WEBVTT - What is time? And why do we rely on Greenwich for it?

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess what mango was that. Well, I remember you

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>met my grandfather before he passed away a few years back,

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but I can't remember. Did I ever tell you how

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>much he loved clocks and watches. I don't think I

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>knew that. I mean I knew they used to go antiquing. Yeah,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so when I was a kid, he ran this small

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.159
<v Speaker 1>flooring business. This was in Huntsville, Alabama, and you know,

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>at the front of his shop there he also had

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this collection of antiques and it was kind of like

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>its own little antique shop, and he'd sell and trade

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>pieces that he'd find. It shows around the Southeast, and

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.959
<v Speaker 1>it was one of my favorite places to be when

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I visited him. I'd either be hiding in the back

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and the rolls of carpet, pretending I was doing something

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really important at this antique roll top desk he kept

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>in there. But you know, it always seemed like my

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>granddad's favorite things to collect and trade were these old

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>clocks and watches. So if you were in the shop

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or at his home and you weren't used to it,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at the ticking and the chiming of all those clocks

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>could just make people crazy. But I always loved it,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was kind of strange because he didn't seem

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to be looking for the fanciest or the most expensive

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>watches he could find. He just liked to find ones

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>that were interesting to him. He'd sometimes see him wearing

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a watch that you hadn't seen before, and if you

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>asked him where he'd gotten it, he'd just say, well,

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>your cousin Sam and I liked each other's watches, so

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we just trade it. And it was just kind of

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the way he was. He just liked having him and

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have other people get to experience them as well. But

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, my grandfather is obviously not alone in his

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>fascination with time pieces and time in general, and the

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>way we think about and talk about time has changed

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>so much over the years, from the birth of time

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>zones to thinking about time travel, to the disputes around

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>what official time actually is. They're just so much we

0:01:45.680 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get to today, So let's dive in. Yea,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, podcast listeners, Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Will Pearson, and as always I'm joined by my good

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>friend Manges Ticketer and on the other side of the

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>soundproof glass showing off his brand new Omega speed Master watch.

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>That's our friend and producer Tristan McNeil. Now, I don't

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>know if you know this, Mango, but right there is

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the infamous Moonwatch. Oh my god, Tristess told me like

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty times already this morning. That's a moon watch. Such

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a show off. I know the speed Master has been

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like the go to watch for NASA for like, you know,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ever since, even before the moon landings took place. But

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's really nerdy and really cool that

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he has one. Well I would probably be sporting it

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>too if I had one. But if you're listening, Omega,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you can always throw us a couple of moon Watches

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>our way. So we're we're here, you know how to

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>find us, And a little bit later we'll talk about

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly why NASA is so big on the speed Man

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Estra brand, as well as the stories behind a few

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>other clocks and watches. But you know, before we get

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to the specific timekeepers, I thought we should kick things

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>off by talking a little bit about time itself. I mean,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really the thing that drives and defines our lives

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways, And you think about how off

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about it, we spend it we save it,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we waste it, we treasure it. But what even is time?

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it an intrinsic part of the universe

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or just something we made up? So I want to

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>turn this over to you, man, go and see if

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you can just go ahead and tell us, like, what

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is time? Over to you? Yeah, I'm sure in like

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>two minutes I'll be able to get through what time is.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>It could be awesome. I mean, quantum physicists aren't even

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>convinced that time exists, so I think it would take

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a little more explaining than we can give it. But uh,

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should just say it's not a thing. Yeah,

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that. That might be the answer. End of episode.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I think what they're arguing is more

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that time doesn't exist in the way that we usually

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>think about it, you know, as this kind of ever

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>moving line that only goes in one direct action, and

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>physicists would say time is a little bit more like space.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>All of it just sort of exists at once and

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually unfold in this chain of moments, which of

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>course is the way we as humans perceive it. Yeah,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe a better answer for people it's

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>just like time is the stuff clocks run on, and

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that feels like a suitable answer. I

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can get behind that for this episode.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we're more interested in the way

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that humans perceive and talk about time, So we'll probably

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>leave relativity and causality for another episode because it's all

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinating stuff. But I like your idea of how to

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>frame this for today. So one thing I think it's fascinating,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's something you mentioned, is how we experience time

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as a chain of moments. But have you ever stopped

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to think about how long exactly a moment is? You mean,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like numerically or what I mean. I feel like a

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>moment is just like that, just like a snap. That's it.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>That's how long a moment is, isn't it. Yeah. I mean,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>as scientific as that system you've given us sounds like

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it sures out we used to be a lot more

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>precise about moments than we are today. In fact, this

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>is actually something I hadn't heard before this week. But

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>apparently there was once a widely accepted definition for exactly

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>how long a moment lasts. And this was true from

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Ages all the way up through the nineteenth century.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>So this definition was that a moment was precisely one

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>hour or about nine seconds one forty Are you joking

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that that seems way too long? I'm telling you, mango,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a moment. It's just that a moment, just a snap

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of what a moment is. So I actually agree with you.

