WEBVTT - From the Vault:  Biophilia

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It's time for a Vault episode. This originally aired July

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>seen and this is our episode on the biophilia hypothesis. Yeah,

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this is ah. This was Edward O. Wilson's hypothesis about

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about life and how we think about life, and it's

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a very I think, uplifting idea. Granted, we you know,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about some of the pros and cons of

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis in this episode, but I think it's a

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>cool thing to take with us here in our first

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Vault episode of the new year. Yeah, I think we

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about some potential limitations of it as an idea,

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, it's hard to resist EO.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's infectious love of all things living and squirming and breathing.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely all right, So let's go ahead and dive right in.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuffworks

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And Robert.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Not too long ago we were talking about ticks, about

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>how it turns out you can get a tick on

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>your eyeball sucking the juice from within straight through the conjunctiva.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>It turns out you can get all kinds of acquired

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>diseases from ticks, like the acquired meat allergy syndrome, or

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the of course lime disease. We all know about all

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>these other diseases. Of course, the woods are full of

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>not just small animals that can hurt you, but in fact,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go up to the Northwest or

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere like that, there might be bears that could be

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a threat to you. And yet people want to go

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to the woods. Well they're lovely, dark and deep, that's

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I mean. I like to go to the woods.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And yet there's nothing in the woods that materially benefits me.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no food there, there's no like mating opportunity there.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of an odd thing to say, but

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no in a biological sense of the word,

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>nothing there for me really except an experience. And yet

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I seek that experience. I love going hiking in the woods. Yeah,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I find the same situation with with my family. We

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>go out in these these little hikes, you know, in

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta area, And yeah, we're not We're not foraging

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for berries or mushrooms or or hunting small prey. We're

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just going out there and kind of breathing air, getting

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a little exercise. And um, yeah, I mean you can.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You could break it down into those tangibles and say, well,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting some fresh air, I'm getting some exercise, I'm

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm occupying myself for the morning, I'm getting

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>away from my phone or something like this. But be

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>happen in terms of these like evolved needs, these basic

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>biological needs, they're not they're not necessarily being fulfilled. Yeah,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the woods, for some reason, seem to give you pleasure.

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing you're seeking out, even though there's not

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a real direct that. There might be indirect explanations, but

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>there's not a really direct explanation for why your body

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would be sending you there. Here's another question, why do

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we like pets? Oh yeah, I mean this is a question.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>My wife and I asked a lot about our cat

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because she's kind of a nightmare. But we so we

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>always have the discussions where like parasites. Yeah, there, she's

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>living in our house, eating our food. Uh, and what

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>does she give back? Like, she's not she's not keeping

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>mice out of our our grain or anything. She's just

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>laying around and frequently attacking my feet and sometimes barfing

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. But then but we still love her

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. She's still enriches our lives somehow. Our dog,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Charlie is an absolute parasite. He sometimes can be so annoying,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but we love this dog. This dog. He brings me

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>so much pleasure. I'm so happy to have this dog,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>even when he's barking at me to take him on

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a walk while I'm trying to work on something, or

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>or just eating a bunch of food that we have

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to pay for. I mean, from a strict material point

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of view, there's not really a reason to want to

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have this thing in my house except that I love him. Yeah.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and I bet a lot of people

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out there right now are thinking, well, I'm not a

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>dog person, I'm not a cat person. I don't like

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to go into the woods. I would I would invite

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>you to expand these definitions because I feel like there

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>are certainly individuals out there who really don't want to

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>go into the you know, the north Georgia wilderness. But

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they might be very attracted to, say, you know, the

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>desert environments of Arizona, or to other national parks, or

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>to the beach or you know, or to tropical islands

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like some. So if your local outdoor environment doesn't call you,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if specific outdoor environments don't don't call to you, then

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there have to be there are probably other natural world

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>environments that that do ring your bell. I got one

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>more for you, Robert. Why do people plant flowers in

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>their backyard? Yeah? I mean what maybe maybe you could say, Okay,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>planning flowers in the front yard could be some kind

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of social thing where you're trying to demonstrate your

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, wealth and leisure time or something like that.

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>People plant flowers in their backyard people nobody can see

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>them except you. And so again is that there There

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>appears to they're getting some kind of pleasure from having

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>these plants that are growing, that they're taking care of.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And the plants don't provide food, they don't provide any

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>material benefit except that you look at them and it

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>makes you feel good unless you're growing edible flowers. Well,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, but wait, is that a thing? I thought

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>edible flowers. You can buy them at heallefits. You can

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>seriously get a whole container of edible flowers for like,

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, eighteen bucks or something. Wait, people eat squash

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>blossom stuff, true squash blossom. But yeah, a lot of

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>people that do grow flowers. You're just growing to look

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>at them or to appreciate, say the butterflies that are

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>attracted and by them, the or the various pollinating insects. Yeah.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So we have all these weird relationships with life forms

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and natural landscapes, with pet animals, with vegetation. And if

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 1>not a dog or a cat, you think of fish, think, oh, yeah,

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know snakes, reptiles, You have the reptiles, whatever your

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fancy is, even a even a weird pet like a

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>scorpion or a tarantula. And uh and you know, I'm

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not calling you a weirdo if you have those, but

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you're probably into the weirdness of it. If you do

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>own a pet scorpion, a tarantula. What about if you

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>own pet ticks, well, then you're probably what a a

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>A a partially mythological Eastern warlord. Right. As a call

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>back to our Ticks episode, that would be great to

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have a pit of ticks in your house for when,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to threaten the children when they're being

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>too unruly, or you just have them as pets, and

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 1>people are like, whoa, you have a pit full of ticks.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That's horrible, And you're like, no, I don't. I don't

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>feed anybody to the ticks. I just keep them around.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I love to watch these little guys crawl around. So

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we're presented with a question here, and the human seek

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>out all kinds of activities and get pleasure from all

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of activities that don't appear to have any direct

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>material benefit, yet we we just like them. And so

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>one reason for this could be that it's some kind

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of cultural thing that we, you know, we grow up

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>being taught to like walking in the woods or to

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like looking at flowers, and that's possible answer. But also

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>many of these things seem very universal, like across different cultures,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people have some kind of companion animal relationship, or they

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoy certain natural landscapes, they enjoy being surrounded by certain

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>types of plants, and so another way of looking at this,

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>apart from just cultural learning, could be that there's some

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of biological instinct that connects us to other forms

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of life, even forms of life that aren't directly benefiting

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>us by say, providing food or providing shelter or something

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. And this brings us to the topic of

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>today's episode, which is a hypothesis that's been around in

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>biology and evolutionary psychology for a few decades now, known

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>as the biophilia hypothesis, and this is mainly attributed to

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the work that there have been multiple people working in

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this field now, but it's mainly attributed to the work

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the American biologist Edward O. Wilson also known as EO. Wilson. Now, Robert,

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you recently went to like the E. O. Wilson Center.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Is this a place uh from his hometown? Um, it's

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely down from his stomping grounds because Edward O.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is it was Alabama, born in the nineteen nine

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and he grew up in various Florida and Alabama towns,

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so this is very much in his his stomping grounds.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>The Edward Wilson Center is in Freeport, Florida, and um

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I and my family visited it earlier this month and

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's named in honor of Wilson. And it echoes his

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>ideas and values. And he's he's been there, he's done,

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he's he's visited the center, so he's he's he's very

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>much a part of it's it's ethos. I guess you,

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess you would say, so, what's this place like?

