WEBVTT - Midterm Previews - March 27th, Hour 3

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, News Roundup and information overload. Our toll free

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>if you want to be a part of the program.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Next Tuesday in the great state of Wisconsin, this will

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>determine the balance of power on the state Supreme Court

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>in Wisconsin. And the implications of this race are far

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and wide for the twenty twenty six midterms and control

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>of the House for President Trump because in large part

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this has to do with the Supreme

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Court of Wisconsin. We'll be dealing with the issue of redistricting,

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>among other important issues. And a second we're going to

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>speak to Brad Schimmel is running for the Supreme Court

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>race in Wisconsin. He would be the fourth conservative justice

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>on that court, otherwise you get a radical leftist. And

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>we learned in a pretty you know, stunning development that

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries expose the Democratic Party

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>in their plan to use this liberal activist Justice Susan Crawford,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the jerry Mander Wisconsin's congressional map for the purpose of

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>flipping two seats to Democrats. And anyway here's Akeem Jeffries

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 2>actually leaking Susan Crawford's plan to jerrymander Wisconsin.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>In Wisconsin, that's a fifty to fifty race because we

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>know Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state and we have

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 3>a strong Democratic candidate, whoever wins is going to determine

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>who has the majority in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Why

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 3>is that important because there are jerrymandered congressional lions right

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 3>now in Wisconsin. Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state, as

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned, but there are six Republicans and only two

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Democrats out of an eight person delegation. Because the lines

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>are broken, and as soon as possible, we need to

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>be able to revisit that and have fair line's. The

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>only way for that to be even a significant possibility

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 3>is if you have an enlightened Supreme Court. And so

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think that's an incredibly important race, a.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Very very important race. Anyway, Brad Schimol is running for

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. This election is this coming Tuesday.

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It's very very important. It's critically important as a matter

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 2>of fact, especially in light of Hakeem Jeffrey's attempt and

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>frankly blatant open attempt to use this new activist justice

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 2>for the purpose of redistricting Wisconsin in a way that

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>would only benefit Democrats anyway, Brad, thanks for being on

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the program.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thank you, Sean. It's a great honor to be

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>on with you. And yeah, you're not going to find

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>me agreeing with Akeem Jeffries very often. But he's right,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a critically important race. You know. The interesting

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thing he complains about these maps being jerrymandered. These are

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the maps that were put in place by our Democrat

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>elected governor. These are his maps. They just don't like

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the outcome because they went to the poll and they

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the congressional seats they wanted. So now they

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>want to do it through the court. And now my

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>opponent promised it over a month ago, and now we

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>got to Keen Jeffries talking about it again that they're

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>going to use the court to take away the power

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of the people reflected through the legislature and do it

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with four justices on the court if they win this race.

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that is to me, corruption at a level

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>we just don't need to see in this country. We

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>really don't. But for Keem jeffries to mention that just

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>shows you the depths of depravity and desperation that the

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 2>left in this country has. Let's talk about some of

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the other issues. Wisconsin is a fifty to fifty state,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a key swing state, and as I mentioned, you

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>know this, this is going to impact a lot of

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>other issues in the in the state of Wisconsin. Tell

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>us what other issues are likely to appear for the

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court if you become that tie breaking justice.

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We actually have huge issues coming. There are major battles

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>queued up over what the respective powers between the executive

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>branch and legislative brandch We have divided government at Democrat

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>governor Republican legislature in Wisconsin. There are huge battles queued

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>up to come to the Supreme Court on that question.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Where of course, we've got a question coming up before

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the Court as to whether our state constitution provides a

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>constitutional right to abortion. We've got questions about a reform

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>path over a decade ago. You're familiar well over a

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, you're familiar with ACTAN in Wisconsin that's being

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>queued up to come before the Court, even though it's

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>already been approved fourteen years ago by the Wisconsin Supreme

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Court and by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal. That's

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>coming back around, and if the liberals have controlled its court,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll strike it down.

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Explain Oct. Ten for those that don't know.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Governor Scott Walker was a governor at the

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>time and back in twenty eleven created a law that

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>puts some restrictions on collective bargaining for public employee unions.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Has nothing to do with public private sector unions. Just

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>public employee unions limited some of their outsized power they had,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and that got resolved many years ago, and now it's

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>coming back because all the liberals want to take another

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>crack at it now that they've changed the makeup of

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the court.

