WEBVTT - 2017 Open Championship Preview

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And when I find my.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Ball in a fried egg, Friday Egg, the dreaded Friday Egg,

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg, Frida Egg, bride Egg.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the course.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg Podcast. I'm your host and Andy Johnson, and

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by the Three Man Weave. We've got DJ

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Paiehowski from Scratch and Tron Carter from No Laying Up.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back, guys.

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Andrew. It's good to be weaving. Good to

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>be weaving. Always be weaving.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Tront has been been a little a little while

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>since you've been on the pod. Kind of curious it

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>was a big weekend for you and Bryson. I would

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>love to hear your thoughts on H one one transpired.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I feel like my absence from the

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>pod trans uh coincided with our trip to Fishers when

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I proved myself to be an elite amateur and beat

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>you on the golf course and you just you just

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>can't handle it. Yeah, The John Deere Fifth Major.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 4>By the way, Tron beating you at Fishers. We don't

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 4>have to talk about you guys' golf games because no.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>One gives a ship.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 4>But Tron beating you at Fishers is like Bryson missing

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 4>like eight straight cuts.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 3>And then coming out and knocking off a win. Very similar, Bryson.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 3>We're both elite amateurs, that's true.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I I wouldn't say I am an elite amateur. I'm

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a middling amateur.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's be honest.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>You say you're an e leade amateur pretty often.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So anyways, really good moving on Bryson.

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 2>So, first of all, fifth Major. Good week, of course

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>was great. I felt the greens were a little bit

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 2>slow on the weekend, but we're not going to nitpick

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 2>what was weather like.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of rain early in the week

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>times of rain camera.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, Actually you guys got crushed in Chicago, right, Yeah,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, I mean it was it was a good week.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Charles Hell third came out firing. Honestly, Bryson wasn't even

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>on my radar screen to start Sunday, like I thought

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>he was just gonna So Randy's been just pumping Bryson.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 3>Probably twelve weeks.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Now, Hey, guys like Bryson, he's coming, He's coming, He's coming,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and like all of us are like, you're you're insane, dude.

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 3>What's the what's the bet? Every time he missed the cut?

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Every time Bryson misses the cut, Randy has to watch

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>one or two episodes of The Wire, which he's like

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>always refused to watch. So he's been watching a lot

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>of the episodes of The Wire. He's through like two seasons,

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>like the Sabatkas and everything. So finally, like, you know,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Bryson just comes through. I took a nap on Sunday

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>afternoon and I just figured, like and then I kind

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 2>of checked my phone and like Rogers was running away

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 2>with it, and I was like, I man, like even

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Rodgers can't miss putts and choke this away. Sure enough,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Bryson just comes through and comes out dukes of hazard

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and uh he shot thirty on the back nine. And

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>my Mike Bryson thing isn't so much. I don't think

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the guy's a fraud. Like he's obviously a great player.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>He's been uh you know, naa champion, USAM champion. I'm

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>not sure he can play outside the Midwest. He hasn't

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 2>proven that yet. I mean, he's won at Aaron Hills,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>he won at Olympia Fields, he's won in Cleveland. Those

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>are pretty much just three big wins. But he's just

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>he can't stop talking about how smart he is and.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 3>How how.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, how unique his mindset is and everything. Just

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>go play, man, I've said this on pods before. Just

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>go play, Like, quit trying to actively piss everybody off,

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 2>and like he doesn't have a whole lot of friends

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>in our allies out there.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 4>So here's the counterpoint to that, I think is first

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 4>of all, I'm all in on Bryson, not in the

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 4>not in the traditional way, I don't think.

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think when a lot.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Of people say like, oh, I love that guy, I

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 4>think what they mean is like, man, I'd love to

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 4>sit down and like have a beer with that guy.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 4>And That's not what I'm saying at all. Like we

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 4>seem like very different people. I don't know that we

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 4>would like I don't know that we would necessarily get along,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 4>but I absolutely love just the circus that comes with it,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 4>and as far as like entertainment goes, like watching him

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 4>make a backline charge rivaled like Bubba or Poulter or

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 4>any of those guys, Patrick Reid, any of those guys.

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Being in the mix.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 4>And just from a pure like golf fan entertainment standpoint,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 4>it like almost.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't get any better, like it's building.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 4>Like imagine if you know, if he gets in contention,

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 4>like actually when he was in contention with the Masters,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 4>like it was awesome, like and who cares like what

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 4>he's doing or or any of that stuff, Like I'm an.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Agreement that golf needs a build.

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 2>You brought up all these your word, I don't know

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>you brought up Poulter, read Bagdad, Jerry, I mean all

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>these guys.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, and so here's here's the other thing is.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 4>To a degree, all the like science stuff, all that's

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 4>like is not his fault. And I think it's a

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 4>bit of him getting sucked into the narratives you guys

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 4>are always so happy to talk about because I think

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 4>what happens is like I mean, you see it, and

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 4>it's fair questioning, but because that's like what people know

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 4>about him, and that's what they want to hear. But

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 4>like he wins, and the first question is about like

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 4>you love science. Nobody tell us about science isn't that crazy?

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>He does. He does.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 2>He's just he goes so over the top and so

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 2>beyond the pill on some of his answers where it's like, man,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 2>just say just say you know what.

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm working on some things right now, but I know.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 5>But That's what I love, though, is if he did that,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 5>everyone would be like, man, what a dick?

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Like he's so standoffish. I love just leaning into it

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and just completely yea leaning well.

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of traditional media complain about Dustin Johnson and

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>his lack of responses and interviews, and Bryson is just

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the complete opposite. He gives you too much.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I feel like he does it in a

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>way that instead of being informative, he is very don

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>king self. He's like a mix between Don King and

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 2>like Albert.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Einstein, don King and Albert.

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 3>It's like Bryce and d Chambeau. In the Art of

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Self Promotion, it's a book I would read.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying so trying.

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the art history teacher wrote a book called

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Booker T. Washington in the Art of Self Promotion, So

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>volume two I could do Volume.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Two first of all, talk about like, here's the one

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 4>thing that does get glossed over a little bit. I

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 4>think is like his game is so good, Like it's

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>so good.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he mashes the ball, he destroys the ball, and

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like he's just struggled too much with this putter. But

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be fine to something. He's gonna win

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a major championship like I I like would say that

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of young players outside of John Rahm, like Bryson D.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Chambeau is going to win a major, Like I put

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>him up there with almost anybody else that's major free

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>under twenty three four years old.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>The thing that also, not a lot of people knows

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>that all his irons are the same length.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Or or are Yeah, you want to fill this up,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 5>there's some It was on golf RX there somebody tweeted that,

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 5>you're like, man, this is like not a whole lot

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 5>of people know this, but most tour players they're irons

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 5>are the same line.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Just a scorching take.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's darker place, the.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Com trails of golf conspiracy.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Somebody somebody said jet fuel can't melt skill shafts.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's a question, and what's it darker place? Golf Club

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at List's message wars or golf wrx's message wars.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Golf WRX because that stuff like doesn't matter. So like

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 2>golf club atlists like that stuff's going to be around

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>in fifty years, Like those courses, nobody's gonna be talking

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>about the title or the tailor made a nine in

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 2>like six months.

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm trying to think, like which I'm trying to

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 3>think which group. I'm trying to think of the right

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 3>way to say this. One of the groups has has

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 3>more to lose, and I'm not sure like which one

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 3>it is.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's just it's like obsolescence.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yah, all right, Well the.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Game just a game. I cannot I cannot even try

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to pretend like I keep up with.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't get into it.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Andy, I got a question for you. So,

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the most interesting things I talked about, or

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I gleaned from Bryson's post round interviews and everything, was

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he was chasing a little bit more distance,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>like he was chasing another ten fifteen yards of distance.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>It seemed like he said he got that, he got that,

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>got that figured out, like kind of got past that

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and then got everything sorted over the last three or

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>four weeks.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 3>If he's so long, Like, why is he chasing more distance?

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Is he like the cat? He just can't?

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, I think that's what everybody does it

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent. I mean, you get to tour

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you think you need to be better, you

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>need you watch what's happening with DJ and you know

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, he hits it so far, I need

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to hit it like that.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but Bryce's freedom long. I mean he was

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>long at the US hand as long as the masters.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Like, hey, I don't know where where does he fit?

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know this, but like where does he

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>fit among tour players?

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think, just like all part above average.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't have the stats right in front

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of me.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Like eight percentile, right like seventy fifth, eightieth percentile.

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know you yeah, I think he's got the best.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure where he is. But you get

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to tour and you see these low scores and he

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>probably looked at it and said, I need to get

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>more wedges in my hand.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, he was looking at the data.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 6>He was you know, although he didn't have enough data

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 6>because he wasn't making enough cuts.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>He was light on data compared to his competitors. That's

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>why he needed to get.

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Plenty disadvantage these bigger sample sizes.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. Another big winner was Rapha Cabrera Bayo finally one.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all in them, my guy. That was awesome.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know a ton about him other than you know,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean I've watched him play over here, just all

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 4>the WGCs and majors and you know when he went

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 4>deep at the match play and all that stuff, but

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 4>like he was kind of sneaky falling into that, Like

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 4>that was the most interesting stat as soon as he won,

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 4>was just knowing like that the stat was going to

0:11:57.960 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 4>be everywhere, like yeah, when was the last time that

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 4>he because I couldn't picture it and it was whatever

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 4>five and a half years.

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying he's like a poor man's Lee Westwood?

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>He had he had three economy of Spain is kind

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 3>of low. That's the other reason he's kind of the

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>poor man. I think he's all the players Lee westw

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 3>It is yeah, deep global.

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 2>God keep diminishing Westwood Man.

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Versus Cabrera BeO.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>This week, any takers, No, you've got your.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>How about Westwood versus.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 3>Leishman is already locked? But that can we talk.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 2>About all right, I don't mean to skip ahead here

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>because I think we need to talk about the Utah

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Championship on the Web Tour, but can we talk about

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Porter and where he pulled his odds from on his

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 2>British Open preview column.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see him.

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So he pulled it and he had who he had?

