Speaker 1: Up next The Truth with Lisa Mouth part of the game.
Speaker 1: So this is actually the fiftie episode of the Truth
Speaker 1: with Lisa Booth. I launched this podcast about a year ago,
Speaker 1: and the reason why I wanted to do it is
Speaker 1: I got so frustrated during COVID. I felt like the
Speaker 1: majority of the people on TV and in the media,
Speaker 1: we're pushing fear, They're pushing lockdowns, They're pushing the scariest
Speaker 1: information possible. I mean, we weren't hearing stories about people
Speaker 1: surviving COVID, we weren't hearing stories about what the true
Speaker 1: fatality rate was. We're just hearing fear. And so I
Speaker 1: wanted to create a space where we can have honest
Speaker 1: conversations that maybe you don't get in other places like
Speaker 1: in TV or what you read in the news. And
Speaker 1: I wanted to provide an opportunity to bring on experts,
Speaker 1: to bring on people who are really interesting, to bring
Speaker 1: on people who have great insight and some of the
Speaker 1: big things that are going on in our country. And
Speaker 1: you know, we live in this era of censorship. I mean,
Speaker 1: you look at what the left is trying to do,
Speaker 1: you look at the media is trying to do, You
Speaker 1: look at what big tech is trying to do. I mean,
Speaker 1: look at how much they try to shut down information
Speaker 1: about COVID. There's a time where you couldn't even say
Speaker 1: that COVID likely came from the Wuhan lab. You couldn't
Speaker 1: say that. You would get censored. Big tech would censor you.
Speaker 1: Twitter could kick you off, YouTube could shut down and
Speaker 1: take down your video. The media would call you a
Speaker 1: conspiracy theorist. Even the same thing on vaccines, Look, we've
Speaker 1: got vaccines that were produced in record time. Right, most
Speaker 1: vaccines have five, five to ten years of safety data.
Speaker 1: These have less than a year. But we can't ask
Speaker 1: questions what kind of world is that? How do you
Speaker 1: get to the truth and that sort of environment. And
Speaker 1: it's not just the left, it's what we've got is
Speaker 1: we've got government, We've got the people in charge pushing this.
Speaker 1: The media comes in and it just pushes that prop aganda,
Speaker 1: pushes that group to think, and then big tech comes
Speaker 1: in and censors anyone that dare raises questions. So I
Speaker 1: think this podcast The Truth with Lisa Booth is so
Speaker 1: important because what we are doing is having those conversations
Speaker 1: they don't want us to have. We're getting to the
Speaker 1: truth in an era where they're trying to change their truth.
Speaker 1: They're trying to rewrite what what words mean. I mean,
Speaker 1: the CDC changed the definition of what it means to
Speaker 1: be vaccinated. How insane is that? You've got the media
Speaker 1: telling us that girls could be boys and boys can
Speaker 1: be girls. We live in a crazy world. So that's
Speaker 1: why I wanted to do this podcast, and we've done
Speaker 1: some incredible things with it. I mean, my god, I've
Speaker 1: been able to interview President Trump twice. President Trump, he
Speaker 1: was my first guest. How cool is that? The legendary
Speaker 1: John Voit, legendary actor who was incredibly nice. I I
Speaker 1: so enjoyed that conversation with him, and he had so
Speaker 1: much wisdom and kindness and just such an interesting conversation
Speaker 1: we had with him. I recently interviewed Larry the Cable Guy.
Speaker 1: I learned a lot from him, you know, just talking
Speaker 1: about could his persona could Larry the Cable Guy? Could
Speaker 1: that that blue collar stick? Could that work? Now in
Speaker 1: this era of wokeness and progressivism, I've been able to
Speaker 1: interview people like Maximo Averis and talk about communism being
Speaker 1: in America soil, American soil, someone who escaped communism, telling
Speaker 1: us to be careful because communism has infected all of
Speaker 1: our institutions. That was such a powerful conversation I was
Speaker 1: able to have with him. I've interviewed Tucker Carlson, the
Speaker 1: King of Cable Knew, someone who I deeply, deeply respect.
Speaker 1: I think he's the best in the business. He's so smart.
Speaker 1: That was incredible to me to be able to interview
Speaker 1: someone like him. I've been able to interview doctors throughout
Speaker 1: COVID as well, to get you the truth about that
Speaker 1: the things that you can't hear necessarily on TV or
Speaker 1: elsewhere in the media. I talked to Dr Pierre Corey
Speaker 1: about I ever metten. I talked about vaccines, truthful information
Speaker 1: about vaccines with Dr Martin Colder. If he gave us
Speaker 1: a really unbiased, objective viewpoint answered all my questions. I
Speaker 1: think I talked to him for like over an hour,
Speaker 1: and he was kind enough to take the time to
Speaker 1: bring us the truth, to bring us the information that
Speaker 1: we needed to hear. I gotta talk to Dr Scott Atlas,
Speaker 1: who fearlessly has taken on people like Dr Fauci, Dr
Speaker 1: Deborah Burks, just really exposing the COVID Task Force for
Speaker 1: for being really worthless and for bringing us to the
Speaker 1: truth about COVID as well the things they didn't they
Speaker 1: didn't tell us how damaging lockdowns truly were to society.
Speaker 1: Also got to talk to j DR J Baticharia about
Speaker 1: Omicron as well. We had the first post interview with
Speaker 1: Betsy of Bas since leaving UH the White House's Education Secretary.
Speaker 1: I mean, just so many incredible We've talked to athletes
Speaker 1: as well, like Jonathan Isaac. I mean, just so many
Speaker 1: incredible interviews, and it's been such an honor to get
Speaker 1: to the truth with you, to dig in on some
Speaker 1: of these critical issues. What really happened on January six
Speaker 1: with Julie Kelly. I mean, this has been so much fun,
Speaker 1: and it's been such an honor to be on this
Speaker 1: journey with you, to learn with you, to talk to
Speaker 1: some of these incredible people who I deeply respect, who
Speaker 1: have great insight, who are so smart, and to learn
Speaker 1: from them. And so I just wanted to let you
Speaker 1: know that this podcast is continuing. It's just going to
Speaker 1: be continuing with a different network in a few weeks,
Speaker 1: So just you know, sit tight, stay tuned, don't unsubscribe.
Speaker 1: You'll get an update when the next episode is out.
Speaker 1: So we are going to be re launching in a
Speaker 1: few weeks. So the podcast is not ending, it's not
Speaker 1: seeing ever, See you next time and see you soon.
Speaker 1: And we're probably gonna be going to twice a week,
Speaker 1: so that's going to be exciting as well, to give
Speaker 1: you a little bit more content with more guests. So
Speaker 1: I'm super excited about that. And so for for this
Speaker 1: week's episode, it is just a little bit different. We're
Speaker 1: gonna go through some of my favorite interviews I've done,
Speaker 1: and now they're all my favorite interviews. I've interviewed some
Speaker 1: credible people. But John, my producer, has a wife, he's
Speaker 1: got kids, he's got other things that he's doing, so
Speaker 1: I felt, you know, we'll tailor it down, you know,
Speaker 1: narrow it down a little bit for him. But so
Speaker 1: we're gonna hear from my interview with Tucker Carlson, with
Speaker 1: President Trump, with Dr Scott Atlas, and with Maximal of
Speaker 1: Veris and again I will talk to you guys very
Speaker 1: very soon, just a few weeks from now, launching with
Speaker 1: a different network. It's going to be huge and twice
Speaker 1: a week, stay with us. Hey, everyone, Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Truth with Lisa Booth. This is my first podcast, my
Speaker 1: first episode, and I have a very very special guest.
Speaker 1: Do you miss me at a lot of things going on?
Speaker 1: That's right, President Donald J. Trump is joining me, Mr President. So,
Speaker 1: I was thinking today about preparing for this interview, and
Speaker 1: it dawned on me that I am starting with the
Speaker 1: biggest name I could possibly get, So it's pretty much
Speaker 1: downhill from here. Well, I think you're doing so great anyway.
Speaker 1: And when you asked, I want to do it with you,
Speaker 1: I turned down a lot of people, but I want
Speaker 1: to do it with you. I just appreciate everything you've done.
Speaker 1: You're really a professional, great professional, and people have a
Speaker 1: lot of respect for your less So thank you very much.
Speaker 1: It's an honor. You know, I've been thinking about it.
Speaker 1: You know a lot of your supporters right now, you know,
Speaker 1: we feel like no one's fighting for us in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. You know, we're being maligned by the media.
Speaker 1: I aligned by the left. Big Tech has shut off
Speaker 1: your ability to communicate with your supporters. What's your what's
Speaker 1: your message to them right now? What do you want
Speaker 1: to tell them? Well, it is a very unfair situation.
Speaker 1: They go after us at every level in the city,
Speaker 1: and the states go after us. You know, I wanted
Speaker 1: the federal and you know, all these Muller investigations and
Speaker 1: all of the nonsense that went on. It turned out
Speaker 1: that it was Hillary Clinton. Uh, it turned out with Russia,
Speaker 1: you know, Russia, Russia, Russia and Ukraine, and we the
Speaker 1: impeachment hoax number one and number two. And you know,
Speaker 1: you do all that and then you have the state
Speaker 1: and local stuff they send it into them. It's a disgrace.
Speaker 1: I mean, honestly, it's a disgrace. It couldn't happen to
Speaker 1: a Democrat. And yet we keep fighting and we were
Speaker 1: I think we're very effective. We had a great election
Speaker 1: and we won and they took it away. They they
Speaker 1: it was a rigged election because as you know, we
Speaker 1: won the first one, but we did much better in
Speaker 1: the second one. So people always say, oh, what do
Speaker 1: you mean you did better? I said, we did much
Speaker 1: better almost sevention votes and that's the votes that we
Speaker 1: know about. And it was really a terrible thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: it was really an unfair thing to the people that
Speaker 1: support us. So what's happened has been Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: people have seen some silence. But actually, if you take
Speaker 1: a look at what's happened over the last period of time,
Speaker 1: we're sending out releases, they're getting picked up much better
Speaker 1: than any tweet. And I'm doing things having to do
Speaker 1: with putting our own platform out there that you'll be
Speaker 1: hearing about soon. But even more importantly, any anything you
Speaker 1: can tell me about that, well, I'll be telling you
Speaker 1: pretty soon. But but you know, when I put out
Speaker 1: a statement, it's much more elegant than a tweet, and
Speaker 1: I think it gets picked up better. You're seeing that
Speaker 1: we put out statements from the President, etcetera, etcetera, and
Speaker 1: it's getting picked up by everybody. Everything you say we say.
Speaker 1: So if I endorsed somebody, because we're endorsing some very
Speaker 1: good people, and if I endorsed somebody, it gets tremendous
Speaker 1: pick up. I would almost say better than a tweet.
Speaker 1: Now it goes on Twitter, because you know, thousands of
Speaker 1: people pick it up and they put it on Twitter,
Speaker 1: and they put it on Facebook, they put it all
Speaker 1: over the place. So we're really having the voices. I think.
Speaker 1: I think it's been very big. I've only started doing
Speaker 1: that over the last three or four weeks. But it's
Speaker 1: the voices out there. I think, maybe in a certain way,
Speaker 1: maybe as big as ever. And I've been reading the
Speaker 1: you know, the releases that you've been putting out. But
Speaker 1: you know you've mentioned earlier about sort of the control,
Speaker 1: the way that the left goes after conservatives. But it's
Speaker 1: kind of scary right now because they essentially control every
Speaker 1: institution in the country. You know, they've got the federal
Speaker 1: government right now, they control big Tech, they control the corporations,
Speaker 1: they're basically controlling the flow of information to the American people.
Speaker 1: You know, at one point, we had the House, you know,
Speaker 1: we had the Senate, we had you in the White House.
Speaker 1: You know, why didn't we reign in big tech when
Speaker 1: we had that chance. Well, they should have done it
Speaker 1: Section two thirty. They should have done it. They didn't
Speaker 1: do it. And now all of a sudden, the Democrats
Speaker 1: are being in their protector. You know, they were never
Speaker 1: their protector. They hated big tech. But now they have
Speaker 1: the protector because you know, they figured they're getting the
Speaker 1: advantage and big tech. But if you look at what
Speaker 1: happened at the election, Mitch McConnell should have fought you know,
Speaker 1: he did nothing. He should have fought, They would have fought.
Speaker 1: They could never have had That could never have happened
Speaker 1: to a Democrat. At what happened to us with the
Speaker 1: presidential election, could never have happened to the Democrats. You
Speaker 1: would have had a revolution if they did. If they did,
Speaker 1: if the if the tables were turned, you would have
Speaker 1: literally had a revolution. And guys like Mitch McConnell, they
Speaker 1: don't fight. And now he's hanging by a thread. He's
Speaker 1: hanging by a three at all, not really, I don't
Speaker 1: really want to talk to him. Look, he's hanging by
Speaker 1: a thread right now with respect to the filibuster. And
Speaker 1: if they get the filler, he's hanging on Joe Mansion,
Speaker 1: who always goes with the Democrats. Joe talks, but he
Speaker 1: ends up going with the Democrats. He's hanging by a thread.
Speaker 1: And if they get the filibuster, if they knock it out,
Speaker 1: it will be catastrophic for the Republican Party. Now there
Speaker 1: is one thing that you can do, not show up.
Speaker 1: If the Republicans don't show up. In other words, there's
Speaker 1: no vote as I understand it, with fifty fifty, as
Speaker 1: I understand it, the vice presidential vote doesn't count in
Speaker 1: that case, so they can't get that through now. I
Speaker 1: don't even know if the Republican if the Senate knows that.
Speaker 1: If you want to know the truth, but if they
Speaker 1: don't show up, Lisa, I hear that you can't take
Speaker 1: of a it doesn't work. So that's a I mean,
Speaker 1: they may have to do that because they can't allow
Speaker 1: if they knocked out the filibuster, they cannot allow this
Speaker 1: to happen. The things that they're they're going to attack
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment violently, which I've told everybody they're going
Speaker 1: to attack. Yeah, they're going to attack the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't it be interesting? The Supreme Court has done absolutely
Speaker 1: nothing for us in terms of the election. They haven't
Speaker 1: done what they should have done. Wouldn't it be ironic
Speaker 1: if they stacked the court? It would be rather ironic. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean the amount of control they want to have
Speaker 1: over the country is pretty terrify. I mean, you look
Speaker 1: at things like HR one. But also I want to
Speaker 1: talk to you about the border crisis and what's going
Speaker 1: on there. You know, they obviously refuse to call it
Speaker 1: a border crisis, but the US is on pace right
Speaker 1: now to stop more migrants crossing the border, or more
Speaker 1: migrants crossing the border than in the last twenty years.
Speaker 1: You had immigration under control. You had to remain in
Speaker 1: Mexico policy. You're putting up a wall. You were not
Speaker 1: doing catch and release, which is something Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: doing now. So you had it handled. Is there any
Speaker 1: advice that you would like to give Joe Biden on
Speaker 1: how he should be handling the immigration crisis right now? Well,
Speaker 1: finish the wall. Don't forget. We would delay two and
Speaker 1: a half years with litigation from the Democrats from Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi and Congress, and we won those cases, but we
Speaker 1: wasted two and a half years. Despite that, the wall
Speaker 1: is just about finished, just little sections of the wall.
Speaker 1: Contractors are essentially paid, and they should finish the wall.
Speaker 1: It's a very little it could you could finish it
Speaker 1: in a month, and it's impossible that they're not. It's
Speaker 1: just crazy that they're not finished in the wall. So
Speaker 1: that's one piece of advice. And then you have to
Speaker 1: go back that week. You have to remain in Mexico.
Speaker 1: You know, Mexico and I had a very good relationship
Speaker 1: at I must say we had a great I have
Speaker 1: a lot of respect and like for the President of Mexico.
Speaker 1: They had their soldiers while we were building the wall.
Speaker 1: They had seven thousand soldiers guarding the wall, guarding our border,
Speaker 1: and they did a very good job. I must tell
Speaker 1: you, you you know, they don't have the restrictions that we have.
Speaker 1: They did a very very good job. But we had
Speaker 1: it to a level that they say it has never been.
Speaker 1: We haven't. We got rid of all sorts of things,
Speaker 1: including catch and release, all sorts of horrible things that
Speaker 1: were that we had to live with. We got rid,
Speaker 1: and the remain in Mexico. Right now, they're remaining in
Speaker 1: the United States and they're never going to leave. And
Speaker 1: we have no idea who these people are. But I
Speaker 1: can tell you when countries send people up, and they
Speaker 1: do send them up, when they send them up, they're
Speaker 1: not sending up their finest. Okay, they're not sending up
Speaker 1: their finest. Uh. You have some very good people coming up,
Speaker 1: but you have some really bad ones coming to, really
Speaker 1: dangerous criminals coming up, and we're allowing them to come
Speaker 1: right into our country. It's insane and it's nothing compared
Speaker 1: to what it's going to be over the coming months.
Speaker 1: When you see it now. Enjoy it because it's much
Speaker 1: better now when you see it in two or three months,
Speaker 1: because they're just starting to come. They'll be coming up
Speaker 1: by the millions. And we have no idea I mean
Speaker 1: forgetting even about COVID and no testing, no nothing. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're trying to get rid because we came up with
Speaker 1: a vaccine, we're going to be hopefully in good shape
Speaker 1: and then not due to the future. But these people
Speaker 1: they're not being tested nothing. But they were also as
Speaker 1: I said before, you have some very bad embres coming
Speaker 1: up and we're taking him into our country and it's insane.
Speaker 1: They're destroying our country, Lisa, they're destroying our country well,
Speaker 1: and it's happening so fast. And for those at home
Speaker 1: who don't The Remain of Mexico policy was such a
Speaker 1: smart thing because essentially what happened was Central American silent seekers.
Speaker 1: They remained in Mexico instead of coming into the United States.
Speaker 1: Because what was happening, and you know, in Mr President,
Speaker 1: this is why you did this, which was so wise.
Speaker 1: What was happening is these individuals were coming here, passing
Speaker 1: that initial interview and then getting lost in the population
Speaker 1: of legal immigrants living here, So they're using that as
Speaker 1: an opportunity to get in and then disappear. So that
Speaker 1: was so smart that you did, and you threatened with
Speaker 1: terrorist and you've got Mesco Mexico to you know, step
Speaker 1: up to the plate. But there's also this, so you know,
Speaker 1: in January and February, border authorities accountered more than fifteen
Speaker 1: thousand unaccompanied minors. A migrant facility in Donna, Texas was
Speaker 1: at s of its pandemic capacity this month. Are Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's immigration policies inhumane? Well, they are a you mean,
Speaker 1: and what's happened is people that are living in their
Speaker 1: countries and that's where they've been and in many cases
Speaker 1: that's where they ultimately want to go back to, if
Speaker 1: you can believe it. But people living in their countries
Speaker 1: are coming in. And these are not just countries in
Speaker 1: South America, Latin America. These are now countries where you
Speaker 1: look and you look at the Middle East. We have
Speaker 1: Middle East owners coming in. We know nothing about them.
Speaker 1: We have things happening that and we had it in
Speaker 1: such good control two months ago, three months ago, and
Speaker 1: then he made the statement that you want to have
Speaker 1: you want to come in and everybody just started marching
Speaker 1: up and the country has had a lot to do
Speaker 1: with it. So one of the things I did was
Speaker 1: it was impossible to bring them back to Guatemala, Honduras
Speaker 1: and San Salvador, El Salvador, San Salvador, and you couldn't
Speaker 1: bring them back. You couldn't get it back no matter what.
Speaker 1: And what happened is I said, look how much money
Speaker 1: we paid those countries, five hundred million dollars a year.
Speaker 1: I stopped payment, and all of a sudden they took
Speaker 1: them back. In other words, we capture Ms thirteen. And
Speaker 1: if you take a look at El Salvador as an example,
Speaker 1: or or any of them, and other countries too, they
Speaker 1: wouldn't take them back. So I stopped payment. As soon
Speaker 1: as I stopped payment, they gladly took him back. Nobody's
Speaker 1: ever done that before. Nobody ever talks about it, because
Speaker 1: you know, how simple is it, but nobody's ever done it.
Speaker 1: So I stopped paying the five hundred million a year
Speaker 1: to the three countries, the triangle as we call them.
Speaker 1: I stopped paying it. Once I stopped paying it, they
Speaker 1: said we'll take them back. They would literally round them
Speaker 1: up for me. They would round them up bring them
Speaker 1: to Honduras, bring them to bring them to Guatemala, and
Speaker 1: they would say, turn around, we're not taking them back.
Speaker 1: Now they take them back, but now they're not going
Speaker 1: to again. So he's paying and we don't get anything
Speaker 1: for We give them a lot of money and we
Speaker 1: get nothing but disrespect. And we had it down to
Speaker 1: an absolute science. It was. It was a beautiful thing
Speaker 1: to see and frankly, what's happened. And even Mexico, I said, look,
Speaker 1: if we don't if we don't make a deal, and
Speaker 1: if you don't help us out, we're gonna have to
Speaker 1: put tariffs on all of the products that you sell
Speaker 1: to the United States because they have a big surplus
Speaker 1: with the United States. So we're gonna have to put
Speaker 1: a terraphone. As soon as I said that they were great,
Speaker 1: and they were great. We had a great relationship with
Speaker 1: Mexico and the other countries because they didn't want to
Speaker 1: have either tariffs imposed or they wanted to get some
Speaker 1: of the money. And and you know, and I also
Speaker 1: gave them back us but we gave them we stopped
Speaker 1: payment on all of that money that was pouring in,
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden they took the MS thirteen
Speaker 1: people back, and they took the people that we wanted
Speaker 1: out of our country back. So people don't talk about that.
Speaker 1: They never talked about that, But that's what happened, and
Speaker 1: we never had it so good. And you know when
Speaker 1: they when they released them in our country, they go
Speaker 1: into our country, they never we never find them again.
Speaker 1: They never come back. Okay, when they never come back,
Speaker 1: a very tiny percentage comes back. They say we're gonna
Speaker 1: release you in the country and you'll come back in
Speaker 1: two years for a legal case. That's the end of them.
Speaker 1: Very few people show up. It's it's ridiculous. So we
Speaker 1: had a thing where we keep them in Mexico. We
Speaker 1: got upheld in the courts meeting positively, so all of
Speaker 1: these people were staying in Mexico. What that did is
Speaker 1: it forced Mexico not to let them in on their
Speaker 1: northern border, so they wouldn't let them in. So we're
Speaker 1: sort of working for everybody. And then these people came
Speaker 1: alone and they just ended everything. And now they to
Speaker 1: be flowing in by the millions, already started very substantially.
Speaker 1: Nobody's ever seen it as bad as it is now.
Speaker 1: It's really good compared to what it will be in
Speaker 1: a few months. We certainly don't see this same pressure
Speaker 1: from the media, the same sort of lies that they
Speaker 1: were telling about your immigration policies being applied to you know,
Speaker 1: the Biden administration here. But no, I wanted to ask
Speaker 1: you you've mentioned COVID early or so, you know. We
Speaker 1: it's been over years since the fifteen days to slow
Speaker 1: the spread, and Dr Fauci has drawn the ire of
Speaker 1: a lot of conservatives like me, uh and also Senator Rampaul.
Speaker 1: We've seen a lot of his exchanges in the Senate
Speaker 1: with Dr Fauci. You know, he's flip flopped on masks.
Speaker 1: He was wrong about the travel bands. He basically told
Speaker 1: us at the beginning to not worry about COVID. Do
Speaker 1: you regret ever elevating him? Well, I didn't really elevate him.
Speaker 1: He's been there for forty years, he's been there forever,
Speaker 1: and I thought rather than firing him, you know, I
Speaker 1: listened to him, but I didn't do what he said
Speaker 1: because frankly, his record is not a good record. I
Speaker 1: like him personally. It's actually a nice guy, is a
Speaker 1: great promoter. He's really a promoter more than anything else.
Speaker 1: And Uh, I think he's you know, I always say
Speaker 1: he's a better pitcher of a baseball than he is
Speaker 1: at what he does, because he was wrong so much.
Speaker 1: If I would have listened to him. First of all,
Speaker 1: he said no masks, and very importantly, he didn't want
Speaker 1: to have China stopped from coming in. If we would
Speaker 1: have done that, we would have had hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of more deaths in our country. And if you look
Speaker 1: at what we've done, you know, we don't get fair publicity.
Speaker 1: But what we've done, we've supplied. You know, the cupboage
Speaker 1: were bare. We had nothing from the previous administration, and
Speaker 1: we got all of the gowns and all of the
Speaker 1: masks and all of the uh, if you take a
Speaker 1: look at the machinery, the equipment that you need, it's massive.
Speaker 1: We took care of everything, and we really did a
Speaker 1: great job. But we stopped so many But the big
Speaker 1: thing that I did is the vaccine. Because the vaccine,
Speaker 1: you know, a lot of people expected we're gonna lose
Speaker 1: two point two million people, and it's going to be
Speaker 1: a number six stantially lower than that. But the big
Speaker 1: thing that I did for the world, not only is
Speaker 1: I went to the f D a I said, fellas
Speaker 1: it's over, this is going to go fast. It would
Speaker 1: have taken five years for another president, a guy like
Speaker 1: Biden would have taken five year, taken five years for
Speaker 1: the vaccine to be approved, and it would have never
Speaker 1: been approved. I think they would have had it. It
Speaker 1: would have you know, goes from five to twelve years.
Speaker 1: I got it done in nine months, and they did
Speaker 1: not like me. I will tell you that they did
Speaker 1: not like me. In statutorily, they had to do things
Speaker 1: a certain way. They were I ended all I said,
Speaker 1: we need have Actually we got it done in nine months.
Speaker 1: I mean they disliked me so much that it was
Speaker 1: approved like two days after the election because they could.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the only one that dislikes me
Speaker 1: more of the drug companies, because what I did with
Speaker 1: favorite nations and everything else. If Biden keeps my policies,
Speaker 1: drug prices will come way down to the lowest in
Speaker 1: the world, will be tied because the favorite nations. That
Speaker 1: means we will match the lowest price in the world,
Speaker 1: which is much lower for the exact same drug with
Speaker 1: the exact same pill. So the drug companies that took
Speaker 1: millions of dollars of advertisements against us, against me, and
Speaker 1: you know, but I had to do what was right.
Speaker 1: Nobody else would have done. Favorite nations against the drug companies.
Speaker 1: So if they leave that in place, and I did
Speaker 1: other things like transparency and other things, but you know,
Speaker 1: the people, I think I know the people love it.
Speaker 1: The problem is they won't see it for a little while.
Speaker 1: If they allowed my policies to stay, we'll have tied
Speaker 1: for the lowest drug prices anywhere in the world. It'll
Speaker 1: be great. But Faucci has been so wrong, so as Burkes.
Speaker 1: They've been so wrong. And if I would have listened
Speaker 1: to them and then they went to the other extreme,
Speaker 1: like the entire country should lock up, I didn't go
Speaker 1: for that, and you know, it just wasn't for me.
Speaker 1: I didn't go for that. And if you look, you
Speaker 1: know I allowed governors like Rhonda Santis, who has done
Speaker 1: a great job, and in texas As they've done a
Speaker 1: really good job, and uh in South Dakota. But many
Speaker 1: many place is I allowed them to keep open if
Speaker 1: they want, if they want to know, the ones that
Speaker 1: shut down are the ones that are doing the worst.
Speaker 1: You look at New York, you look at California, the
Speaker 1: ones that shut down are the ones that the states
Speaker 1: that have done the worst. It's sort of amazing, to
Speaker 1: be honest, if you look at it, but they've done
Speaker 1: really terribly. They've ruined their economies, they've ruined their states,
Speaker 1: and then numbers aren't better. In fact, the numbers are
Speaker 1: worse than the ones that have been much more open.
Speaker 1: All right, Mr President, I know you've got I don't
Speaker 1: want to take up much more of your time. I
Speaker 1: know you've got a busy day, but it is such
Speaker 1: an honor to talk to you. You're welcome here anytime.
Speaker 1: I would love to have you back on the podcast,
Speaker 1: and it is beyond an honor to have you as
Speaker 1: my very first guest on this podcast. So I just
Speaker 1: want to thank you for taking the time. Thank you,
Speaker 1: and Lisa on behalf of a lot of people. Thank
Speaker 1: you for everything. Your voice has been incredible, it's been strong,
Speaker 1: and you're definitely not afraid, and that's something that we need.
Speaker 1: So we need more of that. And it's to do
Speaker 1: your first your first show, and you're gonna have many.
Speaker 1: You're gonna do very well because you're somebody that people
Speaker 1: respect greatly. Thank you very much, Lisa, Thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: that means the world coming from you, I really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: I hope you enjoyed that with President Trump. We're going
Speaker 1: to take a quick commercial break and then back with
Speaker 1: my interview with Tucker Carlson on the other side. This
Speaker 1: is episode eighteen with my colleague and I think the
Speaker 1: smartest person on television, the great Tucker Carlson. You're probably
Speaker 1: subject to the most criticism in the country in terms
Speaker 1: of as being a journalist. Why do you think that is? Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't. I mean, you know, because I'm in the way.
Speaker 1: I guess I don't have perspective on it. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm very against the Internet. You know. I try
Speaker 1: not to spend any time on the Internet if I
Speaker 1: can help it. I think it's disgusting, you know, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm really thrilled that, you know, we can
Speaker 1: get up to the moment weather updates, but like, overall,
Speaker 1: the internet has been like the worst thing that ever
Speaker 1: happened to the world. And clearly and um so I'm
Speaker 1: just not on it that much. I never go go myself,
Speaker 1: I would never do that. And and more broadly, I'm
Speaker 1: I'm not interested like truly and I'm not just saying this,
Speaker 1: I mean it, Ask anyone who lives around me. I'm
Speaker 1: not interested in in the opinions of people I don't respect.
Speaker 1: I'm deeply interested in the people I love and care
Speaker 1: about and their opinions. If my wife looks at me
Speaker 1: cross side it, you know, it brings me to my knees.
Speaker 1: I mean, I really care what the people I love
Speaker 1: to think very much, and I will immediately change my
Speaker 1: behavior if they tell me too. But like somebody at
Speaker 1: the Daily Beast, I don't, you know, why would I
Speaker 1: care what they think? I really don't. I mean, and
Speaker 1: I mean that, oh, you're a Nazi, you're a what
Speaker 1: you know, you quoted Martin Luther King, So you're a
Speaker 1: white supremacist. Okay, you know it's this is so dumb,
Speaker 1: like why do I care? So it doesn't have any
Speaker 1: effect on me at all, like literally none, and so
Speaker 1: it's like to me, it's like it's not even happening.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say what I think is true. If I
Speaker 1: say something that's cruel or unfair, you know that people
Speaker 1: I respect will tell me immediately and I I'll apologize
Speaker 1: and stop doing it. But like the criticism of people
Speaker 1: who you know, work for Jeff Bezos and want to
Speaker 1: defend the existing order like I don't give a ship
Speaker 1: at all, and I really don't either. You know, we've
Speaker 1: seen probably one of the biggest transfers of wealth over
Speaker 1: the past year, and you know, the shuttering of small
Speaker 1: businesses which are more decentralized in the centralized power with
Speaker 1: large corporations, as well as obviously the government growing larger.
Speaker 1: H in addition to that, you know, where where does
Speaker 1: that head? And what does that mean for a country,
Speaker 1: you know, both economically and just as a nation at large.
Speaker 1: But what about racism? What about racism? What about transgender rights?
Speaker 1: I mean, all of the debates that are sort of
Speaker 1: forced on us from above, racism, oh shut up, transgender right,
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's like nine people. All of them
Speaker 1: are recover for the real debates, which are mostly about economics,
Speaker 1: not not exclusively, but the big ones are about like
Speaker 1: the role of the central bank. And in a normal country,
Speaker 1: that's what you would be debating because that that really
Speaker 1: does matter. But we're not having that debate at all.
Speaker 1: And yeah, you're seeing a complete transformation of the U.
Speaker 1: S economy complete two. And this has been a middle
Speaker 1: class country literally middle class country. The majority of people
Speaker 1: fall into the you know, as determined by the Labor Department.
Speaker 1: But in the income range that we call middle class,
Speaker 1: the majority were middle class. Two fifteen, the middle class
Speaker 1: becomes a minority in the country becomes and this has
Speaker 1: accelerated this trend way more lopsided. Small number of people
Speaker 1: control a larger percentage of the assets, and that makes
Speaker 1: the country really unstable, not just this country, in any country.
Speaker 1: That's how Venezuela went from this kind of nice place
Speaker 1: I went there as a kid to you know, this hellhole.
Speaker 1: They're eating zoo animals and you know, Maduro's in charge,
Speaker 1: Like because that concentration of wealth in a democracy provokes
Speaker 1: a response, and it provokes radical populism and they break everything.
Speaker 1: So like, that's a really bad trend. It's one of
Speaker 1: the worst possible trends. But we don't even discuss it.
Speaker 1: And why don't we discuss it because the people who
Speaker 1: control the conversation, you know, who control the tech companies
Speaker 1: and the and the TV networks, I don't want to
Speaker 1: have that conversation because they're on the winning end of it.
Speaker 1: So Trump said something he once Trump stunt super reflective
Speaker 1: as you know. But he did say something I never forgot,
Speaker 1: which is, you know, the one thing that people don't
Speaker 1: like the system, our system doesn't like in this country's
Speaker 1: economic populist. And they really don't. You know that We've
Speaker 1: never had since Teddy Roosevelt. We have not had a
Speaker 1: president including Trump by the way, um, who is an
Speaker 1: economic populist. But most people kind of like the basic
Speaker 1: ideas of economic populism. So what does that tell you
Speaker 1: if for a hundred years people don't get the one
Speaker 1: thing they want, maybe the system isn't very responsive to
Speaker 1: the public. Maybe it's not really a democracy, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean? No, I mean it makes sense. And
Speaker 1: you know, of course, everything ultimately is about, you know, control,
Speaker 1: and that's why obviously they want larger corporations and government
Speaker 1: control and socialism and things of that nature, because it
Speaker 1: empowers the people in charge for real. Last question of this,
Speaker 1: this is something that you encourage people that you know,
Speaker 1: get married, have kids. Why Why is having a strong
Speaker 1: family unit almost counterculture? Now? Well, because it runs contrary
Speaker 1: to corporate interests. I mean, feminism is just like a
Speaker 1: pure corporate propaganda, you know, telling And I have three daughters,
Speaker 1: so I think about this a lot, but like telling
Speaker 1: girls that somehow more virtuous and fulfilling and meaningful to
Speaker 1: work for some soulless corporation in the HR department of marketing, marketing,
Speaker 1: whatever the funk that is marketing, uh, than it is
Speaker 1: to raise your own children. Like who thought of that first?
Speaker 1: Personal It's like so ridiculous. Anyway, this is this is
Speaker 1: the Ryl Sandberg wrote a whole book on this. She
Speaker 1: and a lot of people like her have been making
Speaker 1: this case for fifty years that you're just you're gonna
Speaker 1: be a lot happier if you work for some big
Speaker 1: company than if you have a personal life. And it's
Speaker 1: such a lie that they can only maintain it with
Speaker 1: like maximum hysteria. You know, men are terrible. You don't
Speaker 1: want a man, right, okay? And you know having a
Speaker 1: man and having a family, having little kids you have
Speaker 1: to deal with makes you a less reliable employee. So
Speaker 1: of course they're going to say that the amazing thing
Speaker 1: is we believe that this is a liberation movement. You're
Speaker 1: so liberated you get to, you know, commute to midtown
Speaker 1: sitting r meetings. That's not like that's liberation. So the
Speaker 1: truth is like you know, getting married, having someone who
Speaker 1: you love and loves you back, and who is loyal
Speaker 1: to you and you're loyal to you know, like the
Speaker 1: happiest thing in life having children? Are you kidding? It's
Speaker 1: the most meaningful thing you can do. It's not the easiest,
Speaker 1: it's not always the most fun, but it's it's certainly
Speaker 1: the most rewarding. It's the thing that you know, it's
Speaker 1: all that matters really in my opinion, And so like
Speaker 1: people are like, oh, well, you know it matters. What
Speaker 1: really matters is I don't know, going to sat Barts
Speaker 1: or having more sex partners really do They don't really
Speaker 1: think that makes you happy. Now, It's like absurd, It's
Speaker 1: totally absurd, you know. I tell her, I think back
Speaker 1: before I became afraid to the time at work, I
Speaker 1: m PBS or just you know, in the past thirty years,
Speaker 1: as in television, where I've worked for twenty six years,
Speaker 1: I would always tell the women on it because it's
Speaker 1: like heavily women, because they're amazing producers and they're like
Speaker 1: incredibly hard working, like in a way just candidly that
Speaker 1: a lot of men aren't. You know, people like to
Speaker 1: hire women. That's true because they're like awesome them, you know,
Speaker 1: can you do this? Absolutely? And they do it. It's
Speaker 1: crazy and so but the problem is that companies take
Speaker 1: advantage of women, and women don't kind of complain about
Speaker 1: it because they're so dutiful. These are generalizations, but they're
Speaker 1: generally true. And so I would always take the women
Speaker 1: on our staff aside and be like, you know, you're
Speaker 1: so awesome and you're great, but like, you know, don't
Speaker 1: forget that this is just a TV show and in
Speaker 1: the end, you know, you want to live out your
Speaker 1: life with like someone who really loves you, and like
Speaker 1: if you want children, you should have them, and don't
Speaker 1: let your loyalty to this job, you know, convince you
Speaker 1: to miss your own life, like take time for your
Speaker 1: personal life. I would always say that. Now I'm like
Speaker 1: afraid so I get fired for saying that again. I
Speaker 1: don't know what would happen. I don't say that anymore,
Speaker 1: but I always did because I meant it, And I
Speaker 1: wish a woman would say that to America. You know,
Speaker 1: it's a lie working for City Bank or you do
Speaker 1: you think City Bank cares about you know, you know,
Speaker 1: who cares about you? Like your husband would care about
Speaker 1: your kids, would care of you, your dogs care about you.
Speaker 1: City Bank does not care of about you. So Fox
Speaker 1: City Bank, that's how I feel about it. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean I do. I totally agree with you. And this
Speaker 1: is something I've been grappling with over the past year
Speaker 1: of you know, I've put so much emphasis on work
Speaker 1: before and you know, wanting to look towards having a
Speaker 1: family and find the right person and get married and
Speaker 1: do that whole thing, because it's almost as if society
Speaker 1: we've redirected people away from things that actually have meaning
Speaker 1: in life and purpose in life, like religion, like families,
Speaker 1: and directed it towards things that are completely empty and
Speaker 1: unfulfilling and bring unhappiness and sadness. It's twisted. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: you get to go to Burning Man for a week,
Speaker 1: so it's all worth it, you know, And you know,
Speaker 1: you get your little nappod in the Google break room
Speaker 1: and like, you know, you get free score bars, so
Speaker 1: you're you're you're good, You're very psyched, and you can
Speaker 1: order in lunch and the company will pay for it.
Speaker 1: Like if those are your rewards or you make three
Speaker 1: hundred thousand a year, Wow, that'll make you happier three
Speaker 1: million or thirty million a year. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: all such a lie. And and I mean I can
Speaker 1: say because I'm one of the few people I know
Speaker 1: who's like, you know, I ran out of money at
Speaker 1: one point how to sell my house with fork and
Speaker 1: then I made a lot of money, and so I've
Speaker 1: been kind of both ends. And I can tell you know,
Speaker 1: debt is bad, being poor is hard. Not having enough
Speaker 1: money is hard. But making more than you need does
Speaker 1: not make you happy. It just doesn't. That's a lie.
Speaker 1: And I mean, I think we all sort of know that,
Speaker 1: but let me just say it again. That's a lie.
Speaker 1: What makes you happy are your relationships or your commitments
Speaker 1: to other people, not your random relationships, like your deep relationships,
Speaker 1: the one that's that you sacrifice for the ones you're
Speaker 1: connected to for life. The person will be buried next
Speaker 1: to what that matters, and nobody says it. I don't
Speaker 1: understand why, but you know, as noted, I just don't care.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to because why wouldn't I know? I
Speaker 1: think it's important, which is why you know, I wanted
Speaker 1: to bring it up, because you know, I do think
Speaker 1: we're turning young people towards things that are completely meaningless
Speaker 1: and empty, and social media, of course draws people inside
Speaker 1: and away from those interpersonal relationships, which is the basis
Speaker 1: and foundation of happiness in society. Anything else you want
Speaker 1: to leave my listeners with before we go, well, just one,
Speaker 1: it's just on this topic. I can't control myself. I
Speaker 1: just had this conversation with my wife yesterday, so it's
Speaker 1: just like the top of mind, but we're talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, happiness and unhappiness or whatever. And I thought,
Speaker 1: and I thought this before, but it really struck me. Ester.
Speaker 1: It's like, I don't think I've ever been unhappy in
Speaker 1: my life except because of self pity. I honestly don't
Speaker 1: think I have. I mean, I haven't had a ton
Speaker 1: of you know, bad things happen to me. I've had
Speaker 1: a really happen nice life, easy life, really. But the
Speaker 1: times where I've been unhappy, it's been one because I
Speaker 1: felt sorry for myself. One d you know, poor me,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. And I thought, well, what
Speaker 1: is the root of self pity? And of course it's narcissism,
Speaker 1: you know, It's it's thinking about it's obsessing over yourself,
Speaker 1: and that that really is the root of unhappiness, and
Speaker 1: so anything that pulls you deeper in to yourself. And
Speaker 1: by the way, I would say self knowledge is really important,
Speaker 1: and that's a different category. Understanding who you are and
Speaker 1: what you want, what you're good at, Like those are
Speaker 1: key qualities. Absolutely, it's key skills that you need to master.
Speaker 1: But self obsession is a different thing. Narcissism is a
Speaker 1: different thing. And you know, get out of yourself. I mean,
Speaker 1: just do whatever you can to get out of yourself.
Speaker 1: Not even for moral reasons, so I think those apply,
Speaker 1: but for practical reasons. You'll be happier the less you
Speaker 1: think about yourself, Like stop googling yourself, stop taking your
Speaker 1: fucking self piece, like get off your phone, talk to
Speaker 1: other people, worry about them. You'll be way happier if
Speaker 1: you do that. And this is like so obvious. I'm
Speaker 1: embarrassed to say it, but it just struck me yesterday,
Speaker 1: like just in me. You know, when I think about myself,
Speaker 1: I become unhappy. It's true, I think, and I think
Speaker 1: it's true for everybody. Well, I actually had accidentally left
Speaker 1: my phone at home when I went away for a
Speaker 1: weekend in the Keys, and it was like one of
Speaker 1: the best weekends I've had because I was completely connected
Speaker 1: it I'm saying, but it was really it was sad.
Speaker 1: It made me really sad about what dominance or phones
Speaker 1: have on our lives. I was so happy, I was
Speaker 1: so in the moment, just truly enjoying things in a
Speaker 1: way that you don't when you're checking work emails or
Speaker 1: on this or that, and it. I mean, it's almost like,
Speaker 1: I think we'd all be a lot happier without you know,
Speaker 1: these cell phones, without social media, all these things that
Speaker 1: take us away from the real moments in life and
Speaker 1: you know, those relationships and the things that really matter
Speaker 1: and happiness. Yeah, I'm not going to recommend Ted Kaczynski's
Speaker 1: second book, the one who Wrote from Prison, because that
Speaker 1: would be too radical for your listeners. But but let
Speaker 1: me just but I just want to get it out
Speaker 1: there for those who are interested, you know, maybe check
Speaker 1: it out. But um, I would say, yeah, technology, we
Speaker 1: have not we have not grappled with the effects of it.
Speaker 1: I mean, we had the we had the industrial Revolution,
Speaker 1: and it caused you know, political revolutions, it caused Marxism,
Speaker 1: you know, around the world, and now we've had this
Speaker 1: digital revolution. We're pretending that like, oh, everything is kind
Speaker 1: of the same. No, no, no, no, no, there are
Speaker 1: consequences of this are um are are yet to be visible,
Speaker 1: but they're going to be really, they're gonna be profound.
Speaker 1: I would say, obviously, did to make another obvious point,
Speaker 1: which is my specialty? No, that's how your specialty. Uh, Tucker.
Speaker 1: I really appreciate you making the time for my podcast.
Speaker 1: It means a lot, and it was thank you for
Speaker 1: having I'm the biggest Tucker Carlson fan. I hope you
Speaker 1: guys are too quick. Commercial break, and then back with
Speaker 1: my interview with Maximolaveris on the other side. I love
Speaker 1: this episode. It was episode seven with Maximo Alveries. He
Speaker 1: fled communist Cuba to come to America and he warns
Speaker 1: us about how communism has infiltrated all of our institutions. Listen. So,
Speaker 1: when I was thinking about all these concerns that honestly
Speaker 1: come to mind to me every single day, I'm constantly
Speaker 1: worried about the direction or country is heading, constantly feeling
Speaker 1: like communism is at our doorstep right here in America.
Speaker 1: So in thinking about all this and thinking about who
Speaker 1: to have on the show, was a guest. Maximo Avaris
Speaker 1: came to mind. You all at home might remember him
Speaker 1: from the Republican National Convention, and he gave an incredibly
Speaker 1: emotional speech talking about his journey, talking about escaping, fleeing
Speaker 1: communist Cuba and coming to America at age thirteen. He
Speaker 1: has had a tremendously successful career in the oil industry.
Speaker 1: He is the founder and heads Sunshine Gasoline. So he
Speaker 1: is the epitome of the American dream. And if there
Speaker 1: is anyone who knows how quickly a country can lose
Speaker 1: its freedom, it's Maximo. So that's what we're gonna talk
Speaker 1: to him about today. Maximo, thanks so much for coming
Speaker 1: on the Truth with Lisa Booth. It's such an honor
Speaker 1: to talk to you today about freedom. And we're also neighbors.
Speaker 1: So I just I actually just like left New York
Speaker 1: City to to move to Florida for the primary reason
Speaker 1: of wanting to come to a free state. Welcome, thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you. Sorry, I'm in Miami. I love it. Uh
Speaker 1: So Maximo at the RNC convention, and you know, you
Speaker 1: talked about your story. You fled Cuba at the age
Speaker 1: of as part of Operation Pedro Pan. What do you
Speaker 1: remember about Cuba, Well, I remember what's revidly about Cuba,
Speaker 1: and a lot of the things that you know amazes me.
Speaker 1: People did not know that Cuba in the fifties was
Speaker 1: pretty much another state of our great United States of America. Uh.
Speaker 1: We're an independent country, of course, but we enjoyed the
Speaker 1: same standard of living. Our currency was at the same
Speaker 1: value of the American dollar. It's a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: the Cuban peso circulated as much as the dollar. We
Speaker 1: had all of the benefits that you have in the
Speaker 1: United States. Just to give you an idea, when General
Speaker 1: Motors would put out the cars to the mark let's say,
Speaker 1: let's say in October September, a month before they were
Speaker 1: already sent to Cuba, where a lot of American people
Speaker 1: will go to Cuba by an automobile right around, send
Speaker 1: it in the ferry and not pay the taxes. So
Speaker 1: you could buy a Chevrolet or the Forward or any
Speaker 1: vehicles just about for the less that you could buy
Speaker 1: in the United States. Because you said the taxes. Cuba
Speaker 1: was what it is at the time in the fifties,
Speaker 1: similar to what it is Las Vegas today. People tourism, flourish,
Speaker 1: people went there to have a good time. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, you could just you know, fly to
Speaker 1: Cuba in less than an hour goal and stay the
Speaker 1: weekend in hotels just as luxurious as the ones in
Speaker 1: Miami and the ones in New York. So that's the
Speaker 1: cube that I remember. I also remember our education, which
Speaker 1: he was really impacted. And this is the biggest impact
Speaker 1: that we had when we lost our country. I remember
Speaker 1: how my mom, when I didn't behave, used to threaten
Speaker 1: me that if I didn't behave the next day, I
Speaker 1: would not be allowed to go to school. That was instant,
Speaker 1: because oh my lord, I couldn't miss school. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, I don't remember what ever missing school
Speaker 1: one day. I remember going to school when I had
Speaker 1: a fever and we had a stomach ache. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: tell my mom because I was afraid I was going
Speaker 1: to be left at home. And that is the things
Speaker 1: that we remember that all of a sudden, from one
Speaker 1: day to the next, everything changed. My school was confiscated,
Speaker 1: all the private property was taken away. People were getting
Speaker 1: killed against a wall. They were running trials in mass
Speaker 1: trials because they didn't have enough time in the day
Speaker 1: to execute people. So you go to trial at nine
Speaker 1: o'clock in the morning, you get convicted at ten at
Speaker 1: eleven o'clock against the wall, no appeals, nothing. Our system
Speaker 1: was pretty much the same as the one we have
Speaker 1: here in the United States, and all of a sudden
Speaker 1: that change. I remember crying and being upset because as
Speaker 1: Castle takes over, my friends were marching in the streets.
Speaker 1: Did you and our revolutionary kids a moment that wouldn't
Speaker 1: let me do that? And I remember, as I want
Speaker 1: to be with my friends, these are my neighbors. This
Speaker 1: is the same kids to go to my school. Thank god,
Speaker 1: Mom and Dad knew because they understood communism because many
Speaker 1: years before they migrated to Cue are running away from Spain.
Speaker 1: So I have that in my blood because not only
Speaker 1: I learned from Mom and dad, which when you're young,
Speaker 1: you don't seem to pay much attention to that, but
Speaker 1: then it happened to me. Also it happened to them,
Speaker 1: and it happened to everybody who has ever come to
Speaker 1: this country looking for one thing, which is called freedom.
Speaker 1: And you know why I'm so sad today because I
Speaker 1: saw this coming. I not only said it in that
Speaker 1: speech at the convention. What I've been saying this before.
Speaker 1: I started saying that when all of a sudden we
Speaker 1: had a low passing us in our country, that you
Speaker 1: couldn't say the prayer in school, that's the beginning. That's
Speaker 1: how they do. I saw it when when you will
Speaker 1: be offended because you were called a name. I saw
Speaker 1: it when when you have to be politically correct. I
Speaker 1: saw these things coming and every time there's a shooting,
Speaker 1: how they want to take your guns away. I saw
Speaker 1: it when when even the Catholic people say nothing against abortion.
Speaker 1: But this is something that really hurts because very few people,
Speaker 1: I for one, who had never imagined that this country
Speaker 1: would be vulnerable to communism. But long the whole, if
Speaker 1: you go back in history and you hear the speech
Speaker 1: that Nikita Krushchev said, I think it was nineteen at
Speaker 1: the United Nations. By the way, Nikita Kruschev, for those
Speaker 1: of you who may not know, it's the equivalent of
Speaker 1: putting today in Russia. And he had visited the Fidel
Speaker 1: Castro in Cuba, and then he went and gave a
Speaker 1: speech at the United Nations. And in that speech he says,
Speaker 1: one day the United States of America will be communists
Speaker 1: and we will not even have a war. We will
Speaker 1: infiltrate their education, will infiltrate your society, will infiltrate the youth.
Speaker 1: And I want to play this clip for the audience
Speaker 1: from your RNC convention, and then um, I want to
Speaker 1: ask you a question after it. Let's play this. I
Speaker 1: have seen people like this big for I've seen movements
Speaker 1: like this before. I've seen ideas like this before, and
Speaker 1: I am here to tell you we cannot let them
Speaker 1: take over our country. I heard the promises of Fidel Castro,
Speaker 1: and I can never forget all those who grew up
Speaker 1: around me, who looked like me, who suffered and starved
Speaker 1: and died because they believe those empty promises. They swallowed
Speaker 1: the communist poison pill. Sir, as we're listening to earlier,
Speaker 1: you're talking about communism coming to hear on the American soil.
Speaker 1: As we just heard your RNC convention, you had talked
Speaker 1: about how people in Cuba had swallowed the communist poison pill.
Speaker 1: Have Americans swallowed the communist poison pill? Not only they
Speaker 1: have swallowed, they digesting it. Listen to the media. They're
Speaker 1: no longer objective. You can tell how much they hate
Speaker 1: this country. Look at our our academia. Our kids are
Speaker 1: not being did in doctrinated. They are thought that America
Speaker 1: is a bad country. There were a bunch of racists,
Speaker 1: that we're bad people and we'll have to pay back.
Speaker 1: If this country was racist, I wouldn't be here. If
Speaker 1: this country was a racist country, most of us willn't
Speaker 1: be here because even some people in your family came
Speaker 1: from another country. This country was made of immigrants. That
Speaker 1: we have racist people in this country, of course we do.
Speaker 1: Do we have bad people, yes we do. Do we
Speaker 1: have bad teachers, yes we do. Do we have bad
Speaker 1: police people, yes we do. But con'mpling the country for
Speaker 1: that because we have a justice system that will penalize
Speaker 1: you and punish you if you are a bad person,
Speaker 1: if you are a racist, But don't don't make our
Speaker 1: would then believe that we have to pay back because
Speaker 1: America is a bad country. And this is what it's
Speaker 1: so sad. Whenever we make a donation, most people who
Speaker 1: make donations try to find out where is that money going,
Speaker 1: Who are you helping? What is the American Cancer Society,
Speaker 1: or whether it's your church, or whether it's a politician.
Speaker 1: You have much money they're sending into black lives matter,
Speaker 1: and people don't want to understand that these three ladies
Speaker 1: to control this company are bragging about Marcist learninism, their communists.
Speaker 1: They tell you that, and nobody understands what that means.
Speaker 1: And then you have people who are supposed to be
Speaker 1: role models to our kids who tell you, I'm afraid
Speaker 1: when I left the house in the morning because I
Speaker 1: happened to be black. Really, are you afraid that you're
Speaker 1: making three million dollars in this racist country for shooting
Speaker 1: the basketball? Isn't that sad? And then when you have
Speaker 1: a black person to tell you, ay this in this
Speaker 1: our problem is ours. What is the thirteen year old
Speaker 1: kid doing out in the streets at two o'clock in
Speaker 1: the morning with a gun? Was mom and dad. The
Speaker 1: police officer didn't go there to kill that kid. The
Speaker 1: police officer went there because somebody called made a call
Speaker 1: in distress, somebody who's being robbed or hurt, and the
Speaker 1: police officer went there. It just happens there was a
Speaker 1: bad police officer made a mistake. Okay, that's fine, but
Speaker 1: that kid is not a hero. That whole lump is
Speaker 1: not a hero. How can you, hi, dare you? How
Speaker 1: can you give somebody's family million dollars before the trial.
Speaker 1: I think from the pressment of the country trying to
Speaker 1: influence a trial, the congress woman influence and trial. Just
Speaker 1: think about dot That is all communism, quick commercial break
Speaker 1: back on the other side, So I loved being able
Speaker 1: to interview Dr Scott Atlas. He really uncovered how much
Speaker 1: government failed us throughout COVID. He put Dr Burke's Dr
Speaker 1: Faucci on blast, really exposing their weaknesses and how moronic
Speaker 1: they are to be perfectly honest, and also got into
Speaker 1: all the failures with things like lockdowns when the data
Speaker 1: showed otherwise. I hope you liked this one too with
Speaker 1: Dr Scott Atlas. This was episode thirty nine. You talk
Speaker 1: about how the human cost of lockdowns was never discussed
Speaker 1: by the task task Force and ignored by Dr five
Speaker 1: and Dr Burkes. Why was that ignored? I mean you
Speaker 1: would think that their job would be to take the
Speaker 1: totality of the situation into a out. That's right. I
Speaker 1: mean there was a gross what I call a gross
Speaker 1: failure of morality in the public health leadership when you're
Speaker 1: leading public health interventions. What they did was they considered
Speaker 1: one and only one illness. Stopping COVID nineteen cases at
Speaker 1: all costs. To me, that's just a gross failure. That's
Speaker 1: not what appropriate public health policy is. Public health policy
Speaker 1: must take into account the totality of impact of health
Speaker 1: from the policy itself. You can stop all cases of
Speaker 1: COVID if you killed everybody for instance. Okay, of course
Speaker 1: this is ludicrous. I'm just pointing out something sort of
Speaker 1: to the absurd extreme. The point of a public health
Speaker 1: policy is to take an account also what you're doing
Speaker 1: to people. And we see from the data that they
Speaker 1: You know, there's a study from UH in June, from
Speaker 1: Rand Institute and USC that shows that the the lockdowns
Speaker 1: didn't just fail. The lockdowns increased the dusk. The earlier
Speaker 1: the lockdowns were put on, the more deaths occurred. When bess,
Speaker 1: we're falling and lockdowns were implemented, that's increased. And this
Speaker 1: is analysis of forty three countries and in all of
Speaker 1: the states in the United States. I think it's a
Speaker 1: highly important paper to read from June, and so yes,
Speaker 1: it was a gross failure. In fact, this is why
Speaker 1: you can't We had the wrong people advising UH policy.
Speaker 1: Don't forget Dr Burke's was the task Force coordinator, so
Speaker 1: that means she was the official voice and head of
Speaker 1: the medical policy. She wrote all of the policy advice
Speaker 1: to all the governors that were the official policy of
Speaker 1: the White House, the task Force, and she visited dozens
Speaker 1: of states, and you know, with those visits all these
Speaker 1: public health officials. I visited one state, Florida. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 1: lockdowns were implemented. They succeeded the Burke Spouchy lockdowns were
Speaker 1: successfully transmitted to the governors who implemented them throughout most
Speaker 1: of the country throughout the entire year of and they failed.
Speaker 1: They failed to stop the spread, they failed to protect
Speaker 1: the elderly, and they destroyed families. And I've said this
Speaker 1: many times, but it's so important because this is the
Speaker 1: biggest failure of public health policy and modern history. Well yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I think it's the you know that the
Speaker 1: biggest failure of the media. I mean, it's just I
Speaker 1: don't think people really realize we've just had a complete
Speaker 1: reshaping of American society throughout COVID, from the role of
Speaker 1: the federal government and our lives to the role of
Speaker 1: the media, place loss of loss and trust of institutions.
Speaker 1: I mean there's just been a complete and total societal breakdown,
Speaker 1: and I don't think that's been fully discovered yet. You
Speaker 1: talk about too, like another big aspect of this was
Speaker 1: just getting kids back to school, right, these low risk kids,
Speaker 1: of allowing them to live their lives. And you talk
Speaker 1: about like, even in the presence of actual data, that
Speaker 1: people like Fauci, Berkes and Redfield were so resistant to
Speaker 1: getting these kids back in school. Talk about that, sure, well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I distinctly remember, of course, one of the
Speaker 1: uh one of the earliest Task Force meetings that I
Speaker 1: went to, which was I think, you know, mid mid August,
Speaker 1: and the Vice President who was administratively running the Task Force,
Speaker 1: had wanted me to talk about the risk to children
Speaker 1: these are these schools opening. And I went through the data.
Speaker 1: In fact, I had brought with me more than a
Speaker 1: dozen papers in my briefcase, and I pulled them out
Speaker 1: and I went through. I cited the data from all
Speaker 1: over the world on the extremely low risk to healthy children,
Speaker 1: the extremely low risk of transmission from children, and the
Speaker 1: documented lack of high risk to teachers in schools from
Speaker 1: all over the world. And I went through a little
Speaker 1: you know, let's just say five to ten minutes on this,
Speaker 1: and there was silence from Dr Burke's, silence from Dr Fauci.
Speaker 1: There was no refutation of what I said. They didn't
Speaker 1: cite a single study. And the Vice President turned to
Speaker 1: Dr Redfield and said, well, what do you think, Bob,
Speaker 1: and Redfield leaned back, thought for a second. He said,
Speaker 1: let's just say the jury is still out. That was
Speaker 1: the end of the discussion. I mean, you know, this
Speaker 1: is no scientific uh knowledge about the data, nothing to
Speaker 1: refute what I said. And then you know that this
Speaker 1: sort of was very confusing to the public because and
Speaker 1: harmful the advice. As we know, the schools in the
Speaker 1: United States were closed in the fall term. All the
Speaker 1: pure nations in Western Europe opened the schools. We were
Speaker 1: the outlier. The American educational system was a complete, really
Speaker 1: immoral abuse of children by shutting down schools, and they
Speaker 1: had impact. The isolation was extraordinarily harmful. I mean, the
Speaker 1: way I think of it, there's nothing more important that
Speaker 1: a society does and educate its children. Yet we chose
Speaker 1: out of fear and ignorance, and in my view it
Speaker 1: was too with this uh miss misinappropriate idea of protecting
Speaker 1: adults by using children, sacrificing children even though the children,
Speaker 1: healthy children, did not have a significant risk from COVID
Speaker 1: and that's been proven, that was known then. It's not
Speaker 1: new information, by the way, So you know this is
Speaker 1: really it's almost unspeakable what was done. Well, you know
Speaker 1: they're doing that now with vaccines as well. You know,
Speaker 1: even children who aren't at risk. They're essentially, you know,
Speaker 1: trying to to push kids to to get them, which
Speaker 1: sort of defies logic. In my book, Um, so I
Speaker 1: thought you'd get a kick out of this. So Political
Speaker 1: Political Playbook wrote about how Faucy was at a Jonathan
Speaker 1: Carl book party, and it notes that he kept taking
Speaker 1: the mask on and off for cockers who are trying
Speaker 1: to take pictures of them with it out his mask on,
Speaker 1: and then when asked about it, he said, I just
Speaker 1: decided that if anyone came up to me that I
Speaker 1: didn't know, I would put my mask on. Doesn't that
Speaker 1: summarize the theater surrounding masks and also explain Fauci a lot. Well,
Speaker 1: let's hits with this. Anybody who thinks that that makes
Speaker 1: sense is I mean, you know, I don't want to
Speaker 1: be rude, but I mean That is just ludicrous. I mean,
Speaker 1: what what is the what is the basis of putting
Speaker 1: on a mask because you don't know people. If it's
Speaker 1: just to uh have an image, I think that it's
Speaker 1: very revealing. I mean, let's put it this way. It
Speaker 1: was not uncommon. I heard the people on the task force,
Speaker 1: the doctors on the task force, refer to people in
Speaker 1: the media, their media friends by the first name. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is you know, when I was speaking about the data.
Speaker 1: The result of that was not talking back to me.
Speaker 1: The result of that was going outside to their friends
Speaker 1: and the media and using ad hominum attack and distorting
Speaker 1: my words. So this was sort of all about the image,
Speaker 1: the power. I don't know what was going on. I
Speaker 1: hate to ascribe motive, but there was a gross failure there,
Speaker 1: and I think this is really uh, we can never
Speaker 1: let this happen again. We cannot have people who aren't
Speaker 1: critical thinkers, uh, you know, in charge of a crisis.
Speaker 1: I mean that this should goes without saying, but I
Speaker 1: mean this was just a shocking failure. And and you know,
Speaker 1: they got what they wanted, which were the lockdowns, and
Speaker 1: the lockdowns failed. So now we're seeing this or welly
Speaker 1: in attempt to rewrite history, blaming people like me who
Speaker 1: were opposed to what was implemented for the failure of
Speaker 1: what was implemented. You know, this is just another kind
Speaker 1: of thing that shows I mean, it's important for people
Speaker 1: to understand who are listening. I'm sorry I'm going on,
Speaker 1: but when you see people who are issuing erratic statements,
Speaker 1: who are obviously just saying, oh, it's the science, but
Speaker 1: they don't know the science, or they're doing things that
Speaker 1: are contrary to science, this is how you decide who
Speaker 1: to trust. You must be a critical thinker. Now, the
Speaker 1: burden is on individuals, okay, all of us to become
Speaker 1: more involved in our own critical thinking, in our own beliefs,
Speaker 1: in short of our own filter here to decide what
Speaker 1: is credible what isn't. It's more of an effort but
Speaker 1: to trust. The blind trust in people who are deemed
Speaker 1: experts should be gone. That should be gone. We've learned
Speaker 1: that now. Uh, it's not you know, I don't know
Speaker 1: if I said this, but you know, we all need
Speaker 1: to be critical thinkers here to make the best decisions
Speaker 1: for ourselves and our family. Well, and our MASK policy
Speaker 1: has always been done because I mean, who thinks it's
Speaker 1: a good idea to wear one when you enter a
Speaker 1: restaurant and then you take it off when you're seated
Speaker 1: next to people, or to wear it on a flight,
Speaker 1: as we currently do, and then take it off when
Speaker 1: you're next to people. I mean, none of it has
Speaker 1: ever made sense, yet they continues to be pushed. I mean,
Speaker 1: what is the data and the science say about masks?
Speaker 1: Do they work? Okay? So you know in terms of
Speaker 1: widespread population mass. Uh, there are several good studies out there,
Speaker 1: and people should look at the good studies. The best study,
Speaker 1: the randomized controlled trial of Denmark shows uh. They took
Speaker 1: more than six thousand people. They took people with masks
Speaker 1: and people without masks. They tested them by blood test
Speaker 1: for not just stars too, but other eleven other viruses,
Speaker 1: and they found that people that wear masks do not
Speaker 1: have a significantly less incidents of stars to infection. Neither
Speaker 1: do they have a less lesser incidence of any of
Speaker 1: the other eleven viruses. By the way, and this corroborates
Speaker 1: what was known in the randomized trials about influenza that
Speaker 1: was published by the CDC in May that mass general
Speaker 1: population masks do not prevent the spread of infection or
Speaker 1: the becoming infect that the recipient side of it in influenza.
Speaker 1: Why is that relevant because influenza is the same size
Speaker 1: as roughly as the stars to virus, which is smaller
Speaker 1: than the poor size on the mask. Smaller the virus
Speaker 1: is smaller in the hole in the mask. Secondly, we
Speaker 1: look at the other studies, look at that Denmark. The
Speaker 1: next study to look at is the University of Louisville
Speaker 1: did a very detailed analysis of all the states and
Speaker 1: their conclusions were that mask wearing mask mandates did not
Speaker 1: stop the spread of infection, and mask wearing did not
Speaker 1: stop the spread of infection in states. And then you
Speaker 1: look at the next UH paper that came out, which
Speaker 1: is the study that received a lot of attention on
Speaker 1: Bangladesh villages. And then you know, people were you know,
Speaker 1: this is after a year and a half, they're still
Speaker 1: desperately trying to find something that validates masked widespread mask using,
Speaker 1: and they look at this Bangladesh study which was a
Speaker 1: study where villagers were instruct some villagers some villages were
Speaker 1: instructed to wear masks, other villages were not instruct that
Speaker 1: the wear masks and what the authors reported was an
Speaker 1: eleven percent decrease in symptomatic COVID in villages that were
Speaker 1: instructed to wear mass, not in the mass wears necessarily.
Speaker 1: Just so they said there was a small decrease in
Speaker 1: symptomatic COVID. And when you look at the data and
Speaker 1: the studies, not only was that effect small, but the
Speaker 1: only people they had to reduce incidence of symptomatic COVID
Speaker 1: were people in a single age bracket fifty and above.
Speaker 1: People forty to fifty didn't have a decrease, People thirty
Speaker 1: to forty didn't have a decrease in symptomatic COVID. So
Speaker 1: you have to wonder did the people who were older,
Speaker 1: were they more cautious, did they avoid groups that they
Speaker 1: do other things that might have reduced it. The second
Speaker 1: part of this that was the surgical mass site. The
Speaker 1: regular mass of people wear, by the way, had zero
Speaker 1: significance in terms of its reduction. So the study was
Speaker 1: lauded in the lay media by these mask uh MASK
Speaker 1: advocates as proving mass work, but the in fact it
Speaker 1: was supportive that mass do not have a significant impact
Speaker 1: on limiting a spread of COVID, and so enough in
Speaker 1: the infection. So I mean, you know, you know, there's
Speaker 1: this new study that came out recently, and basically that's
Speaker 1: just a meta analysis of a bunch of studies in
Speaker 1: which they in this article admitted that the studies themselves
Speaker 1: were poor research. Yet somehow this is now the title.
Speaker 1: So people are desperate, Okay, masks. I'm not for forbidding masks,
Speaker 1: just like I'm not for forbidding wearing a copper bracelet
Speaker 1: for arthritis. If you want to wear a mask, if
Speaker 1: you want to wear a six masks, that's fine, but
Speaker 1: it's very dangerous to say what Dr Redfield said under Oath.
Speaker 1: He said two things, and this is in my book
Speaker 1: Under Oath. He said, where if everybody wore a mask,
Speaker 1: we'd get rid of the pandemic in six to eight weeks. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's just completely nonsense, and it's been proven all over
Speaker 1: the world, including societies where people are wearing masks. Secondly,
Speaker 1: he said he held up a mask and infamously said,
Speaker 1: this mask is more protective than a vaccine. Now, why
Speaker 1: is that a problem. First of all, it's it's completely
Speaker 1: irrational and bizarre. Second of all, it's dangerous if you
Speaker 1: think that an old person whose high risk is more
Speaker 1: protected by wearing a mask. You're endangering them if they
Speaker 1: think that, and so, uh, you know, this is very dangerous.
Speaker 1: The misstatements coming out of some of our most trusted
Speaker 1: public health leaders are shocking. We saw it publicly. I
Speaker 1: saw it inside the task Force, as I note multiple
Speaker 1: times multiple conversations in the book. And I think again,
Speaker 1: we've destroyed the trust that is necessary for people when
Speaker 1: a crisis arises, and so we have a long way
Speaker 1: to dig out from that hole that was created by
Speaker 1: these people in public health leadership. Dor Scott Outlas just
Speaker 1: bringing the fire and bringing the truth on the truth
Speaker 1: with Lisa Booth. I want to thank all of you
Speaker 1: for listening from the bottom of my heart. I love
Speaker 1: doing this. I love interviewing people, and I love being
Speaker 1: able to bring this information to you. And I learn
Speaker 1: a lot too just having these conversations with all these
Speaker 1: different guests. I've learned so much over the past year.
Speaker 1: So I truly love doing this. I can't wait for
Speaker 1: the next step. I can't wait to bring you additional
Speaker 1: episodes when we move over to another network. So stay
Speaker 1: tuned for the big relaunch with some truly awesome guests
Speaker 1: and also with more content. And I want to thank
Speaker 1: my team, my producer, my Ride or Die throughout all
Speaker 1: of this, John Castio. He's a great guy. He has
Speaker 1: done a great job on this show. I also want
Speaker 1: to thank Speaker New Gingrich, executive producer of the show,
Speaker 1: and the three sixty network for giving me this opportunity
Speaker 1: over the past year. You can leave us five star
Speaker 1: review on Apple Podcast and stay tuned.