WEBVTT - Maximum Reading with Max Read

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to what Future.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm your host, Joshua Tapolski, and we have a Crackerjack

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>of a show. Do people still say that Crackerjack? Does

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>that even exist anymore?

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you know?

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Crackerjack's there like a candy, It's like a box. It's

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a candy. It's a candy corn. No, no, candy. Corn

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>is a candy. It's like caramel corn or caramel corn

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>depending on who you talk to, which I guess is

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>corn covered in a sugary coating. And then in the

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>box it was like a red stripe box. Does this

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>even Does anybody know what I'm talking about?

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Lyra or Jenna? Do you know what I'm talking about?

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Of course I know what Crackerjack.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what Crackerjack is? Okay?

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>And I had a prize in the box, and.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>At the bottom of the fucking box there'd be a prize,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>like a toy or something.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>That's great. They don't do that anymore. They don't do it.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they do.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>They probably still sell it. It's probably very readily available.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 2>It's probably one of the best selling products at grocery stores.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Heay, cracker Barrel, I bet you.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Cracker Barrel is a right wing establishment dedicated to the

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>suppression and oppression of many groups, and I can't stand

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I won't stand for it. Although they do have really

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>good biscuits in my recollection.

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>But I would bet you good money that they sell

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>cracker jacks in the.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>General store, crackerjack at the cracker barrel.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Probably you're probably right, An, Yeah, we have a crackerjack

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 2>show for you. We've got a wonderful man, Max Read,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a writer, an editor, a screenwriter, and also a friend,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>I should say, a buddy, and he's got a great

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>newsletter called Read Max that I love. And we're going

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to talk about all sorts of stuff. I don't want

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>to waste one minute, so let's get into this conversation.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 2>You were editor in chief of Gawker when it was

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>suit out of existence?

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 4>The lawsuit was ongoing when I was editor. I left

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 4>in twenty fifteen. The following year spring, I want to

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>say the following year was when the judgment came down

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 4>and Gocker declared bankruptcy.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Who was the editor of Gawker at that time.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>I think Alex Parene was the editor in chief. I thought, wow, yeah,

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>the last and final Yeah.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>No, not the last and final of that Goker. There

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>were many other erbitions of Cocker.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 4>They just transitioned. They became h what was it called.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Splinter, splinter, splinder splinter, but splinter was Splinter was owned

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>by that was? When? Was it owned by Fusion? Is

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that was it?

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Ye?

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Fusion became I'm sorry, this is crazy shit to think about,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>but like I know, Fusion was a thing that was

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 2>that existed. It was a new media startup. Correct me

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 2>if I'm wrong.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 4>It was It was new media within Telemundo.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It was like Telemundo Star new Yes, start up, tell them.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Telemundo started a thing called Fusion dot net, which was

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a a diverse millennial news operation, right that was sort

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>of like the overarching which like from like I get it,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>like very of the moment, like very like Mashable, like

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>in the spectrum of like a Mashable and uh yeah,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean who else who else would it have been?

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 2>I guess BuzzFeed News, Mike whatever, This is not Mike, Yeah,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Mike's other perfect example. Actually, I would say in a

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>way Fusion was like a mic competitor. Probably is the

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 2>most most accurate. Anyhow, Sorry, this is not we don't

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>have to talk about this at all. In fact, I wasn't really

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>planning on talking about it, but although I do want

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to talk about media because you are a member of

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the media elite as we know, I don't know what

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>what is the word for a person who just has

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a newsletter?

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you call that?

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 4>I call myself an owner operator, a small business, small

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>business owner.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>You're a small business owner.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you get some some of Biden's tax break,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>tax breaks for the one percent, for the elite. So

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you're in the media, right, you'd say you're in the media,

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>like you continue you continue to publish content that is

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>in the sphere of news media.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Would you say, yeah, I mean, I I write twice

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 4>a week on my substack, do some freelance journalism still too.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's funny the fact that you sort of

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 4>we sort of started talking about this and then immediately

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 4>started remembering some websites. It's very hard. I started my

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 4>substack not really intending to write very much about media.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 4>But if you have been in the business for long enough,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 4>and especially if you lived through the period that we're

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 4>talking about, the twenty tens, the crazy twenty tens, it's

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>hard not to just keep writing about it. Because it

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>still sticks in your mind. I don't want to say trauma,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 4>but you know it's.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, it's trauma. It's Trauma's the right word.

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the word trauma's overused, and I don't want

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to say that people who use it don't have trauma.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 2>But I do feel like people say trauma about things

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>that are like they like, you know, I don't know,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>they've got they couldn't find a pair of shoes that fit,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, I have trauma from that. I'm like,

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's what the word means. Like, I

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>feel like it might get a little overused. But because

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I had a call earlier today, I was talking to

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 2>a reporter and we got into a conversation about the Messenger, Yeah,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 2>which is a the messenger is like so you actually,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I said the boom period when you're talking about what

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about fusion and stuff, but actually what fusion

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 2>is in that era, which is like ten late twenty tens.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 2>I want to say, like, right, I don't know when

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>fusion started or that, like what the but I want

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to say, like twenty ten, that's probably later than twenty ten, fourteen,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>around thirteen fourteen. It's actually the beginning of the end

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 2>for the new media boom. It's like Vice had matured

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>into this monolithic thing, and BuzzFeed news was at least

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>rolling probably pretty successful at that point. It was sort

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of like the beginning of the end for like the

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>boom era of like blogging, which would have been which

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>would have been in the you know, two thousand and

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 2>four to two. I mean, obviously stuff happened aslet's say

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and four to two thousand and ten something

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>like that is like, yeah, the biggest like boom for

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>like blogging, blogging, not like corporate owned blogging.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, there was, I mean, the way I think about

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 4>it is always like there was that early period was

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 4>very people would still go to websites. You know, you

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 4>would actually go to ngadget dot com or goal dot

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 4>com and you you would refresh it to see the feed.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 4>And then it was sort of SEO came along and

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 4>it allowed you to maintain a relatively similar format. But

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 4>the thing that really sort of turned like the when

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Facebook arrived as like the thing that would give you

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 4>traffic around twenty twelve, and all of a sudden, everything

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 4>you wrote didn't matter what your website looked like, didn't

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>matter what your website was. Everything you wrote had to

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 4>sound like it could be shared on a social feed

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 4>or whatever.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 4>And that's when Fusion and all these that's when all

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 4>the VC money started really coming in and the big

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>corporate money.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a very dark period. I mean, I'm just trying

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 2>to think. I'm trying to think of it in personal

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 2>terms only because that's easier for me. My memory is

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>very bad, and so I have to go like, well,

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>what was I doing? What was I doing at that point?

0:06:59.360 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 2>So, like, yeah, Gadget Crew left to start the Verge

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 2>in like twenty ten, I think maybe to early twenty eleven.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>We launched the Verge in November of twenty eleven. I'm

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty sure that sounds wrong, but I think it's actually

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>right anyhow, whatever, But that that to me is like

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of the bit that's about when you used to

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>kickoff of the ends. It's not to be, not to

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>be you know, self centric or whatever. But like, I

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>think we were legitimately doing the blogging thing where we're like,

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to take our team and go do a thing.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>And we went to a company that wasn't it was

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>VC back but it wasn't like it was an NBC

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. It wasn't like Telemundo wasn't wasn't backing it

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>or whatever you're writing. You have a sub stack? Am

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I allowed to say that?

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of times on the Internet somebody says substack.

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>That might put an asterisk in between the S and

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the B because they don't know if Elon Musk is

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>going to block.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 4>It for auditor. Yeah, well, just don't put it in

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 4>the title of this of this podcast.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk. We're gonna have to end.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>As a note for Lyra and Jenna, please let's make

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>sure we don't add the word substack fully spelled out

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>in the title.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But you have a sub stack, which is a.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.559
<v Speaker 2>Is a company that has created a platform for people

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>to publish newsletters which look a lot like blog posts. Yeah,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it just sought me at any point where if you

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 2>sound like this, if this sounds like this is wrong,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>And also, you can charge people a subscription fee for

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>your newsletter and in doing so create a like a

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>personal media company, like a single person media brand.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you've done.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Now you have a thing called read Max which I

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>have to say, as far as titles goes very unoriginal

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>for you, but I guess pretty clever as well. Explain

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to the listener, who I'm sure are all subscribers of

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>read Max. By the way I have, I think the

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>crossover is extremely high. But just explain to them, like

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>what your newsletter does.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 4>The tagline is that it's a newsletter about the future.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Really, yeah, is that the tagline? Yeah? It is? Wow?