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 2>He had somebody had the seventy five to one odds.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 3>The dictator Roberto Castro, Oh Castra.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he had Roberto Castro as a sleeper at seventy

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>five to one odds. On my sportsbook, Roberto Castro was

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>five fifty to one.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's how it's money there.

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Castro is an interesting character because he made the Tour

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Championship last year and two years ago two years before

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>he two years ago he made the Tour Championship and

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>lost his car. You know it's again, Yeah, it's almost

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>impossible to do like. I don't know if anybody else

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>has ever done it legitimately.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not exaggerating here.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 4>I think if you could have any player on the podcast,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 4>he would be probably on my top five.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I love Castro.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying anything bad about the man. It's just

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable that it's gonna it might happen again.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like it's kind of like a reverse

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>or it's kind of like a Camillo community in a

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 2>full season and doing it multiple times.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Crazy.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is, It's nuts. I mean he uh so, anyways,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that trying. We'll move on to the Open Championship now

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>that we got there.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Well all right last last year though, I just want

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to I want to set the records right on price

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and done this before. Bryson's got game, people, I'm not

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>disputing that he's got game.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 3>He just.

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>It's like he wants to be different. I'm cool with

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>being different.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you you do?

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>You just don't tell me about it every and every time.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Every time you're asked about it.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 2>No, No, he does any anytime, anytime, even when he's not.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not like he's like speak softly, carry a big stick,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>carry carry a one a single length big stick.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 3>That's good.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, hey, my our stack guy, just send me a

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>message Tony reality, Bryson is thirty eighth and driving distance

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 3>It's like seventy percent.

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's averaging three hundred off the team. Okay,

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy. I don't know why that guy would need

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to chase the yards, but it could have been in

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the data.

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So all right, well, just here's here's what I'm gonna

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 4>say every time from now and this is all I

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>will ask.

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>You're entitled to your opinion. Here, I'll defend to the death,

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>you're right to express the free country.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Every time you see something that like drives you insane

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 4>about him, just trace it back and say, like, why

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>is he saying this? Is he saying this unprompted? Or

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 4>is he saying this because he was asked about it

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 4>again and again?

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>But he has no discretion about it.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I just I think he's like lacks discretion.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I think he is like I don't know, I think

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 4>he's a I think he is just trying to embrace

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 4>his unique miss and just trying to be him.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, he's certainly trying to raise what I'm into.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm out on what his sponsors do to him. But

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the guy is just a total weirdo. You know, Yeah,

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is this different? Yeah?

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, man, I was lost.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Like it was like even when people weren't interviewing about

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>stuff and they would ask him about Oh, like why

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>do you single like irons like, well, I signed my

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>name left handed back.

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 3>He's toned that stuff down. I think, I think I

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 3>think he a lot of it is just like.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Being a twenty two year old like millionaire that everyone

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 4>is like fascinated with and like there's got to be

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 4>something that like none of us have done that except

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 4>as ground the internet celebrity is the only one that

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 4>has gone through this, and it's it's hard to like, yeah,

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's gonna be hard to like rate it

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 4>in when people are like company your ego all the time.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 4>So who's like a big personality that like totally owns

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 4>it that you like, Who's who's the model in golf

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 4>just in general?

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Both Grayson Murray.

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm kidding. I don't.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't. That's the thing.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I don't know if there is a blueprint

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>because it's I don't know. I mean, you know, I

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 3>would have a hard question.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 2>No that that's a very valid question and a good question.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 2>But I just think there's Yeah, I mean you could

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>look at Ricky and say Phil would be my only Yeah,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 2>but like Ricky's a good like he does things his

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 2>own way. I don't know if he's got that sort

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>of quirky personality, but he does things his own way

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 2>and he can you know, he's done it in a

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 2>way that hasn't offended the ship out of his peers.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I think Phil is the model for this. I think

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 4>phils like old distinguished Bryson. If you think about the

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 4>ship that he says and the stuff that Bryson says,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 4>they're not that different.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Phil saying that ship in like ninety six.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 4>And he alienated everybody, and everyone's like, God, that guy's

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 4>like a little much.

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I get the sense of like Phil has

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a ton of self self awareness too, and yeah, any

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and he always has, whereas I don't get the sense

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>that Bryson has even remotely the.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Same level of self awareness. Maybe maybe it comes with time,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 3>fair Fair.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what's interesting is that you're in on

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Rerictator, Randy's out on the Rictator, You're out on Bryson,

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and Randy's in on Bryson.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>Randy being in on Bryson makes me even more than bring.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm surprised Andy's not not just beating the Bryce

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and drum.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 3>No, but he's got I've got tapes, he's texting me today.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 3>He's all in on Bryson. He's just laying in the weeds, right,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 3>there's contrarian.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Andy's like, oh my contrarian brother, a contrarian revolutionary.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm realistic. He's really good at golf. I'm

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>not in on Bryson. Like I'm like DJ said, I'm

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>never going to go have a beer with Bryson. That's

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>something I'm not interested in doing. But I and I'm

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't really enjoy watching him play golf either. I

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's sluggish way the way the way.

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>That was My one thing about Rogers was was, man,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he should have gotten like a too,

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 2>like two strokes tracted from his score for having to

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>play with Bryson and Zach Johnson on Saturday.

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 3>That was absolutely brutal. Interesting, No, and then and then

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I fired off a take.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 2>They were like like Bryson took like ninety seconds to

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>line up Pott. I think he minded up six different times,

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>got the line exactly right, some salt, And then and

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 2>then I was like, man, like, can we just like

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>preemptively put these guys in the clock? The fire off

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 2>this take no less than like eight seconds later they

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 2>walk up to the next team and they're waiting on

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the next team.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 3>And what would h We're a real quick flashpole for

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the group here. What would make players play faster?

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Get them getting doctor stroke or other players getting gaining.

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>A stroke, other players gaining stroke would make them play

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 3>faster like the rest of the field, or just the

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>guys in their group. No, just the guys in their group.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I can't be to the guys in another in

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>their group because then you got to get guys behind them. Yeah.

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not a perfect system, to be honest. No,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 3>it's it's the belt man, you put the belt on it.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Sorry proposed this. Speaking of the belt, let's talk about

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>the Open Championship.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Tron, you played Royal Birkdale a couple of months ago.

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm so excited and all I can think is just

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 2>like flighted two irons off tas. It's the it's kind

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>of a non the script start, but man, like you

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 2>get out to six, seven to really the rest of

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the course, there's some just nasty part threes, but it's

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>there's some serious course management involved too. It's a it's

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a disciplinarian's course.

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I hear, like I hear Driver might not be a

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>popular club this week.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it all depends on I haven't looked

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>at the weather. I heard kind of offhand that it

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 2>was supposed to be shitty later in the week. But

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think it's all It's tough for me

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to judge because the wind was blowing the opposite direction

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 2>when we played it. But I think it's all dependent

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 2>upon the wind and you know the direction it's coming from.

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, even the holes that were downwind, you

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 2>were like the par fives for us were down the

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>two part fives in the back and like it was,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it was totally it was goading you win to being

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 2>aggressive and going for it and then you just get

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>like you hit it a little bit offline and you're

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>lost ball. I mean, it was you gotta That's why

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 2>it feels really.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Speaky to me. I like, I like speed.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 2>I think DJ and I just took out second mortgages

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 2>today to put on the strap three to one.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that does it favor right to left, left to

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>right at all?

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>I didn't feel like it, And again I think it

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>comes down to the wind. But one hole that sticks

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 2>out to me where it was like four or five.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it was five, five or six. It's like

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 2>a part four and there's this it's pretty non as script.

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a lake on the right, and then there's a

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 2>ton of bunkers up by the green. But somebody like DJ,

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 2>if they're feeling frisky, they could pull it out driver

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 2>carry one three thirty five and get lucky up by

0:22:57.760 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 2>the green and put it on the green and have

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 2>a two advantage over the field versus. But if that

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>goes sideways, you're you're looking at six easily. So I

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>feel like it's it's such you know, it's all about discipline.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And the other big takeaway for me was there's a

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of on the greens. A lot of the greens

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 2>are elevated, and there's these little like rivets in the

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>side of the greens that these little runoffs that you

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>really can't even see from the fairway, but they make

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the green a lot smaller than it than it looks

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to the looks to the eye before you play it.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, I don't think I've been this

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 2>excited for a major championship for a while.

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 3>This is gonna be sweet.

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 2>I think that this is on like the level of

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>like as far as interest in watching, it's on the

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>level of like a shinnacock for me.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, I praise, I praise.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, it's just a really good test of golf.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it favors anybody.

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>You look at you, you look at the past champions.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>From there, You've got Johnny Miller, Peter Thompson won twice,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Palmer, Lee Trevino, Tom Watson, I mean, pedigree Ian

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>even Baker Fitch won when he was really good.

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean he was really really good.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, was playing the best golf anybody in the world.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Where did this fall in like his line of majors Harrington?

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the second second or second?

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so he uh is he?

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean he'll be in the Hall of Fame. All

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the other guys are Hall of famers.

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Can we talk about Peter Thompson just being so That

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>was the big takeaway from going to England, was like

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Peter Thompson being so sorry to sidetrack us here, but

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 2>like everywhere we showed up, it's like Peter Thompson had won. Therefore,

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 2>now that's kind of you know, I was kind of

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 2>like the ignorant dude. I was like, man like I

0:24:59.000 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 2>I know about Peter Tom.

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Probably two of the most underrated players in the history

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 4>of golf are Peter Thompson and Tiger Woods.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, you just this is just an excuse

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>for DJ to bring up the Tiger Woods is underrated.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 3>It's just you know, just staying consistent with is Padrick underrated?

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I think he kind of is. Thompson won

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>five Open Championships.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I know, that's.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Insane Tom Watson, and I feel like the Brits downgraded

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 2>him because.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 3>He was an Australian. He's a prisoner, he's a criminal inmate,

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 3>he was a Florida State seminal.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, Thompson. I mean, it's just somebody you don't

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hear a ton about. I mean Tom Watson is like

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>beloved in in the British Isles. Yeah, but Thompson wasn't

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as beloved.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 3>No. Uh, Tom Watson play, He hasn't played. Has he

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 3>played the opening in a couple of years? Andrews last one?

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he's done.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, because he had the Farewell Dark and.

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So he those two both won five Open Championships, which.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Is where did all right, where did Peter Thompson win?

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He won two two at Birkedale. He won his first

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in his last at Birkedale, and then, uh, let's see

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>where else do you win? I'd have to dive into these.

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to dive into all these. We're we're

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>done talking about Peter Thompson. That his chances here, that's

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's another story for another day. Let's uh, let's talk

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Rory coming in two of this

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>cuts mm hmm, right, yeah, three out of his last

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>four hasn't done it, hasn't really been relevant in a

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>major since his win at Kiowa.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>You love that.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Lee West has been more relevant in major championships since

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>after the twenty fourteen PGA Championship than Rory.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 3>The twenty fourteen PGA If you only.

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Count Fridays and Saturdays where the golf course was in

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 4>the Eastern time zone, Lee West has been way more relevant.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Hey, he's got a runner up.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 2>All right, here's the other all right, going back to

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Peter Thompson, here's the other thing. The guy won three

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Open championships in a row, Birkdale, Saint Andrews, Liverpool, didn't

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 2>win in fifty seven, came in, came runner up at

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Saint Andrews. So they quit Saint Andrews two or three

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>years and then won the next year at lifting at

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Saint ANNs. So he won three out of four years.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 2>In the one year that he didn't win, he was

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 2>runner up. That's freaking strong strong.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a historic pace speed. Underrated, Nobody's just nobody is

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>saying he's not underrated.

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on from the Peter Thompson take. I'm going

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 3>to war for Peter Thomas.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You got anything on make a rib anybody?

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Ah?

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean I watched most of the Scottish Open last

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 2>week and he just he looked like a kid trying

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to find his mom. He was he was lost with

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 2>them all.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 3>He was his mom.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>He couldn't like I mean I was, and he he

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>chalked it up to a simple fix of ball position

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and his stance.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 3>But he looked fine off the tee.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>He just couldn't anything below an eight iron. He just

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even remotely in the circle of trust with I.

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Didn't get to watch much of the Scottish Open, but

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 4>it just seems like for the last two years.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Just I know I've harped on this before, but it

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 3>just always feels like it comes back to just missing

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 3>like momentum putts being able to grind. Yeah, and he

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 3>just yeah. They like it.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 2>They were like, yeah, man, like it's a big round

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>for like, I feel like everybody keeps saying every time

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>you watch Rory on the big round for r they

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 2>said that the Irish openly said, go.

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Back to like when he was paired of speed in

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the last group of Augusta and he just got vaporized,

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 3>blown out to sea, blown out to race, blown out

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to Rays Creek, a tributary.

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the other thing I just noticed with Rory is like,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if you watch the way Speif misses a lot of times,

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Speith will miss short on the side of the green

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's got a lot of space. Just seems like

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Rory regularly short sized himself and it's just in the

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>worst places. He misses long a lot, misses long and left.

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And then.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm probably gonna bring up the same thing.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Here are you on the you in the anti JP

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 3>chorus of that's right.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 2>There's this giant undercurrent of people, I mean, players, caddies,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 2>casual fans, knowledgeable fans, analysts, everybody's like there's this ground

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 2>swell of anti JP sentiment out there t where they

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 2>feel like he's constantly miss clubbed, He's constantly I.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Don't I don't have a read on him.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm out there on the conversation like I

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know, but I feel like you you may have

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a better read on it.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like many are saying that this is the problem.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Many many people are saying this has potential to be

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>fake news.

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Though also yeah, I mean, until you're there, I think

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the player's job to hit the shots.

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what I was gonna say.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, does it like, does that mean JP was

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 4>really killing it when Rory was the best player in

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 4>the world and he was flagging everything and like, yeah,

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 4>making every like I don't know, if I don't.

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Know, well, I think the other thing with Rory too

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 3>is he's at what point, I mean, how many times

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 3>has he changed the equipment now the last three or

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 3>four years?

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, I mean I don't know when he switched

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>from three.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>At least yeah, four titleists to Nike to Callaway Taylor made.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's like at some point, like that's that's

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 2>going to catch up with you, just just like an

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>injury would, or just like it's just one more variable

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 2>to consider.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand the whole putter thing, like he

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>put it so well with the Scottie Cameron at the

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>end of last year, Like he wins the Tour Championship,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he wins the FedEx Cup using that.

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it was five years ago. So that

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 2>that's my thing with the whole equipment thing. And I

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 2>know I can't you know, I'm not like the best A.

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't give a shit about equipment.

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we need to get a golf

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>w RX forum guy on here and so much just.

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Start a thread about Tron's equipment takes and B like yeah, B.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Like Callaway pays us in no lingo. So like I'm

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 2>not you know, like I'm not the most well intentioned

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 2>guy with equipment. And so for me, if DY felt like,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>all right, I like these irons i'm playing, I like

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the ball i'm playing, I love this driver i'm playing,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>that's great, but like the putter is kind of separate

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>from all that, right, Like if if you really like,

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I heard anecdotes of he picked up that

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Scottie Cameron putter again and was putting with it. And

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>he was like, man like, it's like back, like being

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>with an old friend, you know.

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 3>And and he was he was putting really really well

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>with it. And and now he's using you know, he's he's.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Switching back and forth between a mallet and it just

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 2>seems like.

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean having four putters out there Saturday a

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks.

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Again, and it's, man, if you're trying to you know,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>if you've if you're really about playing the best stuff,

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and you can get paid for it too, But if

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 2>you want to play the best stuff, then then play

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the best stuff and don't worry about this equipment contract

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>stipulates that I have to have that potter in the back. Yeah,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 2>that's my that's my take.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 4>I think where I was going to go with it

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 4>originally a tum andy here if he wants to talk

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 4>about it, is I think there's a growing One of

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 4>my favorite conspiracy theories is maybe Rory's not strategic enough

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 4>of a player. And if you look at his US

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 4>open history and you look at like some of the

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 4>tracks where he's played well, some of the tracks where

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 4>he hasn't played well, what you know, what does that

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 4>say about the way that he plays and like, you know,

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 4>you Andy, you kind of you kind of alluded to it,

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 4>like at the US Open this year, I know, after Thursday,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 4>when you know, all these big names just got completely

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 4>ejected on the first day for kind of trying to

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 4>play bomb and gouge and it was it was kind

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 4>of him, Jason Day, a lot of those guys, And

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I'm just I'm curious if you think

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 4>there's any weight there or or.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's it's interesting to think about, but

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you always think about what if golf. Yeah, with technology

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the way it is, it's not possible to play at

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>like the most strategic golf courses because their strategy has

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>been rendered useless.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Right, But it's almost like when you have everything going,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 4>when when you're just like flushing everything and Tiger, yeah,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean when you're when you're just unconscious playing video.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Games with them.

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 2>What's like, It's like Tiger at Litham when he was

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>hitting two iron off every tea and it didn't matter

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 2>if he was thirty yards behind everybody, because he was.

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 4>When you're like playing, when you have that much control

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 4>over what you're doing, like it's fine to play one

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 4>way and as soon as you don't have total control

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 4>over everything you're doing. It just seems like if you

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 4>take the same lines, like, it's so much easier to

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 4>get just ejected and missing all the wrong spots and

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 4>a lot of stuff.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think a good study is just if

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>if you could go watch a round of golf, you know,

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>when you can get to see Rory play with Speed,

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>because to me, I think they're the complete on the

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>polar opposite levels in terms of like Speith is the

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that you watch play and you say, how the

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>hell did he just shoot sixty seven? He was all

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>over the place, so he didn't do anything like he

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>scraped it around.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Which that quote literally came from Rory.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then they played together togainst it and then

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Rory's the guy that you watch and you're like, how

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the hell did he shoot sixty nine? He should have

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>shot sixty five. Yeah, And it's interesting because if you

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.919
<v Speaker 1>watch where Speed misses, it's a lot different than where

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Rory misses.

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot more cerebral, right, I mean it's there,

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it's always well intentioned, it's always.

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>He misses on. He doesn't short sight himself a lot,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's a lot easier to get up and down.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 2>But so so my question for you is is that

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 2>where greller comes into where because it's tough to it's

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 2>tough to constantly be thinking of your misses and not.

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Start playing defensively.

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Versus I think like that's that's kind of that fine

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 2>line between Hey, I want to miss in the right spots,

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 2>but at the same time, I want to go with flags.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to you know, So this is could be

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>where the putting all comes into it, is that Rory's

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>been struggling with his putter, so he feels like he

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>has to hit it close to make Birdie's speeding notorious

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for rolling in twenty footers and fifteen footers, he doesn't

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>feel the pressure to have to fire at flags and

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>make Birdie. That could I mean, I don't know if

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that's true, but that could be part of it.

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Is the other thing, too, is speed, because I agree

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 2>that's the that's the ultimate kind of case studies in

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>different spheres of the game, kind of speed versus Rory

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 2>into a less extent like on the Euros or Thomas

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Peters versus like a Matthew Fitzpatrick.

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 3>But like I think it's also.

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 2>By the time it's all said and done, Rory and

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Speed could SPIE's putter's cooled off some you know, some

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 2>would say this year or in the last eighteen months,

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 2>like is that something where Speed the way that he

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 2>makes putts and the way that he kind of stacks

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>him up in certain rounds, Like Rory may make the

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 2>same number of those putts, but he's just he's he's

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 2>either a streak year with it and he's not doing

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 2>it in the same scenarios and he's doing it just

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of all stacking him up like late in a

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Sunday round like or you know, early on a Friday.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just there's a whole psychology I think

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>when when you don't put well and when you know,

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like Rory knows he hasn't been putting well, like, it

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wears on the rest of.

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Your game through the Yeah, you start pressing, you need.

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>To hit drivers further, so you need to set up

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, wedges that you can hit closer, and eventually

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to make the mistake versus Speed. I mean,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he's won twice this year, Speed and he's been in

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 1>contention and a lot of times why he hasn't won

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>more is because the putters putts just haven't fallen. But

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>his process and understanding, hey, like I don't need to

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>fire at every flag, yields him being in the hunt

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot. And I think, like anything, you can't make

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of birdies without a lot of birdie opportunities.

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>You can't win a lot of events without being in

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>contention a lot.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the other thing. Do you do you think

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 2>do you think Rory is held back by the fact

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that his driver's his strongest attribute, where you know, like

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 2>he that's what he feels like his advantages, and if

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that's not firing on all cylinders, then there's not a

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of foundation there versus speed. That's like, you know,

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 2>if everything, if the putter is his strongest attribute, that's

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 2>his foundation, and right, there's not a whole lot else

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 2>built upon it.

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 3>With a bad putter, you can still shoot sixty nine.

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 3>You're not bad driver.

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 2>You're not as relying upon one putter or one one

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>club because he can his putter can go cold and

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 2>his ball strike and still good enough. Whereas if if

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Rory's you can only hit your driver so many times around, right,

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and then you got to just you know, club in

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 2>from there and it's it's it's a different story.

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 3>First thing. I mean you still see Rory beating up

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the par fives and yeah, yeah.

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It says not a good air. If you want to

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>win a lot of golf tournaments, it's not good to

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be struggling with your short irons and putter.

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 2>But coming back to Birkdale, I think this is why

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 2>this is like the ultimate. I would bet on Speak

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 2>ten times out of ten if it was just Speed

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 2>heads up versus Rory at Birkdale, because I think it

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 2>takes the driver out of Rory's hands on.

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 3>A lot of holes and on the holes that he's

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 3>going to hit it.

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he may be thirty thirty yards ahead of Speed,

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 2>but Spee's you know, half half wedge game is so

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>good that I don't think it really it's that pick

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 2>of an advantage.

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a short course. It's only seventy one yards,

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's if it's firm and fast like most of

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>them play. It's not you don't have to necessarily be

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a bomber to sixteen here.

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of there's a lot of blind t shots,

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of you know, just really quirky shots

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 2>that you got to hit to where you know you

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 2>can't just bomb and golllege this course, you're gonna get ejected.

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So so of the guy of the established guys that

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>have won major championships, who's your guys pick trying? It

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds like your team speed.

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh, for guys that have won before.

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Speed, and then I got I got Harrington in

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty to one.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 3>I think last weekend before. That'd be so fun. I

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 3>love him. How about the follow up? See Padrick? All

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 3>right here, let me let me just you.

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Know, let me just circle back to an earlier part

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 4>of the conversation here. Padrack is also a guy that

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 4>is long winded, that is tinkering constantly doing all kinds

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 4>of weird.

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Though it's not like that's isn't it just because of

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>his accent.

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 3>No, he's not as being reverse racist straight out, He's

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 3>not arrogant. It's not about Padrick.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>He's just he's just like, yeah, all Rightail, I love

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Padre and I love I mean, I was gonna say

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Speed too, but that's because I pick him to win

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>every tournament.

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 3>But he's due. I feel like he's been the last Yeah,

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 3>oh dude, he's like he's hungry. Yeah, exactly. You Sabody

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:57.839
<v Speaker 3>won with a Travelers. Like as soon as he gets

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 3>it going, I mean, it's gonna be He's gonna people's

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 3>doors off.

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 4>It also feels like, I mean, I know this is

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 4>just the nature of golf being played every week in

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 4>multiple places, but it feels like Dustin is like the.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 3>Most underrated player in the world right now.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he's really flying under the radars.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah he doesn't, like he was getting four to one

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>five to one odds and.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Tournaments, yeah, four months, three four months, and like the

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 3>only this is so funny, but how it happens with Gop.

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 4>But like the only reason that he is like kind

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:30.959
<v Speaker 4>of quiet right now is just because he's like taking

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 4>time off to hang out with his kid.

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And like, I don't know, he he allegedly got pushed

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 2>down the stair or he allegedly fell on the stair, right.

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 3>He I don't know. I mean I think he's gonna

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 3>be up there.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 4>I think like him hitting you know, two three four

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 4>irons all over that place and just putting himself in

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 4>good shape, like.

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Because I think that's that's one of the underrated things

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 2>about Dustin is how disciplined he can be.

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 3>His game point hits.

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 2>He hits a lot of two irons and three woods

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 2>off tease where people just you him as some bomb

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:09.919
<v Speaker 2>and gallager.

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's not I'm going, I'm going Sergio. Yeah, I

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like you.

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 2>You think he's still hungry.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I mean the the Open is the tournament that

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>you expected him to win forever, like he always it's

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he hits it so good, he's never out of it. Yeah,

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know he's he's got the piano office back.

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 2>So the other thing that that worries, the thing that

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 2>wears me a little bit about Sergio is the greens.

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 2>It is supposed to be pretty windy later in the week,

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 2>the greens might be a little slower.

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 3>And just putting in the wind is hard.

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think the wind actually diminishes putting skill because

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to make long putts when it's windy.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, that's really hard. It's really hard to get

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 2>lag putts close to Yeah, you.

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 3>End up having to make a lot of eight footers.

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what Sergio is great at, right, Yeah, something like that.

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you who you know going into the guys

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that haven't won. You know, we've had seven straight first

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>time major winners. Lee Westwood was a great.

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Literally, yeah, he just looks rock solid over those three footers.

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>This might be Lee's last chance, last real good chance.

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna be in the Masters next year.

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>He's got to be in the top fifty in the world.

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 2>And I could getting on his horse and winning like

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 2>one of those roll Lex couple events and.

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Dubai or.

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Something next year.

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 3>You know he's gonna ball out at the ned Bank

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Challenge next year. Guys like I feel like that. I

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 3>feel like a parent.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>That's like divorced. And then we're getting into the Leashman

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 2>next and like Andy's gonna.

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Shoot on leish I never have.

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I just have pointed out.

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's poor timing. Leishman just had a kid,

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, but he's I don't know. I just I

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 2>think of two irons off tees and I think of

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that driving iron that speed has.

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 1>To Yeah, you know, what about your brother Jason Day?

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Then Jason Day stinks his ball flight's too high, he

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 2>can't grind.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 3>He stinks what about Ricky?

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>What about Ricky?

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:44.800
<v Speaker 3>What about the Rictator totally.

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I love Ricky.

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 3>I like that he didn't win last week.

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 2>That helps in Scotland. I think that helps immensely. You

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 2>don't want to drain the reserves. Man, we didn't talk

0:45:55.200 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 2>about Andy's boy. Uh Romulus, I mean blew everybody away.

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Two weeks ago.

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>He he showed that his game might be better across

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the pond, I mean the whole.

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Across the I know.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>It's uh.

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean I'm surprised you haven't done a deep dive

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 2>on like his amateur career. Him playing in the amateur

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 2>and he won the better events.

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he won the Spanish and twice.

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>No, but i'll talk about the ones in the British Isles.

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he played the Eisenhower Trophy one year.

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he play the.

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Amateur and like the I don't know if he played

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the English amateur or the Irish amateur.

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I did a deep dive on John Brown's amateur career

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a while ago.

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>But I don't So you've left some little, little a

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 2>trail of breadcrumbs that's not quite picked up yet.

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>You can, I mean you can go on the site

0:46:57.200 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and read it. But I don't think he did anything

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy in on the British isles, he did most of

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>his damage.

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And started started chasing splittail.

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean mostly got to the States. He like

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the life in the States.

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:14.919
<v Speaker 3>But I mean.

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 1>He's another guy you can't the way he hits the ball.

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 2>The odds are crazy. He's like, it's like DJ.

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Him.

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 2>There's like four guys that are that are.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Basically co favorites, and he's one of the co favorites,

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 3>probably those two Speak and Rory, right, yeah, I don't

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 3>even think Rory. I think Rory's like behind those guys.

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Rory's always a betting favorite, though.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You know who I kind of like this week who

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't won a major yet is Hideki.

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can say that he's gonna win a British

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 3>at some point.

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 4>The bat like the whole wind kind of neutralizing the

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 4>putting a little bit seems to play in his.

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 3>In his favor. I think Dey's gonna win at CARNOUSTI

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 3>mm hmm. I like that Carnosie next year. I think

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 3>what about Bryson this week? I don't even I didn't

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 3>even know Riyson on a passport, and.

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Bryson's game is kind of good for a British Opening.

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a good.

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 3>It's going a short story because you don't have a

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 3>data on the course. I feel like there's no shot link,

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 3>there's no shot link. He can't he can't feed Watson.

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Fleetwood is getting just so much hype

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's well deserved by his play, but it's gotten

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the kind of outrageous levels where people everybody's like listed

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>him as a favorite.

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, so you know what kind of pisses me off

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 2>is that's people not doing their homework. Because Fleetwood, when

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 2>we talked to him without the players, I was like, oh,

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you're from Southport, England, Like, you know, you must be

0:48:56.480 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 2>really really excited for the Open this year. And he's like, yeah,

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm pumped to go home. But like, I've never really

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 2>put Hillside in formby a lot, but I've never played

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Birkedale all that much. Like I don't like he's it's

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of an unfamiliar course, just like it is to

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 2>most of these young guys.

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 3>So what do you all?

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Two guys, two guys that I like a lot, and

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 3>this is going to shock you shock the world, all right?

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Ustazan first of all fifty to one through some money

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:28.719
<v Speaker 2>on him just because I feel like I don't know

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that guy's almost got what three majors?

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't I don't want to say this.

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 4>I feel bad saying this because I love Louie, love Louis,

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 4>But Louie's deep in the Westwood game.

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 3>He's he's turning into South African Westwood pretty quick.

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.759
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think he cares though, he doesn't care

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:51.280
<v Speaker 2>that much. So and he's already won.

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 3>One, so what do he is? Just like the switch

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 3>is gonna flip this week?

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And like no, he just doesn't. It's it's just another tournament.

0:49:57.880 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what.

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And then the what about Paul Casey?

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean so good, I could bet on Paul Casey,

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 4>but he's another one that like again, like I love

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Casey and he does everything well, but like what was

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:11.439
<v Speaker 4>the last thing that he wants?

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't won him forever forever, I think anywhere, Like, yeah,

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been years.

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Well and just to climb back to where he was

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 2>to even getting his PGA Tour card back, that was

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 2>that was a lot of energy right there. So the

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 2>guy I was going to say earlier was was was Couture.

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Fardy picked him this week.

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh I would love that too.

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 2>He's seventy five on Fardy said he was just glowing

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 2>about his ball flight, which I don't know if that's

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 2>just like a kind of like a women's like women's

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 2>seven would just yeah.

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:52.319
<v Speaker 3>It's a low. He's going to swoop in and win

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 3>the Rico British Women's British Open. Yeah yeah yeah, weed

0:50:56.360 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Bis yeah sure no yeah, shorter course too, yeah.

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:06.320
<v Speaker 2>So I just I don't know, I feel like Coucher

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 2>plays well on.

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:09.399
<v Speaker 3>On. Uh.

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I actually I don't even know where Couture plays well.

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I just he could backdoor this thing, that's all.

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>What about that? Brian Harmon, Yeah, I know you're I

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think the tank, I.

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Think the tanks a little bit well right now. I

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 3>expect you to play well this past week.

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So recent reason, uh, outside of Rory, recent Open Championship

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>winners have been really old guys. I mean you got Stenson,

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Phil Coach, So that's something to keep in mind. I

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.399
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that links golf lends itself to more

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>experience and it's not I.

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Think, especially this course versus say Ah, I don't know,

0:51:57.000 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 2>like I mean maybe I think Carnoustie kind of comes

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 2>down to a little bit more chance and look and

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 2>driving the ball well, but like this one's more, hey,

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 2>just like take your medicine and get the ball out

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 2>there to seventy to eighty and then go from there.

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>And then Cooch too, Like I was blown away at

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 2>how many I think in every interview this week he

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:24.879
<v Speaker 2>referenced being like trying to prepare for the Open Championship more.

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at his.

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Record in the Open Championship from say twenty ten to now,

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 2>he never did anything until like two years ago. Then

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 2>he got like like T nine or something last year

0:52:40.000 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and he's like, man, like, what can I do to

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 2>prepare for this even better?

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:43.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna come over.

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 2>And play the Scottish Open, Like I feel like this

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is the tournament other than maybe Augusta, that he really

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 2>wants to win for whatever reason.

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to war for Kosher. I put some

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 3>money on him this week. What about Phil fits a

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 3>lot of the things we're talking about here.

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Tell you who I think fills in his own head

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 2>the older the.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Older guys that I kind of think could be the

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 1>ones that come through Rose and Scott, because.

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I always forget about those two guys.

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>They're flying under the radar.

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:17.960
<v Speaker 3>They always are. They're so good.

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I haven't heard much about Scott. I saw

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>somewhere he's got more top tens and and opens than

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody in the last like eight years or something like that.

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about Scott just from a purely driving

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the ball keeping employment. He's playing really really well right

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.399
<v Speaker 2>now too. But just I don't know, it just comes

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 2>back to the putter. You just I have a tough time.

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:43.359
<v Speaker 2>I know there's gonna be win. I have a tough

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 2>time picking guys that don't putt well. But maybe that's

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 2>just my biases creeping in.

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So, so Adam Scott overrated, underrated. It's a good

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:59.879
<v Speaker 3>segue career wise. Woh, my computer battery is getting down there.

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'd say Scott.

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Man, you might be all right.

0:54:11.360 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I think underrated because he was so good for so

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like the consistency has me say underrated.

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:20.919
<v Speaker 3>That's a good point.

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I value consistency.

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree with that.

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 2>But he might be a globalist Switzerland Bahamas doesn't really

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:31.880
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really have a home country anymore.

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:32.839
<v Speaker 3>Citizens of the world.

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he plays the world schedule, global elite.

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.840
<v Speaker 1>We got we got a ton of stuff on Twitter.

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Here, pluck your computer, DJ, let's start bucking our heads.

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Overrated, underrated from car for the course, playing the Irish

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and or Scottish Open to prep for the Open.

0:54:56.160 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 3>And that's such a good question, DJ, go for it. Well,

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to think, Uh, I'm trying to.

0:55:05.120 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Think about just the like the guys who've done it

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 4>recently and the guys who have won. I'm gonna say

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 4>it's slightly overrated. I think it's a little overrated. I think, like,

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just kind of like a fun thing.

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I think guys like I think, I think people go

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 3>through these trends and honestly, I think it's more like

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 3>right driven.

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Than it is like player driven. I think, like who

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 4>chooses to like highlight these things? But like, yeah, and

0:55:33.840 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 4>I think that like a couple of years ago, if

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:38.959
<v Speaker 4>you remember, like it was all about oh he loves

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 4>playing the week before major Ricky loves playing three weeks before.

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Like guys that have played the week before at the

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 2>Scottish opin guys that have skipped the week before and

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 2>guys that have played.

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 3>The John Deere. I think it's yeah, the last nine. Yeah,

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say it's a little I'm gonna say

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 3>it's overrated. I love it. I'm all in.

0:55:56.680 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 4>I love watching those guys. I didn't really watch it

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 4>this year, but I'd love watching the guys go over

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 4>and play. And I love having two weeks where you

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of get a early and watch golf your coffee

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:05.399
<v Speaker 4>in the morning.

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 2>But shout out to NBC too. Yeah, they in Golf Channel.

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 2>They killed it the last couple of weeks.

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:13.240
<v Speaker 3>But I'll say I'll stay a little overrated.

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I will say I think it's probably overrated as far

0:56:17.960 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 2>as prep goes, maybe playing both. But at the same time,

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I think it's underrated. I think more

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 2>guys should do it just for the game and for

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 2>just kind of I feel like the guys that appreciate

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:34.239
<v Speaker 2>playing golf do it.

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like a fun time to go do it.

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:41.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like a bad spot on the schedule.

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Also, I mean, don't don't talk about the John Dear

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 3>like that. Bro. No.

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's it's something where I feel like the

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.320
<v Speaker 2>euro Tours on the right track with this Rolex series.

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I think they should.

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 2>If I can go off on a little segue here,

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the the governing bo or the tour should

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:05.520
<v Speaker 2>do something to where like personally, I think it's bs

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 2>that there's not more.

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Guys playing in Australia every year.

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:11.359
<v Speaker 2>I know it's tough to get to but there's guys

0:57:11.440 --> 0:57:15.320
<v Speaker 2>going over and playing in the HSBC and the Dunlop

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Phoenix and they're gonna have that PGA Tour event.

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 3>In Korea this year.

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Where if you're going all the way over to Australia

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to play or to you know, all the way over

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to Hong Kong or to Shanghai to play for a

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 2>week or two, that's what a five or six hour flight,

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe an eight hour flight from Australia, but you can

0:57:34.280 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of skip up to Singapore.

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 3>And then from there.

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Like I think the schedule should be more segmented to

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 2>allow for these guys to visit different parts of the

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 2>world and do it for three weeks at a time

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and make it worth it. And the fact that there's

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 2>only two events in Australia now versus three kind of

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 2>makes me mad. And I think it's the same thing

0:57:55.360 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 2>like the Irish Open almost died what six five six

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 2>years ago, like there was you know, the economy was

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 2>was fluttering and all that. But I think the euro

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Tours on the right track with this Rolex thing. I

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 2>just think they need to tighten it up a little bit.

0:58:11.440 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I get that Turkey event out of there.

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the European Tour needs to become like the

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>World Tour.

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:58:18.760 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's it's definitely a misnomer.

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it needs to and it needs to get Asia

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and Australia and on it.

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, like there should be a WGC in Australia

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 2>every year.

0:58:32.120 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I completely agree with that. It's probably one

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the best golfing countries in the world. And yeah,

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's tons of great golf courses and.

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 2>In its primetime golf, Like if you if you have

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a tournament there, you can put golf on from like

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 2>nine to one am in the States and on a

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and shit, have it on a Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 2>or something like that and it's like midweek prime time.

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 2>You market at the right way. That's crazy ratings.

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:07.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, We're getting back to the questions who gets

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>more to ur wins in their career, Wes Bryan or

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Bryson d Schambeau from Mike Yost.

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I mean I'm going to stay consistent here and say, Bryson,

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I think if you just look at like, I mean,

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 4>I know this isn't indicative of everything, but just look

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.919
<v Speaker 4>at you know, I know you're like this too, any

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.959
<v Speaker 4>but you always look at like how guys have played

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:32.040
<v Speaker 4>at every level, and usually that's the best indicator of

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of like just how they've always played against their peers.

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think, you know, Wes obviously is massively overachieving

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 4>now in relation to what he did in college and

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 4>what he did his mamet and that kind of stuff.

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Where probably just all around games. Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I think Bryson is head and shoulders above Wes.

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. The thing I think is Wes is

0:59:57.040 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 1>going to play at about ten courses a year really well,

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>like Harbortown, John by Sony yeah, Greenbriar, you're but Bryson.

1:00:07.880 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You probably wouldn't have picked Bryson to win it. John

1:00:10.200 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Deere as like his place to win.

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:12.680
<v Speaker 3>He can win.

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>He can win at any course. So just because of that,

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Bryson gonna get more winds.

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I think Bryson's also going to go through

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>more peaks and valleys too, Like I think he'll go

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>through longer spells of you know, kind of really bad

1:00:33.720 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>results as well, whereas Wes Bryan has kind of the

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>His strength is the putting and that'll carry him through

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too.

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Overrated Underrated from Oakley Harrington's baseball swing during.

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Got Underrated Man under It. Yeah, I'm all in. I mean,

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I love just I'm in on all that stuff.

1:00:57.000 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm in on when he was doing like he used

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 4>to do, like a happy Gilmour is like a legit

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 4>part of his you know, warm up. He was out

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 4>there with like the straight jacket looking thing he's out

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 4>there with, like with everything, I'm in on all of it.

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I am too.

1:01:11.320 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I think the one I think Padreg is probably the

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 2>most conflicting character for me, just in terms of I

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 2>really didn't I don't know if I didn't appreciate him

1:01:23.720 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>when he was winning all his majors or just didn't.

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know what to think.

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>And then I've always been like since he came out

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>of the wilderness, Sergio and all the all the anecdotes

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I hear about Sergio and podrig where like Sergio just

1:01:41.280 --> 1:01:44.919
<v Speaker 2>basically shitting over Padre and like almost making him cry.

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I was like it just that stuff made me sad

1:01:47.880 --> 1:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to where I'm like, man, it questions my allegiance to

1:01:49.960 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Sergio because how could you be mean to Padrig Harrington

1:01:53.800 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>seems a future Ryder Cup captain, future, you know, so

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, shit, how about Padre maybe making a run

1:02:02.160 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>for for Ryder Cup.

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, we're a long we're not talking about we

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>should be talking about huh. Yeah. I heard rumors that

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you might be placing a fact fa in the President's Cup.

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Those are just rumors for now.

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you were a young budding professional, would you

1:02:29.680 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>start out on the web or the euro Tour? This

1:02:32.240 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is from Eric Nelson.

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it all depends on resources, right, It's not

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>it's not cheap the planet on the euro Tour probably

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>cheaper now than it was three or four years ago

1:02:45.880 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>with the with the exchange rate. But but yeah, I

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:53.400
<v Speaker 2>mean that's you know, if you're Peter you Line. I'm

1:02:53.440 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a huge Peter you Lin fan. But you can fly

1:02:56.200 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>around on the jet to all these nice places that

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 2>then hell yeah, but you grind Brooks did it.

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what Brooks's background necessarily was, is like financially,

1:03:07.840 --> 1:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm sure you know, you get.

1:03:09.800 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Sponsored money, and he was, well, I think it all

1:03:14.800 --> 1:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>just depends on your background.

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>This is your you're you're a future star, yeah say

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you're uh, but.

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Future you know, but past success doesn't always I mean

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 3>you you line is a good example of that, actually,

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:30.800
<v Speaker 3>where like you know, who has come out of college

1:03:30.840 --> 1:03:34.520
<v Speaker 3>recently with more promise or more heat than you Line did,

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>And I mean it's taken him quite a while to

1:03:36.760 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of make good on a lot of that stuff.

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Actually, that's like, that's one of my favorite pods that

1:03:43.960 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Solid did. One of my favorite no laying up pods

1:03:45.800 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 4>was with Peter Elin and just talking about how like,

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:52.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, it almost seemed like he it seems like

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:55.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times, like the experience of playing the

1:03:55.800 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 4>European Tour, or.

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Playing the Challenge Tour, or doing any of these things.

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Like kind of gets wasted on these guys a lot

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 4>of the time, and you Line seemed like the total

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 4>opposite to where like he almost seemed like he cared

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 4>too much about like taking in the culture and kind

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:09.920
<v Speaker 4>of like I think.

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:13.919
<v Speaker 2>That's my one thing with Kopka to where I don't

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>think Kepka would have won the US Open if he

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>in all things being equal, if.

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>He came up through the web dot Com Tour and.

1:04:24.560 --> 1:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Played, say, the Utah Championship instead of playing the Scottish

1:04:29.280 --> 1:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Open last week, or playing uh, you know, like uh

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the Boise Albertson's Open instead of instead of playing the

1:04:37.520 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Madeira Islands Open, and learn how to play a firm

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and fast course.

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't think that.

1:04:44.240 --> 1:04:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Web Tour stuff necessarily prepares you

1:04:49.040 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>for being a world class diverse player, like playing over

1:04:55.920 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>there does you know where?

1:04:58.320 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Like to me, when when when Kepka won at I'm

1:05:01.360 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 3>not a I'm not a huge Kopka fan, but when Kepka.

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Won at Aaron Hills, the defining moment for me was

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:10.280
<v Speaker 2>when was that short part for.

1:05:10.360 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 3>You laid up? Yeah, when he laid up made Birdie

1:05:13.320 --> 1:05:13.840
<v Speaker 3>but like.

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Stuffed that wedge in there, that's nine iron or whatever

1:05:17.080 --> 1:05:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you hit in there and and did it. I don't know,

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 2>like didn't didn't try to overpower it, but knew knew

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>what his capabilities were, knew what the percentage plays were

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and still executed it. Like to me, most of the

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 2>guys playing on the web Tour would have just bombed

1:05:33.040 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>a driver down there and then tried to try to

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>get up and down from seventy yards. So and that's

1:05:41.240 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 2>not and that's not a slide on the Web tour.

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Like I know, the Web Tour, they'd like to play

1:05:46.600 --> 1:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>better courses.

1:05:47.400 --> 1:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>It's just a matter of it's just tough, you know.

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>There's just not a whole lot of places that want

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to host and give away their their course for two

1:05:55.640 --> 1:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>weeks in the middle of prime season.

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I'd rather play the European Tour, but

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's also a lot harder to make feasible financially a.

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Family or you know, if you have any sort of connection,

1:06:12.080 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>if you have a serious long term girlfriend and she's

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:19.439
<v Speaker 2>not you know, caddying forty or what like, that's that's

1:06:19.600 --> 1:06:22.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just it's it's kind of I think it's just

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>totally different realities, you know. And if you have the

1:06:25.400 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>wherewithal to do that, then then then go do it.

1:06:29.200 --> 1:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>No brainer in my opinion.

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So CAV wants to know what's worst. Sketchers or blade collars.

1:06:42.360 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Man, Uh, it's been a while since I've owned a

1:06:47.360 --> 1:06:50.120
<v Speaker 4>pair of Sketchers, I think a while.

1:06:50.440 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how about Skechers going after grand.

1:06:55.080 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 3>H I think I could make I think I I

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>think I could make the blade color work for me

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>better than the Sketchers.

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say, what about Sketchers going after a grand delay?

1:07:11.640 --> 1:07:14.200
<v Speaker 3>That was aggressive, brazen, brazing.

1:07:16.280 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I uh so, here's my thing with Sketchers, And we're

1:07:22.080 --> 1:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>putting Brooke Henderson aside here because she doesn't count because

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I feel like she's like in Sketchers Captivity, They're like

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:34.720
<v Speaker 2>they're holding her against her will. Nobody's ever won a

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>major wearing Sketchers, So if they want to play.

1:07:41.840 --> 1:07:44.040
<v Speaker 3>The whole, nobody, you know, could Rusk.

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Grandas never worn a or he's never won a tour event.

1:07:49.320 --> 1:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, cool, cool, nobody's ever won a major in Sketchers,

1:07:56.560 --> 1:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>which which brings me to my next guy, Andy Overrated, underrated.

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>This was a question, Yeah, but everything changes, it's constantly shifting.

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>As I as I said about Adam Scott, I value consistency. Yeah,

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going underrated.

1:08:18.600 --> 1:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>You're such a Midwesterner.

1:08:22.960 --> 1:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Uh, I'll say, very very very very very slightly underrated.

1:08:30.560 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I think I think he's pretty accurately rated. He's not

1:08:33.360 --> 1:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>even from the Midwest. What the hell are you guys

1:08:34.800 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>talking about?

1:08:35.560 --> 1:08:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Just just in general, like you're just overlate, you're just

1:08:39.960 --> 1:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>so American and you're underly critical.

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:08:42.960 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Here, here's a good question, Ben McNamara, which Spaniard has

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the best chance to to open?

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question. I'm gonna say rom just based

1:08:53.560 --> 1:09:00.720
<v Speaker 3>on current form. Man, I don't know. That's a good question.

1:09:00.800 --> 1:09:04.519
<v Speaker 3>That might be even money. Is Pablo in the field?

1:09:04.600 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Cut? I was gonna go with.

1:09:09.240 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Or Gonzale for non news Castano. I think I think

1:09:11.800 --> 1:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>he's probably playing in the fous all this week.

1:09:14.439 --> 1:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Pablo is in the field. I also I'm a sleeper. Yeah,

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I almost put him as a sleeper. He hasn't been

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>playing well lately though. He missed the cut this week,

1:09:22.800 --> 1:09:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think that was the week before.

1:09:25.320 --> 1:09:27.519
<v Speaker 2>That seems to be the ticket though, if you've missed

1:09:27.560 --> 1:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the cut recently, probably gonna win the next week, all right,

1:09:34.960 --> 1:09:40.960
<v Speaker 2>alex noran underrated overrated shout out sally.

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we talking about like where he's rated in the

1:09:47.880 --> 1:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world rankings?

1:09:50.439 --> 1:09:52.639
<v Speaker 3>No, just in general, just in people's minds.

1:09:53.240 --> 1:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, he just he gets so much hype lately.

1:09:57.200 --> 1:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's almost overrated. But I I am firmly

1:10:01.439 --> 1:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the belief of like he's won so much lately

1:10:04.520 --> 1:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's underrated.

1:10:09.200 --> 1:10:11.559
<v Speaker 2>All right, that was a bad question. Can we talk

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:16.880
<v Speaker 2>about the qualifying just just the field in general.

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:22.320
<v Speaker 3>For there's a lot of so I watch a lot

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>of golf, I follow a lot of golf a lot.

1:10:26.400 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of names in this field that I

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>have not heard of before. It is like there's some

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>swaths of this field that are pretty uh pretty Richard

1:10:37.000 --> 1:10:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Slash Adam Bland I would say.

1:10:39.439 --> 1:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about like Mike Lorenzo Vera.

1:10:43.160 --> 1:10:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, question.

1:10:44.360 --> 1:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know a lot about Mike's career. How did

1:10:46.520 --> 1:10:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Maverick mcneally get in? I like Maverick McNeely, But but

1:10:53.760 --> 1:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's a tie. There's a tie, dude not

1:10:56.280 --> 1:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>named curd aban rat or tongue traje I to eat.

1:10:59.800 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 3>It's there.

1:11:03.280 --> 1:11:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming Castro running because he made the FedEx Cup

1:11:06.640 --> 1:11:07.559
<v Speaker 2>like play finals.

1:11:08.200 --> 1:11:19.479
<v Speaker 3>Probably Yeah, yeah, Mike Lorenzo Vera, Well, I think that

1:11:19.680 --> 1:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the biggest point that comes down to you know, we

1:11:21.960 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 3>had was Texans earlier today about it about how you know.

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 4>Xander doesn't get in, Yeah, it doesn't get in for

1:11:31.520 --> 1:11:34.479
<v Speaker 4>a fifth place finish at the US Open, but ends

1:11:34.560 --> 1:11:36.559
<v Speaker 4>up getting in you know, for winning the Green Brier

1:11:36.680 --> 1:11:39.160
<v Speaker 4>based on like which is a worse field and and

1:11:39.240 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 4>all these things and not even that.

1:11:40.600 --> 1:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>But like the guy he would have come in, he

1:11:42.439 --> 1:11:44.080
<v Speaker 2>would have come in second or third at the Green

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 2>still would have gotten in.

1:11:45.200 --> 1:11:47.680
<v Speaker 3>The guy who finishes eighth at the Greenbrier whatever it

1:11:47.880 --> 1:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>shook out to be that week.

1:11:49.120 --> 1:11:51.400
<v Speaker 4>And and I know Streb was a beneficiary of this

1:11:51.560 --> 1:11:55.559
<v Speaker 4>as well, but uh, that's that's a little shaky.

1:11:57.240 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Hey. So McNeely got in because of the mccorn Meca metal,

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>which is given top ranked top ranked am. So that's

1:12:04.439 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty legit.

1:12:05.560 --> 1:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, I would get that.

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>He's he played pretty well at John Finally.

1:12:11.080 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, no, no, Like I'm fine with him getting in.

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I was just curious as to he didn't win the

1:12:17.360 --> 1:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>US Say, like, I'm just thinking consistently titles and all that, But.

1:12:23.280 --> 1:12:24.640
<v Speaker 3>How did g Wan Kim get in?

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't care to look up that.

1:12:28.760 --> 1:12:30.759
<v Speaker 2>All right, So here's something that that kind of pisses

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>me off. The US Open has that qualifier over in

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the British Isles to get into the US Open, Like

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>it's like a sectional qualifier over there. The British Open

1:12:43.960 --> 1:12:44.680
<v Speaker 2>has nothing like that.

1:12:44.800 --> 1:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>On this side of the pond, they don't. They don't

1:12:50.080 --> 1:12:52.080
<v Speaker 3>have one here. I don't think they have one here.

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Most positive, it's all done through the tour events, so yeah, yeah.

1:12:57.760 --> 1:13:00.439
<v Speaker 3>But there's a bunch more Yeah, but I guess and

1:13:00.479 --> 1:13:01.599
<v Speaker 3>they've got they've.

1:13:01.439 --> 1:13:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Got a lot more spots with the qualifying series. But still,

1:13:04.800 --> 1:13:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and I like the qualifying series. I think that's sweet.

1:13:06.880 --> 1:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the fact that a guy can get in.

1:13:08.680 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 3>But I just.

1:13:10.640 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 2>I do think there needs to be more emphasis placed

1:13:12.520 --> 1:13:14.200
<v Speaker 2>on the US Open. If you play well at the

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:15.760
<v Speaker 2>US Open, you get into Open.

1:13:16.080 --> 1:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that.

1:13:17.000 --> 1:13:18.519
<v Speaker 3>There's names in this field man.

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Top ten in the US Open to get you into

1:13:21.080 --> 1:13:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the British Open, like Trey mullen.

1:13:22.720 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Versus like top four, like top four at the you know,

1:13:27.000 --> 1:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>because I think this too is a very developmental experience,

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Like if somebody gets into this tournament, that's that's invaluable

1:13:38.040 --> 1:13:41.000
<v Speaker 2>for their career development as far as especially a guy

1:13:42.080 --> 1:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>like a Mullen Axer probably hasn't played a whole lot

1:13:44.240 --> 1:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>over in Europe, played well, we played college in the States.

1:13:49.080 --> 1:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's not he's not all that familiar with it,

1:13:52.000 --> 1:13:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Like this will challenge his game and help his game.

1:13:55.600 --> 1:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>This is an interesting tidbit that a a major champion

1:14:00.520 --> 1:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>told me that the US Open. He said that the Open, clever,

1:14:07.920 --> 1:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the Open Championship is the easiest major to win of

1:14:12.600 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>all the majors because of the draw and yeah, I

1:14:16.920 --> 1:14:20.639
<v Speaker 1>think that the chance for the weather eliminating half the field.

1:14:21.520 --> 1:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, So the Open is the easiest major to

1:14:25.720 --> 1:14:26.679
<v Speaker 1>win of any major.

1:14:26.760 --> 1:14:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think if you look at like I

1:14:29.960 --> 1:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>was thinking about this earlier, I mean, the Masters has

1:14:31.840 --> 1:14:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the worst field obviously of all the majors. Well, it's

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:37.280
<v Speaker 3>not the worst field, it's the least it's small.

1:14:38.120 --> 1:14:41.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but this is kind of like like this strength

1:14:41.640 --> 1:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>of field here is like almost feels the same, except

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:45.360
<v Speaker 4>it's just kind of like one and a half times

1:14:45.439 --> 1:14:49.080
<v Speaker 4>bigger and so like, I don't know.

1:14:49.240 --> 1:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And then the PGA Championship overcompensates for having the theory,

1:14:57.840 --> 1:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>but they have the top hundred five, one hundred and

1:15:02.160 --> 1:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>ten players in the world there, you know.

1:15:04.720 --> 1:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I don't know.

1:15:05.840 --> 1:15:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's still I mean, it's still harder to

1:15:09.800 --> 1:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>win than any other Like, I don't know. To me,

1:15:15.520 --> 1:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more impressive to win the British Open

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:20.080
<v Speaker 2>than it is to win a players championship, even though

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:23.519
<v Speaker 2>the players might have I don't know, statistically twice as

1:15:23.600 --> 1:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>good of a field, just because it's just such a

1:15:26.960 --> 1:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>distinctly different I do.

1:15:28.640 --> 1:15:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that the point of form of golf. I

1:15:30.720 --> 1:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>think the point about the draw is a good one.

1:15:32.520 --> 1:15:35.840
<v Speaker 4>That like it is impressive that, like, I mean, the

1:15:35.920 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 4>year Darren Clark won was like, I mean, it was

1:15:39.120 --> 1:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>like a you know, statistical anomaly basically that year.

1:15:42.960 --> 1:15:44.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was just like there were so many

1:15:44.600 --> 1:15:47.439
<v Speaker 3>dudes that just had literally like no chance. That was

1:15:47.479 --> 1:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>a black swamp that was shout out there. That's that

1:15:51.840 --> 1:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>dude's name, Larry David No not to leave or whatever,

1:16:02.600 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the black swan dude the book deep. Yeah, I don't

1:16:08.840 --> 1:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>know whatever. We're going, all right, That's that's it. We

1:16:13.120 --> 1:16:13.640
<v Speaker 3>got more of it.

1:16:13.880 --> 1:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>You got like what, I don't know, one or two more.

1:16:16.240 --> 1:16:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Just we'll go quick ones, all right, let's get losing,

1:16:19.560 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. A couple of people ask me. People are

1:16:23.080 --> 1:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>asking many are asking about Poulter's resurgence and the possibility

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of a Patrick Reid Poulter final match and a Rider

1:16:30.479 --> 1:16:31.599
<v Speaker 1>pup who wins.

1:16:33.600 --> 1:16:37.200
<v Speaker 3>M hm, where is it this next?

1:16:37.240 --> 1:16:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Rider?

1:16:38.200 --> 1:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>France yeah, I think Patrick Reid might have a seizure

1:16:43.280 --> 1:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>in France. So read and ram Or paired together this week.

1:16:48.400 --> 1:16:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, which could be there? Could be?

1:16:53.000 --> 1:16:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Right. There was another question about how many structible Captain

1:16:57.640 --> 1:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>America Pat Reid missed the top ten by.

1:17:02.880 --> 1:17:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think like the guy. He's incapable of hitting

1:17:06.120 --> 1:17:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a left to right Paul. And there's certain holes that

1:17:08.720 --> 1:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>burked out where you have to hit have to hit

1:17:11.000 --> 1:17:11.599
<v Speaker 2>it left to right.

1:17:11.760 --> 1:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>So I wish there was betting that you could short

1:17:15.760 --> 1:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>people like you could you know, short stacks like I

1:17:19.479 --> 1:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>wish you could bet on the world golf rankings.

1:17:22.280 --> 1:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like you just need to pull more resources

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:30.679
<v Speaker 2>bet everybody else. Besides, as you're shorting.

1:17:32.080 --> 1:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point.

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:37.679
<v Speaker 2>This sounds like a like like a business opportunity. That's

1:17:37.720 --> 1:17:39.760
<v Speaker 2>what I'm hearing it does.

1:17:41.960 --> 1:17:43.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what else have we got here?

1:17:43.920 --> 1:17:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I did think so.

1:17:45.120 --> 1:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Byron probably said this three times this weekend. He's

1:17:48.880 --> 1:17:54.360
<v Speaker 2>like man Ian Poulter is playing better because he feels

1:17:54.439 --> 1:17:59.120
<v Speaker 2>like the deck is stacked against him again, like he's

1:17:59.160 --> 1:18:02.479
<v Speaker 2>got something he's got to chip on his shoulder again.

1:18:02.600 --> 1:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>He's not comfortable anymore.

1:18:03.960 --> 1:18:06.880
<v Speaker 2>He's playing for something that you know, that's I feel

1:18:06.920 --> 1:18:09.880
<v Speaker 2>like Patrick Reid's kind of that same way. Yeah, we're like,

1:18:10.240 --> 1:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like, I feel like we need to just revoke

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Reid's tour card. And she's like, hey man, you

1:18:14.720 --> 1:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>got to earn yourbody back on like he'd probably just

1:18:16.640 --> 1:18:17.400
<v Speaker 2>start killing it.

1:18:18.160 --> 1:18:19.400
<v Speaker 3>You've be your badging gun.

1:18:20.760 --> 1:18:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Too much good press. He should never have gone on Farida.

1:18:24.960 --> 1:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So uh, here's here's a good press. Yeah, that's that's

1:18:30.800 --> 1:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a good point. I had an interesting one here. I

1:18:35.360 --> 1:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>lost it though. Oh here, I just love this this

1:18:38.840 --> 1:18:44.559
<v Speaker 1>comment from Tucker. Tucker blanket, ship, blank and ship, yeah,

1:18:44.640 --> 1:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>blank and ship when Nick rib this is another cut Friday.

1:18:49.720 --> 1:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the percentage chance of Johnny bringing back the tight

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>shirt theory on this one year anniversary?

1:18:57.240 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Probably sixty and then and then and then adding a

1:19:01.479 --> 1:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>little blade collared.

1:19:02.520 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Dig in that well, it depends what the weathers did.

1:19:04.120 --> 1:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>It could be a tight sweater.

1:19:06.640 --> 1:19:12.400
<v Speaker 2>I did see Rory, so Rory's scripting called for a sweater. No, sorry,

1:19:12.439 --> 1:19:13.559
<v Speaker 2>that was JT's scripting.

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:15.879
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say last thing. Let's talk about JT's

1:19:17.160 --> 1:19:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm reserving judgment until I see it. Yeah, I think

1:19:19.960 --> 1:19:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that's responsible. It's responsible. Take it's just I don't know

1:19:24.080 --> 1:19:27.439
<v Speaker 3>like that. That that was strictly meant for golf divers

1:19:27.520 --> 1:19:29.759
<v Speaker 3>to be like, oh my god, you're not gonna believe

1:19:29.920 --> 1:19:35.519
<v Speaker 3>what JT Squaring. Yeah, I'm with you. Let's let's pull

1:19:36.160 --> 1:19:36.680
<v Speaker 3>does a good job.

1:19:36.720 --> 1:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Man. People are forgetting Ryan Moore. H yeah, Ryan Moore

1:19:42.240 --> 1:19:43.559
<v Speaker 1>was this guy five years ago?

1:19:44.160 --> 1:19:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Shut up, shout out j Riggedon love. I love Ryan Moore.

1:19:47.400 --> 1:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's ahead of a curve.

1:19:49.560 --> 1:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, Ryan Moore oprated? Underrating, underrated, way underrated.

1:19:54.960 --> 1:19:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Right underrated. He hasn't played very well this year though.

1:20:00.640 --> 1:20:05.600
<v Speaker 3>He's been hurt. Andy, do you have the the Illinois

1:20:05.720 --> 1:20:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Amateur coming on tomorrow?

1:20:08.360 --> 1:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow tomorrow?

1:20:09.600 --> 1:20:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as you're listening to that. Why are you not?

1:20:13.120 --> 1:20:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Why are you not in bed right now? Man?

1:20:14.840 --> 1:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I got I got I'm in a late I got

1:20:17.840 --> 1:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a late tea time. I'm at like one for in the.

1:20:20.880 --> 1:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>TV window featured pair you know, who's your feature pairing?

1:20:25.800 --> 1:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Who are you with? I'm with I'm playing with this

1:20:27.880 --> 1:20:30.479
<v Speaker 1>kid that plays at Miami of Ohio supposed to be

1:20:30.520 --> 1:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a good player.

1:20:33.240 --> 1:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow, get a shout out, big Randy, solidly.

1:20:37.600 --> 1:20:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Almost one last year before Nick Hardy. Uh blew everybody

1:20:41.840 --> 1:20:43.519
<v Speaker 1>up to see in the final two.

1:20:43.439 --> 1:20:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Rounds you playing with Ben Curtis now unfortunately he can't stay.

1:20:48.240 --> 1:20:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I can't stay.

1:20:49.040 --> 1:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Sorry.

1:20:49.840 --> 1:20:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh all right, last take Nick Hardy? Overrated, underrated? Career wise?

1:20:57.680 --> 1:20:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Are you going with Nick Hardy.

1:20:59.200 --> 1:21:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Or do you j J put them on the spot.

1:21:07.439 --> 1:21:09.479
<v Speaker 3>There was a line of nations listening to podcast.

1:21:10.080 --> 1:21:14.360
<v Speaker 2>He's starting to just sment right now. Yea, I.

1:21:18.200 --> 1:21:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Myers had a better amateur career, but I like Hardy

1:21:23.920 --> 1:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>because he's got a gas gas pedal. He he shot

1:21:29.479 --> 1:21:33.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight under in our stadium last year over four rounds,

1:21:33.520 --> 1:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>which is just insanity anywhere. It wasn't a hardcourt.

1:21:39.120 --> 1:21:39.759
<v Speaker 3>What did you shoot?

1:21:40.320 --> 1:21:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I shot? I shot plus four for my two rounds.

1:21:44.240 --> 1:21:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:21:45.920 --> 1:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I was gonna keep it within forty shots

1:21:48.080 --> 1:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if I made the catch, finish the raise.

1:21:55.800 --> 1:21:56.519
<v Speaker 3>But you played that.

1:21:58.240 --> 1:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>No, it was that Saint Charles, the easy, easy track.

1:22:02.120 --> 1:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>But I say, oh, he's gonna diminish, it's gonna pump

1:22:06.320 --> 1:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>him up the n I's gonna tear him down.

1:22:08.120 --> 1:22:09.839
<v Speaker 1>It was slow, it was soft.

1:22:10.240 --> 1:22:10.439
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:22:11.240 --> 1:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It was set up for how many do you win by?

1:22:13.680 --> 1:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>He won by ten. He beat TK he beat t

1:22:16.120 --> 1:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>K Kelly by ten who.

1:22:17.320 --> 1:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Just want to narcos sewer event shout out t K

1:22:21.320 --> 1:22:25.040
<v Speaker 2>up at thunder Bay, Ontario last weekend, playing the playing

1:22:25.040 --> 1:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the Mackenzie Tour.

1:22:26.720 --> 1:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>He missed. Uh t K. T K is a two

1:22:29.080 --> 1:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>times state champ, too state am champ.

1:22:32.560 --> 1:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Many people are saying that TK is coming on the

1:22:34.600 --> 1:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Trap Drap podcast this week.

1:22:36.880 --> 1:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I surprised you guys haven't lost the password to

1:22:39.840 --> 1:22:43.160
<v Speaker 3>get it there. But your password has expired to try

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:47.080
<v Speaker 3>to upload a new podcast. Hate news teacher, So I'm

1:22:47.120 --> 1:22:47.679
<v Speaker 3>going hardy.

1:22:49.960 --> 1:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>He's he's also he's made a cut of us open.

1:22:54.920 --> 1:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, one more?

1:22:55.880 --> 1:23:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, sorry sorry, one more Maverick McNeely or Patrick Rogers

1:23:02.640 --> 1:23:05.559
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of their careers from from here on out.

1:23:06.479 --> 1:23:16.639
<v Speaker 3>From this moment, man, I'm gonna take Patrick Rodgers.

1:23:18.760 --> 1:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I take Tiger.

1:23:23.000 --> 1:23:24.519
<v Speaker 3>Only? Only if I can take no time?

1:23:24.640 --> 1:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>As I was just gonna say, I'll take Big Mav.

1:23:31.479 --> 1:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about Big Mav getting bored after about thirty

1:23:34.479 --> 1:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>or four years.

1:23:36.280 --> 1:23:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm worried about Big Mav getting ejected after about nine

1:23:39.280 --> 1:23:41.920
<v Speaker 2>months and then being like, oh, this wasn't the plan anyway.

1:23:41.960 --> 1:23:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go. I'm gonna go be a businessman, which

1:23:44.840 --> 1:23:45.559
<v Speaker 3>is fine, but.

1:23:45.920 --> 1:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about big MAV coming on in the mid

1:23:48.000 --> 1:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>am circuit and just vaporizing everybody.

1:23:52.160 --> 1:23:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, that'd be great.

1:23:55.000 --> 1:23:57.920
<v Speaker 2>We already got shout shout out slender Man Stu Stu

1:23:58.040 --> 1:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>haggs STU.

1:23:59.479 --> 1:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Sorry do that? You know we don't need another one.

1:24:02.479 --> 1:24:07.000
<v Speaker 3>He's like, he's like the new and improved version of STU. Yeah,

1:24:07.920 --> 1:24:09.680
<v Speaker 3>so have the travel size Stu.

1:24:12.040 --> 1:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that it?

1:24:12.880 --> 1:24:14.559
<v Speaker 3>We done? That's it, that's it, that's it.

1:24:14.960 --> 1:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>All right? So trying you got speed DJ? You have DJ.

1:24:20.000 --> 1:24:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Hmm, I'm gonna take speed too.

1:24:22.040 --> 1:24:24.320
<v Speaker 2>No, all right, I'm going off speed.

1:24:24.439 --> 1:24:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I got Ricky, Okay, I got take speed.

1:24:29.360 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I got Sergio.

1:24:31.120 --> 1:24:33.720
<v Speaker 3>We don't have to take different guys. That's okay, nah,

1:24:34.080 --> 1:24:36.799
<v Speaker 3>I was was the plane along?

1:24:39.680 --> 1:24:44.519
<v Speaker 1>All right? Well we'll catch up sometime. Enjoy the early

1:24:44.640 --> 1:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>morning golf. You guys gonna what's your telecast schedule? When

1:24:49.000 --> 1:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are you getting up?

1:24:51.120 --> 1:24:54.519
<v Speaker 3>I'll pretty it up about three. I think it's usually

1:24:54.600 --> 1:24:57.559
<v Speaker 3>my You guys don't do that. I don't know. I mean,

1:24:58.720 --> 1:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Mike A Sonati's what's Naught's opens at six or five? Yeah, Christinnati's.

1:25:03.320 --> 1:25:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Get some key lime donuts, make some coffee.

1:25:07.080 --> 1:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I actually i'll probably I'll catch beat bits and

1:25:11.200 --> 1:25:13.400
<v Speaker 2>pieces on Thursday, trying to get everything done and then

1:25:13.520 --> 1:25:16.559
<v Speaker 2>just absolutely binge my face off on Friday.

1:25:18.080 --> 1:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I was in LA last year for it.

1:25:20.880 --> 1:25:23.760
<v Speaker 3>It's tough, awful. You got to tell it one way

1:25:23.800 --> 1:25:24.120
<v Speaker 3>or the other.

1:25:24.400 --> 1:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you either have to stay awake. All I started

1:25:27.439 --> 1:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I did, ended up like half assing and missing like

1:25:30.160 --> 1:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>four hours right in the middle. I'm waking up and

1:25:33.120 --> 1:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>watching the Rats. Yeah all right, enjoy all right, man,

1:25:38.520 --> 1:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>see dude, yeah yeah,