WEBVTT - Bills By The Numbers: MVP Race Is Heating Up

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Mary Christmas, everybody. Welcome to Bill's by the Numbers, where

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we let the stats tell you where the Bills are at.

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>We're presented by fand we'll make every moment more coming

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.079
<v Speaker 1>your way. The NFL MVP race is heating up in

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the wake of Josh Allen's recent second half play does

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he have a shot at repeating? And James Cook is

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>breathing down Jonathan Taylor's neck for the rushing title. Is

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Offensive Player of the Year in the cards for him,

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have our one burning question. Time to hop

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>on the one horse open sleigh. Welcome to this holiday

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bills by the Numbers.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>He is Bill's Hall of Famous.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>He'saster of Bill's played by playman Chris Brown, and he

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was once considered a non factor, but the unicorn of

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>unicorns has entered the chats. Reigning MVP Josh Allen, with

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>his back to back fourth quarter comeback performances in wins

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>over Cincinnati and New England, has vaulted himself into the

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation of league MVP. It had largely been deemed a

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>two horse race by most handicappers who had the Rams,

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford and the Patriots Drake May as the favorites

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for the League's Most Valuable Player, and deservedly so. Those

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks have been remarkably efficient and productive, and their

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>teams have been in contention for the one seed in

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs for their respective conferences. But in the last

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>three games, Josh Allen has accounted for nine touchdowns and

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>three straight victories, including a road win at New England

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to overcome a twenty one point deficit, matching the largest

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>road comeback in Bill's team history. Prior to the Thursday

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>night game between the Rams and Seahawks in Week sixteen,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Allen had pulled even with Matthew Stafford for the most

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>total touchdownsty seven. May is a distant seventh with twenty seven.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Should scoring ability be the top factor? Steve in the

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>equation of determining league MVP.

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just part of the equation. You'll get

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to it in a minute. I think you have to

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 2>look across the spectrum of how quarterbacks are evaluated wins, losses,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>how high towards the top of the rankings are they

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>in the positive rankings and how high are they in

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the negatives. I mean, two years ago, Josh Allen was

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 2>disqualified from it, even though he had a monster season

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>because he had more He had eighteen interceptions. Other guys

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 2>have won the MVP with way more interceptions than that handful,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>more interceptions than that, most notably Kurt Warner in one

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of his MVP seasons, he had twenty three interceptions. They

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>threw it a lot, So I think it's got to

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>be Obviously, it's got to be in the equation. But

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I think when you look at it, I think you

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 2>look at the broad spectrum of how we evaluate quarterbacks.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, win losses, completion percentage, touchdown to interception ratio,

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 2>rushing touchdowns, rushing yards, first downs, expected yards per complete,

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>all those all this stuff, all the advanced analeagues. I

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>think you got to look at the total package, and

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>not only just the numbers, but you got to strip

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>it away and just say, what do I see when

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I see him play?

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I was going to say, because yes,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>all those numbers count and should be factored in to

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the MVP equation. But I think also you have to

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>look at whether the team that that person plays for

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is in contention for at least the playoffs. It's hard

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to hand an MVP to a guy on a seven

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and ten team, that's right. So I think that counts.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And then I think making critical game changing plays in

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest moments of games really separates what

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>an MVP truly is the most valuable player at the

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>most critical times. And the reason Josh Allen's back in

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this conversation is because he's done that the last two weeks.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right, and that's get it last.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Year in a lot of big games.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>And here's the problem. I think for most fans out

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>here where we sit, it's hard to quantify that. Yes,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 2>and now analytics, advanced analytics people say, yeah, well we

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>do that, you know, and Josh is always.

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>At the tip expected point at it.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 2>He's the best of that. But it's hard for regular

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>fans to say, yeah, well my guy came through in

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>this area and you know, and I it's it's hard

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to quantify it, but your gut tells you which guys

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>are good at it. Certainly Josh is always at the

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>top of that. So yeah, that that is also in

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the equation crunch time and your quarterback has always got

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 2>his hands on the ball in crunch time, and how

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>good is he in those moments. Yeah, that's I think

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that's a large part of it as well.

