WEBVTT - Tech News: Tech and the Surveillance State

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. This is the tech

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>news for September seventh one. It's a Tuesday, and we

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>got a ton of stuff to cover, and a lot

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of it is pretty heavy, so let's get to it.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Tech Times reports that the Russian government has cracked down

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on six virtual private network services as the country is

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>nearing a parliamentary election. And virtual private networks a k a.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>VPNs have lots of different uses. A lot of companies

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>use VPNs for employees to log into before they use

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate systems. One big reason to use VPNs is that

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it provides a shield when browsing stuff on the Internet.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>So the way it works from a very high level

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is you log into a VPN essentially a server, and

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>then the VPN does all the info fetching for you.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So to someone who is snooping from the outside looking

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at your connection, all they would see is that you

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>were connected to a VPN. They wouldn't be able to

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>see what you were doing beyond that. So if you

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>were researching stuff. Maybe you're researching stuff that the government

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>would disapprove of. Let's say you're in Russia and you

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to research something that perhaps the government wasn't in

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>favor of, Well, using a VPN, it would be very

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>difficult for them to figure that out. Now, this is,

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, assuming that the VPN in question is encrypting

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all communications that are taking place and also taking appropriate

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>steps to protect users. So if that's all true, then yeah,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it stands as a way for people to access stuff

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>without outsiders necessarily being privy to it. Anyway, if the

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>government feels like this is a bad thing, then the

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>really the easiest course of action is to block VPN

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>services in that country, and that's what Russia has done.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So those services include big names. If you've been listening

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts or watching videos, you probably heard some of

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>these because they often advertise on those So it includes

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff like Nord VPN, Express VPN, i p Vanish VPN,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Ola VPN, keep Solid VbN, and Speedify VPN. Now, according

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to Russian representatives, this whole move has nothing to do

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>with the elections. It's to block services to curb a

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>legal activity such as the spread of child pornography, which

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 1>is frequently kind of the messaging that you will hear

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever any government starts to crack down on stuff like this.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Russian representatives have also threatened companies like Google and Apple

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>for allowing an app that was created by Alexey Naval

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>these organization. He's a critic of Vladimir Putin, and so

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the fact that that's also happening in

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>line with the shutdown of vp NS starts to kind

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of point towards reasons other than curbing a legal activity. Um.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the Russian government has said that Google and

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple are essentially interfering with Russian elections, which, you know,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if I can take a moment to add some opinion,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty freaking rich coming from Russia, country that has

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>interfered with elections around the world, including US elections a

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>few times, and will no doubt continue to do so. Anyway,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a good idea to pay attention to these sorts

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of things, because while it's happening in Russia right now,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that country is only one of many that has political

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>leaders trying to get a firmer grip on the flow

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of information. Some of those other countries are pretty darn

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>close to home. Some of them might actually be home.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks ago, I talk about the n

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>s O Group. That's a company out of Israel that

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>groups responsible for designing malware called Pegasus, and it allows

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>an external user access to infected devices remotely. So in

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>other words, if you infect a device with this malware,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.239
<v Speaker 1>you then can access that device in various ways, including

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>things like accessing a smartphones, microphone, and camera. Essentially, NSO

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Group creates software that turns various devices into and like

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, computers and smartphones into spies. That's what it

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>really gets down to. It it allows for surveillance. The

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>NSO Group markets this technology to various governments and does

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>so under the protection of the Israeli government. That means

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that technically the n s A Group is not supposed

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to market this to any country that is on unfriendly

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>terms with Israel. The company has shown a pretty blatant

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>disregard for accountability. It has made claims that I argue

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>our contradictory. For example, the company says it prohibits customers

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>from misusing the malware to target say that customer's own

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>citizens in an effort to exert authoritary and control. In

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>other words, n s A group says, no, this is

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>an order for us to protect against things like acts

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of terrorism, but there have been numerous reports saying that

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>n s O groups customers include uh repressive and oppressive

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>governments that are using that technology against journalists, activists and

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>their own citizens. However, the company also says at the

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>same time that it has no way of monitoring how

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>its customers actually use its products, so that that ends

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>up being a contradiction right there, saying Okay, well, we're

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>only going to sell it to people who are using

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it properly. Also, there's no way for us to know

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>how they're using it. Well, that's like n s O

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>groups saying all right, here you go, but don't go

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>using this in ways we don't approve of because there's

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>no way for us to track you. Right Like that's

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the message there anyway. A an organization called Citizen Lab

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>recently released a report. In fact, they've released a few,

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>but the most recent report shows that it had identified

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>nine activists in Bahrain who had their devices compromised by

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the n s O group Pegasus malware between June of

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty and February of this year, and one thing that

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>makes this malware particularly effective is that it can infect

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>iOS devices through what is called a zero click attack,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially a message in I message, which means the target

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>does not have to click on like a malicious link

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that to activate the malware. That means

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that the whole advice of don't click on any links

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't trust doesn't even apply here because it doesn't

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>require a link. Like I literally, the morning that I'm

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>recording this, I received a message on a different messaging

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>service that was a link attack, like it was trying

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to get me to click on a link and to

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>enter my credentials. They're fortunately, even early in the morning,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>before my coffee, I recognized it as an attack. Anyway.

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>More human rights organizations are calling on n s O

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>group to be held accountable for facilitating authoritarian acts and

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>furthering the capabilities of repressive regimes. They pointed out that

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>entities like the Bahraini government could use these tools to

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>seek out, detain, and even torture targets that the government

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>determines are you know, a problem, and by a problem,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean people who just happened to disagree with the government,

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily someone who's like a terrorist or anything like that. So,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like I said, a lot of journalists and diplomats have

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>been targets of NSO groups Pegasus malware from various customers

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of n s O group, and it's an ongoing problem

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that just seems to be getting worse. All right, let's

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>stay on theme because this next story ties in with

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>both of the previous ones. Pro Publica has published a piece.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of alliteration there about WhatsApp and a

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>contradiction in WhatsApps UH brand identity as a secure messaging platform. Alright, So,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>just in case you're not familiar, the elevator pitch for

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>WhatsApp is that it is an end to end encrypted

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>messaging service. That means that if you and a buddy

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are messaging and you're using WhatsApp, every message you send

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to your buddy is encrypted and can only be decrypted

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other end of that communication channel. Your buddy

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>is the only person who has the correct decrypt key

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to read those messages. And then every message your buddy

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>sends to you is also encrypted, and only you hold

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the decrypt key for those messages, so no one else

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>can read them. The same is true for any images

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>or videos, or links or anything else that's sent on

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>WhatsApp between the two of you. And WhatsApp is an

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly popular messaging service, not as much in the United States,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>but in other parts of the world very much so.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So according to the company, no one outside of you

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>and your buddy would be able to understand what your

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>messages are, and that Facebook, which is the owner of WhatsApp,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>would not be able to see those messages. WhatsApp would

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not be able to have any idea of what it

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was you were sending between the two of you, because

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be encrypted, and so it's private and secure. However,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the company also has hundreds of contract workers whose job

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it is to moderate or police content sent across WhatsApp,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And you might think, wait a minute, how is it

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>possible to moderate or police content if no one can

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>see the unencrypted stuff except for the users involved. Well,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there is one really big exception to this. If someone

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>were to tag an incoming message as being against WhatsApps policies,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you tag a message and you say that it's

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>spam or that it's abusive, or you know, something along

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>those lines, then that sends an alert to WhatsApp to

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>review the communication. So some contract workers somewhere, maybe Austin, Texas,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of them there, And this is

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a person who technically does not work for WhatsApp or

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for Facebook. They work for another company that serves as

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the employment center for these contract workers

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>who then are contracting with WhatsApp. That person would be

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sent the unencrypted offending message from the receiver, as well

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as the four previous messages that preceded the one that

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>allegedly was against the policy. So in other words, you know,

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>if you receive a message, your side un encrypts that message.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>From that point forward, that message is in plain text.

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You can read it. So if someone were to get

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>access to your phone, they could read all that content. Right,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>if they try to intercept the message, it would be encrypted,

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>but once it's on your device, they can read it. Well,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what this system does. If you flag something in WhatsApp,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it sends the unencrypted message on for review. Now I

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>point all this out because this is a sort of

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>back door through the security mess measures, and you can

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand why it exists and that any platform

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to reassure its users that those users are going

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to be protected from harassment and other abuse. But on

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, backdoors through security systems are almost always

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea, and that's because of the possibility that

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>someone somewhere is going to abuse that exception to the

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>secure system and then turn it to nefarious purposes. Moreover,

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>since What's Apps brand is so heavily geared towards, you know,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>privacy and security in communication, this really undermines the brand's position.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It undermines the rand's actual identity. Pro Publica also points

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>out that Facebook analyzes tons of metadata related to WhatsApp communications.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Metadata In case you're not familiar with the term, that's

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>information about information. So really it's all the stuff about

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a communication except for the content of the communication itself.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Meta data can include who was involved in the communication,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like which were the parties that we're talking with each other?

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>What time were messages being sent back and forth? Where

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>were people when they were actually sending information? You know,

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you pair it with like geolocation data, that kind of thing,

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can determine a lot of stuff through meta

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>data analysis. You wouldn't know what the actual content of

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the messages were, but you might be able to hazard

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a guess just by examining enough meta data to figure out,

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's going on, and that too, is a

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>huge threat to privacy and security. WhatsApp users were understandably

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>really upset when Facebook first denounced that some data collected

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>from WhatsApp would then be shared to Facebook proper, and

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that the company itself would get into hot water because

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>reps from Facebook had previously sworn to EU officials that

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>incorporating that kind of ability was technically impossible between WhatsApp

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. They said, yeah, there's no way for us

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to do it, even if we wanted to. We don't

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>want to want to, but even if we wanted to,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't do it. Then they turned around and said, hey,

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>guess what we're doing. So that was not, you know, consistent,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's just something to keep in mind, and

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it helps remind us that most of Facebook's revenue depends

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>upon the company collecting and then leveraging, or if you prefer,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>exploiting information about users. So with that in mind, it's

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a really safe bet to assume that any product coming

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>out of Facebook contributes to that pursuit that even on

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the face of it, if it isn't all about acting

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your data in order to sell more stuff to you

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhere down the line. That is what's going on, because

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that's Facebook's business. That's how Facebook makes money. So yeah,

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>important to know. And it also explains why Facebook was

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>willing to shell out billions and billions of dollars to

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>acquire WhatsApp in the first place. So all the things

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that people were worried about when Facebook did that are

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of manifesting or becoming evident. Yeah, so important to remember.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have some more stories that kind of relate

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>back to some of the themes we've already talked about.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I know it gets kind of dark and oppressive, but

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's important to know about them. But hey, I don't

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>know about you, but I could use a quick break.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back and it's time to go down

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on in Australia. Um, sorry, that was terrible. I had

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to introduce a little of ity with my terrible terrible

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh not even Australian accent, you can't even give it

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that much. But yeah, my terrible attempt. Because there's a

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>new bill that's introducing some troubling powers for law enforcement

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with regard to online information in Australia. UH, there's this

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>piece of legislation. It's called the Surveillance Legislation Amendment UH

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Parentheses Identify and Disrupt INDO Parentheses Bill, and it introduces

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>three new powers for law enforcement. The first is that

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement will be able to obtain a quote data

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>disruption warrant end quote and that in turn gives law

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement the right to copy, delete, or modify data in

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>order to disrupt it. Now, that alone is horrifying, and

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to why I find it horrifying in just

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit. But second, the second power is that law

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>enforcement will be able to apply for and obtain a

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>quote Network activit any warrant end quote that gives them

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the power to collect data from networks and devices that

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are believed to be used or maybe used with relation

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to illegal activity. The third power is that they can

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>obtain an quote account takeover warrant end quote, and that

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>would give them the authority to do exactly what that

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, to take over an account entirely in order

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to gather information on an investigation. So, for example, if

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you if the Australian Police think that you know Jimmy

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the crook is is involved in a criminal operation, which

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean seems logical because he's called Jimmy the Crook.

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Then they could take over They could get a warrant

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to take over Jimmy the Crook's Facebook profile and post

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as Jimmy the Crook in an effort to gather information

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>about Jimmy the Crooks accomplices and potentially have like a

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>full sting operation. But yeah, as you get down to it,

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this is all terrible, And again I totally get that

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for law enforcement, online communications stand as a huge challenge.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Criminals can and do use all sorts of platforms to

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>communicate and coordinate, and it can be a challenge to

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>disrupt that, and it sure would be valuable to be

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>able to go in there and manipulate stuff, perhaps setting

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>up a sting operation to catch criminals in the act

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and bring them to justice. But these provisions give way

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>too much power to law enforcement. So imagine that there's

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a legal process for the police to get a warrant,

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So they do have to at least go through the

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>steps of getting a warrant, but let's assume that it's

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not too difficult to do that. So they go get

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a warrant and then they can go in and manipulate

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you have posted online. They can go in

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and change the things you have posted. Arguably, they could

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>manipulate the stuff you post in such a way that

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you appear to have posted incriminating material when in fact

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you did not do any such thing. So an authoritarian

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>government could literally manufacture evidence against you, and then you

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>could be held accountable for something you never did. This

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is the equivalent of the trope you see, and usually

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it's in a comedy where a cop drops a brown

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>paper bag next to someone that picks it up and says, well,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>what do we have here? Illicit drugs? It's kind of

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like that, but on the data side of things. Now,

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that's just one scenario in which this bill becomes a nightmare.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 1>But again, it wouldn't even take an authoritarian government for

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this to go wrong. Building in systems that would allow

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement to do these sorts of things means that

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you have to create vulnerabilities so that the police can

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>go in and do it. Right, you have to have

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a way for police to access those platforms and those

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>accounts in order to do this data manipulation. However, if

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you do that, if you create those vulnerabilities. It gives

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the chance for other people to potentially exploit those. Now

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I've used this analogy many times before, but here we go.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like you've got a gold reserve and you store

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>tons of gold bars in that reserve, and you've got

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this huge vault, and you have a solid vault door

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>with like time locks and all this complicated stuff, and

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really it's like practically impossible to break through. However,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you also include a little back door in the vault

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that's protected by a cheap padlock because you need to

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>occasionally get into the vault and you don't want to

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>go through the trouble of unlocking the big door. Well,

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>anytime you create exceptions to a secure system, you essentially

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>nullify the security. So no matter how you shake it,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this bill is bad news. It creates far too much

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>surveillance power on the law enforcement side, and it introduces

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the possibility for bad actors to take advantage of a

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>system for their own purposes. Heck, it also means people

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>can end up with a plausible alibi for all online communications,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>because if there exists a way to go in and

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>change someone else's stuff online, perhaps even to the point

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of fabricating messages on behalf of another person. Well that

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>what the waters are then moneyed right when it comes

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to holding someone accountable for their online actions, because you

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>could conceivably argue that you never posted something incriminating because

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there is a system that exists that allows others to

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>change what you post without your consent. So, in other words,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it can actually weaken legal cases rather than strengthen them. Now,

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no word yet on how big I sps and

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>platforms are going to work within this legislation in Australia.

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But this is the kind of stuff that really worries me,

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and the hits just keep on coming. So maybe you've

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>heard of a service called proton mail. Maybe you use it.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>This email service uses end to end encryption to keep

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>communications private between users, and just like WhatsApp, the service's

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>reputation depends heavily upon that fact, the idea that your

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>communications are secure through proton mail, and the bottom line

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is that you use proton mail to protect your communication

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>from folks snooping on you. Well, now that services kind

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of on the hot seat in the public eye because

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>proton Mail recently responded to a demand from police in

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland to give up the IP address belonging to a

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>climate activist in France, which Proton Mail did. So why

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>were the Swiss concerned about a French climate activist, Well,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that's because the French authorities asked the Swiss for help.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It was ultimately the French authorities that wanted to track

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>down this activist who was responsible or you know, activists

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>who are responsible for organizing various protests in France, high

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>profile protests, and so these authorities called up their buddies

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland and they said, hey, love the chocolate, do

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>us a solid and lean on proton mail to give

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>us the IP address for this activist. Okay, and the

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Swiss dead proton Mail, I should point out, is headquartered

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, and thus when the Swiss authorities came knocking,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the company didn't really have a whole lot of options,

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>at least from a legal standpoint, and the CEO of

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>proton said as much that the company is legally bound

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>to follow local laws, and so there was really no

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>recourse other than to comply with the demand from the

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Swiss authorities. The actual communication and the email service remains encrypted,

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so the company legitimately cannot read any of the materials

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>sent through those addresses. They cannot reveal what communications were set,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Nor does proton mail have information on who owns a

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>particular email address. But they can give you an IP

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>address associated with a specific email address. They just can't

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>say definitively this email address belongs to you know, Joan

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Smith or something. But as I mentioned earlier, metadata can

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>reveal an awful lot about a person, So it's quite

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>probable that French authorities are using the information to try

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and track down activists who have arranged those really effective

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>protests in France around issues like affordable housing and climate concerns.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So pretty scary stuff. Sticking with tech and politics, but

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>now moving to the absurd. Business Insider reports that thirteen

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans in the United States sent a letter to

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Marissa Meyer, the quote president and chief executive officer of

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo in quote uh and they were saying that she

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>should better well not hand over any personal information of

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, any Republicans or anyone really over to an

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>investigative committee that's looking into the January six insurrection in Washington,

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>d C. Only okay, hey, House Republicans, you thirteen folks.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Marissa Meyer stepped down from Yahoo back in tween, so

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>she hasn't been in charge of that company for several years.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>She wasn't in charge of the company during the whole

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>lead up to the twenty election, let alone the insurrection

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on January six, and the fact that no one decided

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to fact check that or I don't know, do a

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>simple Internet search. I mean they could have even used

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo to do it. That speaks volumes not just about

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>tech literacy, but arguably just playing literacy. It's an embarrassing

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>display of ignorance. Anyway. At the heart of the matter

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is the issue of one party in government power using

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>its authority to demand information and records about another party,

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and doing so with companies like I s p s

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and social media platforms and companies that provide email and

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications companies and more. And to be clear, I think

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>there is merit in that concern. I think we do

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>need a thorough investigation into the January six riots, including

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an investigation into whether or not anyone in government facil

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>ialitated or encourage the insurrection, into what degree as to

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it was a criminal degree. I think

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>all of that needs to happen. However, I also think

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we have to be careful in how that investigation advances.

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you could imagine a future in which whichever party

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>happens to be in power can lean on companies in

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>order to repress political opponents. That's not good. That's authoritarian,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>no matter which way you you subscribe politically. And anyone

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>who has listened to me for a little while probably

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>has a pretty good feel for where my personal politics are.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's not easy for me to necessarily

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>side with conservatives about data surveillance, but some things I

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think need to be off the table. However, I also

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make clear those rules have to apply across

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the board, not just two Democrats who are looking into this,

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>but period to everyone, for all time, because otherwise it

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>becomes a free for all, and it's a nightmare. Now.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that a few weeks ago I mentioned

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that El Salvador representatives were announcing that the company would

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.959
<v Speaker 1>make bitcoin its official currency that becomes effective today, and

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 1>in preparation for that, El Salvador purchase around four hundred bitcoin.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Would plans to buy a lot more in order to

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, make this transition. The four hundred bitcoin that

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>El Salvador purchased amounts to around twenty million dollars in value.

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The country is aiming to make bitcoin legal tender alongside

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar, which until today had served as the

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nation's official currency. Citizens in El Salvador will at least

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>theoretically be able to use bitcoin for all financial transactions

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>within the country, including paying taxes. While cryptocurrency fans might

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be excited, the same is not true for citizens inside

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>El Salvador. The majority of citizens have expressed concern about

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>this change. Some point to the fact that criminals often

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>rely on bitcoin in order to launder money from their

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>illegal exploits, and that El Salvador has a history of corruption,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>including with the present government, and that might mean that

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that corruption is about to get a whole lot worse

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in that country. Other people in El Salvador are worried

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that the change is going to have a negative impact

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on their personal finances. The volatility of bitcoin is well established,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a legit fear that stuff like pensions

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>could get wiped out by another big dip in the

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin market, just like the one we saw earlier this year. Now,

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the currency has recovered quite a bit since it had

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that dip, it hasn't gotten back to the all time

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>highs it was in in early spring, but it has

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>recovered a lot of the value that it lost, but

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>not all of it, and the value still is fluctuating

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot. As I record this. The government in

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>El Salvador has had to respond to emerging issues during

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the adoption process, including putting a hold on a digital

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wallet app that's backed by the government. So it's the

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Hill El Salvador Bitcoin app, and it's been but on

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.239
<v Speaker 1>hold because of a high demand, a greater demand than

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they expected, and that it was starting to tax the servers.

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>A significant population within El Salvador may not even be

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>able to access the cryptocurrency at all because there is

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a significant digital divide in the country. So a lot

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of people have no computer or smartphone. They would have

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>no way to access a digital wallet, which means they

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>can't even participate in that part of the economy. Now,

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you might wonder why El Salvador is depending upon a

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>currency like bitcoin at all, or why it was dependent

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>upon the US dollar beforehand. Well, some countries like they're

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>at a point where they would not be able to

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>offer up a stable currency. It could be a currency

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that is uh that fluctuates wildly in value, which is

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not financially stable for all the people of that country.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So they in this case El Salvador was dependent upon

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a larger, more stable uh country that of the United States.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>At least when we get to the value of the dollar,

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's larger and more stable, uh. And that the switch

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin means that you're no longer dependent upon another

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>nation's currency. Bitcoin, of course is you know, it's it's

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>agnostic as far as nationality is concerned. So there's that

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. Plus there was that whole corruption stuff that

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was talking about. There are several reasons, none of them

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are necessarily great for the majority of El Salvador's population,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and I am concerned about that. We've got a few

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more news items to cover before we close out, But

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>before I get to that, let's take another quick break. Okay,

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>So The Verge has an article that's titled Automated hiring

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>software is mistakenly rejecting millions of viable job candidates. And

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the piece cites a study from the Harvard Business School

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's looking into such software. And you've probably heard about

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this type of software. Employers use it to come through

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>job applications, and they do it so that they can

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>weed out applicants who are just not suitable for a

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>particular position and then just focus on the ones who

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>are quote unquote the best fit. So the whole idea

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is just, you know, not to eliminate folks who aren't

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a good fit, but really define the right people to

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>match with the right job, which ideally is the best

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>solution for everyone because the job applicant lands a gig

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for which they were best suited and the company ends

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up getting the best candidate to fill a position. Only

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's necessarily happening. According to the study. The

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>report says that software like what I just described is

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>actually rejecting millions of people who are qualified for the

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>positions that they apply for, and it contributes to an

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>issue in which there are people who are ready and

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>able and willing to work, but they're not able to

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>land a position because of these issues. That's bad news

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for everyone in this system. It's really bad news for

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all the people who are trying to land a job

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>because it means they consistently can't. But it's also bad

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>news for the employers because they are potentially missing out

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on hiring the perfect candidate because some AI software mistakenly

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>put their application on the rejection pile. According to the

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>report of U S Employers and of Fortune five companies

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>use this kind of software to filter through job applicants.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>As for the reasons behind the high rejection error, those

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>are many and they are varied. It really depends upon

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>which criteria the software is weighing as being the most

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>important in order to weed out unsuitable applications. So one

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>example that the Verge points out is that the software

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>could reject an application that includes an employment gap of

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>six months or more. Now, that would have meant that

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have been eliminated once upon a time, because

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I worked for a company for seven years steadily employed.

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 1>But then they eliminated my position. So I wasn't fired.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't have a job anymore. I realized the

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>distinction is a fine one, and I must admit it

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was lost upon me at the time and arguably still is.

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, you know, I was out of work for

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>six months while trying to get another job. And it

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that I was unqualified. It wasn't that I wasn't

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for work. I was doing both of those things.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It was just a really bad time to be out

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of work when it happened to me, and I was

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>caught up in that it was just a bad job market. Well,

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing happens all the time, and this

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>type of criteria in software then exacerbates it. Right if

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the software just says, oh, well, this person is not

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>reliable because they haven't had a job in six months,

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily reflect poorly on the person. It could

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>reflect poorly on everything else, but then the person gets

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the punishment for it. Meanwhile, you have this growing pool

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of people who are seeking jobs who are getting rejected,

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so they're back in the job hunt and they're looking

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for more stuff, so they're more likely to apply to

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of different positions for which they're qualified in the

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hopes of landing something. But that means that the companies

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that are posting those positions are going to see even

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>more applicants as more rejections join the job pool, and

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that means that they get flooded with applicants, which means

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that they feel like they have to rely upon this

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of software in order to do that initial sorting.

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And thus we see the problem get worse and it

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>feeds upon itself. Cycle after cycle, and as the software

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes more entrenched in this hiring process, it gets harder

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to shift to a different approach. Now, I wish I

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>had a happy ending to the story, but unless companies

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>across industries make a concerted effort to change, or unless

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the organizations that offer these services work really hard to

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>eliminate those errors, this is going to keep going. And yes,

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I recognize the irony that some of those jobs seeking

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>companies have advertised on this show. Now, to be clear,

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I think their mission is admirable. The idea of let's

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>make it easier for the right people to find the

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>right jobs. I think that's great. That's a fantastic mission.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I also think that, at least in some cases, the

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>execution of that mission really needs some work. Analytics firm

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>app Any reports that Android users are spending more time

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>watching content on TikTok than on YouTube on a monthly basis,

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and that this has been going on since August of

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>last year here in the United States, and over in

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the UK it's been going on since May of last year.

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So on average, users were spending around twenty two hours

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and forty minutes per month watching content on YouTube, but

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a full twenty four hours per month watching content on TikTok.

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of TikTok because those videos tend to

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>be pretty short, and YouTube has been leaning harder toward

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>promoting long form content. So it's two totally different content strategies.

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So for TikTok to overtake YouTube is pretty darn impressive

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's so many videos. All I can say is

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that I contributed more toward YouTube because I watched maybe

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>five or six TikTok videos a month because I'm old

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm out of touch. That's not even really a joke.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It's more of a true statement. But the report was

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>focused solely on Android devices. I do not have any

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>details about iOS devices, but I would be shocked if

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a much different story. I figured it's probably

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhere all on the same lines. Also, while users were

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>spending more time on TikTok than on YouTube, I should

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>point out YouTube still has way more active users than

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>TikTok does, so when it comes down to overall numbers,

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is still well in the lead. But it was

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see the viewing trends are favoring TikTok. And

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>our final story is about a man named Gilbert Michaels,

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>who recently received a prison sentence of four years for

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the crime of selling printer toner for way too much

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>money to small businesses and nonprofit organizations. The seventy nine

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>year old had been selling Toner to these smaller entities

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for decades at a huge markup, sometimes up to ten

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>times the actual market price for Toner, which if you've

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>ever shot for Toner you know is already wicked expensive.

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And he is the good old telemarketer fraud approach to

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>do it, and it was effective. He was doing this

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>as far back as the nineteen seventies, and prosecutors said

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that in one six year span he made one twenty

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>six million dollars defrauding clients and selling them Toner at

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>elevated prices. Michaels was found guilty on charges of mail fraud,

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>money laundering, and conspiracy back in two thousand nineteen, so

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>this was just his sentencing trial. He had already been

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>found guilty of the crimes and this story is pretty awful.

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So essentially Michael's and his conspirators would contact these various targets,

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>these small businesses and charities, often posing as representatives for

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>legit vendors, companies that had an established relationship with the

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>targets and had sold them toner in the past, so

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they would essentially pose as these legitimate vendors, and then

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they would say, oh, so the price of toner has increased, however,

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to sell you toner at the lower price,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, to help you out. So go ahead and

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>agree to purchase the next box of toner, and then

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they would get someone to sign over on that. They

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>would then send the toner, but they would send an

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>invoice with an h an enormously inflated price for the toner,

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>so instead of that lower price they had said on

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the phone and ends up being a much much higher price.

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And then they would threaten legal action and UH and

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 1>collections agencies and such if the target refused to pay up,

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or they would charge exorbitant restocking fees if the clients

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>returned the toner. So it was definitely shady, illegal stuff.

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, not all tech crime involves cryptocurrency and hacking.

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it just involves good old fraud on the telephone

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and some insanely expensive toner. And that's the tech news

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for Tuesday, September seven, One if you have suggestions for

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>things I should cover on the show, any tech companies

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or technologies that you're interested in, or trends in tech.

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Reach out to me on Twitter. The handle is tech

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuff H s W and I'll talk to you again

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tech Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.