1
00:00:00,560 --> 00:00:03,120
Speaker 1: You're about to listen to the Late Round Fantasy Football show,

2
00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:05,760
Speaker 1: which originally aired on YouTube. If you'd like to catch

3
00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:07,920
Speaker 1: the show live this offseason, you can head to the

4
00:00:07,960 --> 00:00:11,600
Speaker 1: Late Round Fantasy Football YouTube channel YouTube dot com. Slash

5
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:15,280
Speaker 1: at Late Round FF will be live each Wednesday at

6
00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:17,680
Speaker 1: noon Eastern without further ado.

7
00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:26,080
Speaker 2: Here's this week's episode.

8
00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:36,839
Speaker 3: Welcome in. Welcome in. David Kitchen.

9
00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:45,800
Speaker 4: Mirror, employee of Late Rounds Media, here with JJ, the

10
00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:51,120
Speaker 4: guy who started the Late Round Media brand. JJ.

11
00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:52,159
Speaker 2: That's what we say.

12
00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:54,400
Speaker 1: I'm trying to pull up the tweet of the critique

13
00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:56,560
Speaker 1: that we got and I want to I'm pulling it

14
00:00:56,640 --> 00:00:59,880
Speaker 1: up because I want to uh yeah, here it is ready.

15
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:04,120
Speaker 1: I want to address this straight on. I don't want

16
00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,800
Speaker 1: to hide from what people are saying out there. Right

17
00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:12,840
Speaker 1: says This is from at Legs Benny on Twitter.

18
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:15,080
Speaker 2: Love the Late Round QB.

19
00:01:15,280 --> 00:01:18,319
Speaker 1: At Late Round QB podcast, thanks as I do in

20
00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:22,240
Speaker 1: the mallbeg episodes, but please stop dropping your titles in

21
00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:25,440
Speaker 1: the open. It's so cringe and navel gazing. I'm the

22
00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:28,880
Speaker 1: CEO and he's the CEO. Literally no one else does this,

23
00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,080
Speaker 1: and it's for a reason. We don't care that you

24
00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:33,640
Speaker 1: are a C suite in your three man company.

25
00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:35,600
Speaker 2: Loll love you guys.

26
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:40,480
Speaker 1: All right, we're addressing this, guys, We're not we're not

27
00:01:40,600 --> 00:01:44,800
Speaker 1: being serious with that intro. Well, we know, we're fully

28
00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,760
Speaker 1: aware that we are a three person company, and we

29
00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:51,280
Speaker 1: are not saying this y a brag about being sea

30
00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:52,160
Speaker 1: level employees.

31
00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:56,000
Speaker 2: What kitchen is? Uh this three person company?

32
00:01:56,480 --> 00:01:59,200
Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm saying I. I mean, JJ, I'm dead serious.

33
00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:01,200
Speaker 4: I say, just in case my mom is tuning in

34
00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:04,240
Speaker 4: and he's like, that's my boy.

35
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:07,920
Speaker 1: Uh So yeah, No, I just look, I know that

36
00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:11,520
Speaker 1: like when feedback comes in the way, my where my

37
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:13,519
Speaker 1: brain goes is always like, oh my god. I hope

38
00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,360
Speaker 1: that no one else is thinking this, you know, And

39
00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:17,600
Speaker 1: so I'll try to quote tweet it and just like

40
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:20,720
Speaker 1: address it just that people are on the same page

41
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:23,320
Speaker 1: and know and similar to like any analysis that I do.

42
00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:28,480
Speaker 2: And with this, guys, please don't take it seriously. Please don't.

43
00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:30,720
Speaker 1: Now we're gonna have to lean into it more too,

44
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:34,160
Speaker 1: but don't take it seriously. This is not a very

45
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:36,960
Speaker 1: This is not a serious show. We're not doing anything

46
00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:40,680
Speaker 1: incredibly important. We're just talking ball. We're just talking fantasy football.

47
00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:42,880
Speaker 1: And this show in particular, is more casual than what

48
00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,919
Speaker 1: you're gonna get with the intense Late Round podcast at times.

49
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:48,320
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like when.

50
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:50,600
Speaker 4: JJ does the mailbag episode, you know, and he does

51
00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:53,120
Speaker 4: the thanks for tuning in is a little different, you know.

52
00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:55,400
Speaker 3: Yeah, You've got to think sometimes things are just.

53
00:02:55,919 --> 00:03:00,000
Speaker 4: A tad bit, you know, just more casual, more relaxed.

54
00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:04,560
Speaker 4: So jaj I, I said, I would be your left

55
00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:06,840
Speaker 4: hand man or your right hand man. Godula and I

56
00:03:06,880 --> 00:03:10,600
Speaker 4: would have to fight over you know which which title,

57
00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:15,240
Speaker 4: But then people would think that you had issues with

58
00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:17,240
Speaker 4: your hands and you needed you needed help.

59
00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:21,239
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean also, I'm just like I got

60
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:23,240
Speaker 1: away from all of that just so you guys.

61
00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:25,560
Speaker 2: Know, you know, and and and uh, to be.

62
00:03:25,560 --> 00:03:28,960
Speaker 1: Transparent here, I I left all of that to start

63
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:31,560
Speaker 1: this company because I cannot say, you know, my wife

64
00:03:31,639 --> 00:03:33,960
Speaker 1: still works in corporate and she doesn't you know, she

65
00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:37,840
Speaker 1: likes her job, and it's I it just turns me

66
00:03:37,960 --> 00:03:42,640
Speaker 1: off beyond belief, Like I do not want to care

67
00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:48,640
Speaker 1: or put any thoughts into titles. I cannot even explain

68
00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:51,840
Speaker 1: to you guys how just stupid all of that is

69
00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:52,120
Speaker 1: to me.

70
00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:56,840
Speaker 4: Yeah, I love the when you have a new title

71
00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:58,960
Speaker 4: and it's like you get a you get a promotion

72
00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:01,560
Speaker 4: in name only or in title only.

73
00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:04,640
Speaker 3: That was always my favorite. Yeah, I would pay you anymore.

74
00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:07,640
Speaker 1: But but now we're gonna call you something different and

75
00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:08,800
Speaker 1: it's gonna be really cool.

76
00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:11,560
Speaker 4: You know you're gonna update. We just reorged and you

77
00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:14,200
Speaker 4: get to update your LinkedIn congrats.

78
00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:16,559
Speaker 2: Well you're gonna have the same title here for a while.

79
00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:17,640
Speaker 2: So that's just the way.

80
00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:21,880
Speaker 4: Yeah, better than Tyler email Cowboys says he gets his

81
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:26,040
Speaker 4: Analytics Senior Support title. He wants to know when he

82
00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,680
Speaker 4: gets that. Sorry, Tyler, it might be a while for that.

83
00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:34,560
Speaker 4: I will say we've had some reviews come in already

84
00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,719
Speaker 4: from the late round Prospect Guy, JJ, good stuff.

85
00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:42,040
Speaker 3: People are saying good things. You should feel.

86
00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:45,760
Speaker 4: Good about all the work you did, all those late

87
00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:50,279
Speaker 4: nights you did because people enjoy it and they have.

88
00:04:50,520 --> 00:04:54,680
Speaker 4: We have one hundred and seventy something pages of content

89
00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:56,000
Speaker 4: for this year's Prospect Guide.

90
00:04:56,600 --> 00:04:59,960
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm proud of it. I think it's the best

91
00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:02,920
Speaker 1: one yet. The addition to Brandon doing all the tight

92
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:07,000
Speaker 1: end write ups and us working on that model this offseason,

93
00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:09,000
Speaker 1: I think that's gonna.

94
00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:12,560
Speaker 2: Hopefully yield good results as well. But yeah, I mean

95
00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:13,840
Speaker 2: like it was.

96
00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:16,400
Speaker 1: It's always a fun project to put together and it's

97
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,120
Speaker 1: always a really nice.

98
00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:21,719
Speaker 2: Thing to finish and feel good about afterwards.

99
00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:26,440
Speaker 4: Yeah, one O six streets says, I'm not a rankings guy,

100
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,520
Speaker 4: but I love the green page with the different tiers

101
00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:33,719
Speaker 4: qualitative tiers. I don't know if the last tiers were

102
00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,719
Speaker 4: supposed to be if it was misspelled on purpose, but

103
00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:41,120
Speaker 4: I will say that the green page was last year,

104
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:45,200
Speaker 4: was additioned from last year. And the green page also

105
00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:48,680
Speaker 4: has links that you can go straight to that Prospects profile.

106
00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:51,520
Speaker 3: Love it, so the page is a good page.

107
00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:56,360
Speaker 4: Also, as a reminder, you can subscribe to our Patreon

108
00:05:57,040 --> 00:06:00,960
Speaker 4: and join in on the You know, we have Dynasty

109
00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:04,000
Speaker 4: talk right now, we have JJ hopping in different chats

110
00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:10,880
Speaker 4: and and talking ball. We have the n C Double

111
00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:12,920
Speaker 4: A brackets.

112
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:14,880
Speaker 2: Who's in second in the oh?

113
00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:20,840
Speaker 4: No, I was in first after after that first round.

114
00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:21,400
Speaker 4: That's that's all.

115
00:06:21,520 --> 00:06:24,560
Speaker 2: I We might all matters as we know. As we know,

116
00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:26,039
Speaker 2: polls are one.

117
00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:30,960
Speaker 1: You know you have a great breath, and by how

118
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:33,520
Speaker 1: well they do after day one of the NCAA tournament,

119
00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:34,680
Speaker 1: for sure.

120
00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:37,240
Speaker 4: You gotta you got a victory lap. Why you can

121
00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:41,960
Speaker 4: victory lap so yeah, things things are getting interesting in

122
00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:46,479
Speaker 4: the March Madness Late Rounders bracket and h we're just

123
00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:47,600
Speaker 4: having a good time.

124
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,080
Speaker 3: In the discord JJ, this is like, this is the

125
00:06:50,120 --> 00:06:51,279
Speaker 3: column before the storm.

126
00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:55,320
Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of Pocopia going on in the Zacharyason household.

127
00:06:56,320 --> 00:06:59,000
Speaker 4: Also sign up for their Late Round newsletter if you

128
00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:04,720
Speaker 4: haven't already, because speaking of is it Pocopia or Pokemopia?

129
00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:08,040
Speaker 2: Okay, but what do you put pocopia? Catch and get

130
00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:08,719
Speaker 2: it right? Okay?

131
00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:11,880
Speaker 4: Okay, I didn't know pokemo Mopia. I didn't know, Like,

132
00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:13,600
Speaker 4: is pocopia.

133
00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:16,200
Speaker 1: And it's and it's honestly, guys, I'm saying it as

134
00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:20,680
Speaker 1: a grown man with children and in a company. Pocopia

135
00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:22,800
Speaker 1: is a ten out of ten game. It is un

136
00:07:23,640 --> 00:07:26,640
Speaker 1: believable and anyone can play. Your kid can play, My

137
00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:29,720
Speaker 1: kids play with me. It's a perfect bonding experience.

138
00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:31,560
Speaker 2: It's perfect. It's a great game.

139
00:07:32,320 --> 00:07:35,080
Speaker 4: When I read the intro this morning to the the newsletter,

140
00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:40,280
Speaker 4: I thought, I wonder what other people are thinking, because

141
00:07:40,320 --> 00:07:41,960
Speaker 4: I know, JJ, Yeah.

142
00:07:41,760 --> 00:07:43,560
Speaker 2: I know, I oh yeah, other people.

143
00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:45,880
Speaker 1: That's why I like to just throw stuff out there,

144
00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:50,360
Speaker 1: like I am going to unapologetically be like who I am.

145
00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:53,040
Speaker 2: I don't care. I don't care if people.

146
00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:56,640
Speaker 1: Judge me for liking a Pokemon game. I haven't played

147
00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:59,240
Speaker 1: Pokemon since I was little. But if you're gonna judge

148
00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,720
Speaker 1: me for playing this, go look at any review of

149
00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:04,560
Speaker 1: this game, and it's getting unbelievable reviews because it's.

150
00:08:04,440 --> 00:08:08,880
Speaker 2: An unbelievable game. Okay, I don't care. I'll go. You

151
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:11,320
Speaker 2: know what else I'm doing. I've been doing a lot recently.

152
00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:14,440
Speaker 1: Yeah, that that that people can judge all day while

153
00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:16,960
Speaker 1: while my daughter and son go for bike rides, I

154
00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:18,240
Speaker 1: rollerblade with them.

155
00:08:19,880 --> 00:08:23,480
Speaker 2: Really, I rollerblade with them. Yeah, that was a fair reaction.

156
00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:25,200
Speaker 1: At first it was like, I'm gonna make fun of you,

157
00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:26,840
Speaker 1: and then it was, oh, that's cute.

158
00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:30,840
Speaker 3: Yes, it's like I do you do you wear a helmet?

159
00:08:31,480 --> 00:08:35,040
Speaker 2: No, knee pads? No?

160
00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:37,440
Speaker 1: But my no, like the like literally, two weekends ago,

161
00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:41,320
Speaker 1: my daughter, who's seven, uh we she's in second grade.

162
00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:44,920
Speaker 2: We we we went five miles. I was rollerblading.

163
00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,200
Speaker 1: I went I wrote a rollerblade for five miles while

164
00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:47,840
Speaker 1: she was on the bike.

165
00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:49,400
Speaker 2: It was a great bonding time.

166
00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:52,360
Speaker 3: Bonding experience was five miles on rollerblades.

167
00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:55,960
Speaker 1: The real problem is I used to play this rollerblading

168
00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,360
Speaker 1: game on Sega back in the day, just to bring

169
00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,560
Speaker 1: it back to video games, and it was called skitching. Okay,

170
00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:03,640
Speaker 1: maybe one person in Chad has ever heard of this.

171
00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:07,320
Speaker 1: Skitching is when you're a rollerblader. I learned it's more

172
00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:09,680
Speaker 1: than rollerblading. You can be a skateboarder or whatever the

173
00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:10,200
Speaker 1: case may be.

174
00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:11,800
Speaker 2: And you you you.

175
00:09:11,679 --> 00:09:15,280
Speaker 1: Grab onto a car and you while you're on that device,

176
00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:18,440
Speaker 1: and you're able to hitch a ride, you know, from

177
00:09:18,480 --> 00:09:20,360
Speaker 1: that car. And so the video game was just all

178
00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:24,520
Speaker 1: about grabbing onto cars and punching enemies while you were rollerblading.

179
00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:25,840
Speaker 2: But it was like Sega, so it was you know,

180
00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:28,319
Speaker 2: two D and it was you know yeah.

181
00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:29,920
Speaker 1: So the problem is that every time I get on

182
00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:32,240
Speaker 1: my rollerblades, I just want to go skitching and then

183
00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:34,119
Speaker 1: start riding around the neighborhood.

184
00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:37,640
Speaker 4: They used to call me a snitching kitchen back in

185
00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:38,040
Speaker 4: the day.

186
00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:41,520
Speaker 1: No, that's not surprising. All right, let's get into these

187
00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:43,360
Speaker 1: news items. This is Look, it's the off season. I

188
00:09:43,440 --> 00:09:45,480
Speaker 1: know we're talking about nothing right now, but let's talk

189
00:09:45,520 --> 00:09:46,959
Speaker 1: some news.

190
00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:54,599
Speaker 4: Today's fantasy news. Wait till you see the news items.

191
00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:58,120
Speaker 1: Let's talk about more important things like Elijah Moore going.

192
00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:01,160
Speaker 4: To the Eagles, So we don't know what's happening with

193
00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:02,400
Speaker 4: aj Brown right now.

194
00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:05,880
Speaker 3: You know, apparently he's still staying with the Eagles.

195
00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:09,280
Speaker 4: However, the Eagles just decided to make all these moves

196
00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:11,520
Speaker 4: this week when no one else was making moves. So

197
00:10:12,040 --> 00:10:14,839
Speaker 4: last week we had a ton to talk about. This

198
00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:19,400
Speaker 4: week not so much. Here's what we do have. Elijah

199
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,600
Speaker 4: Moore signed a one year deal with the Eagles, Damian

200
00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:27,600
Speaker 4: Pierce signed a deal with the Eagles, and Andy Dalton

201
00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:32,760
Speaker 4: I think he was traded to the Eagles. So those

202
00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:35,560
Speaker 4: are all the Eagles stuff. Other than that, it's like

203
00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:38,680
Speaker 4: Zach Wilson, like back up Joe Flacco resigning.

204
00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:41,480
Speaker 1: There is I mean, you didn't throw the most important

205
00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:44,400
Speaker 1: news I'm here on here and that's Pokin Nakua biting somebody.

206
00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:44,920
Speaker 2: Evidently.

207
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:46,520
Speaker 3: I didn't know if we wanted to put that up.

208
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:47,439
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know we shouldn't.

209
00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:49,720
Speaker 1: I mean, let's just I'm gonna leave it at like

210
00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:53,320
Speaker 1: it's one of those offs off the field sit like

211
00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:57,400
Speaker 1: personas now not just situation to monitor because he's been

212
00:10:57,440 --> 00:11:00,440
Speaker 1: involved in a lot of different stuff and that is pertinent,

213
00:11:00,520 --> 00:11:02,520
Speaker 1: Like it is something that we have to worry about

214
00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,880
Speaker 1: in dynasty, you know, just like what I actually.

215
00:11:05,640 --> 00:11:07,960
Speaker 4: Thought about that as a pukin Akua owner, like it, like,

216
00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:12,000
Speaker 4: is the asset becoming too like volatile? I don't like.

217
00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:14,720
Speaker 1: I mean, like, and there's a lot of rumors about

218
00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:16,839
Speaker 1: them wanting to trade for a J. Brown, And I've

219
00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:19,560
Speaker 1: seen some reporters even hint that like maybe there's a

220
00:11:19,600 --> 00:11:20,040
Speaker 1: tie to this.

221
00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:21,000
Speaker 2: I don't think there is.

222
00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:24,600
Speaker 1: Like my personal opinion is, you know, hopefully he's not

223
00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:28,400
Speaker 1: doing anything like egregious, like hopefully this is like not

224
00:11:28,559 --> 00:11:31,559
Speaker 1: real or or you know, whatever the case may be.

225
00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:32,960
Speaker 1: I don't want to say something that I don't know

226
00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:37,840
Speaker 1: the the information enough about, but hopefully this is like

227
00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:41,640
Speaker 1: the extent of where things go with Pukakua. But yeah,

228
00:11:41,640 --> 00:11:43,920
Speaker 1: I mean like they they've been they've been linked to

229
00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:45,640
Speaker 1: a lot of wide They need a young wide receiver

230
00:11:45,720 --> 00:11:48,040
Speaker 1: on that team because they don't really have that much

231
00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:52,199
Speaker 1: depth outside of Puka and so like long term depth.

232
00:11:52,600 --> 00:11:55,079
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean I thought he might be on this,

233
00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:58,480
Speaker 1: but I understand the decision to not throw Pokin on this.

234
00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:03,120
Speaker 4: Yeah we're talking about I also left off Jsn's extension,

235
00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:05,439
Speaker 4: Like I don't think we want to get into like extensions.

236
00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:07,840
Speaker 1: No, and it's like what else they gonna do? Yeah,

237
00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:11,280
Speaker 1: let's just talk the Eagles. The The only interesting part

238
00:12:11,320 --> 00:12:12,720
Speaker 1: of this because I don't even know if Damian Pierce

239
00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:14,560
Speaker 1: is going to make the team, right, because they have

240
00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:18,440
Speaker 1: they have Shipley, and they have Tank Bigsby. But the

241
00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:21,920
Speaker 1: one interesting piece is is Elijah Moore. And I only

242
00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:24,240
Speaker 1: say that because he's very good friends with A. J.

243
00:12:24,400 --> 00:12:24,679
Speaker 3: Brown.

244
00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:28,080
Speaker 1: Uh, you know, they're the there go back, it goes

245
00:12:28,120 --> 00:12:31,040
Speaker 1: back to college days. Yeah, yeah, when they had that

246
00:12:31,160 --> 00:12:35,400
Speaker 1: crazy you know, like the DK Metcalf there too, and

247
00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:37,680
Speaker 1: they're I'm pretty sure I don't want to misspeak, but

248
00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:41,280
Speaker 1: I'm I'm fairly certain that Elijah Moore was very helpful

249
00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:45,040
Speaker 1: for A. J. Brown during a massive mental health crisis

250
00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:48,640
Speaker 1: for him. And I'm not saying that like I'm just

251
00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:50,720
Speaker 1: looking at this trying to connect the dots and saying,

252
00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:55,040
Speaker 1: you know, are the Eagles doing this out of like

253
00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:57,360
Speaker 1: trying to keep AJ Brown around by getting a good

254
00:12:57,360 --> 00:12:59,959
Speaker 1: friend there and to to or or are they doing

255
00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:02,000
Speaker 1: this because they actually want that depth because they did

256
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:05,240
Speaker 1: get Hollywood Brown too, and so you know, I've always

257
00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:07,959
Speaker 1: been an Elijah Moore guy from the standpoint of like

258
00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:09,360
Speaker 1: I thought that he was a pretty good prospect. I

259
00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:13,240
Speaker 1: think in hindsight, I wouldn't have been as aggressive with

260
00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:15,199
Speaker 1: the way that I felt about Elijah Moore the way

261
00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:17,960
Speaker 1: that I prospect now and knowing what, like, you know,

262
00:13:18,040 --> 00:13:20,800
Speaker 1: some of the deeper details of slot rates and stuff

263
00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:23,120
Speaker 1: and how that correlates and the data that we've gotten

264
00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:25,400
Speaker 1: over the last handful of years to kind of be

265
00:13:25,480 --> 00:13:27,840
Speaker 1: able to dig into that more. With that being said,

266
00:13:28,400 --> 00:13:30,600
Speaker 1: I think that's what I'm reading into this more from

267
00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:32,160
Speaker 1: like a fantasy perspective, is like.

268
00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:34,840
Speaker 2: What if this is a move of some sort to

269
00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:36,720
Speaker 2: keep AJ Brown around?

270
00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:39,080
Speaker 1: I think we should at least consider that, you know,

271
00:13:39,160 --> 00:13:42,040
Speaker 1: because there are such strong rumors of AJ Brown no

272
00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:42,959
Speaker 1: longer being an Eagle.

273
00:13:44,760 --> 00:13:48,679
Speaker 4: Yeah. I in the last year's DraftKings best ball stuff,

274
00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,080
Speaker 4: I took a lot of Elijah Moore, like in the

275
00:13:50,080 --> 00:13:53,360
Speaker 4: twentieth rounds, remember the case, just in case he was Josh.

276
00:13:53,200 --> 00:13:55,319
Speaker 3: Allen's guy and he did get on the field, so

277
00:13:56,080 --> 00:14:00,400
Speaker 3: he just was not that valuable. Yeah, I mean did

278
00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:02,520
Speaker 3: he get cut like during the season is I.

279
00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:06,360
Speaker 1: Can't remember his whole situation, but his his uh early

280
00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:08,640
Speaker 1: career stuff, like his rookie season was phenomenal and he

281
00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:10,880
Speaker 1: was really good on the outside and it was like, Wow,

282
00:14:10,960 --> 00:14:12,600
Speaker 1: this is really going to translate for him, and then

283
00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:13,520
Speaker 1: it just didn't.

284
00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:16,920
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, we still have this list, like I put this

285
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:19,800
Speaker 4: list up last week as far as fantasy relevant guys,

286
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:24,960
Speaker 4: dads have unsigned, and literally none of them have signed

287
00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:25,760
Speaker 4: since last week.

288
00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:27,840
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean, like we said last week, you

289
00:14:27,880 --> 00:14:30,760
Speaker 1: get veterans, they usually just kind of wait and find

290
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:32,360
Speaker 1: the right spot for themselves.

291
00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:36,000
Speaker 4: So it's interesting. You know, we have heard some rumors

292
00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:39,000
Speaker 4: as far as like David and Joku to the Titans,

293
00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:42,280
Speaker 4: Aaron Rodgers.

294
00:14:43,560 --> 00:14:46,240
Speaker 3: I think he's gonna resign, and then Kirk Cousins.

295
00:14:46,040 --> 00:14:47,680
Speaker 4: Someone said he might be a like a backup to

296
00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:52,200
Speaker 4: Jordan Love. I think that that was a a piece

297
00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:56,000
Speaker 4: from The Athletic that came out this week. So that's

298
00:14:56,120 --> 00:14:59,920
Speaker 4: uh that that's what we have for today's news JJ.

299
00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:00,680
Speaker 4: Are you happy?

300
00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,280
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's that's fun. You want to talk about Skitchen some.

301
00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:11,680
Speaker 4: More today's data that'll answer that we've got this draft

302
00:15:11,760 --> 00:15:16,840
Speaker 4: class versus the twenty eleven through twenty twenty five draft class.

303
00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:19,800
Speaker 1: Yeah, So what I did this is from the newsletter,

304
00:15:19,840 --> 00:15:21,520
Speaker 1: and actually there was a question that I started that

305
00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:23,520
Speaker 1: I wanted to get back to this from k crash

306
00:15:23,560 --> 00:15:26,480
Speaker 1: five on here on YouTube. K crash five said, this

307
00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:29,920
Speaker 1: year's rookie class people been saying it's a week class.

308
00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:32,880
Speaker 1: I'm concerned that with the new grading system and the prospect,

309
00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:35,120
Speaker 1: I might be double counting how bad this class is

310
00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:39,080
Speaker 1: punt completely. So that's why I put together this in

311
00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:41,760
Speaker 1: the newsletter today and I broke it down a little bit.

312
00:15:41,800 --> 00:15:43,760
Speaker 1: I'll basically just kind of regurgitate some of the stuff

313
00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:46,040
Speaker 1: that was in that newsletter because I think it's just

314
00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:48,760
Speaker 1: an important thing to talk about. But what this looks

315
00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:50,920
Speaker 1: at is each of the three positions that we have

316
00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:53,040
Speaker 1: this zapp model for so running back, wide receiver, and

317
00:15:53,080 --> 00:15:55,800
Speaker 1: tight end, and it looks at the average number of

318
00:15:55,840 --> 00:16:00,320
Speaker 1: players in each category, so legendary performer all the way

319
00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:03,680
Speaker 1: down to dart throw from twenty eleven to twenty twenty five,

320
00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:06,800
Speaker 1: and it compares that to the twenty twenty six draft class.

321
00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:09,320
Speaker 1: So let me give you an example. The legendary performer

322
00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:11,640
Speaker 1: running back has a point.

323
00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:12,600
Speaker 2: Four in that cell.

324
00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:15,200
Speaker 1: What that's saying is that we know that in this

325
00:16:15,240 --> 00:16:17,000
Speaker 1: class we have one legendary performer.

326
00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:18,440
Speaker 2: That's Jeremiah Love.

327
00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:21,440
Speaker 1: Right, So that's one, which means there's point six on

328
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:25,080
Speaker 1: average per class. There's not many legendary performer running backs,

329
00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:28,320
Speaker 1: just because you know, I mean the category is just

330
00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:30,280
Speaker 1: to be clear, the categories are just a quick way

331
00:16:30,360 --> 00:16:32,320
Speaker 1: for me to speak about these guys and to give

332
00:16:32,400 --> 00:16:36,080
Speaker 1: context to what the ZAP scores are actually saying the

333
00:16:36,160 --> 00:16:40,040
Speaker 1: categories themselves. It's not like there's a giant like break

334
00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:43,640
Speaker 1: from a guy who is in the Legendary Performer category

335
00:16:43,680 --> 00:16:45,600
Speaker 1: at a score of ninety one to a guy in

336
00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:48,240
Speaker 1: the Elite Producer category with a score of eighty nine, right,

337
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:51,520
Speaker 1: because because ninety is where that that transition occurs. It's

338
00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:54,600
Speaker 1: just a general way to bucket these guys, to allow you,

339
00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:56,840
Speaker 1: you know, people who are consuming this to kind of

340
00:16:56,880 --> 00:16:59,040
Speaker 1: see what that ZAP score means.

341
00:16:59,280 --> 00:16:59,600
Speaker 4: Now.

342
00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:02,360
Speaker 1: I have that mail bag answer from last week about

343
00:17:02,760 --> 00:17:05,920
Speaker 1: publishing scores and talking about the changing of the way

344
00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:08,200
Speaker 1: the system is generated and stuff, so this chart should

345
00:17:08,200 --> 00:17:10,240
Speaker 1: help with that a little bit to contextualize some of

346
00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:13,440
Speaker 1: this stuff. But also nothing, I just want to reiterate

347
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:16,280
Speaker 1: nothing in this a model. Even though the scaling changed,

348
00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:18,879
Speaker 1: the way that I'm calculating things has not changed. So

349
00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:22,359
Speaker 1: the scaling change for all previous draft classes too, and

350
00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:24,760
Speaker 1: you can look at the categories from last year, for instance,

351
00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:26,879
Speaker 1: to get a general idea of where those because the

352
00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:31,080
Speaker 1: categories are generally generally still the same. You know, I'm

353
00:17:31,119 --> 00:17:33,720
Speaker 1: iterating the models every year anyway, so the scores aren't

354
00:17:33,720 --> 00:17:35,879
Speaker 1: going to be identical from one year to the next.

355
00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:38,160
Speaker 2: But what this is.

356
00:17:38,080 --> 00:17:41,880
Speaker 1: Showing is that running back has point four more legendary

357
00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:47,040
Speaker 1: performers than usual, it has one fewer elite producer than usual,

358
00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:49,600
Speaker 1: and then it has basically the same number of weekly starters.

359
00:17:49,600 --> 00:17:53,560
Speaker 1: But then every other category is lower flex play, benchwarmer, waiver,

360
00:17:53,560 --> 00:17:56,040
Speaker 1: wire at in dartthrow. Now, I do want to say

361
00:17:56,440 --> 00:17:58,879
Speaker 1: that this is going to be influenced by the number

362
00:17:58,960 --> 00:18:01,120
Speaker 1: of players that went to the combine. So only twenty

363
00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:05,040
Speaker 1: running backs and really nineteen because one was considered a fullback,

364
00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:07,440
Speaker 1: or twenty one running backs, one was a fullback. And

365
00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:09,560
Speaker 1: then there's Eli heyden Wright, who's basically a slot receiver

366
00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,600
Speaker 1: went to the combine, so that's a low number. Twenty

367
00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:16,679
Speaker 1: is a low number at that position. So naturally that's

368
00:18:16,720 --> 00:18:19,600
Speaker 1: why we see so many fewer dart throws because when

369
00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,040
Speaker 1: you add on if they were to have twenty seven guys,

370
00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:23,960
Speaker 1: and that dart through number would look the exact same

371
00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:25,120
Speaker 1: as other seasons.

372
00:18:25,160 --> 00:18:26,600
Speaker 2: But I will.

373
00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,959
Speaker 1: Say if you have fewer players going to the combine,

374
00:18:29,000 --> 00:18:31,720
Speaker 1: that's probably indicative of not a great class in general,

375
00:18:31,800 --> 00:18:33,520
Speaker 1: right And so that's why I think you can look

376
00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:36,119
Speaker 1: at this and say running back is probably weaker than usual.

377
00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:38,879
Speaker 1: Wide receiver, we don't have the same top end talent

378
00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:42,480
Speaker 1: as we typically do, but we have a lot of depth.

379
00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:45,239
Speaker 1: And I talk about that in the newsletter, where you know,

380
00:18:45,320 --> 00:18:49,640
Speaker 1: the wide receiver profiles this year are averaged to above average.

381
00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:51,840
Speaker 2: They're not elite by any means.

382
00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:54,320
Speaker 1: There's just so many of them, and I say so

383
00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:57,240
Speaker 1: many of them because they're being boosted by draft capital

384
00:18:57,320 --> 00:18:59,480
Speaker 1: right now, right now. According to NFL mock Draft database,

385
00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:02,760
Speaker 1: we have a eleven wide receivers going Day two essentially,

386
00:19:03,080 --> 00:19:06,240
Speaker 1: which is would be the highest that we've had since

387
00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:09,240
Speaker 1: twenty eleven, so like tied for the highest. So what

388
00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:10,399
Speaker 1: that tells you is that we're going to get a

389
00:19:10,400 --> 00:19:14,440
Speaker 1: lot of these weekly starter, flex play benchwarmer type players

390
00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:17,040
Speaker 1: you know in this class. So I think someone's going

391
00:19:17,119 --> 00:19:20,159
Speaker 1: to emerge from Day two that we might not expect

392
00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:24,280
Speaker 1: to emerge or someone's going to emerge who you know,

393
00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:28,360
Speaker 1: has like a not amazing product age adjustin production profile,

394
00:19:28,680 --> 00:19:30,800
Speaker 1: but it's probably gonna happen just by sheer number, right,

395
00:19:30,800 --> 00:19:33,040
Speaker 1: And we had a decent number of guys forty six

396
00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:35,040
Speaker 1: wide receivers at the combine and then tight end. We

397
00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:37,200
Speaker 1: had a ton of tight ends at the combine, as

398
00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:38,640
Speaker 1: we know, I think it was the highest number since

399
00:19:38,680 --> 00:19:41,199
Speaker 1: two thousand and four. And so across the board we

400
00:19:41,280 --> 00:19:44,480
Speaker 1: have more legendary performers. We have about the same number

401
00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:47,439
Speaker 1: of elite producers, and then more flex plays, bench warmers,

402
00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:48,320
Speaker 1: waiver wire adds.

403
00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:51,600
Speaker 2: Dart throws. Where we don't have is the weekly starter category.

404
00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:54,119
Speaker 1: So the way that Brandon and I have the model

405
00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:56,880
Speaker 1: set up right now is that you get legendary performer

406
00:19:57,040 --> 00:20:01,800
Speaker 1: in Kenyan Sidik spoiler alert. You know Eli Stowers if

407
00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:04,880
Speaker 1: his eight I mean, look, Eli Stowers is only worse

408
00:20:04,920 --> 00:20:08,240
Speaker 1: than Kenyon Sadik from a modeling perspective because of a

409
00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:10,760
Speaker 1: difference in draft capital. If the draft capital was not

410
00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:13,560
Speaker 1: like I think, Eli Stowers has a better production profile

411
00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:14,479
Speaker 1: than Kenyon Sadik.

412
00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:15,600
Speaker 3: He won the Mackie Award.

413
00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:18,679
Speaker 1: Yeah, so, and he's he's you know, as we know,

414
00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:21,000
Speaker 1: a pseudo friend of the show because he went to

415
00:20:21,080 --> 00:20:22,560
Speaker 1: Vandy and so.

416
00:20:24,359 --> 00:20:25,800
Speaker 2: He's an elite producer right now.

417
00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:27,440
Speaker 1: I don't think he's going to be a legendary performer

418
00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:29,159
Speaker 1: because I don't think we're going to see like top fifteen,

419
00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:30,760
Speaker 1: top twenty draft capital from him.

420
00:20:31,240 --> 00:20:33,600
Speaker 2: But he's a good prospect, like I talked about this.

421
00:20:33,520 --> 00:20:35,360
Speaker 1: In the Mailbag episode last week, and I do think

422
00:20:35,359 --> 00:20:37,600
Speaker 1: that there's a chance that he goes higher than what

423
00:20:37,800 --> 00:20:40,760
Speaker 1: was being projected when we launched the prospect Guide. But

424
00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:42,919
Speaker 1: tight end is again it's kind of like wide receiver

425
00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:45,280
Speaker 1: where there's just like a lot of dudes who I'm

426
00:20:45,280 --> 00:20:48,880
Speaker 1: not going to be surprised. They have decent athletic profiles

427
00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:51,320
Speaker 1: and average production profiles.

428
00:20:51,320 --> 00:20:52,920
Speaker 2: So we're probably going to see a hit or two

429
00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:54,639
Speaker 2: from that tight end class.

430
00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:57,040
Speaker 1: So when you look at this at a high level

431
00:20:57,080 --> 00:21:00,360
Speaker 1: bird's eye view, which is what this really is, it's

432
00:21:00,520 --> 00:21:03,840
Speaker 1: it's a below average class. You know, it's not it's

433
00:21:03,880 --> 00:21:05,640
Speaker 1: not a great class. I think the running back class

434
00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:08,520
Speaker 1: is pretty pretty brutal. The wide receiver one is at

435
00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:12,000
Speaker 1: least like relatively deep when you factor in draft capital

436
00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:13,040
Speaker 1: or projected draft capital.

437
00:21:13,080 --> 00:21:14,880
Speaker 2: If we don't get that draft Capital at wide.

438
00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:17,840
Speaker 1: Receiver, I'm gonna be concerned because the production profiles are

439
00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:21,760
Speaker 1: not overly strong. And the other thing, too, is that

440
00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:24,919
Speaker 1: a lot of the production profile, like the elite production profiles,

441
00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:27,800
Speaker 1: are from the players that are being boosted up in

442
00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:30,760
Speaker 1: the NFL draft from a projection standpoint, So Jordan Tyson,

443
00:21:30,880 --> 00:21:35,840
Speaker 1: Carnell Tate, McKay Lemon, you know you have Casey Conceptsion, Like,

444
00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,840
Speaker 1: those four have the four best production profiles in my opinion,

445
00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:43,879
Speaker 1: in this class. And so we're not necessarily gonna get

446
00:21:44,520 --> 00:21:48,040
Speaker 1: the incredible values in rookie drafts either were like, let's

447
00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:51,480
Speaker 1: say I really like Casey Conceptsion because the rest of

448
00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:53,080
Speaker 1: the class looks the way it is, and because draft

449
00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:54,880
Speaker 1: capital is probably gonna play out the way that it will,

450
00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:58,720
Speaker 1: chances are the only differences in rankings and ADP that

451
00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:01,400
Speaker 1: we're gonna see is like I'm gonna be like, I'm

452
00:22:01,400 --> 00:22:04,639
Speaker 1: almost definitely gonna have Conceptsion ahead of Denzel Boston, for instance,

453
00:22:04,680 --> 00:22:07,600
Speaker 1: and like, but but the the there might be some

454
00:22:07,640 --> 00:22:10,680
Speaker 1: people who don't. But those are just a small differences

455
00:22:10,680 --> 00:22:12,480
Speaker 1: that we're gonna see in rookie drafts. It's not gonna

456
00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:15,560
Speaker 1: be like conceptsion. I love him and he's great, and

457
00:22:15,600 --> 00:22:18,520
Speaker 1: he got third round draft capital, but we're gonna boost

458
00:22:18,560 --> 00:22:20,160
Speaker 1: him up because he's really good and we're gonna be able

459
00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:21,840
Speaker 1: to get him in the second round of it's not happening.

460
00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:24,159
Speaker 1: Like it's just there's not many players like that in

461
00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:27,520
Speaker 1: this class. So I think, like Elijah surrat could be

462
00:22:27,640 --> 00:22:30,000
Speaker 1: that guy, or could be one of those guys because

463
00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:33,199
Speaker 1: draft capital is currently putting in round three. But the

464
00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:36,200
Speaker 1: fantasy community loves Elijah Surratt because he has really good

465
00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:39,200
Speaker 1: age justin production and so yeah, I mean, I think

466
00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:42,560
Speaker 1: it's just a really it's an easy class to be

467
00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:44,960
Speaker 1: chalky at the top, and then it's just gonna be

468
00:22:45,040 --> 00:22:49,480
Speaker 1: a complete disaster after the mid to late first round

469
00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:52,919
Speaker 1: of rookie drafts, where you're gonna really have to factor

470
00:22:52,920 --> 00:22:54,439
Speaker 1: in I think a little bit more landing spot and

471
00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:56,320
Speaker 1: stuff than we typically do.

472
00:22:56,320 --> 00:22:58,320
Speaker 4: Do you think, just from a zoomed out point of view,

473
00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:01,639
Speaker 4: do you think that we've been I don't want to

474
00:23:01,680 --> 00:23:03,920
Speaker 4: say spoiled, but like last year we had the running

475
00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:07,240
Speaker 4: back class, the year before that, we had the wide

476
00:23:07,240 --> 00:23:09,440
Speaker 4: receiver class. Like going into the draft, there was so

477
00:23:09,520 --> 00:23:12,080
Speaker 4: much hype around these classes and this year there's just

478
00:23:12,119 --> 00:23:13,359
Speaker 4: really not that much.

479
00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:14,119
Speaker 2: Maybe a little bit.

480
00:23:14,119 --> 00:23:16,159
Speaker 1: But at the same time, I think that we often

481
00:23:16,200 --> 00:23:19,119
Speaker 1: overstated and understate what all of that means. You know,

482
00:23:19,160 --> 00:23:20,840
Speaker 1: even I got caught up in the hype a little

483
00:23:20,840 --> 00:23:23,199
Speaker 1: bit of the running back class last year. When I

484
00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:25,720
Speaker 1: look back at the model now and I'm like, yeah,

485
00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:28,239
Speaker 1: it was definitely good, but it was honestly like kind

486
00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:30,880
Speaker 1: of in line with like twenty twenty, you know, or

487
00:23:30,920 --> 00:23:34,480
Speaker 1: like twenty seventeen. Yes, for sure, like, but it's not

488
00:23:35,359 --> 00:23:38,520
Speaker 1: the differences from class to class I think are often

489
00:23:38,640 --> 00:23:41,119
Speaker 1: overstated because we are not nearly as good as we

490
00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:42,520
Speaker 1: think we are predicting this stuff.

491
00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:43,800
Speaker 2: And there are some draft classes.

492
00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:46,280
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure it's a twenty nineteen wide receiver class

493
00:23:46,480 --> 00:23:49,359
Speaker 1: where we think it's horrible and it ends up being great,

494
00:23:49,480 --> 00:23:52,040
Speaker 1: you know, like like I think that's when Terry McLaurin

495
00:23:52,080 --> 00:23:53,440
Speaker 1: came out or something like around that time.

496
00:23:53,480 --> 00:23:54,800
Speaker 2: But regardless, it's.

497
00:23:54,680 --> 00:23:58,600
Speaker 1: Like, like we we shouldn't be so confident in our

498
00:23:58,640 --> 00:24:01,840
Speaker 1: ability to project this stuff. We should still project this

499
00:24:01,840 --> 00:24:05,320
Speaker 1: stuff and understand. But I think what's more important is,

500
00:24:05,480 --> 00:24:09,119
Speaker 1: instead of making the blanket statements, is really understanding where

501
00:24:09,520 --> 00:24:12,600
Speaker 1: the flatness starts to occur and ADP and the flattness

502
00:24:12,640 --> 00:24:15,760
Speaker 1: starts to occur in talent and such, because you know,

503
00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:19,080
Speaker 1: sometimes that flatness, you know, sometimes there's different tiers where

504
00:24:19,080 --> 00:24:21,000
Speaker 1: like the front half of the first round of a

505
00:24:21,040 --> 00:24:24,199
Speaker 1: rookie draft is elite elite to elite, and then the

506
00:24:24,240 --> 00:24:27,359
Speaker 1: next six guys are you know, just one tier below that,

507
00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:29,119
Speaker 1: and then the next six you know, into the second

508
00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:32,240
Speaker 1: round are tier below that. In this year's draft, I

509
00:24:32,240 --> 00:24:34,760
Speaker 1: think it's like you have elite elite, e leite elite,

510
00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:37,600
Speaker 1: and then that end of the first round and then

511
00:24:37,640 --> 00:24:39,600
Speaker 1: that first part of the second round are all kind

512
00:24:39,600 --> 00:24:42,199
Speaker 1: of the same at this point in time right now today,

513
00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:45,320
Speaker 1: whereas you generally do still still see like some sort

514
00:24:45,359 --> 00:24:48,000
Speaker 1: of drop off from that tier two to tier three,

515
00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:49,600
Speaker 1: right now, it's just merged.

516
00:24:49,640 --> 00:24:50,800
Speaker 2: And I think that's.

517
00:24:50,600 --> 00:24:53,440
Speaker 1: The game theory component that we should be taking away

518
00:24:53,480 --> 00:24:56,160
Speaker 1: here Instead of just blanketing and saying, hey, this draft

519
00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:59,240
Speaker 1: class sucks, I think it's more important to you know,

520
00:24:59,280 --> 00:24:59,840
Speaker 1: approach it.

521
00:24:59,800 --> 00:25:02,000
Speaker 2: With Okay, why does it suck? Like where where?

522
00:25:02,359 --> 00:25:05,560
Speaker 1: Like why are we saying this? Why is there this flatness?

523
00:25:05,560 --> 00:25:07,679
Speaker 1: Like what does it mean for my rookie picks? And

524
00:25:07,720 --> 00:25:10,320
Speaker 1: to me It means that late first round rookie picks

525
00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:12,960
Speaker 1: right now today are not that much different than mid

526
00:25:13,000 --> 00:25:14,240
Speaker 1: second round rookie picks.

527
00:25:14,320 --> 00:25:15,680
Speaker 2: And so if you can.

528
00:25:16,200 --> 00:25:18,640
Speaker 1: Kind of dangle that like one to eleven out there

529
00:25:18,680 --> 00:25:21,040
Speaker 1: to somebody and be like, hey, it's the first rounder,

530
00:25:21,280 --> 00:25:24,119
Speaker 1: the first Yeah right, I mean, if you can do

531
00:25:24,119 --> 00:25:26,720
Speaker 1: that today in a more casual dynasty league, I'm all

532
00:25:26,760 --> 00:25:29,040
Speaker 1: for that because I really don't think it's I don't

533
00:25:29,040 --> 00:25:31,080
Speaker 1: think you're gonna get a dramatically different player there than

534
00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:32,560
Speaker 1: you will at like the two oh five or two

535
00:25:32,600 --> 00:25:33,959
Speaker 1: of four in a super flex league.

536
00:25:35,800 --> 00:25:39,080
Speaker 4: We talked about Eli Stowers. I almost mentioned this in

537
00:25:39,080 --> 00:25:41,240
Speaker 4: the news segment, but he had a Top thirty visit

538
00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:43,440
Speaker 4: with the Broncos yesterday.

539
00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:45,320
Speaker 2: Hours with the Broncos would be fun.

540
00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:48,199
Speaker 4: Also met with him at the combine. Can you just

541
00:25:48,280 --> 00:25:51,360
Speaker 4: imagine soturs JJ in the joker role?

542
00:25:51,840 --> 00:25:54,680
Speaker 2: Here we go, Here we go.

543
00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:57,120
Speaker 4: That was an overblown narrative from last year.

544
00:25:57,160 --> 00:25:58,679
Speaker 2: It's always overblown narrative.

545
00:25:58,760 --> 00:26:01,480
Speaker 4: Yeah, little even anger I'm in the in the joker

546
00:26:01,560 --> 00:26:04,080
Speaker 4: role didn't pan out. But if Stowers goes in the

547
00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:08,480
Speaker 4: first round of the Broncos after they restructure Waddles contract

548
00:26:08,520 --> 00:26:08,880
Speaker 4: and that.

549
00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:12,480
Speaker 3: Offense would just would just be nice. All right, enough

550
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:12,800
Speaker 3: of this.

551
00:26:13,600 --> 00:26:19,240
Speaker 4: The late round, main event. All right, these are your

552
00:26:19,320 --> 00:26:24,760
Speaker 4: favorite twenty twenty six draft comps for wide receiver. You

553
00:26:24,840 --> 00:26:27,760
Speaker 4: want you want to preface before you get into this.

554
00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:31,320
Speaker 2: Of course I want to preface. Yeah, this is just fun.

555
00:26:31,640 --> 00:26:32,800
Speaker 2: This is not how I feel.

556
00:26:32,880 --> 00:26:34,719
Speaker 1: But you know, I'll give you guys takes about how

557
00:26:34,760 --> 00:26:36,560
Speaker 1: I actually feel about each of these guys.

558
00:26:36,560 --> 00:26:39,960
Speaker 2: But this is not the way that the ZAP model projections.

559
00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:41,080
Speaker 2: It projects things.

560
00:26:41,840 --> 00:26:44,000
Speaker 1: You know, like we back in the day at number five,

561
00:26:44,080 --> 00:26:46,560
Speaker 1: for instance, Like part of our modeling that we did

562
00:26:46,760 --> 00:26:49,399
Speaker 1: was similarity score based and we would take you know,

563
00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:52,080
Speaker 1: similar games in the past, for instance, that projected a

564
00:26:52,119 --> 00:26:54,639
Speaker 1: certain way, and we would match that and that's how

565
00:26:54,680 --> 00:26:57,240
Speaker 1: we helped project how that particular game was going to go.

566
00:26:57,680 --> 00:27:00,240
Speaker 1: The way the ZA model works, project comps are just

567
00:27:00,280 --> 00:27:01,440
Speaker 1: for fun, that's it.

568
00:27:01,440 --> 00:27:02,880
Speaker 2: It's just to give you an idea.

569
00:27:02,920 --> 00:27:04,719
Speaker 1: And the way that I view comps honestly is like,

570
00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:06,680
Speaker 1: are there a lot of great comps.

571
00:27:06,280 --> 00:27:06,919
Speaker 2: For this player?

572
00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:09,440
Speaker 1: Then we should maybe feel subjectively a little bit better

573
00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:11,880
Speaker 1: about him, are there not? You know, I don't have

574
00:27:11,880 --> 00:27:14,639
Speaker 1: this player on today's list, But like Jeremy Bernard, who

575
00:27:15,080 --> 00:27:17,080
Speaker 1: has some red flags with his profile. Don't get me wrong,

576
00:27:17,080 --> 00:27:18,840
Speaker 1: Like he's the arts pro out run isn't very strong

577
00:27:18,880 --> 00:27:21,520
Speaker 1: and such, and he's not someone I'm higher low on necessarily,

578
00:27:22,200 --> 00:27:25,119
Speaker 1: But his comps whenever I would run it through the

579
00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:28,400
Speaker 1: model and the system were just it was just bad

580
00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:30,919
Speaker 1: comp after bad comp after bad comp. Like it was

581
00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:34,320
Speaker 1: just really not what you want to see from, you know,

582
00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:36,679
Speaker 1: a wide receiver who might go round two and then

583
00:27:36,680 --> 00:27:38,240
Speaker 1: at least gives me a little pause. You know, even

584
00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:40,040
Speaker 1: if the ZAP model is gonna say, oh, he has

585
00:27:40,040 --> 00:27:42,639
Speaker 1: a score of sixty or fifty eight or whatever it is,

586
00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:45,199
Speaker 1: which is along the same lines of this guy or

587
00:27:45,200 --> 00:27:47,239
Speaker 1: this guy, if that other guy has better comps, I'm

588
00:27:47,240 --> 00:27:49,080
Speaker 1: gonna go with the better the guy with better comps,

589
00:27:49,080 --> 00:27:52,919
Speaker 1: of all things being equal. So just just understand that

590
00:27:53,000 --> 00:27:54,840
Speaker 1: as I talk through things. So I think I have

591
00:27:54,880 --> 00:27:57,280
Speaker 1: seven wide receivers to talk about today. These are some

592
00:27:57,280 --> 00:27:59,560
Speaker 1: of my favorite comps from the class, both good and bad.

593
00:28:00,119 --> 00:28:02,520
Speaker 1: Denzel Boston, who's getting a lot of first round love.

594
00:28:02,600 --> 00:28:05,400
Speaker 1: Some people have him as like like they think he's

595
00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:08,040
Speaker 1: like part of the Big three. Others think that he's terrible,

596
00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:11,040
Speaker 1: that he has separation issues. I've seen people throw Keyon

597
00:28:11,119 --> 00:28:13,119
Speaker 1: Coleman out there as like this is a next the

598
00:28:13,119 --> 00:28:14,720
Speaker 1: next key On Coleman. I don't think he's a key

599
00:28:14,720 --> 00:28:18,080
Speaker 1: On Coleman type player at all, really, But if you

600
00:28:18,119 --> 00:28:22,000
Speaker 1: look at him to Jaden Higgins in the model, just

601
00:28:22,119 --> 00:28:25,280
Speaker 1: analytically all this is going to be analytical, there's a

602
00:28:25,280 --> 00:28:28,720
Speaker 1: lot of similarities coming out with the exact same age

603
00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:31,639
Speaker 1: or as the exact same age. They're both the same height,

604
00:28:31,840 --> 00:28:34,640
Speaker 1: almost the exact same weight. Their breakout scores are both

605
00:28:34,680 --> 00:28:38,000
Speaker 1: sixtieth and seventyeighth percentile career yards per out run. This

606
00:28:38,120 --> 00:28:40,680
Speaker 1: is not part of the model yards per out run,

607
00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:42,800
Speaker 1: but Boston was at two point oh two, which is

608
00:28:42,800 --> 00:28:45,320
Speaker 1: a red flag. Jaden Higgins at two point two four

609
00:28:46,040 --> 00:28:48,160
Speaker 1: first downs per route run. Boston actually had a pretty

610
00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:49,960
Speaker 1: good first downs per out run rate, which is nice

611
00:28:50,240 --> 00:28:52,600
Speaker 1: eleven point four percent, but Jaden Higgins at ten point

612
00:28:52,600 --> 00:28:54,880
Speaker 1: eight percent. They both didn't play in the slot very

613
00:28:54,920 --> 00:28:56,800
Speaker 1: much fifteen percent to seventeen percent.

614
00:28:57,040 --> 00:28:59,160
Speaker 2: So there's a lot of similarities. And I think that, like.

615
00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:02,320
Speaker 1: If you want to think about like people just get

616
00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:04,960
Speaker 1: so crazy with comps and they're like, oh, he's Mike

617
00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:06,400
Speaker 1: Evans or he's It's like.

618
00:29:06,840 --> 00:29:09,320
Speaker 2: Calm down, Calm down.

619
00:29:09,760 --> 00:29:13,560
Speaker 1: Mike Evans is a Hall of Fame talent who like

620
00:29:13,840 --> 00:29:16,719
Speaker 1: has has done things that other wide receivers have not

621
00:29:16,800 --> 00:29:18,800
Speaker 1: done in this league. You can't just make that a

622
00:29:18,840 --> 00:29:21,440
Speaker 1: comp like, let's look at a reasonable outcome here. I

623
00:29:21,440 --> 00:29:25,120
Speaker 1: think a reasonable outcome is Jaden Higgins. You know, Boston

624
00:29:25,160 --> 00:29:28,160
Speaker 1: did get a later start production wise because of the

625
00:29:28,160 --> 00:29:32,240
Speaker 1: teammate competition at Washington. But in my opinion, when you

626
00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:35,960
Speaker 1: look at Denzel Boston, I think he's more of a

627
00:29:36,000 --> 00:29:38,960
Speaker 1: second round profile analytical profile.

628
00:29:38,560 --> 00:29:40,560
Speaker 2: Than a first round analytical profile.

629
00:29:41,080 --> 00:29:42,760
Speaker 1: You know, I don't want to say I'm like fading

630
00:29:42,800 --> 00:29:44,480
Speaker 1: him no matter what, but I don't think that he's

631
00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:45,880
Speaker 1: like an elite elite talent.

632
00:29:46,960 --> 00:29:51,320
Speaker 4: Okay, the next one is a guy that I don't

633
00:29:51,320 --> 00:29:55,080
Speaker 4: know if this is a great comp for zach ry Branch.

634
00:29:55,280 --> 00:29:57,160
Speaker 4: But you got Nicole Hardiman.

635
00:29:57,880 --> 00:29:59,880
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean great comp in terms of like him

636
00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:02,160
Speaker 1: being productive in the NFL. No, it's not a great

637
00:30:02,200 --> 00:30:04,600
Speaker 1: comp for him to be productive from a fantasy perspective. Look,

638
00:30:04,640 --> 00:30:06,640
Speaker 1: I have my issues with Zach Branch. I've been talking

639
00:30:06,640 --> 00:30:08,720
Speaker 1: about it for a while. I actually did a little

640
00:30:09,080 --> 00:30:15,600
Speaker 1: Vibe Vibe code Ye work with Claude yesterday to get

641
00:30:15,680 --> 00:30:20,320
Speaker 1: some of the the Zap model stuff into something that

642
00:30:20,360 --> 00:30:22,160
Speaker 1: could easily search. So I'm actually looking at it right

643
00:30:22,200 --> 00:30:24,560
Speaker 1: now on the left side here. But his career behind

644
00:30:24,560 --> 00:30:27,120
Speaker 1: the line of scrimmage rate forty five point five percent.