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay interesting, you know I started it. It's funny. I

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 4>was thinking about this the other day. I started it

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 4>with this, with the sort of manifesto post that people

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 4>can still go back and look at where I said.

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to write a lot about the way life

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 4>in the twenty percentury had been shaped by the mega

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 4>platforms of the Internet, the way that not just sort

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 4>of economics but also culture and social formations get worked

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 4>through your facebooks and your Instagrams and your tiktoks. But

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 4>as it happens, you know, my editorial philosophy has all

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 4>the sort of been that readers like to feel passion

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 4>and joy. I sound like I'm giving like an upfront's

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 4>presentation to sell the advertise.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I wish you had like a clicker

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and some slides.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly right, if you really could, you have a big

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>like a pie chart with some percentage of readers who

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>like the.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Readers love imagine I'm in like a black turtle.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 2>There's like, yeah, it's like it's like seventy eight percent

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 2>of readers love to feel passion.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a small sliver that don't like passion anyhow.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 4>So this is what happens when you spend any time

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 4>in editorial management, as you learn to talk like this.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 4>That being said, yeah cliched, is it sounds It's like

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 4>not worth me finding something to say about tech every

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 4>week if it means that once a week is going

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 4>to be boring. So in practice, the tagline of newsletter

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 4>is a newsletter about the future. In practice, it's a

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 4>newsletter about things that I think are interesting, which includes AI,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 4>includes crypto, includes you know, platforms like Facebook, includes media stuff.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Also includes action movies, sci fi movies. Yes, sort of

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 4>whatever is is interesting me at any given moment. So

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to give the elevator pitch. But people who

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 4>are on the same wave link that I am, I

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 4>think like it because they because it gives them a

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of weekly dose of interesting thinking about, you know,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 4>whatever is going on in whatever things are interesting me

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 4>at that moment.

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think the most successful publications, whether

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 2>they're a person doing a newsletter or you know, lots

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of people working on something, tend to be the ones

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>that center not around necessarily a very hard line of

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 2>specific topics, but a kind of philosophical through line. And

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I agree with you, would be boring to

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 2>simply write about like whatever that description is supposed to

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 2>encapsulate or could encapsulate. It probably would be very boring

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>every week to hear about that. But you have you

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 2>do go pretty far afield. Yeah, Like I downloaded and

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 2>started watching this film Nemesis the other day, which I

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 2>definitely saw in my youth. I mean, you might have

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>written more than one occasion about the movie, but it's

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 2>not a good movie. I mean, to me, just for

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>starters time, I want to be very clear, it's not

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 2>like high art or anything. It is like it was

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>an early nineties. Yeah, like a cyber science fiction kind

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of movie. It's like it's like there were a lot

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>of movies in the early nineties. Another one of them

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 2>is Hardware, which I'm sure you've seen I hope you've seen,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 2>which originally was rated triple X very like for real,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 2>like actually it was rated ACTS or triple X is

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 2>whatever they called it when it was you know, like,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>but there's this kind of genre of film people who

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>like read Neuromancer and were like, that's cool, But I

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 2>don't really have much of a budget. What could I do?

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Like if I like this like a cyberpunk idea, but

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't really have the to go all the way.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 2>And so Nemesis is what of the because you wrote

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>about but you actually did a post. I want to

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 2>say it was like a ranking of the sunglasses from Nemesis,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 2>the cool sunglasses from Nemesis.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I felt so inspired after seeing that that.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I got to watch this movie again,

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and so I h of course I went on the

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Pirate Bay, which is still in existence, even though you

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>have to definitely get a computer.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Virus to access it. You absolutely have.

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>To get a computer virus to go to the Pirate

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Bay and downloaded a you know, a HD like Blu

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Ray rip of Nemesis.

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Christine twenty one sixty.

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, no, no, no, I can't be.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't be watching Nemesis in some seven twenty shit

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>like I need to see I need to see every

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 2>grain of sand in the extremely sandy atmosphere of the

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>film anyhow. But so so you're writing about like you

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>write about stuff that is definitely not the future. But

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 2>I am curious what is like in your mind? Like

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>when you say the future, what are things you've written

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 2>and talked about and are thinking about recently that would

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>fall into that category.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm not any different than anybody else who's

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>paying attention right now in thinking that, like AI is,

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 4>the is kind of the thing that we everybody is

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 4>talking about, and therefore becomes interesting just because it is

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 4>a thing that everybody's talking about. You know, I was

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 4>over the last couple of years, I would describe myself

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 4>as a cryptoskeptic, but I still found crypto as a

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of like object of interest worth writing about and

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 4>thinking about, both as a reason to criticize it, but

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 4>also you know, the communities that arise around something like crypto,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 4>the kind of like the art work I suppose, or

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the cultural formation, if you want to call it that,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, between Nemesis and Bordees. Clearly I have a

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 4>real fascination with bad art at something you're.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Interesting to me here.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I've often described the NFT boom as the Olympics of

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 2>bad art, which I would I think it's just like

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>an astounding quantity of just like the people competing for

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 2>the top slot and like the bad art. Yeah, I

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>mean just some of the worst shit ever put into

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 2>it into humanity.

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, to any terrible. But isn't that But to me,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 4>that's like it's sort of fascinating, Like there's something fascinating

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 4>about this, like weird grifter culture, like tacky grifter culture

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 4>emerging like billionaires.

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what happens when you find out that like something

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>that could you could scam people out of money is art,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and like you can and it's like not art, like

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I had need, I have a Picasso, Right, it's not

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>like not that that's a scam. That's a whole different

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 2>type of scam actually, but one that is real. But

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but but yeah, like what it happens. I mean, that's

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>an interesting place to explore it, right, Yeah, I hear

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying, Like and.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, like right now, all of the all of

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 4>that energy, all of that kind of like prenetic like

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 4>what's next, what's big? What's interesting energy is is plunged

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 4>into large language models and the AI scene in general.

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 4>And to me this is even more kind of fruitful

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 4>and interesting than crypto because the technology is much more

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 4>obviously impressive and like has applications you can think of

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.479
<v Speaker 4>with out having to like, you know, get a lobotomy

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>and start talking like Mark andrieson or what.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 2>About slurp juice to understand like what AI could do

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>for you?

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you know it Also it's interesting to me

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 4>because for the obvious reason that, like, as a writer,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 4>like this is this is technology that is directly overlaps

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 4>with what I am trained to and paid to do,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, and I try to be in general, my

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 4>approach to this stuff is to try and figure out

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 4>what excites like what excites what excites other people about

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 4>something that doesn't necessarily excite me, or like what is

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 4>what do people find so captivating about it. It's a

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 4>little easier to do that because, like I said, it's

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of obviously impressive, and I try to approach it

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>not from like a purely critical, purely kind of negative standpoint.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Even if I think, you know, Sam Altman is not

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 4>a great guy or somebody who's got my best interests

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 4>in mind.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, they ever are a great guy? Are they know?

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Was the last time there was like a huge new

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 2>technology started by somebody that you're like, that is a

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>freat person.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I really like him. They seem cool.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is unusual, right, yeah. I mean people

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 2>used to love like Steve Jobs, but even Steve Jobs

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and not upon further reflection, by the way, always seemed

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>like kind of not a great guy, like he was

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of a dick.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you must remember, I feel like it was.

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 4>It's just a different cultural difference between like the nineties

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 4>and two thousands is now as people used to sort

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 4>of laugh about Steve Jobs as an abuse of boss like,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 4>which he really obviously was. Every story you'd hear, these

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 4>sort of semi heroic stories about him just completely bitching

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 4>people out, screening at them whatever, like in the in

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>the mac Press, in MacAddict or whatever. It was also

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 4>treated as this funny little thing. And now you'd be like,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 4>if that, if that stuff had come out now, that

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 4>people would have been up in arms. I mean, because

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 4>he sounds like he was an horrible person to work

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 4>for and basically every way.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>You do, yes, and then but also you have to

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>wonder what is what could a Steve Jobs level creator exist?

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is the ultimate question. If the man

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 2>wasn't allowed to be a complete like rage aholic or whatever.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 2>It's also right, he also cried. He also cried a lot, right,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 2>That was the other thing, Like in the in the

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Isaacs in books, they talked about him crying, but which

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 2>I find just like incongruous with him. I mean, it

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>makes I can see it, like in my mind's eye.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, okay, I get it. But like, imagine being

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 2>in any work scenario. Okay, you're a you're a guy.

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>You go into an office, your boss is berating you

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 2>or something, or like, you have to deliver bad news,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>and his reactions he starts crying in the room. Forget

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>about forget about abuse for a second. Let's take the

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 2>abuse stuff out of it, just for a moment, just

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 2>put it to the side. I can't think of a

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 2>more uncomfortable situation for a person to be. I mean,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 2>obviously there are more uncomfortable situations, but very unusual and

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>apparently happened on a regular basis that he would break

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>down in tears during a meeting or like you did

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>an argument or something, which is like, it's just very

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 2>like he had a lot of volid emotions.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 4>But that's how we got the iPhone from crying lots

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 4>of it.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Fucking raises the question because you know what happened. I

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 2>guarantee you. I guarantee you. Some people brought him a

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 2>shitty fucking touch screen like the original Android. I mean,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you remember how Android phones were,

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the first version of them, they had like the touch

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>screen sensitivity was all over the fucking map. They sucked

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to use. Yeah, somebody brought him that shit. Yeah, and

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>he had a meltdown on them. He threw the fucking

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 2>phone in the face. He did a David Pogue. He

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>chucked the phone directly at their face. Remember when David

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Poke threw a phone at his wife. This is oh, yeah,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 2>it was sorry, It's just I think about it all

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the time. Whenever I noticed that talk about the iPhone,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, go to Dave. David Pogue throwing an

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 2>iPhone at his wife. Oh also horrible, by the way,

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 2>horrible abusive thing to do. But yeah, Steve Jobs, they

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>gave him the shitty touch screen. He threw it at somebody.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 2>He was like, this is not extentually started crying, I

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>assume at some point, and then eventually, out of fear, right,

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>they brought him really good touch screen, like just out

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of pure fear. They were like, all right, like we

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>have to do this, or like he's gonna be really upset.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 2>We don't like want to make Steve us. You know,

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 2>would we have gotten the iPhone or would we have

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 2>a would it be a whole different future that we're

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 2>living in right now. Maybe there would be no social

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>media because when you think about it, without a great

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 2>touch screen, the iPhone's probably not a successful product. And

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>if it's not successful, then the whole social media boom

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and all that shit really doesn't happen.

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:18.479
<v Speaker 4>Might Yeah, I mean when you put it like that,

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 4>you're not making an argument that it was a good

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 4>thing that any else I'm not sure not if it's

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 4>without bad bosses, we wouldn't have social media. Wouldn't that

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 4>be great?

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Better workplaces and no Facebook.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>But I've come full circle. I mean I was when

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I was twelve years old. I got on the Internet

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 2>when I was like twelve, right, and it was early internet.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 2>But now I'm like, yeah, we got to shut it down, like,

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 2>why did we ever invent any of this stuff? This

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 2>seems bad, like we made a huge mistake.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's funny.

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 4>One thing about AI that I noticed is I think

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 4>we've gone from a position I mean the sort of

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 4>capsule history which isn't which is always more complicated than this,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 4>But the capsule history I think that people tell about themselves,

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 4>journalists tell about themselves and the tech boom is that

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 4>we were all a little bit who positive towards the

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 4>tech industry, that we were too excited that we gave

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 4>them a pass through the recite.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're like the touch screen on this iPhones fucking amazingly.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, as a guy who reviewed most of them,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh my god, the touch screen is

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>so good?

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>How did they do it? Steve Jobs has done it again?

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 4>And then and then when everything kind of fell apart

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 4>and it became clear how bad for all of us,

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 4>all of this stuff.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Kind of was.

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, everybody hunched over and was like, we can't

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 4>let that happen again. And I think a lot of

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 4>the like media critical reaction to a lot of AI

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 4>stuff is born out of that fear that we're going

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 4>to be too. You know that we that we really

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 4>need to give these products like this and technologies like

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 4>this really rigorous and clear kind of investigations goings over

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 4>like make it make them as good as they possibly can.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 4>That's obviously you want journalists who are oppositional and aggressive

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 4>and critical in all these ways. But it's like creates

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 4>this very a very funny and different kind of relationship

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 4>with the tech industry than existed in say like two

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 4>thousand and five or two thousand and six.

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, totally, totally.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I hear, by the way, the sounds of New York

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>in the background there, it's like you gotta sir, and

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm just creeping up. So I've been so long since

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 2>I've heard that, now that I live in out the country. No,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 2>you're right, I mean I think there is probably in

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>some way an over adjustment.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I actually, and I've probably told the story before.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 2>But I I had a meeting with actually it was

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 2>a fund I was fundraising for the Outline and we

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>met with Mark Andries and it turned into an argument

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>between the two of us. It was an interesting meeting

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>because there were like seven people there and it just

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>ended up with us arguing with each other. But one

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of his arguments about generally about like the tech press,

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the outline wasn't pure tech, but it was

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>like he was like, you guys are of all, you're

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>all trashing us, and you're taking shots at us, and

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to like tear down all the work that

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 2>we're doing. And and I was like, one of my

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 2>things that I remember, and I think maybe struck a

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>course with him, I was like, we like actually have

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>been like nothing but like wonderful to the tech industry,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and we expected like that that people in tech to

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>be better. Yeah, and you guys have ended up being

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>exactly like the fucking robber barons of yester year. Like

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>you're supposed to be the next generation of like these

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 2>leaders who do who hold themselves to a higher standard

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 2>or are more aware of what's going on in the

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 2>world and like you know, more sensitive to like the

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 2>users and who they are and what they represent and anyhow.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 2>But like, I think that's that is they've reacted very

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 2>poorly to getting bad press because they they have gotten

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 2>so much good press, and so there's a hugely defensive stance.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 4>I also think, I mean, I think that the other

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 4>aspect of this that is is sort of unexpected and

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 4>you wouldn't have been able to predict in two thousand

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>and six, is these are like the two main power

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 4>user groups on Twitter. So like suddenly all of the

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 4>media kind of got shuttled through this one single social

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 4>media feed, and it was the same feed that all

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 4>of all of tech was also on, and it just

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>was like just sort of a bad neighbors situation. Like

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 4>maybe like all of a sudden, you went from like

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe you get the Times delivered and you see a

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 4>negative article, but you also see the positive article, and

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 4>you also get the Journal and there's a bunch of

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 4>different things. Now you're like you see every single even

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 4>the lowest level, you know, copy editors talking shit about

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 4>you or like replying to you and calling you egghead

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 4>or whatever, and you're freaking out, like it's too much

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 4>for you.

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 2>That is mean you should never I don't think I

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 2>don't I think never go after people's looks.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you don't you know what I mean. I

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>have always felt this.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, especially during the Trump years, people would be

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>like ooh, the orange whatever. I'm like, that's not productive,

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Like it just isn't like it's not a good.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Clearly, I mean, it clearly got under marketing well, clearly

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 4>got under a bunch of people's skins, various various people.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it doesn't.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 4>The funny thing is that Andresen then started his own

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 4>publication to much fanfare, called I think called Future.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>He's also he's also very interested in covering the future,

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>like what future and.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Your public is.

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Then they shut it down because because if.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>He wants to read a fucking white paper from a

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 2>sixteen Z or from andres and Horwitz, like nobody wants

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>to read, nobody cares, nobody wants to read PR. First off,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could tell all the PR people though

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I wish they could learn.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, and the other thing is like running

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 4>an actual like publication that publishes with any kind of

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 4>regularity good things that people want to read with any

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 4>kind of regularity is much more difficult than I think

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 4>people appreciate it. I have this thing about I think

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 4>there's something real about the way people, certain kinds of

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 4>people relate to journalists and the media is because of

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 4>what we do is just write and just sort of

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 4>tell people what's happening in the world. There's there's there's

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 4>a sense that like anybody could kind of do it,

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 4>and so there's a there's a there's a resentment from

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 4>people like Intrisan or whomever that that sort of the

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 4>suggestion that, like, you know, I could be doing what

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 4>you're doing, I could do it better. And when you

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 4>actually try to do it, like run the whole thing

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 4>as a business, like like hit everything that you need

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 4>to hit to be a good journalist and a good

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 4>editor and a good publisher, you recognize that, especially in

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 4>the current environment, especially in the environment that people like

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Andresen created, it's a lot of work. It takes a

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of work and a lot of like accumulated skill

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 4>and knowledge. It's not something you can just replicate because

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 4>you've decided that today's journalists don't know how to do

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 4>it right or whatever.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I agree with everything you just said one hundred percent,

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 2>but I will also say we have so devalued what

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 2>looks like.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Journalism and news.

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been so greatly terrifically devalued, and there are so

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 2>many people who truly suck doing it, like really bad.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 2>There are like bad actors at places like Daily Wire

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. There are people who are bad at it,

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>like that just aren't good at their job because it

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 2>has become probably there was a period where it was

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 2>easier than ever to go, hey, i'm gonna write, I'm

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna make content, Like journalism became this thing called content,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 2>not the journalism with the capital jay that you're probably

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about or we're talking about.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 2>And also it's all free, yeah, right, it's free to everybody,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and everybody thinks it should be free. And so I

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>think it's that combination of like you've got like legitimately

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>bad actors, you've got legitimately like kind of people who

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 2>should never have gotten into the craft to begin with.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Like not to throw it back to the NFT thing,

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's a good it's kind of an interesting parallel

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>where it's like you really aren't an artist. You didn't like,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>you didn't train, you didn't really want to be an artist,

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 2>you kind of don't care about it that much, but

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 2>like you could get a job doing it right. You

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>can get a job like making an NFT and like

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 2>maybe sell some and make a quick buck. I think

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of people who kind of found their

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 2>way into like content creation that was like a machine.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like it kind of like, you.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Know why we're all talking about AI a lot lately

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>in this in this venue is like it became a

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>very machine almost like a machine generated game, where it's

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>like you write a headline that it will get clicks,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and you put some content in the below it that's

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>like feels like enough information to call it a story,

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's like what journalism is. There's actually a fair

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 2>argument to say that there is a lot of bad journalism.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 2>It's just that what they're talking about isn't like is

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>it the Daily Wire, and it isn't like the user

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 2>generated content on BuzzFeed dot com. It's people who say

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>things that are true that they don't want to hear

0:26:58.200 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 2>or don't want anybody else to see.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Basic.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 4>The other thing I wouldn't want to say is that

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 4>it's not as though. I mean, the thing I still

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 4>love about the Internet is that you can find incredible

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 4>geniuses doing work that would otherwise never have been cover.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not like citizens, I like, do I believe in

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 4>citizen journalism like conceptually Circle twenty twelve, Jeff Jarvis talking

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 4>about like said citizen journalism, No, but do I believe

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 4>that there are like people there are incredibly talented writers, reporters,

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 4>journalists out there who would not have access to audiences

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 4>if it wasn't for the Internet.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I mean that those people are those.

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 2>People one hundred percent. I mean, to be clear, we

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 2>would not be having this conversation. I would have done

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 2>nothing if it weren't for the fact. I mean I

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't go to as you as I think. You know,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 2>I barely even went to high school, but I definitely

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't go to to college for journalism. Like I didn't

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 2>go to Jay's school and then leave and go intern

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 2>at the New York Times. Like there used to be

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a way that people did this that was very linear, right,

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and it was a very closed circuit.

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 2>The Internet has has I know that everybody talks about

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 2>this is like kind of like bullshit, but I think it,

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these days, but it had leveled the playing

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>field for if a person was eager and excited and good, yeah,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 2>and had any bit of talent, Like there was a

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 2>place to go and go and do it and find

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>like hone it, you know, and like I that's real

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and awesome. Yeah, And a lot of our best journalists,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the best journalists working today it came

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 2>from that sort of with those backgrounds, like not from

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 2>straight from Jay school.

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, something that I believe, like incredibly strongly, like

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 4>on a political levelist that there's all this incredible, unused,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 4>untapped talent, creative talent, creative genius intelligence out there in

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 4>the world, in the US but around the world that

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 4>is just ill served by the political economic systems that

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 4>we have working right now. And the Internet at its

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 4>best is a way to level that playing field and

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 4>to like find outlets for those people, find ways for

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 4>them to make use of their incredible genius that otherwise

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 4>would and exist. And then the Internet, it's worse, is

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 4>also like a way for very rich guys to like

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 4>find those talents and then just exploit the hell out

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>of the stuff they're creating. I mean, I think this

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 4>about social media for real. It's like, what makes Facebook

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 4>valuable is not the technology, what makes or Twitter or

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 4>any or TikTok or anything. It's the people who are

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 4>creating stuff that is engaging and entertaining and funny and

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 4>weird for free for these social networks.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 4>The drill the drills, Yeah, exactly right, And you know

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 4>this is this is the thing that I think is

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 4>worth thinking about as AI comes into being is the

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 4>sort of sense that, like, you know, what is AI

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be used for? Because I think it has

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 4>this possibility to give sort of production tool in the

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 4>same way that you know, like electronic production music production

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 4>tools gave access to all these kids in their bedrooms

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 4>the ability to make beats and to make music and

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 4>to create create stuff themselves without having to you know,

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 4>pay one thousand dollars an hour for a studio or

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 4>whatever and get that stuff together. Like, I see a

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of gender to AI that feels like, maybe not

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 4>right now, but pretty soon, this is going to help

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 4>people create things themselves, even if they don't really have

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 4>access to these huge resources outside of it, right, And

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 4>what frustrates me is that it sure seems like the

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 4>business model that places like open ai are gunning for

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 4>is instead of like, let's enable people who otherwise wouldn't

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 4>be able to, you know, do these things, let's let's

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 4>find ways to replace the people who are already doing

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 4>these things with the shittier version that we can have

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the boss's control or whatever.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's a lot there that I agree with and

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 2>also to unpack. But I will say that it is

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting that. I mean, I don't want to get into

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a you know, capitalism or whatever. Capitalism isn't good or not.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 2>There's obviously some problems with it, but like there is

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>that you know. The history of capitalism is like these

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 2>like incredible innovations that are then like manipulated into like

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a massive business that then like needs a bunch of

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 2>like worker bees to like go and do and it's

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 2>like owned by a very small segment. Like the thing

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>itself is owned by a very small segment of the population,

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>but the actual work to make the thing is done

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>by a much larger segment.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Of the population.

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's usually grueling and shitty, and people are underpaid

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>for it. And it's like is and that is like

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 2>in some way, like a Facebook is, like you said,

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 2>like all these people are Facebook or Twitter or whatever.

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Is like these amazing people create for it, like that's

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the engine of it or whatever. But it is, you know,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>over time turned into kind of like a just like

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a part of like a machine, Like those people

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 2>are a part of a machine that drives commerce. Right, Yeah,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be fine if the system of

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 2>commerce that it was built on was actually made any

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>fucking sense. But the system of commerce is built on

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>is based on a mistake, like essentially a mistake about

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the value of people on the Internet. I think there's

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 2>like a foundational fundamental flaw and like how we monetize

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 2>content on the Internet. I've probably put this a million

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 2>times and I don't have to go into my spiel here,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>but like the way that Google came up with monetizing

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 2>search is the way that we basically monetize.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Everything, and it is it's wrong. It just was wrong.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>It just was like they could do that at the

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>time because that was all that was available to them,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Like they had one notion of like could we make money,

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and like, well, this is a way, like a billboard

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>on a road, Like that's one way to make money.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Like you put a billboard up and some people drive

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>past it, and you can sell space on the billboard.

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes people who drive past it will be like, hey,

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>like yeah, I need a new car, Like I should

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 2>go check out the fucking Audi that I you know,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>the sign I drove past. But like, out of the

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 2>people who drive past it, most of them never go

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>check out the Audi or whatever. But over time, there's

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 2>some small value that can be extracted from that billboard.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's but that's the entire business model of the Internet,

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>is that every single thing on it is like as

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 2>devalued as.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Like a billboard or whatever.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Like anyhow, I mean it's not the perfect analogy, but

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 2>you know what I'm saying, So.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, part of it too, is that it means

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 4>that when you're doing creative work, like you are also

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 4>having to think about how you're like you yourself are also

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 4>a billboard. And so like I like my job, I

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 4>like my life. I like what I do on substeck,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 4>but like part of what I have to be part

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 4>of what my subtect is and like part of what

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 4>I have to do as a writer who isn't currently

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 4>have W two employment is sort of be my own

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 4>marketing team across a bunch of different platforms so that

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 4>people know they can hire me, people know they can

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 4>find me.

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 4>It's the hustle, yeah, and it's it's not a great

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 4>way to live. And the thing that but the thing

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 4>that really I think is a problem with it is

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 4>that we know, for a fact there are a lot

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 4>of writers who are more talented than me, who are

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 4>better than me at all the things I do. For instance, well,

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 4>who don't want to let's without naming names. I don't

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 4>want to be part of that that hustle who are

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 4>not interested in that. Like, No, I'm talking about the opposite.

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about somebody who is not good at this

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of this kind of thing, who doesn't want to

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 4>do it. Yes, there's like very few ways for that person. Yeah,

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 4>they're very few ways for that person to be compensated

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 4>for work they do. Whereas you have people who are

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 4>who are incredibly good at the hustle part of it,

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 4>again not naming, incredibly good to the hustle part of it,

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 4>not not particularly intelligent or whatever.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Writer. I think that's what we're talking about.

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we can all imagine in our heads somebody

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:23.240
<v Speaker 4>who fits these gat and say, for exactly, for example,

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 4>they're they're ubiquitous.

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm intelligent, but good at the hustle. I'm thinking, actually,

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they shake.

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 4>The right hands, they put themselves in the right names.

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 4>It's one reason why the internet can make you so

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 4>mad when you go online these days, Like the reward

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 4>is market Like you get much better rewarded for marketing

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 4>than you do for quality.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, of course no, yes, I mean and and and

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 2>if you're bad at or don't like or feel like

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, some people like if you're from generation acts

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 2>like myself, you're not gen X.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you? You're a millennial?

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm a millennial.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you're if you're like a gen X person,

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you you feel a kind of physical impulse to reject

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 2>self promotion. And now, I don't know, maybe people would

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 2>say that I don't. I haven't jected self promotion. I'm

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 2>not really sure, but I would tell you I would.

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I think if you ask Lyra and Jenn f I

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 2>am promoting this podcast enough, I think that they would

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>tell you that.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I am not. And they wish I was hustling. They

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>wish I was hustling more. I don't know. I don't

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>want to speak for them.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 2>All that said, you know, if you even are close

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to making a living at doing what you're doing, it's

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 2>also fucking wild because you know your parents and your

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 2>grandparents and certainly every generation that is, almost every generation

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 2>that's come before us. This abstract thing that we are doing,

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>this abstract I mean, it is fucking weird, like it

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is weird, like we are go on to this thing

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the screen, We go into the screen and then we

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 2>do something that frankly we like. Probably for the most part,

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you probably like the writing that you're doing, right, You're

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>not like, you don't wake up every day and you're like,

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know, maybe you got to do

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the hustle, but you don't wake up every.

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean some weeks. Some weeks you're like, ah, do

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 4>I really have to do this? But for the most part, yeah,

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 4>it's good, right.

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, I'm sure there are many struggling YouTubers

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you feel the same way. But like, if you can

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 2>even make if you I'm sorry, if you can even

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 2>make one dime just shooting a video of yourself and

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 2>put it on the internet, Like, it's kind of amazing

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>because there was no period in history before this where

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 2>such a thing was possible in really any venue. I mean,

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't just put a show on and have people

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 2>come to your play or whatever. You couldn't just make

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a movie and put it in a theater. You couldn't

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 2>just like write a newspaper and have it exist in

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 2>front of people. So there is this amazing flip side,

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 2>which is like all of this seems like there's fantasy here.

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Like I think if you were to go back fifty

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 2>years and describe.

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>This to somebody, they'd be like, it would just.

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Be sound like such a fantastic story, like such a

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 2>total bit of fantasy. So there's a flip side to

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 2>all of it, which is like, the internet's a sass

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 2>pulling full of horrible people, and the people who own

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and control most parts of the Internet are tyrants who

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>are working everybody to the bone and don't give us

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>our fair shake. And the model, the monetization model the

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Internet is built on, it's a complete shit show that sucks,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 2>and it's broken at at its most fun a mental level.

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And yet there are more people creating interesting works of fiction,

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.399
<v Speaker 2>non fiction, art, non art, like journalism, whatever, than we've

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>probably ever had in the history of the world. There's

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 2>probably more like journalism being done than ever before. Yeah,

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 2>am I crazy for saying that?

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 4>No? I don't think so. I mean, I think it's

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 4>a it's a I mean for me, the question is,

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 4>how can we have that flowering of creativity and talent

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and intelligence, and how can we you know, like make

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 4>sure that people are reaching their potentials without the layer

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 4>of exploitation that seems that right now seems like integral

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to all this stuff, and I did like to This

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:40.959
<v Speaker 4>is something that I've been thinking about a lot lately,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 4>because so I'm in the Writer's Guild, the TV Writers

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 4>Guild and we're on strike right now, or the TV

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 4>and Film Writers Guild and we're on strike right now,

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 4>and something that is a huge contrast between being a journalist,

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 4>where you might have a workplace union but oftentimes in

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 4>general you don't, versus being in a heavily unionized industry

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 4>part of a pretty powerful union is seeing what can happen,

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 4>how much better a job can be. When you have

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 4>that kind of at least, you have a little bit

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 4>of leverage against the exploitation that you're not completely at

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 4>the whims of what the bosses want at any given moment.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 4>You're not completely like, am I going to have a

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 4>job today? Am I going to have a job tomorrow?

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Am I going to make money from this thing I'm

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 4>working on on? Spec? Am I not going to make

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 4>money from it?

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think Hollywood is a really interesting example of

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 4>an industry that is a creative industry that produces a

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 4>wide range of things from total shit to like you know,

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 4>instances of surpassing genius that manages nonetheless to like adequately

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 4>up until recently, adequately reward the creative people who work

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 4>on it like and sometimes like more than just rewards,

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 4>sometimes make them extremely rich because they they did a

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 4>really good job at whatever it is you're supposed to

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 4>do it. And I think that like to you know,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying like, I don't know how a content creators.

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm not suggesting that content creators unionized, though I would

0:38:58.160 --> 0:38:59.479
<v Speaker 4>love to. I would think it would be great.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if like everybody in YouTube unionized, like you.

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Know, there's like the German German vloggers have been trying

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.959
<v Speaker 4>to do this for years now, and in fact, they're

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 4>unionizing under the steel workers union in Germany, I guess

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 4>is extremely powerful. It's maybe the biggest union there, and

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 4>so they've got a special like YouTube content creators organizing

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 4>like group that they're.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Trying to I like, I really like the idea of

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>like steel workers and YouTubers like you know, together, that's

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>like very I don't know that sounds.

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 4>Right if I might be remembering this wrong, but I'm

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 4>pretty sure the guy behind it is this German guy

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 4>who does videos of where he like builds his own

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 4>catapults and just like it's the most YouTube thing. But

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 4>also I think I like, right at the intersection of

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 4>like steel workers YouTube and German, it's like the guy.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 2>It's like the guy who's like, I'm going to build

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a house from like just like this mud plane. I like,

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>come here and I'm going to build like a mudhouse

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>out of like lumber, I chop down and yeah, something

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.439
<v Speaker 2>like that. So, right, there is this huge strike going

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 2>on right now. Of course, Hollywood is an industry that's

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 2>been around a lot longer than the Internet, right, and

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 2>has has gone through lots of situations where there's tremendous

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 2>abuse of power by the people who are in charge

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of like the studios. I imagine there's still a tremendous

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 2>abuse of power by the people who, yeah, the studios.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 2>But but yeah, of course people eventually were like, hey,

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 2>we need to unionize. Of course, It's interesting the modern

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 2>narrative about unions is is very confused. I think there's

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 2>so much misinformation about about what unions are and what

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>they do that it has really done its job of

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 2>like making a lot of people very skeptical about the

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 2>power of a union.

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I mean, Hollywood unions all formed in the forties

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 4>and fifties, when union density in the US was like

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 4>three or four times what it is now. When you know,

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 4>it was like pretty common to be in a union.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 4>There were like institutions that people knew, well, everybody knew

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 4>at least one person or a family member who was

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 4>in a union. So it wasn't crazy to be like, oh, yeah,

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 4>we're going to form a writer.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a political thing that like, you know, I

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mean there was a wow.

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it depends on the you depends on the union.

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Like some of those you know, the writers in particular

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 4>were and still are relatively left wing compared to the

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 4>other right.

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, I mean, Hollywood is generally speaking not

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 2>a I mean, I'm not saying there are no conservatives

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in Hollywood, but it is obviously the owners are all

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 2>probably there's no question, but I mean, generally speaking, people

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>in the creative arts tend to be more left leaning,

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 2>more liberal than people in a non creative arts. I think, yeah,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 2>I think that's fair, and so unsurprisingly that the union

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 2>would be you know, obviously very very liberal or i

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 2>mean socialism, you know, is directly tied to lots of

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 2>unions in their creation, and like the concept of a

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 2>union of itself.

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Is like a very socialistic idea, although you know that

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 4>being said, like if you go and you talk to

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 4>like the camera operators who work shows in New York

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 4>City who are all members of AATSI, and the teamsters

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 4>who are part of the Stage Hands Union, which is

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 4>one of the other big powerful Hollywood unions. Yeah, yeah,

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying an even vote for Trump, but you're

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 4>going to talk to guys who are very different set

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 4>set up politics than I sew on union guys, guys

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.959
<v Speaker 4>who are showing us solidarity on the strike. But there's

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 4>like a there is a wide range of political.

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, but you see how those cut across.

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 2>There's a very blue collar, white collar interception there where

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 2>you've got like like a camera operation or is a

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 2>vary or like somebody who's doing set design or or

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 2>like literally some of the labor. Like I remember when

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 2>I used to go on on Fallon and like I

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 2>remember once I tried to move a box like we

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 2>were like setting up some like gadget or whatever, and

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they're like, you can't touch that, And I was like Okay,

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 2>there's only the union. People who moved the boxes could

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 2>touch the boxes. Like I it was like literally illegal

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 2>for me to touch the box. But it's very blue

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.919
<v Speaker 2>collar work, you know, it's like not like sitting down

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 2>at your think pad and writing, you know, the next

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:26.760
<v Speaker 2>episode of Lost.

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that, I mean, one of the

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 4>things that has been very inspiring and has made me

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 4>feel really optimistic and positive about the strike wear on

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 4>right now is the extent of the solidarity shown by

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 4>the teamsters to the Writer's Guild so that we've managed

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 4>especially it's supposed to work. Yeah, I mean, the idea

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 4>is that everybody that there's a there's solidarity between unions

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 4>because everybody understands the basic dynamic. And that hasn't always

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 4>been the case. You know, the last strike writers went

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 4>on with two thousand and eight. A lot of this

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 4>is sort of like anecdotes, and but people said, you know,

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 4>back then, people didn't think the writers need to go

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 4>on strike. You know, teamsters were worried about missing there hours.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, they're not productions are getting shut down. In

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of cases, they're not getting paid. So they

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 4>would break picket lines, they would they would walk through,

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 4>they would try to keep working, try to get paid,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 4>and that just has it's been a total change from

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 4>that for this most recent one, which you can attribute

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 4>to a million things, you know, like one of it

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.200
<v Speaker 4>and is just I think, like you were saying, we've

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 4>gone from a real low ebb of unions to like

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 4>the sparks. We're not yet in a place where unions

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 4>are like have the same kind of density that they

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 4>used to, but we've gone from a low ebb to

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 4>there's you know, there's a changes coming, I think, And

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 4>so I think people are more positive in general that

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 4>we're learning more.

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.479
<v Speaker 2>I think people maybe are starting to realize and maybe

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the internet is we can thank the internet for some

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 2>of this, just of being able to visualize what happens

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in non union environments and like going, hey, wait a second, like, yeah,

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 2>it makes sense that we have some leverage because if

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:52.959
<v Speaker 2>you're not in a union, your leverage is basically niil

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 2>with the business. And by the way, have you been picketing?

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Are you out there? Like have you you out there

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 2>with this?

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:43:58.160 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I pick I haven't picketed this week, but I was

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:01.240
<v Speaker 4>getting last week in the week before.

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Are there shifts. Are people doing shifts on picking?

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so they've got big shifts that they announced the

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.439
<v Speaker 4>day before. Like right now, upfronts, which are the big

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 4>ad sales events that the networks I'll put on, are

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 4>going on. So there's pickets outside all the upfronts. You know,

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 4>usually they bring on the actors for the big fall

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 4>shows or whatever. Actors, like the teamsters have been showing

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 4>a ton of solidarity with the writers. Most of them

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 4>have refused to cross. So it's like, you know, a

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 4>couple of nightly news anchors though even even some of

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 4>the news anchors refused to cross too. I hear so

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 4>oh really, yeah, so there's like that's interesting. Yeah, Lester

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 4>hole he won't cross crossing or he isn't. Both refused

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 4>to cross.

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>That's cool.

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Ross Sorkin of The Times and CNBC did cross.

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, Andrew not cool.

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Stephanie rule of MSNBC.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie rule cross She definitely crossed crossed. Yeah, okay, who

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 2>else anybody else? That's his is juiciest.

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Seacrest crossed.

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Seacrest crossed. Yeah. What's going on with Fallon?

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw there's some He came on Blue Sky, he

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 2>joined Blue sky and people were like fucking hazing him.

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 2>I felt bad for the guy, to be honest, It's like,

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know you shouldn't feel too bad, but I.

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Mean, the thing the show is, it's always complicated because

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, you don't want to cross the pivot line.

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 4>But if you're doing a nightly if you're doing a

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 4>nightly talk show, like you've got a huge number of

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 4>people who are that's their living, but you can shut

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 4>it down for two weeks, but at some point you

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 4>have to go back to work. Yeah, I think this

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 4>one's going to last a long time, and so I

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 4>would expect most of the talk show hosts to go

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 4>back on without writers and have to do something similar. Though.

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we'll see, Like I don't.

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I've got Ai that's to spin up chat GBT to

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 2>do some bits. I mean, how hard can it be?

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 2>This is maybe this would be the first big test

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of whether chat GPT can replace human beings that creative

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 2>and depth.

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is one of the items in our negotiations.

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 4>It's very important to us because I mean, I think

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 4>one thing that one way to think about all this,

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 4>you know, just to connect it to us talking about

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 4>media before is like we lived through when we were

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 4>talking about earlier on, we lived through a huge sea

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 4>change in the way like journalism is just created and distributed,

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 4>going from print to online. They just decimated the industry.