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's wonderful. So my family was vacationing at Graton Beach,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>which is close to Deston, But if you need a

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>broader idea of where it is, we're talking roughly halfway

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>along the coast between Pensacola and Panama City. And I

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>know that at times, if one is visiting Florida you're

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>not a Floridian yourself, there's sometimes a hesitancy to uh

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to backtrack away from the beach too much. But there

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>there are some I mean, far from from just this

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one location. There's some wonderful outdoor uh you know, things

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>to see in the States. So so don't be afraid

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to explore a bit. Uh No, I know exactly what

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. Some people really love the beach. I

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>really love the swamp. Yeah. One of my favorite places

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that have been to a few times now is uh

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Coola Springs State Park in Florida. This is where you

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have this wonderful deep natural spring. You have manateees coming

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in this rich um estuary environment with protected regions. Is

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>this where you saw the leaping fish? When we jump

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>off leaping fish, they were just leaping around like it

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was a Disney movie. It was fabulous. If you haven't

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>caught that episode, that's from I guess a year or

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so ago. Yeah, but yeah, I go back and check

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>out our episode about jumping fish. That was a more

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting topic than I expected. Yeah, that one and and

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>at times deadly. I'll make sure we linked to that

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one on the landing page for this episode is Stuff

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. But the Edward O.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Center, Yeah, so it's a wonderful indoor outdoor educational

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>center and it really does an excellent job of relating

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>biology to two young people. Most of the time, during

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the course of the year it's it's only open to

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>school groups and whatnot. But during the summer June and

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>July it's open to the public on Thursdays and Fridays.

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more about it, you can

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>go to E. O. Wilson Center dot org. Uh. But yeah,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's wonderful. There's a giant bird when you first walk

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>in the door. They are giant animals to crawl on.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's an observable bee colony honey bees you

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>can check out and try and find the queen. So

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's Edward Wilson Center, I would expect there to

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>be ants there right. There are ants. Yes, there's a

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>huge display on ants, a giant ant that you can

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>crawl on. Yeah. So it's it's it's really wonderful stuff.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I recommend going like honey, I shrunk the kids scale. Yes. Well,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>so before we get into the biophelia hypothesis, we I

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>guess we should talk about Edward Wilson himself because one

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the so he's got this book from nineteen four

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe, is from the nineteen eighties called Biophelia, where

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he first articulates this idea. Now he would explore it

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>more in a later book. Um, but this book, Biophilia

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is a is a book I've read, and it's a

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyable scientific memoir. A lot of what he talks

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>about is like his research on ants and his field

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>work in places like Suriname and Papua New Guinea, And

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so he weaves together these themes from his life and

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>from his work in science and his thoughts about what

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the role of science and society is. The the idea

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that ties this all together is this idea of biophilia

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are innate affiliation with or desire to focus on other

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>living life forms in natural landscapes or lifelike processes. Now,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some ambiguity in there, and we can address that

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ambi uity later and any problems that might cause for

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>this as a hypothesis. But he definitely has a personal

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>way of expressing his feelings about this idea, right. It

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>very much connects back to stories throughout his life. Yeah,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's important to note that Edward O. Wilson is

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he's the real deal here. He is. He's he is

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>an acclaimed scientist, uh specifically an entomologist, and he is

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a and he is a very accomplished author. Like he

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he officially retired in but he's just continued to write books,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>uh like almost every year. I mean, his bibliography is

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>incredible and his books are good. He's one of those

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>science writers who is actually a very very good writer.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>He's expressive and poetic, but he also gets to the

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>point I think he's one of the better scientists slash

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>science writers in America. Yeah and then. And he's also

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>very relatable, especially when you see him, you know, in

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>person or a video or a Ted talk. He's he's Alabamable, worn,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he's very folksy, and he describes himself as being essentially

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>still a child at heart, and he has that kind

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of enthusiasm for nature. So I mentioned he was born

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in an earlier biographical detail that often comes up and

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he attributes to being what sort of steered him into

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>studying ants is that he was seven years old and

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he blinded himself in one eye during a fishing accident,

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what. He pulled up a fish and the

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>finn got him right, and spiny finn got him in

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the eye and blinded him. And so he this led

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>him to focus more, he says, on little things, things

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that he could actually get up, you know, get up

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>close to with an eyeglass. So he turned to ants entomology.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>This game his key area of research. He attended the

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>University of Alabama and earned his bachelor's and masters in biology,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and he identified fire ants as an invasive species and

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>reported on the first US colony of fire ants. That

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was while he was in college. That was when he

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was in college, the early days for him. Um and

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is we were just talking about this before

0:13:58.200 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>we went on the air. Here there's a video on

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you to uh and it was I believe it. It

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is aligned with the E. O. Wilson Center. But it

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 1>starts off narrated by Harrison Ford and uh and in

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Attenborough comes in and talks about how how how amazing

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Edward o'wilson is. So this this video is weird for

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple reasons, and one of them is that you hear

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Ford trying to sound enthusiastic about something, which I

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I've ever heard before. Yeah, you know,

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the most chronically bored and unenthusiastic actor in the history

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of cinema, and we love him for it. But he's

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about the greatness of the work of Edward Wilson,

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and he still kind of has that that lake onic, sad,

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not very excited edge in his voice. Yeah, even though

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this is this is clearly like he's clearly passionate about it,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you did this for a reason. But later on

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in the video, you're following Edward o Wilson, like recent

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Edward O. Wilson, Old Edward O. Wilson wandering around in

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the Florida wilderness, coming up to uh a fire ant colony.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>He reaches down with his bare hand, stirs them up

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like scrapes the nest and they all begin to swarm.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And then he sticks his hand in the nest and

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>lets them crawl in his hand and lets them begin

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to uh to attack his hand and uh and then

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he brushes them off. But it really demonstrates his man

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>his devotion to connecting with the natural world and his

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>fascination with the With these insects, well, it's almost deranged

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's he's like smiling gleefully as they're all stinging

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and attacking the back of his hand. He's got these

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of ants on his skin and he's like each

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one of these bites is like a hot needle. But

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it it just shows you how, you know, how fascinated

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he is with them like that he would have this

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>really kind of a holy moment, Like I kept thinking

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of St. Francis with the animals, only instead of touching

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a you know, petting a lamb, he's petting fire ants.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>If lambs could sting. Yes, so um Edward O. Wilson

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>h So, he moved onto Harvard in nine and he

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>joined the faculty there and again he retired in UH.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But but he remains on as an honorary curator in

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>entomology and he's during the course of his career again,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>he's written numerous books. He's received more awards than we

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>can list in this podcast, including the Pulitzer Prize, which

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>he I believe received at least twice. UH. He's received

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Ted Prize and the U S National Medal of

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Science again just to name a few. Now, a lot

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of Wilson's efforts outside of his scientific research over the

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>years have been focused on the idea of conservation and

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>preservation of nature. Yes, that we have this rich biodiversity.

