WEBVTT - It's a Numbers Game: Karen Read Acquitted! Turtleboy Reacts

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to a Numbers Game podcast with Brian Gerdowski.

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for coming on this Thursday episode. I am

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on my way to Kansas. I will be the keynote

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.079
<v Speaker 1>speaker this weekend at the Bob Dole Dinner for the

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Kansas Republican Party, which is very exciting.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm very nervous.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do a good job and pay tribute

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to the legacy of Bob Doll to talk about the future,

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>but this is It's very nerve wracking, and I am

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm honored to be invited, but at the same time,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure why I was invited, but I'm excited.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Funny story, Bob Dole running for president nineteen ninety six

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>was the first time I realized that there was an

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>election for president. I was nine years old in school

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and we had to learn about it. And I remember

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>going learning at all the candidates running and going home

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to my parents and saying, I learned about this election,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to vote for Ross Pro.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>They didn't. They voted it for Dole.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think I might open my speech with saying

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that I was a Pro fan at the age of nine. Anyway,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>hopefully goes well, and I'll tell you how it goes

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>next week and they don't boom me as part of

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Bob Dole's revenge for being a you thrust for pro supporter.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Today's gonna be a unique episode.

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I have some numbers I want to throw you guys out,

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to have a non political story and

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>interview that I think you guys would find very fascinating.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So first on the political stuff across the pond over

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the UK, the Labor government finally did at about face

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>this week and did a proper investigation into grooming gangs. Now,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for those who don't know, I appeared on the BBC

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>almost teny years ago saying that there was a it

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was a conversation on Trump and you know, always bringing

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>up the Muslim band and they were telling how racist

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it was and all the rest of this and that

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no you know, Muslim terrorism, and I said, yes

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there is, like you have Muslim grooming gangs from Pakistani

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>men raping white girls in northern England. The host of

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the show at the BBC show, they kicked me off

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the air, said it wasn't happening, that what I said

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't true, and that apologized to the audience that I

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>had offended listeners for what I had said. That was

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>almost ten years ago. Well, Baroness Luis Casey has released

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a two hundred page report and found that the mere

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Pori Pakistanis from the Kashmir Providence were extremely well overrepresented

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in all data responsible for grooming gangs in the UK.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You might think this is one little area of Pakistan

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and how many people could it be. There are about

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one million Poori Pakistanis living in the UK. It is

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest predominant group that come to the UK from Pakistan. Now,

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in many of the cases, the ethnicity of the perpetrators

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>never taken because officials feared that they will be labeled

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as racists. But in areas that it was taken. In

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and twenty three cases known as Operations stove Wood,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty two percent of all groomers were Pakistani, despite the

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that they make up only three percent of the population.

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Eve At Cooper, the Home Secretary basically our version of DHS,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>put out a list of recommendations. It includes ensuring adults

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who engage impenetrative sex with children under sixteen based the

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>most serious charge of rape instead of lesser charges. They're

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>going to launch a new national Criminal Operation to oversee

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the National Crime Agency and tackle grooming gangs. They're going

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to review the criminal convictions of child sexual exploitation and

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>quashing any convictions where the government finds that the victims

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>were criminalized rather than be protected. They're going to make

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a collection of ethnicity and national data for all suspects

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of child's abuse. They're going to commission research into driven

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>into drivers for group based child sexual exploitation, including the

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>role of social media and cultural factors. And they're going

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring a more rigorous standard for the licensing and

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>regulation of taxi drivers because many of these Pakistani men

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>were taxi drivers luring young girls into their taxis saying

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to come have alcohol or you know, drugs,

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>which in many poor areas of Northern England was very

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>enticing to fourteen year old girls to have alcohol. Remember,

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the drinking ages are a lot lower and the culture

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>aroun drinking is a lot more open. They would say yes,

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they would drug them, get them drunk, then drug them

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and then rape them in a group activity. Okay, some

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of these ideas are very good and I'm going to

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>give credit to the Labor government on at least going

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this far, considering they've been completely opposed to it for decades,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly since my comments came out in twenty ten. They've

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>been notoriously against method because it's made just because they

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>have been against it for years. But what the UK

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>government needs to do is repeal most or parts of

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the Equality Act of twenty ten. This was a law

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>passed by the previous Labor Labor government from years ago,

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and it prohibits discrimination based on protected characteristics, including race,

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in employment and service delivery. Police officers, as public servants

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>are subject to this law and discriminatory behavior can be

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>deemed as gross misconduct. So police officers were purposely not

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>investigating cases of child rape child sexual exploitation when the

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>victim was going with biological evidence in some cases saying

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you can look at me, I have been raped multiple times.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>They refuse to do it because if the grooming gang

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>said this police officer is clearly racist, there would be

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming push to have that police officer dismissed from their

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs and that they are the problem, not that the

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>criminals were the problem. And this law is the lynchpin

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>behind which all of these police officers were unable to

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>really do their job in a profound way.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 2>JK.

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Rowling was tweeting like, we need to change the culture

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of protecting girls. Yes, but you need to undo the law,

0:05:58.440 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you crazy liberal like that.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>That is what it is.