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 4>That's not the same thing necessarily is what's happening with

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 4>streaming versus studios, But there's a lot of similarities. And

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 4>one of the similarities is just having these huge cash

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 4>rich companies, tech companies like Netflix and Amazon and Apple

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 4>come in and just kind of throw money around in

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 4>a way that is very hard for people to say

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 4>no to that kind of money, but often means also

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 4>diminishing work protections, accepting deals that you wouldn't have otherwise accepted,

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 4>of course, and now I think a lot of people

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 4>are sort of looking around and saying, hold on, like

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 4>what direction is this going in? And having lived through

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 4>that as a journalist and seeing sort of what happened

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.399
<v Speaker 4>to journalism, I think it's very clear what happens when

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 4>you allow yourself to sort of buy the line that like, oh,

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 4>the technology has changed, so you have to accept that

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 4>you just can't get paid as much anymore. And you

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 4>know the other thing about that is that Hollywood actually

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 4>is a great example of an industry that's gone two

0:46:57.280 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 4>or three times now through major technological shifts and how

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 4>stuff created and distributed. That these unions have lasted since

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 4>before TV, they lasted before the VCR, before DVDs, And

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 4>every time there's been one of these shifts, there has

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:11.879
<v Speaker 4>been almost like you could almost track it by the year,

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:15.760
<v Speaker 4>there's been a strike because every single time the studios

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:17.879
<v Speaker 4>trying and say, oh, well, stuff's changed, we just can't

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 4>pay as much as we used to, and writers and

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 4>actors and directors and stage hands tend to stand up

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.720
<v Speaker 4>and say, hold on, that's not what's going to happen.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 4>We're going to figure out a new system so that

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 4>we get paid what we deserve to create the content

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 4>that people want to see. And so at the end

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 4>of the tunnel right now you can see a place

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 4>where studios want to use AI to create content as

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 4>a way to pay writers less, as a way to

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 4>employ fewer writers. And it's really important to us to

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 4>stand up and say hold on, Like, for example, if

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 4>you come up with a idea for a story via chat,

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 4>GPT or whatever sophisticated Hollywood AI system. I'm sure Netflix

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 4>is developing somewhere in a dark room and they're huge complex.

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 4>You still have to pay the writer who takes that

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 4>idea and turns it into a script the same rate

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 4>that you would pay writer to write a script from

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 4>a Wikipedia article or whatever.

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Up Right, I mean that just seems like a no brainer. Yeah,

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the work is the same exactly right.

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 4>And you know there's another thing where it's like most

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 4>TV shows are written with writer's room, so you get

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 4>ten smart, funny writers. I mean, this is like one

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 4>of those things. I you know, because I started as

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 4>a journalist and moved into TV writing, I'd never really

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 4>experienced the TV writers' room. And now it's like, I

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 4>wish every single thing I write I could write with

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 4>the writer's room, to be able to sit down and

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 4>sayle and be like, heep's great. Here's what we're trying

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 4>to do. Let's get ten like extremely funny, smart people

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.479
<v Speaker 4>to like like just really work on it for five

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 4>months and make it really good. And I think with

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 4>studios they want to cut down the length of the

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 4>writer's rooms. They want to cut down the number of

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:47.759
<v Speaker 4>writers that you have to hire because they have this

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 4>idea in their heads. And you know, I don't think

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 4>any of them have announced this specifically, but this is

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 4>what everybody's sort of hearing. This is the chatter that

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 4>you have one guy, you have your Damon Lindelow or

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 4>JJ Abrams or Shonda Rhymes. They come up with the idea,

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:06.240
<v Speaker 4>and then your writer's room is chat GPT or AI

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 4>or whatever else. And then not only does that make

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 4>for worse content, but it's also that means that writers

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:13.399
<v Speaker 4>in general, when you want to have just one writer

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 4>come in, you know, a human writer coming to punch

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 4>it up, they're now not protected by the contract structures

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 4>that previously existed.

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:20.799
<v Speaker 1>So all of a.

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Sudden, it's like, you know, there's all these things that

0:49:23.040 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the studios, there's ways to make it sound reasonable. Interestings

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 4>like oh yeah, sure, why why do you need to

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 4>have ten writers or whatever? And the answer is, and

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 4>not every show needs to have ten writers. But if

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 4>you don't guarantee that every show has ten writers, then

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden, all the shows that really do

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 4>need ten writers suddenly won't get right because the studios

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 4>don't want to pay for it. They're going to point

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 4>to the guy who just needed himself, like Mike White,

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 4>who wrote all of White Lotus by himself and say, well,

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Mike White did it.

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Why can't you use a good point? That's a great point. Actually,

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 2>come on, why not? Why can't you just come in.

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 4>The right exactly? And then you have guys who really

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 4>can't doing ten episode seasons, you're going to get a

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:54.439
<v Speaker 4>lot more, a lot worse TV.

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's interesting how it mirrors a lot of

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the rest of what's going on in reality, Like there

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 2>is this pursuit of like massive growth and production, and

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like in some way, I feel like we're starting to

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 2>see the limits of like the content mill. Like I

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like with the streaming services, like there's just too

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 2>fucking much. Like like we know that people are starting

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to watch less. We know that there's like an attention

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.799
<v Speaker 2>sort of drift happening. I mean, I don't know about you,

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like the Sunday night appointment viewing thing

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 2>has come back into focus in a big way around

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the stuff that HBO is doing and some other shows

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 2>like stuff like Yellowjackets, where people are like it really

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 2>is week to week, like talking about there's like a

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 2>discourse about a show, not about the million things that

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:36.799
<v Speaker 2>you could possibly watching. I mean, I think it is

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 2>that pursuit of that scale is a very is a

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 2>very tech market based fucking thinking on like all of

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 2>this can be bigger and there can be more of it,

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 2>and we can just pump this out, and like AI

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 2>is a solve I mean, yes, the soul for like

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 2>having to do Oh I don't want to deal with

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 2>these fucking creatives or I don't want to room with

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 2>ten people.

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I want one guy.

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 2>But it's also like a solve for scale, right, You're like, oh,

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I can just pump this shit out and I can

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 2>hone it and refine it to what the audience wants

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and it'll be this perfect marriage of like no cost

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 2>production and content that people love, and like we'll just

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 2>make all the money for ourselves. I want to believe

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 2>there's some impossibility there. I want to believe that there's something.

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 2>I think we're all convinced there's some fear lingering out there,

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 2>this AI fear, you know, and listen, I see it

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 2>in art, like, I mean, the stuff that mid Journey

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 2>does is crazy.

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I put out a song.

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 2>The other day and I had mid Journey do the

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 2>art for it, and it is like as good as

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 2>any maybe better than any piece of art I could

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 2>have gotten from another person because it did exactly what

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I wanted, exactly what I was trying to get it

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 2>to do. And that's scary. That's going to cost people jobs.

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 2>There's no question it already is costing people jobs. Like

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 2>I see it all over the place, Like I see

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 2>it on articles on news stories all the time, right

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:48.399
<v Speaker 2>where the content was devalued. So also has the art

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:49.720
<v Speaker 2>content been devalued.

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Go figure.

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to believe that there's going to be a

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 2>point and maybe I'm wrong, And frankly, I don't know

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:59.439
<v Speaker 2>if I'm right. That the capability of the AI won't

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 2>be as as we think it will be to deliver

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the thing that we think it can deliver. Like I

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 2>feel like in technology and in life in some way,

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:10.279
<v Speaker 2>we're always looking for this magic single solution that you

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 2>put the thing the input into and the output is

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 2>your solve, right like, and I think that this happens

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 2>all the time. I think pivot to video is one

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of these things, right Or like newsletters is one of

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 2>those things. Not a knock on your thing, but it's

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 2>like this is it. Yeah, we found the solution to

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:30.399
<v Speaker 2>the problem here, and if we just put that all

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the our bets on that thing.

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's going to fix it. And like, I think AI

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:33.879
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of like.

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Promise and obviously a lot of potential danger, but is

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 2>it really like can it really do the things? Is

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 2>there an AI that will be Mike White before Mike

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 2>White exists?

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can AI do the White lotus? Just because it's

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 2>able to synthesize what has come before it? Yeah, and

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 2>spit something out even if it's of some quality. Have

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 2>we underestimated the randomness of the human mind? Like I

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 2>think then, I think we have a little bit to

0:52:57.640 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 2>be honest.

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 4>You can almost talk about this in purely technical terms

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 4>right where it's like we've seen these incredible especially large

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 4>language models have advanced by leaps and pounds just by

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 4>throwing power to them, basically, But it doesn't follow from

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 4>that that just by continuing to add more computers, you know,

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 4>more chips, more more power behind those lms, that we're

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 4>going to get to you know, maybe we can get

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 4>to ninety percent of human capability or whatever, and maybe

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of applications that's good enough. Ninety percent

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 4>is fine, and even maybe for television, But that last

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 4>ten percent, like the ten percent that is memorable and

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 4>meaningful and original and new we may never ever reach that,

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 4>we may not ever get.

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>There or whatever.

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that because I think the other the

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 4>flip side of the sort of dynamic you're describing is

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 4>and I can't remember who I feel like there was

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:46.719
<v Speaker 4>an old Wired article that first kind of articulated this

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 4>idea that like the one of the things the Internet

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 4>has done is sort of allowed the rain of the

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.320
<v Speaker 4>good enough. That there's just like once you realize you

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 4>can kind of penetrate into what people are actually accessing

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 4>and seeing and doing whatever else, that you realize that,

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 4>like you don't have to make everything perfect. You can

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 4>just make stuff good enough and people will consume it

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 4>in vast quantities. In some ways, that's incredibly freeing as

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.360
<v Speaker 4>a creative that like you can allow stuff that wouldn't

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 4>necessarily hit your standards out there into the world. But

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the flip side of it is that like if good

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 4>enough is good enough, then like what's the motivation to

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 4>take it to beyond good enough? Especially like on a

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 4>corporate level where you're trying to press shareholders and make

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 4>a profit whatever else, Like you don't get extra money

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.360
<v Speaker 4>by going from good enough to truly excellent. Like the

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 4>dystopian fear about AI. I think I'm just sort of

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 4>echoing what you're saying, is like maybe a I will

0:54:32.920 --> 0:54:34.840
<v Speaker 4>never be able to write the White Lotus or Succession

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:36.919
<v Speaker 4>or whatever to your sopran Certainly not the Sopranos, whatever

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 4>TV Shaw you love.

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not the Soprido, like you're like the other one.

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, the Sopranos to me is like that's part that's like,

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 4>that's that's memorable, that's for it.

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't disagree, But they'll be remaking it

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 2>in like twenty years of the new cast or not

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 2>even twenty years probably.

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:52.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, anyway that there's a million shows that would

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:55.919
<v Speaker 4>be fine to write with AI, and people might notice

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:56.280
<v Speaker 4>the difference.

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 1>But maybe crazy atom maybe for instance.

0:54:58.440 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't want to again, I don't want

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 4>I have to. I have to get a job when

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the strike is over. So I'm not going to say

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 4>anything out loud.

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>No, I've never watched Gray's Anatomy, so I wouldn't be

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>able to tell you.

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 4>But and I think, I mean, I think that's a

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 4>legitimate fear. I mean the other part of it is

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 4>I just think like, there's something about having things created

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 4>by humans that I think is really important to the

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 4>way we consume art and journalism and any other thing.

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>To you, to a lot of people, it's not important

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:26.280
<v Speaker 2>The same people who would happily read a user generate

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:27.880
<v Speaker 2>a piece of content on buzzfit.

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know and enjoy it.

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:30.759
<v Speaker 4>I wonder like I do kind of. Jake Kang had

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 4>this great line and a piece he wrote for The

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 4>New York a few weeks ago where he said that, like,

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 4>it's really important to him when he reads an article

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 4>that he's getting angry at a human, like when you

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 4>and Jay is like, as a writer, I love who

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 4>who's Like one of the things he does is get

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 4>really mad.

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 1>At people, and he's mad online.

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the human component, like the fact that there's

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.439
<v Speaker 4>a human to be mad at, is important to him,

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 4>the fact. And I think you can transperse that to

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 4>all kinds of emotional states that you want to be.

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 4>Let's say this is a hope more than like a

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 4>thing that I absolutely know to be true. This is

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 4>but it's something that I I hope with reason that

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 4>people will feel some kind of difference between watching Let's

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:09.280
<v Speaker 4>pretend some far future AI could from a single prompt

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 4>create a ten episode, not just the script, the whole thing.

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 4>That there's a difference between watching that and watching something

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 4>that somebody else made right even that, like, even there's

0:56:18.640 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 4>a difference between you, Joshua, like I really want to

0:56:20.760 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 4>watch a cyberpunk adaptation of whatever You type that into

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:28.400
<v Speaker 4>your TV generating AI and get it that there's a

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 4>difference between that versus something that Mike White typed into

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 4>his thing. I want to write a thing right that,

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 4>even between those two uses of AI, there's a difference that,

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:39.280
<v Speaker 4>like so much of what we consume, there's this social

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 4>basis to it that I think hasn't quite been worked

0:56:41.680 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 4>out by places like Netflix. That there's that that they're

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 4>betting on the other half, which is, like you say

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 4>that if we can sufficiently allow the prompt to just

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 4>solve all of these problems, then we're all set. But

0:56:53.320 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, man, I've been so wrong as I try

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 4>to get people to subscribe to my newsletter about the future.

0:56:57.680 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Let me just say, I'm so wrong all the time.

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's good to know.

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 2>People love to read about a guy who's predicted in

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the future, but getting it wrong that's one of their favorite.

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, actually, that's it gives you a person

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to hate online.

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:12.279
<v Speaker 2>I feel just perhaps, I mean maybe what saves humanity

0:57:12.560 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 2>is that we need to be mad online, but we

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:18.600
<v Speaker 2>need to be mad online at someone specifically. We can't

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 2>just be mad online, Like being mad online at an

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 2>AI feels like unproductive, right, just not enough, you know.

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:27.960
<v Speaker 2>That's that's that's really seizing the means of production, the

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 2>productive anger.

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, all right.

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got to wrap up, Max.

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 2>This was really great first off, not surprising, but really enjoyable.

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like there's about twenty things we didn't

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 2>get to.

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I had.

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I know that during the time that you were talking,

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 2>several times you were saying something, I'm like, I have

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a great, hilarious rebuttal to this, and I didn't get

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a chance to even get there because we got it

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 2>to so many other things. So you got to come

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 2>back and do this again. Yeah, and people can find you.

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 2>You're not on Twitter. You don't You're not on Twitter.

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm on blue Sky now though I'm.

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Not really uhy, but nobody else is on blue Sky.

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's why you can't promote yourself.

0:58:02.280 --> 0:58:03.959
<v Speaker 1>What is your name? On blue Sky. How come people

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 1>find you?

0:58:04.560 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 4>It's just it's max read dot info. It's my it's

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 4>my personal.

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Lives at r O.

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 4>That's great dot info.

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm also I'm also on blue Sky, I should say,

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 2>because that's a cool thing to tell people.

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh, wait, Tibolski dot.

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Com is my this is my blue Sky day, which

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 2>is great. You obviously have this great read Max newsletter

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that you can subscribe to. It's on substack.

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 4>The U R L is Max read dot substack dot com.

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 4>And my last name is spelled R E A D

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 4>like a book.

0:58:29.040 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we know how to spell read. Do people e

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on the end a lot of the time?

0:58:33.160 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 4>This is this R E E D sometimes?

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure, I guess I don't think of that read

0:58:38.000 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. What else? Instagram? You don't do Instagram?

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Not really?

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm a podcast No, but yeah, I think

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 2>when the I when the higher ups that I heard

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 2>here this, They're going to be like this guy.

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 1>We got to get this guy on the air.

0:58:50.280 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 4>One can only hope.

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Or a chat GBT equivalent of this guy. No.

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I invite people. I invite people to subscribe to the newsletter.

0:58:57.080 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 4>It's free. I should mention there is a subscription fee.

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 4>You can pay for it, but I write one free

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 4>weekly column.

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think you can get that the Nemesis Sunglass

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Post for free. And I think that if you want

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 2>to go a deeper dive on nemmesis you get that,

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:10.439
<v Speaker 2>you have to pay a few bucks.

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly right, and you will after you read the

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Sunglass post, you will want the deeper dive.

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I do think that's a big way to kind of

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 2>dangle the subscription at people.

0:59:17.800 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>To get that.

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:20.960
<v Speaker 2>That's a glass posts. Anyhow, it's a super fun Thank

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:28.919
<v Speaker 2>you for taking the time. Well, that is our show

0:59:28.960 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 2>for this week. I think obviously I've I've concluded the

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:34.840
<v Speaker 2>conversation and now that I've had nothing left my all

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 2>of my essence has been drained from me. That sounds disgusting, actually,

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:42.080
<v Speaker 2>but I go into a cryogenic chamber at the end

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of every show and I'm there until the next show,

0:59:44.440 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 2>so I have to begin my long slumber. We'll be

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more what future, and as always,

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I wish you and your family the very best.

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Height