WEBVTT - Justice Is Coming

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Peepsen. Welcome to wige f Daily with Meet

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your Girl Danielle Moody recording still from the COVID Bunker. Friends,

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it is not often that we get to start off

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the week on a high note, and so I'm really

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>excited to welcome back to Wika f our friend, our good,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>good friend Glenn Kirshner, who in our conversation, you know,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about the ups and downs of where

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we are with the Department of Justice and the legal

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>net that has yet to capture Donald Trump. But you

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>know who it did capture. You know who is inside

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the net, Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon has been indicted again,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about late last week, on twenty five

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>additional charges of defrauding Oh Trump supporters out of roughly

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars that they thought that they were paying into,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, to build that pesky wall that he decided

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to pocket. And we know that Donald Trump had no

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>problem with him defrauding his supporters because he pardoned him.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>But the reality here, dear friends, is that we may

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not see for quite some time Donald Trump in an

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>orange jumpsuit, which we all know that that motherfucker belongs in.

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But justice is coming down on Steve Bannen, and as

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Glenn will walk us through, he is facing upwards of

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years in prison in federal prison for the crimes

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that he has committed. Now, Glenn and I neither one

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of us believe that he will see fifteen years. But

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I just have to say this that any time that

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon spends off of a microphone, off of our

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>goddamn screens, off of the radio, off of our consciousness,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>and is locked in a cell somewhere is good for America.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>It means that America is safe from his bullshit, from

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his lies, from his white supremacist fantasies. And that's really

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>where I am in terms of wanting justice to prevail

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump and all of the sick offense, is

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that the reality is that putting them in jail will

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>make this country safer. You know, that was supposed to

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be the point of prison in the first place. But

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>as Glenn will talk to us about, it seems that

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to quote unquote white collar crimes, crimes

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>against society, crimes against this nation, this justice system does

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>not rain down nearly as hard as it does on

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, loose cigarettes, a counterfeit twenty dollar bill, or

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>suspicion of a backpack being stolen. In those cases, if

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you are black, you are You're dead. It's not even

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an either or you are dead. And so what we

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>will think about and talk about in this conversation with

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>our Frank Glen Kirshner is when will we or will

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we ever make that shift to where it is those

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that are in positions of power that should be held

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to the highest standards and account and not those that

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing nothing more than harming themselves. Shouldn't that be

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>how we look at our justice system. It isn't about

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the privilege and the money that allows you to walk

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>away from unimaginable and unthinkable crimes, but it should be

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>about how much harm you actually did. And I know

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that taking Steve Bannon off the street, taking Donald Trump

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>off of his fucking golf course would serve this country

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole heap of good. Coming up next my conversation

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>with our friend Glenn Kirshner. Hey, there, I want to

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you about another podcast I think you'll love, The

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>Brown Girl's Guide to Politics, hosted by a Shanty Goehler,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the president of Emerge BGG is the one stop shop

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for women of color who want to hear and talk

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about the world of politics. Join a Shanty this season

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as she talks to incredible women of color who are

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>changing the face of politics and tackling some of the

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>most important issues facing the United States, from reproductive justice

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to voting rights, to climate change and more. Tune in

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>every Tuesday wherever you get your podcasts, get a behind

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the scenes look at Comedy Central's The Daily Show on

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Beyond the Scenes, an original podcast from The Daily Show

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with Trevor Noah. Every week, host Roy Wood Junior goes

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>deeper with the notable guests and experts from the Emmy

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Award winning series. Together, they use comedy to tackle current

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>topics from gentrification to gun laws and take a closer

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>look at how and why these topics matter. Listen to

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Beyond the Scenes from The Daily Show with Trevor Noah

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. New episodes every Tuesday. Folks. I am so

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>happy to welcome back to Woke app after my long break.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Kirschner, MSNBC legal analysts and the host of Justice

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Matters to make sense of where we are in this

0:05:55.120 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>legal web that Trump and his sycophants and now federal

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Judge Cannon is weaving right in front of the American

