WEBVTT - China's Debt Poses Much Greater Threat Than Trade

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul Sweene. You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits, each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Seeking with bond markets and also

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>just markets in general. I'm very pleased to say John

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Authors joining us right now, joining us from our Bloomberg

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker Studios. John Author, Senior editor for Bloomberg Markets. John,

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about at least start with a

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Maryland February Fund Manager survey that came

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>out this morning that showed, for the first time ever

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the history of this survey, UH investors thought that

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>long emerging markets is the most crowded trade. Yes, what

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>do you think that? I find it somewhat surprising. I

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably got something to do with the country

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the blind. The one night Man is king um

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of valuation, plainly, lots of people I

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have to admit myself included. I've been making a point

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for a long time that yes, emerging markets do indeed

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>look cheap UM. And the thing that bothers me about

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>this and why I suspect the people are talking to

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>be of a m l as as by saying it's

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not popular but crowded, is that so much of it

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>realies on on the dollar. If you have a week dollar,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>then this is a really good trade. I did just

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 1>check the numbers. The JP Morgan Emerging Markets Effects Index

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is the most sort of popular agglomeration of being diseases,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>up about five from a crushing horrific low set last fall.

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's still about one above its nady air or nadier

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on which side of the Atlantic you are. That

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it was that it sets early in twenty sixteen in

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that very serious growth scared that we had at the

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning of surrounding China. Uh. Plainly, there's a long way

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to recover, but there is still quite a lot of

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>faith put in UM in the fits to be as

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>dubbish as it said it was recently, and in the U.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>S economy to continue to push the help push the

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar up. So, John, what else do you think this trade?

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>This emerging markets trade getting crowded. Does that reflect you

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>think investors, I guess sentiment that some trade deal with

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>China will be achieved, tensions will come down, and that

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>will help EM across the board. I mean, it's certainly

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the case that UM people are working on the assumption

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that the single most likely scenario is that some kind

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of a deal is reached because it's in the interests

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of both sides to do so. I think you do, however,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have to call into question whether I'm not saying that

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the president done to his team are cynics, but they

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 1>have to ask themselves. This goes back to the West Wing,

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>which I've been binge watching while I wasn't terribly well

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>over Christmas. The the the whether he wants an issue

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>or a victory. If he wants an issue, maybe he

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>pushes ahead and lets uh and and we actually get

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a ratcheting up of the trade confrontation with China. I

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I certainly think there is. And this is

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the points that that that you know that

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump supporters make often and I think it's

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>probably correct, is that if you want to get China

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at a point of weakness, this is the best time

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to raise this point in quite a long time.

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting to me. You talked about the dollar, right,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we brought up the trade issue and a

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>deal with China, which is more important. The thing that

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>matters most um by far, I think is the underlying

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>health of China. Uh and everything else is a symptom

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of ratchets off it. I like that you say that, because,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you're not You're not going to just

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>say trade and some kind of trading room, because that's

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of facile when it comes to Chin to slow

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>down in the economy, which goes deeper and had it

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was sort of they're regardless. Not so long since the

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>outgoing head of the People's Bank of China said, are

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we going to have a Minsky? We've got to be careful.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a Minsky moment in China for the

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>head of a central bank to use language like that.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>For readers, the most of the readers old newspaper man

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for listeners out there, For listeners out there, I'm still

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>getting better for listeners out there, a Minsky moment. The

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>last time we had a Minsky moment was when Lehman

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>brothers went down. A Minsky moment is a catastrophic loss

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of confidence in debt. Uh central bank governors never ever

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>ever speculate in public about whether there's going to be

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a Minsky moment to except the head of the second

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>most important central bank in the planet did do so

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not so long ago. Uh So that's still, it seems

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, is the greatest concern. There's a very there's

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a cartoon that has done. It's done the rounds of

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>social media many times from HEDGEI where you've seen this,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>say this, this guy on a on a on a

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the boat from Jaws pointing at this rather pathetic little

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>shark going with tariffs written on it, shouting shark. Meanwhile,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this giants octopus is surrounding the boat with its tentacles

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and pulling it down, and the octopus is marked Chinese economy.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And that I think I've seen that brought up by bulls,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>by bears, by people who pathologically hate China, by people

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of perma bullish on China. That is ultimately where it is.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>I think trade barring real stupidity and nobody given what's

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>going on back at home, we can't rule that out

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>by in real stupidity. I don't think trade is as

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>big a deal as whether China can somehow or other

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with this huge amount of credit it's got outstanding.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned home. I'm assumming that's not New Jersey or

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Long Island. Give us twenty seconds on what you think

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>the latest is on Brexit. The latest I think the

