WEBVTT - Bonus: The Round Table

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>If you will place your left hand on the Bible

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and raise your right hand, and please repeat after me

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I do solemnly swear vent titled action. Find the

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>defendant guilty of the prime. It makes no sense, it

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit. If it doesn't fit, it must a quit.

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We all took the same of of office. We're all

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bound by that common commitment to support and defend the Constitution,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to bear true faith in allegiance to the same that

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>you faithfully discharge the duties of our office. Do you

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but the truth. From Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio,

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this is Sworn. I'm your host, Philip Holloway. Hi everyone,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Christina here, Welcome to the last bonus episode for this

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>season of Sworn. For the first part of the episode,

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take you on an audio tour of

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Phil's office, a cozy house shaped office in Marietta, Georgia,

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>before sitting down for a round table discussion with some

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of the key staff of the Holloway Law Group. I

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoy, Ohsuy, I'll get to see you I

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was just showing in your kids mostly tween my personal

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>office face. I don't think it really has much of

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a rhyme nor reason to what's what's in here other than,

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically the stuff that I need on a

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>day to day basis to to do my work. It's

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>important to give credit where it's due. My wife, Natalie,

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>who the listeners met in one of our earlier episodes,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>she's basically my decorator in chief. She's actually in interior

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>design school now working on her master's in interior designs.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So she sort of helped me get this thing put together.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's nothing special for sure, but what she want

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to do is have people, when they come in to

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>meet me, maybe for the first time, be able to

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>know a little bit about me and maybe my past.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So you see some family pictures here, things that you know,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>say you know, I am a real human person with

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a life outside of court and outside of podcasting and

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>other media. I've got my documents which proved that I'm

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>not lying when I said that I was in the military.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got admissions to the various courts, you know, in

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this case, you've got the trial courts and the appellate

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>courts in Georgia. Of course, there's one on the wall

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>here somewhere that shows that I am in fact admitted

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to the federal courts and in fact the U. S.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. We've got um my law school diploma which

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>proves that I'm actually a law school graduate until they

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>decided to rescind it. And I've got this globe on

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>my desk that gets a lot of comments that my

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>wife got from me on our first anniversary trip. We

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>were in Puerto Rico and she got really lucky playing roulette.

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>She took whatever she won from that one role of

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the Roulette wheel and bought me that little globe there.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason it's really there that the true

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>reason is because it has to cover up a hole

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for for power chords. So I really can't move that.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>This is a small ship, and I may be the

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>captain of it, but I can't run it by myself.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I need another set of eyes, or in this case,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>several sets of other eyes to make sure I don't

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>miss anything, because I know that from time to time

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>things can can get past me. So I need uh

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>some really talented people around me to help make sure

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that we get it right. We're gonna go meet Stephanie,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>she's our paralegal extraordinaire, and we'll meet Addison, who's another attorney.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>That sounds great. This is our great paralegal, Stephanie. She

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>really is the person that keeps this train on the tracks.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>She actually was a student of mine when I talked

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice at university here. She probably made very good

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>grades in my class. Although I don't specifically remember what

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>her grade was. I remember her as a as a

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>very good student. I think I gotta be. I was

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>working and going to school and it's very young so

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>making it through getting that degree. But I enjoyed his class.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>He was a good teacher. After I took his class,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>started working in the warrant Division midnight shift on the weekends.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>While I was in school, I was pretty trime relice

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>officer for I worked at the jail and then making

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>decisions on if people should get out or not, and

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>then I supervised people that were out on bond, making

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sure they were doing everything the judge ordered them to do.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I went from working the midnight shift to working at

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the courthouse during the day, so now completely switch roles,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>switched teams, working on this side. It's just it's it's

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>totally different. It's interesting to see it from both sides.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if she had a Walleye since I'd be

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>happy to send her to court. Well almost anything that

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we do. That's how much she knows about stuff. We

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>keep Addison down here in the basement where we can't

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt anybody. Oh my goodness, is that that's a moose

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>as a moosehead that belongs to another the attorney who

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>owns this building. It's one of his trophies. You know.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>It's as big as I am. This is my cave.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>All I need is a computer or phone, and and

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I am content. I was with Fulton County District Attorney's Office,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>so I handled a lot of a lot of different

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things. Was there a couple of years, and

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it kind of reached my uh my wall, so to speak.