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>people's eyes. Glenn, Well, let's start off, you know, before

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we jump into Trump and that mess with the DJ

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, let's go to where we are with Steve Bannon.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Saw a beautiful site this week, as I'm sure you did,

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which was Steve Bannon in a perp walk. I thought

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that it means it apparently looked like a fashion show

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>runway with the amount of paparazzi and cameras that were flashing.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Just what were your what were you? What are your

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and reflections on where Steve Bannon has finally found himself. Yeah,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>So Steve Bannon is indicted again for stealing money for

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>defrauding Donald Trump's supporters. And before I jumped into the

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>New York case in the new indictment, I still am astonished,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Danielle that Steve Bannon stole from Donald Trump supporters. And

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>when Donald Trump found out about it, he said, it's

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all good, Steve, I got you. I'm gonna pardon you

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for stealing from my supporters. Now we don't know if

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon got to keep the money he stole from

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporters. We don't know if Bannon split it with

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. I would frankly be surprised if Donald Trump

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't take a little cut for himself. But just think

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>about how mind boggling it is that Donald Trump pardoned

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bannon for stealing money from the people who were supporting

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Well, he got away with it in the

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>short term, but now it looks like it's all come

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>home to roost. I will say, Alvin Braggs District Attorney's

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>office decided to indict Steve Bannon, So I think we

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have to compliment Bragg's office when it does something well,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but continue to demand questions on why Alvin Bragg killed

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the criminal case against Donald Trump. That by the accounts

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of the prosecutors working, the case was very strong and

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>should have been brought. But look, we've got a twenty

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>five count indictment against Steve Bannon. Now he's facing upwards

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen years in prison, which for him is kind

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of a de facto life term life sentence, and the

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>case looks strong for a couple of reasons. One, there

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>are some written communications that looks like they will sink Bannon.

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Plus there are I believe, cooperating witnesses. There were multiple

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>code defendants that Bannon was in this conspiracy to defraud with,

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and we can't tell precisely how many are cooperating against him,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but it appears that one or more of them are.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Bannon should be done by all accounts, let him go

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to trial and get convicted. Let's not forget he was

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>indicted while he was pending sentencing in another federal case

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in which he's been convicted. He's facing up to two

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>years in his contempt of Congress case in DC. One

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>way or another, Bannon's going to prison, and that's a

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 1>good thing because he's finally being held accountable for some

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of his crimes. So, Glenn, A couple of things. A

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of things here, which which is this um so Bannon?

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>According to according to reports, right he stole upwards of

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like a million dollars right like this. This was part

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of the build the wall, M give me your money,

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>U scam. And what I think is really interesting about

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>how these criminals are being gone after. And this includes

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Alan Weisselberg, this includes you know, uh, folks like that,

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>which is all about basically mob boss type shit, right,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like money laundering, the theft, not paying taxes, like this

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is all of the things that these people get caught

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>up in. And so my question here, and I you know,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you really can't answer it, but it's just so bizarre

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to me. How do these people continue to like, cape

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for and defend Donald Trump and they're being told they

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>stole from you? Right, Like this is a million dollars

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that Steve Bannon pocketed for his own personal use. This

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is not like a conspiracy of saying like, oh, you

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>owe the government. It's like you stole from these people

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>who thought that you were building a wall. And then

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump put his stamp of approval on Bannon's theft

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>by pardoning him. You're right, Daniel, I can't answer the

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>question why do people continue to support Trump? Why do

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they continue to send him their hard earned money when

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not even running for office. He just said, hey, folks,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>send me money so I can put it in my pocket,

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and they do it. Some of them are gullible, let's

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>face it. I don't want to be unkind, but some

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>people don't have critical thinking abilities. Not that you need

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to think critically with you know, with the evidence that's

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>out there about how Donald Trump continues to grift and

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>steal from his own base, his own supporters. But I

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have to chalk it up to tribalism. You know. People

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>are like, look, he may be a career com man,

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but one he hates folk the way we hate folk,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and so we have that bond. Listen. I have always

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>maintained hate is the strongest bond and the strongest motivator,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>much more powerful than love. Unfortunately I wish that wasn't

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the case, but that's my sense of human nature. And

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump gives people someone and something to hate and

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to look down on. Listen. I've been rooting for the

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington football team, the Washington Commanders for a long time,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>even though I was born and raised on the New

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>York Giants, because my pop was a New York Giants

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>football fan, so I was. And then when I moved

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to DC nineteen ninety, I for some reason became a

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Redskins fan, now a Commander's fan for apparently no good reason,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because they are perennial losers. Do I still kind of

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>still pull for them. I still pull for them. That's

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a form of tribalism. It's like, look, Donald Trump might

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be a losing team. Budd He's our losing team. And

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I think there's also a hatred for the other when

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the political calculation. I hate Biden and

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi and Schumer and this one and that one. So

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>all I really have is the career con man that's

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on my team. I'm gonna think that explains some of it.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But Danielle, none of these explanations are good explanations. So

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty five indictments. This is on top of what Bannon

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was charged with earlier in you know, in the year

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you said at the top, we're looking at five to

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. What I have seen and what we've noticed,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to the insurrection, as it pertains with

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody with these quote unquote white collar dealings, is that

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>they never get the maximum. Because this isn't Steve Bannon's

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>first indictment, right, what are your what is your what

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts about where this is going to land

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for him? Because frankly, you know, we know that Steve

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Bannon deserves more than fifteen years, right, Like, I mean,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we know that, But where realistically do you think that

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we will find ourselves? Because I think that because Honestly,

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that any time that you take a microphone

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and cameras away from Steve Bannon, you are making America safer.

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So if that ends up only being five years, I'm like,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that's five years without hearing his voice. I'm good with that.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, shutting up Steve Bannon helps make America great, No,

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>no two ways about it. But you know, it's a

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>great question, and my heart sinks when you ask the question,

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what do I expect by way of a sentence for

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon? My hopes are high, My expectations are very low.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. Now, maybe if he stole a backpack or

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sold loose cigarettes, he would be facing some real Well, no,

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't, because he'd beat white and rich and influential

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and connected. Okay, if I'm being realistic, I think maybe

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we see five years in prison for Steve Bannon. Hopefully

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's on top of consecutive two the one to two

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>years he's likely to get down here in DC for

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>his contempt of Congress convictions. I would hope for more,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'll tell you, Danielle, I wish I could be

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a politican because I would run on a one plank platform.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I would kick the living hell out of every ruling

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>class criminal. I would. I would pardon all of the

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>WE defenders and the non violent drug offenders, and I

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>would make space for every ruling class criminal who's gotten

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>away with defrauding, stealing, from abusing, running rough shot over

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we the people in a way that is criminal. When

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I say kick the hell out of them, I'm speaking figuratively,

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>using the rule of law, not physically or you know, literally,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But at some point, why can't you know? There's Stephen

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>van zandt Bruce, Springsteen's lead guitarist, has this phrase that

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I have co opted, which I love. He says, where

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are all the tough good guys. We've got so many

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>tough bad guys who are willing to run rough shod

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>over we the people. Where in the hell are the

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tough good guys who are willing to fight back, who

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are willing to kick the hell out of the people

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>who are kicking the hell out of us? I think

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair question, you know. And and when you

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>say you know, and I love the term that you

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just use, ruling class criminals like I love that because

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel like white collar crime right gets

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a wink in a nod. It's not even I feel

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>like we know it. White collar crime gets a wink

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in a nod from our justice system, and I'm like,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>but their crimes are so much more egregious to me

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>than any drug, you know, any drug offense, right, because

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly with the low level black, low level drug dealings

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of black and brown people who are in jail on

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, on attempt to distribute. But it was like

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a dime bag, do you know what I'm saying, Like

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about people like Alan Weisselberg and you know,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Bannon that have defrauded tens of thousands of people, right,

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that have hurt so many, Like it is akin to

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>how again the government gave a wink and a nod

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street and big banks after they defrauded the

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>American people with the housing scam. Right. So I'm like,

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>why is it that those people that have the power

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and the access and the know how always get a

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>slap on the risk. And it is the low level

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>people who have no money, no power, and no access,

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>no friends in high places that we lock up and

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>throw away the key and we're only harming that individual,

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not right, The syndicate Yeah, who did more damage in

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>every definition of the word damage. Who did more damage

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to more people? Steve Bannon or a kid who steals

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a backpack, and yet look at the disparity entreat and

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in punishment. You know, That's why I wish, I wish

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>members of the Democratic Party would say, it's time to

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>focus YEA, our law enforcement efforts on the ruling class criminals,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>because they're the ones doing the real damage, not the

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>person selling loose cigarettes or passing a fake twenty or

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>stealing a backpack. You know, that's not who's destroying America.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's the ruling class criminals. Somebody's got to take them on. Yep,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>um Glenn. Now, I want to get back to back

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to the top with Donald Trump, the stolen nuclear documents

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that he had scattered all over his floor in Mara Lago,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and where we are with the Judge Cannon, because this

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is the first time that I have had the opportunity

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you. What do we know? Firstly about

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Judge Cannon? We know that she was pointed under the

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, But what do we know is she one

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of a myriad of people that actually shouldn't have this position?

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Does she actually have the resume that matches the position

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that she is in, or she just another like Trump flunkey. Well,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>let's start with she was a Federalist Society member since

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>she was in her mid twenties. I when I was

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in my mid twenties, I wasn't longing for the good

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>old days when slavery was still a thing. Is she

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>has been a Federalist Society member since her mid twenties.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>She had zero qualifications to be a federal judge with

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime appointment. You can read up on her. There's

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good stuff, a lot of good investigative

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>journalism that's being done about her, her plenary lack of qualifications.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean she had to fill out a form and

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>anticipation of her Senate Information hearing, It's like, have you

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>published any scholarly legal articles? No? Have you published any articles? Well,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>when I was a reporter for a local paper, I

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>published something about the opening of a yoga studio. Have

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you ever given a media interview about any topic that's

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>related to the law. Well, no, but I was interviewed

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on the day I was getting married, and they published

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a nice picture of me and my fiance. This is

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're dealing with Danielle This is what we're dealing with,

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has zero qualifications. Let's remember she was confirmed

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>by Mitch McConnell's Senate after Donald Trump lost the election,

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think she was confirmed to do precisely what

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>she's done, rule in favor of Donald Trump, notwithstanding zero

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>factual or legal support for Donald trump position. Thank goodness,

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the dj has swooped in filed a very targeted appeal,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to split the baby and be very diplomatic. And

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if she does not reverse course, she will sort of

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lose whatever little lingering credibility as a federal judge. She

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>might be able to sort of retain, but I don't know,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the legal merits, she should absolutely reverse course.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But will she look at who she is, look at

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>what she was installed to do, and look at what

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>she's done. She actually said in her ruling that I'm

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>going to do this in part because I'm concerned about

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the reputational harm to Donald Trump. First of all, if

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>we can stop laughing at that sentence, the reputational harm

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump an abject career criminal. But the other

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>thing is that's not part of the law. That's not

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>why you rule. Because you're concerned with the president's reputational harm,

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is something that you are You've never expressed

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a concern about with respect to anybody else. I mean,

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we could go issue by issue by issue, but it's

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty How do you how do we, Glenn, How do

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we not scrub these people from the positions that they

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>were put in that they shouldn't be in. How is

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this woman not being being told to recuse herself? How

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you get these people up before a panel

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of their peers? Right, I'm just so confused about how

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you can just pick literally, you know, a pumpkin out

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of a patch and say here's a lifetime appointment and

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we just all go along with it because it's the

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>way that things have always been done. You do things

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that they've always been done, if in fact

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been done correctly, if they haven't been yours telling

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>me that we just have to go along with it,

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't understand. Well. The way things were

