1 00:00:00,880 --> 00:00:04,360 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Sound on podcast. Catch us 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the 3 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,200 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. 4 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:12,800 Speaker 2: Or listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts. 5 00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:16,000 Speaker 3: The Treasury Department says the X date will land as 6 00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:21,760 Speaker 3: early as June one. You could hear the gas across 7 00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 3: Washington with this letter from Janet Yellen dropped last night. 8 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 3: So yeah, we're already inside a month. And as President 9 00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 3: Biden invites congressional leaders to the White House on May ninth, 10 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:36,879 Speaker 3: there are real questions about the timeline here and what 11 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:42,279 Speaker 3: is possible before a potential downgrade, never mind a default. 12 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 3: The House will only be in session for three weeks 13 00:00:47,479 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 3: in this period of time before the X date. And 14 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:51,239 Speaker 3: you know they don't do a lot on Mondays and 15 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:54,440 Speaker 3: Fridays around here, so you can do the math on that. 16 00:00:56,680 --> 00:00:59,080 Speaker 3: And that's where we begin with Barat Ramamurdy, the Deputy 17 00:00:59,080 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 3: Director of the Nash Economic Council, advisor at the White 18 00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:07,959 Speaker 3: House for Strategic Economic Communications, and the top of the broadcast, BT, 19 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:09,520 Speaker 3: welcome back to Bloomberg. 20 00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:10,959 Speaker 4: Thanks for having me. 21 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 3: So the President will be sitting down with congressional leaders 22 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 3: one week from today. Is it the hope Barrot to 23 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 3: emerge from that meeting with a clean debt ceiling bill. 24 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:24,880 Speaker 4: Yes, that's been the President's position for many months now. Actually, 25 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 4: he's been clear that this is a congressional responsibility to 26 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 4: avoid default at something that in over two hundred years 27 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 4: we've avoided, and he's been clear that the Congressional Republicans 28 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 4: should move forward a bill that would raise the debt 29 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:42,200 Speaker 4: ceiling without conditions, as was done many times in the past. 30 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 3: Well, I know that you and the President said this 31 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,920 Speaker 3: as recently as yesterday. I think the Speaker's holding the 32 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:51,880 Speaker 3: debt sealing hostage with this demand to negotiate the budget. 33 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 3: But as we get closer to the X date to 34 00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:58,280 Speaker 3: a possible default, does the conversation start to change at all? 35 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:00,520 Speaker 3: Does the White House entertain talks on the budget or 36 00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 3: do we just all go over the cliff together if 37 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 3: the Speaker doesn't budge Well, I think. 38 00:02:04,960 --> 00:02:06,920 Speaker 4: The President has also been clear that he's more than 39 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:10,320 Speaker 4: willing to have a conversation with all of the congressional leaders, 40 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:14,240 Speaker 4: including the Speaker, about budgets and appropriations. In fact, just 41 00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 4: last year, presidents sat down with Democrats and Republicans hammered 42 00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:20,840 Speaker 4: out a bill that not everybody got what they wanted, 43 00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 4: but funded the government, included spending items that we were 44 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:27,040 Speaker 4: in favor of, spending items that the Republicans were in 45 00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:28,640 Speaker 4: favor of, and it got by parts of the support 46 00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 4: in both the House and the Senate. We're perfectly willing 47 00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 4: to do that again. The problem is forcing us to 48 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:39,280 Speaker 4: approve all of the far right wing demands that the 49 00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:42,880 Speaker 4: Speaker is bringing forward here as a condition of raising 50 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:45,480 Speaker 4: the debt limit. Know, what the Speaker is essentially doing 51 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:49,040 Speaker 4: is putting a choice before us either default on the debts, 52 00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 4: which would cause a global economic crisis, or accept his bill, 53 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,840 Speaker 4: which independent experts like Moodies have found would actually push 54 00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:58,800 Speaker 4: the government, push the economy closer to a recession, and 55 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:01,240 Speaker 4: cost us about eight hundred ths job. That's just not 56 00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:03,519 Speaker 4: a negotiation that the President is willing to happen. 57 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:06,360 Speaker 3: We actually talked to Mark Zandy about that very piece 58 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:09,440 Speaker 3: of research here last week on sound on is the 59 00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 3: administration then, since we seem to be pretty far apart 60 00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 3: here open to suspending the debt ceiling if it means 61 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:18,040 Speaker 3: buying a couple of months arrive at a deal later 62 00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:18,639 Speaker 3: on in the year. 63 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,320 Speaker 4: Well, I'm not going to negotiate here in public with you, 64 00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:24,840 Speaker 4: as much as I like you, but what I do 65 00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 4: think is important is that we move forward very quickly, because, 66 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 4: as Secretary Yellen made clear the other day, we have 67 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:36,160 Speaker 4: a tight deadline here and a firm deadline of June. First, 68 00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 4: we're in favor of something that increases the debt ceiling 69 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 4: without condition, and then, of course let's have a conversation, 70 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:46,000 Speaker 4: as we've had in the past, about tax policy and 71 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,200 Speaker 4: spending policy. We have put forward our budget in great 72 00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:52,520 Speaker 4: detail in early March that says exactly what spending we're 73 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 4: in favor of, what tax policy we're in favor of, 74 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 4: and it's a plan to reduce the deficit, by the 75 00:03:57,520 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 4: way over the next ten years by about three trillion dollars. 76 00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 4: We are more than happy to have a conversation with 77 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 4: the Republicans about why our approach is superior to theirs 78 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,160 Speaker 4: and hammer out a deal. What we won't do is 79 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:11,120 Speaker 4: tie that to whether we're going to default on. 80 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:11,560 Speaker 2: Our debt or not. 81 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:15,840 Speaker 3: The bill put forth by House Republicans the one past 82 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:20,320 Speaker 3: last week would extend the debt ceiling until May of 83 00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 3: twenty twenty four. If it were a clean bill, would 84 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,360 Speaker 3: the White House be fine with that timeline? 85 00:04:28,760 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 4: Well, again, I don't want to get into some of 86 00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:34,000 Speaker 4: these negotiations here with you, but a clean debt ceiling 87 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:37,280 Speaker 4: increase Again, it's something that we are generally supportive of. 88 00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:40,159 Speaker 4: But it does get to a broader issue here, which is, 89 00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:43,960 Speaker 4: as you note, this bill would simply increase the debt 90 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:48,120 Speaker 4: ceiling until about next spring, which would then set up 91 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 4: if we permit tying these negotiations to the debt ceiling, 92 00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:55,040 Speaker 4: it sets us up to do this whole thing again 93 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 4: in about a year, threatening the global economy, pushing the 94 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 4: American economy closer to recession, increasing the cost of borrowing, 95 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:06,039 Speaker 4: and this kind of brinksmanship, do it all over again 96 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 4: a year from now. That's just not a sustainable way 97 00:05:08,560 --> 00:05:09,840 Speaker 4: of running well, and right. 98 00:05:09,760 --> 00:05:11,840 Speaker 3: In the middle of a presidential election cycle. I can 99 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 3: only imagine the form that conversation would take. Why even 100 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 3: here's your abstract question of the day brought Rama Murdy, 101 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:23,000 Speaker 3: why even have a debt ceiling when it leads to 102 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:25,360 Speaker 3: this standoff? To your point, on a regular basis, you 103 00:05:25,400 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 3: can always see the next one coming. The New York 104 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:30,320 Speaker 3: Times today is asking if it's even constitutional. So how 105 00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 3: about we have a meeting a week from today on 106 00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 3: eliminating the debt ceiling. 107 00:05:35,480 --> 00:05:37,720 Speaker 4: Well, that's not going to be the topic of discussion 108 00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:39,400 Speaker 4: in the meeting that the President is going to have. 109 00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:41,520 Speaker 4: I think he's going to be very clear. 110 00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:43,560 Speaker 3: If you can humor me though as an economist, I 111 00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:45,280 Speaker 3: realize that you're not going to probably put that on 112 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:47,880 Speaker 3: the table. But shouldn't shouldn't that be a conversation at 113 00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:48,360 Speaker 3: some point? 114 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 4: Well, look, I know that several members of Congress that 115 00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:55,720 Speaker 4: put forth legislation that would functionally eliminate the debt ceiling. 116 00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 4: It's a conversation that members of Congress have had in 117 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:00,479 Speaker 4: the past and certainly can continue to have. But I 118 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 4: think given the situation we're in today, where according to 119 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 4: Secretary Yellen, we have until June first to address the 120 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,800 Speaker 4: debt feeling before we really risk a global economic calamity, 121 00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:14,679 Speaker 4: our position is clear, let's move a clean debt ceiling increase, 122 00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:18,160 Speaker 4: and then let's initiate a separate process where we can 123 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:21,520 Speaker 4: talk about our spending and tax priorities. I just want 124 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:26,279 Speaker 4: to take this opportunity to underscore how extreme the Speaker's 125 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:29,119 Speaker 4: bill is on these fronts, A twenty two percent cut 126 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,800 Speaker 4: to a lot of programs that your typical family relies upon. 127 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,600 Speaker 4: A twenty two percent cut to the VA budget, for example, 128 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:41,479 Speaker 4: which means that thirty million fewer outpatient visits for veterans, 129 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,240 Speaker 4: a huge cut to medical care for veterans, a huge 130 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:46,840 Speaker 4: cut to air traffic control, which would shut down air 131 00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:50,239 Speaker 4: traffic control towers across the United States as we're entering 132 00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:54,839 Speaker 4: a travel season. Real severe impacts on your typical families 133 00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:56,760 Speaker 4: is not something that we're supportive. 134 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:01,960 Speaker 3: Well, and it's interesting as you make that point, the 135 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:05,479 Speaker 3: reason why those cuts would be at the size you 136 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:08,680 Speaker 3: just suggested is because entitlements and many other things are 137 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 3: taken off the table. Right, So when Speaker McCarthy says 138 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 3: we want to roll things back to twenty two levels, 139 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:17,800 Speaker 3: it would actually require larger cuts to those programs because 140 00:07:17,840 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 3: we're not putting the entire budget on the table for negotiation. 141 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:21,440 Speaker 3: Is that right? 142 00:07:22,520 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 4: Well, I would make a point. Yes, they don't address 143 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:27,560 Speaker 4: Social Security and Medicare, and as the President's made clear, 144 00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 4: he's not supportive of US cuts to those programs. Yeah, 145 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:31,760 Speaker 4: but there's another really big part of it that they're 146 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 4: not considering, which is tax policy. You know, our budget 147 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:38,920 Speaker 4: lays out a set of tax increases on very wealthy 148 00:07:38,960 --> 00:07:42,520 Speaker 4: families and very large and profitable corporations that can generate 149 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:45,680 Speaker 4: significant amounts of revenue and allow us to keep investing 150 00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 4: in American manufacturing in American families. And the Speaker and 151 00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 4: House Republicans not only are not supportive of that, they're 152 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 4: separately pushing huge tax breaks for the very wealthy. In fact, 153 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:03,600 Speaker 4: they want to extend the Trump era tax cuts, which 154 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:07,160 Speaker 4: represent on average a one hundred and seventy five thousand 155 00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:11,000 Speaker 4: dollars annual tax cut for a family making over four million. 156 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:11,320 Speaker 5: Dollars a year. 157 00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:15,120 Speaker 4: So that's those are their priorities, a huge tax cut 158 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 4: for very wealthy families, at the same time that they're 159 00:08:18,320 --> 00:08:22,360 Speaker 4: bringing the hammer down on veterans, medical care, on border security, 160 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:26,920 Speaker 4: on air traffic control, on food inspections. It's a very 161 00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 4: misguided set of priority. 162 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 3: Yet, if I dare say something optimistic here, is it 163 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,800 Speaker 3: not true that the larger principles of debt reduction are 164 00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:40,440 Speaker 3: actually shared on both sides of the table. Here, Once 165 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 3: you get through this debt limit negotiation or whatever the 166 00:08:42,960 --> 00:08:44,880 Speaker 3: heck it's going to be called, or whatever it is 167 00:08:45,120 --> 00:08:48,560 Speaker 3: are the longer term goals of debt reduction something that 168 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 3: is shared by Democrats and Republicans, or specifically House Republicans 169 00:08:52,640 --> 00:08:53,520 Speaker 3: and this White House. 170 00:08:54,800 --> 00:08:59,240 Speaker 4: Well, I will make a very clear point. We have 171 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 4: been reduced the deficit each year that we have been 172 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 4: in office, and we have laid out a plan. The 173 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:05,720 Speaker 4: President has laid out of a plan that would reduce the 174 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,200 Speaker 4: deficit by three trillion dollars over the next ten years. 175 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:13,559 Speaker 4: While House Republicans are pushing all of these massive spending 176 00:09:13,559 --> 00:09:17,200 Speaker 4: cuts to programs that your typical family relies upon, they 177 00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:21,200 Speaker 4: are separately pushing, as I said, massive tax breaks for 178 00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:24,560 Speaker 4: the wealthy and for large corporations. Another example, we put 179 00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:27,320 Speaker 4: in place last year of fifteen percent minimum tax on 180 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:30,640 Speaker 4: very large profitable corporations to make sure that no corporation 181 00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:33,760 Speaker 4: that makes billions in profits pays zero dollars in taxes. 182 00:09:34,400 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 4: Republicans are on record wanting to repeal that tax, So 183 00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:42,280 Speaker 4: in reality, all of the cost savings that they get 184 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:44,760 Speaker 4: through these spending cuts are actually being diverted into tax 185 00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,440 Speaker 4: cuts for the very wealthy and large corporations. It doesn't 186 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:49,600 Speaker 4: actually have that significant impact on the deficit. 187 00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:51,680 Speaker 3: At the end of the day, and is that that's 188 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:55,480 Speaker 3: extending the twenty seventeen tax cuts from the Trump administration that. 189 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:58,719 Speaker 6: You're exact accorring too. That's right, brought. 190 00:09:58,440 --> 00:10:00,959 Speaker 3: We're watching shares separately here. I know we're spinning a 191 00:10:00,960 --> 00:10:02,960 Speaker 3: couple of plates, not only the debt sealing, the budget, 192 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:05,240 Speaker 3: but also what's happening in the banking sector. And before 193 00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:07,440 Speaker 3: you leave, i'd like to ask you about your view 194 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:10,200 Speaker 3: on this. We're seeing shares of some regional banks tumble 195 00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 3: today even though there is no news to justify them, 196 00:10:14,040 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 3: when the market's showing a little bit of panic here. 197 00:10:16,440 --> 00:10:20,920 Speaker 3: Are you confident, following the response to SVB and signature 198 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,960 Speaker 3: following the acquisition now of First Republic Bank by JP Morgan, 199 00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:27,120 Speaker 3: that we're actually through the worst of this, that there's 200 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:28,280 Speaker 3: no further contagion. 201 00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:31,960 Speaker 4: Well, I think that our view is that the banking 202 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:35,800 Speaker 4: system remains in very fundamentally strong shape and that's demonstrated 203 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:39,559 Speaker 4: a lot of resilience over the last several weeks. I 204 00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:42,319 Speaker 4: think people should feel confident that if they have deposits 205 00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 4: in the bank, that those deposits are going to be 206 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:46,960 Speaker 4: there if and when they need them. And I think 207 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:49,560 Speaker 4: that we've got to take important steps that the President 208 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:52,080 Speaker 4: has laid out to make sure that we're not back 209 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 4: in this position again. And that means number one, making 210 00:10:55,520 --> 00:10:58,880 Speaker 4: sure that our rules for accountability for executives who engage 211 00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:01,480 Speaker 4: in the kind of mismanagement we've seen that there's real 212 00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:04,960 Speaker 4: accountability for those folks, including clawbacks compensation that they may 213 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:08,160 Speaker 4: have gotten right before their bank got in trouble. And 214 00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:11,080 Speaker 4: also that we need to address some of the rule 215 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:14,840 Speaker 4: rollbacks that happened in the previous administration. Remember, in the 216 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:18,600 Speaker 4: previous administration, rules on exactly this set of banks, these 217 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:23,079 Speaker 4: large regional banks were targeted for rollbacks, and I don't 218 00:11:23,080 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 4: think it's a coincidence that we're now seeing a lot 219 00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 4: of trouble developed in that exact sector. The President has 220 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:30,319 Speaker 4: called for action on reimposing a lot of those rules 221 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 4: so that we avoid getting into the situation in the 222 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 4: first place. But I think the bottom line from our 223 00:11:35,160 --> 00:11:40,560 Speaker 4: perspective is that we're emerging from this with a banking 224 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:43,760 Speaker 4: system that's still fundamentally in very strong shape, and that's 225 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 4: thanks in part to some of the rules that were 226 00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:47,840 Speaker 4: put in place in the Obama by an administration following 227 00:11:47,840 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 4: the financial crisis. 228 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:50,880 Speaker 3: Just to be clear, though you haven't identified. The White 229 00:11:50,880 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 3: House isn't looking at any of these banks right now 230 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:55,160 Speaker 3: as potentially the quote unquote next one. 231 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:59,920 Speaker 4: No, and look, it's ultimately with the regulators, the f 232 00:12:00,160 --> 00:12:02,600 Speaker 4: I see the FED, depending on the exact nature of 233 00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 4: the bank. Sure, they're the front of the front lines here. 234 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:08,040 Speaker 4: They're the ones who are taking the action, and so 235 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:12,000 Speaker 4: would defer to them about whether they're seeing any issues 236 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:15,240 Speaker 4: in any particular bank. From our perspective, overall, the banking 237 00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:18,280 Speaker 4: system remains in strong shape and people should a confidence 238 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 4: that their deposits are going to be there if they 239 00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:20,200 Speaker 4: need them. 240 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 3: He's the Deputy Director of the National Economic Council and 241 00:12:23,640 --> 00:12:28,319 Speaker 3: as well advisor for Strategic Economic Communications at the White House. 242 00:12:28,320 --> 00:12:31,080 Speaker 3: Sparat Ramamurdy many thanks for the insights. 243 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:33,479 Speaker 6: As always on Bloomberg, thanks again. 244 00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:35,920 Speaker 3: And so we assemble the panel for their take on 245 00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 3: all of this, beginning with the X date. Bloomberg Politics 246 00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:42,319 Speaker 3: contributor Republican strategist Rick Davis is with us along with 247 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:46,120 Speaker 3: Jim Kessler, democratic strategist and co founder of Third Way. 248 00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:48,680 Speaker 3: It's great to have you both here. Rick your thought 249 00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:51,559 Speaker 3: on this as we stare down the barrel of a 250 00:12:51,760 --> 00:12:54,520 Speaker 3: very limited congressional calendar. Can they pull this off by 251 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:55,040 Speaker 3: June one? 252 00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:58,200 Speaker 7: Well, I think that it depends on what they're trying 253 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,240 Speaker 7: to pull off. I mean, the discussion you just add 254 00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:02,719 Speaker 7: about changing the tax code and trying to pay down 255 00:13:02,760 --> 00:13:06,240 Speaker 7: the deaf sit and things like that, they're going to 256 00:13:06,280 --> 00:13:09,319 Speaker 7: be only a passing discussion about that, because what they're 257 00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:11,240 Speaker 7: really going to need to do is nail down how 258 00:13:11,320 --> 00:13:16,320 Speaker 7: and when they can increase the debt limit. And in 259 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:19,120 Speaker 7: the House bill it's capped at one point five trillion. 260 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:22,720 Speaker 7: That's their going in proposition takes us basically into twenty 261 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 7: twenty four, and I think the President and his team 262 00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:28,160 Speaker 7: are going to want a different approach, maybe to just 263 00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:32,560 Speaker 7: delaying the debt limit discussion to a later date after 264 00:13:32,600 --> 00:13:35,360 Speaker 7: the election. So just on the basics, I think they're 265 00:13:35,360 --> 00:13:37,200 Speaker 7: going to be fundamental differences in approach. 266 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:42,000 Speaker 3: Yeah. So Jim Kessler was former legislative policy director for 267 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:44,319 Speaker 3: Senator Chuck Schumer, and so, Jim, you've been in the 268 00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 3: room for moments like these. Chuck Schumer invited to the 269 00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:51,880 Speaker 3: White House for a week from today, and we're going 270 00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:53,960 Speaker 3: to have more time to get into the particulars here. 271 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 3: But what's that meeting like I realize it's the opening salvo. 272 00:13:57,480 --> 00:14:01,199 Speaker 3: Will anything get done if both sides are this far apart? 273 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:04,840 Speaker 8: Well, I do think there's enough time. And you know, 274 00:14:04,920 --> 00:14:08,920 Speaker 8: I know, the date of June first sort of shocked everybody, 275 00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:12,280 Speaker 8: But either if the date was July first or August first, 276 00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:15,920 Speaker 8: they wouldn't be doing negotiations in earnest until about a 277 00:14:15,920 --> 00:14:20,240 Speaker 8: month in advance. Anyway, that's the way Washington rolls on this. 278 00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:21,760 Speaker 6: Look. 279 00:14:22,480 --> 00:14:26,040 Speaker 8: Schumer and Biden each want to make sure that nothing 280 00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:30,920 Speaker 8: happens that disrupts the economy. That's their number one goal. 281 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:34,680 Speaker 8: I think the challenge for Kevin McCarthy is can I 282 00:14:34,680 --> 00:14:37,880 Speaker 8: pass a debt ceiling bill and keep my job? That's 283 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:40,240 Speaker 8: you know, a speaker. I think that's the drama in 284 00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 8: this sort of thing. I wouldn't be surprised if something 285 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 8: was done to, you know, move the negotiations forward a 286 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:50,680 Speaker 8: couple of weeks or months, like a very temporary debt level. 287 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:53,360 Speaker 3: Hold that thought, because I do think that suspending the 288 00:14:53,440 --> 00:14:55,760 Speaker 3: debt limit at least for a couple is where we're 289 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:58,760 Speaker 3: going with this. More with the panel. Next, this is Bloomberg. 290 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:02,080 Speaker 2: To the Bloomberg Sound on podcast. 