1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:13,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg 2 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:17,920 Speaker 1: Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern 3 00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:22,000 Speaker 1: on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. 4 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:25,680 Speaker 1: Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch 5 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:26,920 Speaker 1: us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,440 Speaker 2: We welcome all of you across the nation with our 7 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:33,400 Speaker 2: questionnaire conversation of the day. Here he is with Gary Gensler. 8 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:37,599 Speaker 2: He's a former chairman the Securities and Exchange Commission, Professor 9 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 2: of Practice of Global Economics and Management at MIT. Did 10 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 2: you ever study under Stanley Fisher? Did you have the privilege? 11 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:48,880 Speaker 3: H I got to know stan Fisher, terrific public servant. 12 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:52,479 Speaker 3: I got to know him when he served here at 13 00:00:52,479 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 3: the US here in international finance. I also got to 14 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 3: know him a little bit when he ran in the 15 00:00:57,080 --> 00:00:59,120 Speaker 3: Central Bank over in Israel. 16 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 2: Katie Greifeld called me up earlier this morning and she said, 17 00:01:03,240 --> 00:01:05,560 Speaker 2: and folks, gus the horse is okay in the heat. 18 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 2: It's serious. And Katie said that the horses are doing 19 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 2: fine this morning. And Katie said, can you do the 20 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 2: entire interview on crypto? And I said, over Mike, with 21 00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 2: all that's going on from the Ginstler to the Atkins 22 00:01:17,360 --> 00:01:21,319 Speaker 2: SEC We're going to get crypto out of the way now, folks. 23 00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:25,720 Speaker 2: And I'm sorry, Gary Ginsler, it is breaking news. I 24 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:29,120 Speaker 2: got Chris Giles in the ft this morning highlighted the 25 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:33,840 Speaker 2: Bank of International Settlements research. I adore Raphael Hour's work 26 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 2: at BIS. I got rogue off in chapter seventeen, eighteen 27 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 2: and nineteen going after stable coin. We need a Genstler update. 28 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:47,440 Speaker 2: What are we getting into with tether and stable coin? 29 00:01:47,560 --> 00:01:50,440 Speaker 3: So Tom, I couldn't agree with you more about your 30 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 3: earlier statement. There are so many bigger items going on 31 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:59,560 Speaker 3: in this economy. The tariffs, immigration, frankly, a whole attack 32 00:01:59,640 --> 00:02:02,000 Speaker 3: on some funding, a lot of things that are going 33 00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 3: to I think hurt long term economic growth. And that's 34 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:09,839 Speaker 3: why I joined Simon Johnson and other colleagues from the 35 00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:13,200 Speaker 3: Center of Economic Policy Research to do a book, a 36 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:17,079 Speaker 3: rapid response book about the economic consequences. But in that 37 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:21,920 Speaker 3: book you're asking about stable coins. It's interesting, the worldwide 38 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 3: dollar market's about forty five trillion, that's when you add 39 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,800 Speaker 3: everything up, forty five trillion dollars and stable coins are 40 00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:32,239 Speaker 3: about a quarter trillion. And so you know, the question 41 00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 3: is is Scott Bessant, Secretary of Treasury. Right he says 42 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 3: that's going to grow to two trillion. It starts to say, 43 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:41,640 Speaker 3: what's the use of one of these We already have 44 00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:45,440 Speaker 3: digital dollars. You and I we all Lisa earlier saying 45 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 3: I don't understand stable coins. We have stable coins, they're 46 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 3: called US dollars, deposits, money market funds, and so forth. 47 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 3: The only thing that these companies are offering is an 48 00:02:56,880 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 3: alternative way to move dollars out side of the banking system, 49 00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:05,960 Speaker 3: which means outside of sanctions, outside of any money laundering laws. 50 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:08,640 Speaker 3: And so that's the real risk. It could undermine the 51 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 3: US geopolitically. 52 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,160 Speaker 2: Paul's got any questions. Let me get this in right now, 53 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:15,360 Speaker 2: because I think it's so important. The bravest book in 54 00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:18,840 Speaker 2: my career here was Ken Rogoff, The Curse of Cash. 55 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 2: He got death threats off that book. It's nothing more 56 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:28,840 Speaker 2: than a use for criminal activity. It replaces illegal one 57 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 2: hundred dollars bills in briefcases. How simplistic is that statement 58 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 2: that I just made. 59 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 3: Well, you're talking about these stable coins. 60 00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 2: Tethers, stable coin, the whole thing. It's nothing more than 61 00:03:41,320 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 2: a walk around the sec and the rest of the 62 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:45,200 Speaker 2: financial world. 63 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:51,560 Speaker 3: It looks stable coins. Tether was invented early on about 64 00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:55,560 Speaker 3: ten and eleven years ago, to be the equivalent of 65 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 3: the poker chip at the casino. You could use it 66 00:03:58,320 --> 00:04:02,760 Speaker 3: to move crypto versus crypt dough because these large exchanges 67 00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 3: couldn't get bank accounts and so instead you could sidestep 68 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:10,160 Speaker 3: any money lawn during in sanctions. At a quarter of 69 00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:12,720 Speaker 3: a trillion dollars, it's starting to be somewhat meaningful. And 70 00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:17,040 Speaker 3: here's the cool question, the interesting economic question. Who gets 71 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:20,160 Speaker 3: the interest payments, Who gets the float the three and 72 00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:23,719 Speaker 3: a half or four percent on on you know, for 73 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:26,760 Speaker 3: every billion dollars, that's thirty five or forty million dollars 74 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 3: of interest, and who gets that interest. I'd rather have 75 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 3: a money market fund where I get the interest the investor. 76 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:37,920 Speaker 4: Gary The economic consequences of a second Trump administration of 77 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:42,080 Speaker 4: preliminary assessment. We're six months into the second administration of 78 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 4: President Trump. There's lots of unique economic policies coming out 79 00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:46,640 Speaker 4: of Washington. 80 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:47,680 Speaker 5: Let's start with tariffs. 81 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:50,400 Speaker 4: When I was in business school, terrorists were kind of 82 00:04:50,440 --> 00:04:52,760 Speaker 4: a targeted thing you'd do once in a while if 83 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 4: somebody was dumping steel or something else in there. 84 00:04:56,240 --> 00:04:57,040 Speaker 3: We've never really. 85 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:02,080 Speaker 4: Seen them as a whole policy across the globe, across 86 00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:04,599 Speaker 4: all of our trading partners. How do you think about 87 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:09,440 Speaker 4: the President of Trump's economic policies pocusing on strategy on tariffs. 88 00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:13,240 Speaker 3: I think and thank you for mentioning this book that 89 00:05:13,279 --> 00:05:16,120 Speaker 3: we did together, and it was a rapid response book. 90 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:19,359 Speaker 3: But overall, all our experts said tariffs are going to 91 00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:24,960 Speaker 3: put downward pressure on economic growth and upward pressure on inflation. 