WEBVTT - TikTok CEO on Capitol Hill and Hindenburg Shorts Block

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>From hard of were Innovation, Money Empower Colne in Silicon Valley, NBR.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde of Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlow is off today. This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up,

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>we go live to Capitol Hill where the CEO of

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is defending his company against the US lawmakers who

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>are calling for a band. We're bringing the details, and

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>short seller Hendenberg Research targeting block with its latest report.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We break down what's about cash app Unit in particular

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's concerned about as the payments company plunges in trading,

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus lights Camera, Apple, the iphonemaker spending billions to break

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>into show business, more on the company's plans to raise

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>its Hollywood profile, and a low subscribers to streaming service,

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>all that so much more. Coming up meanwhile is Apple

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and some of the big techs seeming like some sort

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>of haven on the day. We're currently seeing the naszack

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>up more than two percentage points, even though we continue

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to worry about some of the solidity in the banks.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Today the stock six hundred is actually down on the

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>day largely dragged down by those banking stocks over in Europe,

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Pound. Want to keep an eye on Europe still trading,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, the pound up four tenths of percent as

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we do. Indeed, see the Bank of England light the

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>United States Federal Reserve high grates by twenty five basis points.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, that's the macro picture for all of your

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>technology investors out there. I'm looking at what's happening in

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin though, because once again is this a haven of choices.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a move that we see as we still worry

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and remain cynical around a banking industry. Here in the

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>United States, we're up five percent over the course of

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>just US trading day alone. But we want to dive

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>into the micro moves that are so important on the day.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's going over to bring most critic up to Yeah. Well, Carolin,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you've covered the macro pretty well with getting to the

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>micro some major movers to your point, and we are

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of that kind of green on the

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>screen coming from a technology space. You're more biggest INDESK contributors, Apple, Amazon,

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and Bidea is really in kind of focus here, and

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I really want to talk about some of the downside

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>movers here because to your point, Caroline, those crypto stocks

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 1>are getting hit hard, but not necessarily for the fundamental reasons. Look,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the macro reasons. The Block story is fascinating.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Hindenburg Research coming out with the short report saying, look,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they are concerned about Block and the financing. They're the

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Block formerly known as Square, Jack Dorsey's baby, basically that

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>sending the shares down about thirteen and a half percent.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>We are still, of course waiting for comment from Block

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. We want to talk about coin base getting

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>quite the hit after the SEC yesterday after hours put

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it on notice when it comes to some of their offerings.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>This is really important in the crypto space because one

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of the big issues has simply been crypto ETFs and

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they can actually pass as a real

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>moving vehicle. The upside their story is interesting, Caroline. At

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the top you mentioned that TikTok hearing over in Congress.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>You are seeing snapshares rally off that. Remember, Snap is

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the major benefactors. If TikTok isn't the band

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>at least on government devices stay side and around the world.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So snapshares highed by four point four percent and Netflix. Look,

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no fundamental reason here yet for Netflix, but you

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have to know a nine percent rally is nothing to

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>scoff at one of the biggest heavy volume trades. Who

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are seeing today some rumors about kind of funding from Apple.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>But it's really something to keep an eye on. Caroline,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good to such a great wrap up. Thank you.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the key story of a Day,

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>which is called TikTok CEO show to testifying on Capitol

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Hill as lawmakers call for a band. Here's just some

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of what he's had to say earlier about Chinese access

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to its user data. I have seen no evidence that

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government has access to that data. They have

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>never asked us. We have not provided well in a

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>way I've asked that I find that actually preposterous. I

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have looked in I have seen no evidence of this happening.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And in order to assure everybody here and all our users,

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>our commitment is to move day data into the United

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>States to be stored on American soil by an American company,

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>overseen by American personnel. May we go now to Capitol Hill,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>where not only a show to still being testified, over there.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But Alex Sperenca is standing by to bring us anything

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that actually we've learned that is new, anything in the arguments,

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the nuances that we hadn't heard before. So show Chu

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is really coming in with a lot of what we've

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>heard before, and that doesn't seem to be wooing what

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>we knew to be some skeptical lawmakers. Lawmakers started this

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>testimony which is still on going just behind me in

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>front of a packed room, basically trying to establish the

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>TikTok connection to China. Chu was queried on who prepped

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>him for this testimony. Was it anyone from Mite Dance?

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>How often does he talk to Chinese executives? Has he

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>heard from anyone from in the Chinese Communist Party? It

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was basically an establishment from these skeptical lawmakers to try

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to connect TikTok to China. Now Chu has come back

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of the facts we've heard before that

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he is working on coordinating off user data here in

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the US, that he does not talk to the Chinese

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party. But I will tell you, Caroline, based on

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of him being cut off by a lot of

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>these lawmakers, based on the times that the chairwoman has

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>not allowed him to respond to questions. It doesn't seem

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like he's making any headway with this group in the room.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It really is notable as we still go to the

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>room and say, we've got a wonderful tea live blog

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>going on the Bloomberg terminal, Alex that I know you're

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>contributing to, as well as some of our other reporters.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Brodie Ford saying that at the moment a Georgia Republican

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Buddy Carter, once again talking about deadly TikTok challenges, that

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be really the emotive subject, isn't it children

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in particular? There it was, and I will tell you

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the room got very quiet earlier in the day when

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a number of videos of users talking about suicide were

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>played for the committee, and that seems to be kind

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of the emotional heartstrings that the lawmakers are pulling on.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>What is TikTok doing to protect our children? Now? Sho

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>did come back and say we have strong content moderation policies.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>We are putting in time limits for users under the

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>age of eighteen. But I will how you those answers

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>as well were responded to by the lawmaker saying that's

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not enough. I hear what you're doing now, but I

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>need you to commit to more brief recess has been cooled.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>It's going to get busy in that corridor with you. Alex.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Just set the scene a little bit, because you did

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful piece of digging on really the Ventia community

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in and around the relationship, broader relationship between US and China.

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>There was an important dinner last night with an old

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>coastala there. We understand Peter tale as well, what are lawmakers?

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Who are lawmakers listening to aside from the leader TikTok?

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>That's right, literally with an eye shot across the lawn

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>from Capitol Hill, the Hill and Valley Foundation where Peter

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>TiAl spoke last night was again this kind of line

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of anti China sentiment. Basically, Peter Teal compared TikTok to

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the US homeless problem, saying it's something that we just

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>can't fix. So there are folks on both sides of

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the coast here in the US who are definitely not

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok side. And I will tell you in terms

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of lies here on the Hill, TikTok has had a

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>few We heard Representative Jamal Bowman speak yesterday at a

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 1>TikTok event on the lawn outside of the Capitol building.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But there are not very many voices who are piping up.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And we've heard during this hearing from the other House

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>from senators who are also coming out with some strong

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>calls to continue to try to be on TikTok. Alex Brinka,

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll let you get back to trying to speak to

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some of those lawmakers. We thank you so much. Meanwhile,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we got another one for you right now, Representative Jim

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Himes of Connecticut, who is on the House Select Committee

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on Intelligence, so deep knowledge on perhaps some of the

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>data issues at stake here with TikTok, as well as

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of course the financial services is another area that you oversee, Jim,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and accomplishment is great to have some time with you. Please,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can you just talk to us a little bit about

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in February you said you're not quite there yet about

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>an idea of imposing an outright ban on TikTok. You

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>needed to learn more. Do you feel you've learned more

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision yet? No, I haven't. And let's

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>face it, we're not doing a lot of learning today today.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>As one of those moments the Congress where a witness

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>gets beat up, the witness is not allowed to answer

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the questions. You know, this is a moment of people

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>expressing emotion. And I think, look, I've said this before.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I work a lot in national security. TikTok is not

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on my phone, It's not anywhere near my phone, and

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>people in sensitive positions, because of course TikTok is probably

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>more accessible to the Chinese government than most platforms. Shouldn't

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>be on anybody who's a phone who does this stuff.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But look, an outright ban. This is a deep breath moment,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>right because the American people need to reflect on the

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>equities associated with saying sorry, the federal government is not

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>going to let you use this media. And my question is,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>where's the limiting principle? What if, all of a sudden

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we get really angry at Belarost, does that mean that

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we ban access to Belarusian newspapers. All I'm saying here

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is that we need to think about what we really

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do about this. The CEO apparently this morning

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>offered the idea of moving the servers to a non

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese country, to the United States. I think he said

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they could contemplate an ownership change. But before we all

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>get on the bandwagon of having the federal government ban

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Americans access to a particular media, we do need to

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>reflect on what, you know, what's the limiting principle? What

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>does that precedent establish with respect of the power of

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the federal government. It feels as though you're aligning yourself

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in some way with your consistent your constituents. Here one

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million people use this app. But how

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>what would you like to see other than moving servers?

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it would a nice balancing app for you be

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a sell off in some way? And what do you

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>think to China's reaction earlier today the comment secretary, They're saying, well,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that's not going on unless we approve it. Well, I

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think in this instance, I'm actually not aligning myself with

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>my constituents. I'm drawing on what I know about Chinese

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>capabilities and what I know about the Constitution of United

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>States in the First Amendment. What I can tell you

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the Chinese are pretty darn good at breaking

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>into anything they want to break into. They're not the

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>only ones that are good at that. But you know,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>here we are, you know, calling for a ban on

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>TikTok when we actually haven't as a Congress been able

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to put in place a federal privacy regulation. So, yes,

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communist Party, we really don't want them to

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have our data. But guess what you know, Facebook, Instagram,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these entities have our data. They sell it.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest that the first thing we ought to

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>do is actually pass some federal privacy legislation and then

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>really get into the details of what a good solution

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>might be with respect to TikTok. Maybe it is moving

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>all of their operations outside of China, maybe it is

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>an ownership change. But again, this is one of those moments.

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit like when we think we've really

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>accomplished something because we rename the French fries in the

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>cafeteria freedom fries because we're angry at the French. Right.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>This is again a moment with a lot at stake

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in which we ought to be maybe a little bit

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>more deliberate than we're being today. Congressman, how optimistic call

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you that such a deal can get done around privacy

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on a bipodism basis. Well, look, at the end of

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, this is well, let's let's let's focus on

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok for a second. You know, TikTok is obviously absorbing

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>sentiment right now. They might want to think about what

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they might do with respect to ownership, with respect to

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>where their operations are located, to maybe take this issue

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>off the table. Privacy, Frankly, this is an area where

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the Congress has been remiss to say the least right.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have to daughters who live on social media,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and it just appalls me to imagine that pretty much

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody out there can buy their data that they see

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there in some instances, most intimate interactions with commercial retailers

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing. It should happen, But sadly,

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, we had a little bit of

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>progress in the last Congress, but it hasn't happened. So

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>my advice would be, let's continue to study TikTok and

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think about the right way to handle it. But for

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>God's sakes, let's get some federal privacy legislation done the

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>way Europe has done, the way lots of countries have done.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Until we do that, it's a little hard for us

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to step onto a soapbox and decide that we're going

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a massive moral high ground on issues of

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>privacy at the moment, the evidence for you TikTok Ceo

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>saying there isn't any evidence that China has had access

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to the data. Do you believe him? I don't have

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>any information either way. I can tell you, though, as

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a member of the Intelligence Committee, that if the Chinese

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>want access to that data, they will get it. They

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>might not tell TikTok, but the Chinese are adept at

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>breaking into pretty much anything they want to break into

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the way. That's something to think about. Even if all

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden the servers were located in the United States,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't tell you that. I'm one hundred percent confidence

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese can't get it there too. I can't

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>tell you that the Chinese can't get into Facebook servers.

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know the answer to the question. But

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a little more complicated than just simply where their

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>servers are located. Tell you what's also been complicated for

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>technology investors, for technology builders has been the banking system

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of late Congressman Himes. And I know you've got some

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>expertise their former banko government, of course, on the Select

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Committee for Economic Disparity and Fairness and growth. How concerned

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are you at the moment that companies that are building

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>have access to funds that they need and have well

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>security in the overall banking system here in the United States.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel very good about the overall banking system. I

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>was a freshman here in two thousand and nine when

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we really thought that JP Morgan and City Bank and

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>other huge banks were going to fail, and there was

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a very real risk that they would. The sector itself

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is very strong right now. We obviously saw problems at

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>three or four banks. I think that the regulators and

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve stepped in in a very competent way

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to handle. I do think we've got a little bit

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of work to think about. A world in which you

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>depositors only deposit the guaranteed amount at small and medium

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>sized banks. That of course creates a lot of pressure

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>for consolidation in the industry. But to answer your question,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think today we may see stock prices move up

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and down in the coming days and weeks or so,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but my sense is that overall the banking system is very,

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>very safe and depositors should not be worried about their

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>about their deposits. Congressman Jim Himes. We thank you so

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>much for your time your expertise across well all areas

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of technology. Today. Betting against Jack Dulsey, Hindenburgh Research strikes again.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>It is a forensic research outfit and a well known

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>short seller. This time it's claiming that the company Block

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>that Jack Dulsey runs was facilitating forsters who will fordulently

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>used government stimulus programs during the pandemic. Block, which owns

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>cash app Tidal, the music streaming companies set up by

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>jay Z, is down twenty percent on the news. Hinnumburg

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Research claims that after a two year investigation, they've understood

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>cash app was facilitating billions in government payment forward. Basically,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>multiple people would use the same bank account to claim

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>government stimulus. Hindumburg says these were brazen red flags of

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>forward and down to shortcomings in compliance now. Hinneburg also

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>takes issue with other areas of block, saying that cash

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>app is over inflating the amount of users it has,

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't like the way in which it's charging

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>merchants every time you swipe your card, and also it's

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>critical of the twenty nine billion dollar deal that was

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>made to buy Australian buy now, pay later company after Pay.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.479
<v Speaker 1>So far, we're yet to hear from Block's own executives,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but we do know that some analysts have weighed in

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>already Bared for example, saying, look, they are worried if

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there's any criminal activity what that does to invest a sentiment,

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But from their perspective, the share as a good un

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Someone's got even more information than this, pretty most Jennys

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Terrain in London helping break down this story and so

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly Jenny. Thus far we've still not heard from Block.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You've reached out many other people have. What do we

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>know in terms of other implications to the business model here,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>because we know that there's been regulatory concerns shall we say, viruses, paypals,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Venmo and the likes. Yeah, I think there's a few

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>different pieces that I think folks are really keying in

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>on with this. I mean, I think any implication that

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>criminal actors are using blocks cash app to facilitate their

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>transactions is you know, really bad news. I think that's

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when you get regulators looking at you. They could impose

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of penalties, whether that's monetary or you know,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>different remediation activities. So that's something that investors will really

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>keen on and want to see further proof of and

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>probably hear from the company on you know, I whether

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>or not this is true obviously first, but if it is,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, how are they what steps are they taking

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to try and stop that. So I think that's probably

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing folks are keying in on, and

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other stuff that they laid out,

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's stuff that was probably a little bit known by

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the investor community, but seeing it all laid out, and

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this very lengthy report at the end of

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a two year investigation, it is sending kind of chills

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>through through not just block stock, but really the entire

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>payments industry. Well said, interestingly, this is a company that

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>has full of from grace in terms of a market

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>capitalization perspective since the Well area of twenty twenty one,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when we were still very much caught up in COVID concerns.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Was that to do with some of these warriors around

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the broader ecosystem and ultimately governance of it. No, So

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this is it's another example where you know,

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got a macro issue weighing on a stock which

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is during the pandemic, Block and all of the other

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>big payment processors solve volumes really balloon because folks were

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>trapped inside and suddenly spending a lot more money, you know,

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>online and doing a lot more online shopping and doing

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot more mobile money transfers of cash app has

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>really taken off in the past few years, but that's

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>slowed down, you know, just it's hard to keep lapping

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>such intense growth and so they've had to lean on

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>new areas and so that has just been a broader

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>overhang on the entire payment sector and it is not

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>block specific. What is block block specific today is this accusation,

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know from Hindenburg that we could be seeing widespread

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent use of cash app, and and that's something that

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it would be very specific to this company,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and it's why their stock is down, you know, as

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>much as it is today. And we such targets do

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>tend to see sustained Prussia on their stocks. Jenny Soerine,

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>we thank you so much, coming a love from London

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for us, coming out from Teshiba to AI to EVS.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We will run you through all the rest that's going

0:17:55.560 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on in technology. We're talking Tech Next Discipline book. Nvidia

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Chief Technology of A Michael Kagan says a new revolution

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and technology will present multiple opportunities going forward for his

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>own company, especially bring bags, Tom McKenzie. Every every new

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>technology and every new revolutional technology, it's opportunity for doing

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>good things and for opportunity for going bad things, and

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we definitely need to be aware of this and be

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ready to mitigate this. Wet Nvidia, you know, work very

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>closely with the collaborating with the regulations we are making

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to what to extend that we can make sure that

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>our technology and our products don't get to the beat hands.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We can trace it down all the way to the

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to the end user. But we make sure that people

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that we sell our things for, our technology for, and

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>our products for are not using them in the way

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that will damage the society. Okay, So your comfort that

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the framework and a focus on ethics

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of AI, the end video is doing enough. I think

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it is doing more than enough. We are on the

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>very extreme case side of this. We are definitely not

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>doing anything in the gray area. It's very black and white.

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We are we are we are not getting to the

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gray area. And we're also developing the technologies that will

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>enable to mitigate cyber attacks in the data center. Actually,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>now there's people even more dependent on the data center infrastructure,

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and we are building the technology that will enable the

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>provisioning and mitigating the cyber attack within milliseconds or seconds

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>versus few months that it would it takes. Today, you

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have two customers, and Video has customers of course all

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>over the world. You're a global company. Some of those

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>customers include Chinese companies Ali, Baba, ten Cent, by To.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you serve your Chinese clients and customers given

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the ban by the US on those high end chips,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the A one hundreds, the one hundreds, how do you

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to serve those Chinese clients? Okay, so first of all,

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at the Chinese Chinese market,

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a big market and they better have the computing

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>accelerating technology so they will use a reasonable amount of energy.

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>There is a bend on the and the restrictions of

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>sell some type of chips to the to the to

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>chatter market, and we have chips that comply with the regulations.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>We're definitely not violating any regulations of the of the

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>US government. We have products that we can serve China

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>market within restrictions and within the rules that are imposed

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>by the US government. Video CTO that Michael Cagan. Time

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>now for talking technology and we can stick on the

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>theme of AI. Startup Character AI, which lets people create

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>their own chatbotses raised one hundred fifty million dollars in

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>funding round led by and Recent Horowitz, notching a one

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar valuation from investors. Now Sarah Wang and general

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>partner over At and Reason will join the company's board.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>As part of the deal, Teshiba accepted buy out an

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>offer from Japanese consortium, moving a step closer to ending

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>years of turbulence for the company. Seventeen Japanese companies and

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>six domestic financial institutions will participate in this buyout. It's

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>led by the domestic private equity company Japan Industrial Partners.

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>The fifteen billion dollars bid I sent the US listed

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>shares rising more than nine percent in New York, the

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>most since October. And finally, let's check out Forward because

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it is predicting losses in the EV business that will

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>grow to three billion dollars this year as it spends

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>big on new models and factories to take on of course, Tesla,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the deficit matches and accumulated EV losses over the past

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. The company, well, it's keeping its profit

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>forecast for the current year unchanged. Let's get back to

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>world of technology. Let's get back to TikTok. Of course,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO giving testimony on the Hill, we're worried about the

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>security concerns around the app will show too. Of course,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>it's continuing to try and broaden out this conversation not

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>just on TikTok's data privacy, but the intire social media

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>industry at large. He says, the companies Project Texas. Of course,

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that plan to far wall all US user data in

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the United States is more than some other companies can promise.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's TikTok only app of concern. Ivan Sereny is

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 1>with us. He is founder and CEO of Ferrut. It's

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a startup that provides technology solutions for corporate customers dealing

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with so called data creep, helping them comply with privacy regulation.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>What's so fascinating, Ivan about the reporting that you've just

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>been doing, is that well a report that you what

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was it? Reviewed websites and more than three thousand, five

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred companies and basically you're seeing so called tracking pixels

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>from TikTok's parent company present and even some government websites.

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us about how difficult courtailing data collection

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>will be for TikTok? Yes, thanks for asking. It's a

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>very great question. That's one of the things that the

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>far Wall is really eye opening is just how many

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>big sourcing trackers are actually collecting sensitive user information without

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>ever asking for consent, and very often without even companies

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>whose websites they are running on being aware of those

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>pixels and truckers being present there, and that it is

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>very very common. It is not just a TikTok concern.

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It's broader concerned obviously, because there's it's you know, we've

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>seen Google Matter and there will be Microsoft, all kinds

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of tech companies being present there. But what is really

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>concerning is that, for example, by Dance and TikTok were

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>bank by executive orders and there were still present on

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>government websites. So if we do see a ban, for example,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok here in the United States, does it do

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>anything well? Band or change of ownership or a band

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>will not necessarily solve all the problems. Kind of once

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>since for all, what I believe is really concerning is

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that there is no governance around what actually happens with

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the data that is being collected. It's less of a

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>band of TikTok, more of having clear rules for all

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the players to follow and have third party validation, maybe alreading,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and accountability and responsibility for bodies who do not follow

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>their rules and violate them. Can you just for those

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>who not particularly adapt to understanding what embedded pixels really mean?

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>What is it? What is happening? What is being teased

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>out of us in terms of our own data? So

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what are pixels? It's they're just like meny spy balloons.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember that giants by balloon a few weeks ago that

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>air force shout out of the sky. So pixels are

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like tiny spy balloons that are embedded into a website's

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>role used on every day, like when you book your

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>appointment through the doctor, when you are perhaps renewing your

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>driver's license, or shopping or doing anything else, and they're

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>watching everything you do or a person does. They can

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>collect and often we see they're actually drabbing everything that

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you're typing in into the forms like your passwords, your

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>precurret numbers, maybe your diagnosis, your health records, and anything else.

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's a really big concern with pixels and what

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we've found that they are actually doing. Why if we

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>went to executives at not just TikTok, but as you mentioned,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it's be other companies, Microsoft, Meta, what would they

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>say they're using them for in a legitimate manner? So

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pixels are legitimate business touls because companies need to market,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to advertise, they need to attract customers, they

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>need to grow. So pixels do have very legitimate rules purpose.

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>What they don't have is clear rules that they need

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to follow, and very often we've seen that. We've found

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that pixels are doing way more and collecting way more

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>information than anyone realizes. Okay, so but how can you

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>put the genie back in the bottle If these things

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>are already out there? And you've said through your three thousand,

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>five hundred companies and organizations that you've looked at, was

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it websites across twenty seven states of US state governments

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are being implicated here? What's to be done? Can you

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>clean up the system in any way or is it

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>more just about disclosure? Well, cleaning up. There's no magic bullet,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no magic want to say, you know that will

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem once all overnight. But there are steps. Definitely,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>some jurisdictions already have taken clear steps, like in Europe

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>there's GDPR and you know people are being held accountable

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>for breaking it. So it's it's a continuous in fourth clarity,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>driving clarity, clarity of what needs to be done, just

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like what has been done in a financial sector, and

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that the financial sector is now a lot

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>more robust because of regulations. I mean, of course you've

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>made this data public. Have any of the US stating

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>governments that manage the websites come to you and said

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>what can be done? Is what are you doing with

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the own data that you're managing to now bring to light? Yes, definitely,

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>we've we've been reached out by Department of Justices and

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>teams for various states already. And just like in a

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ball Suit Journal article published a few days ago, they

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that even the states that they have validated where

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>TikTok was present and collecting information, that they quickly went

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in and remediated to make sure it's not there, and

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that removed it. So there is technical measures that can

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be put in place to prevent this, but it's there's

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>no priority on it or clear variness how common that

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>issue is, but it is solvable. Let's also just bring

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in our own audience for a moment. Ivan and we

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>went to them sort of ultimately asking to care very

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>much about TikTok and whether or not they should sell

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>off to a US company, whether whether they even use

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the app. I have to say, seemingly our audience and

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>technology focused audience, actually half of them basically don't use

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the app at all. I'm interested in whether you think

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>people care about the data the consumer. How would you

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>say to them that you should care about where your

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>data is ending up. Well, that's a very big question.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Well why we care or why to care is? First

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's the free freedom. You know, when it's important.

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Protecting the freedom to be personally is really important. So

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm based in Toronto, Canada, and right now there are

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>concerns and the talks that there were interference by China

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Canadian elections process, for example, or there's many

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>other topics that are being brought up in the current

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>congressional hearing with the CEO of TikTok, where the data

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is being collected or has been accessed for spine, for

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>surveillance on members of the military, members of sensitive groups

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of people. So there's definitely I see personally, there's a

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely big impact on us as people maybe not felt

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>immediately right away, but over some period of time it

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>will definitely creep in and can impact all of us. Ivan,

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for bringing us your data. Ivan Thrainy, the

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder of Furup. We thank him. Meanwhile,

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get over to another Chinese related company. Ten Cents

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>surging actually more than eight percent and most in about

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>four months, with traders citing unfounded talk that China's new premiere.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That's Jijing Ping's top deputy Lequang toward the company's headquarters,

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>though there was a visit from a Communist Party regional

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>representative early today, according to the official weechat account of

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a local state media outlet. The rally also comes after

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the China social media leader, of course, came out yesterday

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>with news of a resumption in revenue growth. I'll be

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it a tiny bit in its fourth quarter. Coming up,

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk all things crypto and regulation and more Hahn

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Ventures chrys La Haynes with us. Next, of course, we're

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>watching shares a coin base as the company gets SEC

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>notice on and they intent to sue over its offerings.

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to digest all of that the Shinali Bassac.

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring back let's talk Hollywood for a moment. Apple

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is trying to raise its profile there and law subscribers

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>into its streaming service while planning to spend big one

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year to produce movies that will be

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>released in theaters. No less, according to sources, Let's bring

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg's Mark German, who has more and just how

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>big a step is this to be teaming up with

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Scorsese and they like and actually bringing it to theaters

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for us to go see. Yeah, the significance here is

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that they're upping this budget for theatrical right, for full

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>featured length movies, for movies they want to put in

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters pretty significantly. Right. They're in talks with a

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>movie for with Scorskazy for almost a quarter billion dollars. Right,

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That would probably be the most that they've spent on

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a movie during this whole tenure of Apple TV, plus

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>since it launched in twenty nineteen. They're thinking bigger and grander.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>They've seen how Coda has done, They've seen how their

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>other shows and movies have done, how they're winning awards,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Oscars in the like. Right, They're very excited about this.

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>They want to keep buying new content, making new content

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as a way to keep people buying subscriptions to TV Plus.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is quite significant, according to the reporting from

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>our Thomas Buckley and Lucas Sean but mark to that point,

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>They've obviously had success awards, but haven't managed to luring

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>people to the streaming service. They've got twenty to forty

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers versus two hundred million more over at Netflix.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So why do they think this sort of marketing is

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>going to win out? Yeah? I mean, right now, it's

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>very clear that Apple is getting a lot of its

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>subscribers in Watch on TV Plus on plans like for instance,

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I have T Mobile as my phone carrier, and my

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>plan comes with Apple TV Plus, so I'm not paying

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>out a pocket to Apple for TV Plus. They have

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of agreement that lets me and other T

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Mobile customers get it for free. Many Apple products these

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>days come with three months free of Apple TV Plus.

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It used to be a year free, right. There's the

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple one bundles where Apple TV Plus is part of that.

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's unclear how many people are paying the six

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine a month for Apple TV Plus. Clearly Apple

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to widen that, right, and the way to do

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that is to get better and better content that you're

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>not able to get at competitors like Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, Disney, etc. Obviously,

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Scorsese's a big name, there's other big names. There's an

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Idris Elba TV show coming to TV Plus that I

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>saw as I was scrolling through TV plus options last night.

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>There was Schmigadoon that was quite popular, Ted Lasso. Everyone

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is talking about severance. Clearly Apple has some cultural hits

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on its hands, and it has so much cash it

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>wants to do more and more and more. The only

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>pause I have is how do you square that with

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the budget cuts and across the rest of the business.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But I guess you really have to keep investing, and

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they probably put the bucket for a TV Plus investment

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the R and D budget rather than the affects.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Interesting nuances there. We thank you. It's helping some of

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cinema chains today as well. Cinema an AMC doing

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>well on the back of it, Margam and thank you.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk crypto now, with already talked about block earlier

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in the show, shares sinking after the Hindenberg Research says

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it took a short position in that company. Now, let's

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>turn to coin Base. It's also under pressure. That's because

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the crypto Exchange says it received a notice from the

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>SEC formally declaring these security regulators clans to bring an

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement action against it. Shares currently off by another twenty percent.

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Umgazaan Ali Bass helped talk around this news break It

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>analyst Jefferies Mazooo say, basically a food of net revenue

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of Coinbase could be affected by this. Well what's strange

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>about this Wells notice and what they've heard from the

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>SEC is we've seen the SEC target different companies for

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>different products, but this Wells notice seems to be encompassing

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple parts of the business at the same time. That is,

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>parts of the exchange business, the wallet business, the staking

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as a service business. And therefore you have coin Bass

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>executives fighting back and saying that the SEC has been

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>neither fair nor reasonable throughout this process. Remember, we have

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.240
<v Speaker 1>seen the tones change from coin Base for the last

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>year really be very open and vocal about their coordination

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC and trying to work with them. So

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>things are certainly escalating and coming to a head here

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to different parts of their business. As

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you see, the stock is certainly reacting to this news.

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a wells notice. This is an intent

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to take action, but not action yet. I think what's

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting here is that we don't know where this goes

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>from the SEC's perspective, but you do have coin Base

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that they welcome a suit and legal action if

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>this were to escal eight here. So let's see if

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the two sides really reached a reasonable solution here. But

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly the direction of travel has been in the direction

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of fighting about what the meaning of crypto is. Oppenheimer

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst saying that the unhealthy regulatory environment is why they're

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>currently downgrading the stock. Shinali is gonna be sticking with us,

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>just a full disclosure on my part my husband as

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>a senior manager over at Coinbase, But nevertheless, we're going

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to dig more into this with Hahn Bench's chief strategy officer,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris Lahine, because you have expertise, you of course have

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a focus on coin Base. Now you're someone who used

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to serve in administrations previously. You understand the conversation that

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>needs to go on between new innovative businesses and politicians

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and regulators. I'm interested when coinbas is with the SEC

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more than sixty times over the last nine months, what

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is not working here? Yeah, it's a great question, and

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. I think you guys actually broke

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>this news yesterday Bloomberg did so. A couple thoughts here.

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I do think, just step way back

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is part of the broader journey that I

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>think any innovative company is going to have, particularly one

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that's trying to ultimately disrupt the status quo of our

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>financial system and dealing with regulators who effectively want to

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>maintain the status quo. So I think just understanding that

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a long journey. I was

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>particularly struck by the fact, and I think coin Base

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>has made this really clear in their communications yesterday, that

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they effectively went through an SEC process right there. S

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>one was reviewed. It was part of the process of

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>being able to become a public company, you know, and

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that s one really laid out their business model, and

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so now you have the SEC basically coming back on

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>something that had already gone through a review process. And

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that really does speak to why coin Base

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>has reflected a lot of confidence in terms of where

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they are on the law of the facts and this

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>process going forward. And we're in an atmosphere and going

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to your core of your question where you know, basically

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>we're getting regulatory action and clarity to enforcement. That is

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>not the best way to develop policy in this country.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I was around way back when in the mid nineties

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>when Democrats and Republicans work together passed the Telcoact that

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>became the framework for what ultimately became the Internet and

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>why it was based here in the US and not

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in other places in the world. And policy through enforcement

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is not the best way to optimize first principle. Yeah,

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>what about just recognizing here that coin base is the

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>largest US crypto exchange, It's a publicly traded exchange. It

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has been given the blessing of investors as well as

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. To your point, what would happen if it

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>goes down the road of the SEC cracking down in

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a much more significant way? Do you think that the

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimate goal here is to stifle the crypto industry, because

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>given the publicly traded nature of this company, this would

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be the way for them to do it. Yeah, well

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you have this action. You have a lot of activity

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>taking place with quote unquote the banking where any number

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of institutions are purported taking steps to make it harder

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and harder for the crypto sector to do banking in

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this country. You had an Electric Capital report. Electric Capital

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is a venture capital fund here in the valley that

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 1>just the other day was released showing that there's one

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>million high quality engineering jobs on the table there are

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be created over the next five or six years.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>The real question is not whether those jobs are going

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to be created. The real question is do they take

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>place here in the US or do they migrate abroad.

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And what is really telling is that if you look

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.959
<v Speaker 1>around the world, the UK, Caroline, where you were from,

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the EU, Japan, Australia, Dubai, Brazil, all of these places

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are moving pretty aggressively to put a regulatory perimeter around

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto to give it a certainty and clarity that folks

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>are looking for, but specifically with the intent, as they

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have stated to become crypto hubs. They understand that this

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>technology will play a really critical role in the future

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>rails of financial systems and want to make sure that

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they actually owned some of that real estate that's really

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in a sharp contrast to where the US is. And ultimately,

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>those developers, those engineers, those entrepreneurs are going to follow

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>where those countries are going. And I really do fear

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>fear as an American that we are seeding our leadership

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>role on this. This technology is taking place, it's already happening.

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>There's four hundred million people across the world who use it.

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>One in five Americans question is it here or abroad?

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go one minute. Sure they haven't done

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a good enough job at making people feel confident and

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with using this sort of technology. Yeah, look, I

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 1>think that's a very fair point. I think ultimately a

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>part of this is the cryptospace themselves and making sure

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we're demonstrating the utility. The fact that forty percent of

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 1>those folks who hold crypto in the US do so

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're using it for remittance purposes. The fact that

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people use stable coins to protect themselves from inflation, to

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 1>get access to a financial system, that they currently don't

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have access to where it's hard for them to have

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>access to. So, no question, we need to make the case.

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>But it's also really important to remember that we're sort

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of at a phase in this technology that would have

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>been early nineties for the Worldwide Web, for early two

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>thousands for mobile. Some of these same questions would have

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>been posed then as part of the pace of technology.

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>AI was first introduced in nineteen sixty eight. Right now

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you're finally getting into a place being able to be

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>used Chris lahane Han Ventures, thank you for that. Shinali Bassak,

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>We thank you for rushing back to do it. That

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>does it for this edition of Bluebeg Technology. Do not

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>forget to check out our podcast. Much more conversation online,

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Join us on Twitter. This is Blomberg