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>As we often do here on bills by the Numbers

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>has provide the numbers for a more in depth analysis.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So total yards this season, Allen ranks fourth with thirty

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred eleven ahead of him Dak Prescott, Patrick Mahomes,

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and third Drake May with thirty nine hundred twenty nine

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>total yards, one hundred eighteen yards ahead of Allen. Heading

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>into Week sixteen, Stafford is sixth with thirty seven hundred

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. Completion percentage, Allen second in the league at

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent. First is May at seventy one percent, Stafford

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>a distant fourteenth at sixty six point four percent. First downs,

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Allan is tied for first with Prescott two hundred and

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>one on the season. May is fourth, Stafford fifth. Scramble

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>yards Allan not surprisingly first four hundred twenty four. May

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is third with three hundred and fifty six. Stafford not

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>part of that competition. Offensive total pass expected points at

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it May is first one hundred fifteen point two two,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Allan third one hundred point four, Stafford fifth, eighty eight

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>passing yards Stafford second, May fifth, Allen eighth passer rating

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Stafford first, May third, Allen fourth, third down passing leaders

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Allen sixth, May tenth, Stafford sixteenth. Fourth quarter passing leaders

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Stafford first, Allen fourth, May twenty second game winning drives

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Alan tied for fourth with four May and Stafford with

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just one each tied for twentieth. And that could be

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>read into as those teams are usually ahead on the scoreboard,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>so fourth, you know, game winning drives not necessarily needed

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>because their teams are winning games and ahead.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>That is true. But you look at the you look

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 2>at the schedules and the outcomes for these for these teams,

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, and that's kind of what you look at.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>They're eleven and three. Uh, they've got only a handful

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 2>of games where they all their ways have been tight.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>They have been tight. It's not like they've been There

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>have been some you know, the Giants game, of course,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the Jets game. But when you get down to the Buccaneers,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons, and then they they lumped up the Browns

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 2>and the Titans.

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>They most people do.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>The Saints game was a one possession game. The Bills

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>game was a one possession game. They lumped up the

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Panthers Uh, they lost to the Steelers. The Miami Dolphins

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>they beat that was a one score game. So they've

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>been in some tight games. So I don't know if

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>you can like la lump lump the main numbers into

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that where they've always been ahead.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>But no last stat here plays of twenty plus yards.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Stafford first with fifty seven, Allen second with fifty six,

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>May fourth with fifty two. We just ran through a

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>boatload of statistics. Do any of them carry more weight

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for you than another?

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Fourth quarter, fourth quarter stuff, I think for me

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>is is important because that's you know, these games the

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>NFL are always tight, and they're they're tough. You got

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to be good and like I said, like you said

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>in crunch time, third down is an important one. You know.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Obviously the scramble yards are an individual stat that's you

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>got to take that.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Stafford's not going to rank there, right, Stafford.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right?

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>And and total offense e p A. I think that's important.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>May's first, Allen's third, Stafford's fifth. All these guys are

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>right at the top, and that you know, and those

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of pass e pa those are like all encompassing

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 2>so for the entire season. But that that also when

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>you do this thing with the all the total season

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and it's e PA expected yards it all it has

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>to do with play selection, personnel on the field, game situation, opponent.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and so that has that's more of a

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>team stat, although the quarterback is a massive part of it.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a team stat. Third downs a little bit of

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>a team stat, fourth quarter passing leaders a little bit

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 2>of a situational team stat. But you know, game winning

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>drives should be important. So I'm yeah, it's it's hard

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to sift through this because all these guys are right

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>in the top five of most maybe it's important category

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that's.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>What you pull from all these statistics because the three

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of these three players are are in the running or

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they're at least in the top ten in almost all

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of these, which I think only cements their candidacy for

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the MVP and consideration to win.

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 2>They hard because you got to take the time and

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>nobody does this. Bill's fans take take the time to

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>go back and look at Josh's plays, and well New

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>England fans look at May's and the LA fans look

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 2>at Stafford's and you pluck out all those times during

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 2>the season, and there's been a bunch for all of

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>these guys of where that guy did it? And who knows?

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean unless you go back and look how many

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and how important were the plays that may made for

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots that won games the way Josh Allen won

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 2>games for the Bills and Stafford won games for the Rams,

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and you go down the list of guys in this conversation,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>so all these I hate to say it like that

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>because I'm a Bills guy, we're Bills guys. All these

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>guys are worthy of the desert. They're all deserted.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Knowing it is a tight race, what do you believe

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen still has to do over the final three

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>games to make a more convincing case for himself. Not

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's campaigning to do that, but no, what do

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you think would have to happen? Because he got himself

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on the radar and back into the conversation with two

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>amazing second half performances these past two weeks, what does

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>he still need to do? What do you think he

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>still has to put on your resume this year?

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Here's what it takes. I mean, he has to keep

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 2>on doing what he's doing. Obviously, I think it's more

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not so much and even say like this where

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>he's played himself into the conversation, that kind of thing.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I think what happens is invariably other guys play themselves

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>out of it. Unfortunately, because it's hard, particularly with four

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 2>games ago, to run off and leave Drake May, Matthew Stafford,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 2>name your guy, Boden, you know that, Name your guy.

