WEBVTT - Best NFL Bets for Week 17 | Top Picks and Predictions (Ep. 632)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, and welcome into BP. NFL Christmas has come

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and gone, but we're still stopping your stocking with our

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>best bets for a Week seventeen of the NFL season.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Seth Wilcock billion for Joey P who

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was unavailable today after having too much gaba ghul at

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Piece of P family dinner last night. But still no,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not alone. I'm joined by a man who had

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a great holiday. I'm much assuming after some unders hitting

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>both the Chief Steelers and Ravens Texans game. He is

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Erickson, aka the Undertaker. Happy Week seventeen, brother, how's

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the holiday?

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Holiday was absolutely excellent. A ton of food, overs

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>on the food and taken to my body, probably way

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>too much food. But the unders cash Joe Mixon came

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 2>nowhere near his sixty three and a half rushing yards

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the lock of the Christmas Day slate. I mean, the

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Texans couldn't basically score on offense at all, you know,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 2>getting a safety as they're to be like, wait, what's

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the score? Thirty one two? Is a very bizarre game.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>But the food was good, the drinks were good, the

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>family was good. So but I'm happy to be here

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.319
<v Speaker 2>today talking about the weeks because we have so many

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>games still coming up. You know, Mayor had asked me

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>in our slack that, hey, do you have a pick

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 2>for tomorrow? I'm like, wait, is there football on Friday? Too?

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I was, but I wouldn't be surprised at this point.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, in the NFL plays on every single day

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of the week. Anytime you look up, there may be

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>an NFL game on. But we're here to make sure

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you have action on all the games you can with

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Saturday and Sunday. So let's break it down, seth.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm looking forward to man, and it is kind

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of tough to keep the calendar straight right now. You

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>got the holidays, You got about twenty bold games happening

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>over the next five or six days as well, so

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot happening in the football world. On today's program,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make sure you're invested in Week seventeen of

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the NFL season. We'll give you our top ten ats

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and total picks. Then i'll give you my parlay of

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the week as well. And also before we get going,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to thank everyone who's making time for

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>us during your busy holiday week watching here on YouTube.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you are here on YouTube and you enjoy

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this type of content, please like this video and subscribe

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to the channel if you are new. Also please rate

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and review us wherever you get your audio podcast. Great.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate the support not just now during the holiday season,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but all year long here at BP. And also please

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 1>download the Betting pros app. It's on iOS or Android.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>You can use the sportsbook Sync to automatically track your

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>bets across all major sports books in one spot. So

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>when college football, NFL, cricket, soccer, everything's happening this week,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you can track it all in one place on this

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pro sports betting app. So make sure you're checking

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>out the app, guys. BP app available everywhere. But Erickson,

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into the pick. Starting with Saturday. You

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>were interested in the Broncos Bengals game. Bengals currently favored

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>by three points. This was a really tough one for me.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The Broncos been playing great, but the Bengals fighting for

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 1>their life every single week.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, Yeah they are, and their playoff chances are basically

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 2>non existent at this point. I mean, every probability model

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 2>will say that they have a chance, but yeah, considering

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs locked up with the number one seed and

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos need to lose their next two games for

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals to get into the playoffs. The Chiefs are

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna do whatever in their power to rest every single

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 2>start to make sure they lose the game against the

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Broncos to make sure the Bengals have no shot of

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>making the postseason. But that's for Week eighteen. Week seventeen,

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals are going to try to win this game

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 2>against Denver, and I like them the spot. I mean,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals have been one of the most disappointing teams

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 2>this season overall, but they've been better as of late.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>And one of the interesting trends I kind of found

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>with them where I've kind of been back in them

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 2>the last couple weeks, is you know, they've been much

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>better against some of these less formidable opponents. So they've

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>been favored twelve times this year, including nine times by

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 2>more than a field goal, and that's really kind of

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the only time I've been good against the spread seven

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to two against the spread when it's been a field goal,

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>or more so, where you're having this line here, you're

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing it at three and a half three at most books,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So I like taking the Bengals with the three. They're

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>playing at home, this is a game that they have

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>to win to stay in playoff contention. They don't care

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>about the other teams that are trying to win this game.

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the offense is still going to have success here.

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Denver's defense has not been good as of late, giving

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>up a lot of points over the last couple of weeks.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So I do like the Bengals here in this spot

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and in Denver hasn't been as good when they've been

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>an underdog this season, like they've been very good when

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the books are saying, hey, bo Nicks is a favorite

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>we like to hear in this spot, and they've been

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 2>very profitable backing bon Nicks in those situations. But as underdogs,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 2>they're just four and four against the spread and two

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and six straight up. So when they've kind of been

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>projected to lose games, I sent some of these more

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>powerhouse teams, they have fallen short of delivering against the number.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's like Joe Burrow three points at home against

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 2>bon Knicks, Like sometimes you just got to zoom out

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and be like, hey, yeah, way, I feel comfortable laying

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow with the points against a rookie quarterback on

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.559
<v Speaker 2>the road. Right. Sometimes it can be just that simple,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 2>especially if we know the Bengals are going to score points, right,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 2>and if bon Nicks has to drop back to throw

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>forty times, I'll take my chances. So I like the

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Bengals here at home minus three.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope this one does come true because I have

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>an AFC West Exact order five to one I put

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on preseason, and I need the Broncos continue to lose

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>some games. The Chargers in them were real close. I

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was happy about that. There's a night f FO ball

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>victory for Los Angeles. Hoping that this one comes true.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Might be telling you on that as well. I do

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like the analysis there from ericson. I'm gonna stick with

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this like fifty foot zoom level the youth throughout there,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna take a page out of your book, actually,

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna go with an alt total paying a

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of juice here for the Las Vegas Raiders

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>versus the Saints alternate under thirty nine and a half points.

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>This is minus one thirty eight at DraftKings, and I

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>never mind buying back a couple points. I felt like

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight and a half where this line was set originally,

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was just a little too short for me. But if

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr doesn't play, this is a game between a

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>no O'Connell and Spencer Radler. Like It's as simple as

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that for me. The Saints have scored under this total

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and two straight games without Derek Carr, and four straight

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>dating back to two games when they had Derek Carr

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Saints estimated practice report Alvin Kamara Derek Carr

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>DNPS as of Wednesday, Jawan Johnson also limited. They might

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get Chris o'lave back, but he has not played since

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Week eight. Their wide receiver corp currently mvs Cedric will

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and a guy named Kevin Austin Junior. So I'm not

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>worried about the Saints or the Raiders putting up a

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of points here. The Raiders have hit this under

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and four straight games after losing Gardner Minshew. Those games

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>were against way better offenses Kansas City, Tampa Bay, Atlanta, Jacksonville.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>They also might be without starting left guard Jackson Powers Johnson,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>who was also estimated as an LP the other day,

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and his backup Jordan Meredith who was a DNP on Wednesday.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna go with the under here in the

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Radler versus a O'Connell game on Sunday afternoon.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Look, sometimes you just gotta zoom out on two quarterbacks

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 2>that are playing and think, hey, does this mean that

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be points or no? I mean last week

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you got to think that, not even like talking about

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the Saints game, which I mean barely was in a game. Yeah, really,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 2>it was something that was on TV where there were

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>two NFL teams. I don't know if they were really

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 2>playing football, they're doing something. But even the Jaguars Raiders game, right,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you looked at that and like, okay, like this can

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 2>be a gross shootout. Yeah, not even close. There's just

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>too bad quarterbacks playing bad quarterback play. So I think

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get more of that here. Again, the only

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>way I see this going over is when you get

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>those wacky fumble six pick six year and again you

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 2>know that is why it's called gambling at the end

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>of the day. But I think the process here is

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>right with your rationale behind this play. So I do

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like the under here as well.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go back to the Saturday slate where you

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like the Chargers and the Patriots to also potentially go

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>over a total at forty two and a half points.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you like there? What are you seeing it for?

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>This game is gonna kick off at one Eastern time.

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is the first game on the Saturday

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>slate at one o'clock on Saturday. So I do like

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I like the over in this game. And the reason

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>is that the Patriots games, the only way I can

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>enjoy watching them anymore is watching Drake may just be

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>amazing at football because the everyone else something team is terrible.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the reason why Austin Hooper is now becoming like

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a tight end that's usable in fantasy because he's like

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the second best receiver on the team besides Hunter Henry,

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 2>who's tight end one. And you look at the Patriots,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So they're five and one towards the over at home

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>this year forty six points per game, so you're seeing

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>this total around forty two and a half forty three

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>points at most books. So I like the over here.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's always dangerous right when you're betting on overs

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the Chargers, right because they're a

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 2>team that is just like notorious for killing game totals.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>They usually go shyed towards the under, but you know, eventually, hey,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you have to have them kind of breakout of that understreak, right.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they've only had one game this season on

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the road where they've actually gone over the total. But

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, as I've indicated already, like they're the gift

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 2>that keeps on giving during the festive time of the year.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>You just give out overs because of how bad the

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 2>defense is and how electric Drake May can be making

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>plays downfield, making plays with his legs. You know, I

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>see similarities between the way Drake May and Justin Herbert play,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Like both really good arms can use their legs. So

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I think you're gonna see some some high end quarterback

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 2>play here in this matchup. And that's why I like

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the over. Again, forty two and a half. That's not