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>With the prosecution side. One of the biggest problems I

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>had was that you really don't have a lot of

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>say about what you think it might be the right

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>outcome for a k case. My interpretation of how I

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>think it should go is not in line with some

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>other people's interpretation of how it should go. So here

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just a lot more freedom in a way, the

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>freedom to to say, here's how we're going to proceed

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with this case because this is how we we think

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the right way to go, or whether to take

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the case at all. Just sometimes he just listening off

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the leashes go And then that's what I like. If

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm somewhere, Phil will step in and take care of

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>something that I worked down likewise too, so it's a

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.239
<v Speaker 1>good give and take. Phil is in the driver's seat

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>almost every time regarding the case. But every case that

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we have he has eyes on it, and I had

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>eyes on it. You're getting a lot of people looking

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>at issues and looking at different facts and seeing what

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>can be spotted. You know, when I say it's a

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>team effort, I mean I mean that it is. I

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can't possibly do it by myself. It's just no way.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>They're professionals, and I've got a trust them that they're

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna comport themselves and conduct themselves as professionals. And they do.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like I said, we all have to

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>work together. We know that this is a team effort,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and without working together, we wouldn't be able to get

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole hell of a lot done at least not

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>done well. So welcome guys to a special addition especial

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>episode of Sworn. I've always kind of wanted to do

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a show like this. I'm joined here at the office

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>by Ms Stephanie are Paralegal extraordinaire, Mr Addison, who is

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a great attorney that works here with me, Christina Dana,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>our lead producer for Sworn, and Mr Mike, the man

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>behind the mike who makes all the sound stuff work.

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>How's it going, Mike? How's all right? So anyway, I

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think what we'd like to do is just go ahead

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and start off talking about maybe some things that we

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>have learned in our careers that maybe the public doesn't

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>understand about the practice of law or the criminal justice system.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Christina is just gonna go and start us off with

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>some topics and then we'll just kind of jump off

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>from there and see where it goes. Yeah. So, I

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>guess my sort of broadest question topic is what kinds

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of questions do you guys get the most, like at

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>parties or sort of when you're just interacting in your normal,

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>non lawyer daily life. What are the questions people try

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to like hit you with. So I want to see

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>how Stephanie answers that, because she's a very experienced paralegal,

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been around the criminal justice system a long time.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But she's not a lawyer, so I know what my

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>answer would be, but I want to hear what hers is.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>People that know what I do usually ask me questions

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>about things that are going on in the news. If

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with cases like that. They also, of course

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>asked me about Phil they'll fill on TV the other day.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of people want to know if we're

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>involved with things that have been on the news recently.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you often involved in things related to the news. Yes,

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we seem to attract cases that are in the media,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it's on TV, on social media, uh that's put

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>out by the local police departments, about new cases that

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have happened, to arrests that have been made. We seem

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to attract cases like that, So yes, a lot of

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>times we are what about you, Addison, what kind of

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>questions do you get? Pretty much the same about if

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>something hits the media, they'll they'll ask me a question

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>about what I think about it, even if really no

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>information is out about the case yet, And then inevitably

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you'll get the well. My cousin's third wife got arrested

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>last week for this, I'd like your your expert opinion

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>about what we can do to help her out. Pretty much,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>questions like that if something is familiar to them, whether

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a family member who's in legal trouble or something

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's on the news, they like to get my input

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about what I think about it, sort of like the

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>doctor take a look at my rash situation exactly exactly well,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>And I get that too. And of course a lot

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of times people are asking general questions about the law,

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'll answer their questions as best I can. And

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when it gets more personal, like you know, they

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>want specific legal advice, I'm thinking, Okay, this person maybe

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there a physician, or maybe their car sales, and maybe

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some way that they can repay me in kind

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>down the road when I need favors. I do my

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>best to try to to answer that. And I think

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people are genuinely interested in the system and in law,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and and I think that the more accurately people are

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>educated than the better off everybody is. So I do

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I do my best to to at least help people

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>understand the real justice system. The way that it really

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is the way that I see it and these folks

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>see it on a day to day basis, which, as

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we've learned throughout our podcasting experience here, is oftentimes not

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the way people think it is based on what they

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>see on TV or at the movies. It's very, very different.

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>They'll ask me, they'll say, how do you represent these criminals?

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very complex question because a they're not

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all criminals, and even the ones that are, there's a

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>lot that needs to be done to make sure that

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they get treated fairly. And so a lot of times

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask the question back, well, you know what makes

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you think they're criminals? And they'll I just assume because

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I got arrested. Well have you ever heard that people

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are presumed to be innocent? And they're like, oh, yeah,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that. So I'll explain to them that

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a large part of what we do is we help

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>people get treated fairly and we try to promote fair sentencing,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big piece of what we do is

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>fair sentencing negotiations. What is a fair sentence is oftentimes

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.239
<v Speaker 1>in the eye of the beholder. But if you ask somebody,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are you against fair sentencing and nobody's gonna say yes

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to that. Everybody is for and then there in favor

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, of of fair sentencing, and they're forced to

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think of it in that way, and then they get

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a better and I think, more accurate picture of what

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this is all about. What do you guys think is

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the bigger misconceptions that people have about the

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>justice system. I think people jump to conclusions about cases

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>without actually doing any so called detective work to figure

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>out what's really going on in a case. They may

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>pass judgment very quickly. They only see the side of

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the story that's been put out there. You know, it's

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>very rare to have a person that's actually been charged

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with a major crime that's on the news to be

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>out there saying, hey, at it and do it. Usually

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they're very quiet because their attorney has told them not to,

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so you're only hearing one side of it, and people

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>just form an opinion, and you know, they want these

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>people to spend the rest of their lives in jail

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>or a very long time, and it's just not always

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the right thing that should be done. A lot of people,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to say to them, not all people that

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>get arrested are bad people. Things could happen to any

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of us. There are some cases that we have that

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I sit there and think, sometimes this could have just

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>as easily have happened to me. And I know that

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I am not a bad person, and I would not

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>want to go to jail for a very long time.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to go to jail. So people need a

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>good attorney to have their back and to give them

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>good representation. Right, piggyback and off what what Stephanie said.

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that when I was a prosecutor, you read

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>words on papers, right, you have statutes that you're putting

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>down on an indictment. You're looking at maybe pictures or

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>police reports, and on this side of the fence, you're

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you're actually talking to people who are charged, and that

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>means you're oftentimes talking with their families and and the

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>problems that a case is having is posing to them.

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They have children, if if they're worried about immigrations, I mean,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case may be, there are dozens of things

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that can impact them. And I never really consider of

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that when I was prosecutor. I tried to, but I mean,

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you just don't have the opportunity to, like Stephanie said,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there are good people who can do some bad things,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>and there are good people who can make mistakes. And

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>every one of us has done that. And if someone

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>says they haven't, their lying could have the most self

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>righteous prosecutor defense attorney and they say otherwise, they're not

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>telling you the truth. And then the biggest rushes when

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know you're looking over a case file and you're like, wait,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this person didn't do it. This person is innocent of

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're they're being charged with. That's a tremendous feeling. Addison,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>when you were a prosecutor, did you ever conceive that

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>innocent people might be arrested? Absolutely? When I was a prosecutor,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a prosecutor in Illinois and Georgia. I'll talk

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about the experience in Illinois is I would have a

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of freedom to do what I wanted, and I

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>would actually toss cases if they filed the motion to suppressed.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Dismissed them on my own motion because I knew that

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fourth Amendment was violated in a particular case. The

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Fourth Amendment deals with a search and seizure. For example,

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>say it search is bad in a case and they

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>file a motion to get rid of the evidence. I

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>would dismiss cases if I didn't think it was a

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>constitutional stop or if something else was really really wrong

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>with that case, because the whole point is getting the

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>right result and not counting convictions. That's how I was trained.

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You just have to have someone who wants to see

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the right thing happened, and that interpretations can differ. But

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think that's a big problem. Big thing that

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't think about is that you

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>have some very very good prosecutors, very good on a prosecutors,

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you have some and this goes both ways,

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know, defense side too, but then

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you have people who are just notch convictions and sometimes

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes the conviction is not the right result in some

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of these cases. So that's the hurdle that we face

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot. We talked about that on this season about

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of what winning means. Having the sort of numerical

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>tally of one cases and lost cases isn't necess certainly

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>indicative of what justice is, but it's more complicated than that. Absolutely.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's the whole that's the whole point.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's why you know sitting in constitutional law

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in law school was so great because you've got to

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>see why we have the system in place and doing

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>everything you can to make sure someone is sitting in

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a cage. I guess it's fine if you have the

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence and it's it's constitutionally back. But if you don't

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know you don't, that's a different story altogether.

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And get all the front page headlines of this huge

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>conviction you get, but it doesn't mean anything if someone

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>else is still out there who did do it and

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the person who didn't is sitting in a cage somewhere.

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not confining it to people who are innocent in

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the crimes. I'm also including people who are asking for

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>punishments that don't fit the crime itself, and that's to

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>appear tough on crime. Maybe it's a media case and

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times maybe they're getting pressure from their

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>higher ups to to do this. I mean that that's

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>often the case. Everyone should do the saying for the

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>right reasons, and that includes defense attorney, includes all attorneys.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the jobs I had with the local government

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is I was supervising people there were out on bond

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and we have to keep in mind. When I was

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that job, the people that I was supervising had

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>not been convicted of anything, but yet they were having

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to answer to me on a weekly basis. On a

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, I got to know so many of them,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and I dealt with people that were charged from d wise, shoplifting,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>child molestation, rape, arm robbery, all these different people, they're

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>still people. I remember one case supervising that was an

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>armed robbery case and a person and no prior record

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>made one mistake and he went to prison for ten

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>years to the door, and I remember, I just don't

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is the right thing. He made one mistake,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he took responsibility for it, and because of what he

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>was charged with, he was going to go to prison

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time and miss out on his family,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>his children getting older. And at the same time, I

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>thought about how his victim felt. But you have to

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>look at both sides of it. I think some of

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that have been spoken about are like mandatory minimums.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>This was a young man that made one mistake against

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>someone that maybe made a continuous decision and committed a

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>crime that was maybe not violent. Um ends up getting probation.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But they've made that decision to commit that crime ten times,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty times, and they have a prior record. But because

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>their charge wasn't an arm robbery was something different, they

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to go to prison, and they got to

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>see their family, you know, their kids get older, and

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it just felt wrong to me. You have to make

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sure you have to hold people accountable because if someone

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't giving a person that's committing a crime their rights,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what makes you think that that officer prosecutor isn't going

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you your rights. Because everybody has the same

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>rights and we have to we have to protect those rights,

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and everybody deserves that. They deserve to have good representation,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and they deserve to be protected. That's such a good

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>point of like when we see things in the media

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're like, oh, that was a bad person. They

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>deserved this, but something went unconstitutionally wrong. That could happen

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to you too. If the system is broken, you're also

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in that system. If you are driving down the road,

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you could get pulled over and your car could be

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>illegally searched. What if something was in there that you

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't know was in there? What if And I think

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>people a lot of times, well that would never happen

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. You can never say what would ever happen

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to you because there are so many variables. You could

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the same situation. You could match a description

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of someone that did something, or not even match it

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and just there be a mistake in communication and you

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>get pulled over. There's so many things that can happen.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's so important. You know, when we get

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>these calls from people, they're calling you in a moment

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of their life is probably wrought bottom for them and

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>they need help, and you have to think, what if

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I was in that situation, I would want someone to

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>help me. It's like some of the law enforcement officers

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know I've represented over the years. A lot

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>of these folks will sit in my office just be

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just in tears because they're thinking, well, wait a minute,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been a you know, a cop all these years

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't realize that innocent people can get arrested.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And then here they sit, They've been accused of something

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and they're absolutely innocent, and they're just they're shocked, they

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>can't believe it. I'm like, well, you know, welcome to

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>my world. This happens, and unfortunately is happening to you.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're just gonna have to deal with it. Addison

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>had do you ever known anybody before you came to

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>work here who was innocent and accused of a serious

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>crime or no, not of anybody. Yeah, I've known. I've

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>known some people who were innocent and some crimes. It

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>goes back to my point. I mean a judge once

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>told me that that the most powerful person in the

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>courthouse is the district attorney. They had the charging decisions,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and they can decide how a case is going to proceed.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Not only can can someone be be innocent, but take

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie's example about the arm robbery in Georgia, there's a

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>mandatory minimum ten years. Well, you know, all cases are different.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>What if you have a fifty five year old man

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>who holds a like replica and gets ten dollars from

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a gas station with no injuries. And someone else who

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>probably doesn't have a clean history, maybe he's been arrested five, six,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seven times and does rob a gas station for say,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>threatens to shoot the person in the head. Each one

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.479
<v Speaker 1>of those cases, the man is facing ten years in prison. Maybe,

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just maybe they should be treated differently, and you need

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor who is able to see the bigger picture

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what is best for everyone involved, including the person who's

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>being charged with the crime. Does putting someone with no

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>criminal history in prison for ten years where he's exposed

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to real hardened criminals on a daily basis is that good?

