WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fiscal Caution With IMF's Gaspar

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg For

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>those of you have Global Wall Street working on a

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Friday and reading into the weekend. This is with our

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>question the most important interview Bloomberg will do on the

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>state of global fiscal policy. Vita gas Bar doesn't get

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the ga Gina Geita Gopinath gets at the I m F.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But trust me, his Fiscal Monitor is a critical document

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in these times. Dr Gaspar joins us. Now, Vitor, I

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>want you to give me an update on your confidence

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that we can expand by trillions. Are debt over the

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>justification that interest rates are so low? Do you buy

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that concept? Yes? I do, uh dom So, what we

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>emphasize in this sub blog that I've just put out

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>together with pakpe Enough is that global debt is at

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this point in time at record levels never in history

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as global public that being so high. It is now

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>above a hundred of percent of world GDP. It is

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so high because we're facing a crisis like no other,

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and in that context, the fiscal response has been very

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>quick and and precedented. Just to give you an idea,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the last few months, the response of fiscal policy

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is bigger than during the local finational crisis. If you

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>take together two thousand and eight, nine and ten, so

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in a few months we're above the response of three

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>years during the global finational crisis that was absolutely appropriate

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to support to extend lifelines to households and firs made

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable by the crisis. Right, this enormous level of debt,

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>this enormous level of debt is in a sense compensated

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of impact on the budget by these very

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates that you're talking about. And this but

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to I don't mean to interrupts her, but

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>because of time, I want to cut to the chase.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We have Dr L. Aaron on with us in the

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>next hour. He has acclaimed for speaking of T decisions.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>What is the T decision we are all going to

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>make two and three and five years out after we

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>count up the trillions of dollars of debt? What is

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the T decision down the road for political authorities is

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they look at endless debt, so I would not put

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the issue that way. Nominal infest rates and so debt

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>service costs are relatively low as a percentage of GDP,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>even with these very high levels of that, because inflation

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and inflation expectations are very low, and at this point

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in time, as getago enough, my colleague emphasized yesterday, we're

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about too low inflation than to high inflation.

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The epidemic has boosted precautionary savings, investment will be prudent,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and so for a while we are going to have

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a situation where savings exceeds investments. So our balance of

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>risks points to the fact that premature withdrawal of fiscal

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>support is a more pressing danger than the high levels

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of that, and that's our balance at the moment. There's

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a question of how companies, how nations are spending the

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>money that they're pumping into their economies as they try

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to support everything as it gets back up and running.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>How good a job our nations doing at supporting companies

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that are viable in the longer term rather than just

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the zombies that are going to die out even if

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they are supported in the short term. So as I

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was saying the short term priority, the number one priority

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is public health, and that requires fiscal support to vulnerable households,

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable firms, and those interventions should be regarded as life lives.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>As the situation normalizes, as we pass the face of

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Great lockdown, as the economy is opened gradually, you

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we have in a sense to pivot towards policies that

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>facilitate the reallocation of resources. And so it is necessary

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to pivot from support to jobs, to support to people,

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>from a blanket lending to firms to a much more

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>discriminating approach. And again, as Getago penas Uh said yesterday,

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's important that the intervention by the government includes capital

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>type instruments, equity participations, perhaps even partial nationalizations, so that

0:05:55.440 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the issues of solvency can be tackled appropriately and the

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>natural restructuring of the economy actually takes place. You know,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this is philosophy, Friday. We hear a lot of big ideas,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and this has been an era of big ideas as

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>people try to reimagine what society will look like. On

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the other side, there is a question of how good

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a job in the here and now governments currently are

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>doing how optimistic you are based on what you have

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>seen that they will implement the policies as you're talking about,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>are you optimistic about that or are you sort of

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>doubling down on these messages because you think that they're

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not getting through. So we are actually quite impressed by

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>how speedy and how effective the interventions by governments have

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>been in the phase of the Great Lockdown. We have

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>put out a annexed to the World Economic Outlook with

0:06:54.839 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the physical perspectives, and we have an online document that

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>reviews policies followed by more than fifty countries. What we

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>see is unprecedented action. We see eleven trillion dollars of measures.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Many of those measures are measures with above the line

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>impact on the budget. There have been crucial to support firms,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to support households. Now the situation is very difficult. We

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>face radical uncertainty, and the first priority is public health.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The first priority is to control the epidemic. Why because

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>only by controlling the epidemic are we going to be

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>able to reduce uncertainty and so to create conditions for

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy to pick up in a sustainable way, for

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>investment to pick up, and for the transition to a

