WEBVTT - Episode 11: How David Bowie Became a Financial Product

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel her intro music is ill suited for this episode.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Can we play something else that's better? Okay, Welcome to

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>odd Lots. It's Tuesday, January nineteen. I'm Tracy Allowit, executive

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg Markets, and I'm Joe Wisenthal, Managing editor

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Markets. So the world lost a musical great

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>last week. I am talking, of course, about David Bowie,

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who died of cancer at the age of sixty nine.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>This makes us all very very sad. But instead of

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>being sad on this episode, we are going to use

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it to celebrate Bowie's creative genius. Sorry, just going to

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>play Bowie music for the next half an hour as

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>much as you might like that. No, We're actually going

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about his financial genius. And what I mean

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>by that is, of course, we are going to talk

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>about Bowie bonds. Yeah, Bowie bonds. So I've heard them

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but what are they exactly? So they are

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a type of bond, to be specific, a securitization that

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>bundles up future cash flows from the royalties from music rights.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And David Bowie was the first to do them, so

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a pioneer in ways beyond just music and style. Oh,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>most definitely so. Joining us today from Los Angeles to

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>tell the story of Bowie Bonds is David Pullman. He's

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the banker who helped create these in the late ninety nineties,

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, Bowie Bonds are sometimes known as Pullman Bonds.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm somehow not surprised that the media for first to

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>call him Bowie. Um. I'm really excited about that. I

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>think it should be a great conversation. Want to quick note,

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not just going to talk about Bowie Bonds. Later

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in the episode, We're going to be talking about the

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>aptly named Beige Book, seen as one of the most

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>boring economic releases in the world, but it actually has

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating bad history. And just like we'll be talking

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to the father of Bowie Bonds, will also be talking

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to the father of the Beige Book. Right, Bowie Bonds

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Beige Book. Let's start. Let's do it. Yeah,

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>David Pullman, welcome to the show. Let's maybe start at

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. Can you tell us how you met Bowie

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and how these bonds kind of came about? Sure, Initially,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Bowie had a very large catalog of songs that he

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>had fought to his manager of the time to revert.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Revert means he was going to sell them or no.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>What happened was David as a teenager and the manager

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>realized importance of his work. So you negotiated very hard

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with the record companies to make sure they got recaptured

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and a reversion of the record masters that he created

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on his original songs that he started in the sixties,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>and then continue that going forward, which is extremely rare

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for artists on their record masters. And negotiates hard that

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the for these and he confidence in himself in times

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>because most artists that they'll fail, they give up their

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>rights to the record masters, which is not at all

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a typical Probably ninety nine point nine nine percent of

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>all artists don't have the record masters. And you know

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this publishing and its writers share and they said, well,

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably in the back of their minds, like

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this kid is a teenager, you know, who'd

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>be nothing in five years or whatever it would be

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward, So big deal to get back his record masters.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, obviously it was a David Bowie and

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>his manager at the time, we're betting that that would

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>not happen, that he had confidence himself that he would

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>these be successful, and he took less up front to

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>deal to to get that, which was a big statement

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about as a teenager, to show how savvy and sophisticated

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he was. I mean not many teenagers give another word

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>recapture or version. So in the nine nineties, he still

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>has these master rights to his music right and he's

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to decide what to do with them. Correct, So

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>wet we passed forward to that and he's deciding was

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>doing him and at the time everyone's coming back to him,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was also an opportunity for David Ticket not

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>only back his record masters, but he also had a

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>publishing administration neal for his publishing, his writers, Shore, every

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>all the rights were coming back to him that he

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>would have a hundred percent control over. Okay, So how

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>did you meet him and come up with this idea?

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>What happened was at that point when he had all

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>these rights coming back, and there's also some there was

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>some tax advantages and estate planning advantages, David and his

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>business manager were looking to sell his catalog and that

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>came up because I was doing transactions with his business

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>manager and other errors investment banking and as it turned out,

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned to me in passing, so I thought, okay,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>well it's not something we're looking at doing a sales catalogs.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's nice you're working on. Then he realized that

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>David wasn't gonna sell because these were his babies. So

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>this turned out to be a smart move. So instead

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of selling the entire catalog, what he did was base

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and what you did was basically a securitization of the

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>future cash flows from the rights to that catalog. Correct.