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>I I lean more in that direction. But a moment

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in history is actually like an era, or it could

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>be an entire decade of social upheaval, and it can

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>really be as long or short as you wanted to be.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>And I think that kind of highlights the disparity between

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>our approach to keeping track of time and the way

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we actually think about it. I mean, we we use

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like complex things like the movements of stars and the

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>radiation cycles of atoms to establish this sense of accurate timekeeping,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and then all convinces ourselves that there is such a

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thing as correct time. But you know, for all the

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>science and the precision behind those systems, we all still

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>perceive and speak about time in an incredibly subjective way. Yeah,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point, And I do think in a

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really meaningful sense, time is something of a you know,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a social construct, and you forget about moments

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and minutes because we also measure time with concepts derived

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>from our socialization. I mean, think about things like work

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>days and weekends and being on time or fashionably late.

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all of these things are ways of marking

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>time that we're definitely born from humans living and working together.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is that because every society is different,

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there actually has a lot of variants out there when

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to perceiving and talking about time. In fact,

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to this breakdown of how different cultures view time.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>There was this article from uh Science Daily, and so

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>here's what they had to say about it. Different languages

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>also embodied different worldviews, different ways of organizing the world

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>around us, and time is a case in point. For example,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Swedish and English speakers prefer to mark the duration of

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>events by referring to physical distances for example a short break,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a long wedding, The passage of time is perceived as

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>distance traveled. But Greek and Spanish speakers tend to mark

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>time by referring to physical quantities for example a small

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>break or a big wedding. The passage of time is

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.679
<v Speaker 1>perceived as growing volume. You know, I always love hearing

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>how other cultures handled their spatial metaphors. And you know,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for instance, I was reading in Scientific American about this

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>secluded group of tribes people in Papua New Guinea and

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they're called the yup No, and they live in these

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>remote villages way up in the mountains, and they don't

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>have any roads, electricity, and of course they interact very

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sparingly with the outside world. But a group of researchers

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>visited the tribe a few years back, and they found

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that these tribes people all made the same spontaneous gestures

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>when speaking about time. Like, the researchers started filming, ing

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and analyzing these gestures, and what they found was that

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Yepno people all justtured downward towards the mouth of

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the local river whenever they spoke about the past, and

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>whenever they spoke about the future, they actually gestured uphill

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to the river's source. I love stuff like that. I mean,

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we always think of time as being linear, you know,

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like the past is behind you and the future always

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lies ahead. I guess, yeah, But for the Yepno, it

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the past is at the bottom and the

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>futures at the top. So basically time flows uphill in

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>their minds from then in a straight line. I'm trying

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to think about what the logic would be behind that, though.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you know why that is? Apparently the

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>researchers didn't find out for certain, but their best guess

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is that the Yepnos procession at the time comes from

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like the knowledge of their own history, and I guess

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>their ancestors came to the region by sea and then

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>climbed up the steep mountain valley to where they established

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the village. So it's possibly that the Yepno connects sort

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of that geography and the low lands with the past,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and think of time is something that travels upward, just

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>like they did. H I just think that's beautiful to

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think about and just how different that is because we're

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>also used to thinking of time is something we have

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>no sway over, and I guess it's kind of nice

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to be reminded that so many things about it actually

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>are shaped by our own perspectives. Yeah, that's true. Like

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>even once we started using clocks, everyone just set them

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to noon based on when the sun was the highest

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in the sky where they lived, so like one community's

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>time would be several minutes off from the time in

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a town just a hundred miles away or so, and

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, having a ton of different local times like

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't that much of a problem at first. You know,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this was still a time before a rapid communication, rapid transportation,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, so it didn't really matter that different communities

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>kept different times. But as human beings began to explore

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, developed new ways to travel, this global

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>economy started to form. Suddenly the world found itself needing

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to really measure and communicate time with one another.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's really how we wound up with things like

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>time zones or Greenwich meantime. All right, so let's talk

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about that history. I mean, the

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>pivotal moment that you're talking about really started during what

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we would call the Age of Exploration and ran right

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>through the Industrial Revolution. For example, here in the US

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, time took a major leap towards standardization

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the late eighteen hundreds. And when you look at

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>why that was, I mean, this was largely due to

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that long distance travel that was finally possible because of

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the rise of railroads, definitely, and the invention of trains

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>really changed the way we look at time in all

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>sorts of ways. For instance, even though people had tried

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to predict the future for thousands of years, we didn't

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think about the possibility of traveling to the future until

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>after the train came along. And once we had a

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>machine that could zip across these vast distances, these authors

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like H. G. Wells began to dream machines that could

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>travel time as if it were a rail line itself.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's an interesting connection. But yeah, of course,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>railroads also forced people to think practically about time, not