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>new model of sustainable and inclusive growth they call. So

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not out of the woods yet. A lot remains

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to be done, but up to now, the ability of

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>governments to deliver timely, targeted and temporary measures have been

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>quite impressive. Okay, so fantastic, get your thoughts on a

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>program today. I appreciate your time. Always valuable to us,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we tell guessed by that of the IMAF. No one

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>has studied the cycles of this like Jim Paulson and

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Luther Oldweden. He's really a student of melding economics into

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the history of our financial system and the opportunities to

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>take and the mind fields to avoid. Jim Paulson joins

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>us now from his UH Minnesota. Jim Paulson the courage

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>to be in the market now was Lesa mentions the

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>confidence of the CFO. How do you develop confidence to

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>participate in anything except Amazon and Apple? Yeah, it seems

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>like that on some days. Tom, I um, you know,

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I really think that in some ways that this is

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a very you know, unique situation where and there's no

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>doubt about that, But in some ways it's also very

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>common to what it feels like at the start of

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>other new expansions and new bowl markets. Um, there's a

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of doubt. There's a lot of problems on Main Street. UM,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them seem like they're going to last

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and they probably will. But yet

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the same kind of situation that existed like when

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the market first took off, or in two thousand nine,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>when it first took off, there was a lot of

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>doubt there too, and the market went up and it

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed like it was disconnected from the reality that was

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that was going on on Main Street in both of

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>those cases. And yet against that wall of fear, with

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>massive policy support that we had in two and we

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>had in two thousand nine, the market kept rising and

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually economic conditions on Main Street also improved. It took

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time before we got back to normal. We

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>had elevated unemployment rates well into the late eighties, well

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>into the last expansion. We never really got back to

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate again until many, many years later. So

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got a lot of issues today. But

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I still think we're in a new expansion in a

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>new ball market. And jam I had this argument a lot.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think you're closely aligned with the thoughts

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>of Morecin Stanley that this is normal, the reopening, the

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>recession playbook. It stands people, as you know Jimmy pushing back.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>They'll say, there's a structural sailing to how quickly we

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>can normalize it, stopped start, it's different, it's not normal.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>What's your message for them, Well, I I think that

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's certainly differences every time, and we've got

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>a big difference to your child. I totally agree with that.

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We've not ever had a pandemic that I've been you know,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>studied before, and it does have unique characteristics. But you know,

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there's been unique characteristics in the past. There were start

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>stop in the two thousand nine recovery too. I mean,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we had massive bank failures and brokerage from failures. Our

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>banking system was totally challenged. Sometimes that looks a little better,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it looked a little worse. Um In in in

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the early eighties we had basically a depression and energy

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and agriculture in my home state of Iowa. UM commodity deflation. Uh,

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a lot of starting stop there too. I

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're this specific thing is is unique

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>to the day, but in reality it's pretty common to

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the past. We The real key here is you don't

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>have to get back to normal before security prices move.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>They've already moved long before we're back to normal, and

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they probably continue to do that. UM. If we can

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just trend northward in terms of economics, I think that's

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be sufficient, even if it's slow, and even

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's starting style well, let's say it's slow. When

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's start and stop, let's talk about what you want

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to own. The rotation into the cyclical areas of this

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>market worked for about five minutes and then really stalled

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>through the month of June. Jim with the backdrop right

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>now that we're facing with a week where the dominance

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of megacat tech is back on top, how uncomfortable does

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it fail to pivot away from that story and back

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to value again, back to the cyclical areas of this market.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I do own Bolt John, I'd own the Barbell, I

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>continue to own New Era growth, and I would I

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>would continue to add exposure in what I'd say the

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>broader market, which to me is who go small caps

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in their nationals UM. And I really think, on the

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>one hand that there's greater participation going on here than advertised. Yes,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>it's done. It's been a their or market since the

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>June eight top here. But from the Marche low, the

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Russell two thousand index, the equally weighted SMP five and

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the market cap weighted SMP five hundred are all up,

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are all had risen by about so there is greater

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>participation here still still going on. It may not be

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>every week, but I think if right now we've got

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a baristattitude towards pandemic and reopening, if that turns back

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to bullishness again, I think we'll see the broader market

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>pick up. In the meantime, your high growth equities are

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>going to continue do well. I don't really see a

0:13:55.160 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>bubble in growth like I saw in two thousand. I mean,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>right now in tech, for example, the forward multiple on

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>SMPF under text twenty seven times. It was fifty five

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>times in two thousands. Right now the relative key motiple

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is one point one times the SMP. It was two

