WEBVTT - 2025 NCAA Tournament: FINAL FOUR Best Bets & Predictions (Ep. 688)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the Betting Pros Podcast. I'm Ryan Warmley,

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>joined today by Terrell Furman Junior and by our guest PJ.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Class Or. It's the Save three folks running it back.

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>After last week we talked about the Sweet sixteen and

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the Elite Eight, we are now talking about the Final Four.

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>We have this historic Final four, all four one seeds,

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the strongest final four at least according to the metrics

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like Ken Pom, basically that we've ever seen. I know

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that every single round it feels like we're saying, Okay,

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the madness, let's get to the fun,

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the real, big epic matchups, and then

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the best teams just keep winning, kind of running away.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>In a lot of cases we had. We had some

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>really good games over the weekend, but still kind of

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that kind of epic feel. I think we're

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get that with this final foward just incredible, incredible games. Obviously,

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got Auburn against Florida, We've got Duke against Houston.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break it all down. Trell, how are you

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>feeling after the Sweet sixteen and Elite Eight? Where were

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>your big takeaways from that weekend.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm still very confident. I have sang the praises of

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Florida and Houston this entire time. Houston has continued not

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to let me down, and I mean the buckling down

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>and Calvin Sampson, So when this team felt like that

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it could be over and this could be another moment,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't, and he got this team through it. Excellent

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 2>play on the out of bounds play. I mean, they've

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 2>been able to handle business. They were slaughtering Tennessee at

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>half like I wasn't even considering anything else there. I'm

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 2>still on the Houston and Florida wave. I'm kno getting

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>off this train. Houston Florida in National Championship. I'm ready.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about it more, but I'm ready.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, PJ. That Houston performance against the Tennessee quite the demolition.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>The game gets predued, like Terrell was mentioning that add

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of bounds play at the end of the game was

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the better games that we've had, you know,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the tournament so far. Once they got passed Gonzaga, who

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to kind of differentiate and pick them

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the bracket. Once it got past to Kenzagga, I

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>think we all felt pretty strongly about Houston making a

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>run to the final four. It after that point, obviously,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like Florida has had some close ish calls on this run,

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but they still just look really, really good. And you know,

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the hottest teams in basketball, Duke the best

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>team in the sport, I think lest I would certainly say,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty obvious. And then Auburn just just keeps winning

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as the number on overall seeds, so like really exciting.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>What were your big takeaways, PJ.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, it's obviously been a chalky tournament so far.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 3>We got all four one seeds in the final four.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>But my takeaway is that it feels like everybody's talking

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>about how chalky it is. But outside of Duke, you know,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>all these teams have had their scares, right. Houston was

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>challenged by Purduing Gonzagai, like you guys were saying, Florida

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>by Yukon and Texas Tech. Auburn needed a big second

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 3>half run against Michigan. You're trailing Creighton at halftime. So yes,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 3>these are the four best teams. These are gonna be

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 3>two epnic games, but they have had some challenges to

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>get here, and certainly Florida. You know that comeback against

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Texas Tech was impressive. But I'm excited for these games. Yeah, guys,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Ken Palm started in nineteen ninety six, and

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 3>these four teams are for the top ten highest rated team.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Wild Oh wow, Me and Kim Palm are the same age,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>me and you both.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Through so these so these are four of the ten

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>best teams in Terrell's lifetime.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Ninety six was a great year. I'd be shy to

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>tell people ninety six was a great year.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean they're four of the top ten

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>highest rated teams, and all four of these teams are

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>top ten in offense and top ten in defense. So

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 3>it's just it's it's gonna be epic And hopefully these

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>two games live up to the hype, and I think

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that they will.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, really, these three games, if you include

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the title game, you know, after we get the winner,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's hard to imagine. The only world in which

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we get duds, truthfully, is Duke just being

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a step ahead of everybody else in almost like the

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years of Yukon, where we keep waiting

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>for them to stub their toe at some point and

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>face a challenge, and it just never happens. You'd get

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the tournament. It's like, well, Duke was

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just the best team by a mile the whole way.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I think that will happen, but that's

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the only world in which I don't think we're getting

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>three epic games here. So we'll see where it goes.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I did notice that when you're talking about Florida facing

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>some you know, difficulties, you mentioned Yukon and Texas Tech.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>You didn't mention the first half against Maryland, which was

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a very close game. I will point out as well,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we could ignore the second.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Half of Maryland first half cash.