92 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:29,520 Speaker 3: And that's the history of these things. We have seen 93 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:33,760 Speaker 3: worldwide movements to tariffs, and it was right before the 94 00:05:33,880 --> 00:05:38,040 Speaker 3: nineteen thirties great depression, and Congress got in and weighed 95 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:42,360 Speaker 3: in and so forth. And I would remind listeners that 96 00:05:42,640 --> 00:05:45,640 Speaker 3: tariffs are only on goods, not on services. And about 97 00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 3: ninety percent of workers in the US are working outside 98 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 3: of the manufacturing field. And one of our authors, Michael Strain, 99 00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,159 Speaker 3: wrote an excellent chapter and Michael says it won't even 100 00:05:56,200 --> 00:06:00,720 Speaker 3: help manufacturing because manufacturers have to buy all all these goods, 101 00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:04,040 Speaker 3: these intermediate goods from overseas and the tariffs will be higher. 102 00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:07,719 Speaker 3: So I don't think the tariffs are going to help. 103 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 3: I think they're gonna hurt, and interestingly, they're going to 104 00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:15,680 Speaker 3: particularly hurt also in rural communities because rural communities have 105 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:19,359 Speaker 3: to sell their farm goods, their agricultural products overseas. So 106 00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 3: it doesn't even necessarily help the president in some of 107 00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 3: his political base in rural states. 108 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:27,960 Speaker 4: A lot of I'm just going to, you know, preempt 109 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:30,520 Speaker 4: a lot of email I'm going to get today in 110 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 4: my social saying we haven't seen any of it. Tariffs 111 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 4: are working. Just find inflation's not there or is it 112 00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:37,520 Speaker 4: just too. 113 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:39,720 Speaker 3: Early, so it's a bit early. But I'd say this 114 00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:43,719 Speaker 3: to any listeners, You've just had the largest tax increase 115 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:48,560 Speaker 3: that you've had in generations. Average tariffs in the US 116 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 3: were two point three percent. Globally, adding everything up two 117 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 3: point three percent, and that was even after the first 118 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 3: Trump administration raised tariffs. In China they are now over 119 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:05,000 Speaker 3: ten percent, so the overall teriff rates have gone up fourfold. 120 00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 3: That's a big tax increase. It takes time, but the 121 00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 3: International Monetary Fund lowered our growth estimates for this year 122 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:16,080 Speaker 3: a full point, so you know we're seeing that happen. 123 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:18,640 Speaker 2: Right. I've got to ask We got all sorts of 124 00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 2: topics to talk to with Gary Ginsler, former Securities in 125 00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:26,280 Speaker 2: Exchange Commission chairman, and MIT out with a wonderful what 126 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:27,760 Speaker 2: do you call it? Like a kindle book? 127 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:30,480 Speaker 3: Is there like a well it's it's a real book. 128 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:33,000 Speaker 3: We do have it physically, but it's online at the 129 00:07:33,040 --> 00:07:36,880 Speaker 3: Center for Economic Policy Research, which is a remarkable organization 130 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 3: in Europe, and you can get it for free right 131 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:40,600 Speaker 3: at the CEPR website. 132 00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:43,200 Speaker 2: Wonderful, So we'll get I'll get that out on LinkedIn 133 00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,160 Speaker 2: and Twitter as well. So I got to get this straight. 134 00:07:46,200 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 2: You're at Pikesville High School, you end up at Wharton, 135 00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 2: you do better than good in your academics. The world's 136 00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:56,200 Speaker 2: imploding in private credit, right, Paul, Sure, everybody needs evaluation. 137 00:07:56,760 --> 00:07:59,600 Speaker 2: You have to be the first call for the University 138 00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:02,800 Speaker 2: of pen Sylvania. Do you have any handle on the 139 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:06,480 Speaker 2: new valuation the mark to market of private credit? And 140 00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 2: dare I say private equity as well? 141 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:12,600 Speaker 3: Well, you're kind I mean, University Pennsylvania was terrific. I'm 142 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:14,560 Speaker 3: at MIT now, so I just have to give that 143 00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 3: shout out. But in terms of private credit, look, this 144 00:08:18,360 --> 00:08:22,080 Speaker 3: is a field about give or take two trillion dollars 145 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:26,200 Speaker 3: of lending and assets under management that has competed with 146 00:08:26,320 --> 00:08:29,480 Speaker 3: commercial banks, and we made sort of a conscious decision 147 00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:32,800 Speaker 3: to move some of these risks out of commercial banks 148 00:08:32,840 --> 00:08:36,239 Speaker 3: and into private credit. I think it's good. It's competition 149 00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 3: in the capital market here. Am I really took to. 150 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 2: The chase of sloan. You're at Sloan with a piece 151 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:43,840 Speaker 2: of chalk in your what's the haircut right now on 152 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:46,959 Speaker 2: private credit? Is it eighteen percent? Is it greater? 153 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:52,880 Speaker 3: Or if you're talking about valuations, it really depends on 154 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:57,560 Speaker 3: what the large companies, the Apollos and the Blackstones and 155 00:08:57,559 --> 00:09:00,840 Speaker 3: so forth, how have they valued it. If they're valuing 156 00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:04,079 Speaker 3: it properly, then it's not a haircut. But yes, they 157 00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:06,320 Speaker 3: usually charge higher interest rates. 158 00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 4: Garret, how do you think the US should from a 159 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:12,880 Speaker 4: trade perspective and economic policy perspective, deal with China? 160 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 5: Right now? 161 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:17,000 Speaker 4: It feels like the globalization trend that you and I 162 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:19,960 Speaker 4: and Tom grew up with that seems to have lost 163 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 4: a lot of stements out of favor. Now maybe that's 164 00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:26,560 Speaker 4: a short term trend. I don't know, But specifically with China, 165 00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:27,360 Speaker 4: how do you put the policies? 166 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:30,200 Speaker 3: My experience and we had to negotiate when I was 167 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:36,000 Speaker 3: at the SEC, A big consequential transactional situation. Can China 168 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:39,600 Speaker 3: keep their companies in the US stock market? And China 169 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:43,160 Speaker 3: was not playing ball and following the rules about inspections. 170 00:09:43,800 --> 00:09:46,599 Speaker 3: We were able to sort that through. And my experience 171 00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:52,040 Speaker 3: is as you treat them with respect and dignity and consistency, 172 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 3: and this oscillation, this big volatile changes of policy, I 173 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:02,520 Speaker 3: think is not doing the US well. I think, yes, 174 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:06,000 Speaker 3: the President is a risk taker. I respect that he 175 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:09,880 Speaker 3: is a fundamentally He's come into office very determined and 176 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 3: he wants to readjust with China. But I think China 177 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:18,160 Speaker 3: is very savvy. They're going to be able to compete 178 00:10:18,160 --> 00:10:21,240 Speaker 3: with this in artificial intelligence even if we clamp down 179 00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:24,880 Speaker 3: on export controls and they have those rare earth minerals 180 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:27,120 Speaker 3: that they're able to they have leverage points. Is what 181 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 3: I'm trying to say. 182 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:29,560 Speaker 2: I've got to go to a new topic here, but 183 00:10:29,640 --> 00:10:33,080 Speaker 2: Gary goinster. To get to that topic, I used AI. 184 00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:36,040 Speaker 2: I went to Gemini here and I tipped in the 185 00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:40,320 Speaker 2: difference between the Genstler and Atkins sec. First of all, 186 00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 2: Gary Gensler with all as you mentioned Paul Esteemed at 187 00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:47,520 Speaker 2: GOLDBN Sachs. Paul and I would editorialize you would be 188 00:10:47,559 --> 00:10:51,520 Speaker 2: on a shortlist to run any major firm in America. Fine, 189 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:55,199 Speaker 2: Gary Gensler on AI, what are our kids? What does 190 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 2: Lisa Mataio need to know? 191 00:10:57,640 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 3: Well, I would say this, it's one. It's around at 192 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 3: least ten years even longer. So it's not just new 193 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:07,680 Speaker 3: with open ai and chat Chept two. It's the most 194 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:13,080 Speaker 3: transformative technology of the time. And I find myself thinking 195 00:11:13,240 --> 00:11:15,480 Speaker 3: I'm more of the optimist. I think there'll be a 196 00:11:15,520 --> 00:11:19,200 Speaker 3: lot of new productivity that comes from this, but also 197 00:11:19,240 --> 00:11:22,720 Speaker 3: a lot of changes in the job market. Bloomberg will 198 00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:26,240 Speaker 3: be different, Bloomberg Radio maybe not so different all right 199 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:29,559 Speaker 3: at least, but I think it will be very different. 200 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:33,280 Speaker 3: And so I think the US versus China is an 201 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:37,559 Speaker 3: interesting thing. The big hyperscalers, the big you know, Chap, 202 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:43,000 Speaker 3: GPT and Gemini and so forth. Those companies are competing 203 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:46,320 Speaker 3: with China, and China's got natural. 204 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:47,679 Speaker 2: Deep deep seek whatever it is. 205 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, well they have deep seek, but they have something else. 206 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:52,280 Speaker 3: They have one point four billion people, so they have 207 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:56,800 Speaker 3: data advantages over We're big, but we're only three hundred 208 00:11:56,840 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 3: and forty million people. 209 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,199 Speaker 2: Let me go to what I was on with jem 210 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:02,840 Speaker 2: and I here and also the AI effort of Bloomberg, 211 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:07,960 Speaker 2: and that is the shift from the Genstler SEC over 212 00:12:08,080 --> 00:12:10,840 Speaker 2: what Paul Atkins has been charged by the President of 213 00:12:10,880 --> 00:12:14,120 Speaker 2: the United States. You're going to tell me collegially that 214 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:17,280 Speaker 2: the ven diagram of Gensler and Atkins is pretty tight. 215 00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 2: There's differences, but there's a collegial agreement. Beloney. People see 216 00:12:22,040 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 2: this Gary Gensler. Is a sharp shift that we're seeing 217 00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:26,959 Speaker 2: right now, is it? 218 00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:30,360 Speaker 3: Look, elections have consequences, and I have a deep respect 219 00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:35,000 Speaker 3: and you're right, I'm going to be respectful. Chair Atkins 220 00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:37,920 Speaker 3: has served at the SEC, not once but twice before. 221 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 3: He knows the agency well, and I think whether it's 222 00:12:40,960 --> 00:12:45,040 Speaker 3: Republican or Democrat, what this show is focused on is 223 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:48,360 Speaker 3: the markets, the capital markets, and the capital markets do 224 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:51,240 Speaker 3: best when there's rules of the road. And that's been 225 00:12:51,240 --> 00:12:54,360 Speaker 3: true for ninety years and that's what's really critical. Now 226 00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:57,800 Speaker 3: the SEC has shrunk about twenty percent, so it's not 227 00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 3: as able to veil the markets and make sure that 228 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:04,200 Speaker 3: it's free of fraud and manipulation. 229 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 2: Where are your shadows right now? If we go to 230 00:13:06,600 --> 00:13:09,280 Speaker 2: a more what's the word swashbuckling? Is that right now? 231 00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:11,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, swashbuckling works. 232 00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:16,720 Speaker 2: That works if we go to a more Trumpian sec 233 00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:20,720 Speaker 2: where are the Guenstler's shadows now? Within global Wall Street? 234 00:13:20,880 --> 00:13:24,760 Speaker 2: Where's the leverage the thing, the portfolio insurance of eighty seven, 235 00:13:25,080 --> 00:13:28,719 Speaker 2: the surprises of August nineteen ninety eight, where's the shadows 236 00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:29,880 Speaker 2: for you in the system? 237 00:13:30,120 --> 00:13:34,880 Speaker 3: Look, I think that overall it's much beyond the Securities 238 00:13:34,880 --> 00:13:38,800 Speaker 3: and Exchange Commission. It's in terms of the whole financial markets. 239 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:42,880 Speaker 3: You probably will have a tendency to greater leverage, meaning 240 00:13:42,920 --> 00:13:47,199 Speaker 3: more borrowing. But we are also in a heightened risk 241 00:13:47,320 --> 00:13:51,559 Speaker 3: environment geopolitical. As we lay out in this book, we 242 00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:55,040 Speaker 3: are pulling back the US from global alliances. So there 243 00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:58,720 Speaker 3: is definitely a bit more inflation risk, There's a lot 244 00:13:58,760 --> 00:14:03,239 Speaker 3: more leverage in this sytem. Investors are less well protected 245 00:14:03,280 --> 00:14:08,320 Speaker 3: with the Frankly, this sort of a large dismantling of 246 00:14:08,360 --> 00:14:12,880 Speaker 3: something called the consumer financial you know, the CFPB, and 247 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:18,200 Speaker 3: so so investors have to be a little bit more aware. 248 00:14:18,920 --> 00:14:23,000 Speaker 3: There's more risk in the system, big risk. And there's 249 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 3: also I would say the US dollar is under pressure. 250 00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:29,000 Speaker 3: It's down ten percent this year so far, and this 251 00:14:29,040 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 3: is in the environment where the stock market has been 252 00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:35,640 Speaker 3: quite resilient. You know, we're almost at near all time highs, 253 00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 3: and so that investors have to say, is there more 254 00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:40,520 Speaker 3: downside risk than upside potential. 255 00:14:40,880 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 4: Another big area of change within the second Trump administration 256 00:14:43,840 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 4: has been immigration. How is that impacting effectively shutting down 257 00:14:48,520 --> 00:14:52,080 Speaker 4: the southern border, how does that impact the US labor market? 258 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:57,239 Speaker 3: So it's interesting again in her book This Economic Consequences 259 00:14:57,240 --> 00:15:01,720 Speaker 3: of the Second Trump Administration A preliminary, we have a 260 00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:07,320 Speaker 3: really interesting chapter on this question. And overall, the forecast 261 00:15:07,440 --> 00:15:10,520 Speaker 3: is that it will cut growth by about zero point 262 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 3: seven to one and a half percent, and in terms 263 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:18,320 Speaker 3: of the labor market itself, interestingly, it's going to hurt 264 00:15:18,440 --> 00:15:21,280 Speaker 3: rural America a lot. Now, rar America will also be 265 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:24,960 Speaker 3: hurt by medicaid cuts because believe it, medicaid is more 266 00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:28,320 Speaker 3: used in raw America than an urban America. And also 267 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:32,840 Speaker 3: the tariffs, so there's like a triple threat to rural America, 268 00:15:32,920 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 3: which again politically, it's an interesting conundrum for this White 269 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:40,240 Speaker 3: House what to do. But on immigration, I would say 270 00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:46,400 Speaker 3: it's a downward pressure on the economy these policies in 271 00:15:46,440 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 3: addition to the downward pressure from tariffs. 272 00:15:49,360 --> 00:15:50,880 Speaker 2: Gary, I want to get this in I think it's 273 00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:53,560 Speaker 2: too important. And this goes to your colleague, the Nobel laureate, 274 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:54,960 Speaker 2: Simon Johnson. 275 00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:56,960 Speaker 3: And wonderful friend in college in. 276 00:15:56,920 --> 00:15:59,800 Speaker 2: The heart of the world blowing up for me personally. 277 00:16:00,240 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 2: And there was Andrew Ross Sorkin's wonderful book and any others. 278 00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:07,720 Speaker 2: Roggy Roger out at booth that's a Chicago, that's a school, 279 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:10,360 Speaker 2: Gary out in Chicago. You may not be familiar with that, 280 00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 2: but Simon Johnson's monograph Thirteen Bankers was the definitive book 281 00:16:17,240 --> 00:16:22,200 Speaker 2: to describe the moment where we lost control in five six, 282 00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 2: where the SEC opened the floodgates to certain transactions and leverage. 283 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:31,760 Speaker 2: Are we at a risk now where we could repeat 284 00:16:31,960 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 2: what Professor Johnson wrote about Chapter four of Thirteen Bankers. 285 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:40,040 Speaker 2: This is the piece of paper that opened the risk 286 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:43,040 Speaker 2: gate floodgates? Can we do that again? Look? 287 00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:47,520 Speaker 3: I think we're human Tom and humankind. We abb and 288 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:53,280 Speaker 3: flow on risk. The financial system written the warrge is 289 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:54,800 Speaker 3: in good shape. 290 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:55,520 Speaker 5: But will it. 291 00:16:55,720 --> 00:17:02,040 Speaker 3: Tend towards greater borrowing against risk assets? And that's when 292 00:17:02,080 --> 00:17:05,119 Speaker 3: you have challenges. And I think we have a US 293 00:17:05,160 --> 00:17:08,639 Speaker 3: dollar that people have some question about. You have inflation 294 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:12,240 Speaker 3: moving up. You have greater leverage, and you have a 295 00:17:12,280 --> 00:17:17,359 Speaker 3: tremendous amount of uncertainty policy and geopolitical uncertainty. And those 296 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:21,560 Speaker 3: are times you can see, you know, I'll call them 297 00:17:21,600 --> 00:17:25,760 Speaker 3: spills on all five and you know, financial spills on 298 00:17:25,840 --> 00:17:29,840 Speaker 3: all five hurt millions of Americans when you lose your 299 00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:32,240 Speaker 3: jobs or your you know, mortgage rates. 300 00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:34,840 Speaker 2: Go home. I got six more questions, how many do 301 00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:37,040 Speaker 2: you have? Yeah, Plank, Sure we are out of time. 302 00:17:37,080 --> 00:17:39,480 Speaker 2: Gary Goensler, thank you so much. As the former chairman 303 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:42,919 Speaker 2: of the Securities in Exchange Commission. Out with a new effort. 304 00:17:42,920 --> 00:17:45,600 Speaker 2: I'll get it out on LinkedIn and Twitter at cep 305 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:50,000 Speaker 2: R with Simon Johnson and his colleagues at mi T. 306 00:17:55,920 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live 307 00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:02,720 Speaker 1: weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on 308 00:18:02,800 --> 00:18:06,439 Speaker 1: Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or 309 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:08,240 Speaker 1: watch us live on YouTube. 310 00:18:08,560 --> 00:18:11,640 Speaker 2: Manica Descenzo with us right now with the market lifting. 311 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 2: The fancy titleist had a global investment Opportunities a JP 312 00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:19,960 Speaker 2: Morgan private bank. Far more importantly, she flies around the 313 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:26,000 Speaker 2: world talking to high net worth family offices and others 314 00:18:26,119 --> 00:18:30,760 Speaker 2: with large pots of money for the JP Morgan Bank 315 00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 2: and way more important, Monica. You were in the trenches 316 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:38,639 Speaker 2: of equity research long ago and you did something that 317 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:42,240 Speaker 2: probably needed on Wall Street a lot more. You were 318 00:18:42,400 --> 00:18:49,960 Speaker 2: a rock star and you took a year off. It's amazing, Lisa, 319 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:51,680 Speaker 2: and I've been working on this since three am. 320 00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:52,560 Speaker 3: Yeah. 321 00:18:52,600 --> 00:18:56,600 Speaker 2: What was it like walking out the door after the 322 00:18:56,680 --> 00:18:58,680 Speaker 2: addiction of seventy hours a week. 323 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:01,280 Speaker 6: Well, everyone thought it lost my mind, including my parents 324 00:19:01,320 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 6: who are very concerned that I'd be living in the basement, 325 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:07,440 Speaker 6: but I wanted to try something different. I enjoyed a 326 00:19:07,520 --> 00:19:10,040 Speaker 6: year traveling all around the world very and then at 327 00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 6: the end of the year, my former boss, Alexia Quodronni, 328 00:19:13,320 --> 00:19:15,600 Speaker 6: who I think Paul knows, called me back and said, 329 00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:17,199 Speaker 6: any interest in coming back to this? 330 00:19:17,240 --> 00:19:18,200 Speaker 3: And I did. 331 00:19:18,400 --> 00:19:21,280 Speaker 2: The stereotypist people sort of drift off in the Netherlands, 332 00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 2: and you came back ever stronger from that year off. 333 00:19:25,840 --> 00:19:28,560 Speaker 2: How did it make you stronger? Did you rise to 334 00:19:28,640 --> 00:19:31,200 Speaker 2: such an important level at JP Morgan. 335 00:19:31,359 --> 00:19:34,000 Speaker 6: I actually think the perspective you get by seeing other 336 00:19:34,040 --> 00:19:36,399 Speaker 6: parts of the world and meeting people. And I traveled 337 00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,160 Speaker 6: with myself for a year like just alone, which makes 338 00:19:39,200 --> 00:19:41,119 Speaker 6: you a little more independent. And I think in my 339 00:19:41,400 --> 00:19:43,320 Speaker 6: role now a little more interesting. You know, all the 340 00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:45,000 Speaker 6: stuff I saw on people I met. When I talk 341 00:19:45,080 --> 00:19:48,119 Speaker 6: to clients, they think it's odd and intriguing. And I 342 00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:50,200 Speaker 6: think when you choose to come back as an adult 343 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:52,800 Speaker 6: versus jumping into this career after college where it just 344 00:19:52,800 --> 00:19:55,119 Speaker 6: feels like the obvious path, that's a very different thing. 345 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:58,800 Speaker 2: President Trump femailed me from the actually texted from the 346 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:02,720 Speaker 2: Air Force one orosse The atlanticing says, ask Monica, if 347 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:06,800 Speaker 2: American exceptionalism still ragns is it still there for your 348 00:20:06,800 --> 00:20:08,320 Speaker 2: clients worldwide? 349 00:20:09,520 --> 00:20:13,879 Speaker 6: So worldwide is interesting question. Let's separate US clients versus international. 350 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 6: In the US client base the last decade, they have 351 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:20,359 Speaker 6: cared mostly about maintaining a very heavy overweight to US 352 00:20:20,359 --> 00:20:24,120 Speaker 6: equities in US investments. Overall the last six months, we've 353 00:20:24,160 --> 00:20:26,600 Speaker 6: seen them start to pivot, which I think is important 354 00:20:27,240 --> 00:20:30,880 Speaker 6: because if you had that sixty to forty portfolio, drift 355 00:20:30,920 --> 00:20:32,920 Speaker 6: brought you closer to seventy five twenty five over the 356 00:20:32,960 --> 00:20:35,080 Speaker 6: last just last few years, which means you have more 357 00:20:35,200 --> 00:20:37,240 Speaker 6: equity than you probably need. You probably have more US 358 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:39,439 Speaker 6: than you need, and so our US clients are finally 359 00:20:39,440 --> 00:20:42,360 Speaker 6: starting to look outside the US, looking at Europe, looking 360 00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:46,399 Speaker 6: at Japan, looking at local denominated assets to balance out 361 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:49,320 Speaker 6: their portfolio. My international clients have always done that, but 362 00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:51,359 Speaker 6: I will tell you coming out of COVID, my international 363 00:20:51,359 --> 00:20:53,560 Speaker 6: clients they felt like the US was the safest bet. 364 00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:55,919 Speaker 6: They thought we were in best position to rally after COVID. 365 00:20:56,240 --> 00:20:58,320 Speaker 6: I was in London a couple of weeks ago, and 366 00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:00,520 Speaker 6: that has changed a little bit and again giving up 367 00:21:00,520 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 6: on the US. Certainly, they appreciate our dominance and tech 368 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:06,919 Speaker 6: and AI and everything like that, but they're understanding that 369 00:21:06,920 --> 00:21:09,080 Speaker 6: they need to have more diversity in their portfolios. And 370 00:21:09,119 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 6: so I don't think US stepialism is dead. Is it 371 00:21:11,600 --> 00:21:13,840 Speaker 6: being chipped away at the on the fringe? 372 00:21:13,920 --> 00:21:14,120 Speaker 3: Yeah? 373 00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:14,720 Speaker 6: Absolutely. 374 00:21:15,160 --> 00:21:17,359 Speaker 4: So for your clients, let's say the family office is 375 00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:19,679 Speaker 4: a big part of your client base, how do they 376 00:21:19,680 --> 00:21:24,040 Speaker 4: think about alternative investments? I'm actually surprised that it's a 377 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:26,480 Speaker 4: big an allocation, as big an allocation as is. 378 00:21:26,560 --> 00:21:28,640 Speaker 5: How do you guys think about alternatives with your clients. 379 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:30,640 Speaker 6: So when you start to get to the family office, 380 00:21:30,680 --> 00:21:32,920 Speaker 6: levels's assume you're talking about a billion dollar plus balance 381 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,720 Speaker 6: sheet at that kind of level. You're talking about generational wealth, 382 00:21:36,119 --> 00:21:38,720 Speaker 6: and so they can have a higher allocation to alternatives 383 00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:40,560 Speaker 6: which are less liquid because they probably don't need to 384 00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:42,560 Speaker 6: tap into that money in the next five ten years. 385 00:21:42,920 --> 00:21:46,040 Speaker 6: And so there we can see alternative allocations north of 386 00:21:46,040 --> 00:21:49,359 Speaker 6: fifty percent, wow, which is amazing. For a traditional client, 387 00:21:49,440 --> 00:21:51,280 Speaker 6: you would be much lower, like half of that, if 388 00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:51,800 Speaker 6: not less. 389 00:21:52,240 --> 00:21:55,000 Speaker 5: So where are we or what's your role at JP Morgan? 390 00:21:55,040 --> 00:21:57,080 Speaker 4: How are you kind of working with your clients to 391 00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:00,959 Speaker 4: deal with the geopolitical risk with the domestic political changes 392 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,200 Speaker 4: that we have here in the US, with the change 393 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:07,080 Speaker 4: in maybe the US not being as safe a haven 394 00:22:07,119 --> 00:22:09,800 Speaker 4: as it was even six months ago. What's the kind 395 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:10,800 Speaker 4: of conversations you're having. 396 00:22:11,040 --> 00:22:13,960 Speaker 6: Yeah, with as far as it remains think about the US, 397 00:22:14,160 --> 00:22:17,639 Speaker 6: the US exceptionalism idea there. We've been advocating more global 398 00:22:17,640 --> 00:22:20,879 Speaker 6: diversification in portfolios. So again, look at Europe, look at Japan, 399 00:22:21,320 --> 00:22:25,680 Speaker 6: look at local denominated bombs, another EM and another markets. 400 00:22:25,680 --> 00:22:28,720 Speaker 6: Just have more exposure in your portfolio to things outside 401 00:22:28,760 --> 00:22:32,080 Speaker 6: the US. When you think about geopolitical risk, we really 402 00:22:32,119 --> 00:22:34,600 Speaker 6: don't do a whole lot in portfolios that we manage 403 00:22:34,600 --> 00:22:38,719 Speaker 6: around that because history tells us geopolitical flare ups are 404 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:41,800 Speaker 6: pretty bad indicator of pulling out the market. People want 405 00:22:41,840 --> 00:22:43,640 Speaker 6: to do that, that that's the inclination, But in fact, 406 00:22:43,680 --> 00:22:45,920 Speaker 6: if you did that, you actually underperformed. And we looked 407 00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 6: back over three, six and twelve months after geopolitical spikes. 408 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:51,240 Speaker 3: Only on a three month basis. 409 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:54,600 Speaker 6: Do equities lag so near term it causes volatility intermediate 410 00:22:54,640 --> 00:22:57,120 Speaker 6: to long term, it generally doesn't matter for a global 411 00:22:57,160 --> 00:22:58,160 Speaker 6: diversified portfolio. 412 00:22:58,200 --> 00:23:01,840 Speaker 2: We continue with Monica descends, Head of Global Investment Opportunities, 413 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:05,399 Speaker 2: JP Morgan, Private Bank, with headlines out from the testimony 414 00:23:05,440 --> 00:23:09,399 Speaker 2: of Chairman Powell that we will see later today. The 415 00:23:09,560 --> 00:23:13,320 Speaker 2: US economy, labor market remain in a solid position. There's 416 00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 2: many headlines. I'll pick a few. Effects of policy changes 417 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:20,600 Speaker 2: on economy remain uncertain. We've heard that uncertain word. Maybe 418 00:23:20,640 --> 00:23:24,560 Speaker 2: the key to headline here the chairman says, ultimate tariff 419 00:23:24,640 --> 00:23:29,240 Speaker 2: level will determine the impact of the path forward. Long 420 00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:33,040 Speaker 2: run inflation consistent one two percent target is your own 421 00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:36,480 Speaker 2: Powell from all your travels Monica as a central banker to. 422 00:23:36,520 --> 00:23:40,439 Speaker 6: The world, certainly all eyes are on him. And that 423 00:23:40,560 --> 00:23:42,320 Speaker 6: was some of the conversations I had in Europe a 424 00:23:42,359 --> 00:23:44,920 Speaker 6: couple of weeks ago, and I think most people agree 425 00:23:44,920 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 6: with this view that we probably haven't seen the full 426 00:23:47,040 --> 00:23:49,840 Speaker 6: impact of tariffs and the data, and so most of 427 00:23:49,840 --> 00:23:51,760 Speaker 6: the people I work with assume that you're looking at 428 00:23:51,800 --> 00:23:54,720 Speaker 6: a fall, if not later, for any kind of move 429 00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:56,959 Speaker 6: on rates. I know overnight, there was some last day 430 00:23:57,000 --> 00:23:59,720 Speaker 6: or so, some questions around maybe July, but still the view. 431 00:23:59,560 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 2: Of most that when you synthesized GP Morgan's research, when 432 00:24:04,600 --> 00:24:08,679 Speaker 2: does the feel of tariffs click in? Now? 433 00:24:09,440 --> 00:24:11,480 Speaker 6: The feel is there from a vibe standpoint. If you 434 00:24:11,480 --> 00:24:15,719 Speaker 6: look at sentiment corporate and consumer, it's there. People are petrified, 435 00:24:15,720 --> 00:24:17,480 Speaker 6: companies are trying to figure out what they're going to do, 436 00:24:17,720 --> 00:24:19,439 Speaker 6: but it hasn't flowed into all the hard data yet, 437 00:24:19,440 --> 00:24:21,159 Speaker 6: and I think that takes time because we don't actually know. 438 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:24,280 Speaker 6: If you look at corporate earnings, we're assuming earnings growth 439 00:24:24,280 --> 00:24:27,160 Speaker 6: slows down in Q two from double digit to single digit, 440 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:30,480 Speaker 6: but still its still okay. And so I think, unfortunately, 441 00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:33,120 Speaker 6: from a data standpoint, you're looking at end of summer, 442 00:24:33,160 --> 00:24:35,119 Speaker 6: if not later, to really have a handle on this, 443 00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:38,119 Speaker 6: and it'd be great to have the administration be somewhat 444 00:24:38,119 --> 00:24:40,200 Speaker 6: consistent in the communication. I think that would help a 445 00:24:40,200 --> 00:24:42,920 Speaker 6: lot and maybe give Powell the amo that he needs 446 00:24:42,960 --> 00:24:45,000 Speaker 6: to actually move. I don't think he's gonna do anything 447 00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:46,520 Speaker 6: without some stability. 448 00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:47,840 Speaker 5: Though thanks to come space. 449 00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:49,840 Speaker 4: I mean we can sit here in a two year 450 00:24:49,840 --> 00:24:51,240 Speaker 4: treasure we can get done. 451 00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:54,600 Speaker 5: Near four percent. Yeah, do your clients want to take 452 00:24:54,600 --> 00:24:57,760 Speaker 5: credit risk at this point or they are comfortable. 453 00:24:57,320 --> 00:25:00,160 Speaker 6: In the treasure mark very comfortable in treasuries where we've 454 00:25:00,160 --> 00:25:01,800 Speaker 6: seen a little more interest in the muni market, So 455 00:25:02,160 --> 00:25:05,399 Speaker 6: some dislocation there, especially in the questions around Wilson. Of 456 00:25:05,440 --> 00:25:08,359 Speaker 6: these universities maintain their tax status, so that's created a 457 00:25:08,359 --> 00:25:10,040 Speaker 6: little bit of volatility. And if you're willing to take 458 00:25:10,280 --> 00:25:13,239 Speaker 6: muni risk, which historically has very low defaults, which most 459 00:25:13,280 --> 00:25:16,240 Speaker 6: of my clients are, that somewhere would lean into high 460 00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:19,199 Speaker 6: yield not so much spread most people feel aren't wide enough. 461 00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:21,440 Speaker 6: You're not getting paid enough. And then the other part 462 00:25:21,600 --> 00:25:26,080 Speaker 6: hybrid instruments like bank preferreds. We love financials here and 463 00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:28,440 Speaker 6: bank preferreds will give you, if you're a US taxpayer, 464 00:25:28,560 --> 00:25:31,480 Speaker 6: high single digit tax equial yields, and so that makes 465 00:25:31,480 --> 00:25:33,399 Speaker 6: a lot of sense if you're not concerned about some 466 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:34,359 Speaker 6: more large banks. 467 00:25:34,720 --> 00:25:36,760 Speaker 2: Is the lot of the sns of formula just as 468 00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:40,480 Speaker 2: simple as load the boat on Georgetown. Is that what 469 00:25:40,520 --> 00:25:41,160 Speaker 2: you're saying. 470 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:43,080 Speaker 3: About, George. 471 00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:47,560 Speaker 6: I've not looked at their bonds lately, but perhaps some 472 00:25:47,600 --> 00:25:49,000 Speaker 6: other universities if you feel. 473 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:50,960 Speaker 3: Comfortable with them. Yeah, and I would want to. 474 00:25:50,920 --> 00:25:53,280 Speaker 6: Diversified UNI portfolio for sure. But I have the privilege 475 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:56,160 Speaker 6: of paying New York New York City taxes, so I'm 476 00:25:56,200 --> 00:25:57,600 Speaker 6: a big owner of meetings myself. 477 00:25:57,640 --> 00:25:59,840 Speaker 2: You're in a meeting, there's seven fancy people from J 478 00:26:00,040 --> 00:26:04,960 Speaker 2: Pete Morgan, There's you know, some elderly high networth foreign domestic. 479 00:26:05,040 --> 00:26:07,359 Speaker 2: I don't care. With the kids, it's like it's like, 480 00:26:07,480 --> 00:26:10,080 Speaker 2: what's the TV show Succession? It's like she's in the 481 00:26:10,160 --> 00:26:14,160 Speaker 2: room with the Succession. That's our clients. Were they your clients? 482 00:26:14,920 --> 00:26:16,520 Speaker 6: The characters from Succession? 483 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:18,119 Speaker 3: The actors are not. 484 00:26:18,359 --> 00:26:20,800 Speaker 6: I would love to meet many of the very quickly here. 485 00:26:20,920 --> 00:26:23,119 Speaker 2: If they say we've loaded the boat an apple or 486 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,040 Speaker 2: pick a big stock, how do you talk about us 487 00:26:26,040 --> 00:26:27,160 Speaker 2: selling the mother load. 488 00:26:27,720 --> 00:26:30,080 Speaker 6: It's a big struggle from many families they work with 489 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:33,760 Speaker 6: now because they have massive embedded gains, and so oftentimes 490 00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:36,480 Speaker 6: the tax tail wags the dog and people don't want 491 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:38,639 Speaker 6: to sell now. There are things you can do to 492 00:26:39,119 --> 00:26:41,560 Speaker 6: chip away over time. There were loss harvesting strategies. There 493 00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:43,760 Speaker 6: are things like exchange funds you can put a concert 494 00:26:43,880 --> 00:26:48,040 Speaker 6: position into. But I'm a big advocate of diversifying that concentration. 495 00:26:48,119 --> 00:26:50,200 Speaker 6: The constitutions are great for creating wealth, they're not great 496 00:26:50,200 --> 00:26:52,680 Speaker 6: for sustaining wealth over the long term, and so we 497 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:55,399 Speaker 6: need to get the diversification going. It's just it can 498 00:26:55,440 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 6: be very difficult when someone's tethered to the stories. 499 00:26:58,200 --> 00:27:00,960 Speaker 2: Jamie from Central Parks just emails ask her if she's 500 00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:03,439 Speaker 2: taken another year off, are you taking another year off? 501 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:05,720 Speaker 6: If Jamie's listening and he wants to offer that, I'd 502 00:27:05,760 --> 00:27:08,800 Speaker 6: be willing to to come back with perspective in a year. 503 00:27:09,040 --> 00:27:11,879 Speaker 2: Thanks you so much. Monica Descenzo on a beach somewhere 504 00:27:12,400 --> 00:27:15,080 Speaker 2: here in the coming month. She is with JP Morgan. 505 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:19,479 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday 506 00:27:19,520 --> 00:27:22,560 Speaker 1: starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android 507 00:27:22,600 --> 00:27:25,600 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen 508 00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:28,920 Speaker 1: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 509 00:27:29,520 --> 00:27:32,120 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 510 00:27:32,280 --> 00:27:35,160 Speaker 2: Henrietta Trace joins in sentw in studio. We could talk 511 00:27:35,200 --> 00:27:39,359 Speaker 2: here for hours and hours. Richard Hass yesterday was heated 512 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:44,639 Speaker 2: that the legislative branch, Capitol Hill, you're expert, has given 513 00:27:44,680 --> 00:27:48,919 Speaker 2: away the right to declare award after years and years 514 00:27:49,119 --> 00:27:53,560 Speaker 2: and years and years with this action, it's over the 515 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:55,920 Speaker 2: president handles the Pentagon. 516 00:27:56,720 --> 00:27:59,920 Speaker 7: Yeah, it's absolutely true. And you know, Leadershoomer's gonna file 517 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:03,359 Speaker 7: War Powers resolution. They'll vote on that on Wednesday. But 518 00:28:03,520 --> 00:28:06,160 Speaker 7: this is a very partisan situation. I'd say like eighty 519 00:28:06,280 --> 00:28:08,800 Speaker 7: five to even ninety percent of the Republican conference is 520 00:28:08,920 --> 00:28:11,520 Speaker 7: very much behind the President making the choices that he made, 521 00:28:11,560 --> 00:28:13,119 Speaker 7: and so they're not they just don't have the votes 522 00:28:13,400 --> 00:28:15,840 Speaker 7: to force the issue. But absolutely, and I think Brand 523 00:28:15,840 --> 00:28:17,439 Speaker 7: Paul would very much agree with that sentiment. 524 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:21,159 Speaker 4: Where do we go here on the domestic stuff, the 525 00:28:21,280 --> 00:28:23,359 Speaker 4: one big beautiful bill? 526 00:28:23,800 --> 00:28:25,080 Speaker 5: Where are we with that right now? 527 00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:28,080 Speaker 7: Yeah, we are in a much tougher place than I 528 00:28:28,160 --> 00:28:30,560 Speaker 7: think it appears from the outside. I was with some 529 00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:34,720 Speaker 7: Republican Senate folks last night and talk to them constantly, obviously, 530 00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:38,320 Speaker 7: and I think that underneath the surface they are paddling 531 00:28:38,480 --> 00:28:41,240 Speaker 7: very furiously. I increase my odds from twenty percent to 532 00:28:41,320 --> 00:28:43,160 Speaker 7: forty percent that they could get this done by the 533 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:46,520 Speaker 7: fourth of July, really, but that's mostly because there they 534 00:28:46,600 --> 00:28:51,520 Speaker 7: have the advantage of these crises, Launching weapons in Iran, 535 00:28:51,920 --> 00:28:54,560 Speaker 7: deploying the National Guard out to California. That all helps 536 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:59,600 Speaker 7: advance the narrative around the immigration spending and the military spending. 537 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:03,719 Speaker 7: The tax package itself, the medicaid cuts are very problematic, 538 00:29:04,040 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 7: and what the American public does know about this bill, 539 00:29:06,360 --> 00:29:09,240 Speaker 7: they don't like. It's got a sixty seven percent disapproval 540 00:29:09,320 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 7: rating on the healthcare side, and it's seventy one percent 541 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:15,320 Speaker 7: disapproval rating from independent voters generally nationwide. So they need 542 00:29:15,360 --> 00:29:17,880 Speaker 7: to jam it through. That can grease the wheels, But 543 00:29:17,960 --> 00:29:19,880 Speaker 7: there's a lot of details to iron. 544 00:29:19,720 --> 00:29:22,160 Speaker 4: Out, all right, Just I don't know how to put this. 545 00:29:22,520 --> 00:29:25,480 Speaker 4: Where's the Republican Party, I guess just in general? Where's 546 00:29:25,840 --> 00:29:28,640 Speaker 4: the Democratic Party? I'm sorry, where's the Democratic Party in general? 547 00:29:28,680 --> 00:29:30,840 Speaker 5: And maybe as it relates to this legislation. 548 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:34,320 Speaker 7: The Democratic Party is not even remotely keeping up with 549 00:29:34,520 --> 00:29:37,560 Speaker 7: the pace of the conversation, especially around this. Yeah, not 550 00:29:37,680 --> 00:29:41,200 Speaker 7: at all. They're not even on target on an hourly basis, 551 00:29:41,280 --> 00:29:44,120 Speaker 7: let alone a daily basis, and I think that that's 552 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:45,120 Speaker 7: really a part of the problem. 553 00:29:45,240 --> 00:29:46,800 Speaker 2: Can let's just cut to the chase. We have an 554 00:29:46,800 --> 00:29:49,719 Speaker 2: election going on this morning in New York. We'll get 555 00:29:49,760 --> 00:29:52,440 Speaker 2: Henrietta Trece's view on that in a moment. She's the 556 00:29:52,480 --> 00:29:55,200 Speaker 2: only one I know who understands ring choice voting except 557 00:29:55,240 --> 00:30:00,640 Speaker 2: Gina Cervetti and Robert Brockton. What's so important your is 558 00:30:00,720 --> 00:30:04,000 Speaker 2: hockeing Jeffries seems to be where everybody goes to. Isn't 559 00:30:04,040 --> 00:30:05,760 Speaker 2: he supposed to be visible. 560 00:30:05,480 --> 00:30:08,960 Speaker 7: And vocal, so much more visible and vocal than where 561 00:30:09,000 --> 00:30:12,240 Speaker 7: he is right now? And they're nowhere in terms of 562 00:30:12,440 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 7: getting a discussion about what's in this bill. The bill 563 00:30:14,720 --> 00:30:18,720 Speaker 7: is unpopular. Go talk about the unpopular stuff on every mediac. 564 00:30:18,560 --> 00:30:22,240 Speaker 2: But you're in that chair fourteen at the Capitol girl 565 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:27,440 Speaker 2: in Washington, you live there. Why Why for Republicans and 566 00:30:27,520 --> 00:30:33,280 Speaker 2: Democrats listening, Why is mister Jeffries, who everyone considers articulate silent? 567 00:30:33,960 --> 00:30:36,360 Speaker 7: I think he can't break through and keep up with 568 00:30:36,480 --> 00:30:39,040 Speaker 7: the cycle, is really what I've seen. I don't understand 569 00:30:39,040 --> 00:30:41,000 Speaker 7: why they're not on tariffs all day, every day. If 570 00:30:41,040 --> 00:30:43,560 Speaker 7: you're making the price of a can of beer more expensive, 571 00:30:43,760 --> 00:30:45,480 Speaker 7: talk about it all day long, talk about it going 572 00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:48,840 Speaker 7: into the fourth of July Memorial Day. They're nowhere on tariffs, 573 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:52,360 Speaker 7: they're nowhere on this War Powers resolution. They don't even 574 00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:54,760 Speaker 7: have a unanimous front there. They're expecting maybe one hundred 575 00:30:54,760 --> 00:30:57,000 Speaker 7: and ninety Democrats to sign on to the War Powers 576 00:30:57,040 --> 00:30:59,040 Speaker 7: Resolution bill in the House, but they're not going to 577 00:30:59,080 --> 00:31:04,400 Speaker 7: be comprehensive, and the pushback to this Senate bill is 578 00:31:04,720 --> 00:31:08,080 Speaker 7: not nearly as forceful or detailed or even talking about 579 00:31:08,080 --> 00:31:10,360 Speaker 7: the medicaid stuff, I think they're relying on the institutional 580 00:31:10,440 --> 00:31:13,760 Speaker 7: knowledge of the American voter to rail against medicaid cuts, 581 00:31:13,840 --> 00:31:16,400 Speaker 7: which the American voter can do very quickly. But I 582 00:31:16,440 --> 00:31:18,240 Speaker 7: don't think Democrats are advancing the narrative. 583 00:31:18,480 --> 00:31:19,640 Speaker 5: So do you believe? 584 00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:20,080 Speaker 2: So? 585 00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:22,040 Speaker 4: We have just explained to us of the timing here. 586 00:31:22,320 --> 00:31:24,680 Speaker 4: We're going to get July fourth, is what date? And 587 00:31:24,760 --> 00:31:26,120 Speaker 4: then what do we do after July fourth? 588 00:31:26,440 --> 00:31:29,680 Speaker 7: July fourth is meaningless. July fourth is a manufactured feel 589 00:31:29,760 --> 00:31:32,840 Speaker 7: good story. It doesn't do anything. The only deadline that 590 00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:35,680 Speaker 7: is real, and I just heard Kevin McCarthy say this 591 00:31:35,880 --> 00:31:38,320 Speaker 7: is the debt ceiling deadline, and that is, of course 592 00:31:38,400 --> 00:31:40,960 Speaker 7: exactly correct. The debt ceiling breach is going to happen 593 00:31:41,040 --> 00:31:42,840 Speaker 7: in mid August. They don't need to pass this bill 594 00:31:42,880 --> 00:31:45,120 Speaker 7: until they're ready to leave for the August vacasion, so 595 00:31:45,440 --> 00:31:46,120 Speaker 7: they've got time. 596 00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:49,760 Speaker 2: Matt from large amount emails and it says, okay, salt 597 00:31:50,040 --> 00:31:52,920 Speaker 2: I think is back to forty thousand, but with a 598 00:31:53,040 --> 00:31:56,200 Speaker 2: lower income hurdle or something are we going to get 599 00:31:57,200 --> 00:32:00,520 Speaker 2: Would you explain, for Matt and for me, why does 600 00:32:00,600 --> 00:32:05,800 Speaker 2: Oklahoma salt in New York or New Jersey or California 601 00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:07,440 Speaker 2: needs to be adjusted? 602 00:32:07,720 --> 00:32:08,120 Speaker 3: They don't. 603 00:32:08,360 --> 00:32:10,800 Speaker 7: They absolutely do not. West Virginia for sure doesn't care. 604 00:32:11,560 --> 00:32:13,720 Speaker 7: And we've heard all the senators from those states say 605 00:32:13,760 --> 00:32:17,720 Speaker 7: that for years now. The reality on this bill is 606 00:32:17,760 --> 00:32:20,520 Speaker 7: that the senators have about a trillion dollars that they 607 00:32:20,600 --> 00:32:22,880 Speaker 7: can throw at various problems. We have a lot of 608 00:32:23,040 --> 00:32:25,160 Speaker 7: big problems. There's one hundred and twenty two billion dollars 609 00:32:25,200 --> 00:32:28,000 Speaker 7: they got stripped out of the snap cuts that the 610 00:32:28,040 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 7: parliamentarium won't allow. We have to fix the salt cap 611 00:32:31,160 --> 00:32:34,040 Speaker 7: more than ten k. It needs to stay probably at 612 00:32:34,080 --> 00:32:36,840 Speaker 7: forty K, but drop down to three hundred thousand dollars 613 00:32:36,920 --> 00:32:40,160 Speaker 7: in an income bracket, which is extremely expensive. Salt alone 614 00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:42,320 Speaker 7: is a one point two trillion dollar revenue raiser. We 615 00:32:42,440 --> 00:32:45,040 Speaker 7: need to extend more money on the IRA and get 616 00:32:45,080 --> 00:32:47,320 Speaker 7: some of these Medicaid cuts out so I can spend 617 00:32:47,360 --> 00:32:49,960 Speaker 7: a trillion dollars real fast, and that's what they need 618 00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:53,120 Speaker 7: to do. But even now in July fourth, so it. 619 00:32:53,120 --> 00:32:56,080 Speaker 4: Looks like the Republicans do they have the run of Washington. 620 00:32:56,160 --> 00:32:58,760 Speaker 4: It just feels like obviously they have the majorities, but 621 00:32:59,080 --> 00:32:59,880 Speaker 4: slim majorities. 622 00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:02,400 Speaker 5: But it feels not that slim. It feels like they 623 00:33:02,400 --> 00:33:04,200 Speaker 5: can get pretty much anything they want here. 624 00:33:04,480 --> 00:33:07,080 Speaker 4: And that's good for policy maybe if you want to 625 00:33:07,120 --> 00:33:09,440 Speaker 4: get stuff done, But is that kind of where we are? 626 00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:12,160 Speaker 7: Absolutely this is the Trump effect. So when you look 627 00:33:12,200 --> 00:33:14,120 Speaker 7: at the details of this bill and to get even 628 00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:16,920 Speaker 7: more granular, the reason Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is out 629 00:33:16,960 --> 00:33:19,640 Speaker 7: right now talking about maybe not supporting this bill is 630 00:33:19,680 --> 00:33:23,080 Speaker 7: because thirty five percent of Medicaid recipients in Alaska will 631 00:33:23,160 --> 00:33:25,760 Speaker 7: lose their coverage with this package. Dan Sullivan is up 632 00:33:25,800 --> 00:33:28,640 Speaker 7: for reelection this cycle, so there are members who are 633 00:33:28,680 --> 00:33:32,040 Speaker 7: taking a lot of heat from the members who are 634 00:33:32,080 --> 00:33:32,480 Speaker 7: at risk. 635 00:33:32,600 --> 00:33:35,680 Speaker 2: So give us a vignette, Henri, to your expert this. Unfortunately, 636 00:33:35,880 --> 00:33:39,640 Speaker 2: we're near out of time a given congress person in 637 00:33:39,800 --> 00:33:43,160 Speaker 2: a room or over lunch like in the movies, Redford's 638 00:33:43,160 --> 00:33:46,800 Speaker 2: there the rest of them do they just say this 639 00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:49,760 Speaker 2: is all that matters to me. If I don't get this, 640 00:33:50,040 --> 00:33:53,160 Speaker 2: I won't vote for the bill. Does that Hollywood drama happen? 641 00:33:53,480 --> 00:33:55,080 Speaker 7: Some of the members are like that. Ran Paul is 642 00:33:55,160 --> 00:33:57,000 Speaker 7: like that, he's a no go just because the debt ceiling. 643 00:33:57,320 --> 00:34:00,360 Speaker 7: But what really happens in these caucus lunches is members 644 00:34:00,400 --> 00:34:02,720 Speaker 7: will get much more vocal towards the end of the process. 645 00:34:02,800 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 7: So last night Tom Tillis of North Carolina, who's in 646 00:34:05,360 --> 00:34:09,280 Speaker 7: a tough race, Yeah, with a piece of paper showing 647 00:34:09,400 --> 00:34:11,600 Speaker 7: the top ten states who are going to lose Medicare coverage, 648 00:34:11,760 --> 00:34:14,239 Speaker 7: Medicaid coverage. He's going to lose six hundred thousand people 649 00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:16,680 Speaker 7: just in North Carolina. So members will go to the 650 00:34:16,760 --> 00:34:20,040 Speaker 7: mat for their individual issues. The Trump effect also is 651 00:34:20,120 --> 00:34:22,440 Speaker 7: such that they're trying to keep members from speaking out 652 00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:25,319 Speaker 7: publicly about their concerns. If you have a problem, goes 653 00:34:25,360 --> 00:34:27,600 Speaker 7: straight to the President, goes straight to Leader thun And 654 00:34:27,760 --> 00:34:32,759 Speaker 7: that keeps the expectation or the negative vibe, if you will, down. 655 00:34:33,040 --> 00:34:35,480 Speaker 7: But it is very much alive in these caucus meetings, 656 00:34:35,600 --> 00:34:36,319 Speaker 7: especially right now. 657 00:34:37,200 --> 00:34:39,560 Speaker 5: Who's driving the bus here in Congress? 658 00:34:39,719 --> 00:34:39,880 Speaker 2: Is it? 659 00:34:41,520 --> 00:34:42,839 Speaker 5: I mean, who's pushing all this through? 660 00:34:43,560 --> 00:34:46,120 Speaker 7: Leader Thun is doing a lot of heavy lifting on 661 00:34:46,200 --> 00:34:47,560 Speaker 7: the set side with Lindsay Graham. 662 00:34:48,000 --> 00:34:51,560 Speaker 2: Is the President near in the vicinity like the Red 663 00:34:51,680 --> 00:34:54,000 Speaker 2: Sox or a lame duck? Okay, they're playing five hundred 664 00:34:54,000 --> 00:34:56,799 Speaker 2: ball again? Is the President near a lame duck? 665 00:34:57,680 --> 00:34:59,920 Speaker 7: I think the reason he floats the idea of running 666 00:35:00,040 --> 00:35:01,880 Speaker 7: a third term is because he doesn't want anybody to 667 00:35:01,960 --> 00:35:03,640 Speaker 7: talk about him being a lame duck. Indeed, I also 668 00:35:03,680 --> 00:35:06,120 Speaker 7: heard that straight from the former speaker, So I think 669 00:35:06,160 --> 00:35:08,239 Speaker 7: he is presenting as though he will run again and 670 00:35:08,320 --> 00:35:10,480 Speaker 7: allowing that confusion to list so that there won't be 671 00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:12,280 Speaker 7: a shadow presidency. 672 00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:15,240 Speaker 2: Do you know that New Orleans is seven degrees cooler 673 00:35:15,520 --> 00:35:16,799 Speaker 2: than New York City? Right now? 674 00:35:16,920 --> 00:35:21,160 Speaker 3: Come on down, Henrietta Treys, thank. 675 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:24,240 Speaker 2: You so much. With Vada Partner's just a hugely popular 676 00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:29,080 Speaker 2: value add for the machinery of the Washington we're within. 677 00:35:35,080 --> 00:35:38,960 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday 678 00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:42,040 Speaker 1: starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android 679 00:35:42,080 --> 00:35:45,040 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch 680 00:35:45,120 --> 00:35:48,040 Speaker 1: us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the 681 00:35:48,120 --> 00:35:49,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg terminal. 682 00:35:49,360 --> 00:35:53,320 Speaker 2: If you look at Emily Kilcreasee's bag collection, it's unbelievable. 683 00:35:53,520 --> 00:35:56,600 Speaker 2: She's never had an introduction like that joining us now 684 00:35:57,000 --> 00:35:59,439 Speaker 2: this is the conversation today for those of you coast 685 00:35:59,480 --> 00:36:04,400 Speaker 2: to coast looking at tariffs and trade. Emily kilcrease is 686 00:36:04,920 --> 00:36:10,120 Speaker 2: earned ability within our trade, our thinking of international affairs 687 00:36:10,200 --> 00:36:13,799 Speaker 2: with the National Security Council and working with mister Litthheiser 688 00:36:14,360 --> 00:36:16,440 Speaker 2: a few years ago. Emily, thank you so much for 689 00:36:16,560 --> 00:36:21,960 Speaker 2: joining Bloomberg Surveillance. How different is the day to day 690 00:36:22,120 --> 00:36:27,080 Speaker 2: trade tariff grind of Trump II versus Trump one, which 691 00:36:27,160 --> 00:36:27,640 Speaker 2: you lived. 692 00:36:29,239 --> 00:36:32,640 Speaker 8: It's a great question. The trade space is fundamentally different 693 00:36:32,840 --> 00:36:36,680 Speaker 8: under the second Trump administration. He came into this term 694 00:36:36,880 --> 00:36:39,719 Speaker 8: willing to use tariffs at a scale we've just never 695 00:36:39,840 --> 00:36:43,120 Speaker 8: seen before in the era of a globalized economy. He 696 00:36:43,239 --> 00:36:46,000 Speaker 8: used them faster, he used them harder, and on both 697 00:36:46,080 --> 00:36:49,920 Speaker 8: strategic competitors like China as well as on close US allies. 698 00:36:50,160 --> 00:36:54,239 Speaker 8: So the goals of his tariff program have changed substantially, 699 00:36:54,320 --> 00:36:56,960 Speaker 8: and the candidly the chaos that we've seen in some 700 00:36:57,080 --> 00:36:59,239 Speaker 8: of his trade policy is just much different than what 701 00:36:59,360 --> 00:37:00,360 Speaker 8: we saw the first time around. 702 00:37:00,520 --> 00:37:04,680 Speaker 2: You lived Lightheiser's book, No Trade Is Free. He came 703 00:37:04,760 --> 00:37:08,560 Speaker 2: out of a desperate northeastern Ohio and said, we need 704 00:37:08,640 --> 00:37:12,640 Speaker 2: to fix the system. What ice Emily killcrease is just simple. 705 00:37:13,080 --> 00:37:17,080 Speaker 2: It's a question of magnitude. Can this nation survive even 706 00:37:17,120 --> 00:37:21,359 Speaker 2: a blended seventeen percent tariff? Isn't that beyond Lightheiser. 707 00:37:23,040 --> 00:37:24,000 Speaker 6: It's a good point. 708 00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:27,200 Speaker 8: You know, tariffs do have a role in addressing unfair 709 00:37:27,280 --> 00:37:31,280 Speaker 8: trade practices that we've seen from other countries, mostly China. Clearly, 710 00:37:31,360 --> 00:37:34,080 Speaker 8: Investor Lightheiser and President Trump have been focused on that 711 00:37:34,680 --> 00:37:38,000 Speaker 8: they can have a role in protecting critical industries. But 712 00:37:38,120 --> 00:37:40,680 Speaker 8: the question that you've identified is can we use tariffs 713 00:37:41,080 --> 00:37:43,520 Speaker 8: at high levels for all of the different goals that 714 00:37:43,560 --> 00:37:46,279 Speaker 8: the Trump administration is now trying to use them for. 715 00:37:46,680 --> 00:37:48,880 Speaker 8: Can we use tariffs to generate revenue? Can we use 716 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:51,239 Speaker 8: them to fix trade deficits? Can we use them to 717 00:37:51,840 --> 00:37:55,200 Speaker 8: combat unfair trade practices? When you add all of that up, 718 00:37:55,560 --> 00:37:58,040 Speaker 8: you do end up with a very high tariff rate 719 00:37:58,320 --> 00:38:01,120 Speaker 8: that could have some serious consequences for the US economy, 720 00:38:01,160 --> 00:38:04,080 Speaker 8: for US productivity and ultimately for the US workers that 721 00:38:04,160 --> 00:38:06,680 Speaker 8: the Trump administration is trying to help. So it's a 722 00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:09,920 Speaker 8: really big risk. It's a big experiment, and there are 723 00:38:10,080 --> 00:38:12,480 Speaker 8: certainly very good reasons to think that it might not 724 00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:14,719 Speaker 8: work out the way that the Trump administration wants it 725 00:38:14,800 --> 00:38:18,040 Speaker 8: to if you do have a tariff wall that exceeds 726 00:38:18,239 --> 00:38:19,279 Speaker 8: twenty percent or more. 727 00:38:20,239 --> 00:38:23,640 Speaker 4: Emily, I think the premise for President Trump and his 728 00:38:23,960 --> 00:38:27,480 Speaker 4: economic supporters and his policies is that somehow the United 729 00:38:27,520 --> 00:38:30,040 Speaker 4: States is at some disadvantage or is not treated fairly 730 00:38:30,120 --> 00:38:31,440 Speaker 4: by some of. 731 00:38:31,480 --> 00:38:32,360 Speaker 5: Its trading partners. 732 00:38:32,400 --> 00:38:35,000 Speaker 4: But others would pushed back and say, hey, since World 733 00:38:35,080 --> 00:38:39,279 Speaker 4: War Two, no one has benefited better or greater than 734 00:38:39,360 --> 00:38:41,320 Speaker 4: the United States from free global trade. 735 00:38:43,120 --> 00:38:44,640 Speaker 5: How do you think we should think about that? 736 00:38:46,360 --> 00:38:48,560 Speaker 8: So there is a small bit of truth in what 737 00:38:48,640 --> 00:38:52,160 Speaker 8: the Trump administration is saying, what the President is criticizing 738 00:38:52,280 --> 00:38:55,320 Speaker 8: in terms of how our trading system works today, we 739 00:38:55,480 --> 00:38:58,440 Speaker 8: have a trading system that treats China the way it 740 00:38:58,520 --> 00:39:01,320 Speaker 8: treats everybody else. Are you politically that doesn't make a 741 00:39:01,360 --> 00:39:04,400 Speaker 8: lot of sense anymore. We also know that it's been 742 00:39:04,480 --> 00:39:07,720 Speaker 8: really hard to get even some of our closer trading partners, 743 00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:11,520 Speaker 8: like Europe to address long standing trade irritance in the relationship. 744 00:39:11,600 --> 00:39:14,279 Speaker 8: Trade is hard, it's hard to get other economies to 745 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:18,000 Speaker 8: fix regulations, fixed barriers to trade sometimes. So it's not 746 00:39:18,200 --> 00:39:21,000 Speaker 8: that the Trump administration is completely wrong. It's a question 747 00:39:21,239 --> 00:39:24,440 Speaker 8: of whether their approach to fixing these problems is actually 748 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:25,640 Speaker 8: going to have the effect they wanted to. 749 00:39:25,920 --> 00:39:31,040 Speaker 2: Emily Gilchrist, your essay in Foreign Affairs is blistering, and 750 00:39:31,239 --> 00:39:34,239 Speaker 2: there has to be a change here in process. Is 751 00:39:34,320 --> 00:39:37,000 Speaker 2: a change here to go from Trump and deal making 752 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:40,359 Speaker 2: back to a diplomacy of say the Uruguay round. 753 00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:44,520 Speaker 8: So I don't think there's going back, right. I don't 754 00:39:44,520 --> 00:39:47,880 Speaker 8: think there's going back to a wto led system. I 755 00:39:47,960 --> 00:39:50,560 Speaker 8: don't think there's going back even to kind of a 756 00:39:50,680 --> 00:39:53,640 Speaker 8: more mild approach that we saw on the first Trump administration. 757 00:39:54,239 --> 00:39:56,319 Speaker 8: The point that I make in the essay in Foreign 758 00:39:56,320 --> 00:39:58,920 Speaker 8: Affairs with my co author Jeff Gertz is really one 759 00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:01,640 Speaker 8: about US credibility, and that's where we argue that the 760 00:40:01,800 --> 00:40:05,120 Speaker 8: US and particularly the Trump administration needs to show that 761 00:40:05,360 --> 00:40:07,920 Speaker 8: not only is it going to threaten tariffs, that it 762 00:40:08,000 --> 00:40:11,720 Speaker 8: can credibly commit to not impose tariffs if our trading 763 00:40:11,800 --> 00:40:13,200 Speaker 8: partners do what we ask them. 764 00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:13,560 Speaker 7: To do. 765 00:40:14,520 --> 00:40:16,880 Speaker 8: So far, we haven't seen that. We've seen continued threats 766 00:40:16,880 --> 00:40:19,480 Speaker 8: of tariffs. We've seen continued back and forth on again, 767 00:40:19,560 --> 00:40:23,000 Speaker 8: off again terror proposals that really hurts the US ability 768 00:40:23,080 --> 00:40:26,080 Speaker 8: to kind of usher the economic order into a better, 769 00:40:26,160 --> 00:40:28,360 Speaker 8: more sustainable state, and in many ways it's undermining the 770 00:40:28,360 --> 00:40:29,680 Speaker 8: Trump administration's own goals. 771 00:40:30,120 --> 00:40:32,160 Speaker 2: Emily, thank you so much, and I'll get the essay 772 00:40:32,200 --> 00:40:35,800 Speaker 2: out from Foreign Affairs. Very valuable, short suite and really 773 00:40:35,960 --> 00:40:40,279 Speaker 2: thought provoking on this new regime of terrors. Emily killed 774 00:40:40,360 --> 00:40:44,439 Speaker 2: Crease joins us this morning off the Foreign Affairs Essay. 775 00:40:44,960 --> 00:40:49,759 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on apples, Spotify, 776 00:40:49,920 --> 00:40:54,160 Speaker 1: and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday, 777 00:40:54,360 --> 00:40:57,279 Speaker 1: seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot Com, 778 00:40:57,719 --> 00:41:01,480 Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. 779 00:41:01,840 --> 00:41:04,920 Speaker 1: You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube 780 00:41:05,239 --> 00:41:07,200 Speaker 1: and always on the Bloomberg terminal