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a high bar to pass in any way. This is

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 2>not Vegas looking at Hey, this game is going to

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 2>be a shootout by no means that are going to

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 2>be a shootout. But can't get over forty two and

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a half points considering the average has been forty six

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>points against all the teams the Patriots have played at

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>home this year. I think it can. And I also

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 2>do like the fact that JK. Dobbins could be coming

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>back for the Chargers here the explosive element they need

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.599
<v Speaker 2>in their running game that can definitely take advantage of

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a very bad Patriots run defense. So, especially with Dobbins

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 2>coming back that's not considered at all in these lines.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he can move off some explosive runs and

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 2>help get this game over the total. So it give

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>me the over forty two and a half Patriots and Chargers.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm gonna stay in this game. I'm gonna actually

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>back the Chargers against the spread here minus four. They've

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>been a top five team ats this season at ten

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and five, and Jim Harball's teams, whether it's last year

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at Michigan or here, with the Chargers, they take care

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of business when they should. They've covered in eight of

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>ten games when they've been favored this season. And while

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like you and I really do like Drake Man.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I've wrote him into the Fantasy Championships in a couple

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of leagues. I like what he's done for this team,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if you feel the same but

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it feels kind of like a letdown spot after getting

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.599
<v Speaker 1>up last week in Buffalo, and I don't like the

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>vibes in New England as a whole. DRAWDMEO. I don't

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, call for anyone's job or anything

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>like that, but called as players soft earlier this year

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>through their offensive linemen under the bus last week as

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>well after that horrible play with Ramandre Stevenson. I think

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a solid matchup for the Chargers, who, as

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to, they might be getting JK. Dobbins back,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't, they need to find a way

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to open up this passing game. The Patriots might be

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the cure to fix as well. They've allowed an eight

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>pointy a dot that's the third highest clip and the

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>seventh most air yards this season. They've also have the

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>seventh fewest interceptions against quarterback seven this season. So I'm

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>expecting Justin Herbert to tee off in this game. Fine

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Laden McConkey, Fine Quintin Johnston downfield. So I'll go ahead

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and take the Chargers minus four against the Patriots.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 2>If I wasn't a Patriots fan, I would agree with

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 2>you you said, because I guess I think I think

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 2>you're spot on. Just I can't. I don't like betting

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>it because not on for me, Like I watched them

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 2>like to only I'll take them with the points usually,

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, last week with like like plus fourteen, so

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 2>that was fine. It was like a fun sweat and

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>then they're up fourteen nothing you think, oh, could I

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>win this game? Not quite, but I agree with you.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the Chargers is probably the sharp play here.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Again goes back to zoom out on the coaches. Right,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 2>you got hardball against raw Mayo. Right, I don't think

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that we would be surprised at any Like the coaching

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 2>mismatch is significant and again like Drick may but he's

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>not quite at the level of Justin Herbert, so you

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of advantages. And yeah, the Patriots are

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 2>playing at home. I can't remember the last time they

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 2>won a home game totally. I think it might have

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>been against the Jets. I don't honestly remember It's it's

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 2>been a while. So yeah, I think you're you're pretty

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>safe here. Back in the Bolts.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you don't bet against your own team because

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm the same way. Like occasionally I will back the

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Steelers or Penn State when I when I'm feeling good

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>vibes around the team. But yesterday, my my cousin walks

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>into the room, Hey, you betting the Steelers today. I'm

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>like no, She's like, well, did you bet against them?

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>And like, because my uncle he always had his favorite

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>teams the Eagles, so you'll hedge against himself every single week.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, no, I'm ride with the boys, you know

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. I'm not I'm going down swinging. So

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I would never do you have you ever hedged against

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your your favorite team? Because I will never do that.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've had a situation where I felt

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the need to do it, Like that's why I bet

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the Like my way version of hedging is like, that's

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 2>why I bet the over games because yeah, yeah, I

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 2>root for Drake May. Like that's basically like why I

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed Patriots games because I know the defense can't do anything,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 2>so it's like they're gonna give up points. I know that.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of me betting against them, and then I'm

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 2>betting for them and rooting for them by betting the

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>game total over, which hey, that means Drake May is

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>balling out doing things, and and again I root for

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>turnovers and touchdowns. Like again, never can never go wrong

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>with root for touchdowns, man, never go wrong.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And hopefully you guys can hold on to a

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>high pick. Maybe some Travis Hunter coming to town next

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>year for the Patriots.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if they can about any any receiver

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of any type come anywhere near Patriots. That's that's a rookie.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Please keep them away. Like I don't want to ruin

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>any any player.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to ruin their very fair because even

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some struggles, some slow starts from Marvin Harrison