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, that was That was an interesting one to watch,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>especially with everything going on with Willard, which we are

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to talk about because I need to maintain

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>my sanity. I do want to let everybody know that

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to boost your final four bets, New

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel customers can bet five dollars and win two hundred

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets. If that first bet hits, just

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>head to bettingpros dot com slash FanDuel to get started.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That's bettingpros dot Com, slash FanDuel and make your plays

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel today, guys. Let's start with the left side

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of the remaining bracket. It's number one Auburn. It's number

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one Florida. It's the one versus four if you look

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>at the overall kind of s curve seating lines, but

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they're the two number one. Obviously, we have seen this

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>matchup before, given what we saw in the SEC this year. PJ,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>as an SEC connoisseur, as a fan of Alabama, I

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>will start with you here. When you start thinking about

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Auburn and Florida, what's the first thing that comes to mind?

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it that you really like aside on the total.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it that you really like laying the points or

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>taking the points? Is it that you expect this to

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>play out similarly to the matchups we saw in the

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>SEC this season. What's the first thing when you think

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of these two teams going against each other that you

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:30.559
<v Speaker 1>think about?

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 3>My thought is that if this game is close late,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>I trust Florida because Florida has Walter Clayton Junior and

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Auburn doesn't.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 4>That's that's my thought.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>The way that I'm betting this game, though, you guys

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 3>is I think you bet it live. These two teams

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 3>have showed throughout the regular season, they've showed throughout the

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>tournament two that they can go on runs at any

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>given point in the game. You know, they could have

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a sluggish first half, they could be trailing in the

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 3>second half, and then they just go on these eighteen

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>to four. We saw Auburn go on to seventeen to

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 3>nothing run against Michigan, and that's what I want to

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 3>bet into. You know, Florida two and a half, I

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>think that's a little too high. I feel like, honestly,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 3>it should be closer to a pick them. But the

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>perception around these two teams right now, and with Florida

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>having Clayton and all the big shots that he's hit,

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I see why they're two and a half point favorite.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>But I'm just I think one of these teams at

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>some point in the game is going to be up

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 3>by double digits, and when that happens, I want to

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 3>bet the other side because I think it's going to

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 3>be close and it's going.

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 4>To come down to the wire.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>It is interesting, you know, when they played on February eighth,

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Auburn was a nine and a half point favorite. Elijah

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Martin didn't play in the game. Now eleven point favorite

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 3>was that high? I thought it was like nine and

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a half te point.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I wouldn't know. I didn't bet Florida.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.559
<v Speaker 3>So eleven point favorite. Now they're two and a half

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 3>point favorite against Auburn.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we were talking.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 3>About Auburn is the team to beat in the tournament

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 3>like three weeks ago, a month ago, and now they

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 3>have the largest odds to win it all at plus

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>five twenty five or whatever it may be. So I

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>think there's value on Alburn. But Clayton just terrifies me

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>because if the game's close, like, that's the guy that

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>you want with the ball in his hands.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's a great game to bet live.

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, whenever we get these games with a short

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>spread and a high total, you expect there to be

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of points. You expect there to be a

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of lead changes, both teams to kind of go

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>on their runs. So that's that's how I'm gonna bet it.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Just wait for one of these teams to go up

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>double digits and then I'll bet the other side. If

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>you had to maybe pick the game, though, I'd probably

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 3>go with Florida, man, just because I think it's going

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>to be close, and I just trust Walter Clayton Junior

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>to find a way to win the Gators the game.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Terrell, you've talked already on this episode about how you

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>know you see this as in Florida Houston, and how

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you've been vettanam Florida.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I was supposed to say that to the end.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just bring that up to say, so it's

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>clear where you're going with the game. What do you

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think about from the betting angle? Do you have thoughts

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on the total? Just looking at the spread, it sounds

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like you would like Florida, But did you have any

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>betting specific angles to this one?

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>With the conference games, I like backing the undering conference

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>games in the tournament. I think that familiarity that you

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>have with the team and the time that you have

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to prepare. You're also putting this in San Antonio, in

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that filthy, stinking dome that they're playing in, and you know,

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>it's all weird and the death perception of being on

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the court with all the fans and all that. Like, yeah,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I can see myself and taught myself into an under here.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Am I gonna do it?