645
00:30:28,080 --> 00:30:30,480
Speaker 1: That's a ninety nine percent TILE. It's across his career,

646
00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:33,800
Speaker 1: that's a ninety nine percentile number. Screen yard share, so

647
00:30:33,920 --> 00:30:36,480
Speaker 1: how many yards were coming on screens thirty six percent,

648
00:30:36,520 --> 00:30:37,960
Speaker 1: that's a ninety nine percentile number.

649
00:30:38,200 --> 00:30:39,920
Speaker 2: That's the kind of profile we're looking at.

650
00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:43,600
Speaker 1: Was Zach Branch where he's gadgety, you know, was used

651
00:30:43,640 --> 00:30:46,600
Speaker 1: in a non traditional way a wide receiver, And yeah,

652
00:30:46,680 --> 00:30:48,800
Speaker 1: that sounds a little bit like Mikol Hardman, does it not.

653
00:30:48,880 --> 00:30:52,080
Speaker 1: They're both early declares five foot nine versus five foot ten.

654
00:30:52,120 --> 00:30:53,840
Speaker 1: Hardman had about ten pounds on him, so he's a

655
00:30:53,840 --> 00:30:57,320
Speaker 1: little bit bigger. Breakout scores were both not great, you know,

656
00:30:57,440 --> 00:31:00,360
Speaker 1: sub fiftieth percentile thirty fourth to forty third percent TILE.

657
00:31:00,720 --> 00:31:03,320
Speaker 1: Their best season in yards per team pass attempt when

658
00:31:03,320 --> 00:31:08,880
Speaker 1: adjusted for strength of schedule and age was two point

659
00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:10,440
Speaker 1: one one versus one point seven to one.

660
00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:11,440
Speaker 2: Hardman was worse.

661
00:31:11,480 --> 00:31:14,080
Speaker 1: Within that metric, both were heavily used out of the

662
00:31:14,120 --> 00:31:17,200
Speaker 1: slot and both were heavily used behind the line of scrimmage.

663
00:31:17,240 --> 00:31:19,720
Speaker 1: Now I know I mentioned Zach Branch was forty five

664
00:31:19,720 --> 00:31:22,440
Speaker 1: point five percent, Miko Hardman was about twenty seven percent

665
00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:24,480
Speaker 1: in terms of his usage behind the line of scrimmage

666
00:31:24,520 --> 00:31:26,640
Speaker 1: in college. But let me tell you, guys, forty five

667
00:31:26,680 --> 00:31:28,360
Speaker 1: point five percent, like I said, as a ninety nine

668
00:31:28,400 --> 00:31:31,160
Speaker 1: percent tile number, it's an outlier type number. So twenty

669
00:31:31,200 --> 00:31:33,680
Speaker 1: seven percent is actually a lot. It's just that there's

670
00:31:33,720 --> 00:31:35,320
Speaker 1: a big This is just such a big gap. But

671
00:31:35,360 --> 00:31:38,400
Speaker 1: the way that Branch was used in college himself, so

672
00:31:38,880 --> 00:31:40,720
Speaker 1: I don't think this is like a one to one

673
00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:43,520
Speaker 1: per se because, like I said, Branch's usage was so

674
00:31:43,640 --> 00:31:48,040
Speaker 1: extreme and Hardman also had that a better career yards

675
00:31:48,040 --> 00:31:51,360
Speaker 1: per out run rate. But I do think that this

676
00:31:51,520 --> 00:31:54,120
Speaker 1: comp which got spit out as the top comp for Branch,

677
00:31:54,560 --> 00:31:56,920
Speaker 1: tells the story of the kind of player that Branches.

678
00:31:57,040 --> 00:31:58,960
Speaker 1: I mean, is there a ceiling shore like is their

679
00:31:59,560 --> 00:32:01,840
Speaker 1: best ball all upside? Sure, but I do worry about

680
00:32:01,880 --> 00:32:02,840
Speaker 1: Branches of prospect.

681
00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:06,360
Speaker 4: Okay, that might not have been a fun profile for

682
00:32:06,640 --> 00:32:10,959
Speaker 4: fantasy enthusiast, but this one kind of is Omar Cooper

683
00:32:11,480 --> 00:32:13,560
Speaker 4: you got the comp to Deebo Samuel.

684
00:32:13,840 --> 00:32:15,440
Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of people have made this comp too.

685
00:32:16,120 --> 00:32:19,120
Speaker 1: It was Rashi Rice was one that also popped up

686
00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:21,800
Speaker 1: in the model. But then in Omar Cooper's rite up,

687
00:32:21,880 --> 00:32:24,040
Speaker 1: I talked about Deebo Samuel, So I want to talk

688
00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:27,239
Speaker 1: about this one a little bit more so when you

689
00:32:27,280 --> 00:32:30,600
Speaker 1: look at their numbers, the biggest difference is that Deebo

690
00:32:30,680 --> 00:32:34,120
Speaker 1: Samuel is a thicker build, right, He's about fifteen pounds heavier.

691
00:32:34,480 --> 00:32:36,280
Speaker 1: And the way that these comps work I mentioned this

692
00:32:36,400 --> 00:32:38,520
Speaker 1: last week, is that it's looking at the distance between

693
00:32:38,560 --> 00:32:41,040
Speaker 1: all these different variables and it's saying, Okay, I'm going

694
00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:44,040
Speaker 1: to calculate this distance and weight, and then this distance

695
00:32:44,080 --> 00:32:46,520
Speaker 1: and this metric, and then it adds all that together

696
00:32:46,560 --> 00:32:49,480
Speaker 1: and says, what is the lowest distance? Right, And that's

697
00:32:49,720 --> 00:32:52,280
Speaker 1: the tightest comp if you will, And so I'll weigh

698
00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:56,920
Speaker 1: things like height and weight more. And despite that, Omar

699
00:32:56,960 --> 00:32:59,640
Speaker 1: Cooper versus Deebo Samuel was the second highest.

700
00:32:59,280 --> 00:33:02,040
Speaker 2: Comp for Omar Cooper. Deebo Samuel was and.

701
00:33:02,000 --> 00:33:04,600
Speaker 1: So and the reason for that is their breakout scores

702
00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:07,200
Speaker 1: are very similar. Fifty fourth to sixty fifth percentile. It's

703
00:33:07,240 --> 00:33:11,040
Speaker 1: forty two to forty seven ish. Breakout scores yards per

704
00:33:11,080 --> 00:33:14,240
Speaker 1: out run and their career point oh four apart from

705
00:33:14,280 --> 00:33:18,040
Speaker 1: one another. First downs per out run very similar. Their

706
00:33:18,080 --> 00:33:21,160
Speaker 1: best season in adjusted yards per team pass attempt almost identical.

707
00:33:21,600 --> 00:33:23,400
Speaker 2: And then the way they were deployed.

708
00:33:23,480 --> 00:33:27,200
Speaker 1: Now, Deebo saw a slot rate of only sixteen percent

709
00:33:27,240 --> 00:33:30,000
Speaker 1: in college, whereas Omar Cooper is at forty seven percent.

710
00:33:30,040 --> 00:33:31,920
Speaker 2: But when you look at the.

711
00:33:31,360 --> 00:33:34,080
Speaker 1: Depth in which they were seeing their targets, their deep

712
00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:35,720
Speaker 1: ball rate wasn't that far from one another.

713
00:33:36,040 --> 00:33:38,560
Speaker 2: Their shorter area targets were.

714
00:33:38,440 --> 00:33:41,240
Speaker 1: Very very similar. And then the big thing here too,

715
00:33:41,560 --> 00:33:45,760
Speaker 1: they're avoided tackles per catch. That's where obviously Deebo has

716
00:33:45,800 --> 00:33:48,400
Speaker 1: won in the NFL. He's a tackle breaker. That's what

717
00:33:48,440 --> 00:33:50,680
Speaker 1: Omar Cooper does as well. Omar Cooper at a point

718
00:33:50,720 --> 00:33:53,960
Speaker 1: three to one misstackles force per catch, which is crazy.

719
00:33:54,000 --> 00:33:57,080
Speaker 1: It's a great number. Deebo Samuels is also very high

720
00:33:57,120 --> 00:33:59,200
Speaker 1: in college. So I do think that's the kind of

721
00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:03,120
Speaker 1: player we're working with with with Omar Cooper, very interesting prospect.

722
00:34:03,160 --> 00:34:06,160
Speaker 1: He's getting round one love right now. He's not gonna

723
00:34:06,400 --> 00:34:09,680
Speaker 1: like I will not like Casey Conceptsione. Even though Conceptio

724
00:34:09,800 --> 00:34:11,560
Speaker 1: might go after Cooper in the draft, I still think

725
00:34:11,600 --> 00:34:13,879
Speaker 1: Conceptsion is a better player and better prospect, so I'll

726
00:34:13,880 --> 00:34:15,960
Speaker 1: have him ranked the head. But I think Cooper is

727
00:34:16,000 --> 00:34:19,399
Speaker 1: an okay player, like an okay prospect in this kind

728
00:34:19,400 --> 00:34:22,879
Speaker 1: of environment in class where there's a there's a non

729
00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:25,959
Speaker 1: zero chance that I would rank Cooper over Boston post draft,

730
00:34:25,960 --> 00:34:29,480
Speaker 1: depending on how draft capital falls.

731
00:34:30,040 --> 00:34:34,560
Speaker 4: Okay, I'm assuming this next comp JJ is just on

732
00:34:34,600 --> 00:34:38,000
Speaker 4: the field and not off the field.

733
00:34:39,600 --> 00:34:41,960
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I don't know anything about.

734
00:34:41,719 --> 00:34:44,040
Speaker 1: Malachi Fields off the field, so yeah, sure, well I

735
00:34:44,239 --> 00:34:46,239
Speaker 1: I and all I know about mc collins off the

736
00:34:46,280 --> 00:34:49,000
Speaker 1: field is that he likes to get to games in

737
00:34:49,000 --> 00:34:52,600
Speaker 1: a wild and crazy way, and he's you know, just

738
00:34:52,640 --> 00:34:53,720
Speaker 1: an interest foot.

739
00:34:54,360 --> 00:34:54,600
Speaker 2: Yeah.

740
00:34:54,719 --> 00:34:57,320
Speaker 3: Interesting, probably the most interesting person in the NFL.

741
00:34:57,480 --> 00:34:58,120
Speaker 2: Yeah.

742
00:34:58,120 --> 00:35:01,720
Speaker 1: But Malachi Fields, who I think has a pretty crummy

743
00:35:02,040 --> 00:35:03,600
Speaker 1: age adjusted production profile.

744
00:35:04,640 --> 00:35:05,840
Speaker 2: He comes to mac Hollins.

745
00:35:05,920 --> 00:35:08,520
Speaker 1: They were both pretty old coming out twenty three point

746
00:35:08,520 --> 00:35:11,680
Speaker 1: eight for for Malachi Fields, twenty three point six for maccollins.

747
00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:15,400
Speaker 1: Both pretty similar, size six five to eighteen for Fields,

748
00:35:15,800 --> 00:35:19,080
Speaker 1: six four to two twenty one for Hollins. Breakout scores

749
00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:22,640
Speaker 1: were both low not surprising for guys who stick who

750
00:35:22,680 --> 00:35:25,560
Speaker 1: were older coming out, and then their best adjusted yards

751
00:35:25,560 --> 00:35:27,960
Speaker 1: perteen pass atten numbers were were pretty on point with

752
00:35:28,000 --> 00:35:32,080
Speaker 1: one another as well. So those numbers like because adjusted

753
00:35:32,160 --> 00:35:35,120
Speaker 1: yards between pass ten feeds into breakout score, those numbers

754
00:35:35,160 --> 00:35:38,239
Speaker 1: are all all of those right there are in the

755
00:35:38,560 --> 00:35:41,319
Speaker 1: ZAP model to some degree, which is why maccollins was

756
00:35:41,320 --> 00:35:44,680
Speaker 1: a top com for Fields and Fields also, by the way,

757
00:35:45,080 --> 00:35:47,279
Speaker 1: I don't have mc collins yards perrowle run numbers because

758
00:35:47,280 --> 00:35:49,239
Speaker 1: it was a while ago and and data doesn't go

759
00:35:49,320 --> 00:35:53,000
Speaker 1: back that far. But Fields had a very poor yards

760
00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:55,400
Speaker 1: perou run profile. I actually said a tweet out today

761
00:35:55,840 --> 00:36:00,200
Speaker 1: about how Fields saw a spike where like his on

762
00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:02,560
Speaker 1: NFL mock draft database, he was going like forty third

763
00:36:02,640 --> 00:36:05,000
Speaker 1: overall at one point on the Consensus big boards, and

764
00:36:05,040 --> 00:36:08,480
Speaker 1: now he's down to sixty four. And so I said

765
00:36:08,480 --> 00:36:10,560
Speaker 1: that as if I said forty four, but I said

766
00:36:10,600 --> 00:36:11,280
Speaker 1: forty three.

767
00:36:11,120 --> 00:36:11,600
Speaker 2: Didn't I.

768
00:36:12,320 --> 00:36:13,840
Speaker 1: But now he's on the sixty four, So he's like

769
00:36:13,880 --> 00:36:16,160
Speaker 1: a fringe round two, round three player.

770
00:36:16,520 --> 00:36:18,040
Speaker 2: Even that to me is too high.

771
00:36:18,280 --> 00:36:20,120
Speaker 1: And what happened, I think was that he had a

772
00:36:20,120 --> 00:36:24,080
Speaker 1: good senior Bowl and people started to mock him higher,

773
00:36:24,480 --> 00:36:27,799
Speaker 1: but the analytical profile is not strong enough in my

774
00:36:27,840 --> 00:36:29,280
Speaker 1: opinion for Malechi Fields.

775
00:36:30,200 --> 00:36:32,920
Speaker 2: Could he be a third rounder or should he be

776
00:36:32,920 --> 00:36:33,640
Speaker 2: a third rounder?