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything is connected, and we have to preserve it because

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if you start you start pulling things out, you start

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>allowing things to go dark in this epic grid of

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>by a biodiverse um life, then you're gonna have cascading

0:16:55.720 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>collapses and you're going to You're going to to risk

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>tremendous damage to our ecosystem. He sort of reminds me

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of the influence of somebody who I enjoyed talking about

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>last year in our summer reading episode, which is the

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>early ecologist Alexander von Humboldt sort of responsible for the

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of ecology, both focusing on the inner connections between

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>things in nature. How an organism doesn't No organism is

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>an island, It doesn't stand on its own, and they

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>all have connected inter dependencies. And we we we threaten

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>natural life forms at our own peril. And I think

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>he frames this in two ways. He says, you know,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>destroying natural habitats and destroying organisms that may in fact

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of keystone species in a natural ecology

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that threatens us materially, like these can have negative effects

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>on our health. It can lead to the spread of

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>new diseases, It can make resources harder to get, it

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>can cause all kinds of problems for us materially. But

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>he also emphasizes a lot just just the feeling of

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>pleasure we get from nature and how important it is

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to our sense of well being and happiness to have

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>intact natural ecologies around us. And this is sort of

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 1>how he gets to the biophilia hypothesis. All Right, we're

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, and when we come back

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we will dive into the biophilia hypothesis and discuss what

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's saying. Uh, and also eventually we also get to

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>some criticism about it. All right, we're back. So Wilson

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>proposed this term biophilia meaning the love of life in

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the short publication back in biophilia the human bond with

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>other species, and he defined this as humanities innate tendency

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to focus on living things as opposed to the inanimate,

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and in effect, he argued for in innate love of nature.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Now there you already see some tension in the definitions, right,

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because in one statement there it's talking about focusing on

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>other life forms and lifelike processes, and in the other

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>statement it's saying that we naturally love nature. Now, focusing

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on things and loving them are different. And this is

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of the problems people have raised

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with the biofilia hypothesis is um that it may not

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>be exactly pinned down on exactly what the hypothesis is saying.

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But for now we we should just try to explain

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the way it's usually expressed by people who are in

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>favor of the biofilia hypothesis, and they tend to go

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>with the focus idea, right, that it's that we focus

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>on other living things and lifelike processes, where for some

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>reason we're way more interested in trees than we are

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in rocks. Now. I should also add that the term

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>biofiliate itself was used earlier in the nineties sixties by

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the German social psychologist Eric from to denote a psychological

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>orientation towards nature. But uh, it was really Lee Wilson

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>who then took it and tweet the meaning and really

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>led to its primary usage today. Well, maybe we should

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>read a passage from Wilson to see what what he

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>has to say about the concept. He says, the object

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of my reflection can be summarized by a single word, biophilia,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>which I will be so bold as to define as

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the innate tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>From infancy, we concentrate happily on ourselves and other organisms.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We learned to distinguish life from the inanimate and move

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>toward it like moths to a porch. Light. Novelty and

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>diversity are particularly esteemed. The mere mention of the word

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>extraterrestrial evokes reveries about still unexplored life, displacing the old

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and once potent exotic that drew earlier generations to remote

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>islands and jungled interiors. That much is immediately clear, but

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a great deal more needs to be added. I will

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>make the case that to explore and affiliate with life

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is a deep and complicated process in mental development, to

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>an extent still undervalued and philosophy and religion. Our our

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>existence depends on this propensity. Our spirit is woven from it.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Hope rises on its currents. Yeah, I like that, and

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so I like that he's he's situating biophilia as a

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sort as a hypothesis to explain something about our nature.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But it also, I think for him takes on a

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of propulsive meaning about like how we should act.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That if we act in accordance with with these natural

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>urges to affiliate with nature, we can sort of shed

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this man conquers nature mentality that was present in a

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of human history. And you might wonder, like, Okay,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>so if throughout a lot of human history we've had

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this mentality of you know, we've got to tame the

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>beast of nature, We've got to make it bend to

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>our will and defeat our predatory adversaries wild? Is that

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is that tendency throughout human history a challenge to the

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>bio philly a hypothesis. I don't know, what do you think, Robert, Well,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss this a little bit more as we go.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But I do find it interesting that even in environmental circles,

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>even in um, in environmental movements, you see them, you

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>see individuals evoke this idea of mastery over nature. You know,

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it becomes this idea of saving the planet, positioning man,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>is this as as not completely you know, dishonestly, but

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>positioning us as individuals with power over nature, and therefore

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we should use our power over nature to rain things

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in and gain control over the situation. I like the

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>way you put it there with about the idea of

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>saving the planet, Like why do what does it mean

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about saving the whales versus not hurting

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the whales? I mean essentially you're you're saying the same thing,

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>but they're starting with different assumptions. Uh. When if you

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>were to say save the whales, it almost says like,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have of two fates on a scale

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that we control, and we can press one side down

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>or press the other side down, save them or kill them.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But really the idea is that on their own they'd

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be fine. We are doing things to them to kill them.

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not like they were naturally going extinct

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>when we found them. Yeah, so you could have you

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>can have one person that's saying save the whales, and

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the other person could say, let's live in harmony with

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the whales. Ultimately they may be arguing for the same thing,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but that but each argument cast humanity and its role

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with nature in a slightly different light. Yeah, and so

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the the stop harming the environment as opposed

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to save the environment might be better because it better

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>emphasizes the fact that we we live alongside all the

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>other organisms in the environment and we need them. They're

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not like pets that we're deciding what to do with.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, then again, messaging is aimed at at the listener,

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and there are going to be certain group, certain individuals

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that are going to react more strongly to two different

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>arguments and say, hey, you have the power to say

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>some whales. Don't you want to say some whales? Yeah,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that made me feel really good. But if you say, hey, man,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>stop killing the whales. Stop hurting the whale, stop wrecking

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>our environment. You know that puts sometimes a negative spin

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on it that is not going to be as embraced

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>by an individual or group. Yeah. I guess it's the

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>superhero mentality. You want to be the superhero and save

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the bus full of children. It's not all that exciting

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to say that you wouldn't harm a bus full of children. Yeah.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I have one more quote from Wilson I want to

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>read before we move forward. He just because this is

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just another example of his his beautiful ability to to

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>sum up so many of these environmental ideas. He says,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the living environment is what really sustains us. The living

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>environment creates the soil, creates most of the atmosphere. It

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>is not just something out there. The biosphere is a membrane,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a very thin membrane of living organism. Now it's important

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to point out that as a scientific HYPOTHESI this if

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Biophelia has anything to say, it should have something to say,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>meaning that it shouldn't just be you know, people love nature, right,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>because we that's sort of obvious. People do generally tend

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to love nature in one way or another, even if

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not really an outdoors person, You probably have some

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of preference for natural shapes, for plant environments, for

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>things like that over dead, dry, uninhabited landscapes. I mean,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think about picture the surface of the Moon or Mars

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Does that look like a place

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to live? No, But at the same time

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is an environment, right. I Mean, we

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about Arabia Mountain yesterday, which is a

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>local hiking area in the Atlanta area, and we were saying, Oh,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it's great, it's like walking on another planet. It's like

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>being on the moon. Yeah, it's cool for a couple hours.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a place that I would want to live,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, because well, even though there are some plants

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>on it, the thing about Arabia Mountain is it's placed

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>near atlant know where it's this this outcropping of mostly

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>bald stone that has no soil. It has no plants.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>There are a few little groves on it that have

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>trees and bushes growing up out of them, but mostly

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just bare rock. And while I'm there, it's cool,

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 1>but it's cool for exactly the reason that it's not

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a place I'd want to stay. Does that make sense?

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>But how do you feel about the desert. I like

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the desert, but the desert is full of life. I

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know how i'd feel about, well, the desert I've

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>been to. I mean, like, I've been to the Chihuahua

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Desert and it's full of life. It's fascinating. And the

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>life in the desert when you come to like a

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>place where there's a river flowing through a desert and

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>there's green radiating out away from it, the life you

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>see becomes all the more precious because of how scarce

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the greenery and things are in other places around. Now

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a place that's just pure sand dunes with no life

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>forms at all, I don't know. That's cool to look

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>out for a few minutes, but I don't know if

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>i'd want to stay there. Okay, uh yeah, I guess

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna vary from from person to person, but I

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear from anyone out there is Listening's like, yes,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>build me a cabin in a out on the sand

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>dunes and would be happy. Uh. You might have might

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to put a make a stronger argument for it.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Now to your point about this being a hypothesis too,

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and about it being scientific scientifically grounded. Is that on

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>one hand, yes, biophilia involves an ethos and uh and

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of just commentary on what it is to

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be human and the human experience. But then there is

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>also the the idea that there's at least in part

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a genetically and involved, that this is something that is

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>going to go deeper than just uh, you know how

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we're nurtured, but it's going to get down to our

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>core biological nature. Yeah, this would make it biologically testable.

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's say, it's that our tendency to affiliate with nature,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes is

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow determined by our gene, or at least it's primed

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>by our genes. Gene primed learning is a thing that

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>they often emphasize. So that should, in theory be testable

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in some way if you're clear enough about what it

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is you're looking for. So maybe we should talk about

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the commonly cited evidence by biophilia theorists. What

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do they say are good reasons to think that we

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>have this innate, in inherited tendency to affiliate with other

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>life forms? All right, well, here's some of the here's

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the anecdotal evidence. All right, Um, so, first

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of all, universal appreciation for nature across human cultures. Now

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we've already touched on this a little bit, but it's

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>just the idea that would no matter where you go,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be nature and natural elements wrapped up

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in that culture. And Uh, one example that I really

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>like is people in very different cultures over the world

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>tend to like a particular kind of landscape, a landscape

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that just happens to be similar to the Pleistocene savannas. Uh,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that we evolved to thrive in the ideal savannah. Yeah,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is related to a concept to known and

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary psychology is the environment of evolutionary adapted nous or

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the e e A, which is basically the idea that

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>animals tend to be adapted not to live anywhere on Earth,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but for a particular landscape or type of environment that

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>shaped their genes. And if that's the case, you've sort

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of like put your chips down on being the kind

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of organism that thrives in this kind of place. And

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as such, you should have some kind of mechanisms in

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>your brain that tell you seek out that kind of

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.959
<v Speaker 1>place where you play best. Yes, now this I love this.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh this this theory in this idea about art though,

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>because if you spend any time in museums, you run

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>across the landscapes. And sometimes I'm not I'm not too

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>much of a landscape guy. I tend to walk by

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the unless there's something really cool going on,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>such as uh we were just in the last episode

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about or one of our previous episodes talking about

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>landscape with the fall of Vicharus by h was it

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Bosha brugle I can't brugle b and uh, so you

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have one detail of a falling mythological figure, but then

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>also just a natural landscape with human activity and nature

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.479
<v Speaker 1>going on. So when you do, when you look at

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these these works of landscape art, you

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>find open spaces of low grasses interspersed with copses of trees.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>The trees tend to fork near the ground, which is

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, if they're tree, their trees you could scramble

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>up into if you needed to get away from something.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>There's water close by or in the distance, so you

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like you're going to necessarily dry up or

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you or you'd be able to take a

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>swim if you got overheated, or there's there are indications

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of animal life, maybe birds in the distance, as well

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as diverse green ory. And finally, get this, a path

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or a road, perhaps a river bank or a shoreline

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that extends into the distance, almost inviting you to follow it.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>And in this type of landscape is generally regard it

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is beautiful, even by people in countries that don't have it.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, like your your culture might not have a

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of landscape art, but you're gonna there's a very

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>good chance you're going to encounter another culture's landscape art

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna get it. You know, you can be complete.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You could have never seen any you know, say Chinese

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or Japanese landscape art, and then you would view it

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and you'd be like, yeah, I totally get it, and

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you're just drawn into it. You you want to

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>crawl into the painting and run around with the trees. Okay.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So this is commonly cited anecdotal evidence about the kinds

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of art and imagery people prefer. Now, I would say,

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>as a counter example, as long as we're sticking with

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>anecdotal for now, and when we're not claiming to have

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>some kind of strong empirical case. I'd say, just personally,

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>when I think about landscape images, I like the most.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I like mountain images. Yeah, well, you know, one of

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>these things is that to what is often going on

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in a mountain image. I mean, you're gonna have some

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody or something standing at a peak looking out just

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>having you know, mastery over the landscape, being able to

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>survey everything around you and see predators approaching you from

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a distance. You could very much argue that that's an

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary adaptation as well. Yeah, because exactly having having the

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>higher ground gives you the ability to see what's coming

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in in multiple directions. But of course that isn't exactly biophilia,

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because that that's talking about landscapes, w It's not really

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about organisms or lifelike processes. Though. One thing I

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>will point out is that in some of the biophilia

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>literature there does seem to be sometimes a kind of

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>blurry nous or fuzziness about whether we're talking still just

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about natural organisms, or whether this is turning into a

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>preference for natural types of landscapes as opposed to I

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what cities or something like that. Yeah. Now,

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and another example that comes up is the fact that

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the earliest human art works are the the

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the various cave paintings that show you know, realistic animals,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>realistic human beings and uh and uh, and also just

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>decorative motifs that are clearly inspired by natural world organisms. Totally. Yeah,

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you see these these ancient reverent images, and they tend

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be what they tend to be animals, Yeah, especially

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>prey animals that you might be hunting. Yeah, exactly. And

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, these date back thirty two thousand years in

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the case of some of the French cave paintings that

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, and if you if you consider shell necklaces

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot, which might be stretching the argument a little bit,

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but that can take you back a good hundred thousand years. Now.

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that, there are other anecdotal examples, like landscape architecture

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is full of of of examples of this. I ran

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>across some of some material by Bill Brown and Keith

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Bowers and Carol Franklin, all of them landscape architects and uh,

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and they point out that you're just frekently going to

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>encounter actual nature inside of of a building. You're going

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to counter fish tanks and plants you can encounter. Uh,

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, ornaments and patterns that read like nature. So

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it might be you say, you're in Florida and then

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>you go into a beach resort. But is there going

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to be some sort of pineapple design, you know on

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the pillars or on the wallpaper. Uh, you have to

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>take that into account and uh and oh and then

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.959
<v Speaker 1>that opens savannah that we crave. Well, you could argue

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that we also create it to some extent in our

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>golf courses. You're right, golf courses. In a way, it's

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a weird combination, like the ultimate mastery over nature.