291 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:06,560 Speaker 1: Catch the program live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, 292 00:15:06,720 --> 00:15:09,000 Speaker 1: the tune in alf, Bloomberg dot Com, and the. 293 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 9: Bloomberg Business App. 294 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:13,200 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 295 00:15:13,200 --> 00:15:17,680 Speaker 1: flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 296 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:21,280 Speaker 3: Now that the big meeting is set for next week, 297 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:25,200 Speaker 3: what are the options? Actually? Speaker McCarthy says he will 298 00:15:25,280 --> 00:15:28,240 Speaker 3: never raise the debt ceiling without budget cuts. The White 299 00:15:28,240 --> 00:15:32,360 Speaker 3: House says it will never agree to budget cuts without 300 00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:35,240 Speaker 3: raising the debt ceiling. And so here we are still 301 00:15:35,760 --> 00:15:39,000 Speaker 3: another day into this with an next date and no 302 00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:42,640 Speaker 3: real path. As we spend time with our panel, they've 303 00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 3: both been through events like these many times. That would 304 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:49,920 Speaker 3: be Rick Davis, Republican strategist and Bloomberg Politics contributor, joined 305 00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:54,560 Speaker 3: today by Jim Kessler, Democratic strategist, co founder of Third Way. Rick, 306 00:15:54,640 --> 00:15:56,240 Speaker 3: it does seem like we need to kick the can 307 00:15:56,320 --> 00:15:59,680 Speaker 3: here at some point unless some magic happens between the 308 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:02,520 Speaker 3: first of June. So, if you're on the White House 309 00:16:02,520 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 3: side of the table here, do you show up next 310 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 3: week with a proposal to suspend the debt limit, maybe 311 00:16:08,920 --> 00:16:11,960 Speaker 3: till fall, so it would coincide with the budget and 312 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:14,920 Speaker 3: we figure out how to deal with reality between now 313 00:16:14,920 --> 00:16:15,200 Speaker 3: and then. 314 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:19,120 Speaker 7: I think that's much more likely Joe to be a 315 00:16:19,120 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 7: fallback position when other issues are deemed insurmountable. There's no 316 00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:28,640 Speaker 7: question that the House bill is debt on arrival at 317 00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 7: the White House, but having some package of budget cuts 318 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 7: that might be tolerable to Democrats and try to give 319 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:41,240 Speaker 7: McCarthy a chance to try and get another two hundred 320 00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:44,200 Speaker 7: and seventeen two hundred eighteen votes from his caucus to 321 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:48,640 Speaker 7: pass something maybe on the table. The biggest problem is, 322 00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:51,840 Speaker 7: even though McCarthy agrees to something, can he actually implement 323 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 7: it on the floor with his caucus? And we barely 324 00:16:54,680 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 7: saw his current plan, which was everything that everybody wanted 325 00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:01,680 Speaker 7: thrown in. The minute you pair that back, you start 326 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 7: losing Republican votes. 327 00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:06,360 Speaker 3: Right, And this is why the White House hasn't engaged 328 00:17:06,400 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 3: untill now, right, Jim, because they have no reason to 329 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:11,800 Speaker 3: believe that Kevin McCarthy has any leverage with his own 330 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:15,359 Speaker 3: caucus as he tries to approach the White House for negotiations. 331 00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:17,199 Speaker 3: But this is the very problem. This is how we 332 00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 3: end up possibly going over the cliff. Right, When does 333 00:17:19,840 --> 00:17:21,880 Speaker 3: that change exactly? 334 00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:24,720 Speaker 8: And look any bill that gets to the President's desk 335 00:17:24,880 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 8: needs to get sixty Senators voting for, which probably means 336 00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:35,040 Speaker 8: all fifty Democratic senators and ten or twelve Republican senators 337 00:17:35,080 --> 00:17:37,679 Speaker 8: there too. And that's a bill that looks very different 338 00:17:37,720 --> 00:17:43,000 Speaker 8: than something that Speaker McCarthy has done. Look, I believe 339 00:17:43,119 --> 00:17:47,040 Speaker 8: in the end this deal will be cut principally by Biden, Schumer, 340 00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:50,720 Speaker 8: and McConnell. It will have some things where the Democrats 341 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:54,720 Speaker 8: will have to concede. It won't be enough really for 342 00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:58,760 Speaker 8: McCarthy's caucus, but probably the markets will force that bill 343 00:17:58,800 --> 00:18:01,359 Speaker 8: to the floor where it's in June, or like a 344 00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:03,720 Speaker 8: kick the can at a later date. But that's the 345 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 8: dynamic I see. 346 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:07,800 Speaker 3: So here we are talking to two veterans of the Senate. 347 00:18:08,320 --> 00:18:10,320 Speaker 3: What do you think, Rick, does Mitch McConnell save the 348 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 3: day here? 349 00:18:12,400 --> 00:18:14,720 Speaker 7: Well, I think the key was what Jim said, which 350 00:18:14,800 --> 00:18:18,880 Speaker 7: was it's a combination of Mitch McConnell and Schumer. Schumer 351 00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 7: has to deliver, you know, fifty Democrats, McConnelly has to 352 00:18:22,800 --> 00:18:27,240 Speaker 7: deliver ten Republicans, and if they get a relatively clean 353 00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:30,840 Speaker 7: bill that won't be that hard to do, then it 354 00:18:30,880 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 7: gets over to the House, and the reality is then 355 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 7: it's like two hundred and fifteen Democrats and how many 356 00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:40,840 Speaker 7: Republicans do you need? And that is that changes the 357 00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:45,360 Speaker 7: dynamic completely, and there are plenty of sort of centrist 358 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 7: Republicans to walk the line, and all you need is 359 00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:48,440 Speaker 7: a couple. 360 00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,400 Speaker 6: So all of a sudden, it's a much more doable thing. 361 00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:53,920 Speaker 6: But it is completely different than the current scenario. 362 00:18:54,840 --> 00:18:57,320 Speaker 3: In that world, though, Jim goes back to the House 363 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:00,480 Speaker 3: and you've got problems there. That would be an incredibly 364 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:03,439 Speaker 3: embarrassing moment for the Speaker to think there was an 365 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:05,960 Speaker 3: agreement in principle he can't get his own caucus around it. 366 00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:08,880 Speaker 3: What then, is that when we start talking about suspending 367 00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:09,400 Speaker 3: the debt limit. 368 00:19:10,800 --> 00:19:13,000 Speaker 8: I mean, that's why I said the drama in this 369 00:19:13,240 --> 00:19:16,960 Speaker 8: is whether we can pass a debt ceiling increase in 370 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:19,760 Speaker 8: which the speaker gets to keep his job. So the 371 00:19:19,840 --> 00:19:23,920 Speaker 8: scenario could happen where it passes the Senate, it fails 372 00:19:23,960 --> 00:19:28,480 Speaker 8: the House on the first try, additional concession is put 373 00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:32,159 Speaker 8: in to win a couple of you know, some Republican votes, 374 00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:36,800 Speaker 8: and then McCarthy gets to save face. But you know, 375 00:19:37,920 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 8: that is the drama on this. I think Schumer, McConnell, 376 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:45,200 Speaker 8: and Biden could figure this out in a couple of days. 377 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:48,120 Speaker 8: It's McCarthy who's got his hands full. 378 00:19:49,080 --> 00:19:51,440 Speaker 3: We haven't talked too much about the motion to vacate 379 00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:55,359 Speaker 3: since the speaker fight Rick, And now that he's gone 380 00:19:55,359 --> 00:19:58,040 Speaker 3: fifteen rounds and managed to get a bill passed, is 381 00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:01,359 Speaker 3: that still a real possibility for him that he could 382 00:20:01,359 --> 00:20:03,520 Speaker 3: lose his job if he doesn't stick the landing this year? 383 00:20:05,119 --> 00:20:08,160 Speaker 7: You know, I don't think the Republican Caucus wants that 384 00:20:08,359 --> 00:20:12,159 Speaker 7: much turmoil because if he loses the job, the question 385 00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:15,480 Speaker 7: is do you have another two hundred and eighteen votes 386 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:17,879 Speaker 7: to put somebody else in there? And you probably don't. 387 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:21,680 Speaker 7: And so I think that as long as McConnell can 388 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:24,920 Speaker 7: come up, or as long as McCarthy can come up 389 00:20:25,280 --> 00:20:28,760 Speaker 7: with some budget cuts. Everybody knows the current bill that 390 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:31,320 Speaker 7: they pass is a non starter. Right, You're not going 391 00:20:31,359 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 7: to get one hundred and thirty billion cuts that they 392 00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 7: have passed already. But if you get some, it saves 393 00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:40,800 Speaker 7: face for him. He can continue to be Speaker. He's 394 00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:44,920 Speaker 7: gotten something that otherwise the administration wasn't going to sign, 395 00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:48,320 Speaker 7: which was a clean debt limit, and he has an 396 00:20:48,440 --> 00:20:52,040 Speaker 7: argument that they've made progress, so we'll see if that's 397 00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:54,720 Speaker 7: something that they can pull off. But we're a long 398 00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:57,560 Speaker 7: way from there. As Jim said, you know, it wouldn't 399 00:20:57,600 --> 00:21:00,520 Speaker 7: take McConnell and Schumer very long to come up with 400 00:21:00,560 --> 00:21:02,600 Speaker 7: a deal, but when they have to pass it through 401 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 7: an almost evenly divided House, it makes it more complex. 402 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:07,160 Speaker 2: Boy, sure does. 403 00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:07,320 Speaker 1: Now. 404 00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 3: The idea was at least from Speaker McCarthy Jim Cassler, 405 00:21:11,520 --> 00:21:14,160 Speaker 3: to extend the debt limit through May of twenty four, 406 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:16,959 Speaker 3: so smack dab in the middle of a presidential cycle. 407 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:20,119 Speaker 3: I'm guessing that's a non starter for this White House 408 00:21:20,119 --> 00:21:23,159 Speaker 3: as well. But how much of this then are we 409 00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:25,959 Speaker 3: going to be hearing about on the campaign trail? This 410 00:21:26,000 --> 00:21:28,720 Speaker 3: is going to be a presidential election issue, I suspect 411 00:21:28,760 --> 00:21:30,879 Speaker 3: unless it's far in the rear view mirror at that 412 00:21:30,920 --> 00:21:34,360 Speaker 3: point and they managed to lift the debt limit beyond 413 00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 3: the campaign, what's more likely. 414 00:21:38,119 --> 00:21:40,760 Speaker 8: They have to lift this beyond the campaign. I don't 415 00:21:40,800 --> 00:21:44,280 Speaker 8: think either party wants to go through this again. It's 416 00:21:44,320 --> 00:21:48,119 Speaker 8: a variable. Look. I think if it was extended to 417 00:21:48,160 --> 00:21:52,040 Speaker 8: May twenty twenty four, that's advantaged Joe Biden because the 418 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:54,920 Speaker 8: more the Republicans look extreme, the better it is for Biden. 419 00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:58,920 Speaker 8: But my guess is it's a variable on either side. 420 00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:02,159 Speaker 8: Once they want to how this be part of the 421 00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:05,200 Speaker 8: twenty twenty four election, to see what's going to happen 422 00:22:05,240 --> 00:22:06,600 Speaker 8: to budgets thereafter. 423 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:09,120 Speaker 3: What do you think on that one, Rick, What would 424 00:22:09,160 --> 00:22:11,320 Speaker 3: be an acceptable timeline. You've got to get it through 425 00:22:11,359 --> 00:22:12,280 Speaker 3: the presidential race. 426 00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:16,560 Speaker 7: Yeah, you look, I mean everybody would want that done. 427 00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:20,480 Speaker 7: But you know, if McCarthy only gets a portion of 428 00:22:20,520 --> 00:22:23,560 Speaker 7: his cuts, he can always claim that, hey, we got 429 00:22:23,600 --> 00:22:26,680 Speaker 7: another shot at this while we're still in majority next year, 430 00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:29,239 Speaker 7: and that may be one of the only ways to 431 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:32,440 Speaker 7: get the caucus to vote for it, if indeed we're 432 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:36,800 Speaker 7: still relying on Republican vote only to pass whatever the 433 00:22:36,880 --> 00:22:39,399 Speaker 7: deal is. So I think this is one of the 434 00:22:39,400 --> 00:22:43,320 Speaker 7: more complicated aspects. Do you lift the borrowing cap, you know, 435 00:22:44,160 --> 00:22:47,080 Speaker 7: to the one point five trillion or more to extend it, 436 00:22:47,200 --> 00:22:49,800 Speaker 7: or are you actually suspending the detlament. I think that's 437 00:22:49,840 --> 00:22:51,840 Speaker 7: got to be figured out as one of the very 438 00:22:51,880 --> 00:22:53,520 Speaker 7: first negotiating points. 439 00:22:54,119 --> 00:22:56,600 Speaker 3: Jim Kesler. The Trump tax cuts came up in our 440 00:22:56,600 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 3: conversation earlier this hour with barat Rama Murdy. Revenue adjustments 441 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 3: would change this conversation around budget cuts quite a bit, 442 00:23:05,640 --> 00:23:08,560 Speaker 3: But is that a non starter with this Republican House. 