WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema Rewind: The Wicker Man (1973) - Part 1

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Weird House Cinema. Rewind, This is Rob Lamb.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>We have some episodes here for you. Let's see. Today

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>is going to be The wicker Man nineteen seventy three,

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a part one of two. We had a lot to

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>say about this one, so we broke it up into

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>two pieces. This piece originally published five to twenty twenty five.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a vacation week, a week when we are

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 1>airing reruns every day in an attempt to catch up

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and stay current and all. So this is a prime

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>week for a Weird House Cinema two partner because in

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the Friday slot this week we will air The wicker

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Man nineteen seventy three, Part two. So anyway, I hope

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this one and you'll get the other one

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>again at the end of the week.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Weird House Cinema. This is Rob Lamb and.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>This is Joe McCormick. And today, as we are recording this,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 3>it is May first, the sacred festival of May Day,

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and so we are going to be talking in accordance

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 3>with the season about the classic nineteen seventy three British film,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>The wicker Man, which is usually usually grouped under a

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 3>genre people call full corror. Maybe we can quibble in

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>this episode about whether that title should or should not

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 3>be applied. And also note though we rarely do this

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 3>on Weird House Cinema, usually we keep it one movie

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 3>per episode. This is one we think we're going to

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>have to split into two parts because we love the

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Wickerman and we're going to have a lot to say

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>about it. The only two other movies we've ever done

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 3>this with before were David Lynch's Doune and Highlander two

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>The Quickening, So putting the Wickerman in there, there is

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>cohesion to this trinity.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, these are three films that are often associated with

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>each other, but I do agree like there's a lot

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to say about the Wickerman. We're probably going to go

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on and on a bit in a good way, so

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very possible we'll split here.

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'm very excited because The Wickerman is one of

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 3>my personal favorite movies. In fact, it's a mutual favorite

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>in our house. It's also one of my wife Rachel's

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>all time favorite movies. So we've got a lot of

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>like Wickerman merch in our house. I don't know if

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 3>you've seen any of that stuff, Rob, but we've got

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>like a Wickerman night light, and.

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I don't think I remember seeing any of this.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, it's great.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Well it lights up behind the Wicker glows. You know,

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 3>there's kind of an orange glow behind a Wickerman silhouette.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>I guess.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Actually, before we go on to any further detail, there

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 3>is something I definitely want to say. So in every

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 3>Weird House Cinema episode we end up discussing the plot

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>of the movie that we're covering in some detail. So

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 3>it's always the case that you should watch the movie

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>first if you don't want to have anything spoiled. But

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>if you've never seen The Wickerman from nineteen seventy three,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 3>this in particular is really a film I would recommend

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>going into knowing as little as possible. Obviously, it gets

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>into some horror territory, so if you're sensitive to horror themes,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you can look things up ahead of time. But otherwise,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>if you have a general appetite for horror, I would

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>strongly strongly encourage you to not even glance at a

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>plot summary, not listen.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 4>To any more of this episode, just go ahead and watch.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>It, but then come back and listen to this. Yes.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So the first time I saw it, a friend

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of mine when I was in college showed it to

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 3>me without telling me telling me anything ahead of time.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm just really grateful I got to experience it that way.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>The Wickerman is such an unusual and surprising film. It

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>is full of unexpected humor and horror and delight and despair,

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and even now, like fifty years later, in a world

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 3>where a lot of movies you may have already seen

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 3>have been inla fluenced by The Wickerman. If you haven't

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>seen it before and you don't know everything ahead of time,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it will keep you very intrigued and puzzled

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 3>in the best possible way.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, It's a film that really stands on its own,

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>even though it is part of the folk car subgenre

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and is very influential over the full car subgenre. I

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think that the big three that are often referred to

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>are sixty eighth, witch Finder, General, seventy one's Blood on

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Satan's Claw, and then of course seventy three is The

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>wicker Man. But at the same time, nothing else is

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>really like The wicker Man, even other movies that have

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the name The wicker Man. There are remakes of the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>movie we're talking about here today are nothing like it.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>We might have to get into the remake in part

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>two here. I think there really just is no other

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>movie like it. It is its own genre and perhaps

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 3>still the only movie in that genre. But anyway, if

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you haven't seen The Wickerman yet and you want to

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 3>pause here and go watch it so you can, you

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>can see it unspoiled, and then come back, we will

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>give you a little music break.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Looking back, I think I saw The wicker Man for

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the first time, probably like on I think it was

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>A and E. So I saw it on cable. Didn't

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I was getting into, but it instantly loved it,

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and at some point decided, well, I need to own

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this forever. I'm going to buy a special edition VHS

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of The wicker Man in a big clamshell case. Yes,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and I did, and of course it was replaced by DVDs.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Just you know a few years later, did you have

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>the version with the wooden box.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I did not, but I do remember seeing that at

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the movie store at the mall. They had all these

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>special editions that one I'm not sure if that was

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>an Anchor Bay release, but this was a time period

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>during which Anchor Bay was like the source for cool

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, DVDVHS editions of whatever your favorite genre films

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>happened to be.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I have to mention again I've said this on the

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>show before, that someday we should come back and do

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 3>a series on weird house cinema. That's just movies that

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>had gimmick packaging, so like the release of The Wickerman

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>and the Wooden Box that I'm sure a lot of

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>people now just used to store whatever and.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Who knows what they put in there.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also like the Dead Pit with the light

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 3>up eyes, and I'm sure we could get a whole

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>list of them. Gimmick packaging on VHS tapes is just

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 3>such a beautiful, beautiful thing. Like almost nothing gives me

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>more weird, gleeful nostalgia.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I know a collector or two we could reach out

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to for them. But yeah, The Wickerman just such a

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>great weird film, one that succeeds in creating not merely

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>an uncanny horror movie, but a thought provoking cinematic enigma.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So not to say you can't appreciate it purely as

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a horror film purely as this you know, roller coaster

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ride and experience. But there's just a lot of rich

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>texture to the film that leaves you to make your

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>own interpretations. Like some of the big ones are of course,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>regard like what is the film saying or not saying

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>about pagan religious beliefs, about modern Christian faith, about human

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>religion in general.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, one of my favorite things about it is that

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>the movie is saying a lot in a way, but

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>it's not really reducible to a message. Maybe I would

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>say it's not actually saying, it is singing, Like the

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 3>story is just overflowing with meaning and has the kind

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 3>of feeling of a commentary, but it is not really

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 3>reducible to a message or a thesis. There's no point

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the movie really makes without also sort of making the

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>opposite point. Also, obviously, the subject matter means that the

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>story is entangled with the of religion, with religion, ritual

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and faith, which are three different things, but also power

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>and violence and the law. Some people talk about this

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>movie like they think the point of it is Christianity

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 3>is bad and Paganism was better. I've seen people talk

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 3>about it like they think it kind of means that.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it would be hard to really say

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>that's the point of the movie if you think about it. Yeah,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, it is certainly not saying the

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>opposite either. This movie is not Christian apologetics, and it

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 3>was considered extremely offensive by many Christians when it came out.