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that the right call? Probably not? And I think

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people you can lose focus of of

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>how each case is different and and and they're not

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just words on an indictment. You need to have discretion,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and you need to have the freedom to do what's right,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and what's right doesn't always mean to have someone convict

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>did on the entire sheet. We've been a lot of

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>time in the podcast world talking about things that that

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware of in the criminal justice system that the

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>public may not necessarily be aware of, and we've tried

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to bring a lot of that to the front. That's

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>my platform. You guys work here in this office, so

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily have that platform. So I want to

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>share it with you just for a minute. If you

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have any things that you know about that you're aware

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of things that exist in the real world of the

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice system that you think the public may not

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>be aware of. And ask you to just maybe mentioned

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>one or two of those things, if you can think

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>of anything right now that people just wouldn't otherwise be

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>aware of. I think that people sometimes underestimate the power

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>that media can have on a prosecutor's decision. If you

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>see a story on the news consistently all the time,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>total exposure, how that can lead and alter someone's decisions

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>regarding whether the charge person, how they're charged. I've seen

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor's offices try to criminalize accidents and make it a crime,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>transform it into a crime because of reasons that have

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with what's in the statutes. That happens

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. Well, actually, let me let me be

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>more specific. In Georgia, there's a sentencing scheme where you

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>can go to prison and then be placed on probation

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for many, many many years afterward after prison. So say

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>someone gets sentenced for twenty years and they have to

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>serve the first five years in prison. Now they have

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to report to a probation officer for fifteen years. That's

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not a mine field away to trip someone up and

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>get them back into a jail cell. I don't know

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>what is, and I believe Georgia leads the country in

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>people number of people under sentence, and that is not

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>taking into account per capita in other jurisdictions. I've been

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a prison case. There, it's a probation case, and

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's a prison case, parole will supervise that person

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>after their release from prison. How the FEDS do it

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot at the federal government, and so I think

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems with the criminal justice system is

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the amount of time that someone is expected to report

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and be under lock and key. I'll tell you one thing,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>when I was twenty three, I don't think I would

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have been able to do that consistently, and most people

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to do that consistently, and that's a problem.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's my personal opinion. If it's a prison case,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a prison case, and when they get out of prison,

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they spend a couple of years on parole and you're done.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that helps anyone. I don't think it

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>helps the court system. I don't think it helps to

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>defend it, and I know it doesn't help the victims

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in the case. So that would be probably my fix

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to eradicate some of the nonsense that I see going on, Stephanie,

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>what are you What are you aware of that the

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>public might not be aware of. I think a lot

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of people have heard heard the term debtors prison. I

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>want everyone to realize jails in our area house people

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that should not be in jail simply because they cannot

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>afford to post a bond. There are people that are

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>out on bond because their family is well off, they

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of money, that are walking around not

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>being supervised. We're in jail for a very short amount

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of time, and there are people that are being housed.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know the exact numbers of how

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>much it costs to house one person in a local

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>jail for one day. I've heard it's anywhere between thirty

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to fifty dollars a day per person. They're being housed

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>there because they cannot post a five hundred dollar bond,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and they will remain in jail until their case is completed.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>A person that cannot post a five hundred dollar bond

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>or one thousand dollar bond most likely is not going

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to afford their own lawyer. Then that

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>person that can't afford to get out has to get

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer that's paid for by the state, which means

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you and me and everybody you know that pays taxes.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>That person will sit in jail for weeks, months a

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>year waiting for trial because they can't afford five a

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars because they don't have a family or friends

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that can post that, and it's awful. It's a dangerous

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>situation for the inmates. There isn't enough money to pay

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for law enforcement to be able to properly supervise that

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>many people that are in jail. It's a dangerous situation

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for deputies or police officers that are supervising them all

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're holding people in jail because they don't have

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a low amount of money and it ends up costing

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone so much more money than that bail would have

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>ever been and it's incredibly inefficient. It almost forces people

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that have been in jail for an extended period of

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>time to enter please against things that they are may

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>not be guilty of, or the charges may need to

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be reduced, but they want to get out because they've

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>been in jail, they've been away from their family or

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>friends for so long. Then they end up with a

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>conviction on the record because they wanted to get out

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sooner than it spirals from there where it can limit

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 1>them to be able to get a job in the future.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Is a cycle, and it could be done more efficiently.