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Probably not. I'm probably just gonna put anything that I

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>thought that I was gonna put on the under all

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>on Florida, because, I mean, the issue with Walter Clayton

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Junior is something that we like in the military, and

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 2>we call it a nuclear deterrent because everybody knows I

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 2>have Walton Clayton Junior in my hip pocket just ready

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>to use them, and everybody is sitting there like, all right,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>let's not antagonize them so that we don't pull out

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Walter Clayton Junior. Let's do everything we can to make

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>sure Walton Clayton Junior does not get out into this game.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 2>And unfortunately, what that's gonna do is that's gonna actually

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>play in a Florida's actual game plan, which is playing

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>through the Bigs. Condon had a big game that last

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>time around when they went on the road, on the

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>road to the place where everybody was terrified to play

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>basketball this year in the jungle, and got to win

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>by double digits as an eleven point dog. Like, I

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 2>think that the Bigs are gonna have something to say, Condon,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>shemy Lou. I think that they are gonna be really

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 2>really big for them in this game, and at the

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 2>end of the game, we may not be talking about

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Wart Clayton Junior, but we're gonna be talking about those

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>bigs and how those bigs really really aided them and

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>helped them get this win.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys think, like, just in looking at these

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two matchups, setting aside who you think is gonna win,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are you more excited about Auburn Florida or about Duke Houston?

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Is there like one of these matchups that you like

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are really jazzed I mean they're both great, obviously, but

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is there one PG that you are like more jazzed

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>up for?

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Duke Houston, Because I think the winner of that

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 3>game wins the national Championship, and I just want to

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>see I want to see how Duke looks against that

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Houston defense, right. I also want to see how Houston's

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 3>offense looks against that Duke defense, because we think it

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 3>do Duke and obviously they're star freshmen and how good

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>those guys are offensively. But I think it was an

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 3>eye opener to all of us to watch how they

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>limited Alabama's offense to only sixty five points, So you

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>know that that'll be the big topic of discussion, right,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>how does Duke's offense look against Houston's defense, because both

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 3>of those units are so great. But I want to

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 3>see how Houston's offense looks against Duke's defense because Houston's

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 3>one of the best three point shooting teams in the country.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And Duke just did a great job against Alabama limiting

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 3>them eight for thirty from downtown. So to me, that'll, uh,

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>that's the game. I can't wait to watch him. I'm

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>looking forward to seeing that matchup on that side. And

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 3>also keep in mind, you know, Duke had this stigma

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 3>around like these John Shire teams. They were kind of soft, right,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Like if you if they went up against a team

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 3>that could like punch him in the mouth, that was

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of the way to beat them.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 4>We don't talk.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 3>About that Duke team this way, and we're we're gonna

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna find out real quick about their toughness Houston.

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 4>So that's the game I'm looking more forward to.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Terrell. Do you feel similarly about being more interested in

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Duke Houston?

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I always can. You know, I always love

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to see the Duke Ky's fall flat on their face,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm perfectly good with that. I think, really honestly,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you could probably scrap the first thirty five minutes of

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>both games for me and give me the last five

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>minutes of both games because I get to either watch

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Walt Clayton junior go off in the last five minutes

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>of the game and a great game there, or I

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>get to see what Duke looks like and yet another

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>close game. Duke has not been good in close games

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>this year. Well, how did Clemson beat them? I keep

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>going back to the Clemson game because that's how I

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 2>forecasted the way for you to beat Duke. You make

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>it an ugly game, You muck it up, you play

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>defense that matches their defense, and you give yourself a

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>chance with the possession in the last couple of minutes

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of the game, and you force them into putting the

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 2>ball into their freshman star players' hands and hope for

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>a turnover. Clemson was able to get the turnover and

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 2>they were able to steal their win. I think that's

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 2>how Houston does it. Here again, we're gonna put that

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>pressure on Cooper flag and yes, he is a great player,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>but at the end of the day, he's still young.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>He's still a freshman and this is the grandest stage

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 2>of them all, and Kevin Sampson and this team is

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>overly due to make it past this stage here. So

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's what I'm really really looking forward

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 2>to the last couple of minutes of the game, because

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 2>I really want to see if you get Duke into

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 2>a close game, how are they able to respond? Do

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>they have that pedigree to take it to the next

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 2>step and win a close game? Because anybody, well not anybody,

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 2>but they've shown that they can beat teams by twenty plus,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>But can you beat a team if they bring you

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>into a tie game with thirty seconds to go?

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about that angle? Pg? I mean

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Terrell is right in games where Cooper flag is healthy,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen this Duke team in a close

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>game in almost two.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Months exactly, which is why you know I've been saying

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 3>on my show all week, if you like Duke, I

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 3>just bet him five and a half. If you like Houston,

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I just bet him on the money line. For everything

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 3>that Terrell was saying, if it's a close game, I

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 3>would trust Houston more in that scenario because that's how

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 3>Houston plays. You know, they play at the fourth slowest

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 3>pace in the country. Their defense is so great, they

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 3>wont a half court game. They want to execute in

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the final minutes. They want to lean on their toughness

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and how well coached they are, and all those sorts

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 3>of things. Duke, I mean, this is what we would

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>see out of all those great and Zaga teams that

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 3>Mark Few had, right, they would go to two and

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 3>a half months not playing anybody. You get him in

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 3>a tight game in the tournament and then they fold

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 3>and that's how they lose. So I agree with Terrell

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, I think if you like Houston, look, obviously

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>five and a half, that's a good amount of points

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 3>where you can bet that. I think if you like them, though,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you just take him out right. I think if they cover,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>they win the game. And if Duke wins, I think

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>they cover this group.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just looking at the d want experience free troster,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Houston averaged over two and a half years of experience

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is pretty high. It's top forty in the country. Duke

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>is a little under two years. That's one hundred and

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighth in the country. So you know, definitely a

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>gap there. Do you guys see a coaching mismatch in

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>either of these because in both of these matchups it's

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a veteran coach who has been around for a long time,

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Calvin Sampson on one end, Bruce Pearl on

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the other end, going up against kind of a young

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>gun in their first final four you know, John Shire

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously played there as a player, and Todd Golden on

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the other side. So in either of these matchups, do

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys give a coaching edge to either side?

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Terrell, Well, I say Florida because I always just kind

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of expect Bruce Pearl just kind of crapped a bit

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>at some point and it's kind of over there, So

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll give it to Florida there. But that I think

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Shire is really good. And I think that's the part

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 2>that makes me very very concerned about the Dookies making

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>a run and potentially winning a national championship is because

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Shire is really really good coach. He has the buy

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>in of the team, the buying of the program, and

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>that's what happens when you go get your guy, Like

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.239
<v Speaker 2>when you have your guy, you know who the successor

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>is you've been playing in this moment like they were

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>able to do that, and he's getting his flowers now

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>in this first final four, so I'm still going to

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>rock with Sampson, but I think it's clearly it might

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit of a bigger edge because again,

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I just expect Bruce Pearl at some point crap a.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Bit, PJ. What do you think about that? Do you

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>see a coaching mismatch in either of these games?

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Not really, I agree with with Terrell.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I think Calvin Sampson is the best coach that's left,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>and I think he's better than Shire, but I think

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Shire is really good, So I don't really see that

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 3>as like a big coaching mismatch or anything like that.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>And then in the other game, like you just have

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 3>a great storyline. When Bruce Pearl first got the job

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>with Auburn in twenty fourteen, he hired Todd Golden from

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Columbia to be his first director of basketball operations, so

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 3>they know each.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Other extremely well.

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 3>He really helped him get his jump start, and then

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Golden went to San Francisco and then obviously went to

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Florida after that. So I think all four coaches that

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>are left are really really good. They're all looking for

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 3>their first national title. But the familiarity there with Pearl

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>and Golden, I think is interesting. I don't really see

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>a mismatch though, in any of these games.

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>If you like betting on basketball, then join Terrell Furman

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Fast Break Bets podcast your daily dose of

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>basketball betting picks. Tune in every weekday for your rapid

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>fire fix and all things basketball. Check out the Fast

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Break Bets podcast on the Betting Pros YouTube channel or

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to podcast. Guys, let's say our just

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple other betting angles before we get out of here.

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a little bit of a shorter episode because there's

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not that many games to hit on. Are there other

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>betting angles, PJ that you're interested in? You talked about

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Walter Clayton, maybe him as like most outstanding player in

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the tournament? Obviously Cooper Flagg, I mean jan I Breuom

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if Favor makes the title game. There's a lot of

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>really good players, you know clearly that are still playing

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why these teams are here. But do you

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have any thoughts on that or any other angles on

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this one besides who wins the games?

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Most outstanding player really no thoughts for me, you know,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I think if Florida wins it, it's probably gonna be Clayton.

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I think if Duke wins it, it probably will be Flag.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Procter and Canipple are both intriguing as well.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.119
<v Speaker 3>If you like Auburn, I would actually go with Pettiford

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 3>rather than Broom. I think, you know, Pettiford's the guy

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>who's probably gonna take and make a lot of the

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>big shots for Auburn if they end up advancing Houston.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 3>You would probably think Crier would be the same. But

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 3>we certainly saw Sharp hit a bunch of big shots

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 3>on that second half against Tennessee. So I mean, look,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 3>this is why all these teams are here. They're all

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 3>so good. They got multiple options. I think the best

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 3>I feel about those. If you like Auburn, you go

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 3>with Pettiford over Broom. I mean, you're getting a way

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 3>better price, and we know, you know you win with

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>guard play in March, and he's gonna be the guy

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>for Auburn if they win the whole thing. He's probably

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit a bunch of big shots. There are a

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>couple player props that I like in the Duke Houston

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 3>game that both kind of correlate with one another. And

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the way that Houston plays defense. Anybody who watches him play,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 3>you know that anytime the ball goes in the post,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 3>they always double, and they're so good at it. It

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>comes so quick, they rotate, They're just they're really good

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 3>at what they do. But because of that, obviously Duke

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>has opportunities that when Houston sends a double to kick

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 3>it out to shooters, Procter over twelve and a half

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>points I think is a good luck. He's been shooting

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the ball ridiculous in the tournament so far. I think

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 3>twelve and a half's a little too low. He's going

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 3>over that in three or four games so far. And

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 3>then come on, Mala, watch the big man. One assist

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>out of him over a half is plus one fifteen.

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 3>He had one against Bama. He didn't have any in

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 3>his two previous games before that. But again, the double

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 3>team comes on him, he's gonna have to kick it out.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 3>I think gets an offensive rebound, he's probably gonna kick

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 3>it out. So the fact that we only need one

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and it's plus money, those were two props I think.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Off of Houston's defense and the way that they trap

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in double team I think two guys, two props to

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 3>keep an eye on Troe.

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about that or any other player

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>props that you're looking at.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going for the big fish. I'm got the

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>worm on the real throwing it out there, and I'm

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 2>going for the big one. Give me the under or flag,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 2>give me the under. If flag goes over, gonna be

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>a long day for Houston. I'm all the way in

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>my Houston handicap. They make this an ugly, ugly game.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>He probably probably still gets up a lot of attempts.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he goes out there and he goes some five

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>for fourteen something like that, like keep him off the line.

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Like PJ was saying in the post, he's not gonna

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 2>get much. Look in the post, he's gonna have to

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 2>try to create something for himself. And they got really

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 2>really good individual defenders, and I think they're going to

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>force the ball out of his hands a lot, force

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 2>him into a bunch of turnovers. If I had a

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 2>turnover prop, I would probably take up turnover prop. I

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>like flag to go under. I think that he may

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 2>have a good game, but getting up to nineteen and

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 2>a half, close to twenty points here against Houston, and

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 2>where I think points are going to be at a

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 2>premium and it's going to be around fifty points to

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the winner. Yeah, no, I'm good.

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do it. We'll make our official picks.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You have already said, Terrell that you are going with

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Florida and Houston. Who do you like in that matchup

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to win it all? Florida? He said, And by the way,

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I will just mention in looking at the futures right now,

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing Auburn plus five point fifty, Houston plus four hundred,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Florida plus three hundred and Duke even Obviously, depending where

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you look, you might see something a little bit different,

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.239
<v Speaker 1>but that's what I'm seeing right now. So with that

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>in mind, Trell, what are you going with?

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Sampson gets it, man, Sampson's due, he gets it. I'm

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 2>going with Houston. Houston wins the National Championship. I think

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Houston gets it done. Houston first half still really really

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 2>good player. We're getting plus money this time around, taking

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>it here again too. So I'm on Houston. I think

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Houston is gonna win the Natty PJ.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Who are you picking? I know you said you kind

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of view Duke Houston almost as the championship game. You're

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick that winner regardless of who they face. Who

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think will win that game? And who do

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you think they'll be facing.

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's going to be Duke and Florida,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.719
<v Speaker 3>and I think Duke cuts down the net side. They

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 3>were my pick from the beginning of the tournament. They've

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 3>looked like the best team up to this point. I

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 3>went to the Elite eight game against Alabama, you guys,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and watching them in person just it blew me away.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I went to see Bama against Yukon in the Final

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 3>four last year. You've seen you con in person really

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 3>changed my perception, and I knew I would bet them

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>against Purdue just how good they were.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Dou had the same effect. It's just that team.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Their defense doesn't get talked enough how good they are

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>on that side of the ball. So ultimately, all the

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 3>firepower they have on offense, but their defense is just

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>as good, and they're the best team.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they went a long or and we might

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 2>have got some in person bias here this is he said,

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>he went and saw the game in person, and now

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>he's back. He might be some in person bias of

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>watching a great team in person, because I remember last

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>NFL season, I went to that Commanders in that Steelers game,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and it was possibly one of the greatest games all year,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and then those Steelers immediately looked horrible every single game afterwards.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I had the same thing. I was on like the

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>student radio station when I was at Maryland, which was

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>their last year. I was a senior there last year

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in the ACC and we went down to Cameron in

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>door and I called a Maryland Duke game and I

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>saw Jabari Parker in person, and I didn't like hate

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>him before then, but I was like, I might be

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a little overrated, Like I don't totally get it. Then

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I watched him in person, and I can't wait, thinking

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that dude's the number one pick in the draft. He's

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the best player at the NBA in two years.

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't his fault, but yeah, I know, but like

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it, like the in person, it can it

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>could totally sway you sometimes so quickly PG before I

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>wrap up, do you see any value in like some

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of these other because these are four really good teams,

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So do you see value in Houston at plus four

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred Auburn up plus five fifty even or do you

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think even at even odds, like it's it's just gonna

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be Duke.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean there definitely is value, Like if you

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>like one of those teams, I would bet any of

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.239
<v Speaker 3>them because again, like I don't think anybody other than

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Duke is gonna win it. Houston would be the only

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 3>other team that interests me. But yeah, I think because

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 3>Duke has looked so dominant up to this point, and

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 3>you have three great teams, Like sometimes we get to

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 3>the final four and there's like a team that's like

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 3>like NC State wasn't gonna win it last year. You know,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>you see teams going magical final four runs. But then

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>once you get to the final four, it's a different animal.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Like getting to the Final four and winning a national

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 3>championship are two different things. All these teams can win it.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>So that's what makes this final four so great, which

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 3>is why I could absolutely see anybody betting any of

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 3>these four teams. I just personally wouldn't just because I

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 3>just think Duke's that much better than these teams.

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 4>I think I just think they win.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Trell. I'm guessing you would bet Houston plus four hundred or.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I would. I mean I'm sitting on a

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Houston future. I would double down too, because I think

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the Purdue game showed me what I needed to see

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 2>and that at the end of the game, it's a

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>close game. I want Samson in this Houston team. Like,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>if you tell me, I'm projecting every game to be

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a close game. I think they're the best close game

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 2>team left in the tournament and left in the field.

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 2>And if you're telling me, I got one possession of

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 2>win in all four of these teams, and the Martians

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 2>have the death beam down on the earth, you gotta

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>win this game, I'm thinking Houston.

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, PJ, What do you got going on at

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bet QL the rest of the week.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we got my show, send it in one to

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 3>one thirty pm Eastern time, Mondays through Fridays. We're obviously

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 3>talking Final four. Baseball's back in full swing and got

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the Masters coming up next week too, So, uh, why

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about what a weekend in San Antonio? You get

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 3>the Final Four and then they got a PGA Tour

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 3>event out there as well, so we're breaking down the

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Valero Texas Open as well.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>You can ask Charles Barkley what he think about San Antonio.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we all know what Charles thinks. I'm san anton.

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you coming on. PJA. You bring a ton

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of March Madness expertise. Savery Year. We love having you.

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody should check out his show too, Like you said,

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>send it in with beck ql where he's breaking down

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>not only March Madness, but everything else going on. PJ,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>my friend, thank you so much for coming on our friend.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll say I know I got called out for that one.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was just really crazy. That's the second time

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>he did that. Like day, PJ and I kn't be

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>friends too, PJ our friend. He's yeah, only one friend,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's cool. I'm just a I'm a friend apparently

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>For Fiji and Terrell, I'm Ryan. Thanks everybody for tuning

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>invested luck this weekend with all your final four bets.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you again next time. Thanks for listening to

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros podcast. If you love the show, the

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>best freeway to support us is by leaving a positive

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Follow us on x

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok at Betting Pros and Instagram at Betting Pros NFL.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Also subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com.

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Slash Betting pros