WEBVTT - Ep. 22: Recapping Strengths and Weaknesses Week 2, Preview Texans Matchup | Jags A.M. Podcast

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>On Monday.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 2>We talked a lot about the issues that this team has,

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>but we still have to be confident going into Week three.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 2>So what are you most confident in about this team

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 2>as they face the Texas?

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 3>The quarterback, the offense as well.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in to jag Dam on this Wednesday and Kai

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>Nannie Stephens in here with Brian Sexton, John Oser, and

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>as I mentioned, we're turning the page today. We're going

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to talk positive all day on Wednesday. I've decided because

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>we kind of went in on it a little bit

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>on Monday and the sky is not falling. Things are

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>okay because you guys still mention what you're most confident

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>in is the issue we were most concerned about.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>When you said that was your question, I thought, where

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>do I want to go with this? Do you want

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 3>to talk about the linebackers? Don't want to talk about

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the secondary, the defense that's played so well, Evan Ingram,

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the receivers. There's really a little bit on the interior

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>of the offensive line, there's some concern, But other than that,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I think this team can turn it around pretty quickly.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:11.279
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 5>History shows us that these players on offense are good.

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 5>Doug Peterson's offense over the course of time and the

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 5>Chiefs offense. Frankly, it's very similar. Produces, it works. I

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 5>think Trevor Lawrence is a good player. We've seen that

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 5>so over seventeen games. They are going to be a

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 5>good offense.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 3>At least. Neither one of us, said Logan Cook, even

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>though he's the best punter in the league. So who

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have confidence in him? But there was a time

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty twenty one where he would have said,

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>hey man, Logan Cook, best player on the team.

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 2>It's dire times when you're going to the punter. Although

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>we do love you, Logan Cook. No nothing against him.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 2>We love you, and we love the banana ball and

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>all of that. Let's get into our big things today,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>because why not.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We're turning the page. That's our first big.

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Thing today because, as I mentioned, what happened in week

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>two against the Chiefs hopefully is an isolated incident. Yes

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you have to watch the tape, Yes you have to

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>learn from it, but we got to move on.

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Mentally.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>That team meets to move on too, because, as we discussed,

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>at certain points, if you don't, you know, turn the

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>page and move on to the next game you have

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>ahead of you, then things can spiral, and that's when

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>we would become really concerned. Brian, do you feel that

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the team is in the right place to move forward

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 2>this week? And I kind of put this behind them.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I do, And you know, I talked on Monday a

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit about how I thought last week that Doug

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Peterson came into his Wednesday press conference, he wasn't himself.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>He was absolutely himself on Monday. There's an old action

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL. Don't let him beat you twice. You know,

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>it's one thing to get beat, especially by the defending

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl champs, but don't let the hangover of a

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>poor performance put you in peril of losing to the

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Texans the next week. And it was clear to me

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 3>from the moment that Doug started talking on Monday that

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 3>he had his focus and thus the team's focus in

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 3>the right place.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 5>I think they are. I also think it's not It's

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 5>not something that you can assume. And I guess what

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean is this last year they were two and

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 5>six and then sort of had to punch their way

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 5>back into the postseason. So at no point have they

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 5>really been considered a good team, and then sort of

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 5>had a body blow and had an early season.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 4>This is new form.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 5>I guess my point. They're favored in this game. They

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 5>believe they ought to win. They're playing a young team

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 5>that they quote ought to beat. They have been in

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 5>a situation before, and it's a division game, so it's big.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 5>I hate the word trap game, but if anything fit,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, not trap, whatever, but they have never really

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 5>done this thing where they've sort of proven okay, we're better.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Trap would fit, though. I mean, I think trap would

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 3>have fit this week if if they had beaten Sure,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 3>if they had beaten the Chiefs, then you could say

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>there's a trap. I think if anything else, it's the

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>reverse of that. This week there is a hyper focus

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>with the loss of Kansasity. And look, we said this

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 3>on Monday. It's one thing to lose to Kansasity. They're

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the defending world champions. Patrick Mahomes is the best player

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>in the league. There's no disgrace in that. The hangover

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>effect here is that the offense just looks so out

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 3>of sync, and we expected the offense to not look

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 3>that way, right. We didn't expect them to lose the

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>weight that they did. But John, I think you wrote

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 3>this a couple of times. You know, they had a

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>shot with five minutes left in the red zone of

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs and they just didn't get it done. It

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>wasn't like they weren't even in a position to win

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 3>the game, and they played very poorly on offense. So

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of reasons to believe that they will

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 3>be ready to go.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Good teams handle this thing.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, absolutely they do.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>It will be very telling. Our next big thing is

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 2>South setup. We mentioned it a little bit, but this

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 2>is the second divisional game in three weeks that they've had.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 2>So these games, you know, they almost count double, right,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 2>So these are going to set them up to get

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>where they want to be.