777
00:36:34,200 --> 00:36:36,239
Speaker 1: I can see someone taking a chance on the size,

778
00:36:36,560 --> 00:36:38,880
Speaker 1: but to me, he's more of a Day three player.

779
00:36:39,080 --> 00:36:41,160
Speaker 2: Like, I'm just not going to be in on field.

780
00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:45,400
Speaker 1: If Fields gets round two capital and that correlates to

781
00:36:45,400 --> 00:36:47,879
Speaker 1: where his dynasty ADP will be, I'm gonna be out

782
00:36:47,960 --> 00:36:50,360
Speaker 1: because his his production profile is just not very strong.

783
00:36:51,680 --> 00:36:54,360
Speaker 4: Okay, I feel like this next Comfy did for me.

784
00:36:55,600 --> 00:36:58,840
Speaker 1: Maybe I did for all the all of the people

785
00:36:58,880 --> 00:37:01,839
Speaker 1: who were burned by just Hunter back in the day.

786
00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:05,640
Speaker 4: So there might be some some younger folks out there

787
00:37:06,520 --> 00:37:10,759
Speaker 4: that they don't really remember the Justin Hunter days or

788
00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:13,799
Speaker 4: Justin Hunter hype even a lot of like he had

789
00:37:13,840 --> 00:37:16,560
Speaker 4: so much potential. Man, were you a big Justin Hunter guy?

790
00:37:17,160 --> 00:37:17,600
Speaker 2: I think?

791
00:37:18,640 --> 00:37:21,839
Speaker 1: Because But the thing is back then, if you look

792
00:37:21,880 --> 00:37:24,279
Speaker 1: in like that twenty fifteen to twenty eighteen time frame,

793
00:37:24,280 --> 00:37:28,399
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen time frame, yeah, I wasn't prospecting really and

794
00:37:28,680 --> 00:37:31,799
Speaker 1: I didn't have Like the evolution for me with my

795
00:37:31,920 --> 00:37:36,800
Speaker 1: analysis has very much been grounded with how that player

796
00:37:36,920 --> 00:37:40,120
Speaker 1: was viewed coming out of college, you know, like especially

797
00:37:40,200 --> 00:37:42,920
Speaker 1: early on in their careers and stuff where I think

798
00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:47,280
Speaker 1: it's important where if a player shows us something after

799
00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:50,600
Speaker 1: being a good prospect, then he's probably a good player,

800
00:37:50,800 --> 00:37:53,560
Speaker 1: right Whereas you know, like Luther Burden, I'm so intrigued

801
00:37:53,600 --> 00:37:55,799
Speaker 1: by because I thought he was a really good prospect

802
00:37:56,000 --> 00:37:59,040
Speaker 1: and he had really good peripherals last year, and so

803
00:37:59,120 --> 00:38:00,759
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh man, this is exciting, right.

804
00:38:01,000 --> 00:38:03,400
Speaker 2: But it's when you get this combination of.

805
00:38:03,600 --> 00:38:07,680
Speaker 1: Like okay prospect or like decent enough prospect and then

806
00:38:07,719 --> 00:38:09,759
Speaker 1: they kind of fall flat on their face. Then you

807
00:38:09,880 --> 00:38:11,680
Speaker 1: kind of be like, I don't know if this guy's

808
00:38:11,719 --> 00:38:13,560
Speaker 1: going to be it or not right or you know,

809
00:38:13,600 --> 00:38:15,840
Speaker 1: there's just all these like different iterations you can look at.

810
00:38:15,960 --> 00:38:17,719
Speaker 2: So I don't know how I would have viewed Justin Hunter.

811
00:38:17,800 --> 00:38:19,040
Speaker 1: To be honest with you, I think back then I

812
00:38:19,040 --> 00:38:22,600
Speaker 1: was probably drafting him because like I fell more victim

813
00:38:22,680 --> 00:38:27,000
Speaker 1: to hype and to group think back then, you know,

814
00:38:27,160 --> 00:38:30,200
Speaker 1: just to be honest, but yeah, you know, if.

815
00:38:30,040 --> 00:38:32,560
Speaker 2: I look back now at what the model says about him, it's.

816
00:38:32,440 --> 00:38:34,879
Speaker 1: Not like he was like this phenomenal prospect necessary because

817
00:38:34,880 --> 00:38:36,880
Speaker 1: he was part of it was his athleticism. He was

818
00:38:36,920 --> 00:38:39,040
Speaker 1: a freak athlete, right, That's why that's why he looked

819
00:38:39,040 --> 00:38:40,240
Speaker 1: as good as he did to some people.

820
00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:43,600
Speaker 4: And six four, I mean, yeah, people love people love

821
00:38:43,640 --> 00:38:45,120
Speaker 4: six or four wide receivers.

822
00:38:45,400 --> 00:38:45,680
Speaker 2: Yeah.

823
00:38:45,719 --> 00:38:49,080
Speaker 1: And so Jacoby Lane is the Justin Hunter comp that

824
00:38:49,120 --> 00:38:51,840
Speaker 1: I'm making, or Justin Hunter's the comp for Jacoby Lane.

825
00:38:51,840 --> 00:38:54,040
Speaker 2: They're both early to clare receivers.

826
00:38:53,560 --> 00:38:56,040
Speaker 1: Both almost identically ages coming out, they're sub twenty two

827
00:38:56,120 --> 00:39:00,279
Speaker 1: years old, very similar frames six four two hundre in

828
00:39:00,320 --> 00:39:04,280
Speaker 1: one ninety six, so you get this like leaner perimeter

829
00:39:04,400 --> 00:39:08,880
Speaker 1: type frame. Their breakout scores almost identical thirty five for

830
00:39:08,960 --> 00:39:11,360
Speaker 1: both of them. Their best year in adjusted yards per

831
00:39:11,360 --> 00:39:13,719
Speaker 1: team pass attempt almost identical two point three five to

832
00:39:13,719 --> 00:39:17,319
Speaker 1: two point four nine. Laine also at a sub two

833
00:39:17,360 --> 00:39:20,040
Speaker 1: point zero yards pro out run rate. So it's not

834
00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:23,160
Speaker 1: great that's twenty six in the class. And the other

835
00:39:23,160 --> 00:39:27,120
Speaker 1: thing with Lane is it's good that he's in early declare.

836
00:39:27,239 --> 00:39:29,399
Speaker 1: You know, it's good that that he's younger, and that's

837
00:39:29,400 --> 00:39:32,000
Speaker 1: something that's factored in by the model. But we've seen

838
00:39:32,000 --> 00:39:35,160
Speaker 1: this kind of profile before, and the problem with it

839
00:39:35,200 --> 00:39:38,080
Speaker 1: is that the other two comps that spit out as

840
00:39:38,120 --> 00:39:41,399
Speaker 1: this top three that are in the prospect guide are

841
00:39:42,080 --> 00:39:43,240
Speaker 1: Terras Marshall.

842
00:39:42,880 --> 00:39:43,640
Speaker 2: And Ady Mitchell.

843
00:39:43,880 --> 00:39:47,719
Speaker 1: Now I fell victim to Terist Marshall because again that

844
00:39:47,880 --> 00:39:51,240
Speaker 1: was earlier in my prospecting career. In life, I wouldn't

845
00:39:51,239 --> 00:39:54,440
Speaker 1: have viewed him necessarily the same way. Now Ady Mitchell.

846
00:39:54,640 --> 00:39:57,880
Speaker 1: I corrected the mistake, and I was off of Ady Mitchell.

847
00:39:57,920 --> 00:40:01,239
Speaker 1: The model did not like Ady Mitchell, and so I'm

848
00:40:01,239 --> 00:40:05,359
Speaker 1: glad for that right that I'm learning. Okay, guys getting better, ye,

849
00:40:05,640 --> 00:40:08,319
Speaker 1: And I do think that Jacoby Lane kind of fits

850
00:40:08,360 --> 00:40:08,879
Speaker 1: the mold here.

851
00:40:08,960 --> 00:40:09,960
Speaker 2: I don't think though, that he's going.

852
00:40:09,960 --> 00:40:11,840
Speaker 1: To see the same draft capital as these guys, So

853
00:40:12,440 --> 00:40:15,000
Speaker 1: that could be, you know, if if Jacoby Lane's like

854
00:40:15,000 --> 00:40:16,920
Speaker 1: a late second round rookie pick or something, or like

855
00:40:16,960 --> 00:40:18,680
Speaker 1: third I don't I have no idea where his ADP

856
00:40:18,800 --> 00:40:20,560
Speaker 1: would be. I'm not going to really care if you

857
00:40:20,560 --> 00:40:22,520
Speaker 1: want to take a chance, because I don't think there's

858
00:40:22,520 --> 00:40:24,239
Speaker 1: gonna be a lot of studs or obvious players to

859
00:40:24,280 --> 00:40:25,520
Speaker 1: go to in that range anyway.

860
00:40:25,600 --> 00:40:27,200
Speaker 2: But I do think that there's a lot of red

861
00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:28,200
Speaker 2: flags to his profile.

862
00:40:29,280 --> 00:40:31,320
Speaker 4: All right, speaking of studs, we might have one in

863
00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:36,440
Speaker 4: the next one. So CARNL Tait, you've got his comp

864
00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:37,480
Speaker 4: as George Pickens.

865
00:40:38,560 --> 00:40:39,719
Speaker 2: Yes, yes.

866
00:40:39,960 --> 00:40:40,120
Speaker 3: Oh.

867
00:40:40,120 --> 00:40:41,759
Speaker 1: By the way, someone says this guy sounds like a

868
00:40:41,800 --> 00:40:46,520
Speaker 1: down spoiler in Indianapolis, so Josh Dollen spoiler. Jacoby Lane

869
00:40:46,520 --> 00:40:50,080
Speaker 1: is definitely a Chris Ballard type wide receiver for sure.

870
00:40:50,520 --> 00:40:51,120
Speaker 2: For sure.

871
00:40:51,440 --> 00:40:55,520
Speaker 1: Like I don't know if the athleticism is as elite,

872
00:40:56,040 --> 00:40:58,000
Speaker 1: you know, for Ballard to kind of go after, but

873
00:40:58,400 --> 00:40:59,840
Speaker 1: I do think that he could be sort of that

874
00:40:59,880 --> 00:41:02,320
Speaker 1: like perimeter guy that they're they're missing to a degree,

875
00:41:02,360 --> 00:41:05,120
Speaker 1: But you know, I don't know if if they'll go

876
00:41:05,160 --> 00:41:06,719
Speaker 1: that route. But the fact that Ady Mitchell was a

877
00:41:06,840 --> 00:41:08,960
Speaker 1: was a comp is kind of funny, all right. Carnel

878
00:41:09,040 --> 00:41:12,160
Speaker 1: Tate to George Pickens. This is one that other people

879
00:41:12,200 --> 00:41:15,799
Speaker 1: have made too, but breakout scores very similar. They're six

880
00:41:15,840 --> 00:41:19,799
Speaker 1: two and six. Career yards per out, run rates are

881
00:41:19,840 --> 00:41:23,759
Speaker 1: most identical. Tait, though, is the better prospect overall. I

882
00:41:23,760 --> 00:41:25,640
Speaker 1: think that needs to be stated. His best season in

883
00:41:25,680 --> 00:41:27,640
Speaker 1: the yards per team pass attempts is two point seventy three,

884
00:41:28,120 --> 00:41:30,560
Speaker 1: Pickens two point one zero, And when you adjust those

885
00:41:30,640 --> 00:41:33,239
Speaker 1: numbers they get even better for both players because of

886
00:41:33,280 --> 00:41:35,880
Speaker 1: the programs they played at and such. But I do

887
00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:38,480
Speaker 1: think Tate is the better prospect. Than George Pickens. And

888
00:41:38,600 --> 00:41:40,640
Speaker 1: the other thing that I did find interesting that is

889
00:41:40,680 --> 00:41:44,680
Speaker 1: not as comparable is that Tit's a dot was roughly

890
00:41:44,719 --> 00:41:46,480
Speaker 1: three yards lower than George.

891
00:41:46,239 --> 00:41:47,759
Speaker 2: Pickens a dot in college.

892
00:41:48,280 --> 00:41:50,760
Speaker 1: And I know that Tit is viewed as this deep

893
00:41:50,800 --> 00:41:53,279
Speaker 1: threat and such, and so I think that's at least

894
00:41:53,320 --> 00:41:57,399
Speaker 1: interesting when you're making that comp to George Pickens. If

895
00:41:57,400 --> 00:42:00,440
Speaker 1: you look at their deep ball target rate, Tate was

896
00:42:00,440 --> 00:42:04,279
Speaker 1: about eleven percentage points lower than George Pickens across their

897
00:42:04,280 --> 00:42:09,600
Speaker 1: collegiate careers. So, like, I think the comp makes sense stylistically,

898
00:42:09,840 --> 00:42:13,560
Speaker 1: analytically all of that, but I do think that there

899
00:42:13,560 --> 00:42:16,000
Speaker 1: are some differences here with with Tate the other the

900
00:42:16,040 --> 00:42:18,440
Speaker 1: other comp just so people were aware with Tate that

901
00:42:18,480 --> 00:42:19,280
Speaker 1: the higher end.

902
00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:21,200
Speaker 2: One was, uh was Calvin Ridley.

903
00:42:21,719 --> 00:42:23,480
Speaker 1: And then I think will Fuller was the third one,

904
00:42:23,680 --> 00:42:26,360
Speaker 1: which you know, will Fuller had his moments in the

905
00:42:26,440 --> 00:42:29,400
Speaker 1: in the league. It's just he he no one, no

906
00:42:29,440 --> 00:42:31,239
Speaker 1: one still knows where will Fuller is.

907
00:42:32,320 --> 00:42:32,919
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't.

908
00:42:32,920 --> 00:42:35,040
Speaker 2: I have no idea what happened to will full He.

909
00:42:35,080 --> 00:42:38,520
Speaker 4: Kind of just fell off, yeah, yeah, the face of

910
00:42:38,520 --> 00:42:39,279
Speaker 4: the earth. Yeah yeah.

911
00:42:39,280 --> 00:42:40,040
Speaker 2: It was bizarre.

912
00:42:40,080 --> 00:42:42,520
Speaker 1: I remember like teams were like ready to sign him

913
00:42:42,560 --> 00:42:44,360
Speaker 1: seemingly and then he just never played again.

914
00:42:45,560 --> 00:42:48,800
Speaker 4: All Right, this next one kind of hurts a little

915
00:42:48,800 --> 00:42:52,920
Speaker 4: bit because or not not this next one. Sorry, Going

916
00:42:52,960 --> 00:42:55,200
Speaker 4: back to George Pickens, it kind of hurts a little

917
00:42:55,239 --> 00:42:57,920
Speaker 4: bit because as a Titans fan, he was in that

918
00:42:58,040 --> 00:43:03,759
Speaker 4: twenty twenty two NFL Draft and the Titans that's when

919
00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:07,440
Speaker 4: they notoriously like fell off the cliff traded AJ Brown

920
00:43:07,800 --> 00:43:12,680
Speaker 4: got Trailing Burke's and I'm screaming for George Pickens. But

921
00:43:12,880 --> 00:43:16,320
Speaker 4: people also like thought that his attitude was like the issue,

922
00:43:16,360 --> 00:43:17,040
Speaker 4: which I mean.

923
00:43:18,080 --> 00:43:20,920
Speaker 1: I mean, I I mean it's it kind of has

924
00:43:20,960 --> 00:43:23,160
Speaker 1: come to a head, like at least with Pittsburgh and stuff.

925
00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:26,120
Speaker 1: But I remember that draft thinking that it wasn't a

926
00:43:26,200 --> 00:43:29,120
Speaker 1: Chicago that was like a lock to get Pickens.

927
00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:29,520
Speaker 2: And then they didn't.

928
00:43:29,840 --> 00:43:31,120
Speaker 4: Yeah, is that what happened.

929
00:43:31,200 --> 00:43:33,560
Speaker 1: I'm looking at the draft right now to make sure that. Yeah,

930
00:43:33,560 --> 00:43:36,920
Speaker 1: the Bears got y Kyler Gordon in that draft and

931
00:43:36,960 --> 00:43:38,879
Speaker 1: then Pickens went.

932
00:43:40,400 --> 00:43:42,200
Speaker 4: Pickens went fifty second over.

933
00:43:42,360 --> 00:43:44,319
Speaker 2: Second to Pittsburgh.

934
00:43:44,400 --> 00:43:45,880
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean, like he slipped, and I think

935
00:43:45,880 --> 00:43:47,759
Speaker 1: the off the field stuff was definitely a problem. And

936
00:43:47,800 --> 00:43:49,839
Speaker 1: I also will go to the grave I talked about

937
00:43:49,840 --> 00:43:51,760
Speaker 1: this last year on Twitter and kind of got roasted

938
00:43:51,800 --> 00:43:55,680
Speaker 1: for it by by mostly Steeler fans. But like, George

939
00:43:55,680 --> 00:43:58,680
Speaker 1: Pickens is better than DK Metcalf. Yeah, and the Steelers

940
00:43:59,000 --> 00:44:02,120
Speaker 1: traded a second from Calf. They traded Pickens for a third,

941
00:44:02,120 --> 00:44:04,839
Speaker 1: and they paid DK Metcalf. And imagine if they were

942
00:44:04,880 --> 00:44:07,920
Speaker 1: to just get it to work with George Pickens, then

943
00:44:07,960 --> 00:44:09,560
Speaker 1: they'd be in a way better spot than they are

944
00:44:09,680 --> 00:44:10,080
Speaker 1: right now.

945
00:44:11,760 --> 00:44:15,560
Speaker 3: Yeah. George Pickens, followed immediately by Alec Pearce sky Moore

946
00:44:15,640 --> 00:44:20,279
Speaker 3: and then Trey McBride. Is interesting. Four picks in the draft.

947
00:44:20,560 --> 00:44:25,680
Speaker 4: All right, Next we've got Skyler Bell and the comp

948
00:44:25,960 --> 00:44:28,080
Speaker 4: is Ricky Pearsall who.

949
00:44:27,880 --> 00:44:32,200
Speaker 3: As we know, JJ got shot shot.

950
00:44:33,080 --> 00:44:35,120
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, as that was one of the first late

951
00:44:35,200 --> 00:44:37,240
Speaker 1: Round shows and it was one of my biggest regrets

952
00:44:37,280 --> 00:44:39,880
Speaker 1: that I've ever had on on YouTube. Uh speaking of

953
00:44:39,880 --> 00:44:43,600
Speaker 1: Brian Robinson signed with with Atlanta. Yeah yeah, who got

954
00:44:43,640 --> 00:44:43,960
Speaker 1: he got?

955
00:44:44,000 --> 00:44:44,640
Speaker 2: He got shot?

956
00:44:45,000 --> 00:44:47,080
Speaker 3: Yeah, he just got shot, not shot.

957
00:44:47,520 --> 00:44:52,160
Speaker 1: Uh. But yeah, So Skyler Bell had a pretty prolific,

958
00:44:52,320 --> 00:44:56,400
Speaker 1: like like end of his career from a production standpoint.

959
00:44:56,800 --> 00:44:59,279
Speaker 1: But a couple things about that number. One, when you

960
00:44:59,360 --> 00:45:01,520
Speaker 1: adjust from mark share, it still looks good. But doesn't

961
00:45:01,560 --> 00:45:02,160
Speaker 1: look as good.

962
00:45:02,760 --> 00:45:05,279
Speaker 2: Number two. You have to remember that he's older and

963
00:45:05,320 --> 00:45:08,320
Speaker 2: he's playing a not major major.

964
00:45:08,120 --> 00:45:11,799
Speaker 1: Program is at Yukon. But the Ricky Piersoll comp makes

965
00:45:11,800 --> 00:45:14,160
Speaker 1: sense to me. I mean, the the ages are pretty similar,

966
00:45:14,840 --> 00:45:20,360
Speaker 1: coming out almost identical, the height six foot six. The

967
00:45:20,400 --> 00:45:24,120
Speaker 1: breakout score is better for Pearsall. It's not great. I

968
00:45:24,160 --> 00:45:26,640
Speaker 1: mean it's thirty five. That's like a less than fiftieth

969
00:45:26,680 --> 00:45:30,200
Speaker 1: percentile breakout score. Skyler Bell it's twenty two because of

970
00:45:30,239 --> 00:45:33,359
Speaker 1: the adjustins made for the program that he was playing at.

971
00:45:33,600 --> 00:45:36,399
Speaker 1: They both had some rushing production, which gets signal within

972
00:45:36,440 --> 00:45:39,400
Speaker 1: the ZAP model, career arts per out run is pretty similar.

973
00:45:39,480 --> 00:45:42,360
Speaker 1: First downs per out run is pretty similar. It's just

974
00:45:42,360 --> 00:45:44,400
Speaker 1: so you got to remember to adjust things for Skyler

975
00:45:44,440 --> 00:45:45,840
Speaker 1: Bell based on where he played.

976
00:45:46,160 --> 00:45:46,799
Speaker 2: And the other thing too.

977
00:45:46,840 --> 00:45:49,880
Speaker 1: When you look at these comps like I I remember

978
00:45:50,320 --> 00:45:53,319
Speaker 1: when I was going through the prospecting process of that

979
00:45:53,560 --> 00:45:55,759
Speaker 1: draft class with Ricky Pearsall a couple of years ago.

980
00:45:57,680 --> 00:46:02,400
Speaker 1: I liked Pearsaw and then he got surprisingly high draft capital,

981
00:46:02,480 --> 00:46:04,360
Speaker 1: Like people were not ready for him to be a

982
00:46:04,400 --> 00:46:06,320
Speaker 1: first round, end of the first round kind of player.

983
00:46:07,520 --> 00:46:09,600
Speaker 1: It was like I was more in him when he

984
00:46:09,640 --> 00:46:11,680
Speaker 1: was like a late second early, you know, date like

985
00:46:12,040 --> 00:46:14,000
Speaker 1: somewhere in Day two kind of player. He was an

986
00:46:14,040 --> 00:46:17,400
Speaker 1: interesting name because he had this versatile profile, and then

987
00:46:17,440 --> 00:46:20,600
Speaker 1: he landed in a place in San Francisco that I thought,

988
00:46:20,640 --> 00:46:23,520
Speaker 1: and we still don't know, could could use sort of

989
00:46:23,520 --> 00:46:27,160
Speaker 1: that versatile skill set, you know, because Kyle Shanahan likes

990
00:46:27,200 --> 00:46:30,680
Speaker 1: to use wide receivers in those yak ways, and so

991
00:46:31,400 --> 00:46:33,560
Speaker 1: I thought, like the landing spot was good, all that

992
00:46:33,640 --> 00:46:37,160
Speaker 1: sort of thing. But Piersall's profile was not close to

993
00:46:37,280 --> 00:46:40,560
Speaker 1: like squeaky clean, like it was very much red flags

994
00:46:40,600 --> 00:46:42,359
Speaker 1: all over the place. Like I said, he's older, his

995
00:46:42,400 --> 00:46:46,200
Speaker 1: breakout score is not great, and actually in the model

996
00:46:46,239 --> 00:46:48,160
Speaker 1: right now, I think he has a high risk profile,

997
00:46:48,280 --> 00:46:49,560
Speaker 1: like it's it's.

998
00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:51,399
Speaker 2: Not the cleanest thing in the world.

999
00:46:51,440 --> 00:46:54,240
Speaker 1: And I don't think Skyler Bell has the cleanest profile

1000
00:46:54,239 --> 00:46:57,600
Speaker 1: in the world either despite people really liking him or

1001
00:46:57,640 --> 00:46:59,040
Speaker 1: you know, I don't mind him as like a Day

1002
00:46:59,080 --> 00:47:00,920
Speaker 1: two guy. But again, and if the hype gets out

1003
00:47:00,960 --> 00:47:03,239
Speaker 1: of control, then we got to bring it in a

1004
00:47:03,239 --> 00:47:05,439
Speaker 1: little bit and just be grounded with with our takes

1005
00:47:05,440 --> 00:47:06,240
Speaker 1: about these players.

1006
00:47:06,239 --> 00:47:08,279
Speaker 2: So I do think the comp makes sense and what

1007
00:47:08,360 --> 00:47:09,240
Speaker 2: he can bring to the table.

1008
00:47:09,280 --> 00:47:12,200
Speaker 1: He's like an inside out player, can can line up everywhere,

1009
00:47:12,960 --> 00:47:15,640
Speaker 1: you know, and had you know, a longer career because

1010
00:47:15,640 --> 00:47:18,000
Speaker 1: he was you know, he's older coming out as well,

1011
00:47:18,120 --> 00:47:21,719
Speaker 1: just like Pier saw and was versatile. But I don't

1012
00:47:21,760 --> 00:47:24,600
Speaker 1: want this to be taken as like necessarily an awesome

1013
00:47:24,640 --> 00:47:28,800
Speaker 1: thing because Ricky Piersall, in my opinion, wasn't a can't

1014
00:47:28,840 --> 00:47:31,720
Speaker 1: miss type prospect, you know, in general.

1015
00:47:33,600 --> 00:47:39,160
Speaker 4: Yeah, I enjoy on these comps seeing when the player

1016
00:47:39,280 --> 00:47:42,080
Speaker 4: incoming players older than the.

1017
00:47:41,719 --> 00:47:44,000
Speaker 3: Comp that has been in the league for a few years.

1018
00:47:45,120 --> 00:47:47,040
Speaker 1: Yeah, well no, no, no, so that's that's the age when

1019
00:47:47,040 --> 00:47:47,799
Speaker 1: they were coming out.

1020
00:47:48,040 --> 00:47:50,720
Speaker 4: Oh okay, I thought that. I was like, Ricky pierceof

1021
00:47:50,800 --> 00:47:52,600
Speaker 4: is only twenty four years old, Like yeah, no.

1022
00:47:52,360 --> 00:47:55,240
Speaker 2: No, no, he's like he's already early. Yeah, he's already

1023
00:47:55,280 --> 00:47:55,759
Speaker 2: like twenty six.

1024
00:47:55,800 --> 00:47:57,719
Speaker 4: Okay, so this is when, all right, So that makes

1025
00:47:57,760 --> 00:48:00,960
Speaker 4: sense because I looked at him like, I don't know

1026
00:48:01,040 --> 00:48:02,880
Speaker 4: that Pearsaul.

1027
00:48:03,160 --> 00:48:05,720
Speaker 1: Is that I didn't know the comp is the comp

1028
00:48:05,800 --> 00:48:08,120
Speaker 1: is looking at age. I should have I should have

1029
00:48:08,280 --> 00:48:09,920
Speaker 1: shouted that out. But the comp is looking at their

1030
00:48:09,960 --> 00:48:12,640
Speaker 1: age coming out, Like Jayden Higgins was twenty two point

1031
00:48:12,680 --> 00:48:13,960
Speaker 1: four coming out last year.

1032
00:48:14,080 --> 00:48:16,359
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I probably should have noticed on the Justin

1033
00:48:16,440 --> 00:48:19,160
Speaker 4: Hunter comp to be honest, Yeah, that's true.

1034
00:48:19,200 --> 00:48:19,960
Speaker 2: You should have picked that up.

1035
00:48:20,040 --> 00:48:23,000
Speaker 4: Yeah, he's like forty. He's like, he's like unk status.

1036
00:48:23,680 --> 00:48:26,319
Speaker 2: Justin Hunter is like doing real estate or something right now.

1037
00:48:26,800 --> 00:48:30,200
Speaker 3: I don't know. He went to college at UT.

1038
00:48:30,480 --> 00:48:32,120
Speaker 4: I think he was a Titan. Then he ended up

1039
00:48:32,160 --> 00:48:35,200
Speaker 4: at the with the Steelers too.

1040
00:48:35,440 --> 00:48:37,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, he might have towards the end. He's you know,

1041
00:48:37,120 --> 00:48:38,760
Speaker 1: he's only thirty four right now.

1042
00:48:41,719 --> 00:48:44,360
Speaker 4: It seemed like it seems like a long time ago,

1043
00:48:45,280 --> 00:48:48,560
Speaker 4: like fifteen twenty sixteen, Like you said, that seems like

1044
00:48:48,600 --> 00:48:49,160
Speaker 4: that's just such a.