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Junior down there in Arizona. You like the Cardinals potentially

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>this week in an underdog spot against the Rams on

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night, eight fifteen pm Eastern Time. What are you

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking here for Arizona Los Angeles Herrickson.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.599
<v Speaker 2>I just think that this one at plus six and

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a half is too many points for a divisional matchup. Look,

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals aren't some garbage team. Yes, have they been

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 2>like super disappointing, especially over the last month. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>because they've had a cupcake schedule. Though they couldn't beat

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks, they couldn't beat the Panthers, but they've also

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>had games where like they went down to the wire

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>with like the Minnesota Vikings. They also killed the Rams

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>earlier this season. Now that was a while ago, but

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>just like learning you know, from looking at a lot

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>of these spreads this year, these divisional matchups, right, they

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>never go what it looks like on paper, like they're

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 2>always way more wacky and things. And when you were

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>given the luxury of six and a half points for

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 2>a divisional matchup against the Rams playing at home, where

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 2>you know they don't have home field advantage. So that's

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>why I really it's really like less about like the

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals themselves, right, because I've seen them. They're obviously disappointing,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>but like that's why the number is what it is,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>because they've been such a terrible team to want to back.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>And and that being said, I mean they've covered the

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 2>spread eight of the last eleven road games. You look

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 2>at the Rams, the team that's played on the road

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>has usually covered their games. Nine of the last eleven

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 2>games for the Rams, the road team has actually covered

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the spread. Wow, the Rams have been a really good

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>team that I've been on when they've been on the

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>road because they've got a lot of suppressed lines as

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a result. But now you're kind of getting the opposite

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>here where the Cardinals are getting no credit whatsoever despite

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>being seven and eight, being a team that already beat

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the Rams this year, and yes they're out of the playoffs,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>but looks like James Connor's gonna shoot up in this game.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>They have Trey Benson. So and I mean the Rams,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>what were they doing against just last week? Like that

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>was a game that we thought could be a shootout,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and then they're stalling out, they're not moving the ball,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>like they've had enough bad games this year. The Rams

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 2>when they went on the road against the Saints, they

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>could barely score points, went on the road against the Jets,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 2>could barely score You're like, wait, that's going on. So

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 2>they're not exactly the most consistent team either, and given

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that the divisional game, I just think this is too

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 2>many points. Do I think the Cardinals win? No, not necessarily.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the Rams find a way to squeak out

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a win. But I've seen them play teams way too

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>close that they should have totally blown out to have

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>confidence that they're gonna win this game by a touchdown.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 2>So I let the Cardinals here plus six and a half.

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Rams are such a tough team to figure

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>out because that inconsistency. One week they can barely scrape

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>by the Jets, and then the week prior it's like

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they're lighting up the Bills. And yeah, definitely an interesting team.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully they can figure some things out late down the stretch.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>They're obviously in that NFC West battle against the Seahawks

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for the division, probably their only way in the postseason.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So excited to see kind of how that shakes up.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to the Sunday slate for my third pick.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with the Dolphins Browns under forty and a

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>half points. And this is moving. I did see this

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>just move. After I place this bet to thirty nine

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half, I think it's still at forty and

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a half at I think bet three six five if

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you're over there, bet rivers as well. And I just

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>want a way to fade the Browns against the Dolphins

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>because Kevin Stefanski, he's a buzzkill, Like he's the guy

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not inviting to Christmas dinner because he's like, oh,

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>let's just start. Dorian Thompson Robinson for the rest of

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the season, ruin everyone's fantasy hopes, whether you had Jerry

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Judy or Jamis or Najoku, anyone who're rolling out there.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But then I was like really thinking about it, and

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, can I actually trust the Dolphins playing

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the elements? It will be a little bit warmer

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio on Sunday, but there's a seventy nine percent

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>chance of rain up along the shores of Lake Erie.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't trust the Dolphins. I don't trust the Browns.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have averaged just nine points in the past

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, and that was with Jamis Winston in two

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of those games. In the five games that Dorian Thompson

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Robinson has started, the Browns are averaging nine point six

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>points per game. Nijoku estimate DNP. Jerry Judy limited at

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>practice this week as well. DTR also isn't at one

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent with a cap, but is trending towards playing.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins also pretty banged up. They've played to the

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>under in two straight good weather games against the forty

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>nine ers in Houston. Better offenses here and estimate DMPs

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for them included left tackle Tarryan Armstead and wide receiver

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Watles. So I also like the Browns under sixteen

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half team total based on DTR's previous history,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>But give me the under forty and a half in

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a weird four or five Eastern time kickoff in Cleveland.

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if any was gonna be at this

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>game ericson, I have no idea, Like, if you're in Cleveland,

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Browns fan, are you going to this

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>game on Sunday?