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>You and you enslave nature and just turn it into

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>your own yard game then and bend it to your will.

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 1>But still you're you're evoking certain natural motifs, you know. Yeah,

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I'm so impressed by that. I

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like you've golf courses. You just blew my Savannah

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis skepticism out of the water. And uh, I mean

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it does go to show that the idea of biophilia,

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>there's like overt biophilia and then biophilia in ways that

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>you didn't even realize you were. You were, you know,

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>employing it. Like. Another example of that is the symbolic

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>use of nature and human language. Oh yeah, all our

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>metaphors are nature metaphors. Yeah, you know a lot of

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them are very over you know, blind

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>as a bat. Wise, is it now pretty as a peacock,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy as a rat as an outhouse rat? Um? Whoa,

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>whoa what? Oh yeah, thats a real expression, just like that,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>as crazy as an outhouse rat. And then there's crazy

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as a rat and a coffee can I love a

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>good crazy rat? Uh? Analogy there? But how about a

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bull in a China shop? A bull in a China

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>shop is good too. Of course, China shops are not

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>very uh, very much part of our revolutionary adapted landscape.

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>But but but the bull is the bull, the bull

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and various other animals as a way to evoke personality,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. And the thing is, these are these are

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>just some of the obvious ones, but it gets a

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more elegant, to the point that you're not always

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>aware that you're invoking animal imagery in your language, but

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's there. Oh and then I mean we could go

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on for forever here about about spiritual everance for nature

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>across cultures totally. Ye, think of all the sacred places

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in global myth, from dentic gardens to sacred mountains to

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 1>primordial oceans like we discussed in our recent episode about

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 1>creating a universe. Yeah, I agree with that, though yet

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>again there were somewhat blurring the original definition. If the

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.919
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis is supposed to be about organisms, Wait a minute,

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about landscapes or just organism? Well, let's

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about organisms. Let's look at all those gods and

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>demigods that we have rolling about, uh how much? I mean,

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly there are examples of very anthropomorphic deities that are

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>just pretty much just tall bearded people. But yet even

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>in even say Abrahamic tradition, you have what you have

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>winged angels that's invoking uh like you know, hybrid or

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 1>or chimerical imagery. And then you have just straight up yeah,

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you have the world serpents. You have celestial dragons in

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese mythology that are themselves com posits of all these

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>various animal motifs. And of course you look at the

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>pantheon of the Hindu deities and you see all of

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>these wonderful animal forms. Now, Wilson himself is very much

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 1>into the idea of serpent imagery throughout human culture. As

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>one example of that, he sites of biophilia. But this

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>goes into Wilson's broader definition of biophilia because as some

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>people employ the term, they think that it just means

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like love of other organisms or love of nature. Wilson

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.720
<v Speaker 1>goes with that focus on that our attention is naturally

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>drawn to and stuck on other organisms, especially organisms that

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of evolutionary relevance for us, and one

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of the examples is the widespread biophobia of snakes. So

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>for Wilson, biophobia is actually a subset of biophilia. We've

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>got this relationship with other organisms, and so the serpent

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>human mind relationship is something that that he really focuses on.

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>He talks about how common snake dreams are across human cultures,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>how common snake imagery is in religions on all all

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>parts of the planet, how common snake imagery is an

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>art that they're just snakes everywhere, we apparently can't get

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>them off the brain. And then he also compares this

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to the way that other primates seem to react to

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>snakes with with greater alarm and magnitude of activity than

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they would too many other types of animals of comparable size.

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean, and and it goes beyond beyond

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that indo our various pet animals. If anyone's ever conducted

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the cucumber test with a cat, replace the cucumber on

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the the the floor behind them when they're not looking. No,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll turn around, and if they glimpse the cucumber they'll jump. Whoa, um,

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had I have not had a lot of luck

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with this experiment with my own cat, granted how many

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>times he tried. Only when I'm holding a cucumber in

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen and I looked down and see the cat

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>facing the other way. So maybe you need longer cucumbers, yeah,

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>or just more you know, I should, I should plan

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 1>more in my cat experiments. But then, of course, anyone

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>who's in who's ever and involved themselves with horses knows.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know how a horse can behave if it sees

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a snake. I mean, and and I'm not even sure

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about dogs. I assume dogs have strong reactions to serpents

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, I'd imagine just the other day, my

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.919
<v Speaker 1>dog Charlie tried to eat a dead one. Oh well,

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we're out walking. It's there on the sidewalk, belly up,

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>rotting a little bit and he he saw a snack.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Do yank him away? You have to get in there now.

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Back to the idea of religion and UH in biophilia,

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also think that that heavily nature line

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>faiths illustrate this as well, such as like Shinto comes

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>to mind, you know, the Japanese UH mentality that there

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is UH. You know, there's a there's a spiritual energy

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and all things. And granted some of that includes rocks

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but statues, but it can you know, certainly includes a

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>natural forms as well an organism UH. And there's actually

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>an excellent article in the New York Times from this week.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>By the time you hear it, it it will be like

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks old, I guess. But it's about

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>resurgent religious faith in China and the environmental activism that

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>is coming with it. And it's hardly an underground thing.

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>President Jijin Ping has a champion to return to interest

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese culture and particularly Taoism and Confusism. So and

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>part of this is countering Western influences, but he's called

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for China to return to its roots as a quote,

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>ecological civilization. Now, the article also points out that the

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>movement as vote motivating Chinese Buddhists, Christians, and Muslims as well.

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's it's always I think worth reminding

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>everyone that the China is is home to fifty five

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>distinct ethnic groups, even if Han is the majority there. Uh,

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're also numerous religious faiths. Now, I wonder how

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this initiative plays into the Chinese government's enabling of heavy

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>polluting industry. I mean, of course they're not unique in

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>government to enable that. But no, no, that's a that's

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a a fair fair criticism, and I think that's certainly

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 1>a conflict in uh in China, uh presently um. And

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are other motivations as well, such as

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the U S sort of taking a

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a lesser role in the environmental leadership, that there's a

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>place for someone like China to step up and assume power.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's power here as well. Uh, that's that's at stake.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But as this article by Javierra see Hernandez points out,

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>there's there's more of an emphasis in these resulting environmental

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 1>movements on living in harmony with nature rather than what

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is perceived as a Western take on saving the Earth.