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>What happened was, I will ask some questions how much

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>has it earned this as a David's business manager, And

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>at the time he told me what was earned, and

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he earned as much what it was earning as much

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as a large corporation. So the next the question was

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>did he have three years of financials? They said they

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>had five? I said where they already said yes. I said,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are they by Big six at the time whould be

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>big four accounting firms at the time. He said yes,

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to which I said, I could securitize that, to which

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>his business manager said, what securitization? And I wanted to

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>just correct that only because so they got it right

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the quotes, but in terms of uh. David, then he

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>got the information in terms of this deal, and he

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>decided within a split second and said, why haven't we

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>started yet? So he basically, even though this concept of

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>securitization maybe unusual, as soon as it was explained to

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>him that he could sell the cash flows of the

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>songs rather than the songs himself, he instantly understood the

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>appeal of it. Yeah, And what's amazing is he got

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the concept faster than other investment bankers and ast ors,

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>other people in the financial markets. He grasped new ideas

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and concepts and was willing to take a chance and

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was wasn't afraid to fail. And that's why he was

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so successful in terms of trying these things. So we

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>went ahead with it. We did a deal in rockets seed.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Now what's interesting when when when when David's hearing this

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for the first time and making a decision to go

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>forward within less than a second, not a second, less

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>than a second. There's no is not a written word

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the world prior to that meeting

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on anyone even thinking about doing this, much less than

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it. What was it like actually going out and

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>selling these bonds? Because they're brand new things. Lots of

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>people haven't heard about them before. How did you do

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the sales pitch and who did you end up selling

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>them to? Okay, Well, first of all, during those it's

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like a couple of months. Usually new deals even today

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they take a year of the market. They were investment grade,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they were disingul a level rated by multiple rating agencies

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and the national recognized rating agencies as well, and they

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>were twenty year legal finals, fifteen year expective maturity, and

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a price off the US ten year treasury the average

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>life of the bonds. And what we did, they were

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>done as a true private fasting, so that the charms

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of the deals are confidential proprietories that others couldn't see

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>what the deal was other than the actual the rating

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>agencies and the investors in the bonds. So they went

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to Life Insurance Company because they typically buy

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>long term investing gray bonds and that was a perfect

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>fit for them. They never missed a payment, they never triggered,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they never they paid off in full. And what was

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that the first they actually just ran the

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>actual cover, which is interesting to me. In the article

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>about David Bowie, the cover story that broke, uh when

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>David had done this deal with me and they got out,

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>which was at the end of nine six in a

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>close in the beginning of so at the very end

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year. So the story breaks and they quote

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>these large investors that are in music, some bonds and

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>other asset classes may say, are you kidding me? Are

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you crazy? And that was that the written reactions when

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this the first article it comes out. Now what happens

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>when that article runs. It was on the cover that

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>morning at the Wall Street Journal, and we had already

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>placed and had the right of the bonds. No one

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>knew that, and they were already placed. There's already sold.

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>The phone is ringing off the hawk to buy the

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>bonds from the biggest investors in the world at the

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>institutions that buy asset attacks and one uncarrelated asset. The

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>new assets is uncarlas the stock market risk diversified. So

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it was the reaction was at that moment I knew

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that we had really hit something in terms of the

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>reaction was so positive on the market. They weren't going

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to find out about it. They were going to buy them.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>How big was the offering It was fifty million dollars

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and it is right at the single A level. I

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>want to go back real quickly to the first when

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you first brought the Bowie bonds to the ratings agencies,

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because here you were, you had created this new type

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of product. What kind of questions did they ask since

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously they had never rated one of these excellent questions. Well,

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting there with one of the major range and

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I always k who it was exactly, and we're sitting

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>there and uh, you know, it's it's sad now in

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of everyone's morning, the death of David Bowie. And

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>now this is almost twenty years ago where this first