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>done in the Obama administration is when he would propose

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a name to as a person to nominate to the

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>federal bench, he would await the American Bar association's rating,

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and if the person was rated not qualified, then he

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>declined to nominate that person. And that I think is

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>an appropriate way to vet. It's not the only way,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but an appropriate way to vet judicial nominees. But Mitch

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>McConnell and Donald Trump didn't care judges. Potential judges could

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be rated not qualified, completely unqualified, and they didn't care.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>As long as they had the right ideology, they would

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>cram them down America's throat on party line votes. That's

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>what Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump were about, and that

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is why we have a Supreme Court that I think

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is on the verge of being entirely illegitimate. And when

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the courts become illegitimate, that's dangerous because you're sending the

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>message to the American people that the rule of law

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is illegitimate, and therefore, why would anybody bother abiding by

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law. You know, that is kind of

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a recipe for anarchy down the road. If we don't

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>write our judicial ship. There are still opportunities to do it.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a lot of movement in that direction,

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but there are still opportunities to do it. Okay, So

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ and I saw, you know, another friend, Joyce

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>white Van said that the DOJ is giving Judge Bannon

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a gift that she should take, and you know, and

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>other legal scholars on the right and on the left

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have said exactly the same thing, which is surprising because

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I would assume that everybody on the right, you know,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>is just going to go along for the get along.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Is the DOJ gambling here? Yeah, I mean they are gambling,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and no matter what position they took, it would have

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>been a gamble. And I agree that That's why I

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>said it was kind of a split debate right approach,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because they're giving the judge an opportunity to save face,

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to reverse course, in part because DJ basically made its

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>best argument as to why we really need to continue

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. We need to continue to be able to

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>protect our national security, and basically, your stop work order, Judge,

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>has endangered everyone and everything. Giving you an out, we're

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>giving you an out. We're giving you an opportunity to

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>save face, to continue to move forward with you know,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Special Master looking at this small batch of

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>information that may have some attorney client privilege attached to it.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to be diplomatic, Yes, it's a gamble.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, no matter what position they took,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be a gamble. And I think

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it was smart to give the judge who already entered

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this horrific ruling, an opportunity to both reverse course and

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing, but also save face and keep

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of what she wanted to do up

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and running to the extent that little bit doesn't really

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>mean anything to the Department of Justice because it won't

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>impede DJ's investigation. But the reason I say, no, matter

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>what they did would be a gamble because if they

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just went hard, they said, judge, you're out to lunch.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We're appealing everything. Where does that appeal go the Eleventh Circuit?

0:26:55.119 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>The eleventh Circuit is lousy with Trump appointees. So when

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I say lousy, that's my old Brooklyn term. Man in

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>places lousy with cops, that means there's a lot of

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So that was going to be a gamble too, because

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in theory, when a case gets appealed to a federal

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>circuit court, it's supposed to be a random selection of

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>judges from that bench that that make up the three

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>judge panel that will hear the appeal. But you know what,

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if you get three Trump appointees and they're not honest

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>brokers of the law, then they might uphold what Judge

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Cannon did. If you got a mixture of Trump appointees

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and non Trump appointees, maybe you get a legitimate ruling.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you don't. So that's why I say, no matter

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what DJ did, it was going to be a gamble.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But what they did was in the most diplomatic way possible.

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like, Judge, we would like you to reconsider this piece,

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, you can go ahead and keep

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that piece of your ruling in play even though it

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>really won't have an So I think it's a smart gamble. Okay,

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So last question for you, what's the timeline here? What

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it like? You know, because we keep kicking this can

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>down the road. Everybody is waiting with bated breath for

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's indictments to come. And I believe that regardless

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of this ruling, they still have a whole heap of

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.239
<v Speaker 1>evidence to be able to charge Donald Trump with and

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>roll out indictments. We have heard that the Department of Justice,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this is true or just gossip, is

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>going to wait until after the midterm elections, which is

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in you know, sixty sixty days are less to roll

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>out their indictment parade. What say you? You know, first