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Man? This this Why does this game exist? Like?

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Why is this on the I mean there's better ways, see,

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I think this is this is a perfect way to

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 2>approach it. Right, Nobody wants to watch this game necessarily

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>except Browns fans or Dolphins fans maybe you know. But

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 2>when you don't want to watch it and you want

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>to fade both teams, you just take me under. That's

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>what you do. Like that's why it was so fun.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Like on Christmas, I'm so busy doing all these things,

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>entertaining aunts and uncles while I got the Unders going,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>so uh yeah, we're good to go. And then you

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 2>look up, you check the scores and get back You're

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>like great. It was a great day. So yeah, the Dolphins, Man,

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 2>if they were playing anywhere buck Cleveland like it, I

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>think it'd be easy to take them against the spread,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>even though it's like laying almost a touchdown with them

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 2>on the road. But they beat up on bad teams,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>we know that. To what extent do they beat up

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>on the Browns? Right, especially if you're playing outdoors, and

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 2>even though the temperature is not a big issue, just

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>we've seen this Dolphins. It's every single time they play

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>someone that's a better team. So again, you know, maybe

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not as down on them against the spread as

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you are. I think again, I think again, if you're

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 2>making me pick a team, I'm not taking the brown

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>So in that way, I think that, Yeah, I think

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe the Dolphins maybe like you can do a little again,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>depending on what the number is where you're getting at

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the total, maybe you can alt the spread a little bit,

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 2>bring it down a little bit Miami, you know, three

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and a half or four and a half or something

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 2>like that, or by a field goal and then get

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 2>a better number on the total. So because they think, yeah,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I think Miam's gonna win this game, not too concerned

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 2>about that.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they need to flex it like True TV or

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>something so somewhere or know what's watching like I think

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather watch my local news at four o'clock that

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this honestly my local news covers you know knows disrespect

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>to the people out here in Lankster County, but not

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the best, not the best local news coverage out here.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But keep swing you guys, We appreciate you. Before we continue,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to remind everyone about the Betting Pros discord.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking to up your game in sports betting, well,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>then join our exclusive discord commuty at Bettingpros dot com

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>slash chat. Not only can you connect with some expert

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>handicappers who provide free picks for the NBA, NFL, MLB,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>NHL soccer player props, live betting, and more, but now

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you can also join our NFL podcast group. You can

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>sink your picks for free and use our quick pick

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>feature on the Betting Pro sports betting app to win

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>some free prizes. Make sure you're getting invested over there

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with the NFL podcast group and on our VP discord community.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Ericson coming right back for you. On the Sunday Slate,

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>we got the Carolina Panthers. Who are now eight and

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a half point dogs against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>edit this show a lot, so I know you've had

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this back and forth relationship with the Panthers all year,

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's your high school girlfriend and you're going away

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to call in the spring. So what's happening here with

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers? Are you back on with them?

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Now? We are reigniting the flame with the Carolina Panthers.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Went home for Christmas and he's Christmas break, baby, let's go.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand why it's this massive a line. We

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>see these teams play not that long ago Week thirteen game,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 2>win to overtime. They end up winning the game because

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of a Chuba Hubbard fumble. That's a game that the

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Panthers could have won outright. We've seen the Panthers play

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>four straight games go down to the wire the last

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>seven weeks. They are six and one against the spread. Again,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the one week that everybody was on them against Dallas,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>of course they crumble. But this is just way too

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>big of a line. Look, we talk about the Buccaneers

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot too on this show, talking about Baker Mayfield.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Love him as a on the road, love him as

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>an underdog. He's not either of these in this scenario,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>like he is a heavy home favorite against a divisional opponent. Yep,

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>this is way too big of a line. So this

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 2>is definitely I think of all the bets we've talked

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>about today, I think this is my favorite one. I

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 2>just and we mentioned it on the early look Ahead

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>line between me and Joe. Joe kind of agreed with

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 2>me that it seems like way too many points for

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the Buccaneers at home. I think their defense is terrible, Like,

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 2>their defense is still so bad. We saw Brayceta have

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>success against them already this season. And who's playing looser? Right,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 2>who's playing more tight? The Buccaneers have to win and

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 2>make the playoffs, right, because they all the Falcons are

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>breathing down their neck. But Carolina's like, dude, like we're

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>just We're just out here trying to have fun. Man

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 2>like play spoiler, play the grinch role. So I really

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>like And David Canl is also playing against his old team,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So I really like the Panthers here in the spot.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>And we've already seen them play well above expectation the

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>last seven weeks, last six games as an underdog, they've

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 2>covered the Carolina Panthers and they again eight and a

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 2>half points. Divisional matchup again, same reasons why I like

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals. Just a divisional matchup, eight and a half

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>points again if I make them one pick against the spread.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>This week, I'm back at the Cardiac Cats.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And it's been interesting because since Bryce Young has

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>returned and they've gone on this not winning streak but

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>semi close losing streak. All their losses as of late

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>have been one score games. They've been close. Bryce Young's

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a new career high in rushing yards last week as well.