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>In the postseason.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.239
<v Speaker 2>If you can win your divisional games, the other stuff

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>will come. And that is part of why we don't

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>want them overlooking this week, John, I know that sometimes

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the Texans, I guess a division opponent, anybody has a

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a buggaboo with them, But things on

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 2>paid should play out well again Houston.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, as I said Monday, I'm not a big believer

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 5>that teams in the past have had the Jaguars number,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 5>because in the past, everybody had the Jaguars numbers the players,

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 5>they haven't been as good as teams. This is so

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 5>that sort of thing I don't think really applies to

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 5>this bunch. I think this goes back to what the

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 5>theme of the week is. It's a game that everybody

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 5>would say, and even players they are, they ought to win.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 4>You ought to handle business.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 5>It ought to There's no easy games in the NFL,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 5>but you ought to know it.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 4>By five minutes left, that is the better team. You think.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 4>That's what they are, It's what they're supposed to be.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 4>They got to do it.

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Now. Here's the hang up. This was a game the

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars were supposed to win last year in Week five

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 3>and Davis Mills as their starting quarterback. By all accounts,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>they were not as talented, but they're not as talented

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 3>now they weren't then, and the Jaguars couldn't score a

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>touchdown and lost thirteen to six. The quarterback had a

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>terrible day. He made an awful throw into the end zone,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 3>one that probably got him focused on playing better football. So, yes,

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguer should win this game. They should have won

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 3>this game last year. This john is a very big

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 3>test in the sense that this is that game, win

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the games. If you're a good team, you win the

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>games you're supposed to. And this might be the first

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>time we've seen that.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 5>I think they're a different team than they were this

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>time last year. They got to show expectations.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Our final big thing is going to be anger management,

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 2>part of turning the pages, using that frustration that we

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>saw a lot of in the locker room and postgame

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>with Doug Peterson as well, turning that frustration into production

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and turning that into something because you can't just be

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>mad about it.

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to fix it, right.

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>So, Brian, we talked a lot about how they're able

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to do that with Doug Peterson at the Helm, because

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he's that kind of coach that can use

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that to motivate his team.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Look at and I don't want to intimate that they're

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 3>not working hard and they're not working long hours, but

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>you know that excellence is generally achieved by doing a

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit more than others think is wise, right, by

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>caring a little bit more than other people believe is necessary.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 3>It's that little bit more. Twenty more minutes on the

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>iPad instead of twenty minutes on Instagram, right, probably makes

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>a difference this week in somebody's game. It's not about

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 3>playing angry. It's about using the frustration to be smarter,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to do a little bit extra, something a little bit

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>different in your preparation that gives you back that focus

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and gives you the edge just a little bit. Right.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>There's a great motivational speaker, Anthony Robbins, and he talks

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 3>about two millimeters. It's just two millimeters on a turn

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 3>of the wrench makes an amazing amount of difference for them.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 3>This week, it's about finding the two millimeters and getting

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 3>sharpened again.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna kind of go the other way. I think

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 4>it is necessary to channel it.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 5>I think Doug's challenge this week a little bit is

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 5>they If there was a theme out of the Chiefs game,

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 5>it's that he thought they were maybe trying a little

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 5>too hard at the big moments to make a play

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to be the guy. I think offensively, at least, it

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 5>very much sounded to me on Monday like his emphasis

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 5>this week is going to.