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>To come back to the distinction we were talking about earlier,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's don't kill the whales, not save the whales, right, Yeah.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is interesting in light of by affiliate,

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's very in keeping with the message

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of stewardship understanding biodiversity. But at the same time we

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>see that that very savior message, uh, you know, invoked

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in materials promoting Edward Wilson and biophilia that like that

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Ford video we're talking about. He describes that quote

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as an epic battle to save our planet and it

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>will involve swords and magic staves. And then you know,

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>there are some people will actually bring a technology into

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this argument as well. Wilson himself said that the more

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we understand organisms through science, the closer we become to them. Uh.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>And while technology can arguably distance ourselves from nature as well,

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it can bring us closer. Molecular biology and genetic engineering,

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, bring us closer to nature because is a

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>greater understanding. And you can even argue that the search

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for extraterrestrial life too is a biophilic endeavor. Oh, I mean,

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the CT is almost perfect example of biophilia if there

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>is any merit to the idea, because like, there are

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 1>millions of planets out there that we could be interested in,

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and what are we interested in. We're interested in the

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that have life on them. Now that could you

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>could say that there there's just sort of like a

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>cognitively recognized self preservation instinct right that we we say, Okay,

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if there's another planet with life on it out there

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 1>could be a threat to us, could help us, so

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have motivations based in our cognitive capacities to

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>understand that life has this this value out there. But

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not the only kind of life we're interested in.

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>People have been looking for microbes in the soil of

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Mars for decades. Now, you know, we scoop up the

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>soil of Mars and we want to see things alive

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in it. Why do we care so much about that?

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and that's not just scientists who care. I

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>understand why scientists care because it's part of their life's work.

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:45.919
<v Speaker 1>But the average person really does care. Usually whether there's

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>life on Mars. That's an interesting question to them. Why, Well,

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 1>because the answer ends up saying I mean, it ends

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>up saying something about ourselves and about life itself, you know.

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But but also I think just because life is interesting,

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that the presence of life somewhere makes that place so

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 1>much more fascinating than an otherwise dead rock covered in

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>loose soil and stones. This makes me want to see

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>more sort of darkly Edward Wilson type characters and some

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 1>of our sci fi horror. You know, someone who's going

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to really just reach out and touch the xenomorphs and

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>love them. I guess we do see characters like that

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the various alien films that Brad Dworf comes to

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:30.280
<v Speaker 1>mind in the Alien Resurrection. I can't speak any anything

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>positive but Thelian Resurrection. Let's move on. All right, Well,

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to DA Let's take one more quick break,

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back we'll get into measurable bio

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>biological evidence for biophilia as well as some evidence against it. Alright,

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So so far we've been talking not super

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>rigorously about science. We've been talking about general anecdotal observations

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>about people's behavi of vir about culture, about our own feelings,

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine, but that's not going to prove a

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 1>scientific hypothesis and make it a workable theory, right. And

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and Edward Wilson has has been pretty clear throughout his

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>career with this that like, there's not strong evidence for it,

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that there I think he more recently said, yeah, there's

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 1>stronger evidence for it, but he's not He realizes that

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence is not there yet. A lot of more

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>research is required. But some of the measurable evidence that's

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out there. We've already touched on this a little bit,

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but measurable physiological responses and humans that are exposed to

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.839
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just images of snakes or spiders, right, There has

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 1>been actual empirical research on this, and and it's comparing

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>our responses as humans to the responses especially of other primates,

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, is there some inherited, uh genetic component

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to our reactions to these animals that's not just culturally learned. Yes,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that in a way, there's just like there's there's awareness,

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's an important like sub cognitive awareness, you know. And

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the the idea of biophobia, this

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>would be a biophobia that Wilson would include underneath his

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>definition of biophilia, it would be a natural focus or

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 1>attention that we give to certain types of organisms. Now,

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>another big area and this is this is certainly an

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>area where there been a number of of studies over

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the years, and we can easily do a whole episode

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on it. But the importance of sunlight on mood and productivity.

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm, Now how would that because obviously the sunlight

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is not like an organism, so right, but it's it's

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe the argument is that you're getting into the

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that like being being outdoors, being in nature, there

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are there are aspects of nature that yes, aren't directly

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>aligned with organisms but aren't but is responsible for organisms

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have this innate connection with. So

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this is expanding the definition. And I have seen this

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.720
<v Speaker 1>done and some people who talk about the subject expanding

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the definition to say that it's not just the desire

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to affiliate with organisms, it with natural environments. Like when

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>people talk about how it's people want to seek out water,

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>being by the water or something like that, and that's

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, not necessarily being by a pool, but being

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>by a natural river, lake or something like that. Uh,

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that could be Yeah, I guess that could be a

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>peripheral or related type of idea. Now, another area of

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>measurable effect here ties in with study by Roger Yuruk

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 1>which found that patients recovering from surgery actually recovered much

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more effectively uh if they were viewing trees and shrubs

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to those who would just had a view

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>out their window of a brick wall. They also ended

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>up taking half the painkillers and made half the nursing calls.

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So there was like a change in their behavior, and

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not just in their reported effect, but in what they

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>actually did. If they could see some vegetation, Yeah, if

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they just if they could just see some trees and

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you know, presumably maybe some squirrels and

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>birds in there as well. M So this is part

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of a broader body of literature on the benefits of

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>vegetative environments. There's been a lot of research like this,

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 1>some of it also associated with the same guy uh

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Roger Ulric and across different studies. People have this positive

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic reaction to plant filled environments, and these environments are

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>usually found to have some kind of stress reducing effect

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>or somehow this otherwise restorative effect on mood and on behavior.

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And this goes beyond vegetation as well. For example, people

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to report reductions in stress or show fewer stress

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>behaviors in the presence of an aquarium has live fish

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in it. Or how about the often report. I mean,

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to tell you about all of the

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>tons of studies that report the health benefits and mood

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:50.720
<v Speaker 1>benefits of exposure to pets, companion animals, you know, lowering

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>your blood pressure and all, you know, all the stuff

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like that over the years. Yeah, I think it's one

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that you you have these hospital animals

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that make the rounds and just meeting Greek people. Uh,

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>just the idea being that this will this will improve

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 1>their their condition at least in a small sense, but

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a measurable sense. One other thing I've read about this

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting is the idea of humans preference for certain geometric patterns.

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>For example, uh So, geometric patterns can be expressed in

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of what are called fractal patterns, that are repeating

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 1>patterns that are often said to resemble designs found in

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 1>biological organisms and in nature. So if you look down

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:34.320
<v Speaker 1>at surfaces of the earth from above, say winding rivers

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>through a plain or how mountain, how you know, the

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the drainage areas in mountains form these these spiky patterns

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>looking down from above, or if you look at the

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>branches of trees, or of ferns, or of the spirals

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and flowering plants. I mean, it gets into the golden ratio, right.

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the idea that if you if you do

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:59.320
<v Speaker 1>any image editing out there, you you know, you often

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.399
<v Speaker 1>bring one of these overlays, even sometimes like I used

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the rule of thirds one a lot, which is a

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>very in organic way of of breaking up your photo.

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 1>But you can also bring in essentially a snail shell

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so you can see this curve. Because so you end

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>up with situations where people are like, they may not

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>be actually thinking this, but essentially they're looking at an

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 1>image and saying, oh this this photograph of race cars

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>is great, but I'd love it a little bit more.