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>just creatively. And you think about trying to coordinate train

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>schedules across all these different local time I mean, that

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>had to have been just this huge headache. And you know,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so it was November of eighty three that the American

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>railroads adopted a standard time system, and it was based

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on the four time zones that we're familiar with today.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Here there's Eastern, Central Mountain, and Pacific and so the

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>clocks within each time zone were to be synchronized. And

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>then as a result of that, the railroads only had

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep track of these four local times instead of

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the dozens that they were having to keep track of before.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And that was obviously this big improvement all around, Like,

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, apparently a lot of people didn't see it

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that way at first. But I was reading this article

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in Smithsonian, and there were a bunch of cities that

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>insisted on keeping their own local time zones for everything

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>except train schedules, and others refused to switch over that too.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. Um it was mostly because these cities bristled

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>at the idea of railroads kind of up ending their

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>established way of doing things, like they just didn't want

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>to change. Like, there was this one editorial in a

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati newspaper where the author actually proclaimed, quote, let the

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>people of Cincinnati stick to the truth as it is

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>written by the sun, moon and stars. I mean, that

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is what they do best in Cincinnati. Everybody knows that.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you're right. Though, there was a staunch

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>opposition to this change over for years after the time

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>zone system was introduced, and so much so that, in fact,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that the country didn't officially adopted until I think thirty

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>five years later, and that was with the Standard Time

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Act of nineteen eighteen. Now, this also established daylight saving

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time for better or worse. Yeah, that's right. But America

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>did take another important step towards standard time and years between.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, just one year after the railroads introduced

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>US time zones, delegates from twenty five other countries gathered

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. For what was called the UM

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the International Meridian Conference. And during this conference, the delegates

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>voted to recognize the Greenwich Meridian in London as this

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>common point from which nations would measure time and longitude.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And so how did they decide on Greenwich Meridian? And

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and I mean you can draw meridians at all different

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>points on the globe, of course, So what what made

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this the clear choice? Well, for one thing, a lot

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of countries have been using the Greenwich meridian as the

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>prime meridian for decades by the time the conference was held.

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So in England the line had been established as zero

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>degrees longitude in eighteen fifty one, and this fixed line

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed merchant ships and explorers to keep better track of

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>their east west position while at sea. Like they could

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>use the position to the sun and stars to get

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>an idea of the time on board the ship and

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>then compare that to the local time at the prime

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>meridian to determine their approximate location. So British sailors started

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>traveling with chronometers set to Greenwich time, and soon the

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>practice spread to countries all over the world. But even

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>though this practice was legitimized at the four Conference, there

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>were still some holdouts, you know, just like there were

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>when railroads tried to introduce time zones. France in particular

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the idea of using British time and longitude

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as the world's standard. Instead, they were pushing for Paris

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the side of the prime meridian. Of course,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, no one else was really interested in this,

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Greenish meridian had already sort of like proven effective,

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>so del Gets figured why start over? So how did

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>France take that? Did they take the loss sense tried

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>or do they pull a Cincinnati and throw a fit? Oh,

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they definitely throw a fit. I mean the French delegates

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>if stained from voting at the conference. Uh. They even

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>decided to adopt Paris meantime as their national time, but

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>eventually they had to switch to Grennish mean time, you know,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like a few decades later. But even then some people

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in France would refer to g M T as quote,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the meantime of Paris retarded nine minutes and twenty one seconds.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that's why we've always said that

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>France is really like the Cincinnati of Nations. Yeah, old,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, since you brought up g M T,

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we should probably talk a little bit about what that

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is and how exactly it's determined. Sure, but before we

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>get into all that, let's take a quick break. You're

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to part Time Genius, and we're talking about mankind's

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>many varied attempts to keep time. All right, Mango, So

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about the worldwide impact of the

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Greenwich Meridian and Greenwich mean time. But I'm not done

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>with this topic just yet because I'm still a little

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>hazy on the specific. So do you have a sense

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of what we're actually referring to when we use these terms. Yeah,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So we always think of the Prime Meridian as an

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>imaginary line running around the world, just like we do

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Equator, and it definitely is that, But the

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Grenich Meridian is also a physical line. Like there's this

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bronze strip that runs through a courtyard at the Royal

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Observatory in UH in London, and it represents the boundary

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>between the Eastern and Western hemispheres. UH so if you

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>were to stand with one foot on either side of

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the line, you technically be in two different hymns fears

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I mean kind of these days.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The prime meridian is determined by this complex statistical solution.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It involves, I think, algorithms and the coordination with the

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>International Bureau of Weights and Measurements. It's it's way too

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>complicated again into hear, but the basic result is that

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the physical line in the observatory courtyard is actually about

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ten feet off from where the imaginary line is that

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we might go by. Okay, so I see, So I