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Be, Look, we've got the players to do this.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Everybody doesn't have to score an eighty or a touchdown

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 5>on every play, Trevor, you don't necessarily have to score

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 5>that touchdown in the red zone. You can hand it

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 5>to Travis four times. At no point did you get

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 5>a vibe from Doug on Monday that they didn't care.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 4>It was more, look, we're good. Just let the game

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 4>come to you.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And what you just said could be the two millimeters right,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 3>figuring out to hand the ball off four times, whatever

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that might be.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, just small things, little things, execution as we said.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, and or calming down right yep, knowing that you're

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 3>good as opposed to we got to go beat the

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs so that everybody knows that we're good.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>No overreacting this week when they take on the Texans.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're here on jag Zam presented by Jet

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Home Loans. Stay with us, coming back, We're going to

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about the AFC South and what's going on around

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the division. For ten years, Dreambinder's Homes has been proud

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>to call themselves the official homebuilder jas Wars. Visit Dreamfindershomes

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>dot com for all of the available inventory and go jags.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back into jags Am here in the Hyundai Studios

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>presented by Jet Home Loans today and we're going to

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>go around the AFC South because we want to keep

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you guys up to day and on what's going on

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 2>in the division so that you can kind of see

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 2>where the Jags stand with things. So there's three teams

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>that are one in one in the division right now,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>and there's one team that's ozho and two and that

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>would be Houston, the team coming to town. So, Brian,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the Texans, we're going to get

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more into the specific game plan later

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>in the week, but they're owing to They've got a

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 2>rookie quarterback.

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>What's been going on with them?

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, they've fallen behind by double digits in both

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>of their first two games, to Baltimore last week to Indianapolis.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 3>They don't have the vertical playmakers that we've all come

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 3>to know in Houston, and when they fallen behind, they've

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 3>had to abandon the run and it's left CJ. Stroud

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to throw the ball. John. He threw the ball forty

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 3>four times in the lost to Baltimore. Look thrown forty

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>times for rookie is a formula for loss, and then

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 3>forty seven last week. He's completing about sixty six percent

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>of his passes and he has no interceptions. So he's

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 3>doing some good things. It's just he's found himself in

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>a position where he's had to do it all himself,

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>and that's tough to do in this league.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, all indications are that he's the real deal. They

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 5>think they found their guy. The issue, the main issue

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 5>there is they feel like they're probably a year away

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 5>in terms of draft, in terms of free agency, from

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 5>sort of getting back on the plane where they have

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 5>a chance to compete. The second issue is of their

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 5>offensive line. They have one starter healthy right now that

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>they've got projected, and it's sometimes you see that and

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 5>they're playing okay with this bunch. They're giving up a

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 5>lot of his on the quarterback and a lot of sacks.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 5>There was a fumble, a very key fumble last week

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 5>for stra This is the time where the Jaguars need

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 5>to take advantage of this and feel like the stronger team.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 3>He's been sacked eleven times, the most in the league,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and he stumbled three times and lost two of those.

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>So they have extra draft picks and cap room from

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>the Deshaun Watson trade in the next year. It won't

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>take long. He looks like he might be the real deal, too.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Time to start building around him.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into a little bit of the rookie quarterbacks

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>in the division later on in the show. We're going

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to go to the Colts now, who got a win

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>against the Texans last week, and they did it without

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Richardson for much of that game because he left

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 2>with a concussion. Went to the concussion protocol and Gardner Minshew,

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>our old friend was in the game, and they were

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 2>able to tick down the Texans and get a win.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're at one in one as well.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 4>John.

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Is Anthony Richardson going to deal with some of those

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>issues being a running quarterback? Is this going to be

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 2>part of the problem or can he adapt to the

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>NFL style and protect himself a little bit more?

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Trevor after the game in the opener said, hey,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 5>protect yourself.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm summarizing.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't there, but.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>This is a league of big, strong, fast, defensive players. Uh. Historically,

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 4>when quarterbacks.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Puts themselves in position to get hit a lot, it

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 5>over time shortens their career. This is a little bit different.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 5>He's gotten hurt twice in two games. Yeah, probably a

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 5>little bit of flukey in that. You can't say, okay, well,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 5>that's gonna happen all the time. Guys have played this

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 5>way and played ten or eleven years. But it's one

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 5>reason the league over time, you know, typically likes guys

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 5>who stand in the pocket.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Even in this day of of of of.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 5>Running quarterbacks, teams would still prefer a guy who can

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 5>protect himself because of the longevity of the position. It's

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 5>changing a little bit, but deep down in the gut

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 5>of this league, you you always get worried when your quarterback.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Takes a lot of hits. Uh.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Mitschew came in, as you mentioned, it was eleven to fourteen.

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, typical Minshew. He's not gonna throw the ball

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 3>down the field, but he completed it enough passes and

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 3>took advantage of the league that they have. Uh. Teams

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>know how to prepare for Gardner. Minshew very different than

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Richardson. So if the Colts, who are built around

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Richardson have to rely on Minshew, they're going to struggle.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 3>They just don't. They just aren't built to be that

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>team right now. Although Shane Steichen said he was very

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>impressed with Minshew, and it's hard to argue. I mean,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 3>Minch's a guy who comes in and he gets the

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 3>job done. In situations where it looks bleak, you lose

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 3>your starting quarterback.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 5>There was a feeling up there that if Minshew had

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 5>played all season and started, they're probably a seven win

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 5>team and probably a five win team with Richardson, you

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, he's a little more.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Ready to be okay.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Now, it's just that Richardson they think has the ability

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 5>to be great long term.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 4>So why Dylan Gardner has that great long.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Term and he needs the reps for sure.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully gets back on the field quickly, and then we're

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>going to head over to the Titans now because they

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>are one in one as well. They came back against

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers to get their first win of the season.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 2>As they went into that game oh to one, Tannehill

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>bounced back. Obviously, they kept him in town because they

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 2>want to kind of keep this all going. Ryan, we

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 2>talked about this, but Henry not exactly that. Derrick Henry

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>were just same.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 3>No, they've got to have Tannehill. It appears tanner Hill

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>led the league last week in yards per attempt. He

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>was over ten point three yards per attempt and led

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>them down. If you have played very well a week

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>after throwing three interceptions in their loss to the Saints.

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 3>The problem for the Titans is going to be do

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>they have the guns the receivers to be able to

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 3>get down the field like that. Derrick Henry is second

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>in the league in rushing attempts, but he is thirty

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>fifth in the league in yards per attempt. So you

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 3>can see that maybe all the years of all the

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 3>carries are starting to wear on him. You know, in

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>his career, he's never averaged below four point two yards

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>per carry, so three point five is pretty low for him.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>If the Titans are going to compete, they're going to

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>need their quarterback. They can get some days from Derrick Henry,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 3>but if they don't have Tannehill, it appears that they're

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>going to struggle.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I always say count these guys at John Peril.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, everybody sort of said at the beginning of

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 5>the season the Jaguars, we're gonna run away with this division.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I really bought into that.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 5>I get that maybe Derrick Henry isn't Dereck Henry superman.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 5>They beat the Chargers last week, and I think the

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 5>Chargers are good. They figure out a way to win.

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 5>The Jaguars are gonna need to get a double digit

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 5>number to be away from this tame this year.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>The key for them is their quarterback playing well. And

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>if he does, it'll it'll give Derick Henry a chance

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>to have some room to run.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Seems like a coin flip though, whether we're gonna see

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 2>good Tannehill or bad Tannahill.

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 3>The says, so we'll have thirty five years old.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll have to see all right, Stay with us

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 2>here on jags Am presented in part by Fields Auto

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Group Jackson. They'll step up until luxury Fields Auto dot Com.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna do this or that when we get back

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>after the break, we may Price dot com is the

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>easiest way to save money with comparison shopping, cashback coupons

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>all in one.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's free.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Try price dot com today.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 4>We prop gonna throws my home.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Look here, he's gonna get hit, but that'll be a

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>sack for Klevon.

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Chase On.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>You have Chase on credit, kept on working, working, working,

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Randall hump around Donovan Smith, but give the credit. You

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>like a different.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Different this this exam, we're gonna do this or that today,

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 2>presented by Price dot Com. John, I know you love

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the word trap game, but how's that involved in you

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>this or that today?

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Well? Is this a trap game?

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Which or I think it's the other word I hate

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 5>with a statement game is you know, I don't like

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 5>either one, but I do believe if you can call

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 5>anything a division statement, Brian, I think this might be

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 5>a week to do that. To me, this is a

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 5>game good teams win if you're going to control your division.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 5>This is the kind of game you get early. You're

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 5>playing at home. He's a team you ought to beat.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 5>It just ought to be one of those twenty eight thirteen.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 5>You're not worried about it in the in the last

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 5>five minutes of the game. If it doesn't go that way,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 5>it's not a reason to panic. But that's what you'd

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 5>like to see out of this team that you believe

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 5>is going to be, that you believe is on the upswing,

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 5>that you believe is going to be one of those

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 5>teams moving forward, those kind of teams do that this week.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I know you don't like the idea. Also, I don't

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 3>like very much. No I know of a team having

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the other team's number, but the Texans have. I mean,

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and two they came in as an

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>expansion team and Jermaine Lewis returned to punt for a

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>touchdown and the expansion Texans beat the Jaguars in their

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 3>first ever meeting. And then, of course, last year, there

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>was no reason why the Jaguars should lose to Davis

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Mills and that bunch of guys, but they did. So

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>there have been moments where it's happened. So I'm gonna

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>say that this is a Yeah, I don't like trap

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 3>game out there's a division statement, and it better be mean.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm the guy who said I think the Jags sweep

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the division in my hot take before the season. Right,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you don't need to kill them. You don't need to

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 3>win by thirty seven points to you know, to establish it.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>But come out win the ball game. Don't make it close,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, don't be in the fourth quarter wondering, hey,

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get this one or not.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it was later in the year.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I might go a trap game because I think sometimes

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 2>these division opponents can sneak up on you a little

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 2>bit when it's a game you're supposed to win. But

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I think because we're only in the third week, I'll

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 2>go a statement win and I think hopefully they can

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>show their best version of their offense, so that we

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 2>have high hopes heading into London.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 3>If it's a trap game after a loss, you got

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 3>a good.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Team, let's hope. So I think they're good, Brian, what's

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>here and this or that for this week?

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, which quarterback would you rather have? The Jaguars will

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 3>see the two rookies in the division in the first

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 3>three weeks, and we saw Anthony Richardson and John You

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 3>alluded to him. His traits, his physical characteristics give him

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 3>the chance to be great. And we saw a very

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 3>limited game planner opening day. The executed it pretty well

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's higg and fast and guys have to account

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 3>for him when he starts to get outside the pocket.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>And then you've got CJ. Stroud, who is by all

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 3>accounts of pocket passer. You know, scrambled three times last

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 3>week for a grand total of one yard. It's not

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 3>what he wants to do. He's a guy who can

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>stand back there. He's sixty six percent accurate in terms

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 3>of his completion percentage and seems very comfortable there. So

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 3>which of these two quarterbacks do you think has a

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 3>better chance long term to be that guy that gets

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 3>his team into the playoffs.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Of Stroud without Quick.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, but I'm a pocket passer guy, so I

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 5>think Straud is out of question because I think he'll

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 5>be healthy for the long term and he's already sixty

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 5>six percent under the dress he's been in all indications

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 5>or he's he's on his way to being that, And

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 5>I think with Richardson has a lot of questions.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 2>And that's just a gamble, right, Like Anthony Richardson, we

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know, we haven't seen a ton of him, and

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>now he's been hurt in these two games so far

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL season. So I would like to be

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 2>a gambling woman and pick Richardson, but I think I'm

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna Well.

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>The one thing it's worthy of pointing out is that

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Richardson isn't an offense like Jalen Hurts. If you saw

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the Vikings Eagles game last Thursday night, when they couldn't

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 3>get the passing game going, AJ Brown was out of sync.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>They just started handing the ball off and DeAndre Swift

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 3>had a big day, and when the Vikings collapsed on Swift,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 3>well here comes Jalen Hurts. I mean, I do think

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 3>that the Colts have an opportunity to have something. I

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know how long it will last if you can't

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 3>stay healthy, But I like Richardson. I'm intrigued by him.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 2>It would be so cool to see them if they

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 2>had a running game going right now with the Colts going, we.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Might we might see that in October, because yeah, that's

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 3>when the running back Jonathan Taylor is back. He'll be

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 3>back in action. You would think somewhere.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It'll be playing somewhere.

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>When we see them, Yes, September fifteenth.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, let's hope, so all right for my list

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>or that this week? We want to see the offense

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 2>bounce back. But who would you like to see a

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>bigger day from on Sundays? At the running backs or

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the wide receivers. Now we're kind of getting on both

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 2>sides of the issue the other day. But Brian, when

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you look at that, which one do you want to see?