443 00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:14,960 Speaker 8: Probably? I mean, what needs to happen if you're looking 444 00:23:15,119 --> 00:23:18,160 Speaker 8: really for a long term budget solution is there are 445 00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:22,600 Speaker 8: two The Democrats have to come off their position where 446 00:23:22,600 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 8: there can be no cuts to entitlements, and the Republicans 447 00:23:25,800 --> 00:23:29,360 Speaker 8: need to come off of their position in which revenue 448 00:23:29,920 --> 00:23:32,959 Speaker 8: can't be increased. That's what has to happen if we 449 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:36,760 Speaker 8: want a long term solution to our fiscal problems. I 450 00:23:36,760 --> 00:23:39,560 Speaker 8: don't think that's going to happen in this set of negotiations. 451 00:23:39,760 --> 00:23:42,240 Speaker 8: It could happen in a future set of negotiations. 452 00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:45,280 Speaker 3: So what's the boss move here? What's the flex for 453 00:23:45,320 --> 00:23:45,840 Speaker 3: the White House? 454 00:23:45,920 --> 00:23:46,080 Speaker 9: Rick? 455 00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:49,080 Speaker 3: When this meeting happens next week, they've got one week 456 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:51,200 Speaker 3: to plan for this. Is there anything that Joe Biden 457 00:23:51,240 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 3: can do that tips the cart a little bit, that 458 00:23:53,840 --> 00:23:57,520 Speaker 3: actually impacts the conversation, maybe sends Speaker McCarthy home with 459 00:23:57,600 --> 00:23:58,359 Speaker 3: something to think about. 460 00:23:59,520 --> 00:24:01,520 Speaker 7: Yeah, two edged sword, because he wants to go out 461 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:03,960 Speaker 7: and talk about the extreme House of Representatives, you know, 462 00:24:04,040 --> 00:24:06,280 Speaker 7: owned by MAGA and holding up the economy. 463 00:24:06,640 --> 00:24:08,320 Speaker 6: But that doesn't help in a negotiation. 464 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:11,119 Speaker 7: So I think that they've got to be pretty productive 465 00:24:11,280 --> 00:24:14,800 Speaker 7: between now and May ninth, when everyone's sitting around the 466 00:24:14,840 --> 00:24:16,440 Speaker 7: cabinet room at the White House. 467 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:19,640 Speaker 6: And so I would imagine that now. 468 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:22,119 Speaker 7: What they're going to talk about are what are the 469 00:24:22,400 --> 00:24:24,800 Speaker 7: what are the issues around you know, the lifting the 470 00:24:24,840 --> 00:24:28,320 Speaker 7: borrowing cap, you know, whether they spend it, what's the 471 00:24:28,359 --> 00:24:30,240 Speaker 7: timing of that. Those are things that aren't going to 472 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:33,880 Speaker 7: upset the apple cart politically, but keep the heat on Republicans. 473 00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:38,240 Speaker 7: And I think that this White House has been pretty circumstanct. 474 00:24:38,280 --> 00:24:41,800 Speaker 7: I mean, I could see being much more demagogic about 475 00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:45,760 Speaker 7: the health of our national economy and the global financial 476 00:24:45,760 --> 00:24:49,040 Speaker 7: system if we if we don't get this done. So 477 00:24:49,240 --> 00:24:51,040 Speaker 7: I think they'll do a little, but I think they 478 00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:52,840 Speaker 7: got to keep the door open for these guys to 479 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:55,480 Speaker 7: walk through on May ninth and actually get a deal. 480 00:24:55,760 --> 00:24:58,600 Speaker 3: Yeah right, boy, this there's a lot to figure in 481 00:24:58,600 --> 00:25:00,560 Speaker 3: this balancing actor. We're going to talk more about it 482 00:25:00,560 --> 00:25:03,280 Speaker 3: next with our panel and Eric Wasson will join the conversation. 483 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:08,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Congressional Reporter. You're listening to The Bloomberg Sound on podcast. 484 00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:12,560 Speaker 1: Catch us Live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, 485 00:25:12,560 --> 00:25:15,399 Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or. 486 00:25:15,440 --> 00:25:17,880 Speaker 2: Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts. 487 00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:21,720 Speaker 3: I suspect no one is looking more closely at the 488 00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:25,719 Speaker 3: congressional calendar between now and the first of June than 489 00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:30,560 Speaker 3: Eric Wasson, Bloomberg Congressional reporter, who joins us here to 490 00:25:30,640 --> 00:25:33,920 Speaker 3: talk about exactly what might unfold in the next couple 491 00:25:33,960 --> 00:25:35,760 Speaker 3: of days. Here with the meeting at the White House 492 00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:38,800 Speaker 3: set for one week from today, and we'll compare notes 493 00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:41,840 Speaker 3: with our panel in just a moment. Eric, thanks for 494 00:25:41,920 --> 00:25:44,400 Speaker 3: joining us on the hill. I know that Speaker McCarthy's 495 00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:46,200 Speaker 3: been abroad here it's probably been a little bit difficult 496 00:25:46,200 --> 00:25:47,919 Speaker 3: to communicate with his office and get a sense of 497 00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,439 Speaker 3: what's going on. He was speaking to the Knesset in 498 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:55,680 Speaker 3: Israel yesterday. Upon his return, he'll be preparing for this 499 00:25:55,760 --> 00:25:58,399 Speaker 3: meeting next week. And it sure sounds like both sides 500 00:25:58,440 --> 00:26:01,760 Speaker 3: are dug in as much as ever. Would you agree. 501 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:03,800 Speaker 10: They're certainly dug in. The one thing I want to 502 00:26:03,840 --> 00:26:06,879 Speaker 10: encourage listeners to notice is that the White House is 503 00:26:06,920 --> 00:26:11,120 Speaker 10: saying that they are ready to initiate a separate budget discussion. 504 00:26:11,200 --> 00:26:13,800 Speaker 10: Now at at some point we're getting to semantics here, 505 00:26:13,880 --> 00:26:16,119 Speaker 10: Like McCarthy will say this is a debt ceiling negotiation. 506 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:19,240 Speaker 10: Biden will say it's a budget discussion. You know, the 507 00:26:19,280 --> 00:26:22,000 Speaker 10: mechanical house gets worked out. You know, maybe they passed 508 00:26:22,119 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 10: a clean death ciling increase in seconds later pass the 509 00:26:24,640 --> 00:26:27,679 Speaker 10: budget bill to give everyone face. But you know, I 510 00:26:27,680 --> 00:26:30,639 Speaker 10: think it's a significant movement that Biden has called this meeting. 511 00:26:30,800 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 10: He's no longer demanding the GP produce a full budget proposal, 512 00:26:34,400 --> 00:26:36,840 Speaker 10: like they're going to basically take the House pass bill 513 00:26:37,240 --> 00:26:40,040 Speaker 10: as the GOP starting point. So I think there could 514 00:26:40,080 --> 00:26:42,320 Speaker 10: be some movement here, but certainly folks need to be 515 00:26:42,359 --> 00:26:44,640 Speaker 10: nervous with this June first deadline. I think a lot 516 00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 10: of people on Capitol are very surprised when that came 517 00:26:47,119 --> 00:26:49,840 Speaker 10: out from Janet Yellen yesterday. They were thinking it could 518 00:26:49,880 --> 00:26:53,000 Speaker 10: be aug histor or something, and they're really having to 519 00:26:53,000 --> 00:26:53,800 Speaker 10: spring into action. 520 00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 3: So does that actually motivate all parties involved here or 521 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:02,080 Speaker 3: give them another into grandstand because a lot of people, 522 00:27:02,119 --> 00:27:04,520 Speaker 3: now that we have an X date are just beginning 523 00:27:04,520 --> 00:27:06,959 Speaker 3: to pay attention. I was asked earlier today, what's this 524 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:08,800 Speaker 3: X date all about? What do you mean we're going 525 00:27:08,840 --> 00:27:09,400 Speaker 3: to default. 526 00:27:10,359 --> 00:27:13,119 Speaker 10: Yeah, No, it's going to definitely like the fire for action. 527 00:27:13,440 --> 00:27:15,640 Speaker 10: But one thing I would also say is it could 528 00:27:15,720 --> 00:27:18,400 Speaker 10: lead to a short term increase the proposals out there 529 00:27:18,440 --> 00:27:21,920 Speaker 10: to bring it to October first or December thirty first. 530 00:27:21,920 --> 00:27:24,160 Speaker 10: That would more closely align it with the normal budget 531 00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:27,240 Speaker 10: process that fund the next fiscal year, which starts in October. 532 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:30,159 Speaker 10: So you could kind of like allow the appropriations and 533 00:27:30,240 --> 00:27:32,440 Speaker 10: budget process to play itself out a little bit more 534 00:27:32,480 --> 00:27:36,000 Speaker 10: with detailed proposals, and then maybe come back and pass 535 00:27:36,040 --> 00:27:38,680 Speaker 10: it all together. So we could see something like that emerge. 536 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:41,480 Speaker 10: I just think given that people were kind of hit 537 00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:44,159 Speaker 10: flat footed with this new date, that's more likely than 538 00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:45,080 Speaker 10: it was yesterday. 539 00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:49,240 Speaker 3: Interesting spending time with Eric Watson, who is joining us 540 00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:52,720 Speaker 3: from Capitol Hill reporting for Bloomberg here, I'm sure that 541 00:27:52,800 --> 00:27:54,919 Speaker 3: the public conversation, to your point, is a little bit 542 00:27:54,960 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 3: different than the one behind the scenes. Is there a 543 00:27:56,800 --> 00:27:58,679 Speaker 3: way that they can do this with kind of a 544 00:27:58,720 --> 00:28:01,920 Speaker 3: wink and a smile here, Eric, where they actually negotiate 545 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:04,000 Speaker 3: both at once, and I think this is where you're going, 546 00:28:04,400 --> 00:28:08,240 Speaker 3: but but publicly suggest that these are are two separate. 547 00:28:07,920 --> 00:28:10,879 Speaker 10: Deals, right, I think Republicans would would you know, as 548 00:28:10,920 --> 00:28:12,960 Speaker 10: someone in the administration once told me they could, they 549 00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:15,800 Speaker 10: could send out different press releases but have the same deal. 550 00:28:15,840 --> 00:28:18,520 Speaker 10: You know, they'll be spin on both sides. But you know, 551 00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:20,240 Speaker 10: at the end of the day, there have been debt 552 00:28:20,280 --> 00:28:23,320 Speaker 10: ceiling increases linked to the budget cuts before. They've also 553 00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:26,240 Speaker 10: been clean ones. So each ie keeps claiming it's impossible, 554 00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:29,480 Speaker 10: it's never happened, but both both types of things have happened. 555 00:28:29,560 --> 00:28:32,280 Speaker 10: There's a lot very interesting move from House Democrats today 556 00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:34,919 Speaker 10: where they kind of unleash their move, which is just 557 00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:37,679 Speaker 10: to sort of set up what's called the discharge petition. 558 00:28:37,800 --> 00:28:41,959 Speaker 10: This would basically allow a five or more House Republicans 559 00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:44,840 Speaker 10: did defect from McCarthy and force on the debt ceiling. 560 00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 10: Now it could line up to early June. I was 561 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:49,000 Speaker 10: I was a little bit surprised because they found a 562 00:28:49,040 --> 00:28:51,160 Speaker 10: little loophole in the House rules. I thought it was 563 00:28:51,160 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 10: going to take months to set this up, this move, 564 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:55,280 Speaker 10: but they can. They can expedite it. So in the 565 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:56,880 Speaker 10: end of the day and the facing of the fall, 566 00:28:56,960 --> 00:29:01,520 Speaker 10: we could see a handful of modern Republicans buck the 567 00:29:01,560 --> 00:29:04,960 Speaker 10: party and kind of passes through the House, defining the speaker, 568 00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:07,120 Speaker 10: that could be in for a world of hurt politically, 569 00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:10,920 Speaker 10: but it does set up a potential another option out there. 570 00:29:11,160 --> 00:29:13,120 Speaker 3: Well, okay, the men, you just got a little longer 571 00:29:13,120 --> 00:29:14,920 Speaker 3: with the help of Eric Watson. Thank you Eric for 572 00:29:14,960 --> 00:29:18,560 Speaker 3: being here. Bloomberg congressional reporter who's right in the middle 573 00:29:18,560 --> 00:29:21,000 Speaker 3: of it on Capitol Hill to the panel, Rick Davis 574 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:23,160 Speaker 3: and Jim Kessler with us here. What do you think 575 00:29:23,160 --> 00:29:26,840 Speaker 3: about the idea that's discharged position? Jim? Is that is 576 00:29:26,880 --> 00:29:29,120 Speaker 3: that kind of an outlier? Is that a real possibility? 577 00:29:30,720 --> 00:29:33,600 Speaker 8: It's an outlier and a possibility. It's like hitting the 578 00:29:33,720 --> 00:29:35,720 Speaker 8: three run homer in the bottom of the nine to 579 00:29:35,760 --> 00:29:38,520 Speaker 8: win it. It happens, It doesn't happen that often, but 580 00:29:38,600 --> 00:29:41,960 Speaker 8: I mean, it's another it's another piece that you can 581 00:29:42,000 --> 00:29:45,480 Speaker 8: put in place to try and you know, maybe extend 582 00:29:45,520 --> 00:29:47,280 Speaker 8: the negotiations a little bit longer. 583 00:29:48,280 --> 00:29:51,040 Speaker 3: Sounds more realistic. Rick that that this is done together 584 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:55,920 Speaker 3: but projected publicly as two separate issues, like Eric said, 585 00:29:55,920 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 3: two separate news releases, but the same deal. Is that 586 00:29:58,240 --> 00:29:59,160 Speaker 3: where you're going here to. 587 00:30:00,280 --> 00:30:02,960 Speaker 7: Yeah, it very well could be. I mean, in the past, 588 00:30:03,040 --> 00:30:06,800 Speaker 7: when cuts have been linked to the increase in the 589 00:30:06,840 --> 00:30:11,120 Speaker 7: debt ceiling. You know, it's all been a part of 590 00:30:11,160 --> 00:30:15,480 Speaker 7: a deal, right and and so there's a precedent for that. 591 00:30:15,600 --> 00:30:19,360 Speaker 7: The mechanics of it, whether it's a standalone bill that 592 00:30:19,600 --> 00:30:21,720 Speaker 7: separates the two things out or is all part of 593 00:30:21,720 --> 00:30:25,560 Speaker 7: one package, is just the art of doing the deal. 594 00:30:25,840 --> 00:30:29,720 Speaker 7: And it would if they were two separate things preserve 595 00:30:29,840 --> 00:30:33,760 Speaker 7: everybody's sensibilities that the Biden administration said they want to 596 00:30:33,760 --> 00:30:35,800 Speaker 7: clean debt ceiling, and they could claim they got one, 597 00:30:36,280 --> 00:30:37,080 Speaker 7: but it's a. 598 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:38,160 Speaker 6: Fool's Erran in that regard. 