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>get that g MT is based on the local time

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at that position of the prime meridian in Greenwich. So

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that explains the G and the T. But what about

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the M. How do means fit into this whole thing? Yeah,

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the mean is just the average that's used when determining

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the accurate time in Greenwich. So the Earth obviously rotates

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>at an uneven speed and the average just helps account

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for that. Okay, well, that actually clears up a good bit.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There is one story that I want to tell here

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>while we're on this subject of GMT, because there's the

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>belvil that the are you familiar with the Belville family.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I do know about them. Yeah yeah, So just for

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>our listeners, as the family that made a living by

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>literally selling time to their neighbors. So, just in case

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you haven't heard this story, it starts with an astronomer

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and a meteorologist. His name was John Delvill and so

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he began working as an assistant at the Royal Observatory

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and Greenwich back in the eighteen thirties. Now, during this time,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>he would always set his pocket watch to the observatories clock.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about it, that was a pretty

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>awesome job perk because this was the eighteen thirties, so

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it was tough to get the right time if you

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>didn't live really close to the observatory and there were

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>no radios, no telephones or even telegraphs to communicate that

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>time to other parts of London. So unless you had

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>access to the observatory, much like John did, you were

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much out of luck and your clocks were likely

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to be off by you know, at least a few minutes.

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>And so John looks at this problem and he sees

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>this money making opportunity and he starts selling the time

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to a network of subscribers all over the city. Now,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>each week he would get his pocket watch certified at

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the observatory, and then he would set off to visit

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>London's clockmakers and shipping companies and even just some ordinary

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>citizens who really wanted to know what time it was exactly.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And so these customers they would pay an annual fee

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 1>for this service, and John would provide this thing for

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like twenty more years until he passed away. It's unbelievable

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that that he thought to make subscriptions for this thing

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is just incredible. But you know what I love about

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the story is how easily it could have ended just

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>there right like, Uh, by the time John died, time

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>signals were being set by telegraph to anyone who owned one,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know, his weekly visits weren't really necessary anymore.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But after twenty years of trusting John's pocket watch, many

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of his subscribers couldn't stomach the thought of setting their

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>clocks to an untested piece of technology like the telegraph.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like in Japan when they put out calculators. Uh,

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>people need to have abicus is attached to them so

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that they would double check the work of the calculators.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But so anyway, they were all these people who were

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>desperate to maintain this service they knew and loved, and

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and these loyal customers kept asking John's much younger widow, Maria,

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to carry on the family business. And so she did

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for thirty six years when Maria carried her husband's watch

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>all over London. But then when she retired in her

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribers still weren't ready to give up the service, so

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they started petitioning for Belleville's daughter Ruth to take up

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this uh business of London's timekeeper. And then she did too. Wow.

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think the story might end there, but

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>it keeps going. And so even after making these weekly

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>rounds for an additional forty eight years, Ruth only stopped

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen forty because World War Two had made it

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>too dangerous to walk the streets. I mean, if you

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think about it, she was eighty six years old. Radios

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>had been broadcasting the time for decades at this point,

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but the family business was somehow still lucrative enough for

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>her to keep up with it for her entire adult life. Yeah,

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's pretty amazing that this family turned

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>like this niche service into basically a dynasty, right Like

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a multi generational and family business. And it's also

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing to me that like the Royal Observatory was just

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>down with this arrangement, like they could have shut it

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>down at any point, but they just never did. M Well,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as we're doling out credit here, I think

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we should probably pause for a minute to give a

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Belville's pocket watch, which actually even had

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a nickname. It was Arnold, and it was named after

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the person who made it, and all three Belvils relied

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on this same eighteenth century pocket watch when they were

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>making their rounds, and it was a state of the

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>art watch when John Delville purchased it nearly a hundred

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>years before Ruth's retirement, and after all those intervening decades,

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it continued to provide time accurate to within I think

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a tenth of a second. So it's remarkable when you

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>consider how old this watch was. So as a reward

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for such faithful service, Arnold is now enshrine at the

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Clockmaker's Museum in London and it's still display there today.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>So nice work, Arnold. It is amazing that, like when

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you give something a name, it just becomes so much

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>more charming, like if you called your toaster Oliver, suddenly

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is a much more toaster. But you know, what's interesting

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about pocket watches like Arnold is that they actually represent

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a tipping point in the history of timekeeping. Yeah, I

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a big deal, but but what do you

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>mean exactly? So obviously humans had tried and failed to

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>keep accurate time for a long time by this point,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, before we had these mechanical clocks run by

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gears and springs, and early civilizations like Egypt or China

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they developed sundials to track the passage of time. These

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>other civilizations created water clocks as to work around, so

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>rather than relying on the stars and the sun, you know,

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>they used water to steadily drip into a container that

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>had these painted lines around the side to mark different

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>points in the day. And of course this method had

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>its problems too, you know, water freezes and that could