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 3>And so instead the religious themes are more it's just

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of a gardening project of religious themes. Just themes

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 3>are sort of growing, and we're seeing how they grow

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and interact. It's like throwing Christianity and Celtic Paganism into

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 3>a weird little flower bed together and seeing what pops

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>up and how they twist around each other.

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, that's a good point, because I think it's

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>easy to reduce the film, you know, sort of boil

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it down to okay, here we have just a it's

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a foll car tale. It's uh, you know, exploitation, your

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>standard story about someone from the city or from civilization,

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like going into a rural or more rural part of

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>their own country and invoking and encountering like, you know,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>scary locals there.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see this a lot uh in fiction

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in general, but also in speculative fiction and weird fiction

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and horror. There's certainly an element of that here, not

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that it doesn't, you know, dip its toes

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and wade into those waters. But like you said, it

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>presents ideas on both sides. Like there's there's certainly plenty

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to admire in the idealistic, close to nature, sex positive

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>society of summer Isle, but we also come to see

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of their ideology. Likewise, our protagonist comes from

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a world of science and reason, and and we you know,

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we we like science and reason, and then obviously that

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a value that celebrated within the context

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the film as well. But we also seated his

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>world as one of, at least in his own experience,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>one of sexual repression and deep seated unhappiness. And at

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the same time, these two worlds are linked in very

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fundamental ways, and the film does a great job of,

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes very subtly, sometimes more overtly, stitching those connections out.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Why should we.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 3>Pause really quickly and just say, like what a one

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 3>sentence plot summary is. Yeah, It's like, there is a

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>remote Scottish island called summer Isle, and a West Highland

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 3>Police officer, a police detective named Sergeant Howie, has been

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 3>summoned to the island via an anonymous letter saying that

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 3>a girl on the island named Rowan Morrison has gone missing.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>So Sergeant Howie, he is, by the way, a devoutly

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 3>religious Christian police inspector. He goes to the island by

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 3>seaplane to look for the missing girl and to find

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 3>out more about the note he received.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 4>So that's the setup.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>And then one of the main things we can say

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>about the plot branching out from there is that Sergeant

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>how he discovers the inhabitants of this remote Scottish island

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 3>are not Christians, there in fact practicing what seems to

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 3>be a variant of Celtic paganism, celebrating the old gods,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the joyous old gods, and some of the modes of

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 3>their celebration are quite distressing to him, the basics at least.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's a good setup here.

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Another thing I want to mention about the Wickerman that

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I'd love and find really unique about the movie is

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the ambiguity of the main characters. So the protagonist of

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the film, the detective protagonist, Sergeant Howie, is simultaneously so

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 3>sympathetic and so hateable. His mission is a good one.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 3>He is trying to investigate the case of a missing girl,

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 3>and we see his dedication to his mission in a

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>way that like, you know, obviously, if a child goes

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>me saying, it is very good to want to solve

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 3>that problem and look out for the welfare of the child,

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 3>which we see he is genuinely invested in. We also

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 3>see the setting of summerle from his perspective and are

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>thus frustrated with the kind of squirreliness and untrustworthiness of

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the people he encounters while he's trying to solve this mystery.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 3>But also Sergeant Howie's personality and worldview are so off putting.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>He is arrogant, self righteous, puritanical, rude, and over and

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 3>over again his behavior is just so misaligned with how

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 3>it seems he should be conducting the investigation. He gets

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 3>sidetracked from this genuinely noble quest in order to screech

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 3>at people about saying the word penis and things like that.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, like the scene where he disrupts the classroom.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah.

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 3>So this is not a type of protagonist I can

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 3>think of many other examples of and I find it

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.479
<v Speaker 3>such an interesting choice. He's kind of like a combination

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 3>of like Hercule Poirot, but not as but without the

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 3>virtuosity and detective work. I'll come back to that in

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 3>a minute. But then also, I don't know, like one

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 3>of the one of the judges in The Crucible or

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 3>like the Witchfinder General. He's like a totally unsympathetically puritanical prude.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so do we like him, like.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Not really sometimes not at all, But also we we

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 3>sympathize with what he's doing, and we want him to

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 3>find out what happened to the girl and solve the mystery,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>because we do repeatedly since that something treacherous is afoot

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and that Sergeant Howie might be the only person on

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 3>this island who is actually trying to do what's right.

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and that's that's important to realize and something

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>that I think you can sometimes lose track of if

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen the film in a long time, or

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>rather if you've seen the film and you know the

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>general plot, you know what's going to happen and you're

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>rewatching it. But yeah, it's important to note like what

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>he's not like, He's not a pure punchline like he's

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not a he's not a straight man to set up

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Yeah, and we'll talk more about the tone

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>here in a second. He's also not a character that

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>deserves punishment like it's. It's you can easily imagine a cheap,

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like easy comics Tales from the Crypt version

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of this exact story, where his downfall is directly connected

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to a specific action or choice on his part, or

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a deep seated character flaw or something. And that's not

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>really the case either, or at least it's not that

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing that fits into the the you know, the

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>little box in the in the Tales of the Crypt

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>comic book. You know, it's it's broader than that.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 3>It's more complicated, right, I know exactly what you're saying. So, yeah,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 3>he's not like a Tails from the Crypt protagonist. To

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 3>is the classic format of that character is it is

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>someone who has done something quite evil, is like flawed

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>in a way that that spells their own doom. They're

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>going to get a kind of karmic punch, and we

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>are satisfied to see them get it.

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Howie is not like that.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 3>His unlikeability is shallower and more esthetic. Again, it's just

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>that he is like a rude, arrogant, aggressive, prudish, self

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>righteous jerk. But again I come back to he is

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a character like that, but we're with him because we

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>sense something is very wrong on this island and he

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>might be the only person who's able to do something

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 3>about it. But then again, is there something wrong on

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>this island. Another way the movie really keeps you guessing

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>is the characterization of the people positioned as Sergeant Howie's antagonists,

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 3>like Lord Summerle played by Christopher Lee in a masterful

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>performance we'll talk about more as we go on, or

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Miss Rose played by Diane Cilento by sort of the

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 3>default structure of the mystery narrative. These are the suspects

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 3>in the mystery disappearance of Rowen Morison, and they're so

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>interesting and likable and polite and have thoughtful perspectives, and

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 3>they're sometimes just positively jolly in the face of Howie

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>being like rude and aggressive to them. And I don't know,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 3>like all the antagonists are so lovable even when it

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>feels like they're covering something up or not being forthright

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 3>about what they know.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, another weird thing about the characters.

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 3>This is one of the only detective stories I can

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 3>think of. In fact, maybe it's the only one. Could

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 3>you even think of a possible counterexample? I don't know

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 3>one of the only detective stories I know of where

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the protagonist is not only unlikable but not particularly competent. Right,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 3>this is what You always have a detective story about

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>somebody who has powers of reasoning and insights, Sherlock Holmes

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>or Poirot. You know, detectives who are skilled at solving

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 3>a complicated puzzle. Sergeant Howie is clearly shown in the

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>movie to be not a very good detective at all,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think this is an essential part of his characterization.

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 3>He is constantly missing important clues and constantly making bad

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 3>choices that lead to dead ends in his pursuit of information.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the main feelings that the audience

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 3>will generally have about Sergeant Howie is the feeling of pity.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 3>It's like, oh boy, this poor guy, he is out

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 3>of his depth.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, isn't that.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 3>So strange to have a what is essentially a detective

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 3>story and that's a key feature of your protagonist. Can

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 3>you think of another story like that?

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>The only examples I can think of are examples where

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the character is played for humor. Yeah, and this is

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>where we should probably talk about the tone of the film,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'll just goe and mentioned like humor wise, there

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are lots of things I think you can you can

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you will find humorous in The wicker Man, and I

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>think those things are intended. And yet at the same time,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not a comedy. It is played straight, and certainly

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant Howie's character is played straight like it's you could

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you could easily imagine a character like this tweaked into

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>more of like a Michael Scott from the office to area,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, or various like bumbling detective comedies we've seen

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>over the years, and that's not what this film is.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course as well as we will continue to

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>discuss like it does defy easy categorization in a number

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of ways.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like the way you put it about the humor.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that's right. It's like, there is a lot.

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 3>Of intended humor in the movie, and it's ironic in nature.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not in the form of overt jokes and gags.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, just all these character dynamics, like the unlikeability

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>of the protagonist, the incompetence of the protagonist, and the

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 3>likability and thoughtfulness of his antagonists. All these things really

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>keep you guessing, or they certainly did keep me guessing

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 3>when I first watched Again. When I first saw this,

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I really had no idea where the movie was going

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 3>and was floored by the ending, the famous surprise ending.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, And that's a testament to a film like

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this if you're along for the ride, even if you

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to wonder, like, where could this ride possibly

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be going?

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, we've said several times we want to come back

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 3>to the tone of the movie. I think I said

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning that it's questionable whether you should really

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>call this movie a horror movie. When people call it horror,

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.479
<v Speaker 3>I think they're thinking mainly about the ending, which is

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 3>absolutely horrifying. But for like ninety ninety five percent of

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 3>the movie, does it really feel like a horror film?

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 3>I think most of the runtime it feels more like

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 3>a bizarre, whimsical, religiously themed mystery.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and even just feels at times feels like

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a goofy musical, but not at like a laugh like

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a horr horror horror goofy musical, but just like you

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>might ask yourself, what am I watching? My wife had

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>never seen it before, and she watched part of it

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>with me last night, and I think that was kind

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of her reaction, Like I was like, do you want

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to watch part of this full Carr movie from the

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen seventies, And she's like sure, and then she's like,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>what's going on?

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 4>This is funny.

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Last night, Rachel and I also showed this movie to

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 3>somebody for the first time and they had a similar reaction, though,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 3>like what is going on for much of the time,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 3>But I can report there was a big thumbs up

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>in the end. But yeah, it's so so. It's got

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>that weird not horror at all tone for most of

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 3>the runtime and then suddenly bam the ending, which is

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the bleakest, most terrifying scenes I

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 3>can think of in all of movie history. It is

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>at once beautiful and terrible. It makes your blood run

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 3>cold and then warm and then cold again.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, it's pretty powerful, and I in terms of

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>films we've watched on Weird House, I'd put it up

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>there with Seconds. Yeah, in terms of its impact. I

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>also want to add that even in the film's restored state,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>which is generally how you'll find it, I assume streaming

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and certainly on home media, there's a rawness to the

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>footage that at times contributes to this feeling that we're

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>watching documentary footage of some sort, like it's a documentary

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>about the way people actually live on this island. Also,

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of non actors in there and musicians,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as we'll note, which adds to that feel like I'm

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not watching actors, I'm watching real people and this must

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be how they live. The production design, the locations are

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>all a part of this, and you could also probably

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>compare this to some rather different films from the nineteen

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>seventies also have a similar feel, like Texas Chainsaw Massacre,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>though again very different sort of horror film.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, though this movie has a lot more of a

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 3>community feel than Texas Chainsaw Masacar does, which is very isolated.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>And you're only going to meet.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 3>A few weird characters, but it has that documentary visual style.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>What you mentioned about the presence of non actors is

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a big has a big impact on

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the ambience of this film. There are scenes in a

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 3>pub or out in a you know, on a street

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 3>beside a harbor, where lots of people are milling around

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 3>on screen, and most of them are clearly not actors.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 3>They're people kind of looking weird and confused and mumbling,

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and it contributes greatly to a sense of reality. Actually, yeah,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>And it also it makes the important characters pop more,

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 3>like when you know, all these kind of like old

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>men who are just kind of mumbling their lines a

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit as they're standing around outside the end, and

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>then we meet Lord Summerle and suddenly it's for Lee

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 3>and you're like awed by his presence.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's a great point.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that is kind you could think of as

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 3>just an extension of the very unusual tone of the

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 3>movie is the fact that it's also sort of a

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>musical like. It not only prominently features music with lyrics

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 3>on the soundtrack, it has several diegetic musical numbers where

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the characters sing and even sing into the camera. Is

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 3>there another horror movie like that?

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't think of another film, certainly a horror

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>film that uses music quite the same way.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 3>One thing that I think is interesting about the use

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 3>of music is that only the characters who live on

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 3>summerle seem to know that they're in a musical. So

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 3>like normally, if you're in a musical, all the characters sing,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>or all of the major characters sing. The protagonist certainly sings,

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>But Sergeant Howie does not sing except we see him

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 3>again it's diegetic music. We see him singing him at

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 3>church at the beginning of the movie. That's just a

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 3>scene where he's in church. He never like looks into

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the camera and sings the way say britt Eklund does

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 3>or the way Christopher Lee does. So it's only the

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Pagans that are allowed to actually be in a musical

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 3>as musical players. Sergeant Howie is just sort of living

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>in their musical world without getting to be an agent

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>of music himself.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, what if he had sung though, that would

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>have been interesting taken in, taken more of it, like

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a Schmigadoon direction where he realizes that he has to

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sing in order to in order to connect with these characters.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 3>M yeah, maybe things would have turned out differently for him.

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>He does sing a little the end. He does sing

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a little the end. I think, well, we'll get back

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to that. And while he may sing just a little bit.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He never dances, and dance is also a big part

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of a number of these these musical numbers where we

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>see some sort of ritual dance taking place.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 3>In fact, at one point when he's in disguise, he

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 3>gets yelled at for not dancing because he's in disguise

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>going down the May Day Parade and uh at one

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 3>and Christopher Lee turns and sees him just kind of

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 3>wandering down the road instead of, I don't know, doing

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 3>whatever he's supposed to be doing, and he yells at him.

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 4>Cut some capers, man, you.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Got time to glance, you got time to dance?

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, I don't think we can possibly do an

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 3>elevator pitch for Wickerman.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>No, it pretty much stands on its own. So let's

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead in here just a little bit from

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the what I believe is the original trailer. I got

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a tail unfold whose lightest work would head O up?

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm so pretest young blood.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 4>I am here to investigate the disappearance.

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a young girl.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Where is Ron Morrison?

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 3>If Ruin Morrison existed, we would.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Not I should expect Manda read the.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Name of God woman, What kind of mother are you

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that can stand by and so your own child slaughtered?

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>You are the fool, little Harry, the liars.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You are despicable little liars. Where if Morrison, if Ruin

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Marrison existed, we would.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 4>Not I should spect Manda, she was bird?

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You are the fool?

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Where is Rowan Morrison?

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god?

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to see The wicker Man again.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Widely available in all formats, and it's could following has

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.959
<v Speaker 1>seen multiple special editions released over the years. There have

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>been a few different cuts. I'm not sure to what

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>degree we're going to get into talking about different cuts

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of the film. I think there are like three major versions,

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like a theatrical version, and then they added some minutes

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to it, and then they took away a few minutes.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>But definitely watch it, and you know the best format

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you can get. Maybe shopple around a little bit on

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>those different forms. I watched it in a restored form

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on Blu ray one that I rented from Atlanta's own

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>video Drome from their full car sub section.

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Nice.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know which edition it was. I know

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it had like baked in trailers at the beginning, which

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I did not like. I feel like especially now. It

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>makes me think it was maybe a slightly older Blu ray,

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>because more and more Blu rays these days, I feel

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like are treated like the premium item they are, and

0:27:55.520 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>they're like less tied to timely trailers from pictures.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 3>Wait, what was what were your baked in trailers for?

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Mine was for a re release of American Psycho. Yes, yes, okay,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>so we've got the same disc, do we?

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So then you probably watched what's called the final cut?

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I think so, And the final cut is I think

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the latest of the major cuts of the film. Did

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 3>your version also have some scenes that were in much

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 3>lower film quality than most of the movie?

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe? So? Yeah, restored sequences, yes.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 3>So, like the scene where Christopher Lee is outside the

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 3>inn at night talking to a slug about how he

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 3>wants to be like him.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh so good.

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was not in the original version of the

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 3>movie that I saw. I think the first one I

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 3>saw was the theatrical cut. But so that's a restored

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 3>scene that the film does not look great, But I'm

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 3>glad it's there and it's worth it to have, even

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 3>though it's cutting back and forth between extremely different levels

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 3>of fidelity.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>It's it's worth it to have that.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it helps too that the best fidelity in

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the film is not like so great that it feels

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>as jarring, or at least that's the impression I had. Alright,

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the people behind this film a bit,

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>starting with the director, of course. The director was Robin Hardy,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>who lived nineteen twenty nine through twenty sixteen. English director

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>who started out directing for the National Film Board of Canada,

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>then Yeah Yeah, then PBS aligned so O World Theater,

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>before moving to London to partner with screenwriter Anthony Shaffer

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to co found an advertising agency. The wicker Man, again,

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>released in seventy three, filmed in seventy two, I believe,

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was his first feature directorial project and by far his

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>most impactful. He only followed it up with two other films,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six is The Fantasist and twenty eleven's The

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Wicker Tree, based on his own novel, Cowboys for a Christ.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He also has a story credit on nineteen eighty eight's

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Forbidden Son. After The Wickerman, he returned to the US

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and mostly wrote historical novels and worked. According to his

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>obituary in The Guardian as a consultant in the historical

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>theme park business. David Piner is the novelist the novel

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ritual from nineteen sixty seven. This apparently is what they like,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they paid to adapt it. It's not one of these

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>cases where they just kind of ripped it off, like

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they paid to do the adaptation but then ultimately deviated

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of it. I haven't read it, but

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm to understand it. You know, it concerns, maybe on

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some level, the same skeleton of a plot line where

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a police investigator is checking out some rural community that

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>ends up having some you know, pagan elements to their

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>religious rights.

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 3>No way to confirm this, just to guess, but I

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 3>like to imagine that this movie was at least in

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 3>part based on something from Christopher Lee's apocryphal collection of

0:30:58.760 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 3>occult Tomes.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised. Yeah. Now, Anthony Shaffer that we mentioned,

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>who wrote the screenplay. He lived nineteen twenty six through

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, British writer whose previous credits included

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Hitchcock's nineteen seventy two film Frenzy, which, if you

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it, seen it as quite a solid psycho

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>killer film starring John Finch and Barry Foster.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 4>I've actually never seen that one. I love Hitchcock, but.

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's good. It hasn't as I recall it as

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a really nice long shot.

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 3>At one point I had some movies with those yet

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 3>was this his second to last movie?

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty late.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah.

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And also Schaeffer wrote the two man play turned film

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Sleuth from the same year, starring Lawrence Olivier and Michael Kine,

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and he'd later work on Let's See. There was a

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>whole series of seventies and eighties Agatha Christie film adaptations

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in which Peter Eustonoff played Birot and his identical twin brother.

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Peter Shaffer, who lived nineteen twenty six through twenty sixteen,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>was also an acclaimed screenwriter whose stage in screen credits

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>include Equis and Amedeus Wow Talented Siblings.

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there is a lot to love about The Wickerman,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 3>but I think it has a particularly fantastic screenplay for

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 3>a horror film. Not to insult horror films generally, but

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm a lover of horror, but I'm aware

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of horror writing does it is attracted

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 3>to cliches like a magnet sort of, and this screenplay,

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 3>even though now we live in a world where a

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of other stories I think have copied a lot

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 3>from The Wickerman, but at least for its own time,

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 3>incredibly unusual and unique and remarkably I think, free of cliches,

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>just an original and authentic exploration.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely all right. Getting into the cast here playing Sergeant Howie,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we have Edward Woodwarton, who lived nineteen thirty through two

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine, British actor of stage, screen and TV,

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>who at the time was best known in the UK

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for his portrayal of secret Service agent Callen on the

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>TV show of the same name. Now, when I first

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>watched The wicker Man, I knew him mostly from advertisements

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for the TV show The Equalizer, which ran eighty five

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>through eighty nine.

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 4>What does an equalizer do?

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's not a show I ever actually watched,

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but I know I just was like, well, that's the equalizer.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>He equalizes.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like a piece of audio equipment.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if the Equalizer on the TV

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>show is a cop if he's like a fixer, like

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which side of the law he's aligned with. Is he

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a secret agent, I'm not sure, but he equalizes, so

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some implied neutrality there.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I guess I've got a seventy nine two equalizer man.

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He has a ton of credits, though, including nineteen sixty

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>four's Beckett, nineteen eighty's Breaker Morant that he had the

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>title role in that. He's in nineteen eighty four as

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a Christmas carol. He plays the ghost of chrism Is

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Present in that one. This is one of the Christmas

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>carols that my family watched a lot when I was

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a kid.

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 4>That's so funny.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 3>The ghost of Christmas Present is supposed to be jolly

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 3>and full of good cheer, which is not at all

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 3>in the role I'm familiar with.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's a very different role. He pops up

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and seven's Hot Fuzz. His only other

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>horror films is that I'm aware of, are nineteen seventy

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one's Bloodsuckers and nineteen eighty two's The Appointment. And I

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>would also be remiss if I didn't mention that he

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>plays Sol in the nineteen eighty five King David movie.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the one that has George Eastman in it.

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 3>This is like the second reference to this in like

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 3>three weeks.

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Everything comes back to George Eastman. Yeah.

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Edward Woodward should get a lot of love

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 3>for this performance because it's kind of a thankless role.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Like it is so much easier to love the Pagans

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 3>in the movie, to love Christopher Lee, and to love

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Diane Cilento and Ingrid Pitt, you know, all the local

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 3>characters who were sort of the colorful, interesting wild ones.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 3>As we've said many times, the protagonist of this movie

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 3>is not very likable. He's kind of a stick in

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the mud. He's kind of a jerk, and so I

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 3>think it's very easy to miss how important the portrayal

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>of this character is to the effect of the story

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in the end. And Edward Woodward is great in the role.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't try to steal the show and make his

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 3>character more likable than he needs to be. Instead, he's

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 3>exactly what is called for by the script, and he's great.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 4>He's great.

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's a complex role. It's arguably far more

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>complex than any of the other characters that we encounter

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in the picture. I was watching an interview with the

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>director and Hardy really gives a lot of credit to

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Woodward for creating this character on the screen, Like he says,

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, like with Christopher Lee's character, we had these

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>parameters set out and Christopher Lee delivered, you know, knocked

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the park. But there was a lot to

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant Howie that really had to be created in the performance,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and he Woodward all the credit in the world for

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>doing that. That's right.

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 3>A lot of how we feel about how he isn't

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 3>even in his lines. It's in kind of facial expressions, reactions.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>He brings such a sense of visible frustration to the

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.919
<v Speaker 3>character in every scene almost you can just see him

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 3>just kind of like shaking with annoyance.

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and wrestling with what he's seeing. You know, there's

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of he's not telling you his internal monologue

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>about how conflicted he may feel about certain things, or

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>tempted he may feel about certain things. He's just in

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the performance, you know.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 3>When he's trying to say hide to maybe a prurient

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 3>sexual interest that he knows he should not have, but

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 3>is part of his character as well. So, yeah, totally agree,

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Woodward is excellent.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to Lord Summerle who, as

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>we've been mentioning is played by the great Christopher Lee,

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>who of nineteen twenty two through twenty fifteen. This is

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>our seventh Weird House Cinema selection featuring Sir Christopher Lee,

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know as we as you know, best known for

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>such roles as Sarimon the White and Lord of the Rings,

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Dracula in multiple Hammer Horror films and some non Hammer

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>horror films, and Count Dooku in the Star Wars prequels.

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I just caught Revenge of the Sith on the big

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>screen in its re release, and his performance is brief

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but very memorable, has a nice little arc to it,

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>probably I would say, arguably stands out among his very

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>late career performances.

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 3>I've said this before that I'm not as big a

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 3>fan of the Star Wars prequels, though not to poo

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 3>poo anybody who does love them. But for me, at

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 3>least even in my least favorite, which is Attack of

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 3>the Clones, when Christopher Lee shows up, it's just it's

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 3>a whole other movie now, Like I love him, and yeah,

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 3>so Christopher Lee is one of my favorites, but this

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 3>is it's got to be. This is my all time favorite.

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Lee role the Wickerman is head and shoulders above

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 3>them all to me.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and this is an opinion that Christopher

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Lee shared as well. By most accounts, the film was

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>reportedly a real passion project for him. We mentioned how

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty much in the room, being one of

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the people who brought it together to begin with, and

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he claimed, and I have no reason to doubt him

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to have waived off any payment for the role. That

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 1>basically like they couldn't afford him, they couldn't afford his rate.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, well, don't worry about it. I want

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this film to be made. And then when the film

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>studio opted to release it in the UK without a

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>screening as part of a double feature, the second half

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of the double feature with Don't Look Now.

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Which is a great horror movie.

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's a very very well received picture. I

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's these are two strange kind of

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>an odd match to pair them together, Yes, but that

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of also shows you that the studio seemingly didn't

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>really know what to do with the film, and we're

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like, well, just put it out there,

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to screen it. But Lee then personally

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>calls all the film critics that he knew of to

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>encourage them to see the film and offering to buy

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>their it if they needed him to.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that's great U And I love that because I'm

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty sure actually I don't know what the original critical

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>reception was, but I know the studio that owned that

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 3>owned the Wickerman hated it when when it was coming

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 3>to I think it was em I like they famously

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 3>like were panicking because they thought the movie was so

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>bad and they were trying to find ways to avoid

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 3>releasing it or to to cut it down. I think

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 3>I think they just hated what they had on their

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 3>hands and they didn't realize that it was a masterpiece.

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, there there. This seems to definitely be the

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>be true to some extent, but then there's also some

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:41.439
<v Speaker 1>seems to be some myth making on top of that.

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:42.879
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you know, like I.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Said, this is a film that's been very popular for

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a long time. There's been a lot of interviews and

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of comments. Like I saw one story that

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm casting some doubt on that Rod Stewart tried

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy all the copies of it at one point

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so he could destroy his then girlfriend's nude scene, things

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, I don't know that, I'm just going to

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pass that by.

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Was he dating britt Ecklund, I believe so, Yes, Okay, Yeah.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Also it said that later on, when the film was

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>released in the United States and seventy four, Lee flew

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to the States on his own dime to promote it

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.479
<v Speaker 1>as well, and would just appear on basically any show

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Wickerman. That just filled me with happiness.

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>That's gorgeous, and as we've been saying, it is a

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 1>delightful performance from Lee, which I think is saying something

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>because while Lee is always a fine screen presence, he

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>almost always plays a rather grim and serious character, often

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>with a malicious glint in his eyes, and for much

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of the film, the Lord Summerle that we experience is

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a joyous, care free figure. I swear Lee, who is

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think around fifty at the time, really feels younger

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and certainly more energetic in this role than anything else

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him in from before or after this picture.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 3>He has the energy of a twenty two year old

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.959
<v Speaker 3>hippie who does clown school. Yes, yeah, he's just he's

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 3>just magical. In the movie, he's bursting with positive intensity,

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 3>occasionally turning threatening and then just turning very friendly and

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 3>charming again. He has, in fact, he has kind of

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 3>the quality of a pagan god. You can you can

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 3>feel him almost becoming superhumanly enlarged and striding over the fields,

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 3>beaming down sunshine at everyone around him.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>That's good, that's good. Yeah. So these are our two

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>main characters, I guess in the film, but we have

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of very interesting supporting roles, starting with I

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>believe we mentioned her already, but Diane Cilento plays Miss Rose,

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>who I believe is the town teacher. She's she's teaching

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to I don't know what other like a lot of

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a small town, so a lot of people have

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple roles here.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, double double booked on a lot of occupations in

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 3>the town.

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Miss miss Rose is a great character in Diane Cilento

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:00.760
<v Speaker 3>is excellent in this role. I mean, I'm gonna sound

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 3>repetitive with the cast because everybody's so good, but she

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 3>is great. She has such a gracious, almost flowing water

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of way of reacting to Sergeant Howie's aggressive inquiry.

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, she's at many points she is resisting his investigation,

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's just hard to feel like she could possibly

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 3>be a bad guy.

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, she like a number of the other townsfolk

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that we meet, they're they're very likable and they seem

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>very sensible in the face of his investigation.

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they're always making good points against yeah so.

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Cialento lived nineteen thirty two through twenty eleven Australian born

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>actress of stage and screen who is nominated for an

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Oscar in nineteen sixty four for her supporting performance in

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the movie Tom Jones. Her other credits include sixty five's

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The Agony and the Ecstasy, nineteen sixty seven Zombre, and

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy two ZPG. She married Anthony Schaeffer in nineteen

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, and from her previous marriage, she was the

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>mother of Jason Connery. I've read that she was a

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>self professed white witch at the time of the Wickerman's

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>filming and was personally involved in various details, including the

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>fire dance. And at one point there's a tarot card

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on the ceiling, and I believe I've read that she

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>drew that or painted it.

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh cool. Oh.

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And then of course there's the innkeeper's daughter, Willow played

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>by Britt Eklund.

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Also great britt Ekland gets a full on musical number

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.439
<v Speaker 3>where she like turns and looks into the camera while

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 3>she's singing Yes.

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Born nineteen forty two, Swedish actress, model, and singer,

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>who certainly delivers charisma and sex appeal for several key

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>scenes in the film, a character who, in Lord Somerle's words,

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is the embodiment of the Goddess of Love. Ecklund was

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a rather major celebrity of the day and appeared in

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>some notable early nineteen seventies films, including seventy ones Get Carter,

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy Two's Asylum, and nineteen seventy four Is the

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Man with the Golden Gun, which of course also featured

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Lee.

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I watched that movie as a kind of it's

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 3>a James Bond movie. Yes, probably one of the worst

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 3>James Bond movies. It's not very good, but as I

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 3>say about some movies on here, it's not very good,

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 3>but it's a good time. It's just a nice little

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 3>wicker Man reunion to watch every now and then. I

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 3>seem to recall the character she plays in The Man

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:47.839
<v Speaker 3>with the Golden Gun is supposed to be kind of

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 3>not very smart, like she's kind of always like clumsily.

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.959
<v Speaker 3>She's like a spy, but she's constantly like whoops, getting

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 3>bumped into the trunk of a car. And yeah, I

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know, it doesn't make a lot of sense, but

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 3>it's not a great movie. But in the Wickerman, she

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 3>is not dumb. She's rather crafty.

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually yeah she uh, you know, she behaves almost like

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a like a siren character. Yeah, and she has at

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>least one key scene that features nudity, and I want

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to want to highlight that. A lot of times, you know,

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the nudity and films of this era and certainly of

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the genre or are more about pure titillation. And you know,

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>not to say that these scenes are removed of titillation,

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but but there's a there's a lot more going on here,

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like they're they're overall very well crafted.

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>In the extra that I featured, Hardy talks a little

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>bit about the key Brett Acklin nude scene and how

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they shot it and all, and there's some there are

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>actually some fun stories about that where they actually had

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to send off for someone to come in to be

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the butt double for that scene they had to get

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:58.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody from a like a nightclub in Scotland. Oh, that's funny, but.

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 3>We should say we've been speaking about them like they

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 3>might be two different scenes. The nude scene is also

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the musical number Yes, yes, yeah, and it is the

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.720
<v Speaker 3>scene where britt Eklund is really dedicated to making Sergeant

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Howie starts sinning.

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, he's in another room. But this the end

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>has very thin walls and you can hear everything, like

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the people downstairs can hear everything. Howid he can hear everything? Yeah,

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that when we talk about the specific scene,

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>all right. And then rounding out the our trio of

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 1>blonde seventy starlets in this picture, we have Ingrid Pitt

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>playing the librarian. She lived nineteen thirty seven through twenty ten.

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Something of a Hammer horror regular, the Polish born actress,

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:46.479
<v Speaker 1>who started out on the East Berlin stage, is best

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:48.879
<v Speaker 1>known for roles in such films as nineteen sixty eights

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Where Eagles Dare, nineteen seventies The Vampire Lovers, and nineteen

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy one's Countessed Dracula. Her other credits include episodes of

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Who nineteen seventy one is the House that Dripped

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the Blood and eineteen eighty five's Transmutations. We'll have more

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to say about her when we talk about the specific

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the main scenes that features the librarian.

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, now you mentioned the character of Willow McGregor. That's

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 3>britt Eklund. But we also meet her father, the Innkeeper

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>aka the Landlord, who is an extremely odd critter.

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Yes. Played by Lindsey Kemp, who lived nineteen thirty

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>eight through twenty eighteen. He was a British dancer, actor, teacher,

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>mime artist and choreographer. His other acting credits include seventy

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>two Savage Messiah, a nineteen eighty four TV adaptation of

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>A Midsummer Night's Dream in which he plays Puck, and

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety eight's Velvet gold Mine. Very interesting character in

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his own right. He was a mentor to both David

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Bowie and Kate Bush.

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Hats off to him. I love every minute he's on screen.

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 3>He's got this wild kind of raised eyebrow that's just

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 3>always like, oh, you know you're a policeman, are you.

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's great. There is always that kind of like

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a sly judgment taking place with him. Yeah, wonderful little role.

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean all the so all the towns folk are great,

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the non actors, the musicians, and then the various character

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.439
<v Speaker 1>actors here and there. One that really stands out though,

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is Aubrey Morris playing the old gardener Slash the grave Digger. Yes,

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a great British character actor whose supporting roles include films

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like seventy one's a Clockwork, Orange Blood from the Mummy's

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Tomb and Lystomania, also nineteen eighty five's Life Force and

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.879
<v Speaker 1>The She Creature from two thousand and one. I would

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>say one of the most memorable locals we meet in

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the film.

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 3>He has a fantastic moment where Sergeant Howie asks him

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 3>where their minister is and he just says minister and

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 3>starts laughing and walks away.

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's really good. He we meet him in the graveyard,

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a great scene of the graveyard. Well we'll probably get

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to but yeah. He lived nineteen twenty six through twenty fifteen.

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, Now, one more local man that I want

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to mention here there's a fishmonger character, and I'm not

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sure I one hundred percent remember the fishmonger. Do you

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>remember the fishmonger?

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It's possible his scene was even cut. I'm not certain.

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 1>If nothing else, we may see him in the background.

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of rosy cheeked, gray haired, partly

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 3>balding old men who stand around in the background of

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.399
<v Speaker 3>many scenes at the pub, at the harbor and so

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 3>forth at the May Day celebration and don't really get

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 3>in many individual moments.

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 4>Of their own.

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 3>But it's a but overall, it's a big community ensemble,

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 3>and so there are a lot of characters you're not

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 3>going to remember very specifically.

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, the Fishmonger is played by John Young, who

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>lived nineteen sixteen through nineteen ninety six. And this is

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy who played the modern day historian that A

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Night murders in nineteen seventy five's Monty Python and the

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Holy Grail.

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 4>Oh I remember him.

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, he shows up like it's, you know, a

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>television show about medieval history, and then at one point

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a Night rides past him and slays him with a sword. Yeah,

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a good gag. Yeah, as John Young. He was

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 1>also in a Life of Brian in seventy nine and

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty one's Chariots of Fire. Oh, and he's also in

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Time Badmit's all right, and then coming back around to

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the music, Paul Giovanni was the composer. He lived nineteen

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty three through nineteen ninety and yeah, there's a lot

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.800
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to continue to say about the music

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of The wicker Man, a film that makes terrific use

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of digetic music, contributing heavily to the uneasiness of the

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>film and also creating that feeling of uncertainty regarding what

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of musical film are we watching. Paul Giovanni was

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>an American playwright, actor, director, a singer and musician, and

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we see him in the film as well the man

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>singing gently Johnny and the green Man in Oh.

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize that was Paul Giovanni. He's a handsome fella.

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 3>He's a good singer.

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, he also sings on corn Riggs and Landlord's daughter.

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Giovanni wrote the music and much of the lyrics. I

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think Cornriggs is adapted from a Robert Burns song. But

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this was his only musical film credit, but his plays

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>include The Crucifer of Blood, which was adapted in nineteen

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>ninety one for a TV film starring Charlton Heston as

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Holmes. What, Yeah, and.

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:30.399
<v Speaker 3>That is one of the weirdest pieces of casting I've

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 3>ever heard of.

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've never seen it. I'm only vaguely aware of it,

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and my initial reaction is much like when I hear

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>about anybody playing Sherlock Holmes. I'm my personal response is

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not Sherlock Holmes. Jeremy Brett is Sherlock Holmes. But

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.240
<v Speaker 1>then I read this is crazy. Just learned this literally today.

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>That ten years earlier before this TV adaptation of The

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Crucifer of Blood, Heston played the role in an LA

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:01.800
<v Speaker 1>stage adaptation of the play, and Jeremy Brett played Watson.

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 4>What.

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it doesn't seem right, It doesn't seem like it

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>should be real. It seems like this is some sort

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of awful joke being played on me personally. But yeah,

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Jimmy Brett was a fine Watson.

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 4>I gotta look this up.

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 3>I just I am not even finding myself able to

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 3>imagine Charlton Eston as Sherlock Holmes.

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:22.760
<v Speaker 4>That is weird. That is deep weird.

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any other information on it. I don't

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>know if he attempts a British accent or not, but

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>it definitely happened. It happened more than once. Now it's

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not just Paul Giovanni on the music here. The collaborating

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>musicians responsible are credited as Magnet, headed up by composer

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Gary Carpenter born nineteen fifty one, who is also associate

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>music director on the film. I watched a great interview

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.479
<v Speaker 1>with Carpenter about the film's music and the winding path

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the soundtrack took to actual physical release. All very insightful

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and full of lots of technical details if you're interested

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the recording details in all but one observation he

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>made that I thought was interesting is he compares the

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>raw recording style of the film's music is being very

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.800
<v Speaker 1>similar to later trends and just music recording in general.

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So we have all these scenes where in the picture

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 1>musicians characters that our musicians are creating the music within

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the scene. But of course all of that is also

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>recorded separately in a sound studio to be used as

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 1>part of, you know, to create the film score and soundtrack.

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's the same people. So you have this interesting

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 1>connection there, and that's I think one of the reasons

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>that they said, well, we're going to record this in

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>such a way that there is a rawness to it

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that he kept talking about, how you can hear like

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>like some of the physical details of the instrumentation. You know,

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess to sort of place you in the scene

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>with the music creation and not just experiencing the results

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:58.399
<v Speaker 1>of the musical act.

0:53:58.800 --> 0:53:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Interesting.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so once again, Yeah, the music is a very

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>important part of The wicker Man and is on the

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:07.160
<v Speaker 1>whole terrific. I should also add that the score is

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>widely available. You can buy it, you can stream it,

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>so after you've watched The wicker Man, you can do

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what I've been doing and just run the score and

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the soundtrack over and over again in your headphones.

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 3>And you can wander around your house singing corn rigs

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:23.760
<v Speaker 3>and bars.

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes, oh, we do that so much. All right, now,

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the point at which we would normally transition

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>into discussing the plot. But I believe, given that we

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have so much more to talk about, and we're going

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and cut this episode and we will

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>continue this in a part two in the next installment

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of Weird House Cinema.

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 3>That's right, gives you plenty of time to watch the

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 3>movie if you did not heed our warning at the

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 3>very beginning and go watch it.

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Then that's right. We haven't done this with many films.

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about this before we rolled here. We

0:54:57.000 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>did it with Highlander two, and we did it with

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 1>inch Is Doune. So uh uh yeah, you know that's

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 1>this is a film that I think checks off all

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the boxes. It's a big film. There's a lot that's

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 1>been said about it. There's a lot that we have

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to say about it. I mean, I feel like I

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 1>could spend a good half hour just talking about key

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 1>scenes such as the scene all the scenes that take

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 1>place in the candy store slash post office.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, okay, then this is something we should do

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 3>before we wrap up today's episode. What is your top

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 3>confection from the post office slash slash candy store in

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 3>summer Isle Town.

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I mean there's so much. I mean, I love

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:36.239
<v Speaker 1>this shop. This is one of those shops that feels

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely real. You know, I imagine they've taken any they took.

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They took an existing shop and in Scotland and uh

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:45.839
<v Speaker 1>on one on the Loton location and dressed it up

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's just filled with all of these uh you know,

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 1>strange pagan treats. Uh and you're.

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Saying they would really feed these nightmare images to children.

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So you know within you know, in the

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 1>fictional world of the film, Yes, I mean there are

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>several key standouts that there is. Of course, the baby cake,

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the kid cake. That's that's an easy favorite, I think

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:13.319
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. But the closer you look, there are all

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>these other little details. There are little pink elephants. I

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the pink elephants represent within their their

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>their rights and observations, but they are there in their

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>numerous ones. There are some wonderful frogs or toads. Those

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 1>were my wife's favorites.

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the chocolate rams heads with littless yellow eyes.

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, there are a number of hairs as well,

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and some other strange babies that are are in the

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>shop in addition to this. So I don't know, I've

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 1>got to go with the kid cake or the elephants.

0:56:46.600 --> 0:56:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Probably the kid cake. It's the kid cake.

0:56:48.640 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 3>How about the bride with the wreath of pink flowers

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 3>around her head with the eyes pinned open like Alex

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 3>and clockwork orange.

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>That's good too.

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 4>What are they showing that cake? What does she have

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 4>to watch? Are they playing the lud Big band.

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the kid cake has maybe some I'd have

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to watch the scene again, but based on a still

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that I pulled up, I think there's like maybe a

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>jelly filling to it, which you know is fitting.

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh I see that. Yeah, you see them cut it

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 3>open and it's kind of spilling out.

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's like a jam roll jamcake sort of a situation.

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Something that's really confusing is that in may Morrison's post

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 3>office slash sweet shop, they serve green frog cakes that

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 3>you eat. But we also see in the same shop

0:57:33.920 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 3>later she's putting a live green frog in a kid's

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 3>mouth to cure her of a sore throat.

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, but then that's not candy, that's medicinal. But

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 1>then she gets a hard candy afterwards as a treat

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to sort of like, you know, that's right, to get

0:57:48.320 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 1>rid of the taste of the frog.

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, to learn more about the sweet Shop and the

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 3>rest of what Samuraile has to offer to the adventurous tourists,

0:57:57.520 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 3>you'll have to come back next week for part two

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 3>two of our series on the Wickerman.

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Keep your appointment with the Wickerman next week

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on Weird House Cinema, but in the meantime, we would

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you if you already have thoughts

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to share about the Wickerman wright in we'd love to

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. Let's see, we should remind you that

0:58:19.160 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if you want to follow Weird House Cinema online, we

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have a letterboxed account. You can find us there. Our

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 1>username is Weirdhouse. We have a nice list of all

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the movies we've covered over the years, sometimes a peek

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead at what's coming up next, and you can also

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:36.560
<v Speaker 1>follow us on Instagram at stbym podcast. We're on some

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 1>other social networks as well, but those are the main

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 1>places to follow us.

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer, JJ Posway.

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact stuff to Blow your

0:58:54.160 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:10.720
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.