599 00:30:38,200 --> 00:30:41,120 Speaker 7: I mean, there will be a deal to cut spending 600 00:30:41,280 --> 00:30:44,440 Speaker 7: if it goes along those lines, and they'll just look 601 00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 7: silly to claim otherwise. But look, I think that right now, 602 00:30:48,280 --> 00:30:50,880 Speaker 7: because it's such a short period of time, all these 603 00:30:50,880 --> 00:30:53,480 Speaker 7: different mechanics are on the table, we don't know what 604 00:30:53,600 --> 00:30:56,200 Speaker 7: the final disposition is going to be. But the good 605 00:30:56,240 --> 00:30:58,120 Speaker 7: news is they're all going to sit down on the 606 00:30:58,240 --> 00:31:00,520 Speaker 7: ninth and we're going to finally have a ociation that 607 00:31:00,560 --> 00:31:03,520 Speaker 7: we've been actually talking about for six months. And so 608 00:31:04,520 --> 00:31:06,760 Speaker 7: I'd say that all the parties are going with the 609 00:31:06,800 --> 00:31:09,000 Speaker 7: idea of getting a deal, and so maybe a deal 610 00:31:09,040 --> 00:31:12,560 Speaker 7: won't take that long to actually come to fruition that 611 00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:13,000 Speaker 7: it'll be. 612 00:31:12,960 --> 00:31:15,920 Speaker 3: Quite a night in the White House driveway for Kevin McCarthy, Jim, 613 00:31:15,920 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 3: And god knows, he'll certainly tell reporters how it went 614 00:31:18,920 --> 00:31:20,920 Speaker 3: if things didn't go well. But you know, we're also 615 00:31:20,960 --> 00:31:23,880 Speaker 3: talking about this as a FED meeting gets underway and 616 00:31:23,960 --> 00:31:28,400 Speaker 3: we expect another interest rate hike. It looks like tomorrow, Jim, 617 00:31:28,440 --> 00:31:31,440 Speaker 3: I wonder how concerned you are about the economic headwinds 618 00:31:31,440 --> 00:31:34,280 Speaker 3: that are coming just as they try to figure out 619 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:35,840 Speaker 3: how to avoid the fiscal cliff. 620 00:31:37,600 --> 00:31:40,400 Speaker 8: Right, I mean, this is this is really paramount for 621 00:31:40,600 --> 00:31:43,040 Speaker 8: Biden because you know, this is this is one of 622 00:31:43,120 --> 00:31:47,280 Speaker 8: the pieces for his reelection as an economy that is strong. Look, 623 00:31:47,320 --> 00:31:51,640 Speaker 8: this feels like this is the last interest rate increase. 624 00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:56,600 Speaker 8: A lot of good signs in the economy, some moderating 625 00:31:56,640 --> 00:32:01,600 Speaker 8: of inflation. Clearly, we've sawt we've seen some shocks in 626 00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:06,200 Speaker 8: the regional banks. Secretary Yellen seems to think that the 627 00:32:06,240 --> 00:32:10,880 Speaker 8: banking system is strong. The Biden administration doesn't once self 628 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:15,280 Speaker 8: inflicted Washington wounds hurting the economy, and that would be 629 00:32:15,320 --> 00:32:16,440 Speaker 8: a debt ceiling breach. 630 00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:20,960 Speaker 3: No one's talking about a downgrade yet, Rick, and we're 631 00:32:21,000 --> 00:32:22,760 Speaker 3: two weeks away from when that would have happened in 632 00:32:22,840 --> 00:32:23,479 Speaker 3: twenty eleven. 633 00:32:24,880 --> 00:32:27,520 Speaker 7: Yeah, well, I mean two weeks away is a very 634 00:32:27,720 --> 00:32:30,240 Speaker 7: short period of time. And if this meeting doesn't go 635 00:32:30,320 --> 00:32:32,080 Speaker 7: well on the NINS, people are going to wondering why 636 00:32:32,080 --> 00:32:32,640 Speaker 7: did we stay? 637 00:32:32,800 --> 00:32:34,560 Speaker 6: Say, you know, why we delay that long? 638 00:32:35,440 --> 00:32:37,480 Speaker 7: But that is actually one of the drivers for getting 639 00:32:37,480 --> 00:32:40,880 Speaker 7: a deal cut is that it's not that you want 640 00:32:40,920 --> 00:32:42,560 Speaker 7: to hit the XT date, but you don't want to 641 00:32:42,560 --> 00:32:43,880 Speaker 7: get down graded in the process. 642 00:32:44,120 --> 00:32:47,160 Speaker 3: God knows it. Rick Davis and Jim Kessler our panel 643 00:32:47,280 --> 00:32:50,000 Speaker 3: with some final thoughts coming up next on the Fastest 644 00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:53,680 Speaker 3: Show in Politics. I'm Joe Matthew in Washington. This is Bloomberg. 645 00:32:54,840 --> 00:32:58,240 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Sound on podcast. Catch the 646 00:32:58,240 --> 00:33:02,400 Speaker 1: program live weekdays at one on Bloomberg Radio, the tune 647 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:04,200 Speaker 1: in alf, Bloomberg dot Com, and. 648 00:33:04,200 --> 00:33:05,560 Speaker 9: The Bloomberg Business App. 649 00:33:05,680 --> 00:33:08,520 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 650 00:33:08,560 --> 00:33:13,360 Speaker 1: flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty. 651 00:33:14,120 --> 00:33:16,760 Speaker 3: Trying to put yourself in a moment if you were 652 00:33:16,760 --> 00:33:20,400 Speaker 3: not there, or if too much time has passed since, 653 00:33:20,400 --> 00:33:22,120 Speaker 3: but I think most of us can still remember the 654 00:33:22,200 --> 00:33:26,400 Speaker 3: impact President Obama's addressed to the nation on the second 655 00:33:26,440 --> 00:33:28,920 Speaker 3: of May this day in twenty eleven. 656 00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:32,120 Speaker 11: Tonight, I can report to the American people and to 657 00:33:32,200 --> 00:33:35,560 Speaker 11: the world, but the United States has conducted an operation 658 00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:39,080 Speaker 11: that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaida. 659 00:33:39,240 --> 00:33:41,520 Speaker 3: He spoke at night from the Cross Hall at the 660 00:33:41,520 --> 00:33:46,000 Speaker 3: White House and recalled being briefed in August that bin 661 00:33:46,080 --> 00:33:48,280 Speaker 3: Laden was hiding in a compound, as he put it, 662 00:33:48,520 --> 00:33:52,880 Speaker 3: deep inside Pakistan. When the time came, he signed off 663 00:33:53,040 --> 00:33:53,719 Speaker 3: on the mission. 664 00:33:53,760 --> 00:33:56,280 Speaker 11: A small team of Americans carried out the operation with 665 00:33:56,480 --> 00:34:01,960 Speaker 11: extraordinary courage and capability. No one Americans were harmed. They 666 00:34:01,960 --> 00:34:06,800 Speaker 11: took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they 667 00:34:06,880 --> 00:34:10,320 Speaker 11: killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body. 668 00:34:11,920 --> 00:34:12,880 Speaker 6: For over two. 669 00:34:12,640 --> 00:34:16,000 Speaker 11: Decades, bin Laden has been al Qaeda's leader and symbol, 670 00:34:16,640 --> 00:34:19,400 Speaker 11: and it's continued to plot attacks against our country and 671 00:34:19,440 --> 00:34:23,040 Speaker 11: our friends and allies. The death of bin Laden marks 672 00:34:23,080 --> 00:34:26,120 Speaker 11: the most significant achievement to date in our nation's effort 673 00:34:26,160 --> 00:34:29,520 Speaker 11: to defeat al Qaida. Yet his death does not mark 674 00:34:29,560 --> 00:34:32,480 Speaker 11: the end of our effort. There's no doubt that al 675 00:34:32,520 --> 00:34:36,200 Speaker 11: Qaida will continue to pursue attacks against US. We must, 676 00:34:36,920 --> 00:34:40,120 Speaker 11: and we will remain vigilant at home and abroad. 677 00:34:40,200 --> 00:34:42,359 Speaker 3: The large group gathered outside the White House that night, 678 00:34:42,440 --> 00:34:44,400 Speaker 3: did sheer? I'm sure remember the photos of the video 679 00:34:44,560 --> 00:34:47,480 Speaker 3: be part of the moment when you don't forget. With 680 00:34:47,680 --> 00:34:50,720 Speaker 3: some final thoughts from our panel in our final moment 681 00:34:50,800 --> 00:34:53,880 Speaker 3: here with Rick Davis and Jim Kessler, Rick, does that 682 00:34:53,960 --> 00:34:56,400 Speaker 3: remain our most significant achievement in the war against terror? 683 00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:00,520 Speaker 7: Well, it's certainly a dramatic achievement. I mean, you could 684 00:35:00,640 --> 00:35:04,719 Speaker 7: argue that the defeat of ices in Syria is equal to, 685 00:35:04,760 --> 00:35:06,960 Speaker 7: if not greater than that, And it is a little 686 00:35:07,000 --> 00:35:11,800 Speaker 7: disappointing that you cannot miss a headline today without reading 687 00:35:11,840 --> 00:35:15,080 Speaker 7: that Al Qaeda continues to do battle as a terrorist 688 00:35:15,200 --> 00:35:19,040 Speaker 7: organization in Afghanistan where all this was begun. 689 00:35:19,160 --> 00:35:22,880 Speaker 6: So the war on terror is not over and they. 690 00:35:22,760 --> 00:35:27,120 Speaker 7: Continue to threaten people's lives, and I think we have 691 00:35:27,200 --> 00:35:28,279 Speaker 7: to be diligent as we. 692 00:35:28,160 --> 00:35:31,759 Speaker 3: Were then many thanks to our panel, Rick Davis and 693 00:35:31,880 --> 00:35:34,680 Speaker 3: Jim Castler. Jim will have more time as always when 694 00:35:34,719 --> 00:35:36,479 Speaker 3: you come back to join us, and I look forward 695 00:35:36,560 --> 00:35:39,480 Speaker 3: to it. I'm Joe Matthew in Washington. Kayley Lines is 696 00:35:39,520 --> 00:35:41,840 Speaker 3: on the way in next our two of sound On 697 00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:42,799 Speaker 3: starts right now. 698 00:35:43,920 --> 00:35:47,440 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Sound On podcast. Catch us 699 00:35:47,480 --> 00:35:50,640 Speaker 1: live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the 700 00:35:50,719 --> 00:35:53,799 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on 701 00:35:53,880 --> 00:35:56,000 Speaker 1: demand wherever you get your podcasts. 702 00:35:56,880 --> 00:35:59,360 Speaker 3: I have Joe, Matthew and Washington along with Kaylee Lines. 703 00:35:59,400 --> 00:36:01,239 Speaker 3: That means it's out or two of sound on. Kayley, 704 00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:03,560 Speaker 3: It's good to see you here. There was something to 705 00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:06,239 Speaker 3: watch you in action yesterday the letter arrived from the 706 00:36:06,280 --> 00:36:09,600 Speaker 3: Treasury Department and Kaylee Line springs. 707 00:36:09,120 --> 00:36:12,279 Speaker 12: To action I live for breaking news to the next day. 708 00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:14,000 Speaker 3: This is well, look, this is a big deal. My god, 709 00:36:14,239 --> 00:36:16,440 Speaker 3: Wall Street, Washington. Everyone's been waiting for this, and now 710 00:36:16,480 --> 00:36:19,200 Speaker 3: they say the first of June should be circled on 711 00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:19,880 Speaker 3: our calendars. 712 00:36:20,080 --> 00:36:23,520 Speaker 12: Yeah. Potentially. What the Treasury Secretary said was that she 713 00:36:23,640 --> 00:36:25,640 Speaker 12: does not have confidence that the US is going to 714 00:36:25,680 --> 00:36:28,040 Speaker 12: be able to meet all of its obligations as early 715 00:36:28,520 --> 00:36:32,480 Speaker 12: as early but as early as June first, which in 716 00:36:32,680 --> 00:36:35,239 Speaker 12: Washington time is what about a split second, Joe. That 717 00:36:35,280 --> 00:36:37,279 Speaker 12: does not leave a lot of time for Republicans and 718 00:36:37,320 --> 00:36:40,200 Speaker 12: Democrats to really get together on this and start to 719 00:36:40,239 --> 00:36:42,200 Speaker 12: try and make something real out of some form of 720 00:36:42,200 --> 00:36:45,160 Speaker 12: debt ceiling lift, because the clock is ticking, and yet 721 00:36:45,200 --> 00:36:46,920 Speaker 12: I'm not sure how much real progress we're going to 722 00:36:46,960 --> 00:36:49,440 Speaker 12: get until next Tuesday, when the President sits down with 723 00:36:49,480 --> 00:36:50,879 Speaker 12: congressional leaders at the White House. 724 00:36:50,920 --> 00:36:53,200 Speaker 3: I said, there may not be progressed that day either. 725 00:36:53,719 --> 00:36:55,799 Speaker 3: You know, weir enough. We talked about this with Rick 726 00:36:55,880 --> 00:36:58,520 Speaker 3: Davis and Jim Kessler last hour. They were both of 727 00:36:58,560 --> 00:37:01,560 Speaker 3: the mind that something is possible that they wouldn't probably 728 00:37:01,560 --> 00:37:05,200 Speaker 3: start negotiating this until a month out. Anyway. The problem 729 00:37:05,239 --> 00:37:07,359 Speaker 3: is the calendar in the House. They're just not going 730 00:37:07,400 --> 00:37:10,040 Speaker 3: to be in session for that many days. Then again, 731 00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:13,279 Speaker 3: this probably emerges in a deal that has nothing to 732 00:37:13,320 --> 00:37:15,839 Speaker 3: do with the House calendar, right. We'll have to see 733 00:37:15,880 --> 00:37:17,880 Speaker 3: how that plays out following the meeting next week. 734 00:37:17,960 --> 00:37:18,160 Speaker 6: Yeah. 735 00:37:18,200 --> 00:37:21,480 Speaker 12: Well, in theory also that you could have members called 736 00:37:21,480 --> 00:37:23,800 Speaker 12: back to the Chamber even when they technically aren't supposed 737 00:37:23,800 --> 00:37:25,680 Speaker 12: to be in session, we could probably see a couple 738 00:37:25,719 --> 00:37:28,840 Speaker 12: all nighters pulled here, Joe. But the calendar is definitely 739 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:32,760 Speaker 12: definitely a massive question, and it also raises the question 740 00:37:32,800 --> 00:37:36,640 Speaker 12: of how close to the brink are lawmakers willing to take. 741 00:37:36,680 --> 00:37:39,520 Speaker 12: This is the Biden administration willing to take this knowing 742 00:37:39,560 --> 00:37:42,120 Speaker 12: what happened in twenty eleven where it wasn't actually the 743 00:37:42,239 --> 00:37:44,839 Speaker 12: X state that mattered. It was weeks before that when 744 00:37:44,840 --> 00:37:46,080 Speaker 12: it's for US credit rating was down. 745 00:37:46,080 --> 00:37:46,200 Speaker 5: Here. 746 00:37:46,360 --> 00:37:49,200 Speaker 3: Rot Ramamurdi was not willing to answer that question when 747 00:37:49,239 --> 00:37:51,040 Speaker 3: we asked him last hour from the White House. You 748 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:52,799 Speaker 3: know what happens when we get two weeks out that 749 00:37:52,840 --> 00:37:56,759 Speaker 3: could be downgrade? Time does anything change? And it introduces 750 00:37:56,880 --> 00:38:00,680 Speaker 3: our conversation with the Congressman from California, Brad Sherman is 751 00:38:00,719 --> 00:38:02,800 Speaker 3: back with us today, the Democrat from California who is 752 00:38:02,880 --> 00:38:06,080 Speaker 3: ranking member House Capital Market Subcommittee and of course on 753 00:38:06,120 --> 00:38:08,640 Speaker 3: financial services, and Congressman, it's great to have you back 754 00:38:09,080 --> 00:38:13,640 Speaker 3: on Bloomberg next week's meeting. Do you actually expect something 755 00:38:13,680 --> 00:38:16,600 Speaker 3: to emerge from that meeting or is that more of 756 00:38:16,800 --> 00:38:20,320 Speaker 3: establishing positions. Once we get everyone in the same room. 757 00:38:20,640 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 5: That's the beginning of establishing positions. And frankly, this is 758 00:38:24,120 --> 00:38:28,799 Speaker 5: already hurting our economy, and we'll hurt the economy a 759 00:38:28,840 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 5: bit more every day. How do you attract capital from 760 00:38:32,080 --> 00:38:35,280 Speaker 5: around the world when you look like the Keystone Cops, 761 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:42,160 Speaker 5: but politically each side is going to have to show 762 00:38:42,360 --> 00:38:45,360 Speaker 5: its team that they were willing to go eyeball to 763 00:38:45,400 --> 00:38:52,759 Speaker 5: eyeball and fight hard, and that that tends to mean 764 00:38:53,719 --> 00:38:56,400 Speaker 5: we go toward the edge of the cliff, which is 765 00:38:56,760 --> 00:38:57,560 Speaker 5: bad for your health. 766 00:38:58,080 --> 00:39:01,160 Speaker 12: Well, Congressman, you say eyeball to eyeball, really underscoring the 767 00:39:01,200 --> 00:39:03,840 Speaker 12: idea that this is basically a staring contest and someone's 768 00:39:03,880 --> 00:39:05,759 Speaker 12: going to have to blink first. What do you think 769 00:39:05,800 --> 00:39:08,600 Speaker 12: the date should be that the Democratic Party would need 770 00:39:08,640 --> 00:39:10,680 Speaker 12: to blink? How close do you think you and your 771 00:39:10,680 --> 00:39:13,359 Speaker 12: colleagues and the leader of your party, President Biden, are 772 00:39:13,360 --> 00:39:15,680 Speaker 12: willing to take this to the edge of the cliff. 773 00:39:16,160 --> 00:39:18,680 Speaker 5: Well, keep in mind, you can always pass a five 774 00:39:18,800 --> 00:39:23,880 Speaker 5: day or a ten day suspension in the debt, so 775 00:39:23,960 --> 00:39:25,840 Speaker 5: you don't have to go over the cliff if you 776 00:39:25,880 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 5: don't want to. I know, you look at what the 777 00:39:30,680 --> 00:39:36,360 Speaker 5: Republicans are talking about, and they've got a few things 778 00:39:36,600 --> 00:39:40,440 Speaker 5: that relate to money that has already been appropriated that 779 00:39:40,480 --> 00:39:43,640 Speaker 5: hasn't been spent yet. But aside from that, all of 780 00:39:43,680 --> 00:39:48,080 Speaker 5: their focus is they want us to prevent them from 781 00:39:48,120 --> 00:39:53,479 Speaker 5: passing an appropriations bill on October one that they don't like. Well, 782 00:39:53,560 --> 00:39:55,000 Speaker 5: if they don't want to pass it. They don't have 783 00:39:55,040 --> 00:39:59,640 Speaker 5: to pass it's it's an absurd ransom note. 784 00:40:01,480 --> 00:40:04,120 Speaker 3: Well, so it sounds like a short term solution might 785 00:40:04,200 --> 00:40:06,400 Speaker 3: be smart to have handy here, Congressman, and maybe this 786 00:40:06,480 --> 00:40:09,239 Speaker 3: is figured out by September or something like that, But 787 00:40:09,280 --> 00:40:12,759 Speaker 3: of course it's still it's still a matter of timeline. 