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>effectively stop the process. But many of these inconsistencies all

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fell by the wayside with the introduction of these mechanical clocks.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>This system just provide a way more reliable way of

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping time, and one that wasn't influenced by changes in

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>temperature or lack of light and its mechanical clocks became

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more and more common and more portable. The active time

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>keeping almost became more entwined with daily life than ever before. Okay,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I see what you're saying. So

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pocket watches were kind of the breakthrough that allowed the

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>average citizen to start keeping track of time in this

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really specific way. I mean, yeah, the old way of

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>doing things where most people were just having to keep

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>up with morning, noon, and nine. I mean, people could

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>now easily gauge, you know, not only the individual hour,

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>but down to the minute of the day exactly. Smithsonian

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>has this really great article on the history of early timekeeping,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's one part I want to read. It's a

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>nice breakdown of the pocket watches impact. It goes like

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this quote. Affordable pocket watches weren't common until the nineteenth century,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but once they arrived, they quickly invaded the world of commerce.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>When you could time your actions with those of a

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>remote trading partner, new styles of just in time commerce

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>could merge. Pocket watch wielding conductors meant trains could begin

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep regular schedules. Scientists and astronomers could conduct more

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>precise experiments. Portable watches even made it easier for lovers

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to conduct illicit affairs by arranging to meet at a

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>pre ordained spot in time. But having a watch wasn't

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just about keeping to the clock. It was a cultural marker,

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a performance of punctuality. Every time you pulled out your

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>watch conspicuously and in public, you signal to others that

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you were reliable. I mean that's interesting because you never

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>really think about how much of a game change or

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>portability was for time pieces. But I mean it makes

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sense that it would be. But you know, it's also

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>easy to imagine how the pocket watch was kind of

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this springboard to the wrist watch. I mean, pulling one

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of those out of your pocket is easy when you're

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>standing still, but it's a different story when you're doing

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>something active, like if you're jogging or riding in a

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>car or whatever it might be. Yeah, it's obviously much

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>easier to take a quick and set your wrist. I mean.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>The problem was that when the first first watches started

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>showing up in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, they were

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>marketed almost exclusively to women. They had leather bands or

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>metallic bands, they were small, they had these delicate watch faces,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and they were primarily worn as jewelries, so men tended

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to shy away from them, and watchmakers came to view

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea of strapping a watch gear wrist is pretty silly.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there was this one German watchmaker who referred

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to the custom as quote the idiotic fashion of carrying

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>one's clock on the most restless part of the body,

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>exposed to the most extreme temperature variations. One hopes it

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>will soon disappear. I love reading or hearing quotes about

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>something like this that are just seems so harmless, and

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>people speak so passionately. I think I've heard anybody speak

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so passionately against wrist watches. But obviously this guy didn't

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>get his way. So what changed, Well, the turning point

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>really came during World War One. Officers started using them

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>because it was easier to core NAT attacks with a

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>watch on your wrist and it was to like fumble

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in your pockets. So as the war went on, watchmakers

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>started rolling out new models with soldiers in mind. They

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>had these larger faces, these more prominent numbers to improve legibility,

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and in the end, this manlier take on the wrist

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>watch was this huge hit with soldiers millions of whom

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>continued wearing them once the war was over, and sales

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>figures actually reflect the sea change. Like in a wristwatches

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>only account for fifteen percent of all watches made in America,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but by five the number had risen to eight percent

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of American watches. So clearly all this rebranding paid off. Wow,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 1>and only what fifteen years that that is amazing. Well,

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, since we're on the subject of wrist watches

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>as status symbols and how wars can kind of help

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>broaden the market for them, I do feel like we

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about maybe the most famous luxury watch

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of them all, and that is, of course, the Rolex. Yeah,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's another great wartime story. But before we get to it,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break. All right, Well, so what's

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the scoop on Rolex and how exactly did it become

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a luxury brand. Well, like you explained, the First World

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>War really established the wristwatches new role in combat and

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that's something that carried over into the Second World War

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. And the Rolex brand was this especially popular

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>choice among British pilots who really considered the Swiss timepieces

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the most accurate ones in the world. So

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>long before they became status symbols here in the States,

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Rolexes were already treasured abroad for their utility really, and

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>you know the only problem was that whenever these British

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>pilots were shot down and taken prisoner, their German captors

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>always confiscated their watches. So word of this gets to

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Rolex and he decides to take

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>action on the troop's behalf. So the deal was that

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>any British elett who lost their Rolex in the line

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of duty could simply send him a letter explaining the situation,

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and the company would then send out a replacement watch,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>along with a note telling the soldier not to quote

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>even think of settlement during the war. So that's a

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>really nice gesture. And I guess they were kind of like,

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I use, when they came back to town they could

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get these watches, but realistically, like, how many POWs we're

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be allowed to send away for watches from