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It evoked an image of a snail shell, you know. Now, yeah,

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't think it consciously, but people do. In

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some studies show preferences for fractal patterns, geometric fractal patterns

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>at certain levels of of density branching, and these basically

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are said to correspond to the most common patterns seen

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in natural organisms. So if you're thinking about branching trees

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or mangrove roots or things like that, these are geometric

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>patterns that are brains seem to prefer looking at. Now,

0:50:57.000 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, one question about that is if we're respond

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:04.239
<v Speaker 1>in the geometric patterns through some innate preference in our

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 1>brain that's not just culturally learned, but we we've got

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>these inherited genetic preferences for things that spike at this

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>angle this many times. One wonder is if that means

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>you could trick your brain into satisfying any kind of

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>biophilic impulse to whatever extent that is real, just by

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at dead geometric patterns or things like that that

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>simulate whatever it is we notice in nature that we like, Yeah,

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think here we get we get down to

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this situation where biophilia it's kind of like the echoes

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of biophilia throughout our our life and our culture and

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>our creations. Even things that don't you know, aren't overtly

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a statue of an animal or the the avocation of

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of an animal's form, Uh, there's still aspects of it

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:52.879
<v Speaker 1>there that are resonating through most of what we do. Now,

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time to talk about some criticisms of

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea because if you if you can't tell I've

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>got some reservations about aphilia. At the same time that

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I find it strongly, intuitively persuasive, I also recognize that

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea it's got some problems. So I wanted to

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about one study I read that was published inn

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and the journal Environmental Values, which is a peer reviewed

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.840
<v Speaker 1>environmental ethics journal by the author's joy and to Block

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>called Nature and I are to a critical examination of

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the biophilia hypothesis. And like I said, while I I

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:30.320
<v Speaker 1>intuitively respond to a lot of what Wilson and people

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like him have said, I think this article makes some

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>good points. So they're arguing against the biophilia hypothesis, and

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't argue that we don't have natural inherited tendencies

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to focus on living things. But they're more talking about

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>whether biophilia, as a commonly understood idea is a coherent

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 1>scientific construct. So this is the author's take. Biophilia is

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.280
<v Speaker 1>presented as a hypothesis, and they say, Okay, that's fine,

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:01.359
<v Speaker 1>because when you're at the hypothesis age in science. You're

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 1>not saying this is a proven theory or something like that.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>You're just saying, we're speculating about something that appears to

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be the case. Let's do some experiments and find out

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's true. That would be fine. But there's one

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>key criterion for a hypothesis, and that's that it needs

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>to be falsifiable. Now, this is buying into one particular

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>theory about the demarcation problem separating science from pseudoscience. We've

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about that before, but this is a very commonly

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>accepted solution of the demarcation problem. A hypothesis should be

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a statement that you can come up with some kind

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of way of showing whether it's true or false, that

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you could prove it false. Now, they turned to the

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>biophelia definition that's often offered by E. O. Wilson, which

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is quote, the innate tendency to focus on life and

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lifelike processes. And they break that into three key parts,

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a the innate tendency be to focus and

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>see on life or lifelike processes. So they start by

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:01.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about life or life like processes, and this is

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a good point. They say, Okay, so how is life

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 1>like defined? The hypothesis is often expanded to include things like,

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about natural landscapes water features as the

0:54:12.280 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>object of biophilia, So is a waterfall an object of biophilia?

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a waterfall is not alive, but biophilia theorists sometimes

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>assert that moving water features and other things are lifelike

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 1>enough that they can be grouped under the biophilia rubric.

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And on what basis do we conclude that? Like what

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gets ruled in? And do people looking at a waterfall

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>really start thinking of it in the same way they

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:41.439
<v Speaker 1>would think of an organism? I'm not sure that there's

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>strong evidence for that. Well, I mean, I mean, if

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you take the waterfall and you just think about flowing water,

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, flowing waters is a habitat for organisms. Uh.

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, in any place where there's some

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of a dynamic with flowing water, there's a potential

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for the the capture and consumption of said organisms. Yeah.

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I see that, But that that almost begs a greater

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the statement of the hypothesis, right, It seems

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like that would make it an innate tendency to focus

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on life or lifelike processes or environments that could sustain

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>life or lifelike processes. But then you can also come

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>back and say, what is a what is a branching uh,

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:26.360
<v Speaker 1>waterway but a bit of branching vein through a body?

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Like does the form of the flowing water evoke the

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>flow of blood through an organism or the you know,

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the chambers inside a plant. I mean, that's a good point,

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I guess the question would be are

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>people really seeing it that way? Like, is that is

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that entering their minds? Or are they just responding to

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>water because sometimes you get thirsty, yeah, Or it's just

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really loud, or they just like these moving features, or

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there's some other thing about it that's yeah. So I

0:55:56.520 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's a decent point to raise. The next thing

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:02.279
<v Speaker 1>they focus on is the idea of focusing. So in

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that definition, there's some wishy washing us about what the

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>human who experiences biophilia does. Like sometimes biophilia is treated

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as the desire to quote affiliate with other organisms, And

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, that means we would assume it to mean

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that you want to be near them, you want to

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:21.920
<v Speaker 1>look at them, you want to touch them, you want

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to interact with them. But other times there's this more

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:29.319
<v Speaker 1>neutral word focus used. And and because of our biophilia,

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the ideas we focus on living organisms, they sort of

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>command our attention living organisms or lifelike processes. But they

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>point out that there's there's not necessarily consistency here. Ulric

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to define biophilia as a positive affiliation with life forms.

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Wilson himself includes biophobia within the definition of biophilia, and

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>one of his primary examples, as we talked about, is

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this nearly universal mental obsession with snakes and frightening snake imagery. Um,

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so they say that, you know, this part of the

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:03.319
<v Speaker 1>definition really does need to be more specific. We need

0:57:03.360 --> 0:57:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what we're talking about here. Is it

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 1>just what we like or is it what gets our

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>attention or what is going on? Well, and this raises

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>questions too. I mean, it makes me think about about

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 1>deer hunters, you know, which you can relate to having

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:20.280
<v Speaker 1>grown up uh in the South in Tennessee because it

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was not a deer hunter myself, but nor I have

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>known many. Yeah, and there's a it's sometimes tricky I

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think for for people who aren't affiliated with that culture

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or haven't really given it much thought to to understand.

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>But there is a love for nature, and you're gonna

0:57:34.280 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>love for deer, I think with with a lot of

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe even most maybe all deer hunters. You know, there's

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a and there's this at times kind of difficult to

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:45.800
<v Speaker 1>understand reverence for the deer. You know, you see like

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>deer stickers on people's car and the trophies of of

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 1>their heads, um, you know, hung in their homes almost

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>with a like a religious zeal, almost like it's some

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>some ancient uh you know antler god. Well, I mean

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it mimics the behavior of our ancient ancestors. Who would

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you who might, in some kind of religious way take

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 1>pieces of an animal that they had killed primarily for

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>material resources. You know, you'd want its meat, you'd want

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>its hide for clothing or something like that. But what

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do you do with the antlers? They become some kind

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of religious artifact, your tools. Yeah, all right, Well what

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 1>about part A that innate part? Right? Then this is

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>another important part. So this means that biophelic tendencies are

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are not learned through culture, but they're inherited biologically. And

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this would generally be accepted to mean that they had

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>adaptive value in the past, right, they served us some purpose,

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we adapted to favor them. And there's not

0:58:43.560 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 1>always agreement on what form these adaptive mechanisms take, what

0:58:48.040 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whether they stem from the same general mechanism, or what

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>their relative importance is. So the authors reformulate the hypothesis

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to fit all the nuances they've just brought in, and

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it becomes there is a set of genetic predispositions of

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>different strength, involving different sorts of affective states toward different

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of lifelike things. You can see the problem here, right,

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is becoming so broad as to accommodate almost anything,

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes really hard to falsify since there's just

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>so much wiggle room in that in that definition of

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the proposition, and it creeps more towards just a pure

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 1>ethos or philosophy as opposed to something you can scientifically

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>test for. Right. Uh Now, to be fair to the

0:59:30.560 --> 0:59:33.960
<v Speaker 1>biophelia theorists, the authors point out that this could be

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of unreasonably broad definition. Uh. That's an artifact

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that they're trying to synthesize the work

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of different researchers working within the biophelia framework, and that

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it's possible for one individual scientist maybe to have a tighter, sturdier,

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 1>more testable version of the hypothesis, though the authors don't

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:55.479
<v Speaker 1>really seem to favor any of the particular ones they've

0:59:55.520 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>come across. But if so, I think what they're thinking

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen is that biophelia theorists should identify the leaner,

1:00:02.240 --> 1:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>more specific hypothesis and unify their experiments underneath it. They

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>also they attack some of the specific evidence given for

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the common legs of the biophilia hypothesis, for example, the

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>savannah preference hypothesis, the idea of us loving companion animals

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and are quote vegetated settings. You know that we surround

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>ourselves with potted plants and things like that, even though

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there's no apparent material reason or benefit for doing so.

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And whether or not these criticisms of the lines of

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>supporting evidence are correct, I'm somewhat persuaded by their criticism

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of the biophilia framework definition uh, and at the same time,

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I still feel persuaded by something about the general idea

1:00:45.800 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>um Like I I do feel this urge to connect

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>with nature in some sense and in the same way

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about Mars. Obviously, I think life commands

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>our attention in a way that non living matter really

1:00:56.920 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to, even if it's not of immediate

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>relevance to our survival or something like that. But I

1:01:06.000 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe this could be culturally learned. I'm open

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to that possibility. So I'm somewhere in the middle on biophilia.

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I find it intuitively persuasive, but I also recognize that

1:01:16.400 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there could be a lot of problems with how it's

1:01:18.680 --> 1:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>framed as a scientific proposition, and maybe it needs to

1:01:21.640 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>be narrowed down and made more specific and more falsifiable. Yeah,

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on a rational um level, I'm I'm, I'm, I think

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm right there with you. But then if I if

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I look at it more emotionally, you know, and uh,

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, philosophically, I guess I tend to decide

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>with biophilia, especially since I my son is so biophilic.

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's just he loves animals so much, like

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not interested in cars or trucks or superheroes, but

1:01:54.360 --> 1:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's just animals. He wants to draw animals,

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants to his the toys he has are generally

1:01:59.640 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>animal related. He needs to see animals. And and I

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do pick that apart, and I think, well, how much

1:02:05.800 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of this is you know, something that we have have

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>nurtured in him? How much of this is just you know,

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>has to do with his you know, with with nature

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>itself and something out of our hands. Um, yeah, Like

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>where does it come from? Is it? Is it biophilic

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and just a mirror like learnable sense or is it

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>something deeper, something that that does have an origin in

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>his genes? So here's the real question. The thing we

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>need to test for is we need to completely remove

1:02:35.400 --> 1:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>some human test subjects from all culture and put them

1:02:39.560 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on another planet and never communicate them with them at all,

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>except we put some hidden cameras in and we give

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>them the opportunity to either live in a in a

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in a sterile environment that satisfies all their material needs

1:02:53.440 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and gives them uh, food and entertainment and stuff like that,

1:02:57.240 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or an environment that's full of house plants and cats

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and dogs and uh and gardens and flowers and access

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to walks in the woods. If they would go for

1:03:09.080 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the ladder, it does raise the question why do they

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>want that? What? What is telling them to do that

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of just go to the place that meets all

1:03:17.920 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>their material needs. You know, in discussing like sci fi

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>scenarios here I can't help but but look back on

1:03:25.840 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the fabulous Bruce Dern movie Silent Running. Oh yeah, where

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to save the plants. Yeah, and he's yeah,

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the situation in this movie. It's a great movie.

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>See it if you if you haven't. But Bruce Dern

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>basically plays like the the last biophilic human in our civilization.

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Like the forests of Earth are gone and they're only

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>maintained within these giant biospheres aboard a series of they're

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>not spaces, they're space ships, but they're kind of just

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in orbit and uh. And then the ruling comes up,

1:03:58.480 --> 1:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the orders come up that they need to sine and

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>detonate all of the forests. Bruce Durn's character goes rogue

1:04:04.560 --> 1:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh and you know, takes off towards Saturn with

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the last forests of Earth. It's the adult version of

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the lorax Y. He speaks for the trees um but yeah,

1:04:16.440 --> 1:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it in that case, like he is that that's a

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>vision of a humanity that has lost its biophilia that

1:04:22.760 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>has drifted so far from it that they no longer

1:04:25.560 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>feel and it's any attachment, and they no longer recognize

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the value of the natural world. Concrete, plastic, and steel

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>environments are good enough. Yeah, yeah, like cubes of food

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the stuff that Bruce Durn's character is growing.

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's part of my intuition. I just can't

1:04:40.000 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>see us ever being cool with that. I just can't.

1:04:43.360 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, maybe it's hard to it's hard to

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>do an experiment to really test that. But maybe somebody

1:04:49.800 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>will come up with a good way. So my my

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>outlook on biophilia now is I recognize their problems with

1:04:56.320 --> 1:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the framework, but but I think it could be salvaged.

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think people could come up with a with a leaner,

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>more falsifiable version of the hypothesis and test the dickens

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>out of it. All. Right, Well, there you have it, biophilia.

1:05:11.520 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we provided a nice introduction to this if you

1:05:14.880 --> 1:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't familiar with it, uh and and and if you

1:05:17.280 --> 1:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were familiar with it, we uh we helped remind you

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about some of the I think some of the important

1:05:22.040 --> 1:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tenants of it. You know, certainly some of the potential

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>problems with it, but also I think the overall positive

1:05:28.200 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>message of biophilia as a you know, biodiversity focused view

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of humans humanity's interaction with nature. Now, take your dog

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>out in the woods and get some ticks. Yeah, yeah,

1:05:42.040 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>get out there all right. Hey. If you want to

1:05:44.880 --> 1:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>check out more episodes of Stuff about your Mind, head

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on over to stuff to Bowl your Mind dot com.

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the mother ship where you will find uh all

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts attached in wonderful biospheres and you can

1:05:56.600 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to everything back to the very beginning.

1:05:59.320 --> 1:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You can check out blog post videos as well as

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>links out to our various social media accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Humbler,

1:06:07.760 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and who knows what else. And if you want to

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us directly, you can email us

1:06:12.240 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>at blow the Mind at how staff works dot com

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Does

1:06:28.560 --> 1:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com