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>An interesting thing about both of the points you guys

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>brought up is that it stops people from being contributing

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>members of society. If someone is stuck in jail, they

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can't work, they can't support their families. If someone's on probation,

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they can't travel, they can't do all these things that

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we sort of uplift as a society of people contributing.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.719
<v Speaker 1>And so then what are we doing because we're not

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>rehabilitating people, were not reaping the benefits of their skills

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as a community. It just seems punitive exclusively at that point.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>At some point, I mean, there are there are cases,

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, don't don't get me wrong where people do

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>need to be punished and how accountable for their actions.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But we have to again, we have to look at

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the long view on some of these cases. Does putting

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>someone under a twenty year probationary sentence for something he

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>did when he was eighteen, does that make sense when

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he's thirty five years old and has never been able

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to get a job because he's got a felony on

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>his record. And I'm not saying if that person deserves it,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>not to punish that person appropriately, But that goes back

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to my point what's appropriate. The bond issue is tremendous

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and what a lot of people don't understand. These people

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.959
<v Speaker 1>are all presumed to be innocent. And sometimes I know,

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been in bond hearing many, many, many many times

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on both sides where it's almost a little mini trial,

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and it shouldn't be. The primary purpose of a bond

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hearing is to ensure that someone returns to court for

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>future court dates. The government needs to show why this

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>person is a flight risk, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. I think

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>some of those principles get lost sometimes the presumption of

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>innocence that all those things we almost becomes becomes a game.

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems like where once I just wants to one

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>up the other and one side just wants to win

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>on whatever little tip for tat little miniature issue. It

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is like I've seen in bond hearings, which is really

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a judge's call to make, and the judge will hear

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>from witnesses from either side. Really, but what you'll see

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is you'll see the defense, who has got to have

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the burden of proof, making their case for why somebody

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in any given case should get bond. But then sometimes

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe the prosecutor will put the arresting officer back on

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the witness stand to give his or her opinion on

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>why the person, who they don't even know except for

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>this one encounter, why they shouldn't be granted bond. And

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's really not what the police are there for. There

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there to present sort of the facts, not necessarily their

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>opinion on whether somebody gets bond. But I see that

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing happening. I see it all the time.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I never did that when I was in the prosecutor's chair.

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It is treated almost like a little game. You try

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to find a little legal theory, or you went up

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>someone in one way in order to get what you want.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes prosecutors one they make decisions. They make the right decisions.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not There are some very very very

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>very excellent prosecutors out there do the right things, and

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>then there are sometimes when you know you're faced with

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the situation and you're thinking, well, wait a minute, why

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is this person still in jail at the end of

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the day, we can go through the theater if you

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>will all you want. Why is this person still in

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>jail when he doesn't when he shouldn't be. To flip

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>almost to the other side, we've talked a lot about

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>how the purpose of a defense attorney is to be

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a zealous advocate for your client. Have you guys ever

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>had a moment where you were sort of like, oh,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the bad guy. They should have been punished more.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the new term throwing shade. I don't want to

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>throw all the all the shade on the prosecutors because

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I used to be one and there was a case

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I had. I'm not going to get into specifics. It

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in this jurisdiction at all that this guy was.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>He belonged in the cage, and he belonged in a

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>jail cell for the rest of his life. He was

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>just born a certain way and and I would have

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>done everything within the boundaries of the law to make

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that he's spent every second in the jail cell

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because he would hurt people. So yeah, I think that

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>there are cases on both sides when that happens, and

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you just have to know. I mean that when you're

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>defending people charged with crimes. You're defending more than the person, right,

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're defending the freedoms that we all have. Okay, it's

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like that saying, would you rather have ten guilty people

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>go free so that an innocent person can go free

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as well? You're willing to have people be acquitted who

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>are guilty so that you could save the person who

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is not guilty. Because everyone can find themselves in a

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>position where you're charged with the crime. You're defending all

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>those those liber these that you have. And you have

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>different cases, and you have different personalities, and you have

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>different clients and different kinds of cases. But if someone's

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to defend client zealously, what are we doing?