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>these camps. Well, here's what surprising about this whole thing

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they were actually thousands of soldiers who responded

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to Rolex's offer. And as for getting the watches behind,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>enemy lines. Apparently there were some German camps that gave

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>special privileges to British airmen, including the chance to order

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and keep these watches. So, as you might imagine, this

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>proved to be a bad idea for Germany in a

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>few different ways. I mean, so for one thing, the

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Rolex program boosted the captured soldiers morale, and after all,

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy who had extended the offer to them, Hans Willsdorf,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was himself a German born expatriot. Now, by allowing soldiers

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to take on these io used that you mentioned, he

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was basically saying, hey, I believe the Allies are gonna

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>win this thing, so go ahead and pay me when

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this is all over. That's pretty fascinating and I really

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do love it. You know, it never occurred to me

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that the arrangement could be taken, you know, as this

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>vote of confidence, which is really cool. But you said

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the program also led to other problems for the Germans. Well,

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely true. I mean, some of these replacement Rolex

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>has played pretty critical roles in the British escape attempts.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for instance, you know the so called Great

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Escape of ninety four. Well, the men who helped dig

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the tunnels, had to covertly disperse the excess soil and

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the prison yard, and so to help them with this,

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some of them were using Rolex watches to time the

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>movements of the guards. That's pretty awesome. But if the

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Rolex program was only open to British soldiers, like, how

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>did it become such a hot brand in the US? Well,

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that was actually another unexpected benefit from the Rolex war campaign.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So when American servicemen were overseas, they heard their British

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>allies go on and on about how these Rolexes were

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>so reliable and how the company had made this amazing

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>replacement service for them. And so once the war was over,

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>many Americans had this newfound appreciation for these watches. And

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>while Rolex had never found much success in the States

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>prior to the war, after the war the brand became

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this go to choice for Americans who wanted what they

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>saw as a classy wrist watch. Well, speaking of classy

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>wrist watches, did you know that the world's first calculator

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>watch was sold exclusively through these high end retailers like

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Tiffany and uh Neiman Marcus. That's pretty funny to imagine yeah,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it sounds ridiculous because we mostly think of

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like calculator watches as almost like tacky plastic slabs that

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>nerds used to wear in the eighties. But before companies

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like Cassio and Saco took the design mainstream in late

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>seventies and early eighties, calculator watches were almost more of

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a luxury item. So I guess if you took the

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>timing of that, it does make sense like we were

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 1>still a decade or two away from computers being common

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fixtures in the home. So this idea of having like

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a mini computer, although it's you know, incredibly basic one

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>strapped to your risk, probably did seem like a little

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of a luxury. But I mean the real question

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is how much were they charging for these things if

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they were being sold at Tiffany of all places. Yeah,

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so I was curious about this too, And it turns

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>out when the first calculator watches were released in nine

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they were cast in solid gold and they retailed for

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about four thousand dollars, and for reference, at the time,

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a year of tuition at Harvard cost about two hundred

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>bucks less than that. So depending on how much do

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you had, you could either attend an Ivy League school,

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>or you could wear a tiny computer on your wrist.

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough choice. I'm not sure which I decide

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on that. Actually I was curious, so I've been using

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>my own calculator watch while you're saying, or just my

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>computer to check the inflation on that number. So if

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you do the math in today's any that golden calculator

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>watch would cost you nearly eighteen thousand dollars. So I

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Mago. I don't want to hurl any accusations,

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think they might have been overcharging just a

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit for those things. Yeah, I think a lot

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of folks agreed with you even back then, And it

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>took a year or so for the same company to

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>come out with what they build as an economy version

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of the calculator watch. These were made of steel instead

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of gold, and the result was that they only cost

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>about fifty dollars or you know, right around two dollars

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>after inflation and from their competitors drove the price even lower,

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with these cheaper models costing under twenty bucks by the

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>early eighties. I like how it's either fifty dollars or

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>four thousand dollars. It seems like a little bit of

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a jump there. But all right, Well, before we wrap

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>things up for this episode, we did promise at the

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>outset that we'd circle back to the infamous moon Watch,

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and I can tell from the white Tristan keeps flashing

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>his wrist that he's gonna hold us to that promise. Well,

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>lucky for us, there's a story that we both wanted

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell anyway, because and off, a lot of attention

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gets paid to Neil Armstrong, and you know, as the

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>first man on the Moon, that's certainly warranted. But the

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>downside of that focus is that the other lunar pioneers

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>tend to get overlooked, including, among others, the Mega speed

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Master a k. The first Watch on the Moon, which

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is just a grave and justice the time pieces everywhere,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>no question. But wouldn't this just take us back to Armstrong.