788 00:40:12,920 --> 00:40:15,640 Speaker 3: Speaker McCarthy wants to raise the debt limit until May 789 00:40:15,640 --> 00:40:19,760 Speaker 3: of twenty twenty four in his bill that was voted 790 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:22,880 Speaker 3: on last week. That's I'm assuming a non starter for 791 00:40:22,920 --> 00:40:24,839 Speaker 3: this White House, knowing we're smack dab in the middle 792 00:40:24,880 --> 00:40:27,200 Speaker 3: of a presidential election. So what would be appropriate. 793 00:40:28,239 --> 00:40:29,920 Speaker 5: I think you want to take it through the end 794 00:40:30,000 --> 00:40:35,560 Speaker 5: of the political cycle, till after the November elections. But 795 00:40:36,840 --> 00:40:41,080 Speaker 5: we'll see. If McCarthy feels that he needs to get 796 00:40:41,200 --> 00:40:45,320 Speaker 5: absolutely every Republican or all Republicans except for one percent 797 00:40:45,360 --> 00:40:47,920 Speaker 5: of them on board, then he's not going to get 798 00:40:47,920 --> 00:40:52,719 Speaker 5: Democrats on board. This has got to be a bipartisan proposal, 799 00:40:52,920 --> 00:40:55,760 Speaker 5: and he you know, McCarthy can't say he can't pass 800 00:40:55,800 --> 00:41:00,920 Speaker 5: something because anything he votes for that Biden likes will pass. 801 00:41:02,320 --> 00:41:05,480 Speaker 12: Well, we also understand, speaking of getting some Republicans on 802 00:41:05,560 --> 00:41:09,000 Speaker 12: board here, that the Democrats are looking at a fallback plan. 803 00:41:09,560 --> 00:41:12,239 Speaker 12: Your leader in the House of Kim Jeffries writing a 804 00:41:12,280 --> 00:41:14,560 Speaker 12: letter basically talking about the idea that they want to 805 00:41:14,600 --> 00:41:17,000 Speaker 12: set up this process to force a floor vote on 806 00:41:17,040 --> 00:41:20,280 Speaker 12: a placeholder bill that then could be amended to increase 807 00:41:20,360 --> 00:41:23,279 Speaker 12: the debt limit. Congressman, do you think that you can 808 00:41:23,320 --> 00:41:26,240 Speaker 12: get enough Republican votes to actually bring that to the floor. 809 00:41:26,800 --> 00:41:32,799 Speaker 5: No, but you know it's good to illustrate, just as 810 00:41:33,800 --> 00:41:38,440 Speaker 5: last week the Republicans passed their bill, which was symbolic 811 00:41:38,480 --> 00:41:44,080 Speaker 5: at best. Democrats have got to show that we have 812 00:41:44,200 --> 00:41:46,920 Speaker 5: a way forward if only Republicans would join us. So 813 00:41:46,960 --> 00:41:51,319 Speaker 5: then politically each Republican has to explain why they won't 814 00:41:51,400 --> 00:41:53,960 Speaker 5: join us. But let me assure you they're not going 815 00:41:54,000 --> 00:41:54,640 Speaker 5: to join us. 816 00:41:56,760 --> 00:41:59,680 Speaker 3: There well, no mincing words there not that you tend to. Congressman, 817 00:41:59,719 --> 00:42:01,279 Speaker 3: I want to ask you about what's going on in 818 00:42:01,280 --> 00:42:03,200 Speaker 3: the banking sector. I know you've had a close eye 819 00:42:03,200 --> 00:42:04,760 Speaker 3: on it, and I believe the last time we spoke 820 00:42:04,880 --> 00:42:09,160 Speaker 3: was shortly after the SVB and signature failures. We're seeing 821 00:42:09,200 --> 00:42:12,239 Speaker 3: Wall Street despite this forced buyout of First Republic and 822 00:42:12,280 --> 00:42:14,840 Speaker 3: you can weigh on way in on that if you like. 823 00:42:15,680 --> 00:42:18,880 Speaker 3: The markets are are worried, and it's hard for us, 824 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:22,800 Speaker 3: even with a Bloomberg terminal, to figure out exactly what's 825 00:42:22,880 --> 00:42:25,960 Speaker 3: driving these shares of regional banks lower today. I'm not 826 00:42:26,000 --> 00:42:28,160 Speaker 3: going to ask you about that. But when you step 827 00:42:28,200 --> 00:42:32,040 Speaker 3: back and look at this situation, Congressman, do you believe 828 00:42:32,080 --> 00:42:34,919 Speaker 3: that there could be further contagion or have we seen 829 00:42:34,960 --> 00:42:35,480 Speaker 3: the worst of this? 830 00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:42,880 Speaker 5: Well, it's not like anybody wants to publish the analysis 831 00:42:43,239 --> 00:42:51,040 Speaker 5: of what interest rate losses banks have already incurred. When 832 00:42:52,640 --> 00:42:55,400 Speaker 5: you can look at the at the balance sheet and 833 00:42:55,440 --> 00:42:59,200 Speaker 5: see what they're unrealized, Well, it's not on the balance sheet. 834 00:42:59,200 --> 00:43:01,160 Speaker 5: It's kind of like off to the sidle a balance sheet, 835 00:43:01,160 --> 00:43:04,560 Speaker 5: But the financial statements will tell you what unrealized losses 836 00:43:04,640 --> 00:43:08,000 Speaker 5: each bank has on their marketable securities. But then you 837 00:43:08,080 --> 00:43:12,040 Speaker 5: get to the banks that have mortgages in their portfolio. 838 00:43:12,960 --> 00:43:16,000 Speaker 5: In the case of a First Republic a one percent 839 00:43:16,040 --> 00:43:20,480 Speaker 5: mortgage to Zuckerberg, I mean zero credit risk, but a 840 00:43:20,560 --> 00:43:22,959 Speaker 5: whole lot of interest rate risk on a one percent loan, 841 00:43:23,239 --> 00:43:29,279 Speaker 5: thirty year loan. I think that the regulators have done 842 00:43:29,320 --> 00:43:33,920 Speaker 5: a terrible job of looking at interest rate risk, and 843 00:43:34,400 --> 00:43:36,839 Speaker 5: to my knowledge, they haven't forced any bank to buy 844 00:43:37,000 --> 00:43:41,359 Speaker 5: interest rate change insurance, which is available in a number 845 00:43:41,400 --> 00:43:43,279 Speaker 5: of different forms. But of course if you buy it, 846 00:43:43,320 --> 00:43:46,640 Speaker 5: that means your profits go down. I would suspect that 847 00:43:48,560 --> 00:43:51,799 Speaker 5: regularly we're going to force these banks to be more 848 00:43:51,960 --> 00:43:57,600 Speaker 5: careful to look at interest rate risk, and that will 849 00:43:58,000 --> 00:43:59,200 Speaker 5: cut into their profits. 850 00:44:00,080 --> 00:44:02,960 Speaker 12: Well, as we talk about the interest rate risk they're facing, 851 00:44:03,040 --> 00:44:07,160 Speaker 12: that's not something that goes away in the immediate near term. 852 00:44:07,200 --> 00:44:09,880 Speaker 12: And yet what we consistently hear from the regulators themselves, 853 00:44:09,920 --> 00:44:13,759 Speaker 12: from the Treasury Department, from the President himself, others in 854 00:44:13,800 --> 00:44:18,320 Speaker 12: the administration is that the banking system is sound and resilient. 855 00:44:18,560 --> 00:44:20,680 Speaker 12: Is it not as sound as resilient as they are 856 00:44:20,680 --> 00:44:23,040 Speaker 12: trying to present? Congressman, I mean, what is your true 857 00:44:23,080 --> 00:44:24,040 Speaker 12: read on the situation. 858 00:44:24,800 --> 00:44:27,400 Speaker 5: Well, it's part of the government. I'm supposed to go 859 00:44:27,440 --> 00:44:30,000 Speaker 5: on radio and tell you that all the banks are. 860 00:44:29,880 --> 00:44:33,080 Speaker 12: Sound, But your honest opinion. 861 00:44:34,800 --> 00:44:40,440 Speaker 5: We don't know until we get interest rate risk analysis, 862 00:44:40,440 --> 00:44:44,560 Speaker 5: both on marketable securities held for sale, marketable securities held 863 00:44:44,640 --> 00:44:49,320 Speaker 5: the design to be held for maturity, and on portfolios. 864 00:44:50,840 --> 00:44:55,480 Speaker 5: It's as if the banks and the regulators have deliberately 865 00:44:57,880 --> 00:45:01,880 Speaker 5: blinded themselves to that risk and it's particularly absurd for 866 00:45:01,960 --> 00:45:04,839 Speaker 5: the FED the blind itself to the possibility and interest 867 00:45:04,920 --> 00:45:08,320 Speaker 5: rates would go up because they're in charge of pushing 868 00:45:08,360 --> 00:45:09,200 Speaker 5: the interest rates up. 869 00:45:10,400 --> 00:45:12,680 Speaker 12: Well, on that note, Congressman, I'm glad you brought that 870 00:45:12,800 --> 00:45:15,719 Speaker 12: up because several of your Democratic colleagues, including the likes 871 00:45:15,719 --> 00:45:18,759 Speaker 12: of Senators Warren and Sanders, your colleagues in the House 872 00:45:18,800 --> 00:45:21,200 Speaker 12: like Brennan Boyle and Jerry Nadler, all signed a letter 873 00:45:21,239 --> 00:45:24,480 Speaker 12: today asking the Fed to posits rate hikes to quote 874 00:45:24,960 --> 00:45:29,759 Speaker 12: avoid engineering a recession that destroys jobs and crushes small businesses. Congressman, 875 00:45:29,760 --> 00:45:31,760 Speaker 12: what do you think the Fed should decide to do tomorrow. 876 00:45:33,560 --> 00:45:36,040 Speaker 5: They've got to try to thread the needle. And you 877 00:45:36,120 --> 00:45:40,520 Speaker 5: can't just say, don't cause a recession. You also have 878 00:45:40,600 --> 00:45:45,919 Speaker 5: to say battle inflation. And that's a that's a very 879 00:45:45,960 --> 00:45:52,239 Speaker 5: difficult needle to thread. I you know, I already think 880 00:45:52,360 --> 00:45:55,839 Speaker 5: that you know, if you didn't care about inflation, then 881 00:45:57,160 --> 00:45:59,600 Speaker 5: you'd be able to create an even greater labor shortage 882 00:45:59,600 --> 00:46:03,120 Speaker 5: in the cunt and that would help drive and wages up, 883 00:46:03,120 --> 00:46:05,480 Speaker 5: which would be a good thing. But you do have 884 00:46:05,520 --> 00:46:06,440 Speaker 5: to worry about inflation. 885 00:46:07,920 --> 00:46:10,040 Speaker 3: Makes you wonder about the dual mandate. At some point. 886 00:46:10,080 --> 00:46:12,839 Speaker 3: But to get back to Kayley's question, if you're the FED, 887 00:46:12,840 --> 00:46:15,080 Speaker 3: do you give us a couple of months the congressman 888 00:46:15,200 --> 00:46:19,120 Speaker 3: to gauge the lagging impact of the hikes already made. 889 00:46:20,960 --> 00:46:23,719 Speaker 5: I think you do what everyone expects them to do 890 00:46:24,719 --> 00:46:27,800 Speaker 5: a you know, for for several reasons, if everybody expects 891 00:46:27,800 --> 00:46:29,839 Speaker 5: them to do it, because that seems like the reasonable thing. 892 00:46:30,480 --> 00:46:34,560 Speaker 5: And it's the reasonable thing because if you disappoint or 893 00:46:34,600 --> 00:46:38,520 Speaker 5: surprise people, that hurts the economy just by itself. So 894 00:46:38,560 --> 00:46:43,000 Speaker 5: I think they'll do what's expected. We'll get the quarter point, 895 00:46:43,080 --> 00:46:48,799 Speaker 5: we'll get the something about being data dependent. Maybe the 896 00:46:48,840 --> 00:46:51,120 Speaker 5: word pause will be in there somewhere well. 897 00:46:51,120 --> 00:46:52,920 Speaker 12: And you know that the Chairman's going to get a 898 00:46:53,000 --> 00:46:55,160 Speaker 12: question in the press conference about the debt ceiling, and 899 00:46:55,200 --> 00:46:58,200 Speaker 12: he's going to return with something akin to we don't 900 00:46:58,239 --> 00:47:01,319 Speaker 12: deal with fiscal policy, but Congress should raise the debt 901 00:47:01,360 --> 00:47:05,640 Speaker 12: ceiling because it could have dire economic consequences. Congressman, we 902 00:47:05,719 --> 00:47:07,799 Speaker 12: spoke a few weeks ago, and we were talking about 903 00:47:07,800 --> 00:47:10,839 Speaker 12: the debt limits still at that point, and you told 904 00:47:10,840 --> 00:47:14,160 Speaker 12: me that you think the market may be underpricing Congress's 905 00:47:14,200 --> 00:47:17,239 Speaker 12: ability to mess this up. So, given everything that we 906 00:47:17,280 --> 00:47:20,239 Speaker 12: have just discussed the federal reserve hiking into this, the 907 00:47:20,239 --> 00:47:23,960 Speaker 12: ongoing questions around the stability of the banking system, the 908 00:47:24,040 --> 00:47:26,560 Speaker 12: looming X state. What would your message to the financial 909 00:47:26,640 --> 00:47:27,959 Speaker 12: markets be right now? 910 00:47:28,640 --> 00:47:32,959 Speaker 5: Well, I don't think you should just at the downside. 911 00:47:33,200 --> 00:47:36,200 Speaker 5: You look at the creativity of this economy, how many 912 00:47:36,280 --> 00:47:40,000 Speaker 5: people are working hard, the new technology that's being developed, 913 00:47:40,080 --> 00:47:43,200 Speaker 5: all the good things that are happening. And then you 914 00:47:43,280 --> 00:47:48,520 Speaker 5: have to balance that against a government that is a 915 00:47:48,520 --> 00:47:51,480 Speaker 5: month or two away from a default, and a banking 916 00:47:51,520 --> 00:47:54,879 Speaker 5: system where the regulators haven't looked at interest rate risk. 917 00:47:56,600 --> 00:47:59,640 Speaker 5: My guess is that the market does that. I'm here 918 00:47:59,680 --> 00:48:03,320 Speaker 5: working in Washington. I just say, don't underestimate the ability 919 00:48:03,320 --> 00:48:07,480 Speaker 5: of the political system to screw things up. But then again, 920 00:48:07,680 --> 00:48:10,480 Speaker 5: you've got technology people listening to this that would say, 921 00:48:10,719 --> 00:48:14,560 Speaker 5: don't underestimate the ability of technology to drive things forward. 922 00:48:16,160 --> 00:48:18,799 Speaker 3: We've been talking now for almost I guess about ten 923 00:48:18,840 --> 00:48:24,480 Speaker 3: minutes Congress when we haven't used the word crypto, and 924 00:48:24,560 --> 00:48:27,600 Speaker 3: I can't have you on without doing that. Of course, 925 00:48:27,680 --> 00:48:30,640 Speaker 3: your favorite topic. I just wonder watching people pile into 926 00:48:30,680 --> 00:48:34,760 Speaker 3: crypto as a safe haven here, a flight to quality. 927 00:48:34,800 --> 00:48:37,959 Speaker 3: This is exactly what you did not want to see, 928 00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:38,319 Speaker 3: isn't it. 929 00:48:39,400 --> 00:48:44,399 Speaker 5: I don't think it's a flight to quality. You're you know, 930 00:48:44,600 --> 00:48:48,200 Speaker 5: it's it's a scandal a month, A multi billion dollar 931 00:48:48,320 --> 00:48:55,799 Speaker 5: heist comes to light every couple of months, and it's 932 00:48:55,880 --> 00:49:00,440 Speaker 5: a highly speculative wager. It's not an asset and sense 933 00:49:00,480 --> 00:49:02,440 Speaker 5: that you know, if you own a part of a company, 934 00:49:02,480 --> 00:49:10,560 Speaker 5: that company has a business, that company makes something. Crypto's 935 00:49:09,200 --> 00:49:16,520 Speaker 5: a share in a hope that that particular asset will 936 00:49:16,560 --> 00:49:19,920 Speaker 5: become valuable. And of course you've got thousands of different 937 00:49:20,440 --> 00:49:24,920 Speaker 5: coins out there, even if anybody in crypto would say 938 00:49:24,920 --> 00:49:27,840 Speaker 5: the vast majority of those coins will be worthless in 939 00:49:27,880 --> 00:49:33,480 Speaker 5: a couple of decades, and in a way it's self mocking. 940 00:49:33,719 --> 00:49:37,440 Speaker 5: I mean, why is bitcoin more valuable than ethereum? I 941 00:49:37,480 --> 00:49:37,839 Speaker 5: don't know. 942 00:49:40,200 --> 00:49:42,920 Speaker 3: I'm sitting here with the co anchor of the Crypto 943 00:49:44,280 --> 00:49:44,839 Speaker 3: Take It Home. 944 00:49:45,600 --> 00:49:49,040 Speaker 12: Congressman Sherman, please come on the Crypto Show in the future. 945 00:49:49,080 --> 00:49:51,160 Speaker 12: It's Tuesdays at one pm here on Bloomberg. I would 946 00:49:51,160 --> 00:49:54,000 Speaker 12: love to have this conversation with you on that. But 947 00:49:54,040 --> 00:49:56,120 Speaker 12: thank you so much for joining us. That is Congressman 948 00:49:56,160 --> 00:49:58,839 Speaker 12: Brad Sherman, the Democrat from California. 949 00:49:58,920 --> 00:50:01,120 Speaker 3: I could be like a paper view thing on the terminal. 950 00:50:01,239 --> 00:50:03,920 Speaker 3: Oh yeah, you and Congressman Sherman crypto. 951 00:50:04,200 --> 00:50:05,560 Speaker 12: Yeah, people would eat it up. 952 00:50:05,600 --> 00:50:07,319 Speaker 3: I saddle Matt Miller hears about this. 953 00:50:07,480 --> 00:50:08,640 Speaker 12: You always need a critical eye. 954 00:50:08,719 --> 00:50:12,000 Speaker 3: Joe, that's right, with Kaylee Lines. I'm Joe Matthew. This 955 00:50:12,160 --> 00:50:12,800 Speaker 3: is Bloomberg. 956 00:50:14,000 --> 00:50:17,360 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Sound on podcast. Catch the 957 00:50:17,400 --> 00:50:21,279 Speaker 1: program live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the 958 00:50:21,320 --> 00:50:23,520 Speaker 1: tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com. 959 00:50:23,200 --> 00:50:24,680 Speaker 9: And the Bloomberg Business App. 960 00:50:24,800 --> 00:50:27,640 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 961 00:50:27,680 --> 00:50:32,160 Speaker 1: flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 962 00:50:32,880 --> 00:50:35,879 Speaker 3: Well. Wall Street's worried about something here, just look at 963 00:50:35,920 --> 00:50:38,759 Speaker 3: the regional banks. I'm Joe Matthew with Kaylee Lines in 964 00:50:38,880 --> 00:50:44,120 Speaker 3: Washington and Kayley. This just after the first republic forced acquisition. 