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Running backs? I want to see the running game get started.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Fred Taylor, of course, he's always going to want to

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 3>see the running game. But he and I had a

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 3>long conversation about this on Sunday afternoon, and he said,

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 3>why have they given up the run? With an offensive

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 3>line that is struggling to keep Trevor clean, and they

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 3>were on Sunday, and to a large degree, they were

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 3>on Opening Day in Indianapolis. The running game slows all

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 3>that down, It calms everything down, and it gives Trevor

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 3>more time in the pocket to get the receiver started.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 3>So from my perspective, I know this is a team

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 3>that's going to use the pass to set up the run.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I know that's where it's headed. But on Sunday, I'd

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>like to see them use the run to set up

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the pass until everything settles down.

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Fred's gonna have a long wait because this is

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 5>and it's not that Doug doesn't like the run. It

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 5>says that this team does not believe, with this style

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 5>of offense that you turn around and just hand the

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 5>ball off if the numbers aren't there. So a lot

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 5>of the passes that they use, you know, Brian, a

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 5>lot of the passes they use, they don't believe that

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 5>running into a stacked box is it.

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Is the way to win. So anyway I digress, I.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 5>Guess I'll go the other way and say I'd like

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 5>to see a big game from the receivers because I

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 5>feel like with this team, if you get some receivers

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 5>going and feel like that's clicking. I think they feel

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 5>like that's their identity and they feel better about themselves.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 5>So I'd love to see the run too, But I'll

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 5>use that argument not thinking that there's a huge difference

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 5>between which I like to see.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, just one more benefit though to the run, and

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>that is if this offensive line they haven't played well,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 3>they've heard that they haven't played well. I don't care

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>whether you're a pass blocking line or run blocking line.

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 3>There's gotta be a toughness and a nastiness to you.

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 3>And I think they're on I think they're back on

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 3>their heels a little bit, especially the interior three. I

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 3>think by running the bowl, who's a Bear Bryant. It

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 3>always talked about thevantages of run blocking in practice. I

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>just I'd like to see them run the ball, just

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 3>to get that offensive line in gear. But I do

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 3>understand that the way that Doug and Press are going

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 3>to build this offense, it's going to be based on

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the past. But this week, I think maybe the run and.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we might see a little bit of both.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 2>To be fair with you, just enough run to get

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 2>the wide receivers open and get them going and that

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 2>high flying offense that we hope and expect them to be.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Say with us coming up, we'll preview the rest of

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 2>the week, and they have a sneak peek.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It sounds of the game. Jags fans.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 2>If you want customized Jaguars furniture for your home, check

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>out zipchare dot com to browse all customizable options. Zipchair

0:23:43.440 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 2>is furniture for fans. It might be a tough one

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to watch this week, but Doug Peterson.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 3>And wait to watch it.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 2>I know we know the outcome, but these are so

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>well put together you got to check them out if

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you can.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>So sure, yeah, for sure, that's a great seas.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>What are you guys working on this week? Anything fun?

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Just trying to get back on track.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 5>I should have a foyer on the ozone podcast on

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 5>Thursday to post on Friday, so look forward to that.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to spend some time with you offensive a

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 3>defensive lineman this week and Breston Buckner for a pregame

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 3>radio interview and talk of by establishing the line of scrimmage,

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the defense has done a very good job. The offensive

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>line obviously has some ground to make up, but I

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 3>think That's a big story for this team going forward,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 3>not just this week. Next week you see b Jon

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Robinson in Atlanta, in London, and I mean, you've got

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to be the lines are where it is all built

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 3>and just kind of get caught up a couple of

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 3>weeks into the season.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I love coach Buckner.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>If you can't get you hyped up for a game,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:28.479
<v Speaker 2>then you're just never going to be able to get

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 2>hyped up.

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 2>That game this weekend against the Texans is brought to

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you by renewal by Anderson A better way to a

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 2>better window. Visit rba fla dot com to gets still

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 2>available for that one if you want to come and

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>check things out as the Jags look to get back

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 2>on track. Will be back with you tomorrow on Jags

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Am as we preview that matchup against the Texans.

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you then,