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>times SMP. And the reason that people are buying those

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks today, it's not because they're out over their skis

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with massive you know, bullishness. It's because of defensiveness. They're

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>buying those stocks like they used to buy utility right. Well, Jim,

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this has sort of been the argument by a lot

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of big investors that basically the big tech are the

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>stalwarts and are the utilities going forward. On the other hand,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look at who is buying, retail

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>investors are accounting for a greater proportion of total volumes

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in the equity market in the United States. The head

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of execution for Citadel coming out yesterday and saying at

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>any given day, uh, there is one fifth of all

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>trading activity attributed to these retail investors, which have traditionally

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>been thought of as the dumb money. Do you agree

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or do you think that they're smarter than the institutions

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that are being more reticent to pile in. Well, I

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>guess that you have to be be determined. I don't.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that the size of the retail run

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to me um is is of a magnitude. I think

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that's concerning like it might have been in earlier periods.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And I also don't know at least one who knows.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But I also don't think it's it's backed by you know, uh,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>rabid bullishness and optimism. I think there are people that

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>were looking and using these growth stocks as defensive investment.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's going to prove to be accurate, I don't know,

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's not something we've done in the past.

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>When when we've had this run concentrated run into these

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>big cap tech stocks in the past, it's been a

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>signal of over bullishness, and that just does not evidence

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to me today the character of that sector has really changed.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim fantastic to catch up with these as always Jim

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Paulson there of Luthold Wait and really fortunate to be

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>joined on the program now by Mohammed al Arian, chief

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor to Ali and son of course Bloomberg opinion columnist. Mohammed,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>We've been following this crisis over the last several months together,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and it just feels like we're entering something different, a

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>new phase. There's a shift here. What are your thoughts

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on it? There is drawn and it's really happening in

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy in the US, and that is a migration

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>up of layoffs from small and medium sized companies to

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>larger ones. And that's consequential. Vote for what it says

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about the demand side, but also what it says about

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the supply side, and there is a lot of businesses

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are not buying into the v they see a different

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the nation and regardless of the journey, Dr Larry and

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett made a t decision this week to invest

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in a distress asset. I think what's missing in our

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>analysis on a Friday in July is how businesses, how

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>executives will respond, what are the t decisions CEO, CFOs

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and big money is going to make over the next year.

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So for most businesses it really comes down to three issues.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Is my balance sheet strong enough a B what is

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>demand and where you're gonna look like? And see what

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>is my cost structure is going to look like? For

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, that's a really interesting aspect going on because

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace has to also incorporate two things. One is

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the very heavy hand of policy and secondly are technicals

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that have proven very strong but remain delicate. So it's

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting configuration um that we're going to be

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about for a long time tom going forward. But

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the basic issue is that there's much more fluidity out

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>there economic and financial of course health wise than we've

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seen for a very long time. Mommed, what is it

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>about the technicals that you think a delicate right now. So,

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what you have is the extension of what

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>has been the formal trade, the Tina trade, and the

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fear of missing out because central banks are our best

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>friends the Tina. There is no alternative but stocks, but

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but certain stocks within that that have become both defensive

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and growth at the same time, and that has attracted

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more interest from the retail side. And the

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>retail side has had quite an influence in the last

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>month or so, you know, John, I think more retail

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>participation is very important. It broadens the marketplace and importantly

0:18:55.920 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it means society buys into a market based system even more. However,

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't want retail to be the victim of a

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>head fake. And that's what I really worry about. Victim

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of a head fake. Another way to say, this is

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a bubble. That's what Rob or not a research affiliates

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>called the tech stocks and the valuations right now there,

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree? So, I think there's there's two issues

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of the head fake. One is to be careful that

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>central bank support does not go all the way down

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to the faulting companies. The false imply capital impairment and

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the experience with Hurts, where should be one that that

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>should be puts front and center of every retail investor.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The second element relates to rob are not really good

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>interview with you yesterday, which is there was a time

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>when the marketplace thinks in relative terms, and there's a

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>time when it thinks in absolute terms. And relative terms,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>tech makes absolute sense. They have strong balance feet, positive

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, good management, and on the sunny side of

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>both the COVID journey and what's on the other side

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID journey. But in absolute terms, look at

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the valuations. And what I have learned in my experience

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace is that the market can be obsessed

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with relative values for a very very long time and

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>then almost overnight, it shifts to absolute. And that moment

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>can be quite a jarring moment if you don't realize

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>where you are on valuations. In Muhammad, You've done this

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>with Bill Gross at PIMCO. You know, Bill Gross had

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>his famous Monroe trader on his desk where you're quota yield,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>yield yield, and all of a sudden you go from

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>relative to absolute and all you're worried about his price

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>price price, How close are we in the bond market

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with where nominal yields are, real yields are, and negative

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>yields are to you flipping from a yield analysis to

0:20:55.400 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a price analysis to protect capital. So a lot depends

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>on which part of the bond market. And I think

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to distinguished tom. And let me start

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with a story that was often told that PIMCO, which

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is the person who comes home and says, look, I

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bought a dog for thirty dollars and his wife says,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are you crazy? You spend thirty tho dollars for a dog?

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>And he answers, yeah, a great deal. That cat was

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>selling for forty tho. Right, there's a point at which

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>relative trades don't make sense. I think you're gonna see

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>this in high yield You're gonna see this in emerging

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>market corporates. You're gonna see that in certain sovereign emerging markets.

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna see it higher up in the counital

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>structure because central banks have and will continue to influence

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>those yields and those spreads. So people have got to

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>be much more careful into how they treat the bond market.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It is very different when you get near the fault risk. Mohammad,

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>You've gotta be careful. Otherwise people listening to this might

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think that people of pimp care actually brought thirty dollar dogs,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that maybe maybe that was in the

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>case you mentioned a couple of times, then they certainly didn't.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Pimco Bimko is and always has been a very fundamental

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>driven shop, right John, John, I paid thirty two thousand

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>ProVet Bill. I'm sorry, which is why you call him

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>vet bill. I'm sure because of the costs are Mohammed,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned them a couple of times there, didn't you,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that it wasn't by accident. Are

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you concerned about the evaluations and emerging markets? I am.

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think people don't realize how tough it is for

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the typical emerging market. Phase one was simply dealing with

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the spin over from what was happening in China, what

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was happening in Europe and the US, which is lower exports,

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>lower commodity prices, lower tourism, lower form direct investment. Phase

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>two is dealing with their own COVID our breaks. If

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at what's happening in Latin America, it is

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>tragic if you're looking at parts of what's happening in Africa,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it is tragic. So the demand on their resources and

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the need to divert more resources to the health care

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>system is just going to go up. And I think

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that people don't realize that there is, to quote my

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at Gramacy, a paradigm of non payments coming up

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for certain emerging market credits. A paradigm of non payments.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The idea that perhaps some of the sovereign debt could

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>get written down, and we've seen some of that from

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the I m F. So far, where are we in

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that How much do you think the sovereign debt of

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>developing markets could get written down ultimately? So we've seen

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ongoing with Ecuador, with Argentina, that's that market based solutions,

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like you say, we've seen the I m F and

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank work with the three twenty on a

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>debt service suspension initiative for the poorest countries, and they've

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>made it very clear that they expect burden sharing. Um.

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>The issue is, as you know, Lisa, it is not

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>easy to dictate burden sharing from a top down perspective,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's where the I m F and the World

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank are struggling and finding a way for private sector involvement,

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as they call it ps I. I think it's gonna come.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think when countries go from immediate emergency assistance to

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing, longer term support from this institution, one of

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the requirements is going to be burden sharing. And I

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think credit is quite realize that that's going to

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>migrate up from the lowest income countries to some, not all,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the middle income emerging markets as well. Mohammed.

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>When people say burden sharing right now, we think of

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe and the fiscal talks are set to take place

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>later this month. You have really pushed back over the

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>last year, maybe longer, when people have come on programs

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like this and talked about pivoting away from America and

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>American assets towards Europe and the consonant. What's the pushback now?

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're getting closer to him. I think

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we've learned once again that it takes a crisis to

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>move Europe, and what you're seeing happening in Europe is

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think an important moment. So I must say that

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm really encouraged by what's going on in Europe right now, Um,

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be important to see how these negotiations proceed. Um.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>There are people that the countries are still resistant, but

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>on the whole, I think they're going to get to

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a better place. And I told you that the time

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>will come to fade the US in favor of Europe.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We're getting much closer to that. I would not fade

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the US in favor of the merger markets though, Mohammed,

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate your time. Thank the family for us wind you.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I know it's super early on the West coast and

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a disruption for the Larian household as well.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Have a fantastic to catch up this Mhammed al Arian

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>there of Blomberg opinion and of course chief economic advisor

0:25:47.080 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to ALIAS, this is a joy and a day. Given

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and the carnege economically across the nation, it

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is good to speak to someone authoritative from a firm

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that owns the franchise. That would be Cowen and Company.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Not only with Chivan Rumor, the legendary airline analysts, the

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Boeing analyst, but also with Helene Becker. Cowen truly owns

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a high ground on airline analysis. To thrilled that MS

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Becker could join us this morning, Helene, I want to

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>cut to the chase and the headlines. I know you've

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>done this, calculate how many people would become unemployed across

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the American aviation business. Yeah. So at the start of

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the year, there were seven d fifty people employed in aviation,

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and we estimate that by the end of the year

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>there will only be between five hundred fifty and six

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand people employed. So somewhere between hundred fifty and

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand people will lose their jobs. Um. You

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>know in the fourth quarter of this year. Hallong, we

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>caught up a several months ago. You and I were

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>talking and just how depressing some of these numbers would

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be for the business. Can you just walk me through

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>what the industry looks like right now? What's booking look like?

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>What does capacity load factors look like on some of

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>these playing some of these roots. Yeah, so, um, so

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we're better than we thought we'd be when we caught

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>up the first time. We thought we'd have by August first,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>about four hundred thousand people traveling, and that was based

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>on the eight seven thousand people at the nater So

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on April fourteen, t s A screened eighty seven thousand

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people versus a normal day when they would screen about

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>two and a half a million, So you see the

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>decline there. And then now, um we're screening about on Tuesday's, Wednesday, Saturdays.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>We're screening between six d six hundred fifty thousand people

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on the peak four days, so that would be Thursday, Friday, Sunday, Monday,

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>we're screening you know, between seven seven fifty thousand people.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's a faster recovery than we were expecting. And

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's without business travel and really without international travel. Without

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>those two, we don't think traffic can really exceed a

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>million UM by the end of the year, and that's

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>our forecast. By the holidays, December holidays, we have a

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>million people going through UM T s A every day

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with without business and without international Where are people going domestic?

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's actually a really good question. UM. So it's

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>visiting friends. So the people who are traveling visiting friends

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and relatives, leisure and people who absolutely have to travel.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So this like eighty some one thousand people we saw

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in April, we're people who were traveling because they were

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>probably rated related doing work related to the pandemic. Now

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you have people, um where states have opened up and

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>where like Universal Orlando and SeaWorld opened earlier in June,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you have people starting to take vacations to those locations. Now. Um,

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>whether that continues given the rampant um a level of

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of coronavirus that we're seeing in those states, you know,

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. Disney is supposed to open, Disney

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Orlando is supposed to open tomorrow. Um. You know, obviously

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>new rules, but that's what's happening. It's it's the Florida beaches,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's western states with um national parks. You know, we're

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of outdoor activities, all right, Helene. So,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that we're not expecting to see demand

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for international or business pick up to the levels that

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we had seen earlier in the year until perhaps according

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to industry projections, how many airlines do you think have

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to go out of business to right size to sort

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of correct the over supply of seats and flights that

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we have currently in the market. Yeah, so I think

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. I think the way the government

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>set it up in the short term, as none of

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the airlines will go out of business but the amount

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of capacity that will come out of the network. So

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we've said between eight thousand aircraft will not have been

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>parked and will not come back, um, you know after

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in let's say bye by this time next year. So UM,

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the level of capacity, that's that's

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>equal to an air size of one full airline. Hello,

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>give me by a hold cell here, give me the

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>single best I three idea three years, five years out

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>which management is going to be most opportunistic and add

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>shareholder value when we get through this this tragedy. Yeah,

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>so Southwest is probably our best idea in the short term. UM,

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just because they've they've got net cash. UM, they're really

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>well positioned. They did a huge cash grab earlier this

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>year about thirteen billion dollars worth a liquidity UM, they've

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>paid down their three six or four day term loan.

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>We think they're really well positioned to get share in

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>every recession since I've covered this group, which is more

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>than three decades, and they've grown share. I think that's

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like our number one idea. UM are big contrarian idea.

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The one that you know we got a lot of

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>pushback on is American because we don't think they're going

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>out of business. They've raised a ton of cash. Um

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they still have some assets that they can raise. They

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have any debt do before two they paid down

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there two sixty four day term loan that was due

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>next year, so they're not in that you know shape

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. And um So I think those would be,

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, one very contrarian and kind of out there

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and the other, you know, more of a um quote

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>unquote safety idea very contrariant given the borrowing costs. Helen,

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I always enjoy catching up with your fantastic to get

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your insights on this program. Elne back there of Cowen

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and Helene is always so compassionate about the work is

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to make up some of these companies. This industry is

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>really going to strop the top for a long long time.

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>play for him you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.