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to run off and leave those guys because

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>everybody's playing well at this time of year. I think

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>it's about other guys playing themselves out of it. So

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what you're looking at. Either you don't

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 2>get the opportunity, or your team wins a close win

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 2>against an inferior points for instance, the Bills win this

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 2>game this weekend ten to seven against the Browns. That

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff. You play yourself out of it. These

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>guys have played themselves into it. They're gonna stay in

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the conversation unless they trip up.

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, Marquee games in Marquee Windows helps, you know.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford, at the time of the taping of this podcast,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>had not yet played the Seahawks on Thursday Night foot ball.

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>If he lights up the Seahawks, which are a top

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>three defense. It's right he could cement himself as the

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>league MVP. Josh Allen in Week seventeen, playing in a

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>major window game against the Eagles, ye in a couple

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, the defending Super Bowl champs. He lights them

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>up and runs for a thirty yard touchdown and you know,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>wins the football game. I mean, we remember what it

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>took last year when he won the MVP. He's you know,

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>making an unbelievable playoff a lateral to die for a pylon,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>against the San Francisco forty nine ers, Right, I mean,

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you make plays like that, it's going to be all

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>over television for the next for Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the next week, and those are the things that

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>get more recognition, it seems these that's right.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>And think about this. Josh makes a play like that

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>San Francis Green in the snow, unbelievable Chris collins Worth,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, standing up in the booth, jumping up and

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>now there are Josh makes a play like that. Even

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>La ram fans couldn't envision Matt Stafford doing that. I mean,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a play that's not in his repertoire, you know.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>So there's that kind of thing that goes into it.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Voters listen to that kind of thing. And I also

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 2>think there's a little bit of this, and I think

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Lamar suffered from this last year. He already won it.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Some of the voters like, hey, won it last year.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>If it's closed, let's give it to a new guy.

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>That kind of thing goes on. There's no question they

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>are human beings, fallible human beings. In some cases you'll say,

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you can you can argue about the qualifications of the voters,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 2>about what they put into it. Some of them sit

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>in their armchair and with the remote and that's how

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>they vote. That's about as much research as they do.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the way it is. So yeah, play like the

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 2>one you're describing. Yes, absolutely, even that until you get

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>close to the end. I think other guy's got to

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 2>play themselves out of it.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Switching gears. Another dynamic player on buffer offense and near

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the top of the league in both rushing and total

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>yards from scrimmage is James Cook. He leads the league

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with eight one hundred yard rushing games this season, three

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone else. Jonathan Taylor and Derrick Henry are

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>tied for second with just five. He also has the

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>most one hundred plus total scrimmage yard games than anyone

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the league with eleven. He is currently just twenty

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>eight rushing yards behind Jonathan Taylor for the league's rushing title,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and his sixteen hundred and eighty six total scrimmage yards

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>ranks fourth in the NFL behind bjon Robinson, Jonathan Taylor,

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and Christian McCaffrey. Robinson's team no longer in contention, which

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>figures to hurt him a bit, but not terribly. What

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>about the race with Taylor and McCaffrey For Cook.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's we're in the exact same conversation

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>we were a moment ago. Certainly, the offensive player of

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the Year is the league's chance and the voters chance

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to give an award to somebody other than a quarterback.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>McCaffrey is a great example of that, a great a

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>great candidate for that. James Cook, this could be his year. Certainly,

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Taylor is in this conversation. Although now you know

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the Colts have fallen away because of the injury to

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones and Sauce Gardner and all of that. They

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 2>just can't find the recipe to win the way they

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 2>did early in the season. That hurts him. So San

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Francisco and McCaffrey. I don't know what their schedule is

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>coming up, but I think those guys got to find

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you gotta finish strong, and certainly James Cook has been

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>walking Jonathan Taylor down for about a month now. He's

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>been He was like one hundred and eighteen yards behind him,

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and now he's closer and closer and closer. Double digits.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>He might take him if he gets the rushing title.

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's it for me, and that would say a lot

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the Colts, with Philip River at quarterback

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for them right now, are leaning even more on Jonathan

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Taylor than they were when they had Daniel Jones in

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the lineup. So it's not like Taylor's going to be

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>short on opportunity to run the ball over these last

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>three games when the Colts are fighting and clawing to

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>stay in the playoffs or to get back in the

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>playoffs because they're outside on the outside looking in heading

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>into Week sixteen here. And to your point about falling

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>off could hurt Taylor, I think it's completely taken. Bjon

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Robinson off the radar, even though I would argue he's

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the most dynamic back in the entire league. He might

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be the most gifted athlete at the running back position

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have seen currently, and the guys got a

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous he might hit two thousand total yards from scrimmage. Now,

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if he hits that number, I think Robinson could be

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>back in the conversation, even with a team that is

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>going absolutely nowhere and is probably going to see their

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>coach fired at the end of the season. As hard

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>as it might be to hand an award to a

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>team that's going to be on the wrong side of

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>five hundred by a lot, it hurt two thousand yards.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>It hurts him.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand yards says something. Though, like you, you reach

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mythical numbers, you could be back in the conversation. I think,

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>don't you. Yeah, two thousand total yards does it do

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it for you? Uh? Maybe not? No, I mean two

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand rushing yards is something different.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Total yards not so much. I'm yeah, because Uh, I

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>would think in a guy, for a guy like Bjeon Robinson,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>there would have to be a bigger gap between him

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>and James Cook they were He'd have to be out

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>here and they're not. They're like four hundred yards exactly.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 2>I think the gap for him and the second place

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>guy has to be bigger than what it will be

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 2>between McCaffrey and Cook.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The last few weeks could have a lot to say

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>about who takes the Offensive Player of the Year award,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's likely to be a running back again as

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it was last year with the Eagles Saquon Barkley, although

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's Jackson Smith and Jigba could be a dark horse candidate.

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>He is racking up receiving yards like nobody's business. Time

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Now for the numbers game and will quiz Steve on

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>MVP and Offensive Player of the Year history. Let's do it.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Question number one, what player holds the record for the

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>highest total yards from scrimmage in a single season.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say, uh, Ladanian Tomlinson.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It is not Ladonian Thomlins. That's a good guest though.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Uh.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what was running back with running back

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>with its Indianapolis with is in the Hall of Fame now,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Eric Dickers, no no, no, no, no no no, with Peyton

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Manny oh Edrin James, Edgrin James obviously noted James.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>It's in that era though. If that helps you.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say it is a running back.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Priest Holmes is not Priest Holmes. It is Chris Johnson.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Who oh Tennessee type.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, y K two yeah K two Yeah.

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five hundred and nine total yards. In two thousand

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and nine, he was the NFL Offensive Player of the Year.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Talk about a comment he just here and gone.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He was like a supernova. He was really a super

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like for three or four years he was top notch

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and then I don't know what happened. It just it

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the same disappeared.

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Question number two, how many NFL MVPs have won the

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>award in back to back years, something that Josh Allen

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>has an opportunity to do potentially this year.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 2>I will say it might be more than that.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say four, You're very close. It's five

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Manning, Aaron Rodgers, Brett Favre, Joe Montana, and Jim Brown.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Manning is the only one to do the back to

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>back twice, right, So good for him?

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Holy cow? Yeah.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Question number three, who is the only league MVP to

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>win the award three years straight?

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Rogers.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It is not Rogers. He's won four, but only two.

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>He only won back to back once. It is not

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Jim Brown either. That's a great guess.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it from that era? Is it?

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's no, it is not from the Jim Brown era.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>No is this century previous century?

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Montana?

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It is not Montana. It is Brett Farr won three

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in a row. Is hard believe? The years were ninety five,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety six, and ninety seven. And question four, what two

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>players share the record for the most Offensive Player of

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Year awards?

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, what two players? Yep? What era? They're

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 2>in two different eras.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you they each won three and here's

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the kicker. They both won three in consecutive years.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say, La Dainian Tomlinson.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Again, it is not legions. They are both Hall of famers.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Earl Campbell.

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Earl Campbell as was very good, Steve that was a

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>shot nineteen seventy eight to nineteen eighty three consecutive Offensive

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year awards. I will say the other

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>one is more recent.

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Like in this century? Just shy or just shy? I

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 2>will say, Uh, Megatron is not Megatron? Is it a

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 2>running back? Yes?

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>And I know you can get this very Hall of Famer,

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not Barry Sanders, the Thurman. Mhmm. You'll you'll say, of

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>course after I give you the name.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 2>If you don't get it, okay, thanks, thanks, running back

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 2>from just a minute, n FC, don't tell me, don't

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 2>tell me.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>You want to get it now. Running Back in three

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>consecutive years won the Offensive Player of the Year award.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>M h.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, I'm going I'm going through my.

0:22:58.720 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, NFC, I gotta I gotta look at the NFC teams.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's see no cheating now, I'm not cheating. Uh oh,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 2>Walter Payton.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Not Walter Wait, don't tell me you want one more?

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Get I want another? Guess let's just getting good.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The competitive nature of Steve Tasker is bubbling to the surface.