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So if that man that you were talking about, the

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one that should have been locked up, had come to

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you as a defense attorney, what would you have done?

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Would you have just not taken the case or tough question?

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. One of the things I love about

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>working here is that we have some a little bit

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of flexibility and freedom about what we take on. And

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have to think on that it was a bad,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>bad situation. Well, every lawyer is not right for every case,

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and let's face it, in the criminal justice world, there's

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some really gnarly stuff that happens, and so if a

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>lawyer is not able to objectively deal with it, they

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't they. I think they have an obligation to not, because, look,

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not right for every case. Every case hitting right

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for us, and if somebody chooses to hire somebody other

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>than us, that doesn't hurt our feelings either, because what

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I want is the person to have the counsel that

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they're most comfortable with, because I think the system works

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>better in that sense. If a lawyer can't objectively take

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a case, they just need to leave it be let

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is able to do that handle the case.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>We have ethical obligations to not take everything, if that

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Are there ever instances where you're watching the

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>news and it's one of these big maybe like serial

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>killer cases, and you watch how the defense attorney is interacting,

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe sort of critically, or oh yeah, when I see

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>something on the news and I see these press conferences

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on the courthouse steps, I look at it very carefully

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>because some lawyers go too far and the things they say,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>they sometimes say some pretty ridiculous things. They will make

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>guarantees that their client is innocent, and they look forward

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to fighting it tooth and nail, and then the next

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>thing you know, they're a month and a half later,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>though there are pleading guilty. Why would you come out

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and say that if you know that there's a chance

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you might wind up pleading guilty next month. When it

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to high profile or media cases, a lot of

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>times it's best to just not say anything, because, especially

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>early on in the case, you don't know what's going on.

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You're still gathering information, and what you're being told may

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>or may not wind up being the case ten minutes

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>or ten weeks from now. Do you guys have pet

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>peeves about the way people talk about the criminal justice

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>system or maybe using legal terms wrong, something that just

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>really gets under your skin. You hear the people say, well,

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>proof beyond the shadow of a doubt or proof beyond

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all doubt, and it's really common, and it's and I

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be so critical about it because it is a

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>legal term of art, but it's it's not it's not accurate.

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no requirement anybody prove anything beyond the shadow of

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that What the hell does that even mean? But I

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>do have a bigger pet peeve about the system in general,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to all the judges who might be listening to this

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or whoever know me. What I won't say to your face,

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but I might be thinking when I'm in your courtroom

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is stop wasting our time. And I'm referring to not

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just my time, but my client's time, their families time,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor's time, all the other people in the courtroom

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>there time. I've had things that have happened recently where

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm in court for eight hours to accomplish something that

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>should take eight minutes. When we talk about our system

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is inefficient and there's not enough judges, there's not enough resources,

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking to myself, well, why don't we just use

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the resources that we have more wisely? Time wasting is

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a big piece of this. This is one of my

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>major pet peeves about the system in general, one of

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>those like this meeting could have been an email situations,

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>except it's lasted eight hours and you've held all of

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this captive your honor in this courtroom. Unnecessarily talk about

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>faults imprisonment. Judges know something about that, How dothen do

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>you have any pet peeves? Sure? I don't like it.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>When people who have never been to law school cite

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>me some article they read on the internet written by

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>someone who probably sixteen years old, about how the best

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>way to proceed in this case is and say, look, relax,

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the words in that article that you're quoting to me

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't even spelled correctly. I don't think the legal principles

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>under writing them aren't correct either. Let us try to

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>find the best way to proceed. Okay, we we know

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing. And sometimes you know, you have parents

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>who are very, very very involved. Quite frankly, some of

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the best clients are the ones that have been, unfortunately

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>been in the justice system so long because they know

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the game. They know it. They don't call all the time.

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>They let you work the case, and they know that

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do a good job. I told someone

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, I talked to them about

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>three times in one week and there was absolutely nothing

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>really to report. And then find ways said, look, I

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can call you and we can talk about the Chicago

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Bears for an hour if you want to. I love

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, all right, but at some point you're taking

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>away you're taking away my time to be able to

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>work on your case. That kind of annoys me a

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Another one that that I hear a lot

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh, the police trapped me. Well, what do

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you mean they trapped you? We don't know they trapped me.

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>You know they did this. I'm like, oh, you mean

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they caught you. And so, you know, entrapment is maybe

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 1>what they're thinking of. But there's all these misperceptions. Most

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>things are not entrapment. In fact, very few things are.

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Merely providing someone with an opportunity to commit a crime

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that they might be otherwise inclined to commit is not entrapment.

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So I've actually seen this happen when I was a prosecutor.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But if the police officer is selling little bits of

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>soap undercover on the street corner, telling you that it's

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>cracked cocaine, and you buy it, they have not trapped you.

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>They have provided you with an opportunity to do something,

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and then they've arrested you. So that that's a little

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of an extreme example, but but I hear that

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a good bit. Well they trapped me, now they didn't

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>trap you. They call you. Another thing I just thought

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about was when clients don't tell you the truth, there's

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a privilege there exercise. It's funny. I remember there was

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a case up that I was sitting in and up

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>north a lawyer, a very high price lawyer from Chicago,

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>came down to the probable cause hearing and his his

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>client had not told them what had really happened, and

0:38:57.880 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so we could go for the hearing. And he goes

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>into the side room where he and his client were talking,

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>screaming obscenities, basically told them, I'll tell you what's a

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>good idea. Why don't you drive your car right into

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the police station, show them the drugs, showing the guns.

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>In that way, they can arrest you very, very easily.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>You're not told the right information, sometimes it hurts the

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>person who's been who's been charged. Yeah, you should never

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to the police, but you should always talk to

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer, and you should always tell the truth to

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer, because if you don't, they can't help you.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if they've got the wrong information, they may

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>make tactical or strategic moves that are not in your

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>best interests. I will say one of the things I've

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>learned the most from working on this is never talked

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to the police. If you're accused of a crime. When

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>do you have to say anything? Never? You never have

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 1>to say anything. You don't even have to tell him

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>your name. You may not be able to post bond

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>until you give them enough information to proceed with booking,

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but you don't really have to say anything. I had

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a case once where someone was accused of obstructing a

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement officer because they would not talk to them.

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>This person was actually arrested posted bond, and you know,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the charge eventually got dismissed, and that the prosecutor just

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was laughing about it was like, I can't because it

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was hysterically funny in the sense that it was something

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so obvious. You know, you can't arrest somebody for not

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to the police. They have an absolute constitutional right. Now.

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't funny that they got arrested. That wasn't why

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we were laughing, but it was just so obviously wrong.

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Even the prosecutor didn't bat night dropping that charge. I

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>want to thank everybody for making this season really, really good.

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I think we've opened up a lot of topics for

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion that needed to be open, and I hope that

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to build on it. But if it

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't for the people who have subscribed and listened, none

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of this would be possible. So I just want to

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>say thanks to to everybody, not only our listeners, but

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>also to you folks who have helped with production. I

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>want to say thanks to everybody who has participated this

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>season as a as a guest and has provided their

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>time and their expertise to give us some really eight interviews,

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because without all of those pieces in place, we couldn't

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>have put this together. And I think it's been awesome.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So thanks to all those folks collectively, and with that,

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a wrap on season two of Sworn.

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Sworn is a production of Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio.

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Our lead producer is Christina Dana. Executive producers are Payne

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay and Donald Albright for Tenderfoot TV, Matt Frederick and

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams for I Heart Radio, and myself Philip Holloway.

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Additional production by Trevor Young, Mason Lindsay, Mike Rooney, Jamie

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Albright and Hallie Beadal. Original music and sound designed by

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Makeup and Vanity Set. Our theme song is Blood in

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the Water by Layup. Show art and design is by

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Eisler, editing by Christina Dana, mixing and mastering by

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Rooney and Cooper Skinner. Special thanks to the team

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at Heart Radio from U T a or In Rosenbound

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and Grace Royer, Ryan Nord and Matthew Papa from the

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Nord Group that Media and Marketing and Station sixteen. I'd

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.760
<v Speaker 1>also like to extend a very personal and special thanks

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to all of our contributors and guests who have helped

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to make all of these episodes possible. You can find

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Sworn on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Sworn podcast and

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>follow me your host, Philip Halloway on Twitter at phil

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Holloway e s Q. Our website is sworn podcast dot com,

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can check out other Tenderfoot TV podcasts at

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 1>www dot tenderfoot dot tv. If you have questions or comments,

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at Sworn at tenderfoot dot tv

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>or leave us a voicemail at four zero four for

0:42:55.400 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one zero zero four four one. As always, thanks for listening.