1045
00:48:49,280 --> 00:48:50,080
Speaker 2: He's a coach right now.

1046
00:48:50,080 --> 00:48:53,000
Speaker 1: He's he's the offensive quality control coach for the University

1047
00:48:53,040 --> 00:48:53,759
Speaker 1: of Memphis.

1048
00:48:54,200 --> 00:48:55,880
Speaker 3: There you go, Yeah, what is.

1049
00:48:55,920 --> 00:48:59,000
Speaker 4: The What does the quality control coach do? I've always

1050
00:48:59,120 --> 00:49:01,319
Speaker 4: wondered this, Probably.

1051
00:49:01,000 --> 00:49:03,600
Speaker 1: Just like make sure that they're like that, that the

1052
00:49:03,680 --> 00:49:06,400
Speaker 1: offenses is quality and controlled.

1053
00:49:08,920 --> 00:49:11,359
Speaker 4: That's as much of a clue as I do about

1054
00:49:11,400 --> 00:49:14,160
Speaker 4: the quality. It just seems like we talked about the

1055
00:49:14,400 --> 00:49:15,800
Speaker 4: name in title only.

1056
00:49:16,480 --> 00:49:18,080
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean they're like, oh, we can get an

1057
00:49:18,200 --> 00:49:18,800
Speaker 2: x nfler.

1058
00:49:18,960 --> 00:49:21,400
Speaker 4: Yeah right, it's get a guy. It seems like you

1059
00:49:21,440 --> 00:49:24,600
Speaker 4: know that it's like, at least with the video assistant,

1060
00:49:24,640 --> 00:49:25,640
Speaker 4: you know, you know kind.

1061
00:49:25,480 --> 00:49:28,040
Speaker 3: Of what they're doing. But the quality of control.

1062
00:49:27,920 --> 00:49:30,160
Speaker 1: I'm sure, Look, I'm sure he's doing something to help

1063
00:49:30,200 --> 00:49:31,880
Speaker 1: their like at least they're wide receivers.

1064
00:49:31,880 --> 00:49:34,400
Speaker 4: And someone in the comments let us know what a

1065
00:49:35,000 --> 00:49:38,480
Speaker 4: what quality control coach is and what the next step

1066
00:49:38,560 --> 00:49:49,239
Speaker 4: step up is from a quality control coach. Please, all right,

1067
00:49:49,280 --> 00:49:53,400
Speaker 4: let's wrap this up. I am a top of this

1068
00:49:53,520 --> 00:49:58,000
Speaker 4: bracket and this picture JJ for the audio listeners that's after.

1069
00:49:58,320 --> 00:49:58,920
Speaker 2: What is this?

1070
00:50:00,400 --> 00:50:00,680
Speaker 4: Okay?

1071
00:50:00,840 --> 00:50:03,319
Speaker 2: Just right now? Yeah, Oh, you're the top because you're

1072
00:50:03,440 --> 00:50:04,560
Speaker 2: it's your entry.

1073
00:50:05,200 --> 00:50:06,160
Speaker 4: It's my screenshot.

1074
00:50:06,280 --> 00:50:07,239
Speaker 2: J Drews is number two.

1075
00:50:07,280 --> 00:50:11,040
Speaker 1: Aaron Todd by the way, Aaron Thomas in the discord,

1076
00:50:11,200 --> 00:50:15,000
Speaker 1: who is part of this. Yeah, as a like ninety

1077
00:50:15,080 --> 00:50:18,680
Speaker 1: nine point fifth percentile bracket right now. Yeah, yeah, mine's

1078
00:50:18,680 --> 00:50:21,000
Speaker 1: in the ninety eighth percentile, man, ninety eight point four.

1079
00:50:21,280 --> 00:50:24,800
Speaker 4: Mine was doing so good until the Vandy upsets.

1080
00:50:24,880 --> 00:50:27,600
Speaker 2: I had Vandy also in the Elite eight. Yeah, I

1081
00:50:27,600 --> 00:50:28,799
Speaker 2: have my my big thing.

1082
00:50:29,040 --> 00:50:30,960
Speaker 1: My big thing is that I have Tennessee in the

1083
00:50:30,960 --> 00:50:36,040
Speaker 1: final four and if that hits, yeah, I'm in the money.

1084
00:50:36,160 --> 00:50:37,160
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm good.

1085
00:50:38,080 --> 00:50:40,600
Speaker 4: There was I saw on Reddit there was a guy

1086
00:50:40,640 --> 00:50:44,480
Speaker 4: that predicted like forty four or forty eight picks correctly.

1087
00:50:45,640 --> 00:50:47,160
Speaker 3: In one of these big contests.

1088
00:50:47,320 --> 00:50:50,040
Speaker 2: Yeah, then a method and then.

1089
00:50:49,960 --> 00:50:51,560
Speaker 3: Didn't fill out the rest of the bracket.

1090
00:50:52,160 --> 00:50:57,320
Speaker 4: Oh really, Yes, that's got a stake to get forty

1091
00:50:57,320 --> 00:50:59,160
Speaker 4: four or forty eight and then not fill out the

1092
00:50:59,160 --> 00:50:59,960
Speaker 4: rest of your bracket.

1093
00:51:00,320 --> 00:51:02,440
Speaker 1: I do a better max score than you two, though

1094
00:51:02,480 --> 00:51:05,480
Speaker 1: Brandon Brand's got ten points better max score. Brandon has

1095
00:51:05,480 --> 00:51:06,719
Speaker 1: a better max than both of us.

1096
00:51:06,920 --> 00:51:09,480
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is this is in the top I just

1097
00:51:09,520 --> 00:51:11,120
Speaker 4: pulled the top ten in the screen show.

1098
00:51:11,200 --> 00:51:12,520
Speaker 2: It is crazy and funny.

1099
00:51:12,640 --> 00:51:16,440
Speaker 1: How like, obviously the demographic of us is not like

1100
00:51:16,480 --> 00:51:18,799
Speaker 1: the people that are in the discord are not called

1101
00:51:18,880 --> 00:51:20,560
Speaker 1: like necessarily college basketball fans.

1102
00:51:20,760 --> 00:51:23,520
Speaker 2: But look how many like nine of the how many

1103
00:51:23,560 --> 00:51:23,880
Speaker 2: are in there?

1104
00:51:23,960 --> 00:51:25,920
Speaker 1: This like sixteen Because we did this very late in

1105
00:51:25,960 --> 00:51:28,879
Speaker 1: the process, there's not like like eighteen I think. Yeah,

1106
00:51:28,880 --> 00:51:30,840
Speaker 1: and half of them are in the ninetieth percent. Tyler

1107
00:51:31,000 --> 00:51:33,480
Speaker 1: better right now. Yeah, that just goes to show we

1108
00:51:33,560 --> 00:51:39,080
Speaker 1: got we got some sharp, chocky listeners and supporters.

1109
00:51:39,640 --> 00:51:43,920
Speaker 4: Yeah, I thought there are most people. I think I

1110
00:51:43,960 --> 00:51:47,720
Speaker 4: think like Duke was the most popular pick, and everyone's

1111
00:51:47,719 --> 00:51:51,080
Speaker 4: going game theory. As you see, no one's picking Duke

1112
00:51:51,200 --> 00:51:55,080
Speaker 4: like Duke in the late rounders. Discord was like the

1113
00:51:55,480 --> 00:51:57,920
Speaker 4: because everyone's like, oh everyone's picking Duke, I need to

1114
00:51:57,960 --> 00:51:58,760
Speaker 4: pick someone else.

1115
00:51:58,960 --> 00:52:00,799
Speaker 2: Yeah, the first big duke's going.

1116
00:52:01,640 --> 00:52:01,960
Speaker 4: Yeah.

1117
00:52:02,040 --> 00:52:04,120
Speaker 1: I mean, but they've been they've been not looking great

1118
00:52:04,200 --> 00:52:07,799
Speaker 1: so far to start the uh attorney, Hey, I mean

1119
00:52:07,840 --> 00:52:10,040
Speaker 1: they so to be fair, I was at a dance

1120
00:52:10,080 --> 00:52:12,440
Speaker 1: competition last weekend and I was keeping track of the

1121
00:52:12,440 --> 00:52:15,640
Speaker 1: scores and I saw that TCU was like ahead by a.

1122
00:52:15,600 --> 00:52:17,000
Speaker 2: Point or something in the second half.

1123
00:52:17,160 --> 00:52:18,480
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then what did they go in like a

1124
00:52:18,520 --> 00:52:22,440
Speaker 1: forty to three run or something that ridiculous? Yeah, crazy,

1125
00:52:22,719 --> 00:52:24,680
Speaker 1: That's classic Jamie Dixon.

1126
00:52:24,719 --> 00:52:27,080
Speaker 2: I know that as a as a pit alum.

1127
00:52:27,920 --> 00:52:29,520
Speaker 3: So what happened in that game?

1128
00:52:29,600 --> 00:52:31,720
Speaker 4: I know we've we've already talked about all the football stuff,

1129
00:52:31,719 --> 00:52:34,040
Speaker 4: But what happened in that game is that they missed

1130
00:52:34,040 --> 00:52:38,200
Speaker 4: a goaltending call. Uh so they lost by thirty because no,

1131
00:52:38,280 --> 00:52:39,919
Speaker 4: it was like a four to six point game.

1132
00:52:40,280 --> 00:52:43,920
Speaker 3: They missed the goaltending call. Dixon goes irate.

1133
00:52:44,719 --> 00:52:48,640
Speaker 4: Yeah, the ref that missed the goaltending call, tease him up.

1134
00:52:49,360 --> 00:52:51,920
Speaker 4: Oh and so at two points then they get two

1135
00:52:51,960 --> 00:52:54,680
Speaker 4: points and they score three. Ever since that goaltending call,

1136
00:52:54,800 --> 00:52:58,040
Speaker 4: they scored like they went on the that just insane.

1137
00:52:58,520 --> 00:53:01,120
Speaker 1: Jamie Dixon could be a villain and in like about

1138
00:53:01,200 --> 00:53:04,279
Speaker 1: like he looks like the Iceland coach from a Mighty

1139
00:53:04,640 --> 00:53:06,919
Speaker 1: He has slick back hair and stuff and.

1140
00:53:06,920 --> 00:53:08,000
Speaker 4: I could I could see it.

1141
00:53:08,440 --> 00:53:09,320
Speaker 2: Yeah.

1142
00:53:09,360 --> 00:53:11,560
Speaker 4: Speaking of movies, JJ, we watched The Goat last night

1143
00:53:11,880 --> 00:53:16,200
Speaker 4: with Steph Curry. Yeah. The movie sports. Uh you know

1144
00:53:17,080 --> 00:53:18,720
Speaker 4: movie with your kids that you can watch.

1145
00:53:19,080 --> 00:53:19,600
Speaker 1: Yeah.

1146
00:53:19,680 --> 00:53:22,799
Speaker 3: So yeah, that's all that's all I got JJ. As

1147
00:53:22,800 --> 00:53:24,120
Speaker 3: far as sports.

1148
00:53:24,120 --> 00:53:26,000
Speaker 4: In the Late Round show, I do want to remind

1149
00:53:26,040 --> 00:53:28,960
Speaker 4: people to subscribe, like comment.

1150
00:53:29,000 --> 00:53:30,479
Speaker 3: Remember this is an interactive show.

1151
00:53:30,600 --> 00:53:35,759
Speaker 4: Before, during after the show, subscribed to the newsletter. You

1152
00:53:35,840 --> 00:53:38,920
Speaker 4: had the newsletter this week. We've got Brandon Godola, right

1153
00:53:39,000 --> 00:53:42,320
Speaker 4: and fire newsletters every week. We have the weekly newsletter

1154
00:53:42,360 --> 00:53:45,279
Speaker 4: on Fridays, and then we also have the Prospect Guide

1155
00:53:46,280 --> 00:53:48,680
Speaker 4: light Round dot com. You can wear the Prospect Guy

1156
00:53:48,719 --> 00:53:51,600
Speaker 4: to become a Patreon member, or you can and or

1157
00:53:52,239 --> 00:53:53,480
Speaker 4: you can sign up for the newsletter.

1158
00:53:53,880 --> 00:53:55,120
Speaker 3: Any closing thoughts.

1159
00:53:55,400 --> 00:53:57,920
Speaker 1: Uh No, Perspectives comes out on Friday and it's a

1160
00:53:57,960 --> 00:53:58,880
Speaker 1: guest that's never.

1161
00:53:58,719 --> 00:53:59,759
Speaker 2: Been on that night.

1162
00:54:01,200 --> 00:54:04,640
Speaker 1: I'm super super pumped to talk to him. To him,

1163
00:54:05,040 --> 00:54:07,640
Speaker 1: I've known him for years, but never I've never done

1164
00:54:07,680 --> 00:54:09,799
Speaker 1: a show with him. I have talked to him and

1165
00:54:10,520 --> 00:54:12,040
Speaker 1: known him for a really long time, but this will

1166
00:54:12,080 --> 00:54:13,359
Speaker 1: be the first show that we do together, so I'm

1167
00:54:13,400 --> 00:54:14,000
Speaker 1: excited for that.

1168
00:54:14,000 --> 00:54:15,560
Speaker 2: That'll drop on Friday.

1169
00:54:15,960 --> 00:54:16,360
Speaker 3: Awesome.

1170
00:54:17,520 --> 00:54:21,120
Speaker 4: Well, JJ, appreciate you being on the show, appreciate everyone

1171
00:54:21,280 --> 00:54:25,040
Speaker 4: that tuned in, and as you're COO.

1172
00:54:25,080 --> 00:54:28,080
Speaker 3: JJ, let me just say you're doing a great job

1173
00:54:28,080 --> 00:54:28,720
Speaker 3: as CEO.

1174
00:54:29,080 --> 00:54:30,560
Speaker 2: Thank you, thank you.

1175
00:54:30,600 --> 00:54:32,839
Speaker 4: Well, that being said, we'll see you next time here

1176
00:54:32,880 --> 00:54:34,640
Speaker 4: in the Late Round Fantasy Football show. Peace