WEBVTT - Week 8 Preview, Start or Sit? 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Listen do do didnit? Yeah? Now welcome eight Hap your host,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>five eight from Maryland, your co host, by Ye from

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>SAT Trike, Stepfall your co host, and five eleven from Plight. Why,

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>ladies and tentlemen your with that? We want you inside

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. He's Frank

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Stamfle he is e Y Eric Young, and I am

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman. Happy to be here with you on a

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Friday as we head in to week number eight. Frankie,

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? Man? Greggy? Happy Friday, Too excited to be here,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Excited to talk about all the fantasy football games coming

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Week eight Man, We're nearly half way through

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL season. Time flies right now. Last night, Greg,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just like we all expected a barn Burner Vikings and

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington Vikings and the Washington football team came through exactly

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>how we expected them to. Ey. What's happening, buddy? Uh?

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Not not the greatest football game, but I mean football nonetheless.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I was flipping around watching some watching some hockey, watching

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>some football. It was a good night. It was a

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>good night. But I do have bad news. Playing in

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the w W WHEE League playing miss he had Delvin

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Cook and somehow Bailey the kicker and he's up on

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>me forty one point with two players. We played Dalvin

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Cook as well. Frank, Yeah, I played I played him

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in five of my nine leagues. So that's that's a

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>good that's a good way to go into the weekends.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So unlucky, man, It's unbelievable. I've played, uh, the Patriots,

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Week two when they played Miami.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I played him in eight of the nine leagues. It's

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>so remote. I'm not a math guy, but like that

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>is that is insane. Dalvin Cook now has had a

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in every game but one so far this year.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He has nine rushing touchdowns in eight games. He's just

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>absolutely amazing, you know, and a lot of people thought

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>this could have happened, right. We all knew that, you know,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going at the turn, he's he's this year's Christian McCaffrey

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because McAffrey was going out a similar spot last season

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 1>at that one to turn Dalvin Cook. We all knew

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what the upside was. The Only reason you got the

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>discount on him was because of the injury risk. But

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we can we see now. Look, as long as this

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>guy is healthy. The offensive line has improved this year

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. They did invest in that in the off season.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>They invested it in in the draft as well. They

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in Garrett Bradbury. The offensive line is playing well.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook one of the most electric running backs in

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the league right now. So if you drafted him on

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that turn or in the second round, or you know

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you reached on him in the first round, it is

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>working out for you right now. Greg, he is this

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>year's Christian McCaffrey. Absolutely. He is the guy that leads

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you to victory each and every week. As you mentioned,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>score touchdown in every game but one this season. He

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>has been a rock star. The offense is simply built

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>around Dalvin Cook and Stefon Diggs. He got his another

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>seven gadgets for overall hundred and forty yards, burning Josh Norman.

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>The only negative Stefon Diggs was that early first quarter

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>fumble where he was trying to change the field and

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>head towards the end zone. Ultimately he fumbles, but that

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was just a blip on the radar. Another really good

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>night e y from Stefon Diggs. Yeah, Diggs looked awesome.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the guy that that I think

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>most of us thought he was going to be. Uh,

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the guy that you know, people drafted him high,

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and I would imagine that a lot of people have

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>have moved on from him and are probably pretty sad

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about that. So, yeah, Diggs looked awesome. Yeah. I tweeted

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that last night as well, just that I hope after

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Eagles where he blew up for

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty seven yards and three touchdowns, that

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you didn't just sell this guy off for anything that

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you can. I mean, I was one of those that

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was actually trying, but nobody wanted him, so I just

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuck around and was like all right, Well,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ride this out. This is now three weeks

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in a row that he has given us a hundred

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and forty three receiving yards or more. How about this,

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>two weeks in a row he's had exactly one hundred

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and forty three receiving yards, So that's weird. On seven

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>receptions two three games in a row. At least seven

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>receptions two games in a row, exactly one d forty

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>three receiving yards just very odd. Four to the last

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>five games he's had over a hundred receiving yards. So

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Stefon Diggs is getting back to the

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>player we thought that he could be. Ever since Adam

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Feeling called out Kirk Cousins, he's been balling out. I

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people ended up using kirk Cousins

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>last night. I myself used Kirk Cousins in the league

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>where I had Lamar Jackson on a bye. He didn't

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>come through. You know, he played well. They just kept

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>throwing screen passes to Dalvin Cook. Washington had no answer

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for that. And then when he wasn't throwing screen passes,

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he was throwing it to Stefon Diggs. So it worked out.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But um. Ultimately, he didn't throw for any touchdowns for

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, so that wasn't great. But the Vikings are

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are playing well right now. Greg, I'll throw this your way.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you try and look into selling Stefon Diggs now

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that he has built up, you know, this three game

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>sample and you kind of use that as a as

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a reason to turn him into a wide receiver too,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that you might trust more consistently once Adam Feeling is back. Yeah,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that the fond days you now have the

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ability to move on from him with a get a

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>stronger return. Ultimately. You know, things have certainly eased up

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Minnesota biking schedule wise, right, They've gone through

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East and that soft, soft landing spot with

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants, the Washington Football Team and the

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles back to back to back weeks and it

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>worked out awesomely. Like, you're still gonna face some tougher

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>secondarias to come. Adam Feeling is going to be back,

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You're damn right, Frank, I'm using the next ten days

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and trying to trade him away. Yeah, we can talk

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about that more next week when Stefon Digg is eligible

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to be traded in your fantasy league. We can kind

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of figure out which players to target. Greg I had

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a tweet last night drink again, talking about my Twitter

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the this is the Frank Twitter Show. Apparently

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>most I didn't really I didn't expect this to kind

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of blow out the way it did. I tweeted out

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>about Terry McLaurin. He was dominating it in the first half.

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>If you watched that game, he was getting whatever he

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted against Xavier Rhodes did not have a single catch

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in the second half because Dwayne Haskins took over. And

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out that if Dwayne Haskins is the quarterback

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, Terry McLarin is no more than a wide

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver four. I don't think you can even trust him

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>as as a wide receiver three that you play weekend

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and week out. I think he would be nothing more

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>than a bye week replacement. If Dwayne Haskins is the quarterback,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahanna has said when case Keena returns from the concussion,

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he is the quarterback still, and you can see why.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time in Dwayne Haskins plays he looks awful. It's

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>not just against the Vikings defense is pretty good. I

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>mean it's against the Giants defense. That's not like Case

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Keenum against the same defense was having success in the

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>first it was no issue and Terry McLarin on that

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>interception for DYINGE. Haskins was wide open, wide open, and

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Hashkins just airmailed it. And then the Vikings do what

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they did master They played keep away for an entire fourth,

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>entire fourth quarter, and that was it from Washington. Dwayne

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Haskins has looked lost. He does not look comfortable. Guys

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>do what they were doing, jacking Danny dvs. How about

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this Greg to two weeks in a row. We're excited

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan Tannehill took over for the because he can

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>get the ball to his receivers. And now Case Keenan,

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we're rooting for Case Keenen to come back so that

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we can have relevance for Terry McLaurin be fine as well.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's go with Case Keena. We'll take a Bregg, we'll

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll start a preview everything else from this Sunday.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to come with e Y and Frank. I'm Gregg.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm back at a moment. I want to be the

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>draft kings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>support and much more safe ten percent on winning NBA

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>com backslash dunk to learn more. All right, will we

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>go further? Before baseball season began, favorite sports sport. Yeah,

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank the Closer and I all had a did a

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>made uh proven having wins the wind totals for each

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and every team, and we went down the list and

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we went over or under every team's win totals and

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>we bet a baseball players shirt to the winner. And

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Frank with all good years. Yeah, we did all have

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>good years. It was pretty surprising. I think I hit

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>on like twenty two out of thirty. I think you

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>were like just behind that as well. So maybe that's

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>something that we should look into moving forward betting baseball futures,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>specifically when it comes to the team totals though wins.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We did well, man, you you were impressed with all

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of us, so uhbody gets lucky. Ever, so last year,

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>last week, Frank uh told us what he wanted, so

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>adventure and I request, what do we got here? So

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's what why thinks about baseball. And we'd

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like to present to you, Frank, Oh what we got

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>because Frank is a huge Yankee fan, we got we

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>got him a Cleveland Indians player shirt. Let's go fifty seven,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>not justin man, Shane Bieber, Shane Bieber, not justin Cleveland

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Indians players, weekend player jersey and enjoy Frankie. Thanks, you

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 1>got it man. Let's so let's do it for Let's

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Super Basketball too. Maybe I'll win that. Well, that's season.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we started too late? I think we tried, we

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>were gonna do that. Maybe we're going to do that.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We do it. I don't think we did well on

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get into this Sunday and let me begin.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Cleveland Indians. Let's talk about Cleveland, Browns,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland and New England. As I said on yesterday's program,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry guaranteed victory. Quickly walked it back when he

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh crap, but the guaranteed victory. Everybody in

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that Patriots locker room knows it. Now it's the Patriots

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Rounds. Frank, did you see shaking out? This

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is actually a tougher game for me to break down

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's been really hard for me to read both

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and the Browns all season long. I'll start

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on the brown side. Obviously, you're starting Nick Chubb, and

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think coming out of the by the best recipe

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.599
<v Speaker 1>for success here for the Cleveland Browns would be to

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>ride Nick Chubb, give him twenty to twenty five touches

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in this game, maybe even more than that. You know,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>just keep the New England Patriots offense off the field,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>do not try and attack this secondary, Do not trying

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and have Baker hold onto the ball and make plays

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>down the field with Odell Beckham. Ride Nick Chubb, and

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>then ride him some more. So obviously we're using Nick

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Chubb here in the spot. Odell Beckham. Look going up

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>against Stephon Gilmore, one of you know, probably the toughest

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>secondary in the NFL right now, one of the toughest

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>secondaries since And I heard people talking about this downstairs

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the legion of boom the Seattle Seahawks. I think to me,

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham is a wide receiver to He's not the

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>top twelve, you know, top five wide receiver you were

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>drafting to be. But for me, he's still a top

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>top twenty wide receiver. He's a wide receiver too, And

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I think in most instances it's gonna be hard to

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>get away from Odell Beckham. And I don't know, if

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe we have to do a little bit

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>of ripping the name off the back of the jersey

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>here in this matchup Greg, but I'm probably still going

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>back to Odell Beckham here. Um and Jarvis Landry looked

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>low end wide receiver three don't really want to attack this, uh,

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this Patriots defense much. And then on the Patriots side,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Sony Michelle is in a good spot. The

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns are twenty five and run defense dv away

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so far this season, Tony Michelle is getting all the

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>work inside of the red zone. I think he leads

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL in rushing attempts inside of the tenant. He

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>has like nineteen rushing attempts already. He has that La

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Blunt role from a couple of years ago when

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Blunt scored like twenty touchdowns. Tony Michelle has that role,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's a high end RB two for me. I

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think James White is a low end RB two and

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>PPR League's Julian Edelman he's questionable with a chess injury.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>He's going to play. Uh, he's a wide receiver to

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed's new I kind of really want to take away

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and see approach. I want to see how they use

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>him here wouldn't be It would surprise me if they

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of try to force feed him a little bit,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of like they did with Antonio Brown his first game.

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But honestly, Denzel Ward and Greedy Williams are back. I

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>want to take away and see approach when it comes

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to Mohammed sanw makes sense to me. Mohammed San, you

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can just rush into that into

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that one, but all the normal players you play for

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>New England, you're gonna do it. Where's James White on

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>your running back rankings this week? So I have James

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>White and my half point pp are running back rankings

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as my RB five, So he's right on that precipice

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as low and R B two high in flex option

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>right r B twenty five this week for James white

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>e y up. Next it's Tennessee and Tampa Bay. Let's

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>go down to Nashville where this one it takes place.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>For Tennessee, it's week two of the Ryan Tannehill era.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>What do we expect? Yeah, I think Tanna Hill is

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>going to have a good game. Um, Everyone every quarterback

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>that's played Tampa Bay has had a good game. I

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>don't think Tannehill will be any difference. The offense look

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>completely different. I think Derrick Henry scores a touchdown. Uh.

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And he's a for sure start has been all year. Uh.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think Corey Davis is gonna show up again.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, every quarterback that has played Tampa Bay

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>has had a great day and uh and I think

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill will also continue that. I think it will be

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>three plus yards for him. Corey Davis is the number

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>one there. I do believe that A J. Brown will

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>get involved and I think even John new Smith has

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a chance to score a touchdown here. For me, you

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>look at this Tennessee team, A lot of people are

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>buying back in it to Corey Davis. In a J.

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Brown are you I never left. I have them both

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>inside my top thirty six. I have Corey Davis is

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a high end wide receiver. Three love both of them

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for DFS as well. On Vandal they're only if you're

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>choosing between one. I would still lead Corey Davis because

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he does play more snaps, he does run more routes

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>than a J. Brown. At this time, I agree with

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>E Y. I like John new Smith as a streaming

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tight end if you're desperate this week. When it comes

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to Derrick Henry, he's still inside my top twelve just

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>because of volume. But I think you have to keep

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your expect aations realistic because he's going up against the Bucks,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>who are allowing just two point seven two yards per

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>carry to opposing running backs. Todd Bowls completely selling out

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for the run right now, and he's done a great

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>job of stopping the run, but ultimately he's getting beat

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>through the air a ton. So when it comes to DFS,

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Derrick Henry is probably a fade for me

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this week, Craig, Derreck Henry a fade for you against

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. Now on the Tampa Bay side of things,

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>O J. Howard has been ruled out so a lot

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of people we heard ven you're talking about on the

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy a little while ago, a lot of players are

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>picking up Cameron Brad and starting because hey, let's throw

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a dart at to tight end. Why not? He's camera

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>rate eight tight end one for you this week, Frank. Yeah,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I moved them up to tight end ten, which might

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive, but if you look at other players in

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that range, Eric Ebron, Jimmy Graham, T J. Hockenson, how

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>reliable are those tight ends either? So look, we understand

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a dart throw a lot of the times with

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>these streaming tight ends, and I think with O. J.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Howard out while you know he was only getting two, three,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>four targets a game, those are gonna go Cameron Braid's

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>way now. And we mentioned this either yesterday or the

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>day before. The Titans are allowing the ninth most fantasy

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing tight end. So I like Cameron Braid

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>as a streaming tight end as well. I like him

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>more than John hu Smith actually dropped Chris Herndon in

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>one league Greg to pick up Cameron Braid for the

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>spot because I do think that it's a pretty good

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one when it comes to everyone else on this team.

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You're obviously starting your your bucks wide receivers. I have

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston as my QB twelve. Um, I kind of

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>want to see how they utilize Ronald Jones and Peyton

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Barbera coming out of the bye I think both guys

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are I think Ronald Jones more so is a low

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>end flex option, but I don't really feel great about either. Frankie,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>our own very young, had a tight end question that

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>let me go with Cameron right right? Would you rather

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>start Cameron Rate this week or in again that we

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do expect to be high scoring between the Lions and

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. Would you rather start t J. Hockenson? How

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>cons iter rate for you? Yeah? So I have Bred

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>as my tight end ten. I have t J. Hockenson

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>as my tight end thirteen, so they are very close.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But I moved Cameron Bright ahead of him again, good matchup.

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the opportunity will be there for him this week.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Perfect for you, Ui, I told you to start Hawks,

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>so good luck. Yeah, that's what you guys normally do.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys, that's where we're a year for. Let's be

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>one on the lines and the Giants. Frank before we

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>hit the break. As I said, I do expect to

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be high scoring. I like the over um in this game.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>The Giants coming off to tough loss or three tough

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 1>losses here to Minnesota, UH, New England and Arizona. They

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>go into Detroit, they're very very heavy underdogs and Detroit

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>tough loss at home last week to Minnesota and last

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>minister played all the NFC seams. I also played Detroit

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>last week as well. What do you think about this game?

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Start off on the Lions side of things. I think it's,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, gonna be hard to get away from pretty

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>much everybody. I like Marvin Jones again this week, coming

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>off a game where he scored four touchdowns. Fantasy points

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.239
<v Speaker 1>are to be had against this giant secondary. I think

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Gollady bounces back as well. I like both of

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys for DFS. Speaking of DFS, Ti Johnson only

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars on FanDuel this week. Nobody knows, you know

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>how this running back. You know this backfield is going

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to break down between Ty Johnson and j D. Mcmick.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a similar breakdown to what we

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>saw last week. I think we see sixty to sixty

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the snaps and the work go towards

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Ti Johnson. He's only on Fandel, so I like him

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>as a value. J D. Mckissic. I think gets you know,

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>seven to eight touches as well. He is a bye

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>week replacement in PPR leagues as a flex option as well.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I like Stafford Greg. I have Stafford ranked as my

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>QB four on the week. He has been performing really

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>well this year. Um and against that giant secondary again,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I like him. Like the Lions defense as a stream

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh Sae Kwon Barclay. I think it's gonna

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>eat The Lions haven't been able to stop anybody on

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground behind the Golden Tate revenge game this week. Yeah,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>he's inside my top twenty four and you go like

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>top twenty four wide receiver, he's Golden Tate. We'll take

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a break, we'll continue on going through everything he needs

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to know. We ate this Sunday here the FFS. I

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>dominate on Fandel and f Kings this season. Compete with

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Rodo dot Com optimizer and the

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>And then we're talking to football. Whether you want to

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>light the lamp on draftings or FanDuel this NHL DFF season,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>then do it by joining Daily rodo dot com. Learn

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that the best daily fantasy sports players get updated fantasy

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>hockey projections for n h L DFS line combinations and

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>build stacks with tournaments in the Daily Rodo NHL DFS

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>line of optimizing. If you're playing DFS hockey without using

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodo dot com, you're doing it wrong. Edge of

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the promo code action for a ten percent discount. That

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>promo code is action percent discount Daily roado dot Com.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We're millionaires are made. You guys are talking about it

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>inside of our YouTube chat. And that is the fact

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that Patrick Mahomes has been ruled out for Sunday night,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>although Devontay Adams has not. Green May, Kansas City. I

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>know when the schedule came out this is one that

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we circle Sunday Night Football that we were super excited about.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Lost a little bit of It's lost with potentially no

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Davontay Adams and with no Patrick Mahomes, but still should

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be a good one on in the night. Yeah, it

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>should be a good one. I think Andy Reid, with

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time he was given coming all Thursday Night football,

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get the most out of Matt More that

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he can. And I think that Loshawn McCoy is gonna

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>be in play here as well. I understand that the

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have not been a good run blocking team so

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>far this year. Their offensive line is getting healthier, but

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Losa McCoy for me, is a high end flex option

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>because the Packers cannot stop the run right now there

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and run defense d v A way. We just

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>saw Josh Jacobs, a banged up Josh Jacobs run for

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred yards against him. The Packers are learning

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>four point nine nine yards per carry two opposing running

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>backs so far this season. That is tied for the

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>most in the NFL. So I do think Lashawn McCoy

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is a play. Obviously, if you own entire you killing

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey you're getting those guys in there. Even with

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Moore as the quarterback. You can use Matt More

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>in super flex leagues the Packers secondary. While we think

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be good for years to come to have

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>some good young players, Greg, they've been susceptible to the

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>past the past couple of weeks as well, so in

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>super flex leagues, do not shy away from Matt More.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 1>On the other side of things, it's a good matchup

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for both Aaron Jones and Jamal Williams. The thing is,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how much work Jamal Williams is going

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to get, so I think he's in play as a

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>low end flex option. But I'm still really banking on

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones seeing six to sixty five percent of the

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>snaps and the same amount of the work as well,

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Chiefs defense that cannot stop the run, Greg,

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that Davante Adams is going to play

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in this game. So everyone's gonna ask, well, do we

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>start Geronimo Allison? Do we start Marcus Valdes Scantling Alan Lazard. Surprisingly,

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs defense has actually been really good against the

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>past this yere they are fourth in past defense DV

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>away Greg, So I don't know that I really want

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to target any of the Packers wide receivers in the spot. Yes,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers is gonna get some of his numbers, but

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think again, like we saw last week, he's gonna

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>spread the ball around. I think Jimmy Graham is a

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>low end tight end one. The Chiefs have struggled against

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, but they have been pretty good against wide receivers.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the obvious questions, are you not waiting

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for Davante adamson. If you're Davante Adams owner and you

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are an MVS guy, you don't have Geronimo Allison? What

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do you do? As of now, I am expecting Davanta

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Adams not to play, so in the league's I own him?

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Which are you know? I played in an NFFC High

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>stakes main event league, seventeen dollar buying Davanta Adams with

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>my first round pick. As of now, Greg, he is

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>not in my lineup, and even if he's not ruled

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>out going into Sunday morning the early games, I'm still

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have them in my lineup because I don't

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>expect him to play. Personally, he was out on the

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>field jogging today, but I don't think that's gonna be

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>enough for him to get on the field. I think

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>week nine we were probably we see Dvante Adams back.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>How have your expectations been been tempered if at all?

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Without Patrick Mahomes in a lot of for Kansas City

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Travis Kelsey Entyreek Hill, I mean

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>they're tempered quite back like. Look, I mean this is uh,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about probably the best quarterback physically, the best

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the league. Mahomes is doing things that have

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>never been done. He is a generational guy. This is

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy they'll talk about in twenty years. Matt Moore

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not the same guy. Um. I think he's gonna be serviceable.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, like I agree with what Frank said. I

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>think Andy Reid will have him coached up, They'll have

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a game plan in place. I think they will lean

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more on the run and short passes, and I think

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>this could be, you know, a decent game for Kelsey.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The Green Bay defense has been pretty good, especially with

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>pressuring quarterbacks, so I feel like quick passes to the

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>tight end to the running backs could be a way

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that Kansas City goes so I mean, if you have

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey and your team, you're playing him. I mean like

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>you drafted him in the first or second round like

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a lunatic. So you have to start him. And if

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes you feel better about starting both of those guys,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg based on Matt Moore's target distribution in that Thursday

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Night game, both Travis Kelsey and Tyree Kill led the

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>team with five targets each. So he is still going

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to lead on those guys. He has to. Those are

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the talent of the guys. And you start, do you start?

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins looks like he's gonna play. He's fully, you know,

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>he's practicing it full. Where's in your rankings? He's outside

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>my top thirty six. I asked you the question and

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you kind of flipped it back on me. We're Sammy

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Watkins in your rankings. I have him out time my

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 1>top forty eight. So clearly not all right? Uh, New

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Orleans and Arizona. I know a lot of people are

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to this one our own game. Marancy loves

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Arizona with the points in this game. We're still not

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>sure on Drew Brees status, if it'll be him or

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater. Why would he play? Greg, why are we

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>doing this? I'm with you, But it does look like

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camaro will be back. It does not look like

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook will be back. So e Y asked us

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a few moments ago about Cameron Brad versus um T J. Hockinson.

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying, Josh Hill all week long, the Cardinals

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have allowed a tight end to score touchdown in every

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>game in this season. Why not again, Josh Hill. I'm

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with you, Greg, I've been ranking Josh Ill like Jared

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Cook is not gonna play. He's my tight end fourteen.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So really he's after Hawkins and he's after break. He's

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>right in that mix. I asked you this morning, Cameron

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Braid versus Josh Hillio said, Josh Hill. Did I say that? Yes?

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Well that was before how to rule that? No? But

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I do like both of them. I don't really think

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's a wrong a wrong answer, right, Like it's

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>dart throws anyway. Right when it comes to the tight

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>ends that we're we're talking about in this range day

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are tight ends dreams and you know one of these

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A few of these guys are gonna hit, but a

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are not. But I think bred is

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in a good spot. I think he's gonna see you know,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from five to seven targets. The tight ends struggle.

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The Titans struggle against tight ends, and the so did

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. So I think Josh Hill. He scored a

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week that was without Jared Cook, he still

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>only saw three targets. So that's why I am somewhat

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tempering my expectations. I think Josh Hill a really good

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 1>DFS play, someone that you could punt on. Both him

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Cameron Braid they're super cheap. But you're right. The

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals have allowed a touchdown to be scored to tight

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>ends in every game but one, and Josh Hill coming

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>off a game where he just scored a touchdown, I

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:03.239
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be in play once again. All Right,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens with New Orleans. We'll see who

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they go with at the quarterback position. Uh for Arizona,

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>do you have any worry e y on Christian Kirk's availability.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I was heard a think to the any saying that

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like he has a good possibility to play.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>They haven't ruled him in or out yet, but they're

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>saying there is a possibility that he will play, so

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna have to keep an eye on it.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And and David Johnson, if I was a guest, I

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>would guess that he's not going to play, and if

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he does, you'll be very very limited, So uh prepared

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for that. Yeah, Greg, we have to talk about this.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really both running back situations. It's David Johnson and

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds. And then you know Alvin Kamara is gonna

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>be back, but he's been practicing on a limited basis.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's Tavias Murray looked really good and they have the

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>buy next week, So you really have to ask yourself, realistically,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>how much are the Saints going to use Alvin Kamar

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>in this game? They have a by coming up, they

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>don't really have to lean on right point their ten

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites. Let's Havevius Murray just ran

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the Chicago Bears, who are supposed to be

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a great run defense. Maybe not so much anymore without

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a Chem Hicks, but I think that we probably still

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>see a good amount of Latavius Murray. Now. I had

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>him ranked as a top fifteen running back earlier in

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the week because I didn't think Kamara was gonna play.

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But with Kamara in there, I probably downgrade Latavius Murray

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to a high end flex option. And I think if

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you own Alvin Kamara, are you really gonna bench him?

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think you just have to throw him

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in there because he's gonna play. What if it's a

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson situation like last so that was gonna ask you,

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a possibility. What do you what do you do

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in most of those scenarios with David Johnson if he's

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>active this week and Alvin Camara when he's so frustrating,

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Why would David Johnson be active for this game? When

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they signed to running backs and Chase Edmonds just ran

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as he did. This offensive line is actually

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>playing better the past couple of weeks. I don't really

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>know what the Arizona Cardinals are thinking. And of course

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it was they're awesome GM Greg who came out, Steve

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Kin who came out and said, oh well, David Johnson

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>still has a chance to play. He's a true game

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>time decisions like what are we doing? Man? You let

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy rest up? You just you spend so much

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>money on it from ever get healthy I think that's

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>more of a like a coach speak, like, is it like,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>oh so we don't so the Saints don't know what

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to prepare for? Is that? Is that what it is?

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I own both of them in one league as of

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, I have Chase Edmonds in my lineup. I

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have David Johnson in my lineup. And that's on

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a team where I also have Ty Johnson. I'm starting

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson over David Johnson. I mean, this is what

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about in Week eight of the fantasy football season.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Are you starting David Johnson? Oh at all? Greg? I

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>mean I have Frank Gore? And are you starting Frank

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Gore over David Johnson if he's active? How do you

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>do it? How do you do it? Frankie? How do

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you mention defense is actually good? So? Like, what are

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we looking at five to ten touches from David Johnson

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>against a good Saints run defense? Okay, well let me

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>ask this with Chase Edmonds. Then in a league that

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we share together, we have Chase Edmonds, we have James White,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we have Frank Gore. Start two of them, Chase ed Men's,

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>James White and Frank core team. Yeah, I'm benching Frank Gore.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, right right now, if David Johnson plays,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>here's how all phrases. If David Johnson plays, I still

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>think Chase Edmonds is a lowand RB two high end flex.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to use David Johnson even if he plays.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what it comes down to. I don't

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>know how effective he's gonna be. It's a tough matchup.

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much you're gonna use him. It

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>might just be a decoy again like last week. Uh,

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I got burned by him. I don't want David Johnson

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in my lineup when it comes to the same situation.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>If Kamara plays, I am going to use him because

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he can be that efficient where if he only touches

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball ten times, he can still be really good

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to But Tavius Murray to me is now a high

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>inflex option. That's how That's how I'm approaching it. And

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>if David Johnson is ruled out on Sunday, Chase Edmonds

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to me is a top fifteen running back, even if

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's again even with against New Orleans against New Orleans, Yes,

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, the Rams and Cincinnati e y they kick

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>off from London one pm start Rams on the road,

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>heavy favorite Jarry Goff. This fight good numbers last week,

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really look good. What do you expect that at

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>goth this week? Yeah, I think he'll bounce back. I

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>mean looking if you want to get right on offense.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>He played the Cincinnati Bengals especially, a guy that I'm

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>really excited about this week is Todd Gurley. Cincinnati hasn't

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>been able to stop anybody on the ground. Uh, Todd Gurley.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Look at I mean he's not He's not productive like

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>he was. But I don't think it has anything to

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do with Todd Gurley or is arthritic knee or any

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the other nonsense. He's getting a decent amount of work,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>He's looked decent, but he's being tackled or touched in

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the backfield before he even gets to the line of scrimmage.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Is an offensive line thing, it's a scheme thing. But

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Gurley will be very good this week. Andy

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Dalton looks like, oh my god, what a mess. I

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mean he is just you have these these weeks where

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you're like, many he's really looking good. I mean, maybe

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>he's turned things around and then he has another week

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>where it looks like he doesn't know how to play football.

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in any of the Bengals. Mixing is

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest disappointment for me this year. He's been rotten.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Rotten is the right word. We come back, Frank. I

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get your opinion on these Bangles wide receivers

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and know Alex Erickson was to pick up on in

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>tastement the Lantus first for a while now, and you

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can opine on Joe Mixon how he has struggled as well.

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Stick around. We have a lot more to come, just

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty or so minutes to do it. We go around

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the league here the BFS. I want to be the

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS,

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>plus lineup alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more.

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to

0:31:44.920 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>learn more. Exactly a Finals Sagment of the week here

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on the BFF e Y Bopping Alongs and Millie Joel,

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanfell, Greg Sussman. Only get e y s questions answered,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just to make sure we get to them, because the

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>most important questions, because there is so their best friend

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously my BFF for life. Alright, Hockinson and Bread we

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about that already. The other questions are in regards

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to Robbie Anderson versus Mike Williams. So let's break that

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>those games down. It's the Los Angeles Chargers in Chicago

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. It's a weird matchup Chargers and Bears. Mike

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Williams a lot of his value. Frankie may come if

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen plays or not. He injured his hamstring yesterday,

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe stretched today. I don't know what his practice

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>designation was. A true game time decision, True game time decision. Nevertheless,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I expect to see more of Mike Williams and more

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of Austin Ekeler for the Chargers this week. Have they

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>seen this one day shaving out? Yeah? Just to answer

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that question, I would go with Mike Williams over Robbie Anderson,

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just based on Keenan Allen b banged up right now.

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers running back situation is just a mess right now.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I've said all week, I think that if Anthony Lynn

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>has any ounce of intelligence, he will start to use

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeln more. He just has no choice. I mean,

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Love and Gordon has looked like a slug. This Charger's

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is beat up. They cannot run between the tackles.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>The way to attack opposing defenses right now is using

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the short passing game as an extension of the run game.

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw the Detroit Lions do that for years, and

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, the Chargers should move over

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to that. And the Bears are allowing seven and a

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>half receptions to running backs per game this season. That

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is the second most in the NFL. So I like

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Alston Ekeler quite a bit this week, Greg. I have

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>him as a top twenty four running back in PPR leagues.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I have Melvin Gordon as a I have him as

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a flex play still because the Bears run defense has

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>been falling about falling apart without a cheam picks. I mean,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed six rushing touchdowns over their last three games

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and over the past month, they're allowing the most fantasy

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>points opposing running backs, So Lovin Gordon is still a

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>flex play for me. I do like Austin Ekeler quite

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit. I'm hoping that they kind of learned from

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>their mistakes Gregg and get him more involved. Mike Williams

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for me, is a wide receiver. Three he and and Allen.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to pay attention. I believe this is

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a later game, so you're gonna have to have either

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>someone in this game or someone later on. Uh it's

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>one o'clock game, all right, so we'll note early on.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, if if keenan Allen's out, Mike Williams moves

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>up to a high and wide receiver three low and

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to other than Alan Robinson. Are there any

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>other Bears that you would start? Uh? Not unless I'm desperate.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Tarik Cohen, you know in PPR leagues, as

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a bye week replacement. He's been seeing a ton of targets.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I think he had like nine receptions last week only

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for like nineteen yards. So he's not going anywhere with it. Uh,

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And look, you can run on the Chargers defense, but

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to go back to David Montgomery.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to see him do it another

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>week before I jump back in on David Montgomery. But yeah,

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean those are only if you're desperate. Those are

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Those are by week fillings for me. E why we

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>gave you the Mike Williams breakdown. Now, let's get to

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson. Anderson, who's on the trade block everything we've

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>heard this week, he goes into Jacksonville with the rest

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Jets to take on the Jaguars. To me,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at this spot for the Jets as a

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bounce back, Like they got slaughtered this

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>past week against the Patriots embarrassingly, So I think there're

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot better this week in Jacksonville. I don't hate

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson either. How do you see this one breaking down? Yes,

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald, I think has a bounce back game. Jacksonville

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is not the same defense that they used to be,

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>uh sans um Jalen Ramsey. So I mean there are

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there are decent defense, don't get me wrong, But I

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think the Jets have something to prove. They looked absolutely

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>horrific um, and I think they're going to bounce back

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this year there this week, Robbie answer, Anderson is obviously

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a boomer bust. I mean he could He's a guy

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that could get you twenty five points or you could

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get two points or zero for for all that matters.

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Um Crowder, I think will be the receptions guy for sure,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and that will depend on if Herndon plays. I don't know.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard much on that, but I think Robby

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Anderson has a bounce back game. I believe Donald will

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be looking to score some touchdowns, run the score up

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Uh. Jacksonville's offense is decent, so but I

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Jets are gonna show up. Whether they win

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>or not. Who geez. I don't know. That all depends

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on Donald, but I think he's the real deal. Terrible

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>week last week, Um, but I think he bounces back. Yeah.

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I like both running backs in this spot a lot

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Greg. You look at Levian Bell going up

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Jaguars there twenty seven and Run Defense TV away,

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:33.959
<v Speaker 1>They're all having four point eight seven yards were carried

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. So in DFS, you know people

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>might be looking at his Jets offense. I don't want

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with him. I'm jumping back in on

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell when it comes to Leonard for Nett, it

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is a tougher matchup. The Jets have been good against

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but he's just seeing so much volume. You

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can't get away from that right now. DJ H Hark,

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>do do do? Do? Do? Do do? Going up against

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Tremaine Johnson on the outside, and look, this guy is

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>just not putting forth any effort. He's getting paid like

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>seventy two million dollars. There you go. I'm not gonna

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sing along. We've got too much to get to you.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>But I do like d J Chark in this matchup

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>against Tremaine Johnson. D D. Westbrook is in play as well,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>assuming that he plays. He is dealing with his shoulder injury.

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>He's questionable. Yeah, absolutely have been there for D. D. Westbrook.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So Robbie Anderson versus Mike Williams, what do you do? Yeah,

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's close. Robbie does have eight targets in back to

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>back games. Personally, I do lean Mike Williams, though with

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen banged up and Keenan Allen hasn't really been

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>doing much. Mike Williams has not scored a touchdown this year.

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>He scored ten touchdowns last year. I think he gets

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>back in the end zone this week. I think some

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>positive touchdown regression is coming from Mike Wake this time

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we're on the same side. I also take Mike Williams

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>over Robbie Anderson. E Y asked this question last week,

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>got it wrong, Tom Brady versus Aaron Rodgers, which quarterback

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to your start? Yeah, I'm gonna go with Aaron Rodgers

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City. There understand that the past defense has

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>played better, but Aaron Rodgers is on a role right now.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And this Patriots offense look as great as they are

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>right now, as great as you know, they're undefeated. A

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of it has been because of the defense. Tom

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Brady was, you know, deflecting a lot of questions asked

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 1>about the offense after the game. He did not see,

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>seemed pleased with them. And the Browns defense has actually

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>played really well against the passes here and that was

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>without Denzel Award and without Greedy Williams so far this year. Um,

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know they're there twenty one and past defense tv

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>O A, but you know they've actually limited a lot

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of passing games. Um, And I think with Greedy Williams

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and Denzel Award back. It's gonna be some tough sledding

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>for Tom Brady. He's you know, he's still a top

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve quarterback for me. But if I'm choosing between those two, uh,

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it's Aaron Rodgers. E y, all your questions answered, We're

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>here for it was a smile, all right. The Atlanta

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are at home facing off against the Seattle Seahawk.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan practiced today. It looks like he'll be ready

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to go against Seattle, which is certainly good for Calvin Ridley,

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who we expected a big game in place of Mohammed's

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>new as the number two wide receiver in this Atlanta

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>offense for Seattle, loving Tyler Lockett, loving dk Metcalfs, loving

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson, loving Russell Wilson. And hey, you know what,

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>where's Jacob Hollis there? And there's tight end rankings. Jacob

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Hollister is right around all these other tight ends that

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about. No, I have his team seventeen

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Titans a little bit lower. You know, I don't want

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to go all in on Jacob Hollister. He did see

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>six targets last week. The Falcons have allowed four touchdowns

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>over their last three games to opposing tight ends. So

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>again he's you know, Hollister's in that mix, but I

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>still would rather have Bread and Josh Hill at streaming

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends ahead of him. When it comes to the

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks passing attack, yes, it's a good matchup Greg,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>but really only if Matt Ryan plays, Because if Matt

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Shaw plays, I think that this is going to be

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a one sided affair. And we've seen that in games

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>where the Seahawks get up, they're just gonna run. The

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>games where Russell Wilson has a little bit of back

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and forth with with an opposing team, that's where we

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can get those spike weeks, those upside weeks from Russell Wilson,

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>from Tyler Lockett, from DK Metcalf, And it is a

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>good match up against the Falcon secondary. But if Matt

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Shaw plays, this game is not going to be competitive.

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think either way we probably see a lot

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Carson. I have Tyler Lockett as a wide receiver. One.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I have DK Metcalf as a high end wide receiver. Three.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Again because right now, I don't think Matt Ryan's gonna

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>play Greg, And you know, if Matt schob is in there.

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how competitive this game is. You're still

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>using Julio Jones regardless DeVonta Freeman. Look, the Falcons cannot

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>run block right now, they cannot run the ball effectively,

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but they use him in the past game. So in

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues, DeVonta Freeman is still in RB two. Uh

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and Calvin Ridley looked, you're hoping that Matt Ryan plays,

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but again, I don't think it's gonna happen. He's probably

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>more of a loan wide receiver three with Matt Shop

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as his quarterback. Yeah, probably said secondary is not a

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>good one. I don't start. And if Matt Shop is

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, Seattle Seahawks defenses and play as a stream,

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. E Y, Buffalo, your other teams

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>taken on a Philly this week in Orlando. Scandra came

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>out today or yesterday in an interview basically kind of

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>ripped apart the Eagles locked room and their culture and

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Edward or tweeting out earlier, Hey, let's see, how is

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>galvanize this Eagles team? What do you expect from Philly

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and Buffalo on Sunday? I mean, he go one of

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>two ways. You mean, this is what happens. These guys

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are human being. Somebody's call somebody out and see they're

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring them together. It's gonna tear them even further apart.

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>The Philadelphia Eagles are not the team, especially offensively that

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people thought they were going

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to be. Um. I really believed in Went. Uh. In

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of my leagues, I'm actually starting Tannehill over

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Went because the Buffalo defense has been so good. Um,

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is competitive, They're they're oddly competitive. Alan's gonna give

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you everything he's got. Frank Gore is somehow the Infinity

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Stone still getting things done. John Brown has looked good

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and this week I think is is a really good

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>start against an atrocious secondary in Philadelphia. But I mean,

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this before. They had the guy comes out

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in the media. We saw it in Minnesota. They're a

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 1>different team. Now. Maybe this will galvan the Philadelphia Eagles

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and this will be a highly competitive game. I'm still

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>believing that the Buffalo Bills will win. Uh And Alan

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a top twelve starting quarterback this week.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I mean, it could go either way.

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a very interesting game, Maorency. If

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you're downstairs listening, nobody circles the wagons like the Buffalo Bills.

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>E Y, I am with you. This is one of

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>my best bets. I think that this kind of continues

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to tear apart the Philadelphia Eagles, and they've kind of

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>been they've they've showed signs recently. Greg They've allowed over

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>three d rushing yards over the past two weeks. Normally

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they pride themselves in their run defense. Now they're not

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>stopping the run and their secondary has been giving up

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>big plays all season. So you know, Frank Gore and

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary could get back on track here based on

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.479
<v Speaker 1>what the Eagles have allowed the past couple of weeks.

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that John Brown is in a good

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>spot to have him as a you know, top twenty

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver this week. So you like John Brown. Cole Beasley,

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bye week fill in as well

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>against his secondary scored a touchdown last week. Uh, Carson Wentz,

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, e y. I have Tannehill ranked over

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Parson Wentz this week. And when you're talking about the

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia tight ends, the Bills are allowing the fewest fantasy

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing tight ends this year. They allowed the

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.879
<v Speaker 1>fewest fantasy points to opposing tight ends last year. That's

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a trend. That's something that you can actually actually, you know,

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>hang your hang your hat on here. I think that

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz is in for a tough spot here. Alshon

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey going up against tre Davious White. I really don't

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>feel good about the Eagles all around here, Greg. I mean,

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe Jordan Howard can have some success. I think the

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>way to attack the Bills is by running the football.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.479
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I think that I'm looking at the Bills

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>here again as the best bet. I like Josh Allen

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>as a top ten quarterback as well. All Right, a

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>couple more games we want to get to before we

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>wrap up. It's the Houston Texans. Uh. They are facing

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>off against Oakland. Is a really big spot for DeShawn

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Watson to go off in DFS. I love stacking Watson,

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills, Yeah, absolutely, and Stills is super cheap. I

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 1>like getting de Hop in there. You could stack all

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>three of these guys going up against the Oakland defense.

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>They just got shredded by Green Bay they allowed Aaron

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers to throw for four twenty nine yards five touchdowns.

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>The wide receiver's absolutely eight in that game. So I

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>love Kenny Stills this week. He's the top twenty wide

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver for me. DeAndre Hopkins for DFS. If you can

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>get him in there, he's gonna be talking, obviously, but

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in store for a big game as well.

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Greg, looks like Tyroll Williams is

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. The Houston Texans secondary could be had as well.

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like Tyroll Williams is a low end

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Three. He's been practicing with the team. Looks

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna be good to go. Darren Waller obviously

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting him in your lineup, but the DFS price

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>has caught up to him. He's very expensive this week. Greg,

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:33.800
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to Josh Jacobs. A lot of points expected

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but he is truly questionable dealing with

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that shoulder injury. Do you want to hit on e y.

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure we get to Indianapolis and

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Denver ja Kobe Broussette going up against Joe Flacco. Courtland's

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Sulton the number one wide receiver with Denver. I love

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>him this week as well. Dave Shawn Hamilton could be

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.879
<v Speaker 1>sneaky too. Yeah, he could catch a bunch of balls.

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean we know that that Joe Flacco loves to

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>check down, loves to throw the ball short. That's Dashawan

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's job, that's his role, that's what he's been before.

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders was kind of that guy. He's gone. Now.

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>What I am worried about, what I'm curious to see

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>is is I know that Sanders would draw number one

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>attention sometimes, so will Sutton be able to He's obviously

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the number one there, so will he be able to perform?

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>My answer is yes, and Sutton top twelve wide receiver

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>go back to the Broncos running backs as well, both

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>inside of my top twenty four anything with San Francisco

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in Carolina, Frank oh Man not enough time, Greg Uh,

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I would avoid the Carolina Panthers wide receivers. I would

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>avoid Emmanuel Sanders as well. I do like Keevin Coleman

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as a high n RB two. Obviously you're getting Kiddle

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in CMC in there for very young and Frank Damvile.

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>My name is Greg sus but thank you so much

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for watching. Good luck and week A. We'll see him Monday.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We hope I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Dunc on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line of alerts,

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support and much more. SA on

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Roadal dot com backslash dunk to learn more. What did happen?

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>What happens? Here's what you missed on the BFS. Just

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like we all expected a barn Burner Vikings and Washington

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and the Washington football team came through exactly how

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we expected them. And to ey, what's happening, buddy. Not

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not the greatest football game, but I mean football. Nonetheless,

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I was flipping around watching some watching from hockey, watching

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>some football. It was a good night. It was a

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>good night, but I do have bad news. Playing in

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the w w W League playing miss he had Delvin

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Cook and somehow Bailey the kicker and he's up on

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>me forty one point with two players. We played Dalvin

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Cook as well, Frank, Yeah, I played. I played him

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in five of my nine leagues. So that's that's a

0:46:58.400 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>good that's a good way to go into the weekends.

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So unlucky. Man's unbelievable. I played, uh, the Patriots, I

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>think it was Week two and they, well, they played Miami.

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I played them in eight of the my nine leagues.

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>About that happening, it's so remote. I'm not a math guy,

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>but like that, that is insane. Dalvin Cook now has

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.839
<v Speaker 1>had a touchdown in every game but one so far

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. He has nine rushing touchdowns in eight games.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>He's just absolutely amazing, you know, and a lot of

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>people thought this could have happened, right. We all knew that,

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:29.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, going at the turn, he's he's this year's

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey because McAffrey was going out a similar spot

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>last season at that one to turn Dalvin Cook, we

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all knew what the upside was. The Only reason you

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:38.879
<v Speaker 1>got the discount on him was because of the injury risk.

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But we can we see now, look, as long as

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy is healthy, the offensive line has improved this

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>year as well. They did invest in that in the

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>off season. They invested in in the draft as well.

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>They bring in Garrett Bradbury. The offensive line is playing well.

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook one of the most electric running backs in

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the league right now. So if you drafted him on

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that turn or in the second round, or you know

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you reached on him in the first round, it is

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>working out for you right now. Greg he is this

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>year's Christian McCaffrey. Absolutely. He is the guy that leads

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you to victory each and every week. As you mentioned,

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>score touchdown in every game but one this season. He

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>has been a rock star. The offense is simply built

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.399
<v Speaker 1>around Dalvin Cook and Stefon Diggs. He got his another

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>seven gadgets for over all hundred and forty yards, burning

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman. The only negative Stevon Diggs was that early

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>first quarter fumble where he was trying to change the

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>field the head towards the end zone. Ultimately he fumbles,

0:48:20.520 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>but that was just a blip on the radar. Another

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>really good night e y from Stefon Diggs. Yeah, Diggs

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>looked awesome. I mean, this is the guy that that

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think most of us thought he was going to be, uh,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>this is the guy that you know, people drafted him high,

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and I would imagine that a lot of people have

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have moved on from him and are probably pretty sad

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about that. So, yeah, Diggs looked awesome. Yeah, I tweeted

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that last night as well, just that I hope after

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Eagles where he blew up for

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty seven yards and three touchdowns, that

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you didn't just sell this guy off for anything that

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you can. I mean, I was one of those that

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>was actually trying, but nobody wanted him, so I just

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuck around and was like, all right, well,

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ride this out. This is now three weeks

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in a row that he has given us a hundred

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and forty three receiving yards or more. How about this,

0:48:57.760 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>two weeks in a row he's had exactly one d

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and four three receiving yards. So that's weird. On seven

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 1>receptions two three games in a row at least seven receptions,

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>two games in a row, exactly one receiving yards, just

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>very odd. Four of the last five games he's had

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred receiving yards. So it looks like Stefon

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Digg is getting back to the player we thought that

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he could be