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Well they if they get the change that they're looking for,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and obviously you would play a very pivotal role, probably

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 2>be the key swing vote in any decision that's made

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 2>in the state. Let me take you back to twenty twenty.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll never forget and I read the entire decision and

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>dissent that was put out by the Wisconsin Supreme Court,

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and this was about the twenty twenty election, and the

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Chief Justice, writing for the descent in this particular case

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice could not have been

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>any more brutal in his takedown of the other justices,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the majority four justices. It was a three to four decision,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and in pointing out that the laws of Wisconsin were

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>not followed, the constitution of the state of Wisconsin was

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>not followed. Correct me if I'm wrong. I thought that

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>was maybe the most stinging rebuke in a dissent I'd

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 2>ever read.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>There were a whole string of election integrity laws that

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>were not followed because of COVID. That was their excuse.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>And then when those challenges came to the Supreme Court,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>our Supreme Court, with three Liberals and one of the

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives who jumped ship, decided it was too close to

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the election to hear those cases, so they didn't take

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>them up until after the election, which meant that no

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one corrected those voter integrity problems. Nobody fixed serious issues.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>For instance, the Green Party was kept off the ballot

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>by our state Elections Commission over a technicality. There was

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court decided in twenty twenty not to take that

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>case up because it was they feared it was too

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>close to the election, and we could influence the outcome

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of the election. Well, President Trump lost Wisconsin by twenty

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>one thousand votes. The Green Party pulls over thirty thousand

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>votes from Democrats based on that. The Supreme Court deciding

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not to take that up did affect the outcome of

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the election. And this is one of a whole string

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of cases they declined to resolve. They should be doing

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>their job take up cases. Resolve these important legal issues

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so that everyone can have confidence in the outcome of

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>an election.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>That's all I want as an American citizen. I want

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>integrity in the process. I want confidence in the results.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I have a hard time understanding a mindset that says

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>they don't want voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>if there's going to be mail on balloting, updated voter roles.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 2>To me, this is basic and fundamental. Again, so people

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 2>have believed that there's integrity in the process and they'll

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>have confidence in the results, and then there won't be

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>questions at the end of the process.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, my opponent was the lead attorney attacking our voter

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>ID law years ago, and that was when that was

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on the potentially on the chopping block. She was the

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>attorney going after it. You know, when she ran for

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Dane County Circuit Court judge, she bragged about that. She said,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>I was that lawyer, and she called it draconian, showing

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>a voter showing a photo ID to vote, she said

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it was draconian. She compared it to a poll tax,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>all those things when she wanted to be a judge

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 1>in our most liberal county in Wisconsin. But now she's

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>running statewide, she's trying to back away from those positions

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>she took. She was also the lead attorney who challenged

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Act ten that I talked about a few moments ago.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>But now she tried to back away from all that.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But we already know the real her. When she's talking

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to her liberal allies, she's all about fighting, fighting against

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>any reforms. But suddenly she pretends to be harmless. But

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, that's how liberals always run. They always

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>run like they're a centrist. They're harmless, we're not updating,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to just follow the law. They all claim that,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but then when they get in power, they don't follow that.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about this special election, and I find

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 2>the timing of it, and this goes for the state

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of Florida, even although Florida law mandates that after somebody

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 2>resigns that you have an election two months after. So

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 2>it's very specifically identified. But why April first, because it's

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>not a date that most people expect to be going

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to the polls. And but what worries me about your election?

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 2>And I hope the people of Wisconsin and we have

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>many many people that listen to us there and watch

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>us on Hannity. My hope is is that the people

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 2>of Wisconsin know that the stakes are very, very high

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>in your election. And do you feel like people are

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 2>engaged because normally you would refer to this as a

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 2>base election. In other words, whatever party is able to

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 2>get their base to the polls is the party that's

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>going to end up winning. And it has little to

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 2>do with swing voters. They usually are not the ones

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be targeted to show up at

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 2>the polls on this particular election. How do you feel

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's going in that regard, Well.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You're right about this. This is a turnout election. This

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is actually for our non partisan elections. We have them

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on the first Tuesday in April according to our constitution.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>So this is the normal Spring election. But you're right,

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they get very low turnouts because they're the non partisan races.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>People don't really get as juiced up about him as

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the November elections. So it is a turnout race. Our

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>side gets it, though. I've never seen our side this

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>excited and motivated and working as hard for a Spring

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Court election as this. I've been involved with elections for

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time. They've never been this fired up because

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been getting our teeth kicked in. The Liberals took

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>over the Supreme Court in twenty twenty three, and for

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the last year and a half, they have been going

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>through a political agenda on that court, and we see it.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We know we've got to make the change. All we've

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>got to do is make sure our voters turn out.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>If sixty percent of the voters who voted for President

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump on November fifth show up and vote for me

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on April first, we win this.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 2>April first is on Tuesday, and I'm merging everybody in Wisconsin.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 2>If you're in Wisconsin and you're a registered voter, this

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>race is critical if you if you don't want the

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>radical left controlling the courts. Now we've seen what's been

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 2>how the left in this country has been using the courts,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and frankly, they go judge shopping most of the time,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and they get these low level court judges, and they've

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 2>been issuing injunction after an injunction after injunction, with no

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>accountability to stymy or at least temporarily stop the president's agenda.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I call judicial activism. And what Democrats can't get done

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 2>legislatively or electorally, they seem to run to the courts for.

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 2>And in this case, if they run to the Wisconsin

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, if you're not elected, then the odds are

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 2>very high that they're going to be successful in advancing

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 2>their radicalism.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>That way, right, And if we don't take the conservative

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>majority back this April first, our next chance is until

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight. So the leftist son this court will

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have had five years of unchecked power because they're the

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>final word when it comes to Wisconsin statutes and the

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Constitution. We don't have five years to go through

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>their political agenda. It will be ugly. We won't even

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize the state when they're done.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you about the polls. When I had

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Scott Walker on last week talking about this very specific issue,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>and he was a very strong advocate for you. He said,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the latest polls had it at a dead heat forty

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 2>seven forty seven. What are the polls showing you down?

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the last poll we got was that one

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>forty seven forty seven. It's and that's pretty predictable in Wisconsin.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing all the momentum though. I mean that my

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>opponent is just doing nothing. She's taken pictures in front

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of ice cream stands, by herself eating an ice cream cone.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We're out. We're out hitting huge gatherings of people. We

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just finished one in Green Bay at great rally of

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>people showed up to have for a meet and greet.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>We're we're going around the state with the meeting the

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>voters where they are. I've gotten to all seventy two

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>counties in this state campaigning over the last sixteen months.

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got the momentum. We're going to take this thing.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as you know, conservatives in states like Wisconsin,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they always underpolled. So if if it shows us tied

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it andans we're about to win.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. When Wisconsin, you know, first passed on March nineth,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty eleven, those consent are ten, that we're restricted collective

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 2>bargaining rights for most public sector employees, but allowed public

0:13:54.640 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>safety employees to continue to collectively bargain with their municipal employers. Anyway,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>there's so much on the ballad here. I want everybody

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>in Wisconsin please pay attention to this race. Brad Schimmel

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>is running for the Supreme Court in the state of Wisconsin.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Shimmelfustice dot com, schim e l for fr Justice

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com and they can find out more about this

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>race and find out how they can help us get

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this across the finish line. You know that Act ten

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you talked about this passage back in twenty eleven. Your

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>listeners may recall those giant riots with one hundred thousand

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>people protesting outside the Wisconsin capital that was over Act ten.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That was how big of an event that was to

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pass that reform in Wisconsin government.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I remember that's when they were taken over like the

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 2>capitol in Wisconsin, right, yep, it was unbelievable. Brad Schimmel,

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate you, and we're watching very closely on Tuesday.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I urge people to pay very close attention to Wisconsin.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>If you support the President's agenda. Please make this an

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 2>important priority for you. Similarly, if you're in my free

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>state of Florida, make the race in the Daytona Beach

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 2>and that would be the Mike Wallasey. That election is

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.239
<v Speaker 2>April first as well, both taking place this coming Tuesday,

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Both very very important races. Brad Schimo, we appreciate you

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 2>being with us. Thank you, sir, Thank you so much. Well.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I've been arguing that the Democratic Party has swung to

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the radical, hardcore left, as evidenced by these comments of

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 2>our old friend Corey Bush. Listen, there were.

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Going to be two separate bills, and we had already

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 5>had those conversations. But when it was clear, remember the

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 5>investment kept going down, down, down, and we were like, no,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 5>because we need this investment. We need, like you said,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 5>the money that was that was more money for lead

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 5>pipes than what we had.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 6>What we see trillion.

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Did it start at three point nine and go down or.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Did it we were at I thought we were at ten,

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 5>and then it went down to six and then down three,

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 5>then went down to one point seven.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I believe ten trillion dollars Democrats were planning to spend

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>on a climate bill. Ten trillion dollars. We are forty

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars close to forty trillion dollars in our national debt.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>And I keep referring back the party that puts the

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>rights of illegals, including gang members from trend day Arragua.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>We have known terrorists, murderers, rapists, gang members, cartel members

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>in the country over your safety and security, your family

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 2>safety and security. This is the same Democratic party that

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 2>is championing the right of men to play women's sports,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>as evidenced by the vote in the US Senate. This

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 2>is the same Democratic party that thinks it's a constitutional

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 2>crisis if you don't want to spend all that money

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and all their radicalism abroad. This is how far left

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>they've become, and where has it gotten them. It has

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>gotten them to the point whether the percentage of Americans

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>that say we are on the right track is through

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the roof. When you break it down issue by issue,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>then Donald Trump is anywhere in the low sixties to

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the high eighties in terms of where he stands on

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 2>issues that people care about. This is how out of

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>touch they are now when you hear this percentage, understand

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 2>these are historic highs.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 7>Listen, let's take a look at the percentage of the

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 7>country who say that we're on the right track. It's

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 7>actually a very high percentage when you compare it to

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 7>some historical numbers.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about?

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 7>According to Maris, forty five percent say that we're on

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 7>the right track. That's the second highest that Maris has

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 7>measured since two thousand and nine.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 2>How about NBC.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 7>News forty four percent, that's the highest since two thousand

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 7>and four. The bottom line is, the percentage of Americans

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 7>who say we're on the right track is through the roof.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 7>And if you were to compare it to when presidents

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 7>have historically been re elected. Of course, Trump is not

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 7>constitutionally eligible to run for election, but I think it

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 7>sort of puts it in perspective. Forty two percent of the

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 7>country says the country is on the right truck when

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 7>the incumbent party is re elected. And also keep in mind,

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 7>back when Kamala Harris lost and the Democrats were turned out

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 7>of power, only about twenty seven or twenty eight percent

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 7>of the country said the country is on the right track.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 7>The bottom line is, right now, a much higher percentage

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 7>of the country says we're on the right truck.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, the country is saying. Now. Add to that,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Democrats last three polls their approval rating the lowest ever

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>in the twenties. This is now a thirty year low

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 2>for them. All right, let's get to our busy phones.

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Eight hundred and nine to four one seawan our number

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>if you want to be a part of the program.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Jeff in South Carolina, Jeff, how are you glad you called?

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 8>Thanks for checking in, Yes, sir, a big fan. I'm

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 8>amazed by the hypocrisy of the left. People are crying

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 8>on TikTok, fear for their lives, Roso big Vett and

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 8>Ellen degenerous leaving in fear. But that's to be in

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 8>torch left and right procket making threats, and some in

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 8>Congress are calling for civil war. But we're supposedly the

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 8>bad guys. I don't understand, well a.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Bad guy exactly. Let me tell you the violence on

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the left. And this is ironic considering this is the

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 2>party that has spent five years and they continue to

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>bring up January sixth, January sixth, January sixth. But yet

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 2>this was the party that said mostly peaceful the five

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy four riots in the summer of twenty twenty,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 2>dozens of dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions of

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 2>property damage, mostly peaceful according to them. This is the

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>same party which has, you know, radical supporters of Hamas.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 2>You've got the Hamas wing of the Democratic Party that

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get condemned by other quote mainstream Democrats. Their silence

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 2>is deafening. This is the same party that praises the

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 2>likes of Luigi Mangioni. I mean certain Democrats and certain

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 2>radical leftists have been praising this guy as if he's

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>a hero after assassinating the United Healthcare CEO. This is

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the same exact Democratic Party that is, you know, celebrating

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>even on ABC Disney. If Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney,

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 2>approves this message of Jimmy Kimmel that we've been playing

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>and his joking about the violence and domestic terrorism at

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>at Tesla dealerships in Tesla charging stations and bullets being

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 2>fired into these places, you know, this is now the

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>radical left today. This is who they are. And you

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>know that's why it's a joke when they talk about

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>national security, because they don't mean it. That's the big secret.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 2>As I've been saying, but it's scary. It is now

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the party of crazy versus the Party of common sense.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And I think the party of common sense that is

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>working to make the lives of working men and women

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>better in this country is going to win that win

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the argument every day of the week. Anyway, my friend,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>appreciate the call. Eight hundred and nine to four one,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Shawn is our number. You want to be part of

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the program, Don and Iowa, Don. How are you glad

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 2>you called?

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Sir?

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 6>Hi Sean, thank you for taking my call. I'm actually

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 6>in San Antonio, Texas right now, Katie's neck of the woods.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what are you doing to know? You're a trucker?

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 6>I am a truck driver, Yes, sir.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, godspeed on the road. I think I just turd

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 2>your horn. And we appreciate our truckers and the fact

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>that you fill every store with everything we could ever want,

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 2>need or desire. I go, I go shopping at Costco,

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 2>or I go shopping at my grocery store. I go

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 2>shopping at Home Depot or Low's, and I'm like overwhelmed,

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 2>there's so much stuff there.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, sir, No, definitely, and I appreciate that. I also

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 6>I've been a Sean Hannity follower since Hannity and Coombs

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 6>back in the eighties, which I can't even remember.

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I have to take it was actually the nineties. But

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>you're closed, don't. You don't want to age me that much,

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'd like to believe I have a few

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>more years left to me. But I do appreciate it.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for being such a loyal, faithful friend. You know,

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing over the years. How how some people, in

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>spite of very steady conservatism, I say one little it's

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>he bitsy thing that they don't approve of. Man, they'll

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 2>just rip my head off on social media, but you

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 2>know what, it goes with the territory. I can handle it.

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, thank you. What's on your mind today?

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 6>Everybody's always looking to criticize. What I called for was

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 6>about this whole signal APP thing. I want to explain

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 6>it in layman's terms for the simple tens that are

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 6>following this reporter and believe that there was some kind

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 6>of national emergency. Signal APP is not much more than

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 6>take Latin a simple encryption. Not meant for national security.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 6>It's meant for, you know, for privacy of you know online,

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 6>that's all it's meant for. It's not as if they

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 6>had thirty thousand emails sent to a known felon's laptop

0:22:55.400 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 6>where he was, you know, messaging with fifteen year old girls,

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 6>where he could have been compromised greatly to the detriment

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 6>of national security. It's not like it was piles of

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 6>boxes parked in a garage next to a core vette

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 6>where a correct user had prostitutes and drug dealers in

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 6>that house, in and out daily. That's a security risk

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 6>signal is used just for privacy, not for national security.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, And I believe it was a one off. It

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>was an honest mistake. It was not done by design.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>There's nobody in the administration that likes or respects the

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 2>work of Jeffrey Goldberg. How it ultimately happened, I don't know.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to be something that we're going to

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>see often.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 2>And that's the difference between this systemic and institutionalized security

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>breaches of the Biden years that nobody you've said a

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 2>word about. The Only people that were pointing it out

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>were people like me. And there's a big difference between

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 2>systemic and institutionalized lying and corruption and national security threat

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>threats plural versus one inadvertent mistake on an app. And

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>you've got to remember too. And I think this is important,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>and that is while it was definitely sensitive information, and

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I think this is very important. Sensitive information versus classified

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>information are two very distinct things in terms of the law.

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 2>And as they pointed out, no classified information was passed on.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>The mission was a success lesson hopefully learned moving forward,

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 2>So we really have to fight back against cybercrime and

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 2>these foreign countries that are bombarding this country with all

0:24:55.000 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 2>this criminal activity. And at some point it now behooves

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 2>us as a country. We can no longer take it

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and say we don't know. The Biden years, all of

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 2>these things happen. You know, the Trump campaign was hacked repeatedly.

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Biden didn't do a thing about it, and now this happened,

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully this will lead to the impetus to make

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>dramatic systemic change that will protect our privacy. I think

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it's critical. Don we appreciate all your truckers. God bless you,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 2>God bless Iowa. Get home safe, my friend, back to

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 2>our phones. As we say hi to Ken in Texas,

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>God bless Texas. Ken how are you glad you called?

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Great? Thanks Sean. Great to talk to you today.

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Great to talk to you. What's going on?

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Understand, I have a great deal of resuspect, first of all,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 4>for Elon Musk and his team for what they're doing

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 4>in a private sector, and for dose you put my

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 4>question and understand, take this in the spiritus intended. I

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 4>hope what hasn't our elected officials that I mean, Congress,

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 4>why haven't they been doing the job of doge over

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 4>the last I don't know, decades, Because I mean, surely

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 4>all this waste and corruption and fraud didn't just show

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 4>up over the past six weeks since January twentieth, and

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 4>surely I would expect Congress has got the same or

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 4>even more access to all the files and the information

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 4>that Elon Muskin's team had. So, you know, I applaud

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 4>Elon Muskin his team, but didn't he taken all the

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 4>heat for the job that the people we send to

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Washington should be doing well.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're making a great point. I mean, these

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>other politicians, all these people that have done this. You know,

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I think we've got to

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 2>dig a little deeper into as well to kind of

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 2>go off. Your point is they were not honest with

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the American people about how they were spending this money.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>They would put it under you know, these broad headings

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 2>without the specifics of you know, forty three million taxpayer

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>dollars for or sesame street productions in Iraq, or DEI

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 2>programs in Burma, or the money that was spent in

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 2>every other country on DEI, transgenderism, wokism, and the radical

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Green New Deal. So they hit it all on top

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of it, and somehow Elon Musk has become public Enemy

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 2>number one for what reason? What has he done? He's

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>just helped the American people, you know, or is helping

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 2>America to get its fiscal house and order so that

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>we don't steal from our kids and grandkids. I'll give

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>you the last words.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 4>And he is doing that. My concern is he's going

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.959
<v Speaker 4>to wake up one day, look in the mirror and say,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 4>you know what, I don't need this, I don't need this.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 4>And especially that's going to happen if he identifies all

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 4>this corruption and waste and in Congress to do anything

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 4>about it.

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 2>He's going to mean I could see, honestly, I could

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 2>see that happening there. Look he did. He signed up

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to help. He didn't sign up for the abuse. He

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 2>didn't sign up for his companies to get rude. He

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 2>signed up to help the country. I'm very confident though,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 2>with the technology in Tesla that can alert and take

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>photos of people that are involved in acts of terrorism,

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>and in the FBI under Cash Betel and the DOJ

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>under Pambondi, I'm very confident that we're going to get

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom of this and these people that are

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 2>responsible will be caught. They will be tried, they will

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 2>be convicted, they will be put in jail, and the

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>people that are funding it will also similarly be held accountable.

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I am confident in that, and I hope that happens

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>sooner than later. Anyway, my friend, I have to roll.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I do appreciate you. Call God bless Texas eight hundred

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>and ninety four one Sean if you want to be

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a part of the program. I guys some wrapplings. So

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 2>for today, don't forget go to Hannity dot com and

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 2>that's we're going to use the same word for the

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 2>next four days. Make it easier for people and just

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>click on the Tesla contest icon. It'll be brought to

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the contest page and today's word of the Day and

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 2>that'll be for today, Tomorrow, Saturday, Sunday is America. And

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>that will give you four chances to win your own tesla.

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 2>You get to pick the winner, We'll get to pick

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the tesla of their choice. Just go to hannity dot

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>com Word of the Day America Today, Tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday.

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And to all of you, good luck. That's all the

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>time we have left. Thank you for joining us, thank

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you for making this show possible.