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>most significant thing that Theresa May said today was that

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>she thinks it's not going to take them the three

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks that had it had been thought it would take

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to clear any deal that's voted by Parliament. She says

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's possible to put it through on a fast track,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>which basically means that she thinks she can wait literally

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>until one week before Britain is due to leave and

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>put it to a vote. So we have the same

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>tractic as before, which has always been to run out

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the clock, taken ever to ever greater extremes as we

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the end of the clock. So it's a mass. Basically, Yes,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's high it's high risk poker and who will blink first,

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's a high risk poker game that's going to

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>take you know, months, years. Well, thank you so much

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for being with us, John author A senior editor for

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Market Well, Netflix has certainly validated the pay streaming

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>video model, and now we've got a bunch of other

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>media companies, including Disney, following suit. One of the real

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 1>questions is is there an opportunity for a free streaming

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>service and how can that be competitive in the marketplace.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So to help us kind of answer that question, um

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us as Tara la Chapelle, Deals and media columnists

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion. She joins us in New York here

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio and Sarah How'sick columnist

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Opinion. She joins us in Washington, d C. Terrence, Sarah, welcome,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>uh ter, give us a sense of we we know

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>how successful the Netflix of the world is. You pay

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>your ten twelve bucks a month and you get all

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this great content. Talk to us about the free streaming market.

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>What are what are some of the opportunities there. So

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is sort of a bifurcation of this

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>streaming market, and it's sort of nascent days where Disney

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and A T and T and the companies that think

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.119
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of brand power and pricing power

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are basically trying to replicate Netflix with subscription video services

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of all different kinds. And then you have on the

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>other side of the market the Roku channel to be

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Pluto TV, some names that may not be as well known,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but they're generating a lot of subscribers, people that are

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>looking to save money their free streaming services, which in

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>media we know free just means AD supported. So you're

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the product and they're basically, you know, seeing that consumers,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>certain number of consumers are willing to tolerate ads and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>have a sort of I guess you would say mediocre

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>service relative to like a Netflix or an HBO and

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to watch TV and not have to pay

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for cable and just pay their internet fees. So Sarah,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>come on in here to get a sense of some

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>examples of how companies have gained market share substantially by

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>a with this free approach while remaining solvent. Yeah. So

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that the e commerce world provides a really

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>instructive example. Um, and this is a place where a

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of retailers have made the bet to that between

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>when consumers are choosing between free shipping and fast shipping,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to want to get it for free

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to want to save money. UM, and

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon I think is the shining example of how this

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>has paid off. That was a core promise of the

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Prime membership and how they brought people into that ecosystem

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to begin with was that people didn't want to have

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to pay for shipping on each transaction. And it's really

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting because an e commerce we've seen all this innovation

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>around speed. We see same day delivery now even two

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hour and one hour delivery available in certain markets, but

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>shoppers just remain wedded to free shipping. So in a

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>survey that was conducted this holiday season by Deloitte can,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>sumers were asked which of the following two promises is

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>more important to you in online shopping, free shipping or

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fast shipping. Of them chose free, So UM. I think

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a powerful example to the streaming world in that

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in e commerce consumers are willing to sacrifice

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>speed in order to not pay money. And I think

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with TV we will see a cohort of consumers that's

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to sacrifice quality programming to not pay money. Yeah.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I love how you guys kind of woven the whole

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>concept of how people like free stuff free shipping and

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>how important it's becoming into the content business because you know,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit counterintuitive just given how successful Netflix

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>has been and even Hulu is having some success when

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>their streaming in Amazon Prime, um tera. What kind of

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>programming if I go to this type of service, Like

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>let's take a look at Viacom. They just paid three

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>forty million dollars for Pluto TV. If I were to

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>go onto Pluto TV or something like that, what kind

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of content am I going to find? Yeah, I mean

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>there's some channels you would recognize. I mean, I think

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV is on there. Um. But yeah, I mean

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get everything. And I think that's

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the point. You know, some networks, like smaller network owners

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like Viacom and Discovery which now owns scripts. You know

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're kind of feeling a little a little bit

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>left out of these higher costs uh O T T

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>streaming products. We're looking to these free streaming options because

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's their shows do generate a lot of

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>viewers um which are important to advertisers. And to the

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>extent that you could have a free product supported entirely

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>by advertising. You know that serves a certain segment of

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. I mean, the especially lower income consumers, which

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I would hazard to guess is maybe even a growing

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>segment of the market, so to the extent that you're

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to reach those people in a world where this

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Balkanization of the TV industry is making these services expensive,

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, and everyone's having to think about, well, if

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I want HBO, I'm going to need a T and

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>T S product, But I want Netflix, but I also

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>want this other thing, and well, Tara, just to that point,

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to wonder, do we see people going to

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>these free online streaming services in lieu of the cable giants,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the cored types of services, or in lieu of Netflix.