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>meeting in right approximately almost almost exactly yet period a

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>few months short of it, so an I llegal final

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>maturity of the deal. So they say, a question comes up,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>says what happens if David dies? So as he asked

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the question, and the person of the range was very

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>stu we worked with on that and other deals. He

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he thought about it and answer his own question as

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if he asked so if he was there where business

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>now is just a meeting with us success right now,

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>there's on the deal. You no, we're we're signed. Well,

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's actually it's a good thing. My

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>response was, because there's no new product right now, we

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>won't And then they got you got an understanding that

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the catalog would soar as it is now in terms

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of value and the interest. And then I followed with,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but we won't tell David that because David's very young man.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that in terms that they thought about that,

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of they understood that the royalties would continue

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and actually increase if something would have happened, they were not.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The question was really that a lot of people do

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ask at the time and even after, we're gonna understand

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the concept that it's not tied to the artists. These

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>songs have a life of their own, and separately that

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it states and airs and successors and a science continue

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to get the royalties, whether the author of the songs,

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the artists as songwriter, or any other intellectual proper or

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>creative assid entry masses is living or not. I question

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the structure of the Bowie bond, they

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>paid a regular coupon, would they did the price that

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they got or that the payment the investors got, did

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they fluctuate and go up like you know, say, in

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the event that David had died during the period of

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the bond and people started buying more and more of

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>his c d s, would the end investor have received

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a higher coupon those months? Good question, and you know

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I do a number interviews on this and I wanted

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 1>your respected David. I respond to everyone because I want

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you know his legacy has preserved

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and in the transaction. What was I was uncomfortable with

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things that your listeners and view is

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really good. Is the deal always maintain its invest in

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>grade rating? The deal deal paid off early as well,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so the bonds holders and bonds of time the seven

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>point and I present interest, which was a higher interest

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rate than US chargeries, which is normal. There was the

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>spread over yours treasures at the time was in the

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>mid hundred basis point range over US treasuries, so the

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>deal was obviously the interest rates were much higher and

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>then that part of time than nineties. So we're looking

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at spread in the mid hundreds over the U. S

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and the tenure treasurers used to price it. So

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>your question is as more cash flow came in two

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>from the royalties, the bonds were paying down faster, which

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was better for the investors. But separately, now you have

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>more collateral and assets, it's worth more over time because

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>cycle our deals were self liquidating, so the balance is

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>getting lower and lower. The cash reserve were having deals

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is getting higher and higher as a proportion of the

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>outstanding blans and the casuals increasing from the royalties as

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they are now. As an example, assertated is that the

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>royalties will be soaring, so the bonds holders now have

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>more collateral and having securities that actually should have a

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>higher rating. We were capped by the rating of the

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.599
<v Speaker 1>payers or is in a deal, including companies like E

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>M I at the time publishing Catalogust and sold UH

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to a joint tenship with Sony. But the example is

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're limited just like in the transaction with a country.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>As sovereign debt dealing, you're limited by the major payer

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>in your deal out there rating. So that's why we're

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>limited to the investment grading rating that we had. But

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>they every single deal, including the first deal for David

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowie Boye bond, every we maintain their investing grade ratings,

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>never missed a payment and paid off in full. All right, David.

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>One last question before we let you go, Uh, what

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was it like working with David Bowie? And do you

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have maybe a fun anecdote from the times when you

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>were putting these things together? And I just want to

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>also combine with that question, what did David Bowie think

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that this musician, he was an artist

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>avant garde? Was he was he surprised that he became

0:13:55.440 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>also famous for in part becoming a financial market innovator.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm you know, actually it makes and it

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that if you look at the news overall.

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a huge component of how David

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is remembered. I mean it's it's in terms of around

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the world, in terms of the press. What it was

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting about it which really stuck out for me, It

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was he was the perfect person to have for the

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>first deal ever. It's kind not only just because he

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was known as an innovator, but how he handled himself.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He was the word is your genius has used in charms.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no questions of genius in terms of his music

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>abilities and artists He's someone's gonna remember this. If you

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>walk into museums, you see works that are priceless. That's

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>what David Bowie is created. But the difference is David

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>bowiees prices, works have casual royalties that come from them,

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's unique. So what is special about him was

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he never ever question me in terms of whether deal

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen or not, how long was taking.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>He was the most supportive person to work with and

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't afraid to fail, which was the key to

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the success. So I'm doing this deal for the very

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>first time no one's ever done in the world before,

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's not worried. I'm thinking, though, is this going

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to happen? Right? And we're doing it

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's not nervous at all. On top of that,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the deal happens, there's a cavalcator press, over five thousand

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>articles in the press, radio, TV magazines and David which

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was you know, I didn't realize that going into this deal.

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>My favorite song by him not knowing at the time

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>there was his number one first number one was same.

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So David understood that and he gave that to me. Right.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>He understood he wouldn't do any interviews, which created a

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger mystique and legend for David on this deal. So

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I just on this deal, David samus. Most artists would

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>want all the attention for themselves, right, David, It gives

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>me in terms of any report of the calls and

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>one wants to talk about the deal. Any artists, other

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>famous artists at the time that are friends of his

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>asked him talk to David Pullman, every single one. He

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't talk to anyone about it. And then my third

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>part was to go to the conferences on the asset

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>doc stories like the biggest investors in the world on

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>where they be, the raiding agencies, the institution, investors, UH

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>attorneys at work on the transactions, trustees, whoever was there

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>at these conferences, and the thing that was statistical that

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you could actually securitize with the questions, the very first question.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Every single conference is spoke at with the keynote, various ones,

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and there are dozens of them over the over where

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it was did you meet David? Every single conference is

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the same question. All right, David Pullman, thank you so

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us to thank you, thank you. All right.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we're going to turned to something that most people

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>probably think is far less interesting than David Bowie but

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you should stay with us because there's a

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>story here that's really fascinating. We're going to talk about

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the Beige Book, what it is, how it came into being,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and where it's going. So the Beige Book is this

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that the FED releases every month where it's basically

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>anecdotal color about the state of the economy from all

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the FED districts. So they produced this big document that

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>has things like wage pressure is rising in Kansas, and

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Broadway theaters in New York are weakening due to the

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that the dollar is strong and keeping tourists away,

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and shipping is doing really well in the Port of

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Miami and stuff like this, And it's sort of a

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>very non numerical way of looking at the economy. I

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>generally find it quite interesting, but I guess a lot

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of people think of it as very very boring. It is.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people say, well, it's perfectly named the Beisian

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's funny. The reason I got interested this is

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>back in December, I was thinking that a really good

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>novelty sort of holiday gift or Christmas gift for a

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>banker would be an old physical copy of the Beija Book.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Because now of course, everyone just looks at it electronically.

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about the history of the Beige Book,

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and I discovered something fascinating on the Wikipedia page, which

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the Beige Book didn't always used to be

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>released to the public, and it wasn't until the mid

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>eighties when a Wall Street Journal reporter named Paul Cox

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>asked the Federal Reserve to make the Beige Book public.

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Imagine a life without the Beige Book. And what's even

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>cooler is that Paul Cox now works for Bloomberg and

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>sits about two rows away from us in the newsroom.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>And so I and I was like, oh my god,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we worked two rows away from a celebrity, the father

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Beijia Book, the men without whom this report

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>would never have seen the light of day. And now

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to get the story. Look, there aren't too

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>many people walking among us they can say if it

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>weren't for me, this economic data point would be relieved.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's something to be proud of, all right. So we

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have Paul Cox here with us today. We also have

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economics reporter Matt Bosler, who's going to be talking

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how people use the Beige Book.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Today some twenty five years later. All right, let's get started.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>That's so we're here with Bloomberg News as Paul Cox, Hello,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing? And we're also here at Bloomberg

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Economic reporter Matthew Bosler. I thank you both so much

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.239
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. So, Paul, you are the father of

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the Beige book. Explain to us how you got into

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this position. What were you doing at the time. It's

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>always fun to go back and relive your wins, and this,

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>this was this was a good win. UM I was

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a reporter for Dow Jones News Service and based in Washington,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was part of their economic policy team. UM. There in Washington,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I was based at the Treasury Department, and you cover

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the economic indicators. You cover Treasury by on issue once

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing, but also Federal reserve and

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy. At some point one of my editors decided

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we should write previews for Federal Open Market Committee meetings

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>or curtain raisers as they call them in the business.

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So already this is kind of weird because we think

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of a preview for an f o MC decision as

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just standard. Everyone always writes a preview. But that wasn't

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>always the case that this was something that got hyped up. Well,

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they were previews like you did. But just like now

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that I'm an editor in Bloomberg and I lean on

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>my reporters to break news. Um, my editors then leaned

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on me to break news, and I was under pressure

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to get more than that, get scoops, if you will,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's how this came about. So and gathering for

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>one of those curtain raisers, I was talking to a

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>FED official on background, of course, and we were sort

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of bantering back and forth, and he was doing his

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>best to not tell me anything, and I sort of

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>jokingly said, well, well, can can you give me the

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Blue Book, which is the internal staff monetary policy recommendations

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>and he said no. I said, okay, how about the

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Green Book? And the Green Book is the Internal Economic

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Forecast and he said no. I said how about the

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Beige Book? And he goes, there's a pause, and he said,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>let me think about that, and we continued our conversation

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and hung up. A couple of days later, he called

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>me back and he said, we've decided to give you

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the Beige Book. Now you know, the Beige Book is

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the summary of economic conditions and the twelve Federal Reserve banks.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not everything, but it's something. That day, a courier

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>showed up at the Treasury Department and dropped off envelope

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>with my name on it, and I opened it up

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and there it was the Beige Book. So what had

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they actually been using that book for before it was

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of public? Well, I believe for as long as

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve has been in business and FMC meetings

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that they always they have twelve regional banks that are

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>full of smart economists who interface with the local banks,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the business communities and have this wealth of knowledge. And

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand that in the past they would give their

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>information to their president, he would come to the f

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>MC meeting and they would in essence read it out.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>M Arthur Burns, I believe from history, decided that that

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a waste of time, and so he asked,

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>could you summarize that and put it in a document

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and sent it in and we'll we'll compile this into

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a book and distribute it before the meeting so everybody

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can digest it. It was a speed process and thus

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>was born the Beige Book. But it was it was

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those private documents until that day. And I

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>just want to make something clear. This is literally a

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>book with a beige cover. So when you talked about

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Book and the Green Book, these were books

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>documents that were handed out internally, and they had the

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they were of different colors. Well, I never got my

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>hands on the blue Book of the Green book. I'm

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>only told that that's what color they are. But the

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Beige Book was in fact beige. It was about twenty

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>pages long and mostly pros, not a lot of numbers,

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>but it was good information and I wrote a pretty

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>good story off it. And you know, of course, my

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>competitors were furious. Um. I took great fun as a

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>good reporter for the Associated Press named Marty Krutzinger. Hey Marty,

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>um that when I would scoop him, he would come over,

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because we at twenty ft apart, he would come over

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and kick my chair. A few times. I got a

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>chair kick out of that one. So so, what did

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>your first story actually say about the Paige Book. Well,

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe at the time that um, that was when

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Paul Volker had run interest rates up to

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>very high and they were in the process of ringing

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation out of the economy. But hoping not to do

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, too much, too much damage to it. And

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe at the time it showed sort of slightly

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>better economic conditions, which led them to believe that they

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>can continue on this path of of you know, keeping

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates high and trying to get inflation back to

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>where it was supposed to be. So now every month

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>when the Beige Book comes out, it's something people know

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Beige Book comes out. News organizations like Bloomberg

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>get ready to read the headlines very quickly. At what

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>point did this go from something that a few reporters

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>got to oh, today's Beige Book day, let's pay attention.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Well that was a surprise to me because I was

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on that beat. I went on to some other things.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I eventually left Washington and did other things. And it

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was just at that time of the policy was if

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you wanted and ask for it, they would give it

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to you. But it was it wasn't an economic indicator,

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as you will. It was sometime many years later I

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>either saw the listing of this week's economic indicators in

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal or heard somebody on radio or

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>TV saying, and this week is coming out, And I

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, Huh, when did that become an economic indicator?

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But it did, So I want to bring in a

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>med Bosler into the conversation. Met you covered the economy,

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you cover the FED. One of the things that you

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>always look at is the Beije Book. So as an

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>economic indicator, what do you look at? How do you

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>digest it? Well, it's interesting because it's not hard economic data, right,

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and it gets sort of it's lots of an it's

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a it's a book of anecdotes, right, So it's interesting.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It sort of colors all of the numbers that you

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>work with every day and look at, you know, and

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of gives you a regional perspective on what's

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>happening in the economy, you know, not just um, you know,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>total agg get consumption or whatever. But here's what's happening

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Boston district, or here's what's happening in the

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia district or whatever. Um. And now it seems like

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing that people do with it is they

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>try to do like linguistic or textual analyzes, you know,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of if you remember a few years ago, when

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we had those really bad winters, we would count the

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>number of times the word weather appeared in the Beige Book,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was like the big thing that everybody wanted

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to see. There wasn't much more to it than that,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and um, I was just putting together, Um, just before

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this recording, I was looking at the number of times

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>that the word dollar has showed up in the Beige

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Book recently. And so if you go back to summer,

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>often there were literally no mentions of the word dollar

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Beige Book, and now as of the latest

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Beige Book, there were twenty one mentions of the word dollar.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's really you know, all over the thing now

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about different regional you know, manufacturing getting hurt by

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this strong dollar recently. So so now we even have

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>indexes or indices based on the Beige Book, right, trying

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to translate the Beige Book into actual numbers. Yeah, exactly.

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's like the same sort of textual analysis, but

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a little more sophisticated. There's one um that Stone

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and McCarthy Research Associates puts together, And basically the way

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they do it is they look for words like expanding, contracting, growing, slowing,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and they sort of have different scores for each of

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>those words, and then they average them, you know, they

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>add them all up and average them together, and they

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of come up with this Beige Book Activity index

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>they call it that. If you look at it kind

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of does look like a lot of other economic data series,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty interesting that you know, you would get

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that out of it. Pull What is it amusing to

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you that this document that you just got on physical

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>paper that was couriered to you is now this thing

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that people are diving into a deep textual analysis. It does,

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's I guess I put it in the category

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of the economy matters, and the economy matters and the

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>FED matter and it was just that, you know, you

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you work hard at something and you think you're making

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Um, sometimes you get a lot of feedback,

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you don't. But it's yes. Bottom line is that

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>it was one of one of those successes. And I

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would like to think that if you if you press

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>hard on this craft and get information about the economy,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>it all works. Paul, you brought us a photograph, right

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>was this showing uh that shows the Treasury press room

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>from that era, and it's a picture of Donald Reagan

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>who was the Treasury secretary under Ronald Reagan, wh what

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>occasionally stopped by and talked to us. It was it

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>was a different era in terms of um uh security

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and access to people and things like that. But I

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 1>decided I brought that along. I found out my basement

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>cleaning out some boxes. So Paul's in the back of

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>this photo rocking some very very eighties hair with a

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>mustache and sunglasses. They're they're just tinted glasses. But I've

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I've long since gone to contact lenses. So what's the

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the Beige Book showing these days? Well, modest to

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>moderate growth, subdued wage growth. Um. You know, that's one

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's kind of funny, is the only

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>place you really see wage growth these days is in

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the Beige Book because it hasn't really come through and

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like the hard, hard data yet. But even in this

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>latest Beige Book that we got last week, didn't really

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>show much in the way of a lot of wage pressure.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting because you know, sometimes that's like

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you get those anecdotes like, um, you know this district,

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>this particular sector in this district, you know, there was

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some signs of increasing wage pressures, but just not enough

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to like move the needle in terms of like the

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>whole economy. Well, you're kind of you you're on a

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in a different role. You're an editor, you're on a

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>more markets focused beat. Do you still check out the

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Beige Book each month? Absolutely is that. I'm on the

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>team that covers treasuries and foreign exchange and what the

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Fed does is a is a huge factor on that

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and just you know, we looked at it as it's

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of this combination thing where employment is pretty good,

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we're almost at full employment depending on your definition. But

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as Matt was pointing out rightly that you know, the

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>wage pressure hasn't come. There's no inflation, and that was

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the other things that the Fed wanted to

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>see in justifying continued wage increases. So as we walk

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>up to this January f MC meeting, it gives you

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a piece of information to try to discern what's the

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Fed going to do along with all the other market

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>participants were keeping close touch with. Plus you're the father

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Beige Book. You have to you know, check

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in on your baby, right, no doubt. Do you get

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>real quickly do you get do you think every time

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes out? Do you think about that or have you.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You've gotten used to it. I've gotten used to it

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, depending on what role is obviously

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in this role at Bloomberg, I'm a little closer to

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it than I was. I've done some other things. I

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>um was, you know, sort of more of an Internet

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>generalist and some other things. I work for, some things

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>called newspapers. You guys have heard of newspapers, right, Okay? Yeah,

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>some thing that even I had were the responsible for

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>an economic data point. Even decades later, I would be

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>pointing that out to people. But I didn't know about

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that until I saw I went and looked at the

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia entry for beige book and I saw your name.

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise I never would have known. I'll speak to my

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>marketing department about that, all right, Paul Cox of Bloomberg News,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Bosler, thank you guys so much for joining. Thank you,

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Okay, Well, that was Bowie, Bonds and beige Books.

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So I guess our theme for this episode was really

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>alliteration the letter B. Yeah. I love both of those conversations,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and I love you know. I still it is absolutely

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>amazing from just from the Bowie perspective that he was

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this huge innovator and it's not just in terms of

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>music or sort of musical securitizations, but all kinds of

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property securitizations, which became a key corp of finance.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>He was an important player in well so as a

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>finance journalist. I will say Bowie gave birth to uh

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>particular subset of bonds called esoteric A b s, which

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>bundled together all sorts of things like restaurant franchises and

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the rights to comic strips like Peanuts, And they are

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>genuinely God's gift to structured finance journalists so people, because

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>people must love any headline with them of course, of course.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And then on the Beige Book, I thought it was

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting just to think back to a period of

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>time when those you know, all those anecdotes weren't public

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and no one was really clamoring for them. It was

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a totally different market and just the idea of getting

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an economic release in physical paper having to then scan

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>through it. Now, people, I think, when they think of

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>any kind of economic data or a FED statement, they

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just think of it as basically coming from coming out

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of magic, out of their computer screens. But at one

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>point people actually had to go go get it and

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>look at it and then type something up. And it

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't nearly so automated. Of course, now they're all these

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>quantitative approaches, which is funny, but in the not that

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>long ago, really it was a much more physical thing

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to get this data. That's right, Okay, Well, another episode

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of Odd Lots has passed us by. I am Tracy Alloway,

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Executive editor of Bloomberg Markets. I'm on Twitter at Tracy Alloway,

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe wi isn't Thal, Managing editor of Bloomberg Markets.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stallard. Thank

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you for listening and see you next week. Joe and

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I are very proud of our new podcast, Odd Lots,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but we are also very proud of Bloomberg's other growing

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>suite of original podcast all designed to help you navigate

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the complexities of business, financial markets, and the global economy.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So in addition to our own podcast, please don't miss

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Benchmark with Dan Moss, Tory Stillwell and Aki Edo and

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>informative jargon free look at the inner workings of the

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>global economy. Then there's Deal of the Week with our

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>m and a reporter Alex Sherman, which is a breakdown

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the against M and A deals, and gives you

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>an inside peak at corporate boardrooms. All three shows are

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>available on iTunes, SoundCloud, pocket cast for Android, Bloomberg dot com,

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:11.959
<v Speaker 1>and of course, the Bloomberg Terminal,