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was wearing a speed Master on the

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Apollo eleven missions, so wasn't his the first watch on

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Moon? Well that's the thing. The electronic timer and

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the lunar module had malfunctioned during the mission, so Armstrong

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>actually had to leave his watch behind before ever setting

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>foot on the Moon. So that actually means that while

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>buzz Aldren ultimately became the second man on the Moon,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it was his speed Master that became the first watch

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Moon. You know, I bet that continues to

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be like this big consolation for Buzz to be able

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to brag about that. But all right, well, now we

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>know why it's called the moon Watch. Let let's back

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>up from it and talk about why the speed Master

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was the right watch for the job. And just be clear,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>several watches made it into space before the Speedmaster. Both

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Russians and Americans had used watches in orbit will before

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the Apollo missions, but in order to survive an actual spacewalk,

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>NASA knew that the average wristwatch wasn't going to cut it.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And that was because whichever watch made it onto the

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Moon but not only need to be water and temperature resistant,

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but shockproof and most importantly, capable of withstanding twelve g

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 1>s of acceleration. So to that in an engineer at

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>NASA named James Reagan. He was tasked with writing out

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the specs for such a watch and sending them to

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>potential manufacturers. According to Reagan, the secrecy and the complexity

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of the lunar landing made the specs nearly impossible to decipher. So,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as he put it, the watch packs were so nebulous

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that people couldn't even tell what we were going to

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do with them. Yeah, I remember reading that even though

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>NASA approached like ten different companies, only for them ever

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>actually submitted watches to be evaluated, and those tests went

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on for months. I think, like one of the watches

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was limited because it had this like crack crystal during decompression.

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>One had hands of the watch that actually worked in

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the test of it. And in the end, the Mega

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Speedmaster was the only watch to meet all of those requirements,

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and to this day it's still the only watch that's

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ever been flight qualified by NASA. I mean, it's definitely

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an impressive track record, especially when you look at the

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>crucial role that the watch has played in later missions.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>For instance, everybody knows how trouble the Apollo thirteen mission was,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but what a lot of people forget is that the

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>crew likely wouldn't have made it back to Earth if

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>not for their speed Masters. And you know, they had

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to shut down their computers just to be able to

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>save power, and so the crew managed to navigate their

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>way home using measurements gleaned from their handwound watches. Yeah,

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you'll sometimes hear the complaint that our increased

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on timekeeping has made humans slaves to time. Like

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you hear this criticism a lot. It

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>was a criticism that was leveled at pocket watch is

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and risk watches back in the day, and now we

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>hear the same thing about the ever present watches on

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>our smartphones or computer screens. But I do think it's

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>worth remembering that our session with marking and tracking time

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>has also led to tons of positive outcomes. You know,

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's saved astronauts from and otherwise uncertain doom, and uh,

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it also lets us know when it's time to go

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>downstairs and get a big bowl of ramen. So you know,

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>having a clock definitely has its benefits. Yeah, I mean,

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a that's a pretty important role that it plays.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>But all right, so what do you say we set

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the clock for a fact off and then we can

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 1>go scarf some of those noodles that you're talking about,

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Because now I'm wondering, yes, please, So how about we

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>start with the fact about the author of A Brief

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>History of Time? Do you know that at Stephen Hawkings

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>funeral it was made clear that time travelers were welcome,

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and this was somewhat of a nod to a party

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>invitation Hawking at once sent out into as a nine.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It read quote, you are cordially invited to a reception

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>for time travelers hosted by Professor Stephen Hawking, to be

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>held in the past at the University of Cambridge Gonville

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at Caius College. I'm sure I said those colleges wrong.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Hawking had of course already thrown the party back in

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>June of that year, and he sent out the invitation

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>later to make sure that only time travelers would show up. Unfortunately,

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he was left a party alone in a decorated room

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>with a banner that read welcome time Travelers. That's a bomber.

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that probably would have changed history just a

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit of wow. All right, So did you know

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that the times on the boards at Grand Central Station

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>are intentionally off by a full minute? Now? This is,

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, because it can be dangerous when passengers are

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing and end up falling or colliding with each other,

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and this means that the trains are actually pulling out

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the station a minute after the posted departure times.

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 1>This may seem trivial, but the ideas that those heading

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>quickly to a train may relax just a little bit

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>know that they're going to get there. And the studies

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>actually backed this up because Grand Central actually has one

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of the lowest rates of slips and falls of all

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the major stations in the US. I love that there's

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a measurement of this, but that's pretty impressive. That's it is.

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think about that every time I go to Grand

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Central from now long. You know, I feel like we

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>can't have an episode on time and not talk about

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>cuckoo clocks. So I'm here to tell you about the

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>world's largest cuckoo clock. It's in Triburg, Germany. The bird

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>alone is fourteen feet long and weighs three pounds. The

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>pendulum is another twenty six feet and ways two hundred

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty pounds. So this is not a petite clock. Right there,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>There's another clock that's trying to edge in for the

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.439
<v Speaker 1>claim to be the largest cuckoo clock in the world.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's in Sugar Creek, Ohio. This clock is twenty three

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ft tall and twenty four ft wide, and Guinness has

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.879
<v Speaker 1>yet to declare one of them winners. So I think

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we should just celebrate the fact that there are two

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably large cuckoo clocks out there. That definitely seems worth celebrating.