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, like the idea of the Quality Act sounds wonderful,

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but the law is creating all these circumstances. And one

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>last thing, maybe don't bring in a million people from

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a culture that views women as lesser than Maybe don't

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in a million people from a culture that thinks

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>child's sexual activities perfectly normal, that women can be beat

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you could have that women are like,

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, furniture or animals. That is the problem. You

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are importing a culture that for many people, especially when

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it is ghetto wise, because you're bringing in so many people,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they they push, they bring that culture with them, They

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>bring that culture to the UK and they view a

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of things like this is a prize is to

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>sit there and rape a young British woman. So good

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for the UK government for doing something, but it is

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>outrageous it took this long and hopefully if there's someone

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in the entire UK government level with a brain from

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>either the Reform or Tory party. They will talk about

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>repealing the Equalities Act if they haven't already.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't. Maybe they did, but I don't think they did.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's your number is for this podcast on the

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>political side.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, I want to.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Get to a passion interest of mine, which is true crime.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a million podcasts on true crime and

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>books and whatever, and we'll get back to politics on Monday.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>This is not going to become a true crime podcast,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 1>but this episode is special.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I am a true crime junkie.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I've listened to podcasts, I've read books like A Stranger

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Beside Me, which is one of my favorite books, documentaries,

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you name it, like if I'm ap at two o'clock

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, I'm researching who killed John bin a Ramsay.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>This is who I am. It is a sickness. It

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is a mental illness. I understand it. But I love

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>true crime. So the most talked about trial of the

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>year just ended, and it is the Karen Reid trial,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's about the death of John O'Keefe. So most

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of you have probably maybe heard about this trial or

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>hear parts of it. I wanted to give you the

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>brief facts before going into the interview because it is interesting.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>On the night of January twenty eighth, twenty twenty two,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Karen Reid and John o'keef, who were dating John A. Keeps,

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a forty six year old Boston police officer, where they

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>were out drinking with friends in Canton, Massachusetts, about twenty

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>miles south of Boston. After visiting bars, they were invited

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to an after party at the home of Brian Albert,

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>another Boston police officer. There was a terrible snowstorm outside

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but they but John insisted on going to this after party,

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so they drove to the house. Allegedly, there they saw

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>no lights on in the house. John o'keef got out

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the car went to the house around twelve thirty

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>am to see if there were people inside. According to prosecutors,

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this is when allegedly Karen Reid, who was intoxicated and

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>angry at him, backed up into him, hitting him and

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>leaving him to die in the snow. John o'keef's body

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was discovered at six am. I think he might have

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>been a lie, but he was pronounced dead shortly afterwards.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Karen Reid was arrested on February first, twenty twenty two,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and charged with second degree murder man saw her while

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of a collision causing injury or death. She pleaded not

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>guilty to all charges. Her defense team insisted that this

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually a cover up, insinuating that the police were

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a fall for his death. Witnesses said that Karen

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>she did come back to the scene of crime a

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>few hours later, I guess when she had sobered up,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And they said that she said that she had hit him,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and she had left the scene and left him to die.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And when she had left the scene of twelve thirty,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>she did leave him a lot of angry voicemails because

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>he did not come back to see to say like, oh,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you can come in, or I'm good or whatever. So

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Reid's defense team Karen Read's defense team, led by attorney

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>David Yanetti and Alan Jackson. They argue that O'Keefe was

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>killed inside the Albertone, possibly beaten an attacked by a dog,

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and dumped outside, with Reed being framed as the cover

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>up for the crime. Their theory was that O'Keefe got

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the car went inside the house, a fight

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>ensued with someone inside the house, either Brian Albert or

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>his other Colin Albert, or Brian Higgins, a federal agent

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>who was also the party someone fought with him is

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the point they pointed to o'keef's arm injuries, though the

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>defense did saying that saying because of a witness, an

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>expert witness, doctor Marie Russell, they suggested that his injuries

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>were not with a car, but they were with dog bites,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and the family inside the house had a dog at

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the time, they had a German shepherd. They said these

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>dog bites at the home were showing that there must

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>have been a fight and the dog got involved, which

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a German shepherd would if their owner was fighting. Incidentally,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>between the time of the attack and the trial, the

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>very first trial of Karen Reid, the dog was re

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>homed in that time, so they could never do a

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>investigation where they looked into the dog. A lot of

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>things that were inside that house allegedly went missing or destroyed.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>There were outside videotapes from across the street that never

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>showed up. There was phones that were destroyed. Afterwards. At

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>two twenty seven am, Jennifer McCabe, who was married to

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>mister McCabe. She looked in her Google searches on her

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>phone has a long to die in cold, suggesting that

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>there was some fore knowledge of mister O'Keefe's condition, of

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>John o keep's condition before the body was found. McCabe

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>claimed that it was searched at six am, six twenty

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>am when Karen was there at the house looking for him,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>but it was it was to twenty seven am. They

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>also said that there was key evidence, the key evidence

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of the whole trial was this broken tail light that

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Karen Read's car allegedly had. This broken tail light found

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at the scene, but it was found days later underneath

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all the snow. They they claimed the defense claimed it

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was actually planted there, and it was not. It wasn't

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>like that she hit him, broke the tail light and

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>then fled. That actually was planted there a few days

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>later by people within that Canton PD Boston PD universe

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect the mccabes well. On Wednesday, June eighteenth,

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>after four days of deliberation in the second trial, the

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>first trial was on jury. In this second trial, the

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>jury acquitted Karen Read of all major charges, finding her

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>only guilty of driving under the influence, which basically I

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>mean Karen did say she was drinking right beforehand, so

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not shocking. But all the major things of the

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>murder in the second degree, fleeing the scene of a crime,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all that she was declared that she was not guilty.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>This case has deeply divided communities across the country who

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>feel that Ree was either innocent and wrongfully framed by

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a power hungry and corrupt police department, or that they

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>felt she murdered her boyfriend and that she was a

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>cold hearted, crazy woman. And then there are other people

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>feel like she was overcharged. Maybe she hit him, but

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it should have been a manslaughter charge and not a

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>homicide in the second degree. Remember the prosecution, and they

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't just say, oh, they probably hit her. They went

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for the full juggular. They went for the full She

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>intentionally hit him. It wasn't an accident. She meant to

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>hit him. She did hit him, and then she fled

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in her drunken state. That's what they accused her of.

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a very very severe charge. In the middle of

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>his whole trial, Karen Reid became this lightning rod of

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>controversy and one man was behind the entire ground swell,

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>grassroots effort to free her. And his name is Aiden Carney,

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise known as turtle Boy. Aiden also has become a

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>lightning plot of controversy. He was charged with witness tampering

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or sorry, witness intimidation. Rather, he said he said that

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was an effort to smear him. He's fighting those charges,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>but hate him are love him. He created a widespread

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>effort to free Camra Read and he was successful in

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>doing that. He created a movement from people all over

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that region and all over the country. They responded to

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing. He is coming on this podcast

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>next the first time after the Karen retrial. He's going

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to give a full interview. I'm so excited. Please stay

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>tuned and we'll be back with Turtle Boy. With me

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on today's podcast is Aimed Cardney. He is otherwise known

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as turtle Boy. Thank you so much for coming on.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Aiden.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>My first question to you is how did you first

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>hear about Karen's story and what made you throw yourself

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>fully into it, like it's been a big part of

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your life last few years.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, I know it was in the news when

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 4>John first died I typically write about stories like that when,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 4>especially when the police are killed, it's you know, content,

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 4>people are interested in death of a police officer. When

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 4>I saw that it appeared to be an accident though,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 4>which just wasn't a very interesting story. Quite frankly, it

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 4>was a tragic story. But then a year and a

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 4>half later, when court filing started coming out and you

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 4>started reading more and more about this, and it turned

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 4>out that I was sitting on the story of the century,

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I realized that this deserved a much deeper dive when

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 4>I realized that, wait a minute, a Boston police officer.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 3>At his house.

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Apparently killed another Boston police officer with an ATF agent

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 4>and other people, and they covered it up after the fact,

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 4>and the state police assisted them in that. Like I'm

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 4>sitting on the story of the century here, and you know,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 4>I just started writing about it, and here we are,

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 4>so you.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Know, at the center of this case is a real tragedy.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, John'll keep his dead and his family and

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>his friends miss him terribly. Karen is a lightning rod, right.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Either she is a victim of the biggest cover up

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>by the state and local police, or she's a crazy,

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>jilted woman who did this, either intentionally or by an accent.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What made people's intensity that drew her towards her so

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>heavy like this?

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Why did?

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a lot of cases of people who

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are accused of crimes, but something about Karen made her

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>people appealed to her.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you have an opinion about that?

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because she's so transparently innocent. I mean, that's all

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 3>of this. It's just so obvious.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't defend people who are charged with murdering police.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm usually on the other side of that issue. Usually

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm very pro police, and I still am. And I've

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 4>done a lot of articles exposing the opposite of this,

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the weakness of our court system that allows cop killers

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 4>to be free in the first place. The profile of

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 4>a cop killer is always the same. It's somebody with

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 4>like one hundred and twenty five priors almost always, and

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 4>so this.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Didn't fit that description.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 4>So like, for me to go out and defend somebody

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 4>who's accused of murdering a cop, you better believe there's

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 4>going to be overwhelming evidence to back that up. I

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 4>never would have jumped into this otherwise. It's just so

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 4>obvious the amount of evidence that she had in her

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 4>legal team. Ad showing that not only was she factually innocent,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 4>but that other people were involved in murdering him.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Made me realize, Oh, this is I have to get

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>involved here. I have to do something. I have to

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 3>write about this.

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 4>And you know, the story had been going on for

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 4>about a year and a half, but it wasn't getting

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 4>any media coverage.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I'm good at.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, if I've been doing what I do now

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 4>for over a decade and I just started writing about it,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 4>and I had a pretty large platform, and it just

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 4>grew and grew and grew from there.

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>When you think back to the trial, obviously, I mean

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>she was up against like a goliath, right, I mean

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning there was it did not I

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.239
<v Speaker 1>mean I watched the documentaries of she was really up

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>against it and her legal defense was like it was

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>literally David and Goliath. How they turned the corner? Looking back,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>When did you think to yourself, they're going to find

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>her innocent, Like they've done enough at this point where

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the defense has actually done their job, Like, was there

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a point or did you always think like she was

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be found in this sent there's no question, Well, I.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Always felt she was going to be found innocent, no question,

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 4>until I did after the first trial, after the first

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>ended in a mistrial, I was convinced they were going

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 4>to deliver it for about five seconds, and because it

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 4>was just so obvious that she was innocent and these

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 4>people are all so shady and they're all lying, it

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 4>was just like, Okay, obviously they're going to quit her.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 4>And then when they didn't and they came back hung,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I did what's called a journalism.

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I went and found jurors.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 4>The journalist was impounded, so you couldn't just find these

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 4>people on their own, but I asked around. I got names,

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 4>I got emails, and I started reaching out to them,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 4>and I got this guy Ronnie to come on.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 3>And Ronnie, as painful as it is to listen to

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 3>him and.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 4>His explanation of what was happening in that jury room,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 4>even though it's insanity the things that they were talking about,

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 4>it was still really important to hear because he was

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Basically what he said was, we didn't pay any attention

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 4>to the conspiracy.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 3>We thought that was a distractor.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 4>We were focused on the data, the textream data from

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the car, the fact that she was the one that

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 4>dropped them off there that she was drunk blah blah

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 4>blah blah, and that enabled Karen Reid's defense team to

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 4>read My interview with Ronnie enabled the Karen Reid team

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 4>to readjust their strategy and focus less on the conspiracy.

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 4>You didn't get that much in the second trial, and

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>more on John wasn't hit by a car, there was

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 4>no collision.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 3>If there was no collision, then.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Karen Reid didn't do it, and it's not their job

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 4>to figure out who did.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Quite frankly right, and they blew that did so?

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:22.959
<v Speaker 2>Do you so?

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Like they didn't think about the dog bites or already

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>think that dog bite They thought that was a distraction.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's one of the things that Ronnie told me that,

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 4>like the dog thing was a distraction. That these are

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 4>all big distractions to take away from the fact that

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 4>she ran him over with the car. I mean, it

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>was it was painful to interview him, but as as

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 4>painful as that was, like, that's journalism, that's finding out

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.719
<v Speaker 4>from these people who were in the room, what happened.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 3>What did you guys discuss and no one else had

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 3>that scoop?

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's crazy. I didn't. Okay, I missed that story

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that they thought that all.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Of this was was so they thought that even what

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>about the text from the cop talking about how she is,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>how she looked, and were there any nudes or they

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>thought that was they thought that was abstraction.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Their basic takeaway with that was, Yeah, he's a scumbag,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 4>he's not a good person, but it doesn't change the

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 4>fact that she had him with the car like that

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>was their takeaway, and that he got carried away because

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 4>he was so upset with this woman for killing John

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 4>O'Keefe that it was almost like understandable that he would

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 4>vent like this on his private cell phone.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What about what about the Okay, so I'm not from

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Boston and from New York, but I do have relatives

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>from Lynn, Massachusetts. Lynn Lynn said, what is the feeling about?

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But you hear people from that area talk about that

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the police are corrupt? Why is that feeling palpable in

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that area?

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh? You know, I mean, just look at how easy

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>this was.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 4>I Mean, the issue wasn't just we all know Michael

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 4>Proctor was a corrupt scumbag who's been fired, right, But

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the issue is that Michael Proctor was protected that Michael.

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Procter knew the mcalvert, McCabe's and the Alberts prior to this.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 3>He lied about it.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 4>He was so obviously lying on reports or whatever. And

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, I used to be a high school teacher.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 4>If another teacher was inappropriate with a student, we wouldn't

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 4>back them up. The union would sell you down the river,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 4>like no one would have your back if you behave

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 4>inappropriately like that. But with police, it's different. It's like,

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 4>no matter what, they're gonna have your back. They just

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 4>and I understand it. I understand that, Like in twenty

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 4>twenty with the Black Lives Matter riots or whatever, it

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 4>was like us against the world mentality, they're attacking us.

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 4>We got to stick together and that mentality. Because of that,

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 4>they do stick together to a fault, you know, to

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 4>a fault like I support the police, but not corrupt

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 4>police and not the police in this situation. And you know,

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 4>I do talk to a lot of cops about this

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 4>who are like, you know, they completely agree with me

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 4>that Karen ree was framed, that she didn't do it,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 4>but they remained silent.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 2>What is okay?

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So that you became a lightning rod as well, which

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>is very rare for somebody who started. I mean, you

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>did start a movement. I don't know if Karen would

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>have had what she had without you, like her conviction.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Without you.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You really did change the course of this woman's life

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and this case. But you became a lightning rod. Is

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>there anything that happened during the course's trial you personally

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>regret on your part or that? Because that got very heated.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I read some of the things that people were saying

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about each other. Is there anything you feel like maybe

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I went over the line, or maybe I didn't go

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>over line enough or anything.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I went to jail.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 4>I was arrested and charged and charged with god knows

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 4>how many counts of felony witness intimidation. But the things

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 4>that I did to get charged with that are not criminal.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 4>They're only criminal in Massachusetts if it's if they interpret

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the law a certain way. Like for instance, I went

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 4>up to Jennifer McCabe at her kid's lacrosse game, right

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 4>because it's the only place I could find her. I

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 4>knew her kid was playing across that day, so I

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 4>went to her game, and Bill and I took my

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 4>camera out and went up to her and I said, Jennifer,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 4>why did you google how wanted Diane Cold?

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Why did you do that at two twenty seven? Why

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 3>did you do that?

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 4>And it turned it to a scene and Matt McKay

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 4>pushed me, and you know, I got I left the

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 4>stadium on my own accord, and I got charged with

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>two counts of felony witnessed intimidation for that. That's what

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 4>used to be called journalism, like going up to people,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 4>asking them the tough questions, getting in their face, not

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 4>taking no for an answer. But in Massachusetts, our statue

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 4>witness intimidation statue says that you cannot cause emotional, physical,

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 4>or financial harm to witnesses. Every other state it's physical.

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 4>I understand the need to say that. You can't threaten

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 4>to break someone's legs if they don't, you know, do

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 4>say what you want to say.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Understand. I get that. But the emotional aspect of this.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Every single person I've been charged with intimidating claims that

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I caused them emotional harm, that I made them sad.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 4>This is literally what they told the grand jury. He

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 4>made me I can't eat. Everybody thinks I'm a killer now,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 4>blah blah blah. He made me uncomfortable. I was embarrassed,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 4>and this and that, not a single I haven't caused

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 4>a single cut, a scrape, a bruise, nothing to anybody.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't threaten people. I'm a reporter, I'm an activist.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a tough guy. So and if you see

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 4>Brian Albert, Bran Albert could eat me for lunch. You know,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I could eight one hundred and seventy pounds. Brian Albert's

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>like two fifty, you know, six foot two, two fifty.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 4>He's a big boy, he's a marine. He could he

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 4>could destroy me if he wanted to. So this idea

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 4>that I'm intimidating these people is ridiculous. So to answer

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 4>your question, I wouldn't change anything. I mean, I wish

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't arrested. I wish that didn't happen, but it did.

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 4>And I contend that I did nothing wrong.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I wish I was one seventy. It's good for you.

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I all right, this is the question on everyone's mind.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you this. What do you think

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>happened to John O'Keeffe.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he went inside that house after camer Reid

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 4>dropped him off. He was supposed to text her back

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 4>and say everything's cool here, you can go home, and

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm all set. But I think he went that house

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 4>and a confrontation happened. We don't know with who. There's

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 4>many possible suspects. There's Brian Higgins, who had the motive

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 4>to do it because he was half an hour earlier flirting,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 4>sending flirtatious text messages to his girlfriend. There is Colin Albert,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 4>who was a punk who gets a lot of fights,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 4>who had issues with John.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 3>They were neighbors.

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 4>They threw beer cans on his lawn, disrespected him, and

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 4>they were all drunk. And so what I think is

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 4>he went in there, words were exchanged, punches were thrown,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 4>and I think an accident happened. I think John felt

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 4>backwards during this fight after the dog bit him, because

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, if Brian Alberts involved in the fight, the

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 4>dog's going to back him up.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Mean, that's ban the German shepherd, It's like their instinct.

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think it dragged him down and I think

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 4>he hit his head on a stair and I think

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 4>it caused a three inch laceration in the back of

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 4>his head, and I think it knocked him out and

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 4>it made him unconscious and he was immediately incapacitated. According

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 4>to every who testified at that trial, that's what killed John,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 4>the blunt impact to the back of the head. And

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 4>so I think that they realized that he was probably

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 4>convulsing be a puke on his box of shorts, and

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 4>I think they realized, we have a dying Boston cop

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 4>in our house.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>This is really bad. What are we going to do?

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 4>And the plan was simple. I mean, people act like

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 4>this is so complicated. Just tell him the guy and

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 4>never came in a house. He never came in an house.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Just we're going to put him right outside where where

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 4>we last saw her car and then say, I don't

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.239
<v Speaker 4>know how Jesus Christ did she hit him?

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 3>What happened? Oh my god. I mean, it's just it's

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 3>such a simple story. You never came in the house.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And the big question I think everyone once knows what

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>else was in that house when they were there, because

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what mean, yeah, usually you don't throw after parties at

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve thirty in the morning just to have a few

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>more beers and watch finding Nemo.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 4>You do if you're a functioning alcoholic, like a lot

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 4>of these people are. I mean, these are these are

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 4>grown ass adults having after parties.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 3>You're You're absolutely right. It's a weird thing that I mean,

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 3>that's why he didn't want to go in.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 4>She's a grown ass woman who was a financial analyst

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 4>of fidelity, you know, making a quarter million dollars a year.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't go to after parties at twelve thirty, you know.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>On a weekday, right on a weekday.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 3>It was a Friday night.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>It was a Friday night. Okay, yeah, it's like a

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>holiday or something like that, was right, It was right

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>around the corner right after all it was.

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 4>It was a blizzard was happening, so a lot of

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 4>people were, you know, not going to work or whatever.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 4>So like, yeah, so John, you know that was a

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 4>problem in the relationship is John liked to drink.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 3>John liked to go out, and she was always stuck

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 3>with the kids.

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 4>And that that's why she left all those nasty voicemails

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 4>for him. Afterwards, She's like, I'm fucking suck at you.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 4>You know, you're a fucking douchebag. I'm home with your

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 4>fucking kids again.

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 3>What the fuck?

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Those are the exact type of voicemails you leave to

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 4>someone if you intend to see them again and chew

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 4>them out like that's not from me.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 3>You till a dead person?

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was, There was.

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>There was this one comedian who was very much on

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the side of Karen, but who said, in all the

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>true crime documentaries, usually you leave a message like can't

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>wait to see you, hope you're home soon.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 2>And then you know st.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Peterson did that with Lacy. That's the exact voicemail.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then meanwhile you're cleaning out their bank accounts

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're moving their money around, but like you're leaving

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the messages like I'm this innocent person and she was

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at the scene again within I think three hours of

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>her or four hours when dropping him off or whatever

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the case is, looking for him. Usually it's not the

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>pattern of somebody that as you say, you know, people

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>who kill cops usually have a long history and a

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>pattern to it. What are you going to do now

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that the trial is over?

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I got going to soak it all in and.

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm starting in a documentary that they're doing about me

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 4>with compelling pictures. We just announced that a major motion

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 4>picture has been greenlit for this. I'm going to be

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 4>speaking a crime con in September I'm going to be

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 4>writing a book, and then I'm going to be dealing

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 4>with my own legal issues, like I still have my

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 4>charges to deal with, a whole bunch of them. I'm

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 4>facing like one hundred and twenty years in prison when

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 4>you know it's never gonna happen, but theoretically could one.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Hundred and twenty years in prison for a while.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Each kind of fell any witness intimidation carries a ten

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 4>year maximum sentence. If they wanted to, they could throw

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the book at me, you know. And these people are sick.

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 4>We've seen what they've done to Karen Reid. My lawyers

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 4>are not going to let that happen. I'm not going

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 4>to let that happen.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Obviously. I have two kids, they're seven and ten.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 4>They need me, and I'm not going to allow the

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 4>state to take them away from me.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Period.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that she has a civil trial.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Still, do they just start from scratch now looking for

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>John o'keefs killer?

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 2>What do you think it'd be like a cold case.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 4>They've already issued a statement saying that like this is

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 4>a shame, John deserved justice. Mcalverts have already issued a

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 4>statement too, and I'm sure that's all that they're going

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 4>to treat her like OJ or like Casey Anthony and

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 4>just say she got away with it, and that's the

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 4>excuse not to go after the people who actually did this.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 4>But they know, like Karen Reid is going to Karen

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Reid can go out anywhere in this state, in this

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 4>country really and be welcomed, And any restaurant in Boston

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 4>she goes out to tonight, her meal is free. You know,

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 4>she's basically a quasi celebrity unintentionally, right. The mcalberts can't

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 4>do that. Mclberts go places and they get booed and

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 4>every they look at they have to look around and say,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>who knows what we did? Like who here doesn't like us?

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 4>So that's the karma that they will have to live

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 4>with for the rest of their lives.

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, last question, where can people go to read more

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>about what you're doing? Where can they follow your cases

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and your book and your movie and your speeches. You've

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>got a busier schedule than me, so where can people

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>go to continue follow? Yeah, I mean turtle boy is

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>so weird to say, turtle boy, you're you're a man,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 1>but like what like what uh?

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Doctor turtle Boys Doctor.

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Turtle Boy where people go to keep following.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Jill Biden's a doctored and so am I That's what

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 4>That's why I started myself. That's my super handle is

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 4>at doctor Turtle Boy d O C t O or

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 4>turtle Boy. My website is TV as in Turtleboy DailyNews

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 4>dot com.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Uh and you can see me on YouTube Turtle Boy

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Live Channel.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, keep up with turta boy because I

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>guess there's a lot more coming out about the story

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and about you. And I appreciate you being here and

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>giving me the interview.

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>My pleasure. Ryan, have a good night.

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, we'll be right back after this. Now for the

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>ask Me Anything segment of this podcast. I love getting

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>these emails. Please keep sending them. Ask me any kind

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.959
<v Speaker 1>of question. I could possibly answer the emails. Ryan at

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Numbers gamepodcast dot com. Ryan at Numbers gamepodcast dot com. Okay,

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>first question readers, Hi, Ryan, what are your thoughts about

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the quality of polling coming out showing a dramatic swing

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in the favorite immigration enforcement and deportation among the wider

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>American population and especially the Hispanic community. I see a

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of Twitter x post polls with comments like this

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>poll was almost accurate in twenty twenty four. However, I

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>think that the kind of polling for a straightforward binary

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>election is very different than polling on an issue in

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>which respondents our positions are very nuanced. The data can

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be impacted by how the question is worded. That is

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent tru of. By the way, do these

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>high quality polls for twenty four necessarily translate to how

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the polling issues are set? And we're asking now? Also,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that you have following European politics. Do you

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>follow TLDR news in the EU? Best regards, love the podcast,

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert diaz Arista.

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I hope I'm pronouncing your last time.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Correctly, but Robert, thank you so much for sending me

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the email. I don't follow TLDR, but I will check

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>them out at your suggestion.

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Okay.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>On the polling, so yes, it is a lot based

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>on how the question is asked. But I think when

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you're asking in such generalities, when they're not asking specifically

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do this policy or do with

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that policy? And there's a full nuanced connection. First of all,

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in polling, there's something called a leading question. Right, if

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I sit there and say, Tom, Dick and Harry are

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all child molestors. Would you want them to live at

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>your house next to your house with your four year

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>old child. That's a leading question, right, You're you're giving

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the information ahead of time to affect the answer that

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you want. So pay attention to that when the questions

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are being asked to have an informed pole. The question

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of immigration in the broad terms, right, is more specific

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to the time that we live in, in the moment

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that we live in then in the than in like

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the actual policy of how people are carrying it out right,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the polling around immigration enforcement and immigration reduction specifically

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was mounting before even the midterms of twenty twenty two,

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Like that number was changing well before that even started changing,

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like really during COVID, where people felt that they felt

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>threatened by a lot of changes. Some of it was legitimate,

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>some of it was not legitimate. But that has started

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that change. I want to take you back in time

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for a second. If you look at the Gallop polling,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which goes back to nineteen sixty five, that's the that

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>LBJ fundamentally altered the way we have legal immigration. A

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>plurality of Americans wanted the system to stay as is,

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And what that tells me is that they never really

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thought about immigration because it wasn't that big of a deal.

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>There weren't that many immigrants coming to our country between

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty eight and nineteen sixty five. We had a

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>basic immigration moratorium for forty years. Then illegal immigration after

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty five starts ticking up, and there is a

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>demographic change of who's coming to our country. Before in

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty five, the immigrants had to reflect the current population.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So because the immigration was mostly Western Europe, all immigrants

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>were mostly Western Europe, we weren't bringing in Africans and

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Chinese and all the rest of them. Right, So the

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>number starts ticking up of people who want lower levels

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of immigration as both demographics change, because mass change in

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>demographics is oftentimes correlated with a declining social trust, and

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as illegal immigration changes, then it all comes together. In

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six, Reagan does his amnesty and sixty five

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent of Americans at that point want legal immigration reduced,

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>any legal immigration stop. It's a mood in the country

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that stayed with the majority for over a decade throughout

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's entire presidency. Now when Clinton was present, over a

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>million illegal aliens were coming to our country every year.

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>They were pouring through. In the mid nineties, Clinton works

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>with Congress from Barbara Jordan and the Republicans in Congress

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to create a bunch of immigration enforcement. The numbers start

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ticking down as far as illegal immigration comes in, and

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then by like the late nineties, the number of people

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>saying they want immigration reduce falls from a majority for

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the first time since the eighties, right for over a decade,

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>and then what happens nine to eleven. Obviously that would

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>cause people to say, we need to bring things in home.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>We need to stop you know what we're doing as

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>far as immigration, We need to focus on us. The

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>percentage of people who want immigration reduced spikes to fifty

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>eight percent after nine to eleven. That dwindles over time.

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no more terrorist attacks, and terrorism becomes in people's

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>minds what they're thinking about when they're thinking about people

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>coming to our country right after nine to eleven, justifiably,

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's what you would think of when you're thinking

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of safety and threats from the outside of the country.

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So that stay is of plurality until twenty nineteen. That's

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the third year of the Trump presidency and is the

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>very first time and only time on record, that a

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 1>plurality of Americans actually favor more legal immigration than less

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>legal immigration. Because during that time, the beginning of the

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Great Awokening, when liberals probably became woke and hating Trump

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>was their ideology and their religion. To want more immigrants

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>was to show that you hate Trump. So the number

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of liberals, who traditionally had a lot of them wanting

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to say will want less immigration plummets. They all want

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>mass more immigration, and it hits thirty two percent in

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen one more legal immigration. Then Joe Biden becomes president,

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the floodgates open, and the number of people who want

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>less immigration is hits its highest points since nine to

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven and fifty five percent, and that was in June

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 2>So, yes, the quality of this polls matter.

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But what I look for when I look at these

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>kinds of issues like abortion, gay marriage. You know, let's

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>take gay marriage for example. A number of poles from

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Pere Research to you know, I don't know, I think

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it was morning Console whatever.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Morning.

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Const's a pretty low level.

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Poll, but they all showed that there is a downtick

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>in the number of Americans who support gay marriage. If

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it was just one pole, I would say it's it's

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>they must asked the question weird or whatever. But is

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a genuine change, especially among younger conservative people who I think,

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I honestly believe it's a transgender issue which is turning

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>them away from gay marriage. But that is a real

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really happening. As far as how we feel

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>as a country, the immigration story has ticked up significantly,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>especially because of how Joe Biden governed this country. So yeah,

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be so obsessed with this one. Was this

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>pole the most accurate or this one was the least

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>accurate or whatever, look.

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 2>At the over arching story.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Cato Institute did his poll and I think twenty twenty two,

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and Kato, I mean, they would turn our country into

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Uganda if they could. They did a poll showing sixty

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>five or sixty eight percent of Americans wanted immigration reduced.

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That was legal immigration reduced, because we taken one point

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.439
<v Speaker 1>two million per year. And it's a mass demographic change.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Even when I was a kid. You know, I'm I'm

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>middle aged now at thirty eight, but I'm not seventy eight.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It was not like I'm like, you know, sitting there

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>saying back in my day, although I do say that

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>all the time to my Zoomer employees. Anyway, That's what

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I That's what I have to say about it. The

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>overarching narrative from all these poles are saying the same

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>thing or around most of these polls, and that is

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the bigger thing than whether or not one or two

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>polls are sitting there in saying don't worry about the

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>accuracy of that versus like the horse race. That matters

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with the horse race issue. When it comes to the

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>overall question, if they're all saying the same thing or

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>most are saying this one trajectory over time, and it's building,

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it's building, it's building, it's probably accurate and politicians should

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>look at that. As I've said in this whole entire rant,

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a majority of Americans for most of my lifetime, since

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven, even predating that in nineteen eighty six,

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>have won of the lower levels of legal immigration. And

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all our politicians have done is increased legal immigration. Have

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they actually in the eighties or nineties reduced legal immigration

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and the fear of mass immigration demographically changing our country

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't present. And have they not done the Iraq War,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in the World Trade Organization with China and opening China

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 1>those you know, those little three things. Donald Trump would

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>probably never have been president because the issues he ran

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on would have never been issues.

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>But they were.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Sold on neoliberalism, full boogie, and that's why they got

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the man that they hate the most. Anyway, I hope

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Okay, but thank you for your email.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 2>I love them. Is on them.

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Our next and last question for the day comes from

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Wade to Bosh. How do you feel about quote unquote

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>abundance and point based immigration? Please interview Tristan Hopper. I

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know who Tristan Hopper is. I will look him

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>up and maybe interview him. If he's not crazy, Okay,

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's related a dentist opera. It'd be great if

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we coun talk about his movies for a whole segment.

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The abundance I think he's talking about this book by

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Ezra Klin and Derek Thompson. Abundance is like the stupidest

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>slogan for politics that, of course only people who don't

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>actually work in politics they just write about it would

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think of. It talks about how the need to reregulate

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>everything from like housing to energy to have a prosperous society.

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's mostly Elbert letter to liberals about how like

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you can win people back by saying, you know, we're

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going to make things affordable by just building everywhere. That

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>was my read a bit anyway, Maybe I'm reading it wrong,

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I am the it was. You

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>could clearly tell one it's written by people who don't

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>work in politics, because I think abundance is a very

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>stupid phrase. It's not it's not I don't think it's interesting.

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a tagline people going to rally around.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, it's a you could tell it's written by

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>people who have never truly loved a place.

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I love the neighborhood I grew up and I really

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>really love it. I know every street, I could read

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>them like the back of my hand. I spent most

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of my life there as of now, and I don't

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>want I don't want mass housing there. It's mostly one

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in two family homes and makes a community. I know

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that I know the people I know. I don't need

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a train station in there. I'm good like we can

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>make things a little better, we can improve on the margins.

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But I love it, and I don't want to see

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it becomes something completely different for the sake of wealthy

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>yuppies moving there or foreigners moving there. I and when

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you love someplace, preserving it becomes as important as making

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it affordable, right, making it affordable while preserving certain characteristics

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that keep a community together. My other problem with it

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is they approach the issue of affordability from a demand

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>issue and not from a sorry, from a supply issue,

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>not a demand issue. Yes, Laguna Beach, California, beautiful beach

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>community has a demand problem, right, I'm sorry, a supply problem.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>They only have so many homes to keep it this way,

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So why not just shove apartment buildings everywhere and everyone

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>could live there. The question is not so much just

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the supply as the demand, the demand for energy, the

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>demand for housing, the demand for space would not be

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>so large if we did not bring in one point

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 1>two million people in this country every year. Legally, that's

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 1>just the fact there's only so much room. There's only

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>so much space, and the more credible people's space is

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the less inclined they are to have their own children,

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or to afford their own home, or to grow up.

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>All these things feed into each other. So it's a

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 1>very neoliberal idea. It's like saying, like, why don't we

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>just open up China to the world's economy, and then

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 1>they'll want to be the democracies.

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Just like we are. It's it's it shows no foresight

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 2>into the future of problems that that would create.

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to live in a box just because

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you can get a nice view, maybe you will. I

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's true for a lot of people.

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they want to own something that they could

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>live in, and I think they want to be part

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of a community if they can. They're all looking for

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this authenticity that they feel like they belong somewhere, and

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hard when you live in a crowded, little cramp space.

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they want to live like in

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>parts of China that people like literally live in a cubicle.

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I just I just don't see it. And I don't

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think that that abundance argument works. I don't think it's compelling,

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a bad political tagline anyway, Okay,

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and the points based system on immigration. I generally favor it,

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but I want overall immigration numbers reduced. I would like

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a moretatorium for a period of time, and then overall

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>numbers reduced to one to two hundred thousand a year,

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>which are historical numbers based on a point system. Immigrants

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>should be better than us. They shouldn't be worse or

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>as good. We should want the best in the brightest

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of the world, the cream of the world, not your

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>average Joe. And I know that can bring up a

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of hurt feelings, but that is what I want.

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We should always pursue immigrants who are better than the norm,

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>not at or below the norm. So that's why I'm

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>supportive of a point based system, but I want overall

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>immigration numbers reduced. You cannot have a twenty first century

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>economy with the twentieth century immigration policy. Okay, that's my

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>rant for today. We will be back on Monday. I

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you. I hope you like this little true crime episode.

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely different. Please like and subscribe to this podcast

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening. You can listen the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 2>I'll be back next week. I hope you will too,

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Thanks