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, with respect of the timeline of the litigation

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in Florida over the Special Master and the classified documents,

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to predict because this is completely within the

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>discretion of the federal judges who are involved, both trial

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>court and appellate court judges. And whereas I want to,

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we can go to Georgia for a minute.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the way Judge Lee Master Lee

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Master May, I'm forgetting her name. There's so many judges

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in the mix. Judge May is handling the Lindsay Graham litigation.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>She's like, bam bam, bam damn. Forty eight hours, dam

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>another decision. Lindsay, you lose, you lose, you lose, go

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to the grand jury and testify. That's the way the

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>federal Judiciary judiciary ought to be operating. Now, whether that's

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the way the federal judiciary judiciary down in Florida operates

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>or not in the judge canon Special Master Arena, I

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but that's what they need to do with

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>respect to indictments. I'm almost angry each time I see

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a new criminal investigation into Donald Trump. Now it's his pack, right,

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know why not, because I'm upset that they're

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>investigating yet more crimes by Donald Trump. But each one

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to bring with it more delay. Oh, you gotta

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>give DJ all the time you need to now investigate

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this new thing that should not result in the old things,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the other crimes now being on hold for

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>some reason. But it feels like with every new crime

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's investigated, the old crimes, whether it's the campaign finance

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy with Michael Cohen, or the ten counts of obstruction

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of justice that Bob Muller found, or the insurrection, or

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like, for God's sakes, indicte something. The way federal

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors do business, Danielle, is we indict something and then

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we build superseding indictments. We had charges, we had defendants,

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we had conspiracy counts. There is this insane, inexplicable paralysis.

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It looks like to me from the outside looking into

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice that you know has resulted in

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>zero indictments, and now as you say sixty day pause,

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we know we typically don't indict anybody sixty days before

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an election. That's not precisely the way DJ operates. There

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is an internal, unwritten norm, not a rule, not a law.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the norm. We try not to take any overt

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement action that could interfere with the election or

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>be perceived as political or partisan. First of all, Donald

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump ain't on the ballot, so there's no reason to

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pause your law enforcement activity for Donald Trump. It doesn't

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>matter if that might have a ripple effect. That's not

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a good reason to take a law enforcement pause. But

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>there's another reason not to take a law enforcement pause.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We have insurrectionists running for reelection. Think about the insanity

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of having insurrectionists running for reelection to Congress a sixty

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>day election holiday, which will simply give them the opportunity

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to get re elected to more firmly entrenched themselves inside

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>government so they can keep trying to kill us our

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>democracy from within. This sixty day Norman tradition might have

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>had a place decades ago, it doesn't have a place

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in today's environment. Oh, Glenn, you know, I, just like you,

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>patience has worn thin. I get excited by what we

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>see and here, and then I just wait for the

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>other shoe to drop. I think, like what most people think,

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and like what you've said, I think that Judge Cannon

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.959
<v Speaker 1>is going to not take the gift that she has

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>been given. And you know, and we will just have

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to see where this moves. But I will tell you

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that I believe that Georgia has moved from simmer to

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a slight boil, and I think that we are going

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to see the movement there before we see the indictment

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>parade coming from the DOJ. That is just that is

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>just my opinion, Glenn Kirshner. As always, we appreciate your

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>time and insight, and we will pick this up again

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>next week and see where we land. Appreciate you. I'll

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>see you next week, Daniel. That is it for me today.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Dear friends, on Woke a f as always, Power to

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the people and to all the people. Power, get woke

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and stay woke as fuck. Get a behind the scenes

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>look at Comedy Central's The Daily Show Beyond the Scenes,

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>an original podcast from the Daily Show with Trevor Noah.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Every week, host Roy Wood Junior goes deeper with the

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>notable guests and experts from the Emmy Award winning series.

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Together they use comedy to tackle current topics from gentrification

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to gun laws, and take a closer look at how

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and why these topics matter. Listen to Beyond the Scenes

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>from the Daily Show with Trevor Noah on the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. New episodes

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>every Tuesday.