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Eric Dickerson, He's not Eric Dickerson.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea who he is.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It is Marshall falk Oh yeah, nineteen.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't you know what because they're so close. I

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I ball ups fulk in the same makes sense.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That's that's why I tried to give you NFC, to

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>try to help you, because I could tell Tomlinson was

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on the Marshall fulk wherever you.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Are at there, I apologize you should have I should

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 2>have believe it was amazing for he was the dude.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 2>He was an absolute dude.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>That guy with Kurt Warner. Holy kh all right, So

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that's uh the numbers game. Bill's fans get in on

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the action with FanDuel, America's number one sportsbook. Just download

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the app today to play anyway you want. Plus, with

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>live betting, you'll get updated odds on games that have

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>already started. Best of all, you get page your winnings

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>fast now, every moment more with FanDuel Official Sportsbook, partner

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Buffalo Bills. Time now for our one Benning question.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you think James Cook's candidacy for Offensive Player of

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the Year could actually be hurt by the fact that

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback is Josh Allen.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh? I don't think so. Not in not in this,

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:45.479
<v Speaker 2>not in the shape we're seeing it with the Bills.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Because of the run game. Because everybody already knows Josh

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>is this, you know, unicorn kind of guy. To have

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a run game that has complimented him in so much,

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 2>it might Ah, it could hurt him because they might think, well,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>they got Josh, nobody's really packing it in to stop

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the run anyway. I don't think so. Though. I don't

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>think so. I think the fact that the Bills are

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 2>still scoring at a high rate with a run first

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 2>offense says something at least if the voters go that

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 2>deep and think about it. No, I don't think so.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 2>I think he can.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>The only reason I worry that some might be biased

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>with that is because Jonathan Taylor was playing with a

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>resurgeon Daniel Jones, and is now finishing with a forty

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>four year old Philip Rivers and Christian McCaffrey largely played

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the season with Mac Jones and Brock Purty, who I

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think are None of those quarterbacks are viewed in

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the same stratosphere as Josh Allen. I do think James

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is helped by the fact that they are the number

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>one team in rushing and pretty much have been wired

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to wire this season, and he has the numbers to

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>back up the production not only over the stretch of

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the entire season, but game by game. There's like, there

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't too many dud games for James Cook this season.

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's only one game he was held under

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards that was the Week five game against New England.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, he's been flirting with one hundred. Yeah,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>almost every single week. And that's just rushing yards I'm

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>But we've been talking, we've been talking about, you know,

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 2>like McCaffrey's to McCaffrey's.

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>His receiving is off the charts right.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 2>His rushing is way down, but.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>His receiving yards are insane.

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he ranks number three in rushing attempts, but he's

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 2>thirteenth in yards. I mean, he's not even in the

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 2>top half of the leagu he's barely in the top

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>half of the league. So I'm no, I think he've

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 2>got to be better than that.

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I might be down to Cook and Taylor at this point.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I think, so anything can happen and Jackson, Smith and Jig,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>but I think it could pivot on how their team finishes.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I think he's a dark horse candidate Smith, Jig.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>He's been unbelievable.

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 2>He's been an amazing player this year. So we'll see.

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 2>But I think the consistency of Cook may help him.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Our closing figure deals with Josh Allen's exploits as

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a scoring machine. Alan currently sits just one offensive touchdown

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>away from three hundred in his career. If he gets

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just one touchdown in Cleveland Sunday in Week sixteen, he

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>will become not only the fastest player to three hundred

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>career touchdowns, doing so in just one hundred twenty six games,

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but also the youngest at twenty nine years and two

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fourteen days old. Aaron Rodgers was previously the

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>fastest to three hundred touchdowns, doing so in one hundred

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty four games. No other NFL player in the history

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the game has hit three hundred offensive touchdowns before

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>age thirty one. Hall of Famer Peyton Manning was previously

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the youngest at thirty one years, two hundred and twelve

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>days old, almost two full years older than Joshua Patrick Allen,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who should get the job done on Sunday. Amazing. Yeah,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like I say all the time, is no one

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>scores touchdowns at the rate of josh Allen.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 2>There is a reason why the Bills are the most

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 2>entertaining team in football, and it's because they score score,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 2>score score, And that's the guy that's responsible for it.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>He's amazing. That's it for this episode. Be sure to

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on whatever podcast platform you use so you know

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>when the next episode is out, or watch us on

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bills YouTube channel, because when you need to know

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>about the Bills, you need to check Bills by the Numbers.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>For Steve Tasker on Chris Brown, thanks for listening. Merry Christmas, everybody,