the economy growing? Is it slowing too much at this

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 8>stage is still a question mark. We're still in positive

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 8>territory in terms of GDP forecasts, so we're looking at quality. Actually,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 8>we're looking at large cap growth, and we think that

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 8>is the place to be, particularly if you're in companies

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 8>that have strong balance sheets. That's how we're looking at

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 8>the beginning of next year. We do think a recession

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 8>may hit. It could be a technical recession, just as

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 8>we had over a year ago. But the fact is

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 8>we do see a slow down and then you're listening.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 7>To the tape. Catch our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.239
<v Speaker 7>at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, Tune it up,

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg dot Com and the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 7>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 7>York station.

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 9>Just say we were marveling earlier at the Russell two thousand,

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 9>the only index that's actually moving today, up eight tens

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 9>of one percent.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 4>Are you seeing breath coming back into this market in

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Four, Well, most likely we will unless the market and

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 8>the backdrop is very weak, because we know that what

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 8>happens is the market narrows and the money goes into

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 8>those big, big, megaatech names because they are seen as defensives.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 8>The Russell two thousand, I watch it as a bellwether

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 8>because I'll tell you, as soon as it believes that

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 8>the economy is slowing too much, that market just pulls

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 8>right back down. It is granular. It is probably the

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 8>most important bell weather of the economy, the real economy

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 8>that we have, because but it will move quickly. And

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 8>so I think it's great that it's moving higher because

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 8>at this point it's suggesting that the economic backdrop remains constructive.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 8>The banks twenty percent of banks, twenty percent industrials, and

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 8>you've got buyer checks in there. The banks are moving

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 8>and that's why they're moving higher because rates are coming down.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 8>But the economy is still solid according to the Russell

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 8>two thousand. That will probably change as we move into

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 8>it a more difficult environment in twenty twenty four as

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 8>the market absorbs still the higher rates.

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting, Quincy. Just another part of the

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 2>market that's just been running all over the place is

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the energy market. WTI crewde oil is down four point

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 2>two percent today. We're not below seventy dollars a barrel.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've said it once, I'll say it again.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad I didn't. I could never be an

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 2>oil trader. The volatility just crushed me. What do you

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 2>make about the energy space? I mean, is it too

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>much volatility for you to look at or how do

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you guys think about that?

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 8>No, no, we look at it, and having worked in it,

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 8>I actually enjoy this. There's trouble in the OPEC plus

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 8>cartel in their oil patch. Obviously they couldn't come out

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 8>with a deal an announcement. But nonetheless the companies make money.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 8>The cash flow is strong. But the fact is here

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 8>in the United States, I'm getting two ninety nine. By

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 8>the way, in Charlottesville, Virginia. You got to come down

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 8>here to fill out really nice. But the point here

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 8>is America is producing more oil thirteen million barrels a day.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 8>It's a record that's not good. You want to see

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 8>a pullback now. The thing I worry about, by the way,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 8>is the Saudis have done this in the past, flood

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 8>the market with oil in order to push out our producers.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 8>They've done this in the past. I don't think they

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 8>would do it now. What they really want are deeper

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 8>cuts and habit could co join with Russia and the

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 8>African States and come out with a very strong production cut. Remember,

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 8>they need about seventy eight bucks a barrel, even though

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 8>it's not much to get the oil out and find it.

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 8>Because they have a very large benefit program, welfare program,

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 8>and then and then they're building cities, they need higher

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 8>oil prices. And I wouldn't put it past them to

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 8>try to negotiate a very deep, not voluntary, but a

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 8>very deep production cut, not not flood the market with

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 8>oil to get us out. But they've done it before.

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 8>I don't think they'll do it again.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I should mention for our listeners here. Quincy

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 4>is a former US diplomat and was posted as an

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 4>energy at TACHE. The US and the embassy in London.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 4>So interesting perspective there. You know, how does that How

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 4>does cheaper prices at the pump play out for the

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 4>American consumer, which many companies have been calling out as

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 4>a little bit constrained at this point.

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, absolutely, obviously it helps. But here's here is one

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 8>of the most fascinating parts of this. You would think

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 8>that US consumer expectations a future inflation would come down

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 8>based on the lower oil prices because there's a very

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 8>high positive correlation between the consumer gasoline prices and by

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 8>the way, how they look at the administration. However, what

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 8>we saw in the last University of Michigan Consumer Confidence Report,

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 8>the component that looks at future inflation, Americans came out

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 8>and said, well, we acknowledge that inflation has come down,

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 8>but we expected to climb higher. The FED does not

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 8>want to see this because what happens is this psychology

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 8>becomes intact, it becomes unanchored actually from the FED standpoint.

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 8>And it is fascinating because last time go around, when

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 8>the Strategic Petroleum Reserve was pushed out into the tanks,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 8>Americans said, inflation is coming down, and even Biden's approval

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 8>ratings actually ticked up, but not this time.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, Quincy, thank you so much once again for

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>taking some time to chat with this. Quincy Crosby, Chief,

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a global strategist for LPL Financial.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio