Speaker 1: Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2: All right, News Roundup and information overload. Our toll free
Speaker 2: our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean
Speaker 2: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2: Next Tuesday in the great state of Wisconsin, this will
Speaker 2: determine the balance of power on the state Supreme Court
Speaker 2: in Wisconsin. And the implications of this race are far
Speaker 2: and wide for the twenty twenty six midterms and control
Speaker 2: of the House for President Trump because in large part
Speaker 2: a lot of this has to do with the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court of Wisconsin. We'll be dealing with the issue of redistricting,
Speaker 2: among other important issues. And a second we're going to
Speaker 2: speak to Brad Schimmel is running for the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: race in Wisconsin. He would be the fourth conservative justice
Speaker 2: on that court, otherwise you get a radical leftist. And
Speaker 2: we learned in a pretty you know, stunning development that
Speaker 2: the House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries expose the Democratic Party
Speaker 2: in their plan to use this liberal activist Justice Susan Crawford,
Speaker 2: the jerry Mander Wisconsin's congressional map for the purpose of
Speaker 2: flipping two seats to Democrats. And anyway here's Akeem Jeffries
Speaker 2: actually leaking Susan Crawford's plan to jerrymander Wisconsin.
Speaker 3: In Wisconsin, that's a fifty to fifty race because we
Speaker 3: know Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state and we have
Speaker 3: a strong Democratic candidate, whoever wins is going to determine
Speaker 3: who has the majority in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Why
Speaker 3: is that important because there are jerrymandered congressional lions right
Speaker 3: now in Wisconsin. Wisconsin's a fifty to fifty state, as
Speaker 3: I mentioned, but there are six Republicans and only two
Speaker 3: Democrats out of an eight person delegation. Because the lines
Speaker 3: are broken, and as soon as possible, we need to
Speaker 3: be able to revisit that and have fair line's. The
Speaker 3: only way for that to be even a significant possibility
Speaker 3: is if you have an enlightened Supreme Court. And so
Speaker 3: you know, I think that's an incredibly important race, a.
Speaker 2: Very very important race. Anyway, Brad Schimol is running for
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court in Wisconsin. This election is this coming Tuesday.
Speaker 2: It's very very important. It's critically important as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, especially in light of Hakeem Jeffrey's attempt and
Speaker 2: frankly blatant open attempt to use this new activist justice
Speaker 2: for the purpose of redistricting Wisconsin in a way that
Speaker 2: would only benefit Democrats anyway, Brad, thanks for being on
Speaker 2: the program.
Speaker 1: Oh, thank you, Sean. It's a great honor to be
Speaker 1: on with you. And yeah, you're not going to find
Speaker 1: me agreeing with Akeem Jeffries very often. But he's right,
Speaker 1: this is a critically important race. You know. The interesting
Speaker 1: thing he complains about these maps being jerrymandered. These are
Speaker 1: the maps that were put in place by our Democrat
Speaker 1: elected governor. These are his maps. They just don't like
Speaker 1: the outcome because they went to the poll and they
Speaker 1: didn't get the congressional seats they wanted. So now they
Speaker 1: want to do it through the court. And now my
Speaker 1: opponent promised it over a month ago, and now we
Speaker 1: got to Keen Jeffries talking about it again that they're
Speaker 1: going to use the court to take away the power
Speaker 1: of the people reflected through the legislature and do it
Speaker 1: with four justices on the court if they win this race.
Speaker 2: I mean, that is to me, corruption at a level
Speaker 2: we just don't need to see in this country. We
Speaker 2: really don't. But for Keem jeffries to mention that just
Speaker 2: shows you the depths of depravity and desperation that the
Speaker 2: left in this country has. Let's talk about some of
Speaker 2: the other issues. Wisconsin is a fifty to fifty state,
Speaker 2: it's a key swing state, and as I mentioned, you
Speaker 2: know this, this is going to impact a lot of
Speaker 2: other issues in the in the state of Wisconsin. Tell
Speaker 2: us what other issues are likely to appear for the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court if you become that tie breaking justice.
Speaker 1: We actually have huge issues coming. There are major battles
Speaker 1: queued up over what the respective powers between the executive
Speaker 1: branch and legislative brandch We have divided government at Democrat
Speaker 1: governor Republican legislature in Wisconsin. There are huge battles queued
Speaker 1: up to come to the Supreme Court on that question.
Speaker 1: Where of course, we've got a question coming up before
Speaker 1: the Court as to whether our state constitution provides a
Speaker 1: constitutional right to abortion. We've got questions about a reform
Speaker 1: path over a decade ago. You're familiar well over a
Speaker 1: decade ago, you're familiar with ACTAN in Wisconsin that's being
Speaker 1: queued up to come before the Court, even though it's
Speaker 1: already been approved fourteen years ago by the Wisconsin Supreme
Speaker 1: Court and by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal. That's
Speaker 1: coming back around, and if the liberals have controlled its court,
Speaker 1: they'll strike it down.
Speaker 2: Explain Oct. Ten for those that don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so Governor Scott Walker was a governor at the
Speaker 1: time and back in twenty eleven created a law that
Speaker 1: puts some restrictions on collective bargaining for public employee unions.
Speaker 1: Has nothing to do with public private sector unions. Just
Speaker 1: public employee unions limited some of their outsized power they had,
Speaker 1: and that got resolved many years ago, and now it's
Speaker 1: coming back because all the liberals want to take another
Speaker 1: crack at it now that they've changed the makeup of
Speaker 1: the court.
Speaker 2: Well they if they get the change that they're looking for,
Speaker 2: and obviously you would play a very pivotal role, probably
Speaker 2: be the key swing vote in any decision that's made
Speaker 2: in the state. Let me take you back to twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: I'll never forget and I read the entire decision and
Speaker 2: dissent that was put out by the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: and this was about the twenty twenty election, and the
Speaker 2: Chief Justice, writing for the descent in this particular case
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice could not have been
Speaker 2: any more brutal in his takedown of the other justices,
Speaker 2: the majority four justices. It was a three to four decision,
Speaker 2: and in pointing out that the laws of Wisconsin were
Speaker 2: not followed, the constitution of the state of Wisconsin was
Speaker 2: not followed. Correct me if I'm wrong. I thought that
Speaker 2: was maybe the most stinging rebuke in a dissent I'd
Speaker 2: ever read.
Speaker 1: There were a whole string of election integrity laws that
Speaker 1: were not followed because of COVID. That was their excuse.
Speaker 1: And then when those challenges came to the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: our Supreme Court, with three Liberals and one of the
Speaker 1: Conservatives who jumped ship, decided it was too close to
Speaker 1: the election to hear those cases, so they didn't take
Speaker 1: them up until after the election, which meant that no
Speaker 1: one corrected those voter integrity problems. Nobody fixed serious issues.
Speaker 1: For instance, the Green Party was kept off the ballot
Speaker 1: by our state Elections Commission over a technicality. There was
Speaker 1: Supreme Court decided in twenty twenty not to take that
Speaker 1: case up because it was they feared it was too
Speaker 1: close to the election, and we could influence the outcome
Speaker 1: of the election. Well, President Trump lost Wisconsin by twenty
Speaker 1: one thousand votes. The Green Party pulls over thirty thousand
Speaker 1: votes from Democrats based on that. The Supreme Court deciding
Speaker 1: not to take that up did affect the outcome of
Speaker 1: the election. And this is one of a whole string
Speaker 1: of cases they declined to resolve. They should be doing
Speaker 1: their job take up cases. Resolve these important legal issues
Speaker 1: so that everyone can have confidence in the outcome of
Speaker 1: an election.
Speaker 2: That's all I want as an American citizen. I want
Speaker 2: integrity in the process. I want confidence in the results.
Speaker 2: I have a hard time understanding a mindset that says
Speaker 2: they don't want voter ID signature verification, chain of custody controls,
Speaker 2: if there's going to be mail on balloting, updated voter roles.
Speaker 2: To me, this is basic and fundamental. Again, so people
Speaker 2: have believed that there's integrity in the process and they'll
Speaker 2: have confidence in the results, and then there won't be
Speaker 2: questions at the end of the process.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: Well, my opponent was the lead attorney attacking our voter
Speaker 1: ID law years ago, and that was when that was
Speaker 1: on the potentially on the chopping block. She was the
Speaker 1: attorney going after it. You know, when she ran for
Speaker 1: Dane County Circuit Court judge, she bragged about that. She said,
Speaker 1: I was that lawyer, and she called it draconian, showing
Speaker 1: a voter showing a photo ID to vote, she said
Speaker 1: it was draconian. She compared it to a poll tax,
Speaker 1: all those things when she wanted to be a judge
Speaker 1: in our most liberal county in Wisconsin. But now she's
Speaker 1: running statewide, she's trying to back away from those positions
Speaker 1: she took. She was also the lead attorney who challenged
Speaker 1: Act ten that I talked about a few moments ago.
Speaker 1: But now she tried to back away from all that.
Speaker 1: But we already know the real her. When she's talking
Speaker 1: to her liberal allies, she's all about fighting, fighting against
Speaker 1: any reforms. But suddenly she pretends to be harmless. But
Speaker 1: as you know, that's how liberals always run. They always
Speaker 1: run like they're a centrist. They're harmless, we're not updating,
Speaker 1: we're going to just follow the law. They all claim that,
Speaker 1: but then when they get in power, they don't follow that.
Speaker 2: So let's talk about this special election, and I find
Speaker 2: the timing of it, and this goes for the state
Speaker 2: of Florida, even although Florida law mandates that after somebody
Speaker 2: resigns that you have an election two months after. So
Speaker 2: it's very specifically identified. But why April first, because it's
Speaker 2: not a date that most people expect to be going
Speaker 2: to the polls. And but what worries me about your election?
Speaker 2: And I hope the people of Wisconsin and we have
Speaker 2: many many people that listen to us there and watch
Speaker 2: us on Hannity. My hope is is that the people
Speaker 2: of Wisconsin know that the stakes are very, very high
Speaker 2: in your election. And do you feel like people are
Speaker 2: engaged because normally you would refer to this as a
Speaker 2: base election. In other words, whatever party is able to
Speaker 2: get their base to the polls is the party that's
Speaker 2: going to end up winning. And it has little to
Speaker 2: do with swing voters. They usually are not the ones
Speaker 2: that are going to be targeted to show up at
Speaker 2: the polls on this particular election. How do you feel
Speaker 2: that it's going in that regard, Well.
Speaker 1: You're right about this. This is a turnout election. This
Speaker 1: is actually for our non partisan elections. We have them
Speaker 1: on the first Tuesday in April according to our constitution.
Speaker 1: So this is the normal Spring election. But you're right,
Speaker 1: they get very low turnouts because they're the non partisan races.
Speaker 1: People don't really get as juiced up about him as
Speaker 1: the November elections. So it is a turnout race. Our
Speaker 1: side gets it, though. I've never seen our side this
Speaker 1: excited and motivated and working as hard for a Spring
Speaker 1: Court election as this. I've been involved with elections for
Speaker 1: a long time. They've never been this fired up because
Speaker 1: we've been getting our teeth kicked in. The Liberals took
Speaker 1: over the Supreme Court in twenty twenty three, and for
Speaker 1: the last year and a half, they have been going
Speaker 1: through a political agenda on that court, and we see it.
Speaker 1: We know we've got to make the change. All we've
Speaker 1: got to do is make sure our voters turn out.
Speaker 1: If sixty percent of the voters who voted for President
Speaker 1: Trump on November fifth show up and vote for me
Speaker 1: on April first, we win this.
Speaker 2: April first is on Tuesday, and I'm merging everybody in Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: If you're in Wisconsin and you're a registered voter, this
Speaker 2: race is critical if you if you don't want the
Speaker 2: radical left controlling the courts. Now we've seen what's been
Speaker 2: how the left in this country has been using the courts,
Speaker 2: and frankly, they go judge shopping most of the time,
Speaker 2: and they get these low level court judges, and they've
Speaker 2: been issuing injunction after an injunction after injunction, with no
Speaker 2: accountability to stymy or at least temporarily stop the president's agenda.
Speaker 2: I call judicial activism. And what Democrats can't get done
Speaker 2: legislatively or electorally, they seem to run to the courts for.
Speaker 2: And in this case, if they run to the Wisconsin
Speaker 2: Supreme Court, if you're not elected, then the odds are
Speaker 2: very high that they're going to be successful in advancing
Speaker 2: their radicalism.
Speaker 1: That way, right, And if we don't take the conservative
Speaker 1: majority back this April first, our next chance is until
Speaker 1: twenty twenty eight. So the leftist son this court will
Speaker 1: have had five years of unchecked power because they're the
Speaker 1: final word when it comes to Wisconsin statutes and the
Speaker 1: Wisconsin Constitution. We don't have five years to go through
Speaker 1: their political agenda. It will be ugly. We won't even
Speaker 1: recognize the state when they're done.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you about the polls. When I had
Speaker 2: Scott Walker on last week talking about this very specific issue,
Speaker 2: and he was a very strong advocate for you. He said,
Speaker 2: the latest polls had it at a dead heat forty
Speaker 2: seven forty seven. What are the polls showing you down?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the last poll we got was that one
Speaker 1: forty seven forty seven. It's and that's pretty predictable in Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: We're seeing all the momentum though. I mean that my
Speaker 1: opponent is just doing nothing. She's taken pictures in front
Speaker 1: of ice cream stands, by herself eating an ice cream cone.
Speaker 1: We're out. We're out hitting huge gatherings of people. We
Speaker 1: just finished one in Green Bay at great rally of
Speaker 1: people showed up to have for a meet and greet.
Speaker 1: We're we're going around the state with the meeting the
Speaker 1: voters where they are. I've gotten to all seventy two
Speaker 1: counties in this state campaigning over the last sixteen months.
Speaker 1: We've got the momentum. We're going to take this thing.
Speaker 1: And you know, as you know, conservatives in states like Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: they always underpolled. So if if it shows us tied
Speaker 1: it andans we're about to win.
Speaker 2: Yeah. When Wisconsin, you know, first passed on March nineth,
Speaker 2: twenty eleven, those consent are ten, that we're restricted collective
Speaker 2: bargaining rights for most public sector employees, but allowed public
Speaker 2: safety employees to continue to collectively bargain with their municipal employers. Anyway,
Speaker 2: there's so much on the ballad here. I want everybody
Speaker 2: in Wisconsin please pay attention to this race. Brad Schimmel
Speaker 2: is running for the Supreme Court in the state of Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Shimmelfustice dot com, schim e l for fr Justice
Speaker 1: dot com and they can find out more about this
Speaker 1: race and find out how they can help us get
Speaker 1: this across the finish line. You know that Act ten
Speaker 1: you talked about this passage back in twenty eleven. Your
Speaker 1: listeners may recall those giant riots with one hundred thousand
Speaker 1: people protesting outside the Wisconsin capital that was over Act ten.
Speaker 1: That was how big of an event that was to
Speaker 1: pass that reform in Wisconsin government.
Speaker 2: I remember that's when they were taken over like the
Speaker 2: capitol in Wisconsin, right, yep, it was unbelievable. Brad Schimmel,
Speaker 2: We appreciate you, and we're watching very closely on Tuesday.
Speaker 2: I urge people to pay very close attention to Wisconsin.
Speaker 2: If you support the President's agenda. Please make this an
Speaker 2: important priority for you. Similarly, if you're in my free
Speaker 2: state of Florida, make the race in the Daytona Beach
Speaker 2: and that would be the Mike Wallasey. That election is
Speaker 2: April first as well, both taking place this coming Tuesday,
Speaker 2: Both very very important races. Brad Schimo, we appreciate you
Speaker 2: being with us. Thank you, sir, Thank you so much. Well.
Speaker 2: I've been arguing that the Democratic Party has swung to
Speaker 2: the radical, hardcore left, as evidenced by these comments of
Speaker 2: our old friend Corey Bush. Listen, there were.
Speaker 5: Going to be two separate bills, and we had already
Speaker 5: had those conversations. But when it was clear, remember the
Speaker 5: investment kept going down, down, down, and we were like, no,
Speaker 5: because we need this investment. We need, like you said,
Speaker 5: the money that was that was more money for lead
Speaker 5: pipes than what we had.
Speaker 6: What we see trillion.
Speaker 4: Did it start at three point nine and go down or.
Speaker 5: Did it we were at I thought we were at ten,
Speaker 5: and then it went down to six and then down three,
Speaker 5: then went down to one point seven.
Speaker 2: I believe ten trillion dollars Democrats were planning to spend
Speaker 2: on a climate bill. Ten trillion dollars. We are forty
Speaker 2: trillion dollars close to forty trillion dollars in our national debt.
Speaker 2: And I keep referring back the party that puts the
Speaker 2: rights of illegals, including gang members from trend day Arragua.
Speaker 2: We have known terrorists, murderers, rapists, gang members, cartel members
Speaker 2: in the country over your safety and security, your family
Speaker 2: safety and security. This is the same Democratic party that
Speaker 2: is championing the right of men to play women's sports,
Speaker 2: as evidenced by the vote in the US Senate. This
Speaker 2: is the same Democratic party that thinks it's a constitutional
Speaker 2: crisis if you don't want to spend all that money
Speaker 2: and all their radicalism abroad. This is how far left
Speaker 2: they've become, and where has it gotten them. It has
Speaker 2: gotten them to the point whether the percentage of Americans
Speaker 2: that say we are on the right track is through
Speaker 2: the roof. When you break it down issue by issue,
Speaker 2: then Donald Trump is anywhere in the low sixties to
Speaker 2: the high eighties in terms of where he stands on
Speaker 2: issues that people care about. This is how out of
Speaker 2: touch they are now when you hear this percentage, understand
Speaker 2: these are historic highs.
Speaker 7: Listen, let's take a look at the percentage of the
Speaker 7: country who say that we're on the right track. It's
Speaker 7: actually a very high percentage when you compare it to
Speaker 7: some historical numbers.
Speaker 2: What are you talking about?
Speaker 7: According to Maris, forty five percent say that we're on
Speaker 7: the right track. That's the second highest that Maris has
Speaker 7: measured since two thousand and nine.
Speaker 2: How about NBC.
Speaker 7: News forty four percent, that's the highest since two thousand
Speaker 7: and four. The bottom line is, the percentage of Americans
Speaker 7: who say we're on the right track is through the roof.
Speaker 7: And if you were to compare it to when presidents
Speaker 7: have historically been re elected. Of course, Trump is not
Speaker 7: constitutionally eligible to run for election, but I think it
Speaker 7: sort of puts it in perspective. Forty two percent of the
Speaker 7: country says the country is on the right truck when
Speaker 7: the incumbent party is re elected. And also keep in mind,
Speaker 7: back when Kamala Harris lost and the Democrats were turned out
Speaker 7: of power, only about twenty seven or twenty eight percent
Speaker 7: of the country said the country is on the right track.
Speaker 7: The bottom line is, right now, a much higher percentage
Speaker 7: of the country says we're on the right truck.
Speaker 2: Oh, okay, the country is saying. Now. Add to that,
Speaker 2: Democrats last three polls their approval rating the lowest ever
Speaker 2: in the twenties. This is now a thirty year low
Speaker 2: for them. All right, let's get to our busy phones.
Speaker 2: Eight hundred and nine to four one seawan our number
Speaker 2: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2: Jeff in South Carolina, Jeff, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8: Thanks for checking in, Yes, sir, a big fan. I'm
Speaker 8: amazed by the hypocrisy of the left. People are crying
Speaker 8: on TikTok, fear for their lives, Roso big Vett and
Speaker 8: Ellen degenerous leaving in fear. But that's to be in
Speaker 8: torch left and right procket making threats, and some in
Speaker 8: Congress are calling for civil war. But we're supposedly the
Speaker 8: bad guys. I don't understand, well a.
Speaker 2: Bad guy exactly. Let me tell you the violence on
Speaker 2: the left. And this is ironic considering this is the
Speaker 2: party that has spent five years and they continue to
Speaker 2: bring up January sixth, January sixth, January sixth. But yet
Speaker 2: this was the party that said mostly peaceful the five
Speaker 2: hundred and seventy four riots in the summer of twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: dozens of dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions of
Speaker 2: property damage, mostly peaceful according to them. This is the
Speaker 2: same party which has, you know, radical supporters of Hamas.
Speaker 2: You've got the Hamas wing of the Democratic Party that
Speaker 2: doesn't get condemned by other quote mainstream Democrats. Their silence
Speaker 2: is deafening. This is the same party that praises the
Speaker 2: likes of Luigi Mangioni. I mean certain Democrats and certain
Speaker 2: radical leftists have been praising this guy as if he's
Speaker 2: a hero after assassinating the United Healthcare CEO. This is
Speaker 2: the same exact Democratic Party that is, you know, celebrating
Speaker 2: even on ABC Disney. If Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney,
Speaker 2: approves this message of Jimmy Kimmel that we've been playing
Speaker 2: and his joking about the violence and domestic terrorism at
Speaker 2: at Tesla dealerships in Tesla charging stations and bullets being
Speaker 2: fired into these places, you know, this is now the
Speaker 2: radical left today. This is who they are. And you
Speaker 2: know that's why it's a joke when they talk about
Speaker 2: national security, because they don't mean it. That's the big secret.
Speaker 2: As I've been saying, but it's scary. It is now
Speaker 2: the party of crazy versus the Party of common sense.
Speaker 2: And I think the party of common sense that is
Speaker 2: working to make the lives of working men and women
Speaker 2: better in this country is going to win that win
Speaker 2: the argument every day of the week. Anyway, my friend,
Speaker 2: appreciate the call. Eight hundred and nine to four one,
Speaker 2: Shawn is our number. You want to be part of
Speaker 2: the program, Don and Iowa, Don. How are you glad
Speaker 2: you called?
Speaker 4: Sir?
Speaker 6: Hi Sean, thank you for taking my call. I'm actually
Speaker 6: in San Antonio, Texas right now, Katie's neck of the woods.
Speaker 2: Okay, what are you doing to know? You're a trucker?
Speaker 6: I am a truck driver, Yes, sir.
Speaker 2: Well, godspeed on the road. I think I just turd
Speaker 2: your horn. And we appreciate our truckers and the fact
Speaker 2: that you fill every store with everything we could ever want,
Speaker 2: need or desire. I go, I go shopping at Costco,
Speaker 2: or I go shopping at my grocery store. I go
Speaker 2: shopping at Home Depot or Low's, and I'm like overwhelmed,
Speaker 2: there's so much stuff there.
Speaker 6: Yeah, sir, No, definitely, and I appreciate that. I also
Speaker 6: I've been a Sean Hannity follower since Hannity and Coombs
Speaker 6: back in the eighties, which I can't even remember.
Speaker 2: I have to take it was actually the nineties. But
Speaker 2: you're closed, don't. You don't want to age me that much,
Speaker 2: you know, I'd like to believe I have a few
Speaker 2: more years left to me. But I do appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Thank you for being such a loyal, faithful friend. You know,
Speaker 2: it's amazing over the years. How how some people, in
Speaker 2: spite of very steady conservatism, I say one little it's
Speaker 2: he bitsy thing that they don't approve of. Man, they'll
Speaker 2: just rip my head off on social media, but you
Speaker 2: know what, it goes with the territory. I can handle it.
Speaker 2: But anyway, thank you. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 6: Everybody's always looking to criticize. What I called for was
Speaker 6: about this whole signal APP thing. I want to explain
Speaker 6: it in layman's terms for the simple tens that are
Speaker 6: following this reporter and believe that there was some kind
Speaker 6: of national emergency. Signal APP is not much more than
Speaker 6: take Latin a simple encryption. Not meant for national security.
Speaker 6: It's meant for, you know, for privacy of you know online,
Speaker 6: that's all it's meant for. It's not as if they
Speaker 6: had thirty thousand emails sent to a known felon's laptop
Speaker 6: where he was, you know, messaging with fifteen year old girls,
Speaker 6: where he could have been compromised greatly to the detriment
Speaker 6: of national security. It's not like it was piles of
Speaker 6: boxes parked in a garage next to a core vette
Speaker 6: where a correct user had prostitutes and drug dealers in
Speaker 6: that house, in and out daily. That's a security risk
Speaker 6: signal is used just for privacy, not for national security.
Speaker 2: Agreed, And I believe it was a one off. It
Speaker 2: was an honest mistake. It was not done by design.
Speaker 2: There's nobody in the administration that likes or respects the
Speaker 2: work of Jeffrey Goldberg. How it ultimately happened, I don't know.
Speaker 2: Is this going to be something that we're going to
Speaker 2: see often.
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 2: And that's the difference between this systemic and institutionalized security
Speaker 2: breaches of the Biden years that nobody you've said a
Speaker 2: word about. The Only people that were pointing it out
Speaker 2: were people like me. And there's a big difference between
Speaker 2: systemic and institutionalized lying and corruption and national security threat
Speaker 2: threats plural versus one inadvertent mistake on an app. And
Speaker 2: you've got to remember too. And I think this is important,
Speaker 2: and that is while it was definitely sensitive information, and
Speaker 2: I think this is very important. Sensitive information versus classified
Speaker 2: information are two very distinct things in terms of the law.
Speaker 2: And as they pointed out, no classified information was passed on.
Speaker 2: The mission was a success lesson hopefully learned moving forward,
Speaker 2: So we really have to fight back against cybercrime and
Speaker 2: these foreign countries that are bombarding this country with all
Speaker 2: this criminal activity. And at some point it now behooves
Speaker 2: us as a country. We can no longer take it
Speaker 2: and say we don't know. The Biden years, all of
Speaker 2: these things happen. You know, the Trump campaign was hacked repeatedly.
Speaker 2: Biden didn't do a thing about it, and now this happened,
Speaker 2: and hopefully this will lead to the impetus to make
Speaker 2: dramatic systemic change that will protect our privacy. I think
Speaker 2: it's critical. Don we appreciate all your truckers. God bless you,
Speaker 2: God bless Iowa. Get home safe, my friend, back to
Speaker 2: our phones. As we say hi to Ken in Texas,
Speaker 2: God bless Texas. Ken how are you glad you called?
Speaker 4: Great? Thanks Sean. Great to talk to you today.
Speaker 2: Great to talk to you. What's going on?
Speaker 4: Understand, I have a great deal of resuspect, first of all,
Speaker 4: for Elon Musk and his team for what they're doing
Speaker 4: in a private sector, and for dose you put my
Speaker 4: question and understand, take this in the spiritus intended. I
Speaker 4: hope what hasn't our elected officials that I mean, Congress,
Speaker 4: why haven't they been doing the job of doge over
Speaker 4: the last I don't know, decades, Because I mean, surely
Speaker 4: all this waste and corruption and fraud didn't just show
Speaker 4: up over the past six weeks since January twentieth, and
Speaker 4: surely I would expect Congress has got the same or
Speaker 4: even more access to all the files and the information
Speaker 4: that Elon Muskin's team had. So, you know, I applaud
Speaker 4: Elon Muskin his team, but didn't he taken all the
Speaker 4: heat for the job that the people we send to
Speaker 4: Washington should be doing well.
Speaker 2: I mean, you're making a great point. I mean, these
Speaker 2: other politicians, all these people that have done this. You know,
Speaker 2: one of the things that I think we've got to
Speaker 2: dig a little deeper into as well to kind of
Speaker 2: go off. Your point is they were not honest with
Speaker 2: the American people about how they were spending this money.
Speaker 2: They would put it under you know, these broad headings
Speaker 2: without the specifics of you know, forty three million taxpayer
Speaker 2: dollars for or sesame street productions in Iraq, or DEI
Speaker 2: programs in Burma, or the money that was spent in
Speaker 2: every other country on DEI, transgenderism, wokism, and the radical
Speaker 2: Green New Deal. So they hit it all on top
Speaker 2: of it, and somehow Elon Musk has become public Enemy
Speaker 2: number one for what reason? What has he done? He's
Speaker 2: just helped the American people, you know, or is helping
Speaker 2: America to get its fiscal house and order so that
Speaker 2: we don't steal from our kids and grandkids. I'll give
Speaker 2: you the last words.
Speaker 4: And he is doing that. My concern is he's going
Speaker 4: to wake up one day, look in the mirror and say,
Speaker 4: you know what, I don't need this, I don't need this.
Speaker 4: And especially that's going to happen if he identifies all
Speaker 4: this corruption and waste and in Congress to do anything
Speaker 4: about it.
Speaker 2: He's going to mean I could see, honestly, I could
Speaker 2: see that happening there. Look he did. He signed up
Speaker 2: to help. He didn't sign up for the abuse. He
Speaker 2: didn't sign up for his companies to get rude. He
Speaker 2: signed up to help the country. I'm very confident though,
Speaker 2: with the technology in Tesla that can alert and take
Speaker 2: photos of people that are involved in acts of terrorism,
Speaker 2: and in the FBI under Cash Betel and the DOJ
Speaker 2: under Pambondi, I'm very confident that we're going to get
Speaker 2: to the bottom of this and these people that are
Speaker 2: responsible will be caught. They will be tried, they will
Speaker 2: be convicted, they will be put in jail, and the
Speaker 2: people that are funding it will also similarly be held accountable.
Speaker 2: I am confident in that, and I hope that happens
Speaker 2: sooner than later. Anyway, my friend, I have to roll.
Speaker 2: I do appreciate you. Call God bless Texas eight hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety four one Sean if you want to be
Speaker 2: a part of the program. I guys some wrapplings. So
Speaker 2: for today, don't forget go to Hannity dot com and
Speaker 2: that's we're going to use the same word for the
Speaker 2: next four days. Make it easier for people and just
Speaker 2: click on the Tesla contest icon. It'll be brought to
Speaker 2: the contest page and today's word of the Day and
Speaker 2: that'll be for today, Tomorrow, Saturday, Sunday is America. And
Speaker 2: that will give you four chances to win your own tesla.
Speaker 2: You get to pick the winner, We'll get to pick
Speaker 2: the tesla of their choice. Just go to hannity dot
Speaker 2: com Word of the Day America Today, Tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday.
Speaker 2: And to all of you, good luck. That's all the
Speaker 2: time we have left. Thank you for joining us, thank
Speaker 2: you for making this show possible.