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>In other words, who's losing the business to these to

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>these sort of free online services. It's hard to know

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, but I imagine that what we're seeing are

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>younger people or people looking to save money going to

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>these free services, which means they likely have an Internet connection,

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe they still have cable, or maybe they have Netflix.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But I did a survey recently, and you know, it

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was only a hundred or so people, but it seems

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>like people really value Netflix. They don't value it enough

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to be willing to cut the cord and only have Netflix.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>They do want other things. So maybe a Netflix and

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>a free live TV streaming service is a is a

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>good little combination for some people. Um. And at the

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>same time, they're also said that they're willing to pay

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>more than they already do for Netflix. The average response

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I got when I asked about that was nineteen dollars

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a month. There's a lot of value in Netflix. And

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>when I think about people trying to navigate this very jumbled,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>confusing marketplace and trying to save money, you know, Netflix

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is very simple and easy and that's sort of the

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>beauty of it, and it's not very expensive. And then

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, a free service is the way that

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you get your fixed with some reality TV shows. So, Sarah,

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what have you guys in your reporting got any sense

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the advertiser support for this product? Did the advertisers

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>view this as a viable place to put their dollars? Uh?

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not sure Tera might be a better

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>equipped answer a question about where the advertisers are putting

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>their dollars, but I do think that, Um, it's interesting

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the ripple effect of people's preferences for free control up

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in ways you don't even expect, and I think that

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>will be important for the TV guys to keep in

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>mind too. So I think in e commerce, what we've

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seen is this preference for free shipping has really driven

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>folks to click and collect services where you buy something

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>online and pick up in store. That's the most prominent

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>reason that people choose that, and then that ends up

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>providing this other opportunity for the retailer for what is

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>known as attachment spending, meaning typically when people come in

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to pick up their online or they ended up buying

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty to four dollars worth of stuff that they didn't

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>even realize they needed. Um. And so I think these

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>these free programs had the opportunity to become something else

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for these streaming services in the same way that they

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>did for e commerce. Tara just real quickly. I'm wondering,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what about from the advertiser's perspective, are they willing to

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pay up on for some of these free services, given

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they funnel so much spending towards uh,

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the amazons and the things. I mean, we've got to

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>see what kind of viewership these services get. I mean,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still very early days. But I know via common

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>standpoint with this Pluto deal was that you know, they

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have a telefay in Latin America, and you know, maybe

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they could marry some of their Spanish language programming with Pluto,

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>which has a younger audience, which has a big Hispanic audience,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and not a lot of advertisers are successfully targeting that

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>right now in a very narrow way. So maybe this

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity from an advertiser standpoint with this service.

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's like unique ways that they're looking

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>at it and trying to meet those consumers that aren't

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are going to just pay for every

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>service out there and have you know, already have every

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>device and they've got an Xbox and they've got Apple TV.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are a lot of people that don't,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's where maybe these mortgage products

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are going for really really interesting column Thank you so

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us, both of you, Tera La

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Chapelle Deals and media columnists Sarah HOW'SAC columnists covering the

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>retail sector for Bloomberg Opinion. Both of you, thank you

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Well, we are two days away

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>from Valentine's Day. The pressure is building to get that

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>right gift, and flowers always make the right gift for

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Valentine's Day. And who better to help us break down

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the business of the flowers than Chris McCann. And Chris

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is president and CEO of one flowers dot com. Uh.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He companies based on Long Island City, but he joins

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg eleven three studios. So, Chris,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we are two days away from Valentine's Day, people always

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>fall back on that classic gift of flowers. How big

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is Valentine's Day? That time period of Valentine's Day to

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>your business? Every year? It's such an important day for

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>us because it's so important to our customers, and it's

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a nice spike for us. It's about ten percent of

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>out consumer floral segments annual business, but it's really only

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>less than five percent about total companies business because today

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>half of our businesses come from our gourmet food brands

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like Harry and David and Cheryl's Cookies and simply Chocolate.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>We really built the celebratory echo system. All right, Paul,

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are you buying flowers for your wife? I think I

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>might be buying flowers for my wife. What kind of

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>flowers are gonna be buying. Um, I'm not really sure.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, Chris can give what's the most popular

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>flower rangement right now and not committing. He's also very

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>very traditional guy, so I'll recommend roses. I'll put a

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>little spin. Trending this year is hot pink roses, So

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that's really wild. I'm wondering you mentioned about food. You know,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is food becoming a more popular option chocolate, for example,

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>over flowers, or is you know, as that mixed continue

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you just sort of more steadily skewed toward the food offerings. Well,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's instead of flowers. What we find

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>with food offerings, especially from our brands like Harry and David,

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 1>are simply chocolate that they're big around the Christmas season

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and the complimentary to other gifts throughout the year. Okay,

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second. How much has the average spending

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on Valentine's Day changed over time? I mean, are people

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just going crazy and hog wild here? I hope? So

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I know we have a sense of, you know, what

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the direction is of the overall spending. Well and expects

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.719
<v Speaker 1>it to be up about four or five percent this year,

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and sixties six dollars on average Valentine celebration.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope most of that includes flowers and chocolates, but

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's expected to be up again this year,

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>which is very nice. And what sixty hundred and sixty

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>six you're looking at me? Okay, interesting, Chris? So what

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing? You know, you've been in this business

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>thirty years? Thirty five years? How is consumer? How's the

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>consumer change? And how's the consumer perceives gift giving not

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just Valentine's Day? How the trends changed across the board. Well,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're just seeing is that the consumers are really

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>looking for ways to express, connect and celebrate. And then

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this technological world that we live in, this interconnected world,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we're looking to see how do we bring the human

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>back into the process more. And that's what we do

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as a company, really to help you express yourself, that

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we deliver smiles on your behalf. Now you're using technologies

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>more and more to do that in all different forms,

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it be AI capabilities, whether it be voice computing capabilities, chatbots.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So that continues to change and that's our job. Make

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it frictionless for you to express yourself, all right, So

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred flowers dot com is sort of an

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>example of how the world has changed in and of itself.

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>One eight hundred of flowers is the telephone number. But

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>since telephones have got out of style, dot com is there.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>What is the proportion of online sales versus calls and

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>how has that shifted? So the one hundred flowers brand

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and some of our younger customers may not know what

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that means. Uh, really the numbers, the eight hundred is

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>often a toll free number you do not know. But

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>aboutent of that brand's business comes online, and when I

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>say online, more and more of that coming from mobile devices.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>More than half of our traffic this holiday is from

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>mobile devices. So talk to us about the supply of flowers.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Where do you get your flowers? How what's going on

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>with the cost of flowers? So I think about the

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>business of one flowers, Your raw material costs, your cost

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to get sold are flowers? What's going on there? So

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting in flowers as the raw material costs

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>really haven't gone up because of technology improvements on the

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>supply chain over the last ten years, cost have remained stable,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>if not down a little bit, and we import product.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the flowers come from South America, Columbia

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ecuador, so of logistics get better and better. But

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're also seeing an increase in domestic production over the

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>last ten years and more and more flowers being grown

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>domestically here in the US. I'm going to be such

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a debby downer. I'm gonna be made fun of this.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>For years. How has global warming affected that? Oh? No,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we we haven't seen an effect on global warming on

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>our flour production even where you source them. Most of

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the time it's sourced around the equator, which is hot

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to begin with. Uh So, I think we've been fine

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on that side of it. All, Right, what's what's how

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>big are you guys versus? Just size out the market

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>for me. I don't know if it's US or global,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and how big are you guys in that market? So

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>we're about overall about one point two billion of the

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>estimates that we'll do in revenue this year. We're growing

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>nicely with the leader in the floral category, where the

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>leader in the gourmet food category, and now we're starting

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to expand into all the product categories as well, listening

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to our customers as to what products they will use

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>to express, connect and celebrate. Thank you so much for

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Chris McCann Happy Valentine's Day, Happy Valentine's

0:20:48.359 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris McGann as CEO of what eight hundred flowers dot com.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like we have a border deal potentially,

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which suggests that the US government will potentially remain open.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>To get a sense of how the credit markets are

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>pricing in these developments, let's chat with our good friend

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey iras a chief US interest rate strategist from

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. He comes to us from the phone from

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>bi's headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey, or I assume it's

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>snowing down there, Ira, does the bond market to what

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>extent does the bond market care about what's going on

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with the border deal and the shutdowns and all of

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty. Yeah, hey, Paul, I'm actually in Washington, d C.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>This week to you know, get a sense of what

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>life is here on the ground in politics, and it

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>does look like that, you know, thanks, that some deal

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.959
<v Speaker 1>is going to be uh is going to be done? Uh?

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You know that, I think for for fixed income markets

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and for even risk asset markets in general, UM markets

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't like uncertainty. And when you have a resolution to

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>something like this, and that's gonna be good for risk assets.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You see equities up today, you see bond yields up today,

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so so bonds doing doing poorly. So that's that's the

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>reaction that you'd expect from an optimistic set of circumstances

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like like a deal. Um, I think what one thing

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that I'll be looking for is does this deal also

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>include an extension of the debt ceiling? Because the debt

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ceiling as we know, winds up expiring on on March one,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they the government will be able to use

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary measures probably to get into the late summer, maybe

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>September October. It depends on a lot of variables. But um,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but if that's done, then then you know, quite frankly,

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not something it's not a model that I like

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to to have to do all the time and worry

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not we're going to see the fault

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on the US debt, because that is something that is

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>completely man made and not not a UM, it's a

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>political problem, it's not that's not a real economic problem.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I love that we can say in all seriousness, I

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't like modeling for us to fall to every two

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>weeks because it's just you know, especially since it's totally avoidable,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is sort of a serious discussion that is ongoing.

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to pick up on what you're talking about,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the debt ceiling negotiations that are imminent. Uh,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the latest on the government shutdown is that President Trump

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>still hasn't decided whether or not he'll support the bipartisan

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>congressional agreement, so we don't even know whether we actually

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have staved off a government shutdown. Is the sign that

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bonds are not selling off more, in other words, that

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>yields are not rising more and that stocks are not

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ralling more. Is that a sign that investors are still

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about the debt ceiling negotiations and that there

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is a real risk being priced into the market that

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>there could be some sort of more serious gridlock that

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>leads to another government shutdown. Well, I think I think

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>part of it is certainly is certainly the goings on

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>here in Washington. I think the the bigger question for

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the bond market right now is how well this is

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>going to impact confidence and ultimately the ultimately the outcome

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. You know, we we got some really

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>good data just twenty minutes ago with the Jolts data

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>showing that there's a lot of job openings, that there's

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it seems like at least on the job front,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>things are good, but uh, there is I think a

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions to how how confident both businesses and

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>consumers are going to be with an environment that's as

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>politically contentious as we have today. Um, and this isn't

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the only the only thing that's that's worrying people, right,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So even if we get a budget deal and we

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, avoid to shut down, even if we get

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the debt limit uh done, then we still have a

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of trade tensions that that people are going to

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>worry about. You are seeing some of that actually in

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the data where you have seen some um

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>uh some real world data that's uh, that's showing that

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that's having an impact on global trade and and that's

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that's something I think that at least in the corporate

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>boardroom that you're going to have a lot of angst

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>about in the future if if it's not resolved, so

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you're you're done in Washington, d c Uh, I'm sure

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna wander up to the FED at some point.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>But is I guess the consensus in the marketplace as

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>people you know, try to price in everything that's going

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>on in the market, economic, financial, geopolitical, is that the

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>FED has you know, maybe one or two rate increases

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for the remainder of the year combined with a steady

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>roll off of the balance sheet. Is there anything that

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you've seen, data wise or just discussions with clients that

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>would lead you to believe that that's there's material risk

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to that kind of scenario. Yeah, So it's so they're

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be very data dependent, and I actually think

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that the um UH that that basically the level for

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>them to have to hike is they want to see

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>additional um UH, an additional inflation impulse. So our wage

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>growth that we're seeing at three and a half percent

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a year, is that going to translate into higher inflation

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Um you know, it tends to. It tends

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to lead services inflation by a little by a little bit.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you see an inflationary impulse, we think that

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's something that's going to be needed for um UH

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for the FED to to hike again later this year.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna hike before the third quarter. UM.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that they want to be data dependent. They

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that the economy is on stable

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>footing before they take any additional action. On the On

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the other side, if something gets to rail and say

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>equity markets fall another ten percent from here or something

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like that, UM, that would be something where they would,

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe be in more risk management mode, maybe

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>stop the FED to runoff, and then maybe even start

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about cutting interest rates. All right, I read

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds here. I'm looking at ten ten year treasury

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 1>yields now at two point six eight percent. Where would

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they be if we did not have the trade negotiation

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>tensions or the prospect of a government shutdown? Yeah, we

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have fair value closer to three percent, and we actually

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that over time will probably get back up there.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Again that that's our forecast for for year end is

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>three plus or minus a few basis wents. In other words,

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a discount of three tenths of one percentage point

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>UH that is being baked in due to the uncertainty

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>around some of these governments. It seems that way right now. Yeah,

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I Red Jersey, thank you so much for

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Our Jersey chief US interest rate strategist

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us from Washington, d C. Where

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to try to understand everything that's going on there,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and he'll report back and we'll all make sense of it,

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and then it will be complete. Thanks for listening to

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Lisa abram Woits. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Bramwoits. One

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide. I'm

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio