WEBVTT - 2024 Bold Predictions With Justin Mason (EP. 760)

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>What's the Friends of Welcome into the Fantasy Baseball podcast

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>right here on Fantasy Pros. I am Chris Welsh. I'm

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>happy to have you all in here. No Joe piece

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of Pia he gone, He's not here for this one.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a me time, so occasionally I might require

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some me time with some of my favorites in the industry,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I'm doing today. Joining me for twenty

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four Bold Predictions. We're doing this pre camp by

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, so like I have one, I have absolutely

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>set myself up to be destroyed because it could literally

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like happen before everything this episode even airs, So just

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on that would be aware of that one. But joining

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>me for these twenty twenty four Bold Predictions is Justin Mason,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>my dear friend who you can listen to over on

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Sleeper and the Bust, Friends with Fantasy Benefits, creator and

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the creator of the Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational. Justin Mason,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what's up, Buddy?

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Hey, also a featured writer for Fantasy Pros. Like it's

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>like we're families, So yeah, it's always great to see you.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>You for sure will have your bold prediction blown prior

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to this Eric.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It is I know you know which one it is too.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is just how podcasting works that any time

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>you say something that is any remote chance of like

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>changing before you actually get to release the episode, it

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 2>will change. So yeah, that will happen. It's great to

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 2>see my friend. It's been way way too long.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It has been too long. Me and Justin pretty much

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of came up if they were like class. I've

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>always mentioned this that there's like classes of the fantasy industry.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Justin and I came up around Tennis years ago together

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the little independent world. And look at us now, Justin,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Look at us now, by the way, great great looking

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>room we have back there. I love the colors. I

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>need to put some color in here. But we are

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be going through all these bad boys. And

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned bold predictions, the interesting take we can

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have on bold predictions is it just doesn't have to

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>be like this cumulative stat though that's usually what it's

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>attached to. Since we're doing it pre ca you could

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>also say this guy, you know breaks camp, or you

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>know this guy is a halfway leader, or a certain move,

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna predict I'm actually gonna predict a convoluted

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>move that's gonna go on. So that's what we've got

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>going on today, all of our bold predictions. Justin's got five,

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got five. And I kind of view bold predictions

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes like it's not quite an urban legend, but maybe

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like a wives tale, you know why, why is wives tale?

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Where it's like there's parts of truth that's involved in it,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>but there it's probably not gonna materialize. Justin, I don't

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>know how you end up viewing bold predictions sometimes I

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>actually struggle going on the complete bold side because it's like, okay,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know Dylan See's returns, it's number one starting picture,

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you know how bold? How bold do you tend

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to want to go when you're constructing bold predictions.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>When I first started doing bold predictions, I was always like, oh,

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna make this the boldest thing possible, right, Like

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm gonna give you the hottest of hot takes.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 2>And I would do things like this picture's gonna in

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the cy Young or this player is going to be

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the best player in fantasy. Those have such small margins

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>for error, and we're already dealing with things that are

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>unlikely to happen. So if we think of like a projection, so,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 2>like you know Blake Snell's projection for twenty twenty four.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Usually that is a median projection, right, that is the

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 2>like the average of like what could happen. You could

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously do better, you could obviously do worse, but this

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 2>is kind of the baseline of the middle of what

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 2>we think could happen. So for a bold prediction, I

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>like to think of, okay, what is the eightieth percentile?

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Right if the if the projection is a fiftieth percentile,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>what is like pretty close to the top of the

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>line of what could happen? And that's kind of what

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I shoot think.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, super smart. That's a good way to approach. If

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody else is looking on how they can approach creating

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>some bold predictions, that's definitely way you can do it.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>One cool thing Justin mentioned it before. He is a

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>featured writer on Fantasy Pros And when you guys sign

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>up on premium, you get some extra access. So Fantasy

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Pros has got like a gajillion awesome thing that are free.

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can get in on a lot of

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the draft wizard stuff. You can go in sink your leagues.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of it that you can do for free, well,

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and articles as well, aggregate ranks. We've got some new

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>premium articles and actually Justin I think was one of

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the first rollouts of it, where you can get Justin's

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>top draft targets any premium article when you sign up,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>available right now, you can get a bunch of his

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>other free articles. But like I said, if you sign

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>up for a premium account fantasypros dot Com slash Premium,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you sign up today, you can get access to all

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the free stuff and all the extra goodies which there's

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>tons of will tell you about, and you can get

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Justin's favorite draft day targets. I actually mirrored his structure

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of an article, and I've got one coming out this

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>week as well. So go and check out the day.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>We'll get back to the episode in one second. Because

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it is officially Fantasy Baseball season, and that means it's

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>time for MLB Best Ball on Rival Fantasy. That's right,

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Rival Fantasy now has Best Ball. Full season lobbies are

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>live now until Opening Day, then weekly and daily drafts

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>will be available from opening day through the end of

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the World Series. Bestball is all the fun of the

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>draft without the season long management in our league drafter Squad,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and the app does the rest. No need to set

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>your lineup or make waiver moves. The highest scores at

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the end of the regular season will be the winners.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Invite your friends and start drafting for the twenty twenty

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>four fantasy baseball season today. Sign up at join Rival

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Fantasy Pros twenty three to claim your

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollars deposit match. Welcome to the future of

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports. Welcome to Rival Fantasy. Now back to the episode.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, justin, are you ready to jump into some

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bold predictions for twenty twenty four, because if you are,

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put you on the hot seat for the

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>first one. Your first bold prediction for twenty twenty four.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I'm going bold here, and this is

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 2>what I actually talked about in that article you just referenced,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>which is available at Premium. I also have another article

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 2>on Premium coming out in the next day or two

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>on high stakes drafting, So if you're interested in trying

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 2>with the high stakes world, check that article out as well.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>But this one is the guy he done six drafts

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>I think this year, and the guy I've drafted in

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>every single draft this season is Dalton var Show.

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 2>And my bold prediction for him is that he goes

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty twenty this year. I know last year was quote

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>unquote disappointing for var Show, but if you look under

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 2>the hood, everything was actually better. He actually made improvements

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 2>in zone contact. He had a very good eggs of

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 2>max eggs of velocity. I think he got a little

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 2>bit unlucky. I think he's still adjusting to Toronto now.

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I've always been a Dalton Varshow hater when he was

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 2>with your Diamondbacks, but it was mostly because I didn't

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>think he was a catcher, and the Diamonbacks organization didn't

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>think he was a catcher too, because I had someone

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>within the organization tell me once that the only person

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>who thought he was a catcher was a general manager

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 2>and that's why he kept trying to catch the minor leagues.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 2>He's not a catcher anymore. He's a full time outfielder.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a ton of upside in this bat

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Dulton Varshow this year.

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's an interesting one. Look into career. Low ground

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ball rate, which I think would absolutely be huge for him,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like second to best career strikeout rate, his walks

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have dipped a little bit. I've just always struggled with him.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>He definitely has the ability. He always steals. He doesn't

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>look like physically like the body type of a guy

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to keep stealing twenty bases, but he can

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. But it's like the really inconsistent batting average.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the inconsistent contact for me that struggles in getting

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to that number. But if you're right, here's what's var

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>show's ADP.

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it like it Probably it's around one sixty or

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>one seventy something.

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I was goot to say, like two hundred or something

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. If he goes what was the bold prediction

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you said? Was it twenty thirty or thirty thirty, twenty

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty twenty. If he goes thirty twenty, justin he's probably

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a second round player, right.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, as long as he can

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>keep that average, Like, his average is never going to

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>be super high. He's not a guy who runs with

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>really high babbitbs. But he did get unlucky in the

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 2>babby department last year. I think he's probably more like

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a two to seventy batted guy. Last year is two

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>ffty six. If you could hit two forty thirty twenty, like, yeah,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that's probably a second or third round pick that you're

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>getting super super late.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Something to watch too. Career high launch angle twenty point

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>five Toronto's like a kind of median factor ballpark factor

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as hitters go. If he shows any improvements

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>early on on barrel percentage, hard hit percentage and continues

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that launch angle, that's gonna be that like optimized stuff.

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to say Jake Berger maybe had a similar

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>line like those big launch angles Win paired with at

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>least like really hard hit balls or solid barreling, it's

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna do big numbers. He just hasn't clicked into that.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>G had a slight uptick and hard hit percentage. So

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just an all in the Dalton var show train. All right,

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>here's mine and mine is a convoluted little chain of

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>events that is probably gonna get broken by the time

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>this airs, So hopefully we get this up like immediately.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>But my bold prediction is that the Mariners sign Blake Snell,

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>then they trade Brian Wo to the Rays for Esak

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Parades because they don't have a third baseman, which then

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in turn puts junior Cameronaro on the opening day roster

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Rays, but it does not win him Rookie

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Year. We'll talk about that in a little bit.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's my bold prediction. There's been a lot of

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell stuff out there. I think the two biggest

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>The two biggest rumors have been the Angels, and apparently

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the Angels have had the interest, but they haven't been

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>given the go to release the money for Blake Snell.

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>But Blake Snell is from the Pacific Northwest. I think

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>he wants to play there. The Mariners, they've got some

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>toys to play with. If you're talking about that young pitching.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>They also can sign Blake Snell without trading Brian Wu.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>That's actually the most likely situation. Trading good young pitching

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>probably not ideal. But the reason I picked on Brian

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Wu is because I think he's an analytics darling. He

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is the exact type of pitcher the Rays would covet

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and love to get. So I don't know if Esock

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Praidies works for it straight out. There might be some

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>other pieces involved, but my idea is the Mariners have

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge hole in the corner endfield at third base

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>unless they really feel comfortable with Rojas or luis Arius.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>There had been rumors of Esock praties. They've already made

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>a trade. Wu goes into the starting rotation for the Rays,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Esock Praties comes here, Cam and Arow. It is a

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>chain of events justin. That's my bold prediction, and that

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is my pre camp bold prediction. It's the only one

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do. So what do you think about

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that one?

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I like the way you're thinking.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I had not thought about that kind of scenario, but

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>it makes a lot of sense. Like you said, Blake

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Snell is from Shoreline, Washington, so like that is home

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>for him. I'm sure he would love to go back

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and play. It's a great organization to pitch for. Imagine

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Blake Snell being your number four starting pitcher that that

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 2>would be unreal.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I think if the Mariners were going.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 2>To make a move, they should probably just sign Matt Chapman,

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, just to me, like, you know, he gives

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>you elite defense on the corner right there, and that

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of solves that problem. But I'd love to see

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Blake Snell in uh in Seattle. I don't know that

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the rest of it would fall quite that way, but

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you know it's uh, it may it all makes sense. Now,

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>let's I just want people to sign, just sign, just sign,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 2>just stop this like top four free agents still not signed.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, there is a thing. I'm gonna be very loose

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about this to not age this podcast, so we'll move

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>right past as quick. But there is a there's like

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a clerical thing that goes on with rosters where teams

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>can start putting players on sixty man's within I think

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty four hours or as this episode is airing,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and then what that's gonna do is that theoretically might

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>open up some of the doorways for players to start signing.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think that's something that's kept some of

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys away. But Jorge Hilaire just signed a three

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>year deal with your San Francisco Giants for four forty

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars. I love that signing. I wanted him

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Diamondbacks, so we might see those pickups.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's why this may fall apart. But that's also

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>why this is a bold prediction. This isn't me going, Hey,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell's gonna sign with the Mariners. This is me

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>tailing out this little story of he signs the Mariners

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>then take from what they have of depth and they

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>trade and then they get a bigger, probably better piece.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>They could sign Matt Chapman, but that doesn't make the

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>bold prediction as much fun. And it opened up the

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>junior Camonaro. So that is seven degrees of Blake Snell,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>where Blake Snell creates junior Cameron Aro having a starting role.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's my first bold prediction. Just in bold prediction

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>number two, you're up all right.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 2>So last year I made a bold prediction and actually

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>bet on it and it fell just short. But it

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>was kind of right, just for the wrong reason. That

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>was the Arizona Diamondbacks. We're gonna win the NLS. They

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.599
<v Speaker 2>didn't win the NLS. They did make it all the

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 2>way to the World Series. I just missed kind of

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>exactly where I should put my money. So this year

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do the same thing on a team that

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I think people are kind of overlooking that I actually

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of really like. Uh, And that's Kansas City Royals

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>winning the Division, winning the Al Central. I like a

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of the moves they've made that division is pretty weak.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>To say the least.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that there's a really good chance, like the

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>additions of Waka and Lugo to that rotation.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's a great part for them to pitch in.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I really really like the Royals as a team that

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>could kind of sneak up and all of a sudden, uh,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 2>look you looking at the top of that division very

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>very quickly.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think if you're if you're attaching the

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>boldness to the Royals, which is a very bold statement

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>for them to you know, win out that division, there's

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some bounce some big bounce backs or breakouts

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on that team. If you had to pinpoint a player

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or two, who are the biggest beneficiars, I agree with Waka.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I actually tend to be for whatever reason in

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the rankings on Fantasy Pros, I tend to be a

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lot higher on like Waka on Seth Lugo because I

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>think they'll eat innings. But if I were thrown at you,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know Cole Reagan's can make a jump. You

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>got mikel. Garcia, who is if he's gonna be given

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the go, might steal a lot of bases. If you

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had to pick two players to be attached to your

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bold prediction for the Royals that kind of break out,

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>who would you pick?

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Give me vinnp Like I he is one of those

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>guys that I think, had it not been for the

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>injury last year, we'd be talking about him as like

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a top five round draft pick this year. I just

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>think he has all the talent in the world of

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the ability to make contact power, and he's gonna get

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>full time playing time in Kansas City.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>The other one's Michael Massey.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Massy is one of those guys that I was really

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of in on last year, and it just he

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>never seemed to really get going. But if you actually

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 2>look at the underlying statistics for like the second half

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 2>of the year, he was really really good under the hood.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna give him a chance to play

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 2>every day he manned up in a platoon if he

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>can't handle lefties perfectly. But I think he is one

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>of those guys that is gonna go undrafted in ten

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 2>team leagues, twelve team leagues, that should be on your

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>watch list, or the last guy on your bench on

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a fifteen team leagues. He's definitely a target for me.

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's a really good like DC type of target,

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, he's a solid He's definitely a solid bet there.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Royals are winning their division. Didn't

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think we'd say that anytime soon. Probably would also be

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>very much due to Cole Reagan's. Let's just be honest too.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>If Cole Reagan's is successful, that's going to help that

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>team as well. All Right, my second bold prediction, we're

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of stay in that rookie realm. First part

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not as bold, but Jackson Holiday breaks camp with the

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Orioles and it's a starting day, second basement shortstop. They

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of laid it out if anybody missed the news

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that they said if he were to break camp with

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the team, he would be playing probably some combination of

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>second base and shortstop, but more primarily second base. So

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that might be a bit of news for people. But

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the second piece of it is, not only does he

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>break camp, he wins a Rookie of the Year. So

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the favorite is Evan. You've got Wyatt Langford that's in there,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've got quite a few interesting names that are

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>dancing around. Junior Camonaro that's another one. There's a lot

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of competition, but the Orioles are going to be great.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It will be one reason due to Jackson Holiday and

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they will do it again. They're very motivated as well

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to give these guys the playing time. Trust them. What

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>did they do with Gunner Henderson justin They let him

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>get through it. They let him work through it and

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that ended up working out. He at one point was

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>like third or fourth on the Rookie of the Year

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>awards last year on how bad it got. Jackson Holiday

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is that guy. He hit three twenty three this past

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>year over four forty OBP across. I believe it's the

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>four levels in the miners. The power wasn't quite there,

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but over one hundred walks. He's a great contact hitter.

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Big Obp showed off his batting average and the power

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to come and Gunner won it. What you know,

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty is around twenty five to ten, twenty eight, eleven,

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was. If Gunner can go fifteen to eighteen

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with thirty stolen bases and he steals a little bit

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>more while a high batting average and the Orioles win

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the division. Jackson Holliday not only breaks camp but ale

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Rookie of the year and underrated, by the way, I think,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a kind of undervalued draft asset right now, there all

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the rookies I've been talking about a decent amount justin

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, you know, Langford is in like the

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>one forties trios in the one thirties, Caminarow is back

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, but Jackson Holliday is sitting in this

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like one eighty one to ninety range. I think he's

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy that you can push up a little bit more.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you're on the same path. I don't

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>try you don't try to target too many rookies, of

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>course I don't.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>But I'm actually one lockstep with you. The I understand

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 2>like how good Langford was in the minor leagues last year,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 2>But Jackson Jackson Holliday is still the number one prospect

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of baseball, and he's got the clearest path to playing time.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Like I love why at Langford, but like, where does

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Langford actually play to start the year with Evan Carter

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and Adulas Garcia in that outfield? You know, I think

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Trio is really really interesting prospect, But where does he

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 2>play in that outfield with Christian Yelledge and Sal freylk like,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think people have talked enough about Tarrio's, like,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, issues with swing and miss at times in

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 2>the minor leagues. So I think Jackson Holiday has the

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>clearest path to playing time. There's no one on that

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 2>team that is stopping him if he's ready. And the

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Orioles have shown, unlike a team like the Brewers, that

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>they'll bring up a guy to play day one. They

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>want those draft picks that are associated with finishing high

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 2>end work of the year. I think this is actually

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a perfect bold prediction, and I think that this is

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 2>probably the bold prediction that has the best chance of

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>actually hitting.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you're like welsh, are we gonna get bolder,

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get bolder. We're gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>get bolder with you, So don't worry. Friends. Want to

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you though about the draft simulator before we move

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>forward to the rest of our bold predictions, because Fantasy

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Pros Draft Simulator it is a killer tool. You can

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>go in and you can sink your leagues and guess

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what you can mock to your league's settings. Right now,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>go in, sink, put a bunch of mocks, together. You

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>can get analysis if you jump up on premium, but

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>guess what you can do all of that still on

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the freemium. You can get a bunch of this free access,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to jump up a little bit further,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you can get analysis from experts like justin myself. You

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>can get the whole report card after. But all you

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta do is go in, sink your league and start

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>drafting to your own settings today. Sky's a limit with

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the draft simulator. Go and use it today, fantasypros dot

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>com slash mock sink your league and get jammin'. Let's

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>go to our bold prediction number. Trace what you got justin.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 2>All right, John Means is the top forty starting pitcher

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 2>this year. I don't know why people are fading John

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Means the way they.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Are in draft early drafts so far.

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I know he is, you know, coming off of

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>injury from Tommy john Search, but he pitched last year.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Like what I want to see from a guy is

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 2>that they finish the year on the mound. And he

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>pitched really really well in twenty three and two thirds

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 2>innings a two C sixty six year. Right, the strikeouts

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>weren't there, but I'm not super worried about that. For me,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 2>it's really about him getting back on the mound with

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a velocity. That park is an absolute palace for left

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 2>handed pitchers. You just cannot hit the ball out as

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 2>a righty. So I think John Means is going to

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>have a fantastic year. I think the strikeouts are going

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 2>to come back, and I think he is going to

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 2>be a top forty starting pitcher this year.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that John Means can canon will be

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the number two fantasy pitcher for the Orioles.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he can. I don't know if he will

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>because I mean I love Grayson Rodriguez.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>And Kyle Bradish.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Bradish, Yeah, yeah so, but I definitely, honestly, I

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 2>really love the entire Orioles rotation, especially the addition of Burns,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Like this is like, this is a really really fun

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 2>rotation for them. It means probably is the fourth guy,

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 2>but from a fantasy value, like yeah, I mean, could

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 2>he surpass guys like Chris and Rodriguez and Bradish?

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure? Will he?

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, man, I think I think Grayson Rigez

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 2>could be a top fifteen starter this year.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, I mean if you're putting

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>John Means as a top forty sp That means you're

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have four Orioles pitchers inside the top forties.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to do. I mean this, This

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Orioles team is going to be a juggernaut in years

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>years to come.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and it works well to my like

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Holiday teams winning. You know, he's succeeding as long

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>as he obviously is. So I love that bold prediction.

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, number three, Now I'm going bolder if you

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like how bold I've been going. Jared Kelnick with

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Braves goes twenty twenty five a twenty twenty

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>five season, by the way, third round, third round value,

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>justin Would you say that's about.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Right depending on the batting average?

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, like that's kind of what

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at from Randi Rosarno is going around pick

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>forty eight I think right now. So yeah, that's third,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 2>fourth round value depending on his batting average.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So kel Nick last year he hit lefties as well

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>as hitting righties, or I should probably say he hit

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>righties as well as hitting lefties. Solid the second half

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>included right before he got hurt and then like when

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he returned, he hit two eighty eight and that was

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>better than that first part. He also had been stealing

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>through the first eighty games, stole eleven bases. When he

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up returning, didn't really end up stealing anymore. It

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>finished with thirteen, but he was aggressive in the forefront

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Well, here's a couple positives and why Atlanta

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can boost all this up. Atlanta fourteenth best ballpark factor

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for lefties versus Seattle, which is the worst of all,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and Atlanta was in top ten for stolen bases. I

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>think at the end of the lineup where Kelna currently

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is according to the roster resource and probably stays, he's

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be running, and I think they're going to

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>want him to do so to get into scoring position,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as Akuna is going to be getting in. He showed

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>off his power again after hitting eleven homers in one

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five games. This lineup creates better offensive potential,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and we saw that offensive potential growth last year with Kelnick.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>He punched a cooler. He was dumb about it, but

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw big stolen bases. We saw the resurgence of him,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and he now goes to an Atlanta lineup that has

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>better ballpark factors, that is a higher stealing team. And

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing. Remember when they acquired him, and

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>all the notes out there were, hey, he's gonna platoon

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with von Grissom. No he's not. This is his job

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. And they could bring somebody else in and

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>screw this up, but this is his job right now

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to succeed. Jared Kelnick goes twenty twenty five, and that

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>would make him a third to fourth round fantasy option.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's bold in the Jared Kelnick world right justin.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I love it.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you followed my content at all, whether

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 2>written or verbal content, Like I have been a Jared

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Kelnick believer for quite a while, nothing has changed, Like

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I know that there is a little bit of a

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>hole in a swing, but he made improvements in the

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>second half.

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Like you mentioned, I think Kelnick could definitely do this.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and hitting lefties I think is like really important

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>for him because there's not like there, at least this

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>past year, there wasn't massive platoon deficiencies, so for him

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to hit lefties as solid. He has

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>hit for good average before and he hit too eighty

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>eight in that short stint of games, like before he

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.479
<v Speaker 1>got hurt and when he returns. I think that's a

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>good positive. And you know he is aggressive runner. When

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed him back in there was in a fall

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>league and like whatever it was twenty nineteen, he told

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>me I was asking about goals and he was like, oh,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I have goals. Twenty twenty. He's like me and my team.

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>We discussed the goals every single year. Probably some of

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that has changed, but he was aggressive in wanting to

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>hit those twenty twenty markers. This is the year that

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>he hits the twenty twenty marker. So big on Jared

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Kelnick in a good draft day value. All right, bold

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>prediction number four. I kind of led this up to,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think you and I looking at our list,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>probably led these up to the two biggest ones that

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we've got on the list. So number four, which might

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in tune be number two. Here justin what's your bold prediction?

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I think vlad Greer Junior is a top ten fantasy

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 2>player this year. I know a lot of people are

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 2>like really down on him after kind of what we

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 2>consider a disappointing year where he only hit twenty six

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 2>home runs. But Vladgerer Junior does exactly what I want

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 2>a fantasy hitter to do when I draft him early

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>in a draft, and that is be a plate appearance hog.

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Get all the plate appearances. He's had three straight seasons

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of at least six hundred and eighty two plate appearances.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he got unlucky in the babbitt I think

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 2>he got unlucky the home run to fly ball rate.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I think just natural regression will get him to being

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 2>back to a first round pick. And if he has

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 2>any babbit pelp, if he has any home run to

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 2>fly ball help, Like, I think we're talking about a

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>guy that could hit three hundred with forty home runs.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And I love Lad Grier Junior. Like, if he's available

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>in the third round in my drafts, he's going to

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>be on all of my teams.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And he's one of those guys that has popped.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because I feel like he's the guy that

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>projection people look at and they're like, what, Like, I

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>don't understand, because let's see trying to find him here

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>on the bat X. The bat X has him for

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty five homers one hundred and three RBI while hitting

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>two ninety one. That is an exponential increase, but it's

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because he still has all the intangibles, but he does

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fall into these bad rhythms. I just did a social

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>short video talking about players that are going to bring

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the power this year, that are gonna well overperform their

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>power output from the previous year, and Vlad was number one.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>He is one of those guys because he is a

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>great hitter. But I do think like that there's so

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>much criticism around Vlad because he is kind of he

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is an analytics and projections darling, yet the production is wavering.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Does that sound about right?

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's fair. But I also I think

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 3>part of it.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Is like he had just had this prospect type that

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>was unreal, right, Like his rookie year, he was projected

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to win the batting title of the American League, Like

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>come on, like like he just he was one of

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the greatest prospects we had seen in a really, really

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>long time. And I think some people are just like, well,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>he's a bus. What are you talking about. He's a bus.

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Like he's been amazing these last three years. Yes, last

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>year was a little bit down, but like he's done

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 2>everything you want from a young player. He plays the

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>game in a really really fun way too. He's great

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>to root for. Like they're like, I I think people

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 2>are just overrating a quote unquote down season in.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Which he didn't actually kill you.

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it wasn't what you were looking for as a

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 2>first round pick last year, but like he was fine,

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, and I think he's gonna bounce back

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>huge this year. And I mean obviously with Varshow being

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 2>on this list and like Greginia being on this list,

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty high in the Blue Jays as well.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, apparently you are. I remember we were all at

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Fall League that year when vlad was a

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>rookie and I was sitting in the stands. I don't

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>think you were there yet, but it was. I was

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting with Vlad Sedler who was just on the show,

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Rob Silver, and a couple other people. Oh, and Jason

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Collette opens up his phone and goes the Steamer projections

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are out and it was Vladimir Guerrero batting title as

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a rookie two ninety one batting average projected and everyone

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>was just in awe of the batting average projection. So

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been it's been pretty hardcore with vladd for a

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>long time, and that was a fun thing. That was

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a fun thing, all right. Bold prediction number four for me,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>This is one of my big ones. I've kind of

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about this. Maybe this isn't even that bold,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to anoint a cy young winner and

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>his name is George Kirby. George Kirby is my bet.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I have actually already placed a futures bet on George

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Kirby winning this. I love and always have loved the

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>super low walk rates two point five two point five

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>percent this year, top percent tile in the league. The

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that has always kept him off of it

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.239
<v Speaker 1>because everything else is like relatively elite. I suppose he's

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he gave up a little bit more hard hit but

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>low three's era this past year. But the thing that

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>gets everybody focused are the strikeouts. Where are the strikeouts?

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two point seven percent, which by the way, still

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lands him in the like twenty plus k minus walk

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>percentage range because of the low walks. But what is

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's going to change. Well, one thing I

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think that can change. I definitely think the strikeouts can

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>uptick George Kirby's always been kind of a maniac about

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not walking. And what would be ironic, by the way,

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about Blake Snell being there is Blake Snell's approach is

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>aggressive strikeout approach and using walks as part of his game.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't care like he's just gonna pitch you in

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain way, and if he walks you, he walks you.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>George Kirby, it destroys him if he ends up walking,

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want that. But I think Kirby can make

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>those improvements. And one of the things is that there's

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>been this uptick in like split finger splitter usage on

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that team. I believe Logan Gilbert ended up adding that,

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and we saw more of an uptick in George Kirby

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>doing that year over year twenty twenty two didn't even

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>throw it one percent jumped up to six percent life

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. I would not be shocked if he uses

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it more because why would he thirty five plus percent

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>whiff rate on that pitch last year it was the

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>highest whiff rate of any single pitch. So if he

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>upticks that a little bit, gets a little bit more

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>swing and strike, He's not going to walk anybody. You

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>have a great ballpark that's with you. You can stack

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on some wins. I think the Mariners are going to

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>do really well this year. I think George Kirby is

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna liign himself with a low era, immensively low walks.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.719
<v Speaker 1>He's going to eat innings, he's going to pick up

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the wins, and he's gonna put himself in line to

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>win a Cy Young this year. And that was actually

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>something that popped up during the first pitch Arizona. We

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>had this random question when I was on Rates and Barrels,

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcast with Eno and DVR, was like, who is

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the pitcher that could be number one in all the

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>land and it can't be Garrett Cole or Strider. And

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting there and I went George Kirby and

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>collect me and Collett went on this big thing because

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that was Collette's guy. So I'm not sure what you

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think about George Kirby as al Cy Young. It's a

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>tough task to do against Garrett Cole. And obviously, if

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like Blake Snow went to his own team SIAM Award.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Winner, I mean, I think he's gonna have even more

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 2>competition than just Blake Snell. If Blake's not all were

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>to sign, they're on his own team. Luis Castillo has

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>been amazing since coming to Seattle, too, and I'd honestly

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I put money on him winning the cy Young this

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 2>year as well. So, but Kirby is one of those

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 2>guys that I love as a well. I don't necessarily

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna win the cy Young like I love

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>as a draft pick because the floor is so safe.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 2>That walk rate makes him so freaking safe, and I

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>think that's gonna be a very good team that's going

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of games.

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 3>So who do he do it? Absolutely? Will he?

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I would probably pivot to his teammate Lose Gestio.

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 2>If I was gonna make a bet on a Maritner.

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Give me Jr. Everybody knows I'm obsessed with George Kirby.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I might be just super obsessed with like those low

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>variance pitchers. I know he's not gonna walk a bunch.

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>He does need to uptick the strikeouts a little bit more,

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But we're one or two things going his direction where

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he becomes one of the best pitchers in baseball. And

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope that it gets there because I'm betting than

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he is. Cy Young. We got our final Bold prediction

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up. I mentioned earlier the draft simulator. Let me

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you guys about the Draft Assistant. It is probably

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hate to do it because there's a

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of amazing tools and everybody may may feel differently,

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but the Draft Assistant might be like the best tool

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's out there. You can connect Draft Assistant to your

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>draft and get real time suggestions like expert ranks, team needs,

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>positions scarcity while you're drafting in your live draft wherever

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it is, because you have sinked your league. Get the

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>most value out of every pick in your Fantasy Baseball

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>draft this year using Draft Assistant, And like I said,

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>after it's all done, the Draft Assistant can go and

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you all the cool insights about the people that

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>liked it, the people that didn't like it, where you're

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>winning categories and more. Go to fantasypros dot com slash

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Assistant and get locked in today. Sink your leagues and

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>unlock the powers of Fantasy Pros. All right, this is

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>our final final bold prediction. I think I don't know

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>which one is going to be bigger, because you've decided

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to go negative and I'm gonna go positive. So justin

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>kick it off with a little bit of negative and

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all finishes out on the positive side.

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, this may be my least bold prediction. I

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 2>probably should have started off the show. I think some

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 2>people are gonna be yelling at me on their podcast

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>player because they don't believe it. But if I told

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>you Tyler Glass now has never been a top thirty

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 2>starting pitcher in baseball and then that will continue to

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 2>happen even being on the Dodgers, would you believe me?

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Like immediately I realize, like, well, I'm like,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, he didn't do the innings, but even though

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do the innings, I'm actually I am surprised.

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>He's never been a top Is that real? He's never

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been an SP thirty.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Last year was.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>The most amount of innings he threw in the major

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 2>leagues in once he'son one hundred and twenty. He was

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the forty first starting pitcher. You can't be a top

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 2>tier starting pitcher in fantasy if you don't get innings,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and Tyler Glass Now has never never gotten above one

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty innings at the major league level. They're

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna run a six me on rotation they're gonna really

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 2>protect him now he's on a long term deal and

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>he gets hurt. He just gets hurt all the time.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I love him on a paranning basis. I totally understand

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Shalli Lee players in eight and ten teen leagues getting

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>him because you can backfill off the I you know,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 2>or off the waiver while I've put him on the iel.

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But he is not an elite starting pitcher because it

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 2>can't stay healthy. Maybe this is just a Dodger hate,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 2>but no, I've hated Tyler Glassnow for a long time,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.320
<v Speaker 2>way before he was with the with the Dodgers, and

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna continue to kind of say this over and

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 2>over and over again until he proves that he can

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 2>go one hundred and fifty innings. Tyler glassa is not

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a top thirty pitcher in fantasy.

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You absolutely know. Like in the comments people are like,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, Giants fan. Second, I'll actually just yeah.

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, if you know, if you've listened to me before,

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I have been saying this for years, Like I understand

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>why people get so hyped on him because on a

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 2>paranning basis, he is fantastic, but like you have to

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>be able to throw innings. I know it's not as

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 2>important as it used to be because we don't have

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a million guys throwing two hundred innings anymore.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 3>But like, you have to be able to get tow.

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>One hundred and forty hundred beginnings to have real impact

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and fantasy. Otherwise, like you're just selling yourself short. And

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 2>he's going way, way too high.

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I was just at camp too, By the way, he

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>just really does look like Killian Murphy. I always thought

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it was Sillian Murphy, by the way, but apparently it's Killian.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Why.

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I only learned that for Oppenheimer

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and didn't learn that in his best movie twenty eight

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>days later, but I learned it was Killian.

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 3>He really does it Binders.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Peak Blinds is incredible, by the way, But I

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>felt tempted to say that to the glass now. But

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>let's not be that person. I tend to love glass now,

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but I love the potential. But you're right, he is scary.

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>He's risky real quick. Do you have him ranked outside

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of the top twenty.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, he's outside my top twenty five, probably thirty.

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I like, I honestly like, I said, this isn't that bold.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 2>He does not deserve to be that high, like you

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the Oppenheimer, Like I get like, I get that people,

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 2>And I mean i've seen him inside of people's top

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 2>ten starting pictures, right Like, people, they're gonna be a lot,

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and they're gonna be some people who have him as

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 2>a top five guy for something. But when you one

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 2>of the things I started doing last year was like

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 2>full projections. I do my own full projections and then

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 2>I run it through draft software, right, And what you

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 2>find when you do that that is that innings are

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 2>so important because innings allow your good ratios to count.

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>More innings allow you to get more strikeouts. Right, Like,

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't care what your strikeout or k

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 2>per nine is if you're throwing one hundred and twenty innings,

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 2>and I got another guy who's throwing.

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 3>One hundred and ninety, one hundred and ninety's.

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Gonna win unless the guy is just devoid of striking

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 2>people out.

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 3>So uh, it just the volume matters in fantasy.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, you know, I've made this case

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and and I do stand to it that like one

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is the new one forty and one thirty five is

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the new one sixty and So what do I mean

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>by that. I'm just saying like we've always wait, we

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>wait the innings, and one twenties always sound centa bad,

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but like nobody pitches two hundred anymore, and there's just

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so fewer, so you can move the bar up of

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what if you get one hundred and fifty out of

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher that's equivalent to like one eighty, and that's

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty good in fantasy. But here's the problem, and

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this is what go back, goes back to your side.

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>A guy that gets one ninety is in almost the

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>elite category of innings right now. So if you can

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>get comparable like strikeouts in a similar range, and you know,

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>comparable production but over one hundred and ninety innings versus

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing in Glass now, it's not close. Like

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if someone's drinking glass now top five, I would take

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Glass now, or I would take Zach Gallon today,

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow and for the next three years before. I would

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>take Glass now, because you know, you get the innings.

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Strikeouts are still gonna be around nine k per nine.

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get wins and stuff like that. Like the

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>chasing of strikeouts is a little over barren but there

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you go. Not top three pitcher. I'm sticking with SPS

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm dying to hear what you have to say

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>about this one. Justin because my final bold prediction is

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite players. I got a couple players

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that I'm drafting in all the leagues. This one I

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>am the highest on Fantasy Pros consensus ranks. Nobody has

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>him higher than me, at least not yet. Someone might

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>fix it. It is Michael King, because Michael King will be

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this year's Pablo Lopez. Michael King in twenty twenty three

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>had a twenty nine plus percent K percentage to go

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>along with a seven percent walk rate. That's great. Two

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>point seventy five ERA also great. Expected rare three point

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>four was pretty solid, but in seven starts because he

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.479
<v Speaker 1>was a reliever and a starter, he had only one

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>outing that he gave up more than a single run.

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>As a starter, his ERA was better than a reliever.

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>It was two point two to three. He also walked

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>less as a starter. His K minus walk percentage is

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a reliever was nineteen point eight percent, so that is

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the walks taking away from his strikeouts. So the lower

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>than number of the word blah blah blah as a starter.

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So remember nineteen point eight as a reliever. As a starter,

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five point eight, that is elite when you get

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>into that number. A lot of these. I mean, I

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>told you George Kirbys is around twenty. So the reason

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I use the Lopez is there's actually a lot of

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>usage similarities. Both utilized fastball, sweeper change up as kind

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the top predominant ones pitches that they use. King

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ends up using a little bit like the sinker fastball

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of flows in and out. Pablo four seam but

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>also uses the sinker fastball runs similarly as far as

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Vlo goes. Pablo gets a little bit more whiffs, but

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Kings slower sweeper induces more whiffs as does his change up.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Padres are going to push. Those innings

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about are so valuable ATC if you

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>want to use projections has him as a three four

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to eight ERA and a one hundred and thirty four innings

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and almost a twenty eight percent K percentage player. I

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>think he can push over one fifty. He gets his wins,

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that sweeper keeps utilizing, and it's no shock that play.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Your similarities using Baseball Savant Pablo Lopez is the number

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.959
<v Speaker 1>one comp for right handed pitchers to Michael King. I'm

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>all in on Michael King. There's a lot to be

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>desired as far as what he's done as a starter,

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but we've seen it fly. People are making bets on

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Triik's scouble in short usage, Cole Reagan's in short usage,

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>yet almost around two hundred on eighty p's and NFBC

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for Michael King. To me, he is this year's Pablo

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Lopez justin and he killing me on that one.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the only knock on Michael King is what

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 2>is his innings total going to be? We just talked

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 2>about glass down not being a top thirty started because

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust the innings.

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Michael King only threw.

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 2>He threw a less one hundred and ten last year,

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and part of that, like you said, was because he

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 2>was in relief. Now, I don't think they need to

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 2>baby Michael King quite as much as maybe another guy

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 2>who would have a big jump in innings. But I

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 2>just can't see him like getting up to one sixty.

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that one thirty five one forty area is

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>probably top of the line, which I think limits his

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 2>upside that being said, everything else you said is spot on,

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think he could do a lot of damage.

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 2>And unlike Tyler Glassnaw, who we might project for one

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty innings, Michael King's going super low. You

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 2>just said like pick two hundred. I'll take that all

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 2>day long. The one thing I've really learned in this

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 2>podcast is I don't want to play any leagues with

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh because we're gonna be targeting a lot of guys.

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a nightmare, So we don't want to

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>do any like NFPCS together. Justin Mason FWFB on the twitters,

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you got going on right now? Which Appe'll

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 1>be on the lookout for. You just mentioned we got

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a great article another premium artcle coming up here on

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros. What else is going on in your world?

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I mean I'm right now.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm writing five days a week at Fangrafts and three

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.479
<v Speaker 2>to five days a week at Fantasy Pros. I've got

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the Friends of Fancy Benefits podcast and the Sleeproom the

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Bus podcast going on. TGFBI is about to start. Pot

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 2>of PALOOZAUS coming up in just under two weeks, which

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 2>is two days live striap event to raise money for charity.

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 2>If you can get into TGFI Satellite TGFBI is for

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 2>content creators right, but if you're not a content creator,

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you want to try to get in, you can inter

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 2>a satellite league and win your way in next year.

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So you can go to TGFBI dot com in site

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 2>up for a satellite league.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Killer stuff, my friend, I'm looking forward to it. I'm

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>getting back into TGFBI. I'll be doing it. Make sure

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you check out all his great content here for free

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and on the premium side. You can find me on

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at isit the Welsh where you can also find

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>my ranks. You can find Dynasty, I got prospect here.

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>My redraft are updated. I'm on the ECR if you're

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>checking it out. Plus, I have got probably as this

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is airing, I've got my Draft day targets. Wonder if

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you'll see any of the guys we talked about on there.

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a premium article. Oh you gotta do. Go check

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>out Fantasy Pros. They've got tons and tons of free

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you can get hooked up with. Just sink

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your league. You can start accessing in the simulator. You

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>can work with some of the other tools, and if

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you like it and you want more, you can upgrade,

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>get the premium, you can get in to the discords

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got, you can get access to the premium articles,

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>download the app, and it's easy peasy, my friends. Lemon squeeze.

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>That's all that we got for you here today. Justin

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 1>please tell Sport I love him. Sleeper and the Bus

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the mainstay in the industry, and you guys, you guys

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are all phenomenal. Thank you so much for hanging out

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Bold Predictions for twenty twenty four. We'll review and we'll

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>see and we'll talk to you next time right here

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Pros. Bye, friends,