0:37:58.160 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That is funny. I like the idea that Guinness is

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is like ignoring to wait on some even bigger clock.

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>They're just not going to pay attention yet. Well, when

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you look at the working hours of the richest Americans

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>today versus a few decades back, it's interesting to see

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that the wealthier working much longer now than they used to.

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And that makes the findings from a study out of

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Anderson School of Management this is a u c

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>l A that much more interesting because in a study

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of four thousand people, or a survey of four thousand

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people at various age, employment, and income levels, when people

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>were asked whether they would take more money or more

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>time if they could get it, about two thirds of

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the people chose money. But the study found that those

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>who chose time over money were generally happier people, and

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this was after controlling for various income level. So it

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting to see that. Huh, so I forgot

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to mention as Stephen Hawking factorlier did you know that

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>A Brief History of Time was on the London Sunday

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Times bestseller list for an unbelievable two hundred thirty seven

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks after it published. And this which is so many

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks of people pretending to understand what they were ready,

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that is years. That really is unbelievable. I will say

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit every time I would see somebody

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>holding that book, even though it is a fascinating read,

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you you do have this tendency to look at and

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be like, do you really understand what this book is saying?

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm not sure I did. But all right, well

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I've got a quick one too. I decided we should

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 1>throw in effect about Cindy Lauper because of her song

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Time after Time. And I didn't realize this, but her

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>debut solo album, which was called She's So Unusual, came

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>out three and it was the first debut female album

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to have four songs hit the top five on the charts,

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>which is unbelievable. So it included Time after Time. And

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of course girls just want to have fun. You know what,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a song fact as well. It's about the

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>song time is on my side? You mean like that's

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the that's the Rolling Stones, right, Yeah, that's the one.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So it was actually first written by Jerry Raggaboy and

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>performed by a jazz from bonist Kaiwinde, but then soul

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>singer Irma Thomas and of course the Rolling Stones made

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it a song almost everyone knew, and it became the

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Rolling stones first top ten hit in the US. You know,

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we we both ended up with facts

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that had to do with songs with the word time

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in them. So I've got a challenge for you here, mango,

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you say that we have a little bit

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>of a back and forth where we have to name

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>songs with the word time and the title, and then

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you also have to give the name of the performer

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>or performers. What do you say to this? Yeah, I'm

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>up for this. All right, you go first, Let's see

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:34.919
<v Speaker 1>how far we can go. Uh if I could turn

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>back time with share? Oh I thought that you started

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>out with the Share, when I'm gonna start out with

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>one that's like equally respectable. Just the song Time of

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>course by Hootie and the Blowfish during our high school years.

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>UM Summertime by Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong, Nice you

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>went a little more sophisticated there. Um for the Longest Time,

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's just called the Longest Time by Billy Joel?

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Did anyone really know what time it is? Chicago? Nice?

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow is a Long Time by Bob Dylan, One More

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Time by Daft Punk Nice. All right, I've got a

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>great one, maybe the best of all time. I've had

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the time of my life, you know from Dirty Dancing? Yeah?

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Who sings that? Wait? Oh no, there's so many other

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>songs I could have chosen. Wait, wait, wait, I should

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>get credit because nobody knows who's sang this? Right? Was

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it pet Crazy? Yeah? It's a Patrick Swayzy original. Yeah. Yeah,

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look at up fair Bill Medley and Jennifer Warrens.

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Come on, nobody even knows that that? Why did I

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>go with that? But you know what, I'm gonna play

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>true to the game and I'm gonna give it to you.

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You you have one today, Congratulations, Thank you so much. Now,

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we forgot a lot of terrific facts about

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>watches and time and clocks and all of that, and

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we always love hearing those facts from you, so please

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 1>send those to us. Part time Genius at how stuff

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. You can also hit us up on

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Twitter, but as always, thanks so much for listening. Yea,

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks again for listening. Part Time Genius is a production

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of How Stuff Works and wouldn't be possible without several

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>brilliant people who do the important things we couldn't even

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>begin to understand. Tristan McNeil does the editing thing. Noel

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown made the theme song and does the MIXI mixy

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sound thing. Jerry Rowland does the exact producer thing. Gay

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>blues Yer is our lead researcher, with support from the

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Research Army including Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and Lucas Adams

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and Eve Jeff Cook gets the show to your ears.

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Eves. If you like what you heard, we

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>hope you'll subscribe, and if you really really like what

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you've heard, maybe you could leave a good review for us.

0:42:49.600 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Do we forget Jason? Jason who