965 00:50:44,200 --> 00:50:46,600 Speaker 3: I guess we'll call it that. Some call it a bailout. 966 00:50:46,640 --> 00:50:49,080 Speaker 3: I'm not going near any of this stuff. But there 967 00:50:49,120 --> 00:50:52,200 Speaker 3: was a thought when we came into the week as 968 00:50:52,239 --> 00:50:55,240 Speaker 3: the administration rolled out details here, the Treasury, the FDIC 969 00:50:55,400 --> 00:50:56,960 Speaker 3: did their work over the weekend, that we were at 970 00:50:56,960 --> 00:50:58,840 Speaker 3: a better moment that things were better, We were feeling 971 00:50:58,880 --> 00:51:02,040 Speaker 3: better about things that First Republic may have in the 972 00:51:02,120 --> 00:51:04,880 Speaker 3: last But then you look at the markets today and 973 00:51:04,920 --> 00:51:06,480 Speaker 3: obviously investors think otherwise. 974 00:51:06,680 --> 00:51:09,799 Speaker 12: Yeah, obviously we've now seen a fourth bank failure in 975 00:51:09,840 --> 00:51:13,880 Speaker 12: the span of just two months less than and yet 976 00:51:14,000 --> 00:51:16,839 Speaker 12: there seems to be some concern out there that there 977 00:51:16,920 --> 00:51:20,279 Speaker 12: could potentially be more failures to come, or at least 978 00:51:20,280 --> 00:51:23,439 Speaker 12: some concern about the stability of regional banks, because looking 979 00:51:23,480 --> 00:51:26,240 Speaker 12: at the price action today, Joe Frankly, it's just ugly. 980 00:51:26,320 --> 00:51:28,840 Speaker 12: The regional banks overall are down six and a half percent, 981 00:51:28,880 --> 00:51:30,880 Speaker 12: which is not great. But you look at some of 982 00:51:30,880 --> 00:51:35,120 Speaker 12: the individual names, Pack West down twenty five percent on 983 00:51:35,200 --> 00:51:38,719 Speaker 12: the day, Western Alliance down about eighteen percent. So it 984 00:51:38,760 --> 00:51:40,719 Speaker 12: doesn't seem like the market thinks it's all quiet on 985 00:51:40,760 --> 00:51:43,239 Speaker 12: the Western front here. They're still worried about another. 986 00:51:43,680 --> 00:51:47,040 Speaker 3: Headlines about these banks, specifically that would cause someone to 987 00:51:47,120 --> 00:51:48,319 Speaker 3: dump shares, right, So. 988 00:51:48,239 --> 00:51:51,719 Speaker 12: There's no headlines about any concerns with them necessarily, but 989 00:51:51,760 --> 00:51:56,920 Speaker 12: we're also not getting headlines about progress on the stability front. 990 00:51:56,920 --> 00:51:59,319 Speaker 12: The idea that the FDI see yesterday put forward these 991 00:51:59,360 --> 00:52:03,719 Speaker 12: proposals for you know, better safeguarding wants to talk about it, 992 00:52:04,200 --> 00:52:07,439 Speaker 12: and as we talked about yesterday, that's something that needs 993 00:52:07,440 --> 00:52:09,680 Speaker 12: congressional buy in. You don't hear Congress making a lot 994 00:52:09,680 --> 00:52:12,160 Speaker 12: of noise about this at this point, and so perhaps 995 00:52:12,760 --> 00:52:15,640 Speaker 12: that is feeding into this today that there isn't necessarily 996 00:52:16,200 --> 00:52:17,239 Speaker 12: moves forward on that for. 997 00:52:17,280 --> 00:52:19,800 Speaker 3: Us, as Congressman Brad Sherman just now calls for banks 998 00:52:19,840 --> 00:52:24,560 Speaker 3: to start buying insurance interest rate insurance. Something needs, something 999 00:52:24,560 --> 00:52:26,239 Speaker 3: else needs to happen here, and that's why we put 1000 00:52:26,239 --> 00:52:29,000 Speaker 3: together a special panel that you're only going to hear 1001 00:52:29,040 --> 00:52:32,280 Speaker 3: on Bloomberg. Edward Harrison is with us in Washington, Bloomberg 1002 00:52:32,320 --> 00:52:35,480 Speaker 3: News Senior Markets editor, and in New York Herman Chan 1003 00:52:35,560 --> 00:52:39,600 Speaker 3: Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US Regional Banks Analysts. I think we're 1004 00:52:39,640 --> 00:52:42,359 Speaker 3: about to learn something here, Killy, so welcome everyone. It's 1005 00:52:42,440 --> 00:52:45,280 Speaker 3: great to see you, and ed welcome back. I wonder 1006 00:52:45,320 --> 00:52:47,440 Speaker 3: your thoughts on this. You're not hearing something we aren't. 1007 00:52:47,640 --> 00:52:51,200 Speaker 3: Are you for investors to have such a negative reaction 1008 00:52:51,360 --> 00:52:52,359 Speaker 3: out of the pocket. 1009 00:52:52,080 --> 00:52:55,560 Speaker 13: Today, Yeah, Joe, I think that's exactly right. I haven't 1010 00:52:55,560 --> 00:53:01,120 Speaker 13: heard anything about specific banks, and most of what you 1011 00:53:01,160 --> 00:53:04,839 Speaker 13: would expect would be positive as a result of you know, 1012 00:53:05,200 --> 00:53:09,560 Speaker 13: taking first republic as a impetus for problems off the table. 1013 00:53:09,960 --> 00:53:14,759 Speaker 13: So my general belief is that what we're seeing is 1014 00:53:14,880 --> 00:53:20,640 Speaker 13: people who have specific worries about banks doubling down on 1015 00:53:20,680 --> 00:53:26,360 Speaker 13: their positions and that creating this panic. 1016 00:53:26,400 --> 00:53:29,760 Speaker 12: If you will, well and remember what we saw with SVB, 1017 00:53:29,920 --> 00:53:33,040 Speaker 12: for example, it was market panic that really became a 1018 00:53:33,160 --> 00:53:37,320 Speaker 12: driver ultimately in its failure. So herman on the subject 1019 00:53:37,360 --> 00:53:39,840 Speaker 12: of failures, should we be worried about pac West or 1020 00:53:39,880 --> 00:53:43,600 Speaker 12: Western Alliance? I mean, could we see more failures added 1021 00:53:43,640 --> 00:53:45,640 Speaker 12: to the list, or is this kind of market concerned 1022 00:53:45,760 --> 00:53:47,200 Speaker 12: not really warranted here? 1023 00:53:48,160 --> 00:53:51,360 Speaker 14: I would go on the ladder front with markets concerned 1024 00:53:51,440 --> 00:53:54,800 Speaker 14: not really warranted at this juncture. If the most recent 1025 00:53:55,000 --> 00:53:57,640 Speaker 14: data from these two banks came out just a couple 1026 00:53:57,640 --> 00:54:00,759 Speaker 14: of weeks ago when they reported first quarter earnings, and 1027 00:54:00,840 --> 00:54:04,040 Speaker 14: they both gave really credible pass forward, I would take 1028 00:54:04,040 --> 00:54:06,640 Speaker 14: a step back and say that both Western Alliance and 1029 00:54:06,680 --> 00:54:09,839 Speaker 14: PacWest have been thrown in the bunch over the past 1030 00:54:09,880 --> 00:54:14,719 Speaker 14: month or so in terms of banks that have tech exposure, 1031 00:54:14,960 --> 00:54:19,720 Speaker 14: to exposure to tech clients and venture capital deposits. 1032 00:54:19,680 --> 00:54:21,439 Speaker 12: Guilty by association, kind of. 1033 00:54:21,400 --> 00:54:25,240 Speaker 14: Right, guilty by association. They're tendentially related to what happened 1034 00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:29,520 Speaker 14: with SVB, but their tech deposits are a much smaller 1035 00:54:30,000 --> 00:54:34,040 Speaker 14: subset of their deposit base, whereas for SVB was the 1036 00:54:34,200 --> 00:54:37,760 Speaker 14: entirety of their business and their entirety of the business 1037 00:54:37,760 --> 00:54:41,960 Speaker 14: model that they operated in. So it's an issue that 1038 00:54:42,280 --> 00:54:44,640 Speaker 14: where they've saw some of decline in deposits in the 1039 00:54:44,719 --> 00:54:50,880 Speaker 14: first quarter, but they also mentioned that the capital ratios 1040 00:54:50,920 --> 00:54:54,359 Speaker 14: would be improving, they talked about selling assets, they talked 1041 00:54:54,360 --> 00:54:58,239 Speaker 14: about seeing deposits come back in April. So from a 1042 00:54:58,239 --> 00:55:01,480 Speaker 14: fundamental standpoint, things but the most recent data that we 1043 00:55:01,520 --> 00:55:05,319 Speaker 14: know of have pointed to stability and improvement. But the 1044 00:55:05,360 --> 00:55:06,760 Speaker 14: market's taking a different turn. 1045 00:55:06,920 --> 00:55:10,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, ed, with all the talk of consolidation yesterday, you 1046 00:55:10,880 --> 00:55:13,319 Speaker 3: would have started thinking that, you know, maybe investors start 1047 00:55:13,360 --> 00:55:16,600 Speaker 3: identifying potential takeover targets, that that could send some shares 1048 00:55:16,640 --> 00:55:17,680 Speaker 3: of these regionals higher. 1049 00:55:17,840 --> 00:55:20,160 Speaker 13: Quite the opposite, though, Yeah, you would think that that 1050 00:55:20,200 --> 00:55:24,240 Speaker 13: would be the case, especially with the yields going down 1051 00:55:24,440 --> 00:55:28,120 Speaker 13: much more, because really the interesting bit is is that 1052 00:55:28,880 --> 00:55:31,799 Speaker 13: stocks and bonds are going in the opposite direction, and 1053 00:55:32,640 --> 00:55:35,760 Speaker 13: the fact that bonds are actually increasing, you know, yields 1054 00:55:36,000 --> 00:55:40,400 Speaker 13: coming down should suggest that these banks look better than 1055 00:55:40,440 --> 00:55:43,520 Speaker 13: they did before because so called marked to market losses, 1056 00:55:43,600 --> 00:55:46,520 Speaker 13: especially on securities, are going to be less, and the 1057 00:55:46,600 --> 00:55:49,560 Speaker 13: same would be true for their loan books, so that 1058 00:55:49,600 --> 00:55:53,680 Speaker 13: would make merging a much more viable option. One of 1059 00:55:53,719 --> 00:55:56,879 Speaker 13: the reasons that First Republic went under was because their 1060 00:55:56,920 --> 00:55:59,239 Speaker 13: marked market losses were so great that it made it 1061 00:55:59,280 --> 00:56:03,000 Speaker 13: onerous for any other organization to take them over. And 1062 00:56:03,040 --> 00:56:04,640 Speaker 13: that's less of a problem now today. 1063 00:56:05,160 --> 00:56:07,759 Speaker 12: But on the subject of taking over Herman, we have 1064 00:56:07,840 --> 00:56:09,719 Speaker 12: to think about what bank ultimately did that, and it 1065 00:56:09,760 --> 00:56:13,080 Speaker 12: was JP Morgan. A bank that had already been deemed 1066 00:56:13,120 --> 00:56:16,680 Speaker 12: too big to fail has gotten even bigger. Does this 1067 00:56:16,800 --> 00:56:19,279 Speaker 12: not just reinforce this narrative that the too big to 1068 00:56:19,320 --> 00:56:22,120 Speaker 12: fail banks are the only safe ones. I mean, I wonder, 1069 00:56:22,160 --> 00:56:25,760 Speaker 12: even though First Republic is now a resolved issue in theory, 1070 00:56:25,800 --> 00:56:28,279 Speaker 12: could it still exacerbate some of that deposit flight we 1071 00:56:28,280 --> 00:56:30,000 Speaker 12: were seeing kind of reignite that. 1072 00:56:30,920 --> 00:56:34,560 Speaker 14: There are a number of regional banks that stand ready 1073 00:56:34,640 --> 00:56:39,600 Speaker 14: to absorb any potential failed banks. We've heard through bloom 1074 00:56:39,640 --> 00:56:41,840 Speaker 14: the Great Bloomberg reporting over the past couple of days 1075 00:56:41,840 --> 00:56:48,760 Speaker 14: of banks like PNC, of Citizens fifth Third that lobbed 1076 00:56:48,840 --> 00:56:54,000 Speaker 14: and potential bids for First Republic, and these banks from 1077 00:56:54,000 --> 00:56:58,400 Speaker 14: a relative standpoint, their stocks are holding much stronger today 1078 00:56:58,520 --> 00:57:02,880 Speaker 14: versus the broader regional bank space. You point to banks 1079 00:57:02,960 --> 00:57:05,840 Speaker 14: historically that I have strong credit quality, like M and T, 1080 00:57:06,239 --> 00:57:09,879 Speaker 14: like First Citizens that recently bought the SBB assets and deposits. 1081 00:57:09,880 --> 00:57:12,760 Speaker 14: So there are a number of regionals that stand ready 1082 00:57:12,840 --> 00:57:18,200 Speaker 14: to be potential to potentially be bigger than they would 1083 00:57:18,280 --> 00:57:21,680 Speaker 14: be without a banking crisis that we potentially could be 1084 00:57:21,680 --> 00:57:22,080 Speaker 14: in today. 1085 00:57:22,240 --> 00:57:25,560 Speaker 3: Hermann, Does Wall Street want to see something else come 1086 00:57:25,600 --> 00:57:27,840 Speaker 3: out of Washington see and rule change at the fd 1087 00:57:27,960 --> 00:57:33,520 Speaker 3: I see see legislation that helps to shore up regulations here? 1088 00:57:33,840 --> 00:57:36,120 Speaker 3: Or does Wall Street still have an allergy to all 1089 00:57:36,160 --> 00:57:38,840 Speaker 3: of this what is preferred when you talk to traders. 1090 00:57:38,680 --> 00:57:41,360 Speaker 14: What we're hearing is that there needs to be a 1091 00:57:41,440 --> 00:57:45,760 Speaker 14: solution that comes down from either regulators or the government. 1092 00:57:46,520 --> 00:57:52,640 Speaker 14: These are the resolutions of SBB, of signature of First Republic. 1093 00:57:53,400 --> 00:57:57,000 Speaker 14: While great that the system is working that larger, more 1094 00:57:57,000 --> 00:58:02,040 Speaker 14: healthier banks absorb these failed institutions, what we really need, 1095 00:58:02,080 --> 00:58:05,800 Speaker 14: it seems like, is a more holistic solution to a 1096 00:58:05,880 --> 00:58:09,200 Speaker 14: lack of confidence within region banks today and what that 1097 00:58:09,240 --> 00:58:14,160 Speaker 14: potentially could be. That's something that we're mullying maybe a 1098 00:58:14,280 --> 00:58:16,880 Speaker 14: short term guarantee of deposits, which some of the Rejon 1099 00:58:16,960 --> 00:58:20,520 Speaker 14: banks have asked for a month ago when SBB was 1100 00:58:20,520 --> 00:58:24,479 Speaker 14: in the news. Something needs to happen, and we need 1101 00:58:24,560 --> 00:58:29,560 Speaker 14: a more holistic response from other folks that have the 1102 00:58:29,640 --> 00:58:33,280 Speaker 14: power to make this crisis of confidence be relieved. 1103 00:58:33,800 --> 00:58:36,920 Speaker 12: Well, speaking of the folks that have the power on crises, 1104 00:58:37,320 --> 00:58:39,720 Speaker 12: let's also talk about the debt ceiling, because we also 1105 00:58:39,880 --> 00:58:43,000 Speaker 12: in theory need Congress to come together on that issue. 1106 00:58:43,080 --> 00:58:44,880 Speaker 12: What are you seeing in the market today now that 1107 00:58:44,960 --> 00:58:46,880 Speaker 12: we do have that firmer idea of the X state 1108 00:58:46,880 --> 00:58:48,200 Speaker 12: from Treasury Secretary Ellen. 1109 00:58:48,760 --> 00:58:49,520 Speaker 9: You know, I. 1110 00:58:49,440 --> 00:58:53,480 Speaker 13: Think that what we're seeing is a repeat of what 1111 00:58:53,520 --> 00:58:56,720 Speaker 13: we saw twelve years ago, which is that there's a 1112 00:58:56,760 --> 00:59:01,800 Speaker 13: bid for safe assets like treasury. It's kind of perverse 1113 00:59:01,840 --> 00:59:04,480 Speaker 13: in the sense that you know, you could defall in 1114 00:59:04,520 --> 00:59:08,760 Speaker 13: the exact same instruments financial instruments, but those are seeing 1115 00:59:08,760 --> 00:59:12,600 Speaker 13: a bid to what we saw literally a month before 1116 00:59:13,480 --> 00:59:17,120 Speaker 13: the so called X date back then was a massive 1117 00:59:18,160 --> 00:59:22,360 Speaker 13: flight to quality of flight to treasuries and yields went 1118 00:59:22,400 --> 00:59:24,840 Speaker 13: way down. In the context of everything that we've just 1119 00:59:24,880 --> 00:59:28,040 Speaker 13: been talking about, that's very positive for the banking system, 1120 00:59:28,080 --> 00:59:32,720 Speaker 13: because obviously then those underwater assets won't be as problematic. 1121 00:59:33,520 --> 00:59:35,520 Speaker 13: We have a FED meeting tomorrow, so it'll be. 1122 00:59:35,480 --> 00:59:37,640 Speaker 12: Interesting to see, and they're expected to hike again. 1123 00:59:38,480 --> 00:59:40,920 Speaker 13: Given the fact that they're hiking one more time and 1124 00:59:40,960 --> 00:59:44,520 Speaker 13: who knows, maybe even two more times, what they have 1125 00:59:44,600 --> 00:59:47,120 Speaker 13: to say about the banking crisis, I'm sure that they'll 1126 00:59:47,160 --> 00:59:48,120 Speaker 13: say that this isn't. 1127 00:59:47,920 --> 00:59:49,720 Speaker 12: A crisis Sound and resilient. 1128 00:59:49,840 --> 00:59:53,480 Speaker 13: It was sound and resilient, But you do have to wonder. 1129 00:59:53,560 --> 00:59:57,640 Speaker 13: Things are starting to become a little bit difficult and 1130 00:59:58,400 --> 01:00:01,840 Speaker 13: we're gonna need to go through a lot of this, 1131 01:00:02,560 --> 01:00:08,160 Speaker 13: including some credit losses at some point in time if 1132 01:00:08,160 --> 01:00:09,560 Speaker 13: this continues on the same. 1133 01:00:09,400 --> 01:00:12,400 Speaker 3: Path, really important conversation. By the way, I've decided my 1134 01:00:12,560 --> 01:00:15,240 Speaker 3: first album is going to be titled Sound and Resilient. 1135 01:00:15,320 --> 01:00:15,440 Speaker 15: Oh. 1136 01:00:15,640 --> 01:00:18,640 Speaker 3: I think that's an instant hit at least absolutely in 1137 01:00:18,720 --> 01:00:22,880 Speaker 3: walk circles. Great panel. Edward Harrison, Bloomberg News senior Markets 1138 01:00:22,960 --> 01:00:26,200 Speaker 3: editor with us in Washington. Herman Chan Bloomberg Intelligence Senior 1139 01:00:26,200 --> 01:00:30,000 Speaker 3: Regional Banks analyst, don't be strangers. We should reassemble this 1140 01:00:30,040 --> 01:00:31,880 Speaker 3: panel when we have more to talk about, because something 1141 01:00:31,920 --> 01:00:34,280 Speaker 3: tells me that's going to happen a lot going forward, 1142 01:00:34,440 --> 01:00:35,560 Speaker 3: ed Herman, Thank you so much. 1143 01:00:36,680 --> 01:00:40,200 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Sound on podcast. Catch us 1144 01:00:40,240 --> 01:00:43,400 Speaker 1: live weekdays at one Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the 1145 01:00:43,480 --> 01:00:46,160 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or. 1146 01:00:46,200 --> 01:00:48,640 Speaker 2: Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts. 1147 01:00:49,760 --> 01:00:51,560 Speaker 3: But the question here when it comes to the meeting 1148 01:00:51,600 --> 01:00:54,800 Speaker 3: a week from today is will they negotiate both kayley 1149 01:00:55,040 --> 01:00:57,120 Speaker 3: or one at a time. Because if you asked the 1150 01:00:57,160 --> 01:00:59,800 Speaker 3: White House, will they want the debt ceiling to be addressed? 1151 01:01:00,120 --> 01:01:02,360 Speaker 3: Will negotiate on the budget, And it's the opposite. On 1152 01:01:02,440 --> 01:01:04,720 Speaker 3: Capitol Hill they say we're not doing one without the other. 1153 01:01:04,760 --> 01:01:08,080 Speaker 3: Certainly when you ask Speaker Kevin McCarthy weighing in on 1154 01:01:08,120 --> 01:01:11,760 Speaker 3: this now, the gentleman from West Virginia, and we're all 1155 01:01:11,800 --> 01:01:14,360 Speaker 3: wondering how Joe Manchin is going to play into this. 1156 01:01:14,720 --> 01:01:16,960 Speaker 16: There's no such thing as a red line. The bottom 1157 01:01:17,000 --> 01:01:19,680 Speaker 16: line is, as we're here to negotiate, Shane, can't we 1158 01:01:19,720 --> 01:01:22,440 Speaker 16: even talk about how we got ourselves in a position 1159 01:01:23,000 --> 01:01:25,080 Speaker 16: and start talking about how we're going to get ourselves 1160 01:01:25,160 --> 01:01:25,560 Speaker 16: out of it? 1161 01:01:25,880 --> 01:01:29,320 Speaker 3: Dismissing talk of a Democratic Party red line between raising 1162 01:01:29,440 --> 01:01:33,320 Speaker 3: the debt limit and cutting future spending. It sure seems 1163 01:01:33,360 --> 01:01:35,400 Speaker 3: like there's a red line there when you hear from 1164 01:01:35,440 --> 01:01:36,160 Speaker 3: the White House, though. 1165 01:01:36,440 --> 01:01:39,680 Speaker 12: Yeah, and they've been very consistent about that, including yesterday, 1166 01:01:39,720 --> 01:01:44,120 Speaker 12: even after we got the letter from Secretary Janet Yellen 1167 01:01:44,320 --> 01:01:46,960 Speaker 12: from the Treasury saying the X date could be as 1168 01:01:47,000 --> 01:01:50,600 Speaker 12: early as June first, that the Treasury will exhaust its 1169 01:01:50,600 --> 01:01:53,000 Speaker 12: measures and not be able to fulfill the US obligations. 1170 01:01:53,280 --> 01:01:56,480 Speaker 12: Even after we got news that Biden had called congressional 1171 01:01:56,520 --> 01:01:59,400 Speaker 12: leaders asked them to meet next week, the message didn't 1172 01:01:59,440 --> 01:02:02,080 Speaker 12: actually each change that they still don't want to negotiate 1173 01:02:02,120 --> 01:02:02,400 Speaker 12: over this. 1174 01:02:02,640 --> 01:02:06,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, technically the needle has not moved other than scheduling 1175 01:02:06,160 --> 01:02:06,840 Speaker 3: a meeting. 1176 01:02:06,960 --> 01:02:09,120 Speaker 12: Which is like a baby step forward. 1177 01:02:09,440 --> 01:02:12,000 Speaker 3: He's correct, we're taking baby steps. I wonder if Emily 1178 01:02:12,000 --> 01:02:16,560 Speaker 3: agrees with that. Emily Wilkins Bloomberg, government congressional reporter with 1179 01:02:16,640 --> 01:02:18,880 Speaker 3: us from Capitol Hill. Now, Emily, we've been talking for 1180 01:02:18,920 --> 01:02:22,000 Speaker 3: the last hour and forty five minutes about every possible 1181 01:02:22,040 --> 01:02:25,040 Speaker 3: wrinkle in what might come from this meeting and what 1182 01:02:25,120 --> 01:02:27,919 Speaker 3: both sides are going to be packing as they meet 1183 01:02:27,920 --> 01:02:30,760 Speaker 3: at the White House one week from today. That red 1184 01:02:30,800 --> 01:02:33,240 Speaker 3: line that Joe Manchin was talking about. Seems to really 1185 01:02:33,280 --> 01:02:36,120 Speaker 3: be the essence of the conversation. And it was suggested 1186 01:02:36,160 --> 01:02:39,200 Speaker 3: earlier that maybe there's a little bit of a wink 1187 01:02:39,240 --> 01:02:42,160 Speaker 3: in a nod that these are in fact negotiated together. 1188 01:02:43,120 --> 01:02:46,600 Speaker 3: But we have two separate announcements, two separate news releases 1189 01:02:46,640 --> 01:02:48,960 Speaker 3: that go out after their work is done. What do 1190 01:02:49,000 --> 01:02:49,560 Speaker 3: you think. 1191 01:02:50,880 --> 01:02:52,880 Speaker 17: I mean at this point, what we've really seen for 1192 01:02:52,920 --> 01:02:57,000 Speaker 17: both sides is just that they've completely dug into their position. Democrats, 1193 01:02:57,040 --> 01:02:59,480 Speaker 17: for the most part, at least Biden and a lot 1194 01:02:59,520 --> 01:03:03,200 Speaker 17: of Congression leaders see more adamant than ever that this 1195 01:03:03,280 --> 01:03:05,880 Speaker 17: has to be a clean rays of the debt liment. 1196 01:03:05,960 --> 01:03:07,640 Speaker 15: And we saw today a House. 1197 01:03:07,600 --> 01:03:11,160 Speaker 17: Majority minority leader had King Jeffries put out basically say 1198 01:03:11,160 --> 01:03:13,200 Speaker 17: that Democrats have had a secret plan in the works 1199 01:03:13,200 --> 01:03:15,280 Speaker 17: for months now that would allow them to do so. 1200 01:03:15,960 --> 01:03:18,640 Speaker 17: But Republicans at the same point are calling for the cuts. 1201 01:03:18,680 --> 01:03:21,400 Speaker 17: They're saying the urgency means that the Democrats need to 1202 01:03:21,920 --> 01:03:23,640 Speaker 17: accept at least some of what. 1203 01:03:23,760 --> 01:03:25,520 Speaker 15: House Republicans have put forward. 1204 01:03:25,800 --> 01:03:28,320 Speaker 17: And I think now the big question becomes, you know, 1205 01:03:29,120 --> 01:03:30,560 Speaker 17: do they wind up finding some. 1206 01:03:30,440 --> 01:03:32,840 Speaker 15: Sort of agreement here where. 1207 01:03:32,680 --> 01:03:35,600 Speaker 17: You know, Democrats might give Republicans a piece of what 1208 01:03:35,640 --> 01:03:38,360 Speaker 17: they've asked for, or do you wind up kind of 1209 01:03:38,360 --> 01:03:40,520 Speaker 17: waiting to the last minute when the pressure is on, 1210 01:03:40,880 --> 01:03:43,240 Speaker 17: and then you see a number of modern Republicans join 1211 01:03:43,320 --> 01:03:45,960 Speaker 17: Democrats in a clean raise of the debt liment. 1212 01:03:46,560 --> 01:03:48,600 Speaker 12: Well, and of course the date we're all watching is 1213 01:03:48,680 --> 01:03:51,120 Speaker 12: May ninth, next Tuesday, for this meeting to happen. But 1214 01:03:51,160 --> 01:03:53,800 Speaker 12: there's also a question emily of how many meetings could 1215 01:03:53,800 --> 01:03:57,200 Speaker 12: in theory happen after that, because looking at the calendar, 1216 01:03:57,920 --> 01:04:01,240 Speaker 12: the President and the Senate in the House aren't all 1217 01:04:01,240 --> 01:04:03,440 Speaker 12: in Washington at the same time very often in the 1218 01:04:03,440 --> 01:04:04,680 Speaker 12: next couple of weeks. 1219 01:04:05,800 --> 01:04:07,680 Speaker 17: You know, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw some 1220 01:04:07,720 --> 01:04:08,880 Speaker 17: shifting in the schedule. 1221 01:04:09,800 --> 01:04:10,120 Speaker 15: It was. 1222 01:04:10,240 --> 01:04:13,480 Speaker 17: I think it's very notable how quickly everyone moved yesterday 1223 01:04:13,720 --> 01:04:15,640 Speaker 17: as soon as Jill and Jenny Ellen put out that 1224 01:04:15,760 --> 01:04:19,280 Speaker 17: letter naming June first is the day that the extra 1225 01:04:19,320 --> 01:04:22,120 Speaker 17: measures could be exhausted. I mean, you saw people move 1226 01:04:22,240 --> 01:04:24,880 Speaker 17: very quickly in terms of getting folks to the White House, 1227 01:04:24,920 --> 01:04:27,840 Speaker 17: reaching out to everyone. And I think that underscore is 1228 01:04:27,880 --> 01:04:30,280 Speaker 17: the fact that the lawmakers initially thought that they had 1229 01:04:30,280 --> 01:04:33,800 Speaker 17: more time, but ultimately they do not want to see 1230 01:04:34,200 --> 01:04:37,280 Speaker 17: the US default on its debts, and my guess is 1231 01:04:37,320 --> 01:04:39,680 Speaker 17: that they're even terrified about, you know, having the US 1232 01:04:39,720 --> 01:04:41,680 Speaker 17: as credit rating dip again. 1233 01:04:42,160 --> 01:04:44,120 Speaker 15: And so I think there is a huge hGe. 1234 01:04:43,960 --> 01:04:46,240 Speaker 17: Sense of urgency now due to this letter that came 1235 01:04:46,280 --> 01:04:47,000 Speaker 17: out yesterday. 1236 01:04:47,120 --> 01:04:50,040 Speaker 3: Well, does that urgency results in any progress here? Emily? 1237 01:04:50,080 --> 01:04:54,280 Speaker 3: I guess the question that I'm asking right now is 1238 01:04:55,280 --> 01:04:58,240 Speaker 3: do we get this done in time? They come together somehow, 1239 01:04:58,280 --> 01:05:01,479 Speaker 3: everyone finds religion and they managed to raise the debt 1240 01:05:01,480 --> 01:05:04,360 Speaker 3: ceiling and come to an agreement on spending cuts, or 1241 01:05:04,400 --> 01:05:07,080 Speaker 3: do we need to find a short term solution right 1242 01:05:07,120 --> 01:05:09,560 Speaker 3: now and extend this by a couple of months. 1243 01:05:10,480 --> 01:05:12,440 Speaker 17: You know, a lot of folks on Capitol Hill have 1244 01:05:12,480 --> 01:05:15,600 Speaker 17: been asked about whether they would want a short term solution, 1245 01:05:15,760 --> 01:05:17,680 Speaker 17: and at this point that just doesn't seem to be 1246 01:05:17,680 --> 01:05:21,160 Speaker 17: something that's being discussed. It seems like both sides are 1247 01:05:21,160 --> 01:05:23,920 Speaker 17: really digging into their own positions ahead of this May 1248 01:05:24,080 --> 01:05:27,080 Speaker 17: ninth meeting and then waiting to see what happens. The 1249 01:05:27,200 --> 01:05:29,360 Speaker 17: members are, you know, waiting to see what McCarthy says, 1250 01:05:29,400 --> 01:05:32,240 Speaker 17: what Biden says, what comes out of this meeting, and 1251 01:05:32,320 --> 01:05:35,040 Speaker 17: if they can find some sort of agreement, and I 1252 01:05:35,080 --> 01:05:38,480 Speaker 17: think if you wind up seeing McCarthy and Biden leave 1253 01:05:38,520 --> 01:05:40,960 Speaker 17: this May ninth meeting and say, hey, we're going to 1254 01:05:41,000 --> 01:05:43,960 Speaker 17: need a little bit more time, you know, that's I 1255 01:05:43,960 --> 01:05:46,680 Speaker 17: think that's when the conversation really shifts in that direction. 1256 01:05:47,120 --> 01:05:49,400 Speaker 15: But I think right now both sides are trying to give. 1257 01:05:49,280 --> 01:05:52,360 Speaker 17: Their folks in the room as much leverage as possible 1258 01:05:52,480 --> 01:05:55,080 Speaker 17: on their own position, and that's why you really haven't 1259 01:05:55,120 --> 01:05:59,280 Speaker 17: seen anyone change their tumb in the last twenty four hours. 1260 01:06:00,000 --> 01:06:02,800 Speaker 12: Of course, it's not just you know, the politicians themselves 1261 01:06:02,840 --> 01:06:05,360 Speaker 12: that are going to be pushing each other to change 1262 01:06:05,400 --> 01:06:07,440 Speaker 12: tune on this. They are also, in theory, could be 1263 01:06:07,440 --> 01:06:11,720 Speaker 12: pressure from constituents, from lobbyists from the banking community. I mean, 1264 01:06:11,760 --> 01:06:14,600 Speaker 12: do you think those conversations are happening as we speak 1265 01:06:14,720 --> 01:06:17,240 Speaker 12: on the hill, people walking into these offices and saying, hey, 1266 01:06:17,280 --> 01:06:18,400 Speaker 12: you guys got to get it together. 1267 01:06:20,040 --> 01:06:22,240 Speaker 15: There are absolutely conversations going on. 1268 01:06:22,320 --> 01:06:24,480 Speaker 17: I mean, I think it's safe to say for an 1269 01:06:24,480 --> 01:06:27,360 Speaker 17: issue like this of this level of importance, there has 1270 01:06:27,440 --> 01:06:29,840 Speaker 17: long been been talks going on about the debt limit 1271 01:06:29,920 --> 01:06:32,080 Speaker 17: and what to do and how to raise it. And 1272 01:06:32,120 --> 01:06:34,440 Speaker 17: I think there is a good amount of pressure that 1273 01:06:34,440 --> 01:06:38,200 Speaker 17: these lawmakers feel. At the same point, if you're a Republican, 1274 01:06:38,360 --> 01:06:40,360 Speaker 17: you really do want to be able to get some 1275 01:06:40,400 --> 01:06:42,160 Speaker 17: sort of win out of this, to be able to 1276 01:06:42,280 --> 01:06:44,959 Speaker 17: leverage one of these few opportunities to say, hey, look, 1277 01:06:45,200 --> 01:06:47,520 Speaker 17: we were able to cut federal spending, we were able 1278 01:06:47,560 --> 01:06:51,240 Speaker 17: to roll back some provisions in the last year's Biden. 1279 01:06:50,960 --> 01:06:52,440 Speaker 15: Bill that we didn't really like. 1280 01:06:52,800 --> 01:06:56,880 Speaker 17: I mean, Republicans really need to deliver, especially McCarthy because 1281 01:06:56,880 --> 01:06:59,280 Speaker 17: he does have the threat of his old members of 1282 01:06:59,480 --> 01:07:01,920 Speaker 17: ousting Hill from the speakership thanks to some of the 1283 01:07:02,000 --> 01:07:04,560 Speaker 17: rules that he negotiated right at the start of the year, 1284 01:07:05,080 --> 01:07:07,520 Speaker 17: and so they're under tremendous pressure to do that, and 1285 01:07:07,680 --> 01:07:09,920 Speaker 17: Democrats under tremendous pressure not to give in. 1286 01:07:10,000 --> 01:07:11,320 Speaker 15: So I think, you know, you. 1287 01:07:11,360 --> 01:07:15,040 Speaker 17: Have these groups that are certainly advocating to avoid a default. 1288 01:07:15,120 --> 01:07:17,680 Speaker 17: Lawmakers want to avoid a default, but they also have 1289 01:07:17,840 --> 01:07:22,080 Speaker 17: other considerations that have made this debate much more complicated. 1290 01:07:22,400 --> 01:07:24,760 Speaker 3: Kaylee, Has anyone put this into AI? This is like 1291 01:07:24,840 --> 01:07:28,040 Speaker 3: the only thing I haven't Has anyone asked chat GPT like, 1292 01:07:28,120 --> 01:07:29,600 Speaker 3: how this is going to end? How about we have 1293 01:07:29,680 --> 01:07:32,280 Speaker 3: the bots figure it out? Because humans are apparently not. 1294 01:07:32,280 --> 01:07:34,040 Speaker 12: Capable that would be a great experiment. 1295 01:07:34,160 --> 01:07:35,960 Speaker 3: I feel like this has to happen. So if it's 1296 01:07:35,960 --> 01:07:37,160 Speaker 3: not now, Emily, it's going to. 1297 01:07:37,160 --> 01:07:40,640 Speaker 17: Be soon, right, I mean it's going to have to 1298 01:07:40,640 --> 01:07:44,080 Speaker 17: be soon because we just don't have much time left. 1299 01:07:44,120 --> 01:07:46,840 Speaker 17: I mean everyone initially was thinking we could have till July, 1300 01:07:46,920 --> 01:07:48,040 Speaker 17: we could have till August. 1301 01:07:48,320 --> 01:07:51,240 Speaker 15: I think Yellen's yeah, no, not anymore. 1302 01:07:51,240 --> 01:07:53,640 Speaker 17: And I think you know, we've seen you've seen all 1303 01:07:53,680 --> 01:07:56,240 Speaker 17: of government kind of jump at that letter that came 1304 01:07:56,240 --> 01:07:59,040 Speaker 17: out yesterday, and now things have shifted it into high gear, 1305 01:07:59,760 --> 01:08:03,080 Speaker 17: and I think really the main ninth meeting is going 1306 01:08:03,120 --> 01:08:05,240 Speaker 17: to be one to watch. I think to this point, 1307 01:08:05,240 --> 01:08:07,240 Speaker 17: you've seen a lot of members. You've seen a lot 1308 01:08:07,280 --> 01:08:10,480 Speaker 17: of Democrats remain in line behind Biden, maybe Mansions one 1309 01:08:10,480 --> 01:08:12,880 Speaker 17: of the very few exceptions. You've seen a lot of 1310 01:08:12,880 --> 01:08:15,560 Speaker 17: the Republicans kind of remain in line behind McCarthy's and 1311 01:08:15,640 --> 01:08:19,320 Speaker 17: McConnell support McCarthy. And I think that everyone wants to 1312 01:08:19,360 --> 01:08:22,760 Speaker 17: back their member up until their leader comes to them 1313 01:08:22,760 --> 01:08:24,920 Speaker 17: and says, Okay, we got a deal and here's the 1314 01:08:24,960 --> 01:08:26,880 Speaker 17: new plan. And I think that's the point that you're 1315 01:08:26,920 --> 01:08:29,600 Speaker 17: going to start seeing different parties. 1316 01:08:29,240 --> 01:08:31,080 Speaker 3: Kind of and Emily will be the one to tell 1317 01:08:31,160 --> 01:08:34,439 Speaker 3: us when it happens. Bloomberg Government, Emily Wilkins. We thank you, Emily, 1318 01:08:34,520 --> 01:08:41,560 Speaker 3: This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Sound on podcast. 1319 01:08:41,640 --> 01:08:44,720 Speaker 3: Make sure to subscribe if you haven't already, at Apple, Spotify, 1320 01:08:44,800 --> 01:08:47,240 Speaker 3: and anywhere else you get your podcasts. And you can 1321 01:08:47,240 --> 01:08:50,280 Speaker 3: find us live every weekday from Washington, DC at one 1322 01:08:50,280 --> 01:08:53,640 Speaker 3: pm Eastern Time at Bloomberg dot com.