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It's starting to kind of see that Alabama Bryce Young.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they stay with him going into twenty

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty five or do you think maybe they draft like

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a Day two guy, like a Jackson Dart or Curtis

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Rourk out of Indiana something like that. Or do you

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think Bryce Young it is the future there in Carolina?

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think they definitely wanted to be the

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 2>future there, But I think that any you know, sharp

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>organization is never gonna say like we want like you

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 2>should be a quarterback factory, right, you should always be

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>looking at like because guys get hurt all the time.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 2>And you never know. You know, we've seen Bryce sung guests,

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>he seems like he's got his commidence back, we've also

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 2>seen it when it's not there, and like, what's gonna

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>happen if he had goes through a cold spell of

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>our really disappointing games. And he's also an undersized quarterback,

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So what are the elements in terms of like his

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>injury and health. So I don't think it's ever a

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>bad idea to always continuing to invest into the quarterback position. Again,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to get the best guy. And it's like

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 2>goes back to the forty nine ers, right, you know,

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the trade up to get Trey Lance, they drafted brock Birdy,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, at the end of the day, they got

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 2>their guy and it's like not the way that we

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 2>planned on doing it, but it kind of worked out

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>at the end. So I think it would be sharp

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>for them to continue to look at the position. But

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 2>I think obviously going into next year, Bryce Young is

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be the unequivocal starter in Noka in that lineup.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, For my fourth pick, I am going to

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>go with the over in the Green Bay Packers Minnesota

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Vikings game. This line currently set forty eight and a

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>half points. I got at minus one oay at DraftKings,

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this of course going off at Sunday at four twenty

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>five pm Eastern time. I really think that the Green

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay offense, while they've been frustrating for fantasy outside Jordan

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Love and Josh Jacobs, they've been playing great ball lately

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on that side of the ball. Matt Lafleur coaching them

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>up scored over thirty points in five straight games, averaging

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty seven yards of total offense in

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that span as well, and the Vikings have allowed just

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one more rushing yard than the Ravens for the fewest

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>amount this season. So I do not think Josh Jacobs

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>will be very effective in this game. If you want

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to take some unders on his rushing props, I wouldn't

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mind that either, But I think this will force the

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Pack to throw the ball a little more around the yard.

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love's gonna have a big game. They're gonna have

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to save some clock. Meanwhile, the Vikings, they've also averaged

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty and a half points over the past five games.

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnold is absolutely cooking right now. Average two in

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight yards two point six touchdowns per game in

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that five game span, I expect him to air it

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>out here. And with the Packers also being a top

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>six defense against the run, I think Aaron Jones is

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>probably clogged up a little bit. So there are sixty

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>points scored in this game between these two teams back

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in week number five. So give me the over in

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota in a controlled environment in the Dome. I'm going

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to you know, it's always sketchy with the divisional game

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that they've seen each other a couple times already, once

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this season and multiple times last season, but I'm sticking

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with it. Forty and a half seems low, So give

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>me the over.

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that this is a good pick by you Seth.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Not to say the other picks are bad, this one,

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>this one in particular, especially because it's hey, like, don't

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 2>watch Miami Browns, Watchbackers Vikings, like this is already action

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be And knowing my like, I know that

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna get on the East Coast broadcast. I'm gonna

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>get Dolphins and brown and just and just wish that

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>they would switch the game over to Packers in Minnesota Vikings.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>But I think this thing to point out to it,

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and the first time that these teams played, it was

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 2>a very weird game. I believe that the Vikings jumped

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>out to like a massive lead, yes, and then Jordan

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Love just started just like hucking it in the second half,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>and they eventually kind of crawled their way back into

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the game. Now, it seemed like the Vikings were always

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 2>gonna win in the end, but Green Bay obviously came back.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>But I also believe that game was Love was kind

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 2>of still banged up right the beginning of the season,

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>so he's dealing with that groin injury, that that knee injuries,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 2>so he should be he's one hundred percent healthy now.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's coming off basically essentially a bye week

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 2>against the New Orleans against the New Orleans Saints. So

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you're getting both teams at at full capacity.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 2>You got Hawkinson, he wasn't in the first matchup, right,

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think you're gonna see points here. And

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 2>this is a matchup I love for fantasy too, because

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>we know the Vikings like they drive volume out of

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 2>their opponents, and like that's the biggest issue with these packers, Like, oh,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>no one gets enough targets. Well, targets are coming in

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 2>week seventeen. I don't know where they're.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Going still, I don't know who they're going to.

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 2>But if everybody can, if we can, if we can

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 2>go from like four to like seven for everybody, then

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 2>we feel much better, especially if Kristia Watson doesn't play.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 2>So God, I can only pray for those that are

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna rely on Tavian Wicks to play him in the

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Championships. I don't know if i'd happen in me,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>but he's probably gonna have another big game. So yeah,

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I like the over here as well.

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's let's round out your picks here with

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night Football, maybe one of the most intriguing games

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>on the slate, Like maybe not from a closest game

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think it's going to happen, but we have

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pennix Junior in a second start going up against

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders. How do you feel this one shakes out?

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>After Jane Daniels has what was perhaps the best game

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of his career last week and perhaps sealed him the

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Rookie of the Year honors.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that he's actually not getting enough credit

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 2>for that performance last week because the line is only

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 2>four points, and I think it has to do a

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>lot with Oh, well, Michael Pennix, like looked really good

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>in his start, and I went into last week just

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>keeping this in the back of my mind that if

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Michael Penix comes out, I need to keep this in mind.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 2>They played the Giants, yep, they play. They played the

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>JV team of the New York Giants, and Penix, I

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>mean what, you didn't even have to do that much.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 2>They had two pick sixes, right, So yes, he looked good,

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 2>but you have to keep in mind the opponent that

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 2>they were playing. Something. A trend that I've looked at

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot this year has been rookie quarterbacks as favorites.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>They performed really well against the spread this year, so

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Michael Penix was a favorite. I was back in him

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 2>last week because they used to be like, hey, this

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>guy should cover. And now I'm following that same trend,

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 2>except on the other side of this matchup, because I'm

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at Jaden Daniels as the rookie quarterback who's favored

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>in this matchup. So for me, it goes back to

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think four points here is enough. The Commanders

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 2>are playing at home, they are riding high after this

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>massive win over the Philadelphia Eagles Atlanta. Yeah, they beat

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 2>the Giants great, but this team still has a lot

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of issues that will go beyond the quarterback position. I

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>still don't think their defense is very good, even though

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>they've they've played well against some sub are composition shooting up.

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 2>They played the Giants, They played the Giants and the Raiders.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Desmond Rider drew Lock. Like, great job, guys.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Now you're gonna play the future offensive rookie of the

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>year in terms of Jade and Daniels. So the Commanders

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>all year have been this team that have struggled to

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 2>beat like the best teams, which was why last week

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>again obviously maybe a little asterisk because Jalen Hurts didn't

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 2>play the game, but they still end up winning that

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>game against the Eagles. And yes, the Falcons have a

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 2>winning record, but you know who has winning record the Texans, Right,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Just like one of these like kind of like fraudulent

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 2>teams where it's like, yeah, like they're supposed to be good,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>but the record says they're good, but are they really good?

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Are the Falcons good? Seth? I mean, if you ask

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Trel Furman, again he's on the show either, But Treyll

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Furman would be very proud. This has to be about

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>his picks to fade the Falcons into oblivion, which is

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 2>he always he usually does on a week to week basis.

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 2>So I know that Treill's gonna like this pick. So

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go with the Commanders laying four at home

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 2>against the Dirty Birds and Michael Pennix. I just think

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>that they're probably getting too much love for Penix's performance

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>last week when I think it was more about the

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>New York Giants than the Falcons being this. Oh, this

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>team's ready to run away with the NFC South. I

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's going to be the case.

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of problems for Atlanta. I'm not sure

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>if Drake London is going to suit up in this one.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We also have Kyle Pitts who thinks he was a

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback last week and just started laddering footballs forward.

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>He thought he tried to be Travis Kelsey except.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Forgot that you're only allowed to throw the ball backwards

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when you already catch it. But yeah, I'm with you.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the Falcons have a long way to go.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm really hoping for Michael Pennix's sake that they don't

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.959
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs, just because I think Baker Mayfield has

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a better chance to make a run out of the

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>South than the Falcons do. And yeah, Commanders have been hot,

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>They've they've been frisky, kind of slowed down their rushing

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>attack a little bit in the backfield. I want to

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>see Brian Robinson Junior get back to full hell. I

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's still a little banged up, and hopefully Austin

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Eckler can return at some point. But yeah, I think

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a good spot for the Commanders. On Sunday Night Football,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll round us out my final pick and win it.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Dout Fae the Giants, who are four and eleven ats

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this season, two and seven ats at home. They just

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>lost the foul Andrew told us thirty four to seven

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and Pennix's first start, Malik Neighbors, Tyrone Tracy estimated dnps

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. I think Neighbors is tracking towards playing, but

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>tracy status seems very much in the air. Drew Locke

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>also limited with a shoulder, but I'm kind of hoping

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he plays because he has four interceptions one touchdowns this season.

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Richardson for the Colt something to monitor. He was

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>listed as an estimated DNP on Wednesday, But I don't

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really think this matters for betting this game because Joe

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Flacco and him are very you know, one A, one B.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in this type of situation, Colts are still

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt for a playoff spot, coming off a

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>vintage Jonathan Taylor game where he had two hundred and

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen yards three touchdowns a week after I was eliminated

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for my fantasy playoffs in my big money league. So

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that JT. But now they get a Giants defense.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It's allowed the second most rushing yards this season, four

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>point eight yards per carry. Clip giddy up. I'm betting

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>all the JT overs I can. I'm laddering him, and

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I expect JT to carry people to fantasy championships and

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the Colts cash and tickets. I would wait on this one, though,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because I think maybe if Richardson gets rolled out or

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>he's questionable coming into Sunday, maybe you can get rab

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of six and a half so you can finish this

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>one off if they win by a touchdown. So I'm

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>waiting on this, but I do like the Colts at

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, hoping this line moves a little

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:18.719
<v Speaker 1>bit towards Sunday.

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Colts are traditionally a team that you want

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to bet on when they're favored, right, so they usually

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 2>show up when they're underdogs when you kind of run

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 2>into issues, especially when they're facing It seems like every

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 2>like AFC South matchup with these teams is always like

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 2>a pickups, like I don't really know, like who's at home.

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, the Colts here, I think that. I mean,

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>even if Richardson suits up, you know, the Giants two

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 2>of the things that they're worst at are against the run.

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>We know that the Colts can run the ball effectively

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>with Richardson, with Jonathan Taylor, and they're the number one

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>worst defense against the deep ball. Look, Richardson might complete

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>five passes, but he might get over one hundred and

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards with those. His passing yards projection, I don't

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>know what it is now, but I think it opened

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 2>at like one hundred and sixty yards.

0:31:57.680 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It was comic low. And honestly, I think he gets

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the over in his passing arts because it's funny. Well,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 2>he completed like six passes I think last week, Yeah,

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>he's thought over one hundred passing, so I think he's

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>got to complete some of these moonballs. It looks like

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>al Pierce is gonna be back as well. So yeah,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I like the cold here.

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna go and transition into my parlay of

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the week to round us out on the program. And

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I know this is an NFL show, but we all

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like football, right, So I'm gonna be taking my favorite

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>bet of the NFL this week, parlaying it with my

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite college football bowl game bet, Miami Dolphins and the Browns.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the under there forty and a half points

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifteen. I also got Sarahcuse laying sixteen and

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a half points on Washington State in the Holiday Bowl.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Total odds of plus two sixty nine at fandle Fran

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Brown has done an exceptional job with the Syracuse team,

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and they are all up for the Holiday Bowl. Most

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of their starters will be playing, including quarterback Kyle McCord,

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>who was first in the nation and passing attempts, third

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in total yards, fifth and passing touchdowns. Wazoo, they had

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback John Tier who's their entire offense he's in the portal.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>They're leading rusher way Shaun Parker, and the Porter their

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>second leading wide receiver Chris Hudson, and the Portal their

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>right tackle. Four defensive starters opting out of this game.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So Washington State they have nothing returning, no consistency. They

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>also have their head coach and most of their staff

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be gone for this one as well. So

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, give me Syracuse my sixteen and a half.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm parlaying that with the Dolphins Browns under this gives

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>us combined odds plus two sixty nine. Nice at fandles.

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna go ahead and round us out there

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>with the college football NFL parlay Andrew. I don't know

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>if I broke the rules of the show, but I'm

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it anyways.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Hey, if it hits, it doesn't matter. There are no

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 2>rules to winning. So I've it hit, seth We'll have

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you back on.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, well I appreciate that. Make sure you

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are tailing Andrew at bettingpros dot com, slash ericson

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe I if this hits, maybe I can finally

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get my url short. And yes, I am bettingpros dot

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>com slash you slash between underscore seth FF backs, so

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of slashes a lot of underscores in there.

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But hopefully we'll be just at SETH soon. But make

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sure you guys are checking out ericson all the wonderful

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>work he's doing at BP at Fantasy Pros as well.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>That's going to do it for us today on the

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>BP NFL show. Make sure you like this video. If

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed it, subscribe to the Bening Pros YouTube channel

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and the podcast feed. Please download the bank Pros app

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and sync your sportsbooks today. For Andrew Erickson, I'm Seth Wilcock.

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for watching. Take care of y'all.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 3>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 3>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros